text:
STE IN PRESS.
   Reimann M, 2010, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V38, P326, DOI 10.1007/s11747-009-0164-y.
   Reinartz W, 2004, J MARKETING RES, V41, P293, DOI 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.293.35991.
   Rigby DK, 2016, HARVARD BUS REV, V94, P41.
   Rose C., 2013, ROTMAN MANAGEMEN FAL, P29.
   Sabherwal R, 2007, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V54, P409, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2007.900785.
   Saldanha TJV, 2013, J OPER MANAG, V31, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.007.
   Sampson RC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P364.
   SAS, 2011, TURN CUST DAT AN MAR.
   Sawhney M, 2000, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS, P258.
   Schilling MA, 2007, MANAGE SCI, V53, P1113, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624.
   Setia P, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P565, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.11.
   Sharma R, 2014, EUR J INFORM SYST, V23, P433, DOI 10.1057/ejis.2014.17.
   Shaver JM, 1998, MANAGE SCI, V44, P571, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.44.4.571.
   Song M, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V26, P259, DOI 10.1002/smj.450.
   Song M, 2008, J OPER MANAG, V26, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.001.
   Song M, 2007, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V24, P52, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00232.x.
   Sorensen JB, 2000, ADMIN SCI QUART, V45, P81, DOI 10.2307/2666980.
   Srinivasan R, 2005, J MARKETING, V69, P193, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.193.
   Subramanyam R, 2010, COMMUN ACM, V53, P137, DOI 10.1145/1666420.1666455.
   Varadarajan R, 2009, J INTERACT MARK, V23, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.002.
   Wadhwa A, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P819.
   Wagner M, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P1587, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004.
   Wall TD, 1996, J OCCUP ORGAN PSYCH, V69, P153, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00607.x.
   Xu X, 2014, INFORM SYST RES, V25, P710, DOI 10.1287/isre.2014.0540.
   Yadav MS, 2014, J MARKETING, V78, P20, DOI 10.1509/jm.12.0020.
   Yadav MS, 2005, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V33, P585, DOI 10.1177/0092070305278487.
   Yoo Y, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1398, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1120.0771.
   Yoo YJ, 2010, INFORM SYST RES, V21, P724, DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0322.
   Zablah AR, 2012, INFORM SYST RES, V23, P418, DOI 10.1287/isre.1120.0419.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{126}},
Times-Cited = {{7}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{25}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{62}},
Journal-ISO = {{MIS Q.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EO9ZS}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000397047200015}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000397047200017,
Author = {Huang, Jimmy and Henfridsson, Ola and Liu, Martin J. and Newell, Sue},
Title = {{GROWING ON STEROIDS: RAPIDLY SCALING THE USER BASE OF DIGITAL VENTURES
   THROUGH DIGITAL INNOVATON}},
Journal = {{MIS QUARTERLY}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{41}},
Number = {{1}},
Pages = {{301-314}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Digital ventures, start-ups growing by drawing on and adding to digital
   infrastructures, can scale their business at an unprecedented pace. We
   view such rapid scaling as a generative process by which a venture's
   user base increases significantly between two points in time through
   digital innovation. We studied WeCash, a Chinese digital venture, nearly
   doubling its user base monthly, to learn more about this generative
   process. We trace three contingent mechanisms underpinning rapid
   scaling: data-driven operation, instant release, and swift
   transformation. We explain these mechanisms and how they interact in the
   rapid scaling of digital ventures. The research offers an agency
   perspective on scaling of digital ventures that speaks to the digital
   innovation literature.}},
Publisher = {{SOC INFORM MANAGE-MIS RES CENT}},
Address = {{UNIV MINNESOTA-SCH MANAGEMENT 271 19TH AVE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455
   USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Huang, J (Reprint Author), Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.
   Huang, Jimmy, Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.
   Liu, Martin J., Univ Nottingham, Business Sch China, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   Newell, Sue, Univ Sussex, Sch Business Management \& Econ, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England.}},
DOI = {{10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.16}},
ISSN = {{0276-7783}},
Keywords = {{Digital innovation; digital ventures; digital technology; user base;
   rapid scaling; case study}},
Keywords-Plus = {{NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; TECHNOLOGY; MARKETS; GROWTH; STRATEGIES; AGENDA;
   LOGIC}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science; Business \&
   Economics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science \& Library
   Science; Management}},
Author-Email = {{jimmy.huang@wbs.ac.uk
   ola.henfridsson@wbs.ac.uk
   Martin.Liu@nottingham.edu.cn
   Sue.Newell@sussex.ac.uk}},
Cited-References = {{ARTHUR WB, 1989, ECON J, V99, P116, DOI 10.2307/2234208.
   Benkler Y., 2006, WEALTH NETWORKS SOCI.
   Boland R. J., 2004, MANAGING DESIGNING, P265.
   Brynjolfsson E, 2010, WIRED FOR INNOVATION, P1.
   Brynjolfsson E., 2014, 2 MACHINE AGE WORK P.
   Chandler A., 1962, STRATEGY STRUCTURE C.
   CHURCH J, 1992, J IND ECON, V40, P85, DOI 10.2307/2950628.
   Eisenmann T, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P92.
   Fine CH, 1998, CLOCKSPEED WINNING I.
   Garud R, 2001, LEAS ORG MAN SERIES, P1.
   Garud R, 2008, ORGAN STUD, V29, P351, DOI 10.1177/0170840607088018.
   Garud R, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P760, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x.
   Gerring J, 2007, CASE STUDY RESEARCH: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521676568.
   Giddens A., 1984, CONSTITUTION SOC OUT.
   Grindley P., 1995, STANDARDS STRATEGY P.
   Hanseth O., 2000, CONTROL DRIFT DYNAMI, P56.
   Henfridsson O, 2014, ORGAN SCI, V25, P932, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2013.0883.
   Henfridsson O, 2014, J INF TECHNOL, V29, P27, DOI 10.1057/jit.2013.30.
   Henfridsson O, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P907, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11.
   Kallinikos J, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P357, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02.
   Langley A, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P691, DOI 10.2307/259349.
   Langlois RN, 2007, GRAZ SCHUMPETER LECT, P1, DOI 10.4324/9780203963630.
   Lee E, 2006, MANAGE SCI, V52, P1838, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0571.
   Lee J, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1428, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0707.
   Leitch C, 2010, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V34, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00374.x.
   Lusch RF, 2015, MIS QUART, V39, P155.
   McKelvie A, 2010, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V34, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00375.x.
   Nambisan S, 2013, J ASSOC INF SYST, V14, P215.
   Oliva R, 2003, SYST DYNAM REV, V19, P83, DOI 10.1002/sdr.271.
   Porter M., 1985, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG.
   Prasad A, 2010, MANAGE SCI, V56, P2224, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1259.
   Schilling MA, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P387, DOI 10.2307/3069353.
   SCHMITTLEIN DC, 1994, MARKET SCI, V13, P41, DOI 10.1287/mksc.13.1.41.
   Shapiro C, 1999, INFORM RULES STRATEG.
   Song M, 2009, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V26, P291, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00659.x.
   Strauss A.L., 1998, BASICS QUALITATIVE R.
   Sun BH, 2004, MARKET SCI, V23, P243, DOI 10.1287/mksc.1040.0058.
   Svahn F, 2017, MIS QUART, V41, P239, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12.
   Tilson D, 2010, INFORM SYST RES, V21, P748, DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0318.
   Tripsas M, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P441, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0419.
   Verganti R., 2009, DESIGN DRIVEN INNOVA.
   Wareham J, 2014, ORGAN SCI, V25, P1195, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2014.0895.
   Yoo Y, 2013, J ASSOC INF SYST, V14, P227.
   Yoo Y, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1398, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1120.0771.
   Yoo YJ, 2010, INFORM SYST RES, V21, P724, DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0322.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{45}},
Times-Cited = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{20}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{44}},
Journal-ISO = {{MIS Q.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EO9ZS}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000397047200017}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000397047200018,
Author = {Kyriakou, Harris and Nickerson, Jeffrey V. and Sabnis, Gaurav},
Title = {{KNOWLEDGE REUSE FOR CUSTOMIZATION: METAMODELS IN AN OPEN DESIGN
   COMMUNITY FOR 3D PRINTING}},
Journal = {{MIS QUARTERLY}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{41}},
Number = {{1}},
Pages = {{315-332}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Theories of knowledge reuse posit two distinct processes: reuse for
   replication and reuse for innovation. We identify another distinct
   process, reuse for customization. Reuse for customization is a process
   in which designers manipulate the parameters of metamodels to produce
   models that fulfill their personal needs. We test hypotheses about reuse
   for customization in Thingiverse, a community of designers that shares
   files for three-dimensional printing. 3D metamodels are reused more
   often than the 3D models they generate. The reuse of metamodels is
   amplified when the metamodels are created by designers with greater
   community experience. Metamodels make the community's design knowledge
   available for reuse for customization-or further extension of the
   metamodels, a kind of reuse for innovation.}},
Publisher = {{SOC INFORM MANAGE-MIS RES CENT}},
Address = {{UNIV MINNESOTA-SCH MANAGEMENT 271 19TH AVE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455
   USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Kyriakou, H (Reprint Author), IESE Business Sch, Av Pearson 21, Barcelona 08034, Spain.
