text:
2013 FAI Women's Cup final

The 2013 FAI Women's Cup Final was the final match of the 2013 FAI Women's Cup, the national association football Cup of the Republic of Ireland. The match took place on 3 November 2013 at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. Raheny United and Castlebar Celtic contested the match.

The match was shown live on RTÉ2 and RTÉ2 HD in Ireland and was refereed by Marie Ward, assisted by Deirdre Nolan and Olivia Syned with Natasha Valenti as Fourth Official. The Referee Observer was Victor Loughman.

Raheny United won the Cup to retain the trophy they won for the first time the previous year. Underdogs Castlebar Celtic equalised twice to force extra time but were unable to come back a third time after conceding an own goal.

Background
The two managers were already acquainted, as Raheny's Terry Eviston had previously been in charge of Athlone Town when Castlebar's Adrian Carberry had been a player at the League of Ireland club.

Carberry was barred from the technical area at the Aviva Stadium because he was an employee of the Football Association of Ireland. His request for a one-off dispensation was refused, so he took his place in the stand and his assistant Maz Sweeney directed operations from pitch-side.

All the Castlebar Celtic players wore the name Jeremy on the back of their shirts, as a mark of respect to their former manager Jeremy Dee whose untimely death occurred in November 2012.

As Cup holders, reigning Women's National League champions and undefeated League-leaders, Raheny United entered the match as strong favourites. Two weeks previously they had beaten Castlebar Celtic's comparatively youthful team 9–2 in a League fixture.

Castlebar Celtic were without Shauna Jackson due to an injured ankle. Deirdre Doherty had missed recent fixtures while attending college in England, but Castlebar retained her registration and she agreed to come back to play in the match. Seana Cooke had agreed a transfer from Raheny United to Durham in the week leading up to the match.

Summary
As the match was played as a curtain raiser to the 2013 FAI Cup Final between Drogheda United and Sligo Rovers, it began with a "small crowd" of around 200 which expanded to a reported attendance of 17,573 in time for the men's final.

Raheny took control of possession in the early exchanges and forced Castlebar's 16-year-old goalkeeper Caoimhe O'Reilly into action. Raheny took the lead after 37 minutes when Ciara Grant hit a half volley over O'Reilly and into the net.

Castlebar continued to yield the territorial advantage but tried to hit Raheny on the break, usually through their skilful playmaker Emma Hansberry. On 67 minutes Sarah Rowe made a foray up the right wing and found Hansberry, who played the ball inside for substitute Emma Mullin to score the equaliser.

On 84 minutes Raheny went back ahead when Caroline Thorpe was controversially adjudged to have been fouled by Castlebar's young goalkeeper, and scored the resultant penalty kick herself. Castlebar equalised again in the last minute of normal time, when another substitute Deirdre Doherty fired a powerful long-range shot past Niamh Reid Burke.

The standard 15-minutes each-way of extra-time was unexpectedly abridged to ten minutes each-way. Five minutes into the additional period Castlebar's centre-back Kim Flood inadvertently headed Siobhán Killeen's cross past O'Reilly and into her own goal. The luckless Flood was later carried off with an injury, replaced by Rachel Kearns.

During the presentation of the trophy to victorious Raheny captain Becky Creagh, Sligo Rovers players intruded on the pitch to begin their warm up.

Experienced midfielder Caroline Thorpe was named Player of the Match by RTÉ summariser Susan Ronan. Thorpe later revealed that she had been bereaved by the death of her brother and was in the grip of anorexia nervosa at the time.

title: 2013 FAI Women's Cup final


text:
Myyrmäen jalkapallostadion

Myyrmäen jalkapallostadion (Myyrmäki Football Stadium) (Myrbackas fotbollsstadion), formerly ISS Stadion and Pohjola Stadion, is a football stadium in the Myyrmäki district of Vantaa, Finland. It is the homeground of PK-35 Vantaa, its women's representative team plays in the top-tier Kansallinen Liiga. The stadium holds 4,700 and was built in 2000.

The IFAF 2018 European Championship of American Football will be held in Myyrmäen jalkapallostadion at 29 July - 4 August 2018.

Specs

 * Pitch: Artificial turf
 * Pitch dimensions: 105*68
 * Floodlights: 1,500 lux

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Myyrmäen jalkapallostadion


text:
Talk:Charles H. Yale

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Charles H. Yale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://content.lib.washington.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/sayrepublic&CISOPTR=9451&CISOBOX=1&REC=6
 * Added tag to http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/var1994001113/PP/
 * Added tag to http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/var1994001402/PP/
 * Added tag to http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/var1994001297/PP/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130125024201/http://www.loc.gov:80/pictures/item/var1993000055/PP/ to http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/var1993000055/PP/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Charles H. Yale


text:
Robotics/Exotic Robots/Special Robot Brains

Most robots have an electronic "brain" (part that uses sensor input to determine actuator output). This can be either a simple electronic circuit, a µcontroller or a PC. This is not the only way to build a robot "brain".

Mechanical Robot Brains
One of the first robots was designed by Da Vinci, this was a small vehicle powered by wind-up springs and it was "programed" by changing gears. Although possible this kind of robot brains are very hard to design and build.

Pneumatic Robot Brains
If you need to automate some part of a plant where explosive gases are used it might be too dangerous to use electronic circuits. Instead pneumatic circuits are used. It's possible to construct logical circuits, timers, sequences,... using pneumatic valves and cylinders. You can find a lot of pneumatic valves for automation here: www.ngtvalves.com


text:
Klingon/Lesson 2

 Previous < Up > Next

Introduction
In every lesson you will learn a few new words and some grammar. In this lesson, you will learn how to form a few basic sentences.

Vocabulary
Klingon has only three parts of speech: nouns, verbs and other. Here are a few nouns and verbs.

Articles
English has one definite article (the) and one indefinite article (a and its variant an). Klingon has no equivalents to these words.

Affixes
An affix is either a prefix or a suffix.

English uses affixes. For example, in English the prefix dis- is used to reverse the meaning of a verb, as in agree and disagree. Suffixes are used to form plurals, as in cat and cats.

