text:
All About Eve (album)

All About Eve is the self-titled debut album of All About Eve. Commercially, this was their most successful, reaching No. 7 in the UK charts and spawning four Top 40 singles (one of which went top 10). Most of the album was produced by Paul Samwell-Smith.

Release
Some of the earlier cassette versions of the album had the album title Flowers in Our Hair printed on both sides of the tape, instead of All About Eve.

Although drummer Mark Price was a full-time member of the band when this album was completed, he was not present for all of its recording. Some songs feature Mick Brown, on loan from The Mission, one features session drummer Greg Brimstone, and one features a drum machine.

The album spent 29 weeks in the UK top 100 album charts, and is certified Gold with in excess of 100,000 units being sold.

All About Eve was bolstered by several singles preceding and following the album's February 1988 release: "In the Clouds" charted at No. 47 on the UK Singles Chart, "Wild Hearted Woman"/"Apple Tree Man" at No. 33, "Every Angel" at No. 30, "Martha's Harbour" at No. 10, and "What Kind of Fool" at No. 29. A different version of "Flowers in Our Hair" was released as a single (no chart position) under the band's own "Eden" label before they signed to Mercury and recorded this album.

In return for Julianne Regan helping out on backing vocals for The Mission's first studio album, God's Own Medicine, Wayne Hussey lent his backing vocals to the song "Shelter from the Rain". Hussey and his bandmate Simon Hinkler also produced "Lady Moonlight".

"She Moves Through the Fair" is the only non-All About Eve composition on the album, it being a traditional Irish folk song.

One of the B-sides to the single "What Kind of Fool" was "The Garden of Jane Delawney", originally by Trees.

Track listing
All songs written and composed by Tim Bricheno, Andy Cousin and Julianne Regan except where noted.

Re-issue
On 25 September 2015, the album was reissued with 12" versions of some tracks, including singles and B-sides, as part of Universal UMC "Re-presents" series.

Disc One
Re-Issues notes disc one: Tracks 1-6, 9-14, 16, 17 by Bricheno, Cousin, Regan (as on song listing [i.e., not alphabetical]). Track 7 is a traditional Irish folk song, arrangements by Bricheno, Cousin, Regan. Tracks 8 and 15 by Bricheno, Brown, Cousin, Regan.
 * 1) Flowers in Our Hair
 * 2) Gypsy Dance
 * 3) In the Clouds
 * 4) Martha's Harbour
 * 5) Every Angel
 * 6) Shelter from the Rain
 * 7) She Moves Through the Fair
 * 8) Wild Hearted Woman
 * 9) Never Promise (Anyone Forever)
 * 10) What Kind of Fool
 * 11) In the Meadow
 * 12) Our Summer (extended version)
 * 13) Flowers in Our Hair (extended version)
 * 14) In the Clouds (extended version)
 * 15) Wild Hearted Woman (extended version)
 * 16) Every Angel (extended version)
 * 17) What Kind of Fool (Autumn Rhapsody)

Disc Two
Re-issue notes disc two: Tracks 1-18 by Bricheno, Cousin, Regan. Track 19 by Bricheno, Cousin, Price, Regan; this is the original b-side version, subsequently re-recorded for the second All About Eve album, Scarlet and Other Stories. Track 20 by Bias Boshell is a Trees cover.
 * 1) Our Summer
 * 2) Lady Moonlight
 * 3) Shelter from the Rain (B-side version)
 * 4) Flowers in Our Hair (single version)
 * 5) Paradise
 * 6) Devil Woman
 * 7) Calling Your Name
 * 8) Apple Tree Man
 * 9) Like Emily
 * 10) What Kind of Fool (reprise)
 * 11) Every Angel (single version)
 * 12) Wild Flowers
 * 13) Candy Tree
 * 14) More Than This Hour
 * 15) Another Door
 * 16) In the Meadow (live)
 * 17) Never Promise (Anyone Forever) (live)
 * 18) What Kind of Fool (single version)
 * 19) Gold and Silver
 * 20) The Garden of Jane Delawney

Personnel

 * All About Eve
 * Julianne Regan - Vocals, Keyboards, Piano
 * Tim Bricheno - Guitars
 * Andy Cousin - Bass
 * Mark Price - Drums, Percussion

 * Additional personnel

 * Mick Brown - Drums
 * Greg Brimstone - Drums
 * Simon Hinkler – Keyboards
 * Wayne Hussey - Backing Vocals on "Shelter from the Rain"
 * Adam Peters – Arrange & Conductor on "What Kind of Fool"
 * Paul Samwell-Smith – Drone, Horns, Piano on "Wild Hearted Woman", Recorder, Strings
 * Ric Sanders – Violin
 * Peter-John Vettese – Keyboards

title: All About Eve (album)


text:
Bigeye tuna

The bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) is a species of true tuna of the genus Thunnus, belonging to the wider mackerel family Scombridae. In Hawaiian, it is one of two species known as ahi, the other being the yellowfin tuna. Bigeye tuna are found in the open waters of all tropical and temperate oceans, but not in the Mediterranean Sea.

Description
Bigeye tuna can grow up to 2.5 m in length. Maximum weight of individuals probably exceeds 180 kg, with the all-tackle angling record standing at 178 kg. They are large, deep-bodied, streamlined fish with large heads and eyes. The pectoral fins are very long, reaching back beyond the start of the second dorsal fin in juveniles and the space between the first and second dorsal fin in adults. They have 13 or 14 dorsal spines.

Physiology
Bigeye tuna have a unique physiology which allows them to forage in deeper colder waters and tolerate oxygen-poor waters. Bigeye tuna are reported to tolerate ambient oxygen levels of 1.0 mL/L and routinely reach depths where ambient oxygen content is below 1.5 mL/L, largely due to the presence of blood with a high oxygen affinity. Vascular counter-current heat exchangers maintain body temperatures above ambient water temperature. These heat exchangers are engaged to conserve heat in deeper colder waters and are disengaged to allow rapid warming as the tuna ascend from cold water into warmer surface waters, providing short-latency, physiological thermoregulation. The eyes of bigeye tuna are well developed and with a large spherical lens allowing their vision to function well in low light conditions.

Life history
Conventional tagging data and counts of growth increments in otoliths (ear bones) of bigeye tuna have recorded a maximum age of 16 years. Recorded lengths at which sexual maturity is attained varies geographically with a length at which 50% of fishes sampled are mature of 135 cm in the eastern Pacific Ocean and 102–105 cm in the western Pacific Ocean. This translates to an age of maturity of 2 – 4 years. Differences in methods of studies may contribute to this variability. Spawning takes place across most months of the year in tropical regions of the Pacific Ocean, becoming seasonal at higher latitudes when sea surface temperatures are above 24 °C. In the northwestern tropical Atlantic spawning occurs in June and July, and in January and February in the Gulf of Guinea, which is the only known Atlantic nursery area.

Vertical movement
Bigeye tuna undertake a distinct diel shift in vertical behaviour, generally descending at dawn to deeper, cooler waters and returning to shallower, warmer waters at dusk. During the day they can undertake vertical movements into waters of 300–500 m depth that can be as much as 20 °C cooler than surface waters. Individuals undertake thermoregulatory behaviour whilst at depth, periodically returning from deeper, cooler waters to shallower, warmer waters to re-warm. Across the Pacific Ocean the depths at which bigeye tuna spend the majority of their time during the day vary: in the eastern Pacific the majority of time is spent at 200–350 m; around Hawaii the majority of time is spent at 300–400 m and in the Coral Sea the majority of time is spent at 300–500 m. These suggest that bigeye tuna (or their prey) are tracking an optimum temperature (10-15 °C) which is shallower in the eastern Pacific Ocean than in the western Pacific Ocean. The diel shift in the vertical behaviour of bigeye tuna has been suggested to be associated with the diel migration of their prey. This is supported by the identification of a number of diurnally migrating species from the stomachs of bigeye tuna and observations of close associations between bigeye tuna and the sound scattering layer both during the day and at night.

Typical vertical behaviour of bigeye tuna shifts when fish associate with seamounts, buoys and fish aggregating devices, with individuals remaining in surface waters. Association with objects has been observed to occur over periods of approximately 10–30 days. This associative behaviour of bigeye tuna (and also other species of tuna) is taken advantage of by fisheries with approximately 27% of all catches of tunas by purse seine vessels in the western and central Pacific Ocean derived from fish aggregating devices.

Migration
Results from tagging studies show that bigeye tuna are capable of traversing ocean basins, but can also show a high degree of site fidelity to some regions. One study suggested an annual migration influenced by water temperature, specifically that near the surface. Central Pacific bigeye migrate from subtropical waters in September to tropical waters in March. The fish also briefly travel outside these thermal ranges. Other data indicate similar Pacific-wide variations.

Diet
Bigeye tuna primarily feed on epipelagic and mesopelagic fish, crustaceans and cephalopods.

Commercial fishery

Globally, approximately 450,500 metric tonnes of bigeye tuna were caught by commercial vessels in 2012. Commercial fisheries for bigeye tuna are regionally managed within the Pacific Ocean by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC). In the Indian Ocean catches are managed by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) and in the Atlantic Ocean by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). Regular stock assessments are carried out for bigeye tuna by each of the regional fisheries management organisations with bigeye tuna currently regarded as overfished in the western and central Pacific Ocean and eastern Pacific Ocean, close to or being overfished in the Atlantic Ocean and not overfished in the Indian Ocean. The majority of commercial catches across the Pacific Ocean is by purse seine fleets, while catches are dominated by longline fleets in the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. Various conservation measures have been introduced by the regional fisheries management organisations which apply to particular sized vessels and fleets and include measures such as spatial and temporal closures, trip duration limits, observer requirements and limits on catches

Threats
The bigeye tuna catch rates have also declined abruptly during the past half century, mostly due to increased industrial fisheries, with the ocean warming adding further stress to the fish species.

