TITLE: $A$ is some fixed matrix. Let $U(B)=AB-BA$. If $A$ is diagonalizable then so is $U$?
QUESTION [12 upvotes]: This is from Hoffman and Kunze 6.4.13. I am studying for an exam and trying to solve some problems in Hoffman and Kunze.
Here is the question.
Let $V$ be the space of $n\times n$ matrices over a field $F$. Let $A$ be a fixed matrix in $V$. Let $T$ and $U$ be linear operators on $V$ defined by
$T(B)=AB$ and $U(B)=AB-BA$.
a) (True or False) If $A$ is diagonalizable then $T$ is diagonalizable.
This is true. I can show that both A and T have the same minimal polynomial. So if 
$A$ is diagonalizable then the minimal polynomial of $T$ should be a product of distinct linear factors. Proving that $T$ is diagonalizable. but its the next question I am having trouble with.
b)(True or false) If $A$ is diagonalizable then $U$ is diagonlizable. 
I am thinking this is false. But I can't think of of a counter example. May be I am wrong.
Can anybody help?. Thanks for all your help.

REPLY [4 votes]: Diagonalise $A$ as $PDP^{-1}$. Then the matrix of $U$ w.r.t. the canonical basis of $M_n(F)$ is $I\otimes A - A^T\otimes I$. Therefore
$$
(P^T \otimes P^{-1}) (I\otimes A - A^T\otimes I) (P^{-T} \otimes P) = I\otimes D - D\otimes I
$$
is diagonal, i.e. $U$ is diagonalisable.
This answer, of course, requires knowledge in Kronecker product. As your question comes from a Hoffman and Kunze exercise, you are not expected to use Kronecker product, but to solve the question in a linear algebraic way. However, I think this exercise is a perfect example that sometimes a matrix theoretic solution can be much neater than a linear algebraic one.