text:
User:Joseywales1961/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

AfD noms before August 2020 can be found in my Stats here''

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2020

 * Sun Valley Magazine nominated at AfD; notified 09:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: An online local publication for which I couldn't find any reliable 3rd party RS mentions fails WP:WEBCRIT

October 2020

 * User:TheBigYES/sandbox nominated at MfD; notified 18:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This nonsense sandbox was created by a subsequently indef blocked Vandalism Only User

December 2020

 * Ghazi Bismillah khan nominated at AfD; notified 22:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unsourced one-liner BLP, there is already an existing Draft:Ghazi Bismillah khan by the same author with the same in formation so I can't move this
 * Fiifi Coleman: nominated at AfD; notified 19:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails NACTOR, references 1 and 3 don't point to anything about him they bring you to the main page of a website. The other 4 references are all IMDb showing minor roles.

January 2021

 * Dawid Mocke: nominated at AfD; notified 20:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not mentioned in sources 1 or 2, source 3 is a youtube video making this an unreliably sourced, promotional BLP of a non-notable person, also include in this discussion the unsourced Draft:Dawid Mocke which I moved from mainspace earlier during page triage
 * Template:Siblings: nominated at TfD; notified 20:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unnecessary template, new user creation, possibly mistake or test edit

March 2021

 * Lipton Invitational Cup: nominated at AfD; notified 17:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Tagged as not referenced since December 2009, Previous AfD from 2006 here which expected this article to be improved. A WP:BEFORE turns up only this article and Wikipedia mirrors

April 2021

 * Ricardo Farcaș: nominated at AfD; notified 18:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NFOOTBALL never having played at the professional level as stated at WP:FPL One appearance on the bench (unused) in Serie A in 2018/19, currently 4th tier in Italy. Not finding GNG in this case.

July 2021

 * Trevance Salmon: nominated at AfD; notified 13:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Contested PROD, player seems to have only played 5 matches in the Jamaican league (and so fails NFOOTBALL see WP:FPL) a BEFORE search does not establish GNG for me

August 2021

 * Reza Fakhrabadipour: nominated at AfD; notified 10:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Has not yet played a fully professional game per WP:FPL (his soccerway profile). My BEFORE could not establish GNG.
 * Zidan Miah: nominated at AfD; notified 13:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Contested PROD, Fails WP:NFOOTBALL not having played at the required levels yet. The coverage seems to be transfer news about being a Bangladeshi signing for different clubs, in my opinion not meeting WP:GNG
 * Marc Jurado: nominated at AfD; notified 08:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Looks like another WP:TOOSOON article, he has only played in underage leagues and so fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Neither is there any sign of WP:GNG in this case.

September 2021

 * Prince Odeneho Oppong: nominated at AfD; notified 19:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Article is still WP:TOOSOON has not held elected political office yet. GNG has not been established since last AfD discussion closed in March 2021 in my opinion
 * Kelana Mahessa: nominated at AfD; notified 12:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL previously deleted on 5 September 2021, has not met either notability guidelines since
 * Devansh Dabas: nominated at AfD; notified 22:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL Appears to be WP:TOOSOON has not appeared in a first class match yet, the best my BEFORE comes up with is Soccerway profile which indicates only unused substitute appearances

October 2021

 * Rahul V Raj: nominated at AfD; notified 19:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NFOOTBALL havin never played in a [ [WP:FPL]] and, in my opinion, WP:GNG while there are a lot of references in the article it is (approaching WP:REFBOMB), they are trivial mentions, team news and match reports
 * Jonathan Khemdee: nominated at AfD; notified 14:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he has not yet played in a fully professional league or a full international. I'm not finding anything that could establish WP:GNG either.

December 2021

 * Yoke FM Hilongos: nominated at RfD; Target: Hope Channel Philippines (notified); notified 09:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No mention of this in the target article

January 2022

 * Laila Faris: nominated at AfD; notified 13:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Has not yet played at the level required to satisfy NFOOTY, neither can I find anything that establish notability under GNG

February 2022

 * Kobe Chong: nominated at AfD; notified 22:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This article looks WP:TOOSOON The player currently fails the WP:NFOOTBALL guidelines having not yet appeared in a match at the level required. Not finding anything to to show he meets WP:GNG either.

March 2022

 * Mary Neequaye: nominated at AfD; notified 15:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Has not played at the required level per WP:NFOOTBALL - BEFORE includes Soccerway which shows she has only played some national under 17 games back in 2012, fails WP:GNG

July 2023

 * Gujarat FC: nominated at AfD; notified 20:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Only source is a 6 year old article (that I can't access from this neck of the woods anyhow) that is titled "...Gujarat could have an ISL, I-League tam soon". My BEFORE can not find anything only the similar named state football team, therefore I thinks the article should be deleted now and re-created if/when a team actually is formed in the future.

title: User:Joseywales1961/XfD log


text:
топлъ

Etymology
From. Cognate with 🇨🇬/, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, Czech and Slovak, Lower Sorbian , Upper Sorbian , Macedonian , Polish , Russian , Slovene and Ukrainian.

Adjective

 * 1) warm
 * 2) hot

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: топлъ


text:
Damien Karras

Father Damien "Demis" Karras, SJ, is a fictional character from the 1971 novel The Exorcist, its 1983 sequel Legion, one of the main protagonists in the 1973 film The Exorcist, and a supporting character in The Exorcist III, the 1990 film adaptation of Legion. He is portrayed by Jason Miller.

The Exorcist
In William Peter Blatty's 1971 novel, Father Damien Karras was one of the priests who exorcises the demon from young Regan MacNeil. He is a Jesuit psychiatrist suffering a crisis of faith. He searches for proof to lead an exorcism, yet during his investigation he comes to realize that there is no better way for God to prove His own existence than to reveal the foul presence of a demon; in God's perspective, He appeared not to waste His time on a skeptic, but instead to aid the callings of Father Lankester Merrin to rescue the child victim. During the exorcism, the demon frequently brings up the subject of Karras's mother's death and how he wasn't there to see her die, which seems to trouble Karras emotionally. Karras dies by throwing himself down a flight of stairs in order to purge the demon from his own body after having coaxed it out of Regan's.

Legion
In the 1983 sequel, it is revealed that after the demon departed, another evil spirit invaded Karras's body. Karras was found wandering and amnesiac, and was placed in the care of a mental hospital near Washington, D.C. While incarcerated there, the spirit suppresses Karras's personality and makes forays into the bodies of other patients in order to commit a series of ritual murders.

Adaptations
In the films The Exorcist and The Exorcist III, he is played by Jason Miller (who was in fact educated at the Jesuit University of Scranton).

Jack Nicholson was up for the part of Karras before Stacy Keach was hired by Blatty. According to The Exorcist director William Friedkin, Paul Newman also wanted to portray Karras. Friedkin then spotted Miller following a performance of Miller's play That Championship Season in New York. Even though Miller had never acted in movies, Keach's contract was bought out by Warner Bros. and Miller was signed.

Karras is voiced by Robert Glenister in the 2014 BBC Radio dramatization.

In popular culture
In Percival Everett's Dr. No, an atheistic priest named Damien Karras appears in four chapters in two parts. He assists Wala Kitu and Eigen Vector with nothing before double-crossing them and getting shot to death by the villain, John Milton Bradley Sill.

title: Damien Karras


text:
User:Aarav paudel

Aarav paudel
Me Aarav Paudel from Mainapokhar-1, Bardiya, Nepal I am new member of Wikipedia. I am interested in online money making. Contact me at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
My blog: Aarav Helps I live Mainapokhar-1, Bardiya, Nepal. I study in Bardiya Academy. Some of the hobby of me are I am interested in internet money, creating blog ,writing reviews, iam administrator of Aarav Helps blog. I want people to be informed about the modern technologies of the world. The world should bee contracted.

title: User:Aarav paudel


text:
Statistics/Testing Statistical Hypothesis

There are many different tests for the many different kinds of data. A way to get started is to understand what kind of data you have. Are the variables quantitative or qualitative? Certain tests are for certain types of data depending on the size, distribution or scale. Also, it is important to understand how samples of data can differ. The 3 primary characteristics of quantitative data are: central tendency, spread, and shape.

When most people "test" quantitative data, they tend to do tests for central tendency. Why? Well, let's say you had 2 sets of data and you wanted to see if they were different from each other. One way to test this would be to test to see if their central tendency (their means for example) differ.

Imagine two symmetric, bell shaped curves with a vertical line drawn directly in the middle of each, as shown here. If one sample was a lot different than another (a lot higher in values, etc.) then the means would be different typically. So when testing to see if two samples are different, usually two means are compared.

Two medians (another measure of central tendency) can be compared also. Or perhaps one wishes to test two samples to see if they have the same spread or variation. Because statistics of central tendency, spread, etc. follow different distributions - different testing procedures must be followed and utilized.

In the end, most folks summarize the result of a hypothesis test into one particular value - the p-value. If the p-value is smaller than the level of significance (usually $$\alpha=5%$$, but even lower in other fields of science i.e. Medicine) then you reject the null-hypothesis, but this does not mean you accept the alternative hypothesis. The p-value is essentially the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one observed. If the p-value is greater than the level of significance you fail to reject the null-hypothesis, but this does not mean that the null-hypothesis is correct.


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touch-type Read and Spell

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America1000 00:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Touch-type Read and Spell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Α Guy into Books ™ § ( Message ) -  23:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 02:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

 * Comment – At a quick glance at sources, it seems there are many mentions about the program & most of them seem to be in dyslexia-related books. So it may be merged to Dyslexia or Management of dyslexia. Tomorrow I will look at it properly. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: To get knowledgeable inputs, I left a note regarding this AfD at user Doc James's page, which seem fine per WP:APPNOTE, as they are known for "expertise in the field" of medicine. Obviously they might or might not participate here. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


text:
Whalerock Industries

Whalerock Industries Holding Company, LLC, commonly referred to as Whalerock Industries, is an American media and technology company. Based in West Hollywood, Whalerock partners with public figures and brands to create, build and operate direct-to-consumer multi-media apps which integrate music, video, live streaming, e-commerce, and gaming. Whalerock's partners include Sirius XM, Howard Stern, Warner Bros., Pottermore, MTV, Comedy Central, CMT, MSN, Microsoft, the Kardashian/Jenner sisters, and Tyler the Creator. The multi-media apps were described by Wired as "promising a new kind of interaction—one with more control (and money) for celebrities and more content (and exclusive allure) for super fans."