Research indicates that increasing ocean temperatures are taking a toll on the tuna in the Indian Ocean, where rapid warming of the ocean has resulted in a reduction of marine phytoplankton.

Conservation
Most seafood sustainability guides encourage consumption of other types of tuna. In 2010, Greenpeace International added bigeye tuna to its seafood red list. "The Greenpeace International seafood red list is a list of fish that are commonly sold in supermarkets around the world, and which have a very high risk of being sourced from unsustainable fisheries."

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Bigeye tuna


text:
User:Tlatoani7

Spanish Experience
I am a native speaker and a current Spanish Literature Major (Literatura Iberoamericana); with a particularly interested in -but, not limited to- XXth century authors.

title: User:Tlatoani7


text:
Wikibooks:Talk page

What is a talk page?
A talk page is a special page containing discussion about the contents of its associated "subject" page. To view the talk page of a module (or any other page in Wikibooks), click on the "Discuss this page" link in the sidebar or at the bottom of the screen. When you are in the talk page, clicking on "View module" will take you back to the main module.

Inevitably, there will arise situations in which collaborators on a module can benefit mutually from discussing the module--thus we have designated a namespace specifically for such discussions.

What is it used for?
On Wikibooks, the purpose of a talk page is to help to improve the contents of the main page, from an neutral point of view. Questions, challenges, excised text (due to truly egregious confusion or bias, for example), arguments relevant to changing the text, and commentary on the main page is all fair play.

Wikibooks is not a soapbox, it's a collection of non-fiction books. In other words, talk about the module, not about the subject. It's only the habits we encourage that keeps Wikibooks from turning into another H2G2 or Everything2. See also: Wikipetiquette

That said, Wikibookians are fallible creatures, so it's entirely natural that a bit of partisan wrangling takes place on talk pages - and occasionally this even leads to improvements in the module! So there's a fair degree of tolerance, and most Wikibookians succumb to a bit of wrangling from time to time.

User talk pages
Your user page has a talk page as well. There is a link to it in the header next to your name (if you use a "skin" other than the default it may be somewhere else). Also, if edits are made to it by others, the text You have new messages will appear at the top of the page. These pages can be used for occasional personal communication among users; but note that these pages are public. If you want to communicate privately, use e-mail.

To write in another user's talk page, click the Discuss this page link on your sidebar when you view the user page (which you can do by clicking on a user's nickname). On the list of recent changes and on your watchlist, you can directly access a user's talk page by following the (Talk) link behind the user's name / IP address.

"Post a comment" feature
For editing a talk page, one can optionally use the "Post a comment" feature, but only for a new thread and for a reply to be put at the bottom of the last thread.

 * For a new thread, fill in the "Subject/headline" box. Then the edit summary is automatically the same as the new section header.

 * For a reply to be put at the bottom of the last thread, do not fill in the "Subject/headline" box. In this case it is not possible to supply an edit summary. Instead, edit the previous thread.

When using "Post a comment", an edit conflict is impossible. However, in the case that you are not starting a new thread but replying to an existing one, your response may be appended to a newly created post that was added while you wrote yours. It is therefore generally recommended to use section editing to respond, and "Post a comment" to start new threads. If your comment is accidentally misplaced, just edit the page and move it.

Standards and conventions of writing and layout
A few community standards do apply to talk pages, these are not to be taken strictly as "rules" but were evolved by users to make the talk pages more useful and easier to read. Often the talk pages of controversial topics can be very heavily used.

 * Sign your posts: To sign a post, type three tildes, and they will be replaced with your username after saving, like this: Karl Wick. Type four tildes ( ~ ), and they will be replaced with your username and time stamp, like this: Karl Wick 03:44 Jul 10, 2003 (UTC). On Wikibooks we recommend that you try to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can also use a pseudonym, or just "--anon".

 * Use indenting to keep the conversation straight: The first contributor is all the way to the left, the next person starts with one colon, the next person starts with two colons.  Then, when the first contributor responds, she starts at the left margin again, and the second and third persons continue to mark themselves with one and two colons respectively,  In that way, who is saying what is clear.

 * Separate discussion topics: Put each new topic under a different headline ( == Subject == ). The "Post a comment" feature accomplishes this automatically when you enter a subject line. The edit summary is automatically the same as this header. Thus every thread is a section. This allows section editing of the thread in question. You can also use horizontal lines, although some users strongly dislike them.

 * Proceed vertically: The further down the contribution to talk, the later it was made.

 * Feel free to ignore typographical conventions: Do as you please to make your points clear.  The Manual of Style is for just modules and Wikibooks.

 * Make links freely: Links to modules are as useful on talk pages as anywhere else, and links to non-existent modules can help get them onto the most wanted pages list.

 * Don't edit other people's words: Please don't ever do this (except for obvious typing errors) but editing or deleting your own words is up to you.  (but contrast this with suggestions on refactoring below - this could be considered a simplistic approach)

 * Archive rather than delete: When a talk page's content has become extremely large or the discussion of the issue in hand has simply died down and no one has a reasonable chance of adding to it. Then create a new page. (See Help:How to contribute for details.) Place the page in a talk or Wikibooks namespace. Give it an explanatory name. Often people simply add "archive" to the original name. Explain on the archive page where the text you plan to archive will come from and provide a link. Cut the relevant content from the original page and paste it into the new page. Replace the text on the original page with a link to the archive.

 * Summarize discussion (or refactor): After a discussion on a page has died down for several weeks or the discussion has become heated and long, you (if you can be smart and respectful at the same time) might replace the discussion with a summary of major points, as though you were (!) writing an encyclopedia module about the discussion. If the discussion entailed opposing arguments, present the arguments from an unbiased point of view. Where possible, distinguish the common ground from the points of contention. See Refactoring talk pages below.

 * Keep to the topic: Not layout, but worth keeping in mind.  Talk page discussions can be much more humorous and POV than the typical module, but personal attacks don't do much to make modules better.

Example
This module is great. mav 18:20 Jul 30, 2003 (UTC)

 * No it isn't! --fish

 * Yes it is! --wojahowicz

 * I was talking to mav! --fish

 * Now, now. Toby Bartels

- Need this more?

We need a module on kindness more than we need this mess. --Alfred the butler

 * Yeah, but what about rubber baby buggy bumpers? -- Comissioner gordon

Refactoring talk pages
from editing policy

A point of terminology: the notion of refactoring, in the context of a wiki, means basically cleaning up and reorganizing a page such that all the useful information on the page is preserved and made more accessible. It's relatively rare that one needs to entirely refactor a Wikibooks module--usually, edits and additions are what is necessary.

The purpose of talk pages is to assist in creating better modules. Therefore, the purpose of refactoring talk page discussions is to help create good textbook modules, at least in the long run. A short-run purpose is to channel a discussion in a useful direction, that is, to help aim it at the future time when it can be used in an textbook module.

There are a number of talk or other discussion oriented pages which could use a bit of traditional Wiki refactoring. There's useful content there, sometimes, that can be transferred to the module itself. Sometimes large chunks of old talk pages can be completely wiped out with no harm done--feel free to do so, unless you think there's some value in preserving the discussion. In refactoring a talk page, one solid recommendation is to use the traditional wiki refactoring technique of adding a summary with whatever consensus we've arrived at the top, grouping separate discussion items together, and placing them towards the bottom.

da:Hjælp:Hvordan bruger jeg diskussionssiderne

title: Wikibooks:Talk page


text:
Airports Company South Africa

Airports Company of South Africa Limited (ACSA) is a [https://www.airports.co.za/about-us/airports-company/company-profile#:~:text=Our%20diverse%20shareholders%20include%20the,staff%20sha%20re%20incentive%20scheme. majority] (94.6%) state-owned South African airport management company. Founded in 1993, ACSA operates nine of South Africa's airports. The company is headquartered at Aviation Park, Western Precinct Building, situated at O.R. Tambo International Airport in Kempton Park, Gauteng, South Africa.

History
All of South Africa's airports used to be owned and operated by the state until 23 July 1993, when nine airports were reassigned to ACSA. ACSA was then owned by the South African Government through the Department of Transport.

In 1998, Aeroporti di Roma bought 20% of ACSA's shares for R819 million. In 2005, the Public Investment Corporation, bought the 20% shares back from the Italian group.

In 2006, ACSA was part of a consortium that won the bid to manage the Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport in Mumbai, India.

In 2012, ACSA signed a 20-year concession agreement to manage the São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport in Brazil, a strategic alliance between two countries that organized the soccer world cup in recent years. The deal was signed through a consortium including Brazil's Invepar for 51% of the concession and at a cost of $9.2 billion.

In May 2016, ACSA finished installing a solar power plant near the Kimberley Airport as part of a broader plan to install solar farms in all of its regional airports.

Airports
The following international airports are operated by ACSA:
 * O.R. Tambo International Airport
 * Cape Town International Airport
 * King Shaka International Airport
 * Bram Fischer International Airport
 * Upington International Airport
 * Chief Dawid Stuurman International Airport
 * São Paulo Guarulhos International Airport, Brazil
 * Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, Mumbai, India (consortium with Bidvest and Airports Authority of India)

The following local airports are operated by ACSA:
 * King Phalo Airport
 * George Airport
 * Kimberley Airport
 * Mthatha Airport

Armed cash heist at OR Tambo
On 25 March 2006 gunmen armed with AK-47s stole bags containing several million US dollars at O.R. Tambo International Airport. Three ACSA employees and six other individuals were arrested and appeared in court in connection with the heist.

title: Airports Company South Africa


text:
1909 Országos Bajnokság I (men's water polo)

1909 Országos Bajnokság I (men's water polo) was the sixth water polo championship in Hungary. There were two teams who played one match for the title.

