text:
v-ento-120709-144836.
   Potts SG, 2005, ECOL ENTOMOL, V30, P78, DOI 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00662.x.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Ratnasingham S, 2007, MOL ECOL NOTES, V7, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x.
   ROSENHEIM JA, 1990, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V83, P277, DOI 10.1093/aesa/83.3.277.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1421, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2.
   Stephen W. P., 1961, PAN-PAC ENTOMOL, V37, P89.
   STEPHEN WP, 1965, J ECON ENTOMOL, V58, P965, DOI 10.1093/jee/58.5.965.
   Taki H, 2004, CAN ENTOMOL, V136, P889.
   TORCHIO PF, 1980, EVOLUTION, V34, P993, DOI {[}10.2307/2408004, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04037.x].
   Torne-Noguera A, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0097255.
   Tylianakis JM, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1295, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01493.x.
   Vickruck JL, 2012, ANIM BEHAV, V83, P1083, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.039.
   Walker K, 2012, J BUS ETHICS, V109, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4.
   Wcislo WT, 1996, J INSECT BEHAV, V9, P643, DOI 10.1007/BF02213885.
   Westphal C, 2008, ECOL MONOGR, V78, P653, DOI 10.1890/07-1292.1.
   Williams NM, 2011, BASIC APPL ECOL, V12, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2010.11.008.
   Woodward DR, 1996, AUST J ENTOMOL, V35, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1996.tb01385.x.
   Zurbuchen A, 2010, J ANIM ECOL, V79, P674, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01675.x.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{50}},
Times-Cited = {{38}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{3}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{119}},
Journal-ISO = {{PLoS One}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CE9BN}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000352138500219}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000351276300031,
Author = {Tiedeken, Erin Jo and Stout, Jane C.},
Title = {{Insect-Flower Interaction Network Structure Is Resilient to a Temporary
   Pulse of Floral Resources from Invasive Rhododendron ponticum}},
Journal = {{PLOS ONE}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{10}},
Number = {{3}},
Month = {{MAR 12}},
Abstract = {{Invasive alien plants can compete with native plants for resources, and
   may ultimately decrease native plant diversity and/or abundance in
   invaded sites. This could have consequences for native mutualistic
   interactions, such as pollination. Although invasive plants often become
   highly connected in plant- pollinator interaction networks, in temperate
   climates they usually only flower for part of the season. Unless
   sufficient alternative plants flower outside this period, whole- season
   floral resources may be reduced by invasion. We hypothesized that the
   cessation of flowering of a dominant invasive plant would lead to
   dramatic, seasonal compositional changes in plant- pollinator
   communities, and subsequent changes in network structure. We
   investigated variation in floral resources, flower- visiting insect
   communities, and interaction networks during and after the flowering of
   invasive Rhododendron ponticum in four invaded Irish woodland sites.
   Floral resources decreased significantly after R. ponticum flowering,
   but the magnitude of the decrease varied among sites. Neither insect
   abundance nor richness varied between the two periods (during and after
   R. ponticum flowering), yet insect community composition was distinct,
   mostly due to a significant reduction in Bombus abundance after
   flowering. During flowering R. ponticum was frequently visited by
   Bombus; after flowering, these highly mobile pollinators presumably left
   to find alternative floral resources. Despite compositional changes,
   however, network structural properties remained stable after R. ponticum
   flowering ceased: generality increased, but quantitative connectance,
   interaction evenness, vulnerability, H'(2) and network size did not
   change. This is likely because after R. ponticum flowering, two to three
   alternative plant species became prominent in networks and insects
   increased their diet breadth, as indicated by the increase in network-
   level generality. We conclude that network structure is robust to
   seasonal changes in floral abundance at sites invaded by alien,
   massflowering plant species, as long as alternative floral resources
   remain throughout the season to support the flower- visiting community.}},
Publisher = {{PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE}},
Address = {{1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Tiedeken, EJ (Corresponding Author), Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Bot, Sch Nat Sci, Dublin 2, Ireland.
   Tiedeken, Erin Jo; Stout, Jane C., Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Bot, Sch Nat Sci, Dublin 2, Ireland.
   Tiedeken, Erin Jo; Stout, Jane C., Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Trinity Ctr Biodivers Res, Dublin 2, Ireland.}},
DOI = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0119733}},
Article-Number = {{e0119733}},
ISSN = {{1932-6203}},
Keywords-Plus = {{PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS; ANIMAL MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS; ALIEN PLANT;
   RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; SEED PRODUCTION; NEST DENSITY; IMPACTS;
   CONSERVATION; INTEGRATION; TOLERANCE}},
Research-Areas = {{Science \& Technology - Other Topics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Multidisciplinary Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{tiedekee@tcd.ie}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Stout, Jane/AAS-8867-2020
   Stout, Jane C/B-1631-2010
   borba, jared/D-6810-2015}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Stout, Jane/0000-0002-2027-0863
   Stout, Jane C/0000-0002-2027-0863
   }},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Science Foundation IrelandScience Foundation Ireland {[}10/RFP/EOB2842];
   Irish Research Council's EMBARK Postgraduate Scholarship SchemeIrish
   Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology
   {[}RS/2010/2147]; National Science Foundation Graduate Research
   FellowshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) {[}2010097514]}},
Funding-Text = {{This project was funded by Science Foundation Ireland
   (http://www.sfi.ie/, grant number 10/RFP/EOB2842 to JCS) and the Irish
   Research Council's EMBARK Postgraduate Scholarship Scheme
   (http://research.ie/, grant number RS/2010/2147 to EJT). This material
   is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate
   Research Fellowship (http://www.nsfgrfp.org/, under Grant No. 2010097514
   to EJT). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
   expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not
   necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or
   other funding bodies. The funders had no role in study design, data
   collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
   manuscript.}},
Cited-References = {{Aizen MA, 2008, PLOS BIOL, V6, P396, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060031.
   Alarcon R, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P1796, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16987.x.
   Albrecht M, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.0773.
   Bartomeus I, 2008, OECOLOGIA, V155, P761, DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0946-1.
   Bartomeus I, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P440, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01629.x.
   Bascompte J, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P431, DOI 10.1126/science.1123412.
   Bascompte J, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P9383, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1633576100.
   Bascompte J, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P567, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818.
   Bersier LF, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2394, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}2394:QDOFWM]2.0.CO;2.
   Bjerknes AL, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V138, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.015.
   Bosch J, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P409, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01296.x.
   Burkle LA, 2011, AM J BOT, V98, P528, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1000391.
   Byrne E, 2010, THESIS TRINITY COLL.
   Carolan JC, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029251.
   Clout M.N., 2002, TURNING TIDE BIOL IN.
   CROSS J R, 1975, Journal of Ecology, V63, P345, DOI 10.2307/2258859.
   CROSS JR, 1981, J ECOL, V69, P807, DOI 10.2307/2259638.
   Dicks LV, 2002, J ANIM ECOL, V71, P32, DOI 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00572.x.
   Diekotter T, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01759.x.
   Dietzsch AC, 2009, THESIS TRINITY COLL.
   Dietzsch AC, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V167, P469, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-1987-z.
   DORMANN C. F., 2008, R NEWS, V8, P8, DOI DOI 10.1159/000265935.
   Dormann C. F., 2009, OPEN ECOLOGY J, V2, P7, DOI DOI 10.2174/1874213000902010007.
   Dupont YL, 2009, OIKOS, V118, P1261, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17594.x.
   Ferrero V, 2013, BIOL INVASIONS, V15, P2347, DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0457-4.
   Ghazoul J, 2002, ECOL ENTOMOL, V27, P638, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00438.x.
   Gibson RH, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P822, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18927.x.
   Goulson D, 2000, OIKOS, V88, P547, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880311.x.
   Hegland SJ, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P2092, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.018.
   JORDANO P, 1987, AM NAT, V129, P657, DOI 10.1086/284665.
   Kaiser-Bunbury CN, 2011, J ECOL, V99, P202, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01732.x.
   Kaiser-Bunbury CN, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P442, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01437.x.
   Kaiser-Bunbury CN, 2009, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V11, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2009.04.001.
   Kearns CA, 1998, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V29, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83.
   Knight ME, 2009, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V2, P116, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00049.x.
   Knight ME, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P1811, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x.
   Morales CL, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P716, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01319.x.
