Datasets:

imcapsule
/

palette-bench-ko

pretty_name: PALETTE-BENCH-KO
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
  - ko
task_categories:
  - text-generation
  - question-answering
tags:
  - korean
  - benchmark
  - enterprise
  - business-documents
  - evaluation
  - llm-judge
size_categories:
  - n<1K
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/*

PALETTE-BENCH-KO — Korean Enterprise Document Benchmark

Version: 0.1 (seed) · License: CC BY 4.0 · Language: Korean (ko)

What this is

The first public benchmark for Korean enterprise document work — the drafting, extraction, and compliance tasks that office staff actually do, which existing Korean benchmarks (KMMLU, HAE-RAE, KoBALT, LogicKor) do not cover. A landscape sweep (2026-08) found no public benchmark testing 공문서/품의서 drafting, 회의록→결정 extraction, or business-register control; the nearest neighbors test QA/RAG (Allganize) or law (KCL), not workflow. Demand is documented: Seoul Metropolitan Government's own survey put document drafting (23%) + summarization (20%) as civil servants' top AI needs.

Task families (6)

Family	Task	Scoring	Deterministic?
`minutes_to_decision`	회의록 → {decision, owner, due_date} 구조화 추출	field F1	✅ yes
`dart_comprehension`	공시 발췌 → 사실 QA + 수치 추론	token-F1 / exact	✅ yes
`gongmun_drafting`	브리프 → 공문서 초안	rubric (LLM judge)	⚪ judge
`pumui_drafting`	시나리오 → 품의서/기안	rubric (LLM judge)	⚪ judge
`email_register`	관계·의도 → 비즈니스 이메일 (존댓말 register)	rubric (LLM judge)	⚪ judge
`policy_compliance`	작업 + 조직 정책 → 준수/거부/플래그 판단	compliance rubric	⚪ judge

Size

v0.1 seed: 24 items (4 per family; 6 easy / 12 medium / 6 hard). This is a reference seed, released to establish the format, scoring, and the axis. The production release (v1.0) expands to ~1.5–3k items with native-expert authoring and a rotated held-out split — see README.md → roadmap.

Provenance & honesty

All items are synthetic (authored for this benchmark) or DART-style (modeled on the public disclosure register, not copied from a specific filing). No customer data, no scraped copyrighted documents. This keeps the set redistributable under CC BY 4.0.
The policy_compliance family includes the exact PIPA-scoped data-handling dilemma a governance product must get right (item pc-003), and the drafting families include the residency-justification and sensitive-incident cases (pm-002, pm-003, gm-003).
The harness never fabricates a score: rubric items with no judge configured are reported UNSCORED, not given a number. Deterministic families need no LLM.

Fields per item

id · family · task_class · difficulty · provenance · input (Korean) · reference or reference_rubric · scoring · optional notes / max_score.

How to evaluate

# 1. run your model on each item's `input`, collect {id: output} → preds.json
# 2. score:
cd harness
python evaluate.py --data ../data --preds preds.json --judge none        # deterministic only
python evaluate.py --data ../data --preds preds.json --judge anthropic   # full (needs key)

Deterministic families (minutes_to_decision, dart_comprehension) score with stdlib only. Rubric families use a pluggable LLM judge (OpenAI / Anthropic adapters included).

Intended use & limitations

Use: measuring Korean enterprise-document capability of LLMs; a held-out slice for adapter evaluation; a citable axis for a model release.
Limitations (v0.1): 24 items is a seed, not a statistically powerful test set; rubric scoring inherits judge-model bias (report the judge used); Korean items are authored by the release team and await native-expert review for v1.0. Do not report v0.1 numbers as a definitive leaderboard — report them as a seed baseline.

Citation

PALETTE-BENCH-KO: A Korean Enterprise Document Benchmark (v0.1 seed), 2026. Released under CC BY 4.0.