Affixes are central to Klingon grammar and they will be introduced gradually.

Verb Prefixes
Only verbs have prefixes. A prefix indicates the subject and object that accompany a verb. They are sometimes called pronomial prefixes. There are 29 of them, and they will be introduced throughout the course. Here are the first four:

Suffixes with an object will be introduced in a later lesson.

A prefix is added to the front of a verb to form a simple sentence:

 * Punctuation: Some writers do not end single sentences of Klingon with the final period (.). This practice is common in The Klingon Dictionary. However it is normal practice when writing several sentences to end each with a period, as in English. I would recommend that all sentences in Klingon end with a period.

Verbs can be used without any prefix. The absence of a prefix can be translated in several ways, but the most common is where the subject is any one of he, she, it or they, and with no object.

So yIt, which is a verb meaning walk, on its own can form a sentence meaning He walks, She walks, or They walk, and so on. Of course, if there is a noun, it is used instead of the pronoun. We will see examples of this later.

Suffixes
Klingon also makes extensive use of suffixes, which are added to the end of verbs and nouns.

There are many different suffixes, but this lesson introduces just one, -be'. It is added to the end of a verb to negate it, so is often translated by not or do not.

Simple Sentences
In Klingon, the word order in a sentence is reversed from English. The subject comes after the verb instead of before it. The subject is the noun carrying out the action of the verb, so in Klingon it appears at the end of the sentence:

In this sentence, no prefix is required on the verb.

Exercises
Now, go and read the lesson again, memorize the new words and then try these easy exercises.

 * 1) Vocabulary
 * 2) Klingon to English
 * 3) English to Klingon

Conclusion
In this lesson, you learned some verb prefixes and a suffix. You learned a few new words of Klingon and how to string them together to form simple sentences.

 Previous < Up > Next

title: Klingon/Lesson 2


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Baptiste Sipido

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 01:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Jean Baptiste Sipido
CSD was challenged on th talk page, therefore we need a discussion on this one paragraph entry with no context, references, or statement of notability. I'd vote delete. Harr o 5 09:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable person, only 29 Google results -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???   ???   ??? 09:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was never a legitimate speedy candidate, as mentioning somebody as having attempted to assassin the Prince of Wales is, at the very least, an "assertion of notability". I've found a few references. The Times (obviously) reported on the case, There is an article by a "Dr Speyer" (no first name is mentioned), "The Legal Aspects of the Sipido Case", in the Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 1900. There is also an entry for him in the WBIS Online with a reference to a Belgian biographical dictionary (I'll see if I can find that one in the library). As an alternative, we could consider deleting Sipido and adapt Wikipedia policy to report on things in exact proportion to the number of Google hits, in which case we really need to get up to speed with increasing our coverage of naked blonde women with big boobs. u p p l a n d 10:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Except they dont need to be blonde Im ok with that Defunkier 13:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I challenged the CSD, so here's why: Sipido took part in a real, if minor, historical event that played a part both in the history of anarchism and the history of the British Empire. An assasination attempt on the heir to the British throne during a time of imperial war is important and notable. I'd like to see a better article here (it should be tagged and probably  too) but I don't believe this should be deleted. If Wikipedia is an encyclopedia it should cover this sort of material. Gwernol 13:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Back from the library. The Belgian Biographie nationale, vol. 42 (1981), has a fairly long article on Sipido on pp. 662-679. A Google Books search also turns up a couple of useful hits. u p p l a n d 14:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if expanded. At the very least, the article needs to decide whether it is about the event (in which case the title changes) or the person (in which case it needs to be rewritten as a biography). JPD (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see anything in notability criteria that distinguishes between assassins who shoot and kill, assassins who shoot and wound, and assassins who shoot and miss. Squeaky Fromme, John Hinckley, Leon Czolgosz. Monicasdude 16:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep An assassination or attempted assassination of an important person makes him notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 23:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up per above Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 23:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs work, but worthy of coverage. -Colin Kimbrell 14:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Puliyanthivu 3D map

Puliyanthivu 3D map
Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2015  at 06:07:22 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality 3D work from references
 * Articles in which this image appears:Puliyanthivu, Batticaloa
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
 * Creator:AntanO

 * Support as nominator – Anton Talk  06:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose A good aerial photo would be a lot more eye-catching and have more EV. --Janke | Talk 09:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a 3D work, not an aerial photo. -- Anton Talk  09:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Cartoonish, misleading (no island in the world is that flat and that far out of the sea), and copyright of the underlying images (the trees etc.) is unclear. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose, per Crisco. J Milburn (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose as above, not really the best encyclopaedic value, something more realistic would be appropriate, as this island still exists. Mattximus (talk) 01:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 06:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Scarborough High School (Maine)

Scarborough High School is a high school (grades 9–12) located in Scarborough, Maine, United States. The student population was approximately 917 students and around 180 staff and faculty members during the 2021-2022 school year.

History
The first high school in Scarborough was built in 1927 and was named after Elwood G. Bessey, a former principal, and the current high school was built in 1954.

Athletics
Scarborough High School offers 26 varsity teams in 17 sports, with junior varsity/or and freshman teams in 11 sports.

U.S. News & World Report
As of 2020, Scarborough High School is ranked 12th within Maine. Students have the opportunity to take Advanced Placement course work and exams. The AP participation rate at Scarborough High School is 45%. The graduation rate is 96%. The student body makeup is 53% male and 47% female, and the total minority enrollment is 7%. Scarborough High School is the only high school in the Scarborough School Department.

title: Scarborough High School (Maine)


text:
Reaktor/Hosts/Tracktion

 * Traction is an audio/MIDI sequencer that is working fine with R4.
 * it supports Reaktor as a VST & VSTI.
 * VST & MIDIin Tracktion.
 * Tracktion also supports Multi in/out via the racks.
 * Those racks are also useful if you want to use Reaktor as a send fx within traction or if you need to send MIDI to an fx like the R4 libary's Classic Vocoder(for example).