   Levine JM, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P775, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2327.
   Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x.
   Martin P. H., 1999, Biological Invasions, V1, P215, DOI 10.1023/A:1010084421858.
   Memmott J, 1999, ECOL LETT, V2, P276, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00087.x.
   Memmott J, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P2605, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909.
   Memmott J, 2002, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V269, P2395, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2174.
   Morales CL, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01069.x.
   Murray TE, 2008, CONSERV GENET, V9, P653, DOI 10.1007/s10592-007-9394-z.
   National Biodiversity Data Centre, 2010, ID GUID IR BUMBL.
   Olesen JM, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P1573, DOI 10.1890/07-0451.1.
   Olesen JM, 2002, DIVERS DISTRIB, V8, P181, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00148.x.
   Padron B, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006275.
   Parnell J, 2011, WEBBS IRISH FLORA.
   Petanidou T, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P564, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x.
   Power EF, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01949.x.
   PYSEK P, 1995, J VEG SCI, V6, P711, DOI 10.2307/3236442.
   R Development Core Team R, 2011, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Rose F., 2006, WILD FLOWER KEY IDEN.
   Stanley DA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065516.
   Stout JC, 2007, BOT J LINN SOC, V155, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00719.x.
   Stout JC, 2009, APIDOLOGIE, V40, P388, DOI 10.1051/apido/2009023.
   Stout JC, 2014, ACTA OECOL, V55, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2013.12.002.
   Stout JC, 2007, APIDOLOGIE, V38, P198, DOI 10.1051/apido:2006071.
   Stout JC, 2006, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V15, P755, DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-1065-5.
   Stubbs A.E., 1983, BRIT HOVERFLIES ILLU.
   Sugiura N, 1996, ECOL RES, V11, P249, DOI 10.1007/BF02347782.
   Tiedeken EJ, 2014, J EXP BIOL, V217, P1620, DOI 10.1242/jeb.097543.
   Tylianakis JM, 2007, NATURE, V445, P202, DOI 10.1038/nature05429.
   Tylianakis JM, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P202.
   USHER MB, 1986, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V314, P695, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1986.0081.
   Vance NC, 2004, AM J BOT, V91, P2060, DOI 10.3732/ajb.91.12.2060.
   Vazquez DP, 2007, OIKOS, V116, P1120, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15828.x.
   Vazquez DP, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1445, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp057.
   Vazquez DP, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P1088, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x.
   Vila M, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P3887, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.1076.
   Waser NM, 1996, ECOLOGY, V77, P1043, DOI 10.2307/2265575.
   Westphal C, 2003, ECOL LETT, V6, P961, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00523.x.
   Westphal C, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01580.x.
   Winfree R, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P1105, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01110.x.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{76}},
Times-Cited = {{18}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{93}},
Journal-ISO = {{PLoS One}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CD7ND}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000351276300031}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000348766200004,
Author = {Kuhlmann, Michael and Hollens, Hilke},
Title = {{Morphology of oil-collecting pilosity of female Rediviva bees
   (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Melittidae) reflects host plant use}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{49}},
Number = {{9-10}},
Pages = {{561-573}},
Month = {{MAR 12}},
Abstract = {{The oil-collecting hair morphology and pilosity on female foretarsi for
   all 26 species of the southern African endemic bee genus Rediviva was
   studied and related to host plant use based on about 2700 flower
   visitation records. Four different types of tarsal pilosity and six
   principal hair types are identified. Rediviva bees collect floral oil
   from 12 plant genera representing the families Iridaceae, Orchidaceae,
   Scrophulariaceae and Stilbaceae, with Diascia being the most frequently
   used host. Differences in foretarsal pilosity reflect the availability
   of floral oil and elaiophore morphology of the principal host flowers.
   Rediviva species with short female forelegs exhibit a greater diversity
   of tarsal oil-collecting pilosity than long-legged species. This
   contradicts an earlier hypothesis that the pilosity of species with
   shorter legs might be less complex than in Rediviva with elongate
   forelegs.}},
Publisher = {{TAYLOR \& FRANCIS LTD}},
Address = {{2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Kuhlmann, M (Corresponding Author), Nat Hist Museum, Dept Life Sci, Cromwell Rd, London SW7 5BD, England.
   Kuhlmann, Michael, Nat Hist Museum, Dept Life Sci, London SW7 5BD, England.
   Hollens, Hilke, Univ Munster, Inst Landscape Ecol, D-48149 Munster, Germany.}},
DOI = {{10.1080/00222933.2014.939732}},
ISSN = {{0022-2933}},
EISSN = {{1464-5262}},
Keywords = {{foretarsal pilosity; flower relationships; oil-collecting; solitary bee;
   Rediviva}},
Keywords-Plus = {{FLORAL OILS; POLLINATION; SCROPHULARIACEAE; FLOWERS; PHYLOGENY;
   IRIDACEAE; SECRETION; EVOLUTION; ORCHIDS}},
Research-Areas = {{Biodiversity \& Conservation; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology; Zoology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Zoology}},
Author-Email = {{m.kuhlmann@nhm.ac.uk}},
Cited-References = {{BUCHMANN SL, 1987, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V18, P343, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.002015.
   Cocucci Andrea A., 2000, Mitteilungen Muenchener Entomologischen Gesellschaft, V90, P51.
   Datson PM, 2008, PLANT SYST EVOL, V270, P39, DOI 10.1007/s00606-007-0612-4.
   Dellicour S, 2014, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V70, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.08.013.
   Dumri K, 2008, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V69, P1372, DOI 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.12.012.
   HILLIARD O M, 1984, Journal of South African Botany, V50, P269.
   Hollens H, 2010, THESIS U MUNSTER MUN.
   Kuhlmann M, 2012, ZOOTAXA, P71.
   Kuhlmann M, 2014, J NAT HIST, V48, P2633, DOI 10.1080/00222933.2014.909069.
   Kuhlmann Michael, 2012, European Journal of Taxonomy, V34, P1.
   Kuhlmann Michael, 2012, Systematics Association Special Volume Series, V81, P439.
   Manning J, 2002, S AFR J BOT, V68, P171, DOI 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30416-6.
   Manning JC, 2005, INT J PLANT SCI, V166, P459, DOI 10.1086/428703.
   MANNING JC, 1986, J ENTOMOL SOC S AFR, V49, P107.
   Michez D, 2009, SYST ENTOMOL, V34, P574, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00479.x.
   NEFF JL, 1981, J KANSAS ENTOMOL SOC, V54, P95.
   Pauw A, 2006, AM J BOT, V93, P917, DOI 10.3732/ajb.93.6.917.
   Pauw A, 2005, AM J BOT, V92, P1878, DOI 10.3732/ajb.92.11.1878.
   Pauw A, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P1531, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19417.x.
   Pauw A, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P344, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.19039.x.
   Renner SS, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P423, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2009.0229.
   Roig-Alsina Arturo, 1997, Mitteilungen Muenchener Entomologischen Gesellschaft, V87, P3.
   Schaefer H, 2008, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V47, P799, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.030.
   SIMPSON BB, 1990, PLANT SYST EVOL, V173, P209, DOI 10.1007/BF00940864.
   STEINER K E, 1989, Lindleyana, V4, P164.
   Steiner KE, 2011, S AFR J BOT, V77, P777, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2011.04.001.
   STEINER KE, 1993, PLANT SYST EVOL, V185, P7, DOI 10.1007/BF00937717.
   Steiner KE, 2002, PLANT SYST EVOL, V235, P53, DOI 10.1007/s00606-002-0216-y.
   Steiner KE, 1996, PLANT SYST EVOL, V201, P131, DOI 10.1007/BF00989056.
   Steiner KE, 1996, SYST BOT, V21, P63, DOI 10.2307/2419563.
   STEINER KE, 1991, EVOLUTION, V45, P1493, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02651.x.
   STEINER KE, 1989, ANN MO BOT GARD, V76, P1152, DOI 10.2307/2399701.
   STEINER KE, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P1701, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03857.x.
   Steiner KE, 2011, AM J BOT, V98, P1663, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1100141.
   VOGEL S, 1995, FLORA, V190, P353.
   Vogel S., 1974, P1.
   Vogel S, 2009, S AFR J BOT, V75, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2009.02.018.
