TITLE: Why is conjugation by an odd permutation in $S_n$ not an inner automorphism on $A_n$?
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: I was reading about the outer automorphism group on wikipedia, and it mentions that conjugation by an odd permutation is an outer automorphism on the alternating group $A_n$. This suggests the automorphism defined on $A_n$ by
$$
\varphi: A_n\to A_n:\varphi(\tau)=\sigma\tau\sigma^{-1}
$$
where $\sigma\in S_n$ is odd it not an inner automorphism of $A_n$. Is there a way to see explicitly that $\varphi$ isn't just $\tau\mapsto\rho\tau\rho^{-1}$ for $\rho\in A_n$ in disguise? To avoid trivial cases I guess we can assume $n>2$. Thanks.

REPLY [2 votes]: Lemma: The centralizer of $A_n$ in $S_n$ is trivial for $n \geq 4$. 
Proof: Since the centralizer is normal, it has to be trivial for $n \geq 5$. For $n = 4$, the only normal subgroup is $V_4$, but $(123)\,(12)(34) = (134) \neq (12)(34)\,(123)$, so it is trivial for $n \geq 4$. 
Proof of the problem: For $n = 3$, notice that $A_3 = \{e, (123), (132)\}$ is abelian, so it has no inner automorphisms. For $n \geq 4$, suppose there is an odd $\sigma \in S_n$ such that conjugation by $\sigma$ is an inner automorphism in $A_n$, i.e. there is $\rho \in A_n$ such that $\sigma \tau\sigma^{-1} = \rho \tau \rho^{-1}$ for all $\tau \in A_n$, then $$\rho^{-1} \sigma \tau \sigma^{-1} \rho = 
\tau.$$ Hence $\rho^{-1} \sigma$ is a centralizer of $A_n$, so $\rho^{-1} \sigma = e$ by the lemma, but $\sigma$ is odd and $\rho$ is even, which is a contradiction.