# s1mb-generalization-contextual-score

English evaluation cases authored using GPT-6-Astra. This review contains answers; do not send it as model input.

## contextual-score-001

### Instruction

```json
"How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?"
```

### State

```json
"Claim: the valve was closed at noon. The stipulated definitive inspection record shows it fully open at noon; this observation establishes the claim is false."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The definitive observation refutes closure.

## contextual-score-002

### Instruction

```json
"How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice."
```

### State

```json
{
  "game": {
    "duration_minutes": 30,
    "maximum_loss_tokens": 10,
    "prize": "book"
  },
  "player": {
    "duration": 60,
    "max_loss": 20,
    "prize": "book"
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Only the prize preference matches.

## contextual-score-003

### Instruction

```json
"How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics."
```

### State

```json
{
  "non_negotiable": "No new city debt",
  "primary": "Public ownership",
  "proposal": "Build publicly owned homes using new city debt.",
  "secondary": "More homes"
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

New debt violates the non-negotiable despite other benefits.

## contextual-score-004

### Instruction

```json
"Score this study's applicability to the specified review question."
```

### State

```json
"The study concerns adults receiving tutoring, measures reading, and uses a randomized design. The review requires exactly those four characteristics."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All four dimensions match.

## contextual-score-005

### Instruction

```json
"Score this study's applicability to the specified review question."
```

### State

```json
{
  "order": [
    "population",
    "intervention",
    "outcome",
    "design"
  ],
  "review": [
    "adults",
    "tutoring",
    "reading",
    "observational"
  ],
  "study": [
    "adults",
    "tutoring",
    "reading",
    "randomized"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Only design differs.

## contextual-score-006

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Meeting: Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote; participant is available.",
  "Preferences: morning, at least 60 minutes, in person."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only the morning preference matches.

## contextual-score-007

### Instruction

```json
"Score this study's applicability to the specified review question."
```

### State

```json
{
  "review": {
    "design": "observational",
    "intervention": "exercise",
    "outcome": "balance",
    "population": "children"
  },
  "study": {
    "design": "randomized",
    "intervention": "tutoring",
    "outcome": "reading",
    "population": "adults"
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

No dimension matches.

## contextual-score-008

### Instruction

```json
"How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences."
```

### State

```json
"Menu: spicy lentil stew, hot and low cost. Diner permits all ingredients but prefers mild food, cold dishes and a formal multi-course service. The stew is a single casual dish."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

None of the three preferences matches.

## contextual-score-009

### Instruction

```json
"Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth."
```

### State

```json
"The charter requires owner consent and prioritizes public access, active community use and imminent damage. The owner consents; all three factors are documented at this site."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

Eligibility and all three factors are established.

## contextual-score-010

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Plan: anonymous counts; report visits and purchases only. Permitted.",
  "Client requests visits, dwell time and device types."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only visits match the requested analyses.

## contextual-score-011

### Instruction

```json
"How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?"
```

### State

```json
[
  "Answer: The museum opens at 10:00.",
  "User needs the museum's admission price; verified price is 8 credits."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The subject matches but the price is absent.

## contextual-score-012

### Instruction

```json
"How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Proposal: build publicly owned homes using new city debt.",
  "No non-negotiable is breached. Primary priority: public ownership. Secondary: reduce city debt."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Public ownership is met; debt reduction is not.

## contextual-score-013

### Instruction

```json
"How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?"
```

### State

```json
"Answer: 'The museum opens at 10:00.' User asks opening time. The verified current opening time is 09:00, and 10:00 is explicitly incorrect."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The answer contradicts the verified requested time.

## contextual-score-014

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant."
```

### State

```json
"Meeting: Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote. The participant is available and prefers morning, no more than 30 minutes and remote attendance."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All three preferences and availability match.

## contextual-score-015

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant."
```

### State

```json
{
  "availability": "Wednesday only",
  "meeting": "Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote.",
  "preferences": [
    "morning",
    "at most 30 minutes",
    "remote"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Tuesday lies outside mandatory availability.

## contextual-score-016

### Instruction

```json
"How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "event": "The sender broke the recipient's mug.",
  "message": "You made me do it; this is your fault."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The sender blames the recipient for established harm.

