text:
Silva GM, 2004, CONTRASTE ENTRE AMBI, P257.
   Smith L. T., 2012, DECOLONIZING METHODO.
   USDA, 2012, REP NAT STAK C HON B.
   USDA ARS, 2004, WHATS BUZZ AFR HON B.
   Villas-Boas JK, 2015, KAWAIWETE PEOPLES TR, P55.
   Viveiros De Castro E., 2002, PERSPECTIVISMO MULTI, P347.
   WHYTE KP, 2013, ECOL PROCESS, V2, pNIL1, DOI DOI 10.1186/2192-1709-2-7.
   Zent S, 2009, TRADITIONAL ECOLOGIC.
   Zent S, 2007, FINAL REPORT INDICAT.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{80}},
Times-Cited = {{13}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{41}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DP4BW}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000378441400002}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000377564000001,
Author = {Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko and Foldesi, Rita and Mozes, Edina and Szirak,
   Adam and Fischer, Joern and Hanspach, Jan and Baldi, Andras},
Title = {{Conservation of Pollinators in Traditional Agricultural Landscapes - New
   Challenges in Transylvania (Romania) Posed by EU Accession and
   Recommendations for Future Research}},
Journal = {{PLOS ONE}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{11}},
Number = {{6}},
Month = {{JUN 10}},
Abstract = {{Farmland biodiversity is strongly declining in most of Western Europe,
   but still survives in traditional low intensity agricultural landscapes
   in Central and Eastern Europe. Accession to the EU however intensifies
   agriculture, which leads to the vanishing of traditional farming. Our
   aim was to describe the pollinator assemblages of the last remnants of
   these landscapes, thus set the baseline of sustainable farming for
   pollination, and to highlight potential measures of conservation. In
   these traditional farmlands in the Transylvanian Basin, Romania (EU
   accession in 2007), we studied the major pollinator groups-wild bees,
   hoverflies and butterflies. Landscape scale effects of semi-natural
   habitats, land cover diversity, the effects of heterogeneity and woody
   vegetation cover and on-site flower resources were tested on pollinator
   communities in traditionally managed arable fields and grasslands. Our
   results showed: (i) semi-natural habitats at the landscape scale have a
   positive effect on most pollinators, especially in the case of low
   heterogeneity of the direct vicinity of the studied sites; (ii) both
   arable fields and grasslands hold abundant flower resources, thus both
   land use types are important in sustaining pollinator communities; (iii)
   thus, pollinator conservation can rely even on arable fields under
   traditional management regime. This has an indirect message that the
   tiny flower margins around large intensive fields in west Europe can be
   insufficient conservation measures to restore pollinator communities at
   the landscape scale, as this is still far the baseline of necessary
   flower resources. This hypothesis needs further study, which includes
   more traditional landscapes providing baseline, and exploration of other
   factors behind the lower than baseline level biodiversity values of
   fields under agri-environmental schemes (AES).}},
Publisher = {{PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE}},
Address = {{1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Kovacs-Hostyanszki, A (Corresponding Author), MTA Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol \& Bot, Lendulet Ecosyst Serv Res Grp, Vacratot, Hungary.
   Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko; Foldesi, Rita; Mozes, Edina; Szirak, Adam; Baldi, Andras, MTA Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol \& Bot, Lendulet Ecosyst Serv Res Grp, Vacratot, Hungary.
   Fischer, Joern; Hanspach, Jan, Leuphana Univ, Fac Sustainabil, Luneburg, Germany.}},
DOI = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0151650}},
Article-Number = {{e0151650}},
ISSN = {{1932-6203}},
Keywords-Plus = {{FLOWER-VISITING INSECTS; LONG-TERM CHANGES; FARMLAND BIRDS; LAND-USE;
   SEMINATURAL GRASSLANDS; DEPENDENT RESPONSES; NATURAL ENEMIES; BEE
   ABUNDANCE; BODY-SIZE; WILD BEES}},
Research-Areas = {{Science \& Technology - Other Topics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Multidisciplinary Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{kovacs.aniko@okologia.mta.hu}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Fischer, Joern/W-5380-2019
   Foldesi, Rita/AAU-7609-2020
   Fischer, Joern/C-6625-2012
   Baldi, Andras/A-7501-2008
   }},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Fischer, Joern/0000-0003-3187-8978
   Foldesi, Rita/0000-0002-3500-981X
   Fischer, Joern/0000-0003-3187-8978
   Baldi, Andras/0000-0001-6063-3721
   Hanspach, Jan/0000-0002-6638-8699}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{`Lendulet' program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences}},
Funding-Text = {{A. Kovacs-Hostyanszki was a Bolyai and a MTA Postdoc Fellow
   (http://mta.hu/english/). The study was supported by the `Lendulet'
   program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (http://mta.hu/english/).}},
Cited-References = {{Alignier A, 2014, BIOL CONTROL, V77, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.06.006.
   Archer CR, 2014, OIKOS, V123, P401, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00949.x.
   Baldi A, 2007, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V118, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.021.
   Baldi A, 2011, BIRD STUDY, V58, P365, DOI 10.1080/00063657.2011.588685.
   Batary P, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V136, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.004.
   Benelli G, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093153.
   Benjamin FE, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P440, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12198.
   Bignal EM, 1996, J APPL ECOL, V33, P413, DOI 10.2307/2404973.
   Bommarco R, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P2075, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.2221.
   Carvell C, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01249.x.
   de Snoo GR, 2013, CONSERV LETT, V6, P66, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00296.x.
   Decourtye A, 2010, APIDOLOGIE, V41, P264, DOI 10.1051/apido/2010024.
   Delibes-Mateos M, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V43, P1256, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9297-5.
   Donald PF, 2001, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V268, P25, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325.
   Donald PF, 2002, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V89, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00244-4.
   Dormann CF, 2007, ECOGRAPHY, V30, P609, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x.
   Ekroos J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1283, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9864-2.
   European Environment Agency (EEA), 2013, EUR TOP CTR SPAT INF.
   Fischer J, 2012, CONSERV LETT, V5, P167, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00227.x.
   Fox R, 2013, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V6, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00186.x.
   Gallai N, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014.
   Garibaldi LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1608, DOI 10.1126/science.1230200.
   Gathmann A, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P757, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00641.x.
   Gellrich M, 2007, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V118, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.001.
   Genz A., 2013, MVTNORM MULTIVARIATE.
   Gilbert N, 2014, NATURE, V510, P455, DOI 10.1038/510455a.
   Greenleaf SS, 2007, OECOLOGIA, V153, P589, DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9.
   Hanspach J, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06915-190432.
   Hartel T, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P1118, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.006.
   Holzschuh A, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P41, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01259.x.
   Hothorn T, 2008, BIOMETRICAL J, V50, P346, DOI 10.1002/bimj.200810425.
   Jauker F, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P547, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9331-2.
   Kleijn D, 2006, BASIC APPL ECOL, V7, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2005.07.011.
   Kleijn D, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms8414.
   Kovacs-Hostyanszki A, 2011, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V13, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00498.x.
   Legendre P, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V129, P271, DOI 10.1007/s004420100716.
   Loos J, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0103256.
   Mand M, 2002, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V89, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00319-X.
   Meyer B, 2009, BASIC APPL ECOL, V10, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2008.01.001.
   Michener C.D., 2007, BEES WORLD.
   Michez D, 2013, ATLAS HYMENOPTERA.
   Moczar M, 1967, FAUNA HUNGARIAE.
   Moczar M, 1957, FAUNA HUNGARIAE, V19.
   Moczar M, 1958, FAUNA HUNGARIAE, V35.
   Moczar M, 1960, FAUNA HUNGARIAE, V51.
   Muller A, 2008, BIOL J LINN SOC, V95, P719, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01113.x.
   Muller D, 2013, AGR SYST, V117, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.010.
   Nicholls CI, 2013, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V33, P257, DOI 10.1007/s13593-012-0092-y.
   Nieto A, 2014, EUROPEAN RED LIST BE.
   Ockinger E, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x.
   Oksanen J., 2008, VEGAN PACKAGE COMMUN.
   Ollerton J, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
   Osborne JL, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P406, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.x.
   Pe'er G, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P1090, DOI 10.1126/science.1253425.
   Pinheiro J, 2013, NLME LINEAR NONLINEA.
   Plieninger T, 2006, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V9, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.03.001.
   Poyry J, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P732, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01789.x.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   R Development Core Team, 2013, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Raymond L, 2014, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V185, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.019.
   Rogerson P., 2001, STAT METHODS GEOGRAP.
   Rundlof M, 2014, BIOL CONSERV, V172, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.027.
   Sanderson FJ, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V168, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.01.015.