   Kyriakou, Harris, IESE Business Sch, Av Pearson 21, Barcelona 08034, Spain.
   Nickerson, Jeffrey V.; Sabnis, Gaurav, Stevens Inst Technol, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.17}},
ISSN = {{0276-7783}},
Keywords = {{Knowledge reuse; metamodels; digital innovation; customization;
   parametric design; online communities; open source; software reuse;
   Thingiverse; 3D printing}},
Keywords-Plus = {{OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS-DEVELOPMENT;
   ONLINE COMMUNITIES; INNOVATION; COLLABORATION; METAKNOWLEDGE}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science; Business \&
   Economics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science \& Library
   Science; Management}},
Author-Email = {{hkyriakou@iese.edu
   jnickerson@stevens.edu
   gsabnis@stevens.edu}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{National Science Foundation {[}IIS-1211084, IIS-1422066, CCF-1442840]}},
Funding-Text = {{The authors thank the editors and reviewers for their direction. We
   thank Steven Englehardt and Joseph Risi for the collection and analysis
   of data, as well as the members of the Center for Decision Technologies
   at Stevens Institute of Technology for their feedback. We also thank
   Sinan Aral for a helpful discussion on network autocorrelation. This
   material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation
   under grants IIS-1211084, IIS-1422066, and CCF-1442840.}},
Cited-References = {{Abernathy W.J., 1978, TECHNOL REV, V64, P254.
   AIELLO L, 1986, P IEEE, V74, P1304, DOI 10.1109/PROC.1986.13633.
   Alavi M, 2001, MIS QUART, V25, P107, DOI 10.2307/3250961.
   Alford L. P, 1929, RECENT EC CHANGE US, V1 and 2, P96.
   Allen G, 2010, INFORM SYST RES, V21, P56, DOI 10.1287/isre.1080.0189.
   Arakji RY, 2010, INT J ELECTRON COMM, V15, P145, DOI 10.2753/JEC1086-4415150106.
   Balka K, 2009, 1 MONDAY, V14.
   BANKER RD, 1991, MIS QUART, V15, P375, DOI 10.2307/249649.
   BENKLER Y, 2015, THE HANDBOOK OF COLL, P175.
   Berente N, 2010, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V28, P569, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2010.489926.
   Boland RJ, 2007, ORGAN SCI, V18, P631, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1070.0304.
   Brooks F. P, 2010, DESIGN DESIGN ESSAYS.
   Cameron AC, 2015, J HUM RESOUR, V50, P317.
   Garrett B., 2011, STRATEGIC FORESIGHT.
   Conner B. P., 2014, ADDITIVE MANUFACTURI, V1-4, P64.
   Crowston K., 2012, ACM COMPUTING SURVEY, V44.
   DAVIS FD, 1989, MIS QUART, V13, P319, DOI 10.2307/249008.
   Earls A., 2014, TECHNOLOGY FORECAST, P2.
   Evans JA, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P721, DOI 10.1126/science.1201765.
   Faraj S, 2015, MIS QUART, V39, P393, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.06.
   FISCHER G, 2006, END USER DEV, P427, DOI DOI 10.1007/1-4020-5386-X\_19.
   Flavell L., 2010, BEGINNING BLENDER OP.
   Fogliatto FS, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V138, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.002.
   Franke N, 2016, REVOLUTIONIZING INNOVATION: USERS, COMMUNITIES, AND OPEN INNOVATION, P511.
   Frazer J, 2016, ARCHIT DESIGN, V86, P18, DOI 10.1002/ad.2019.
   Frenken Koen, 2006, INNOVATION EVOLUTION.
   Gebler M, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V74, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033.
   Gershenfeld N., 2008, FAB COMING REVOLUTIO.
   Greene W. H., 1994, EC9410 NEW YORK U.
   Haefliger S, 2008, MANAGE SCI, V54, P180, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0748.
   Hann IH, 2013, INFORM SYST RES, V24, P520, DOI 10.1287/isre.2013.0474.
   Henfridsson O, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P907, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11.
   Hill BM, 2013, AM BEHAV SCI, V57, P643, DOI 10.1177/0002764212469359.
   Hill B. M., 2013, CSCW, P1035.
   Hoffman T., 2016, PC MAGAZINE.
   Holzmann T, 2014, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V26, P601, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2014.913786.
   Howison J, 2014, MIS QUART, V38, P29, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.02.
   Huang SH, 2013, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V67, P1191, DOI 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5.
   Hyland K, 2003, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V54, P251, DOI 10.1002/asi.10204.
   Jarke M., 2009, METAMODELING METHOD, P43.
   Jeppesen LB, 2005, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V22, P347, DOI 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00131.x.
   Jones R, 2011, ROBOTICA, V29, P177, DOI 10.1017/S026357471000069X.
   Kallinikos J, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P357, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02.
   KARIMI J, 1990, MIS QUART, V14, P179, DOI 10.2307/248776.
   Kazhdan M., 2003, Symposium on Geometry Processing, P156.
   Kelly S., 2008, DOMAIN SPECIFIC MODE.
   Kim Y, 1998, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V14, P113.
   Kintel M., 2015, OPENSCAD PROGRAMMERS.
   Koren Y, 2010, J MANUF SYST, V29, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.01.001.
   Kuk G., 2013, P 21 EUR C INF SYST.
   Lampel J, 1996, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P21.
   Lim W. C., 1994, SOFTWARE IEEE, V(11, P23.
   Majchrzak A, 2004, MANAGE SCI, V50, P174, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0116.
   Mallapragada G, 2012, MARKET SCI, V31, P474, DOI 10.1287/mksc.1110.0690.
   March JG, 1991, ORGAN SCI, V2, P71, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
   Markus ML, 2001, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V18, P57.
   McMenamin PG, 2014, ANAT SCI EDUC, V7, P479, DOI 10.1002/ase.1475.
   Mironov V, 2003, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V21, P157, DOI 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7.
   Noble David F., 1979, AM DESIGN SCI TECHNO.
   ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 1993, MIS QUART, V17, P309, DOI 10.2307/249774.
   Orlikowski W.J., 1992, P C COMP SUPP COOP W, P362, DOI DOI 10.1145/143457.143549.
   Piller F, 2016, REVOLUTIONIZING INNOVATION: USERS, COMMUNITIES, AND OPEN INNOVATION, P483.
   Piller FT, 2004, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V15, P435, DOI {[}10.1080/0953728042000238773, 10.1080/095372804200238773].
   Pons Pascal, 2006, J GRAPH ALGORITHMS A, V10, P191, DOI DOI 10.7155/JGAA.00124.
   Purao S, 2003, INFORM SYST RES, V14, P269, DOI 10.1287/isre.14.3.269.16559.
   Raasch C, 2009, R\&D MANAGE, V39, P382, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00567.x.
   Ransbotham S, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P613.
   Rengier F, 2010, INT J COMPUT ASS RAD, V5, P335, DOI 10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x.
   Rogers E. M., 2010, DIFFUSION INNOVATION.
   Sarker S, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P317.
   Saviotti P., 1996, TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUT.
   Schon D., 1983, REFLECTIVE PRACTITIO.
   Schubert C., 2013, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, P1.
   Sherif K, 2006, MIS QUART, V30, P339.
   Shirky C., 2008, HERE COMES EVERYBODY.
   Simon H. A., 1996, SCI ARTIFICIAL.
   Simpson TW, 2001, ENG COMPUT-GERMANY, V17, P129, DOI 10.1007/PL00007198.
   Tarski A., 1983, LOGIC SEMANTICS META.
   Tibbits S, 2014, ARCHIT DESIGN, V84, P116, DOI 10.1002/ad.1710.
   Tseng M. M., 1996, ANN CIRP, V45, P153.
   von Krogh G, 2006, MANAGE SCI, V52, P975, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0560.
   West J, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.025.
   Wohlers T, 2013, MANUF ENG, V150, P67.
   Woodbury R, 2010, ELEMENTS PARAMETRIC.
   Yates JoAnne, 2015, 512414 MIT SLOAN SCH.
   Yumer ME, 2015, UIST'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, P109, DOI 10.1145/2807442.2807448.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{86}},
Times-Cited = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{14}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{41}},
Journal-ISO = {{MIS Q.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EO9ZS}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000397047200018}},
OA = {{green\_published}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000396808900004,
Author = {Svahn, Fredrik and Mathiassen, Lars and Lindgren, Rikard and Kane,
   Gerald C.},
Title = {{Mastering the Digital Innovation Challenge}},
Journal = {{MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{58}},
Number = {{3}},
Pages = {{14-16}},
Month = {{SPR}},
Publisher = {{SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW ASSOC, MIT SLOAN SCHOOL MANAGEMENT}},
Address = {{77 MASSACHUSETTS AVE, E60-100, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139-4307 USA}},
Type = {{Editorial Material}},
Language = {{English}},
ISSN = {{1532-9194}},
Research-Areas = {{Business \& Economics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Business; Management}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{0}},
Times-Cited = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{11}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{21}},
Journal-ISO = {{MIT Sloan Manage. Rev.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EO6ND}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000396808900004}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000396463400007,
Author = {Nicolete, Priscila Cadorin and Sommer Bilessimo, Simone Meister and da
   Silva Cristiano, Marta Adriana and Schardosim Simao, Jose Pedro and da
   Silva, Juarez Bento},
Title = {{Technology Integration Actions in Mathematics teaching in Brazilian
   Basic Education: Stimulating STEM disciplines}},
Journal = {{RED-REVISTA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA}},
Year = {{2017}},
Number = {{52}},
Month = {{JAN 30}},
Abstract = {{Mathematics is a fundamental skill in many aspects of a student's life.
