text:
11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000330161000021,
Author = {Laycock, Ian and Cotterell, Katie C. and O'Shea-Wheller, Thomas A. and
   Cresswell, James E.},
Title = {{Effects of the neonicotinoid pesticide thiamethoxam at field-realistic
   levels on microcolonies of Bombus terrestris worker bumble bees}},
Journal = {{ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{100}},
Pages = {{153-158}},
Month = {{FEB}},
Abstract = {{Neonicotinoid pesticides are currently implicated in the decline of wild
   bee populations. Bumble bees, Bombus spp., are important wild
   pollinators that are detrimentally affected by ingestion of
   neonicotinoid residues. To date, imidacloprid has been the major focus
   of study into the effects of neonicotinoids on bumble bee health, but
   wild populations are increasingly exposed to alternative neonicotinoids
   such as thiamethoxam. To investigate whether environmentally realistic
   levels of thiamethoxam affect bumble bee performance over a realistic
   exposure period, we exposed queenless microcolonies of Bombus terrestris
   L workers to a wide range of dosages up to 98 mu g kg(-1) in dietary
   syrup for 17 days. Results showed that bumble bee workers survived fewer
   days when presented with syrup dosed at 98 mu g thiamethoxam kg(-1),
   while production of brood (eggs and larvae) and consumption of syrup and
   pollen in microcolonies were significantly reduced by thiamethoxam only
   at the two highest concentrations (39, 98 mu g kg(-1)). In contrast, we
   found no detectable effect of thiamethoxam at levels typically found in
   the nectars of treated crops (between 1 and 11 mu g kg(-1)). By
   comparison with published data, we demonstrate that during an exposure
   to field-realistic concentrations lasting approximately two weeks, brood
   production in worker bumble bees is more sensitive to imidacloprid than
   thiamethoxam. We speculate that differential sensitivity arises because
   imidacloprid produces a stronger repression of feeding in bumble bees
   than thiamethoxam, which imposes a greater nutrient limitation on
   production of brood. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE}},
Address = {{525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Laycock, I (Corresponding Author), Univ Exeter, Coll Life \& Environm Sci Biosci, Hatherly Labs, Prince Wales Rd, Exeter EX4 4PS, Devon, England.
   Laycock, Ian; Cotterell, Katie C.; O'Shea-Wheller, Thomas A.; Cresswell, James E., Univ Exeter, Coll Life \& Environm Sci Biosci, Hatherly Labs, Exeter EX4 4PS, Devon, England.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.10.027}},
ISSN = {{0147-6513}},
EISSN = {{1090-2414}},
Keywords = {{Bee health; Bombus; Field-realistic; Imidacloprid; Neonicotinoid;
   Thiamethoxam}},
Keywords-Plus = {{NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTORS; MYZUS-PERSICAE; INSECT MEMBRANES;
   COLONY GROWTH; CLOTHIANIDIN; BINDING; CONSERVATION; HYMENOPTERA;
   DECLINES; EXPOSURE}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology; Toxicology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Environmental Sciences; Toxicology}},
Author-Email = {{il219@exeter.ac.uk}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Serrano, Jose/A-2854-2009
   }},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Serrano, Jose/0000-0002-1565-5216
   O'Shea-Wheller, Thomas/0000-0002-5537-2659}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)NERC Natural Environment
   Research Council}},
Funding-Text = {{Ian Laycock was supported by a studentship from the Natural Environment
   Research Council (NERC).}},
Cited-References = {{Biesmeijer JC, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P351, DOI 10.1126/science.1127863.
   Blacquiere T, 2012, ECOTOXICOLOGY, V21, P973, DOI 10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x.
   Brown LA, 2006, J NEUROCHEM, V99, P608, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04084.x.
   Burkle LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1611, DOI 10.1126/science.1232728.
   Cho SR, 2011, J KOREAN SOC APPL BI, V54, P889, DOI 10.3839/jksabc.2011.135.
   Cresswell JE, 2012, ZOOLOGY, V115, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.zool.2012.05.003.
   Deglise P, 2002, NEUROSCI LETT, V321, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02400-4.
   Devine GJ, 1996, PESTIC SCI, V48, P57, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199609)48:1\<57::AID-PS435\>3.0.CO;2-9.
   Dively GP, 2012, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V60, P4449, DOI 10.1021/jf205393x.
   Elbert A, 2008, PEST MANAG SCI, V64, P1099, DOI 10.1002/ps.1616.
   Elston C, 2013, APIDOLOGIE, V44, P563, DOI 10.1007/s13592-013-0206-9.
   European Food Safety Authority, 2012, EFSA J, V10, DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2752.
   European Food Safety Authority, 2013, EFSA J, V11, DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295.
   FERA (The Food and Environment Research Agency), 2013, PEST US STAT.
   Franklin MT, 2004, J ECON ENTOMOL, V97, P369, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.369.
   Gill RJ, 2012, NATURE, V491, P105, DOI 10.1038/nature11585.
   Henry M, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P348, DOI 10.1126/science.1215039.
   Hoyle M, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2123, DOI 10.1890/06-1972.1.
   Ihaka R., 1996, J COMPUTATIONAL GRAP, V5, P299, DOI DOI 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713.
   Ihara M, 2006, J PESTIC SCI, V31, P35, DOI 10.1584/jpestics.31.35.
   Iwasa T, 2004, CROP PROT, V23, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.018.
   Kayser H, 2004, PEST MANAG SCI, V60, P945, DOI 10.1002/ps.919.
   LAMBERT D, 1992, TECHNOMETRICS, V34, P1, DOI 10.2307/1269547.
   Laycock I, 2012, ECOTOXICOLOGY, V21, P1937, DOI 10.1007/s10646-012-0927-y.
   Magalhaes LC, 2008, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V128, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00718.x.
   Maxim L., 2013, LATE LESSONS EARLY W.
   Mommaerts V, 2010, ECOTOXICOLOGY, V19, P207, DOI 10.1007/s10646-009-0406-2.
   MULLER CB, 1992, ECOL ENTOMOL, V17, P343, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1992.tb01068.x.
   Nauen R, 2003, PESTIC BIOCHEM PHYS, V76, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0048-3575(03)00065-8.
   NAUEN R, 1995, PESTIC SCI, V44, P145, DOI 10.1002/ps.2780440207.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Prabhaker N, 2011, J ECON ENTOMOL, V104, P773, DOI 10.1603/EC10362.
   Schneider CW, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030023.
   Shardlow M., 2013, REV RECENT RES RELAT.
   Stoner KA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039114.
   Tasei JN, 2000, PEST MANAG SCI, V56, P784, DOI 10.1002/1526-4998(200009)56:9<784::AID-PS208>3.0.CO;2-T.
   Thany SH, 2011, NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, V60, P587, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.12.008.
   Thompson H., 2013, EFFECTS NEONICOTINOI.
   Vanbergen AJ, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P251, DOI 10.1890/120126.
   Wellmann H, 2004, PEST MANAG SCI, V60, P959, DOI 10.1002/ps.920.
   Westphal C, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01580.x.
   Whitehorn PR, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P351, DOI 10.1126/science.1215025.
   Wiesner P, 2000, J BIOCHEM MOL TOXIC, V14, P221, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0461(2000)14:4<221::AID-JBT7>3.0.CO;2-6.
   Williams PH, 2009, APIDOLOGIE, V40, P367, DOI 10.1051/apido/2009025.
   Winfree R, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1195, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{45}},
Times-Cited = {{46}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{204}},
Journal-ISO = {{Ecotox. Environ. Safe.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{296BV}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000330161000021}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000330257800009,
Author = {Ntanos, C. and Botsikas, C. and Rovis, G. and Kakavas, P. and Askounis,
   D.},
Title = {{A context awareness framework for cross-platform distributed
   applications}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{88}},
Pages = {{138-146}},
Month = {{FEB}},
Abstract = {{With the introduction of interconnected cross-platform middleware, a new
   area of opportunities for ubiquitous/pervasive computing has emerged.
   Context aware applications can be enhanced to practically and
   realistically incorporate multiple facets of human-machine interactions
   in everyday life that are not limited to a device-centered model for
   deducing context. In this paper, we propose that they can rather extend
   this model to a human-centered, device and platform independent model,
   based on a personal distributed application and data cloud ecosystem.
