text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydro's Battle Net

The result was delete, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising a site, nor is it a place to host a 'guide for all of those new members that join the site'. Simply existing isn't a good enough reason to have an article about the website. - Bobet 21:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Hydro's Battle Net
NN web forum. Prod removed by author. -- Merope 19:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. No revelant Google hits besides the site itself. --Gray Porpoise 19:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with Gray Porpoise. Although Wikipedia is not paper, it's just not appropriate for this project. אמר Steve Caruso ( desk / AMA / vote for me ) 20:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep-The Page recieves hundreds of hits a day, Although it may not be top of the list on google the site is still recognised amongst the community with 69 registered members.The site has been around for around 1 and a half years and its still going strong. Wikipedia should offer information on recognised sites and not simply dismiss then because a search engine cant pick it up. --Ford206
 * 69 registered members? Delete per Ford206.  (and per WP:V ) --Xyzzyplugh 23:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Keep - Hydro's Battle Net is small but not little. As Ford206 said this site is still going strong after more than an year, and it deserves to have a chance to get even better. It's not right to just delete something because it seems pointless with no results on Google. Chances are, the best option is to keep this page up for people to actually recognize HBN. - Blaze-kun
 * Comment two images at the bottom keep getting tagged as "non-commercial use only". Wikipedia cannot accept non-commercial use only images; such images will be deleted unless their license is changed. theProject 21:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Like the two above me have said. I believe this page deserves a chance. It may not be on the top of Google's search list but it is a wonderful reference for those who wish to see it and know more of what it's about. A guide if you will for all of those new members that join the site. It gives a good description of the story line the characters that play an important role and build the site up. Besides. Who said Google and Yahoo were God? (Though no one mentioned Yahoo I at least use it) If that's all things are rated on of relevence then Jesus help us all. The site is going strong and is a place for people to gather in the world of RP. Wikipedia shouldn't dismiss this page because it gives Hydros Battle Net a chance to be recognized by the mass of the internet. - Rae-chan
 * Comment. Sadly this site does not meet WP:WEB's criteria, which isn't just about search engine hits. It's also about material written by others about the site (of which the site has none), web awards and recognition (of which the site has none), or content being distributed by third party sources (of which the site has none). Google and Yahoo (which uses Google's search technology) are not "gods", but are decent guidelines when combined with other things when determining whether an article on a website satisfies notability guidelines. Wikipedia isn't a free webhosting service and the information would probably be better off on the Hydro Battle Net site. You also admit that you want people to recognize the site, which means the article is advertising, whether or not it's for profit (advertising is not solely done for profit - non-profit organizations can also advertise). On top of all this, none of the material can be verified by reliable sources - this means by third parties. ColourBurst 22:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Delete. None of the information is verifiable through reliable sources, and on top of this it fails WP:WEB.  ColourBurst 22:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- "keep this page up for people to actually recognize" gives it away. Wikipedia is a website that recognizes subjects worth recognition, not one that subjects use to gain recognition. theProject 22:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The Article is not to "Advertise" The site as HBN is already an established site know by various members of the MegaMan Community. The Articles main objective was to give others  information about the website itself no different from the articles of websites such as RuneScape or Neopets. Although obviously HBN is not in the same league as the two examples it still bears the same principles. The objective of the article is to inform rather than advertise--Ford206 22:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Asking for recognition is indeed advertisement (see Rae-chan's comment).  You have not addressed the fact that the article doesn't meet, and can't meet, Wikipedia's notability or verifiability guidelines.  ColourBurst 23:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Delete, fails WP:WEB, no WP:RS indicating that this website is notable, possible advertising violation. -- Kinu t /c  00:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Keep. I fail to see personally how this fails to meet Wikipedia criteria. The information in the page is verifiable, as the link to the site is providied. The characters are all fan-made and are owned privately by the members of Hydro's Battle Net, who have agreed to let me make this page. Copyright is not an issue, even for the images, which have all been drawn by a HBN member, and used with permission. While Google my fail to see this site in a simple search, it DOES exist and the information provided about the site IS correct. Raston00 00:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You might want to read Verifiability. To be verifiable, the information in a wikipedia article must be based on reliable sources, things like books, magazines, newspapers, etc.  If Hydro's Battle Net has been covered in any such reliable sources, please list them here.  --Xyzzyplugh 00:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep-Come on. The site itself may not be well known, but the article itself meets criteria. It's not really advertising or anything, just information on a certain site. There's not harm in keeping this page up anyhow, and everyone knows that wikipedia is the voice of the people-Diaxiann
 * Comment Can you state the criteria it meets and provide proof of such? There are no secondary sources (ie written by people not affiliated with HBN).  "There is no harm" is one of the common arguments bandied about - for that, see WP:ILIKEIT, because it's wrong.  On top of this, Wikipedia specifically is not a voice of the people (aka soapbox).  ColourBurst 07:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Delete Don't take into account the people who have just come from the site to vote keep as this has less than 100 members and is ridiculously small. J.J.Sagnella 08:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ooh, Look what I found. A link telling people to vote on the main site. J.J.Sagnella 08:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * CommentHey, monkey mojo pants. It that topic doesn't specifically ask people to vote for it. Most of the them reckon that it'd be deleted anyway. Ah buuuuuh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)
 * "Monkey Mojo Pants"? Well that's new. Is it a good thing or a bad thing? J.J.Sagnella 11:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Delete - only 69 registered members makes it non-notable, surely. Peterkingiron 16:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


text:
Instructional design/Cognitive behaviors/Invariant Tasks: Principles for Learning

Back to Topic:Instructional Design > Cognitive behaviors > Invariant Tasks > Define >  Learn >  Teach >  Tactics >  Try It >  Example

Source: Invariant Tasks by Charles M. Reigeluth. Used by Permission.

Overview: Before you can figure out how to teach an invariant task, it is helpful to know how invariant tasks are learned. Different learning theories provide different perspectives on how they are learned. In this section, we provide a description from the perspective of behaviorist theory, cognitive / information processing theory, cognitive / schema theory, and constructivist theory. We then provide an integrated view of principles for learning invariant tasks.

Behaviorist Learning Theory
There are several kinds of behaviorist learning theories. You may be familiar with "conditioned response theory" developed by Pavlov, whereby a response that already occurs in the presence of one stimulus can be "conditioned" to occur following a different stimulus. This learning theory is very important for emotional learning, but has little relevance to most learning of invariant tasks.

Far more relevant is "reinforcement theory," first developed by E. L. Thorndike (1913). and further developed by B.F. Skinner and others. In reinforcement theory, an invariant task is viewed as a "response" and is learned when it becomes "associated" with an appropriate stimulus. For example, "3.14" is a response that should become associated with "Pi". This learning process occurs whenever "reinforcement" follows the response. For example, each time a learner responds with "3.14", a reinforcer such as "Right!" or "Good!" or even just a smile with a nod will increase the probability of the learner responding the same way in the future. With sufficient repetition of these stimulus-response-reinforcement events, the response will come to occur automatically in the presence of the stimulus.

Cognitive / Information Processing Theory
There are at least two major kinds of cognitive theory relevant to learning invariant tasks: information-processing theory and schema theory. According to the information-processing model of learning (see Figure 1 below), there is a series of stages by which new information is learned (Gagné, 1985). Information is received by receptors (such as the eyes and ears), from which it is passed to the sensory register where all of it is held, but for only a few hundredths of a second. At this point, selective perception acts as a filter which causes some aspects of the information to be ignored and others to be attended to. For example, the ears (receptors) receive the sounds comprising "Pi equals 3.14," along with various other background sounds, and all those sounds are passed on to the sensory register in the brain. Then through the selective perception process, some of the information (hopefully the "Pi equals 3.14 part) is attended to."

Figure: The Information-Processing Model of Learning

That information which is attended to is transformed and passed on to short-term memory, which can only contain a few items of information at a time (usually identified as 7+2 items, depending on their complexity). For example, if "Pi equals 3.14" is attended to, it is then passed on to short-term memory, where it might be said to "echo" for a few seconds, and the echoing can be prolonged through rehearsal." Items can persist in short-term memory for up to about 20 seconds without rehearsal, but with constant rehearsal they can be retained indefinitely.

Finally, the information may be passed to long-term memory. This process is called encoding. For example, if appropriate encoding processes are exercised to link the "Pi equals 3.14" with prior knowledge, then the information is passed on to long-term memory." It is likely that different types of knowledge are encoded in different ways, which is why they require different methods of instruction. It is typically only this stage which we call "learning", for information which is not passed on to long-term memory is lost (at least, it is not retrievable). It is necessary to turn to other theories, such as schema theory, for descriptions of how the encoding process may occur.

