TITLE: Geometric implication of the Sobolev embedding
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: It is stated in section 10 of this paper that the usual Sobolev embedding $$W^{1,1}(\mathbb{R}^n) \subset L^{n/(n-1)}(\mathbb{R}^n)$$ can be interpreted in geometrical terms as an isoperimetric statement. Although the authors said that this is well-known, I can not find such a statement in Evans classical book on PDEs. Can anyone elaborate the details here? That is, how can we derive an isoperimetric-type inequality from such a Sobolev embedding?

REPLY [6 votes]: When I first saw this question, I thought it was asking for the opposite: derive the Sobolev embedding from the isoperimetric inequality.  This is also possible and fascinating from my point of view so here's a proof.
Suppose we already know the isoperimetric inequality:
\begin{equation*}
\mathcal{H}^{d-1}(\partial A) \geq C \mathcal{H}^{d}(A)^{\frac{d-1}{d}}.
\end{equation*}
I will use this to derive the Sobolev embedding for $W^{1,1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$.  Above, we will only need to know that the isoperimetric inequality holds in the "nice" case that $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d}$ is a smooth open set that is bounded.
By the coarea formula, if $u \in C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, then
\begin{equation*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} \|Du(x)\| \, dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathcal{H}^{d-1}(\{u = t\}) \, dt.
\end{equation*}
Sard's Theorem tells us that $\{u > t\}$ is a bounded smooth open set for almost every $t \in u(\mathbb{R}^{d}) = [\min \, u, \max \, u]$, and it's boundary is $\{u = t\}$.  Therefore, for all $u \in C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ with $u \geq 0$, the isoperimetric inequality gives
\begin{equation*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} \|Du(x)\| \, dx \geq C \int_{0}^{\infty} \mathcal{H}^{d}(\{u > t\})^{\frac{d-1}{d}}\,dt 
\end{equation*}
Finally, we use Minkowski's integral inequality:
\begin{align*}
\int_{0}^{\infty} \mathcal{H}^{d}(\{u > t\})^{\frac{d-1}{d}} \, dt &= \int_{0}^{\infty} \left[ \int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} \chi_{\{u > t\}}(x)^{\frac{d}{d-1}} \, dx \right]^{\frac{d-1}{d}} \,dt \\
&\geq \left(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} \left[ \int_{0}^{\infty} \chi_{\{u > t\}}(x) \,dt \right]^{\frac{d}{d-1}} \, dx \right)^{\frac{d-1}{d}} \\
&= \left(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} u(x)^{\frac{d}{d-1}} \, dx \right)^{\frac{d-1}{d}}.
\end{align*}
Thus,
\begin{equation*}
\|Du\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})} \geq C \|u\|_{L^{\frac{d}{d-1}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})} \quad \text{if} \, \, u \in C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), \, \, u \geq 0.
\end{equation*}
At the same time, if $u \in W^{1,1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, then $|u| \in W^{1,1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ and we can approximate it by a sequence of non-negative functions $(u_{n})_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subseteq C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ (e.g. by cut-off and mollification).  This implies the Sobolev inequality in general since $\|D|u|\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})} = \|Du\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})}$.
Finally, notice that this shows that the best constant in the $W^{1,1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ Sobolev inequality is precisely the isoperimetric constant $C_{0}$, given by
\begin{equation*}
C_{0} = \sup \left\{ \frac{\mathcal{H}^{d-1}(A)}{\mathcal{H}^{d}(A)^{\frac{d-1}{d}}} \, \mid \, A \, \, \text{smooth and bounded} \right\}
\end{equation*}
which, incidentally, is attained whenever $A$ is a Euclidean ball. To see this, note that we could have used $C = C_{0}$ above so $C_{0}$ serves in the Sobolev inequality.  On the other hand, if we set $u = \chi_{B(0,1)}$, then it is not hard to build smooth bump functions $(u_{n})_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subseteq C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ such that
\begin{gather*}
\|Du_{n}\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})} \to \|Du\|_{TV(\mathbb{R}^{d})} = \mathcal{H}^{d-1}(B(0,1)), \\
\|u_{n}\|_{L^{\frac{d}{d-1}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})} \to \|u\|_{L^{\frac{d}{d-1}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})} = \mathcal{H}^{d}(B(0,1))^{\frac{d-1}{d}}.
\end{gather*}
and, thus,
\begin{equation*}
C_{0} = \sup \left\{ \frac{\|Du\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})}}{\|u\|_{L^{\frac{d}{d-1}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})}} \, \mid \, u \in W^{1,1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) \right\}.
\end{equation*}
I guess it is not possible to do this for $W^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ with $p > 1$ since, in that case, a characteristic function $\chi_{A}$ cannot have finite $W^{1,p}$ norm unless $\mathcal{H}^{d}(A) = 0$.