 * the multi in/out & send fx tutorials in in french

 * And the Best Part of it is that it's FREE

title: Reaktor/Hosts/Tracktion


text:
Bassick High School

Bassick High School is a US public trade high school located in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

History
In 1924, the Bassick family home was demolished to begin construction for a school. The E & F Construction Company was awarded the contract after submitting a bid for $692,946. Architect Ernest G. Southey created a Georgian style plan set back 100 feet from Fairfield Avenue leaving "ample room to the south of the school for a large athletic field."

Bassick Junior High School opened in 1929 with 1,034 students in grades seven through nine and was soon thereafter converted to a senior high school. A new addition was built in 1968 at a cost of $3.5 million.

Academics
As of 2006, the school administration planned to continue developing "Achievement and Career Academies" within the school. "These Academies will create small communities of learners that will personalize the educational experience for each student and provide needed support for increased levels of academic achievement," according to the Federal Department of Education Web site. "Through an Advisory Program, Bassick will ensure that each student is known well by at least one adult member of the school community." The program was also to integrate reading and mathematics instruction.

In the federal 2006 fiscal year, The U.S. Department of Education awarded the school $476,753 for a five-year "Smaller Learning Communities" grant. Since that point, Bassick High School has cycled through various academic models.

Athletics
The school is a former member of the FCIAC conference, having departed for the Constitution State Conference in 2015. They have since left the CSC and now compete as an independent school. Bassick High School offers various athletic teams for both boys and girls. The Bassick Lions compete in football, soccer, cross country, track, basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball, and there is also an active cheer squad, the Lionettes. Bassick's basketball team boasts several great successes, including the 1940 and 1989 Connecticut state championships, and three more finals appearances, in 1939, 2000 and 2004. More recently, the team qualified for the semifinals of the 2015 Connecticut state championship, before losing to Bunnell High School of Stratford.

Notable alumni

 * Kevin Belcher, former NFL player
 * Angel Echevarria, Class of 1989, former MLB player (Colorado Rockies, Milwaukee Brewers, Chicago Cubs)
 * Philip Nastu, former MLB player (San Francisco Giants)
 * Daniel Trust, Rwandan genocide survivor, motivational speaker, and founder of the Daniel Trust Foundation

title: Bassick High School


text:
Wikipedia:Peer review/S.C.I.F.I. World/archive1

S.C.I.F.I. World
I've spent much time crafting this article together but feel that it can be improved upon even further.. I believe that, for the channel of SciFi, it has been something comparable to monumental in the shape of things and to this day: we still have those very marathons. I'd really appreciate advice and goals to aim for as to how this article can be strengthened for Good article nomination as well as possibly beyond. With work, I do believe this can be attained. DrWho42 10:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Automated suggestions are provided here, that you may wish to refer for some useful style guidelines. - Mailer Diablo 17:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Should there be a section or corresponding sections focusing in on the shows featured on each theme? I.e. Creatureland, &c. DrWho42 09:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I made a list so that looking up what shows aired and in what "theme-day" would be made incredibly easier. List of S.C.I.F.I. World shows, however I'm wondering whether or not referencing would be just or in what way should it be done... Please see either the adjacent Talk page or its entry along the WP Television's Talk page DrWho42 20:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Neo-Victorian

Japan?
Is there a reason why this is considered a Japanese article? I thought Gothic Lolita covered this, and was the focusing article about Japanese Neo-Victorianism. Also, this article seems to be redundant as compared to Gothic Lolita and Gothic fashion. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Neo-Victorianism is not confined to Japan, so no I don't know why this is labelled as a Japanese article either. Unless someone has a specific reason for Japanese exclusivity I'd suggest removing the header. ~ Brother William (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed and removed. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Consensus from RSN
Those who considered the work bookspam:
 * Dougweller
 * Brmull
 * Nuujinn
 * Ian.thomson

Those who said it should be included
 * Andy Dingley (who has since become silent on the issue)

Herostratus and FuFoFuEd stated that if a book is informative it should be included -- it was shown that the book had no editorial oversight or factchecking (and failed WP:RS) and that the work is not a reference work but an autobiography. Citing this is like citing a non-famous blogpost of someone's experiance at a Star Trek convention in an article on Faster than Light Travel. It has also been shown that the book does not fit the exceptions to WP:RS given in WP:FR.

Silver siren seems to be arriving at the consensus from Blueboar's question about whether I found the book or the link objectionable (the answer, I found the book ojectionable because of the link, because I'm rather experianced in dealing with bookspam). Ian.thomson (talk) 21:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Ian, you are misrepresenting me. I said the web page was spam, not the book itself. As noted at RSN, further reading entries are not required to meet RS criteria, and I know of no policy that requires that a book not be an autobiography to be included in a further reading section. How the book wound up on the list is not really relevant. The question is whether the book, not the web page promoting the book, might be of interest to readers. I haven't seen the book, but I imagine neither have you, but I can conceive that such an autobiography might be of interest to readers of this article, which concerns a renewed interest in Victorian customs and dress. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I see now I misread your agreement over what was spam.
 * WP:Further reading lists reliable sources, or "historically important publications; creative works or primary sources discussed extensively in the article; and seminal, but now outdated, scientific papers" as potential subjects -- None of which this book qualifies as. As the author of the book is not Neo-Victorian fashion incarnate, and the article is about neither her nor her book, including her book would be like including someone's blogpost about how their dog likes to gnaw on corn in the article pet.
 * WP:Further reading also says that books are not to be added by their publishers or authors, as was originally the case here.
 * WP:BOOKSPAM says we should not add books just to draw attention to the books, but to contribute to the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