Final list
 * M: Matches W: Win D: Drawn L: Lost G+: Goals earned G−: Goals got P: Point


text:
Talk:Ursula Andress

Infobox Photo
The Wikipedia article itself states that Ursula Andress is recognised as being "a major sex symbol of the 1960s". She should be remembered as such.

I propose that the Infobox photo, showing her to be a haggard old woman beaten by age, be deleted.

We should remember her as she was not as she is now.--<IP_ADDRESS> 10:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Does nobody actually ever read the Ursula Andress article and talk page ?

I made my proposal a month ago and not one person has come to this talk page since then ?

If nobody disagrees with me then I feel I have the right to remove the Infobox photo.

I can't believe that I am the only person who ever bothers to look at the Ursula Andress article.

--<IP_ADDRESS> 11:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I have received permission from Wikipedia Help Desk to remove the Infobox photo, see Ursula Andress Talk Page

I am therefore removing the photo. <IP_ADDRESS> 12:43, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

 * Please point to where on the Help Desk anyone "gave you permission" to emove the image? Wikipedia is not censored.  There seem to be few, if any, free images of Ms. Andress, and the image that was there is one that's available.  Your view of the image eing of someone who is "a haggard old woman beaten by age" is merely your own point of view, and somewhat ageist, at that.  I will be restoring the image until you come up with a reasonable argument as to why the image should not be there.  Corvus cornix 17:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't know why you are having a go at me. I did everything right.

 * 1) I did not act peremptorily
 * 2) I put my proposal on the Talk Page
 * 3) Not one person bothered to reply - not even you
 * 4) I gave the link showing where I got permission, above, did you not click on it ?
 * 5) You do not have the right to say you will keep on reverting. You have to abide, as I do, by the Consensus of the Wikipedia majority.

I, therefore, put my proposal again on the table again for another month - and this time, I hope people will actually bother to vote.

My own vote is - Remove.

<IP_ADDRESS> 10:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Remove - the fact that there are "few free images" of Ursula Andress should not be a factor in considering this photo. It has to be considered on its own merits. It is better to have no photo in the Infobox than this one. I want Ursula Andress remembered as the beautiful woman she was. Caprisa 10:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Remove - Remember the legend of Ursula Andress. There is a photo of a beautiful Ursula Andress with Peter Sellers in the article, that is sufficent. Tovojolo 11:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I fully agree. I therefore added a recent photo of Ursula Andress where she looks beautiful. I hope you like it. I also added some facts to her personal life.--John Jason Junior (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Biography assessment rating comment
WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 06:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

the article states that Ursula Andres is Swedish, but she was born in Switzerland and had a Swiss mother and a German father. I believe they mixed up Switzerland with Sweden — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 13:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Discussion
Ok. There is one huge problem here. The Filmography. It is verbatim to the filmography on the IMDB  or at least the first 8 listings, but have a feeling the rest follows suit. Beamer 20:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Beamer

Filmography
Neither of them included Five Against Capricorn, but Wikipedia does now!

Chris 03:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Then & Now
You seen her now? She look like a zombie!

Can we include that?

Please?--Crestville 16:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Photo
I have a photo, just unsure how to post it. It is of Ursula about 3-4 years ago and yes, she looks exquistite. Suissenut (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)suissenut
 * I do not see a single bit of logic in this conversation. This is an article of an actor, who received her only international award for her performance in the movie "Dr No" in 1962. We don't own an image from the film, so we cannot include one in the info box. Can we at least include a screenshot as a fair use image in the latter sections of the article? It does state, that the scene in "Dr No" of her emerging from the sea has been voted as the sexiest movie scene ever. The article needs a picture from the scene. Any other opinion? User:Erikupoeg
 * Then write up the fair use rationale for either this one or this one. Gimmetrow 23:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no logic in your response to my original post concerning a picture of Ms. Andress. She is known for movies other than Dr. No. Please have your facts in order before accusing another of lack of logic.Suissenut —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you took the image yourself and want to contribute it, that's great! You would use the "upload file" link from the toolbox (probably on the left of the page). You have to upload from an account (not an IP). Gimmetrow 05:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Another Marriage?
I thought I'd read at one time that the (younger) drummer from some rock group was married to her, like Bon Jovi or something. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 04:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The drummer from Bon Jovi was married to a Czech model. Ms. Andress has only been married once and that was to John Derek. Maybe you are thinking of Faye Dunaway, she was once married to the lead singer of the J. Geils Band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 02:56, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

 * Looks like she was a hooker beeing with so many gays 2600:1700:D828:E080:1CDB:5A1A:EBF9:8E34 (talk) 00:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

trivia
I'm cutting this paragraph, because it strikes me as a very minor bit of trivia, and as written it took me several re-reads just to figure out what it was saying:

 * Andress has the singular distinction among Bond girl actresses of having actually appeared in the narrative of a Fleming novel, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, written after Fleming was present during filming of Dr. No. She is pointed out to Bond by Irma Bunt while they are dining at Piz Gloria.

If it seems like it belongs somewhere, I would suggest putting it in one of the hated "Trivia" sections, and definitely re-writing it for neutrality, something like:

 * Ursual Andress in mentioned by name in the text of the Ian Fleming novel On Her Majesty's Secret Service (Fleming had been present during filming of Dr. No): She is pointed out to Bond by Irma Bunt while they are dining at Piz Gloria.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doom (talk • contribs) 01:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

an extra then?
Wasn't UA the female lead in the cowboy movie "Red Sun" with Charles Bronson or just an extra? —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It is listed as Soleil rouge, Englisht title Red Sun. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