   For this to be achieved, webinos, a set of web runtime extensions that
   enable web applications and services to be used and shared consistently
   and securely over a broad spectrum of converged and connected devices,
   is used to provide this ecosystem. The webinos Context Awareness
   Framework described here is accessible to each webinos-enabled
   application. After strict policy enforcement, it can collect contextual
   information, either via an automatic mechanism that intercepts native
   calls made by webinos applications through the various webinos APIs, via
   an automatic polling mechanism to these APIs, or via custom,
   application-specific context schema extensions. It can then distribute
   the contextual information from its own personal cloud storage
   mechanism, in the form of simple, manageable and intuitive Context
   Objects, to and from all webinos-enabled devices owned by the same user,
   or even other, authorized users. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights
   reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC}},
Address = {{STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Ntanos, C (Corresponding Author), Natl Tech Univ Athens, Elect \& Comp Engn Dept, 9 Iroon Polytech Str, Athens 15780, Greece.
   Ntanos, C.; Botsikas, C.; Rovis, G.; Kakavas, P.; Askounis, D., Natl Tech Univ Athens, Elect \& Comp Engn Dept, Athens 15780, Greece.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.jss.2013.10.018}},
ISSN = {{0164-1212}},
EISSN = {{1873-1228}},
Keywords = {{Context awareness; Webinos; Cross-platform}},
Keywords-Plus = {{MIDDLEWARE}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Software Engineering; Computer Science, Theory \&
   Methods}},
Author-Email = {{cntanos@epu.ntua.gr
   cbot@epu.ntua.gr
   askous@epu.ntua.gr}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Ntanos, Christos/0000-0002-5162-6500}},
Cited-References = {{Athanasopoulos Dionysis, 2008, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, V4, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.pmcj.2007.12.004.
   Bardram J.E., 2004, JAVA CONTEXT AWARENE, P98.
   Botsikas A., 2012, HEART RATE MONITOR S.
   Capra L, 2003, IEEE T SOFTWARE ENG, V29, P929, DOI 10.1109/TSE.2003.1237173.
   Dey AK, 2001, HUM-COMPUT INTERACT, V16, P97, DOI 10.1207/S15327051HCI16234\_02.
   Dey AK, 2001, PERS UBIQUIT COMPUT, V5, P4, DOI 10.1007/s007790170019.
   Gu T, 2005, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V28, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2004.06.002.
   Han B, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3358, P519.
   Henricksen  Karen, 2006, P INT WORKSH MIDDL S, P60, DOI {[}10.1145/1176866.1176877, DOI 10.1145/1176866.1176877].
   Hofer T., 2003, CONTEXT AWARENESS MO.
   Kim H, 2005, 2005 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, P237.
   Kofod-Petersen A, 2005, CONTEXT REPRESENTATI.
   Ngo HQ, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3207, P672.
   Norberg PA, 2007, J CONSUM AFF, V41, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x.
   Roman M., 2002, IEEE Pervasive Computing, V1, P74, DOI 10.1109/MPRV.2002.1158281.
   Truong HL, 2009, INT J WEB INF SYST, V5, P5, DOI 10.1108/17440080910947295.
   Vergori P., 2013, MOBILE COMPUTING APP, V110, P391.
   Voulgaris G., 2011, WEBINOS FACTSHEET.
   webinos, 2012, CARD HILLS REM SENS.
   webinos, 2013, WEB DEV AP WORK REP.
   Yamabe T, 2005, 11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED AND REAL-TIME COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, P489, DOI 10.1109/RTCSA.2005.32.
   Yau SS, 2004, J PARALLEL DISTR COM, V64, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.jpdc.2003.10.007.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{22}},
Times-Cited = {{7}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{17}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Syst. Softw.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{297LV}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000330257800009}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000330016400008,
Author = {Campbell, D. R. and Forster, M. and Bischoff, M.},
Title = {{Selection of trait combinations through bee and fly visitation to
   flowers of Polemonium follosissimum}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{27}},
Number = {{2}},
Pages = {{325-336}},
Month = {{FEB}},
Abstract = {{Pollinators are known to exert natural selection on floral traits, but
   the extent to which combinations of floral traits are subject to
   correlational selection (nonadditive effects of two traits on fitness)
   is not well understood. Over two years, we used phenotypic manipulations
   of plant traits to test for effects of flower colour, flower shape and
   their interaction on rates of pollinator visitation to Polemonium
   foliosissimum. We also tested for correlational selection based on
   weighting visitation by the amount of conspecific pollen delivered per
   visit by each category of insect visitor. Although bumblebees were the
   presumed pollinators, solitary bees and flies contributed substantially
   (42\%) to pollination. In manipulations of one trait at a time, insects
   visited flowers presenting the natural colour and shape over flowers
   manipulated to present artificial mutants with either paler colour or a
   more open or more tubular flower. When both colour and shape were
   manipulated in combination, selection on both traits arose, with
   bumblebees responding mainly to colour and flies responding mainly to
   shape. Despite selection on both floral traits, in a year with many
   bumblebees, we saw no evidence for correlational selection of these
   traits. In a year when flies predominated, fly visitation showed a
   pattern of correlational selection, but not favouring the natural
   phenotype, and correlational selection was still not detected for
   expected pollen receipt. These results show that flower colour and shape
   are subject to pollinator-mediated selection and that correlational
   selection can be generated based on pollinator visitation alone, but
   provide no evidence for correlational selection specifically for the
   current phenotype.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Campbell, DR (Corresponding Author), Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol \& Evolutionary Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
   Campbell, D. R.; Bischoff, M., Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol \& Evolutionary Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
   Campbell, D. R.; Forster, M.; Bischoff, M., Rocky Mt Biol Labs, Crested Butte, CO USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1111/jeb.12295}},
ISSN = {{1010-061X}},
EISSN = {{1420-9101}},
Keywords = {{correlational selection; flower colour; flower shape; phenotypic
   manipulation; Polemonium; pollinator effectiveness; pollinator
   visitation; temporal variation in selection}},
Keywords-Plus = {{POLLINATOR-MEDIATED SELECTION; PHENOTYPIC SELECTION; FLORAL DISPLAY;
   REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; NATURAL-SELECTION; SEED PREDATORS; SPUR LENGTH;
   COLOR; PLANT; SIZE}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics \&
   Heredity}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Ecology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics \& Heredity}},
Author-Email = {{drcampbe@uci.edu}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Campbell, Diane/A-1653-2012}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Campbell, Diane/0000-0002-1147-846X}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation (NSF) {[}DBI
   0753774]; RMBL}},
Funding-Text = {{We are grateful to Kirsten Dales for help with field work; Kenneth Chang
   and Stephanie Fong for assistance with counts of pollen loads; and
   Jarrod Hadfield and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an
   earlier version of the manuscript. Funding was provided by National
   Science Foundation Grant DBI 0753774 to the Rocky Mountain Biological
   Laboratory and a RMBL Research Fellowship to D. Campbell.}},
Cited-References = {{Alarcon R, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P1796, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16987.x.
   Armbruster WS, 1996, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V9, P261, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9030261.x.
   Ashman TL, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P2408, DOI 10.1890/03-8024.
   Benitez-Vieyra S, 2006, FUNCT ECOL, V20, P948, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01179.x.
   Benitez-Vieyra S, 2012, EVOL ECOL, V26, P1451, DOI 10.1007/s10682-012-9565-3.
   Boberg E, 2009, FUNCT ECOL, V23, P1022, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01595.x.
   Briscoe AD, 2001, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V46, P471, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.471.
   Brody AK, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P1624, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078{[}1624:EOPHAS]2.0.CO;2.
   Brody AK, 1995, OIKOS, V74, P447, DOI 10.2307/3545989.
   Campbell DR, 2012, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V25, P352, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02430.x.
   Campbell DR, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P2638, DOI 10.1890/09-0941.1.
   Campbell DR, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1557, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp032.
   Campbell DR, 2002, OECOLOGIA, V131, P436, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-0900-1.
   CAMPBELL DR, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P318, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04230.x.
   CRESSWELL JE, 1991, AM NAT, V138, P1342, DOI 10.1086/285290.
   Cuartas-Dominguez M, 2010, FUNCT ECOL, V24, P1219, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01737.x.
   Dudash MR, 2011, AM J BOT, V98, P275, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1000350.
   Dyer AG, 2004, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V190, P105, DOI 10.1007/s00359-003-0475-2.
