TITLE: Justifying a theory by a seemingly unrelated example
QUESTION [15 upvotes]: Here is a topic in the vein of  Describe a topic in one sentence and  Fundamental examples  : imagine that you are trying to explain and justify a mathematical theory T to a skeptical mathematician who thinks T is just some sort of abstract nonsense for its own sake. The ideal solution consists
of a problem P which can be stated and understood without knowing anything about T, but  which is difficult (or impossible, even better) to solve without T, and easier (or almost-trivial, even better) to solve with the help of T. What should be avoided is an example where T is "superimposed", e.g. when T is a model for some physical phenomenon, because there is always something arbitrary about the choice of a specific model.   
A classical example is Galois theory for solving polynomial equations. 
Any examples for homological algebra ? For Fourier analysis ? For category theory ?

REPLY [4 votes]: Proving the termination of Goodstein sequences (a problem in natural numbers) via arithmetic on infinite ordinals.