--- language: - ne license: unknown # set this to match your actual sources task_categories: - automatic-speech-recognition --- # Nepali Speech Dataset (YouTube-sourced) 63 labeled speech segments, split by **channel** (not by individual video) so the same speaker/recording can't appear in more than one split. ## Splits - **train**: 63 segments - **validation**: 0 segments - **test**: 0 segments ## Transcript columns — read this before training Each segment carries three transcript variants. They are NOT interchangeable: - `text_original` — the YouTube caption text (if any) that overlapped this segment's time range, in whatever spelling/style convention that caption used. - `text_whisper` — this project's fine-tuned Whisper model's own transcription of the segment's audio. - `text` / `text_final` — the transcript actually selected as this segment's label (see `transcript_source` for which one won). **This is a mix of both conventions across the dataset** — some segments carry caption-style text, others carry Whisper-style text — so treat `text_final` as a single working label, not a normalized ground truth, and check `transcript_source`/`label_tier` per segment if your use case needs one consistent convention. ## Label trust tiers (`label_tier`) `transcript_source` is collapsed into a coarser trust label: - **gold** (`youtube_manual_caption`) — human-authored caption. - **silver** (`youtube_auto_caption`) — YouTube's own ASR caption. - **bronze** (`custom_whisper`) — this project's Whisper model's own output. Silver and bronze are both machine-generated transcripts, and the Whisper model used for bronze was fine-tuned on a corpus with its own systematic error patterns — treat bronze as a separate, lower-confidence pool rather than blending it silently with gold for anything where transcript accuracy matters most. - gold: 28 segments (44.4%) - bronze: 35 segments (55.6%) ## Quality tiers (`quality_tier`) `A`/`B`/`C` reflect a combination of audio cleanliness (clipping, VAD speech coverage, estimated SNR), forced-alignment confidence, and language-ID confidence. **These thresholds are heuristic starting points, not independently calibrated values** — if precision matters for your use case, spot-check a sample against human judgment before trusting a tier at face value. `music_likelihood` and `overlapping_speech` are best-effort heuristic flags (not trained classifiers) that cap a segment at tier B rather than rejecting it outright — a false positive should cost a tier, not the clip. ## Content mix - explainer content: 100.0% KL divergence from the target content mix: 13.1223 (0 = matches target exactly).