   Faegri K. L, 1966, PRINCIPLES POLLINATI.
   GALEN C, 1987, OECOLOGIA, V74, P20, DOI 10.1007/BF00377340.
   GALEN C, 1985, ECOLOGY, V66, P792, DOI 10.2307/1940540.
   Gomez JM, 2006, AM NAT, V168, P531, DOI 10.1086/507048.
   Hansen DM, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P634, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.1349.
   HARDER LD, 1983, OECOLOGIA, V57, P274, DOI 10.1007/BF00379591.
   Herrera CM, 2001, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V14, P574, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00314.x.
   Jones AG, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P1747.
   Kessler D, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P1200, DOI 10.1126/science.1160072.
   King C, 2013, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V4, P811, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12074.
   Kingsolver JG, 2001, AM NAT, V157, P245, DOI 10.1086/319193.
   Kulbaba MW, 2012, EVOLUTION, V66, P1344, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01536.x.
   Leonard AS, 2011, CURR ZOOL, V57, P215, DOI 10.1093/czoolo/57.2.215.
   Maad J, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P112, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00012.x.
   Makino TT, 2007, FUNCT ECOL, V21, P854, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01293.x.
   Mayfield MM, 2001, ANN BOT-LONDON, V88, P591, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2001.1500.
   McGlothlin JW, 2010, EVOLUTION, V64, P1377, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00914.x.
   Mojica JP, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P2945, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0568.
   Ne'eman G, 2010, BIOL REV, V85, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00108.x.
   O'Connell LM, 1998, ECOLOGY, V79, P1246, DOI 10.2307/176740.
   Perez F, 2007, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V20, P1730, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01393.x.
   PHILLIPS PC, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P1209, DOI {[}10.2307/2409357, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02569.x].
   Pohl NB, 2011, ECOL ENTOMOL, V36, P290, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01271.x.
   Price MV, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P2106, DOI 10.1890/04-1274.
   R Core Team, 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Raguso RA, 2005, ANIM BEHAV, V69, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.04.015.
   Raguso RA, 2008, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V39, P549, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095601.
   RAUSHER MD, 1992, EVOLUTION, V46, P616, DOI {[}10.2307/2409632, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02070.x].
   Reynolds RJ, 2010, EVOLUTION, V64, P358, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00805.x.
   Robertson IC, 2011, ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTE, V5, P379, DOI 10.1007/s11829-011-9142-7.
   Roff DA, 2012, EVOLUTION, V66, P2953, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01656.x.
   Sletvold N, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P2167, DOI 10.1890/11-0791.1.
   WASER NM, 1985, OECOLOGIA, V67, P121, DOI 10.1007/BF00378462.
   WASER NM, 1983, NATURE, V302, P422, DOI 10.1038/302422a0.
   WILSON P, 1995, BIOL J LINN SOC, V55, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01071.x.
   Worley AC, 2009, SYST BOT, V34, P149, DOI 10.1600/036364409787602267.
   ZIMMERMAN M, 1980, ECOLOGY, V61, P497, DOI 10.2307/1937414.
   Zimmerman M, 1998, J INSECT BEHAV, V11, P371, DOI 10.1023/A:1020902714225.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{56}},
Times-Cited = {{12}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{64}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Evol. Biol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{294BC}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000330016400008}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000331773100011,
Author = {Stout, Jane C. yy and Casey, Leanne M.},
Title = {{Relative abundance of an invasive alien plant affects insect-flower
   interaction networks in Ireland}},
Journal = {{ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{55}},
Pages = {{78-85}},
Month = {{FEB}},
Abstract = {{1. Invasive alien flowering plants may affect native plant pollinator
   interactions and have knock on impacts on populations of native plants
   and animals. The magnitude of these impacts, however, may be modified by
   the relative abundance of the invasive plant and the number of flowers
   it presents.
   2. We tested this by examining the structure of insect flower
   interaction networks in six sites with increasing levels of invasion by
   Rhododendron ponticum in Ireland.
   3. Neither flower-visiting insect abundance, species richness nor
   diversity were related to R. ponticum flower abundance, but the
   composition of insect communities was. The total number of flowers in a
   site increased with the relative abundance of R. ponticum flowers but
   the number of co-flowering native plant species in these sites was low
   (<6), making interaction networks relatively small.
   4. As a result,,changes in interaction network properties (connectance,
   interaction evenness and network level specialisation), which correlated
   with R. ponticum flower abundance, were a result of the small network
   size rather than due to changes in the resilience of networks.
   5. Overall, we conclude that the impacts of invasive alien plants on
   native plant-pollinator interactions are not only species specific, but
   site specific, according to the abundance of flowers produced by both
   the invasive and the native plants. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All
   rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV}},
Address = {{PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Stout, JC (Corresponding Author), Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nat Sci, Bot Bldg, Dublin 2, Ireland.
   Stout, Jane C. yy, Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nat Sci, Dublin 2, Ireland.
   Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Ctr Biodivers Res, Dublin 2, Ireland.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.actao.2013.12.002}},
ISSN = {{1146-609X}},
EISSN = {{1873-6238}},
Keywords = {{Bombus; Connectance; Generality; Interaction evenness; Plant invasion;
   Plant-pollinator networks}},
Keywords-Plus = {{ANIMAL MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS; RHODODENDRON-PONTICUM L.; POLLINATOR
   NETWORKS; ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS; EXOTIC SHRUB; WEB; SPECIALIZATION;
   ESTABLISHMENT; BIODIVERSITY; METAANALYSIS}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Ecology}},
Author-Email = {{stoutj@tcd.ie}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Stout, Jane/AAS-8867-2020
   Stout, Jane C/B-1631-2010}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Stout, Jane/0000-0002-2027-0863
   Stout, Jane C/0000-0002-2027-0863}},
Cited-References = {{Aizen MA, 2008, PLOS BIOL, V6, P396, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060031.
   Bartomeus I, 2008, OECOLOGIA, V155, P761, DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0946-1.
   Bascompte J, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P431, DOI 10.1126/science.1123412.
   Bascompte J, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P9383, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1633576100.
   Bascompte J, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P567, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818.
   Bersier LF, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2394, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}2394:QDOFWM]2.0.CO;2.
   Bjerknes AL, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V138, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.015.
   Bluthgen N, 2007, CURR BIOL, V17, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.039.
   Bluethgen Nico, 2006, BMC Ecology, V6, P9, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9.
   Brown BJ, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2328, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}2328:CFPBAI]2.0.CO;2.
   BROWN J. M. B., 1953, QUART JOUR FOREST, V47, P239.
   Carolan JC, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029251.
   Chittka L, 2001, NATURE, V411, P653, DOI 10.1038/35079676.
   COLAK AH, 1998, J PRACT ECOL CONSERV, V2, P34.
   CROSS J R, 1975, Journal of Ecology, V63, P345, DOI 10.2307/2258859.
   CROSS JR, 1981, J ECOL, V69, P807, DOI 10.2307/2259638.
   CROSS JR, 1982, J LIFE SCI R DUBL S, V3, P209.
   Dicks LV, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P32, DOI 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00572.x.
   Dietzsch AC, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V167, P469, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-1987-z.
   Dormann C. F., 2009, OPEN ECOLOGY J, V2, P7, DOI DOI 10.2174/1874213000902010007.
   Erfmeier A, 2010, BIOL INVASIONS, V12, P657, DOI 10.1007/s10530-009-9472-x.
   Fang Q, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032663.
   Gibson RH, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P822, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18927.x.
   Hegland SJ, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P2092, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.018.
   JORDANO P, 1987, AM NAT, V129, P657, DOI 10.1086/284665.
   Jordano P, 2006, PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS: FROM SPECIALIZATION TO GENERALIZATION, P173.
   Kaiser-Bunbury CN, 2011, J ECOL, V99, P202, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01732.x.
   Kaiser-Bunbury CN, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P442, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01437.x.
   Kaiser-Bunbury CN, 2009, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V11, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2009.04.001.
   Knight ME, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P1811, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x.
   Morales CL, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P716, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01319.x.
   Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x.
   Memmott J, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P2605, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909.
   Memmott J, 2002, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V269, P2395, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2174.
   Milne RI, 2000, MOL ECOL, V9, P541, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00906.x.
   Morales CL, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01069.x.
   Moron D, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P1322, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.036.
   Munoz AA, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P459, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01361.x.