Cognitive / Schema Theory
The other major kind of cognitive theory is schema theory. It proposes that, when new knowledge is encoded, it is organized into schemas, which are networks of related pieces of knowledge. For example, an invariant task can be encoded as a new schema, complete with such contextual factors as conditions for its use, in which case it will be at least loosely related to other schemata, or more typically it can be assimilated into an existing schema. But more importantly for instructional purposes, specific elements of the invariant task can often be learned--or more accurately, retrieved--more easily by relating them to certain carefully selected prior knowledge, especially meaningful knowledge. For example, it is easier to remember the colors of the rainbow and their order (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet) by associating them with the name, "Roy G. Biv."

Constructivist Theory
In contrast to the objectivist views of learning from both the behaviorist and cognitive information processing theories presented above, constructivists do not subscribe to the notion that knowledge exists independent of the learner. Instead, constructivist theory is founded on the premise that knowledge is both individually constructed and socially coconstructed by learners as they interpret their experiences (Jonassen, 1990). Unlike the theories presented above which focus on how information is encoded into long term memory, constructivists focus on the way that knowledge is constructed by the learner in working memory (Mayer, 1999).

This difference in perspective on learning impacts how learning is supported. Given the constructivist emphasis on the learner’s experience, there is a strong focus on “learning in context”. Therefore, as described by Driscoll (2005, p. 393), constructivist conditions for learning typically include:
 * Embedding learning in complex, realistic and relevant environments
 * Providing for social negotiation
 * Supporting multiple perspectives and the use of multiple modes of representation
 * Encouraging ownership in learning
 * Nurturing self awareness of the knowledge construction process

An Integrated View
There are two major degrees of memorization: recognition and recall. In recognition for a list, the name of the list and an item from the list are both presented to the learner, who indicates whether or not the item belongs to the list: "Which of the following were Presidents of the United States: Abraham Lincoln, Fred Washington, . . . ?" For an ordered list, two or more items from the list are presented or performed, and you indicate whether or not they are in the right order. In recall for a list, the name of the list is presented, and you have to retrieve the items from your own memory: "List ten Presidents of the United States below" or "Change the oil in your car."

Does association learning occur the same way? An association, in its simplest form, has two elements which must be paired together (associated with each other): a stimulus, which is presented to the learner, and a response (either mental or physical), which is provided by the learner. A state with its capital, a person with her name, a painting with its artist, a symbol with its name, and the letters of the alphabet with the finger movement necessary to type each on a standard keyboard are all cases in point. In its more complex forms, an association can have many elements which are all to be associated with each other, such as a person, a place, a date, and (the name of) an event. In this case, you usually have one stimulus and multiple responses. For example, "the discovery of America" might be associated with "Christopher Columbus," "1492," "Queen Isabel of Spain," and "the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria."

In recognition for an association, the stimulus and a response are both presented, and you indicate whether or not they are a correct match, or you match up the correct ones. "Was the Declaration of Independence signed in 1770?" is such an item. In recall for an association, the stimulus is presented, and you have to retrieve the response from your own memory. "When was the Declaration of Independence signed?" is a case in point. In spite of these differences, association learning is similar to list learning in that it is a rote (nonmeaningful) form of learning which is committed to memory primarily by repetition. It is also acquired gradually over time with practice, and it can be learned to the point of recognition or to the point of recall. Learning a rote procedure may require learning two things: when to do each action, and how to do each action. But in many cases, the learners may already know how to do each action, such as an experienced computer user learning how to use a particular web browser to search the Internet. That learner just needs to learn what actions to take when, not how to take them.

Click Next to continue.

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Talk:Djamila Bouhired

Untitled
The 1,5 million victims is the number given by FLN propaganda in Algeria, a more precise and less one-sided number should be given with references to objective historians... —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 00:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

POV
This is a biased and very badly written article. Yikes! And you are clearly not educated in this article. Yikes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Algeria forever democratic (talk • contribs) 16:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Other resources
In the absence of substantial information about Djamila Bouhired, perhaps this entry should look toward fact-based portrayals of this figure in multimedia or novels, such as Youssef Chahine's 1958 film "Jamila, the Algerian," interviews with her and her husband Jacques Verges (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPFuaUNW4_4 ; http://chnm.gmu.edu/wwh/modules/lesson9/lesson9.php?s=12), and other primary sources that detail historical accounts of her significance and experience. Ztaylor567 (talk) 23:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Djamila Bouhired (cropped).jpg

title: Talk:Djamila Bouhired


text:
No Yeon-bin

No Yeon-bin (born 2 April 1990) is a South Korean footballer who plays as defender for Chungju Hummel in K League Challenge.

Career
He was selected by Chungju Hummel in 2014 K League draft. He made his professional debut in the league match against Suwon FC on 29 March 2014.

title: No Yeon-bin


text:
User:RwiTexx/List of Contributions

To see complete and official list, click the following text. Special:Contributions/RwiTexx

Note: The contributions are mentioned in chronological order. The dates mentioned below are when I started editing the page. Also, I only count articles.

Contributions

 * 1) User:RwiTexx - 30 Nov 2019
 * 2) National Anthem of the Udmurt Republic - 3 Dec 2019
 * 3) User:RwiTexx/List of Contributions (this page) - 18 Aug 2020
 * 4) Anthem of Chukotka Autonomous Okrug - 18 Aug 2020
 * 5) Uyazybashevo - 10 Oct 2020
 * 6) Wikipedia's 20th Birthday - 19 Jan 2021
 * 7) Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai - 22 Jan 2021
 * 8) Samuel Slater - 3 Feb 2021
 * 9) Ossetian Language - 10 Feb 2021
 * 10) List of works similar to the 2020 Utah monolith - 18 Feb 2021
 * 11) 10th of Ramadan (city) - 31 Mar 2021
 * 12) Sus, Pyrénées-Atlantiques - 12 May 2021
 * 13) 2020 Summer Olympics medal table - 24 July 2021 (undid)
 * 14) Olympic Hymn - 25 July 2021
 * 15) Jasses - 26 July 2021
 * 16) State Anthem of Turkmenistan - 15 Aug 2021
 * 17) 62nd meridian east - 10 Sep 2021
 * 18) 63rd meridian east - 12 Sep 2021
 * 19) 65th meridian east - 13 Sep 2021
 * 20) 67th meridian east - 15 Sep 2021
 * 21) 69th meridian east - 15 Sep 2021
 * 22) 72nd meridian east - 20 Sep 2021
 * 23) Kalaupapa, Hawaii - 21 Sep 2021
 * 24) 78th meridian east - 3 Oct 2021
 * 25) 81st meridian east - 8 Oct 2021
 * 26) Chebulinsky District - 10 Oct 2021
 * 27) Edmund I - 24 May 2022 (reverted in good faith)
 * 28) Gyeongju - 30 Oct 2022
 * 29) 2022–23 European windstorm season - 31 Oct 2022
 * 30) Martinsburg, Iowa - 4 Apr 2023
 * 31) Hedrick, Iowa - 4 Apr 2023
 * 32) Choachí - 1 May 2023

title: User:RwiTexx/List of Contributions


text:
Talk:Monmouth Ocean Middlesex Line

Public/political reaction/input
Generally appears Ocean County is advocating very hard for construction, and along with Monmouth, prefers the Monmouth Junction alignment (whose numbers indicate highest ridership0, whereas Middlesex is NIMBY.
 * Larry Higgs, "Transit advocates push MOM commuter rail line," "Asbury Park Press," April 9, 2014
 * NJ State Legislature 1999
 * Ocean County Planning 2002
 * Ocean County MOM status 2006
 * DEIS public hearing 7-1-04 South Brunswick
 * DEIS public hearing 5-16-03 Eatontown
 * DEIS public hearing 10-25-03 Toms River
 * congressional funding and endorsement
 * 2007
 * DEIS public hearing 10-25-03 Toms River
 * congressional funding and endorsement
 * 2007

Reactions to the project have been mixed. Some Ocean County residents have advocated for the project. while others have asked for U.S. Route 9 to be widened. Resistance was greatest in Middlesex County.

title: Talk:Monmouth Ocean Middlesex Line


text:
Talk:Steve Forrest (actor)

Most Notable For...?
I was a little surprised that Mr. Forrest was not written up as being most notable for his starring role on the TV show S.W.A.T.

I didn't want to just throw that in there since what someone is most notable for is often a subject of debate on Wikipedia. Any thoughts?

