TITLE: Derivative map of the diagonal inclusion map on manifolds
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: I was trying to work through a problem(#10 of $\S$1.2) in Guillemin and Pollack's book $\textit{differential topology. }$ The problem is given as follows.

Let $f: X\longrightarrow  X\times X$ be the mapping $f(x)=(x,x)$.
  Check that $df_x(v)=(v,v)$. Here $X\subset \mathbf R^m$ is a manifold.

My attempt so far has been:
First we parametrise an open neighbourhood of $x\in X$ and $(x,x) \in X\times X$ locally by $\phi$ and $\phi \times \phi$ into open subsets $U\subset\mathbf R^m$ and $U\times U$ (we use $\phi(0)=x$ for simplicity). This gives the commuting diagram as follows:
$$
\begin{array}[c]{ccc}
X\;\;&\stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow}&X\times X\\
\downarrow\scriptstyle{\phi}&&\downarrow\scriptstyle{\phi \times \phi}\\
U\;\;&\stackrel{h}{\longrightarrow}&U\times U
\end{array}
$$
$$
\begin{array}[c]{ccc}
T_x(X)&\stackrel{df_x}{\longrightarrow}&T_{(x,x)}(X\times X)\\
\downarrow\scriptstyle{d\phi_0}&&\downarrow\scriptstyle{d\phi_0 \times d\phi_0}\\
\mathbf R^m\;\;&\stackrel{dh_0}{\longrightarrow}&\mathbf R^m \times \mathbf R^m
\end{array}
$$
According to the definition (or the commuting diagram above), $df_x=(d\phi_0 \times d\phi_0) \circ dh_0 \circ d\phi_0$.
However I have no idea how to proceed after that. If I want to calculate $df_x$, I have to know what $d\phi_0$ is first... But since we let $\phi(0)=x$, what would the derivative map of that be (since $\phi(0)=x$ just means we send a specific point $0$ to a specific point $x$, it doesn't tell us anything about the expression of this parameterisation)?
Thanks everyone for the help!

REPLY [4 votes]: Hoping it helps you, I am expanding A.Bellmunt's comment.
Let be $x$ a point of $X$, a submanifold of $\mathbb R^n$, and $\phi:X\to\mathbb R^m$ a local coordinate chart centered at $x$ (i.e. $\phi(x)=0$).
Therefore $\phi\times\phi:X\times X\to\mathbb R^m\times\mathbb R^m$ is a local coordinates chart centered at $(x,x)$ (i.e. $(\phi\times\phi)(x,x)=(0,0)$).
Now we get the local expression $f=(\phi\times\phi)^{-1}\circ \widetilde{f}\circ\phi$, where $\widetilde{f}$ is the linear map $$\widetilde{f}:u\in\mathbb R^m\to(u,u)\in\mathbb R^m\times\mathbb R^m.$$
Therefore:

$\widetilde f$ is linear, so it coincides with $d_0\widetilde f$, and
if $v\in T_xM \overset{d_x\phi}{\longrightarrow}\tilde v\in\mathbb R^m$, then $(v,v)\in T_{(x,x)}X\times X\overset{d_{(0,0)}(\phi\times\phi)}{\longrightarrow}(\tilde v,\tilde v)\in\mathbb R^m\times\mathbb R^m$,

and by 1. and 2. we get immediately the searched expression of $d_xf$, i.e.:
$$\begin{array}{ccc}
v\in T_xM&\overset{d_xf}{\longrightarrow}&(v,v)\in T_{(x,x)}X\times X\\
\downarrow d_x\phi&&\downarrow d_{(x,x)}(\phi\times\phi)\\
\tilde v\in\mathbb R^m&\overset{d_0\widetilde f}{\longrightarrow}&(\tilde v,\tilde v)\in\mathbb R^m\times\mathbb R^m\end{array}$$

Dear Evariste, answering the supplementary question in your comment:    
given any curve $\gamma=(\gamma_1,\gamma_2)$ in $M\times M$, if we take the time-derivative of $(\phi\times\phi)\circ\gamma=(\phi\circ\gamma_1)\times(\phi\circ\gamma_2)$, then, by the chain rule, we get $$\begin{aligned}(d\phi\times d\phi)\circ\gamma'&=(d\phi\circ\gamma_1')\times(d\phi\times\gamma_2')=\dfrac{d}{dt}((\phi\circ\gamma_1)\times(\phi\circ\gamma_2))\\&=\dfrac{d}{dt}((\phi\times\phi)\circ\gamma)=d(\phi\times\phi)\circ\gamma'.\end{aligned}$$ By the arbitrariness of $\gamma$, we derive the desired identity.