## contextual-score-017

### Instruction

```json
"How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false."
```

### State

```json
{
  "checklist": [
    "approved",
    "signed",
    "funded",
    "scheduled"
  ],
  "record": "Not rejected; signature status unknown; funds requested; date proposed.",
  "rule": "None of these phrases entails the corresponding checklist item."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

No positive checklist condition is established.

## contextual-score-018

### Instruction

```json
"If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Four features: search, upload, download, billing.",
  "Independent backup serves search and download. Upload and billing require the primary."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Two independent backup features remain.

## contextual-score-019

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant."
```

### State

```json
"Meeting: Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote. Participant is available then but prefers afternoon, at least 60 minutes and in-person meetings."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Availability holds but none of the preferences matches.

## contextual-score-020

### Instruction

```json
"How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice."
```

### State

```json
"Game: maximum loss 10 tokens, lasts 30 minutes, prize is a book. Player: accepts loss up to 10, prefers 60 minutes and a toy."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Loss is acceptable but neither preference matches.

## contextual-score-021

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context."
```

### State

```json
{
  "source_meaning": "Do not send the file to Lee today.",
  "translation": "Send the file to Lee today."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The prohibition is reversed into an instruction.

## contextual-score-022

### Instruction

```json
"Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Permitted plan: replica, community-written labels, no audio, paid entry.",
  "Requests: community-written labels, audio testimony, free entry."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only community-written labels are present.

## contextual-score-023

### Instruction

```json
"How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics."
```

### State

```json
"Proposal: build publicly owned homes using new city debt. The caucus has no debt prohibition. Its primary priority is public ownership and its secondary priority is more homes."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

Both stated priorities are met without a prohibition.

## contextual-score-024

### Instruction

```json
"How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Checklist: approved, signed, funded, scheduled.",
  "Record: approved and signed; funding and scheduling unknown."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Approval and signature are established.

## contextual-score-025

### Instruction

```json
"Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Assignment: four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation.",
  "Worker: five-hour cap, trained editor, no licensed workstation."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The worker has skill but lacks equipment.

## contextual-score-026

### Instruction

```json
"How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false."
```

### State

```json
"Checklist: approved, signed, funded, scheduled. The definitive record explicitly confirms approval, signature, full funding and an agreed scheduled date."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All four are explicitly established.

## contextual-score-027

### Instruction

```json
"How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "contract": "Duplicate closed requests need no response.",
  "ticket": "Exact duplicate of an already resolved and closed request."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The duplicate rule sets no response requirement.

## contextual-score-028

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement."
```

### State

```json
"Plan: store anonymous counts; report visits and purchases only. Agreement permits anonymous counts. Client requests dwell time, device types and referral sources, none provided."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The plan complies but supplies none of the requested analyses.

## contextual-score-029

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice."
```

### State

```json
"Ceremony: silent evening gathering outdoors, without invocations. It is permitted. The participant wishes for music, a morning time and an indoor venue."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

It meets none of the three wishes.

## contextual-score-030

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Translation: Send the file to Lee today.",
  "Required source meaning: send the file to Lee tomorrow."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The action and recipient match but the required time does not.

## contextual-score-031

### Instruction

```json
"Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs."
```

### State

```json
{
  "buyer": {
    "desired_warranty_years": 2,
    "hard_budget": 60,
    "required": [
      "print",
      "scan"
    ]
  },
  "item": {
    "functions": [
      "print",
      "scan"
    ],
    "price": 80,
    "warranty_years": 2
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The price exceeds the hard limit.

## contextual-score-032

### Instruction

```json
"Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints."
```

### State

```json
"Assignment: four hours of audio editing on a licensed workstation. Worker can spend five hours but has neither audio-editing skills nor the workstation."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Neither skill nor equipment is available.

## contextual-score-033

### Instruction

```json
"How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?"
```

### State

```json
"Event: sender broke the mug. Message: 'I broke your mug and am sorry. I will pay for the equivalent replacement you choose.'"
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The message includes relevant restitution.