--PoughkeepsieNative (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Need more info on name change
When an actor chooses to change his name early in his career, it is customary to explain why and to indicate whether the new name is only used professionally or if the change is a legally permanent one. This information is missing from the article, and leaves us scratching our heads when we reach the "Personal life" section. Because no last name is given for his children, we are left wondering if he really was cruel enough to name a child "Forrest Forrest". I trust you can see why the missing information is required here. Canonblack (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, he was the brother of Dana Andrews
I don't know how to put the reference in properly. Hope someone can sort it out. Put the URL in independently in address bar and you should read the full New York Times article. Octavius88 (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

https://web.archive.org/web/20220322233407/http://www.nytimes.com:80/1992/12/19/obituaries/dana-andrews-film-actor-of-40-s-is-dead-at-83.html Octavius88 (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hopefully, this URL should take you to the full article.

title: Talk:Steve Forrest (actor)


text:
Talk:Christl Mardayn

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Christl Mardayn, c. 1925.jpg

title: Talk:Christl Mardayn


text:
An Unbelievable Story of Rape

"An Unbelievable Story of Rape" is a 2015 article about a series of rapes in the American states of Washington and Colorado that occurred between 2008 and 2011, and the subsequent police investigations. It was a collaboration between two American, non-profit news organizations, The Marshall Project and ProPublica. The article was written by Ken Armstrong and T. Christian Miller. It won the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting and the 2015 George Polk Award for Justice Reporting.

The article alternates between two true stories of events occurring between August 2008 and June 2012. The first narrative is about a woman in Lynnwood, Washington, known pseudonymously as "Marie", who reports being raped to the police. After repeated interrogation by the police, who do not believe her, she says that her report was false. She is subsequently charged with a gross misdemeanor for false reporting. The second narrative details the police investigations into a serial rapist in Colorado, who is known to have raped four women and made a fifth attempt. The man is arrested in February 2011, and subsequent evidence on his hard drive reveals that Marie, not previously known to the local investigative team, was raped by him.

T. Christian Miller of ProPublica had been reporting on law enforcement failures in identifying rapists throughout 2015. In August, he learned of the case of Marie and contacted her lawyer, discovering that Ken Armstrong of The Marshall Project was already working on a similar story. They began to collaborate, with Armstrong writing about Marie's story in Washington and Miller writing about the police investigation in Colorado. Marie agreed to speak to Armstrong after six months of communication. The article was further informed by other interviews and thousands of pages of public records material.

The article was later adapted into the Netflix series Unbelievable (2019), which has received critical acclaim. The article also provided the basis of Miller and Armstrong's full-length book A False Report: A True Story of Rape in America (2018).

History
"An Unbelievable Story of Rape" was written by Ken Armstrong and T. Christian Miller. A collaboration between The Marshall Project and ProPublica, it was published on both websites on December 16, 2015. Colorado publication Westword reprinted the article as their cover story on May 19, 2016. The Marshall Project and ProPublica are American non-profit online news organizations. The Marshall Project specializes in criminal justice.

T. Christian Miller was a senior reporter at ProPublica. Throughout 2015, he had been reporting on the failure of law enforcement to trace rapists, including the case of Darren Sharper, a football player who raped nine women. Miller had discovered that a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) database to identify serial murderers and rapists was mostly unused in the cases of rape, as most police departments fail to upload sexual assault reports. His article "The FBI Built a Database That Can Catch Rapists — Almost Nobody Uses It" was published in July 2015.

By August 2015, Miller was working on a report about the Washington and Colorado serial rape cases, with focus on the woman who recanted a report of rape after intense police interrogation, proven true years later by the rapist's conviction—known in the article by her middle name "Marie". Miller called the woman's lawyer and discovered she was in contact with Ken Armstrong of The Marshall Project, who had been working on an article about the case for several months. The teams decided to collaborate.

Research and writing
Armstrong's editor Joe Sexton and Miller's editor Bill Keller had worked together at The New York Times. Numerous other editors contributed to the article, including managing editor Kirsten Danis of The Marshall Project. As the two reporters and two primary editors were all male, the team ensured that they consulted various women, some with knowledge of the case and some without, particularly in regards to how graphic or detailed to make the description of Marie's rape.

Miller wrote the sections about the woman in Colorado, while Armstrong wrote the sections about the investigation in Washington. The sections are ordered alternately, with an opening paragraph about the woman in Washington being charged with false reporting. The structure was proposed by Sexton. The first draft was 15,000 words in length, shortened to 12,000 in the final version. Keller and other editors recommended cutting down on the ending of the article, yielding a short epilogue.

For the article, Armstrong and Miller made public records requests to police departments and prosecuting attorney's offices in Washington and Colorado. They received thousands of pages of documents, including investigative reports, case reviews, crime scene photographs and footage of surveillance and O'Leary after his arrest. News coverage, criminal justice guidelines and court transcripts were also consulted. Extracts of an external report made of the police department that investigated Marie's case were made public for the first time in the article.

After seven months of email and phone communication with Marie's lawyer, Marie agreed to speak to Armstrong. It was the first time she had agreed to be interviewed by a journalist. Armstrong and Miller also interviewed two of Marie's foster parents and her friend, her public defender and civil suit attorney. The pair spoke to various police officers, including Detectives Stacy Galbraith and Edna Hendershot who investigated the Colorado cases. Three officers in the Lynnwood Police Department were interviewed, including Mason, one of the officers who handled Marie's request. The interviews were made late in the process, the department having refused earlier requests for comment. The other officer, Rittgarn, declined to be interviewed. The perpetrator of the serial rapes, Marc O'Leary, was also interviewed. A brief audio recording of Marie describing her rape is included in the article.

Summary
In Lynnwood, Washington, an 18-year-old woman, referred to as "Marie," reported being bound, gagged and raped at knifepoint to police. Following police confrontation about inconsistencies in her story, she said that she made the incident up. In March 2009, she was charged with a gross misdemeanor, fined $500 and put on probation. Marie had been sexually and physically abused in early life and was in foster care for most of her childhood. She joined Project Ladder at age 18, a program designed for people transitioning from foster care to living alone.

In Golden, Colorado, during January 2011, Detective Stacy Galbraith interviewed a woman who was raped at gunpoint for four hours. When Galbraith talked to her husband, also a police officer, he observed similarity with an incident reported to his police department in Westminster. Galbraith began collaboration with Westminster Detective Edna Hendershot, who had investigated two cases in which women aged 59 and 65 were raped in similar ways. They also discovered a burglary where a masked man had attempted to tie up a 46-year-old woman, who jumped out of her window and was badly injured. The four known cases took place in different suburbs of Denver. The man had gone to extreme lengths to avoid leaving DNA evidence, but touch DNA from the same paternal family line was found at three of the four crime scenes.

Marie had made her report in August 2008 to Sergeant Jeffrey Mason and Jerry Rittgarn. Police guidelines advised that rape victims should not be interrogated, as they may be uncertain of details or report conflicting information. Investigating Marie's report, police found evidence of an assailant and abrasions to Marie's vagina and wrist. However, two of Marie's former foster parents began to disbelieve her due to her seemingly calm demeanour, one reporting doubts to the police. Following this, and Marie's conflicting account of when she phoned a friend, Mason and Rittgarn made Marie repeat her story, Rittgarn saying that he disbelieved her. He asked if the rapist was real and she said "no." Without reading the Miranda warning, they asked her to write that she had made a false report. She wrote instead that she had dreamed the incident, now unsure of what happened. After hours of further questioning, Marie wrote that she had been lying.

Project Ladder staff made Marie return to police when she said she made the report under duress. She asked to take a polygraph test—though such tests do not provide reliable evidence—but declined when Rittgarn threatened jail and loss of housing if she failed it. Mason filed a false reporting charge; such charges in similar circumstances were rare. Marie became the subject of media reports and an attack website. She quit her Costco job and considered suicide. In October 2008, one of Marie's foster parents saw a report of a woman in Kirkland, Washington, raped in the same way as Marie. Kirkland police abandoned this lead after Lynnwood police told them at least twice that Marie's account was a lie.

In February 2011, a report was unearthed of a suspicious vehicle registered to army veteran Marc Patrick O'Leary, who lived in Lakewood, Colorado, and whose description matched the attacker. FBI agents collected DNA evidence from his brother which showed one of them was the rapist. A search warrant led to the arrest of O'Leary. He possessed a mask, gun, women's underwear and other identifying evidence. Photographs of Marie were found on O'Leary's hard drive. O'Leary had watched women for hundreds of hours, breaking into their houses multiple times before each rape. In December 2011, O'Leary was sentenced to 327.5 years in prison for four incidents in Colorado. In June 2012, he was sentenced to an additional 38.5 years for two incidents in Washington.

An external report by Sergeant Gregg Rinta, who worked for the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office as a sex crimes supervisor, condemned the handling of Marie's case. It described the officers' behaviour as "bullying" and highlighted threats of jail and housing assistance removal as "coercive, cruel, and unbelievably unprofessional." An internal review also concluded that Mason and Rittgarn's behaviour was "designed to elicit a confession of false reporting." In 2015, the commander of Lynnwood's Criminal Investigations Division said that practices had since changed. Neither Mason nor Rittgarn were disciplined. After Marie approached Mason, he offered an apology. Marie sued the city, winning $150,000. By the time of the article, Marie was married with two children.

