TITLE: The saturation of Murray von Neumann relation
QUESTION [7 upvotes]: Edit: According to comment of  Pace Nielsen, I remove question 2 of the previous version:
Let $R$ be a unital ring. We define  Murray Von Neumann  relation $M$ on $R$ as follows:
We say $a M b$ iff $a=xy,\;b=yx$ for some $x,y\in R$. (This is inspired by the usual Murray Von Neumann equivalent relation in K theory, which is defined on the set of idempotents of  a  ring). The relation $M$ is a reflexive  and symmetric relation but is not a transitive relation. So we consider its  saturation. The saturation of this relation is an equivalent  relation denoted by $\simeq$. In fact we say $a\simeq b$ if there are $p_{i}\in R\;$  with $p_{0} M p_{1},\;\;\;p_{1}  M p_{2},\ldots p_{n-1} M p_{n}$  where $p_{0}=a,\;p_{n}=b$.
Put $R=M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$. One can show that the equivalent class containing $0$ is $$[0]=\{A\in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\mid A^{n}=0\}$$
(In fact one can prove the following: If $A\in B(H)$ satisfy $A^{k}=0$ then there are $X,Y\in B(H)$  with $A=XY$  and $(YX)^{k-1}=0$. Here $B(H)$ is the space of bounded operators on a  Hilbert space. The same is true by replacing $B(H)$   with an  arbitrary  Von Neumann  algebra. The  same  also is true   without any topological consideration, that is by replacing $B(H)$  with $L(V)$, the space of linear endomorphisms of  a vector space $V$.)
So for  $R=M_{n}(\mathbb{C}),\;\;[0]$  is  an algebraic variety,i.e: the variety of nilpotent  matrices  $A^{n}=0$ 

1.Is every equivalent class  of  $M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ an  algebraic variety?(the zero set of  polynomials on $M_{n}(\mathbb{C}) \simeq \mathbb{C}^{n^{2}}$ or the zero set of  polynomials in the form $f(A)=0$ where $f\in \mathbb{C}[x]$?What is the precise description of equivalent classes?

Assume that  $A$ is  a  $C^{*}$  algebra  and $a\in A$  satisfies $a^{k}=0$  for  some  $k>1$. Are there two elements $x,y \in A$  with $a=xy$  and $(yx)^{k-1}=0$?


**Note:**Inspired by methods from K theory, I tried to construct a functor $NK$ based on the constructions above. please see  A functor on the category of rings, algebras or compact Hausdorff topological space
Perhaps, it would be interesting to ask "Is there a kind of periodicity property for this functor?"

REPLY [3 votes]: In answer to the second question, yes this is true. Say $x^k=0$.   Let $x=v|x|$ be the polar decomposition of $x$ in $A^{**}$ (the bidual of $A$). Let $a=v|x|^{\frac 1 2}$ and $b=|x|^{\frac 1 2}$. Then clearly $x=ab$.
Both $a$ and $b$ belong to $A$. In $b$'s case, by functional calculus. It is a well-known property of polar decompositions that $v|x|^{\frac 1 2}$ is also in $A$. To see this, write $p_n(|x|)\to |x|^{\frac 1 2}$, where each $p_n$ is a polynomial such that $p_n(0)=0$. Then $vp_n(|x|)\to v|x|^{\frac 1 2}$ in norm and $vp_n(|x|)\in A$ for all $n$ because we can factor out $|x|$ from $p_n(|x|)$. 
Now consider $ba=|x|^{\frac 1 2}v|x|^{\frac 1 2}$ (the Aluthge transform of $x$). Then
    $$
(ba)^{k-1}(ba)^*=
(|x|^{\frac 1 2}v|x|^{\frac 1 2}\cdots |x|^{\frac 1 2}v|x|^{\frac 1 2})\cdot 
|x|^{\frac 1 2}v^*|x|^{\frac 1 2}= 
|x|^{\frac 1 2}x^{k-1} v^*|x|^{\frac 1 2}=0,
 $$ 
    where we have used that $|x|^{\frac 1 2}x^{k-1}=0$ (since  $|x|^{\frac 1 2}\in C^*(x^*x)$ and $(x^*x)x^{k-1}=0$). It follows that $(ba)^{k-1}((ba)^{k-1})^*=0$ which implies that $(ba)^{k-1}=0$.