TITLE: Formal proof for A subset of the real numbers, well ordered with the normal order of $\mathbb R$, is at most $\aleph_0$
QUESTION [17 upvotes]: I tried to write a formal proof for the theorem: $A$ subset of $\mathbb R$ well ordered by the normal order $\implies A$ is at most of cardinality $\aleph_0$.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.

REPLY [16 votes]: Now that your question has been answered, let me point out that it may be interesting to observe furthermore that all the countable well-orderings are in fact represented by suborders of $\langle\mathbb{R},\lt\rangle$, and even of $\langle\mathbb{Q},\lt\rangle$. Let me give two proofs. 
The first proof is an elementary exercise in transfinite induction. One shows that every countable ordinal $\alpha$ embeds into $\mathbb{Q}$. Note that $0$ embeds trivially. If an ordinal $\alpha$ embeds, then by composing with an isomorphism of $\mathbb{Q}$ with an interval in $\mathbb{Q}$, we may suppose the embedding is bounded above, and thereby extend it to an embedding of $\alpha+1$. If $\lambda$ is a countable limit ordinal, with $\lambda=\text{sup}_n\alpha_n$, then by induction we may map $\alpha_n$ into $\mathbb{Q}\cap (n,n+1)$, and this is an embedding of an ordinal at least as large as $\lambda$. QED
The second proof is simply to argue that $\langle\mathbb{Q},\lt\rangle$ is universal for countable linear orders: every countable linear order embeds into $\mathbb{Q}$. This is proved by using just the "forth" part of Cantor's famous back-and-forth argument, namely, given a linear order $L=\langle\{p_n\mid n\in\mathbb{N}\},\lt_L\rangle$, then map $p_n$ to a rational $q_n$ so that one has a order-preserving map at each finite stage. The next element $p_{n+1}$ relates to the previous elements either by being above them all, between two of them, or below them all, and we may choose a corresponding $q_{n+1}$ of the same type. So we get an order-preserving  map $L\to \mathbb{Q}$. Thus, in particular, every countable well-ordering embeds into $\mathbb{Q}$. QED

REPLY [6 votes]: The following idea uses some set-theoretic machinery, has the advantage of coming from a simple geometric visualization. 
Suppose to the contrary that there is an uncountable set $A$ of reals which is well-ordered under the natural order.
Then $A$ is order isomorphic to an uncountable ordinal.  It follows that some subset $B$ of $A$ is order isomorphic to the least uncountable ordinal $\omega_1$.
The set $B$ has a least element.  By shifting if necessary, we can make that least element $0$. Either $B$ is bounded above or it isn't.  If it is bounded above, let $m$ be the least upper bound.  Note that since $B$ is order-isomorphic to $\omega_1$, $m$ cannot be in $B$.  Then the map that takes $x$ to $x/(m-x)$ is order preserving, and "stretches" $B$ so that for every integer $n$, there is $b\in B$ such that $b>n$.  (We have kept the name $B$ for the stretched set.)
So we can assume that $B$ has smallest element $0$, and that for every integer $n$, there is an element of $B$ which is $>n$.
Let $B_n$ be the intersection of $B$ with the interval $[0, n]$.  Then $B_n$ is order isomorphic to an initial segment of $\omega_1$.  Since $\omega_1$ is the least uncountable ordinal, it follows that $B_n$ is countable.
Since 
$$B =\bigcup_{n \in N} B_n$$
we have expressed $B$ as a countable union of countable sets, or equivalently $\omega_1$ as a countable union of countable ordinals.   This is impossible.