Response
The article won the 2015 George Polk Award for Justice Reporting, presented by Long Island University, and the 2016 Al Nakkula Award for Police Reporting, awarded by the University of Colorado Boulder and Denver Press Club. It also won the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting, the article being described as "a startling examination and exposé of law enforcement's enduring failures to investigate reports of rape properly and to comprehend the traumatic effects on its victims". It was a finalist in the 2016 National Magazine Awards in the Feature Writing category.

Nora Caplan-Bricker of Slate reflected that "Marie's story helps remind us that false reports of rape are the exception, not the rule", believing that the article shows the "ruinous consequences" and "ubiquity" of rape victims being disbelieved. Writing for the alternative Wisconsin newspaper Isthmus, Bill Lueders praised the article and compared it to his own reporting about a similar case from 1997 to 2001, where a woman was charged by police after ostensibly making a false report of rape, but was later proven truthful by DNA evidence leading to her rapist's conviction.

The University of Colorado Boulder reported in 2016 that law enforcement officials had requested to use the article in training. Jennifer Gentile Long, CEO of AEquitas: The Prosecutors' Resource on Violence Against Women, commented that the article presented an "extraordinary learning opportunity for both criminal justice professionals and ordinary citizens alike". Journalist Pamela Colloff referenced the article as an example of good reporting on criminal justice, as it is told from the perspective of a survivor.

Related media
"An Unbelievable Story of Rape" was published on December 16, 2015. In the days following, Miller and Armstrong published two subsequent articles: "A Brutal Crime, Often Terribly Investigated" enumerated five recommendations for police institutions to improve their handling of rape cases, while "Rape is Rape, Isn't It?" commented on the changing definition of rape used by the FBI.

In December 2015, ProPublica published a podcast episode where Miller and Armstrong discussed the article. At the Investigative Reporters and Editors' 2016 conference, the pair gave a talk about their experience writing the article. In July 2016, they appeared on the Longform podcast to discuss the article. Armstrong appeared on Utah Public Radio in November 2016, discussing the article on Access Utah.

"An Anatomy of Doubt"
"An Anatomy of Doubt" is the 581st episode of the American radio program and podcast This American Life. It adapts "An Unbelievable Story of Rape". Credited as a collaboration with The Marshall Project and ProPublica, it debuted on February 26, 2016. The hour-long episode features Ira Glass, Ken Armstrong and Robyn Semien and includes interviews with Marie, Mason and two of Marie's foster parents.

A False Report
Armstrong and Miller adapted their article and additional research into a 304-page book, A False Report: A True Story of Rape in America. It was published on February 6, 2018 by the Crown Publishing Group. The book expands upon details of the case like O'Leary's perspective and subjects such as victim blaming and social media harassment. Mason was interviewed for the book, but Rittgarn refused to speak to the authors without being paid.

The book received mostly positive critical reviews, with Hamilton Cain of Star Tribune calling it an "instant true-crime classic". Emily Bazelon of The New York Times praised that the authors "tell their story plainly, expertly and well", and the style of alternating between Marie's story and the other Denver sexual assaults was praised by Claudie Rowe of The Seattle Times and Cain. However, though Rosita Boland of The Irish Times enjoyed the early sections of the book, she found it to have a "curiously flat style overall, without any distinctive voice".

Unbelievable
The Netflix miniseries Unbelievable is an eight-part adaptation of "An Unbelievable Story of Rape", also drawing from "An Anatomy of Doubt" and A False Report. It premiered on September 13, 2019. The main characters are based on Marie (Kaitlyn Dever), known in the series as Marie Adler, and Detectives Edna Hendershot and Stacy Galbraith, who were renamed as Grace Rasmussen (Toni Collette) and Karen Duvall (Merritt Wever). Marie, Armstrong and Miller were consulted during the production.

Netflix reported that Unbelievable had garnered 32 million views by the end of September, where a "view" entailed watching at least 70% of an episode. This made it the seventh-most viewed television series on the platform from August 2018 to September 2019. The program was nominated for numerous awards, including four nominations each at the Golden Globe Awards and the Critics' Choice Television Awards, with one win at the latter. On Rotten Tomatoes, the series has a rating of 98%, based on 82 reviews, with the summary: "Heartbreaking and powerful, Unbelievable transcends familiar true-crime beats by shifting its gaze to survivors of abuse, telling their stories with grace and gravity." On Metacritic, the program has a rating of 83 out of 100 based on 25 reviews, indicating universal acclaim.

title: An Unbelievable Story of Rape


text:
go the way of

Verb

 * 1)  To end up the same way as; to undergo the same fate as.
 * Vinyl records seem to have gone the way of the dinosaurs [i.e. become extinct, or fallen out of common use].

title: go the way of


text:
Paul Wasicka

Paul J. Wasicka (born February 17, 1981, in Dallas, Texas) is a professional poker player, based in Denver, Colorado, who was the runner-up at the 2006 World Series of Poker Main Event and the winner of the 2007 NBC National Heads-Up Poker Championship. Paul attended college in Madison, WI.

World Series of Poker
Wasicka finished as runner-up to Jamie Gold in the 2006 World Series of Poker Main Event, winning over $6,000,000.

NBC National Heads-Up Poker Championship
Wasicka's tournament accomplishments since that World Series of Poker finish include winning the 2007 NBC National Heads-Up Poker Championship by defeating Eli Elezra, Joe Hachem, T. J. Cloutier, Nam Le, Shannon Elizabeth, and finally Chad Brown in the finals 2-0. He won $500,000 for his victory in the tournament.

World Poker Tour
At the World Poker Tour (WPT) $9,900 No Limit Hold'em held at the 2007 L.A. Poker Classic, Wasicka made the final table which also included poker players J. C. Tran and Eric Hershler, he finished in fourth place, earning $455,615. Wasicka has also cashed in three other WPT Championship events and has made a total of over $700,000 from WPT events alone.

Aussie Millions
At the 2007 Aussie Millions A$10,000 Main Event, Wasicka just missed making the final table, coming in 12th and earning A$120,000 ($95,434). The event was won by fellow professional poker player Gus Hansen.

As of 2016, Wasicka's total live tournament winnings exceed $7,885,000. His 14 cashes at the WSOP account for $6,308,316 of those winnings.

title: Paul Wasicka


text:
Abu Ishaq Shami

Abu Ishaq Shami (died 940) was a Muslim scholar who is often regarded as the founder of the Sufi Chishti Order. He was the first in the Chishti lineage (silsila) to live in Chisht and to adopt the name "Chishti", so that, if the Chishti order itself dates back to him, it is one of the oldest recorded Sufi orders. His original name, Shami, implies he came from Syria (ash-Sham). He died in Damascus and lies buried on Mount Qasiyun, where Ibn Arabi was later buried.

Masters and students
Abu Ishaq Shami's teacher was Mumshad Al-Dinawari, whose own teacher was Abu Hubayra al-Basri, a disciple of Huzaifah Al-Mar'ashi who was in turn a disciple of Ibrahim ibn Adham (Abu Ben Adhem In the western tradition.) The Chishtiyyah silsila continued through Abu Ishaq Shami's disciple Abu Aḥmad Abdal Chishti. In South Asia Moinuddin Chishti, whose silsila goes back to Abu Ishaq Shami, was the founding father who brought Chishti teaching to the region. He remains the most revered saint of the Chishti order in India and Pakistan.

Quotes
Some of Abu Ishaq Shami's sayings are:
 * “Starvation excels all in bliss.“
 * “The worldly people are impure while the dervishes are pure in their souls. These two different natures cannot therefore mingle.”

title: Abu Ishaq Shami


text:
Talk:Developing Scripts and Case Studies for cisLunarFreighter/STC

Article based on (in Heavily modified and tweaked form from) - URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Regulations_for_Preventing_Collisions_at_Sea History: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Regulations_for_Preventing_Collisions_at_Sea&action=history

The notes are in no way complete.. ShakespeareFan00 21:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Move model details from other page?
Erm, should the information in the other page be here?

ShakespeareFan00 21:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


text:
Francesco Canali

Francesco Canali (1764, Perugia–1835, Ferrara) was an Italian cardinal. He was the Titular Archbishop of Larissa.

Early life
Francesco Canali studied in his native city of Perugia and was ordained in December 1786 as a deacon. Two years later he received the priesthood. In 1793 he was professor of theology at the seminary of Perugia, which he was rector from 1797 to 1806. Moreover, Canali was from 1797 to 1800 prior of the theologian College his hometown, and thereafter the chamberlain. 1809, he was jailed by the French and taken to Parma, Piacenza, Corsica and Bastia. In August 1814 he returned to Perugia.

Episcople biography
Francesco Canali was appointed Bishop of Spoleto in 1814 and transferred the 23 July 1820   by Pope Pius VII in Tivoli church as administrator, then elected bishop of Tivoli on 28 August 1820. He resigned in 1827 and became titular Archbishop of Larissa in Thessaly. In February 1827 he was appointed secretary of the Congregation of regular and canonical bishops of the Vatican Basilica.

