| # s1mb-generalization-contextual-score |
|
|
| English evaluation cases authored using GPT-6-Astra. This review contains answers; do not send it as model input. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-001 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Claim: the valve was closed at noon. The stipulated definitive inspection record shows it fully open at noon; this observation establishes the claim is false." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The definitive observation refutes closure. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-002 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "game": { |
| "duration_minutes": 30, |
| "maximum_loss_tokens": 10, |
| "prize": "book" |
| }, |
| "player": { |
| "duration": 60, |
| "max_loss": 20, |
| "prize": "book" |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only the prize preference matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-003 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "non_negotiable": "No new city debt", |
| "primary": "Public ownership", |
| "proposal": "Build publicly owned homes using new city debt.", |
| "secondary": "More homes" |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| New debt violates the non-negotiable despite other benefits. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-004 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this study's applicability to the specified review question." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The study concerns adults receiving tutoring, measures reading, and uses a randomized design. The review requires exactly those four characteristics." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All four dimensions match. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-005 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this study's applicability to the specified review question." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "order": [ |
| "population", |
| "intervention", |
| "outcome", |
| "design" |
| ], |
| "review": [ |
| "adults", |
| "tutoring", |
| "reading", |
| "observational" |
| ], |
| "study": [ |
| "adults", |
| "tutoring", |
| "reading", |
| "randomized" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only design differs. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-006 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Meeting: Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote; participant is available.", |
| "Preferences: morning, at least 60 minutes, in person." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only the morning preference matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-007 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this study's applicability to the specified review question." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "review": { |
| "design": "observational", |
| "intervention": "exercise", |
| "outcome": "balance", |
| "population": "children" |
| }, |
| "study": { |
| "design": "randomized", |
| "intervention": "tutoring", |
| "outcome": "reading", |
| "population": "adults" |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| No dimension matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-008 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Menu: spicy lentil stew, hot and low cost. Diner permits all ingredients but prefers mild food, cold dishes and a formal multi-course service. The stew is a single casual dish." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| None of the three preferences matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-009 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The charter requires owner consent and prioritizes public access, active community use and imminent damage. The owner consents; all three factors are documented at this site." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| Eligibility and all three factors are established. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-010 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Plan: anonymous counts; report visits and purchases only. Permitted.", |
| "Client requests visits, dwell time and device types." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only visits match the requested analyses. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-011 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Answer: The museum opens at 10:00.", |
| "User needs the museum's admission price; verified price is 8 credits." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The subject matches but the price is absent. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-012 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Proposal: build publicly owned homes using new city debt.", |
| "No non-negotiable is breached. Primary priority: public ownership. Secondary: reduce city debt." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Public ownership is met; debt reduction is not. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-013 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Answer: 'The museum opens at 10:00.' User asks opening time. The verified current opening time is 09:00, and 10:00 is explicitly incorrect." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The answer contradicts the verified requested time. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-014 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Meeting: Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote. The participant is available and prefers morning, no more than 30 minutes and remote attendance." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All three preferences and availability match. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-015 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "availability": "Wednesday only", |
| "meeting": "Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote.", |
| "preferences": [ |
| "morning", |
| "at most 30 minutes", |
| "remote" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Tuesday lies outside mandatory availability. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-016 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "event": "The sender broke the recipient's mug.", |
| "message": "You made me do it; this is your fault." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The sender blames the recipient for established harm. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-017 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "checklist": [ |
| "approved", |
| "signed", |
| "funded", |
| "scheduled" |
| ], |
| "record": "Not rejected; signature status unknown; funds requested; date proposed.", |
| "rule": "None of these phrases entails the corresponding checklist item." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| No positive checklist condition is established. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-018 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Four features: search, upload, download, billing.", |
| "Independent backup serves search and download. Upload and billing require the primary." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Two independent backup features remain. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-019 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Meeting: Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote. Participant is available then but prefers afternoon, at least 60 minutes and in-person meetings." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Availability holds but none of the preferences matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-020 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Game: maximum loss 10 tokens, lasts 30 minutes, prize is a book. Player: accepts loss up to 10, prefers 60 minutes and a toy." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Loss is acceptable but neither preference matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-021 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "source_meaning": "Do not send the file to Lee today.", |
