TITLE: What is the correct way of disproving a mathematical statement?
QUESTION [12 upvotes]: This question is motivated by my midterm exam. In this exam there was a question as follow:

Question: If the following statement is true, prove it, otherwise disprove it.
If $\mathbf{u}$ and $\mathbf{v}$ are vectors in three dimensions, then
  $\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{u}$. The $\times$
  operation here means cross product.

For this question I actually proved that $\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{v}=-\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{u}$ and so the statement is false but my lecturer deducted some marks and said that my solution is not correct. She said for disproving question, you need one counter example. But still I think that I disproved it because I clearly showed that the given statement does not hold.
So my question after this long story is, what is the correct way of disproving a mathematical statement?

REPLY [3 votes]: In my experience, there are three common types of proofs of falsity. These are:

Finding an explicit counterexample. 
Showing the existence of a counterexample without exhibiting it (and in some cases with not the slightest chance of exhibiting one!)
Assuming the thing you want to disprove and inferring something you know to be false. This is called reductio ad absurdum, or proof by contradiction. It may seem bizarre to assume a (possibly) false proposition, but what you are really doing is considering the truth value of propositions conditional on the proposition you want to disprove. To be more explicit, if you know "A implies B" is a true statement and you know that B is false, you also know A is false.