## contextual-score-034

### Instruction

```json
"How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "answer": "The museum opens at 10:00.",
  "user_need": "What time does the museum open?",
  "verified_facts": "Museum opens at 10:00."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The answer supplies the complete requested fact.

## contextual-score-035

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context."
```

### State

```json
{
  "source_meaning": "Send the file to Lee; no deadline is stated or implied.",
  "translation": "Send the file to Lee today."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Today is an unsupported added deadline.

## contextual-score-036

### Instruction

```json
"How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?"
```

### State

```json
"Answer: 'The museum opens at 10:00.' User asks when the museum opens and closes. Verified hours are 10:00 to 18:00."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Opening is answered correctly but closing is omitted.

## contextual-score-037

### Instruction

```json
"How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Menu: spicy lentil stew, hot, low cost, single casual dish; permitted.",
  "Preferences: spicy food, cold dishes, formal multi-course service."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only spiciness matches.

## contextual-score-038

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief."
```

### State

```json
"Reply: 'Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today.' Naming is permitted. Brief requires a greeting, the project name and a request to reply today."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All three style requirements are satisfied.

## contextual-score-039

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement."
```

### State

```json
{
  "plan": "Permitted anonymous counts reporting visits and purchases only.",
  "requested": [
    "visits",
    "purchases",
    "referrals"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Two of the three requested analyses are provided.

## contextual-score-040

### Instruction

```json
"Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints."
```

### State

```json
{
  "assignment": "Four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation.",
  "worker": {
    "audio_skill": false,
    "hours_cap": 4,
    "licensed_workstation": true
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Equipment is available but skill training is needed.

## contextual-score-041

### Instruction

```json
"How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics."
```

### State

```json
"Proposal: build publicly owned homes using new city debt. The caucus's priorities are lower debt and private ownership, but neither is a non-negotiable. The proposal meets neither priority."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Neither priority is met, without an absolute prohibition.

## contextual-score-042

### Instruction

```json
"How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?"
```

### State

```json
"Contract: confirmed ongoing data loss requires immediate response. Ticket: logs confirm data is currently being lost."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The immediate-response trigger is confirmed.

## contextual-score-043

### Instruction

```json
"How useful is the quoted answer for the user's actual information need?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "answer": "The museum opens at 10:00.",
  "user_need": "How do I reset my router?",
  "verified_facts": "Router reset requires its reset button."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Contradicts the requested fact"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Unrelated to the requested subject"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Same subject but no requested fact"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Answers part of a multi-part request correctly"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Answers the complete request correctly"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Museum hours are unrelated to router reset.

## contextual-score-044

### Instruction

```json
"How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "contract": "A team-wide work blockage without data loss requires response within one hour.",
  "ticket": "The whole team is blocked; no data is lost."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

The one-hour blockage category applies.

## contextual-score-045

### Instruction

```json
"Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth."
```

### State

```json
{
  "charter": "Consent required. Factors: public access, active community use, imminent damage.",
  "site": "Consenting owner; public access and active community use; no imminent damage."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Public access and active use supply two factors.

## contextual-score-046

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement."
```

### State

```json
{
  "agreement": "No storage of any kind",
  "plan": "Store anonymous counts; report visits and purchases, not referrals.",
  "requested": [
    "visits",
    "purchases",
    "referrals"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Even anonymous storage violates the mandatory restriction.

## contextual-score-047

### Instruction

```json
"How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice."
```

### State

```json
"Game: at most 10 tokens lost, 30 minutes, book prize. Player accepts up to 10 tokens of loss and prefers a 30-minute game with a book prize."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The loss boundary and both preferences are satisfied.

## contextual-score-048

### Instruction

```json
"Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth."
```

### State

```json
"Charter: owner consent required; priority factors are public access, active community use and imminent damage. Owner consents, but the private unused site is stable and closed to the public."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The eligible site has none of the factors.

## contextual-score-049

### Instruction

```json
"Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions."
```

### State

```json
{
  "plan": "Permitted replica display with community-written labels, audio testimony, paid entry.",
  "requested": [
    "community-written labels",
    "audio testimony",
    "free entry"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Labels and audio are supplied, but entry is not free.

## contextual-score-050

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice."
```

### State

```json
{
  "ceremony": "Silent evening gathering outdoors, with no invocations.",
  "prohibition": "No outdoor gatherings",
  "wishes": [
    "silence",
    "evening",
    "no invocations"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The outdoor setting violates an absolute prohibition.