 * No problem, the discussion was rapid and warmish. But Further_reading is just a proposal, and your assertion is not supported by WP:FURTHER, the current guideline. That says "...a reasonable number of editor-recommended publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject". What was originally the case is no longer relevant--even if WP:Further reading were a current guideline, the author's link was removed, and the discussion is whether or not it should be restored or not. We are in apparent agreement that the web site is spammy, I think there is real consensus there. Andy Dingley has seen the book, perhaps they can provide a synopsis of what they recall of it to help inform discussion? --Nuujinn (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The web site gives a reasonable taste of what the book is about, which is why I supported it, despite the issues about linking to a sales site (you do realise we already link indirectly to Amazon for every book ref that gives an ISBN?) or hosting via Weebly.
 * As the author states, this book describes the core of the modern "neo-Victorian" experience - and thus why I don't think it's justified under Victorian fashion. It's not about corset theory in the detail that other books cover, but it does describe the life-changing aspects (in the everyday sense, it's not some lofty self-improvement spiel) of dressing as a Victorian Lady, particularly when this also marks you out as a freak in today's context. I don't wear a corset, but I live with someone who does on occasion - this week we've yet another newspaper interview & photo shoot. This changes many everyday things, including meal planning. Big Victorian breakfasts? It's because you can't eat once you're bolted in. Posture changes hugely. Much of the formalism of movement comes about, not because of Victorian education or cold showers, but because it's the natural way to move when wearing a corset. It's very like a kimono with obi and the way they in turn change your attitude to seating (it's easier to kneel than to sit in a chair). Ladies need to be helped to carry heavy parcels - not because it's polite, or because they're "the weaker sex", but because a corset requires you to lift anything with your arms, rather than your back muscles, and so the effect is indeed that they're made less able to do physical work. We need to re-examine the causality of some pre-conceived notions about Victorian (or even more significantly, Edwardian) society and behaviour: it was the dress that often created custom, not custom creating fashion. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:56, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I learned very little from the web site. I have learned a bit more by looking up the author in google news. In regard to ISBN numbers, they are a recognized identifier of books, and what the web does with them is beyond our control, and many of these issues would not arise had the book in question an ISBN. Can you distinguish what is your personal experience from what the book covers? The former, however interesting, isn't really relevant here--what we really need is a sense in concrete terms of what the book is about. --Nuujinn (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That much above is the overlap between both. Really though, you want to be asking a woman with experience of corsets, or a gender theorist (many of my friends are Goths, so gender politics is a big issue locally). I just sew stuff, I don't have to wear it. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I really don't want to be asking a woman with experience of corsets, I want to be asking someone of experience of the book. You are, as far as I know, the only person to have held the book in question in your hands. I'm asking you about the contents of the book, not about personal experiences or the experiences of friends. When you speak of carrying parcels, large breakfasts, etc. which of those are covered in the book? How long is the book? What are the topics the book covers? That's the kind of think I'm curious about in this context. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The site's description of the book is: "Have you ever wondered what it would be like to live a Victorian life in modern-day surroundings? What is it really like to wear a corset twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week? How do modern people react to finding a "time-traveler" in their midst? Waisted Curves: My Transformation Into A Victorian Lady is the fascinating, true account of a twenty-first century woman learning to live a Victorian life." The primary focus of the work does not appear to be describing the fashion, but about her experiances interacting with others while she happened to be wearing neo-Victorian fashion. To Andy Dingley, Silver Siren (who has given the impression of having the book), or anyone else who may have the book: Is the main focus of this work, the purpose for which it is written, its "thesis" as it were, a discussion and description of Neo-Victorian fashion in itself? Or is it a combination of anecdote, gender theory, autobiography, etc? Does the work primarily discuss the types of clothing and accessories common to neo-Victorian fashion? Or is the point of the work about how the author had fun wearing the clothes, and about people's reactions to her wearing the clothing?

I found an excerpt from the book:
 * "I stared at my reflection in the glass. The dear mirror was showing me the most flattering lie possible, and my mind struggled to fit the lovely form in the silvered glass into the image of what I truly knew myself to be. This was not me. And yet, it was..."

Is this a representative excerpt of the book?

This review says the "book tells of her decision to wear a Victorian-style corset on a daily basis, the physiological changes involved, and the reactions of society to her choice."

The description, excerpt, and review give the impression that clothing is not the main focus, but reactions (the author's and others') to it. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ian, why does a book have to be about clothing? To my knowledge and experience Neo-Victorian is NOT exclusively about clothes (though they do play a significant part). If this woman has chosen to start dressing in a corset and 19th century clothing styles, or in other words to become a Neo-Victorian, and her book tells about her experiences then it sounds ideal as a "Further Reading" suggestion. Most NV stuff has been swallowed up by the steampunk behemoth so it's nice to see something that doesn't require cogs. ~ Brother William (talk) 16:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Considering the article is about a fashion, that pretty strongly implies it's about clothes and accessories. I mean, fashion does refer to outward appearance.
 * Let's look at other articles' "Further reading" sections:
 * World War II (a good article) only lists the "World War Two Chronological Atlas."
 * Lutheranism (another good article) doesn't give any heart-warming stories about how much fun the church picnic was, but scholarly or ecuminical examinations of doctrine.
 * President of the United States does not cite any autobiographies (because the further reading sections are supposed to be balanced, which would mean outside studies, not subjective anecdotes).
 * Poverty reduction only lists "Poverty Alleviation through Sustainable Strategic Business Models." It doesn't include, say, the novel Slumdog Millionaire is based on.
 * Positive psychology doesn't list any biographical works at all, and there are certainly plenty of biographical works that relate to this subject as much as Wasited Curves does to this.
 * Ian.thomson (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

 * I disagree that neo-victorian is limited to fashion, see this conference on neo-victorianism. From the description and topics list, it looks like the term has broad applications indeed. I'm not sure I understand your point of listing articles with few further reading entries, and I think we've covered the MOS issues already. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