BRD
You've now twice reverted improvements to the citations of this article: &&. You've also reverted any other tidying-up I did. I view this as disruptive and regressive, and the recent ANI thread rather went against your position. Twice. Your resistance to improving the referencing is at odds with the improving Wikipedia aspect of IAR, and the notion of avoiding proper endashes and adding useless null-sort templates to support an obsolete browser used by a minuscule and only declining number of people is simply inappropriate. This is, of course, pretty much the same issue as with Halle Berry, Uma Thurman and Miranda Kerr. I know that some folks here know and respect you, but you're new to me and all I'm really seeing from you in this area is you raising these issue regarding my editing, and not any of the myriads of other users running WP:Reflinks. Merridew 01:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Yes, this is the same issue, citation templates. Now, can you please cut the rhetoric? I'm not "resisting" your "improvements"; I disagree that cite templates are always and in all ways improvements. Enough other editors similarly disagree that this issue is even written into a guideline (WP:CITE), and I think you know that. I've tried to retain other tidying-up you do, but when you make an omnibus edit, it's possible I've missed something you consider important. If so, what is it? Gimmetoo (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Seems to me you're the strident one. This has been to ANI, what?, four times? A few editors support what you're after, but most are raining on your approach and on your singling me out for your reverts. Your mantra of maintain the status quo is at odds with the nature of a wiki, which is that things change. Time for you to drop the stick, methinks. Merridew 03:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Do you want to talk about substance and attempt to achieve resolution, or do you want to continue with the rhetoric? Gimmetoo (talk) 03:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * I expect you to stop dogging my edits and making inappropriate reverts, as many have advised you. Merridew 03:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * There's the rhetoric again, claiming I'm "dogging" your edits and the reverts are "inappropriate". At some point, that sort of repetition has to be dealt with. Objectively, your edit (which installed citation templates in this article) was not in accord with WP:CITE. Do you want to talk about that? Or would you like to discuss the table issue? (You might find we have some agreement there.) Gimmetoo (talk) 03:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * It [templates] has been talked to death, and it's getting old. I've improved these articles; you've managed to regress some of them. People see this. There is not a significant table issue; just an obsolete browser issue. We should use the endash, and sort templates on the names, as needed. Safari v4 is down to 0.7% from 0.8%, as of a month ago. Merridew 04:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 * Then what would you like to discuss? Ideas to avoid future conflicts? (If you identify that an article already has developed with cite templates [ie, has a lot of refs with nearly all using templates], then you're probably not going to get into any conflicts by adding a cite template for some urls a new editor just added.) We could also discuss the relative importance of various errors the scripts generate? Gimmetoo (talk) 04:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Accessibility and dates
The article at present has some obvious problems: I'd be happy to fix those problems, but thought I'd ask here first in case there were any serious objections that I was unaware of. --RexxS (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The filmography table lacks a caption and row headers, which would make the table more accessible to screen readers;
 * The images lack alt text, which also would benefit those using screen readers;
 * The references use a mixture of dmy and ymd date styles.
 * Feel free to add alt texts if you want. The images here are pretty stable so it's probably worth the effort. I don't understand your point about the filmography table, though: it's in a section captioned "Filmography", and all the columns have headers (year, film, role, notes). The references look to me to have consistent date styles: all the publication dates are dmy, and all the accessdates are ISO. Am I missing something? Gimmetoo (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and added alt text to the two images. Hopefully it reads well in conjunction with the relevant captions, but please feel free to improve it.
 * For a visually-impaired reader to make full use of their screen reader, it is necessary to have row headers as well. This allows them to navigate a table in a non-linear way if desired, with the screen reader announcing the column and row header for each data cell. The guidance is at Manual of Style (accessibility) and a tutorial is available at Manual of Style (accessibility)/Data tables tutorial. Not all tables can be made accessible in this way, but in this article the name of the film is the identifier for each row, and should be the row header. A proper caption would give a blind user a much better idea of what they were about to hear, and help them make sense of the following stream of information.
 * Consensus was reached at Manual of Style (dates and numbers) that "Dates in article references should all have the same format".
 * I know these are relatively recent developments, so not everyone is aware of them. I hope that answers your questions. --RexxS (talk) 16:46, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The dates in the references do all have the same format: all the publication dates are dmy, and all the accessdates are iso. Right? Gimmetoo (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not really what "all" means is it? --RexxS (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * All the references use the dates in a consistent way. Are you really saying there's a "style issue" about distinguishing publication and accessdates that needs fixing? Gimmetoo (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Manual of Style (dates and numbers) has this sub-section:
 * Format consistency
 * Dates in article body text should all have the same format.
 * Dates in article references should all have the same format.
 * These requirements apply to dates in general prose and reference citations, but not to dates in quotations or titles.
 * It was arrived at as a compromise from requiring all dates in an article to have the same format. I don't know how you can read the section in the way you seem to be doing. --RexxS (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:MOSDATE also says "If an article has been stable in a given style, it should not be converted without a style-independent reason". So again I ask, is there a problem that needs fixing? Gimmetoo (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The previous line of MOSDATE says "Consistent standards make articles easier to read, write, and edit. Where this manual provides options, consistency should be maintained within an article, unless there is a good reason to do otherwise." You'll also note that the line you quoted uses "a given style" (singular), not "styles" (plural). I'll ask then, is there a good reason why you want to retain a mixture of two different styles in the references? --RexxS (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It is one style, a style that happens to use different formats to distinguish two symantically-different classes of dates. Is this a problem that needs fixing? Gimmetoo (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Since each so-called "format" is a "style" as defined in MOSDATE, the article breaches our guideline without good reason. There's no exception for "symantically-different classes of dates". So yes, there's the problem – will you fix it it shall I? --RexxS (talk) 17:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Neither. Even if it were conceded to breach one part of the MOS, changing it would breach another part of the guideline, and would also be removing contextual information. Gimmetoo (talk) 01:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * So, you are absolutely adamant that the use of two different styles in the references does not breach the Format consistency guideline, and that you oppose my suggestion that they should be made consistent. --RexxS (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No, that's not what I said, and given our past history, I don't perceive your rhetoric as particularly helpful or civl. Gimmetoo (talk) 03:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Then I'm at a loss to see what your objection is to making the references compliant with the Format consistency guideline, which is quite unambivalent, in my opinion. Your perception of my attempts to understand why you want to keep two different styles of dates in the references is irrelevant. Perhaps it's time to get other opinions as we've reached the point where you are preferring to comment on me, rather than the edits I am proposing. Thanks for asking at WT:MOSDATE; I'll chip in with my perspective in a while. --RexxS (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:MOSDATE. About the table. Although I don't like the film title first, since nearly every filmography table on Wiki has/had year first, imdb does it that way now, so it's probably worth discussing. Nevertheless, bolding the film titles does not look right. Is there a way to do what you want without the titles appearing in bold? Also, the duplicate caption is odd-looking. Is there a reason a screen reader won't understand the section heading "Filmography"? Gimmetoo (talk) 14:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it's possible the table with the title in the first column might grow on you. The visual presentation is, of course, merely an editor's preference. I would certainly agree with you that any change simply for that reason should not be made. However, when you consider how the table may be read to a visually impaired user, there's a big difference. Many screen readers allow the user to navigate around the cells of the table in a non-linear fashion, and can be set to announce the row and column headers before the cell data. So if they arrived at the cell containing 'Honey Ryder', the table as it stands might be read as "Dr. No, Role, Honey Ryder" – wouldn't you agree that's much more useful than "1962, Role, Honey Ryder", especially for those filmographies where an actor has made several films in one year? The key point is that the film title identifies what the rest of the row is about, so it is a much better choice for a row header. IMDB, like all major websites, is having to take the issues of accessibility seriously, and I'd hazard a guess that that may be a factor in their change of format. I expect that wikiprojects will gradually come to accept that there is a good reason to alter their preferred style (as an example, WP:WikiProject Discographies is in the process of bringing their tables into line with accessibility guidelines). Like you, I prefer not to see different formats across similar articles, so I hope the transition goes quickly, particularly as it will widen the benefit for the visually-impaired.
 * I fully accept that the bold first column doesn't look right to you, and it could be corrected with inline syles (style="font-weight:normal;"). However, there probably isn't anything intrinsically wrong with bold film titles, so I'd suggest that making that determination could be postponed until the relevant WikiProjects discuss what guidance they want to give in order to improve table accessibility (are there more projects than just James Bond that are in scope here?).
 * As for the caption, the screen reader would announce "Filmography", and it's a bit of a judgement call whether a blind user would already be familiar enough with fimographies that they would expect a table containing the given information. I'd prefer to err on the safe side and give them some idea about what the data stream is going to contain before they actually hear it. Possibly "Sortable table of films, years and roles" would be more helpful, I don't know. We could always ask User:Graham87 for advice, as he uses JAWS, and feedback would be useful. --RexxS (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If "Filmography" is not sufficiently descriptive, then we should be using something else for the section caption. Bolding the film titles doesn't look right, especially for redlinks and non-links, and it's arguably contrary to MOSBOLD. Also, isn't "scope=col" automatic with a column header? If it's not, it should be, rather than done with inline code, no? Gimmetoo (talk) 04:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The function of the section title is to create semantic markup giving structure to the document, as well as creating an anchor for navigation via the TOC. Simpler is usually better for that. A second level section could contain more than a table/list of works and ought to be descriptive of potentially the whole section, so it is not a synonym for the table caption. The purpose of a table caption is to provide an identifier for the table, as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/H39.html, and in the absence of a summary element can provide a screen reader with meaningful information.
 * If you don't like the bold row headers, there are several choices:
 * apply an inline style;
 * make a case at MediaWiki talk:Common.css to make them normal weight by default (as we did in order to get them left-aligned);
 * make the corresponding change in your own css page for the skin you use;
 * change to a different browser which does not make table headers bold by default.
 * MOS:BOLD specifically states that boldface is used for table headers, but I suppose you could argue that it only meant column headers.
 * The purpose of 'scope="col"' is to clarify the scope of the TH element, and becomes more useful as the complexity of tables increases (although very complex tables really require ids and the 'headers' element). It is indeed optional in simple tables, if we assume that all screen reader agents are conformant with WCAG. Our current guideline for editors is to always include scope with a header. I believe that is because it is an easier standard to adhere to. The guidance is at Manual of Style (accessibility)/Data tables tutorial and you could suggest improvements at the talk page there. I agree it would be preferable to have the scope of each header automatically determined, but it appears that is not always possible, otherwise 'scope="col"' would not exist. --RexxS (talk) 06:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks like the MOSDATE discussion resulted in "meh". Now, what can be done about the table? The table caption still appears redundant, and what would it sound like without "scope=row"? Gimmetoo (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I got the impression that the MOSDATE discussion indicated that ISO dates were discouraged other than where space was a premium, but that changing them to "plain English" wasn't much of a priority. I disagree that the table caption is redundant for the reasons I gave above. What it would sound like without scope attributes would depend on the screen reader used. Perhaps you should ask for other opinions on captions and scope attributes at WT:Manual of Style (accessibility) or WT:WikiProject Accessibility – or ask user:Graham87, a well-respected editor who is blind and uses JAWS? --RexxS (talk) 02:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see the second table caption adding anything yet, except redundancy, and the bolding still looks bad. I also notice that the table no longer sorts correctly. Are you going to do anything about any of this? Gimmetoo (talk) 16:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What did you mean by the "second table caption"? I only see one table and one caption in my browser. I quite like the bolding, but apart from the evils of inline styles, there's little reason why you shouldn't add normal font weight style to each cell – after all, the display is merely a matter of personal preference. You'll recognise that when the hyphen in the date range was changed today to an endash (per MOS:DASH), it broke the sorting for Safari 4 users. It still sorts correctly for the other 99% of viewers, but if you feel strongly that we want to cover everybody, I'd be happy to add a sort key for each date in the column. --RexxS (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There are two captions - one is "Filmography". Now, given two options for the sorting issue, adding a ton of sort keys, or using a hyphen in one date range, what makes more sense to you? I think a hyphen has enough advantages to warrant IARing MOS:DASH in this instance. I can see some justification for the scope tags, but adding them shouldn't create such a substantial visual change; that begs adding more inline tags to reverse some of its effects. And that sets up another "revolution" in table format a few months down the road. Gimmetoo (talk) 01:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Filmography is the level two section header, not a caption – as I explained earlier. The most sense for me would be accept that the sorting isn't going to work for a vanishingly small number of readers, but I can see that IARing the MOS is a valid argument. Unfortunately that leads to the problem that multiple users, scripts and bots are not going to be aware of the IAR, and will simply put the endash back, leaving you with the unenviable task of making the same case to every one of them. I'd rather spare you the anguish and use sort keys if you insist that the sort has to work for every browser. The scope attributes have no intrinsic effect on the visual presentation (apart from the CSS3 selector rule we incorporated into Common.css). It's the '!' wiki-markup, which generates a semantically correct  tag for the cell, that your browser displays as bold by default. I'd also prefer not to add inline styles to over-ride that browser behaviour simply to satisfy a personal preference for visual presentation. Nevertheless I'd accept that others may be so used to normal font weight for those cells that they would wish to add those styles. As I said earlier, it might be worth waiting to see if the WikProjects that use filmography and similar tables reach a consensus on how they want to implement compliance with WP:Accessibility. --RexxS (talk) 04:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The section header identifies what is in the section. For this section, that's a table. Surely you can see how adding another caption to the table could be viewed as redundant? There are other solutions for the sorting; I've tried another idea which I will have to check later. Finally, I had not noticed the ! symbol was added. Gimmetoo (talk) 10:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The section heading and captions are two distinct elements, as Ralph has been saying. Explicit caption on tables is proper form and most should sport one. Jack Merridew 10:58, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You are now edit-warring, Merridew. Can you suggest anything contructive, ie that doesn't involve doing everything exactly as you want? Gimmetoo (talk) 11:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You could stop harassing my edits; *that* would be constructive. Jack Merridew 11:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please demonstrate what you just said, or refactor. You have not been involved in this discussion. Why did you suddenly get involved? Gimmetoo (talk) 11:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * See the various comments people have made about your approach to me. I've been reading the above and have this page watched. I watch everything. I fix bad edits. Simple. FWIW, I believe the scope attributes should somehow generated, not hard-coded; didn't you advocate that, somewhere? Jack Merridew 11:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I am again asking you to refactor your statement, a statement I perceive as a personal attack. Gimmetoo (talk) 11:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * it's what's going on here. Jack Merridew 11:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

