text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Martin (academic)

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Dan Martin (academic)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article fails to demonstrate the subject's notability. No cited sources. Google search uncovers only primary sources. Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:BIO Dolphin  ( t ) 02:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Dolphin  ( t ) 02:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete. His bio here and at CMU makes him look more like a mid-level academic administrator than someone with either the high research impact or top-level administrative position that WP:PROF demands. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:PROF does NOT demand those things. Read the Criteria section. He only needs to meet ONE of them. He does. #5 (named chair). --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 00:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Keep -- per WP:PROF#C5 -- according to he now has a named chair and is Dean of their School of Fine Arts (no longer interim).  CMU's drama program is near the top in the country; I don't see the type of work that most academics do, but I think that the named chair, full dean, and top-ranked program make it a clear WP:PROF notability pass. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * My understanding is that #C5 refers to named chairs given for the personal merits of the holder, and not to ex officio named chairs for deans etc, which this one looks to be. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you have evidence to back up your understanding, because the guidelines don't distinguish? --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that David's interpretation would be reasonable if we knew it were an ex officio chair, but I don't think we do. For all we know he was in line for a named chair for his research and its availability coincided with a larger turnover that also left the deanship open (there are named Deanships, but this is not one of them).  I think that speculating why a researcher got a chair (is it the research quality? or because she was well liked, or because of whom he was sleeping with, etc.) is a bit too close to original research for my tastes. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 19:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete No secondary sources, no independent, notable sources regarding his research. As a matter of fact, I don't see any published research. Kind of makes WP:ACADEMIC a hard sell. Yes, he is currently a dean at a major university. Great. But, I would have voted for keep if he acquired that position while publishing, distinguishing himself (e.g. fellowship) in some way. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 18:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:ACADEMIC makes clear that "for the routine uncontroversial details of a career, official institutional and professional sources are accepted as sourcing for those details." Therefore, the announcement by CMU is a perfectly acceptable, reliable source But it was also published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the city's major daily newspaper. Also, published research is not necessary at all. WP:ACADEMIC is not only not a hard sell, it actually proves Martin's notability. Read the Criteria section. He only needs to meet ONE of those criteria. He does. #5 (named chair). --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 00:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Keep: In addition to his n.chair at Carnegie Mellon University (a highly rated US university) I think his presidency of the Association of Arts Administration Educators is sufficient to show notability. (Msrasnw (talk) 13:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC))
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Comment: I don't have much faith in the AfD process. One of the reasons for this is the fact that "decisions" about what articles make the cut seem to be made haphazardly. Sure, reasoning is looked at, but in the end it seems that power by numbers is the game. With that in mind, the fact that dolphin51 and others note the lack of substantial secondary coverage of Martin is one of the main reasons why this article ought to be deleted. Of course, the keepers can just keep voting to keep and say he has a chair at CMU and that is enough and that'll probably do it. Funny how AfD is the underbelly of this "encyclopedia." No wonder so many editors bolt!Jimsteele9999 (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Jim -- you noted your reasons in your delete vote above, but what would you expect the research publication path of a superstar arts administrator to be? As far as I can see, he's the only prof. of Drama management in their super-highly regarded school, so I don't see any independent evidence that CMU has lowered any standards to appoint him. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 19:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Jim, I think this discussion proves that this decision is not being made haphazardly at all. That's not to say that there haven't been, and won't continue to be, inadequate AfD discussions. But what I see here is good-faith, thoughtful input. And the fact is that Martin does hold a named chair at a major university, which is not in dispute. That by itself establishes his notabiltiy per WP:ACADEMIC. WP:ACADEMIC also points out that the official announcement on a univeristy's website is considered a perfectly reliable source. Major universities don't go around making announcements about appointments that never actually happened. Having said all that, absent the named chair Martin holds, I was originally leaning toward recommending deletion. But that was before I read the guidelines with regard to the importance of the chair, and then read CMU's description of him as "the founding dean of arts management." I would've looked into that pretty impressive statement more had I not discovered that Martin's holding the chair was enough to establish his notability. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 01:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Comment The only way I see him passing the notability test is per criteria 5 of WP:ACADEMIC: "The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon)." He does hold a named chair, but it's an intermim postition. Is holding a named chair enough to establish notability, when nothing else establishes it? If so, is holding an INTERIM named chair enough? Absent this one factor, I would not hesitate to recommend deletion. Thoughts? By the way, when I see puff terms like "superstar arts administrator" and "super-highly regarded school," it puts a giant red flag up for me indicating that notability can't be established based simply on the subject's own merits. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 16:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * My reading is that he has now "been named the Stanley and Marcia Gumberg Professor and Dean of the College of Fine Arts (CFA), effective July 1" . That is it is no longer interim. I think his managing Directorship of the Classic Stage Company might also be important. (Msrasnw (talk) 22:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC))
 * Yep, looks like the chair is permanent, but that he'll continue as interim dean of the College of Fine Arts. The line that stood out most to me in the CMU announcement was that Martin is "a prominent arts management scholar and practitioner known as the "founding dean" of arts management." Wow, founding dean of arts management... that's a pretty powerful piece of information and, if accurate, certainly establishes his notability in academia, particularly when it's combined with holding the chair. I wish that statement was from a source not directly connected to Martin, but it's never nevertheless credible and from a highly-ranked school (and top-ranked in drama). --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 00:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

 * Keep It's now clear, from an objective standpoint, that Martin passes the notability test based on the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC, which says that "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." Criteria 5 is: "The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon)." Martin holds a named chair at a highly-regarded university, so he's notable. The CMU announcement is a reliable source per the notability guidelines, and it was also published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.  --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 00:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I guess this comment is directed to the editor from Ohio, who seems to be intent on reminding me and others to read WP:PROF and WP:GNG over and over, as if none of us have, or that it is some type of esoteric knowledge he is clueing me in on. Yeah, read it. Thanks. Also read: The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE). Somehow I don't see--from an "objective standpoint" or otherwise that Martin's so called "superstar" administrator status as a chair of the Drama department at CMU as notable. It doesn't have the same feel as the chair of NAS or other examples noted in the guidlines. Again, though, these are guidlines, not rules, so there are exceptions. Did you read that, too? Then again, just being a dean of a school is not enough to be notable. I;m sure he does a great job. He started programs and did all sorts of great administrative stuff, but...that in itself isn't notable. If it were, every dean of every major college would have a WP page. Also, for someone whose been in academia so long, he only has three peer-reviewed publications on his resume. Not impressive nor notable.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 01:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Jim, I agree that if you take away his named chair, he likely does not pass the notability test. That's where I was originally. (Although I am interested in looking into the description CMU attached to him, when they called him the "founding dean of arts management.") I also agree with you that the puff terms like "superstar" shouldn't be taken seriously. The sole reason I voted to keep this article is because WP:ACADEMIC is very clear and unambiguous: "Academics/professors meeting any ONE of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." It says "are" notable, not "may be" notable. Martin passes C5, so he's notable. That's purely objective. You sound like you're angry about the entire AfD process and that you have little faith in it. I understand your frustration based on a number of AfD discussions I've seen. Maybe you should step away from AfDs for awhile. Just a thought. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)


text:
Computer Security/Who is a hacker?

Who is a Hacker?
A Hacker is someone who has exceptional knowledge in Computer Hardware as well as Software and one who uses his or her knowledge wisely to break into other systems. It may be for the purpose of stealing or modifying information, which is unlawful and unethical, or to test the vulnerabilities of a system which helps to develop security tools to protect the system. The term "Crackers" generally means using softwares to get the password and username of someone else account. They are also known as Black Hats.

There is nothing wrong in saying that Linux is a contribution of Hackers, sometimes called Red Hat Hackers, or "Red Hats" -from "Red Hat Linux", a well-known commercial distribution.

True Hackers want to share their knowledge with others and receive knowledge from others as well.

At the same time, however, there are hackers who will break into servers as described above, but not for malicious reasons, White Hats who break into systems to find and alert administrators or fix the system themselves. Sneakers and Tiger Teams would come into this category. As well as these, there are Grey Hats who will break into systems for the greater good, such as illegally breaking into a company's network to find information related to embezzlement.

Hackers attack and disrupt adversaries for various reasons.
 * Advanced persistent threat
 * Most likely a national government
 * Cyberterrorism
 * Hacktivism
 * i.e. [Wikipedia: Anonymous(group)]]
 * Script kiddie

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Computer Security/Who is a hacker?


text:
Mike Hiltner

Mike Hiltner (born March 22, 1966) is an American former professional ice hockey player.

Career
Hiltner played four seasons at the University of Alaska Anchorage, where he was a point per game player, scoring 125 point in 121 games.

Hiltner made his professional debut in 1989, splitting time between the International Hockey League and the newly formed East Coast Hockey League.

Hiltner played the following season in the Finnish SM-liiga with Ilves, where he scored 33 points in 39 games. He returned to the IHL for the 1990–91 season, playing with the Kansas City Blades. Hiltner's totals dropped, where he scored eight goals and thirteen points in forty-four games.