The archived discussion on the RSN on whether it is reasonable for a self-published book spammed in by a single purpose account to be in this article, which presumably should involve similar or higher standards than those required of external links (which would exclude such a SPS), is here. Nevard (talk) 03:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, you will note that I participated in that discussion. There's no doubt in my mind that the original inclusion was spammy, nor that the link to the web site should be excluded. It does not seem to me that how the book first came to our attention is relevant at this point. Our guide for this issue should be, I think, WP:FURTHER, which does not mention reliability issues, and I think the question is whether or not editors can make the case that the book would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. Please note that we are not using the book as a source, and that SPS is part of WP:V, which concerns verifiability of sources. Indeed, were the book a reliable source, we should use it as a source for the article, and not list it in the further reading section. It does seem to me that the book is of sufficient interest to warrant inclusion. But if there are better ones, I'm open to using those instead. --Nuujinn (talk) 10:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I would also like to point out that it is highly likely that most of the readers coming to this page will be those who are interested in practicing the fashion of Neo-Victorianism, so a book such as this, which is about a woman's personal experiences with said fashion in modern times, would be of significant interest to our readers. Thus, it clearly fulfills the requirements of WP:FURTHER. Silver  seren C 11:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Copyright Violation
Looks like this might be copied from Kevin Roebuck's Mobile Social Networks (ISBN<PHONE_NUMBER>456). Only the last page is available as a preview on Amazon, but the last section almost matches entirely and the reference list is pretty similar too. Permission for this may have been given, but I couldn't see it anywhere.
 * Thanks for pointing out your concerns! I've looked into it, and Roebuck's book was published in 2011. The content shows signs of having evolved here gradually for years before that; see, for example, 2007. In case that book was a reprint, I've looked through Google's catalogue for the author, and I don't see any book published before 2011. Sadly, this is a pattern. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Neo-victorian Sexual morals
There seems to be no mentioning of the concept of neo-victorian sexual morals. Is that an entirely Scandinavian concept that doesn't translate to english? It refers to the eroding victories of the sexual liberation and a return of shyness of nudity (In many cases from American influence).Carewolf (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Unclear/contradicting definition
The first sentence in the article currently states:
 * Neo-Victorianism is an aesthetic movement which amalgamates Victorian and Edwardian aesthetic sensibilities with modern principles and technologies.

From this sentence, one would expect a mixture of Victorian and contemporary setting, e.g. people in Victorian attire using modern technology. However, in the following paragraph, examples of works of fiction are mostly set in 19th or early 20th century, without "modern principles and technologies". Only modern thing with these works of fiction is that they were created recently.

So, does "Neo-Victorianism" refer to a mixture of settings, or just a pure Victorian setting but made by modern authors?

So far, the article is unclear and self-contradictory regarding this issue. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 12:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see that the article, as a whole, contradicts itself. The term refers to more than simply a literary genre or sub-genre, but also to the use of Victorian styles in fashion, modern technology (skeuomorphism), and social attitudes. The literary works to which you refer are set in the Victorian era, but do reflect modern sensibilities.<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 14:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * For the literary works it is indeed sufficient to only be set in a Victorian period and created later to qualify. There is no need for it to even "reflect modern sensibilities", although, being written by modern authors, they might be difficult to avoid. Works that would portray an above-mentioned "mixture" may be considered to be about something neo-Victorian, but a work does not need to be about anything neo-Victorian to be a neo-Victorian work, it can be just set in a plain old "pure Victorian setting".
 * I did some rearrangement and added a sentence that should hopefully make this clear. Niokog (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Messy Leading Section
The opening of the article starts off by citing a bunch of books that don't seem to be added to any kind of bibliography. It makes for reading it seem like a "to-read" list instead of just mentioning some of the works that are cited. I've done some minor editing on the leading section in an attempt to improve general readability, but I'm afraid that it will need to be rewritten and I'm not entirely familiar with this subject. Perhaps someone who is more comfortable with it, should take a shot at it. DontAskMeAboutThis (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Neo-Victorian


text:
User:J Wynia

J Wynia is a web developer and businessman located in St. Paul, Minnesota. He is a partial owner of Pragmapool, Inc. (a small software company) and Myriad Intellect, Inc. (a web technologies company).

title: User:J Wynia


text:
Introduction to graph theory/Proof of Corollary 3

Statement
A graph is a tree if and only if for every pair of distinct vertices $$u,v$$, there is exactly one $$u,v$$-path.

Corollary of
Theorem 2: A graph is a forest if and only if for every pair of distinct vertices $$u,v$$, there is at most one $$u,v$$-path.

Proof
A tree is defined to be a connected forest. Furthermore, a graph is defined to be connected if and only if for every pair of distinct vertices $$u,v$$, there is at least one $$u,v$$-path. The proof should now be evident, but for completeness:

If graph $$G$$ is not a tree, it is either not a forest, or not connected. If $$G$$ is not a forest, by Theorem 2, there exists a pair of vertices $$u,v$$ with more than one $$u,v$$-path. If $$G$$ is not connected, there exists a pair of vertices $$u,v$$ with no $$u,v$$-path. Thus if $$G$$ is not a tree, it is not the case that each pair of vertices has precisely one $$u,v$$-path.

If graph $$G$$ is a tree, fix a pair of vertices $$u,v$$. As G is a forest, by Theorem 2, there exists at most one $$u,v$$-path. Since $$G$$ is connected, there is at least one $$u,v$$-path. Thus there is exactly one $$u,v$$-path. Since we have proved this for any fixed pair of vertices $$u,v$$, it follows that if G is a tree, each pair of vertices has precisely one path.


text:
User:Synoman Barris/todo

User:Synoman Barris/todo 20:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Class RM’s with clear consensus  User:Synoman Barris/todo 20:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia birthday comitee work

title: User:Synoman Barris/todo


text:
Ken Kelley (journalist)

Ken Kelley (September 24, 1949 – January 13, 2008) was an American journalist and publisher, active in the underground press movement. He founded and edited the underground magazines the Ann Arbor Argus and SunDance, and was a notable interviewer for Playboy magazine.

Early life
Ken Kelley was born on September 24, 1949, in Ann Arbor and grew up in Monroe, MI.

He attended the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor on a full scholarship, studying chemistry but dropping out after three semesters. While at University of Michigan, he worked on the student newspaper, the Michigan Daily, lived at the Trans-Love Energies commune off campus, and was involved in the White Panther Party.

Career
In 1969, Kelley founded the Ann Arbor Argus, which ran until 1971 and reached a circulation of 14,000.

In the early 1970s, Kelley moved to the San Francisco Bay Area and, along with Craig Pyes, founded SunDance, an underground magazine funded by John Lennon and Yoko Ono.

