TITLE: Suppose C and D are Morita equivalent fusion categories, can you say anything about R I: C->Z(C)=Z(D)->D?
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: If C and D are (higher) Morita equivalent fusion categories, then the Drinfel'd centers Z(C) and Z(D) are braided equivalent.  Given any fusion category C we have a restriction functor Z(C)->C (by forgetting the "half-braiding"), and adjoint to that an induction functor C->Z(C).
If C and D are Morita equivalent then you can compose the induction and restriction to get a functor C->Z(C)=Z(D)->D.  (Actually now that I think about you may need to fix the Morita equivalence in order to actually identify Z(C) and Z(D)?)  Is there anything nice one can say about this composition?  If C=D then Etingof-Nikshych-Ostrik says that $R \circ I(V) = \sum_X X \otimes V \otimes X^*$.
The reason that I ask is that Izumi calculated the induction and restriction graphs for the Drinfel'd center of one of the even parts of the Haagerup subfactor, and I would like to understand the same picture for the other even part.

REPLY [6 votes]: I think the answer should depend on the particular choice of Morita equivalence between C and D.
So let M be (bi)module category connecting C and D. My first guess would be that
$R\circ I(V)=\sum_X{\underline Hom}(X,V\otimes X)$ (sum over simple objects of M;
${\underline Hom}$ is the internal $Hom$).