   Murray TE, 2008, CONSERV GENET, V9, P653, DOI 10.1007/s10592-007-9394-z.
   National Biodiversity Data Centre, 2010, ID GUID IR BUMBL.
   Nienhuis Caroline Marijke, 2009, Journal of Pollination Ecology, V1, P1.
   Nienhuis CM, 2009, APIDOLOGIE, V40, P450, DOI 10.1051/apido/2009005.
   Olesen JM, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P1573, DOI 10.1890/07-0451.1.
   Olesen JM, 2002, DIVERS DISTRIB, V8, P181, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00148.x.
   Parker IM, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P1457, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078{[}1457:PLOCSS]2.0.CO;2.
   Petanidou T, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P564, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x.
   Power EF, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01949.x.
   {*}R DEV COR TEAM, 2007, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Rathcke B., 1983, P305.
   Shackleton J., 2004, GUIDE BUTTERFLIES IR.
   Stace C.A., 2010, NEW FLORA BRIT ISLES.
   Stang M, 2006, OIKOS, V112, P111, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14199.x.
   Stang M, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1459, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp027.
   Stephenson CM, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V193, P747, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.09.007.
   Stout JC, 2007, BOT J LINN SOC, V155, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00719.x.
   Stout JC, 2009, APIDOLOGIE, V40, P388, DOI 10.1051/apido/2009023.
   Stout JC, 2007, APIDOLOGIE, V38, P198, DOI 10.1051/apido:2006071.
   Stout JC, 2006, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V15, P755, DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-1065-5.
   Stubbs A.E., 1983, BRIT HOVERFLIES ILLU.
   Tepedino V, 2008, NAT AREA J, V28, P44, DOI 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28{[}44:MFOIPI]2.0.CO;2.
   Traveset A, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006.
   Tylianakis JM, 2007, NATURE, V445, P202, DOI 10.1038/nature05429.
   Tylianakis JM, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P2270, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.004.
   Valentine D. H., 1978, The pollination of flowers by insects, P117.
   Vazquez DP, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1445, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp057.
   Vila M, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P702, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x.
   Vila M, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P3887, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.1076.
   Waring P., 2003, FIELD GUIDE MOTHS GR.
   Westphal C, 2008, ECOL MONOGR, V78, P653, DOI 10.1890/07-1292.1.
   Wolf S., 2009, APIDOLOGIE.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{70}},
Times-Cited = {{5}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{90}},
Journal-ISO = {{Acta Oecol.-Int. J. Ecol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{AB4PT}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000331773100011}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000334002700004,
Author = {Garratt, M. P. D. and Breeze, T. D. and Jenner, N. and Polce, C. and
   Biesmeijer, J. C. and Potts, S. G.},
Title = {{Avoiding a bad apple: Insect pollination enhances fruit quality and
   economic value}},
Journal = {{AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS \& ENVIRONMENT}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{184}},
Pages = {{34-40}},
Month = {{FEB 1}},
Abstract = {{Insect pollination is important for food production globally and apples
   are one of the major fruit crops which are reliant on this ecosystem
   service. It is fundamentally important that the full range of benefits
   of insect pollination to crop production are understood, if the costs of
   interventions aiming to enhance pollination are to be compared against
   the costs of the interventions themselves. Most previous studies have
   simply assessed the benefits of pollination to crop yield and ignored
   quality benefits and how these translate through to economic values. In
   the present study we examine the influence of insect pollination
   services on farmgate output of two important UK apple varieties; Gala
   and Cox. Using field experiments, we quantify the influence of insect
   pollination on yield and importantly quality and whether either may be
   limited by sub-optimal insect pollination. Using an expanded bioeconomic
   model we value insect pollination to UK apple production and establish
   the potential for improvement through pollination service management. We
   show that insects are essential in the production of both varieties of
   apple in the UK and contribute a total of 36.7 pound million per annum,
   over 6 pound million more than the value calculated using more
   conventional dependence ratio methods. Insect pollination not only
   affects the quantity of production but can also have marked impacts on
   the quality of apples, influencing size, shape and effecting their
   classification for market. These effects are variety specific however.
   Due to the influence of pollination on both yield and quality in Gala,
   there is potential for insect pollination services to improve UK output
   by up to 5.7 pound million per annum. Our research shows that continued
   pollinator decline could have serious financial implications for the
   apple industry but there is considerable scope through management of
   wild pollinators or using managed pollinator augmentation, to improve
   the quality of production. Furthermore, we show that it is critically
   important to consider all production parameters including quality,
   varietal differences and management costs when valuing the pollination
   service of any crop so investment in pollinator management can be
   proportional to its contribution. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by
   Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV}},
Address = {{PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Garratt, MPD (Corresponding Author), Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy \& Dev, Ctr Agri Environm Res, Reading RG6 2AH, Berks, England.
   Garratt, M. P. D.; Breeze, T. D.; Potts, S. G., Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy \& Dev, Ctr Agri Environm Res, Reading RG6 2AH, Berks, England.
   Polce, C.; Biesmeijer, J. C., Univ Leeds, Fac Biol Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.032}},
ISSN = {{0167-8809}},
EISSN = {{1873-2305}},
Keywords = {{Apples; Pollination; Economic valuation; Pollinators; Pollination
   deficit; Apple quality; United Kingdom}},
Keywords-Plus = {{ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SEED NUMBER; HYMENOPTERA APIDAE; BEES HYMENOPTERA;
   HONEY-BEES; LANDSCAPES; DECLINES; YIELD; WILD; SET}},
Research-Areas = {{Agriculture; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Ecology; Environmental Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{m.p.garratt@reading.ac.uk}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Garratt, Michael/AAT-2259-2020
   Potts, Simon G/C-7250-2008
   }},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Garratt, Michael/0000-0002-0196-6013
   Potts, Simon G/0000-0002-2045-980X
   Breeze, Tom/0000-0002-8929-8354}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{BBSRCBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC);
   DefraDepartment for Environment, Food \& Rural Affairs (DEFRA); NERCNERC
   Natural Environment Research Council; Scottish Government; Wellcome
   Trust, under the Insect Pollinators InitiativeWellcome Trust; Norman
   Collett Ltd.; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
   CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
   {[}BB/I000348/1, BB/I000275/1] Funding Source: Researchfish}},
Funding-Text = {{This research was funded jointly by a grant from BBSRC, Defra, NERC, the
   Scottish Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the Insect Pollinators
   Initiative. We would like to thank Duncan Coston, Louise Truslove,
   Rebecca Evans, Cassie Dodson, Ellen Moss, Siddhi Deshmukh and Sarah
   Facey for involvement in the research. We would also like to thank Robin
   Dean and Stuart Roberts for help and advice, as well as Norman Collett
   Ltd. for support with the research and all growers involved in the
   study.}},
Cited-References = {{Abson DJ, 2011, CONSERV BIOL, V25, P250, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01623.x.
   Allsopp MH, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128.
   Biesmeijer JC, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P351, DOI 10.1126/science.1127863.
   Bommarco R, 2013, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V28, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012.
   Bommarco R, 2012, OECOLOGIA, V169, P1025, DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2271-6.
   Bos MM, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P1841, DOI 10.1890/06-1763.1.
   Brookfield PL, 1996, J HORTIC SCI, V71, P265, DOI 10.1080/14620316.1996.11515405.
   Buccheri M, 2004, J PLANT NUTR, V27, P1735, DOI 10.1081/PLN-200026409.
   Cameron SA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P662, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014743108.
   Carreck N, 1998, BEE WORLD, V79, P115, DOI 10.1080/0005772X.1998.11099393.
   Carreck NL, 1997, BEE WORLD, V78, P67, DOI 10.1080/0005772X.1997.11099337.
   Chacoff NP, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P18, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01116.x.
   CHAGNON M, 1993, J ECON ENTOMOL, V86, P416, DOI 10.1093/jee/86.2.416.
   Conway WS, 2002, ACTA HORTIC, P413, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.594.53.
   DEFRA, 2012, BAS HORT STAT.
   DEFRA, 2012, ORCH FRUIT SURV.
   DEFRA, 2012, FOOD IND.
   DEFRA, 2013, NAT AV WHOL PRIC SEL.
   Delaplane KS, 2000, CROP POLLINATION BEE.
   FAOStat, 2013, CROPS.
   FREE JB, 1964, NATURE, V201, P726, DOI 10.1038/201726b0.
   Gallai N, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014.
