TITLE: Why is $\sup f_- (n) \inf f_+ (m) = \frac{5}{4} $?
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: This question is an old question from mathstackexchange.
Let $f_- (n) = \Pi_{i=0}^n ( \sin(i) - \frac{5}{4}) $
And let
$ f_+(m) = \Pi_{i=0}^m ( \sin(i) + \frac{5}{4} ) $
It appears that
$$\sup f_- (n) \inf f_+ (m) = \frac{5}{4} $$
Why is that so ?
Notice
$$\int_0^{2 \pi} \ln(\sin(x) + \frac{5}{4}) dx = Re \int_0^{2 \pi} \ln (\sin(x) - \frac{5}{4}) dx = \int_0^{2 \pi} \ln (\cos(x) + \frac{5}{4}) dx = Re \int_0^{2 \pi} \ln(\cos(x) - \frac{5}{4}) dx = 0 $$
$$ \int_0^{2 \pi} \ln (\sin(x) - \frac{5}{4}) dx = \int_0^{2 \pi} \ln (\cos(x) - \frac{5}{4}) dx = 2 \pi^2 i $$
That explains the finite values of $\sup $ and $ \inf $.. well almost. It can be proven that both are finite. But that does not explain the value of their product.

Update
This is probably not helpful at all , but it can be shown ( not easy ) that there exist a unique pair of functions $g_-(x) , g_+(x) $ , both entire and with period $2 \pi $ such that
$$ g_-(n) = f_-(n) , g_+(m) = f_+(m) $$
However i have no closed form for any of those ...
As for the numerical test i got about $ln(u) (2 \pi)^{-1}$ correct digits , where $u = m + n$ and the ratio $m/n$ is close to $1$.
Assuming no round-off errors i ended Up with $1.2499999999(?) $. That was enough to convince me.

I often get accused of " no context " or " no effort " but i have NOO idea how to even start here. I considered telescoping but failed and assumed it is not related. Since I also have no closed form for the product I AM STUCK.
I get upset when people assume this is homework.
It clearly is not imho ! What kind of teacher or book contains this ?
——-
Example :
Taking $m = n = 8000 $ we get
$$ max(f_-(1),f_-(2),...,f_-(8000)) = 1,308587092.. $$
$$ min(f_+(1),f_+(2),...,f_+(8000)) = 0,955226916.. $$
$$ 1.308587092.. X 0.955226916.. = 1.249997612208568.. $$
Supporting the claim.
I'm not sure if $sup f_+ = 7,93.. $ or the average of $f_+ $ ( $ 3,57..$ ) relate to the above $1,308.. $ and $0,955..$ or the truth of the claimed value $5/4$.
In principle we could write the values $1,308..$ and $0,955..$ as complicated integrals.
By using the continuum product functions $f_-(v),f_+(w)$ where $v,w$ are positive reals.
This is by noticing $ \sum^t \sum_i a_i \exp(t \space i) = \sum_i a_i ( \exp((t+1)i) - 1)(\exp(i) - 1)^{-1} $ and noticing the functions $f_+,f_-$ are periodic with $2 \pi$.
Next with contour integration you can find min and max over that period $2 \pi$ for the continuum product functions.
Then the product of those 2 integrals should give you $\frac{5}{4}$.
—-
Maybe all of this is unnecessarily complicated and some simple theorems from trigonometry or calculus could easily explain the conjectured value $\frac{5}{4}$ .. but I do not see it.
——
——
Update
This conjecture is part of a more general phenomenon.
For example the second conjecture :
Let $g(n) = \prod_{i=0}^n (\sin^2(i) + \frac{9}{16} ) $
$$ \sup g(n) \space \inf g(n) = \frac{9}{16} $$
It feels like this second conjecture could somehow follow from the first conjecture since
$$-(\cos(n) + \frac{5}{4})(\cos(n) - \frac{5}{4}) = - \cos^2(n) + \frac{25}{16} = \sin^2(n) + \frac{9}{16} $$
And perhaps the first conjecture could also follow from this second one ?
Since these are additional questions and I can only accept one answer , I started a new thread with these additional questions :
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3000441/why-is-inf-g-sup-g-frac916
---EDIT---
I want to explain better how to get a closed form for these numbers.
I already mentioned that the periods of these functions are $2 \pi$ and how to use that.
But those few lines deserve more attention.
Basically this is what we do :
We use the fourier series
$$ f(x) = \ln(\sin(x) + 5/4) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{-2 \cos(k(x + \pi/2))}{2^k k} $$
Now we use the inverse of the backward difference operator
( similar but distinct from the so-called "indefinite sum" which is defined as inverse of the forward difference operator )
In other words we solve for $F(x)$ such that
$$F(x) - F(x-1) = f(x)$$
We call this the " continuum sum " (CS) and write/define :
$$ CS(f(x),x) := F(x) $$
$$ CS(f(x),y) := F(y) $$
For clarity :
$$ \sum_0^y f(x) = CS(f(x),y) - CS(f(x),-1) $$
$$ \sum_0^0 f(x) = CS(f(x),0) - CS(f(x),-1) = f(0) $$
This operator is linear so we make use of that :
$$CS(2 \cos(k(x+\pi/2),x) = \csc(k/2) \sin(k(x+1/2 + \pi/2)) -1.$$
This implies that :
$$ CS(f(x),x) = F(x) = - \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{\csc(k/2)\sin(k(x + 1/2 + \pi/2)) - 1}{2^k k} $$
and
$$ G(x) = \frac{d F(x)}{dx} = - \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{\csc(k/2) \cos(k(x+1/2+\pi/2))}{2^k} $$
Now $\sup f_+ = 7.93.. $ is the supremum of $ \exp(F(x) - F(-1) $ and $\inf f_+ = 0.95..$ is the infimum of $ \exp(F(x) - F(-1) $.
And both these values are achieved at $x$ such that $G(x) = 0$.
The analogue for $f_-$ works.
So the numbers from the OP can ( more or less) be given by these infinite series and hence the whole conjectures can be stated by these infinite series.
We also know for instance
$$  \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k 2^k} = \ln(2) ,  \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{k 2^k} = - \ln(3/2) $$
So that is hopefull.
Also the max and min of functions can be given by contour integrals but that might not make things easier ?
Many trig identities and symmetry are probably related.
But I see no clear proof.
So that is how we compute the values and it might just help.
Also notice :
$$ t(x) = \ln(\sin(x) - 5/4) =  \ln(-1) + \ln(\sin(-x) + 5/4) = \ln(-1) + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{-2 \cos(k(x + \pi/2))}{2^k k} $$
So the other case is no mystery.
And ofcourse the case $ \ln(\cos^2(x) - 9/16) $ is also simply related.
( trig addition identities can be used )

