TITLE: Rolling-ball game
QUESTION [23 upvotes]: The analyses
in two recent MO questions 
("recent" with respect to the original posting in 2011),
"Rolling a random walk on a sphere"
and
"Maneuvering with limited moves on $S^2$,"
suggest a Rolling-Ball Game, as follows.
A unit-radius ball sits on a grid point of
a $\delta \times \delta$ regular grid in the plane,
with $\delta \neq \pi/2$.
Player 1 (Blue) rolls the ball to an adjacent
grid point, and the track of the ball-plane contact point
is drawn on the ball's surface.
Player 2 (Red) rolls to an adjacent grid point.
The two players alternate until each possible
next move would cause the trace-path to touch itself,
at which stage the player who last moved wins.
In the following example, Red wins, as Blue cannot
move without the path self-intersecting.

          


Q1.
What is the shortest possible game, assuming the players cooperate
to end it as quickly as possible?
For $\delta=\pi/4$, the above example suggests 6, but
this min depends on $\delta$.  It seems smaller $\delta$ need 8 moves to create
a cul-de-sac?
Q2.
What is the longest possible game, assuming the players cooperate
to extend it as much as possible?
Q3.
Is there any reasonable strategy if the players are truly competing
(as opposed to cooperating)?
Addendum. 
We must have $\delta < 2 \pi$ to have
even one legal move, 
and the first player wins immediately with one move for $\pi \le \delta < 2\pi$ (left below).

The right image just shows a non-intersecting path of no particular significance for $\delta=\pi/8$.

REPLY [7 votes]: For testing potential answers to Q3, let me suggest http://www.math.chalmers.se/~wastlund/Quirks/Game.html. 
The appearance as well as the specific set of bugs might depend on your browser, but as I hope will be clear, the length of the longest path as a function of the angle $\delta$ is quite funny (this is part of the reason I spent too much time on this problem, although I'm also interested in similar path-forming games for more "serious" reasons).  
After drawing a couple of quick sketches I realized I wasn't even able to figure out the behavior when $\delta$ approaches $\pi$ from below. As it turns out, the number of edges in the longest path is 5 throughout the interval $3\pi/4 \leq \delta < \pi$. For $\pi/2 < \delta < 3\pi/4$ it's 7 (although the game-tree changes also at $2\pi/3$). At $\delta = \pi/2$ it has an isolated local minimum of 5, and for angles just smaller than $\pi/2$, it seems to jump to 23. 
Here's why I couldn't let go of this problem: In all the cases where I can visualize the entire game-tree, which is when $\delta\geq \pi/2$,
(1) Alice, who draws the first arc, wins the game-version.
(2) Bob, while losing, can force Alice into a maximal-length path. In other words, Alice cannot force a win in fewer moves than the length of the longest path. This property holds for some similar path-forming games where there are explicit winning strategies.
(3) As a consequence of (1) and (2), the length of the longest path is always odd.
A couple of other observations: If we allow players to cross their own edges but not the opponent's, then an edge is never a liability, and consequently Alice has a non-losing strategy. If on the other hand we allow players to cross the opponent's edges but not their own, then an extra edge cannot be an advantage, and now Bob has a non-losing strategy (two more questions arise here: are these games too necessarily finite, and can the (winning?) strategies be made explicit rather than just exhibited by strategy-stealing?).
Therefore I thought for a while that I was on to something, and that there might be a beautiful reason that Alice must win. 
So I let Maple analyze the game for some suitably chosen angles, working symbolically to get reliable results. This is feasible when $\delta$ is such that the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\cos\delta, \sin\delta]$ where the coordinates of the points lie, is either a sub-ring of $\mathbb{Q}$ or of some nice algebraic field (degree 2 or 4). 
To summarize, I found counter-examples to each of (1), (2) and (3): For $\delta = \arctan(24/7)$, Bob wins at move 16 but the longest path has length 23. For $\delta = \arctan(12/5)$, the longest path has length 24 (but Alice can force a win in 13). Moreover, for $\delta=\pi/3$ there is a path of length 29 but Alice wins in 17. For $\delta=\arctan(4/3)$, Bob wins in 16 (I don't know the length of the longest path). 
Addendum. (by J.O'Rourke). I took the liberty of adding an image of
Johan's $\pi/3$ longest path from his applet, as detailed in his comment below.
Note the near miss where the 28th segment just misses the 1st segment.