TITLE: Affine manifolds
QUESTION [10 upvotes]: An affine manifold is a topological manifold which admits a system of charts such that the coordinate changes are (restrictions of) affine transformations. Let $M$ be a compact affine manifold. Let $G$ be the fundamental group of $M$ and $\tilde M$ be its universal cover. One can show that each $n$-dimensional affine manifold comes with a developing map $D\colon \tilde M \to \mathbb R^n$, and a homomorphism $\varphi \colon G \to {\rm Aff}(\mathbb R^n)$, such that $D$ is an immersion and equivariant with respect to $\varphi$. 
An affine manifold is called complete if $D$ is a homeomorphism, in this case: $\varphi$ is injective, $G$ is a Bieberbach group, and $M$ is aspherical, i.e. $\tilde M$ is contractible. The non-complete case seems to be far more complicated.

Question 1: Is there an easy example, where $D$ is not surjective? 
Question 2: Is there an easy example, where $\varphi$ is not injective? 
Question 3: Is there an easy example, where $M$ is not aspherical? 

EDIT: As André suggested, let's ask for examples for which $\varphi$ takes values in $SL(n,\mathbb R) \ltimes \mathbb R^n$ or even $SL(n,\mathbb Z) \ltimes \mathbb R^n$, seen as subgroups of ${\rm Aff}(\mathbb R^n)$.

REPLY [9 votes]: There is a conjecture due to Markus which states that any compact affine manifold has parallel volume (i.e. the linear part of $\varphi$ lies in $\mathrm{SL}(n;\mathbb{R})$) if and only if it is complete. To the best of my knowledge, this conjecture is still open, which goes towards saying that there should be no easy examples to questions 1 and 3 for affine manifolds with parallel volume. 
If the fundamental group $G$ of a compact affine manifold with parallel volume is nilpotent, the beautiful Affine manifolds with nilpotent holonomy by Fried, Goldman and Hirsch, Comm. Math. Helv. 56 (1981) proves that Markus' conjecture holds in this case and, thus, there are no examples to questions 1 and 3 with nilpotent fundamental group. The proof is a cunning mixture of representation theory and  geometry, so I strongly recommend taking a look at it. The results in this paper also imply that the above examples (to questions 1 and 3) constructed by Andre Henriques cannot be adapted so that the resulting manifolds admit parallel volume (these are, nonetheless, very nice examples to the original question!).