   Schmid-Egger C, 1997, ILLUSTRIERTE BESTIMM.
   Schmidt MH, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P1905, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2469.
   Settele J., 2009, ECOLOGY BUTTERFLIES.
   SSYMANK A, 1993, DEUT ENTOMOL Z, V40, P245.
   Stanescu Carmen, 2005, Travaux du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle Grigore Antipa, V48, P177.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1421, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2.
   Stoate C, 2001, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V63, P337, DOI 10.1006/jema.2001.0473.
   Stoate C, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005.
   Storkey J, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P1421, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.1686.
   Stubbs A., 2002, BRIT HOVERFLIES ILLU.
   Sutcliffe LME, 2015, DIVERS DISTRIB, V21, P722, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12288.
   Tomanovic Z, 2008, EUR J ENTOMOL, V105, P495, DOI 10.14411/eje.2008.064.
   Tryjanowski P, 2011, ACTA ORNITHOL, V46, P1, DOI 10.3161/000164511X589857.
   van Veen M, 2004, HOVERFLIES NW EUROPE.
   Walther-Hellwig K, 2000, J APPL ENTOMOL, V124, P299, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2000.00484.x.
   Westphal C, 2003, ECOL LETT, V6, P961, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00523.x.
   Westphal C, 2006, OECOLOGIA, V149, P289, DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{80}},
Times-Cited = {{16}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{51}},
Journal-ISO = {{PLoS One}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DO1UG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000377564000001}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published, Green Accepted}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000375887700017,
Author = {Garantonakis, Nikos and Varikou, Kyriaki and Birouraki, Athanasia and
   Edwards, Mike and Kalliakaki, Voula and Andrinopoulos, Fotis},
Title = {{Comparing the pollination services of honey bees and wild bees in a
   watermelon field}},
Journal = {{SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{204}},
Pages = {{138-144}},
Month = {{JUN 2}},
Abstract = {{Field studies of pollination services of honey bees and wild bees were
   carried out at a watermelon crop in western Crete. Specifically,
   pollination treatment by honey bee or mining bee species was applied to
   female flowers of a watermelon plant. There were also three other
   treatments; a no-visit treatment, an open-pollinated treatment and a
   `hand' pollination treatment. Comparisons were based on the number of
   single bee visits to treated flowers, fruit abortion rates, seed sets as
   influenced by bee type and the quality characteristics of the developed
   fruit. The main representative genus of wild bees in the studied area
   was Lasioglossum. Whilst it was possible that a single visit from either
   bee type effected pollination, wild bees needed a significantly lower
   mean number of visits to effect pollination than honey bees. In
   particular they spent three times as long at each flower compared to
   Apis mellifera. None of the studied quality characteristics of the
   developed watermelon fruits (mean weight, brix, number of seeds per
   fruit and weight of seed) differed significantly for both tested
   pollinators. The current study provides theoretical and practical
   evidence to the growers of watermelon crop of the existence of
   alternative pollinator species that can be targeted for development and
   management because of their high pollination efficiencies. Therefore the
   results support the hypothesis that the native bee community can provide
   an equivalent service to that of managed honey bee pollinators for
   watermelon, a crop that has heavy pollination requirements. (C) 2016
   Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV}},
Address = {{PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Varikou, K (Corresponding Author), ELGO DIMITRA Inst Olive Tree Subtrop Crops \& Viti, Dept Entomol, Khania 73100, Crete, Greece.
   Garantonakis, Nikos; Varikou, Kyriaki; Birouraki, Athanasia, ELGO DIMITRA Inst Olive Tree Subtrop Crops \& Viti, Dept Entomol, Khania 73100, Crete, Greece.
   Edwards, Mike, Syngenta Crop Protect AG, Syngenta Operat Pollinator, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
   Kalliakaki, Voula; Andrinopoulos, Fotis, Sygenta Hellas, Dept Regulatory Affairs, Stewardship \& Tech Support, Anthousa 15349, Greece.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.scienta.2016.04.006}},
ISSN = {{0304-4238}},
EISSN = {{1879-1018}},
Keywords = {{Apis mellifera; Lasioglossum; Pollination; Pollination services;
   Watermelon; Wild bee}},
Keywords-Plus = {{CROP POLLINATION; NATIVE BEES; FRUIT-SET; CONSERVATION; PROVIDE;
   AGRICULTURE; ABUNDANCE; DECLINE; FLOWERS}},
Research-Areas = {{Agriculture}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Horticulture}},
Author-Email = {{kvarik@yahoo.gr}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Varikou, Kiki/AAD-3312-2020
   }},
ORCID-Numbers = {{varikou, Kyriaki/0000-0002-4120-8006}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Syngenta Hellas}},
Funding-Text = {{We are indebted to Syngenta Hellas for the financial and technical
   support on this project.}},
Cited-References = {{ADLERZ WC, 1966, J ECON ENTOMOL, V59, P28, DOI 10.1093/jee/59.1.28.
   Aizen MA, 2009, CURR BIOL, V19, P915, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.071.
   AMBROSE JT, 1995, AM BEE J, V135, P267.
   Ashman TL, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P2408, DOI 10.1890/03-8024.
   Bartomeus I, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1331, DOI 10.1111/ele.12170.
   Baxendale F., 1995, NEBRASKA COOPERATIVE.
   Breeze TD, 2014, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V23, P1193, DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0660-3.
   Breeze TD, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V142, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.020.
   Buchmann S.L, 1996, FORGOTTEN POLLINATOR.
   Cane JH, 1997, ACTA HORTIC, P309, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.437.38.
   Carvalheiro LG, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P810, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01829.x.
   COUTO R H N, 1990, Cientifica (Jaboticabal), V18, P21.
   Delaplane KS, 2000, CROP POLLINATION BEE.
   Free J.B., 1993, INSECT POLLINATION O.
   Gallai N, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014.
   Garibaldi LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1608, DOI 10.1126/science.1230200.
   Gikungu M. W., 2006, THESIS.
   ISELIN WA, 1974, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V3, P664, DOI 10.1093/ee/3.4.664.
   Javorek SK, 2002, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V95, P345, DOI 10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095{[}0345:CPEABH]2.0.CO;2.
   Karanja R.H.N., 2010, THESIS.
   Kasina J.M., 2007, THESIS U BONN GERMAN.
   Kati V., 2013, 16 WRS S SAMS TURK 2, P139.
   Kearns C.A., 1992, AM MIDL NAT, V82, P127.
   Kearns CA, 1998, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V29, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83.
   KEYS RN, 1995, J APPL ECOL, V32, P519, DOI 10.2307/2404649.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Kremen C, 1998, CONSERV BIOL, V12, P549, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96374.x.
   Kremen C., 2002, FREMONTIA, V30, P41.
   Mayfield MM, 2001, ANN BOT-LONDON, V88, P591, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2001.1500.
   McGregor SE, 1976, INSECT POLLINATION C.
   Mitchener C.D., 2000, BEES WORLD, P13.
   Njoroge G. N., 2010, Journal of Applied Horticulture (Lucknow), V12, P35.
   Njorogea G.N., 2004, KENYA INT J TROP INS, V24, P73.
   Ollerton J, 2012, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V27, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.12.001.
   Rader R, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P126, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02066.x.
   Richards A. J., 1986, PLANT BREEDING SYSTE.
   Sanford M.T., 1992, BEE KEEPING WATERMEL.
   SCOTTDUPREE CD, 1987, CAN ENTOMOL, V119, P735, DOI 10.4039/Ent119735-7.
   SEDGLEY M, 1978, AUST J BOT, V26, P663, DOI 10.1071/BT9780663.
   SHAWER MB, 1981, AFR J AGR RES, V7, P225.
   SKINNER JA, 1992, AM BEE J, V132, P815.
   Stanghellini MS, 1997, AM BEE J, V137, P386.
   Stanghellini MS, 1998, HORTSCIENCE, V33, P28, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.33.1.28.
   STEBBINS G. L., 1970, Annual review of ecology and systematics., V1, P307, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001515.
   Sullivan M.J., 1972, N C AGR EXP STN, V443.
   Sung I-Hsin, 2006, Formosan Entomologist, V26, P161.
   Suryanarayana M.C., 1988, MANST IND BEE J, V50, P5.
   Walters SA, 2005, HORTSCIENCE, V40, P1268, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1268.
   Winfree R, 2009, P R SOC B, V276, P229, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.0709.
   Winfree R, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P793, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01418.x.
   Winfree R, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P1105, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01110.x.