Pope Gregory XVI created him cardinal in pectore on 30 September 1831. Published 23 June 1834.

title: Francesco Canali


text:
Joseph-Berlioz Randriamihaja

Joseph-Berlioz Randriamihaja (born 30 November 1975) is a Malagasy athlete who specializes in the 110 metres hurdles. In his early career he competed in decathlon. He is the current Malagasy record holder in hurdles and former record holder in decathlon.

title: Joseph-Berlioz Randriamihaja


text:
neerlandese

Etymology
, remodelled to include the native suffix.

Adjective

 * 1) Dutch

Noun

 * 1) Dutch

title: neerlandese


text:
medicin

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  medicine
 * 2) medicine, drug (a substance which promotes healing)

Noun

 * 1) medical doctor, doctor, physician (a medical professional)

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1)  medicine (the art of curing illness)
 * 2)  a medicine, a drug

Usage notes
Compare, which leans heavily toward illegal recreational drugs in Swedish.

title: medicin


text:
Kenneth Grant (disambiguation)

Kenneth Grant (1924–2011) was an English occultist.

Kenneth Grant may also refer to:
 * Kenneth J. Grant (1839–1932), Canadian Presbyterian missionary
 * Kenneth Grant (politician) (1866–1922), member of the Queensland Legislative Assembly
 * Kenneth Grant (umpire) (1899–1989), West Indian cricket umpire
 * Kenneth Grant (bishop) (1900–1959), Scottish Roman Catholic bishop
 * Ken Grant (born 1967), photographer
 * Kenneth Grant (American football) (born 2003), American football player

title: Kenneth Grant (disambiguation)


text:
Talk:Keiji Nishitani

Improper commentary
The next to last paragraph. 2600:4040:5667:A400:19EA:220F:9DB7:323C (talk) 04:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Keiji Nishitani


text:
Purusha Sukta

Purusha Sukta (पुरुषसूक्तम्, ) is a hymn in the Rigveda, dedicated to the Purusha, the "Cosmic Being". It is considered to have been a relatively late addition to the scripture — probably, to accord theological sanction to an increasingly unequal Kuru polity — and is the only hymn to mention the four varnas in explicit, alluding to a hierarchical division of the society. The hymn is also found in the three other Vedas but in slightly different forms.

Contents
The Purusha Sukta gives a description of the spiritual unity of the universe. It presents the nature of Purusha, or the cosmic being, as both immanent in the manifested world and yet transcendent to it. From this being, the Sukta holds, the original creative will (identified with Vishvakarma, Hiranyagarbha or Prajapati) proceeds which causes the projection of the universe in space and time. The Purusha Sukta, in the seventh verse, hints at the organic connectedness of the various classes of society.

Purusha
The Purusha is defined in verses 2 to 5 of the Sukta. He is described as a being who pervades everything conscious and unconscious universally. He is poetically depicted as a being with thousand heads, eyes and legs, enveloping not just the earth, but the entire universe from all sides and transcending it by ten fingers length – or transcending in all 10 dimensions. All manifestations, in past, present and future, is held to be the Purusha alone. It is also proclaimed that he transcends his creation. The immanence of the Purusha in manifestation and yet his transcendence of it is similar to the viewpoint held by panentheists. Finally, his glory is held to be even greater than the portrayal in this Sukta.

Creation
Verses 5–15 hold the creation of the Rig Veda. Creation is described to have started with the origination of Virat, or the astral body from the Purusha. In Virat, omnipresent intelligence manifests itself which causes the appearance of diversity. In the verses following, it is held that Purusha through a sacrifice of himself, brings forth the avian, forest-dwelling, and domestic animals, the three Vedas, the meters (of the mantras). Then follows a verse that states that from his mouth, arms, thighs, and feet the four varnas (categories) are born.

After the verse, the Sukta states that the moon takes birth from the Purusha's mind and the sun from his eyes. Indra and Agni descend from his mouth and from his vital breath, air is born. The firmament comes from his navel, the heavens from his head, the earth from his feet and quarters of space from his ears. Through this creation, underlying unity of human, cosmic and divine realities is espoused, for all are seen arising out of same original reality, the Purusha.

Yajna
The Purusha Sukta holds that the world is created by and out of a Yajna or exchange of the Purusha. All forms of existence are held to be grounded in this primordial yajna. In the seventeenth verse, the concept of Yajna itself is held to have arisen out of this original sacrifice. In the final verses, yajna is extolled as the primordial energy ground for all existence.

Context
The Sukta gives an expression to immanence of radical unity in diversity and is therefore, seen as the foundation of the Vaishnava thought, Bhedabheda school of philosophy and Bhagavata theology.

The concept of the Purusha is from the Samkhya Philosophy. It seems to be an interpolation into the Rigveda since it is out of character with the other hymns dedicated to nature gods.

The Purusha Sukta is repeated with some variations in the Atharva Veda (19.6). Sections of it also occur in the Panchavimsha Brahmana, Vajasaneyi Samhita and the Taittiriya Aranyaka. Among Puranic texts, the Sukta has been elaborated in the Bhagavata Purana (2.5.35 to 2.6.1–29) and in the Mahabharata (Mokshadharma Parva 351 and 352).

Authenticity
The verses about social estates in the Purusha Sukta are considered to belong to the latest layer of the Rigveda by scholars such as V. Nagarajan, Jamison and Brereton. V. Nagarajan believes that it was an "interpolation" to give "divine sanction" to an unequal division in society that was in existence at the time of its composition. He states "The Vedic Hymns had been composed before the Varna scheme was implemented. The Vedic society was not organized on the basis of varnas. The Purusha Sukta might have been a later interpolation to secure Vedic sanction for that scheme". Stephanie Jamison and Joel Brereton, a professor of Sanskrit and Religious studies, state, "there is no evidence in the Rigveda for an elaborate, much-subdivided and overarching caste system", and "the varna system seems to be embryonic in the Rigveda and, both then and later, a social ideal rather than a social reality".

title: Purusha Sukta


text:
Nathmalpur, Bhojpur

Nathmalpur is a village in Barhara block of Bhojpur district in Bihar, India. As of 2011, its population was 6,966, in 984 households.

title: Nathmalpur, Bhojpur


text:
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Azaz (1030)/archive1

Battle of Azaz (1030)

 * Nominator(s): Constantine  ✍  11:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

This article is about a battle between the Byzantines and the Arabs of the Mirdasid emirate of Aleppo. Coming shortly after a period when Byzantine military might was at its highest under Basil II, the Byzantine army, under a vainglorious emperor, suffered a humiliating, although in the end not decisive, defeat. The article was co-developed by myself and Al Ameer son over the past few years, has passed GA and ACR, and is as complete as we can get it. Constantine  ✍  11:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Support Comments from Tim riley
This is a splendid article and I expect to be supporting its elevation to FA, but first I have a few minor suggestions about the prose.
 * Lead
 * First sentence: you say here that the Byzantine army was led by the emperor "in person" but just that the opposing forces were "under" Emir Shibl al-Dawla Nasr. I see from the main text that the latter too led his troops in person, but that isn't altogether clear in the lead as it is currently phrased.
 * Good point. Hopefully fixed now.
 * I wondered at first what the strange r characters were before the dates: the pop-up "reign" is clever, but a little distracting, and I think unnecessary. If it is the usual form for such things, fine, but is it needed four times during the article?
 * Hmmm, you are the first one to complain about the reign template. I don't know if it is the "usual form", but generally I find providing the reader with regnal dates useful, as it gives a clue as to the interactions between the rulers and the position of the events described in their reign.
 * Ah, that is sensible, thanks. Done
 * Ah, that is sensible, thanks. Done