| "translation": "Send the file to Lee today." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The prohibition is reversed into an instruction. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-022 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Permitted plan: replica, community-written labels, no audio, paid entry.", |
| "Requests: community-written labels, audio testimony, free entry." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only community-written labels are present. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-023 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Proposal: build publicly owned homes using new city debt. The caucus has no debt prohibition. Its primary priority is public ownership and its secondary priority is more homes." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| Both stated priorities are met without a prohibition. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-024 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Checklist: approved, signed, funded, scheduled.", |
| "Record: approved and signed; funding and scheduling unknown." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Approval and signature are established. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-025 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Assignment: four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation.", |
| "Worker: five-hour cap, trained editor, no licensed workstation." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The worker has skill but lacks equipment. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-026 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Checklist: approved, signed, funded, scheduled. The definitive record explicitly confirms approval, signature, full funding and an agreed scheduled date." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All four are explicitly established. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-027 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "contract": "Duplicate closed requests need no response.", |
| "ticket": "Exact duplicate of an already resolved and closed request." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The duplicate rule sets no response requirement. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-028 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Plan: store anonymous counts; report visits and purchases only. Agreement permits anonymous counts. Client requests dwell time, device types and referral sources, none provided." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The plan complies but supplies none of the requested analyses. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-029 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Ceremony: silent evening gathering outdoors, without invocations. It is permitted. The participant wishes for music, a morning time and an indoor venue." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| It meets none of the three wishes. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-030 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Translation: Send the file to Lee today.", |
| "Required source meaning: send the file to Lee tomorrow." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The action and recipient match but the required time does not. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-031 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "buyer": { |
| "desired_warranty_years": 2, |
| "hard_budget": 60, |
| "required": [ |
| "print", |
| "scan" |
| ] |
| }, |
| "item": { |
| "functions": [ |
| "print", |
| "scan" |
| ], |
| "price": 80, |
| "warranty_years": 2 |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The price exceeds the hard limit. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-032 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Assignment: four hours of audio editing on a licensed workstation. Worker can spend five hours but has neither audio-editing skills nor the workstation." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Neither skill nor equipment is available. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-033 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Event: sender broke the mug. Message: 'I broke your mug and am sorry. I will pay for the equivalent replacement you choose.'" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The message includes relevant restitution. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-034 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "answer": "The museum opens at 10:00.", |
| "user_need": "What time does the museum open?", |
| "verified_facts": "Museum opens at 10:00." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The answer supplies the complete requested fact. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-035 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "source_meaning": "Send the file to Lee; no deadline is stated or implied.", |
| "translation": "Send the file to Lee today." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Today is an unsupported added deadline. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-036 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Answer: 'The museum opens at 10:00.' User asks when the museum opens and closes. Verified hours are 10:00 to 18:00." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Opening is answered correctly but closing is omitted. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-037 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Menu: spicy lentil stew, hot, low cost, single casual dish; permitted.", |
| "Preferences: spicy food, cold dishes, formal multi-course service." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only spiciness matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-038 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Reply: 'Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today.' Naming is permitted. Brief requires a greeting, the project name and a request to reply today." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All three style requirements are satisfied. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-039 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "plan": "Permitted anonymous counts reporting visits and purchases only.", |
| "requested": [ |
| "visits", |
| "purchases", |
| "referrals" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Two of the three requested analyses are provided. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-040 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "assignment": "Four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation.", |
| "worker": { |
| "audio_skill": false, |
| "hours_cap": 4, |