Hiltner started the 1991-92 IHL season, but was later assigned to the Raleigh IceCaps and the Nashville Knights of the ECHL.

He would finish his career in 1993 in Germany, playing with SC Memmingen and later ERSC Amberg.

title: Mike Hiltner


text:
spherulite

Pronunciation

 * sfîr,, /sfIrulait/
 * sfîr,, /sfIrulait/

Noun

 * 1) a minute spherical crystalline body having a radiated structure, observed in some vitreous volcanic rocks, as obsidian and pearlstone.

Translations

 * French:

title: spherulite


text:
Ctenocheirodon

Ctenocheirodon pristis is a species of characin native to South America that can grow up to 3.4 cm long (only 3.3 for males). It is the only known member of its genus. Its specific name comes from the Greek word pristis, which means saw. This refers to the projected fins on the underside of the fish.

Habitat
C. pristis is a freshwater fish and it lives in the drainage basin of the Rio Tocantins in South America. It lives in areas of slow-moving water over river bottoms with little vegetation. As a result of the location, C. pristis lives exclusively in tropical areas.

title: Ctenocheirodon


text:
User:Melaneyw/sandbox

My Artifact
My artifact is the television show Hogan's Heroes. It was created in 1965, and it's based in a German Prisoner of War Camp during World War two. Hogan's Heroes is a comedic television show that was created to not only entertain, but also teach. It was created by Bernard Fein and Albert S. Ruddy, two men who didn't know how successful their silly idea would one day be. I got these simple facts from the Wikipedia page on Hogan's Heroes.

Topic One
My topic for RP one is the inaccuracy of Hogan's Heroes. I am going to focus on things they did wrong, and things that are place due to the time period.

Topic Two
My topic for RP two is the affect of the Vietnam War on Hogans Heroes. I am going to focus on differences from the first episodes and the last ones, and see if there are different attitudes towards war.

title: User:Melaneyw/sandbox


text:
User:Tomruen/Quasiregular and isogonal polygons

Quasiregular polygon
Quasiregular polygons alternation two types of edges are constructed as truncations of the regular star polygons. These polygons are isogonal (vertex-transitive).

Some definitions of quasiregular include the isogonal duals, i.e. isotoxal (edge-transitive) polygons with one type of edge, but alternate two types of vertices. Both isogonal and isotoxal variations have half the symmetry of the regular polygon, but the lines symmetry are on the edges in the first, and the vertices on the second.

A truncated regular polygon, t{p}, is geometrically the same as a regular {2p}.

A truncated regular star polygon, t{p/q}, is geometrically the same as a regular {2p/q} with odd q. Some others can be construcated as quasitruncated regular star polygon by reverse the orientation, expressed as {p/(p-q)}. The quasitruncation t'{p/q} is the same as the truncation {p/(p-q)}, and again is same as the regular {2p/(p-q)}, except with two types of edges, again reqiring (p-q) odd.

Isogonal star polygons
The quasiregular star polygon t{p/q} has a continuous isogonal transformation to t{p/(p-q)}. Some of the positions have overlapping vertices which can be seen as degenerate edges, or double-wound polygons.


text:
Rally del Atlántico

The Rally del Atlántico - Trofeo Ricardo Gorbarán is an international rallying race held in the Lavalleja and Maldonado departments in Uruguay since 1994. The event has been hosted in Punta del Este, Minas, San Carlos, Piriápolis and El Edén along the different editions, always on gravel roads. The event is a round of the Codasur South American Rally Championship and the Uruguayan Rally Championship since the first edition. Some years it has also been a round of the Argentinian Rally Championship.

Paraguayan drivers Alejandro Galanti and Gustavo Saba are the most successful drivers in the rally's history having each won five times.

List of winners
Sourced in part from:

title: Rally del Atlántico


text:
Rivinilda Mentai

Rivinilda Correia Mentai (born 1 April 1994, Bissau) is a Portuguese sprinter who specializes in the 400 metres.

She competed at the 2012 World Junior Championships, the 2015 European U23 Championships (200 m) and the 2018 Mediterranean Games without reaching the final.

Mentai has also won a national 200 m title in 2015 and national indoor titles in 2016, 2017 and 2018.

In the 4 × 400 metres relay she won a gold medal at the 2018 Ibero-American Championships and finished fifth at the 2018 Mediterranean Games. She also competed at the 2015 European U23 Championships (4 × 100 m relay), the 2016 European Championships, the 2018 World Indoor Championships and the 2018 European Championships without reaching the final. At the 2018 World Indoor Championships the team did however set a new Portuguese indoor record of 3:35.43 minutes.

Her personal best time is 53.65 seconds, achieved in May 2018 in Lisboa.

title: Rivinilda Mentai


text:
User:Omii Ghadge

Onkar Ghadge (born 13 February 2000) is an Indian Tiktok Actor known for his best videos, acting & also daily updated on tiktok. Hindi Marathi & English languages videos. He want to become a IFS Officer. His Father Satish Ghadge he is in police department & Mother Madhuri Ghadge, Qualification:- 10th SSC, 12th HSC from science & Now he is pursuing FYBSC.

title: User:Omii Ghadge


text:
User:Countrymike

Ko te manu kai i te Miro nōna te ngāhere, Ko te manu kai i te mātauranga nōna te ao.

(The bird who eats of the Miro tree owns the forest, the bird who eats of the Tree of Knowledge owns the world.)

Maori whakatauki (proverb)

My real name is Brent Simpson... Countrymike is... well it's a long story which may have to be told some other time. I used to be a somewhat active custodian here at Wikiversity, and was involved in WikiEducator project where I was a member of the Advisory Board. My user page over there has a bit about me as well. If you need to get in touch with me regarding Wikiversity please leave a note on my Talk page.

I am quite firmly an inclusionist on Wikiversity and I am in the Eventualism camp.

Wiki Projects
That i'm interested in or have participated in in the past.

Wikiversity
 * Portal:Reading_groups - my favourite Wikiversity learning projects
 * Wikiworld
 * Eric Von Hippel:Democratizing Innovation
 * Ivan Illich: Deschooling Society - a Reading Group on Wikiversity.

WikiEducator
 * Audacity Tutorial
 * Wikieducator Tutorials
 * The Learning Design Project on WikiEducator.
 * Main Page redesign.
 * I attended the Tectonic Shift Think Tank in Vancouver in April, 2007 where I got to meet a lot of the top MediaWiki hackers and talk Wikis for education with a lot of people from the OER movement.

Personal Learning Spaces
/Open PhD/ - an open working space for a PhD proposal.

/Masters Thesis/ - MA completed in Dec 09 w/ degree awarded in 2010. Title of thesis: Community Radio on Waiheke Island

/The Political Economy of Information/ - 2009 postgraduate class at the University of Auckland with Joe Atkinson

/Notes on Reading groups/

To Do
Templates

 * Look at Wikiversity Templates on Wikibooks

Advocacy

 * Interwiki links from Wikieducator to Wikiversity
 * explore reciprocation of the above
 * Expand Wikiversity page on WikiEd

Reading Groups

 * Finish Illich Deschooling Society
 * Reading group for Democratizing innovation
 * Start group on Isaiah Berlins' Two Concepts of Liberty

Google is where frustrated people end up looking for information when wikipedia doesn't have an article on it. Quote by User:Yeoman on IRC.

title: User:Countrymike


text:
Petrus Houttuyn

Petrus Houttuyn (18 June 1648, Amsterdam – 10 January 1709, Leiden), often cited as Peter Hotton, was a Dutch botanist and medical professor of medicine and botany at Leiden University. As professor of botany, he was ex officio supervisor of the university's botanic garden and was given an official residence and an allowance for foreign correspondence and the exchange of seeds and plants.

He studied medicine in Leiden, obtaining his doctor's degree in 1672. In 1695 he succeeded Paul Hermann as professor of botany at the University of Leiden. Houttuyn was a member of the Leopoldina and a fellow of the Royal Society of London. He was succeeded in turn by Herman Boerhaave.

The genus Hottonia (family Primulaceae) is named in his honor.

Selected works

 * Positiones quaedam medicae, 1672.
 * Sermo academicus quo rei herbariae historia et fata adumbrantur, 1695.
 * Letter from Petrus Hotton (1648-1709), 1704.
 * Bibliotheca Hottoniana: sive Catalogus Librorum, 1709.

title: Petrus Houttuyn


text:
Talk:List of American countries by monthly average wage

PPP?
What about PPP comparsion ? CickSlowUnion (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Columbia's number on map doesn't match the table
Columbia says $400 something on the map and $200 something in the table. Don't know which is correct. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


text:
Template:Computer Programming/Control/3

Unconditionals
Unconditionals let you change the flow of your program without a condition. You should be careful when using unconditionals. Often they make programs difficult to understand. Read Isn't goto evil? for more information.

return
End a function and return to the calling procedure or function.

title: Template:Computer Programming/Control/3


text:
Seattle to Portland Bicycle Classic

The Seattle to Portland, or STP, is an annual one- or two-day supported bicycle ride from Seattle, Washington, to Portland, Oregon, in the United States. The STP "is considered one of the 10 biggest recreational bicycle rides in the country, drawing riders from across the nation and from other nations", and has been operating since 1979. The ride is organized by the Cascade Bicycle Club. It is approximately 206 mi in length. Most riders complete the distance in two days; however, 1854 of the nearly 8000 riders attempted to ride in one day (2018).