   Woodcock BA, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V171, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.03.005.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{53}},
Times-Cited = {{9}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{94}},
Journal-ISO = {{Sci. Hortic.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DL8JG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000375887700017}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000380233100002,
Author = {Bahlai, Christie A. and Landis, Douglas A.},
Title = {{Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive
   crowdsourcing}},
Journal = {{ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{3}},
Number = {{6}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{Global concern regarding pollinator decline has intensified interest in
   enhancing pollinator resources in managed landscapes. These efforts
   frequently emphasize restoration or planting of flowering plants to
   provide pollen and nectar resources that are highly attractive to the
   desired pollinators. However, determining exactly which plant species
   should be used to enhance a landscape is difficult. Empirical screening
   of plants for such purposes is logistically daunting, but could be
   streamlined by crowdsourcing data to create lists of plants most
   probable to attract the desired pollinator taxa. People frequently
   photograph plants in bloom and the Internet has become a vast repository
   of such images. A proportion of these images also capture floral
   visitation by arthropods. Here, we test the hypothesis that the
   abundance of floral images containing identifiable pollinator and other
   beneficial insects is positively associated with the observed
   attractiveness of the same species in controlled field trials from
   previously published studies. We used Google Image searches to determine
   the correlation of pollinator visitation captured by photographs on the
   Internet relative to the attractiveness of the same species in
   common-garden field trials for 43 plant species. From the first 30
   photographs, which successfully identified the plant, we recorded the
   number of Apis (managed honeybees), non-Apis (exclusively wild bees) and
   the number of bee-mimicking syrphid flies. We used these observations
   from search hits as well as bloom period (BP) as predictor variables in
   Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) for field-observed abundances of each
   of these groups. We found that non-Apis bees observed in controlled
   field trials were positively associated with observations of these taxa
   in Google Image searches (pseudo-R-2 of 0.668). Syrphid fly observations
   in the field were also associated with the frequency they were observed
   in images, but this relationship was weak. Apis bee observations were
   not associated with Internet images, but were slightly associated with
   BP. Our results suggest that passively crowdsourced image data can
   potentially be a useful screening tool to identify candidate plants for
   pollinator habitat restoration efforts directed at wild bee
   conservation. Increasing our understanding of the attractiveness of a
   greater diversity of plants increases the potential for more rapid and
   efficient research in creating pollinator-supportive landscapes.}},
Publisher = {{ROYAL SOC}},
Address = {{6-9 CARLTON HOUSE TERRACE, LONDON SW1Y 5AG, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Bahlai, CA; Landis, DA (Corresponding Author), Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
   Bahlai, Christie A.; Landis, Douglas A., Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1098/rsos.150677}},
Article-Number = {{150677}},
ISSN = {{2054-5703}},
Keywords = {{bee; data mining; nectar; pollination; search engine}},
Keywords-Plus = {{NATURAL ENEMIES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CITIZEN-SCIENCE; MONITORING DATA;
   NATIVE PLANTS; CONSERVATION; WILD; ABUNDANCE; BEES; HONEYBEES}},
Research-Areas = {{Science \& Technology - Other Topics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Multidisciplinary Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{cbahlai@msu.edu
   landisd@msu.edu}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Landis, Douglas A./L-7991-2019
   Bahlai, Christie/L-5500-2019}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Bahlai, Christie/0000-0002-8937-8709}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{US Dept. of Energy's Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER
   Office of Science)United States Department of Energy (DOE)
   {[}DE-FC02-07ER64494]; National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological
   Research Program at the Kellogg Biological Station (NSF)National Science
   Foundation (NSF) {[}DEB 1027253]; Michigan State University
   AgBioResearch}},
Funding-Text = {{This work was funded in part with support from the US Dept. of Energy's
   Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science
   DE-FC02-07ER64494) and the National Science Foundation Long-Term
   Ecological Research Program at the Kellogg Biological Station (NSF DEB
   1027253) to D.A.L., and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch to
   D.A.L. and C.A.B.}},
Cited-References = {{Aizen MA, 2009, CURR BIOL, V19, P915, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.071.
   Blaauw BR, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P890, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12257.
   Black SR, 2012, AGING NEUROPSYCHOL C, V19, P566, DOI 10.1080/13825585.2011.639868.
   Burnham K.P, 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT.
   Cook S, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023610.
   CRAGG JG, 1970, CAN J ECONOMICS, V3, P386, DOI 10.2307/133656.
   Decourtye A, 2010, APIDOLOGIE, V41, P264, DOI 10.1051/apido/2010024.
   Dickinson JL, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P149, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636.
   Dicks LV, 2013, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V6, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00221.x.
   Fiedler A., 2006, THESIS.
   Fiedler AK, 2007, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V36, P878, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36{[}878:PCAWNE]2.0.CO;2.
   Fiedler AK, 2007, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V36, P751, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36{[}751:AOMNPT]2.0.CO;2.
   Fiedler AK, 2008, BIOL CONTROL, V45, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.12.009.
   Fienen MN, 2012, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V49, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.06.015.
   Frank SD, 2004, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V33, P1662, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X-33.6.1662.
   Frank SD, 2008, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V37, P478, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37{[}478:SATVIN]2.0.CO;2.
   Garbuzov M, 2014, BIOSCIENCE, V64, P1019, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biu150.
   Gardiner MM, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P471, DOI 10.1890/110185.
   Garibaldi LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1608, DOI 10.1126/science.1230200.
   Garratt MPD, 2014, BIOL CONSERV, V169, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.001.
   Haenke S, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P505, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12221.
   Hallett RH, 2014, PEST MANAG SCI, V70, P879, DOI 10.1002/ps.3674.
   Holland JM, 2014, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V183, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.025.
   Isaacs R, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P841, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01823.x.
   Isaacs R, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P196, DOI 10.1890/080035.
   Kadoya T, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.012.
   Kearns CA, 2001, CONSERV ECOL, V5.
   Keeler BL, 2015, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V13, P76, DOI 10.1890/140124.
   Landis DA, 2000, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V45, P175, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175.
   Lowry CS, 2013, GROUND WATER, V51, P151, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00956.x.
   Lye GC, 2012, J INSECT CONSERV, V16, P697, DOI 10.1007/s10841-011-9450-3.
   Moritz RFA, 2005, ECOSCIENCE, V12, P289, DOI 10.2980/i1195-6860-12-3-289.1.
   O'Hara RB, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P118, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00021.x.
   Oertel E., 1980, AGR HDB USDA, V335, P16.
   Potts SG, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P2628, DOI 10.1890/02-0136.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   R Development Core Team, 2014, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Rader R, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P146, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1517092112.
   Riley JR, 2005, NATURE, V435, P205, DOI 10.1038/nature03526.
   Salisbury A, 2015, J APPL ECOL, V52, P1156, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12499.
   Schneider C., 2013, BUILDING SUSTAINABLE, P509, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7540-8\_39.
   Smith KM, 2013, ECOHEALTH, V10, P434, DOI 10.1007/s10393-013-0870-2.
   Teacher AGF, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P5268, DOI 10.1002/ece3.888.
   Tuell JK, 2008, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V37, P707, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37{[}707:VBWAMB]2.0.CO;2.
   van Etten J, 2011, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V42, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00240.x.
   Vaughan M, 2007, CAMB IMP POST-COL ST, P1.
   Werling BP, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P1652, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1309492111.
   WESTERKAMP C, 1991, PLANT SYST EVOL, V177, P71, DOI 10.1007/BF00937827.
   Wickham H, 2009, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3\_1.
   Wiggins A., 2011, P HICSS, DOI {[}DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207, 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207].
   Zhang L, 2013, ACM T MULTIM COMPUT, V9, DOI 10.1145/2490823.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{51}},
Times-Cited = {{8}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{44}},
Journal-ISO = {{R. Soc. Open Sci.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DR9RF}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000380233100002}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000380074500009,
Author = {Fowler, Jarrod},
Title = {{Specialist Bees of the Northeast: Host Plants and Habitat Conservation}},
Journal = {{NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{23}},
Number = {{2}},
Pages = {{305-320}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{Habitat conservation is performed in North America to support
   populations of managed and wild pollinators. The current recommended
   plant selections for northeastern pollinator habitats primarily provide
   resources for common or generalist pollinators. However, such plants may
   not benefit uncommon or rare northeastern specialist pollinators, whose
   populations are susceptible to harm from anthropogenic threats. This
   manuscript presents the first catalog of native specialist bees and
   associated host plants for the Northeast. Approximately 15\% of
   northeastern native bee species are pollen specialists, represented by 6
   families, 15 genera, and 61 species of bees that restrict pollen
   foraging to 23 families, 33 genera, and 201 possible species of native
   host plants. Specialist bees are associated with non-graminoid forbs and
   non-coniferous woody plants in nearly all major northeastern terrestrial
   and wetland habitats. Herein, I identify and discuss vulnerable
   bee-plant associations and suggest greater emphasis on research and
   restoration efforts. I recommend that northeastern
   pollinator-conservation practice specifically target specialist bees.}},
Publisher = {{HUMBOLDT FIELD RESEARCH INST}},
Address = {{PO BOX 9, STEUBEN, ME 04680-0009 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Fowler, J (Corresponding Author), Xerces Soc Invertebrate Conservat, Portland, OR USA.
