TITLE: Definition of a profinite category
QUESTION [7 upvotes]: When studying objects like profinite groups, profinite spaces and profinite rings, I have noticed that some properties just remain the same. For example they will always be inductive limits of some discrete finite spaces, or equivalently totally disconnected compact Hausdorff spaces.
I was therefore wondering, if there is some kind of a categorical generalization of these notions. Something I would call a profinite category.
I was thinking defining it either in terms of a subcategory of profinite spaces, where the objects would be profinite spaces and morphisms some subsets of continuous maps between two profinite spaces. (For profinite groups we'd require them to be morphisms of groups, for rings morphisms of rings and for modules, morphisms of modules etc...)
Other possible definition, I had in mind would be taking a subcategory of the category of finite sets with some properties that would make it possible to do projective limits and then define the objects in the profinite category as these projective limits.
Are there any references for these kinds of notions?

REPLY [5 votes]: There are two natural definitions of a profinite category.  You can look at inverse limits of finite categories or you can look at topological categories whose underlying spaces are profinite (call these Stone categories).  Any profinite category is Stone and any Stone category with finitely many objects is profinite.  But there are Stone categories that are not profinite.  Many years ago I asked George Bergman for an example, and in typical Bergman fashion he immediately provided me one.  It's been many years, so I might be slightly off, but there is a well known example of a Stone lattice that is not a profinite lattice.  Any poset can be viewed as a category and I believe just used that poset, viewed as a category, as his example or something very close to that.
Stone categories come up very frequently in monoid theory via taking the free Stone category on a profinite graph.  This comes up when trying to understand semidirect product decompositions of monoids.
It is typical given a homomorphism of profinite monoids $f\colon M\to N$ to build the category of elements of $N$ viewed as a right $M$-set with $M$ acting on $N$ via $f$.  This is a profinite category and so can be generated by a profinite graph.  People then like two write it as a quotient of a free Stone category on that profinite graph to get profinite identity theory involved.  But because that free Stone category might not be profinite, troubles arise.
There is lots of work on this by Jorge Almeida and his former students.  The original goal was to find profinite identities defining semidirect products of pseudovarieties of monoids, but the approach has not been 100% successful and the profinite versus Stone issue is part of the difficulties.
This paper might give some flavor of what people look at.  There are older papers referred to within.