About
The ride takes place on the second or third weekend in July mostly on country roads, avoiding Interstate 5 (the freeway between the cities). The Cascade Bicycle Club describes the 2006 route as "pretty flat with the “Big Hill” coming at the 45-mile mark. It's a mile long with about a 7 percent grade. ... The majority of the ride is on beautiful, rolling rural roads". In 2005 approximately 30 mi of the 202 mi were considered uphill with a combined ascent of approximately 2000 ft.

The official midpoint is in Centralia, Washington, on the campus of Centralia College. Amenities include overnight accommodations, showers, first aid, chiropractic and massage, bicycle repair and storage, food and drink vendors, pancake feed and breakfast to go, live music, and a beer garden. The twin city of Chehalis is used as an overflow option to Centralia.

Support
The ride is supported, meaning that food is provided at stops approximately every 25 mi along the route. The stops include, in part: Seward Park, Tenino, Vader, Goble, and Scappoose. In 2004 volunteers handed out "more than 11,000 bananas, 4 tons of watermelon, 13,000 bagels and 18,000 sandwiches". There is some mechanical support, provided by Performance Bicycle stores from Tacoma, Seattle, Redmond and Lynwood WA. The Cascade Bicycle Club also arranges transportation for riders to Seattle the day before as well as a return trip to Seattle after the ride.

History
The first STP took place in 1979 and was a race. From 1979 - 2019, the ride took place every year including 1980 when the route was changed because of the eruption of Mount St. Helens, also ending in Seattle. In 2020 and 2021, the event was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. From 1981, the Cascade Bicycle Club changed the event from a race to "recreational ride". Jerry Baker from Seattle was the winner of the first STP race. Baker, and Paul Wantzelius from Maple Valley, Washington, were the only riders who attended every consecutive STP, until their deaths, Wantzelius in 2010 and Baker in 2015. Despite being a cycling event people have taken part on unicycles, inline skates and two skateboarders have done it using a technique known as long distance skateboard pumping.

Participation reached a peak in 1989, the tenth year (Paul Zakar, Director‘86 to‘89) when the limit of 10,000 riders took part. In recent years the Cascade Bicycle Club has imposed a limit on the number of participants. The limit was 9,000 in 2007.

The 2010 event sold out 10,000 slots on April 26, 2010. The 32nd annual Group Health Seattle to Portland Bicycle Classic was held on July 9 and July 10, 2011 and sold out the 10,000 spots in advance.

In 1980 an additional ride became the annual Ride from Seattle to Vancouver, BC and Party (RSVP).

title: Seattle to Portland Bicycle Classic


text:
AIR Awards of 2014

The AIR Awards of 2014 (or Carlton Dry Independent Music Awards of 2014) is the ninth annual Australian Independent Record Labels Association Music Awards (generally known as the AIR Awards) and was an award ceremony at The Meat Market, North Melbourne on 8 October 2014. The event was sponsored by Australian liquor brand, Carlton Dry with Levi Jeans coming on board as a supporting partner in 2014.

Performers

 * Sheppard
 * DMA's
 * Safia
 * Meg Mac

AIR Awards
Winners are listed first and highlighted in boldface; other final nominees are listed alphabetically.

title: AIR Awards of 2014


text:
gullig

Adjective

 * 1) cute, sweet (cute in a sweet way, like a child or an animal, of appearance or behavior or the like)

Usage notes
The word that best matches English cute in the general sense is. Gullig additionally implies sweetness, like of a child or an animal, and so is less common for describing being cute in a physically attractive way (unless going for "cute and sweet" in tone, which sounds the same). Gullig implies söt, but söt does not necessarily imply gullig.

Like English cute, neither söt nor gullig has any inherent connotations of physical attractiveness. A baby can be called both without sounding weird. is similarly neutral.

title: gullig


text:
The Lolas' Beautiful Show

The Lolas' Beautiful Show is a Philippine television comedy talk show broadcast by GMA Network. Hosted by Wally Bayola, Jose Manalo and Paolo Ballesteros, it premiered on September 25, 2017 on the network's afternoon line up replacing Trops. The show concluded on February 2, 2018 with a total of 95 episodes.

Premise
A spin-off of Kalyeserye segment of Eat Bulaga! as Bayola, Manalo and Ballesteros reprise their roles as Nidora Zobeyala, Tinidora Zobeyala and Tidora Zobeyala respectively.

Ratings
According to AGB Nielsen Philippines' Nationwide Urban Television Audience Measurement People in television homes, the pilot episode of The Lola's Beautiful Show earned a 4.4% rating. While the final episode scored a 3.5% rating.

title: The Lolas' Beautiful Show


text:
Sandro Cunha

Sandro Fernando Silva Cunha (born 5 December 1982) is a Portuguese former professional footballer who played as a central defender.

Club career
Born in Fafe, Braga District, Cunha spent five of his first six seasons as a senior in the third division, in representation of AD Fafe, FC Porto B, G.D. Tourizense and F.C. Lixa. In 2007 he upgraded to the Segunda Liga, where he first appeared with S.C. Olhanense.

In the 2010–11 campaign, Cunha contributed 29 games and two goals as Gil Vicente F.C. returned to the Primeira Liga after an absence of five years. He made his debut in the competition on 12 August 2011, playing the full 90 minutes in the 2–2 home draw against S.L. Benfica. His first goal arrived on 19 May 2013, but in a 1–3 home loss to G.D. Estoril Praia.

In the summer of 2014, after one season in the second tier with Moreirense FC, Cunha signed for Varzim S.C. in the third. He won promotion in his debut campaign with a career-best seven goals, then spent a further four years with the club in division two.

Cunha returned to Fafe in February 2020. He retired shortly after, however, going on to work as manager in the lower leagues.

title: Sandro Cunha


text:
Wikiversity and Connexions collaboration

There is a proposed collaboration between Wikiversity and the Connexions project to create content that can be imported and used between each project as a "proof" (or perhaps "inquiry") of concept for developing other technical bridges between various open educational resource (OER) projects and platforms. This page is to develop details of this collaboration and brainstorm how the project is to be carried out. Please feel free to add, change details, move around ideas between headings, etc. Discussion can go on the talk page, and if necessary subpages can be created (by making a link that begins with a slash, like this: /Subpage name )

Aims

 * To develop a technical bridge between Wikiversity (Mediawiki) and Connexions, so that content can be imported and exported in either direction,
 * To develop content that is interoperable between the two projects (Wikiversity and Connexions), and which will be useful for the OLPC project (which will use the content in some form),
 * To analyse the relative strengths and weaknesses of different models of production.

Topic selection
The goals for the test case content topic are that it be immediately useful and attractive to children and their families in the developing world so that its inclusion on the OLPC laptops will have high impact. Additionally, the content should be something that local communities would be likely to customize and contribute back to the project. Possible topics include music, biology, or “How stuff works” content such as “How to dig an irrigation ditch”.

Technical bridge features

 * Send2Wiki: a bookmarklet that allows easy exporting of a webpage to a wiki - the idea (as I understand it) would be to make this a two-way process between the two projects.
 * IMS Content Package export from MediaWiki into Connexions. (Interoperability)

Ideas

 * Idea: MediaWiki templates - what are these to be used for, and how? Perhaps explain on talk page..
 * At wikiversity, we have many projects that will help us understand and make better use of the MediaWiki software. These are coordinated through a central MediaWiki Project
 * Topic:MediaWiki Templates - For templates for Wikiversity and any site that uses MediaWiki is one of many.

 * Idea: Try to develop a community of interest around this project that includes a wider variety of people than simply developers (building bridges between communities of interest, as well as technical systems)
 * Wikiversity outreach looks beyond the "boundaries" of Wikiversity and even the Wikimedia umbrella organization for parties interested in Open Educational Resources of all kinds. This very page is the result of such an outreach.

 * Idea: ...Wikiversity is a place to share ideas...please add yours!...

Issues
(in no particular order):

 * Semantic tagging
 * Interface with CNXML - Connexions's own version of XML
 * Authorship - OpenID?
 * Licensing (CC-BY?)
 * Social issues - how do we deal with vandalism across projects, or people's sense of ownership of "their" materials?

Interested participants
Please list yourself if you are interested in any aspect of this project (and perhaps detail what it is that you are interested in)

 * Cormaggio talk 12:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * CQ 17:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Countrymike 21:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Rayc 05:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Anti-psychiatry/Archive 2

Origins
I have just spent a few hours going through the "origins of anti-psychiatry" and made some significant changes. Firstly, i referenced as many statements of claims as best i could. Despite much googling and academic literature searches there was some claims that i simply couldn't find evidence for including a claim on behalf of "anti-realists" that was in quotes. I have no idea where that came from, of course, if anyone can source it please feel free to put it back. Other sources are not great, but they were the best i could find and i figured it would be better to add them and keep the statement than wholesale delete and risk being accused of having an agenda. If other editors can improve them, that would be great. I also removed some sentences that, i believe, simply repeated the same claims using different adjectives.