   Garibaldi LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1608, DOI 10.1126/science.1230200.
   Garibaldi LA, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P1062, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x.
   Holzschuh A, 2012, BIOL CONSERV, V153, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.032.
   Isaacs R, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P841, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01823.x.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Ladurner E, 2004, J APICULT RES, V43, P118, DOI 10.1080/00218839.2004.11101121.
   Magalhaes CB, 2013, APIDOLOGIE, V44, P234, DOI 10.1007/s13592-012-0175-4.
   Matsumoto S, 2007, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V82, P323, DOI 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512236.
   Matsumoto S, 2012, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V137, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.01.033.
   Pando JB, 2011, ENTOMOL RES, V41, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-5967.2011.00334.x.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Potts SG, 2010, J APICULT RES, V49, P15, DOI 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.02.
   Pritchard KD, 2006, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V81, P78, DOI 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512032.
   Serrano AR, 2006, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V110, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.06.024.
   Roselino AC, 2009, GENET MOL RES, V8, P539, DOI 10.4238/vol8-2kerr005.
   Sheffield CS, 2008, CAN ENTOMOL, V140, P589.
   Smith P., 2011, UK NATL ECOSYSTEM AG.
   Soltesz M, 1997, ACTA HORTIC, P445, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.437.60.
   SOUTHWICK EE, 1992, J ECON ENTOMOL, V85, P621, DOI 10.1093/jee/85.3.621.
   Stern RA, 2001, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V76, P17, DOI 10.1080/14620316.2001.11511320.
   Vanengelsdorp D, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004071.
   Volz RK, 1996, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V66, P169, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4238(96)00934-X.
   Watson JC, 2011, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V40, P621, DOI 10.1603/EN10231.
   Winfree R, 2011, ECOL ECON, V71, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.001.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{46}},
Times-Cited = {{109}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{4}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{219}},
Journal-ISO = {{Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{AE5BL}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000334002700004}},
OA = {{Green Published, Other Gold, Green Accepted}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000330237000092,
Author = {Leong, Misha and Kremen, Claire and Roderick, George K.},
Title = {{Pollinator Interactions with Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis)
   across Urban, Agricultural, and Natural Landscapes}},
Journal = {{PLOS ONE}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{9}},
Number = {{1}},
Month = {{JAN 17}},
Abstract = {{Pollinator-plant relationships are found to be particularly vulnerable
   to land use change. Yet despite extensive research in agricultural and
   natural systems, less attention has focused on these interactions in
   neighboring urban areas and its impact on pollination services. We
   investigated pollinator-plant interactions in a peri-urban landscape on
   the outskirts of the San Francisco Bay Area, California, where urban,
   agricultural, and natural land use types interface. We made standardized
   observations of floral visitation and measured seed set of yellow
   starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a common grassland invasive, to
   test the hypotheses that increasing urbanization decreases 1) rates of
   bee visitation, 2) viable seed set, and 3) the efficiency of pollination
   (relationship between bee visitation and seed set). We unexpectedly
   found that bee visitation was highest in urban and agricultural land use
   contexts, but in contrast, seed set rates in these human-altered
   landscapes were lower than in natural sites. An explanation for the
   discrepancy between floral visitation and seed set is that higher plant
   diversity in urban and agricultural areas, as a result of more
   introduced species, decreases pollinator efficiency. If these patterns
   are consistent across other plant species, the novel plant communities
   created in these managed landscapes and the generalist bee species that
   are favored by human-altered environments will reduce pollination
   services.}},
Publisher = {{PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE}},
Address = {{1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Leong, M (Corresponding Author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy \& Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   Leong, Misha; Kremen, Claire; Roderick, George K., Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy \& Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0086357}},
Article-Number = {{e86357}},
ISSN = {{1932-6203}},
Keywords-Plus = {{CARABID BEETLE ASSEMBLAGES; POLLEN LIMITATION; CROP POLLINATION;
   INVASIVE PLANT; GLOBAL CHANGE; NATIVE BEES; BIODIVERSITY; SERVICES;
   URBANIZATION; CONSERVATION}},
Research-Areas = {{Science \& Technology - Other Topics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Multidisciplinary Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{mishaleong@berkeley.edu}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Roderick, George/0000-0001-7557-2415}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Margaret C. Walker Fund; Department of Environmental Science Policy and
   Management; Essig Museum of Entomology; Berkeley Institute for Global
   Change Biology; Gordon and Betty Moore FoundationGordon and Betty Moore
   Foundation; UC Berkeley's Undergraduate Research Apprentice Program}},
Funding-Text = {{This work was supported by The Margaret C. Walker Fund, Department of
   Environmental Science Policy and Management, Essig Museum of Entomology,
   the Berkeley Institute for Global Change Biology, the Gordon and Betty
   Moore Foundation, and UC Berkeley's Undergraduate Research Apprentice
   Program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and
   analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.}},
Cited-References = {{Allen-Wardell G, 1998, CONSERV BIOL, V12, P8.
   Ash C, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P739, DOI 10.1126/science.319.5864.739.
   Barnosky AD, 2012, NATURE, V486, P52, DOI 10.1038/nature11018.
   Barthell JF, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P1870, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011{[}1870:POSSIY]2.0.CO;2.
   Bates D, 2011, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF.
   Bjerknes AL, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V138, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.015.
   Boone CG, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST, V15, P795, DOI 10.1007/s11252-012-0240-9.
   Chittka L, 1999, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V86, P361, DOI 10.1007/s001140050636.
   Deguines N, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045822.
   Dray S, 2007, J STAT SOFTW, V22, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v022.i04.
   Engel EC, 2003, AM J BOT, V90, P1612, DOI 10.3732/ajb.90.11.1612.
   ERRINGTON A, 1994, J RURAL STUD, V10, P367, DOI 10.1016/0743-0167(94)90046-9.
   Gallai N, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014.
   Garibaldi LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1608, DOI 10.1126/science.1230200.
   Gathmann A, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P757, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00641.x.
   Gill S.E., 2007, BUILT ENV, V33, P115, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115.
   Grabas GP, 1999, ECOSCIENCE, V6, P230, DOI 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682524.
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195.
   Guise V, 2011, 2011 ANN CROP LIVEST.
   Hennig EI, 2011, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V13, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.03.003.
   Hoehn P, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P2283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.0405.
   Hooper DU, 2005, ECOL MONOGR, V75, P3, DOI 10.1890/04-0922.
   Kearns C.A., 1993, TECHNIQUES POLLINATI.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Knight TM, 2005, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V36, P467, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320.
   Kollin C, 1991, BALANCE WEIGHING BEN.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Kremen C, 2011, CONSERV BIOL, V25, P607, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.x.
   Kremen C, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P299, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x.
   Leong M, 2013, DRYAD DIGITAL REPOSI.
   Lonsdorf E, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1589, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp069.
   Magura T, 2004, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V19, P747, DOI 10.1007/s10980-005-1128-4.
   Mciver J, 2009, WEED BIOL MANAG, V9, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2009.00331.x.
   McKinney M. L., 2008, Urban Ecosystems, V11, P161, DOI 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4.
   Morandin LA, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P829, DOI 10.1890/12-1051.1.
   Niemela J, 2002, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V17, P387, DOI 10.1023/A:1021270121630.
   Oksanen  J, 2011, VEGAN COMMUNITY ECOL.
   Ollerton J, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
   Pauw A, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P1759, DOI 10.1890/06-1383.1.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Ricketts TH, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P499, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x.
   Sampson BJ, 2000, J ECON ENTOMOL, V93, P1726, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-93.6.1726.
   Sax DF, 2002, AM NAT, V160, P766, DOI 10.1086/343877.
   SCHEMSKE DW, 1984, SCIENCE, V225, P519, DOI 10.1126/science.225.4661.519.
   Shochat E, 2010, BIOSCIENCE, V60, P199, DOI 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6.
   Stout JC, 2009, APIDOLOGIE.
   Swope SM, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P2122, DOI 10.1890/12-0131.1.
   Tscheulin T, 2013, BIOL INVASIONS, V15, P385, DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0293-y.
   Tylianakis JM, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P1351, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x.
   Vanbergen AJ, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P251, DOI 10.1890/120126.
   Vazquez DP, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P1088, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x.
   Westerkamp C, 1991, PLANT SYSTEMATICS EV.
   Whittington R, 2004, J ECON ENTOMOL, V97, P1384, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-97.4.1384.
