text:
User:Stephh20

My names Stephanie Rothe and I am 18 years old. I was born in Alexandria, Virginia on February 20th. I have 2 older brothers who have both graduated college, one from Virginia Tech and one from Old Dominion University. I also have two incredibly supportive parents and were born in South America (Colombia and Venezuela). I am currently at James Madison University seeking a degree in Kinesiology with a pre- physical therapy minor. I have always wanted to do something health care related and was glad to finally find something I am very interested in.

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:Stephh20


text:
Dreams F.C.

Dreams Football Club is a football club based in the Greater Accra Region. The club is competing in the Ghanaian Premier League.

History
The club was formed in 2009 and was promoted to the second level of the Ghanaian soccer league system in 2014.

The club operates a first team, popularly called Stage 1 and a youth team called Stage 2. Players of Stage 1 are considered first team members and compete in the Ghana Premier League. Stage 1 is managed by former Asante Kotoko trainer and national U20 team coach Abdul Karim Zito.

Ghana Premier League
Dreams FC sealed their qualification to the 2015–2016 Ghana Premier League season for the first time ever in their history. In December 2016, the club was demoted from the Ghana Premier League due to an anomaly with the registration of a player. The decision was taken by the Ghana Football Association's Disciplinary Committee.

Kit sponsor
The Ghanaian Premier League side signed a partnership deal with kit manufacturing firm, Mayniak Sports Wear.

Youth team players
Dreams Youth Team has produced players such as:
 * John Antwi of Misr Lel-Makkasa SC, on loan from Al Ahly SC, in the Egyptian Premier League.
 * Baba Rahman of Chelsea, now playing for the Reading F.C. on loan
 * Benjamin Tetteh of Sparta Prague in the Czech First League.
 * Leonard Owusu of Vancouver Whitecaps FC in the Major League Soccer.
 * Montari Kamaheni of F.C. Ashdod in the Israeli Premier League.
 * Emmanuel Lomotey of Extremadura UD, on loan at Villarreal CF B
 * Lawson Bekui of AC Kajaani in Finland.
 * Samuel Alabi of F.C. Ashdod in the Israeli Premier League.
 * Emmanuel Sowah Adjei of KAS Eupen in the Belgian Pro League.

title: Dreams F.C.


text:
Nightlife in Tokyo

Nightlife in Tokyo is an album by tenor saxophonist Eric Alexander. It was recorded in 2002 and released by Milestone Records.

Recording and music
The album was recorded in December 2002. The quartet contains tenor saxophonist Eric Alexander, pianist Harold Mabern, bassist Ron Carter, and drummer Joe Farnsworth. Five of the eight compositions are Alexander originals.

Release and reception
Nightlife in Tokyo was released by Milestone Records. The AllMusic reviewer wrote that, "Alexander offers a sustained program of fresh, creative, and advanced hard bop that unequivocally establishes him as a player who is not only fully aware of the tradition, but who is now among those most eminently qualified to develop it further." The Penguin Guide to Jazz commented that, "the small miracle is that Alexander keeps it all so fresh as far as the chief improviser's role is concerned."

Track listing
All compositions by Eric Alexander except where noted
 * 1) "Nemesis" – 7:58
 * 2) "I Can Dream, Can't I?" (Sammy Fain, Irving Kahal) – 7:59
 * 3) "Nightlife in Tokyo" (Harold Mabern) – 6:36
 * 4) "I'll Be Around" (Alec Wilder) – 7:59
 * 5) "Cold Smoke" – 8:25
 * 6) "Island" – 7:40
 * 7) "Big R.C." – 6:17
 * 8) "Lock Up and Bow Out" – 5:32

Personnel

 * Eric Alexander – tenor saxophone
 * Harold Mabern – piano
 * Ron Carter – bass
 * Joe Farnsworth – drums

title: Nightlife in Tokyo


text:
Help:Color schemes 2

Go to Sample Header

Go to Sample Body

Go to Another Sample Body

Go to Sample Assignments

Go to Sample Reference

Go to Sample Pop Quiz Header

Go to Sample Pop Quiz Answers

Go to Software Review - New Format

Go to Sample Footer Template

Sample Header

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Lesson Introduction - Creating the Thumbnail Storyboards
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |What are thumbnail storyboards?
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Example storyboards for our movie.
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |What software do I need for thumbnail storyboards?.
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Pre-Visualization for thumbnail storyboards.
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |How to draw thumbnail storyboards with ArtRage 2.
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |How to draw thumbnail storyboards with Photoshop.
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="390px"

The Storyboard Worksheet • The Original Story · The Script Outline · All the Storyboard Frames · [[Media:SBTDS Script Ciprian2.pdf|The Formatted Script]] · The Floor Plan.
 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Using the library of storyboard frames.
 * }
 * }

Sample Body
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="background-color: #ffffa0; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 60px;" colspan="2" | [[Image:Crystal Clear app kfm home.png|50px]] Color Scheme #1: This color is #FFFFA0

 * style="width: 60%; background-color: #ffffe0; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" |
 * style="width: 60%; background-color: #ffffe0; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" |

Left Column is #FFFFE0

 * Simple title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * Another simple title
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text.