I also went ahead and removed the subsection on the history of psychiatry. I do not believe that needs to be in what is already an overlong article, a reader can go to the appropriate article for that. If the anti-psychiatry is a truly notable movement, it should be able to justify its own existance without the need for a lengthy preamble. Finally, i did some rearranging to try and keep a roughly chronological narrative flow. Its not perfect by any means (infact, its not even very good), but i think its a start in getting the key facts across in a managable, coherent, NPOV manner. Rockpocket

 * Firstly, I agree that the section could be more concise, as I have already suggested above. I agreed that it needed sourcing.

 * However, I disagree with the culling you have done. I recently spent hours rejigging and trying to improve that section. You stated above that you do not really know this area. You also stated that you would not start culling if there were attempts to source. As you can see above, and as I clarified to you personally, I am attempting to source and you can see that I have been doing so. A lot of your sourcing, although useful in some ways and I recognise the time and work involved, appears to be to fairly random and personal websites.

 * You say that 'if antipsychiatry is a truly notable movement, it should be able to justify its own existance', and have deleted everything pre-1960s (although mentioned in passing later, out of order). I feel this shows you have little awareness of the issues involved. While, as I say, I agree it can be more concise and asked for opinions on this above (which you did not offer), the rise of the theory and practice of psychiatry is fundamental to the rise of antipsychiatry. I am not aware of where this is covered elsewhere as you suggest - for instance the psychiatry page has a scant and basically unsourced section, and can not be assumed to address the same issues in any case.

 * Some of your edits are incorrect, e.g. that social psychiatry is a form of intervention (it is an important branch of psychiatry, both theoretical and practical); deleted mention of CBT which is crucial and not the same as cognitive therapy; changed 'antipsychiatry also faced...financial and professional gain for psychiatry' to 'they suggest this was motivated by a financial and professional gain' which is not the same and distorts the antipsychiatry position.

 * Regarding new cults or religions advancing some antipsychiatry views, you deleted 'as had more traditional religions for a long time'. This appears factual, why?

 * You deleted this whole bit: "Schemes to assist or encourage people with mental health issues....alongside challenging stigma and discrimination....Collaborative models of mental health services were promoted...service users as experts alongside professionals." These are not particularly controversial or rare things within mental health and are easily sourced, as I was going to do when I decided where best in the article.

 * You also changed this: "[antipsychiatry] remained relatively marginalised within psychiatry, and to a lesser extent within the wider mental health community. Anti-psychiatry arguments remain prevalent, however, and [antipsychiatry]...prominent both within..." To this: "...remain relatively marginalised within psychiatry and the wider mental health community. Anti-psychiatry arguments remain a significant minority view...remain active within...". It appears that you do not have an NPOV attitude in regard to this subject, and do not feel you need to source in order to edit more in line with your POV. I'm not making an argument here but suggesting apparent double standards regarding sourcing.

 * This feels like it's creating more work and ignoring or hindering those already putting in effort to make a really good and well sourced page.

Franzio 10:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

 * My mistake, you did ask for any objections to your culling the first paragraphs, and then started doing so about an hour later it looks like... Franzio 10:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

César Tort writes: Perhaps the article ought to be shortened to 60 per cent of its current size? I do not want to make any changes until consensus is arrived among my fellow editors if you agree with such a radical edition.

For the moment I merely suggest the following modifications:

1.	Laing’s “The Divided Self” does not advance the idea that, as the main article says, “madness can be a sane response to a sick society”. “The Divided Self” is rather a study of schizoids and schizophrenics from what now is called the trauma model of mental disorders. (Laing’s “The politics of experience” did say that madness can be a sane response to a sick society. But this should not be mentioned in the main article because some of Laing’s colleagues, those who in the 1970s also worked in the trauma model such as psychiatrists Theodore Lidz and Silvano Arieti, disagreed with him on this point.)

2.	I have with me a biography of Solzhenitsyn and will have to check and see if he was in fact diagnosed with schizophrenia (though I know that this stigmatizing was done in the former Soviet Union with other political dissenters).

3.	I would suggest to remove the phrase that Ken Kesley used “hallucinogen drugs” to write “One flew over the cuckoo’s nest” and that he saw “sane individuals” in the ward, since the movie produced by Michael Douglas shows the inmates as actually insane.

4.	Also, I would suggest to change the phrase “Scientology began challenging non-spiritual or materialistic approaches”. The reason behind the CoS stance against psychiatry is that Hubbard’s second wife intended to commit him (remember by the way that I am not a scientologist).

5.	I suggest to change the phrase “emphasis on genetics” to “emphasis in the medical model of mental disorders”.

6.	Also, I suggest that the section “Psychiatry, a pseudoscience” should be placed before the section “Biochemical factors” since the former is general and the later is going into the details.

7.	With regard to the citations needed in the section “Biochemical factors” I may add references to psychiatrist Colin Ross’s work, but I wish the thorough rewriting should be done first.

8.	Also, I believe the following phrase should be deleted altogether: “Anti-psychiatrists also claim psychiatrists focus on understanding and, in the future, potentially altering the genetics of those individuals with mental health problems, and not on understanding and potentially altering the genetics of individuals who may influence the wider environment, to worsen or cause mental health problems for others [citation needed

9.	In the next section it is written: “It is true that a highly active child is more likely to cause damage...” Two things must be noted here. First, there are perfectly healthy and sane children being diagnosed with AHDD and drugged into brain damage (I can post a Peter Breggin reference here). Second, the genuinely disturbed kids are being abused at home (I can post an Alice Miller reference here). The parental abuse itself, not a putative biological condition, is causing the child’s misconduct.

There are a lot more changes that occur to me in the rest of the article. But I would like to know first whether or not my fellow editors will rewrite the entire article. 16 March 2006.

 * Cesar, they seem reasonable to me. My only caution would be be careful of saying things like kids are being "drugged into brain damage". This is highly POV. You need to say, X believes that, then put it in quotes followed by the citation. Rockpocket 23:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Hi César Tort,

 * These all sound OK to me. The article clearly needs to be cut down a lot in size and I agree that we need to decide how to do this, by consensus. I think the version of the 'origins' section that I started should be restored so it can be worked on and reduced properly with less bias and less unilaterally (no doubt re-applying some of Rockpocket's useful sources and edits) otherwise there is just too much missing and it has also been watered down a great deal - for example no longer properly addressing the various shock procedures and lobotomies and only in relation to a fictional book; glossing over the impact of the introduction of psychiatric medication and issues of adverse effects and compliance; deleting mention of the development and expansion of clinical psychology as opposed by psychiatry; not even mentioning the non-medical alternatives to psychiaric care and asylums that developed or collaborative ways of delivering services. I will do this unless objections.

 * I think The Divided Self example was only there as one example of Laing's work, but you're right it does suggest that. The point about the psychiatric focus on genetics linked to mental illness has been edited by someone (Rockpocket I think) and is poorer and less clear now; it was trying to make the point that psychiatrists target genes linked to mental illness within individuals, but which may also be linked to positives (e.g. sensitivity, caring) and also that psychiatry doesn't really talk about genes which may be a factor in the negative behaviours of 'healthy' individuals which may harm the mental health of others (e.g. selfishness, insensitivity), a bias which is alleged to have numerous bad consequences for understanding and addressing mental health in a proper social context.

 * I would like to know what Rockpocket or other admin are planning to do to this article before I consider doing any more work on it, if I do anyway. The article was sitting here for weeks without them doing anything about it yet when work starts being done to reorganise, source and improve it (whilst respecting the work already done by others) they suddenly wade in and take over as if no one else had started to raise or address the issues they are (rightly) concered with. Franzio 16:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

 * OK I've partially reverted to the 'full' origins of antipsychiatry, revised it again, and I don't personally feel it is overly long now, given everything that I feel needs covering. You may want to reinsert some of the sources you found Rockpocket, I have some but not sure all. I don't feel that section is particularly controversial or POV and most of it is widely known and similar to other pages. However, please obviously raise or tag or source anything you personally feel requires a source, I can do so for anything there. I'll go and quickly source one now actually that you tagged and deleted before.

 * Regarding the rest of the article, I think a useful first step would be to boil down the elaborate arguments that are there into sets of single, clearer statements - in order to lose the POV style and length but not the good underlying points that someone worked hard to try to get across. And as Cesar Tort said then it should be easier to sort out the organisation and sourcing. Franzio 03:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm sorry you feel personally offended by my edits. I stand by some of them which you reverted back and justify why below, but i also note that you have kept quite a few and rejigged it again yourself, Franzio. As it happens i think it does read better now (with a few caveats) and that is the whole point of collaborative editing. I also spent hours rejigging it, but am not going to get angry at your reverts. The article doesn't belong to anyone, remember, and we all have the equal priviledge to edit it. Firstly, let me address you criticisms of me and my edits.