   Fowler, Jarrod, Xerces Soc Invertebrate Conservat, Portland, OR USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1656/045.023.0210}},
ISSN = {{1092-6194}},
EISSN = {{1938-5307}},
Keywords-Plus = {{POLLINATOR CONSERVATION; UNITED-STATES; POLLEN; SERVICES}},
Research-Areas = {{Biodiversity \& Conservation; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology}},
Author-Email = {{jarrod@xerces.org}},
Cited-References = {{Ascher J.S., 2014, DISCOVER LIFE SPECIE.
   Bartomeus I, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1218503110.
   Behmer ST, 2003, ADV INSECT PHYSIOL, V31, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2806(03)31001-X.
   Breed GA, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P142, DOI {[}10.1038/nclimate1663, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1663].
   Cameron SA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P662, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014743108.
   Cane JH, 2006, PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS: FROM SPECIALIZATION TO GENERALIZATION, P99.
   Garbuzov M, 2014, BIOSCIENCE, V64, P1019, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biu150.
   Gavier-Pizarro GI, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P1913, DOI 10.1890/09-2168.1.
   Griffith G. E., 2009, ECOREGIONS NEW ENGLA.
   Haines A, 2011, NEW ENGLAND WILD FLO.
   Hilty J.A., 2012, OLIGOLECTIC BEES.
   HURD PD, 1971, EVOLUTION, V25, P218, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1971.tb01874.x.
   HURD PD, 1980, PRINCIPAL SUNFLOWER.
   Isaacs R, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P196, DOI 10.1890/080035.
   Kartesz J, 2013, N AM PLANT ATLAS.
   Kennedy CM, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P584, DOI 10.1111/ele.12082.
   Kleijn D, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms8414.
   LINSLEY EG, 1958, EVOLUTION, V12, P219, DOI 10.2307/2406032.
   Lovell J. H., 1918, FLOWER BEE PLANT LIF.
   Mader E., 2010, MANAGING ALTERNATIVE.
   Mader E, 2011, ATTRACTING NATIVE PO.
   MINCKLEY RL, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P1406, DOI 10.2307/1937464.
   Mitchell T. B., 1960, BEES E US, VI.
   Mitchell T. B., 1962, BEES E US, V2.
   New England Wild Flower Society, 2015, GO BOT.
   New England Wild Flower Society, 2015, STAT PLANTS CHALL OP.
   Olroyd B.P., 2007, PLOS BIOL, V5, P168.
   Omernik JM, 2004, ENVIRON MANAGE, V34, pS27, DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-5197-2.
   OMERNIK JM, 1987, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V77, P118, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x.
   Praz CJ, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P795, DOI 10.1890/07-0751.1.
   Price TD, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P6427, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0902617106.
   PROCTER W, 1946, BIOL SURVEY MOUNT 7.
   Radeloff VC, 2005, ECOL APPL, V15, P799, DOI 10.1890/04-1413.
   Rafferty NE, 2015, OIKOS, V124, P14, DOI 10.1111/oik.01523.
   Robertson C, 1925, ECOLOGY, V6, P412, DOI 10.2307/1929107.
   Robertson C, 1926, ECOLOGY, V7, P378, DOI 10.2307/1929320.
   ROBERTSON CHARLES, 1929, PSYCHE, V36, P112.
   Roulston TH, 2000, PLANT SYST EVOL, V222, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00984102.
   Roulston TH, 2000, ECOL MONOGR, V70, P617, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070{[}0617:WGPCOP]2.0.CO;2.
   Senapathi D, 2015, CURR OPIN INSECT SCI, V12, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.cois.2015.11.002.
   The Xerces Society, 2016, RED LIST BEES NAT BE.
   US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS), 2009, POLL BIOL HAB NEW EN.
   USDA-NRCS, 2014, POLL FRIENDL PLANTS.
   Vaughan M., 2012, CONSERVATION COVER 3.
   Viereck H.L., 1916, STATE CONNECTICUT GE, V22, P1.
   Wratten SD, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V159, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.020.
   Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation (Xerces Society), 2014, FARM NAT BEN INS EC.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{47}},
Times-Cited = {{16}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{30}},
Journal-ISO = {{Northeast. Nat}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DR7IZ}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000380074500009}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000378041400003,
Author = {Rodrigues, Cleiton G. and Kruger, Alexandra P. and Barbosa, Wagner F.
   and Guedes, Raul Narciso C.},
Title = {{Leaf Fertilizers Affect Survival and Behavior of the Neotropical
   Stingless Bee Friesella schrottkyi (Meliponini: Apidae: Hymenoptera)}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{109}},
Number = {{3}},
Pages = {{1001-1008}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{The ongoing concern about bee decline has largely focused on honey bees
   and neonicotinoid insecticides, while native pollinators such as
   Neotropical stingless bees and agrochemicals such as other insecticide
   groups, pesticides in general, and fertilizers-especially leaf
   fertilizers-remain neglected as potential contributors to pollination
   decline. In an effort to explore this knowledge gap, we assessed the
   lethal and sublethal behavioral impact of heavy metal-containing leaf
   fertilizers in a native pollinator of ecological importance in the
   Neotropics: the stingless bee Friesella schrottkyi (Friese). Two leaf
   fertilizers-copper sulfate (24\% Cu) and a micronutrient mix (Arrank L:
   5\% S, 5\% Zn, 3\% Mn, 0.6\% Cu, 0.5\% B, and 0.06\% Mo)-were used in
   oral and contact exposure bioassays. The biopesticide spinosad and water
   were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Copper
   sulfate compromised the survival of stingless bee workers, particularly
   with oral exposure, although less than spinosad under contact exposure.
   Sublethal exposure to both leaf fertilizers at their field rates also
   caused significant effects in exposed workers. Copper sulfate enhanced
   flight take-off on stingless bee workers, unlike workers exposed to the
   micronutrient mix. There was no significant effect of leaf fertilizers
   on the overall activity and walking behavior of worker bees. No
   significant effect was observed for the respiration rate of worker bees
   under contact exposure, but workers orally exposed to the micronutrient
   mix exhibited a reduced respiration rate. Therefore, leaf fertilizers do
   affect F. schrottkyi, what may also occur with other stingless bees,
   potentially compromising their pollination activity deserving attention.}},
Publisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC}},
Address = {{JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Guedes, RNC (Corresponding Author), Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Entomologia, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, Brazil.
   Rodrigues, Cleiton G.; Barbosa, Wagner F.; Guedes, Raul Narciso C., Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Entomologia, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, Brazil.
   Kruger, Alexandra P., Univ Fed Pelotas, Fac Agron Eliseu Maciel, BR-96010610 Pelotas, RS, Brazil.}},
DOI = {{10.1093/jee/tow044}},
ISSN = {{0022-0493}},
EISSN = {{1938-291X}},
Keywords = {{heavy metal; native pollinator; fertilizer toxicity; risk assessment;
   nontarget effect}},
Keywords-Plus = {{REDUCED-RISK INSECTICIDES; HONEY-BEE; NATIVE BEES; HORMESIS; METALS;
   IMPACT; QUADRIFASCIATA; ACCUMULATION; POPULATIONS; POLLINATION}},
Research-Areas = {{Entomology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Entomology}},
Author-Email = {{cleitongr16@gmail.com
   barbo-sawf@gmail.com
   guedes@ufv.br
   guedes@ufv.br}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Guedes, Raul Narciso Carvalho/L-3924-2013
   Barbosa, Wagner Faria/F-9531-2015}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Guedes, Raul Narciso Carvalho/0000-0001-6229-7549
   Barbosa, Wagner Faria/0000-0001-8725-2099}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of Education)CAPES; National
   Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Brazilian Ministry
   of Science and Technology)National Council for Scientific and
   Technological Development (CNPq); Minas Gerais State Foundation for
   Research Aid (FAPEMIG)Minas Gerais State Research Foundation (FAPEMIG)}},
Funding-Text = {{We thank the CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of Education) and the
   National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Brazilian
   Ministry of Science and Technology), as well as the Minas Gerais State
   Foundation for Research Aid (FAPEMIG) for the financial support
   provided.}},
Cited-References = {{Andrews N., 2015, CAN I USE THIS PRODU.
