TITLE: Seeking errata for Berger-Moerdijk Axiomatic Homotopy Theory for Operads
QUESTION [10 upvotes]: The paper I'm referring to can be found here. It came out in 2003. I've been told by professors before that I should be careful relying on things from this paper, because it contained errors.

Is there some place the errors in this paper are enumerated?

An error in a different paper of the authors (but related to this paper) was pointed out and corrected here. Is this the only known error in the paper?
My interest is in building model structures on categories of algebras over an operad. For a long time I thought there weren't any errors in that part of the paper. However, today I realized that in Remark 4.2 they claim that Prop. 4.1 implies every topological operad $P$ is admissible, i.e. $P$-alg inherits a model structure. This makes me suspicious. It would say for one thing that commutative monoids in Top form a model category, i.e. it would give us a model structure on a subcategory of Top where every object is a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. Does that work?

REPLY [9 votes]: The only errors that I am aware of in this paper are the following:

A $G$ missing in the statement of Lemma 5.10 (pointed out by the authors after Lemma 2.5.3 in [1])
A small mistake in the proof of Proposition 5.1 (also pointed out by the authors and fixed in the Appendix of [2])

[1] I. Moerdijk and C. Berger, The Boardman-Vogt resolution of operads in monoidal model categories, Topology 45 (2006), 807-849.
[2] I. Moerdijk and C. Berger, On the derived category of an algebra over an operad, Georgian Math. J. 16 (2009), 13-28.