 * Hi Rockpocket, please don't ignore the point that you said you were not going to start just culling stuff, and then when you did only gave an hours warning for objections. This is why I was angry. It was you who was not being collaborative. I was not personally offended by your edits, but the way in which you went about it. I apologise if I came across as critical of what you had done, but it was, as a I say, the manner.

 * My awareness of the issues involved are not important, what is is that i know how to do research and write in a NPOV manner. The reason for some of my edits were i could not accurately source them. Let me give you an example. You suggest I "do not have an NPOV attitude in regard to this subject, and do not feel you need to source in order to edit more in line with your POV." Irrespective of your lack of good faith), i changed "Anti-psychiatry arguments remain prevalent... in the United Nations" to "Anti-psychiatry arguments remain a significant minority view...in the United Nations" for a very good reason. I tried very hard to find what could be called a "prevalance" of anti-psychiatry influence in UN literature. What i did find was a lot of criticism of anti-psychiatry dogma and the best i could find in terms of influence was the two references i added  (so i'm not quite sure what you mean by claiming i didn't source it). Now i think calling that sort of influence a "significant minority" is being very generous. I think i could easly justified removing that claim altogether, but i didn't so i wouldn't be accused of pushing an agenda - it appears that happened anyway. So, if you want to claim there is a "prevalence" then you simply must provide justification of that with sources, as i did (and you deleted). I draw your attention to WP:V: The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.

 * The section you refer to did not say that antipsychiatry arguments were prevalent in the UN and EU. It said that antipsychiatry organisations had also become prominent in mental health services, including in political bodies such as those. Now I don't have a problem with suggestions about the word 'prominent', for example, but it was the way you went about watering down that whole paragraph, marginalising antipsychiatry in a way that went beyond your sources. In addition, you are still not getting the point that if you work with the people already involved in this area it will be easier. You did not need to try very hard to source this stuff, I could have provided sources and named the organisations it referred to, if you had given a proper chance, including WNUSP and ENUSP which you didn't manage to find. Please do not bold quote wiki policies at me when I am not suggesting anything in opposition to them, but was questioning your wording which you hadn't sourced.

 * It said "anti-psychiatry individuals and organisations ... have become prominent both within mental health services and regional and international political bodies such as the European Union and United Nations" My point is simply that they are far from "prominant" in those bodies and are a significant minority elsewhere in mental health (do you know how i know that? look at how many anti-psychiatrists there are in your yellow pages, then look up psychiatrists or any other mental health practitioners? Which is the majority and which is the minority? I gave you "significant" based on the fact it is notable enough for an article) I added the references i found of individuals or groups who claimed influence with the UN. So i edited an unsourced gandiose claims to refect reality, which i justified, and sourced. That is, by the letter, good editing according to Wikipedia policy. The reason i quoted it to that is i have yet to see any justification for any of you edits in any policy, they appear instead to be based on your beliefs. How many times do i have to say this: if you don't like it and disagree, then change it with sources and justifications to make it better. I will not be offended. Rockpocket 22:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

 * With the above policy in mind, i am going to replace a few Fact tags in that section around material i tried to source and couldn't. If no-one else can source these i will deleted them again. An example - you say "you deleted 'as had more traditional religions for a long time'. This appears factual, why?" Because i couldn't find a reliable source. "Appears factual" is not good enough. If it is factual source it, otherwise it goes. This isn't my POV - its Wikipedia policy.

 * My point was that it is generally accepted and obvious that religions often oppose non-spirtualist practices including those of psychiatry. These statements are found a million times throughout wikipedia pages, without constant sourcing. I do not know how you couldn't find a source if you really felt one was essential. You seem to be applying some exacting ideal to these pages that isn't applied to others, which is unfair and just creating more work.

 * As i, and another editor said before, controversial articles are highly referenced (as we gave examples). Besides, policy says everything should be sourced and the obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it. You say you are aware of this policy, but then in the next paragraph completely dismiss it. I'm applying Wikipedia policy to this article in an attempt to improve it. If you think that is unfair, then i suggest you try and chgange the policy. If it is generally accepted then give a sourced example. I for one, would like to know which traditional religions oppose pshychaitry with more than your word for it.

 * Other edits i made to try and improve flow, grammer and ease of reading. I may have unintentionally changed the meaning, in that case its good that someone who appreciates that is here to correct those errors. Again, that is the whole point of having multiple editors. In the same vein, the reason i changed the text of the section on genetics is that some innaccurate language misrepresented it. I didn't accuse the author of purposely trying to mislead, i just assumed that, when writing about a complex subject, the didn't quite grasp the inference.

 * Again I obviously don't object to consensual edits helping each other to improve, it is the way you went about it. I raised specific concerns regarding your genetics edits above, to which you have not responded. You didn't just change the bit that was wrong, you deleted the bit that was correct and very important. It is important on a page like this to try and understand the points people were trying to make, and help that become better and more accurate rather than hinder it.

 * I'm sorry, i somehow missed the specific concerns you raised (as is obvious from my lengthy justification below). Rockpocket 22:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Quite a few of my minor edits were to add a "claimed" or "proponents suggest". Stating that the anti-psychiatry movement drove the development of some psychiatry alternatives and the demise of others is hubristic and idealist. Its like saying an anti-medicine movement drove the advance from dilling random holes in peoples skulls to modern surgery. Its completely ignoring the fact the disciplines evolve and develop themselves along with lots of outside influence. Indeed, there is a big difference between those that are anti-psychiatry and those that wish to improve psychiatry and many would argue that this section reads more about the latter group than the former. So a lot of my edits were to try and get away from a general survey of the evolution of psychiatry and focus more on the specifics of the movement itself. The Anti-Psychiatry movement may believe their influence was paramount, but unless there is independant sources (WP:RS) backing this up, and i don't see any, we have to write is as a claim. I notice you have kept most of these however.

 * Again you misrepresent what that section said, and it's very frustrating. It did not say that the antipsychiatry movement drove the development of all alternatives, it said and continues to say that the antipsychiatry movement was also being driven by individuals who felt they had suffered as a result of psychiatric services. It separately said that other professions developed in opposition to psychiatry. You cannot explain antipsychiatry without reference to those professions which are often and generally critical of, opposed to, and represent alternatives to, psychiatric theories or practices.

 * Yet only anti-psychaitrists would insist those "professions developed in opposition to psychiatry". The only discipline in direct "opposition" to psychiatry is anti-psychiatry. Plenty of professionals in those disciplines work together with psychiatrists. Thus they are alternatives, yes, but sometimes are complemetary also. This is a perfect example of a perspective completely colouring a view on a subject. Rockpocket 22:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I still believe it is ridiculous to have a four paragraph introduction before the subject of the article is even mentioned, especially when the article is way to long already. Your argument that "the psychiatry page has a scant and basically unsourced section, and can not be assumed to address the same issues" is genuinely bizarre. The obvious response is to take that information and add it to the psychiatry page then where it would be useful and highly relevent! The origins of anti-psychiatry starts exactly where i edited it to, everything prior to that is the origins of psychiatry and should be under a section (and article) named as such. Anti-psychiatry is notable as a movement, not as the antithesis of psychiatry (otherwise we would have articles on anti-dentistry and simply list the evolution of that discipline from a critical POV). There is precedent on this - the article on the ALF, for example, does not contain the origins of animal testing. Can you justify why this page should be different? However, if you disagree we can get other opinion to try and reach a consensus. Until then i'll leave it.

 * You talk as if I hadn't already suggested that section was too long, but I had above and was asking for feedback - and you did not offer any except to say you were going to start culling. And now you say it was ridiculous. It isn't helpful. The section now has just two paragraphs and it may be your opinion that nothing prior to the 1960s relates to the origins of antipsychiatry, and please go ahead and try and justify this. For a start, the main features of psychiatry that the movement came to challenge originated prior to the 1960s in ways that are important and help explain the origins of antipsychiatry. Secondly, the antipsychiatry movement was about negative issues coming to the fore, not about their springing into existance from nothing, an idea which would be historically innacurate to convey. My point about the psychiatry page history section is not bizarre and you mispresent it - this page is about the origins of opposition to psychiatry, something which is unlikely to be highlighted on the psychiatry page (and I could say the same, why didn't you move the stuff on lobotomies etc over on to that page rather than just deleting it?).

 * Because i was not complaining that the psychaitry page was poor, you were. My point was the article, as it was, didn't mention anti-psychaitry until the 4th paragraph. That is not my opinion, it was what the article said. I did not think that was appropriate and thus changed it. Its getting tedious now, but let me repeat again, if you can make the intro relevent to the origins of anti-psychiatry (rather than psychiatry itself) then change it again. Unlike you, i do not mind others being bold.