This looks like a long list of moans, but in fact I greatly enjoyed reading the article. I knew nothing of this period of history and learnt a lot. –  Tim riley  talk   13:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Second para: "the emperor" appears twice where a plain pronoun might move the text along more briskly with no loss of precision.
 * Done.
 * Background
 * I think I can guess what "confessional clashes" means, but it isn't a familiar phrase and could do with a note of explanation or else rephrasing in plain words.
 * Rephrased.
 * "According to medieval Arabic chroniclers Yahya of Antioch ... and Ibn al-Adim" – the tabloidese false title here could be avoided by the insertion of "the" before "medieval".
 * Fixed.
 * "that all of the above versions" – perhaps lose the unnecessary "of"?
 * Fixed.
 * "whom Romanos likely sought" – unexpected Americanism in a BrE article. The Guardian's style guide sums it up neatly: "In the UK, if not the US, using likely in such contexts as 'they will likely win the game' sounds unnatural at best; there is no good reason to use it instead of probably. If you really must do so, however, just put very, quite or most in front of it and all will, very likely, be well."
 * Fixed. I blame the dominance of US-style English online and in media.
 * "might wrest the city from them due to their youthfulness" – another point of BrE usage. In AmE "due to" is accepted as a compound preposition on a par with "owing to", but in BrE it is not universally so regarded. "Owing to" or, better, "because of" is safer.
 * Fixed.
 * "Zakkar claims the latter figure" – I'd be cautious with "claim": it can be read as implying that you think the assertion is false or in bad faith. Something more neutral such as "in Zakkar's view" might be safer. Similarly with Psellos, later.
 * Good point. Fixed.
 * Battle
 * "to reconnoiter the area." – the OED admits "reconnoiter", but favours "reconnoitre", as do I, but to each his own.
 * Let's go with the OED.
 * Second para – I think it would be better to decide whether "army" is singular or plural and stick to one or the other. At present we have "the army departed its camp" but "demoralized the Byzantine army and induced panic in their ranks".
 * Fixed.
 * "who was nearly captured himself" – not sure the "himself" is wanted here.
 * Fixed.
 * Aftermath
 * "an annual tribute of 500,000 dirhams" – I realise it is terribly difficult to give even faintly approximate modern equivalents of ancient currencies, but is it possible to put 500,000 dirhams into context as, e.g. x per cent of the imperial income or some such? Quite understand if not, but it would be helpful if possible.
 * Usually I'm the one insisting on this with sums of money, so I understand. Unfortunately here it is rather complicated, as the Musim and Byzantine coins were similar but not identical in weight, and as the Muslim rate of exchange between silver and gold coins (from a canonical 1:10, it more usually ranged from 1:14 up to 1:20) was different to the Byzantine one (1:12). My co-author Al Ameer son has added an approximate value in dinars, but the rate (1:60) is clearly wrong, especially if it is meant to echo the Treaty of Safar, which used the plausible 1:16 rate of exchange. Even if we provide a rough analogy in gold dinars by that value (31,250) and ignore for a moment that the dinar was usually a little lighter than the Byzantine nomisma, unfortunately there is no basis for even a half-reliable estimate on the Byzantine budget in the 11th century. I've seen figures from 3 million to 6 million gold coins, but even there the authors acknowledge that this is extrapolation and speculation from the far better attested Abbasid state budget. Perhaps the most useful figure I've found is that 1-2 dirhams per day were the salary of a skilled worker or soldier in the 9th century during the Abbasid heyday, although how far this is applicable to a border emirate in 1030 is open to question, given the fluctuations in silver coinage availability affecting the post-imperial Muslim states. I don't know how to proceed here, I would like to avoid a lengthy explanation. What do you think would work best?
 * I hardly dare express a view, so little do I know of the period. If you think any of the above would be helpful to readers – perhaps as an explanatory footnote – that would be excellent, but having raised the point I really feel I should leave it to your best judgment.  Tim riley  talk   19:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The figure I cited could very well be a typo in Zakkar's translation of Yahya of Antioch's work, with "60" (sitīn in Arabic) being mistaken for 16 (sitta'ash). It wouldn't be the first translation typo that I've spotted in the same source. --Al Ameer (talk) 22:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words, and don't worry, I appreciate a thorough review. I've tried to fix/answer the points you raised above. Please have a look. Any further comments and suggestions, even regardless of FA requirements, would be welcome. Constantine  ✍  18:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Happy to support. As noted, I am very far from expert about the subject, but so far as I can see the article is comprehensive, balanced (I note 's points below, but I do not feel myself competent to express a view) and well and widely referenced. The article is well illustrated and an excellent read, and I am happy to support.  Tim riley  talk   19:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments Support from PM
Placeholder, will wait until you've addressed Tim's points before I stick my oar in. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC) Great job with this, although I know nothing of this period, it reads well and I could only find a few minor things:
 * battle of al-Uqhuwanah→Battle of al-Uqhuwanah and redlink?
 * Done, in hopeful expectation...

 * suggest "Banu Kilab tribe"
 * Good point, done

 * suggest linking tribute and vassal
 * Done

That's all I have. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Peacemaker67, done. Anything else? Constantine  ✍  15:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Nope. Supporting, nice work on this. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments from HaEr48 (support)
This is an excellent, well-written and well-researched article. The background section gives adequate information to situate a new reader on the topic, and major events are covered in prelude and battle. It is written in an accessible manner and I enjoy reading it. I have some small comments:

 * Infobox "Result" say "Arab victory", is there any reason that we don't say more the specific "Mirdasid victory" or "Aleppine victory"? In the infobox, none of the "belligerents" say "Arab". It may not be obvious to the uninitiated, and in any case it's good to be specific.
 * Done.
 * "presence in Romanos's entourage of Mansur ibn Lu'lu', the former ruler of Aleppo": is Mansur from the same dynasty, or is he the Mirdasid's former enemy, or ?
 * Clarified.
 * Is it possible to discuss more on the Mirdasid's side of the story, e.g. their planning, motivation, or notable events that happened during the preparation or the battle? We get a lot of this regarding the Byzantines, e.g. how the emperor was planning the campaign, his motivations, how the general advised him, some little details such as the army going hungry and disciplines breaking down, siege engines having to be burned, and so on. I know it's probably impossible to achieve complete balance if the sources are not equally complete, but seeing that you are already several Arab historians here, I wonder if we have anything more?
 * Access to these primary sources is limited but sufficient info from them is found in Zakkar's Emirate of Aleppo and Bianquis' EI2 entry on the Mirdasids. There's info about the Mirdasids' preparations in the third paragraph of the Prelude section and about Arab troop numbers in the fourth paragraph. More information has since been added about the strength and tactics/mode of operations of the Banu Kilab cavalry in Background and Prelude. The aftermath from the Arabs' side has been slightly expanded as well. As for their motivations, the article demonstrates they sought to avoid hostilities and only confronted the imperial army to defend their realm. Other than what's currently in the article, there's not much more available about the Arab side. --Al Ameer (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As Al Ameer wrote, unfortunately the battle is known chiefly from the Byzantine sources. What we could find about the Arab side, has been added; to Al Ameer especially goes the credit here.

-- HaEr48 (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know if it's just me, but I feel the lead section a bit dominated by the Byzantines' point of view. The second para is almost totally written from the Byzantines' view, and more than half of the third para too. Could we balance it somehow?
 * As stated above, that rather reflects the situation of the sources, which allows us an insight into Romanos' mind (and even multiple variants thereof), whereas the Mirdasids are almost faceless. I've rewritten the lede somewhat, however, in view of your comments and some recent additions by Al Ameer. Please have a look.
 * Thanks for taking the time and for the suggestions/comments. I've tried to address them, please have a look. Constantine  ✍  16:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Haha, "almost faceless" is the right word. But I understand your explanation about it. I thought because I'm already seeing some Arab chroniclers attributed in the article, we could have more. I think what you and Al Ameer added made it less faceless, so thank you. I'll read the article one more time and will add here if I have more comments. HaEr48 (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately AFAIK the later Arab chroniclers don't go into so much detail as Psellos, who after all was a contemporary, a senior courtier, and an inveterate gossip to boot...
 * I suggest adding one more sentence to the first para of lead to summarise the battle and result, something like "The Mirdasids defeated the much larger Byzantine army and took great booty, even though they were eventually unable to capitalise on the victory". I think it's fair for the first para to be a very high-level summary and only the next para starts chronologically. HaEr48 (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Good point HaEr48, done.
 * I'm happy to support this, and thank you for your responses. Great work, and . HaEr48 (talk) 12:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your time and input, HaEr48. Constantine  ✍  17:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments Support by Mr rnddude
I still owe a couple FA reviews, and I've been eye-ing this article up for one of those.
 * Lede
 * ... and attempts to break out were defeated - This conflicts with the article proper. You only mention one attack by the Byzantines in the article – The patrikios Constantine Dalassenos then led an attack against the Arabs, but was defeated and fled back to the camp – and this doesn't appear to be a break out, as described in the lede, but more an attempted assault.
 * Good catch, fixed
 * ... the disordered Byzantines, and the ensuing engagement resulted in a rout for the Byzantines - You can cut the duplication of "Byzantines" and tighten the prose by rephrasing to something like ... the disordered Byzantines, who routed in the ensuing engagement.
 * Rewritten and tightened

 * Aftermath
 * In the meantime, ... - you can spare a couple words by using meanwhile here. Just a nitpick.
 * Done
 * The failure by the Romanos ... - stray "the", I suspect this originally read "by the Byzantines".
 * Done
 * ... was followed soon after by ... - is "soon after" necessary here? It seems superfluous.
 * Indeed. Removed

 * General
 * You have a mixture of " s' " and " s's " in the article. Use either, but be consistent.
 * Hmmm, I can only find instances of " s' " in the plural, which is as it should be.