   VOGEL S, 1984, ACTA BOT NEERL, V33, P509, DOI 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1984.tb01842.x.
   Vogel S., 1990, TROPISCHE SUBTROPISC, V73, P1.
   VOGEL S, 1986, TROPISCHE SUBTROPISC, V54, P1.
   Whitehead VB, 2008, J KANSAS ENTOMOL SOC, V81, P122, DOI 10.2317/JKES-703.12.1.
   Whitehead V.B., 1985, African Wildlife, V39, P146.
   Whitehead V. B., 2001, Annals of the South African Museum, V108, P143.
   Whitehead V. B., 1994, Annals of the South African Museum, V104, P1.
   Whitehead V. B., 1992, Annals of the South African Museum, V102, P143.
   Whitehead V. B., 1993, African Entomology, V1, P159.
   WHITEHEAD VB, 1984, S AFR J SCI, V80, P286.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{47}},
Times-Cited = {{7}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{20}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Nat. Hist.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CA2WL}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000348766200004}},
OA = {{Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000351458500013,
Author = {Tokuda, Nanako and Hattori, Mitsuru and Abe, Kota and Shinohara,
   Yoshinori and Nagano, Yusuke and Itino, Takao},
Title = {{Demonstration of pollinator-mediated competition between two native
   Impatiens species, Impatiens noli-tangere and I. textori (Balsaminaceae)}},
Journal = {{ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{5}},
Number = {{6}},
Pages = {{1271-1277}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Plant-plant interspecific competition via pollinators occurs when the
   flowering seasons of two or more plant species overlap and the
   pollinator fauna is shared. Negative sexual interactions between species
   (reproductive interference) through improper heterospecific pollen
   transfer have recently been reported between native and invasive species
   demonstrating pollination-driven competition. We focused on two native
   Impatiens species (I.noli-tangere and I.textori) found in Japan and
   examined whether pollinator-mediated plant competition occurs between
   them. We demonstrate that I.noli-tangere and I.textori share the same
   pollination niche (i.e., flowering season, pollinator fauna, and
   position of pollen on the pollinator's body). In addition,
   heterospecific pollen grains were deposited on most stigmas of both
   I.noli-tangere and I.textori flowers that were situated within 2m of
   flowers of the other species resulting in depressed fruit set. Further,
   by hand-pollination experiments, we show that when as few as 10\% of the
   pollen grains are heterospecific, fruit set is decreased to less than
   half in both species. These results show that intensive
   pollinator-mediated competition occurs between I.noli-tangere and
   I.textori. This study suggests that intensive pollinator-mediated
   competition occurs in the wild even when interacting species are both
   native and not invasive.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY-BLACKWELL}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hattori, M (Corresponding Author), Shinshu Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 3908621, Japan.
   Tokuda, Nanako; Hattori, Mitsuru; Abe, Kota; Shinohara, Yoshinori; Nagano, Yusuke; Itino, Takao, Shinshu Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Matsumoto, Nagano 3908621, Japan.
   Itino, Takao, Shinshu Univ, Inst Mt Sci, Nagano, Japan.}},
DOI = {{10.1002/ece3.1431}},
ISSN = {{2045-7758}},
Keywords = {{Bumblebees; improper pollen transfer; plant-plant interaction;
   pollination; reproductive interference}},
Keywords-Plus = {{INTERSPECIFIC POLLEN TRANSFER; REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT;
   DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL-CONDITIONS; SHARED POLLINATORS; FLOWER COLOR;
   MALE FITNESS; SYSTEMS; CONSEQUENCES; INTERFERENCE; PEDICULARIS}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology; Evolutionary Biology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Ecology; Evolutionary Biology}},
Author-Email = {{mtr.hattori@gmail.com}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Ministry of the Environment, JapanMinistry of the Environment, Japan
   {[}D-0904]; MEXT, JapanMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
   and Technology, Japan (MEXT)}},
Funding-Text = {{This study was supported by the Global Environmental Research Fund
   (D-0904) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and by Research and
   Education Funding for the Japanese Alps Inter-Universities Cooperative
   Project, MEXT, Japan.}},
Cited-References = {{Aizen MA, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04552.x.
   Arceo-Gomez G, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V192, P738, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03831.x.
   ARMBRUSTER WS, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P315, DOI 10.2307/1939537.
   Brown BJ, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2328, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}2328:CFPBAI]2.0.CO;2.
   Eaton DAR, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, pS182, DOI 10.1890/11-0501.1.
   Fishman L, 1999, EVOLUTION, V53, P1723, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04557.x.
   GALEN C, 1989, OECOLOGIA, V81, P120, DOI 10.1007/BF00377020.
   Gibson MR, 2012, J ECOL, V100, P1216, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02004.x.
   Gomez JM, 2006, PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS: FROM SPECIALIZATION TO GENERALIZATION, P145.
   Groning J, 2008, Q REV BIOL, V83, P257, DOI 10.1086/590510.
   Hopkins R, 2012, EVOLUTION, V66, P469, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01452.x.
   Huang SQ, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V199, P858, DOI 10.1111/nph.12327.
   Iwaizumi MG, 2004, CAN J BOT, V82, P563, DOI 10.1139/B04-013.
   Johnson SD, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P140, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01811-X.
   KATO M, 1988, OECOLOGIA, V76, P364, DOI 10.1007/BF00377030.
   Masuda M, 2004, ECOL RES, V19, P571, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00673.x.
   MASUDA M, 1994, ECOL RES, V9, P67, DOI 10.1007/BF02347243.
   Matsumura Chizuru, 2002, Plant Species Biology, V17, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-1984.2002.00069.x.
   Mitchell RJ, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1403, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp062.
   Morales CL, 2008, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V27, P221, DOI 10.1080/07352680802205631.
   Muchhala N, 2014, EVOLUTION, V68, P2275, DOI 10.1111/evo.12441.
   Muchhala N, 2012, FUNCT ECOL, V26, P476, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01950.x.
   Muchhala N, 2010, AM NAT, V176, P732, DOI 10.1086/657049.
   Nakamura J, 1980, DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTER, V1.
   Natalis LC, 2012, OECOLOGIA, V170, P709, DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2346-4.
   Nishida S, 2014, FUNCT ECOL, V28, P450, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12165.
   Nishida S, 2012, BIOL INVASIONS, V14, P439, DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0088-6.
   Runquist RDB, 2012, AM J BOT, V99, P1125, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1100588.
   Sargent RD, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.003.
   Satake Y, 1999, WILD FLOWERS JAPAN H, P235.
   Sokal R.R, 1995, BIOMETRY PRINCIPLES.
   Sugita H., 2001, THE WORLD OF PLANTS, P56.
   Takakura KI, 2010, PLANT ECOL, V206, P309, DOI 10.1007/s11258-009-9644-x.
   WASER NM, 1978, OECOLOGIA, V36, P223, DOI 10.1007/BF00349811.
   Waser NM, 1996, ECOLOGY, V77, P1043, DOI 10.2307/2265575.
   WASER NM, 1986, OECOLOGIA, V70, P573, DOI 10.1007/BF00379906.
   Yang CF, 2007, BIOL J LINN SOC, V90, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00709.x.
   Ye ZM, 2014, PLANT ECOL, V215, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11258-013-0274-y.