 * I'm going to readdress those points in the article and provide other editors the opportunity to address them before i act again as per policy, WP:V. Finally, although you may fail to see it, the process of us each editing and re-editing each other is the exact process that will improve this article. As long as we don't get into edit warring, it is this iterative process that makes Wikipedia work. Please do not get angry - and avoid personal attacks - when people edit according to policy, even if it makes you feel like you wasted your time. If you really don't like it, just revert and justify why. If you can justify as per WP:POL, then there should be no problem. Rockpocket 06:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

 * These comments are so frustrating. I think what's bugging me is that you don't seem to reply to suggestions and discussions already started by those already working on the page, and to existing attempts to improve the page. You have done this again here - by not engaging with the suggestion about boiling down the more elaborate statements, but then starting your own section below on just that issue, in a critical manner as if no one else thinks it. I have not attacked you as you suggest, I have criticised your actions here. You seem to want to just take your own line, with others following. I worry that you are getting carried away with citing wikipedia policies and referring to administrators [correction to my previous mention that you are yourself an admin, gather you are not, must have misread something) and are not working properly with existing efforts, or properly checking who else is involved and what they're trying to do with what resources, and are creating more work than is necessary, and it no longer feels as collaborative, which was something I was valuing about Wikipedia. And I do worry if you feel, as you have said, that the whole anti-psychiatry thing is probably just 'counter-productive' and basically about criticising attempts to tackle things. There are a lot of different, complex, subtle issues involved and it takes a lot to understand this area from all angles and to be NPOV, so we need to work together to achieve it. Franzio 11:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Be bold, they say. We could - and it appears we have - spent all day debating back and forth our opinions on the talk page. But it doesn't get the article improved. Like it or not, the article has changed for the better yesterday. Clearly our opinions differ on a lot of things, you might think you are correct, as might I. At the end of the day what is important is that we edit according to, and the spirit of, Wikipedia policy. That is what Wikipedia is about and that is why i keep referring to it. It is tedious and pointless debating "what you value" or "what you think" when it is not justifiable in policy. As, to be frank, i don't care - it just sounds like POV pushing otherwise. If you can justify and source anything put it in. If you can't it risks being deleted. As will I. It doesn't matter whether the other likes it or not. Rockpocket 22:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad you agree with me that this is a waste of time. Incidentally you misrepresent me yet again in a number of ways. I never said the psychiatry page was poor, I said the history section was, and basically unsourced, which it patently is or was at the time of writing I haven't checked it since. You misunderstand the point about other professions developing in opposition to psychiatry - the point is that in initially developing and expanding, they generally had to challenge and oppose the psychiatric establishment, who for example thought clinical psychology should be restricted to psychometric testing and fought for this; these professions still often conflict, and of course this is not to deny that they also often work alongside each other. Your assumption that 'only anti-psychaitrists would insist' on this is a clear POV and again suggests a negative stance towards this area. Again you talk is if I do not believe in sourcing, when I have been repeatedly talking about this aim and was before you got here, and have added about 10 high quality references. I can add about 100 more when the page is sufficiently organised and I get a chance. When you say "At the end of the day what is important is that we edit according to, and the spirit of, Wikipedia policy" - can I suggest strongly that it also important to work with fellow editors, and to listen and understand properly where they are coming from and what they are trying to do. Franzio 15:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

What's with all the citations needed?
It's true that everything in Wikipedia should be citable, but this is not the same as saying that every sentence in Wikipedia should be cited. The way "citation needed" is sprinkled throughout this article seems ridiculous. I'm sure some of the statements are probably non-obvious and maybe should be cited. But if something is common knowledge or is easy to verify, then a citation is clutter really. Neurodivergent 18:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. It's ignorance and prejudice against anything which isn't mainstream psychiatry. Franzio 18:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

 * The “citations needed” issue could be simplified if we start to significantly cut down the article in size. César Tort 16 March 2006

 * True, although Rockpocket seems to feel that anything he isn't personally fully aware of or totally in agreement with requires a source. And cutting it down properly - and fairly to those who have previously worked on it - takes a bit of time and discussion. And requires people who actually know about antipsychiatry and who aren't going to misleadingly water it down, or actually edit to make the case for psychiatry rather than describe and explain antipsychiatry, because they're so unable to get out of their own pro-psychiatry POV. Franzio 19:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I agree. Have you noticed how I rewrote the antipsychiatry section in the main Psychiatry article?  My sources were so sound that the orthodox psychiatrists who edit that page didn’t delete my phrases.

 * And in the section “Improvements and criticisms” of the main Psychiatry article I also added the phrase: “In a 1984-2000 study, Australia and New Zeeland ranked third in total psycho-stimulant use after the United States and Canada ”, and thus I deleted two “citation needed” demands in that paragraph. César Tort 16 March 2006

 * I think it's good you've tried to supply the sources that were requested on the psychiatry page. There seems to be some confusion about what people want that page to cover. That article on psycho-stimulants is very useful and could partially source the ADHD issues mentioned in this article. I think we can work together to find the most neutral and evidence-based sources. I'm annoyed at myself for wasting time defending things on here that I could have spent organising and sourcing the article.

 * I know Rockpocket does appreciate a lot of the issues here, and was just very concerned about accuracy and length. I just got pretty angry today because I thought we had reached an understanding and hadn't expected what happened. It takes a lot to be NPOV in this area. Franzio 00:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Dear Rockpocket:
I presume you can now appreciate our efforts, Franzio’s and mine, to rewrite a shorter, truly NPOV article. As you can see, my antipsychiatry contribution to the main Psychiatry article did not rise objections from the orthodox psychiatrists. All of this is a misunderstanding. When a couple of days ago I wrote about “impassioned, searing exposé” I was not talking about my proposed Wiki-style, but to “The Gulag Archipelago”. César Tort 17 March 2006

 * I have a talk page you can use to address me directly. I have no concern with your contribution to the psychiatry article - as i said before, i have not read it. I simply ask that you follow WP:RULES, do not remove without justification tags others add, and do not self cite here. Your previous comments above, appeared to me to explicitly acknowledge that you intended to enforce POV material even though you know it was such because it read better. If that is not the case, then of course, i welcome your contribution. Rockpocket 05:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I followed your advise and already wrote to your address. César Tort 17 March 2006

title: Talk:Anti-psychiatry/Archive 2


text:
SS Charles Bulfinch

SS Charles Bulfinch was a Liberty ship built in the United States during World War II. She was named after Charles Bulfinch, an American architect. Bulfinch is best known for his designs of the Massachusetts State House, and the wings and central portion of the US Capitol.

Construction
 Charles Bulfinch was laid down on 14 May 1943, under a Maritime Commission (MARCOM) contract, MCE hull 999, by the Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, Baltimore, Maryland; she was sponsored by Mrs. Milton G. Baker, the wife of a yard employee, and was launched on 10 June 1943.

History
She was allocated to Luckenbach Steamship Company, on 22 June 1943. On 10 January 1948, she was laid up in the Hudson River Reserve Fleet, Jones Point, New York. On 4 May 1953, she was withdrawn from the fleet to be loaded with grain under the "Grain Program 1953", she returned loaded on 18 May 1953. On 25 November 1957, she was withdrawn from the fleet to be emptied of grain, she returned empty on 2 December 1957. On 10 October 1958, she was withdrawn from the fleet to be loaded with grain under the "Grain Program 1958", she returned loaded on 27 October 1958. On 19 October 1959, she was withdrawn from the fleet to be emptied of grain, she returned empty on 23 October 1959. On 15 November 1960, she was withdrawn from the fleet to be loaded with grain under the "Grain Program 1960", she returned loaded on 25 November 1960. On 8 March 1963, she was withdrawn from the fleet to be emptied of grain, she returned empty on 14 March 1963. On 7 January 1970, she was sold for scrapping to Steel Factors, Ltd., for $65,130. She was removed from the fleet on 1 May 1970.

title: SS Charles Bulfinch


text:
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Rommel myth/1

Rommel myth
While very well written and seemingly exhaustively sourced, the article is a POV content fork dealing with a subject that is fundamentally a neologism supported by synthesized research of a small group of editors. Additionally several claims are made regarding sources and their content that are not accurate, including misrepresentation of credentials and context. Concerns are more elaborate outlined on talk page, showing failure to meet criteria 2(b)(c), 3(b), 4, and now, 5. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Rommel_myth/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: No consensus to delist, so defaults to keep as a GA for now, but note that this may change in future given this reassessment is being discussed as a small part within the ongoing arbitration case at . Fish +Karate 09:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC).
 * I've added my comment to the article's Talk page, as this is where the discussion is happening ATM: diff. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I was about to close this as kept, but have had second thoughts. First off the article title and notability are not issues as far as a good article review are concerned. There are other venues to deal with that and they fall outside the scope of what we try and do here. My concern is neutrality (criteria 4). I am not a historian, or even that interested in military matters, but I am familiar with controversial topics and there are a few too many red flags here for me. In the lead we have scare quotes and (if any) in brackets. I can not work out what is meant by he term critical historians. As opposed to the ones that are not critical? Google did not help me here, or the body of the article (which it should for this to be a GA). I get the feeling this lacks WP:BALANCE. I am fine for a content fork to focus on this aspect of his life, but I would expect a better introduction into what his myth is before it is torn down. Maybe if the elements section was a bit earlier and expanded upon and there was a bit more in the lead about it I would feel more comfortable. I realise that neutrality is a spectrum, and this is near the edge of that spectrum if not off the side. It is very interesting and a great read, but I will let someone else close this one. AIRcorn (talk) 09:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


text:
Volvo Venus Bilo

The Volvo Venus Bilo was a concept car unveiled by Volvo Cars in 1933. It was a streamlined design with rear hinged doors and conventional doors in the side to access the engine bay. It was designed to have good loading capacity.

