TITLE: Upper bounds for ranks of modular jacobians
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: The following question came to me earlier as a "side question"; something I'd like to know, but which is not totally necessary for what I'm thinking about or doing:
Consider the genus 32 curve $X_0(389)$, and denote its Jacobian variety as $J_0(389)$.
I am interested in finding an upper bound for the Mordell-Weil rank of $J_0(389)(\mathbb{Q}(i))$. 
After thinking about this for some time, I turned to Google, which threw up [1]. Apparently, assuming the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, there is an absolute constant $C > 0$ such that for all primes $q$ sufficiently large, we have
$ \mbox{rank } J_0(q)(\mathbb{Q}) \leq C \mbox{ dim} J_0(q) $. 
[Ideally this equation would be in the center]
The point of that paper is to show that $C = 6.5$ will do (existence of $C$ having been proved in an earlier paper by the same authors), but, "assuming [also] the Riemann Hypothesis for automorphic $L$-functions, Iwaniec, Luo and Sarnak have recently proved that one could take $C = \frac{99}{100}$". 
Now I reckon 389 is "sufficiently large", which means (if you believe those conjectures) an upper bound for the rank over $\mathbb{Q}$ is 31. But this feels like it is way too big, maybe because there are generally so few rational points on modular curves.

Does anyone know how to get a better upper bound? Or am I wrong in hoping for a smaller upper bound?

Furthermore, since I'm interested in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$-rank, there is the following:

What is the biggest the rank can jump by  when going from $J_0(389)(\mathbb{Q})$ to $J_0(389)(\mathbb{Q}(i))$?

I guess this last question can be asked in greater generality, replacing the Js with any abelian variety $A/\mathbb{Q}$. Can the rank jump be arbitrarily large when passing from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $\mathbb{Q}(i)$? Or is there a bound in terms of the dimension of $A$, say?
It's my bedtime now, so I'll pick this thread up in 9 or so hours.  
[1]: "Explicit Upper Bound for the (Analytic) rank of $J_0(q)$". E. Kowalski, P. Michel. Israel J. Math, 2000. Preprint Available here

REPLY [7 votes]: To partly answer your last two questions:  It's not too hard to write down a sequence of abelian varieties $A_i/\mathbf{Q}$ such that $\mathrm{rank}A_i(\mathbf{Q})=0$ but $\mathrm{rank}A_i(\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-1}))\to \infty$ as $i\to\infty$. More precisely, if $p\equiv 1\ \mathrm{mod}\ 4$ is large enough, there is some newform $f$ of weight $2$ on $\Gamma_0(p^3)$ such that
a. $L(s,f)$ has root number $+1$, and $L(1/2,f)\neq0$, which in fact implies $L(1/2,f^{\sigma})\neq0$ for all Galois conjugates of $f$ by some work of Shimura;
b. $L(s,f\otimes \chi_{-4})$ has root number $-1$ (which is automatic from a. and my choice of $p$)  and $L'(1/2,f \otimes \chi_{-4})\neq 0$, which again implies $L'(1/2,f^{\sigma} \otimes \chi_{-4})\neq 0$ for all Galois conjugates of $f$ by the Gross-Zagier formula and its generalizations.
The existence of such a newform follows from the asymptotic evaluation 
$\sum_{f\in S_2^{new}(\Gamma_0(p^3)),\ \varepsilon(f)=+1}L(1/2,f)L'(1/2,f\otimes \chi_{-4}) \sim cp^3$ 
for some real $c>0$, which nowadays is a standard application of the Petersson formula (see e.g. the final chapter of Iwaniec and Kowalski's book).  Given such an $f$, let $A_f$ be the corresponding optimal quotient of $J_0(p^3)$.  Then a. guarantees that $\mathrm{rank}A_f(\mathbf{Q})=0$ by the work of Kolyvagin-Logachev/Zhang/Longo/Tian-Zhang, while b. guarantees that $\mathrm{rank}A_f(\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-1}))=\mathrm{dim}A_f$ by the same group of people, and $\mathrm{dim}A_f \geq \frac{p-1}{2}$ (see e.g. this question), so we're done.  
This whole argument works with $\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-1})$ replaced by any fixed imaginary quadratic field.  If you demand the same dichotomy for a sequence of $A$'s of bounded dimension, I imagine it's not known.