Whalerock also produces and develops content for film, television, and stage, and develops and operates emoji keyboards for Kim Kardashian (Kimoji), the Los Angeles Lakers, (Showtime! Stickers), Ellen DeGeneres (Emoji Exploji), and the NFL Players Association (Any Given Emoji).

History
Whalerock Industries was founded in January 2014 by Lloyd Braun, previously the president of Brillstein-Grey Entertainment, the chairman of the ABC Entertainment Group, and the head of the Yahoo! Media Group. In 2005, he predicted that celebrities would become "more directly in contact with their fans, and that "instead of watching them through a cable box, you could see them on the Web and interact with them more." The Street wrote in 2015 that Braun was doing "exactly" that, "but using mobile and over-the-top distribution over the Internet without traditional networks, cable TV, or even major social networking sites."

Braun founded Whalerock Industries following his buyout of BermanBraun, a media production company he co-founded with Gail Berman. In 2015, the investment firm GF Capital acquired a minority stake in the company, MGM renewed its existing TV and film deal with Whalerock, and launched the direct-to-consumer over-the- top media hubs were launched. In 2016, the investment company Insight Venture Partners acquired a minority stake in the company.

In September 2018, RockYou acquired Mom.me and Purple Clover from Whalerock Industries for an undisclosed amount.

Film and television

 * Nuts + Bolts (television)
 * Battlebots (television)
 * Believer (television)
 * American Hyperdrive (television)
 * I Am Pilgrim (film)
 * The Jellies! (television)
 * The Addams Family (film)

Digital

 * Wonderwall
 * Tested
 * Golf Media by Tyler, the Creator
 * Khloe Kardashian
 * Kylie Jenner
 * Howard Stern
 * Sirius Satellite Radio
 * Kimoji
 * Lakers Showtime! Stickers
 * Ellen's Emoji Exploji
 * Any Given Emoji with National Football League Players Association
 * Mom.me

title: Whalerock Industries


text:
Talk:Jacqueline Law

Error in dates
According to the article she was born in 1966. The article also says: In 1987, Law launched her own acting career at the age of 17. Obviously there's something wrong here, but I can't tell what. Perhaps an expert on the subject can look into this. Jahoe (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jacqueline Law


text:
User:ERcheck/sandbox/RexMcMillian

LtGen Rex C. McMillian is the current commander of the United States Marine Corps Reserve.

Marine Corps career
McMillian graduated from the University of Southern California and was subsequently commissioned as a 2nd lieutenant in the Marine Corps through the Platoon Leaders Course in 1980. In 1983, he completed flight training at VT-21 in Kingsville, Texas, flying F-4 Phantoms and F/A-18 Hornet jets.

Following flight training, he became a flight instructor.

Following active duty, he entered the Reserves in 1989. He has been a reservist since 1989, and since has served as commanding officer of a Marine fighter squadron and was activated in January 2003 in advance of the Iraq invasion, for which he served overseas and stateside, according to his military biography.

FROM USMC BIOGRAPH

A Naval aviator by trade, Lieutenant General McMillian completed flight school in 1982 and has accumulated more than 3,000 flight hours during his career in numerous platforms.

As a Lieutenant, he trained with VT-21 in Kingsville, Texas and remained as a flight instructor flying the TA-4J. In 1983, he reported to Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 101 for transition training in the F-4S. In 1986, Captain McMillian transitioned to the F-18 at Strike Fighter Squadron 106, Naval Air Station Cecil Field, Florida, and flew the Hornet with VMFA-531 in El Toro, California.

In April 1989, Captain McMillian transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve and joined Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 134. As a Major, he served as the Operations Officer and Executive Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 134 in Miramar, California.

Lieutenant Colonel McMillian served as the Assistant Air Operations Officer, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force Augmentation Command Element / I Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton, California. In January 2000, he assumed command of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 134 in Miramar, California and relinquished command in January 2002.

While a Colonel, in 2003 he was mobilized and reported to 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing as the Chief of Staff for both overseas and stateside duties in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. In June 2005, he was demobilized and transferred to Marine Aircraft Group 46 in order to serve as the Deputy Commander.

Upon selection to Brigadier General, he served as Deputy Commanding General of Marine Corps Forces Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii. From 2009 to 2010, Brigadier General McMillian assumed the duties as the Deputy Commanding General, I Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton, California.

Major General McMillian served as the Commanding General, 4th Marine Aircraft Wing from July 2010 to August 2012. Following command, he served as the Director, Reserve Affairs Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps until May 2013. Prior to his current assignment, he served as the Senior Advisor to the Commander for Reserve Affairs, assigned to North American Aerospace Defense Command and United States Northern Command, headquartered at Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado. His secondary responsibility was a Threat Assessor for NORAD and NORTHCOM. Prior to his return to active military service, Lieutenant General McMillian was a Captain for Delta Air Lines in his civilian employment. He has been a career airline pilot since 1989.

Lieutenant General Rex C. McMillian assumed the duties of Commander, U.S. Marine Corps Forces Reserve and Marine Forces Northern Command on 12 September 2015. A native of Norfolk, Virginia, he graduated from the University of Southern California and was commissioned in 1980 via the Platoon Leaders Class program.

Attribution

Category:United States Marine Corps generals Category:United States Marine Corps officers

title: User:ERcheck/sandbox/RexMcMillian


text:
Offending religious feelings (Poland)

Offending religious feelings (Obraza uczuć religijnych) is a blasphemy law in Poland. According to Article 196 of the Penal Code: "Whoever offends the religious feelings of other persons by publicly insulting an object of religious worship, or a place designated for public religious ceremonies, is liable to pay a fine, have their liberty limited, or be deprived of their liberty for a period of up to two years."

Constitutionality
A law forbidding blasphemy was included in the original 1932 Polish penal code.

The Constitutional Tribunal has ruled that the law is not in conflict with the Constitution of Poland and is not overbroad. The European Court of Human Rights has also allowed other blasphemy laws under margin of appreciation doctrine, as individual countries have broad ability to set moral standards.

Polish law has no provision which exempts or reduces the scrutiny applied to artistic expression alleged to violate the law, although many artists who have been accused of violating it say that their work should be protected as artistic freedom.

A separate law, Article 256, criminalizes incitement to hatred based on religious belief.

Cases
The majority of cases in which charges of Article 196 are made do not lead to actual convictions. About 55 prosecutions on average were brought each year between 1999 and 2016. Since Poland is a predominantly Catholic country (around 87% of Poles say they were baptized as Catholics), most Article 196 cases concern that religion.

In 2000, Polish artist Dorota Nieznalska juxtaposed Greek cross with male genitalia in an artistic exhibition. In 2009 she was finally acquitted after lengthy legal proceedings, due to the court not finding an intent to offend religious feelings.

In 2008, musician Adam Darski tore up a Bible during a performance, referring to it as "the book  of  lies". He was acquitted after the performance was deemed not to be sufficiently public, the audience had bought tickets and consented to the performance, and only one audience member complained. After his acquittal, Darski announced his intention to hold "Satanist communion" during performances.

In 2009, singer Dorota Rabczewska (Doda) referred to the Bible as "something written by individuals high on alcohol  and  weed". She was convicted and fined. The case Rabczewska v. Poland  is currently pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

In 2015, Robert Biedroń, mayor of Słupsk, was investigated for removing a portrait of John Paul II from his office after PiS activists reported him for allegedly offending religious feelings.

In 2019, Elżbieta Podleśna was arrested for displaying a Rainbow Madonna adaptation of the Black Madonna of Częstochowa. In July 2020, Podleśna and two other activists were formally charged with offending religious feelings; they pled not guilty. Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and Amnesty International criticized the use of the law.

In October 2019, Bishop Szymon Niemiec of the United Ecumenical Church was interrogated by police under suspicion of offending religious feelings "by insulting the object of worship in the form of a Catholic Mass"; police had received more than 150 complaints regarding the incident. He had held an ecumenical, LGBT-inclusive religious service in connection with Warsaw's 2019 Equality Parade, which was criticized by the Catholic Episcopal Conference of Poland and Law and Justice politicians. Niemiec previously held similar services every year since 2010 without controversy. Niemiec and Julia Maciocha, president of the committee which organizes Equality Parade, stated that the complaint against Niemiec violates the constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion.

In June 2021 pastor Paweł Chojecki, editor-in-chief of Against the Tide TV, has been tried for insulting the religious feelings of Catholics. The pastor was sentenced to eight months of restriction of freedom in the form of 20 hours per month of community work and reimbursement of the costs of the trial – more than 20 thousand PLN. The judgment was not legally valid. On June 5 The Court of Appeals upheld the verdict of the court of first instance. The pastor was also ordered to pay the costs of both instances. Under the Polish system, Pastor Chojecki can no longer appeal the verdict. The case will be referred to international institutions for consideration.2023

Calls to toughen the law
In 2022 United Poland called for tougher blasphemy laws in Poland, such as three-year jail terms for insulting church or interrupting mass.

In October 2022, they submitted a citizens' legislative initiative for the tougher blasphemy laws with close to 400,000 signatures to parliament.

Repeal attempts
The law is controversial in Poland. Lawyers have noted that it is excessively vague, not stating what actions count as "offending religious feelings", leading some to call for repeal of the law. Opponents of the law say that it has a chilling effect on legitimate free speech and criticism of religion. It has been criticized for violating free speech by human rights watchdogs such as Article 19, Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, End Blasphemy Laws, and Amnesty International. The Council of Europe's Recommendation 1805 urges member states to repeal blasphemy laws. Anne Ramberg and Michael Kirby of the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute stated that the law was overbroad, conflicting with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and was used unfairly to target LGBT rights advocates.