   Arena M, 2014, ECOTOXICOLOGY, V23, P324, DOI 10.1007/s10646-014-1190-1.
   Baghban A., 2014, J PLANT PROT RES, V54, P1.
   Barbosa WF, 2015, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V34, P2149, DOI 10.1002/etc.3053.
   Barbosa WF, 2015, PEST MANAG SCI, V71, P1049, DOI 10.1002/ps.4025.
   Barbosa WF, 2015, ECOTOXICOLOGY, V24, P130, DOI 10.1007/s10646-014-1365-9.
   Barua M, 2012, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V21, P1457, DOI 10.1007/s10531-012-0257-7.
   BAYLEY M, 1995, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V32, P166, DOI 10.1006/eesa.1995.1098.
   Borowska J, 2004, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V13, P1402.
   Borowska J, 2011, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V57, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.02.012.
   Breeze TD, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082996.
   Calabrese EJ, 2008, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V27, P1451, DOI {[}10.1897/07-541.1, 10.1897/07-541].
   Camargo J. M. F., 1989, PUBLICACAO, P41.
   Chauzat P., 2013, PAN EUROPEAN EPIDEMI.
   Cox DW, 1999, BRIT MED BULL, V55, P544, DOI 10.1258/0007142991902619.
   Cutler GC, 2013, DOSE-RESPONSE, V11, P154, DOI 10.2203/dose-response.12-008.Cutler.
   Del Sarto MCL, 2014, APIDOLOGIE, V45, P626, DOI 10.1007/s13592-014-0281-6.
   Deng DM, 2007, ENVIRON POLLUT, V147, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.05.024.
   Fageria NK, 2009, J PLANT NUTR, V32, P1044, DOI 10.1080/01904160902872826.
   Godfray HCJ, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.0558.
   Gomez-Escobar E, 2014, J ECON ENTOMOL, V107, P1447, DOI 10.1603/EC13490.
   Goulson D, 2003, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V34, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132355.
   Gross M, 2013, CURR BIOL, V23, pR462, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.030.
   Guedes RNC, 2016, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V61, P43, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023646.
   Guedes RNC, 2014, PEST MANAG SCI, V70, P690, DOI 10.1002/ps.3669.
   HALLIWELL B, 1984, BIOCHEM J, V219, P1, DOI 10.1042/bj2190001.
   Hardstone MC, 2010, PEST MANAG SCI, V66, P1171, DOI 10.1002/ps.2001.
   Haytova D., 2013, Annual Review and Research in Biology, V3, P455.
   Horvath K., 2013, ANN I SUPER SANITA, V162, P51.
   Jensen PD, 2006, ARCH ENVIRON CON TOX, V50, P523, DOI 10.1007/s00244-005-0111-y.
   Johnson RM, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054092.
   KELLERT SR, 1993, CONSERV BIOL, V7, P845, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x.
   Kleinman DL, 2013, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V38, P492, DOI 10.1177/0162243912442575.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Linder M. C., 2013, AM J CLIN NUTR, p797S.
   Malakar Chandrik, 2009, American-Eurasian Journal of Toxicological Sciences, V1, P32.
   Ministerio da Agricultura Pecuaria e Abastecimento, 2015, AGROFIT SIST AGR FIT.
   Mogren CL, 2010, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V135, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.00967.x.
   Noret N, 2007, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V26, P565, DOI 10.1897/06-413R.1.
   Pena MMO, 1999, J NUTR, V129, P1251.
   Phillips J.P., 1990, Advances in Genetics, V28, P43.
   Popham HJR, 2006, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V52, P771, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.04.005.
   Rollins J., 2009, THE DOOSMDAY KEY.
   Roubik DW, 2014, POLLINATOR SAFETY AG.
   Salgado VL, 2010, INSECT CONTROL BIOL, P137.
   Sanchez-Bayo F, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094482.
   SAS Institute, 2008, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE.
   Schacker M, 2009, SPRING BEES COLONY C.
   Slaa EJ, 2006, APIDOLOGIE, V37, P293, DOI 10.1051/apido:2006022.
   Sovik E, 2015, BIOL LETTERS, V11, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0989.
   Sparks TC, 2001, PEST MANAG SCI, V57, P896, DOI 10.1002/ps.358.
   Tchounwou Paul B, 2012, Exp Suppl, V101, P133, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4\_6.
   Toft S, 1998, PESTIC SCI, V52, P223, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199803)52:3\<223::AID-PS692\>3.0.CO;2-Z.
   Tome HVV, 2015, ANN APPL BIOL, V167, P186, DOI 10.1111/aab.12217.
   Tome HVV, 2015, CHEMOSPHERE, V124, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.038.
   Tome HVV, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038406.
   Valk H., 2013, ASPECTS DETERMINING.
   Vanbergen A. J., 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V61, P45, DOI DOI 10.2966/SCRIP.
   vanEngelsdorp D, 2010, J INVERTEBR PATHOL, V103, pS80, DOI 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011.
   Wilms W, 1996, STUD NEOTROP FAUNA E, V31, P137, DOI 10.1076/snfe.31.3.137.13336.
   Yamada T, 2004, INF AGR.
   Yang R. S., 1994, TOXICOLOGY CHEM MIXT.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{62}},
Times-Cited = {{3}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{56}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Econ. Entomol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DO8NX}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000378041400003}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000378041400006,
Author = {Morandin, L. A. and Long, R. F. and Kremen, C.},
Title = {{Pest Control and Pollination Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hedgerow
   Restoration in a Simplified Agricultural Landscape}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{109}},
Number = {{3}},
Pages = {{1020-1027}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{Field edge habitat in homogeneous agricultural landscapes can serve
   multiple purposes including enhanced biodiversity, water quality
   protection, and habitat for beneficial insects, such as native bees and
   natural enemies. Despite this ecosystem service value, adoption of field
   border plantings, such as hedgerows, on large-scale mono-cropped farms
   is minimal. With profits primarily driving agricultural production, a
   major challenge affecting hedgerow plantings is linked to establishment
   costs and the lack of clear economic benefits on the restoration
   investment. Our study documented that hedgerows are economically viable
   to growers by enhancing beneficial insects and natural pest control and
   pollination on farms. With pest control alone, our model shows that it
   would take 16 yr to break even from insecticide savings on the US\$
   4,000 cost of a typical 300-m hedgerow field edge planting. By adding in
   pollination benefits by native bees, where honey bees (Apis mellifera
   L.) may be limiting, the return time is reduced to 7 yr. USDA cost share
   programs allow for a quicker return on a hedgerow investment. Our study
   shows that over time, small-scale restoration can be profitable, helping
   to overcome the barrier of cost associated with field edge habitat
   restoration on farms.}},
Publisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC}},
Address = {{JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Long, RF (Corresponding Author), Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, 70 Cottonwood St, Woodland, CA 95695 USA.
   Morandin, L. A., Ecol Consulting, Victoria, BC, Canada.
   Long, R. F., Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, 70 Cottonwood St, Woodland, CA 95695 USA.
   Kremen, C., Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy \& Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1093/jee/tow086}},
ISSN = {{0022-0493}},
EISSN = {{1938-291X}},
Keywords = {{hedgerow; pest control; pollination; economics}},
Keywords-Plus = {{WILD BEE ABUNDANCE; QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CROP
   POLLINATION; NATIVE BEES; FRUIT-SET; CONSERVATION; COMMUNITIES;
   MANAGEMENT; CALIFORNIA}},
Research-Areas = {{Entomology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Entomology}},
Author-Email = {{lora.morandin@gmail.com
   rflong@ucanr.edu
   ckremen@berkeley.edu}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{NSERCNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Xerces
   Society; National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation (NSF)
   {[}DEB 0919128]; National Geographic Society Research and
   ExplorationNational Geographic Society}},
Funding-Text = {{We thank our grower cooperators for allowing us to work on their farms.
   We thank S. Kaiser, H. Wallis, S. Ambercrombie, L. Swain, and R. Hanifin
   for assistance with data collection, specimen processing, and data
   entry, and K. Steinmann for advice on the manuscript. The research was
   funded by an NSERC Postdoctoral Fellowship to L.A.M., a Conservation
   Innovation Grant to C.K. and the Xerces Society, National Science
   Foundation grant (DEB 0919128) and a National Geographic Society
   Research and Exploration grant to L.A.M. and C.K.}},
Cited-References = {{Aizen MA, 2009, CURR BIOL, V19, P915, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.071.
   {[}Anonymous], 2014, YOLO COUNTY CROP REP.
   Blaauw BR, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P890, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12257.
   Bolker B., 2012, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF.
   Brodt S, 2009, AGROFOREST SYST, V76, P195, DOI 10.1007/s10457-008-9168-8.