RexxS, it appears that the table will need inline font-normal weighting and sort keys, as you suggest. I regretfully agree to go with that, since other attempts at solution are getting rejected out of hand. Likewise, I suggest you (RexxS) handle the implementation of the inline code and sort keys. Gimmetoo (talk) 11:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

 * teh bold is standard on headings and inline-styling to defeat it is inappropriate; and the sort keys are unwarranted for dead browsers. Jack Merridew 11:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

 * I've returned the table to a version that has marked-up row headers, which usefully identify the topic of the row (the film title) for screen readers. I hope that won't be controversial, as it is mandated at WP:ACCESS. I've also restored the "1987 to 1988" format for the date range, as I can't see that producing any problems for any browser. When Safari 4 becomes completely obsolete, I'm sure there will be no problem in using the MOS-compliant "1987–1988". In the meantime, I'd suggest that we've already fell out too much over that detail, and our time would really be better spent working together where we can make improvements, now that we have the "plainrowheaders" class. Peace. --RexxS (talk) 19:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You have not replied here for over a week. You have reverted to a disputed "sandbox" version. The "plainrowheaders" doesn't seem to do anything, and the revert restored the duplicate header, and also leaves the film in the first column, which you have expliclty said is not required for accessibility. These are much the same concerns currently being discussed among the editors involved with featured lists. You do not need to use this article to sandbox disputed edits. Gimmetoo (talk) 19:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought you were reasonably content with the version you committed on 30 October. The only differences I see with the current version are: (1) the 30 Oct version has centred film titles, while the latest version has them left-aligned; (2) the 30 Oct version has combined the caption into the section header, while the current has them separate.
 * With the best will in the world, I don't see those as worthy of trying out in a sandbox. I don't think anybody would want centred titles, and the heading/caption is a topic worthy of discussion. My preference is to keep them separate, as they can have different uses. --RexxS (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The titles were not centered at that point. Something got changed in the CSS, no? With the guidelines (and CSS?) in a state of flux, do you think should be in live articles? Gimmetoo (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Despite what I understood as consensus above,"I've also restored the "1987 to 1988" format for the date range, as I can't see that producing any problems for any browser", an IP with apparent prior history on this point has chosen to edit-war contrary to this consensus and has not discussed the issue here. Gimmetoo (talk) 13:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Rolf
I strongly suspect that Rolf was a Nazi. Has any one any details about his expulsion from Switzerland and alleged disappearance? —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The source mentioned does not mention the vanishing directly, only the expulsion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Movie - Casino Royale
'Sure it was with David Niven in the 1967 James Bond Casino Royale spoof - not Peter Sellers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 15:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ursula Andress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216074258/http://www.srf.ch/player/tv/10vor10/video/happy-birthday-ursula-andress?id=6b52dc71-9c72-4489-80f7-21a0861f55de to http://www.srf.ch/player/tv/10vor10/video/happy-birthday-ursula-andress?id=6b52dc71-9c72-4489-80f7-21a0861f55de

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ursula Andress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713145625/http://www.goldenglobes.org/browse/member/30387 to http://www.goldenglobes.org/browse/member/30387

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Photograph
Is that photo of her disrobing really necessary? It seems inappropriate,to say the very least. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Ursula Andress


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Central Modern School

The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and the absence of calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

The Central Modern School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I cleaned up the page to remove unencyclopedic information. All remaining data is unreferenced and does not address notability standards Metao (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Secondary schools are generally considered notable. School obviously exists. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Keep – Per Notability (high schools) and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verified secondary schools are generally held to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * KeepThe school obviously meets Notability (high schools).Also i have added some links on the article given by Colapeninsula and a few more.Ayanosh (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * , you just cited an essay as if it were a guideline. If you weren't aware of that, please make yourself aware by reading something before you cite it.  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  18:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I had read the essay ,I did not know that you can not use them in a discussion. since they "represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints".Thank you for pointing out out the mistake.But still the school meets WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Ayanosh (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You can use them in a discussion. You just have to be aware that they don't have equal status to guidelines. They're still valuable pointers to usage on Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Keep - We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian schools because, unlike US schools, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this school cannot meet notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would suggest that the merge proposal at Talk:Barasat is also flawed. Experience shows that a standalone page encourages article development. TerriersFan (talk) 15:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
kupe

Etymology
From, from (an elliptical form of ), the past participle of. .

Noun

 * 1) coupé: the front compartment of a railway carriage.

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) coupé

Noun

 * 1) tick
 * 2)  a white-collar worker who depends on the work of others to survive

title: kupe


text:
Template:Announcements/Community bulletin board

 * Help form active Wikiversity learning communities: see Reading groups.
 * Wiki Campus Radio (once called "Wikio") is getting closer to becoming a reality. This audio learning platform will help "increase participation in Wikiversity while strengthening its community and extending its reach." get involved
 * Summer is here and the Bloom clock project is looking for blooming flowers. Anyone with a digital camera or even a notepad can help out!
 * [[Image:Flag of France.svg|20px]] The French Department is in need of an Instructor and contributers.
 * New learning project: Collaboratively-building concepts.
 * Users interested in learning Spanish should sign up at Spanish/Students.
 * Register language of interest We have a threshold of ten interested participants to initiate a dedicated language domain away from the beta.wikiversity.org incubator site.
 * Update the links on this page from Wikipedia links to Wikiversity links.
 * Create pages from the redlinks on this page (if required and useful)
 * New learning project: English as a Second Language (ESL) project in coordination with The Justin M. Dart Foundation (www.justindart.net). We are looking for volunteers and teachers to help create a FREE online English learning program.  Please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>if interested!


text:
Praça do Relógio station

Praça do Relógio (Station code: REL) is a Federal District Metro station operating on the Green line. It was opened on 31 March 2001 as the western terminus of the inaugural section of the line, from Central to Praça do Relógio. In November 2006, the line was extended to Ceilândia Sul as shuttle service, and on 23 April 2007, full service was opened. It is located between Estrada Parque and Centro Metropolitano. The station is named after Taguatinga's Praça do Relógio.

title: Praça do Relógio station


text:
Talk:Science as religion/Darwinism

I don't think it's appropriate to be using the Alba article as the primary jumping-off point for this discussion. After reading some of her other stuff, I have trouble taking her seriously. Perhaps an article from a philosophy journal or textbook would be more appropriate? The Alba article seems to be pretty poor quality material to base an entire course on. -zach

 * I selected that article because it is an example of the kind of thing that gets said and it influences people (such as voters and politicians), even if it would be hard to find similar comments in a scholarly source. --JWSchmidt 18:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Actually, the text is so bad it makes for a good introduction and motivation. The main points are not well laid out and argued one-sidedly at best. This forces the avid student to try to distill those first! Usually with good texts this is all laid out and must therefore never be done explicitly. Pedro.Gonnet 18:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Ah, ok I see. I guess I would agree then.

here's a good article on speciation

www.trueorigin.org may have some more intelligent articles relating to evolution, etc., though I don't think any of them take a specifically sociological perspective. The Jade Knight 03:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * yeah, its also got a lot of information if you want to learn about young-earth creationism.
 * Yes, I meant as an anti-evolution source which (primarily - it is a collection of articles) treats subjects on a very scientific, analytical level. Some of the articles have clear religious overtones, or discuss direct Christian concepts.  The Jade Knight 21:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Perspective
One should be careful with the spectrum of this project; is it exclusively limited to the US? How are these subjects treated in other countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East? The Jade Knight 03:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The topic is rather moot here in Switzerland, where we still have a division of Church and State. The same goes for the rest of western Europe. Darwinism (or Darwinian Evolution) is taught in school and if you want to hear creationism you can go to church. For some reason people don't get as emotionally involved as in the US regarding many religious topics. I guess for most people religion or faith is a very privat thing and they won't fuss too much about what others believe or want to believe, as long as they are not bothered by it -- which is quite contrary to the attitude percieved in the USA... --Pedro.Gonnet 11:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The US also has a clear division of Church and state—the US has no national religion, unlike several European nations. However, what a division of Church and State means is very, very subjective, as the past 300 years of Western history has shown.  The Jade Knight 21:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Something to keep in mind—many Americans would be outraged at the kind of taxation to support churches that occurs in many of the cantons of Switzerland, violating (in American minds) the separation of Church and State. The Jade Knight 20:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a bit OT, but the taxation is not mandatory. If you are not a member of a given denomination or you simply don't want to pay, you don't pay a cent. The money collected is re-distributed directly to the religious groups. The whole scheme is more of an administrative process for the churches to collect funds. As far as I know there is no government money going to churches directly, i.e. by financing of "faith-based" initiatives. --Pedro.Gonnet 11:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I know, but this would still be overstepping the line in the minds of most Americans. My point is simply to illustrate how concepts of the separation of Church and state differ—if nothing else, many Swiss cantons have official religions (which is a violation of the American concept of separation of Church and State).  The Jade Knight 00:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * To put this back to the original discussion, I personally consider this topic to be entirely US-centric. The public dispute over evolution and intelligent design in public schools is, as far as I know, exclusive to the US. <IP_ADDRESS> 09:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Compassion as both religion and evolution
As I started studying education to become a middle school teacher, I encountered the Constructivist concept of a "community of knowledge." I have spent a significant part of my life in forests, and I could seen the "community of knowledge," or all the collected information be it the knowledge of the animals about food sources, or the information about growth in the DNA of all the beings as a "natural community of knowledge." As I followed this line of thought, I came into contact with lot of recent research linking evolution to the development of morality. Much of the research showed that the natural morality that we get from evolution is vastly more sophisticated than the morality that is handed down by, say, a judge in a court of law. This natural morality was referred to as "natural affection" Darwin, and he wrote about it extensively. People who study Darwin say his work extends Aristotle's, especially with regard to the concept of Eudaimonia, which roughly translates to "having a good life through moral living." Darwinism appears to me to be linked to compassion, which to me is what all religions have common; compassion is also biologically healthy for those who feel it a lot.