   Yuan YM, 2004, TAXON, V53, P391, DOI 10.2307/4135617.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{39}},
Times-Cited = {{7}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{54}},
Journal-ISO = {{Ecol. Evol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CD9YT}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000351458500013}},
OA = {{DOAJ Gold, Green Published}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000350858900004,
Author = {Jakobsson, Anna and Padron, Benigno and Agren, Jon},
Title = {{Distance-dependent effects of invasive Lupinus polyphyllus on
   pollination and reproductive success of two native herbs}},
Journal = {{BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{16}},
Number = {{2}},
Pages = {{120-127}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{A comprehensive understanding of the effects of invasive plants on
   native species requires identification of both the mechanisms of
   interaction and the spatial scale over which they act. Indirect
   interactions involving mobile organisms such as pollinators are likely
   to be scale-dependent, yet most studies examining effects of invasive
   species on pollination of native plants have considered effects across a
   single distance between interacting species. We examined the effects of
   the invasive herb Lupinus polyphyllus on pollination of two native herbs
   using multiple distances between the invasive and the natives. We
   recorded pollinator visitation and seed production in the native herbs
   Lotus corniculatus and Lychnis viscaria at 0, 5 m or 200 m away from L.
   polyphyllus. To reduce the influence of confounding factors, we used
   experimentally established populations of the invasive and potted
   individuals of the natives. In the immediate vicinity to L. polyphyllus,
   visitation to L. corniculatus was higher than 200 m away, and seed
   production per flower was higher than 5 m and 200 m away. In L.
   viscaria, bumblebee visitation was higher adjacent to L. polyphyllus
   than 5 m and 200 m away, but total pollinator visitation and
   reproductive success did not vary with distance. The results indicate
   that L. polyphyllus facilitates pollination of the native plants, and
   that this occurs at a very local spatial scale as effects dropped off
   already at a distance of 5 m. Presence of L. polyphyllus could benefit
   both pollinators and pollination of native herbs, and these positive
   effects should be considered along with likely negative effects due to
   resource competition. Moreover, the results illustrate the necessity to
   consider scale-dependent effects when assessing the impact of invasive
   flowering plants on native pollination interactions.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN \& FISCHER VERLAG}},
Address = {{OFFICE JENA, P O BOX 100537, 07705 JENA, GERMANY}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Jakobsson, A (Corresponding Author), Uppsala Univ, EBC, Dept Ecol \& Genet, Plant Ecol \& Evolut, Norbyvagen 18 D, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
   Jakobsson, Anna; Agren, Jon, Uppsala Univ, EBC, Dept Ecol \& Genet, Plant Ecol \& Evolut, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
   Padron, Benigno, El Hierro Santa Cruz Tenerife, Canary Isl, Spain.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.baae.2014.12.005}},
ISSN = {{1439-1791}},
EISSN = {{1618-0089}},
Keywords = {{Fecundity; Invasion; Lotus corniculatus; Lychnis viscaria; Pollination;
   Spatial scale}},
Keywords-Plus = {{ALIEN PLANT; PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE; CARPOBROTUS SPP.; SEED SET; VISITATION;
   COMMUNITIES; COMPETITION; POLLEN; MUTUALISMS; DIVERSITY}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Ecology}},
Author-Email = {{anna.jakobsson@ebc.uu.se}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Agren, Jon/E-6093-2011}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Agren, Jon/0000-0001-9573-2463}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Oscar and Lilli Lamms Minne; Swedish Research Council for Environment,
   Agricultural Sciences and Spatial PlanningSwedish Research Council
   Formas {[}217-2007-428]}},
Funding-Text = {{Chris Ditlefsen and Andreas Nystrom provided excellent field assistance.
   We thank Patrik Borjesson for statistical advice, and Orjan Totland for
   comments on the manuscript. The study was supported by Oscar and Lilli
   Lamms Minne (to AJ) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment,
   Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (217-2007-428 to AJ).}},
Cited-References = {{Bartomeus I, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P440, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01629.x.
   Bennett JA, 2014, BASIC APPL ECOL, V15, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2014.03.004.
   Bjerknes AL, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V138, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.015.
   Brown BJ, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2328, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083{[}2328:CFPBAI]2.0.CO;2.
   Brown BJ, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V129, P43, DOI 10.1007/s004420100700.
   Cariveau DP, 2009, OIKOS, V118, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16705.x.
   Chittka L, 2001, NATURE, V411, P653, DOI 10.1038/35079676.
   Cussans J, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011753.
   Dietzsch AC, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V167, P469, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-1987-z.
   Ghazoul J, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01098.x.
   Goulson D, 2002, OECOLOGIA, V130, P267, DOI 10.1007/s004420100803.
   Grabas GP, 1999, ECOSCIENCE, V6, P230, DOI 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682524.
   HAYNES J, 1984, OECOLOGIA, V61, P249, DOI 10.1007/BF00396768.
   Jakobsson A, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.005.
   Jakobsson A, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P199, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2904-z.
   Jakobsson A, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V174, P217, DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2756-y.
   Jakobsson A, 2009, ECOSCIENCE, V16, P138, DOI 10.2980/16-1-3193.
   Johnson SD, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P2919, DOI 10.1890/02-0471.
   JONES DA, 1986, J ECOL, V74, P1185, DOI 10.2307/2260243.
   Kandori I, 2009, OECOLOGIA, V159, P559, DOI 10.1007/s00442-008-1250-4.
   Kearns CA, 1998, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V29, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83.
   King VM, 2012, BIOL INVASIONS, V14, P1809, DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0191-3.
   Kowarik I., 2003, BIOL INVASIONS, V5, P293, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:BINV.0000005574.15074.66.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Lambdon PW, 2008, PRESLIA, V80, P101.
   Morales CL, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P716, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01319.x.
   Lihoreau M, 2012, PLOS BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392.
   Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x.
   Molina-Montenegro MA, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P1833, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16896.x.
   Moragues E, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V122, P611, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.015.
   Munoz AA, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P459, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01361.x.
   Nielsen C, 2008, BIOL INVASIONS, V10, P1353, DOI 10.1007/s10530-007-9210-1.
   NILSSON LA, 1983, NATURE, V305, P799, DOI 10.1038/305799a0.
   Ockinger E, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x.
   PETTERSSON MW, 2004, GRODOR VILDBIN SVERI.
   Pimentel D, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P53, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050{[}0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2.
   Pysek P, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1725, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x.
   Ramula S, 2012, BIOL INVASIONS, V14, P2079, DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0215-z.
   Rathcke B., 1983, P305.
   Sheffield CS, 2008, CAN ENTOMOL, V140, P589.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 1999, OECOLOGIA, V121, P432, DOI 10.1007/s004420050949.
   Thijs KW, 2012, BIOL INVASIONS, V14, P355, DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0067-y.
   THOMSON JD, 1978, AM MIDL NAT, V100, P431, DOI 10.2307/2424843.
   Totland O, 2006, AM J BOT, V93, P868, DOI 10.3732/ajb.93.6.868.
   Traveset A, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{45}},
Times-Cited = {{6}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{3}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{65}},
Journal-ISO = {{Basic Appl. Ecol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CD1UD}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000350858900004}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000351085900009,
Author = {Sheffield, Cory S. and Wilkes, Margie A. and Cutler, G. Christopher and
   Hermanutz, Luise},
Title = {{An artificial nesting substrate for Osmia species that nest under
   stones, with focus on Osmia inermis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)}},
Journal = {{INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{8}},
Number = {{2}},
Pages = {{189-192}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Several megachilid bees are excellent crop pollinators, and many species
   show potential for management as they nest in pre-existing cavities in
   artificial substrates. Some species, particularly in the Osmiini,
   however, have nesting habits not conducive to conventional trap-nesting.
   Here we report on an artificial nest for species of Osmia bees which
   normally build nests on the underside of stones. The Holarctic species
   Osmia inermis accepted overturned terracotta saucers as nesting sites,
   with 10\% of the saucers occupied in the fall of 2011. These saucers are
   inexpensive and available in many sizes, facilitating further scientific
   study of this, and other species. Implications of using artificial nests
   for managing this bee for crop pollination, and for its conservation,
   are discussed.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Sheffield, CS (Corresponding Author), Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Invertebrate Zool, 2340 Albert St, Regina, SK S4P 2V7, Canada.
   Sheffield, Cory S., Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Invertebrate Zool, Regina, SK S4P 2V7, Canada.
   Wilkes, Margie A.; Hermanutz, Luise, Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Biol, St John, NF, Canada.
   Cutler, G. Christopher, Dalhousie Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Truro, NS, Canada.}},
DOI = {{10.1111/icad.12095}},
ISSN = {{1752-458X}},
EISSN = {{1752-4598}},
Keywords = {{artificial nest; pollination; pollinator conservation; rare species}},
Keywords-Plus = {{BEES HYMENOPTERA; SOLITARY BEE; APIFORMES; DIVERSITY; CANADA}},
Research-Areas = {{Biodiversity \& Conservation; Entomology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Biodiversity Conservation; Entomology}},
Author-Email = {{Cory.Sheffield@gov.sk.ca}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Sheffield, Cory/I-4812-2019}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Sheffield, Cory/0000-0003-0603-7333}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canadian Pollination
   Initiative (NSERC CANPOLIN)}},
Funding-Text = {{We thank the property owners in Grand-Falls Windsor and Colliers for
   access to field sites used in this study. This represents publication
   127 of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canadian
   Pollination Initiative (NSERC CANPOLIN), who provided the funding.}},
Cited-References = {{Ascher J.S., 2014, DISCOVER LIFE BEE SP.