   Burton RJF, 2008, SOCIOL RURALIS, V48, P16, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x.
   Carvalheiro LG, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P251, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01579.x.
   Chaplin-Kramer Rebecca, 2011, Rangelands, V33, P33.
   Dale VH, 2007, ECOL ECON, V64, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.009.
   Douglas MR, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P5088, DOI 10.1021/es506141g.
   Garibaldi LA, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P439, DOI 10.1890/130330.
   Garibaldi LA, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1608, DOI 10.1126/science.1230200.
   Garibaldi LA, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P1062, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x.
   Griffiths GJK, 2008, BIOL CONTROL, V45, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.09.002.
   Hobbs PR, 2007, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V145, P127, DOI 10.1017/S0021859607006892.
   Jackson LE, 2007, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V121, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017.
   Jonsson M, 2015, J APPL ECOL, V52, P1274, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12489.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Klein AM, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P723, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02144.x.
   Klein AM, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P955, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2306.
   Knight TM, 2006, AM J BOT, V93, P271, DOI 10.3732/ajb.93.2.271.
   Kremen C, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1109, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00662.x.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Kremen C, 2011, CONSERV BIOL, V25, P607, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.x.
   Long R. F., 2010, AGR NATURAL RESOUCES, V8390.
   Long RF, 2011, CALIF AGR, V65, P155, DOI 10.3733/ca.v065n03p155.
   M'Gonigle LK, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P1557, DOI 10.1890/14-1863.1.
   MEA, 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING BI.
   Miyao E., 2008, SAMPLE COSTS PRODUCE.
   Morandin LA, 2005, ECOL APPL, V15, P871, DOI 10.1890/03-5271.
   Morandin LA, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V116, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.012.
   Morandin LA, 2014, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V189, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.030.
   Morandin LA, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P829, DOI 10.1890/12-1051.1.
   Neumann P, 2010, J APICULT RES, V49, P1, DOI 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.01.
   Olson DM, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01241.x.
   Pascual U, 2007, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V121, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.025.
   Rusch A, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V221, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.039.
   Sardinas HS, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V207, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.020.
   Team R. C., 2013, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Tilman D, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P5995, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995.
   UC IPM, 2013, U CAL INT PEST MAN G.
   vanEngelsdorp D, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006481.
   Winfree R, 2013, BASIC APPL ECOL, V14, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2013.07.004.
   Winfree R, 2011, ECOL ECON, V71, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.001.
   Zhang W, 2007, ECOL ECON, V64, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024.
   ZIMMERMAN M, 1988, AM NAT, V131, P723, DOI 10.1086/284815.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{46}},
Times-Cited = {{48}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{118}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Econ. Entomol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DO8NX}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000378041400006}},
OA = {{Bronze}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000376663400015,
Author = {Bruckman, Daniela and Campbell, Diane R.},
Title = {{Timing of invasive pollen deposition influences pollen tube growth and
   seed set in a native plant}},
Journal = {{BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{18}},
Number = {{6}},
Pages = {{1701-1711}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{Invasive plants may threaten the reproductive success of native
   sympatric plants by modifying the pollination process. One potential
   mechanism takes place through the deposition of invasive pollen onto
   native stigmas when pollinators are shared among species. We explore how
   pollen from the invasive plant Brassica nigra influences pre- and
   post-fertilization stages in the native plant Phacelia parryi, through a
   series of hand pollination experiments. These two species share
   pollinators to a high degree. P. parryi flowers were hand-pollinated
   with either pure conspecific pollen (the control) or with B. nigra
   pollen applied prior to, simultaneously with, or following conspecific
   pollen. Application of B. nigra pollen lowered seed set, with the
   simultaneous application resulting in the highest reduction. Pollen tube
   growth was also influenced by the presence of invasive pollen, with
   fewer conspecific pollen tubes reaching the base of P. parryi styles in
   treatments where B. nigra pollen was applied prior to or simultaneously
   with conspecific pollen. The deleterious effects of invasive pollen on
   native seed set in this study are likely not due to loss of stigmatic
   receptivity since seed set was less affected when heterospecific pollen
   was applied prior to conspecific pollen, but may instead involve
   interactions between interspecific pollen grains on the stigma or within
   the style. Our study highlights the importance of timing of foreign
   pollen deposition on native stigmas and suggests that interspecific
   pollen transfer between native and exotic plants may be an important
   mechanism of competition for pollination in invaded plant communities.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER}},
Address = {{VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Bruckman, D (Corresponding Author), Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol \& Evolutionary Biol, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
   Bruckman, Daniela; Campbell, Diane R., Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol \& Evolutionary Biol, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/s10530-016-1113-6}},
ISSN = {{1387-3547}},
EISSN = {{1573-1464}},
Keywords = {{Pollination; Heterospecific pollen deposition; Competition; Brassica
   nigra}},
Keywords-Plus = {{INTRODUCED EUPHORBIA-ESULA; IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA; HETEROSPECIFIC POLLEN;
   HUMMINGBIRD POLLINATION; DELPHINIUM-NELSONII; PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE;
   CARPOBROTUS SPP.; FLOWER CONSTANCY; BRASSICA-NIGRA; ALIEN PLANT}},
Research-Areas = {{Biodiversity \& Conservation; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology}},
Author-Email = {{dbruckma@uci.edu}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Campbell, Diane/A-1653-2012}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Campbell, Diane/0000-0002-1147-846X}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{UC Irvine's Center for Environmental Biology}},
Funding-Text = {{This research was funded by UC Irvine's Center for Environmental
   Biology. We thank the Irvine Ranch Conservancy and OC Parks for granting
   access to field sites. We are also grateful to our undergraduate
   assistants, Grace Yu and Jae Kyung Yeon, and to Steve Weller, Kailen
   Mooney, two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for providing
   feedback on manuscript drafts.}},
Cited-References = {{Ashman TL, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1061, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200496.
   Bais HP, 2003, SCIENCE, V301, P1377, DOI 10.1126/science.1083245.
   BELL DT, 1973, AM MIDL NAT, V90, P277, DOI 10.2307/2424453.
   Bjerknes AL, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V138, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.015.
   Brown BJ, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2328, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}2328:CFPBAI]2.0.CO;2.
   Brown BJ, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V129, P43, DOI 10.1007/s004420100700.
   Bruckman D, 2015, THESIS U CALIFORNIA.
   Bruckman D, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V176, P465, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3023-6.
   Callaway RM, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P436, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002{[}0436:NWISAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Caruso CM, 2000, CAN J BOT, V78, P600, DOI 10.1139/cjb-78-5-600.
   Chittka L, 2001, NATURE, V411, P653, DOI 10.1038/35079676.
   CONNER JK, 1995, OECOLOGIA, V104, P218, DOI 10.1007/BF00328586.
   Da Silva EM, 2011, BOTANY, V89, P141, DOI 10.1139/B11-001.
   GALEN C, 1989, OECOLOGIA, V81, P120, DOI 10.1007/BF00377020.
   Gegear RJ, 2005, ANIM BEHAV, V69, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.029.
   Grabas GP, 1999, ECOSCIENCE, V6, P230, DOI 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682524.
   HARDER LD, 1993, CAN J BOT, V71, P353, DOI 10.1139/b93-038.
   Jakobsson A, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.005.
   KANCHAN S, 1980, NEW PHYTOL, V84, P739, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04786.x.
   Kearns C.A., 1993, TECHNIQUES POLLINATI.
   KOHN JR, 1985, AM J BOT, V72, P1144, DOI 10.2307/2443461.
   KWAK MM, 1991, OECOLOGIA, V86, P99, DOI 10.1007/BF00317395.
   Larson DL, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V130, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.009.
   Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x.
   Matsumoto T, 2010, BIOL INVASIONS, V12, P1617, DOI 10.1007/s10530-009-9574-5.
   Memmott J, 2002, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V269, P2395, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2174.
   Montgomery B. R., 2015, Journal of Pollination Ecology, V16, P101.
   Montgomery BR, 2009, BOTANY, V87, P283, DOI 10.1139/B08-139.
   Moragues E, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V122, P611, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.015.
   Morales CL, 2008, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V27, P221, DOI 10.1080/07352680802205631.
   Morales CL, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01069.x.
   MURPHY SD, 1995, CAN J BOT, V73, P1417, DOI 10.1139/b95-154.
   Murphy SD, 1992, MODERN METHODS PLANT.
   Planka E.R., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P53.
   PRICE MV, 1982, OECOLOGIA, V54, P353, DOI 10.1007/BF00380004.
   THOMSON JD, 1982, NEW PHYTOL, V90, P777, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03286.x.
   Traveset A, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006.