A lot of people wonder aloud what the fuss is all about, including me. I see no conflict between evolution and religion; I see science simply as an explanation of religion.

Possibly to strengthen what I am trying to say, it is literally science in the form of social science that has brought me to church. I attended a service with a friend mostly to be social, and in this tiny church, I found nearly every aspect of an ideal and healthy society as described by the Constructivists in this church, so I keep going back -- though I have to fake the praying part a little ;)

My research was for my final paper for my undergraduate work: "Spiritual Darwinism". My professor/mentor, Alan Mandell, credited me with "tuning his head around" on many issues surrounding empathy, and also the moral nature of the natural world.--John van v 02:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

 * I wonder if you have read any of the work of Edward Wilson. In his book, "Consilience", he discusses some of the issues that you mention above. --JWSchmidt 03:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

about the title
This is a disgrace! Evolutionary biology at the university level is absolutely NOT concerned with discussing religion. Evolution is hard science. Don't believe me? Search evolution in PubMed and see the vast quantities of non-philosophical literature that result. I suggest that "--- as religion" articles be moved to their proper locations in philosophy, sociology, or religious studies. Doing so will encourage actually helpful entries populate the Evolutionary Biology section. -Tom

Concerns
My biggest concern with this continuous discussion is how people seem to confuse tools with dogmas. Science is merely a tool, an extension of what we think we know currently, and it is questioned, adjusted, and adapted to suit peoples' needs and new discoveries. Science is used by both the secular, and the ecclesiastic. So, where is the issue here? Also, Darwin's ideas are not "isms". I mean, who ever heard of natural selectionism? The addition of the "ism" suffix is a recent development. Only aspects of his ideas are even relevant today- look at his theories from then and compare them with what we currently know. This is the beauty of science as a tool. Darwinian evolution might be a more appropriate term, but it's more palaeontological in the sense that its old propositions have steadily been replaced. With which theological philosophy can you see everyone, from the layman all the way up to the leadership, changing the dogma of the faith in question to suit what is currently known? I am no theology major, but I certainly question, for it is my nature. For hundreds of years, people have either accepted a creationist world view, or they have looked to other ideas for whatever reason (not my place to question them doing so). The ideas themselves have never truly been in conflict, except when I look at how I went through nearly twelve years of grade school never learning anything about evolutionary concepts because of all the conflicts with teaching it, which we're seeing yet again. I do not see anyone questioning mathematics- would you remove math from school because someone called it a religion? To a mathematician, his world is numbers. But that does not mean it is his religion- he could thank God every night for being able to express the beauty he sees with a language which is utterly human (I do not see any squirrels writing algebraic equations). Math is also a tool. Do you see what I see? --Amanda 07:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The whole page needs some attention and organization. There could be an introductory paragraph that tries to put the idea of "darwinism" into historical perspective. I agree that we need good learning resources that tackle fundamental issues about the nature of science....issues like making the distinction between the scientific method and particular scientific theories. I think it is clear from the history of science that dominate patterns of scientific thought get established and they can be deeply flawed while being essentially immune from criticism. I think Wikiversity should make clear that scientific study of biological evolution is an on-going process in which it is important to question all assumptions. We might be able to give a detailed account of how science works and how scientific ideas change through time and compare that to the way religious dogmas are not questioned and persist through time. --JWSchmidt 18:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with the opinions you express and ideas you propose herein. Personally I feel like this is one of the big issues- there is a lot of misunderstanding of science, what it is, and so on. One of the questions you raise for me is, aside from the current evolution debate, which is questioned every single day, what aspects of science are so hard wired that they may need to be questioned for, well, not being questioned? One of the fundamental foundations of science is to question everything- leave no premise or treatise unturned. So many individuals in scientific fields exist so that there should be so many critics that, like Tolkien had said once some time ago, people might even be expected to venture to criticize even the critics. However, I have to add that, you make a good point in stating that theology is a stasis. Like Charles Marsh once said, "...language is a primary element of culture, and stasis in the arts is tantamount to death...", but, theology in all its various expressions persists (and I do not bemoan this). In fact it is a remarkable thing about it. --Amanda 23:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * We have a page called What is science?. It would be fun to have a Wikiversity page about the history of scientific ideas that became dominant memes within scientific communities but were later found to have been misguided. Maybe we need a leaning project such as Science: question everything. --JWSchmidt 18:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

 * I wonder to what extent it was Wallace's book "Darwinism" that brought the term "Darwinism" into popular use. --JWS 15:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

 * For a counterpoint take a look at How To Defend Society Against Science by Paul Feyerabend. He makes a distinction between the ideal of science and how it is implemented and taught.  Another similar essay is The End of Science?  Contrast those two references with these: Is Science a Religion? and Is Science Religious?  All of these references are more about science in general, rather than Darwin, and might be better discussed at Science as religion.--mikeu 13:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If we are doing point, counter-point I think Carl Sagan's formula of "skepticism and wonder" is a far more realistic strategy than Feyerabend's dream of engineering society to give equal time for astrologers and scientists. I suppose Feyerabend enjoyed his free plane ticket to Europe and had a good laugh that he could earn access to the fruits of science while at the same time trying to equate it with mysticism. I suspect that philosophers such as Daniel Dennett, who prefer realism over anarchism, will have far more lasting effect on philosophy, science and society. Note: I'm having trouble getting this to load to my browser. --JWSchmidt 15:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

overhaul
This whole article needs to be overhauled for it to be of use. My impressions are 1) The premise is inflammatory 2) It's not honouring to any deity of choice to compare him/her to a mortal  3) It's not representative of the vast literature produced by scientists of faith and none who have grappled with this question 4) And so the end result is a mess. It'd better off being deleted and replaced by something that has taken more thought to produce. Graham Hartland 16:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It would be interesting to see if the Ben Stein's new film (Expelled) will renew interest in this topic and bring some revival and improvement to it. The Jade Knight 09:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

 * Graham: feel free to craft an alternative approach. The "read and discuss" format is just a starting point. The existing learning resource is a reaction to the claim that ideas from science are sometimes treated like unquestioned religious dogma. Honor for deities is not a goal for this learning resource. Rather than try to delete the resource, why not provide alternatives? --JWSchmidt 23:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

 * To anyone editing this article: please also feel free to improve the article with a complete rewrite. Do not feel pressurised to set up shop on another page or accept earlier edits. If an editor feels that a resource is of such low quality that it must be improved or rewritten, then they may express that opinion and look for consensus on that, or they can even be bold and simply go right ahead. An editor may also request deletion of an article if they have reason and try to seek consensus for that at Requests for Deletion. --McCormack 04:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

 * This is a discussion group, a type of resource that should probably not be at the top level in mainspace. It has become a coatrack for drive by comments and claims. I'm going to prune it, and intend to move this to some resource subspace. "Darwinism" is not a subject in a university catalog. As has been pointed out, it's a polemical term. —Abd (discuss • contribs) 01:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Darwinism?
The word itself is pejorative. Evolution theory has changed vastly since Darwin and this word is almost 100% used by IDists & Creationists in order to further the idea that it is a religion. Also, this is almost solely confined to the USA. TheresaWilson 02:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * (I don't understand how this wiki works, I'm afraid, would my comment have been appropriate on the "resource" page which seems to be used for comments?) TheresaWilson 09:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a strange one! Here, the "resource" page (equivalent to an "article' on Wikipedia) is itself a discussion, so I think your comment was more in line with the discussion, rather than the discussion around the discussion. :-) You could always copy and paste your initial comment to the resource page - it's clearly something which could do with expanding. Cormaggio talk 10:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Cormaggio, I think that I will. This is only my second day around here, so I'm still learning! TheresaWilson 14:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I saw your remark on the Colloquium. In my country, Holland, religion is being scorned by the majority of society nowadays. There is no chance whatsoever that the religious critique on Darwinism will get root. However, one of the ministers of te Dutch Labour Party, a well-known atheist, has said that socialism has its sources in the christian morality. I guess he is referring solely to liberation theology and not to anti-evolution theory propaganda. I think that Europe has been lost to christianity without any chance to become christian again. I am hoping for a kind of taoist humanism. I am a (mainstream) atheist, by the way.--Daanschr 16:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

IP chatter
In the section, "Is Christianity the religion of public schools?" an IP re-added a comment that was apparently sarcastic chatter. It was a response to a very old IP comment:
 * It depends on your culture, my dear.

