TITLE: Parodies of abstruse mathematical writing
QUESTION [85 upvotes]: Perhaps under the influence of a recent question
on perverse sheaves,
in conjunction with the impending $\pi$-day (3/14/15 at 9:26:53),
I recalled a long-ago parody of abstruse mathematical language
that I can no longer remember in detail nor find by searching.
I am not seeking merely 
"examples of colorful language,"
as in that earlier MO question, but rather parodies
almost in the Alan Sokal Fashionable Nonsense sense
(although I don't think he parodied abstract mathematics directly).
I am partly motivated by the possible educational advantage
of self-mockery (or self-awareness),
tangentially related to
an MESE question, "Wonder as Motivation."
But I ask here to tap into the likely greater density 
of mathematicians working in abstract fields ripe for parody.

Q. Can you provide examples of (or pointers to) intentionally comic parodies of abstruse
  mathematical language, written by knowledgeable mathematicians so that they
  could (in another universe) make mathematical sense.

REPLY [4 votes]: The Qualifying Exam by Richard Roth (Mathematics Magazine 38(3):166–167 (May, 1965)) mentioned in Zhen Lin's comment seems worth posting as an answer.  Excerpt:

ALPHA: The candidate will please define what is meant by a continuous denominator.

CANDIDATE: Consider the set of all doubly evocative singly homologous functions on the unit sphere. Introducing a continuous group structure in the usual way we may define the Skolem uniformity of automorphic cycles to be the theta relation on all sets of measure zero and the zeta function on left ideals whose valuation is Gaussian, uniformly on compacta. Then given any cardinal predicate, the continuous denominator is the corresponding normal quaternion for which the problem vanishes almost everywhere.

BETA: Could the candidate please give an example of a non-Skolem uniformity?

CANDIDATE: I believe the inversion of the reals under countable intersections is non-Skolem… at least almost everywhere.

BETA: That’s correct. Now could you…

OMICRON: (Interrupting) I wish to contradict. It isn’t a non-Skolem uniformity since the third axiom concerning the density of the seventh roots of unity is not in fact satisfied.

BETA: Ah, yes, but you see, in my paper on toxic algebras… 1957… Journal of Refined Mathematics and Statistical Dynamics of the University of Lompoc… I showed that the third axiom need not be satisfied if the basis is countably finite and the metric is Noetherian, hence…