TITLE: Does the family of graphs closed under taking unions and adding dominating vertices have a name?
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the smallest family of (simple, finite) graphs such that:

The empty graph is in $\mathcal{F}$.
If $G \in \mathcal{F}$, then $G_{\bullet}$, the graph obtained from $G$ by adding another vertex $v$ connected by an edge to each vertex in $G$, is also in $\mathcal{F}$.
If $G,H \in \mathcal{F}$, then $G \cup H \in \mathcal{F}$.

There are natural bijections between $\{G \in \mathcal{F}: \textrm{$G$ has $n$ vertices}\}$ and the set of rooted (but unlabeled) forests on $n$ vertices and between $\{G \in \mathcal{F}: \textrm{$G$ has $n$ vertices and is connected}\}$ and the set of rooted (but unlabeled) trees on $n$ vertices.
Does $\mathcal{F}$ have a name? I want to call it something like the set of "generalized threshold graphs" because the rules that define it are close to those of threshold graphs.

REPLY [9 votes]: It appears that you are looking at the family of quasi-threshold graphs. These are the graphs which can be built, starting from $K_1$, by repeatedly taking the disjoint union of two quasi-threshold graphs, or the join of a quasi-threshold graph with a single new vertex.
By the way, if you relax your conditions a bit more, you get the extremely well-studied family of cographs. These are the graphs which can be built, starting from $K_1$, by repeatedly taking the disjoint union or join of two smaller cographs.