TITLE: Does formally etale imply flat for noetherian schemes?
QUESTION [21 upvotes]: This is a followup to an earlier question I asked: Does formally etale imply flat? After some remarks I received on MO I noticed that this was answered to the negative by an answer to an earlier question Is there an example of a formally smooth morphism which is not smooth. However, the simple example involves a non-noetherian ring (in fact, a perfect ring; these are seldom noetherian unless they are a field). 
So my challenge is to provide an example of a formally etale map of noetherian schemes which is not flat, or otherwise proof that for maps of noetherian schemes formally etale implies flat.

REPLY [41 votes]: Every formally smooth morphism between locally noetherian schemes is flat; this is a deep result of Grothendieck.  Indeed, the formal smoothness is preserved by localization on target and then likewise on the source, so we can assume we're deal with a local map between local noetherian rings. By EGA 0$_{\rm{IV}}$, 19.7.1 (also proved near the end of Matsumura's book on commutative ring theory) a formally smooth local map between local noetherian rings is flat.