## contextual-score-051

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order."
```

### State

```json
{
  "preferences": [
    "quiet room",
    "near transit",
    "free entry"
  ],
  "required": "hearing loop",
  "venue": "Step-free entry, no hearing loop, quiet room, near transit, free entry."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The required hearing loop is absent.

## contextual-score-052

### Instruction

```json
"How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "event": "Sender broke the mug.",
  "message": "I broke your mug. I am sorry for the damage I caused."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Responsibility and harm are acknowledged but no repair is offered.

## contextual-score-053

### Instruction

```json
"Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions."
```

### State

```json
"The committee permits this replica display and requests community-written labels, audio testimony and free entry. The plan provides all three."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The plan fulfills every condition and request.

## contextual-score-054

### Instruction

```json
"How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?"
```

### State

```json
"Event: sender broke the recipient's mug. Message: 'Nice weather today.'"
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The message never acknowledges the incident.

## contextual-score-055

### Instruction

```json
"How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "claim": "The valve was closed at noon.",
  "record": "Two independent calibrated position logs both directly show closed at noon."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

Two independent direct observations support closure.

## contextual-score-056

### Instruction

```json
"How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences."
```

### State

```json
"The diner permits the spicy lentil stew and wants spicy food, a hot dish and low cost. The menu meets exactly those three preferences."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

Every stated preference is met.

## contextual-score-057

### Instruction

```json
"Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints."
```

### State

```json
"Assignment: four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation. Worker is a trained editor with that workstation and exactly four hours available."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All required resources fit, including the inclusive cap.

## contextual-score-058

### Instruction

```json
"Score this study's applicability to the specified review question."
```

### State

```json
"Study: adults, tutoring, reading outcome, randomized design. Review requires adults, exercise, balance outcome and observational design. Treat these categories as exact and disjoint."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only population matches.

## contextual-score-059

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice."
```

### State

```json
{
  "ceremony": "Silent evening gathering outdoors, no invocations.",
  "permitted": true,
  "wishes": [
    "silence",
    "evening",
    "indoor venue"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Silence and evening timing meet two wishes.

## contextual-score-060

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice."
```

### State

```json
"The participant permits the silent outdoor evening gathering and specifically wishes for silence, an evening time and no invocations."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All three wishes are met.

## contextual-score-061

### Instruction

```json
"Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs."
```

### State

```json
{
  "buyer": {
    "desired_warranty_years": 2,
    "hard_budget": 100,
    "required": [
      "print",
      "fax"
    ]
  },
  "item": {
    "functions": [
      "print",
      "scan"
    ],
    "price": 80,
    "warranty_years": 2
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only printing matches a required function.

## contextual-score-062

### Instruction

```json
"How adequate is this message as an apology for the event described?"
```

### State

```json
[
  "Event: sender broke the mug.",
  "Message: I see that your mug is broken and you are upset, but I am not saying who caused it."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Denies or blames the recipient for established harm"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant acknowledgment of the harm"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Acknowledges harm without accepting responsibility"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Acknowledges harm and accepts responsibility, but no repair"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Acknowledges harm, accepts responsibility and offers relevant repair"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Harm is acknowledged without responsibility.

## contextual-score-063

### Instruction

```json
"How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?"
```

### State

```json
"Contract: cosmetic issues require response within seven days. Ticket: a cosmetic spacing issue with no loss of functionality."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The cosmetic category has the seven-day requirement.

## contextual-score-064

### Instruction

```json
"Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions."
```

### State

```json
{
  "non_negotiable": "Do not display the original object",
  "plan": "Display the original object, with community-authored labels, audio testimony and free entry.",
  "requested": [
    "community labels",
    "audio testimony",
    "free entry"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Displaying the original violates the absolute condition.

## contextual-score-065

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how suitable this ceremony is for this participant's explicitly stated practice."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Ceremony: silent evening gathering outdoors, no invocations; permitted.",
  "Wishes: silence, morning time, indoor venue."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Conflicts with an absolute personal prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted, but meets none of the participant's three wishes"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one wish"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two wishes"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three wishes"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only the wish for silence is met.

## contextual-score-066

### Instruction

```json
"If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining."
```

### State

```json
"The service has search, upload, download and billing. A fully independent hot replica immediately serves all four if the primary fails, with no shared dependencies."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The intervention leaves all four features available.