   Bees Wasps \& Ants Recording Society (BWARS), 2014, OSM IN.
   Bosch J, 2002, B ENTOMOL RES, V92, P3, DOI 10.1079/BER2001139.
   Bosch J, 2008, ANIM BEHAV, V75, P809, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.018.
   Cane JH, 2007, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V100, P350, DOI 10.1603/0013-8746(2007)100{[}350:SAMUFN]2.0.CO;2.
   Cane JH, 2012, J KANSAS ENTOMOL SOC, V85, P262, DOI 10.2317/JKES120531a.1.
   Else George R., 1996, Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, V132, P291.
   Falk S, 1991, REV SCARCE THREATENE.
   Hicks Barry, 2009, Journal of the Acadian Entomological Society, V5, P12.
   Krombein K, 1967, TRAP NESTING WASPS B.
   Macdonald M., 2008, VISIT BLAIR ATHOLL A.
   Michener C.D., 2007, BEES WORLD.
   Muller A., 2014, PALAEARCTIC OSMIINE.
   Priesner E., 1981, Carinthia II, V171, P349.
   Rands SA, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025971.
   Rau P., 1937, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, V30, P324.
   Richards MH, 2011, CAN ENTOMOL, V143, P279, DOI 10.4039/n11-010.
   Rightmyer MG, 2013, SYST ENTOMOL, V38, P561, DOI 10.1111/syen.12013.
   Rightmyer MG, 2010, ZOOKEYS, P37, DOI 10.3897/zookeys.60.484.
   RUST RW, 1993, ENTOMOL NEWS, V104, P113.
   Sheffield CS, 2008, CAN ENTOMOL, V140, P235.
   Smith F., 1851, ZOOLOGIST, V9, P3253.
   Stubbs Constance S., 1997, Northeastern Naturalist, V4, P133, DOI 10.2307/3858708.
   Zurbuchen A, 2010, J ANIM ECOL, V79, P674, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01675.x.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{24}},
Times-Cited = {{6}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{31}},
Journal-ISO = {{Insect. Conserv. Divers.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CD4WI}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000351085900009}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000350353200006,
Author = {Efstathion, Caroline A. and Bardunias, Paul M. and Boyd, Janice D. and
   Kern, Jr., William H.},
Title = {{A push-pull integrated pest management scheme for preventing use of
   parrot nest boxes by invasive Africanized honey bees}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{86}},
Number = {{1}},
Pages = {{65-72}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera scutellata) compete with
   endangered parrots for nest boxes and can hamper conservation efforts.
   We tested an integrated pest management push-pull protocol in the
   Atlantic Forest in SAo Paulo, Brazil, in an effort to prevent bee swarms
   from colonizing nest boxes (N = 30 in the forest plus five in aviaries)
   meant for use by Vinaceous-breasted Amazons (Amazona vinacea). Fifteen
   parrot nest boxes were treated with a permethrin insecticide to push
   scout bees away and each parrot box was paired with a bee trap box
   containing a pheromone lure to pull bees. Over a 1-yr period (March 2013
   to March 2014), 29 insect colonies moved into 18 of the 35 trap boxes.
   Nine Africanized honey bee, three native Jatai bee (Tetragonisca sp.),
   and 17 wasp colonies occupied trap boxes. Only one experimental
   push-pull pair untreated parrot box was invaded by bees and no parrot
   boxes in aviaries were colonized. Four of the parrot nest boxes were
   occupied by birds during our study. Although none were used by
   Vinaceous-breasted Amazons, Southern House Wrens (Troglodytes musculus),
   Green-winged Saltators (Saltator similis), and Plain Parakeets
   (Brotogeris tirica) nested in the boxes and all nests were successful.
   Although long-term studies are needed before drawing conclusions about
   the effectiveness of trap boxes, our results suggest that a push-pull
   protocol may prove useful for reducing the use of nest boxes meant for
   parrots and other cavity-nesting birds by Africanized honey bees and
   other insects.
   RESUMEN Un esquema integrada de alejar-atraer para el control de plagas
   para la prevencion del uso de cajas nido para loros por las abejas de
   miel Africanizadas invasoras Las abejas de miel Africanizadas (Apis
   mellifera scutellata) compiten con los loros en peligro de extincion
   para las cajas nido y puede impedir los esfuerzos de conservacion.
   Probamos un metodo integrado para el control de plagas, el protocolo de
   alejar-atraer, en el Bosque Atlantico, en SAo Paulo, Brasil, en un
   esfuerzo para evitar que los enjambres de abejas colonicen las cajas
   nido (N = 30 en el bosque, mas cinco en aviarios) destinadas a ser
   utilizadas por el loro Amazona Vinosa (Amazona vinacea). Quince cajas
   nido fueron tratados con una insecticida permetrina para alejar las
   abejas exploradoras de las cajas nido. Las cajas nido tambien fueron
   emparejada con una caja trampa para abejas, que contenia una feromona
   para atraer las abejas. Durante un periodo de un ano (marzo 2013 - marzo
   2014), 29 colonias de insectos se trasladaron a 18 de las 35 cajas
   trampa para abejas. Nueve colonias abejas de miel Africanizada, tres
   colonias abejas nativo Jatai (Tetragonisca sp.) y 17 colonias de avispas
   ocuparon las cajas trampas. Solo un experimento caja nido, emparejada
   con el metodo alejar-atraer, fue invadida por las abejas y ninguna de
   las cajas nido en aviarios fueron colonizados por abejas. Cuatro de las
   cajas nido estaban ocupados por aves durante nuestro estudio. Aunque
   ninguno fue utilizado por el loro Amazona Vinosa, los nidos fueron
   anidados por el Chivirin Raton (Troglodytes musculus), el Pepitero
   Verdoso (Saltator similis) y la Catita Tirica (Brotogeris tirica) y
   todos los nidos fueron exitosos. Aunque se necesitan estudios a largo
   plazo antes de sacar conclusiones acerca de la efectividad de la caja
   trampa para abejas, nuestros resultados sugieren que un protocolo de
   alejar-atraer puede ser util para reducir el uso de nidos de loros, y
   otras aves, por las abejas de miel africanizadas y otros insectos.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Efstathion, CA (Corresponding Author), Univ Florida, Inst Food \& Agr Sci, Ft Lauderdale Res \& Educ Ctr, Dept Entomol \& Nematol, 3205 Coll Ave, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA.
   Efstathion, Caroline A.; Bardunias, Paul M.; Kern, William H., Jr., Univ Florida, Inst Food \& Agr Sci, Ft Lauderdale Res \& Educ Ctr, Dept Entomol \& Nematol, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA.
   Boyd, Janice D., Texas A\&M Univ, Dept Vet Pathobiol, Schubot Exot Bird Hlth Ctr, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1111/jofo.12089}},
ISSN = {{0273-8570}},
EISSN = {{1557-9263}},
Keywords = {{Amazona vinacea; Apis mellifera scutellata; nasonov; nest competition;
   permethrin; swarm-founding wasp}},
Keywords-Plus = {{APIS-MELLIFERA; SITE SELECTION; CAVITIES; INSECTICIDES; HYMENOPTERA;
   PHEROMONE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGY; SWARMS; VOLUME}},
Research-Areas = {{Zoology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Ornithology}},
Author-Email = {{cefstathion@ufl.edu}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Parrot Fund-Amigos de las Aves USA}},
Funding-Text = {{Our study was conducted with the permission and assistance of the
   Lymington Foundation. We want to thank B. and L. Wittkoff for granting
   permission to use their farm for this study and for all their
   assistance. Monitoring, maintenance, and removal of insects of the
   experimental boxes was provided by L. C. Oliviera. We also thank A.
   Saidenberg for his assistance, Fernando B. Noll for identifying the wasp
   species, M. Stanback, T. Broschat, and R. Horsburgh for assisting with
   the preparation of this manuscript, and three anonymous reviewers for
   comments that greatly improved our manuscript. Funding was provided by
   The Parrot Fund-Amigos de las Aves USA and F. and D. Feinstein.}},
Cited-References = {{Berkunsky I., 2012, PSITTASCENE, V24, P3.