 * Third title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * Fourth title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * style="width: 40%; background-color: cornsilk; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 400px;" |

Right Column is Cornsilk

 * Simple title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * Another simple title
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text.

 * }

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 60%; background-color: BlanchedAlmond; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" |

Left is BlanchedAlmond

 * Simple title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * Another simple title
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text.

 * Third title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * Fourth title
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text.

 * style="width: 40%; background-color: Lavender; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 400px;" |

Right is Lavender

 * Simple title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * Another simple title
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text. Text text text text text.

 * Third title line
 * Lots of wonderful text. Even more text. Great text is the best text but marvelous text is even better yet. Text text text text text.

 * }

{| cellpadding="20" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 100%; background-color: LemonChiffon; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="2" |

The Next Page

 * The next page tells you what to look for on the "Follow Dave?" Editing Workshop CD.
 * Page 1 - This background color is LemonChiffon [[Image:Crystal Clear action forward.png|24px]]

 * }

Short Sample Body
{| cellpadding="20" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 60%; background-color: #ffffe0; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="2" |

Left Title
Left text

 * style="width: 40%; background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 10px;" |

Right top
Right top text.
 * style="background-color: #fff8f8; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 10px;" |
 * style="background-color: #fff8f8; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 10px;" |

Right bottom
Right bottom text.

 * }

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 50%; background-color: LemonChiffon; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" |

Bottom

 * }

Another Sample Body
{| cellpadding="20" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 60%; background-color: #ffffe0; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="2" |

Analyze the story to format the movie script
For the first lesson of this course, you are given a short story and you are told to format the story into the proper format for a motion picture script.

 * A golden opportunity:Now is an excellent time to learn script formatting. This is a task that people do every day in Hollywood so this lesson give you excellent practice.

 * A wonderful tool:To help you, you can download a free yet working demo version of Final Draft which is a script typing and script formatting program. This is the ideal program for learning script formatting.  There are versions for both the Macintosh and Windows.

Why such a simple story?

 * This is an extremely simple story. It seems trivial.  You say, "I want something more challenging!"

 * I have heard this a thousand times from beginning filmmakers. Filmmaking looks so easy.

 * Wrong! This movie will be anything but easy. By the time we turn this simple script into a motion picture, this tiny movie will require a huge amount of effort.  Filmmaking is never as simple as it looks.  With this very simple scene, you will have the opportunity to do it all.

The steps of this lesson

 * 1. Look at the story
 * To the right, you see the story for "Seduced by the Dark Side!". Even though this is a very short story, it still needs proper formatting because this movie will be worked on by hundreds of people.  Everyone in Hollywood expects to see your script typed in the proper format.

 * 2. Identify the elements
 * On page 2, you see how the story is broken down into the different elements such as CHARACTER and DIALOG. Before you turn to this page, think about what elements of the story are needed for the script.

 * 3. Download and learn to use Final Draft demo version
 * On page 3, you get a brief introduction to Final Draft. Final Draft is both a very professional program with lots of features and a simple typing program.  First, you need to learn all the elements of a formatted script.  Your second step is to learn how to navigate inside of Final Draft.

 * Important: Even though Final Draft has a tutorial, you will learn navigation mostly by trial and error using the TAB and the RETURN keys.

 * 4. Typing the script - Line by Line
 * On page 4, you as shown all the steps of typing this script using Final Draft. Try doing this without looking.  If you have studied the script and learned how to format using Final Draft, you should not need to read this page… but I include it just in case.

Your Assignment

 * Submit a PDF file with the completed script formatted in proper format for a motion picture. (With the Macintosh OS X, you simply as to print the page using the PDF option.)

 * The title page will print automatically when you print your script so don't forget to select the Title under the Document menu and fill in all the info for the title page.

 * style="width: 40%; background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 10px;" |

 * style="background-color: #fff8f8; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 10px;" |
 * style="background-color: #fff8f8; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 10px;" |

The Tutorial

 * Skim the tutorial for Final Draft which is located in the Final Draft folder. Most of the content is for advanced users so you will not need this.

Optional Readings

 * Script Formatting
 * Script Formating Specs.

Optional References

 * Screenplay
 * Script Formatting Example (pdf)
 * Formatting tutorial
 * Article on Script Formating
 * Final Draft Demo Download

Want more?
There is another course which teaches how high school drama departments can create motion pictures as part of their class. See Course #03 :Basic Filmmaking for High School Drama Departments. Please write a movie script and, of course, format the script just as you did in this lesson.
 * }

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 50%; background-color: LemonChiffon; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" |

The Next Page

 * Continue this lesson on Page 2 - Analyze the story

 * }

Sample Reference
{| cellpadding="20" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="background-color: #e0e0ff; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" colspan="2" |

Reference materials

 * Reference materials for Seduced by the Dark Side! that you might need.
 * All the Lesson 4 Storyboard Frames. This sheet will give you ideas for your storyboards.
 * The storyboard outline. Print this script outline and use the numbers on this script for your thumbnail storyboards.
 * The original story.  To get additional information for your storyboards, look at the original story.
 * The [[Media:SBTDS Script Ciprian2.pdf|formatted script]].
 * A possible floor plan for the movie set. This will help you plan your shots.