## contextual-score-067

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief."
```

### State

```json
{
  "brief": "Never name Project Cedar; use a greeting, name the project, and request a reply today. Confidentiality overrides conflicting style requests.",
  "reply": "Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The explicit confidentiality priority overrides the conflicting style request.

## contextual-score-068

### Instruction

```json
"Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth."
```

### State

```json
{
  "charter": "Only owner-consented sites are eligible; priority factors are public access, active community use, imminent damage.",
  "site": {
    "active_use": true,
    "imminent_damage": true,
    "owner_consented": false,
    "public_access": true
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Lack of owner consent makes the site ineligible.

## contextual-score-069

### Instruction

```json
"Score the proposed assignment's fit to this worker's declared constraints."
```

### State

```json
{
  "assignment": "Four hours of audio editing using a licensed workstation.",
  "worker": {
    "audio_skill": true,
    "hours_cap": 3,
    "licensed_workstation": true
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Breaks a hard hours cap"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within hours cap but lacks both required skill and equipment"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within hours cap and has skill but lacks equipment"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within hours cap and has equipment but needs skill training"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within hours cap with both skill and equipment"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Four hours exceeds the cap of three.

## contextual-score-070

### Instruction

```json
"Score this exhibition plan against the community committee's stated conditions."
```

### State

```json
"Plan: display an approved replica with curator-written labels, no audio, paid entry. Replica display is permitted. The committee requests community-written labels, audio testimony and free entry."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable condition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted but meets none of three requested features"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted and meets one requested feature"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted and meets two requested features"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted and meets all three requested features"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

None of the three requested features is supplied.

## contextual-score-071

### Instruction

```json
"Score this site's restoration priority using the local charter's category, not a personal judgment of cultural worth."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Charter: consent required; factors are public access, active community use, imminent damage.",
  "Owner consents; site is publicly accessible, unused and stable."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Ineligible under the charter"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Eligible, but none of three priority factors applies"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Eligible with one priority factor"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Eligible with two priority factors"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Eligible with all three priority factors"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only public access applies.

## contextual-score-072

### Instruction

```json
"If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining."
```

### State

```json
{
  "features": [
    "search",
    "upload",
    "download",
    "billing"
  ],
  "model": "All features require the primary; no backup."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Failure removes every feature.

## contextual-score-073

### Instruction

```json
"If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining."
```

### State

```json
"Four features: search, upload, download, billing. After primary failure, an independent read-only cache serves search only; all other features stop."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only one of four survives.

## contextual-score-074

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Reply: Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today. Project naming is permitted.",
  "Brief: include a greeting, omit project names, avoid requests for action."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only the greeting requirement is satisfied.

## contextual-score-075

### Instruction

```json
"If the primary server failed, how much of the four-feature service would remain available under this model? Score the fraction of features remaining."
```

### State

```json
{
  "assumption": "Backup remains operational after primary failure.",
  "features": {
    "billing": "primary only",
    "download": "independent backup",
    "search": "independent backup",
    "upload": "independent backup"
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No features remain"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One of four features remains"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two of four features remain"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three of four features remain"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "All four features remain"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Only billing is lost.

## contextual-score-076

### Instruction

```json
"How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?"
```

### State

```json
[
  "Claim: the valve was closed at noon.",
  "Record: flow was low, which may result from closure or from an empty tank; no direct observation."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Low flow is relevant but has an alternative explanation.

## contextual-score-077

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief."
```

### State

```json
"Reply: 'Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today.' Naming the project is permitted. Brief: no greeting, no project name, no requested action."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The reply violates all three style requirements, but no confidentiality rule.

## contextual-score-078

### Instruction

```json
"How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?"
```

### State

```json
{
  "claim": "The valve was closed at noon.",
  "record": "Only a photograph of an unrelated office is available."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The record contains no relevant evidence.

## contextual-score-079

### Instruction

```json
"Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs."
```

### State

```json
"Item: 80 credits, prints and scans, two-year warranty. Buyer: budget 100, requires print and scan, wants a five-year warranty."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Both functions fit but the warranty is too short.

## contextual-score-080

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order."
```

### State

```json
"The venue has step-free entry, a quiet room, nearby transit and free entry. The attendee requires step-free entry and prefers exactly the other three features."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

Required access and all preferences match.