In 2019, MP Krzysztof Mieszkowski of Modern submitted legislation that would have abolished the offense. Referencing Podleśna's arrest, he said that Article 196 "has become a political tool today" and was an "oppressive article that has repeatedly limited creative freedom". Robert Biedroń, leader of Spring, said that his party aims to repeal the offense if elected. Biedroń added that the law and arrest of Podleśna made Poland internationally "famous for the idiotic attitude of today's rulers who go after artists and those who enjoy freedom of speech".

title: Offending religious feelings (Poland)


text:
2019 ASEAN Grand Prix – First Leg squads

These are the official line ups for the 2019 ASEAN Grand Prix.

The following is the Indonesian roster in the 2019 ASEAN Grand Prix - First Leg.

Head Coach: Oktavian

The following is the Filipino roster in the 2019 ASEAN Grand Prix - First Leg.

Head Coach: Shaq Delos Santos

The following is the Thai roster in the 2019 ASEAN Grand Prix - First Leg.

Head Coach: Danai Sriwatcharamethakul

The following 14 players of Vietnam in the 2019 ASEAN Grand Prix - First Leg.

Head Coach: Nguyễn Tuấn Kiệt


text:
Mount Nasugahara

Mount Nasugahara (那須ヶ原山) is a mountain with an altitude of 769 m located in the Suzuka Mountains, in Mie and Shiga Prefectures. It is located within Suzuka Quasi-National Park.

title: Mount Nasugahara


text:
Ion Vlădoiu

Ion "Jean" Vlădoiu (born 5 November 1968) is a Romanian former professional footballer who played as a striker. He is one of the few who played for the biggest teams of Romania – Steaua București, Rapid București, Dinamo București, Universitatea Craiova, Argeș Pitești and UTA Arad. He was also a manager.

Biography
Vlădoiu played a total of 324 games in Divizia A, scoring 130 goals, being the league topscorer in 1996. He also played 51 games in the Bundesliga, scoring 10 goals.

International career
He won 28 caps for Romania, most of them as a substitute, scoring twice. He played briefly in 1994 FIFA World Cup, coming on as a sub against Switzerland, but then being sent off three minutes later for a bad foul on Switzerland's Christophe Ohrel.

Honours
Argeș Pitești
 * Balkans Cup runner-up: 1987–88

Steaua București
 * Divizia A: 1992–93, 1995–96, 2000–01
 * Cupa României: 1991–92, 1995–96
 * Supercupa României: 1995

Individual
 * Divizia A top scorer: 1995–96 (25 goals)

title: Ion Vlădoiu


text:
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Squirtle

Squirtle
Probably meets the criticera — M in  un  Spiderman • Review Me 12:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Object Porbably needs needs more cites, mainly in the anime and game sections. Also, it's a bit short.  Both Torchic and Bulbasaur, the two FA Pokemon articles, are longer, and have twice the cites.  --PresN 15:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support I don't know if the length of article is a good indicator of FA-worthiness, but all other technical merits suggest it is FA-ready. --Kitch 17:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Great article, even though it is slightly short. Some P. Erson 15:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Are you there, Minun? The article hasn't been edited since the 11th, and you haven't responded to my object.  If you're serious about getting this to FA, message me, and I'll try to give you more precise info on what it would take to make me give this a support.  --PresN 15:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Haha, I feel dumb. Turns out Minun's been banned. So, he won't be responding to this FAC anymore. (link) --PresN 19:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Strong Object, poor TCG, anime, video games sections, lack of cites, poor prose, fan cruft and unsourced sections. Roll on Bulbasaur and Torchic. H ig hway Return to Oz...  18:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Object for reasons stated by HighwayCello; I particularly agree that the prose is subpar. Amuck 18:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm taking over the nomination due to banning of Minun. Please stand by. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 01:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Stand by? Anyway, I'd like to object for reasons given by others; there also seems to be a problem with the reference to chapter 33, which apparently has two different titles?! - User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 16:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * TM101 - Object Use object to signify that article is unready for featured status. Compare to FF7 fac - no effort made to display any information on real-world significance or development. Everyone else's reasons good too. (not to mention that sunbirds and turtles are mortal enemies) Sabine's Sunbird talk 06:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


text:
13th Bangladesh National Film Awards

The 13th Bangladesh National Film Awards were presented by the Ministry of Information, Bangladesh to felicitate the best of Bangladeshi cinema released in the year 1988. The ceremony took place in Dhaka in 1988 and awards were given by then president of Bangladesh. The National Film Awards are the only film awards given by the government itself. Every year, a national panel appointed by the government selects the winning entry, and the award ceremony is held in Dhaka. 1988 was the 13th National Film Awards.

List of winners
This year awards were given in 17 categories. Awards for Best Male Playback Singer was not given in 1988.

Special awards

 * Best Child Artist (Special) - Baby Joya (Bheja Chokh)
 * Special Award - Firoza Rahman Tina (posthumous)

title: 13th Bangladesh National Film Awards


text:
Yaakov Moshe Kulefsky

Rabbi Yaakov Moshe Kulefsky (December 14, 1925 - November 30, 2000) was an American-born rabbi and teacher. He served as both dean and rosh yeshiva at Yeshivas Ner Yisroel for decades, until the last year of his life.

Early life
His parents, Raphael Nisan Shlomo (Nathan) and Rachel (Rose), had a business in Chicago, where he was born. The family moved to St. Louis for a better opportunity. This "opportunity" did not include a better Jewish education, and at age 15 he was sent to study in Chicago's Beis Medrash L'Torah, specifically to learn from Dovid Lifshitz. Three years later he transferred to Mesivta Torah V'Daas. Despite his yeshiva rabbinical student status, he was drafted into the United States Army August 1944.

While on leave during his training period mid-week, he spent time in a Jewish book store frequented by his future father-in-law. He was discharged in early 1946. He married Sarah Gartenhouse on June 18, 1947. Through 1954, he studied at Bais Medrash Elyon, in Monsey, at which time, with the help of a cousin already at Yeshiva Ner Yisroel, he accepted a teaching position.

Teacher
A student, asking his teacher, Kulefsky, how he remembered so many details connected with so many topics he taught, was told: "Do you remember how many children you have? Do you remember their names?" His teaching role began while in the U.S. Army; when given a Shabbos off, he'd walk miles from his training base to Yeshiva Torah Vodaas and lecture.

Dean, Ner Yisroel
He also was involved with the testing process for rabbinical ordination at Ner Yisroel.

When the school was able to accept students permitted to leave Iran, he "became almost like a surrogate parent to them." Kulefsky served as the rosh yeshiva from Rabbi Weinberg's death in 1999 until his own death on November 30, 2000.

Yissocher Frand compared how his personality was able to "transmit to literally thousands of talmidim" because his method was like giving "a baby its first lollypop" leading to many a life-long connection.

An example of his being gentle was when a student asked for permission to skip part of a day in yeshiva to attend an out-of-town wedding. When Rabbi Kulefsky delayed a direct yes or no, the student asked, "So is it OK?" and was told, "I can't tell you whether it's OK for you to go. I have enough problems worrying about my bittul Torah; I can't speak for yours."

Some of his teachings were encapsulated in "Chidushei Rav Kulefsky."

Personal
Rabbi Kulefsky was a first born only son; he had 3 sisters. He and his wife of 53 years had two sons and three daughters.

title: Yaakov Moshe Kulefsky


text:
User:Chrismo/Blog

=My Wikiversity Blog - Be bold= Copy this link and paste it into your aggregator.

Add entry | Update Feed | Leave a comment

Rssbot
Testing rssbot by MichaelBillington. Chrismo 00:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

General news
I've updated the Blog howto and added to a couple pages, last night on irc Poningru was keen to get something happening with the Linux Desktop topic so hopefully we can get some activity happening. I think we need to get people to update their userpages and tell us what their learning goals are and generally encourage participation rather then focus on filling up the pages. One of the problems is that most Universities have policies that restrict their students from sharing their research and they're not allowed to collaborate. Their research has to be original and has to be their own. I think this is a horrible problem but thankfully we have some brilliant scientists that have no problem with that.Chrismo 02:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Blogging on Wikiversity
Well I'm muddling through setting up my blog on Wikiversity. I haven't contributed anything in a while, I've been trying to learn to improve my writing skills and found a lot of really useful information on Wikiversity and Wikibooks, perhaps I should start trying to write stories and/or poetry and find someone willing to help assess my ability every now and again.Chrismo 23:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

First post
This is an entry so that I have at least 2 entries for my expirements with the web feed. The other "course" I really like is the course on Software Freedom.Chrismo 23:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

title: User:Chrismo/Blog


text:
User:PerformaChemicals/sandbox

Performa Chemicals, LLC develops Pelitex, a new chemical composition derived from reacting polymethylacrylates, saturated hydrosilicons and silicon dioxides.

title: User:PerformaChemicals/sandbox


text:
Talk:Styx (moon)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 7 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BestLampNA.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments
Should the albedo upper bound be 0.4 instead of 0.04? — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No, the sources state 0.04. There is an inverse relationship between albedo and diameter - i.e. a lower albedo results in a greater diameter.  Therefore the lowest albedo gives the upper bound on diameter. Crispmuncher (talk) 13:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Although the sentence is factually correct, I agree with the commenter that it is confusing. The terms "minimum" and "maximum" seem to be referring to the albedo rather than to the radius.  Is there someway to reword the sentence to make it clearer? JavautilRandom (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Made-up designation?
Unless I've missed it, NONE of the external links in this article uses the designation "S/2012 P 1". Why is this article titled with a fake designation that no-one uses? It should be either "S/2012 (134340) 1" or "P5 (moon)". <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

 * It is the standard formulaic designation as defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) as defined for moons of planets, with "P" reserved for Pluto, so it is not a fake designation. However, since Pluto has been demoted to a dwarf planet, "P" may no longer be appropriate. This designation is anachronistic. -- <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 05:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