| "licensed_workstation": true |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Equipment is available but skill training is needed. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-041 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Proposal: build publicly owned homes using new city debt. The caucus's priorities are lower debt and private ownership, but neither is a non-negotiable. The proposal meets neither priority." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Neither priority is met, without an absolute prohibition. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-042 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Contract: confirmed ongoing data loss requires immediate response. Ticket: logs confirm data is currently being lost." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The immediate-response trigger is confirmed. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-043 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "answer": "The museum opens at 10:00.", |
| "user_need": "How do I reset my router?", |
| "verified_facts": "Router reset requires its reset button." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Museum hours are unrelated to router reset. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-044 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "contract": "A team-wide work blockage without data loss requires response within one hour.", |
| "ticket": "The whole team is blocked; no data is lost." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The one-hour blockage category applies. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-045 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "charter": "Consent required. Factors: public access, active community use, imminent damage.", |
| "site": "Consenting owner; public access and active community use; no imminent damage." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Public access and active use supply two factors. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-046 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "agreement": "No storage of any kind", |
| "plan": "Store anonymous counts; report visits and purchases, not referrals.", |
| "requested": [ |
| "visits", |
| "purchases", |
| "referrals" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Even anonymous storage violates the mandatory restriction. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-047 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Game: at most 10 tokens lost, 30 minutes, book prize. Player accepts up to 10 tokens of loss and prefers a 30-minute game with a book prize." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The loss boundary and both preferences are satisfied. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-048 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Charter: owner consent required; priority factors are public access, active community use and imminent damage. Owner consents, but the private unused site is stable and closed to the public." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The eligible site has none of the factors. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-049 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "plan": "Permitted replica display with community-written labels, audio testimony, paid entry.", |
| "requested": [ |
| "community-written labels", |
| "audio testimony", |
| "free entry" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Labels and audio are supplied, but entry is not free. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-050 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "ceremony": "Silent evening gathering outdoors, with no invocations.", |
| "prohibition": "No outdoor gatherings", |
| "wishes": [ |
| "silence", |
| "evening", |
| "no invocations" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The outdoor setting violates an absolute prohibition. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-051 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "preferences": [ |
| "quiet room", |
| "near transit", |
| "free entry" |
| ], |
| "required": "hearing loop", |
| "venue": "Step-free entry, no hearing loop, quiet room, near transit, free entry." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The required hearing loop is absent. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-052 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "event": "Sender broke the mug.", |
| "message": "I broke your mug. I am sorry for the damage I caused." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Responsibility and harm are acknowledged but no repair is offered. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-053 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The committee permits this replica display and requests community-written labels, audio testimony and free entry. The plan provides all three." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The plan fulfills every condition and request. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-054 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Event: sender broke the recipient's mug. Message: 'Nice weather today.'" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The message never acknowledges the incident. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-055 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "claim": "The valve was closed at noon.", |
| "record": "Two independent calibrated position logs both directly show closed at noon." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| Two independent direct observations support closure. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-056 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The diner permits the spicy lentil stew and wants spicy food, a hot dish and low cost. The menu meets exactly those three preferences." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| Every stated preference is met. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-057 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Assignment: four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation. Worker is a trained editor with that workstation and exactly four hours available." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All required resources fit, including the inclusive cap. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-058 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this study's applicability to the specified review question." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Study: adults, tutoring, reading outcome, randomized design. Review requires adults, exercise, balance outcome and observational design. Treat these categories as exact and disjoint." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only population matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-059 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "ceremony": "Silent evening gathering outdoors, no invocations.", |
| "permitted": true, |
| "wishes": [ |
| "silence", |
| "evening", |
| "indoor venue" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Silence and evening timing meet two wishes. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-060 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The participant permits the silent outdoor evening gathering and specifically wishes for silence, an evening time and no invocations." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All three wishes are met. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-061 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "buyer": { |
| "desired_warranty_years": 2, |
| "hard_budget": 100, |
| "required": [ |
| "print", |
| "fax" |
| ] |
| }, |
| "item": { |
| "functions": [ |
| "print", |
| "scan" |
| ], |
| "price": 80, |
