TITLE: Explicit proof that $c_0$-module $\ell_\infty$ is not projective
QUESTION [9 upvotes]: It is well known in narrow circles that the homological dimension (in the sense of relative Banach homology) of $c_0$-module $\ell_\infty$ is 2. As the corollary, this module is not projective. This proof is rather involved, its main ingridient is a lack of a right inverse for the mapping:
$$
\Delta:c_0\;\hat{\otimes}\;c_0\to(c\;\hat{\otimes}\;c_0)\oplus(c_0\;\hat{\otimes}\;\ell_\infty): x\;\hat{\otimes}\;y\mapsto (x\;\hat{\otimes}\;y)\oplus(x\;\hat{\otimes}\;y)
$$
in the category of left Banach $c_0$-modules. 
I would like to see a more direct proof of non-projectivtity. The standard route would be to show that there is no right inverse $c_0$-morphism for the mapping $\pi:c \;\hat{\otimes}\; \ell_\infty\to \ell_\infty \colon a\; \hat{\otimes}\; x\mapsto a\cdot x$, where $c$ is the Banach space of convergent sequences.
Does anyone have an idea how to prove non-projectivity more or less directly?

REPLY [3 votes]: If $\ell^\infty$ was projective then any Banach limit $L:\ell^\infty \to \mathbb{C}$ would extend to a $c_0$-module morphism $\bar{L}:\ell^\infty \to c$
such that $L=\lim\circ \bar{L}$, but such does not exist.
Assume such $\bar{L}$ does exist.
Consider $r=\bar{L}(1)-1\in c$
and observe that $\lim r=\lim\bar{L}(1)-1=L(1)-1=0$, thus $r\in c_0$.
Let $I\subset \mathbb{N}$ be the set of indices $n$ for which $r_n=-1$ and let $V<\ell^\infty$ be the vector space of sequences supported on $I$. Note that $I$ is finite, thus $V$ is finite dimensional. 
For $s\in c_0$, $\bar{L}(s)=s\bar{L}(1)=sr+s$.
It follows that $c_0\cap \ker\bar{L}=V$.
But, as $V$ and $c$ are separable and $\ell^\infty$ is not, we can find $x\in \ker \bar{L}$ which is not in $V$. We consider the element $s=(1/n)\in c_0$ and observe that $sx$ is in $c_0\cap\ker\bar{L}$ but not in $V$. This is a contradiction.