   Most students everywhere, and in this study in Brazil, sometimes lack
   motivation to thrive in such subjects. The work presented in this paper
   aims to contribute to the development of a multiplatform teaching and
   learning application through the use of Information and Communication
   Technologies (ICT), in order to encourage the study of mathematics from
   the first years of basic education. The activities are divided into two
   areas: training teachers and how to integrate technology in the
   classroom through the use of mobile learning. The experience was
   conducted with children from the 5th grade, teaching them fractions and
   mathematics concepts all as part of a research project called
   ``Technology Integration Proposal in Teaching STEM Disciplines in Public
   Basic Education{''}, supported by CNPq - the Brazilian National Council
   for Scientific and Technological Development, and the project ``Use of
   Remote Experimentation on Mobile Devices for Basic Education in Public
   Schools{''} supported by FRIDA (Regional Fund for Digital Innovation in
   Latin America and the Caribbean). In 2011, this project was selected as
   one of the most innovative research projects in Brazilian education by
   the Institute for Development and Educational Innovation (IDIE) of the
   Organization of Ibero-American States for Education, Science and Culture
   (OEI) and sponsored by FundaciOn Telefonica.}},
Publisher = {{EDIT UM-EDICIONES UNIV MURCIA}},
Address = {{EDIFICIO SAAVEDRA FAJARDO, C/O ACTOR ISIDORO MAIQUEZ 9, MURCIA, 30007,
   SPAIN}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Nicolete, PC (Reprint Author), Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Ararangua, SC, Brazil.
   Nicolete, Priscila Cadorin; Sommer Bilessimo, Simone Meister; da Silva Cristiano, Marta Adriana; Schardosim Simao, Jose Pedro; da Silva, Juarez Bento, Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Ararangua, SC, Brazil.}},
DOI = {{10.6018/red/52/7}},
Article-Number = {{7}},
ISSN = {{1578-7680}},
Keywords = {{Educational Technology; Education; Mathematics}},
Research-Areas = {{Education \& Educational Research}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Education \& Educational Research}},
Author-Email = {{priscila.cadorin@ufsc.br
   simone.bilessimo@ufsc.br
   marta.cristiano@ufsc.br
   pedro.simao@posgrad.ufsc.br
   juarez.silva@ufsc.br}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{FRIDA (Regional Fund for Digital Innovation in Latin America); FRIDA
   (Regional Fund for Digital Innovation in Caribbean); CNPq (Brazilian
   National Council of Scientific and Technological Development); RNP
   (Brazilian National Network of Education and Research)}},
Funding-Text = {{We would like to thank FRIDA (Regional Fund for Digital Innovation in
   Latin America and the Caribbean), CNPq (Brazilian National Council of
   Scientific and Technological Development) and RNP (Brazilian National
   Network of Education and Research) for their support and resources to
   carry out this project.}},
Cited-References = {{Avison D. E., 1991, European Journal of Information Systems, V1, P183, DOI 10.1057/ejis.1991.33.
   Batista S. C. F., 2010, REV NOVAS TECNOLOGIA, V8, P1679.
   Butterworth B., 2002, OP ADDR MATH ASS REA.
   Bzuneck J. A, 2001, MOTIVACAO ALUNO CONT, P9.
   CAGR, 2013, SIST CONTR AC GRAD.
   Catapan A. H., 1999, C INT ED DIST RIO JA.
   Coperve, 2015, COM PERM VEST.
   de Lima J., 2014, GLOB ENG ED C EDUCON.
   Dziabenko O., 2013, IT INNOVATIVE PRACTI, V10.
   Gallant D. J., 2010, SCI TECHNOLOGY ENG M.
   Goh T. T., 2009, MULTIPLATFORM E LEAR.
   Gramani M. C. N., 2013, CADERNOS PESQUISA, V42, P868.
   Hofmann J, 2006, HDB BLENDED LEARNING, P27.
   INEP/MEC, 2013, CENS ED SUP BRAS 201.
   INEP/MEC, 2013, APR AL BRAS.
   INEP/MEC, 2013, CENS ESC BRAS 2013.
   Johnson L., 2015, NMC HORIZON REPORT 2.
   JOHNSON L., 2014, NMC HORIZON REPORT E.
   Koehler Matthew J, 2009, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, V9, P60.
   McPherson S., 2014, INT STEM ED C ISEC.
   Mishra P, 2006, TEACH COLL REC, V108, P1017, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
   Barbosa Neto J. F., 2013, REV NOVAS TECNOLOGIA, V11, P1679.
   OECD {[}The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development], 2013, PROGR INT STUD ASS P.
   Pereira O. R. E., 2013, ACM COMPUT SURV, V46.
   Sadovsky P., 2007, REV NOVA ESCOLA REV, P16.
   Shulman L. S., 1986, ED RES, V15, P4, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Softex, 2013, INT OBS.
   Tajra S. F., 2011, INFORM EDUCACAO NOVA.
   Unesco, 2014, DIR POL APR MOV.
   Unesco, 2015, ED IMP DIR HUM IMP D.
   Welsh ET, 2003, INT J TRAINING DEV, V7, P245, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.1360-3736.2003.00184.X.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{31}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{9}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{24}},
Journal-ISO = {{RED-Rev. Educ. Distancia}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EO1MU}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000396463400007}},
OA = {{gold}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@inproceedings{ ISI:000426903800172,
Author = {Merluzzi, Andrea and Brunetti, Gianpiero},
Editor = {{Biljanovic, P and Koricic, M and Skala, K and Grbac, TG and CicinSain, M and Sruk, V and Ribaric, S and Gros, S and Vrdoljak, B and Mauher, M and Tijan, E and Hormot, F}},
Title = {{Metals Industry: Road to Digitalization}},
Booktitle = {{2017 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
   TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO)}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{967-973}},
Note = {{40th International Convention on Information and Communication
   Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, CROATIA,
   MAY 22-26, 2017}},
Organization = {{IEEE}},
Abstract = {{The challenge of the new globalized market and the current steel market
   outlook characterized by plant underutilization, are the elements
   leading metal producers to seek for low Capex investments, aiming at
   improving the efficiency of the production facilities, the quality of
   the products, the health and safety of the workers as well as the
   environmental sustainability. In this scenario, DANIELI has created a
   new cross-functional business unit named DIGI\&MET whose mission
   consists of developing and implementing new plant design concepts, based
   on digital innovation, and also new business models, based on
   servitization and outcome economy principles. DANIELI summarizes in this
   article its approach for both brown and green field plants.}},
Publisher = {{IEEE}},
Address = {{345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA}},
Type = {{Proceedings Paper}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Merluzzi, A (Reprint Author), Danieli Automat SpA, BU DIGI\&MET, Buttrio, UD, Italy.
   Merluzzi, Andrea, Danieli Automat SpA, BU DIGI\&MET, Buttrio, UD, Italy.
   Brunetti, Gianpiero, Danieli Automat SpA, BU Steelmaking, Buttrio, UD, Italy.}},
ISBN = {{978-953-233-092-2}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Engineering; Telecommunications}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science,
   Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering, Electrical \& Electronic;
   Telecommunications}},
Author-Email = {{a.merluzzi@dca.it
   g.brunetti@dca.it}},
Cited-References = {{ESTEP Platform, 2016, ROADMAP INT INT MAN.
   PwC, 2016, 2016 GLOB IND 4 0 SU.
   World Economic Forum in collaboration with Accenture, 2017, CISC VIS NETW IND GL.
   World Steel Association, 2016, WORLD STEEL FIR 2016.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{4}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ6PJ}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000426903800172}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000427176100008,
Author = {Batt, Chris},
Title = {{Long-term digital strategy: do it once, do it right}},
Journal = {{INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCE}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{118}},
Number = {{5-6}},
Pages = {{331-335}},
Abstract = {{Purpose - Collecting Institutions in the Network Society is a
   multidisciplinary PhD study examining present practices and policies of
   collecting institutions (museums, galleries, libraries and archives) in
   their use and development of digital technologies, within the context of
   wider socio-technical change. It investigates whether existing service
   paradigms are best suited to future digital delivery of services in the
   emergent network society.
   Design/methodology/approach - It uses an interpretive methodological
   approach creating a body of phenomenological evidence enabling
   comparison between the organisational context, internal practices,
   histories and policies of collecting institutions, and the wider
   socio-technical impact of the internet. Literature reviews provide
   evidence from the ``outer world{''} of internet developments and impact
   to establish four generic drivers of internet change. For the ``inner
   world{''} of collecting institutions, organisational context and
   research and development on innovation are examined to analyse various
   perspectives on common approaches to service policy and practice.
