TITLE: Cramer's rule for eigenvectors
QUESTION [7 upvotes]: I know that the above doesn't exist, but do bear with me. I need estimates/formulas for entries of certain eigenvectors and Cramer's rule keeps popping up in my mind. So, what can play an anlogous role in this case?

REPLY [17 votes]: If $u$ is a unit eigenvector with eigenvalue $\lambda$ of a Hermitian matrix
$$ A_n = \begin{pmatrix} a & X^* \\\\ X & A_{n-1} \end{pmatrix}$$
with $a$ a real number, $X$ an $n-1$-dimensional row vector, and $A_{n-1}$ an $n-1 \times n-1$ Hermitian matrix, then (provided that $\lambda$ is not an eigenvalue of $A_{n-1}$) the magnitude of the first coefficient $u_1$ of $u$ is given by the formula 
$$ |u_1|^2 = \frac{1}{1 + \| (A_{n-1} - \lambda)^{-1} X \|^2};$$
see e.g. Lemma 41 of this paper of mine with Van Vu (and we learned of this formula from this previous paper of Erdos, Schlein, and Yau).  Similarly for other components of $u$.  The proof proceeds by expanding out the bottom $n-1$ components of the eigenvalue equation $A_n u = \lambda u$ and using the resulting equation and the formula $\|u\|^2=1$ to solve for $u_1$.  
The expression $\| (A_{n-1} - \lambda)^{-1} X \|$ can be expanded further by a number of formulae (e.g. Cramer's rule); in our applications, it turns out that the spectral theorem applied to $A_{n-1}$ is useful.  The above identity is particularly useful for establishing delocalisation of eigenvectors for random matrices (i.e. that the energy of the coefficients of a unit vector are spread out almost uniformly).  It may seem a bit strange that the top left coefficient $a$ plays no explicit role in this formula, but it is implicitly present due to its influence on the eigenvalue $\lambda$.
The phase $u_1$ of the unit eigenvector does not have a clean formula, because eigenvectors are only determined up to phase rotations unless one somehow selects an artificial normalisation.