Kelley joined the staff of the Berkeley Barb in February 1973 and became managing editor that summer. Alongside fellow Berkeley Barb columnists Dancing Bear and Gabrielle Schang, Kelley was a correspondent on Earthquake News, a 1973 alternative television news pilot in San Francisco.

Starting in 1976, Kelley became a regular writer for Playboy, best known for his interviews of notable figures. His most well-known interview was of Anita Bryant in the May 1978 issue, in which she revealed her homophobic and anti-Semitic views. Kelley had traveled with Bryant and her husband for a week and protected her from a pieing incident while conducting the interview. The Kelley–Bryant interview is portrayed in the comedic play, Anita Bryant's Playboy Interview, which premiered in 2016 in Silver Lake, Los Angeles. Kelley also interviewed Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos, Cheech & Chong, Abbie Hoffman, Arthur C. Clarke, and Ray Bradbury, among others, for Playboy.

Kelley won a Maggie Award for his 1987 interview of Lyndon LaRouche for Focus Magazine.

Personal life
In 1971, Kelley was issued a subpoena from a federal grand jury probing the 1971 United States Capitol bombing, and subsequently burned the subpoena during a press conference with Yippie leader Abbie Hoffman.

Kelley became interested in the Divine Light Mission in 1973 and wrote about it extensively. He started writing a book about the Divine Light Mission entitled Brave New Bliss, but left it unfinished at the time of his death.

Kelley was a press aide to Huey P. Newton. After Newton's death, Kelley wrote that Newton had admitted to ordering the murder of Betty Van Patter.

Later life and death
In 2005, Kelley was arrested on charges of possession of child pornography. While awaiting the outcome of an appeal, he had a heart attack in jail and died on January 13, 2008. In April 2008, federal prosecutors asked to drop charges against Kelley.

title: Ken Kelley (journalist)


text:
Living in Japan/Getting Established/Computing

Windows
It is necessary to do some minor changes in order to displaying Japanese text.

Inputting Japanese Text
In the 'Regional and Language Options' Control Panel applet, choose the 'Languages' tab. Ensure that the 'Install files for East Asian languages' checkbox is selected. Click the 'Details...' button. Click the 'Add' button and choose 'Japanese'. Click the 'OK' buttons as necessary to close all dialog boxes.

To test the new settings, open any Unicode-enabled text processing application, such as Microsoft Word. Press the combination [Alt]+[Shift] on your keyboard until 'JP' replaces 'EN' in the new section of your taskbar. To input hiragana, enter the Japanese input mode by pressing [Alt]+[~].

Type a Japanese word using romaji keys (e.g. "nihongo") and either press [Enter] to leave that text in hiragana (e.g. "にほんご"), [F7] to change the text into katakana, or [Spacebar] then [Enter] to choose an alternative version containing kanji (e.g. "日本語").

To return to English input mode, press [Alt]+[~] again.

Windows 95/98/ME
To install a Japanese typeface, simply open Internet Explorer and open a web page coded in Japanese. An Install-on-Demand window should appear, asking to install Japanese text support. After completing this install, the Japanese page should display correctly. (Please note: Wikibooks is not coded in Japanese. Try Google in Japanese.)

Windows 2000/XP
For Windows 2000/XP reading support, you will need to install a Unicode typeface, such as 'Code2000' or Arial Unicode MS. Both will cover nearly all of the non-Latin scripts used throughout Wikipedia.

For input support, you will need to install the East Asian language files. You can do this from the 'Control Panel'. Open the 'Regional and Language Options' and navigate to the 'Languages' tab. Minimally, you will want to check the box for 'Install files for East Asian languages', though you may wish to also install the complex script files, too. Clicking 'Apply' will install the 'Arial Unicode MS', 'MS Mincho' and 'MS Gothic' families of fonts. All of these fonts contain the Hiragana and Katakana scripts, as well as a substantial majority of the Kanji characters most commonly used.

Depending on how your computer was initially setup, you may need the original source CD to complete the installation. Your computer will prompt you to insert the CD if it is necessary

If this does not work you can also download and install the Office XP Tool: Japanese Language Pack from the Microsoft website.

Mac OS X
Apple computers display Japanese characters out of the box, and are capable of inputting Japanese characters very simply. To do so, open up System Preferences (located in the "Dock") or click the Apple icon in the top left of your display and click 'System Preferences...'. Next, select 'International' and then the 'Input Menu' tab. Scroll down until you see 'Kotoeri' and check the box to the left of it. This will by default enable the input methods 'Hiragana', 'Katakana' and 'Romaji'.

To switch between your normal input and Hiragana quickly you can do one of two things. The first way to do this is to enable the input menu in the menu bar (you do this by checking the box next to 'Show input menu in menu bar' in the same place described previously), this will put a flag in the upper right part of your display. To change between input methods click the flag and select the new method. Alternatively, you can use the keyboard combination Command + Space Bar to switch between methods, although this is problematic in Apple's new operating system Tiger as this is also the shortcut for Spotlight. There are also direct shortcuts of Ctrl-Shift-; for Romaji, Ctrl-Shift-J for Hiragana, and Ctrl-Shift-K for Katakana.

Please note, while in the Hiragana input method you can temporarily switch to Katakana by holding down the shift key in much the same way that you temporarily hold down the shift key to type capital letters in English.

X11 (GNU/Linux, UNIX-like, etc.)
For displaying Japanese, you will need the correct fonts selected. Please refer to your distribution's documentation for more on that.

You will need a helper application for inputting Japanese characters. The most prominent are:
 * uim
 * SCIM


text:
Movie Making Manual/How you can help

What is this thing you call a "Movie Making Manual WikiBook"?
Think of this as a manual. It is intended as a practical guide to filmmaking. The Movie Making Manual is also a wiki which means that anyone can edit it. This is considered a Good Idea™ because every reader effectively becomes an editor so the content matures and improves over time. As more people read and edit, the content becomes more accurate, more up-to-date and more balanced.

In addition, you will find definitions and lists to supplement the information in the Movie Making Manual here at The Wikipedia Film page.