 * In addition, it seems odd that it is known as P 1 (with space) and P5 (without). Is this styling correct? Ericoides (talk) 07:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

 * P 1 stands for first discovered satellite of planet Pluto that year (ie: S/2012). P5 just means the 5th moon of planet Pluto. If they announce another Pluto satellite this year it will be known as "S/2012 (134340) 2". -- Kheider (talk) 07:11, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 08:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

– Per the discussions at Talk:S/2012 P 1 and Talk:S/2011 P 1, "P" is inappropriate since Pluto is no longer a major planet (but is a dwarf planet), so these articles should not use the anachronistic formulaic name from the time when it was a major planet. Many of the sources use "134340" instead, as this is the Minor Planet Number for Pluto. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * S/2012 P 1 → S/2012 (134340) 1
 * S/2011 P 1 → S/2011 (134340) 1
 * Support Seems pretty clear cut, I was unable to find sources for S/2012 P 1 a couple of days ago, it seems S/2012 (134340) 1 or more loosely P5 are the accepted provisional designations. Crispmuncher (talk) 04:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Weak Support. In this context, P and (134340) mean exactly the same thing. Personally, I don't think it makes much difference... as long as the articles don't end up at P4 and P5, as those seem to only be temporary nicknames. If more official sources use (134340) than P, go with (134340). Just make sure to maintain redirects from the P versions. --Patteroast (talk) 04:42, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Support. The page would finally have to be renamed again when the official names are declared. Anir1uph (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Strongly Support. Pluto is not a major planet. Pluto is not a planet in formal use or on Wikipedia. In 1978 and 2005 Pluto was a planet. Thus the 2011 and 2012 moons should be moved to the (134340) designation. Any website overseen by Alan Stern such as pluto.jhuapl.edu should be seen as a conflict of interest/Due and undue weight issue since Alan Stern is the Principal investigator of the New Horizons project and has an agenda promoting Pluto as a planet. -- Kheider (talk) 05:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose Pluto is in a threshold and if it was so designated at the time, I see no reason to move it. This is a waste of time and the outcome is inconsequential since it will be named soon enough and will not require the usage of any preliminary designation will it?LuciferWildCat (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - As I pointed out in the previous discussion on this page, the "S/2012 P 1" designation appears not to be used. Therefore in this case the move rationale is clear: having the article at an unused designation does not make sense. Presumably the name will change at some point in the future from the provisional designation, but we don't know how long that is going to take and in any case the fact it will change in the future does not justify providing inaccurate information at the current time. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 10:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * MOVE --ArgGeo (talk) 10:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. Pluto is not a planet. --JorisvS (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Pluto was considered a planet when this convention was established, and some (including the director of the NH mission) continue to insist that it is one. There's the matter of simple consistency with the temp moon names S/1978 P 1, S/2005 P 1, and S/2005 P 2 (now Charon, Hydra, and Nix). "P5" is ubiquitous, and part of the same convention of P = Pluto. That is, planetary nomenclature has been grandfathered in in the case of Pluto. — kwami (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment @Kwami I couldn't have said it better myself and @Jorvis YES IT IS.LuciferWildCat (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't. A planet is gravitationally the dominant body in its orbital zone, but Pluto isn't. But you already know that. --JorisvS (talk) 21:47, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Yes, it is clearly not a planet per the dominant IAU definition. My point was only that grandfathered-in nomenclature is not a contradiction of the IAU, any more than "dinosaur" means that we still think they're lizards. Because of its history as a planet, I suspect Pluto will have a special place among minor planets for quite some time. — kwami (talk) 23:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This is not the place for POV pushing. We defer to the IAU.  If you don't like that, tough. Asserting the name follows a pattern that was itself broken in the sole preceding example following the relevant change is fighting old battles in a completely inappropriate forum. Crispmuncher (talk) 23:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC).
 * You're missing the point. Also, that edit was intended for P4; I misread the dates. — kwami (talk) 00:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't the New Horizons website refer to "S/2011 P 1" (emphasis mine) last year anyway when P4 was discovered? They haven't referred to "S/2012 P 1" or "S/2012 (134340) 1" yet, but they probably will refer to it as "S/2012 P 1" when not using "P5". Double sharp (talk) 03:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No, they did not, at least if they ever have Google hasn't spotted it: a Google for "S/2011 P 1" site:nasa.gov gives no results. A similar search for "S/2011 (134340) 1" site:nasa.gov gives 375 results.  Far from never having used the term, a similar search for "S/2012 (134340) 1" site:nasa.gov yields about 340 results versus none again for the "P" form.  It is therefore clear what NASA's position is, as is that of CBAT and every other source.  To date no one has quoted a single reliable source in favour of the current page titles.  Vague and unreferenced appeals to memory do not alter that, particularly when contradicted by actual evidence. Crispmuncher (talk) 03:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Search for their pluto.jhuapl.edu site. They used "S/2011 P 1" once there. Double sharp (talk) 11:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Searching for "S/2011 P1" does return some results from the NASA page. This is in complete contrast to "S/2012 P1" - apparently no-one is using this and it has been invented by the "Pluto is a planet" crowd here on Wikipedia. If you want to claim that the moon should be called "S/2012 P 1", or even that it is informally known as such (as mentioned in the lead paragraph of this article), provide a reference. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You're attributing motivations to people which you can't possibly know. I do not accept Pluto as a planet, yet am happy to accept S/2012 P 1 as an informal temp name for the moon. S/2011 P 1 was apparently used after the precedent set by S/1978 P 1 etc. WP may be the only place that has further extended the pattern, I don't know. But the pattern does exist, and there is s.t. to be said for consistency. (We don't extend the planetary pattern to minor planets only because it is impossible to do so with only 26 letters in the alphabet. But it already has been extended to Pluto, so IMO the planetary argument is in itself irrelevant.) — kwami (talk) 09:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If Wikipedia is the only place using it, and the only reason for using it is to keep the pattern of articles that are now not even named that way (ie. Nix, Hydra), then "S/2012 P 1" fails WP:UCN, and WP:NOTBURO -- <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 09:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 'S/2012 (134340) 1' also fails UCN, and NOTBURO is irrelevant. But I'm not saying you should agree with me, merely stating what my preference is and why I hold it. — kwami (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * NOTBURO is relevant, since your reasoning is entirely bureaucratic. And unlike "P", "134340" actually is a candidate for UCN, since it is used outside of Wikipedia, whereas titles only used on Wikipedia are not candidates for consideration under UCN. -- <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Strongly Oppose There is nothing wrong with S/2012 P1 and I have no doubt New Horizions will use the term when they update their pages with info on the moon. The Pluto haters who infest Wikipedia need to get over themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. The official IAU designation is S/2012 (134340) 1, period. And IAU is the only authority for asigning designators for celestial bodies. Insisting on a invented and completely inofficial designator like S/2012 P 1 is ridiculous for an encyclopedia. --GDK (talk) 09:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * <IP_ADDRESS>, please do not go against the overwhelming consensus on this talk page as you did with this series of edits. Thank you. -- Kheider (talk) 06:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Overwhelming consensus? What consensus? And what gives you the right to tell me not to go against "the consensus"? I sure as hell don't see it. And I need not remind you that this very discussion happend last year with S/2011 P 1 ( I know it hurts you to see that...) and the consensus was no move. Now, you've tried to go ahead and change all the P1's into 134340's without any discussion, especially while the page remains at P1. I will continue to revert your edits as you alone have no right to force one term over another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * <IP_ADDRESS>, *if* you continue to vandalize the page I will ask that you be BLOCKED for violating the The three-revert rule. -- Kheider (talk) 06:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I will also point out that last years failed move was S/2011 P 1 → P4 (moon), it was not to the proper IAU name S/2011 (134340) 1. -- Kheider (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What's the matter, don't like somebody disagreeing with you? You should be blocked for changing all the P1's to 134340 without ANY discussion. Again, what gives you the right to decide which one is better than other? Oh yeah, and I still Oppose the move. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Now that Kwami has added a biased reference (IMHO), I will also point out that any website controlled by Alan Stern is probably a Conflict of interest reference since Alan Stern obviously has an agenda promoting Pluto as a planet. The discussion that lead me to make the changes can be found here (Made-up designation?). -- Kheider (talk) 15:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Three Four points:
 * It doesn't matter what the vote is. WP is not a democracy. Names are chosen according to our naming conventions. That often accords with the majority, but sometimes not. (These discussions are a forum to convince others, or at least the deciding admin, by the power of your argument, not a popularity contest.)
 * Until/if a new name is decided on, it's normally the old name that we use. The name in the lead echos the name of the article, and there's nothing about this case that would make it an exception (unlike, say, "List of X" articles, where often we don't bother to echo the name of the article in the lead).
 * Changing one name to another is not "vandalism". Reporting someone for vandalism over a content or naming dispute is likely to be seen as frivolous. (Reporting them for edit warring is another matter.)
 * [on new comment] It would only be a COI if Stern were the editor. What you're staying would be like saying that we can't use Christian sources for an article on Christianity. The issue you're concerned about is covered at WP:weight.