That's all I picked up on, on first read through. Mr rnddude (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mr rnddude, thanks a lot, the suggestions above have been implemented. Anything else? How is the comprehensibility etc. of the article? Constantine  ✍  15:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I've re-read the article. I had no issue with comprehending the subject matter, beyond the occasional Greek term, but these have all been linked. I didn't notice anything else, so I'm switching to support. It's an excellent, if brief, article. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Image review - pass

 * The source of "The Arabs drive the Byzantines to flight at Azazion.jpg" links to a 492 page document. Could you specify the page please.
 * Likewise "Emperor Romanos III encamps at Azazion.jpg".
 * Optional: consider alt text for the location map, if only to be consistent with the other images.

Gog the Mild (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Gog, done. Constantine  ✍  16:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

All images are appropriately licenced. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments Support by CPA-5
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The Emirate of Aleppo had been a Byzantine vassal Link the Emirate of Aleppo.
 * Relinked
 * I see two howevers I think one is good enough because it's really small for two howevers (little too small in my opinion).
 * Both howevers are rather unnecessary, so removed.
 * Although his generals urged him to avoid action Remove the extra space between "urged" and "him".
 * Done, although this is not actually visible to the reader, only in Wikitext
 * leading in person the campaign against Aleppo --> "leading in-person the campaign against Aleppo"
 * I am not sure that is correct... As a non-native speaker, I may be wrong, but I've never seen this usage before, in contrast to "in person".
 * May I ask you why the source of Zakkar uses a Google Books's URL? By WP:GBOOKS we only should add a Google Books's URL to a book who gives us a preview.
 * Don't know, this was added by Al Ameer son in 2016. It often happens that GBooks links stop working or change over time, so that a link that gave a preview no gives only snippets or nothing. Still, I think that a link is useful to have, even for snippets.
 * PS, I just now notice that WP:GBOOKS is about linking to individual pages, which is definitely not the case here. Constantine  ✍  12:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:GBOOKS also uses Google Books' URL in a book cite in case the pages aren't linked. Sorry for the delay I am really struggling my free time on Wikipedia. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries CPA-5, just checking, take your time. Re WP:GBOOKS, that's not what I see. The section is explicitly headed "Linking to Google Books pages" and says "Page links should only be added when the book is available for preview", because "they will not work with snippet view." This is quite beside the point here, where a link for the entire work is provided. Even if it only allows snippets, the existence of a Google Books link is a good thing for WP:VERIFICATION purposes. Cheers, Constantine  ✍  14:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Well yes but WP:GBOOKS uses it as an example how Google Books's URL should looks like. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I honestly can't see where you get that from. It is explicit and specific on pages in inline references etc., it is not about "how Google Books's URL should looks like". Anyhow, since we are probably not going to agree on this, is this really something that is should hold up this nomination? Constantine  ✍  21:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I do not describe this one as a major issue (almost no one use Google Books link in the pages) in the article so sure I can give you my support. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Change the "~20,000" in the infobox into "c. 20,000".
 * Done
 * Hi CPA-5, thanks for taking the time. I've answered your points. Cheers, Constantine  ✍  12:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * a friendly reminder. Constantine  ✍  12:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Sources review
Brianboulton (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No spotchecks carried out
 * Formats: Checked, no issues found
 * Quality/reliability: no issues. All sources appear to meet the standard required by the FA criteria.

-- Laser brain  (talk)  10:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Hill 723

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Hill 723

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find WP:RS, other than a small mention in one book, web search generally comes back to this page. Page is vaguely worded with no real detail and relies on a single non WP:RS. Page appears to be an attempt to dice up Operation Lam Son 719 but without providing any useful or verifiable information Mztourist (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero sources; appears to be an unsourced fork of Operation Lam Son 719. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete -- I am extremely dubious of the objectivity of the media in a totalitarian state, which is presumably where the book cited were published.  I find it difficult to beleive that such an engagement was not reported in newspapers on the other side, though they may well call it something else.  If more sources can be cited, please let me know and I will reconsider my vote.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
User:LEENAMAXXINDIA/sandbox

Basanti Ke Kapde Aur Koffee is an ecommerce website based in Delhi. It is an innovation and design in Delhi's fashion industry, Indu and Sanjay Ahuja is known for heading They have Basanti, a multi-designer lifestyle online store ecommerce website.

title: User:LEENAMAXXINDIA/sandbox


text:
Talk:Ada Programming/Mathematical calculations/Trigonometry

Can some diagrams be borrowed from wikipedia? e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometry.
 * <IP_ADDRESS> 21:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Gee, someone needs to find some suitable diagrams. I had a tough time describing right triangles and a unit circle only in words... and I'm too lazy to find diagrams :-\. Ugen64 01:58, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I'll make some in SodiPodi right now..Thunderbolt16 05:15, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I drew it incorrectly with not the hyp to the unit circle to the leg. I'll fix this pretty quick

Um, where are the answers?

...to the exercises

Some notation for an angle must be included in defining the trig ratios because the value of the angle measure is one of the three variables in the equation. Math anxious students need to see as many visaul clues as possible in order for them to build an understanding of this concept.

Elementary Trigonometric Functions
Their teachers have taught my children the memory aid "SOHCAHTOA", pronounced so-ka-toe-a. Sin == Opposite / Hypotenuse, Cos == Adjacent / Hypotenuse. Tan == Opposite / Adjacent. This might be considered for adding to this section. Walrii 20:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Suggest delete page
It's not clear what useful role this page plays in the book. I think it is simply an introduction to the topic of trigonometry, which already exists in more well-developed form at the beginning of the book. Any objections to deleting the page? Douglas W. Mitchell (talk) 16:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


text:
Overload (Sugababes song)

"Overload" is the debut single of British girl group Sugababes. It was released on 11 September 2000 through London Records as the lead single from the group's debut studio album, One Touch (2000). At the time, the group consisted of Siobhán Donaghy, Mutya Buena and Keisha Buchanan. It was co-produced and co-written by British songwriters and producers Paul Simm, Felix Howard, Jony Rockstar and Cameron McVey. The general theme of the song involves a teenage girl's crush towards a boy and her finding the situation difficult to manage.

The song was listed at 432 on Pitchfork Media's Top 500 songs of the 2000s. It received an overwhelmingly positive reception from music critics. The song features on the soundtrack to the 2001 film High Heels and Low Lifes, directed by Mel Smith, and the 2002 film 40 Days and 40 Nights, directed by Michael Lehmann. The song was nominated for "Best British Single" at the 2001 BRIT Awards and later inspired the title of the group's greatest hits compilation Overloaded: The Singles Collection. English indie pop band Bastille covered the song for the soundtrack of the 2015 film Kill Your Friends.

Background
"Overload" was co-written by group members Keisha Buchanan, Mutya Buena, and Siobhán Donaghy together with the song's co-producers Cameron McVey, Paul Simm and long-time Sugababes contributor, Jony Rockstar. The track fuses together styles of soul and hip-hop and features contributions of numerous instruments, including: drum, bass, keyboard, electric guitar and horns.

Composition
"Overload" is a pop and R&B song with elements of soul and hip hop. Amy Raphael of The Observer described it as a "smoothly produced, seductive R&B track". According to the digital sheet music published by EMI, the song is written in the key of F♯ Phrygian dominant using common time, at a tempo of 125 beats per minute. The Sugababes' vocal range in the song spans from the lower note of F♯3 to the higher note of G5. The song's chorus line, "Train comes, I don't know its destination", is sung in doubled octaves. Matthew Horton of Virgin Media noted that the song contains "huffling beats, honeyed vocals and surf guitar".

Critical reception
"Overload" received universal critical acclaim from music critics. NME regarded the song's quality as "hauntingly infectious", and praised the track as irresistible and radio-friendly. The Portland Mercury also considered the song irresistible, and applauded its "snappy pop harmonies" and "jazzy dance beats". Sydney Morning Herald called the track "disarmingly sophisticated". Cameron Adams of Herald Sun wrote that "Overload" is one of the group's "finest moments", and reflected upon this as to why the song does not resemble those released by other girl groups. The Observer's Kitty Empire called the song a "brilliant" hit with "unexpected class", and cited it as the starting point of the Sugababes' "course to stardom".

Digital Spy considered "Overload" one of the best debut singles by a British girl group, whilst it also made NME's Year End Top 10 Singles for the year of 2000. Pitchfork included it at number 432 on their Top 500 Tracks of the Decade list in 2009. In October 2011, NME placed it at number 51 on its list "150 Best Tracks of the Past 15 Years". In 2014 they included it at number 493 on their list of the "500 Greatest Songs of All Time".