Join the discussion space for this wikibook here.

It's a Wiki!
You can fully edit this book. Please feel free to remove mistakes, flesh out existing pages or even to start entire new pages. If you've never used a Wiki before then take a look at the Help:Contents page to get started and the MediaWiki users' guide for more detailed information. Also have a look at the To Do page.

OK... sell it to me... why should I spend my time contributing?

 * It's fun showing off how clever you are.

 * It's a pleasure to contribute to a wiki because it's a collaborative process. What does that mean?  Well... you add a little bit and then you come back the next day to find that someone has added a little bit more and so on.  Remember those cress-growing kits kids used to get before Play Stations were developed?  Contributing to a wiki is a little like growing cress... you lay the seeds, let it grow a bit, then take some for your sandwhich, then let it grow some more (OK, crap analogy but you get the idea).  You get to participate in and nurture a growing document.

 * As a filmmaker, you'll spend a lot of your time doing your own independent research (e.g. "What tax breaks can I get in Prague? Should I shoot my next short film on High Def?  What are the guidelines for submitting a music video to a broadcaster?").  Before you do your next bit of research, take a look at the Movie Making Manual to see if we already some answers to your questions.  If not, start a new page and use it to make your research notes on (you were gonna make notes anyway, right?).  Now you're killing two birds with one stone: not only are you doing yourself a favour by taking organised notes but you're also setting the foundations for a full-fleshed-out page that will help others.  Don't worry... you don't have to leave the page in a pristeen condition... just do what you can and others will add to it later.

 * If you're a manufacturer then you might like to educate people about your product. Explicit advertising is not allowed but there's nothing to stop you writing an informative article on how to use your particular tool.

 * You get to feel like you're doing something useful with those hours spent in front of the computer!

Yes, I want to contribute! How do I get started?
There are no concrete regulations but the following could be considered "best practice":

 * 1) Register at WikiBooks (click the "Create account" link at the top right).  This is free and they wont spam you.  Registering will mean that your edits will be signed with your username.
 * 2) If you haven't done so yet then read up on how to edit WikiBooks on this help page and this users' guide for more detailed information.
 * 3) Sign up to the Movie Making Manual discussion forum.  Please discuss any large changes before doing them.
 * 4) Take a look at the "to do" items for this book.
 * 5) Add your name to the list of contributors.
 * 6) Before contributing, make sure the Movie Making Manual doesn't already contain the information you're planning to write about.
 * 7) Have a quick look over the formatting guide below...

The Movie Making Manual and WikiPedia
Before editing or writing an article, check to see if WikiPedia has an article on what you're about to write about. If it does then your job is to integrate the WikiPedia content into the Movie Making Manual. First, link from the Movie Making Manual to WikiPedia (this is easy using interwiki links, you just write a link like this: Interesting WikiPedia page ). Then, if appropriate, link back from WikiPedia to the Movie Making Manual. Useful WikiPedia categories include:
 * Video and movie technology
 * Film techniques
 * Film production

It's very important that we don't try to duplicate what's already on WikiPedia. The Movie Making Manual is focussed on the practical aspects of filmmaking. For example, WikiPedia has some excellent articles on 16mm film but doesn't even begin to tell you how to shoot on 16mm film.

If you have found (or if you have added) a Movie Making Manual page that contains content that isn't covered in WikiPedia then it may be appropriate to start a WikiPedia stub article containing a brief, "encyclopaedic" introduction to the subject and then add a link to the MMM page. For example, the Movie Making Manual has a page on the Panavision Genesis HD camera which is way too technical for WikiPedia but we have added a WikiPedia stub article on the Genesis which points the curious reader to the Movie Making Manual.

Tone
One of the fears with a collaborative book effort is that it loses any sense of "voice". Here are a few guidelines for this.

 * Be direct. Don't be afraid to give it to the reader straight.
 * Use a natural tone. Pretend you are explaining the topic to your best friend.
 * Be positive - encourage, encourage, encourage. There are enough naysayers in this industry, keep it outrageously upbeat.

Style

 * Use the present tense.
 * Use the active voice. "Take the lights", not "The lights should be taken by you"

Practical versus theoretical
This book is a manual so please keep the emphasis on the practical. That said, some topics will require a brief discussion of what you could call "practical theory". That's fine. All the theory in this book should directly inform decisions taken on set and in the edit suite. Please don't discuss film criticism theory or film history in the Movie Making Manual - there is a separate book for film history here.

Personal opinions and experiences
The main narrative of this book should be impartial. But don't shy away from expressing your own opinion. Just make sure it's perfectly clear to the reader which sections are impartial and which bits are personal opinions. For example, you might want to put your opinions or brief case studies in Side Note Boxes.

Pictures

 * 1) Upload your pictures to Creative Commons
 * 2) Name your picture MMM_picturename
 * 3) Link to your photo like this:

For more details, have a look at this help page and this one

Registered trade mark
Whenever you mention a copyrighted trade mark then you should put an ® by the name and add a footnote to say to whome the trade mark is registered. The code to insert this symbol is:

&reg;

When to use WikiBooks
For some reason, wikibooks seems to be fastest in the morning (GMT). It slows down considerably as the evening wears on. Hopefully things will get better as the MediaWiki Foundation get more funding.

Page naming conventions
At the moment, we're using a slightly outdated naming convention of

Movie Making Manual-Page name

But apparently this is outdated and may be made illegal. See the WikiBooks Naming Policy for more info. We'll probably use the following page naming in the future:

MMM/Chapter Name/Module Page

e.g.

MMM/Cinematography MMM/Cinematography/Capture Mediums and Recording Formats MMM/Cinematography/Capture Mediums and Recording Formats/Electronic Capture and Storage

Chapter names
PLEASE DO NOT USE THESE YET

Chapter name (examples of pages they contain)

Preface (contributers, how you can help, how to navigate this book) Intro (basics of filmmaking) Writing Funding and Budgetting Contracts and Law Pre-production Paperwork Cinematography Audio Actors Directing Post-production Sales and Exhibition Training Short Films Music Videos Local Resources Film Festivals You the Filmmaker Tools and Equipment Case Studies

Structure of the book
The MMM has both a flat and a hierachical structure! The naming is flat (i.e. out names are all of the form Movie Making Manual:Writing) but we also make good use of the MediaWiki categorization system to provide a hierarchical structure (see below for more information on the Movie Making Manual's categorization implementation).

