TITLE: Matrices generating non-discrete subgroups of SL(2,R)
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: Jorgensen's inequality $\mid \left(Tr\left(A\right)\right)^2-4\mid+\mid Tr\left[A,B\right]-2\mid\ge 1$ gives a necessary condition for two matrices A,B to generate a discrete subgroup of SL(2,R). Are there examples showing that this inequality is not a sufficient condition? Are there methods to prove that two given elements do NOT generate a discrete subgroup?
Background: A recently published paper http://xm10402.reportworld.co.kr/data/paper/view/2882/P2881838.html claims (in Theorem 4.5. in the appendix) that a group generated by two hyperbolic matrices A,B of positive trace is discrete if and only if their axes intersect and the trace of the commutator [A,B] is smaller than -2. This theorem seems a bit strong to me but it is not obvious to me how to construct counterexamples. In fact the condition on the trace of the commutator automatically guarantees that Jorgensen's inequality holds, so the first check for non-discreteness must fail.

REPLY [2 votes]: The answer is negative. If $G$ is a discrete subgroup of $SL(2, {\mathbb R})$ then  it cannot contain elliptic elements of infinite order. Thus, let $A$ be an elliptic of infinite order with fixed trace. In order for Jorgensen's inequality to be satisfied, we want $|tr([A,B])|$ be large. Note that $ABA^{-1}B^{-1}=AC$, where $C$ is also elliptic whose trace is the same as the one of $A$. Consider the character variety  $X$ of representations of $F_2$ to $SL(2,R)$, where we send free generators of $F_2$ to $A$ and $C$. Then $X$ is parameterized by traces of $A, C, AC$. Thus, if trace of $AC$ is bounded, then be get a bounded domain in $X$. However, if you take a sequence $B_n=g^n$, where $g$ is a fixed hyperbolic translation, then the distance between the fixed points of $A$ and $C_n= B_n g B^{-n}$ tends to infinity as $n\to \infty$. Therefore, the resulting sequence of elements of  $X$ diverges to infinity. Thus, we obtain a sequence of pairs $(A, B_n)$ so that $|tr([A,B_n])|$ diverges to infinity. Hence, for all but finitely many $n$'s Jorgensen's inequality holds but the group generated by $A, B$ is nondiscrete. 
On the other hand, the result that you mention does seem plausible in view of Goldman's thesis, see here and here. Goldman proves that representations of surface groups to $SL(2, {\mathbb R})$ with maximal Euler number are Fuchsian. (Namely, the representation you mentioned looks like a representation of the fundamental group of the 1-holed torus with maximal relative Euler number.)