TITLE: Different notions of convergence of complex subvarieties
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: Let $X$ be a smooth complex algebraic variety (or, better, complex analytic manifold). Let $\{C_i\}$ be a sequence of compact algebraic subvarieties (resp. analytic reduced subspaces) which converges to a compact reduced subspace $C$ in the sense of the analytic topology on  complex points of the Hilbert scheme (resp. Douady space).
Question. Is it true that $\{C_i\}$ converges to $C$ in the sense of currents, namely for any smooth differential form $\omega$ on $X$ one has
$$\lim_{i\to\infty}\int_{C_i}\omega=\int_C\omega?$$ 
A reference would be helpful.
Added: In the case when $C$ is not reduced, the right hand side in the last equality should probably be multiplied by an appropriate multiplicity.

REPLY [4 votes]: For Kahler manifold this is true.
First, notice that limits in the sense of Barlett or Douady
clearly (up to multiplicity) coincide with the limits
in Hausdorff topology on the set of compact subsets.
This can be proven using the following argument:
the Douady moduli space $D$ with the usual topology 
is Hausdorff, compact, and the map to the same space
$H$ with the Hausdorff topology is continuous. By Bishop's 
theorem, $H$ is also compact. Bijective continuous maps
between compacts are homeomorphisms.
Now, the map from $H$ to currents is continuous in
currents topology (also by construction, or, if you like,
by semicontinuity of Lelong numbers). The same argument
proves that it is also a homeomorphisms (currents are
compact for obvious reasons).
The same argument for complex manifold would work if the volume of the subvarieties is bounded, because this is the condition under which the Bishop's theorem remains true.