   Additionally, textual analysis of institutional mission statements and
   policy documents is used to establish the degree of common purpose
   across collecting institutions and the preparedness of practitioners and
   policymakers to deal with rapid socio-technical change.
   Findings - The evidence is synthesised to define an institutional
   paradigm describing the present operational processes and practices of
   collecting institutions. This is compared with the four generic drivers
   to define opportunities and challenges that collecting institutions face
   in exploiting the internet. This synthesis demonstrates that the
   siloised and fragmented nature of the institutional paradigm creates
   significant barriers to effective exploitation. Evidence from the
   textual analysis is used to develop a shared mission statement for all
   collecting institutions as the foundation of a strategic digital future.
   Originality/value - The study proposes a radically new service paradigm
   (the digital knowledge ecology) enabling collecting institutions to
   achieve maximum user value in their delivery of digital services, and
   concludes with proposals for actions to build a collective strategy.}},
Publisher = {{EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD}},
Address = {{HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
DOI = {{10.1108/ILS-06-2017-0058}},
ISSN = {{2398-5348}},
Keywords = {{Strategic planning; Libraries; Internet; Museums; Archives; Digital
   innovation; Socio-technical change}},
Research-Areas = {{Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Information Science \& Library Science}},
Author-Email = {{cbatt@mac.com}},
Cited-References = {{Lincoln A, 1862, AM PRESIDENCY PROJEC.
   Martin R. S, 2003, COOPERATION CHANGE A.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{2}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{2}},
Journal-ISO = {{Inf. Learn. Sci.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{FY9HI}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000427176100008}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@inproceedings{ ISI:000426701100069,
Author = {Julia, Kaidalova and Kurt, Sandkuhl and Ulf, Seigerroth},
Editor = {{CruzCunha, MM and Varajao, JEQ and Rijo, R and Martinho, R and Peppard, J and SanCristobal, JR and Monguet, J}},
Title = {{Challenges in Integrating Product-IT into Enterprise Architecture a case
   study}},
Booktitle = {{CENTERIS 2017 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION
   SYSTEMS / PROJMAN 2017 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT
   / HCIST 2017 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
   INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERI}},
Series = {{Procedia Computer Science}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{121}},
Pages = {{525-533}},
Note = {{International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems (CENTERIS) /
   International Conference on Project MANagement (ProjMAN) / International
   Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and
   Technologies (HCist), Barcelona, SPAIN, NOV 08-10, 2017}},
Abstract = {{Digital Innovation (DI), Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-physical
   Systems (CPS) offer new opportunities for enterprises but also cause new
   challenges for Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM). Based on an
   industrial case from power garden products illustrating potentials and
   challenges of DI and IoT, this paper investigates the integration of
   product-IT into enterprise architecture (EA). Product-IT includes the
   embedded IT-systems in physical products and services / components for
   operations, maintenance or evaluation purposes. The paper investigates
   problems in product-IT and enterprise-IT integration and challenges for
   the field of EAM. The case study shows that industry implemented
   pragmatic solutions for dealing with P-IT integration into EA, but there
   is a clearly expressed demand for improvements and a need for refined
   EAM standards in this context. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by
   Elsevier B.V.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV}},
Address = {{SARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Proceedings Paper}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Julia, K (Reprint Author), Jonkoping Univ, Sch Engn, Jonkoping, Sweden.
   Kurt, Sandkuhl, Univ Rostock, Inst Comp Sci, Rostock, Germany.
   Julia, Kaidalova; Kurt, Sandkuhl; Ulf, Seigerroth, Jonkoping Univ, Sch Engn, Jonkoping, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.070}},
ISSN = {{1877-0509}},
Keywords = {{Product-IT; Enterprise-IT; Enterprise Architecture Management;
   Integration}},
Keywords-Plus = {{INTERNET; THINGS}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science; Operations
   Research \& Management Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Information Science \&
   Library Science; Operations Research \& Management Science}},
Author-Email = {{julia.kaidalova@ju.se}},
Cited-References = {{Ahlemann F., 2012, STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE.
   Berman SJ, 2011, DIGITAL TRANSFORMATI, V17.
   Bi ZM, 2014, IEEE T IND INFORM, V10, P1537, DOI 10.1109/TII.2014.2300338.
   Buckl S, 2010, WORK C PRACT DRIV RE.
   Chan HC, 2015, J SERVICE SCI MANAGE, V8, P552, DOI DOI 10.4236/JSSM.2015.84056.
   Glissmann SM, 2011, SYST SCI HICSS 2011.
   Haren V., 2011, TOGAF VERS 9 1.
   Johnson P, 2004, C SYST ENG RES.
   Johnson P, 2007, INFORM SYST FRONT, V9, P163, DOI 10.1007/s10796-007-9030-y.
   Li YJ, 2012, BMJ CASE REP, V2012, P13.
   Luftman J, 2003, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V20, P9, DOI 10.1201/1078/43647.20.4.20030901/77287.2.
   Patel P, 2015, J SYST SOFTWARE, V103, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.027.
   Sandkuhl K, 2015, INT C BUS INF SYSTEM.
   Schmidt R, 2014, ENT DISTR OBJ COMP C.
   Simonsson M, 2010, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V27, P10, DOI 10.1080/10580530903455106.
   Williamson K., 2002, RES METHODS STUDENTS.
   Winter K, 2010, INVESTIGATING STATE, V90.
   Wissotzki M, 2015, INT C BUS INF RESEAR.
   Yin R. K., 2013, CASE STUDY RES DESIG.
   Zimmermann A, 2015, LECT NOTES INFORM P, V244, P183.
   Zimmermann A, 2015, CLOUD COMPUTING.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{21}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ6HX}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000426701100069}},
OA = {{gold}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700018,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, A and JuellSkielse, G and Johannesson, P},
Title = {{Open Digital Innovation: A Contest Driven Approach}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{1-140}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Book}},
Language = {{English}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{0}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700018}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700002,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Open Digital Innovation A Contest Driven Approach Introduction}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{1-3}},
Abstract = {{This chapter provides a background to the book. It introduces the notion
   of innovation and discusses how it can be managed, in particular through
   innovation contests. A life-cycle perspective on innovation contests is
   introduced, which shows how a contest moves through the phases of
   pre-contest, contest, and post-contest. This perspective is used
   throughout the book and the activities of the life-cycle are described
   and analysed in separate chapters, moving from goal setting and
   stakeholder engagement over operations management to business model
   design and barrier management.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Editorial Material; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_1}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Cited-References = {{Fagerberg J., 2006, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO.
   Terwiesch C, 2009, INNOVATION TOURNAMEN.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{2}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700002}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700001,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Open Digital Innovation A Contest Driven Approach Preface}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{V}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Editorial Material; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{0}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700001}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700003,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Open Innovation}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{5-9}},
Abstract = {{This chapter introduces the notion of open innovation, which is about
   organizations making use of external ideas, solutions and technologies
   instead of only relying on its internal innovation. Three different
   forms of open innovation are discussed: inside-out, outside-in and
   coupled innovation, which differ with regard to the direction of the
   idea flows. The chapter also introduces a number of models for open
   innovation, including crowdsourcing, product platforming, collaborative
   innovation networks, and innovation contests. Digital innovation has
   transformed many businesses, enabling new kinds of smart, connected
   products as well as novel business models based on platforms.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_2}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Cited-References = {{Chesbrough H., 2006, OPEN INNOVATION NEW.
   Gassmann O., 2004, R D MAN C, V6.
   Gloor PA, 2006, SWARM CREATIVITY COM.
   Lichtenthaler U, 2009, J MANAGE STUD, V46, P1315, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x.
   Surowiecki J., 2005, WISDOM CROWDS.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{5}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700003}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700004,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Open Digital Innovation Contest}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{11-21}},
Abstract = {{This chapter introduces open digital innovation contests that aim to
   develop digital services. Key stakeholders in such contests are
   identified: organisers, participants, resource providers, and
   beneficiaries. A classification of digital innovation contests is
   proposed based on the length of a contest and its inclusiveness. Other
   design elements of contests are also discussed, including media, target
   group and evaluation. It is argued that innovation contests can be
   viewed as innovation intermediaries that help to connect actors in an
   innovation system. Advantages and disadvantages of innovation contests
   are discussed. Finally, six contests are introduced, which serve as
   running examples throughout the book.
   Open digital innovation contests are competitions that aim to develop
   digital services. Based on the work by Hjalmarsson and Rudmark (2012),
   they can be described as events in which external developers compete to
   design and implement innovative and solid digital service prototypes,
   based on digital resources made available by the organiser. There are
   three key ingredients in this definition. First, the participants of the
   contests are to be external developers, i.e. developers outside the
   organisation that arranges the competition. In this way, new categories
   of people are drawn into the innovation system around an organisation,
   thereby enabling open innovation. Furthermore, the goal is to develop a
   digital service prototype; it is not sufficient just to suggest a new
   idea or create a product without digital content. Finally, the service
   developed is to be based on digital resources made available by the
   organiser.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_3}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Cited-References = {{Adamczyk S, 2012, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V21, P335, DOI 10.1111/caim.12003.
