TITLE: Non-vanishing of elements in cohomology of full Flag varieties
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: Consider the full flag variety $F_n$ consisting of full flags in $\mathbb C^n$. There is a collection of tautological bundles on $F_n$: 
$0=U_0\subset U_1\subset ...\subset U_{n-1}\subset U_n=\mathbb C^n\otimes O_{F_n}$.
Recall that for $i=1,...,n-1$ the classes $\sigma_i=c_1(U_i^*)\in H^2(F_n)$ form a base in $H^2(F_n)$ and moreover generate multiplicatively the cohomology ring of $F_n$.
Question. Is it true that the cohomology classes $(\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2\cdot...\cdot \sigma_{n-1})^k$ and $(\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2\cdot...\cdot \sigma_{n-2})^k$ are non-zero for $k$ small enough with respect to $n$ (say for $k<\log(n)/100$)? Or at least, say for $k\le 10$ for large $n$?

REPLY [5 votes]: Yes. I claim that $(\sigma_1 \sigma_2 \cdots \sigma_{n-1})^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor} \neq 0$, which is better than anything you ask for. (Here $\lfloor x \rfloor$ is $x$ rounded down to the nearest integer.) 
Recall that a basis for $H^{\ast}(FL_n)$ is the Schubert classes $[X_w]$, indexed by permutations $w$ in $S_n$. We use $\ell$ for the length function on $S_n$ and write $(i j)$ for the transposition that interchanges $i$ and $j$.
Monk's formula states that
$$\sigma_r [X_w] = \sum_{\begin{matrix} \ell( w(ij)) = \ell(w)+1 \\ i \leq r < j \end{matrix}} X_{w (ij)}.$$
The identity of $H^{\ast}(FL_n)$ is the identity permutation. Thus, we see that the coefficient of $[X_w]$ in $\sigma_{r_1} \sigma_{r_2} \cdots \sigma_{r_N}$ is the number of chains 
$$e = w_0,\ w_1,\ w_2,\ \ldots,\ w_N=w$$
so that $\ell(w_k)=k$ and $w_k$ is of the form $w_{k-1} (i j)$, with $i \leq r_k < j$.
In particular, if the word $(r_1 \ r_1+1) (r_2\ r_2+1) \cdots (r_N \ r_N+1)$ is reduced, meaning that the product of the first $k$ transpositions has length $k$, then $\sigma_{r_1} \sigma_{r_2} \cdots \sigma_{r_N} \neq 0$.
Now notice that
$${\Big (}(1 \ 2)(3\ 4)(5\ 6) \cdots (2\ 3)(4\ 5)(6\ 7) \cdots {\Big )}^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$$
is reduced.