TITLE: Why are operads so closely connected to mathematical physics?
QUESTION [10 upvotes]: Mark Sapir's question inspired me to ask the question in the title. A lot of mathematicians who have done work related to mathematical physics (e.g Kontsevich, Stasheff, Getzler, Manin, etc.) have done work with operads, but I don't really grok why operads have anything to do with physics. I wonder if anyone has ideas about why there is such a close connection.
Added: Examples of how operads are used in physics are welcome, but just like in Mark Sapir's question, I am much more interested in a general reason that explains why they appear. Especially why multiple operads appear, not some particular operad. Note that operads can be defined in various categories (topological spaces, vector spaces, etc) and I'm most interested in operads in the category of vector spaces. But if there is an answer that covers more than one category, that would be very nice.

REPLY [9 votes]: I'm not a mathematical physicist, so parts of this may be wrong.
In quantum field theory, one encounters operators that are supported at points in spacetime, or at least are very local.  For example (if we ignore uncertainty), one may have a "photon creation at $x$ with momentum $p$ and helicity $\xi$" operator, which changes the universe so that there is an extra photon at $x$ with momentum $p$ and helicity $\xi$.  If you have encountered raising and lowering operators when studying the quantum mechanics of a harmonic oscillator, this is a generalization to the situation where you have harmonic oscillators at every point (and in interacting theories, the oscillators may coupled nonlinearly).
If we set up multiple operators supported at different points, there may be no canonical way to compose them.  For example, if we have creations at spacelike separated points, any choice of time-ordering can be permuted by a boost.  However, we can consider a parameter space of all possible ways to compose such operators, and we can consider how the compositions change when we continuously vary the positions of the creation events in spacetime.  Furthermore, if we put a subset of such creations close to each other, we may view their composition as a single operator supported on the neighborhood, that depends on their relative position inside that neighborhood.  Operads are precisely the objects that encode such families of composition laws and iterations.
One example where these arise is in the theory of vertex operator algebras, which (so I'm told) describe the chiral parts of conformal field theories.  Given an compact complex algebraic curve and a vertex operator algebra, you can choose points with frames, and insert states (i.e., apply certain operators) at those points.  There is a procedure by which you can construct from these data a space of chiral correlation functions, and this space will vary smoothly with the points and frames (and also with the complex moduli of the curve).  If you put some points with frames close to each other and ignore the global geometry of the curve, the configurations of points with frames form a space in the framed $E_2$ operad, and the spaces of correlation functions are something like an algebra over the operad.  This is a genus zero restriction of the compatibilities we see in conformal field theory, and can be strengthened to the statement (proved here under some extra hypotheses) that modules of a vertex operator algebra form a framed $E_2$ (in particular, braided) tensor category.

REPLY [8 votes]: It's not really possible to give a precise answer to this question, so I apologize for being vague here. One answer is because a lot of multiplications in physics are associated with moving two things close to each other and looking at the result as a single object. The archetype for this is the operator product expansion in quantum field theory. This naturally leads to thinking about a little n-spheres operad with various decorations. Most examples that come to mind right now really reduce to that.