— kwami (talk) 06:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * When you are working on a project such as New Horizons, it can be bad for your career/paycheck to not go with what the Principal investigator (in this case Alan Stern) wants. Thus it is probable that pluto.jhuapl.edu is intentionally biased. -- Kheider (talk) 16:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Quite possibly. But that's not WP:COI, which refers to us as editors. Also, if the question is whether the name is used, then that's an example that it's used. It's not for us to judge WP:truth like that (especially for names or definitions, which aren't questions of fact), though WP:weight should sort out an entrenched minority from an established consensus. — kwami (talk) 17:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

 * The references use the name "S/2012 (134340) 1" for a reason. Kwamikagami, this whole naming controversy is hurting your POV-pushing credibility over at the dwarf planet article. -- Kheider (talk) 07:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a bizarre statement, Kheider. How does your dispute here (with someone unconnected to me) have anything to do with that? I'm merely pointing out some elements of WP conventions you don't appear to be familiar with, because your shouting match with a not-terribly-rational IP is not making you look good. I don't understand your need to make things personal. — kwami (talk) 07:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Kwamikagami, you know that there are no reliable references for the PLANETARY name "S/2012 P 1", and you also know that Pluto was removed as a planet in 2006. Yet you continue to support the PLANETARY format for naming moons of a minor planet when YOU OPPOSE the move. -- Kheider (talk) 07:36, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that people shouldn't have opinions you disagree with? The whole point of this is that we present our reasoning for evaluation. Why does that upset you so? None of us live in a world where everyone agrees with us. And the comments that set you off weren't even my opinions on this matter, but merely clarifying WP:democracy, WP:vandalism, etc, pointing out that threatening to report someone for vandalism when they were not engaged in vandalism is not likely to be a productive line of action. — kwami (talk) 08:08, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I am saying Pluto is not a planet in formal use or on Wikipedia. In 1978 and 2005 Pluto was a planet. Thus the 2011 and 2012 moons should be moved to the (134340) designation. -- Kheider (talk) 08:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand your argument, Kheider. It's a good argument. And I agree about Pluto not being a planet. I simply find the simpler, grandfathered-in nomenclature convenient for a system that's in the news, and in three years will be even more in the news. To me, this is like arguing that we shouldn't use the word "asteroid" because in fly-by pix Gaspra doesn't look like a star, nor "minor planet" because it isn't a [minor] [planet]. These are all just convenient labels, and in this case won't even cause confusion, because anyone well versed enough in astronomical nomenclature to understand the distinction already understands the issues surrounding Pluto's status.
 * Technically, it's not "P5" either, yet official sources continue to call it that, because it's convenient. — kwami (talk) 08:39, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Support – None of the titles particularly satisfy the naturalness requirement of WP:CRITERIA. People would be more likely to search for "Pluto's fourth moon". But the new titles would satisfy the precision and conciseness requirements, so I'll support. Regards, RJH (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Comment I think all the comments here stating one or the other designation is more technically correct are entirely missing the point. Article titles on Wikipedia are chosen on a number of criteria as mentioned above.  None of them state that the most technically correct title is the right one, it is based ultimately on what visitors are most likely to search for.  See the V-2, "technically" the A-4.

 * I have a hard time believing that vistors will be searching for "S/2012 (134340) 1", it isn't concise or natural. The way forward is in front of our eyes, indeed NASA has done the work for us in their discovery article, P4 and P5. No jumble of numbers in sight. It doesn't matter about the reasoning behind these names and their rights and wrongs as the article will explain the technical designation anyway.  I know this may not go down well with some here but this is clearly what Wikipedia policy, and your average human being who isn't an astronomy geek, would prefer. ChiZeroOne (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Neutral . The suggested moves are to the "official" names, but those are not commonly used by lay readers; for the 2011 moon, the old name seems to have been used more commonly (including by the discoverers) . Via ChiZeroOne's comment directly above mine, I'd suggest moving to P4 / P5 since these seem to be commonly used and easily understood by the average reader; they're also shortest. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I certainly would not object to using P4 (moon) and P5 (moon) for the article titles, though my preference is for S/2011 (134340) 1 and S/2012 (134340) 1. I definitely object to any mention of the designation "S/2012 P 1" in the article unless it can be backed up with a reliable source, and unfortunately an extrapolation from a pattern that is officially no longer used does not cut it. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, the "S/2012 P 1" name is inappropriate without a reliable source; I would have weakly supported that move, while weakly opposing S/2011 P 1's move, if the two "requested moves" had been brought up separately. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ditto what <IP_ADDRESS> wrote. -- Kheider (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * One could also "spell out" P4 and P5 to "Pluto IV" and "Pluto V"; these are the official designations for both planetary and minor-planet moons after confirmation, AFAIK. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Until these satellites are formally designated as such, the names "Pluto IV" and "Pluto V" are speculative and should not be used. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. If the moons are named at the same time, the Roman numeral designation could very well be by distance, or in some other ordering. It's possible that 'P5' could end up as Pluto IV. --Patteroast (talk) 22:27, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Good points; I retract those "spelling out" suggestions. A better spelling-out would then be just using the descriptive titles Pluto's fourth/fifth moon, which are easily supported (paraphrased) by sources. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * On the other hand you could probably make a good case that these can naturally be described as Pluto's fourth and second moons, in order of distance... <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 11:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * But those descriptions are due to change when more moons are discovered, unlike the order of discovery. And I haven't seen any source using those descriptive titles for the moons, probably for just that reason. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Support, and this should be done ASAP. It is bizarre that it has been named S/2012 P 1, and I don't know how that happened. That title produces essentially NO search results. Everyone refers to this as either "S/2012 (134340) 1" or "P5". This looks like a rehash of a battle lost six years ago. Rename and be done with it. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note that this discussion is on two suggested moves, for this moon and P4. While you're right that no-one seems to use S/2012 P 1, S/2011 P 1 is the more common name AFAICS. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was indeed responding in relation to the 2012 (P5) discovery. However, if I google S/2011 P 1, and compare that to the quality of the results I get with the same search for S/2011 (134340) 1, then it appears a no-brainer. The former gets various wikipedia entries and sources that may have been influenced by them, while the latter gets nasa, harvard, the bbc and a reasonably solid looking personal archive of data by a Wm Johnston. My view is a strong support for a rename for P5, but i would still support one for P4. hamiltonstone (talk) 13:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * There are also high-quality sources for the current name (e.g. ), but you seem to be right that S/2011 (134340) 1 is more widely used now by reliable sources. I think it was different last year, which was the ("outdated") basis for my claim. Therefore I change my position to support (but would equally support a move to one of the two alternative names I suggested above).--Roentgenium111 (talk) 14:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Moot. Dr. Showalter has assured me that the moon will have a real name within three months, at most.  It may not be worth arguing about what to title this page if it's going to be re-titled fairly soon. JavautilRandom (talk) 01:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't agree. Right now is when there is likely to be the most public interest in the discovery, and it currently has a name that no-one is using. My view is that it should be renamed urgently. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I also do NOT agree. As more moons of EX-planet Pluto are announced Wikipedia needs a consensus on how to properly name them. I am tired of the bureaucratic semantics every time a new moon of Pluto is announced. The current name of this article is unreferenced and made up. -- Kheider (talk) 05:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. In that case, I change my vote to Strongly Support.   The name of the moon is temporarily S/2012 (134340) 1.  Its nickname is P5.  I suspect that New Horizons had probably written their announcement before the release of the IAU circular, and didn't realize they had accidentally used obsolete nomenclature.   All astronomers recognize the IAU as the sole arbiter of names. JavautilRandom (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have no problem with mentioning and using the nickname P5 in the article. But as an Encyclopedia Wikipedia should use the most appropriate provisional designation as the main article page/title. After the moon is named, the provisional designation will just be a footnote to the article that Joe Q. Public will not bother reading. -- Kheider (talk) 06:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

 * comment: leaving aside the blind alley of whether Pluto is a planet or not, the only question for me is, "where are the sources"? If we rely only on Alan Stern for our sources, we are never going to reach a conclusion, because he is engaged in a mildly deceptive PR campaign to treat Pluto as a planet, whatever the IAU may say, and without explanation or justification. What are the majority of sources using? Obviously Wikipedia must treat Pluto as a minor planet, because that is the established rule. However, we can't just invent a name for a moon that no one else has used.  Serendi pod ous  06:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. I do not think that P4/P5 variants should be used because they are too imprecise. Ruslik_ Zero 12:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Comment I'd be happy to support P4 (moon) and P5 (moon) as WP:COMMONNAME per ChiZeroOne, Roentgenium111, <IP_ADDRESS>, and (?) Kheider. Not clear what Ruslik0 means by "imprecise": those labels are only used for these two moons. — kwami (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Though P4/P5 is more tolerable than the current "wrong and thus unacceptable" titles, I still think the titles should be the proper provisional designations using (134340). -- Kheider (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Question from a newbie What is the process by which this will be resolved? It seems that there are strong partisans on every sides. Will this page keep on flip-flopping back and forth between S/2012 P 1 and S/2012 (134340) 1 until one side gets tired, or is there an actual resolution mechanism? I'm not trying to be snide. I'm just trying to figure out what's going on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JavautilRandom (talk • contribs) 22:54, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a seven day discussion, after which an admin reviews it and either comes to a determination either way or allows more time for consensus to emerge (unlikely in this case, given both the level of interest and that the arguments are already going round in circles). Seven days is up in 27 hours time, give it some time for an admin to get around to looking at it and it should be done in the next 48 hours. Crispmuncher (talk) 23:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Well, eventually these two moons will receive names (instead of designations or nicknames), so at that point, that should end things if nothing else does. -- <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia needs to quit making up "formal nomenclature" that goes against the IAU every time a moon of Pluto is discovered. On a personal website/blog someone can call it whatever they want. -- Kheider (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Kheider, everyone heard you the first several times you said it. — kwami (talk) 16:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Kwami, you have tendency to disregard the IAU and make up your own rules when it comes to naming moons or the number of dwarf planets. -- Kheider (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Somehow I keep expecting intelligent people like you to be rational. Oh well. I did not name this article, nor the other one, and the IAU believes there are hundreds of dwarf planets. But sure: I named both of these articles through mind control of the nominal editors, there are only five DPs (there were only three, but two more popped into existence when the IAU invoked them), and the Peloponnesian War was fought by skeletons—we know, because we've dug them up. — kwami (talk) 00:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Date of the naming
Would it be worth noting the date of when the IAU will name the two moons? Or is there not a definite date? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 02:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no fixed date. Something to bare in mind for the "hold on" arguments in favour of a fictional status quo above. Crispmuncher (talk) 02:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC).

