TITLE: Physicists misuse the term "Kac Moody algebra". Does that bring problems?
QUESTION [11 upvotes]: In physics textbooks one frequently sees the name (affine) Kac Moody algebra used to describe the universal (one dimensional) central extension of the loop algebra of a semisimple algebra. But this is not an affine Kac Moody algebra: one would still need a derivation extension to obtain a true (untwisted) affine Kac Moody algebra. 
Do the properties of the object that physicists call affine Kac Moody algebra resemble the properties of the true Kac Moody algebra so closely that this misuse of the terms is rendered harmless? Meaning, are physicists somehow justified to assume that properties proved for affine Kac Moody algebras hold for "their" affine Kac Moody algebras?

REPLY [8 votes]: I can't address all uses by all physicists, but in many contexts, they consider only representations at a fixed level that admit a well-behaved energy grading.  That is, sometimes an energy grading is implicit in the environment.  Such a grading can be given by the eigenvalues of some semisimple operator, and adjoining such an operator to the centrally extended loop algebra yields the full affine Kac-Moody Lie algebra.  In this case, the representations in question naturally extend to representations of the larger algebra, but when energy is implicit, a physicist may feel that references to an explicit operator are unnecessary.