Nine specially designed suitcases could be fitted into spaces in the back and compartments in the right front fender (the left fender contained a spare tyre and tools). A second spare tyre in the rear was used as the bumper. The design was by Gustaf Ericsson, the son of Lars Magnus Ericsson.

The car was based on the chassis of the Volvo PV655, with coachwork by Gustaf Nordbergs Vagnfabrik AB in 1932. The name was a pun referencing the Venus de Milo, with bil meaning “automobile” in Swedish. The concept was a four-door, four-seater saloon and led to the Volvo PV 36 Carioca production car, which was also a four-door saloon.

The fate of the concept car itself is currently unknown. It was sold to a buyer in Denmark after World War II and in the mid-1950s was owned by the son of a scrapyard owner in Denmark, who rebuilt it into a pickup truck. It was used as late as 1956, after which there are no records of it.

title: Volvo Venus Bilo


text:
Genealogy (band)

Genealogy was an Armenian supergroup that was formed to represent Armenia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015. Five of the six members come from a different continent of the Armenian diaspora whose families once spread all over the world after the Armenian genocide of 1915. The five artists from the diaspora also symbolize the five petals of the forget-me-not (official logo of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide, commemorated in April 2015), while the center of the flower is represented by the sixth artist, based in Armenia.

The group performed the song "Face the Shadow" in the contest. The song was originally called "Don't Deny", but organizers changed it later to the present title, as it was deemed too political (hinting at Armenian genocide denial). The song represented Armenia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015 on the final held on 23 May 2015, finishing 16th overall, with a total of 34 points from only 8 countries including a maximum 12 points from Georgia.

Members
The first member of the group, Essaï Altounian, a French Armenian, was announced on 16 February 2015. The second member of the group, Tamar Kaprelian, an American-Armenian singer, was announced on 20 February 2015. The third member being Vahe Tilbian, an Armenian-Ethiopian singer, was announced on 23 February 2015. The fourth member was Stephanie Topalian, a U.S. born Armenian-American-Japanese singer residing in Japan. Her father is Armenian-American and her mother Japanese; her membership was announced on 27 February 2015. The fifth member is Mary-Jean O'Doherty Basmadjian, an Australian opera singer of Armenian descent. Her membership was announced on 3 March 2015. The sixth member is Inga Arshakyan, who also represented Armenia at the Eurovision Song Contest 2009 in Moscow, along with her sister, Anush.

On 28 April 2015 the five Armenian diaspora members of the group, the American Kaprelian, the Australian O'Doherty Basmadjian, the Ethiopian Tilbian, the French Altounian and the Japanese-American Topalian, became Armenian citizens and at the end of an audience with President Serzh Sargsyan were given their Armenian passports by the President. The sixth member Inga Arshakyan already carries Armenian citizenship.

After Eurovision
After Eurovision, Tamar Kaprelian from Genealogy released a collective single "The Otherside" featuring a number of other singers who were in the final including Elhaida Dani, Elina Born, Maria-Elena Kyriakou and fellow Genealogy member Stephanie Topalian. Tamar also competed in Depi Evratesil 2018 with the song "Poison (Ari Ari)", for which she was a favorite to win. She was eliminated in the semifinal.

Essaï Altounian was a judge in Depi Evratesil 2017, where he mentored Artsvik to victory. In 2019, he was a member of the "Wall of the World" panel on the CBS talent competition The World's Best.

title: Genealogy (band)


text:
Talk:D.D. Wozniak

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on D.D. Wozniak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130109063958/http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/coajudgebio.html to http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/coajudgebio.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:D.D. Wozniak


text:
User:JWSchmidt/Blog/20 May 2007

I have been editing wikis since 2002 and have had a user account at Wikipedia since early 2003. I think it is official; I have forgotten what it is like to start out as a wiki editor.

Culture shock
What do new Wikiversity visitors experience? I am devoted to the idea that the Wikiversity Main Page should provide a gentle entry into the wiki universe for people who have never edited a wiki. At my current draft for a newbie-friendly main page there is a link to Introduction to Wiki. I guess that introductory page should be split into:
 * 1) an initial part about browsing and finding content, and
 * 2) a part that shows new participants how to edit.But I need to try to remember what it is like to be a new wiki editor.

Newbie game
In order to make Introduction to Wiki effective, I am going to play a game. I am going to pretend to be a new visitor to Wikiversity who has never edited a wiki. To document this "game", I will keep a record of my reconstructed "newbie steps" at The newbie experience. The goal of this exercise is to force myself back into the shows of a wiki newbie so that I can be sure that the Wikiversity introductory and help pages correctly provide new Wikiversity participants with what they need.

Top level portals
Discussion at Pre-tertiary portal led to the idea that it might be time for a new way to categorize content at Wikiversity. Is Wikiversity too centered on organizing content according to the traditions of college-level educational institutions? Do we need a new set of "high-level" portals?Would each "high level portal" need its own Browse page?

Related effort

 * Service community - needs to explain/remind new visitors what the key differences are between Wikiversity and other Wikimedia sister projects.
 * Student union - needs to force students into editing
 * Wikiversity teachers - needs to be broadened beyond Wikiversity's current emphasis on college-level content.
 * Content development - needs to be integrated with the learning materials at Topic:Wikiversity.
 * All these introductory pages need to be supported by a set of short screen cast tutorials.

title: User:JWSchmidt/Blog/20 May 2007


text:
Baytown Township Ground Water Plume

The Baytown Township Groundwater Plume is a Superfund site located east of the village of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, United States. The plume extends into Baytown and West Lakeland Townships and continues eastward approximately four miles to the St. Croix River. Baytown Township is a rapidly developing rural/suburban residential area on the eastern edge of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. The contaminated groundwater is primarily in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer, which is the major source of drinking water for many residents in the area through private and residential wells. The Lake Elmo Airport is located near the western end of the plume and is administered by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). An estimated 8,000 people live in the area; 80 percent of the residents use private wells for their water supply.

Threats and contaminants
There are two volatile organic compounds of concern in the groundwater contaminant plume - trichloroethylene (TCE) and carbon tetrachloride. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) believes that use of the chlorinated solvent TCE at a former metal working facility at the location of the Hagberg Country Market was the major source of site ground water contamination. The use of TCE at the Lake Elmo airport likely also have caused some of the TCE groundwater contaminant plume. On the north side of the plume there are a few former grain storage bins which MPCA believes were the potential source of carbon tetrachloride that was previously detected in that area of the plume.

Cleanup progress
The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) first detected TCE in private wells in 1987. Between 1987 and 2003, the MPCA, MDH, MAC, and the Washington County Department of Health collected thousands of samples from private wells. MDH conducted a public health assessment and created a well advisory area. MPCA and MAC have installed over 30 monitoring wells in the area. MPCA signed a Record of Decision in 2000 which calls for cleanup in three areas: the groundwater plume and private wells; the city of Bayport municipal well #2; and the source area.

The remedy for the groundwater plume and private wells includes plume monitoring and installation and maintenance of granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment units for private wells that exceed 5 micrograms per liter (ug/L or "parts per billion") TCE. Installation of GAC units has been completed at approximately 125 existing wells. The plume currently appears to be stable; however, a small number of additional units may be needed annually due to new home construction or interior plume variation. If the health-based limit for TCE is lowered in the future, GAC units would be needed at additional residential wells. The site currently is undergoing a groundwater optimization study by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under contract to the United States Environmental Protection Agency to be completed in winter 2011.

title: Baytown Township Ground Water Plume


text:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikii128/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

Both single-purpose accounts, spamming links to www.issd.org (a steroid website) and hiding the spam between trivial Wiki-linking. Both also initialized their user page and user talkpage with trivial messages to avoid red links in edit history. Requesting a checkuser for possible sleepers. GermanJoe (talk) 16:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC) GermanJoe (talk) 16:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus . . Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

to ✅. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


text:
Talk:phil-

from wikipedia
Suffixes with the common part -phil- (-phile, -philia, -philic) are used to specify some kind of attraction or affinity to something, in particular the love or obsession with something. They are antonymic to suffixes -phob-.

Phil- (Philo-) may also be used as a prefix with a similar meaning.

Philia (φιλία) as an ancient Greek word for love refers to brotherly love, including friendship and affection. This contrast to the ancient Greek terms Eros, or sexual/romantic love, and agapē, or detached, spiritual love. English usage differs in some cases from the etymological use, and several of these words refer in English not to brotherly love but to sexual attraction.

The suffix "-phile" (or, in a few cases, -philiac) applies to someone or something with one of these attractions.

The suffix "-philic" describes the property of being attracted to something.