| "warranty_years": 2 |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only printing matches a required function. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-062 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Event: sender broke the mug.", |
| "Message: I see that your mug is broken and you are upset, but I am not saying who caused it." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Harm is acknowledged without responsibility. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-063 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Contract: cosmetic issues require response within seven days. Ticket: a cosmetic spacing issue with no loss of functionality." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The cosmetic category has the seven-day requirement. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-064 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "non_negotiable": "Do not display the original object", |
| "plan": "Display the original object, with community-authored labels, audio testimony and free entry.", |
| "requested": [ |
| "community labels", |
| "audio testimony", |
| "free entry" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Displaying the original violates the absolute condition. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-065 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Ceremony: silent evening gathering outdoors, no invocations; permitted.", |
| "Wishes: silence, morning time, indoor venue." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only the wish for silence is met. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-066 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The service has search, upload, download and billing. A fully independent hot replica immediately serves all four if the primary fails, with no shared dependencies." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The intervention leaves all four features available. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-067 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "brief": "Never name Project Cedar; use a greeting, name the project, and request a reply today. Confidentiality overrides conflicting style requests.", |
| "reply": "Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The explicit confidentiality priority overrides the conflicting style request. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-068 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "charter": "Only owner-consented sites are eligible; priority factors are public access, active community use, imminent damage.", |
| "site": { |
| "active_use": true, |
| "imminent_damage": true, |
| "owner_consented": false, |
| "public_access": true |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Lack of owner consent makes the site ineligible. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-069 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "assignment": "Four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation.", |
| "worker": { |
| "audio_skill": true, |
| "hours_cap": 3, |
| "licensed_workstation": true |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Four hours exceeds the cap of three. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-070 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Plan: display an approved replica with curator-written labels, no audio, paid entry. Replica display is permitted. The committee requests community-written labels, audio testimony and free entry." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| None of the three requested features is supplied. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-071 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Charter: consent required; factors are public access, active community use, imminent damage.", |
| "Owner consents; site is publicly accessible, unused and stable." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only public access applies. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-072 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "features": [ |
| "search", |
| "upload", |
| "download", |
| "billing" |
| ], |
| "model": "All features require the primary; no backup." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Failure removes every feature. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-073 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Four features: search, upload, download, billing. After primary failure, an independent read-only cache serves search only; all other features stop." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only one of four survives. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-074 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Reply: Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today. Project naming is permitted.", |
| "Brief: include a greeting, omit project names, avoid requests for action." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only the greeting requirement is satisfied. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-075 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "assumption": "Backup remains operational after primary failure.", |
| "features": { |
| "billing": "primary only", |
| "download": "independent backup", |
| "search": "independent backup", |
| "upload": "independent backup" |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only billing is lost. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-076 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Claim: the valve was closed at noon.", |
| "Record: flow was low, which may result from closure or from an empty tank; no direct observation." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Low flow is relevant but has an alternative explanation. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-077 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Reply: 'Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today.' Naming the project is permitted. Brief: no greeting, no project name, no requested action." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The reply violates all three style requirements, but no confidentiality rule. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-078 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "claim": "The valve was closed at noon.", |
| "record": "Only a photograph of an unrelated office is available." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The record contains no relevant evidence. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-079 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Item: 80 credits, prints and scans, two-year warranty. Buyer: budget 100, requires print and scan, wants a five-year warranty." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Both functions fit but the warranty is too short. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-080 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "The venue has step-free entry, a quiet room, nearby transit and free entry. The attendee requires step-free entry and prefers exactly the other three features." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| Required access and all preferences match. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-081 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "game": { |
| "duration_minutes": 30, |
| "maximum_loss_tokens": 10, |
| "prize": "book" |
| }, |
| "player": { |
| "duration": 30, |
| "max_loss": 5, |
| "prize": "book" |
