TITLE: What are the implications of a zero of zeta off the critical line
QUESTION [12 upvotes]: So what happens if there is a non-trivial zero of the Riemann zeta function off the critical line?  Has there been any work in the following direction:  We know from Landaus theorem that there is a positive proportion of the zeros $\alpha$ on the critical line.  Suppose that $\rho$ is a a non-trivial zero of $\zeta$ off the critical line.  Then can we use this to cook up an argument to show the existence of another zero off the line?  I am being highly optimistic here but continuing in this direction maybe we can show there will be infinite set of zeros off the critical line and going even further we may try to show that the density of this set is greater than $1-\alpha$, yielding the desired contradiction.

REPLY [3 votes]: Perhaps this is a duplicate of this question If the Riemann Hypothesis fails, must it fail infinitely often?.
The discussion continues here The Hardy Z-function and failure of the Riemann hypothesis, where a hypothesis is proposed, which implies If the Riemann Hypothesis fails, must it fail infinitely often?.
To this hypothesis there are two approximations based on: 1. Zeta function universality 2. GUE hypothesis.

Concerning 1. I can say that even, $\zeta (s)$ for $Re(s)=\frac{1}{2}$ is dense in $\mathbb{C}$, is unknown.
2. it seems to me it will be easier. It is enough to make an inversion for the expression $N(t_{n})=n$, where $N(t_{n})$ the number of non-trivial zeros of the zeta function, which is well-known function and $t_{n}$ the nth non-trivial zero, and define the property of the recurrence.