## contextual-score-081

### Instruction

```json
"How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice."
```

### State

```json
{
  "game": {
    "duration_minutes": 30,
    "maximum_loss_tokens": 10,
    "prize": "book"
  },
  "player": {
    "duration": 30,
    "max_loss": 5,
    "prize": "book"
  }
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The possible loss exceeds the hard tolerance.

## contextual-score-082

### Instruction

```json
"How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences."
```

### State

```json
{
  "menu": "Permitted spicy hot lentil stew, low cost, casual single dish.",
  "preferences": [
    "spicy",
    "hot",
    "formal multi-course"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Spiciness and temperature match, service does not.

## contextual-score-083

### Instruction

```json
"Score this study's applicability to the specified review question."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Study: adults / tutoring / reading / randomized.",
  "Review: adults / tutoring / balance / observational. Categories are exact and disjoint."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Matches none of population, intervention, outcome or design"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Matches exactly one of the four dimensions"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Matches exactly two of the four dimensions"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Matches exactly three of the four dimensions"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Matches all four dimensions"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Population and intervention match.

## contextual-score-084

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the proposed meeting time for this participant."
```

### State

```json
{
  "available": true,
  "meeting": "Tuesday 10:00, 30 minutes, remote",
  "preferences": [
    "morning",
    "at most 30 minutes",
    "in person"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Outside a mandatory availability window"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Available but violates all three preferences"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Available and meets one preference"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Available and meets two preferences"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Available and meets all three preferences"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Time and duration match, mode does not.

## contextual-score-085

### Instruction

```json
"How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false."
```

### State

```json
{
  "checklist": [
    "approved",
    "signed",
    "funded",
    "scheduled"
  ],
  "record": "Approved, signed, fully funded; no date has been agreed."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Three conditions hold; scheduling does not.

## contextual-score-086

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Venue: step-free entry, quiet room, near transit, free entry; no other facilities.",
  "Required: step-free entry. Preferences: quiet room, cafe, parking."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only the quiet room preference is satisfied.

## contextual-score-087

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order."
```

### State

```json
"Venue: step-free entry, quiet room, near transit, free entry; no other facilities. Required: step-free entry. Preferences: parking, cafe, outdoor seating."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Required access exists but none of the preferences does.

## contextual-score-088

### Instruction

```json
"How suitable is this investment-like game for the player's stated preferences? This is a fictional game, not financial advice."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Game: lose at most 10 tokens, 30 minutes, book prize.",
  "Player: loss limit 20, prefers 30 minutes and a toy."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the maximum acceptable loss"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Loss limit respected, but neither preferred feature met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Loss limit respected, only preferred duration met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Loss limit respected, only preferred prize met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Loss limit respected, preferred duration and prize both met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only duration matches.

## contextual-score-089

### Instruction

```json
"Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs."
```

### State

```json
[
  "Item: 80 credits, prints and scans only, two-year warranty.",
  "Buyer: budget 100; needs faxing and laminating; wants two-year warranty."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Neither required function is present.

## contextual-score-090

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context."
```

### State

```json
"Translation: 'Send the file to Lee today.' Source, unambiguously in this context: delete the file today, without sending it."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Sending substitutes a different central action for deleting.

## contextual-score-091

### Instruction

```json
"Rate the translation's fidelity to the source as disambiguated by the context."
```

### State

```json
"Translation: 'Send the file to Lee today.' The source requires exactly that action, recipient and day, with no other meaning."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Reverses the central instruction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Changes the central action to a different action"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Preserves action but gets a required time or recipient wrong"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Preserves all required meaning but adds an unsupported detail"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Preserves all and only the required meaning"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

The translation exactly preserves the stipulated meaning.

## contextual-score-092

### Instruction

```json
"How strongly does this record support the claim under the specified evidence rubric?"
```

### State

```json
"Claim: the valve was closed at noon. One calibrated position log directly records closed at noon; there is no other evidence."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "The record establishes the claim is false"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "No relevant evidence either way"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Relevant but inconclusive indication"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "One direct reliable observation supports the claim"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Two independent direct reliable observations support the claim"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

There is one direct reliable observation.