Do we have at least a rough estimate? I know several names have been suggested and it will be based off of underworld deities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 04:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It can take years. S/2011 (134340) 1 was discovered almost a year ago and as far as I am aware a name hasn't even been proposed for it yet. S/2003 J 4 still doesn't have a name eight years after its discovery. Crispmuncher (talk) 04:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC).
 * I have talked with Dr. Showalter about this, and he assures me that the two moons will have names in three months or sooner. The naming of P4 was intentionally delayed because they suspected that P5 existed, and wanted to name both at the same time. (I don't know anythng about a timetable for the Jovian moon.)  JavautilRandom (talk) 05:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The current name of this article is unreferenced and made up. It needs to be changed now, not when the IAU gets around to it. -- Kheider (talk) 05:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know who Dr Showalter is, and he isn't really relevant to our processes. We need to get this sorted now, per Kheider. hamiltonstone (talk) 06:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Dr Showalter is the discoverer of the currently unnamed moons, so I assume he has the rights to name them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 09:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The issue is an irrelevance. For a start like most of the discussion above in favour of keeping it at its present location this is completely unsourced and therefore counts for nothing.  Even if the assertion is true it does not count for anything - naming rights reside with the IAU.  Discoverers have the right to suggest a name but approval and ratification rests with the IAU. Crispmuncher (talk) 16:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC).
 * I have no idea how to "source" private email. This is the "talk" page, so I presumed it was okay for me to introduce relevant but unpublished information.  And yes, the IAU has the final say.  But the nomenclature committee has typically followed the discoverer's suggestion as long as it fits within the general naming scheme. JavautilRandom (talk) 19:23, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You can introduce whatever you want, but equally I can demand sources for anything I want. Given that people have been making claims about what NASA have written on their website that I was able to disprove unsourced claims need to be taken with a pinch of salt.  Since this affects the article that will ultimately need sorucing in any event. Crispmuncher (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Huh? We're in a section entitled "Date of the Naming", and I answered the question by going to the discoverer. This isn't the section where we argue about what it should be called in the meantime. If you want to argument above about whether the alleged imminent naming of the moon should affect what we do now, then please do that in the appropriate section.  Someone asked a question.  I asked Dr. Showalter.  He answered.  You are free to believe I made the whole thing up; it doesn't change anything. End of story. JavautilRandom (talk) 15:56, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Crispmuncher, your "disproving" above was actually disproved itself by User:Double sharp in his reply to you, see e.g. . Double sharp didn't claim it was hosted on nasa.gov ... --Roentgenium111 (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

That's interesting. I believe he was holding off naming until he had covered all the Hubble data. This suggests that either there is no P6 at Hubble detection levels, or that it's been discovered and not yet announced. — kwami (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

It has been 3 months since our report of Showalter's e-mail. The moons are still unnamed. I believe the next IAU convention is in May, so perhaps then? I know Showalter wants to name them Orpheus and Eurydice. Worth noting, or should we just wait until May? 134340Goat (talk) 16:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Without a reliable source we can not mention suggested names. Besides, generally most people are publicly quiet about the names they recommend to the IAU as to make sure they do not step on any bureaucratic toes. -- Kheider (talk) 16:33, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Here's a direct quote from Showalter himself: http://news.yahoo.com/moon-pluto-hubble-telescope-spots-5th-plutonian-satellite-220000705.html 134340Goat (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * "Maybe a good name for them would be Orpheus and Eurydice" seems like a logical synthesis of reading between the lines, but does NOT directly state that those are the names that were recommended to the IAU. It may seem like I am splitting hairs, but I am just trying to think of Wikipedia's No original research/Synthesis policies. -- Kheider (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I get the feeling they'll hold off naming until New Horizons gets there so they can just name all of them at once. 134340Goat (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Good article review
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarastro1 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Poor Little Styx
No wiki-ite seems to want to take the time to update the info here with the latest from the New Horizons mission like the Charon article has been updated - guess Styx is the Rodney Dangerfield of the Pluto/Charon system, it gets no respect! — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 13:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Then you do it! This is Wikipedia after all. --JorisvS (talk) 14:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, refuse to do any more edits since they get immediately reverted usually with some idiotic comment by some wikite who obviously doesn't no squat about the subject being discussed - worked for 8 years on shuttle SRMs as lead combustion instability engineer for company only to have comments reverted on subject by a french medical student, but I do love to come every now and then and chuckle at the text and information that generally reads like some junior high term paper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What edits are you talking about? --JorisvS (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Styx (moon)


text:
Talk:Debora Cahn

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Debora Cahn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6XjARCjVO?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wga.org%2Fwga-awards%2Fprevious-nominees-winners2.aspx to http://www.wga.org/wga-awards/previous-nominees-winners2.aspx

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Debora Cahn


text:
Club Hebraica

Club Hebraica (or Hebraica) is a Brazilian-Jewish social and recreational community center. The clubs operate in a number of cities in Brazil and are deemed by its members to be important to the expression of Jewish identity. Though Hebraica clubs are found in different cities under the same name, they are operated independently. The World Jewish Congress describes the Hebraica clubs as "exclusive social clubs that are privately owned and traditionally headed by leaders of the community."

Programs
A number of programs are geared to community members who cannot afford Hebraica membership, such as food and transportation for the elderly. The clubs have youth movements and offer informal Jewish education, as well as synagogues.

Locations

 * Clube Hebraica São Paulo
 * Clube Hebraica Rio
 * Hebraica Niteroi
 * Hebraica Porto Alegre

title: Club Hebraica


text:
Electronics/KVL

Kirchoff's Voltage Law
Kirchoff's laws can be described with a sentence as, What comes in, must go out. It's that simple. You have a potential on one side of a battery, then you need the negative potential on the other side of the battery. You have a current into a junction, the same current must go out of the junction.

in a circuit

in series voltage drops and current stays constant in parallel voltage stays constant and current divides according to the resistance

voltage stays constant in parallel and current drops in p

Voltage is the potential between two charges.

The nice things about potentials is you can add or subtract them in series to make a larger or smaller potential as is commonly done in batteries.

In parallel voltage...

The flow a circuit is that of a potential drop. Electrons flow from areas of high potential to ground which is low potential. At a given place in a circuit there are numerous paths to ground. Each of them has the same voltage as they have the same potential from ground.

All the components of a circuit have resistance that acts as a potential drop.

title: Electronics/KVL


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/rootsanalysis.com

Links

 * rootsanalysis.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Additions

 * Displayed all 4 additions.


text:
Order of Chaeronea

The Order of Chaeronea was a secret society for the cultivation of a homosexual moral, ethical, cultural, and spiritual ethos. Founded by George Cecil Ives in 1897, based on his belief that homosexuals would not be accepted openly in society, the Order offered a network for underground communication.

The secret Order was named for the 338 BC battle where the Sacred Band of Thebes was ultimately defeated.

Establishment and organization
In the 1860s, the German lawyer Karl Heinrich Ulrichs may have been the first modern European to publicly declare his homosexuality. Ulrichs wrote dozens of books and pamphlets which argued that the preference for same-sex love is hereditary; therefore it should not be a crime. He introduced the word "Uranian" as a synonym for homosexual relations, and even demanded that homosexuals be granted the right to marry.

Less radical thinkers in Germany, Austria and France began to argue that same-sex attraction and relations between men were a psychological disturbance to be treated by physicians, rather than a crime to be punished by the courts. As a result, by 1876 "psychological" had become a term that Oscar Wilde and his peers used to describe anything pertaining to gay sex. At the same time, McKenna writes, "aestheticism seemed to spring to life, fully formed, towards the end of the 1870s." It was "a heady mix of art, idealism and politics, which sought to propagate a new gospel of Beauty."

In 1893, shortly after meeting Wilde, George Cecil Ives, a friend of Wilde's whose diaries contain many new details of the writer's life, founded a secret society called the Order of Chaeronea, aimed at promoting 'the Cause'. The society was named "after the battle where the male lovers of the Theban Band were slaughtered in 338 BC." Ives and other members dated letters and other materials from the year of the battle, so that 1900 would be written as C.2238.

The 'Rules of Purpose' stated that the Order was to be 'A Religion, A Theory of Life, and Ideal of Duty', although its purpose was primarily political. Members of the Order were 'Brothers of the Faith', and were required to swear under the 'Service of Initiation', that "you will never vex or persecute lovers" and "That all real love shall be to you as sanctuary."

The group was male dominated, but did include a few lesbian members.

At its peak 'the Elect' numbered perhaps two or three hundred, but no membership lists survive. Oscar Wilde was, however, probably an early recruit, along with Lord Alfred Douglas "Bosie". Other members may have included Charles Kains Jackson, Samuel Elsworth Cottam, Montague Summers, and John Gambril Nicholson.

An elaborate system of rituals, ceremonies, a service of initiation, seals, codes, and passwords were established. The Order, according to Ives' notebooks, had a specific purpose, distinct prescriptions and philosophy, and its particular symbolism: the "sign-word" AMRRHAO and "the seal of the double wreath." The prerequisites of membership were indicated to be "Zeal, Learning and Discipline." The principle of secrecy was conveyed by the metaphor of "The Chain" underlining that one should never reveal any information about the order or its members. The writings of Walt Whitman were particularly revered.

Ives was keen to stress that the Order was to be an ascetic movement, not to be used as a forum for men to meet men for sex, although he accepted a degree of 'passionate sensuality' could take place. He also believed that love and sex between men was a way to undermine the rigid class system, as a true form of democracy. The Secret Society became a worldwide organisation, and Ives took advantage of every opportunity to spread the word about the "Cause."

In Ives' words: "We believe in the glory of passion. We believe in the inspiration of emotion. We believe in the holiness of love. Now some in the world without have been asking as to our faith, and mostly we find that we have no answer for them. Scoffers there be, to whom we need not reply, and foolish ones to whom our words would convey no meaning. For what are words? Symbols of kindred comprehended conceptions, and like makes appeal to like."

title: Order of Chaeronea


text:
Talk:A History of Japan: From Mythology to Nationhood

Renamed Pages
I have moved pages to the state they used to be in as the book was nearing completion until everything was moved around and made unreadable.


text:
Comandante Sampaio (CPTM)

Comandante Sampaio is a rail station belonging to ViaMobilidade Line 8-Diamond, located in the city of Osasco, in the Km 18 borough.

