TITLE: Cutting a Gaussian in two pieces that are maximally separated in the Wasserstein metric
QUESTION [10 upvotes]: Denote the standard Gaussian probability measure on $\mathbb R^n$ by $\gamma$. We partition $\mathbb R^n$ into two sets $A$ and $A^c$ such that $\gamma(A) = \gamma(A^c) = 1/2$. 
Denote by $\gamma_{A}$ to Gaussian measure restricted to $A$, and normalized so that it is a probability measure. Similarly, define $\gamma_{A^c}$ to be the Gaussian measure restricted to $A^c$ and normalized.
My question is the following: 
What is the optimal $A$ such that $\gamma_A$ and $\gamma_{A^c}$ are the farthest apart; i.e., solving
$$\arg\max_{A} W_2(\gamma_A, \gamma_{A^c}),$$
where $W_2$ is the 2-Wasserstein distance?
Possible generalization: Instead of constructing $\gamma_A$ and $\gamma_{A^c}$ as above, we could start with any two probability measures $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ such that $\gamma = \frac{\gamma_1 + \gamma_2}{2}$ and find $\arg \max_{\gamma_1, \gamma_2} W_2(\gamma_1, \gamma_2)$. 
Finding upper bounds on the $W_2$ distance is also of interest. A natural conjecture, inspired by the Gaussian isoperimetric inequality, would be that $A$ should be a half-space. Counterexamples to this are also welcome!

REPLY [2 votes]: Here are calculations for the two possibilities posed in the comments in the case $n=2$.
The element of probability for $\gamma$ is $(1/\pi)\exp(-x^2-y^2)\,dx\, dy = (1/\pi)\exp(-r^2)\,r\,dr\, d\theta$.
So the dividing lines can be either a line or a circle, $|$ or $\circ$, at $x=0$ or $r=\sqrt{\ln(2)}$.
In the circular case the probability between the circle and $r$ is the same as the probability between the circle and $f(r)=\sqrt{-\ln(1-\exp(-r^2))}$. These give
\begin{align}
W_2^{^|} &= \int_{x=0}^{\infty}\int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty} 2x\frac{2}{\pi}\exp(-x^2-y^2)\,dx\, dy \\
&= \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\\
&\simeq 1.13\\ \\
W_2^{^{\Large\circ}} &= \int_{r=0}^{\sqrt{\ln(2)}}\int_{\theta=0}^{2\pi} 
\left(f(r)-r\right)
\frac{2}{\pi}\exp(-r^2)\,r\,dr\, d\theta \\
&= \sqrt{\pi}(1-2\text{erf}(\sqrt{\ln 2}))+2\sqrt{\ln 2}\\
&\simeq 0.74
\end{align}
So of these two options, the half-plane gives the larger Wasserstein distance.