   Carlile C. N., 2003, MARINE ORNITHOLOGY, V31, P185.
   COELHO JR, 1994, AM BEE J, V134, P697.
   Cook SM, 2007, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V52, P375, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407.
   Cosenza G.W., 1972, Ciencia e Cultura Sao Paulo, V24, P1153.
   DANKA RG, 1986, J ECON ENTOMOL, V79, P18, DOI 10.1093/jee/79.1.18.
   DELNICKI D E, 1977, Southwestern Naturalist, V22, P275, DOI 10.2307/3669820.
   Diniz JAF, 1995, EVOLUTION, V49, P1172, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04444.x.
   Eadie J, 1998, BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, P306.
   HALL HG, 1989, NATURE, V339, P211, DOI 10.1038/339211a0.
   Hepburn H. R., 2006, LIFE CYCLES SOCIAL I, P121.
   ICMBio, 2012, EX SUMM NAT ACT PLAN.
   Ingold DJ, 1998, WILSON BULL, V110, P218.
   Jeanne R.L., 1991, P191.
   JEANNE RL, 1981, ANIM BEHAV, V29, P102, DOI 10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80157-1.
   JEANNE RL, 1980, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V25, P371, DOI 10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.002103.
   Jensen T, 1995, CALIF FISH GAME, V81, P167.
   Kogan M, 1998, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V43, P243, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.243.
   Madeiros J, 2012, BIRD CONSERV INT, V22, P35, DOI 10.1017/S0959270911000396.
   MCNALLY LC, 1992, INSECT SOC, V39, P167, DOI 10.1007/BF01249292.
   Mineau P, 2001, REV ENVIRON CONTAM T, V170, P13.
   NEWTON I, 1994, BIOL CONSERV, V70, P265, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4.
   OLDROYD BP, 1994, AUST J ECOL, V19, P444, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1994.tb00510.x.
   Pell AS, 1997, BIOL CONSERV, V79, P145, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00112-7.
   Pereira AM, 2010, J VENOM ANIM TOXINS, V16, P647, DOI 10.1590/S1678-91992010000400016.
   Prange S, 2007, SOUTHEAST NAT, V6, P370, DOI 10.1656/1528-7092(2007)6{[}370:UOSNBB]2.0.CO;2.
   Proudfoot GA, 2006, J WILDLIFE DIS, V42, P873, DOI 10.7589/0090-3558-42.4.873.
   Pyke B., 1987, AUST COTTON GROW, V9, P7.
   Quezada-Euan JJG, 2000, APIDOLOGIE, V31, P443, DOI 10.1051/apido:2000135.
   RIETH JP, 1988, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V13, P213, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1988.tb00925.x.
   SCHMIDT JO, 1992, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V21, P1130, DOI 10.1093/ee/21.5.1130.
   Schmidt JO, 1995, APIDOLOGIE, V26, P467, DOI 10.1051/apido:19950603.
   Schmidt JO, 1999, J CHEM ECOL, V25, P2051, DOI 10.1023/A:1021084706241.
   SCHMIDT JO, 1994, J CHEM ECOL, V20, P1053, DOI 10.1007/BF02059741.
   Schneider SS, 2004, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V49, P351, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123359.
   SEELEY T, 1977, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V2, P201, DOI 10.1007/BF00361902.
   Seeley TD, 2004, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V56, P594, DOI 10.1007/s00265-004-0814-5.
   Seeley TD, 2001, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V49, P416, DOI 10.1007/s002650000299.
   Seeley TD, 2003, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V54, P511, DOI 10.1007/s00265-003-0664-6.
   SEELEY TD, 1978, INSECT SOC, V25, P323, DOI 10.1007/BF02224297.
   Synder N., 2000, PARROTS STATUS SURVE, DOI Washington D.C., USA.
   TAYLOR KS, 1987, APIDOLOGIE, V18, P243, DOI 10.1051/apido:19870304.
   U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008, PUERT RIC PARR AM VI.
   Veiga JP, 2013, J TROP ECOL, V29, P187, DOI 10.1017/S026646741300014X.
   VISSCHER PK, 1985, INSECT SOC, V32, P217, DOI 10.1007/BF02224236.
   WCS Guatemala Program, 2011, WCS GUAT PROGR.
   WINSTON ML, 1992, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V37, P173, DOI 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001133.
   WINSTON ML, 1979, J APICULT RES, V18, P85, DOI 10.1080/00218839.1979.11099951.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{48}},
Times-Cited = {{6}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{43}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Field Ornithol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CC4VS}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000350353200006}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000350190100006,
Author = {Chateil, Carole and Porcher, Emmanuelle},
Title = {{Landscape features are a better correlate of wild plant pollination than
   agricultural practices in an intensive cropping system}},
Journal = {{AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS \& ENVIRONMENT}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{201}},
Pages = {{51-57}},
Month = {{MAR 1}},
Abstract = {{Organic farming is commonly associated with increased pollinator
   diversity and abundance, but the net effects on pollination rates are
   less documented. Besides, organic farms are often surrounded by more
   diverse landscapes than conventional farms, such that the contributions
   of landscape diversity vs. farming practices to pollination rates are
   often confounded with each other. Here, the roles of local vs. landscape
   scale variables on pollination rates of experimental plants are examined
   in agricultural landscapes. To this end, fruit set and seed production
   were measured in the obligate insect-pollinated Lotus corniculatus.
   Plants were located in pairs of neighboring organic vs. conventional
   farms, which were characterized by contrasting landscape structures and
   compositions. Fruit set, a proxy for pollinator visitation rates, was
   significantly related to landscape variables: fruit set was higher in
   farms close to a patch of semi-natural habitat, but lower in landscapes
   with a high cover of semi-natural habitats. Fruit set also correlated
   with local variables, such as habitat type, but not with farming type.
   Identical pollination rates in conventional and organic farms are likely
   due to similar diversities of habitats, crops and weeds in both farming
   types of the study area. These results therefore confirm that habitat
   diversity prevails over pesticide-free practices to explain the higher
   pollinator abundances usually observed in organic vs. conventional
   farms. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER}},
Address = {{RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Porcher, E (Corresponding Author), Museum Natl Hist Nat, CESCO, CP 53,61 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France.
   Chateil, Carole; Porcher, Emmanuelle, Museum Natl Hist Nat, UMR MNHN CNRS UPMC CESCO 7204, F-75005 Paris, France.
   Porcher, Emmanuelle, Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol \& Med, Div Biol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.008}},
ISSN = {{0167-8809}},
EISSN = {{1873-2305}},
Keywords = {{Lotus corniculatus L.; Fruit set; Bumblebees; Organic farming;
   Semi-natural habitats}},
Keywords-Plus = {{LAND-USE; BEE POLLINATORS; DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES;
   SERVICES; SCALE; VISITATION; DECLINES; DISTANCE}},
Research-Areas = {{Agriculture; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Ecology; Environmental Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{porcher@mnhn.fr}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Porcher, Emmanuelle/0000-0002-9264-8239}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Balzan Foundation}},
Funding-Text = {{We thank Richard Luis Ibanez and Fabien Verfaillie for help with L.
   corniculatus cultivation, and Lea Tarallo for field assistance. We also
   thank Ingrid Lair from the Groupement des Agriculteurs Biologiques
   d'Ile-de-France, and all farmers for their involvement in the
   experiment. This work was partly supported by a grant from the Balzan
   Foundation.}},
Cited-References = {{Andersson GKS, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031599.
   Ashman TL, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1061, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200496.
   Bengtsson J, 2005, J APPL ECOL, V42, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x.
   Benjamin FE, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P440, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12198.
   Biesmeijer JC, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P351, DOI 10.1126/science.1127863.
   Brittain C, 2010, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V12, P259, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00485.x.
   Brittain C, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P1860, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.029.
   Carvalheiro LG, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P810, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01829.x.
   Carvalheiro LG, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P251, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01579.x.
   Clough Y, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P804, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01294.x.
   Dauber J, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P188, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01590.x.
   Deguines N, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P212, DOI 10.1890/130054.
   Farwig N, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P919, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9376-2.
   Feber RE, 2007, J ZOOL, V273, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00296.x.
   Fontaine C, 2006, PLOS BIOL, V4, P129, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040001.
   Fuller RJ, 2005, BIOL LETTERS, V1, P431, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357.