Chart performance
"Overload" entered the UK Singles Chart at number six on 23 September 2000. The following week, it dropped to number nine for two consecutive weeks, and eventually spent a further five weeks on the chart. "Overload" has sold approximately 160,000 copies in the United Kingdom, ranking it as their ninth best-selling single. In Ireland, "Overload" debuted at number 25 and reached its peak of number 15 five weeks later. It was the group's only single from the One Touch era to reach the top-twenty in Ireland. "Overload" entered the singles chart in Austria at number 34 on 21 January 2001, and later reached number three for two consecutive weeks, spending an additional three weeks in the chart's top-ten. It became the group's second-best performing single in Austria to-date.

In Germany, "Overload" debuted at number four and reached number three two weeks later. The song managed to spend six weeks in the chart's top-ten, and was certified Gold by the Bundesverband Musikindustrie, denoting shipments of 250,000 copies of the single. "Overload" reached number five in Switzerland and spent 29 weeks on the chart. In Norway, "Overload" debuted at number 17 and held the position for three consecutive weeks; it reached a peak position of number 12 in its fourth week on the chart. The single attained top-twenty in the Netherlands and top-forty positions in the Flanders and Wallonia regions of Belgium. The song reached number 21 in Sweden and spent 17 weeks on the chart. "Overload" also became a commercial success in New Zealand, where it peaked at number two. In Australia, the song peaked at number 27 for two non-consecutive weeks.

Music video
The music video for "Overload" was directed by Phil Poynter and filmed in London, England in August 2000. The video has no plot and is known for its fresh and simplistic style, a theme that they would continue in their early videos. It features the group in a variety of ever-changing outfits, singing the song in front of a plain white background, either by themselves or together as a group.

Track listings
Notes
 * $undefined$ denotes additional producer(s)

title: Overload (Sugababes song)


text:
List of ministers of Greyfriars Kirk

The minister of Greyfriars Kirk is a position within the Church of Scotland's Presbytery of Edinburgh. The current minister of Greyfriars Kirk is Richard Frazer, who was admitted in 2003.

Greyfriars originated in 1598, when Robert Rollock and Peter Hewat were appointed ministers of the South West Parish of Edinburgh, then meeting in the Upper Tolbooth portion of St Giles’. The charge of Greyfriars continued with two ministers until 1840, when St John's Church, Victoria Street, was erected and the last minister of the second charge, Thomas Guthrie became the first minister of the new church. New Greyfriars was erected in 1722 and occupied the western half of the kirk. It was a sole charge served by one minister. In 1929, the congregations of Old and New Greyfriars united under one minister. Both churches were burgh churches, meaning that the town council held the right to nominate the churches' ministers.

Since the establishment of the South-West Parish in 1598, 75 ministers have served the congregation: 40 in Old Greyfriars, 30 in New Greyfriars, and five in the united charge. Three ministers of Old Greyfriars were elected moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland during their incumbencies: George Kay in 1755, William Robertson in 1763, John Inglis in 1804. Two ministers of New Greyfriars were elected to this role during their incumbencies: Robert Henry in 1774 and James Nicoll Ogilvie in 1918. In 2003, Alison Elliot, an elder of Greyfriars, was elected to serve as moderator of the 2004 General Assembly. Elliot was the first woman moderator and the first lay person to hold the office since George Buchanan in 1567. Other notable ministers of Greyfriars include the Covenanters, Robert Douglas, Robert Traill, and Gilbert Rule; the statesman, William Carstares; the philanthropist, Thomas Guthrie; and the liturgical reformer, Robert Lee.

Old Greyfriars
The first congregation of Greyfriars began as the South West Parish of Edinburgh, which met in the Upper Tolbooth portion of St Giles'. In 1620, the congregation moved to the newly-built Greyfriars Kirk. The designation Old Greyfriars was adopted after the erection of New Greyfriars in the western half of the Greyfriars building in 1722.

The congregation was served by two ministers until 1840, when St John's Church on Victoria Street was erected and the minister of the collegiate charge, Thomas Guthrie, became the first minister of the new church. Old Greyfriars was a burgh church of the city of Edinburgh, meaning that, until the abolition of patronage in the Church of Scotland in 1874, the town council held the right to nominate the churches' ministers.

New Greyfriars
After an explosion destroyed part of Greyfriars in 1718, the town council decided to rebuild the church to accommodate two congregations. The western half of the church was occupied by New Greyfriars, which opened on 31 December 1722. In its earliest days, the congregation was also known as Wester Greyfriars.

Like Old Greyfriars, New Greyfriars was a burgh church and, prior to the abolition of patronage in the Church of Scotland in 1874, the town council held the right to nominated the minister. Unlike Old Greyfriars, the congregation was a sole charge served by one minister. The town council often appointed promising ministers to the sole charge of New Greyfriars on the understanding that they would be promoted to one of the city’s two-charge churches soon afterwards. For this reason, many ministers of New Greyfriars served relatively short incumbencies.

Greyfriars
After the death of Samuel Dunlop in 1928, no new minister was appointed to Old Greyfriars and the charges of Old and New Greyfriars were united as Greyfriars with William Wallace Dunlop Gardiner, the last minister of New Greyfriars, becoming the first minister of the united congregation. The partition between Old and New Greyfriars was demolished and the church was restored as one sanctuary between 1932 and 1938 under the architect Henry F. Kerr.

Lady Yester's Kirk united with Greyfriars in 1938 and, after Gardiner's departure in 1940, Greyfriars and the New North Church united in 1941; Duncan William Park Strang, the last minister of the New North Church, became minister of Greyfriars.

When Highland, Tolbooth, St John's united with Greyfriars in 1979, Ewen Angus MacLean, the last minister of Highland, Tolbooth, St John's, became minister of the united charge, which adopted the name Greyfriars, Tolbooth, and Highland Kirk. After Greyfriars, Highland, Tolbooth united with Kirk o' Field Parish Church in 2013, the name reverted to "Greyfriars".

title: List of ministers of Greyfriars Kirk


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gapping

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123    (e)  02:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Gapping
Neologism from the future? Crystal bollocks? Eivindt@c 11:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This has got to be a joke. Nothing else links to it. Dolive21 11:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure nonsense. Davelong 12:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Crystal bollocks sounds quite a delicate condition!  (aeropagitica)   13:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as patent nonsense. Feezo (Talk) 13:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Patent nonsense, as is the other article created by, Round buildings. Fan1967 17:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. He can't even spell "vestigial ". Gwernol 18:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Vestigial's not that common a word. I'm more bothered that he can't spell "rabbit". Fan1967 18:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Speedy Delete Obvious silliness. Evillan 21:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G1 patent nonsense.  Dei z io  01:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Hoax. (Although I think there is a real term 'gapping' with respect to spark plug adjustment.) Peter Grey 06:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to spark plug per Peter Gray. Haikupoet 03:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gapping


text:
KSDC

KSDC may refer to:

 * Kuki State Demand Committee
 * KSDC, the ICAO airport code for Williamson-Sodus Airport in New York State
 * KSDC-LP, a low-powered radio station in Centralia, Missouri
 * Kentucky State Data Center

title: KSDC


text:
Talk:A Moment in Chiros

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on A Moment in Chiros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609083755/http://www.lancekingvox.com/1111-decoded.html to http://www.lancekingvox.com/1111-decoded.html
 * Added tag to http://hardrockhaven.net/online/2011/11/lance-king-a-moment-in-chiros/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:A Moment in Chiros


text:
1928 Iowa State Cyclones football team

The 1928 Iowa State Cyclones football team represented Iowa State College of Agricultural and Mechanic Arts (later renamed Iowa State University) in the Big Six Conference during the 1928 college football season. In their third season under head coach C. Noel Workman, the Cyclones compiled a 2–5–1 record (2–2–1 against conference opponents), finished in fourth place in the conference, and were outscored by opponents by a combined total of 67 to 39. They played their home games at State Field in Ames, Iowa.

Harry Lindblom was the team captain. Paul Trauger was selected as a first-team all-conference player.

title: 1928 Iowa State Cyclones football team


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Amazing Feats of Young Hercules

The result was delete. Tone 21:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

The Amazing Feats of Young Hercules

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable short film with no independent sources found during search. Tagged since January for notability. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete - I did some digging, but I can't find any reviews for this thing. I'd say it's not notable as per nom. EverybodyEdits (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


text:
Category:Japanese idols in anime and manga

Anime and manga about Japanese idols, a type of entertainer marketed for image, attractiveness, and personality in Japanese pop culture. Idols are primarily singers with training in other performance skills such as acting, dancing, and modeling. Idols are commercialized through merchandise and endorsements by talent agencies, while maintaining a parasocial relationship with a financially loyal consumer fan base.


text:
Cedar Key Scrub State Reserve

The Cedar Key Scrub State Reserve is a Florida State Park, located six miles (10 km) northeast of Cedar Key on State Road 24.

Admission and Hours
There is no entrance charge. Florida state parks are open between 8 a.m. and sundown every day of the year (including holidays).

title: Cedar Key Scrub State Reserve