| } |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The possible loss exceeds the hard tolerance. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-082 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "menu": "Permitted spicy hot lentil stew, low cost, casual single dish.", |
| "preferences": [ |
| "spicy", |
| "hot", |
| "formal multi-course" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Spiciness and temperature match, service does not. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-083 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this study's applicability to the specified review question." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Study: adults / tutoring / reading / randomized.", |
| "Review: adults / tutoring / balance / observational. Categories are exact and disjoint." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Population and intervention match. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-084 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "available": true, |
| "meeting": "Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote", |
| "preferences": [ |
| "morning", |
| "at most 30 minutes", |
| "in person" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Time and duration match, mode does not. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-085 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "checklist": [ |
| "approved", |
| "signed", |
| "funded", |
| "scheduled" |
| ], |
| "record": "Approved, signed, fully funded; no date has been agreed." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Three conditions hold; scheduling does not. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-086 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Venue: step-free entry, quiet room, near transit, free entry; no other facilities.", |
| "Required: step-free entry. Preferences: quiet room, cafe, parking." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only the quiet room preference is satisfied. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-087 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Venue: step-free entry, quiet room, near transit, free entry; no other facilities. Required: step-free entry. Preferences: parking, cafe, outdoor seating." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Required access exists but none of the preferences does. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-088 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Game: lose at most 10 tokens, 30 minutes, book prize.", |
| "Player: loss limit 20, prefers 30 minutes and a toy." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only duration matches. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-089 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Item: 80 credits, prints and scans only, two-year warranty.", |
| "Buyer: budget 100; needs faxing and laminating; wants two-year warranty." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Neither required function is present. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-090 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Translation: 'Send the file to Lee today.' Source, unambiguously in this context: delete the file today, without sending it." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Sending substitutes a different central action for deleting. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-091 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Translation: 'Send the file to Lee today.' The source requires exactly that action, recipient and day, with no other meaning." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| The translation exactly preserves the stipulated meaning. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-092 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Claim: the valve was closed at noon. One calibrated position log directly records closed at noon; there is no other evidence." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| There is one direct reliable observation. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-093 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Plan: anonymous counts report visits, purchases and referrals. The agreement permits anonymous counts, and those are exactly the three requested analyses." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| All requested analyses are provided compliantly. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-094 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "preferences": [ |
| "quiet room", |
| "near transit", |
| "cafe" |
| ], |
| "required": "step-free entry", |
| "venue_features": [ |
| "step-free entry", |
| "quiet room", |
| "near transit", |
| "free entry" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Two preferences are present, but no cafe. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-095 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Item: 80 credits, prints and scans, two-year warranty. Buyer: budget 100, needs printing and scanning, wants a two-year warranty." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0} |
|
|
| Budget, functions and warranty all fit. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-096 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "confidentiality": "Project naming permitted", |
| "reply": "Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today.", |
| "style_requirements": [ |
| "greeting", |
| "project name", |
| "no action request" |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Greeting and project naming match, but the action request does not. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-097 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| "Checklist: approved, signed, funded, scheduled. Record: explicitly approved; not known to be unsigned; funding undecided; scheduling undecided. Lack of known non-signature does not establish signing." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only approval is established. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-098 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "non_negotiable": "None", |
| "primary": "Reduce city debt", |
| "proposal": "Build publicly owned homes using new city debt.", |
| "secondary": "More homes" |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Only the secondary housing priority is met. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-099 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "diner": { |
| "preferences": [ |
| "spicy", |
| "hot", |
| "low cost" |
| ], |
| "prohibition": "No lentils" |
| }, |
| "menu": "Spicy lentil stew, served hot, low cost." |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| Lentils are prohibited regardless of preferences. |
|
|
| ## contextual-score-100 |
|
|
| ### Instruction |
|
|
| ```json |
| "How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?" |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### State |
|
|
| ```json |
| [ |
| "Contract: a non-blocking functional defect gets a response within one day.", |
| "Ticket: a functional defect with a documented workaround and no blocked users." |
| ] |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Criteria |
|
|
| - `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required" |
| - `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days" |
| - `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day" |
| - `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour" |
| - `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately" |
|
|
| Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0} |
|
|
| The defect fits the one-day category. |
|
|
