TITLE: Cohomology of rigid-analytic spaces
QUESTION [12 upvotes]: Let $R$ be a complete discrete valuation ring and let $K$ be its field of fractions.  Suppose $X$ is a smooth rigid-anaytic space over $K$.  Often it is convenient to have a model of $X$ whose reduction has singularities which are as mild as possible--a semistable model.  This amounts to having an admissible covering of $X$ by open affinoids $X_i$, each of which has good reduction, such that the reductions of any pair $X_i$ and $X_j$ meet transversally, if at all.  (See the paper of Bosch/Lütkebohmert for definitions.)   Let us assume such a semi-stable model of $X$ exists.  Then the étale cohomology of $X$ can be computed from the combinatorics of the covering $X_i$, together with the étale cohomology of each $X_i$, via the weight spectral sequence of Rapaport-Zink.  
Now suppose I have an open affinoid $Z\subset X$ which happens to have good reduction.  My question is:  Does there admit a semi-stable model of $X$ for which $Z$ belongs to the covering?   Failing this, is there some sense one can make of my intuition that the cohomology of the reduction of $Z$ ought to contribute to the cohomology of $X$?
Feel free to edit/criticize my question to smithereens if you like.

REPLY [7 votes]: In dimension 1, the answer should be yes because the semi-stable reduction is well understood. The only problem would be the difference between the rigid analytic reduction and the algebraic reduction as a formal covering defines a reduced analytic reduction but non necessarily reduced algebraic reduction (= special fiber of the formal scheme associated to the formal covering). The answer should be in Bosch-Lütkebohmert's paper on the stable reduction of curves and in Fresnel-van der Put's book (the second one). 
In higher dimension, I am a litte skeptical. As Emerton pointed out, you could construct a model containning $\overline{Z}$ in its reduction at least birationally (result of Raynaud, explained in Melhmann's thesis in Münster). But it is not clear for me whether a semi-stable model dominating a given one model exist. Another difficulty in higher dimension is that the semi-stable reduction is not unique even in good reduction case (non-uniqueness of minimal birational model). However, you have two stable reductions whose irreducible components are all not uniruled, then there is a one-one birational correspondance between the components of two stable reductions (Abhyankar's lemma, I don't remember whether this requires desingularization).