   Bullinger AC, 2010, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V19, P290, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.x.
   Hjalmarsson A., 2012, DESIGN SCI RES INFOR.
   Juell-Skielse Gustaf, 2014, Information Polity, V19, P247, DOI 10.3233/IP-140346.
   Terwiesch C, 2009, INNOVATION TOURNAMEN.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{5}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{1}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700004}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700005,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Organising Open Digital Innovation Contests}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{23-27}},
Abstract = {{This chapter introduces a structured approach to support organisers of
   open digital innovation contests. It supports organisers to design and
   operate contests to achieve intended outcomes and effects. First, the
   logic of the model is presented. Then each phase in the model is
   described and key activities are highlighted. The following chapters
   describe each activity in detail.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_4}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{0}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700005}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700007,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Engage Contest Stakeholders}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{37-47}},
Abstract = {{This chapter address the stakeholders that should be identified and
   engaged in the contest process. First, different types of stakeholders
   are presented along with their characteristics and support to the
   contest organizers. This is followed by a description of the activity
   Engage contest stakeholders and a running example. Engaging contest
   stakeholders is affected by the activity Set goals and itself affects
   activities such as Motivate developers and Design contest. Often,
   iterations are made between engaging stakeholders and the process to
   design the contest, as the structure of the competition is evolving
   during the pre-contest phase. Finally, we suggest further reading on
   engaging stakeholders in open digital innovation.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_6}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Cited-References = {{Freeman R.E., 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{1}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700007}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700008,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Design Contest}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{49-63}},
Abstract = {{In this chapter, we discuss how to design an open digital innovation
   contest. First, contest formats are matched to contest goals. Then,
   different elements of contest design are presented, followed by a
   description of the activity Design contest with guidelines and a running
   example. Design contest sets the scene for the remainder of the contest
   process and is heavily affected by the activity Set goals. Finally,
   contest rules and how to budget a contest are discussed together with
   some suggestions for further reading.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_7}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Cited-References = {{Bullinger A. C., 2010, INNOVATION, V8, P1.
   Hjalmarsson Anders, 2012, Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. Proceedings 7th International Conference, DESRIST 2012, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9\_2.
   Juell-Skielse Gustaf, 2014, Information Polity, V19, P247, DOI 10.3233/IP-140346.
   Mankins JC., 1995, TECHNOLOGY READINESS.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{4}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700008}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700016,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Monitor Contest}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{123-133}},
Abstract = {{In this chapter, we present a method for evaluating open digital
   innovation contests. The method serves several purposes: it helps to
   evaluate whether the organisers have achieved their goals of organising
   the contest or not, it supports managers in managing the contest
   operations and it supports learning within the organisations. The
   activity also supports knowledge transfer to other organisations and
   supports making contributions to the scientific knowledge base. The
   method description is followed by an example and a few guidelines.}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8\_15}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Cited-References = {{Ayele W., 2016, PREICIS WORKSH PRACT.
   Ayele W., 2015, P PAC AS C INF SYST.
   Hansen MT, 2007, HARVARD BUS REV, V85, P121.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{3}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700016}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000424491700017,
Author = {Hjalmarsson, Anders and Juell-Skielse, Gustaf and Johannesson, Paul},
Book-Author = {{Hjalmarsson, A
   JuellSkielse, G
   Johannesson, P}},
Title = {{Rules for the Open Digital Innovation Contest ``Olympic City Transport
   Challenge{''}}},
Booktitle = {{OPEN DIGITAL INNOVATION: A CONTEST DRIVEN APPROACH}},
Series = {{Progress in IS}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{135-138}},
Publisher = {{SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN}},
Address = {{HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, A (Reprint Author), RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders, Univ Boras, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Hjalmarsson, Anders; Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, RISE Viktoria, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Juell-Skielse, Gustaf; Johannesson, Paul, Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8}},
ISSN = {{2196-8705}},
ISBN = {{978-3-319-56339-8; 978-3-319-56338-1}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Information Science \& Library Science}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science \&
   Library Science}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{0}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ3XG}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000424491700017}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000419738000343,
Author = {Gagliardi, Mario},
Title = {{Analysing the Digital Transformations, Territories, Frames and Uses}},
Journal = {{DESIGN JOURNAL}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{20}},
Number = {{1}},
Pages = {{S4197-S4212}},
Note = {{12th International Conference of the European-Academy-of-Design (EAD),
   Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Architecture, Rome, ITALY, APR 12-14, 2017}},
Organization = {{European Acad Design}},
Abstract = {{While digital space is explained in itself by computer science,
   important questions for the humanities - such as how the Digital affects
   human behaviour, or how it impacts society and economy - are outside its
   scope. Different disciplines have provided answers, but there has been
   no integrated concept bridging these insights. This paper proposes a
   concept to explain the Digital by integrating insights from computer
   science, media studies, sociology and philosophy. The resulting
   framework suggests that the Digital consists of characteristic dynamics,
   spaces and mechanisms. After explaining the concept of Digital Machine,
   an ontological framework consisting of four main fields of analysis -
   Transformation, Territory, Frame and Use - is proposed. With
   Transformations and Territories, the processes of the Digital and its
   wider socio-political and economic dimensions are analysed. Within
   Frames, human action and interpretation happen. In the Uses of the
   Digital, consumption has become a form of production, and User's uses
   can be analysed in the differential between the intents of a Digital
   Machine and the interpretations of its users. To conclude, Anders'
   concept of Promethean slope is taken to explain the increasing problems
   of humans to distinguish the actions of algorithms from human action,
   and future implications of the evolution of the Digital are discussed.
   Finally, routes for digital innovation and recommendations for design
   practice are proposed.}},
Publisher = {{ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR \& FRANCIS LTD}},
Address = {{2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article; Proceedings Paper}},
Language = {{English}},
DOI = {{10.1080/14606925.2017.1352919}},
ISSN = {{1460-6925}},
EISSN = {{1756-3062}},
Keywords = {{Digital; Society; Analysis; Design}},
Research-Areas = {{Art}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Art}},
Author-Email = {{digital@mgstrategy.com}},
Cited-References = {{Akhawe D., 2013, P 22 INT C WORLD WID, P59.
   Altheide David L, 1979, MEDIA LOGIC.
   Anders Gunther, 2002, ANTIQUIERTHEIT MENSC, VII.
   Anders Gunther, 2002, ANTIQUIERTHEIT MENSC, VI.
   Baecker D., 2007, STUDIEN NACHSTEN GES.
   Baecker D., 2003, NUTZEN UNGELOESTER P, P17.
   Baecker D., 2003, ORG MANAGEMENT.
   Batailles G., 1949, PART MAUDITE 1 CONSU, V1.
   Bateson G., 1972, STEPS ECOLOGY MIND C, P214.
   Beaumont Peter, 2016, GUARDIAN.
   Bell P., 2001, HDB VISUAL ANAL, P14.
   Berry DM, 2011, PHILOS SOFTWARE CODE.
   Chafkin M., 2016, BLOOMBERG       1130.
   Choi M., 2012, TEXTLINGUISTICS, V33, P469.
   Chua THH, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011.
   Culkin J. M., 1967, SATURDAY REV, V50, P51.
   de Certeau M, 1984, PRACTICE EVERYDAY LI.
   DeLanda M., 1991, WAR AGE INTELLIGENT, P220.
   Deleuze G., 1983, ANTIOEDIPUS.
   Deleuze G., 1993, 1000 PLATEAUS.
   Descola P., 1996, NATURE SOC ANTHR PER, P83.
   Ebert H., 2014, DIGITAL DEATH MORTAL, P37.
   Floyd C., 1992, SOFTWARE DEV REALITY, P20.
   Fredkin E., 2003, INT J THEORETICAL PH, V42, P2.
   GAGLIARDI M, 2001, DES MANAG J FORMER S, V12, P32.
   Gathman E. C. H., 2008, INNER HIST DEVICES, P45.
   German K., 2011, ETHICS EMERGING MEDI, P2.
   Gross M. D., 1988, DESIGN STUDIES, V9, P133.
   Guattari F., 1992, CHAOSMOSE, P58.
   Guattari F., 1995, COMPLEXITY J PHILOS, V6, P8.
   Jenkins H., 2010, WALL STREET J.
   Lanier J, 2010, YOU ARE NOT GADGET.
   Lonnqvist JE, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.002.
   Luhmann Niklas, 1998, GESELLSCHAFT GESELLS.
   MacDougall R., 2011, ETHICS EMERGING MEDI.
   Manovich L, 2013, SOFTWARE TAKES COMMA.
   Manovich L., 2013, CHRONICLE HIGHER ED.
   Massumi Brian, 1992, USERS GUIDE CAPITALI.
   McLuhan M., 1967, MEDIUM IS MESSAGE, P74.
   Moore RK, 2015, ROBOTS THAT TALK AND LISTEN: TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL IMPACT, P317.
   Murgia M., 2015, TELEGRAPH.
   Nass CI, 2007, WIRED SPEECH VOICE A.
   Nikkei, 2016, NIKKEI ASIAN RE 0312.
   Reed T. V., 2014, DIGITIZED LIVES CULT, P219.