The less common suffix "-phily" is synonymous with "-philia".

There are five major areas of usage of this suffix: biology, sexology, chemistry/physics, hobbies, and attitude to specific nations, with occasional coinage in other areas.

Biology

 * acidophilia / acidophile: Preference of acidic conditions.
 * alkaliphilia / alkaliphile: Preference of alkaline environments.
 * anthophilia / anthophile / anthophilic: Attraction to flowers.
 * anthrophile / anthrophilic: Attracted to humans (e.g., parasites).
 * anemophily: a form of pollination whereby pollen is distributed by wind.
 * cryophilia / cryophilic / cryophile: Preference for cold environments, climates, objects and low temperatures; e.g., Protea cryophila (Snow Protea).
 * dendrophilia / dendrophilic / dendrophile: Preference of trees or other plants.
 * entomophilous: Adapted for pollination by insects.
 * extremophilia / extremophile: Preference of living extremal conditions for some microorganisms.
 * geophilia / geophilic / geophile Referring to organisms that prefer the soil.
 * halophilia / halophile: Attraction/attracted to salt or salt-water.
 * heliophilia / heliophile: Attraction/attracted to sunlight.
 * hydrophilia: Attraction to water.
 * hyperthermophilia / hyperthermophile / hyperthermophilic: Describing organisms that thrive in extremely hot environments.
 * limnophilia / limnophile / limnophilic: Preference of ponds or marshes.
 * lithophilia / lithophile / lithophilic: Preference/affinity to stones.
 * mesophilia / mesophile: Preference of moderate temperatures in microorganisms.
 * microaerophilia / microaerophile / microaerophilic: of organisms that can tolerate or require environments containing low levels of oxygen.
 * myrmecophilia: in names of orchids of genus myrmecophila, "love of ants"
 * nemophilia: Love of the woods/forests, in the name of the genus Nemophilia of flowers.
 * nyctophilia: A preference for darkness or night.
 * ombrophilia / ombrophile: Affinity/affined to large amounts of rainfall.
 * petrophilia / petrophile / petrophilic: Preference of living or spending time in rocky areas.
 * photophilia / photophile / photophilic: Preference of living or spending time in lighted conditions.
 * psammophile: A plant loving sandy areas (psammophyte).
 * psychrophilia / psychrophile: Preference of cold temperatures.
 * rheophilia: Preference of living in running water.
 * rhizophilia: Preference of living on roots.
 * thermophilia: Love of high temperatures; thriving in high temperatures (e.g. microbes).
 * tropophilia / tropophile / tropophilous: Preference of seasonal extremes of climate.
 * xerophilia: Love of living or spending time in very dry conditions.
 * xylophilia: Love of wood.
 * zoophily: a form of pollination whereby pollen is distributed by animals.

Chemistry/physics
 * chromophilous: Staining easily
 * electrophile: A substance having an affinity for electrons or negative charge
 * lipophilic: A substance that is attracted to lipids, as in cell membranes.
 * nucleophile: A substance having an affinity for positive charge; antonym of electrophile.

Hobbies
 * audiophilia: Love of high-fidelity sound reproduction
 * arctophilia: Love of teddy bears; especially, an interest in collecting teddy bears
 * bibliophilia: Love of books
 * biophilia: Love of nature
 * cinephilia: Love of cinema and film
 * glossophilia: Love of languages
 * hippophilia/hippophile: Attraction/attracted to horses
 * logophilia: Love of words - Logophiles may be interested in word games, such as crosswords, or Scrabble, and in the extreme, derive enjoyment from reading things commonly given less notice, such as labels
 * metrophilia: Love of the metro rail or subway systems
 * neophilia: Love of the latest novelties and trends
 * oenophilia: Love of wine
 * ornithophilia: Love of birds
 * taphophilia: Love of graves, cemetries and funerals
 * technophilia: Love of technology
 * turophilia/turophile: Love of cheese / connoisseur of cheese

National
 * Anglophile: a non-English person who is extremely fond of all things English. Antonymous term: Anglophobia
 * Francophile, a fan of French culture
 * Asiaphilia: love of Asia.
 * europhile: a person who wants to increase cooperation between governments within the European Union. Antonymous term: Euroscepticism
 * Germanophile, a fan of German culture
 * Hellenophile, a fan of Greek culture
 * Indophile, a fan of India
 * Japanophile: a non-Japanese person with a strong interest in Japan or Japanese culture. Antonym: Japanophobia.
 * Russophilia: Love of Russia and/or Russians. Antonym: Russophobia.
 * Sinophile: a non-Chinese person with a strong interest in China or Chinese culture. Antonym: Sinophobia

Other

 * See paraphilia for the list of sexology terms
 * hemophilia: A disease relating to blood clotting
 * lygophilia: Love of darkness
 * philosophy: Love of wisdom, also an academic field
 * retrophilia: Love of things of the past
 * theophilia: Love of a god

Prefix “phil-”

 * philately
 * Phillumenism
 * philosophy
 * philology
 * philanthropy
 * Philadelphia
 * philhellenism, the love of Greek culture

"Respect for"
When does it have this meaning? Equinox ◑ 19:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:phil-


text:
East Gate Square

East Gate Square is a shopping center complex located along the border between Moorestown and Mount Laurel in New Jersey. East Gate Square is adjacent to the Moorestown Mall and is accessible from Interstate 295, Route 38, and Route 73.

The shopping complex consists of six buildings with a total of 888842 ft2 of retail space. The six shopping centers were developed by BPG Properties between 1992 and 2002, and the first one opened in 1993.

Buildings

 * Phase I – 371600 ft2
 * Phase II – 154742 ft2
 * Phase III – 129016 ft2
 * Phase IV – 99561 ft2
 * Phase V – 94680 ft2
 * Phase VI – 36243 ft2

title: East Gate Square


text:
Talk:Amateur Radio Manual

I'm just in the process of fleshing out the contents... please feel free to dig in and add whatever you always wanted to see in a manual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ve3snw (talk • contribs) 21:28, 27 July 2004 (UTC)

I suggest you check here: Electronics

Yup, I did...great stuff! Building links to it should be great fun. However, electronics is only part of ham radio so there is a lot of work to do yet. Things have been on hold for bathroom renovations...don't you hate it when real world stuff interferes with your hobbies?

MATERIAL TO INTEGRATE can be found at http://wikisource.org/wiki/Solomon_Isles_Amateur_Radio_Course This is originally from rtf format, but most of the formatting is wrong. If you are keen enough you can get it emailed to you in 16 pages, 1.5 Mb.

I suggest starting with all material on one page.
Instead of creating a main page with a bunch of links, why not just keep all content on one page at first. Then if/when we get to the 50kb size, then start subdividing. I can help with porting all the child pages back to the main page if that's the direction the group wants to take.

Specificity
I think that many of the chapter headings are too specific. Many of the topics can be combined fairly easily and doing so might group related and fundamental information. In particular, information on voltage, current and atoms could be put together and perhaps clarify the information. This will help give somewhat longer chapters. I will write a combined page

Table of transmission fequencies is irrelevant
The page http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Amateur_Radio_Manual/Table_of_transmission_frequencies contains long lists of broadcast transmitters in Europe, all irrelevant to Amateur Radio so I'd like to propose removing it from this book. Dodger67 10:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Amateur Radio Manual


text:
ljuda

Etymology 1
From, from , equivalent to.

Verb

 * 1) to sound (loudly), to resound

Etymology 2
Semantic calque of English sounding, surface level +

Verb

 * 1) to learn reading by sounding each letter before joining them into words

title: ljuda


text:
User:Neutrality/sandbox5

Since Donald Trump took office as president of the United States, a variety of scientific opinion polls have measured the level of public support for efforts to impeach Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors.

General polling
‡ Question was: "Based on what you've read and heard, do you think the Congress should? ... Or should not? ... impeach Donald Trump and remove him from the presidency, or are you not sure?"

*** Question was: "Based on what you have read or heard, do you believe that President Trump should be impeached and removed from office, or don't you feel that way?"

** Question was: "Do you think President Trump should be impeached and compelled to leave the Presidency, or not?"

* Question was: "As you may know, the first step toward removing a president from office is impeachment. Do you believe Congress should or should not begin impeachment proceedings to remove President Trump from office?"

† Question was: "Would you support or oppose impeaching Donald Trump?"

 * 1) Question was: "As you may know, the first step toward removing a president from office is impeachment. When Democrats take control of the House of Representatives in January, do you believe Congress should or should not begin impeachment proceedings to remove President Trump from office?"

 * 1) Question was: "Do you believe the President Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office, or don't you feel that way?"

†† Conducted by Hart Research Associates and Public Opinion Strategies. Question was: "Do you believe that Congress should hold impeachment hearings to remove Donald Trump from office or not?"

^ Question was: "Do you think that Congress should begin the process to impeach President Trump, which could lead to his removal from office, or don't you think so?"

title: User:Neutrality/sandbox5


text:
Talk:Donnie Hammond

Current
Donnie now works for PGATOUR Radio as an oncourse color announcer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

title: Talk:Donnie Hammond