TITLE: Laplacian on manifolds and random matrix theory
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: Let $M$ be a compact Riemannian manifold with a metric $g$, and consider the spectrum of the Laplacian operator $\Delta$.
What is known about the relationship between this spectrum and random matrix theory?
In posing this question, I am imagining that the metric $g$ is drawn randomly from a suitable distribution.  I am agnostic as to how this is done, but since the space of metrics on $M$ is somewhat unwieldy it may be simpler to consider special finite-dimensional spaces of $g$'s.
To be concrete, we could for instance imagine a two-dimensional Riemann surface of genus greater than one equipped with a uniformly negatively curved metric. Such metrics come in finite-dimensional families and it is natural to imagine drawing the metric from this set.
(Clearly in the genus one case the spectrum on a flat torus is not random, so I am also imagining that the topology of $M$ is suitably generic.)
In higher dimensions there are also sometimes natural finite-dimensional families of metrics, e.g. on Calabi-Yau manifolds and I am also interested to know what generic features of the spectra are known here as well.
As some physics motivation, if you consider a quantum particle moving on such a manifold, the energy levels are controlled by this spectrum.  If the system is sufficiently generic, one expects chaotic behavior and hence some type of random matrix universality in properties of the spectrum.
Thanks for any answers or links to relevant literature!

REPLY [4 votes]: There are quite a few  connections. I will mention a  result of mine where the connection is explicit and essential. Fix the metric $g$. Set $m=\dim M$ and assume that ${\rm vol}_g(M)=1$.
Denote  by $\DeclareMathOperator{\spec}{spec}$ $\newcommand{\bR}{\mathbb{R}}$ $\spec(\Delta)$ the spectrum of  $\Delta$
$$
\spec(\Delta)= \big\{\, 0=\lambda_0<\lambda_1\leq \lambda_2\leq \cdots \,\big\},
$$
where each eigenvalue is repeated according to its multiplicity.
Fix an orthonormal eigenbasis $(\Psi_k)_{k\geq0}$ of $L^2(M,g)$
$$
\Delta \Psi_k =
\lambda_k\Psi_k,\;\;\forall k.
$$
Pick a nonnegative even Schwartz function $w:\bR\to[0,\infty)$. (E.g. $w(x)=e^{-x^2}$) Fix $\newcommand{\ve}{{\varepsilon}}$ $\ve>0$ and  set $w_\ve(x)=w(\ve x)$. Consider the  random Fourier series
$$
U^\ve=\sum_{k\geq 0} X_k w_\ve\big(\sqrt{\lambda_k}\big)\Psi_k,
$$
where $X_k$ are independent standard normal random variables.
Random matrices appear when you study the distribution of critical points and critical values of the random function $U^\ve$ as $\ve\searrow 0$.  $\DeclareMathOperator{\Hess}{Hess}$ $\newcommand{\bp}{\boldsymbol{p}}$
The Hessian of $U^\ve$ at a point $\bp\in M$ is a random matrix $\Hess_\bp^\ve$. Suitably rescaled it converges in distribution to a classical random matrix of the form $\newcommand{\one}{\boldsymbol{1}}$
$$   X_m\one +A_m $$
where $X_m$ is a normal random variable with mean zero  and variance depending only on $m$ and $w$ and $A_m$ belongs to  GOE, the Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble.
The critical values of $U^\ve$ are with high confidence  distributed in an interval of the form $[\ve^{-m},\ve^{-m}]$.
If  you denote by $\spec(U^\ve)$ the set of critical values of $U^\ve$  then we obtain a random  measure on $\bR$
$$
\mu^\ve=\sum_{c\in\spec(U^\ve)}\delta_{\ve^mc}.
$$
Its expectation  $\newcommand{\bE}{\mathbb{E}}$ $\bar{\mu}^\ve:=\bE[\mu^\ve]$ is a deterministic measure on $\bR$. Its mass
$$
N^\ve:=\bar{\mu}^\ve[\bR]
$$
is the expected number of critical points.
Suppose that $A_{m+1}$ is belongs to the GOE of symmetric matrices of dimension $(m+1)\times (m+1)$.  We obtain similarly a random\probability measure
$$
\sigma_{m+1}=\frac{1}{m+1}\sum_{\lambda\in \spec{A_{m+1}}\delta_\lambda.
$$
Its expectation $\bar{\sigma}_{m+1}=\bE[\sigma_{m+1}]$ bis a deterministic  probability measure on $\bR$ that  has a rather explicit, albeit complicated, description.
In the paper I mentioned I show that
$$
\bar{\mu}^\ve\to Z_m e^{-b_mx^2}\bar{\sigma}_{m+1}
$$
weakly in the sense of measures as $\ve\searrow 0$.
I am not very precise here because  this is true up to certain very explicit rescalings depending only on $m$ and $w$. The constants $Z_m$ and $b_m$ are also explicit and depend only on $m$ and $w$.
The normalizing constant $Z_m$ ensures that the right-hand-side above is indeed a probability measure.