   Robinson H., 2007, INT J ADVERTISING, V26.
   Russell S., 1994, ARTIF INTELL, P31.
   Sartre J-P., 1960, CRITIQUE RAISON DIAL.
   Steeves V, 2014, YOUNG CANADIANS WIRE.
   Sterling B., 1992, INTERNET.
   Sturken M, 2001, PRACTICES LOOKING IN, P45.
   Waters R., 2015, FINANCIAL TIMES.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{51}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Journal-ISO = {{Des. J.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{FS4DP}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000419738000343}},
OA = {{gold}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000423959900001,
Author = {Masiero, Silvia},
Title = {{Digital governance and the reconstruction of the Indian anti-poverty
   system}},
Journal = {{OXFORD DEVELOPMENT STUDIES}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{45}},
Number = {{4}},
Pages = {{393-408}},
Abstract = {{On a global scale, programmes of social protection for the poor are
   becoming increasingly computerised, and architectures of biometric
   recognition are being widely used in this respect. I research how these
   architectures, adopted in anti-poverty systems, structure ways to `see
   the state' for citizens living in poverty. To do so I study India's
   Public Distribution System (PDS) in Kerala, which is augmenting its main
   food security scheme with the computerised recognition of its users. In
   the government's narrative, biometric technology is depicted as an
   optimal solution to the illicit diversion of PDS goods on the market.
   Nevertheless, according to the multiple narratives collected across the
   state, beneficiaries dispute this view in different ways because of the
   mixed effects of the new technology on their entitlements under the PDS.
   The government's capability to reconstruct its image through digital
   innovation is thus found to be constrained by citizens' perceptions
   derived from their encounters with the new technology of governance.}},
Publisher = {{ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR \& FRANCIS LTD}},
Address = {{2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Masiero, S (Reprint Author), Loughborough Univ Technol, Sch Business \& Econ, Int Dev, Loughborough, Leics, England.
   Masiero, Silvia, Loughborough Univ Technol, Sch Business \& Econ, Int Dev, Loughborough, Leics, England.}},
DOI = {{10.1080/13600818.2016.1258050}},
ISSN = {{1360-0818}},
EISSN = {{1469-9966}},
Keywords-Plus = {{SOCIAL PROTECTION; POLITICS; KERALA; POOR}},
Research-Areas = {{Public Administration}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Planning \& Development}},
Author-Email = {{s.masiero@lboro.ac.uk}},
Cited-References = {{Aker J. C., 2015, 268 CTR GLOB DEV.
   Ankita Aggarwal, 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, V46, P21.
   Barrientos A, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P439, DOI 10.1080/13600810903305257.
   BENEI V, 2001, EVERYDAY STATE SOC M.
   Bhalla S, 2011, 39 LSE AS RES CTR.
   Bhatti B., 2012, Economic and Political Weekly, V47, P16.
   Boulding Kenneth, 1956, IMAGE KNOWLEDGE LIFE.
   Carswell G, 2013, ECON SOC, V42, P430, DOI 10.1080/03085147.2013.772757.
   Chatterjee P., 2004, POLITICS GOVERNED RE.
   Corbridge S., 2005, SEEING STATE GOVERNA.
   Corbridge S, 2013, ECON SOC, V42, P455, DOI 10.1080/03085147.2013.772758.
   Cordella A, 2010, J STRATEGIC INF SYST, V19, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001.
   Devereux S, 2010, DEV PRACT, V20, P367, DOI 10.1080/09614521003709940.
   Dreze J., 2015, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V50, P39.
   Foucault Michel, 2007, SECURITY TERRITORY P.
   Decker C., 2011, 253 CTR GLOB DEV.
   George P. S, 1979, PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
   Government of India, 2015, EC SURVEY.
   Saini S., 2015, 294 IND COUNC RES IN.
   Himanshu, 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, V46, P38.
   Himanshu H., 2013, LIVE MINT.
   Khera R, 2014, FOOD POLICY, V46, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.009.
   Khera R, 2011, J DEV STUD, V47, P1038, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2010.506917.
   Kumar S., 1979, IMPACT SUBSIDIZED RI.
   Ray I., 2009, P 3 IEEE ACM INT C I.
   Madon S, 2005, EUR J INFORM SYST, V14, P401, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000576.
   Masiero S., 2015, P 7 IEEE ACM INT C I.
   Mooij J., 1999, Journal of International Development, V11, P625, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<625::AID-JID607>3.3.CO;2-7.
   Muralidharan K., 2014, 1999 NAT BUR EC RES.
   Prakash Amit, 2007, Information Technology \& People, V20, P262, DOI 10.1108/09593840710822868.
   Puri R., 2012, Economic and Political Weekly, V47, P21.
   Radhakrishna R., 1997, INDIAS PUBLIC DISTRI.
   Rajalekshmi KG, 2007, INF TECHNOL INT DEV, V4, P19, DOI 10.1162/itid.2007.4.1.19.
   RAMAKUMAR R, 2010, ETHICS POLICY BIOMET, V6005, P154.
   Reetika Khera, 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, V46, P106.
   Riessman C. K., 2008, NARRATIVE METHODS HU.
   Rose N, 1999, POWERS FREEDOM REFRA.
   Sarkar S, 2014, OXF DEV STUD, V42, P516, DOI 10.1080/13600818.2014.924493.
   Scott James., 1998, SEEING STATE CERTAIN.
   Sen A., 1981, POVERTY FAMINES ESSA.
   Srinivasan J., 2013, P 6 IEEE ACM INT C I.
   Suchitra M., 2004, UNDERMINING FINE PUB.
   Swaminathan M., 2008, 70 UN DEP EC SOC AFF.
   Swaminathan M., 2002, SOCIAL SCI, V30, P34.
   Veeraraghavan R., 2015, THESIS.
   Vincent K, 2011, INT SOC SECUR REV, V64, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2010.01383.x.
   Wade RH, 2002, GLOB GOV, V8, P443.
   Williams G, 2003, DEV CHANGE, V34, P163, DOI 10.1111/1467-7660.00300.
   Williams G, 2012, GEOFORUM, V43, P991, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.001.
   WINNER L, 1980, DAEDALUS, V109, P121.
   Yin R. K, 2009, CASE STUDY RES DESIG.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{51}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Journal-ISO = {{Oxf. Dev. Stud.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{FU6JW}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000423959900001}},
OA = {{green\_published}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@article{ ISI:000422964600002,
Author = {Zulhuda, Sonny and Sayuti, Afifah Binti},
Title = {{WHITHER POLICING CRYPTOCURRENCY IN MALAYSIA?}},
Journal = {{IIUM LAW JOURNAL}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{25}},
Number = {{2}},
Pages = {{179-196}},
Abstract = {{Cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin, is a digital currency in which encryption
   techniques are used to regulate the generation of units of currency and
   verify the transfer of funds, operating independently of a central bank.
   It is an emerging financial technology enabled by innovation,
   increasingly popular among global Internet users, and more
   interestingly, it challenges the existing financial and regulatory rules
   on the currency and payment systems of the world today. On the other
   side, certain cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, have been actively used as
   payment tools for illicit transactions. Both the ``promising{''} and
   ``challenging{''} faces of cryptocurrency trigger causes for concern for
   policy makers, not only from financial sector, but also legal and
   technological sectors. The decentralised nature of cryptocurrency
   creates unique problems for the government to regulate or impose any
   regulatory requirements. This article argues that, in order for Malaysia
   to remain at the forefront of financial and digital innovation, it is
   timely to look at the question on whether to formulate certain policy
   and regulatory framework on the use of cryptocurrency in Malaysian
   market. The answer can pave the way for Malaysian digital citizens to
   potentially grab the opportunities made possible by the cryptocurrency
   technology. For this purpose, the researchers seek to study the features
   of cryptocurrency and the experiences from policymakers in other
   jurisdictions in dealing with the matter.}},
Publisher = {{INT ISLAMIC UNIV MALAYSIA, PRESS RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CENTER}},
Address = {{PO BOX 10, KUALA LUMPUR, 50728, MALAYSIA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Zulhuda, S (Reprint Author), Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah Laws, Civil Law Dept, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Zulhuda, Sonny, Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah Laws, Civil Law Dept, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Sayuti, Afifah Binti, Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Ahmad Ibrahim Kuliyyah Laws, Comparat Law Program, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.}},
ISSN = {{0128-2530}},
EISSN = {{2289-7852}},
Keywords = {{cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; digital money; electronic commerce; regulations}},
Research-Areas = {{Government \& Law}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Law}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia under Fundamental Research
   Grant Scheme (FRGS)}},
Funding-Text = {{The researchers wish to thank the Ministry of Higher Education of
   Malaysia for providing a support under the Fundamental Research Grant
   Scheme (FRGS) that has helped this research and publication.}},
Cited-References = {{Ball James, 2014, GUARDIAN.
   Bracking Sarah, 2008, 28 BROOKS WORLD POV.
   Brito Jerry, 2013, BITCOIN PRIMER POLIC, P13.
   Chan Elaine, 2014, J INT BANKING FINANC, P398.
   Colbert, BITCOIN MALAYSIA.
   De Vries Derek, 2014, UBS SECURITIES LLC G, P1.
