TITLE: Why is "The Higman Rope Trick" thus named?
QUESTION [14 upvotes]: I'm studiyng Higman's Embedding Theorem, and a fundamental part of the proof is the following lemma:
If R is a benign normal subgroup of finitely generated group F, then F/R can be embedded in a finitely presented group.
A proof of the lemma in context could be found on page 16 of this paper.
I understand the lemma on technical levels, and to some degree also on an intuitive level.
But I have no idea why Lyndon & Schupp chose the name "The Higman Rope Trick" for the lemma.
I'm hoping someone could enlighten me because my feeling is that I'm missing something important about the meaning of the lemma...otherwise I'd get the meaning of the name, not so?
Thank you very much!
Shlomi.  
P.S: This is my first time posting a question. I read the different guides and I'm pretty sure I stuck to the rules. If not though then I apologize and will correct upon notice.

REPLY [12 votes]: Well, Sam Nead and Flounderer got it right but in different ways... :-)
I took up Sam's idea and asked Schupp directly.
He said Flounderer was right, and I'll quote:
"The answer on mathoverflow is exactly correct - the reference is to the Indian
Rope Trick.   I  always think of the lemma in the following way:  As one is concentrating
on the details of the proof, Higman the magician makes the infinitely many
relations disappear.  The Higman Embedding Theorem is certainly one
of the great theorems."
So all credit to Schupp and Flounderer, but I decided to post this as an answer for the sake of closure.
Thanx all,
Shlomi.