TITLE: Specializing early
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: Topic: this is a mathematics education question (but applies to other sciences too). 
Assumptions: my first assumption is that most mathematical concepts used in research are not intrinsically more complicated to grasp than high-school and undergraduate maths, the main difference is the amount of prerequisites (and hence time and experience) involved. My second assumption is that some undergraduate topics currently taught compulsarily are a bit of a burden for someone focussed on a particular topic.
Now of course cognitive development is a constraint, but upon reaching the age of high-school, I would think that a fairly large proportion of the scientifically-enclined students could really understand things usually taught much later and indeed become active at research level within a few years, provided some shortcuts are introduced. 
Early specialization: I'm wondering if a balanced curriculum already exists (or is planned) to provide such early specialization. What I'm looking for is this:  a one-week panorama of maths (or physics, or biology) would be organized at the beginning, and then the students would decide which subtopic to study. For example someone interested by group theory (or quantum optics, or genetics) would thus start with basics at the age 15 or 16, and gradually learn more stuff and skills, but for a few years with a strong emphasis on things directly relevant for the chosen subtopic. 
So for example the student specializing in group theory would only learn differential calculus and manifolds in passing in the context of Lie groups, and would skip most undergraduate real and functional analysis until it becomes relevant for his/her research topic, if at all. Of course other general courses would still be taught (history, sciences, programming, foreign languages...), but at least 50% of the student's week would be devoted to the research topic, ensuring satisfying progress.  
Question: do you know of any active or planned educative curriculum (at a high-school or university, or maybe a specific home-schooling program) as outlined above?  As an example of successful early specialization see e.g. the winners of the Siemens Foundation Prizes, but I haven't been able to learn much about their specific curriculum if any. 
Note: Skipping grades in school to enter university earlier is not the point, I'm really interested in a subtopic-oriented curriculum.

REPLY [12 votes]: I agree with José's comment above: I do not think early specialisation is a good idea.  Did I understand correctly that you want to give a one week to a 15-year old to decide on which area of mathematics to specialize?  
I want to add something different, however.  I fail to see how "some undergraduate topics currently taught compulsorily are a bit of a burden".  Mathematics is not a set of disconnected areas.  They are all highly related.  Most research problems, while staying in one area, may be related to another, motivated by another, applicable in another, or steal ideas or techniques from another.  One general course in, say, real analysis, complex analysis, abstract algebra, differential geometry, discrete mathematics, or topology is not a burden, but I dare say an actual necessity for anybody wanting to do research on any topic in pure math.  To use your own example, someone doing research in Lie theory will benefit from, rather than be burdened by, a solid understanding of basic differential geometry.  Or to use my own case, I am a Poisson geometer, but I have used ideas or results from all the above topics in my research.