   Gadkari Pia, BBC NEWS.
   Gatto James, 2014, OHIO STATE ENTREPREN, V9, P430.
   Global Legal Research Directorate Staff, 2014, REG BITC SEL JUR, P1.
   Kelly Jemima, REUTERS.
   Kurbalija Jovan, 2014, INTRO INTERNET GOVER, P128.
   Middlebrook Stephen T., 2013, BUS LAWYER, V69, P2.
   Middlebrook ST, 2013, BUS LAWYER, V69, P263.
   Nakamoto Satoshi, BITCOIN PEER TO PEER, P4.
   Quest David, 2015, J INT BANKING FINANC, P401.
   Saunders Sarah, 2015, TAXATION MAGAZIN MAR, V175, P16.
   Simser Jeffrey, 2015, J FINANCIAL CRIME JF, V22, P164.
   Southurst Jon, COINDESK.
   Trautman Lawrence, 2014, RICHMOND J LAW TECHN, V20, p{[}13, 14].
   Meredith Michael W., 2015, WASH LAW REV, P299.
   Volastro Anthony, CNBC.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{21}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{1}},
Journal-ISO = {{IIUM Law J.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{FT2IP}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000422964600002}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@inproceedings{ ISI:000419843900082,
Author = {Chen, James K. C. and Altantsetseg, Purevdulam},
Editor = {{Kocaoglu, DF and Anderson, TR and Daim, TU and Kozanoglu, DC and Niwa, K and Perman, G and Steenhuis, HJ}},
Title = {{Entrepreneurship of Professional Managers in High-Tech Firms to Enhance
   Service Innovation: Case Study of Hsinchu Science Park and Silicon
   Valley Park}},
Booktitle = {{2017 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND
   TECHNOLOGY (PICMET)}},
Series = {{Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and
   Technology}},
Year = {{2017}},
Note = {{Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and
   Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR, JUL 09-13, 2017}},
Organization = {{Portland State Univ, Dept Engn \& Technol Management; Portland State
   Univ Fdn}},
Abstract = {{International Business Machines (IBM) points out that academics and
   industries pay a higher attention on ``Service Science{''} since 1985.
   With the rotation of the wheel of a service era, many companies has
   driven from production to service-orientation, and focus on
   manufacturing services field. In the past, high-tech companies with
   leading technologies and unique products were ahead of other companies,
   but nowadays, this pattern is changed due to the changing market
   environment, consumption and other factors. In order to attract
   customers and to continue a leading position at the market, companies
   require to have service innovation infrastructure. This study focuses on
   enhancement of service innovation goal by professional managers'
   entrepreneurship for high-tech companies in Hsinchu Science Park and
   Silicon Valley areas.
   Initially, in accordance with the purpose of the study, relevant
   literatures integrated from domestic and international journals to
   develop the draft questionnaire. Then, a survey was conducted at Hsinchu
   Science Park and Silicon Valley by the participation of 12 experts to
   finalize the content of the questionnaire. Third, the pilot
   questionnaire survey sent out to 250 participants (200 in Hsinchu
   Science Park and 50 in Silicon Valley) through e-mail and internet
   platform. Finally, the statistical software is used analyze multivariate
   regression.
   Findings state that the personality (PersA) of Entrepreneurial
   Orientation to Service Innovation (InnV) no significant correlation. The
   personality (PersB) to InnV have significant correlation. When PersA
   integrated environment (Env) to InnV generated significant positive
   correlation; PersB integrated Env to InnV got strong positive
   correlation. Consequently, environment factor hold on intermediary
   efficient results. PersA integrated Organizational Factor (OrgV) have
   significant correlation but only increase a little coefficient value.
   PersB integrated OrgV have significant correlation but decrease the
   coefficient value. Consequently, this study demonstrates that OrgV
   doesn't have an intermediary efficient result.
   The result of the analysis is useful for decision - makings of top
   managers, when they adopt service innovation in these two Science Park.
   Moreover, results provide theoretical contribution for academicians for
   their future academic reports.}},
Publisher = {{IEEE}},
Address = {{345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA}},
Type = {{Proceedings Paper}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Chen, JKC (Reprint Author), Asia Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taichung, Taiwan.
   Chen, James K. C.; Altantsetseg, Purevdulam, Asia Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taichung, Taiwan.}},
ISSN = {{2159-5100}},
ISBN = {{978-1-890843-36-6}},
Keywords-Plus = {{ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS; DIGITAL INNOVATION; STRATEGY-MAKING;
   PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; MODEL; MANIPULATION; PERSPECTIVE; KNOWLEDGE;
   COMPONENT}},
Research-Areas = {{Engineering}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Engineering, Electrical \& Electronic}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan {[}MOST-104-2410-H-468-021]}},
Funding-Text = {{This research is supported by a research grant from Ministry of Science
   and Technology (MOST-104-2410-H-468-021) in Taiwan. We appreciated
   Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan offer importance resources
   support this research and helps. We also thanks for two Science Park
   engineers response the questionnaire.}},
Cited-References = {{Andrews K, 1986, BUSINESS POLICY TEXT.
   BAHRAMI H, 1987, CALIF MANAGE REV, V30, P51, DOI 10.2307/41165266.
   BAIRD IS, 1985, ACAD MANAGE REV, V10, P230, DOI 10.2307/257965.
   Bandura A, 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A.
   BATEMAN TS, 1993, J ORGAN BEHAV, V14, P103, DOI 10.1002/job.4030140202.
   Bless C., 1993, FUNDAMENTALS SOCIAL, P6.
   Bless C., 2000, FUNDAMENTALS SOCIAL, P15.
   Boudreau KJ, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1409, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0678.
   BOURGEOIS LJ, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V5, P241, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250050305.
   Bourgeois L. T., 1980, ACAD MANAGE REV, V5, P25, DOI DOI 10.2307/257802.
   BOWERS KS, 1973, PSYCHOL REV, V80, P307, DOI 10.1037/h0035592.
   Boyd H. W., 1985, MARKETING RES TEXT C, P19.
   Brittain J. W., 1980, ORG LIFE CYCLE, P291.
   Bryman A., 1990, QUANTITATIVE DATA AN, P34.
   Burgelman R. A, 1986, INSIDE CORPORATIVE I.
   BUSS DM, 1987, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V52, P1219, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1219.
   BUSS DM, 1987, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V53, P1214, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1214.
   Cantillon R., 1734, ESSAY NATURE GEN COM.
   Carayannis EG, 2006, TECHNOVATION, V26, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.003.
   Chesbrough H. W., 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW.
   Cole AH, 1946, J ECON HIST, V6, P1.
   Collins O, 1971, AM J SOCIOL, V77, P617.
   Cooper A. C., 1971, FOUNDING TECHNOLOGIC.
   COVIN JG, 1988, J MANAGE STUD, V25, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00033.x.
   Covin JG, 1991, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P7, DOI DOI 10.1177/104225879101600102.
   Crant JM, 2000, J MANAGE, V26, P435, DOI 10.1177/014920630002600303.
   Deal T. E., 1982, CORPORATE CULTURES R.
   De Hertog P, 1999, EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
   DESS GG, 1984, ADMIN SCI QUART, V29, P52, DOI 10.2307/2393080.
   Dess GG, 2005, ACAD MANAGE EXEC, V19, P147, DOI 10.5465/AME.2005.15841975.
   Dess G. G., 1987, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V1987, P21.
   De Vellis R. F., 1991, SCALE DEV THEORY APP, P38.
   Devore J., 1993, STAT EXPLORATION ANA, P29.
   DOWNS GW, 1976, ADMIN SCI QUART, V21, P700, DOI 10.2307/2391725.
   Field A. P., 2000, DISCOVERING STAT USI, P69.
   FREDRICKSON JW, 1986, ACAD MANAGE REV, V11, P280, DOI 10.2307/258460.
   Gasse Y, 1982, ENCY ENTREPRENEURSHI, P209.
   Gilley KM, 2000, J MANAGE, V26, P763, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00055-6.
   GLAZER R, 1991, J MARKETING, V55, P1, DOI 10.2307/1251953.
   Hage J., 1980, THEORIES ORG.
   HART SL, 1992, ACAD MANAGE REV, V17, P327, DOI 10.2307/258775.
   HARTMANN H, 1959, ADMIN SCI QUART, V3, P429, DOI 10.2307/2390809.
   Wu M. L., 2005, EUR J OPER RES, V176, P252.
   Hofer C.W., 1978, STRATEGY FORMULATION.
   Kanter RM., 2004, STRATEGIC DIRECTION, V20, P7.
   Kearney C, 2009, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V16, P26, DOI 10.1108/14626000910932863.
   Kim Jae-On, 1985, INTRO FACTOR ANAL, P9.
   KIMBERLY JR, 1981, HDB ORG DESIGN, V1, P84.
   KOBERG CS, 1987, J BUS RES, V15, P397, DOI 10.1016/0148-2963(87)90009-9.
   Kreiser P.M., 2010, J SMALL BUSINESS ENT, V23, P39, DOI DOI 10.1080/08276331.2010.10593472.
   Laforge R. W., 1987, RES MARKETING ENTREP, P54.