   Gabriel D, 2007, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V118, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.005.
   Gibson RH, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P792, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01292.x.
   Holzschuh A, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P41, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01259.x.
   Holzschuh A, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P354, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16303.x.
   Holzschuh A, 2010, J ANIM ECOL, V79, P491, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01642.x.
   Kearns CA, 1998, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V29, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83.
   Kennedy CM, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P584, DOI 10.1111/ele.12082.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Kohler F, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P753, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01394.x.
   Kremen C, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1109, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00662.x.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16812, DOI 10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   Kunin William E., 1997, Population and Community Biology Series, V17, P150.
   Nakagawa S, 2013, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V4, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x.
   Norton L, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.09.002.
   Ockinger E, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x.
   Ollerton J, 1998, PLANT ECOL, V139, P35, DOI 10.1023/A:1009798320049.
   Ollerton J, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
   Pellissier V, 2012, ACTA OECOL, V39, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2012.01.008.
   Potts SG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007.
   Ricketts TH, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P499, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x.
   Robinson RA, 2002, J APPL ECOL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x.
   Rundlof M, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.011.
   Rundlof M, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1121, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01233.x.
   Rundlof M, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P813, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01448.x.
   Scherber C, 2010, NATURE, V468, P553, DOI 10.1038/nature09492.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 1999, OECOLOGIA, V121, P432, DOI 10.1007/s004420050949.
   Steffan-Dewenter I, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.004.
   Wilcock C, 2002, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V7, P270, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02258-6.
   Williams NM, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P910, DOI 10.1890/06-0269.
   Winfree R, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P793, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01418.x.
   Winfree R, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P213, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00574.x.
   Winfree R, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P2068, DOI 10.1890/08-1245.1.
   Wolf S, 2008, APIDOLOGIE, V39, P419, DOI 10.1051/apido:2008020.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{49}},
Times-Cited = {{9}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{97}},
Journal-ISO = {{Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CC2QQ}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000350190100006}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000350246500004,
Author = {Jha, S.},
Title = {{Contemporary human-altered landscapes and oceanic barriers reduce bumble
   bee gene flow}},
Journal = {{MOLECULAR ECOLOGY}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{24}},
Number = {{5}},
Pages = {{993-1006}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Much of the world's terrestrial landscapes are being altered by humans
   in the form of agriculture, urbanization and pastoral systems, with
   major implications for biodiversity. Bumble bees are one of the most
   effective pollinators in both natural and cultivated landscapes, but are
   often the first to be extirpated in human-altered habitats. Yet, little
   is known about the role of natural and human-altered habitats in
   promoting or limiting bumble bee gene flow. In this study, I closely
   examine the genetic structure of the yellow-faced bumble bee,
   Bombusvosnesenskii, across the southwestern US coast and find strong
   evidence that natural oceanic barriers, as well as contemporary
   human-altered habitats, limit bee gene flow. Heterozygosity and allelic
   richness were lower in island populations, while private allelic
   richness was higher in island populations compared to mainland
   populations. Genetic differentiation, measured for three indices across
   the 1000km study region, was significantly greater than the null
   expectation (F-ST=0.041, F'(ST)=0.044 and D-est=0.155) and correlated
   with geographic distance. Furthermore, genetic differentiation patterns
   were most strongly correlated with contemporary (2011) not past (2006,
   2001) resistance maps calibrated for high dispersal limitation over
   oceans, impervious habitat and croplands. Despite the incorporation of
   dramatic elevation gradients, the analyses reveal that oceans and
   contemporary human land use, not mountains, are the primary dispersal
   barriers for B.vosnesenskii gene flow. These findings reinforce the
   importance of maintaining corridors of suitable habitat across the
   distribution range of native pollinators to promote their persistence
   and safeguard their ability to provide essential pollination services.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Review}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Jha, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Texas Austin, Dept Integrat Biol, Biol Labs 401, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
   Univ Texas Austin, Dept Integrat Biol, Biol Labs 401, Austin, TX 78712 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1111/mec.13090}},
ISSN = {{0962-1083}},
EISSN = {{1365-294X}},
Keywords = {{Bombus; dispersal; landscape genetics; microsatellites; pollinator}},
Keywords-Plus = {{CONTERMINOUS UNITED-STATES; LAND-USE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; SIBSHIP
   RECONSTRUCTION; BIODIVERSITY LOSS; COMPUTER-PROGRAM; NEST DENSITY;
   HYMENOPTERA; POPULATIONS; POLLINATORS}},
Research-Areas = {{Biochemistry \& Molecular Biology; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology;
   Evolutionary Biology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Biochemistry \& Molecular Biology; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology}},
Author-Email = {{sjha@austin.utexas.edu}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{National Geographic SocietyNational Geographic Society; National Science
   FoundationNational Science Foundation (NSF)}},
Funding-Text = {{We deeply appreciate the feedback we received from the reviewers and
   editor and thank them for their constructive suggestions. We also thank
   Amber Sciligo for help in the laboratory and field. This work was
   partially supported by the National Geographic Society and the National
   Science Foundation.}},
Cited-References = {{Aguilar R, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P5177, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x.
   Balkenhol N, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P818, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05807.x.
   Bartomeus I, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1218503110.
   Barton K., 2013, MUMIN MULTIMODEL INF.
   Beerli P, 2004, MOL ECOL, V13, P827, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02101.x.
   Bhattacharya M, 2003, BIOL CONSERV, V109, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00130-1.
   Biesmeijer JC, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P351, DOI 10.1126/science.1127863.
   Bommarco R, 2014, DIVERS DISTRIB, V20, P591, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12187.
   Brown DG, 2005, ECOL APPL, V15, P1851, DOI 10.1890/03-5220.
   Cameron SA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P662, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014743108.
   Carvell C, 2006, APIDOLOGIE, V37, P326, DOI 10.1051/apido:2006002.
   Clarke RT, 2002, J AGRIC BIOL ENVIR S, V7, P361, DOI 10.1198/108571102320.
   Cusser S, 2013, RESTOR ECOL, V21, P713, DOI 10.1111/rec.12003.
   Darvill B, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04423.x.
   Davis ES, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P4922, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04868.x.
   Dillon ME, 2006, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V46, P49, DOI 10.1093/icb/icj007.
   Durand E, 2009, MOL BIOL EVOL, V26, P1963, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp106.
   ESRI, 2006, ARCGIS 9 2.
   ESTOUP A, 1995, MOL ECOL, V4, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00195.x.
   Evanno G, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2611, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x.
   Falush D, 2003, GENETICS, V164, P1567.
   Francois O, 2010, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V10, P773, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02868.x.
   Gallai N, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014.
   Gerlach G, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P3845, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04784.x.
   Goslee SC, 2007, J STAT SOFTW, V22, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v022.i07.
   Goulson D, 2008, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V53, P191, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454.
   Goulson D, 2011, CONSERV GENET, V12, P867, DOI 10.1007/s10592-011-0190-4.
   Goulson D, 2008, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V17, P3269, DOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9428-y.
   Goulson D, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P1207, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.x.
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195.
   Guillot G, 2013, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V4, P336, DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12018.
   Gurka MJ, 2006, AM STAT, V60, P19, DOI 10.1198/000313006X90396.
   Heard MS, 2007, BIOL LETTERS, V3, P638, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0425.
   Holderegger R, 2008, BIOSCIENCE, V58, P199, DOI 10.1641/B580306.
   Hooper DU, 2005, ECOL MONOGR, V75, P3, DOI 10.1890/04-0922.
   Jha S, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P2483, DOI 10.1111/mec.12275.
   Jha S, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P555, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1208682110.
   Jost L, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P4015, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03887.x.
   Kalinowski ST, 2005, MOL ECOL NOTES, V5, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00845.x.
   Kearns CA, 1998, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V29, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83.
   Kelly AC, 2014, POPUL ECOL, V56, P327, DOI 10.1007/s10144-013-0427-9.
   Keyghobadi N, 2007, CAN J ZOOL, V85, P1049, DOI 10.1139/Z07-095.
   Klein AM, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P303, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
   Knight ME, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P1811, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x.
   Kosior A, 2007, ORYX, V41, P79, DOI 10.1017/S0030605307001597.
   Kraus FB, 2009, J ANIM ECOL, V78, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01479.x.