History
Opened on 12 October 1946 by Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana, the station had two official names: General Sampaio and Comandante Sampaio, both in tribute to General Antônio de Sampaio, hero of the Paraguayan War and patron of the infantry of the Brazilian Army, being the 2nd second name who prevailed.

The original station was built where the current Viaduct Presidente Tancredo Neves is located, in 1986. In 1971, Ferrovia Paulista S/A (FEPASA) absorbed EFS, and remodeled the West Line, and Comandante Sampaio station was rebuilt on 25 January 1979. Besides FEPASA had expropriated an area in front of the main access of the station for the construction of a bus terminal, the work wasn't executed and the area became a car park.

In 1996, CPTM assumed the operation of the station and the line.

Project
Between November 2004 and March 2005, CPTM published bidding no.<PHONE_NUMBER>, aiming the modernization of 12 station, divided in 6 lots. Station Comandante Sampaio was part of Lot 1, along with station Domingos de Moraes. This lot was won by Sistema Pri/Engecorps Consortium by the value of R$ 492,852.00 (US$ 0 in 2018).

The architectural project of remodeling was made between 2005 and 2007 by Escritório N&W Arquitetos, of Nelson Andrade and Wilson Edson Jorge. Besides it was concluded, no construction works was hired until this time.

title: Comandante Sampaio (CPTM)


text:
Alexandra Emilianov

Alexandra "Sasha" Emilianov (born 19 September 1999) is a Moldovan female discus thrower, who won an individual gold medal at the 2015 Youth World Championships and at the 2018 IAAF World U20 Championships.

title: Alexandra Emilianov


text:
Shrewsbury–Lansdowne I-44 station

Shrewsbury–Lansdowne I-44 station is a light rail station on the Blue Line of the St. Louis MetroLink system. This station is located on an embankment near Lansdowne Avenue and River Des Peres Boulevard in St. Louis near its boundary with Shrewsbury in St. Louis County. The city limits between the two communities runs through the northern portion of the 800 space park and ride lot.

The station is also a large MetroBus transfer and is equipped with a kiss and ride area and 25 long term spaces.

Station layout
The station has an island platform that is accessed by a staircase and switchback ramp on the north end of the platform and an elevator and another staircase on the south end.

Public artwork
In 2006, Metro's Arts in Transit program commissioned the sculpture Aquilone by Doug Hollis for installation on the embankment next to the station. The steel and aluminum sculptures are composed of tetrahedral wind-vanes that frame smaller, perforated wind sails that rotate independently, animating the entire surface. The whole piece turns into the wind as the nine sculptures dance with each other.

In 2014, the Arts in Transit program commissioned a second sculpture for the station by artist Ben Fehrmann called London. It's made out of 900, 13-foot tall stainless steel rods and was placed in the station's passenger plaza.

Notable places nearby

 * River Des Peres Greenway
 * River Des Peres Park
 * Ted Drews Frozen Custard

Previous extension proposal
The platform at this station is designed to accommodate a future extension, either via the River Des Peres to the southeast or more southerly toward South County Center. Called MetroSouth, this extension was originally Segment 2 of the Cross County corridor. Currently, there are no plans to advance studies on this alignment as the region focuses on a route within the city of St. Louis that would run primarily on Jefferson and Natural Bridge avenues.

title: Shrewsbury–Lansdowne I-44 station


text:
El Señor de los Cielos season 1

The first season of the American television series El Señor de los Cielos, was developed by Telemundo, it premiered on April 15, 2013 and ended on August 5, 2013. The Show was broadcast from Monday to Friday in the time of 10 pm/9c. The season consisted of 74 episodes and it premiered with a total of 2.34 million viewers and ended with a total of 3.62 million viewers becoming the most watched series on Telemundo.

The season is starred by Rafael Amaya as Aurelio Casillas – A drug lord who is recognized for knowing how to transfer drug substances to Mexico, Colombia, and the United States, along with Ximena Herrera, Robinson Díaz, Raúl Méndez and Gabriel Porras.

Plot
The season follows the life of Aurelio Casillas (Rafael Amaya), a drug lord who is recognized for knowing how to transfer drug substances to Mexico, Colombia, and the United States. Aurelio and his wife Ximena (Ximena Herrera) have three children, Rutila (Carmen Aub), Heriberto (Ruy Senderos), and Luz Marina (Gala Montes). He also has his faithful brother Chacorta (Raúl Méndez) who helps him in all his illicit businesses. Aurelio would end up being cornered by the authorities after being found as he decides to undergo a face operation in which he supposedly dies, thus causing his empire of power to fall.

Main

 * Rafael Amaya as Aurelio Casillas
 * Ximena Herrera as Ximena Letrán
 * Robinson Díaz as Miltón Jiménez / El Cabo
 * Raúl Méndez as Víctor Casillas / Chacorta
 * Gabriel Porras as Marco Mejía

Recurring

 * Andrés Parra as Pablo Escobar
 * Carmen Villalobos as Leonor Ballesteros
 * Fernanda Castillo as Mónica Robles
 * Sara Corrales as Matilde Rojas
 * Fernando Solórzano as Óscar Cadena
 * Arturo Barba as Alí Benjumea / El Turco
 * Lisa Owen as Doña Alba Casillas
 * Juan Ríos Cantú as General Daniel Jiménez Arroyo / El Letrudo
 * Angélica Celaya as Eugenia Casas
 * Marco Pérez as Guadalupe Robles
 * Tommy Vásquez as Álvaro José Pérez / El Tijeras
 * Fabián Peña as Jesús Linares
 * Emmanuel Orenday as Gregorio Ponte
 * Ruy Senderos as Heriberto Casillas
 * Bianca Calderón as Roxana Mondragón
 * Ángel Cerlo as General Castro
 * Arnoldo Picazzo as Flavio Huerta
 * Juan Ignacio Aranda as Ramiro Silva de la Garza
 * Jorge Zárate as Juan Montoya
 * Javier Díaz Dueñas as Don Anacleto "Cleto" Letrán
 * Rodrigo Abed as César Silva de la Garza, President of Mexico
 * Roberto Uscanga as Arturo Benitez, later becomes President of Mexico

 * Terina Suarez Murias as Rutila Casillas

title: El Señor de los Cielos season 1


text:
User:BKalesti

User: BKalesti
Hello! I am very familiar with wikipedia, but I have recently started helping out in Wiktionary.

Words I have added

 * whitten (note: In October of 2007, I was not a member yet, hence the anonymous nature.)

title: User:BKalesti


text:
naer

Etymology
From, from (compare 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬), from , from. Compare 🇨🇬. Related to,.

Noun

 * 1)  snake

Etymology
From. Related to 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬 and 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1) a laugh
 * 2) laughter

title: naer


text:
User:Aq0sw9de8fr7/sandbox

Clemence Sophia Harned Lozier
Clemence Sophia Harned Lozier was an American physician, advocate, educator, and suffragist. She was among the first women to attend medical school, and began a successful private practice in New York. She began teaching classes from her home on women's hygiene and health, and due to popular demand, decided to open a women's medical college with the help of her good friend Elizabeth Cady Stanton. In 1863, she founded the New York Medical College and Hospital for Women, the first medical college for women. Lozier specialized in obstetrics and gynaecology, and the hospital she founded was the first place women could be treated by female physicians. In addition to her medical contributions, Lozier also strove to improve the lives of marginalized groups through her many leadership positions in groups advocating for social reform like the Women's Christian Temperance Union, National Woman Suffrage Association, Universal Peace Union, New York Abolitionists' Reunion, and Moral Education Society among others.

Early Life
Clemence Sophia Harned, daughter of farmer David Harned and Hannah Walker Harned, was born on December 11, 1812 in Plainfield, New Jersey. Growing up, she observed her mother treating the sick with traditional medicine she learned from Native Americans. Witnessing her physician brother and mother help patients exposed her to medicine at an early age. She was the youngest of 13 children, and was orphaned at 11 years old. She then finished her schooling at Plainfield Academy.

At age 17, she was married to Abraham Witton Lozier, an architect many years her senior. Both her father and husband were dedicated members to the Methodist Church, and she herself felt Methodism built women up and allowed for differences in opinion. When her husband's health began to fail, Clemence started to study physiology, and in 1832 began teaching classes from her home to educate girls in anatomy, physiology, and hygeine. At the time, these topics were not included in women's education, and her classes quickly expanded. Among other topics, she educated women on the physiological consequences of fashion, like the deformities and breathing problems caused by corsets. She continued to teach these classes until 1843.

Soon after, she moved to New York and continued giving lectures and visiting the sick. Widowed by her first husband in 1837, she went on to marry John Baker in New York. The marriage eventually ended in divorce, but little is known about what happened between the two.

Education
She attended Plainfield Academy and learned about medicine from her mother and brother as well as from caring for her ill husband. She wished to attend medical school, but women were not attended at the time, so her brother continued to tutor her. She continued to apply to medical schools and experienced a lot of rejection, even from Geneva Medical College which was attended by Elizabeth Blackwell. Eventually, she was allowed to attend classes at Central New York College of Rochester in 1849, and was later admitted to Syracuse Eclectic College. She graduated top her class in 1853 and dedicated herself to the teachings of Samuel Hahnemann and the new homeophathic movement in medicine.

Medical Career
After graduating from medical school, Lozier began a private practice that focused on homeopathic treatments. She specialized in obstetrics and gynecology, but was also renowned for her surgical skills, especially the removal of tumors. Her practice became very successful and returned over $25,000 annually. She believed that women were better suited to become physicians due to the natural instinct and aptitude of their sex. She specifically advocated for more female obstetricians, citing her own large patient list as evidence of patient preferences--she would often see 50 patients a day.