This was the new comment, and it blanked the attribution and obscured it.
 * If it's a Christian school... Yes. If it's not a Christian school... No. Although it depends on your culture, my dear and upon the area of which you live combined with the colour of your hair.....and also the technique in which you salsa....left foot, right foot, right foot, hip swivel.. and then to finish it off my dear sassy hand flick. Also depending on who your partner is, because you will then end with a dip instead of a sassy hand flick. Don't forget the synchronized salsa ultimate punch, otherwise the religion of public schools will be converted to machiavellianism

The original comment was a bit obscure. Obviously, any religious bias or institutionalization of a "public school" will depend on the "public" or the government of the society running the school. That's perhaps what the original BON meant. The extended comment by the new BON doesn't add to the page, so I've reverted it again. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 19:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

title: Talk:Science as religion/Darwinism


text:
Talk:Benjamin Nelson

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Benjamin Nelson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120112112344/http://www.wmich.edu:80/iscsc/about to http://www.wmich.edu/iscsc/about

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Benjamin Nelson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120516023923/http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Nelson.htm to http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Nelson.htm

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Benjamin Nelson


text:
Filmmaking Basics/Thumbnail Storyboard/Step by Step/aaaaaa

Excellent Decision!
Now the first four shots are:

$$\Rightarrow$$ Fade In $$\Rightarrow$$ $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$   $$\Rightarrow$$ Dolly Out  $$\Rightarrow$$      $$\Rightarrow$$ Pedestal Down $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$

EXTERIOR - The local movie theater - NIGHT

(1) The Young Person and Old Person stand looking at the movie poster outside the theater.

(2) Young Person: "That was a great movie..."

(3) Young Person (contined): "but I do not understand one thing."

(4) Old Person: "What's that?"

(5) Young Person: "How can anyone be seduced by the Dark Side?"

Next Frame?
You want to see the Young Person as the Young Person speaks.

 * Option A
 * The Young Person says, "How can anyone be seduced by the Dark Side?"

 * Option B
 * The Young Person says, "How can anyone be seduced by the Dark Side?"

 * Option C
 * The Young Person says, "How can anyone be seduced by the Dark Side?"

Now Decide!

 * Select either option A or B or C

 * If you change your mind, you can go back to the previous page.

 * Reference Material
 * All the thumbnail storyboard frames.
 * The unformatted script.
 * The original story.
 * The [[Media:SBTDS Script Ciprian2.pdf|formatted script]].
 * To start over, go back to the beginning.


text:
Saint-Macaire-en-Mauges

Saint-Macaire-en-Mauges is a former commune in the Maine-et-Loire department in western France. Since 2015, it is the seat of the commune of Sèvremoine.

History
On 15 December 2015, Le Longeron, Montfaucon-Montigné, La Renaudière, Roussay, Saint-André-de-la-Marche, Saint-Crespin-sur-Moine, Saint-Germain-sur-Moine, Saint-Macaire-en-Mauges, Tillières and Torfou merged becoming one commune called Sèvremoine.

title: Saint-Macaire-en-Mauges


text:
Cookbook:Deep Fat Frying

| Frying

Deep frying involves fully immersing food in hot oil. It is an extremely fast cooking method, and, despite the use of liquid oil, is best classified as a dry cooking method because it does not involve liquid water.

With a deep fat fryer, deep frying is reasonably safe, but hot cooking oil is intrinsically dangerous, and one should be very careful so as to avoid fires and/or severe burns.

Method
Deep frying does not actually make the food greasy if it is done properly. The water in the food repels the oil. However, the hot oil also boils the water within the food, and steams the food from the inside out. As long as the oil is hot enough and the food is not immersed in the oil for too long, no oil will enter the food itself. If the food stays in the oil too long, the water will steam out and the oil will penetrate the food. If the oil is too cool, the food won't be done before this happens.

Most fried recipes rely on either a coating of batter or breading, or on foods that have or produce a natural skin around the food such as potatoes or whole poultry with the skin on. The effect of this is that the outside of the food becomes crispy and browned while the inside is tender, moist, and steamed, similar to searing. Of course, the batter can absorb huge amounts of fat and is usually consumed along with the food, causing the total fat content ingested to increase tremendously.

Chip pans
Chip pans can be dangerous and should only be used with caution and when continuously supervised, preferably with a thermometer; deep fryers are safer. Chip pans are the leading cause of house fires in the UK, and further, may spill hot oil, causing severe burns. If you have a chip pan, your local fire brigade may offer to trade it in for a deep fryer, or can otherwise advise about the dangers.

Safety tips
General cooking advice that particularly applies:
 * deep fryer, not pan: Deep fryers are less likely to tip than chip pans (avoiding scalding oil), and generally have thermometers to prevent overheating and fires. Familiarizing yourself with operation prior to use is also prudent.
 * no water in oil: Water in hot oil cause splatters and fires – it sinks (being denser than oil), then vaporizes, splattering hot oil and possibly scalding. If the oil is on fire, this can cause a chip pan fire – a fireball of burning oil ejects from the fryer, posing extreme hazard. In case of fire, do not use water; see below instead.
 * fire blanket or suitable extinguisher: Have a fire blanket immediately to hand, to smother fires, or a specialized fire extinguisher marked for cooking oil fires (class K in the US, class F in Europe).
 * proper oil: Some oil is not suited for deep frying, smoking at frying temperatures. Suitable oils include refined safflower oil, refined sunflower oils, refined peanut oil, coconut oil (South Asia), and rice bran oil (East Asia).
 * do not overheat: Oil is flammable and oil fires are extremely dangerous; before burning, oil will smoke, providing a warning. Most often, one deep fries between 175 and 190 °C (345–375 °F).
 * do not overfill: There must be space in the fryer for food to be added – use the recommended amount of oil, and small quantities of food. If there is too much oil or food, oil can flow over the sides, causing fire or burns. Further, small quantities of food cook better.
 * use utensils: Use metal utensils to manipulate food in a fryer – a wire cage is the main tool, and a spider or long-handled chopsticks can be used for additional manipulation.
 * metal range hood: Cook under a metal range hood: flames from burning hot oil can be 2 or 3 feet high, and can easily burn shelving.
 * cool after use: After use, allow the oil to cool for 2 hours before handling.
 * do not leave unattended:
 * do not drink alcohol:
 * no children present:
 * wear tight, thick clothes: Wear tight-fitting, long-sleeved, thick clothes to prevent burns from splatters, such as mechanics’ shirts and denim, rather than loose, thin clothes such as saris.

In case of smoke
When the oil starts to give off continuous smoke, you have it far too hot – it is at the smoke point, and the oil becomes carcinogenic at this point.
 * Turn off your deep fryer, and allow the oil to cool.
 * It is likely not acutely dangerous – the fire point and kindling point are generally significantly higher than the smoke point, so the oil will not ignite without further heating – but it is extremely hot, and smoke is a warning sign.
 * Next time, use a lower temperature setting or choose an oil with a higher smoke point.

In case of fire
In case of fire, call the fire department immediately.

Cooking oil fires are extremely dangerous and hard to fight, requiring special measures: If no fire blanket or suitable extinguisher is available, and the fire is small and contained, try quickly adding baking soda as this can quench it (do not add any other substances, which may burn instead). However, in the case of a large cooking oil fire, leave the house and contact the fire department immediately, and do not try to fight it yourself – your efforts are liable to end in disaster.
 * Burning oil can only be adequately fought with a fire blanket, or specialized fire extinguisher (Class K in the US; Class F in Europe); these may not be available for residential use.
 * Water should never be used on an oil fire; neither should regular fire extinguishers.

Frying whole poultry
A whole turkey is sometimes deep fried during a regional holiday in the United States; one may also wish to deep fry a chicken or other bird. In general, cutting up the bird (or buying it pre-cut) and frying individual pieces is significantly easier and safer; it also makes service easier.

If you wish to deep fry a turkey, please contact your fire department before doing so, so that you do not need to contact them urgently after doing so.

The main advice is:
 * All usual advice, with extra care.
 * Use a specialized turkey fryer, because it is large.
 * Carefully measure oil required beforehand, with the actual bird, to ensure that the fryer is not over-filled.
 * Cook outside.
 * Thaw the bird before deep-frying; advice which deserves to be in bold or caps.

Tips for frying

 * Generally, cook small pieces briefly at high temperatures to get crisp but not greasy food.
 * Dry food before frying (to avoid splatters), especially soaked potatoes; remove ice crystals from frozen food.
 * Foods flavor the oil after use; thus, cook light-flavored food (vegetables) before heavy-flavored foods (fish, shrimp) – or alternatively, use separate fryers for different foods.
 * Starting with cold foods (good idea), generally frying temperatures are around 325–375 degrees Fahrenheit (160–190 degrees Celsius). It may be higher for small foods. If the oil is too hot, the outside will burn before the inside is done.
 * When starting with warm or hot foods, the oil can be much hotter. (this is why the egg roll recipe instructs you to use hot filling, and why the fried fish recipe instructs you to microwave the fish before breading and deep-fat frying it)
 * Don't add too much food at one time; it will cool the oil too much.
 * Do not use a basket with food which could stick to the wires. Alternatively, suspend food in oil with tongs for ten seconds before releasing.
 * Consider using deep frying as one step in cooking, to crisp the outside only – similar to broiling or pan-searing. For instance, rather than deep frying chicken from raw to cooked, first roast it, then only finish it in the fryer. Similarly, you may deep fry potatoes as one step in making roast potatoes – after parboiling, and either before or after roasting.