   Tscheulin T, 2009, PLANT ECOL, V205, P77, DOI 10.1007/s11258-009-9599-y.
   Vila M, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P3887, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.1076.
   WASER NM, 1978, OECOLOGIA, V36, P223, DOI 10.1007/BF00349811.
   WASER NM, 1986, OECOLOGIA, V70, P573, DOI 10.1007/BF00379906.
   WASER NM, 1986, AM NAT, V127, P593, DOI 10.1086/284507.
   WASER NM, 1978, ECOLOGY, V59, P934, DOI 10.2307/1938545.
   Westman AL, 1999, EUPHYTICA, V106, P253, DOI 10.1023/A:1003544025146.
   Weston LA, 1996, AGRON J, V88, P860, DOI 10.2134/agronj1996.00021962003600060004x.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{45}},
Times-Cited = {{7}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{60}},
Journal-ISO = {{Biol. Invasions}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DM9CZ}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000376663400015}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000432647700004,
Author = {Ramseier, Hans and Fueglistaller, Dominik and Laedrach, Christina and
   Ramseier, Christian and Rauch, Michael and Etter, Franziska Widmer},
Title = {{Flower strips encourage honey bees and wild bees}},
Journal = {{AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{7}},
Number = {{6}},
Pages = {{276-283}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{Honey bees and wild bees are essential for agricultural production and
   biodiversity, but have come under pressure worldwide. Besides the varroa
   mite, diseases and environmental toxins, lack of food is likely to be an
   important stress factor. For this reason, it is hoped that flower strips
   in the cultivated landscape will reduce the nectar dearth from late May
   to late July. From 2011 to 2015, flower-strip mixtures supplying pollen
   and nectar to honey bees and non-specialised bees during this summer
   gap, but which also appealed to agriculturally important beneficials
   such as hoverflies and predatory bugs, were developed at HAFL, the
   School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences. A comparison with
   extensively managed meadows, fallow lands and margins revealed that
   flower strips offer nourishment to many honey bees and non specialised
   wild bees. In addition, a 2015 case study with bumblebees showed that
   the proximity of a flower strip has a positive influence on colony
   development. A further positive aspect of flower strips most likely also
   lies in the fact that they reduce food competition between honey bees
   and wild bees in the remaining flowering areas.}},
Publisher = {{AGRARFORSCHUNG}},
Address = {{AGROSCOPE LIEBEFELD-POSIEUX, POSIEUX, CH-1725, SWITZERLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{German}},
Affiliation = {{Ramseier, H (Corresponding Author), HAFL, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
   Ramseier, Hans; Fueglistaller, Dominik; Laedrach, Christina; Ramseier, Christian; Rauch, Michael; Etter, Franziska Widmer, HAFL, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.}},
ISSN = {{1663-7852}},
EISSN = {{1663-7909}},
Keywords = {{bees; beneficials; flower strips; pollen; pollinators}},
Research-Areas = {{Agriculture}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Agriculture, Multidisciplinary}},
Author-Email = {{hans.ramseier@bfh.ch}},
Cited-References = {{Amiet F., 1994, ROTE LISTE GEFAHRDET.
   BAFU \& BLW, 2008, UMW LANDW HERG BEST.
   Boecking O., 2013, KONKURRENZ ZWISCHEN.
   Kleijn D, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms8414.
   Lehnherr B., 1990, NEKTAR POLLENPFLANZE.
   Maurizio A., 1994, TRACHTPFLANZENBUCH N.
   Muller A., 2007, EINSCHATZUNG G UNPUB.
   Pfiffner L., 2014, WILDBIENEN BESTAUBUN.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Pritsch G., 2007, BIENENWEIDE 200 TRAC.
   Tirado R., 2013, REPORT GREENPEACE RE.
   Vespa-crabro, 2015, HUMM APH SOC.
   Wilson-Rich N., 2015, BIENE GESCH BIOL ART.
   Zurbuchen A, 2012, WILDBIENENSCHUTZ WIS.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{14}},
Times-Cited = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{15}},
Journal-ISO = {{Agrarforschung Schweiz}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{VC2CH}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000432647700004}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000376803400005,
Author = {Grass, Ingo and Albrecht, Joerg and Jauker, Frank and Diekoetter, Tim
   and Warzecha, Daniela and Wolters, Volkmar and Farwig, Nina},
Title = {{Much more than bees-Wildflower plantings support highly diverse
   flower-visitor communities from complex to structurally simple
   agricultural landscapes}},
Journal = {{AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS \& ENVIRONMENT}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{225}},
Pages = {{45-53}},
Month = {{JUN 1}},
Abstract = {{One goal of wildflower plantings is to promote biodiversity in
   intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Flower visitors of
   wildflower plantings encompass many ecologically and economically
   important species. However, most studies on flower visitors of
   wildflower plantings have focused on single or few prominent taxa (e.g.,
   wild bees and hoverflies). In contrast, it remains largely unresolved
   how non-prominent flower visitors of the community are affected by
   wildflower resources, landscape context and time of the flowering
   season. We studied highly diverse flower-visitor communities on 14
   wildflower plantings varying in flower abundance and richness and their
   surrounding landscape context within a 500 m radius (percentage arable
   land, presence of additional wildflower plantings). Flower visitors were
   sampled in the early (May-June) and late (June-July) flowering season
   and grouped as follows: managed honeybees, wild bees, hoverflies, all
   other flower visitors. Strikingly, only 81 (25.1\%) of all 322 visiting
   species (<50.0\% of individuals) were bees or hoverflies, and 241
   non-prominent `other' visitor taxa were sampled, encompassing many
   ecologically and economically important species, e.g., parasitic wasps
   and non-syrphid Diptera. With the exception of honeybee abundance that
   was positively related to flower abundance, flower abundance and
   richness of wildflower plantings affected neither abundance nor richness
   of any visitor group. While a high amount of surrounding arable land
   decreased species richness of wild bees, richness of all other groups
   was unaffected. In contrast to the relatively weak abundance and
   richness responses at the group-level, we found strong species-specific
   responses to landscape context, resulting in substantial spatial and
   temporal turnover in community composition. In the early flowering
   season, wildflower plantings that were accompanied by additional local
   plantings and embedded within complex landscapes supported the highest
   abundances of habitat specialists (e.g. Bombus spp.), whereas isolated
   plantings were predominantly visited by agricultural generalists (e.g.
   predatory hoverflies and pollen beetles). These compositional
   differences diminished towards the end of the flowering season. Our
   study highlights the great conservation potential of wildflower
   plantings in agricultural landscapes. With the exception of wild bees,
   wildflower plantings support a high diversity of
   functionallycomplementary flower-visitor species from complex to
   structurally simple agricultural landscapes. These so-far overlooked
   flower visitors may have the potential to provide complementary
   ecosystem services and to step-in in agricultural settings where
   prominent providers have been lost. Assessments of the value of
   wildflower plantings to biodiversity conservation and agriculture
   require a shift away from solely focusing on prominent taxa and towards
   a more holistic appreciation of the entire flower-visitor community. (C)
   2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER}},
Address = {{RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Grass, I (Corresponding Author), Univ Gottingen, Dept Crop Sci, Agroecol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany.
   Grass, Ingo, Univ Gottingen, Dept Crop Sci, Agroecol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany.
   Grass, Ingo; Albrecht, Joerg; Farwig, Nina, Univ Marburg, Fac Biol, Conservat Ecol, Marburg, Germany.
   Albrecht, Joerg, Polish Acad Sci, Inst Nat Conservat, Krakow, Poland.
   Jauker, Frank; Diekoetter, Tim; Warzecha, Daniela; Wolters, Volkmar, Univ Giessen, Dept Anim Ecol, D-35390 Giessen, Germany.
