TITLE: Analytic Applications of Stone-Čech compactification
QUESTION [11 upvotes]: Following Bredon's Topology and Geometry, we let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all continuous maps $f:X \to [0,1]$ on a completely regular space $X$, define $X \xrightarrow{\Phi} [0,1]^{\mathcal{F}}$ by setting $\Phi(x)(f)=f(x)$ for each $x \in X$ and $f \in \mathcal{F}$, and declare the closure $\beta(X)$ of $\Phi(X)$ in $[0,1]^{\mathcal{F}}$ to be the Stone-Čech compactification of $X$. Munkres writes in Topology that there are "a number of applications [of the Stone-Čech compactification] in modern analysis", which is purportedly "outside the scope of [the] book." I looked at a few sources, including The Stone-Čech compactification by Russell Walker, and failed to find any application of the theorem that is overtly analytic. Perhaps I do not have sufficient background in functional analysis---this is where, I assume, the prototypical analytic applications would be in--to recognize the functional-analytic applications I have encountered, but the point remains that I have yet to see such an example. So:

What are prototypical applications of the Stone-Čech compactification in mathematical analysis, and where can I read about them?

REPLY [6 votes]: Stone-Čech compactification is frequently mentioned in the book Carothers: A short course on Banach space theory, so this might be a good guess where to look for such applications. 
One of the applications is Garling's proof for Riesz representation theorem for $C(K)$, $K$ being compact. The proof is first done for the Stone-Čech compactification of discrete space and then extended to arbitrary compact Hausdorff spaces.
You can check Chapter 16 of Carother's book, or some of the following papers:

D. J. H. Garling: A ‘short’ proof of the Riesz representation theorem, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1973 - Volume 73, Issue 03, pp 459-460
D. J. H. Garling: Another ‘short’ proof of the Riesz representation theorem, 
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1986, Volume 99 / Issue 02, pp 261 - 262
Donald G. Hartig: The Riesz Representation Theorem Revisited, The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Apr., 1983), pp. 277-280
One of these papers mentions that this proof can also be found in the book R. B. Holmes: Geometric functional analysis and its applications.

I am making this post community wiki, so that if someone is more familiar with the proof, they can add more details. (I only know that such a proof exists and more-or-less understand what are the basic ideas behind it.)