   LAWRENCE PR, 1983, RENEWING AM IND.
   Lazarus R. S., 1984, STRESS APPRAISAL COP.
   Lee J, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1428, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0707.
   LIEBERMAN MB, 1988, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V9, P41, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250090706.
   Lumpkin GT, 1996, ACAD MANAGE REV, V21, P135, DOI 10.2307/258632.
   Lusch RF, 2015, MIS QUART, V39, P155.
   Maccoll B., 2004, THESIS RHODES U GRAH, P36.
   Machuki V. N., 2011, PRIME J BUSINESS ADM, V1, P205.
   MacMillan I. C, 1982, J BUS STRAT, V2, P43.
   McGranth R. G., 2000, ENTREPRENEURIAL MIND.
   MILLER D, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P544, DOI 10.2307/256459.
   MILLER D, 1983, MANAGE SCI, V29, P770, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770.
   MILLER D, 1978, MANAGE SCI, V24, P921, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.921.
   MINTZBERG H, 1973, CALIF MANAGE REV, V16, P44, DOI 10.2307/41164491.
   MINTZBERG H, 1985, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V6, P257, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250060306.
   MOTOWIDLO SJ, 1994, J APPL PSYCHOL, V79, P475, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475.
   NAMAN JL, 1993, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V14, P137, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140205.
   Nambisan S., 2007, GLOBAL BRAIN YOUR RO.
   Okeyo W. O, 2014, INT J BUSINESS SOCIA, V4, P59.
   Penrose E, 1959, THEORY GROWTH FIRM.
   Peters TW, 1982, SEARCH EXCELLENCE.
   Pfeffer J., 1978, EXTERNAL CONTROL ORG.
   Porter M., 1985, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG.
   Porter M. E., 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, P72.
   Prahalad C.K., 2004, FUTURE COMPETITION C.
   RAJAGOPALAN N, 1993, J MANAGE, V19, P349, DOI 10.1177/014920639301900207.
   RANDOLPH WA, 1984, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P114, DOI 10.2307/258238.
   Rauch A, 2009, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V33, P761, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x.
   Vasquez-Urriago AR, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006.
   SANDBERG WR, 1987, J BUS VENTURING, V2, P5, DOI 10.1016/0883-9026(87)90016-4.
   Saxenian A., 2001, IND CORP CHANGE, V10, P893, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.4.893.
   SCARR S, 1983, CHILD DEV, V54, P424, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb03884.x.
   Schneider B., 1983, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V5, P1.
   Sekaran U., 2000, RES METHODS BUSINESS.
   Shane S. A., 1994, ACADEMY MANAGEMENT B, P90.
   SHAPERO A, 1975, PSYCHOL TODAY, V9, P83.
   SMITH CA, 1983, J APPL PSYCHOL, V68, P653, DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.68.4.653.
   STAW BM, 1975, ADMIN SCI QUART, V20, P345, DOI 10.2307/2391995.
   Stinchcombe Arthur L., 1965, HDB ORG.
   TUSHMAN ML, 1986, ADMIN SCI QUART, V31, P439, DOI 10.2307/2392832.
   Pedrycz W., 2008, HDB GRANULAR COMMUTA, P719.
   Watada J., 1982, JAPANESE J ERGONOMIC, V34, P333.
   Wheelen J. D, 1988, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT.
   WHETTEN DA, 2001, DEV MANAGEMENT SKILL.
   Yoo YJ, 2010, INFORM SYST RES, V21, P724, DOI 10.1287/isre.1100.0322.
   {[}Anonymous], 1993, BUSINESS WEEK.
   {[}Anonymous], 1991, WEBSTERS NINTH NEW C.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{98}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{0}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ2RN}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000419843900082}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@inproceedings{ ISI:000417417800005,
Author = {Sandkuhl, Kurt and Kaidalova, Julia and Seigerroth, Ulf},
Editor = {{Halle, S and Dijkman, R and Lapalme, J}},
Title = {{Towards Integration Methods of Product-IT into Enterprise Architectures}},
Booktitle = {{PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED
   OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS AND DEMONSTRATIONS (EDOCW 2017)}},
Series = {{IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference
   Workshops-EDOCW}},
Year = {{2017}},
Pages = {{23-28}},
Note = {{21st IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing
   Conference (EDOC), Quebec City, CANADA, OCT 10-13, 2017}},
Organization = {{IEEE; IEEE Comp Soc; Lab Informatique Formelle; Univ Quebec Chicoutimi}},
Abstract = {{Digital innovation (DI), Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-Physical
   Systems (CPS) offer new opportunities for enterprises but also cause new
   challenges for Enterprise Architecture Management. Based on an
   industrial case from power garden products illustrating potentials and
   challenges of DI and IoT, this paper investigates the integration of
   product-IT into enterprise architectures. Product-IT includes the
   embedded IT-systems in physical products and services, components for
   operations, maintenance or evaluation purposes. The paper investigates
   the suitability of traditional enterprise architecture layers for
   structuring product-IT, identifies problems in product-IT and
   enterprise-IT integration and challenges for the field of EAM. The main
   contributions of the paper are (1) to position the area of product-IT in
   the field of EAM, (2) to identify challenges from real-world cases
   regarding integration of product-IT into EA and (3) outline potential
   ways to approach the challenges.}},
Publisher = {{IEEE}},
Address = {{345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA}},
Type = {{Proceedings Paper}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Sandkuhl, K (Reprint Author), Univ Rostock, Inst Comp Sci, Rostock, Germany.
   Sandkuhl, Kurt, Univ Rostock, Inst Comp Sci, Rostock, Germany.
   Kaidalova, Julia; Seigerroth, Ulf, Jonkoping Univ, Sch Engn, Jonkoping, Sweden.}},
DOI = {{10.1109/EDOCW.2017.13}},
ISSN = {{2325-6583}},
ISBN = {{978-1-5386-1568-3}},
Keywords = {{Product-IT; Enterprise-IT; Enterprise Architecture Management;
   Integration}},
Research-Areas = {{Computer Science; Engineering}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Computer Science, Software Engineering; Computer Science, Theory \&
   Methods; Engineering, Electrical \& Electronic}},
Author-Email = {{kurt.sandkuhl@uni-rostock.de
   julia.kaidalova@ju.se
   ulf.seigerroth@ju.se}},
Cited-References = {{Ahlemann F., 2012, STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE.
   BUCKL S, 2010, WORK C PRACT DRIV, V69, P17.
   Fowler M., 2002, PATTERNS ENTERPRISE.
   Glissmann S. M., 2011, SYSTEM SCI HICSS 201, P1.
   Guinard D, 2010, IEEE T SERV COMPUT, V3, P223, DOI 10.1109/TSC.2010.3.
   Haren V., 2011, TOGAF VERS 9 1.
   Hill James, 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 13th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC 2010). Volume I: Main Symposium, P10, DOI 10.1109/ISORC.2010.29.
   Johnson P., 2004, 2 ANN C SYST ENG RES.
   Johnson P, 2007, INFORM SYST FRONT, V9, P163, DOI 10.1007/s10796-007-9030-y.
   Land O, 2009, ENTERP ENG SER, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-85232-2.
   Lohe J, 2014, INF SYST E-BUS MANAG, V12, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10257-012-0211-y.
   Luftman J, 2003, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V20, P9, DOI 10.1201/1078/43647.20.4.20030901/77287.2.
   Machado G. B., 2006, NETW INT C SYST INT, P18.
   Sandkuhl K., 2015, INT C BUS INF SYST, P260.
   Schmidt R, 2014, IEEE INT ENTERP, P266, DOI 10.1109/EDOCW.2014.47.
   Simonsson M, 2010, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V27, P10, DOI 10.1080/10580530903455106.
   STELZER D, 2010, SERV OR COMP ICSOC, V6275, P12.
   Valja M., 2014, 2014 International Conference on Embedded Systems (ICES), P297, DOI 10.1109/EmbeddedSys.2014.6953179.
   Wissotzki M., 2015, PERSPECTIVES BUSINES, P82.
   Yoo T., 2013, EURASIP J WIREL COMM, V2013, P1.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{20}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{2}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BJ1DE}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000417417800005}},
DA = {{2018-05-07}},
}

@incollection{ ISI:000417314600001,
Author = {Mancini, D. and Lamboglia, R. and Castellano, N. G. and Corsi, K.},
Editor = {{Corsi, K and Castellano, NG and Lamboglia, R and Mancini, D}},
Title = {{Trends of Digital Innovation Applied to Accounting Information and
   Management Control Systems}},
Booktitle = {{RESHAPING ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS: NEW OPPORTUNITIES
   FROM BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS}},
Series = {{Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{20}},
Pages = {{1-19}},
Abstract = {{The period we live is known as the digital era. The way in which
   companies work and interact with each other has radically changed. The
   digitalisation of data, information and flows requires an additional
   effort of research, especially in the field of accounting information
   and management control systems, which are under-explored, in order to
   understand the potentiality, the benefits and the disadvantages of that
   kind of technologies. The research works published in this book are a
   selection of the best papers submitted at the Accounting Information
   Systems track of the

license: MIT

license_type: permissive

branch_name: refs/heads/master

extension: bib