   Diekoetter, Tim, Univ Kiel, Dept Landscape Ecol, Kiel, Germany.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.001}},
ISSN = {{0167-8809}},
EISSN = {{1873-2305}},
Keywords = {{Agri-environment scheme (AES); Ecosystem services; Flower resources;
   Landscape; Farmland biodiversity; Restoration}},
Keywords-Plus = {{POLLINATION SERVICES; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; BIODIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE;
   RESPONSES; CONSERVATION; RESOURCES; STRIPS}},
Research-Areas = {{Agriculture; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Ecology; Environmental Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{ingo.grass@agr.uni-goettingen.de
   albrecht@iop.krakow.pl
   frank.jauker@allzool.bio.uni-giessen.de
   tdiekoetter@ecology.uni-kiel.de
   daniela.warzecha@allzool.bio.uni-giessen.de
   volkmar.wolters@allzool.bio.uni-giessen.de
   farwig@staff.uni-marburg.de}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Wolters, Volkmar/B-4635-2010
   Warzecha, Daniela/I-4334-2019
   Jauker, Frank/I-5823-2017
   Diekotter, Tim/L-2463-2016
   Grass, Ingo/H-7609-2019
   }},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Wolters, Volkmar/0000-0002-7556-4578
   Jauker, Frank/0000-0003-4137-9072
   Grass, Ingo/0000-0001-7788-1940}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU); foundation of the
   University of Marburg}},
Funding-Text = {{We greatly thank Lara Bau, Stefanie Braun, Stefanie Kaib, Lilith Jeske
   and Sarah Werner for flower-visitor sampling and identification. Birgit
   Jauker assisted with species identification. We thank all farmers who
   participated in HIAP and allowed us access to their lands. Two anonymous
   reviewers gave very helpful comments on the manuscript. D.W. is funded
   by the German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU) in the framework of
   a PhD. scholarship. I. G. and J.A. acknowledge funding from the
   foundation of the University of Marburg.}},
Cited-References = {{Batary P, 2011, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V278, P1894, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.1923.
   Bates D., 2015, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF.
   Blaauw BR, 2014, BASIC APPL ECOL, V15, P701, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2014.10.001.
   Blaauw BR, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P890, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12257.
   Blitzer EJ, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V146, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.09.005.
   Carvell C, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P1760, DOI 10.1890/10-0677.1.
   Dicks LV, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P32, DOI 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00572.x.
   Diekotter T, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01759.x.
   Farwig N, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P1291, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2974-y.
   Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772.
   Garibaldi LA, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P439, DOI 10.1890/130330.
   Gathmann A, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P757, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00641.x.
   Goulson D, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1255957.
   Grass I, 2014, FUNCT ECOL, V28, P1117, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12285.
   Grass I, 2013, OECOLOGIA, V173, P913, DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2688-6.
   Holland JM, 2008, BIOL CONTROL, V47, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.06.010.
   Jauker B, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P107, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9820-6.
   Jauker F, 2012, BASIC APPL ECOL, V13, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2012.03.010.
   Jauker F, 2012, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V14, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2011.00541.x.
   Jauker F, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P547, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9331-2.
   Kleijn D, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x.
   Korpela EL, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V179, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.07.001.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Oksanen J., 2015, VEGAN COMMUNITY ECOL.
   Orford KA, 2015, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V282, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.2934.
   Parsche S, 2011, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V13, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2010.12.001.
   Pfiffner L, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.003.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Rader R, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P146, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1517092112.
   Riedinger V, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P1351, DOI 10.1890/14-1124.1.
   Roulston TH, 2011, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V56, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144802.
   Sala OE, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P1770, DOI 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770.
   Scheper J, 2015, J APPL ECOL, V52, P1165, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12479.
   Scheper J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P17552, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1412973111.
   Scheper J, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P912, DOI 10.1111/ele.12128.
   Skaug H., 2016, GEN LINEAR MIXED MOD.
   TENHUMBERG B, 1995, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V52, P39, DOI 10.1016/0167-8809(94)09007-T.
   The R Development Core Team, 2015, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Thies C, 1999, SCIENCE, V285, P893, DOI 10.1126/science.285.5429.893.
   Tscharntke T, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P857, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x.
   Venables WN, 2002, MODERN APPL STAT S, P495.
   Wang Y., 2015, MVABUND STAT METHODS.
   Wang Y, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00190.x.
   Westphal C, 2008, ECOL MONOGR, V78, P653, DOI 10.1890/07-1292.1.
   Winfree R, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P2068, DOI 10.1890/08-1245.1.
   Zuur Alain F., 2009, P1.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{46}},
Times-Cited = {{23}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{6}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{138}},
Journal-ISO = {{Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{DN1CH}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000376803400005}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000377043200025,
Author = {Martin, Michael D. and Olsen, Morten Tange and Samaniego, Jose A. and
   Zimmer, Elizabeth A. and Gilbert, M. Thomas P.},
Title = {{The population genomic basis of geographic differentiation in North
   American common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)}},
Journal = {{ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION}},
Year = {{2016}},
Volume = {{6}},
Number = {{11}},
Pages = {{3760-3771}},
Month = {{JUN}},
Abstract = {{Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is an invasive,
   wind-pollinated plant nearly ubiquitous in disturbed sites in its
   eastern North American native range and present across growing portions
   of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Phenotypic divergence between
   European and native-range populations has been described as rapid
   evolution. However, a recent study demonstrated major human-mediated
   shifts in ragweed genetic structure before introduction to Europe and
   suggested that native-range genetic structure and local adaptation might
   fully explain accelerated growth and other invasive characteristics of
   introduced populations. Genomic differentiation that potentially
   influenced this structure has not yet been investigated, and it remains
   unclear whether substantial admixture during historical disturbance of
   the native range contributed to the development of invasiveness in
   introduced European ragweed populations. To investigate fine-scale
   population genetic structure across the species' native range, we
   characterized diallelic SNP loci via a reduced-representation
   genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach. We corroborate phylogeographic
   domains previously discovered using traditional sequencing methods,
   while demonstrating increased power to resolve weak genetic structure in
   this highly admixed plant species. By identifying exome polymorphisms
   underlying genetic differentiation, we suggest that geographic
   differentiation of this important invasive species has occurred more
   often within pathways that regulate growth and response to defense and
   stress, which may be associated with survival in North America's diverse
   climatic regions.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Martin, MD (Corresponding Author), Norwegian Univ Sci \& Technol NTNU, Univ Museum, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
   Martin, Michael D.; Olsen, Morten Tange; Samaniego, Jose A.; Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr GeoGenet, Oster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
   Martin, Michael D., Univ Calif Berkeley, Ctr Theoret Evolutionary Genom, Valley Life Sci Bldg, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   Martin, Michael D.; Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Norwegian Univ Sci \& Technol NTNU, Univ Museum, Dept Nat Hist, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
   Zimmer, Elizabeth A., Museum Support Ctr, Smithsonian Inst, Natl Museum Nat Hist, Dept Bot, MRC 534,4210 Silver Hill Rd, Suitland, MD 20746 USA.
   Zimmer, Elizabeth A., Museum Support Ctr, Smithsonian Inst, Natl Museum Nat Hist, Labs Analyt Biol, MRC 534,4210 Silver Hill Rd, Suitland, MD 20746 USA.
   Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Curtin Univ, Dept Environm \& Agr, Trace \& Environm DNA Lab, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.}},
DOI = {{10.1002/ece3.2143}},
ISSN = {{2045-7758}},
Keywords = {{Ambrosia artemisiifolia; common ragweed; GBS; population genetics;
   population genomics; ragweed}},
Keywords-Plus = {{GENETIC-VARIATION; SESQUITERPENE LACTONES; R-PACKAGE; EVOLUTION;
   INVASIVENESS; DETERMINANTS; ASSOCIATION; ADAPTATION; DIVERSITY; SOFTWARE}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology; Evolutionary Biology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Ecology; Evolutionary Biology}},
Author-Email = {{mike.martin@ntnu.no}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Olsen, Morten/J-4783-2013
   Gilbert, Marcus/A-8936-2013
   Samaniego Castruita, Jose Alfredo/B-9033-2015}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Olsen, Morten/0000-0001-6716-6345
   Gilbert, Marcus/0000-0002-5805-7195
   Martin, Michael/0000-0002-2010-5139
   Samaniego Castruita, Jose Alfredo/0000-0001-5904-1198}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Lundbeck FoundationLundbeckfonden {[}R52-5062]}},
Funding-Text = {{Lundbeck Foundation (Grant/Award Number: R52-5062).}},
Cited-References = {{Alexander DH, 2009, GENOME RES, V19, P1655, DOI 10.1101/gr.094052.109.
   Baker H.G., 1974, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V5, P1, DOI {[}10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000245, DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.05.110174.000245].
   Bossdorf O, 2005, OECOLOGIA, V144, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0070-z.
   Bradbury PJ, 2007, BIOINFORMATICS, V23, P2633, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308.
   Chun YJ, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P1378, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05013.x.
   Colautti RI, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P364, DOI 10.1126/science.1242121.
   Conesa A, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P3674, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610.
   Conesa Ana, 2008, Int J Plant Genomics, V2008, P619832, DOI 10.1155/2008/619832.
   Dlugosch KM, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P431, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03538.x.
   Dlugosch KM, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P701, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01181.x.
   Dlugosch KM, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P2095, DOI 10.1111/mec.13183.
   Earl DA, 2012, CONSERV GENET RESOUR, V4, P359, DOI 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7.
   Ellstrand NC, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P7

repository: lizlaw/flashLIT

repo_name: lizlaw/flashLIT

filename: savedrecs (2).bib