   Williams NM, 2011, BASIC APPL ECOL, V12, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2010.11.008.
   WILSON LM, 2003, BIOL BIOL CONTROL YE.
   Winfree R, 2009, P ROYAL SOC B, V276, P1.
   Winfree R, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P213, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00574.x.
   Wojcik VA, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST, V15, P581, DOI 10.1007/s11252-011-0211-6.
   Zurbuchen A, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P669, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.003.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{59}},
Times-Cited = {{31}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{183}},
Journal-ISO = {{PLoS One}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{297EA}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000330237000092}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000328802700021,
Author = {Larcombe, Matthew J. and Barbour, Robert C. and Vaillancourt, Rene E.
   and Potts, Brad M.},
Title = {{Assessing the risk of exotic gene flow from Eucalyptus globulus
   plantations to native E-ovata forests}},
Journal = {{FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{312}},
Pages = {{193-202}},
Month = {{JAN 15}},
Abstract = {{The recent rapid expansion of Eucalyptus plantations in Australia has
   raised concern that exotic gene flow could pose a genetic risk to
   indigenous eucalypt species. The most widely used plantation species
   Eucalyptus globulus, now covers about 538,000 ha of southern Australia.
   Eucalyptus ovata is a common plantation neighbour, and this paper
   assesses the likelihood of exotic gene flow from E. globulus plantations
   to remnant E. ovata forests by assessing three key processes. Firstly,
   the effect of patch size on the rate of F-1 hybridisation was
   investigated. Open pollinated seed was collected off native E. ovate
   trees from five patch-size classes in and around plantations (142 trees
   from 25 patches). Hybridisation was then assessed in 24,322 open
   pollinated progeny. The overall rate of exotic hybridisation was 1.62\%,
   with small patches having higher rates than larger patches, as did trees
   on the edges of patches and paddock trees in open pasture 50-200 m from
   the plantation edge. Secondly, natural hybrid establishment was
   investigated along 3.9 km of plantation-native forest boundary that was
   classified as being high risk for hybridisation and establishment. Of
   the 745 seedlings found, only 1\% of seedlings were identified as E.
   ovata x globulus F-1 hybrids, with 73\% being pure E. ovata and 26\%
   pure E. globulus seedlings (wildlings). Finally, evidence for selection
   against hybrids was found when assessing the survival of naturally
   established E. globulus x ovata F-1's that were paired with E. ovata in
   fire affected native forest beside a plantation. After six years the
   exotic hybrids were 78\% less likely to survive than the pure E. ovata
   seedlings. It is concluded that hybrid fitness appears to be an
   important barrier to exotic gene flow and introgression between E.
   globulus and E. ovata. However, E. globulus wildlings are establishing
   along the boundaries of native forest, and could have a greater impact
   on the integrity of E. ovata populations close to plantations. (C) 2013
   Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER}},
Address = {{RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Larcombe, MJ (Corresponding Author), Univ Tasmania, Sch Plant Sci, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia.
   Larcombe, Matthew J.; Barbour, Robert C.; Vaillancourt, Rene E.; Potts, Brad M., Univ Tasmania, Sch Plant Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia.
   Larcombe, Matthew J.; Vaillancourt, Rene E.; Potts, Brad M., Univ Tasmania, Natl Ctr Future Forest Ind, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.005}},
ISSN = {{0378-1127}},
EISSN = {{1872-7042}},
Keywords = {{Introgression; Source-sink dynamics; Pollen dispersal; Hybrid fitness;
   Blue gum; Genetic risk}},
Keywords-Plus = {{POLLEN DISPERSAL; POPULATION-SIZE; SEED DISPERSAL; BRASSICA-NAPUS;
   OILSEED RAPE; CHUKAR GENES; GM PLANTS; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION;
   POLLINATION}},
Research-Areas = {{Forestry}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Forestry}},
Author-Email = {{Matthew.Larcombe@utas.edu.au}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Potts, Brad M/C-6489-2013
   Vaillancourt, Rene E/J-7456-2014
   Vaillancourt, Rene E/C-6123-2013}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Potts, Brad M/0000-0001-6244-289X
   Vaillancourt, Rene E/0000-0002-1159-9149
   Vaillancourt, Rene E/0000-0002-1159-9149}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Forests and Wood Products Australia; CRC for ForestryAustralian
   GovernmentDepartment of Industry, Innovation and ScienceCooperative
   Research Centres (CRC) Programme}},
Funding-Text = {{For providing free access to his seed sorting facilities we thank Martyn
   Lavery (Arianda Pty Ltd.). For providing access to plantations, maps,
   nursery space and technical assistance we would like to thank: Hancock
   Victoria Plantations, particularly Stephen Elms, Ross Gillies, Justine
   Krieger and Mark Reynolds; Australian Blue-gum Plantations, particularly
   Ben Bradshaw; and Gunns Ltd. We also thank the private land owners who
   gave us access to their properties to collect seed. For help in the
   field we thank Justin Bloomfield. We thank the two anonymous reviewers
   for their careful reading of the manuscript. This research was funded by
   Forests and Wood Products Australia, and the CRC for Forestry.}},
Cited-References = {{Bacles CFE, 2009, SOUTH FORESTS, V71, P125, DOI 10.2989/SF.2009.71.2.7.822.
   Baratti M, 2005, ANIM GENET, V36, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01219.x.
   Barbour RC, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V256, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.028.
   Barbour RC, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V228, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.004.
   Barbour RC, 2005, CONSERV GENET, V6, P253, DOI 10.1007/s10592-004-7849-z.
   Barbour RC, 2005, AUST J BOT, V53, P465, DOI 10.1071/BT05021.
   Barbour RC, 2003, AUST J BOT, V51, P429, DOI 10.1071/BT03016.
   Barbour RC, 2002, NEW FOREST, V23, P177, DOI 10.1023/A:1020389432492.
   Barbour RC, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P896, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.016.
   Bloomfield JA, 2011, AUST J BOT, V59, P226, DOI 10.1071/BT10315.
   Broadhurst LM, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P587, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x.
   Byrne M, 2008, CONSERV GENET, V9, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10592-007-9311-5.
   Byrne M, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P1365, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02045.x.
   Byrne M, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.11.004.
   Calvino-Cancela M, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V305, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.037.
   {*}COMM AUSTR, 1999, ENV PROT BIOD CONS A.
   Conner J. K., 2004, PRIMER ECOLOGICAL GE.
   Silva JCE, 2012, TREE GENET GENOMES, V8, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11295-011-0437-8.
   CREMER KW, 1977, AUST FOREST RES, V7, P225.
   Cresswell JE, 2004, J APPL ECOL, V41, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00912.x.
   Dare M, 2011, FOREST POLICY ECON, V13, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.011.
   Devos Y, 2012, TRANSGENIC RES, V21, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11248-011-9515-9.
   Dickinson G., 2012, ANN FOREST SCI, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13595-13012-10231-13592.
   Dickinson GR, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V109, P1215, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcs050.
   Ellstrand NC, 1999, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V30, P539, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.539.
   ELLSTRAND NC, 1993, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V24, P217, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245.
   Ellstrand NC, 2003, PHILOS T R SOC B, V358, P1163, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1299.
   ELLSTRAND NC, 1992, OIKOS, V63, P77, DOI 10.2307/3545517.
   ELLSTRAND NC, 1985, AM NAT, V126, P606, DOI 10.1086/284442.
   Euclid, 2006, EUCLID EUC AUSTR.
   Field DL, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P1198, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01434.x.
   FRIEDMAN ST, 1985, THEOR APPL GENET, V69, P609, DOI 10.1007/BF00251112.
   Gavran M, 2011, AUSTR PLANTATION STA.
   GORE PL, 1990, AUST J BOT, V38, P383, DOI 10.1071/BT9900383.
   GRIFFIN AR, 1988, AUST J BOT, V36, P41, DOI 10.1071/BT9880041.
   GRIFFIN AR, 1987, AUST J BOT, V35, P465, DOI 10.1071/BT9870465.
   Hadley AS, 2012, BIOL REV, V87, P526, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00205.x.
   HEINRICH B, 1972, SCIENCE, V176, P597, DOI 10.1126/science.176.4035.597.
   Heinze B, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P2233, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05098.x.
   Huesken Alexandra, 2010, Environmental Biosafety Research, V9, P67, DOI 10.1051/ebr/2010009.