(This will soon change... we'll soon be using a hierarchical naming convention)

Headers
Please put a link to one of our page header templates at the top of each new page created. Just put one of these at the top of your new page:

PLEASE DO NOT USE THESE YET - THEY ARE BEING ACTIVELY DISCUSSED IN THE STAFF LOUNGE and in Wikibooks_talk:Naming_policy

Categories
The MediaWiki Category feature is a powerfull way to... well.. categorise pages! There are several great things about this feature:

 * Category indexes are generated automatically
 * Each page can be in as many categories as you want. Take "Telecine"  Should that be in the "cinematography" or the "post-production" category?  Easy!  Just put it in both!
 * Categories allow the wiki to become more "booklike" whilst inheriting all the coolness that databases and hyperlinking provide.

Please put the correct category at the bottom of each page. The availabe categories are (please note that they are all lowercase and that MediaWiki is case sensitive!:

PLEASE DO NOT USE THESE YET - THEY ARE BEING ACTIVELY DISCUSSED IN THE READING ROOM

You also have to put the name of the page into the category sort field like this (note that you have to use a capital letter at the start):

Putting each page into a category means that MediaWiki can automatically make an index page for these categories. Each page can be in several different categories, for example, the page on writing low budget would be put in both the "writing" and the "low budget" categories like this:

If you start a new category then please put the following on the new category page:

A description of my new category

For more info on categories, see this help page.

=Promoting The Movie Making Manual=

We are actively looking for new contributors to the Movie Making Manual. If we can get enough contributors this manual could be THE definitive independent filmmaking resource.

If you wish to promote the MMM to users/contributors then you can use the following outline to Promote the MMM

Before you promote the MMM check out the MMM Promotion Tracking Page to ensure someone else has not very recently publicised it where you were going to. 1 per month per forum should be plenty of promotion :-)!

/Preface

title: Movie Making Manual/How you can help


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/bahrainsexdating.com

Links

 * bahrainsexdating.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Users
No users found.

Additions
No additions recorded.


text:
Talk:Douglas Rain

Marriages
Are there any sources for Rain's purported marriage to Kate Reid? I cannot find any. In fact, I only find sources that contradict it. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Can 'anyone' find any sources for the claim? I will delete is, since there are no references to it anywhere. Even Kate Reid's official biography states nothing about any such marriage. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Good edit. Doug and Lois got married in London, by the way; should that be included? I have no decent sources handy, and it's of minor significance. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

DOB?
A blog with the improbable name of "2010 Odyssey Archive" states his DoB is May 9. I do not think blogs are reliable sources, however. --<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Douglas Rain


text:
Talk:Entertainment Industries Council

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Entertainment Industries Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061001023014/http://www.eiconline.org/about/index.php to http://www.eiconline.org/about/index.php

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Entertainment Industries Council


text:
правъ

Alternative forms

 * Glagolitic:

Etymology
From.

Adjective

 * 1) straight
 * 2) right
 * 3) just

title: правъ


text:
Cookbook talk:Garlic Lemon Dressing

This page should be split. Kellen T 06:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

This page was transwikied from en.wikipedia.org. List of contributors: Poccil 21:56, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * [2003-10-02T05:29:23Z] Dori ( new, needs editing )
 * [2003-12-27T20:34:54Z] Moink ( vfd )

Recommendation for deletion
I have split this page, it now has only one recipe, and a very simple one at that.

It is only linked to by one cookbook article.

Jmsfwk (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

title: Cookbook talk:Garlic Lemon Dressing


text:
Akin Odimayo

Akinwale Joseph Odimayo (born 28 November 1999) is an English professional footballer who plays as a defender for club Northampton Town.

Career
Odimayo began his career with Reading, turning professional in July 2018, and making his senior debut for the club on 27 August 2019 in the EFL Cup. He moved on loan to Hungerford Town in September 2019, and on loan to Irish club Waterford in February 2020.

After being released by Reading at the end of the 2019–20 season, he signed for Swindon Town in August 2020. On 14 May 2021 it was announced that he had been offered a new contract. Odimayo went on trial with League One club Portsmouth but failed to earn a contract. On 3 August 2021 Odimayo signed a new one-year contract with Swindon Town.

He signed for Northampton Town in July 2022.

Personal life
Born in England, Odimayo is of Nigerian descent.

Honours
Northampton Town Individual
 * EFL League Two promotion: 2022–23
 * Swindon Town Supporters' Player of the Year: 2020–21

title: Akin Odimayo


text:
Philipp Roth

Philipp Roth (1853–1898) was a German cellist. He was born at Tarnowitz in Prussian Silesia. His teacher was Robert Hausmann.

title: Philipp Roth


text:
Talk:Sum-product number

Just a little note: In his proof Puzio used m to represent Length[IntegerDigits[n, b]]. Here I used l for that purpose because that's what PrimeFan used when he started the article (he was thinking of "length," I presume). Anton Mravcek 22:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * The l has the problem that it looks like 1. The problem with m is that I don't know how to give it a mnemonic meaning that makes sense here. If anyone else can, then they should change all the ls to ms. PrimeFan 14:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to know, if there is a name for the sum of 4 didget numbers like:2649=21 also same as 9462=21 what is that called? —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

220 in base 16 has to be wrong.
As commented in the text above, no sum-product number other than 0 may have a 0 in it since that would make the entire thing 0.Naraht (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't see a reference to 220 in base 16, but there is an example of 22O in base 36, which is correct. That number uses the digit of "O" (oh) and not the digit zero. "O" in base 36 is equivalent to 24 in base 10, so (2+2+24) * (2*2*24) = 28 * 96 = 2688 = 2*36*36 + 2*36 + 24. Steveschwei (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sum-product number