Breading
Adding too much food to the fryer not only cools the temperature of the oil, it also causes your food to start to produce steam from overcrowding the fryer, and lowers the temperature, this will result in soogy foods and breading falling off the product.
 * When breading with a dry powder, use an egg wash or viscous liquid (such as buttermilk) to make it stick to the food.
 * When breading with a moist batter, use cornmeal, cornstarch or flour to make it stick to the food, and make sure batter is sufficiently dry on adding.
 * Shake off excess batter or breading before frying; otherwise it will come off in the oil, requiring more frequent oil changes.
 * Some recommend refrigerating breaded food for a ½ hour before frying, so that the breading sticks better.

Re-using oil

 * Opinions differ regarding re-use of oil, and the storage of used frying oil.
 * Some say frying improves with repeated use of the oil and use one batch of oil for three to six fryings, while others claim used oils are hazardous either due to bacterial growth or due to the breakdown of the oil into harmful compounds.
 * Those who reuse oil disagree as to whether refrigeration is necessary, but generally agree that it is important to filter the oil and then store it tightly capped and away from light.
 * Discard reused oil when it becomes dark or begins to smell "off".
 * If reusing oil, add fresh oil for each use in order to extend its usefulness.
 * Filter your frying oil regularly, if your fryer has a filtering system.
 * Cooled oil can be filtered with a tea strainer, kitchen paper, muslin or coarse coffee machine filter paper.
 * Change the oil when it becomes extremely dark. If you don't, your food will all taste the same – fries will taste like fish, fish will taste like fries, and, in the end, everything will taste a bit rancid.
 * A rule of thumb is to change oil each week under heavy use, or every three weeks if it's only used for frying vegetables.
 * When using new oil in your fryer, add an extra 1.5 minutes to your frying time.
 * Oil can be purified by deep-frying parsley. The parsley absorbs the odors in the oil. Watch for spatters!

Oil disposal
At some point, oil must be disposed of. Suggestions include:
 * Re-use oil for non-deep frying (stores airtight in fridge for months; discard when rancid).
 * Dispose at local restaurant, after asking – they often will have cooking oil recycling (into biodiesel or other substances).
 * Store (after cooling!) in the original container, milk containers, beer or wine bottles, wide-mouth jars (yogurt, mayonnaise, pickles), and dispose of these, optionally wrapped.
 * Use solid fats (lard, coconut oil, Crisco) and allow it to solidify and cool.
 * There is a Japanese “oil solidifier” which will solidify oils, making disposal easier.
 * Check with local sanitation on proper disposal.

However, do not dispose down drain, this is illegal in some locations as it can clog pipes and sewers problems and ultimately contribute to decreases the performance of the water treatment plants.

Serving suggestions

 * Serve deep fried food immediately, or keep warm in oven (95°C, 200°F) in a pan (properly, a jelly roll pan – a raised edge)
 * Drain on paper
 * Salt immediately, while hot; optionally pepper or use other spices as well.
 * Dipping sauce is often desirable.
 * A wedge of lemon is also tasty.
 * Contrast textures – deep fried food (such as seafood or croûtons) on salad are a classic combination, and tempura in soup is common in Japan
 * Forks, chopsticks, and hands are generally the easiest way to eat (due to crust); provide napkins if hands are to be used.
 * Drinks-wise, beer, black tea, and soft drinks often pair well; big (tannic) red wines can also work.

Health
Some health concerns exist regarding deep frying; some are misconceptions, some are contentious, and some are well-founded. In brief, properly deep frying yields food that is crisp, not greasy, and is little different from other frying such as pan-frying. Ultimately, ingredients are fundamental: deep-fried leek is still leek, while a deep-fried Mars bar is still a Mars bar.

Tips

 * Use appropriate oil (high temperature oil), at appropriate temperature (well below smoke point).
 * Cook small pieces, briefly, at high heat.
 * If it stops making sound, it’s over-cooking.
 * Either filter oil or use new oil each time.

Criticism
The following are the general criticisms leveled at deep frying:
 * Fat is bad (and deep frying is fatty): The image of a vat of oil is shocking and disturbing to some, as though one is going to consume that oil; this fear is largely baseless.
 * The oil is used to heat, and very little is actually consumed. A simple test of this is to inspect the level of oil before and after cooking – it should be almost identical, reflecting that almost all the oil is still in the vat, not in the food. Simply, the hot oil heats the food and steams it from the inside (steaming is generally considered healthy cooking), as reflected in the sound of steam escaping during cooking; the steam keeps the fat out.
 * This is not the case for potatoes, where one intends fat to enter, and hence blanches the potatoes beforehand.
 * Pan-frying and stir-frying involve similar coatings of fat, but are less visually striking.
 * Further, the proposition that "fat is bad" is contentious, and rejected by many – compare low-fat and low-carb diets.
 * Lastly, the oils used in deep frying (mostly monounsaturated vegetable oils) are general highly praised.

 * Deep frying creates toxins: There is some basis for this concern – using unrefined oils or oils with low smoke points and raising them to the smoke point causes production of carcinogens via oxidation, as reflected in smoking. This is reduced, if not eliminated, by using refined oils with high smoke points. There are suggestions that toxins are produced below the smoke point, and particularly if oil is reused or kept hot for extended periods – this leads to the suggestion that oil not be reused. Further, pieces of food that fall into oil are themselves impurities and may oxidize on further cooking – this leads to the suggestion that reused oil be filtered.
 * Deep frying destroys nutrients: Deep frying is similar to other cooking in nutrient destruction, because the interior is not touched by oil, just heated (steamed, in fact). Cooking destroys some nutrients, while making others easier to digest.
 * Deep frying does not provide nutrients: There is some basis for this – Essential Fatty Acids (EFAs) are destroyed by deep frying, and must be obtained from other sources – deep fried food should not be one’s only source of fat.

Commonly deep fried foods
Virtually any food can in principle be deep fried. Certain classes of food are frequently deep fried: General categories include fritters and tempura.
 * Meat:
 * Seafood – shrimp, squid, clams, scallops, oysters
 * Poultry – chicken, turkey (as parts or whole)
 * White fish – fish & chips
 * Vegetables:
 * Potatoes – fries (chips), chips (crisps)
 * Allium (onion family) – onions, leeks
 * Green vegetables
 * Bread and dough:
 * Bread-wrapped – dumplings, egg rolls, empanadas, samosas
 * Dough – fried dough
 * Bread/starch – croutons, fried bread sticks, tortilla chips, fried noodles
 * Other:
 * Minced mixtures – croquettes, crab cakes
 * Fat – Cheese, Pork skin
 * Mushrooms

More unusually:
 * Candy bars – Twinkies, Mars Bars
 * Fast food – Hot dogs, Pizza
 * Icecream

Red meat (beef, lamb) and fatty fish (salmon) are generally not deep fried, however.

Deep frying recipes

 * Deep Fried Turkey
 * Egg Roll
 * Empanada
 * Fried chicken
 * Fried Corn
 * Fried Fish
 * Frog's Legs à la Parisienne
 * Jersey breakfast dog
 * Koeksisters
 * Modak
 * Mozzarella Sticks
 * Samosa
 * Tempura

title: Cookbook:Deep Fat Frying


text:
Zygopini

Zygopini is a tribe of twig and stem weevils in the beetle family Curculionidae. There are more than 20 genera and at least 250 described species in Zygopini. 83 species are currently known from the 11 genera occurring north of South America, 8 genera occur exclusively in South America, and 2 are recorded from Africa.

Genera
These 22 genera belong to the tribe Zygopini:

 * Acopturus Heller, 1895
 * Arachnomorpha Champion, 1906
 * Archocopturus Heller, 1895
 * Colpothorax Desbrochers, 1890
 * Copturosomus Heller, 1895
 * Cylindrocopturus Heller, 1895
 * †Geratozygops Davis and Engel, 2006
 * Helleriella Champion, 1906
 * Hemicolpus Heller, 1895
 * Hypoplagius Desbrochers, 1891
 * Isocopturus Hustache, 1931
 * Larides Champion, 1906
 * Lissoderes Champion, 1906
 * Macrotimorus Heller, 1895
 * Parazygops Desbrochers, 1890
 * Peltophorus Schoenherr, 1845
 * Phileas Champion, 1906
 * Philenis Champion, 1906
 * Timorus Schoenherr, 1838
 * Xeniella Hustache, 1931
 * Zygops Schoenherr, 1825
 * Zygopsella Champion, 1906

title: Zygopini


text:
Talk:Guyana at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 02:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Here are the issues I found:
 * Michael Anthony and Georgetown link to disambiguation pages; have them link to the right ones.
 * Done. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "It is adjacent to Venezuela, to Brazil, and to Suriname," to Venezuela, Brazil, and Suriname
 * Fixed. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "and has participated at every" and have
 * Fixed. Good catch. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "In all of its history, only the only case in" history, the only
 * All set. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "Born in Linden and trained in Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge," the use of trained sounds a bit iffy here, but I'm not sure what to replace it with.
 * Let me know what you think of the rewording. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll put the article on hold and will pass when the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I've addressed all the comments. Let me know if anything comes up. Thanks for reviewing the article! :) --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks good, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 14:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
moho

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) The North Island takahē, an extinct rail of New Zealand.

Related terms

 * moho-pereru

Etymology 2
From, from its call, via confusion of its name with the.

Adverb

 * 1) together

Etymology
, from.

Noun

 * 1) mildew US, mold, mould UK, AU, CA
 * 2)  rust

title: moho