   Krauss J, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P597, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01457.x.
   Kremen C, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16182.
   Larsen TH, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00749.x.
   Legendre P, 1998, NUMERICAL ECOLOGY.
   Lepais O, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P819, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04500.x.
   Lonsdorf E, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1589, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp069.
   Loreau M, 2002, GLOB CHANGE IGBP SER, P169.
   Lozier JD, 2013, CONSERV GENET, V14, P1099, DOI 10.1007/s10592-013-0498-3.
   Lozier JD, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P4870, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05314.x.
   Luikart G, 1998, CONSERV BIOL, V12, P228, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96388.x.
   Manel S, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P189, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9.
   Marchi C, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066208.
   McFrederick QS, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V129, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.004.
   McKinney ML, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V127, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005.
   McRae BH, 2006, EVOLUTION, V60, P1551, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x.
   Memmott J, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P2605, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909.
   Michener C.D., 2000, BEES WORLD.
   Munshi-South J, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P1360, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05476.x.
   NEI M, 1973, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V70, P3321, DOI 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321.
   Nei M., 2000, MOL EVOLUTION PHYLOG.
   Ollerton J, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
   Perfecto I, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P5786, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0905455107.
   Pinheiro J., 2014, NLME LINEAR NONLINEA.
   Piry S, 1999, J HERED, V90, P502, DOI 10.1093/jhered/90.4.502.
   Pritchard JK, 2000, DOCUMENTATION STRUCT.
   Pywell RF, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V129, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.034.
   R Development Core Team, 2005, R LANG ENV STAT COMP.
   Rayfield B, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P519, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7.
   RAYMOND M, 1995, J HERED, V86, P248, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573.
   Ricketts TH, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P1113, DOI 10.1890/12-1600.1.
   Ricketts TH, 2001, AM NAT, V158, P87, DOI 10.1086/320863.
   Riley JR, 1999, NATURE, V400, P126, DOI 10.1038/22029.
   Rousset F, 2008, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V8, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x.
   Schmid-Hempel R, 2014, J ANIM ECOL, V83, P823, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12185.
   Sisk TD, 2008, PERSPECTIVES LAND US.
   Sleeter BM, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.006.
   Spear SF, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P3576, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04657.x.
   Spiegelhalter DJ, 2002, J R STAT SOC B, V64, P583, DOI 10.1111/1467-9868.00353.
   Stolle E, 2011, BMC GENOMICS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-48.
   Stolle E, 2009, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V9, P1345, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02610.x.
   Storfer A, 2007, HEREDITY, V98, P128, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800917.
   Stubbs CS, 2001, J ECON ENTOMOL, V94, P609, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-94.3.609.
   Svensson B, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V77, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00106-1.
   Thorp R.W., 1983, Bulletin of the California Insect Survey, V23, P1.
   TILMAN D, 1994, NATURE, V371, P65, DOI 10.1038/371065a0.
   Truett GE, 2000, BIOTECHNIQUES, V29, P52, DOI 10.2144/00291bm09.
   UN (United Nations), 2005, WORLD URB PROSP 2005.
   van Oosterhout C, 2006, MOL ECOL NOTES, V6, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01082.x.
   Wang JL, 2004, GENETICS, V166, P1963, DOI 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1963.
   Wardle DA, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P1273, DOI 10.1126/science.1197479.
   Watts PC, 2004, MOL ECOL, V13, P2931, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02300.x.
   WEIR BS, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P1358, DOI {[}10.2307/2408641, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x].
   Williams NM, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P1049, DOI 10.1890/11-1006.1.
   Williams NM, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P2280, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024.
   WILLIAMS PH, 1982, J APICULT RES, V21, P236, DOI 10.1080/00218839.1982.11100549.
   Winfree R, 2011, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V42, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042.
   Wolf S, 2012, POPUL ECOL, V54, P115, DOI 10.1007/s10144-011-0285-2.
   Yang RC, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P1839.
   Zellmer AJ, 2009, MOL ECOL, V18, P3593, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04305.x.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{105}},
Times-Cited = {{40}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{141}},
Journal-ISO = {{Mol. Ecol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{CC3KH}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000350246500004}},
DA = {{2020-11-05}},
}

@article{ ISI:000351208000009,
Author = {Peterson, Megan L. and Miller, Timothy J. and Kay, Kathleen M.},
Title = {{AN ULTRAVIOLET FLORAL POLYMORPHISM ASSOCIATED WITH LIFE HISTORY DRIVES
   POLLINATOR DISCRIMINATION IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS}},
Journal = {{AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY}},
Year = {{2015}},
Volume = {{102}},
Number = {{3}},
Pages = {{396-406}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{Premise of the study: Ultraviolet (UV) floral patterns are common in
   angiosperms and mediate pollinator attraction, efficiency, and
   constancy. UV patterns may vary within species, yet are cryptic to human
   observers. Thus, few studies have explicitly described the distribution
   or ecological significance of intraspecific variation in UV floral
   patterning. Here, we describe the geographic distribution and pattern of
   inheritance of a UV polymorphism in the model plant species Mimulus
   guttatus (Phrymaceae). We then test whether naturally occurring UV
   phenotypes influence pollinator interactions within Mimulus guttatus.
   Methods: We document UV patterns in 18 annual and 19 perennial
   populations and test whether UV pattern is associated with life history.
   To examine the pattern of inheritance, we conducted crosses within and
   between UV phenotypes. Finally, we tested whether bee pollinators
   discriminate among naturally occurring UV phenotypes in two settings:
   wild bee communities and captive Bombus impatiens.
   Key results: Within Mimulus guttatus, perennial populations exhibit a
   small bulls-eye pattern, whereas a bilaterally symmetric runway pattern
   occurs mainly in annual populations. Inheritance of UV patterning is
   consistent with a single-locus Mendelian model in which the runway
   phenotype is dominant. Bee pollinators discriminate against unfamiliar
   UV patterns in both natural and controlled settings.
   Conclusions: We describe a widespread UV polymorphism associated with
   life history divergence within Mimulus guttatus. UV pattern influences
   pollinator visitation and should be considered when estimating
   reproductive barriers between life history ecotypes. This work develops
   a new system to investigate the ecology and evolution of UV floral
   patterning in a species with extensive genomic resources.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Peterson, ML (Corresponding Author), Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Ecol \& Evolutionary Biol, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA.
   Peterson, Megan L.; Miller, Timothy J.; Kay, Kathleen M., Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Ecol \& Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.3732/ajb.1400415}},
ISSN = {{0002-9122}},
EISSN = {{1537-2197}},
Keywords = {{Bombus impatiens; bumblebee; ethological isolation; floral constancy;
   life history; nectar guide; Phrymaceae; pollination ecology; pollinator
   isolation; ultraviolet}},
Keywords-Plus = {{FLOWER COLOR POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; BUMBLEBEE
   POLLINATION; MEDIATED SELECTION; EVOLUTION; PATTERNS; POPULATIONS;
   TRAITS; CONSTANCY; HYBRIDIZATION}},
Research-Areas = {{Plant Sciences}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Plant Sciences}},
Author-Email = {{mdemarch@ucsc.edu}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{NSF Graduate Research FellowshipNational Science Foundation (NSF); Jean
   H. Langenheim Fellowship in Plant Ecology and Evolution}},
Funding-Text = {{The authors thank J. Whittall for the use of his digital camera, G.
   Berryman for help with data collection, and J. Velzy, C. McKinley, and
   the UCSC greenhouse staff for expert plant care. Three reviewers
   provided helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This
   work was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and the Jean
   H. Langenheim Fellowship in Plant Ecology and Evolution to M.L.P.}},
Cited-References = {{Aldridge G, 2007, EVOLUTION, V61, P99, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00008.x.
   Anderson B, 2008, EVOLUTION, V62, P220, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00275.x.
   Arathi HS, 2004, INT J PLANT SCI, V165, P1039, DOI 10.1086/423876.
   BLOOM M, 1973, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84640-3.
   Bodbyl Roels S. A., 2012, THESIS U KANSAS LAWR.
   BRADSHAW HD, 1995, NATURE, V376, P762, DOI 10.1038/376762a0.
   Brandvain Y, 2014,

repository: lizlaw/flashLIT

repo_name: lizlaw/flashLIT

filename: savedrecs (2).bib