## contextual-score-093

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this analytics plan against the client's explicit privacy agreement."
```

### State

```json
"Plan: anonymous counts report visits, purchases and referrals. The agreement permits anonymous counts, and those are exactly the three requested analyses."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a mandatory restriction"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Complies, but provides none of three requested analyses"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Complies and provides one requested analysis"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Complies and provides two requested analyses"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Complies and provides all three requested analyses"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

All requested analyses are provided compliantly.

## contextual-score-094

### Instruction

```json
"Rate this venue for the attendee using the rubric's priority order."
```

### State

```json
{
  "preferences": [
    "quiet room",
    "near transit",
    "cafe"
  ],
  "required": "step-free entry",
  "venue_features": [
    "step-free entry",
    "quiet room",
    "near transit",
    "free entry"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "A required access feature is absent"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Required access is present; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Required access is present; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Required access is present; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Required access is present; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Two preferences are present, but no cafe.

## contextual-score-095

### Instruction

```json
"Score this purchase against the buyer's budget and needs."
```

### State

```json
"Item: 80 credits, prints and scans, two-year warranty. Buyer: budget 100, needs printing and scanning, wants a two-year warranty."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Exceeds the hard budget"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Within budget but meets neither required function"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Within budget and meets exactly one required function"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Within budget and meets both functions but not the desired warranty"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Within budget and meets both functions and desired warranty"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 1.0}

Budget, functions and warranty all fit.

## contextual-score-096

### Instruction

```json
"Rate how well this reply follows the recipient's communication brief."
```

### State

```json
{
  "confidentiality": "Project naming permitted",
  "reply": "Hi Sam, Project Cedar is approved. Please reply today.",
  "style_requirements": [
    "greeting",
    "project name",
    "no action request"
  ]
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates the brief's mandatory confidentiality rule"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Confidentiality respected; none of three style requirements met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Confidentiality respected; one style requirement met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Confidentiality respected; two style requirements met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Confidentiality respected; all three style requirements met"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 1.0, '4': 0.0}

Greeting and project naming match, but the action request does not.

## contextual-score-097

### Instruction

```json
"How much of the four-part checklist is logically established by the record? Treat unestablished items as unmet, not false."
```

### State

```json
"Checklist: approved, signed, funded, scheduled. Record: explicitly approved; not known to be unsigned; funding undecided; scheduling undecided. Lack of known non-signature does not establish signing."
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Zero items established"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "One item established"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Two items established"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Three items established"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Four items established"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 1.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only approval is established.

## contextual-score-098

### Instruction

```json
"How well does the proposal fit this caucus's stated priorities? Use the stated priority hierarchy, not your own politics."
```

### State

```json
{
  "non_negotiable": "None",
  "primary": "Reduce city debt",
  "proposal": "Build publicly owned homes using new city debt.",
  "secondary": "More homes"
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates a non-negotiable commitment"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Meets no priority but violates no non-negotiable"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Meets only the secondary priority"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Meets only the primary priority"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Meets both priorities without a prohibited feature"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Only the secondary housing priority is met.

## contextual-score-099

### Instruction

```json
"How well does this menu fit the diner's own requirements? Apply prohibitions before preferences."
```

### State

```json
{
  "diner": {
    "preferences": [
      "spicy",
      "hot",
      "low cost"
    ],
    "prohibition": "No lentils"
  },
  "menu": "Spicy lentil stew, served hot, low cost."
}
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "Violates an explicit prohibition"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Permitted; none of three preferences met"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Permitted; one preference met"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Permitted; two preferences met"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Permitted; all three preferences met"

Target: {'0': 1.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 0.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

Lentils are prohibited regardless of preferences.

## contextual-score-100

### Instruction

```json
"How urgent is the response under this fictional support contract?"
```

### State

```json
[
  "Contract: a non-blocking functional defect gets a response within one day.",
  "Ticket: a functional defect with a documented workaround and no blocked users."
]
```

### Criteria

- `0` (value: 0.0): "No response required"
- `1` (value: 0.25): "Respond within seven days"
- `2` (value: 0.5): "Respond within one day"
- `3` (value: 0.75): "Respond within one hour"
- `4` (value: 1.0): "Respond immediately"

Target: {'0': 0.0, '1': 0.0, '2': 1.0, '3': 0.0, '4': 0.0}

The defect fits the one-day category.