REPLY [4 votes]: (This is an extended comment, not a true answer. It provides a sort-of-closed-form expression for $f_+(n)$.)
There is a special function $S_2(\alpha; z)$, called the double sine function, which is meromorphic in $z \in \mathbb{C}$ and which satisfies
$$ S_2(\alpha; z + 1) = \frac{S_2(\alpha; z)}{2 \sin(\tfrac{\pi}{\alpha} z)} \qquad \text{and} \qquad S_2(\alpha; z + \alpha) = \frac{S_2(\alpha; z)}{2 \sin(\pi z)} \, . $$
If we set $\alpha = 2 \pi$ and write simply $S_2(z) = S_2(2 \pi, z)$, we get
$$ S_2(z + 1) = \frac{S_2(z)}{2 \sin(\tfrac{z}{2})} \, . $$
Choose $b > 0$ such that $\cosh b = \tfrac{5}{4}$, and write $\xi_\pm = \tfrac{\pi}{4} \pm b i$. Then
$$ \sin(z) + \tfrac{5}{4} = 2 \sin(\tfrac{z}{2} + \xi_+) \sin(\tfrac{z}{2} + \xi_-) . $$
It follows that
$$ \frac{2^n S_2(\xi_+) S_2(\xi_-)}{S_2(n + 1 + \xi_+) S_2(n + 1 + \xi_-)} = \prod_{k = 0}^n 2 \sin(\tfrac{k}{2} + \xi_+) \sin(\tfrac{k}{2} + \xi_-) = \prod_{k = 0}^n (\sin k + \tfrac{5}{4}) $$
is your sequence $f_+(n)$.
Now the double sine function is a special function that I know next to nothing about (I learned about it, as well as about many other fancy special functions, from Alexey Kuznetsov), but apparently it is reasonably well-understood. The refernences that I got from Alexey are:

S. Koyama and N. Kurokawa, Multiple sine functions, Forum Mathematicum 15 (2006), no. 6, 839–876;
S. Koyama and N. Kurokawa, Values of the double sine function, J. Number
Theory 123 (2007), no. 1, 204–223.

I did not check them to see if they contain any information relevant to your questions.