   Kunin WE, 1997, J ECOL, V85, P225, DOI 10.2307/2960653.
   Laikre L, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.013.
   Larcombe M.J., 2013, BIOL INVASIONS.
   Law Bradley S., 2000, Pacific Conservation Biology, V6, P130.
   Lee D. J., 2007, Australian Forestry, V70, P11.
   Lee DJ, 2010, AUST FORESTRY, V73, P106, DOI 10.1080/00049158.2010.10676316.
   Lee DJ, 2009, SILVAE GENET, V58, P205, DOI 10.1515/sg-2009-0026.
   Levin DA, 1996, CONSERV BIOL, V10, P10, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010010.x.
   Lindenmayer DB, 2004, BIOL CONSERV, V119, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.028.
   Liu YB, 2010, PLANT SCI, V179, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.07.005.
   Llorens TM, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P314, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05396.x.
   Lopez GA, 2000, HEREDITY, V85, P242, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00739.x.
   Lumsden LF, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V122, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.006.
   Meirmans PG, 2010, AM J BOT, V97, P1688, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0900271.
   Meirmans PG, 2009, EVOL APPL, V2, P160, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00050.x.
   Middelhoff U, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P1000, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.008.
   Mimura M, 2009, MOL ECOL, V18, P4180, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04350.x.
   Negro JJ, 2001, BIOL CONSERV, V98, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00129-4.
   Petit RJ, 2004, NEW PHYTOL, V161, P151, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x.
   Petit RJ, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P9996, DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9996.
   Pineyro-Nelson A, 2009, MOL ECOL, V18, P750, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03993.x.
   Poppy GM, 2004, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V22, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.005.
   Potts B.M., 1988, POLLINATION 88, P165.
   Potts BM, 2003, AUST J BOT, V51, P1, DOI 10.1071/BT02035.
   Potts BM, 1997, EUCALYPT ECOLOGY IND.
   PRICE MV, 1982, OECOLOGIA, V54, P353, DOI 10.1007/BF00380004.
   Pryor LD, 1976, BIOL EUCALYPTS.
   Richards CM, 1999, EVOLUTION, V53, P63, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05333.x.
   Rieben S, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029730.
   ROBERTSON AW, 1992, BIOL J LINN SOC, V46, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00868.x.
   Southerton S.G., 2004, Australian Forestry, V67, P44.
   Talbot P, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V285, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.036.
   Tejedor MT, 2007, J HERED, V98, P179, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esm001.
   THOMSON JD, 1980, OECOLOGIA, V46, P68, DOI 10.1007/BF00346968.
   Tricault Y, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V34, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2010.10.001.
   TURNER ME, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI-BIOL, V79, P203, DOI 10.1073/pnas.79.1.203.
   Vanden Broeck A, 2005, ANN FOREST SCI, V62, P601, DOI 10.1051/forest:2005072.
   Venables WN, 2002, MODERN APPL STAT S, P495.
   Wang KJ, 2012, EUPHYTICA, V186, P817, DOI 10.1007/s10681-012-0621-4.
   Weeks AR, 2011, EVOL APPL, V4, P709, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x.
   Wilkinson MJ, 2003, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V8, P208, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00057-8.
   Wilkinson MJ, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P457, DOI 10.1126/science.1088200.
   Zeileis A., 2002, R NEWS, V2, P7, DOI DOI 10.HTTPS://CRAN.R-PR0JECT.0RG/D0C/RNEWS/.
   Zuur Alain F., 2009, P1.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{84}},
Times-Cited = {{11}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{30}},
Journal-ISO = {{For. Ecol. Manage.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{277EV}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000328802700021}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000329866300093,
Author = {Buri, Pierrick and Humbert, Jean-Yves and Arlettaz, Raphael},
Title = {{Promoting Pollinating Insects in Intensive Agricultural Matrices:
   Field-Scale Experimental Manipulation of Hay-Meadow Mowing Regimes and
   Its Effects on Bees}},
Journal = {{PLOS ONE}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{9}},
Number = {{1}},
Month = {{JAN 9}},
Abstract = {{Bees are a key component of biodiversity as they ensure a crucial
   ecosystem service: pollination. This ecosystem service is nowadays
   threatened, because bees suffer from agricultural intensification. Yet,
   bees rarely benefit from the measures established to promote
   biodiversity in farmland, such as agri-environment schemes (AES). We
   experimentally tested if the spatio-temporal modification of mowing
   regimes within extensively managed hay meadows, a widespread AES, can
   promote bees. We applied a randomized block design, replicated 12 times
   across the Swiss lowlands, that consisted of three different mowing
   treatments: 1) first cut not before 15 June (conventional regime for
   meadows within Swiss AES); 2) first cut not before 15 June, as treatment
   1 but with 15\% of area left uncut serving as a refuge; 3) first cut not
   before 15 July. Bees were collected with pan traps, twice during the
   vegetation season (before and after mowing). Wild bee abundance and
   species richness significantly increased in meadows where uncut refuges
   were left, in comparison to meadows without refuges: there was both an
   immediate (within year) and cumulative (from one year to the following)
   positive effect of the uncut refuge treatment. An immediate positive
   effect of delayed mowing was also evidenced in both wild bees and honey
   bees. Conventional AES could easily accommodate such a simple management
   prescription that promotes farmland biodiversity and is likely to
   enhance pollination services.}},
Publisher = {{PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE}},
Address = {{1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Buri, P (Corresponding Author), Univ Bern, Inst Ecol \& Evolut, Div Conservat Biol, Bern, Switzerland.
   Buri, Pierrick; Humbert, Jean-Yves; Arlettaz, Raphael, Univ Bern, Inst Ecol \& Evolut, Div Conservat Biol, Bern, Switzerland.
   Arlettaz, Raphael, Swiss Ornithol Inst, Valais Field Stn, Sion, Switzerland.}},
DOI = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0085635}},
Article-Number = {{e85635}},
ISSN = {{1932-6203}},
Keywords-Plus = {{AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION;
   HYMENOPTERA; ABUNDANCE; COMMUNITIES; COMPONENTS; RESOURCES; APIFORMES}},
Research-Areas = {{Science \& Technology - Other Topics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Multidisciplinary Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{pierrick.buri@iee.unibe.ch}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Buri, Pierrick/I-3749-2019
   Arlettaz, Raphael/O-2182-2016}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Buri, Pierrick/0000-0003-1038-9550
   Arlettaz, Raphael/0000-0001-6360-5339}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Swiss National Science FoundationSwiss National Science Foundation
   (SNSF) {[}31003A\_125398/1]; Federal Office of Environment; cantonal
   office of environment, Bern; cantonal office of environment, Vaud;
   cantonal office of environment, Basel-Landschaft; cantonal office of
   environment, Aargau; cantonal office of environment, Neuchatel; cantonal
   office of environment, Fribourg; cantonal office of environment, Valais;
   cantonal office of environment, Graubunden; cantonal office of
   agriculture, Bern; cantonal office of agriculture, Vaud; cantonal office
   of agriculture, Basel-Landschaft; cantonal office of agriculture,
   Aargau; cantonal office of agriculture, Neuchatel; cantonal office of
   agriculture, Fribourg; cantonal office of agriculture, Valais; cantonal
   office of agriculture, Graubunden}},
Funding-Text = {{This project was supported by a grant of the Swiss National Science
   Foundation to R. A. (No. 31003A\_125398/1), the Federal Office of
   Environment, and the following cantonal offices of environment and/or
   agriculture: Bern,Vaud, Basel-Landschaft, Aargau, Neuchatel, Fribourg,
   Valais and Graubunden. The funders had no role in study design, data
   collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
   manuscript.}},
Cited-References = {{Aizen MA, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1579, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp076.
   Albrecht M, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P813, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01306.x.
   Amiet F., 1999, APIDAE 2 COLLETES DU.
   Amiet F., 2004, APIDAE 4 ANTHIDIUM C.
   Amiet F., 2001, APIDAE 3 HALICTUS LA.
   Amiet F., 2007, APIDAE 5 AMMOBATES A.
   Amiet F, 1996, APIDAE.
   {[}Anonymous], 1998, VERORDNUNG DIREKTZAH, P229.
   {[}Anonymous], 2009, BEWIRTSCHAFTUNGSVERT, P1.
   Bates D, 2012, PACKAGE LME4.