From 1860 to 1863 she taught private lectures in her home, which led to the formation of "A Ladies' Medical Association". Due to increasing enrollment, she collaborated with her friend Elizabeth Cady Stanton to petition for a charter for a women's medical college. In 1863, she founded the New York Medical College and Hospital for Women, the first medical college for women. She was president of the College and taught diseases of women and children. During its first year, seven female students were enrolled and taught by four male and four female physicians. For seven years, Lozier supported the college with her own income, and donated $10,000 in lump sum. After the Civil War, Lozier visited Europe in 1867 to observe hospitals and speak with physicians. Upon her return, she resumed teaching under the titles of dean and professor of gynecology and obstetrics. After practicing at thirty-sixth street for 11 years, shareholders and investors encouraged her to expand the Women's Medical College. However, after a large new building was purchased, the investors backed out, forcing Lozier to declare bankruptcy in 1878. . Lozier lost everything, but the college survived and she threw herself back into practicing medicine on thirty-fourth street for the next eleven years. The Women's Medical College would eventually become a part of the New York Medical College in 1918.

Advocacy
Lozier was devoted to improving the lives of others, going beyond just treating patients. She hosted Anti-Slavery Society meetings monthly at her own home, and she provided refuge for African Americans during the July Riots of 1862. She helped found the Female Guardian Society with Margaret Pryor, which visited prisons and poor areas of New York to help mistreated women and children. Her son claimed "her house was a Mecca for all reformers, and bristled like a fortress from garret to cellar with ammunitions of war--documents and pamphlets upon woman's disabilities under the law, arguments and petitions in behalf of suffrage, anti-slavery and temperance, sanitary reform, international arbitration, amelioration of the condition of the Indians, moral education, reform of prisons and insane asylums, etc."

She was a well-known suffragist at the time and was good friends with Elizabeth Cady Stanton. She fought for the rights of her female students to attend classes with men at the Bellvue Hostpital College by swaying public opinion during public meetings. She further fought for women's rights in the courtroom and successfully advocated for the release of Hester Vaughan who had been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death for infanticide. Additionally, she fought for women's right to vote. When Susan B. Anthony was sentenced for voting, she called a public meeting to criticize Chief Justice Hunt who sentenced her. She served as the president of many prominent organizations including the Woman's American Temperance League, the Moral Education Society of New York, the National Woman's Suffrage Association for five years, and the New York Woman's Suffrage Society from 1873 to 1886.

Organizations:
 * 1) Homeopathic County Society
 * 2) WCTU
 * 3) National Woman Suffrage Association
 * 4) NY Suffrage League
 * 5) City Ladies' Suffrage Committee
 * 6) Universal Peace Union
 * 7) NY Abolitionists' Reunion
 * 8) American Female Guardian Society
 * 9) Moral Education Society

Legacy
Lozier founded the first Medical College for women and trained over 200 female physicians. The hospital attracted over 2,000 female patients a year and was the first place a woman could be treated by a female physician, paving the way for women to regain control of childbirth. She, herself, gave birth to seven sons, but only Dr. Abraham W. Lozier survived. Nevertheless, by the time of her death, she had already inspired nine of her direct relatives to become physicians. She also increased the credibility of female physicians. Elizabeth Cady Stanton claimed "Physicians would not recognize her as a member of the profession... they tampered with her patients to see if they could find aught against her. But in spite of all the machinations of her enemies, she triumphed".

As the first woman to read a scientific paper before the New York State Medical Society, Lozier also blazed a trail for female scientists. She also advocated for the incorporation of physiology classes in schools, and preached the importance of education at meetings and in writing. One of her most well-known documents was a short pamphlet, Child-Birth Made Easy, empowering mothers with knowledge. Lozier passed away from heart troubles two days after giving the 25th commencement speech in 1888 at the College she founded.

Quotes
Her Motto: "In certilis unitas; in bublis libertas; in omnibus caritas." --in certainty, unity; in doubt, liberty in all things, charity."

"I desire to do this for the sake of the cause, for the credit of woman, when performing difficult surgery for the first time".

"I am so much indebted to my religious teachings, to an unwavering faith in a present Savior, and his constant inspiring love, that I want to tell all the world about that, and how I feel the gift of healing to be the talent committed to me by him".

"I want to live long enough to cast one vote".

title: User:Aq0sw9de8fr7/sandbox


text:
Talk:Jerome, Illinois

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jerome, Illinois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jerome, Illinois


text:
1953 Speedway Southern League

The 1953 Southern League was the second season of the regional third tier of speedway racing in the United Kingdom for Southern British teams. It was the final season before being replaced by the Southern Area League.

From the previous season, Aldershot Shots dropped out, Wolverhampton Wasps moved up and Oxford Cheetahs came down to replace them.

Summary
Rayleigh Rockets were champions for a second consecutive season whilst Cardiff Dragons withdrew mid-season. Goog Hoskin of Exeter topped the averages.

Final table
Withdrawal (Record expunged) : Cardiff Dragons

National Trophy
For the National Trophy see the 1953 Speedway National League.

Riders & final averages
Cardiff (withdrew)

 * Charlie May 9.80
 * Hugh Geddes 9.08
 * Bert Edwards 8.94
 * Frank Johnson 7.76
 * Mick Holland 7.50
 * Gerald Pugh 5.33
 * Mick Callaghan 4.52
 * Jimmy Wright 4.40
 * Kevin Hayden 4.26

Exeter

 * Goog Hoskin 10.86
 * Jack Geran 9.33
 * Don Hardy 7.96
 * Maurice Barnett 7.33
 * John Hart 7.04
 * Vic Gent 6.72
 * Neil Street 6.46
 * Johnny Sargeant 6.40
 * Charlie May 5.95
 * Bob Meyer 4.00

Ipswich

 * Bert Edwards 9.12
 * Sid Clarke 8.08
 * Jimmy Grant 7.53
 * Harold McNaughton 7.28
 * Dick Shepherd 7.08
 * Tich Read (George Snailum) 6.60
 * Nobby Stock 6.57
 * Dennis Day 6.32
 * Jim Blythe 5.71
 * Charlie Mugford 5.58
 * Doug Papworth 5.54
 * Len Silver 4.67

Oxford

 * Jim Boyd 8.70
 * Jim Gregory 8.54
 * Peter Robinson 7.38
 * Bill Kemp 6.47
 * Frank Johnson 6.29
 * Bob McFarlane 6.10
 * Bill Osborne 5.25
 * Benny King 4.66
 * Herby King 4.64
 * Frank Boyle 3.70
 * Bill Codling 3.67

Plymouth

 * Alan Smith 9.50
 * Pete Lansdale 8.56
 * Bill Thatcher 8.05
 * Len Read 6.73
 * George Wall 6.51
 * Stan Clark 4.82
 * Kevin Hayden 4.38
 * Brian Hitchcock 3.33
 * Derek Timms 3.02
 * Doug Fursey 2.80
 * Dick Harris 2.00
 * Jack Hillard 1.60

Rayleigh

 * Gerry Jackson 9.96
 * Peter Clark 9.74
 * Maury McDermott 7.92
 * Tom O'Connor 7.81
 * Les McGillivray 8.16
 * Alby Smith 6.30
 * Ron Howes 6.06
 * Frank Bettis 5.60

St Austell

 * Harold Bull 7.18
 * Jack Gates 7.18
 * Cyril Maidment 6.71
 * John Yates 6.19
 * Alf Webster 6.18
 * Ken Monk 6.14
 * Johnny Sargeant 6.05
 * Bob Duckworth 4.99
 * Graham Williams 4.47
 * Norman Street 4.30
 * Kevin Bock 3.55
 * Maury McHugh 3.26

Southampton

 * Brian McKeown 8.74
 * Ernie Rawlins 8.55
 * Hugh Geddes 7.85
 * Ernie Brecknell 7.55
 * Maury Mattingley 7.31
 * Dudley Smith 5.45
 * Mike Tamms 5.20
 * Jack Vallis 4.75
 * Brian Hanham 4.15
 * Lionel Levy 3.27

Swindon

 * Ian Williams 8.39
 * Danny Malone 8.15
 * Bob Wells 6.72
 * Ron Swaine 6.44
 * Reg Lambourne 6.17
 * Bob Jones 6.06
 * Mick Hard 5.38
 * Frank Evans 5.18
 * Gordon Leigh 4.73
 * Bill Grimes 4.57
 * Ken Wiggins 4.16

title: 1953 Speedway Southern League


text:
aikuinen

Etymology
. is a variant stem of  also seen in other dialectal words, such as  (= ) and  (=, in the expression ).

Adjective

 * 1) adult
 * 2)  dating from the time of something

Noun

 * 1) adult person

title: aikuinen


text:
catus

Etymology 1
From the, from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.

Adjective

 * 1) clever, intelligent, sagacious, clear-thinking
 * 2) cunning, crafty, sly
 * 3)  shrill, sharp, clear-sounding

Etymology 2
Alternative spelling of, possibly under the influence by folk-etymology of the above sense.

title: catus


text:
User:DevanK20000

Nane:-Devan Khandagale

City:- Ulhasnagar

Country:- India

Education:- Degree college

Skills:-cube solving

Interest:-programming,gamming,anime

title: User:DevanK20000


text:
KWHN-FM

KWHN-FM was a radio station at 105.5 FM in Haynesville, Louisiana, with transmitter located in Columbia County, Arkansas. The station broadcast between 1984 and 1998.

History
On November 3, 1981, J.P. Robillard and his Ladybug Broadcasting Company, owners of KLUV (1580 AM), were granted a construction permit to build a sister FM station in Haynesville. The station signed on the air as KLVU-FM in 1984, after the stations engaged in a call letter swap with Dallas radio station KLVU, which became KLUV. The station offered an easy listening format when it launched that September.

In 1990, KLVU-AM-FM was sold for $200,000 to the Hawkins Broadcasting Company, headed by Ray Hawkins. Hawkins owned WWHN in the Chicago area, and the proceeds from the operation of WWHN subsidized the acquisition of the stations in Shreveport. Hawkins returned the FM station to air as urban contemporary KWHN-FM in 1991, giving KMJJ-FM its first competition in the format, though the station was a rimshot with a poor signal in Shreveport proper.

The station had its FCC license deleted in 1998 for failure to renew.

title: KWHN-FM