   BAWA KS, 1990, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V21, P399, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.21.1.399.
   Biesmeijer JC, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P351, DOI 10.1126/science.1127863.
   Bignal EM, 1996, J APPL ECOL, V33, P413, DOI 10.2307/2404973.
   Breeze TD, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V142, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.020.
   Burel F, 1998, ACTA OECOL, V19, P47, DOI 10.1016/S1146-609X(98)80007-6.
   Carvell C, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01249.x.
   Decourtye A, 2010, APIDOLOGIE, V41, P264, DOI 10.1051/apido/2010024.
   Diekotter T, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01759.x.
   Droege S, 2010, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V3, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00074.x.
   FOAG, 2012, RAPP AGR 2011.
   Fontaine C, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P1002, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01405.x.
   Furieri A, 2008, SPATIALITE COMPLETE.
   Gathmann A, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P757, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00641.x.
   Ghazoul J, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.026.
   Gotelli N. J., 2004, PRIMER ECOLOGICAL ST.
   Haaland C, 2011, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V4, P60, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00098.x.
   Hart K., 2011, GREENING CAP DELIVER.
   Hendrickx F, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01270.x.
   Heneberg P, 2013, J INSECT CONSERV, V17, P473, DOI 10.1007/s10841-012-9529-5.
   Humbert JY, 2012, ENVIRON EVID, V1, DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-1-9.
   Humbert JY, 2012, BIOL CONSERV, V152, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.015.
   Jaffe R, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P583, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01331.x.
   Johnson JB, 2004, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V19, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013.
   Kindt R, 2005, TREE DIVERSITY ANAL.
   Kleijn D, 2003, J APPL ECOL, V40, P947, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x.
   Kleijn D, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Knop E, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P120, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01113.x.
   Kohler F, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P753, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01394.x.
   Kwaiser KS, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V124, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.012.
   Le Feon V, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V166, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.020.
   Littlewood NA, 2012, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V5, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00174.x.
   Memmott J, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P2605, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909.
   Murray TE, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P998, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02175.x.
   Neumann P, 2010, J APICULT RES, V49, P1, DOI 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.01.
   Peres-Neto PR, 2005, COMPUT STAT DATA AN, V49, P974, DOI 10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015.
   Potts SG, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01609.x.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Pywell RF, 2011, J INSECT CONSERV, V15, P853, DOI 10.1007/s10841-011-9383-x.
   Pywell RF, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V129, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.034.
   Quantum GIS Development Team, 2012, QGIS QUANT GIS GEOGR.
   R Development Core Team, 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Rasmont P, 2010, CATALOGUE SOUS GENRE, P1.
   Roulston TH, 2007, J KANSAS ENTOMOL SOC, V80, P179, DOI 10.2317/0022-8567(2007)80{[}179:ACOPTA]2.0.CO;2.
   Russell KN, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V124, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.022.
   SchmidEgger C, 1997, ILLUSTRIERTE BESTIMM, VIII.
   Schmidt MH, 2008, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V17, P3003, DOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9412-6.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1421, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.004.
   Swisstopo, 2012, VECT 25.
   Tscharntke T, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P857, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x.
   Valtonen A., 2006, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, V29, P133.
   Veddeler D, 2006, OIKOS, V112, P594, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14111.x.
   Warren J, 2008, AGRI-ENVIRONMENT, P1.
   Westphal C, 2008, ECOL MONOGR, V78, P653, DOI 10.1890/07-1292.1.
   Winfree R, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P2068, DOI 10.1890/08-1245.1.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{66}},
Times-Cited = {{32}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{4}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{122}},
Journal-ISO = {{PLoS One}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{291XP}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000329866300093}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000329862500024,
Author = {Breeze, Tom D. and Vaissiere, Bernard E. and Bommarco, Riccardo and
   Petanidou, Theodora and Seraphides, Nicos and Kozak, Lajos and Scheper,
   Jeroen and Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. and Kleijn, David and Gyldenkaerne,
   Steen and Moretti, Marco and Holzschuh, Andrea and Steffan-Dewenter,
   Ingolf and Stout, Jane C. and Paertel, Meelis and Zobel, Martin and
   Potts, Simon G.},
Title = {{Agricultural Policies Exacerbate Honeybee Pollination Service
   Supply-Demand Mismatches Across Europe}},
Journal = {{PLOS ONE}},
Year = {{2014}},
Volume = {{9}},
Number = {{1}},
Month = {{JAN 8}},
Abstract = {{Declines in insect pollinators across Europe have raised concerns about
   the supply of pollination services to agriculture. Simultaneously, EU
   agricultural and biofuel policies have encouraged substantial growth in
   the cultivated area of insect pollinated crops across the continent.
   Using data from 41 European countries, this study demonstrates that the
   recommended number of honeybees required to provide crop pollination
   across Europe has risen 4.9 times as fast as honeybee stocks between
   2005 and 2010. Consequently, honeybee stocks were insufficient to supply
   >90\% of demands in 22 countries studied. These findings raise concerns
   about the capacity of many countries to cope with major losses of wild
   pollinators and highlight numerous critical gaps in current
   understanding of pollination service supplies and demands, pointing to a
   pressing need for further research into this issue.}},
Publisher = {{PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE}},
Address = {{1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Breeze, TD (Corresponding Author), Univ Reading, Ctr Agri Environm Res, Reading, Berks, England.
   Breeze, Tom D.; Potts, Simon G., Univ Reading, Ctr Agri Environm Res, Reading, Berks, England.
   Vaissiere, Bernard E., INRA, Avignon, France.
   Bommarco, Riccardo, Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Petanidou, Theodora, Univ Aegean, Dept Geog, Mitilini, Greece.
   Seraphides, Nicos, Cyprus Agr Res Inst, Nicosia, Cyprus.
   Kozak, Lajos, Univ Debrecen, Dept Nat Conservat Zool \& Game Management, H-4012 Debrecen, Hungary.
   Scheper, Jeroen; Kleijn, David, Alterra, Anim Ecol Team, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   Biesmeijer, Jacobus C., Nat Biodivers Ctr, Darwinweg, Netherlands.
   Kleijn, David, Wageningen Univ, Resource Ecol Grp, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands.
   Gyldenkaerne, Steen, Aarhus Univ, Inst Environm Sci, Danish Ctr Environm \& Energy, Aarhus, Denmark.
   Moretti, Marco, Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow \& Landscape Res, Community Ecol Res Unit, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
   Holzschuh, Andrea; Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Univ Wurzburg, Dept Anim Ecol \& Trop Biol, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany.
   Stout, Jane C., Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Ctr Biodivers Res, Dublin, Ireland.
   Zobel, Martin, Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol \& Earth Sci, EE-50090 Tartu, Estonia.}},
DOI = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0082996}},
Article-Number = {{e82996}},
ISSN = {{1932-6203}},
Keywords-Plus = {{FRUIT-SET; SEQUENTIAL INTRODUCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BEES; COLONIES;
   DECLINES; DENSITY; ENHANCE; BIODIVERSITY; HYMENOPTERA}},
Research-Areas = {{Science \& Technology - Other Topics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Multidisciplinary Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{t.d.breeze@reading.ac.uk}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Scheper, Jeroen/G-1385-2015
   Potts, Simon G/C-7250-2008
   Zobel, Martin/H-1336-2015
   Holzschuh, Andrea/X-8989-2018
   Stout, Jane C/B-1631-2010
   Partel, Meelis/D-5493-2012
   Bommarco, Riccardo/E-7109-2016
   Stout, Jane/AAS-8867-2020
   Petanidou, Theodora/AAU-3212-2020
   }},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Scheper, Jeroen/0000-0002-4314-996X
   Potts, Simon G/0000-0002-2045-980X
   Zobel, Martin/0000-0001-7957-6704
   Holzschuh, Andrea/0000-0002-5235-4746
   Stout, Jane C/0000-0002-2027-0863
   Partel, Meelis/0000-0002-5874-0138
   Bommarco, Riccardo/0000-0001-8888-0476
   Stout, Jane/0000-0002-2027-0863
   Petanidou, Theodora/0000-0003-1883-0945
   Moretti, Marco/0000-0002-5845-3198
   Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf/0000-0003-1359-3944
   Kleijn, David/0000-0003-2500-7164
   Breeze

license: MIT

license_type: permissive

branch_name: refs/heads/main

extension: bib