 * }

Software Review
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em; width:98%" Filmmaking Software Review for Narrative Film Production
 * colspan="2" style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid Sienna; background-color:Cornsilk;" |

Notation's Protégé - demo version

 * A fun and useful demo program for film scoring with full symphony orchestra sounds. Works for 30 days.

 * }

{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em; width:98%" Review by Robert Elliott
 * style="width:60%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid Gold; background-color: LightYellow;" rowspan="2"|

Notation's Protégé - demo version

 * This is a unique musical notation program for people who want to learn film scoring. The quality of the symphony orchestra sounds if great.

 * Notation has two programs. This is the smaller version with fewer voices yet all the voices are from the London Symphony Orchestra at full quality.

 * To use this program, you must know musical notation or you must be very eager to learn musical notation. There is a useful reference card with the program and a good, but short, tutorial.  However, there is no help in learning notation.  Fortunately, there are many free tutorials on the Internet.

 * This fully working demo version can only be used for 30 days and has other minor limitations. However, that is enough for you to learn a tremendous amount about film scoring with the sounds of a symphony orchestra.  This is version 1.0 so it is still a bit rough.

 * Anyone interested in filmmaking should immediately request a free copy of the program. It is fun!

 * style="padding:0em 0.5em 0em 0.5em;" |

Uses at Wikiversity Film School
 * style="width:40%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#f1f5fc;" |

 * Film scoring
 * Learning musical notation
 * Having fun!!!
 * style="padding:0em 0.5em 0em 0.5em;" |
 * style="padding:0em 0.5em 0em 0.5em;" |

Rating
 * style="width:40%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#f1f5fc;" |

 * Four Stars

 * The program is wonderful but this version is 1.0 so some things are still a bit rough.

 * }

Sample Footer Template
This:

Creates this:

which is called by this:

which creates this:

title: Help:Color schemes 2


text:
Category:Taxa named by Josef Hafellner

Taxa named by Josef Hafellner (1951–), an Austrian mycologist and lichenologist.

title: Category:Taxa named by Josef Hafellner


text:
Yehezkel Braun

Yehezkel Braun (יחזקאל בראון; January 18, 1922 – August 27, 2014) was an Israeli composer.

Biography
Yehezkel Braun was born in Breslau, Germany. The family moved to Mandate Palestine when he was two. He grew up surrounded by Jewish and East-Mediterranean traditional music that influenced his later compositions.

Braun was a graduate of the Israel Academy of Music and held a master's degree in Classical Studies from Tel Aviv University.

In 1975, Braun studied Gregorian chant with Dom Jean Claire at the Benedictine monastery of Solesmes in France. His main academic interests were traditional Jewish melodies and Gregorian chants. He lectured on these and other subjects at universities and congresses in England, France, the United States and Germany. Yehezkel Braun was Professor Emeritus at Tel Aviv University.

Braun died in Tel Aviv on August 27, 2014. He was 92.

Awards and recognition
In 2001, Braun was awarded the Israel Prize, for music.

title: Yehezkel Braun


text:
User:Jdl32579~enwikibooks

I am preparing to teach a writing course at a university here in Minnesota. I received my BA at the University of Kansas in English Literature and Creative Writer. Doing work in a text book setting is kind of a new thing for me, so I hope that I don't go too crazy. Big words are not generally my thing. The work I want to accomplish with Wikibooks is going to be in the Literature department for the most part. I would also like to dabble in History, but it looks like there are a lot of articles in there already. I'll see what I can do.

title: User:Jdl32579~enwikibooks


text:
How To Search/PubMed

PubMed
 * Purpose: "to provide access to citations from biomedical literature."
 * Audience: PubMed is run by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) which is part of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) in the United States. NCBI was established in 1988 as a national resource for molecular biology information, NCBI creates public databases, conducts research in computational biology, develops software tools for analyzing genome data, and disseminates biomedical information - all for the better understanding of molecular processes affecting human health and disease.
 * Scope: Biomedical literature. Pubmed "allows users to access a superset of NLM's MEDLINE database containing MEDLINE, in-process citations, and citations to articles from selectively indexed journals that normally would not be selected for MEDLINE indexing."
 * Refresh Rate: ?

Search Fields
"PubMed uses an Automatic Term Mapping feature to search for unqualified terms. When you click Go, PubMed will look for a match in up to four lists. It looks first for a match in the MeSH Translation Table. If it doesn't find a match, it looks in the Journals Translation Table and finally in the Author Index. As soon as PubMed finds a match, the mapping stops. That is, if a term matches in the MeSH Translation Table, PubMed does not continue looking in the next table." When there are no matches found during the automatic term mapping process, individual words are searched in all fields.

Alternative Search Interface

 * iPubMed An interface allowing interactive and fuzzy search

Other Features
An excellent PubMed tutorial can be found at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/pubmed_tutorial/m1001.html.

title: How To Search/PubMed


text:
Talk:Derren Litten

MySpace link
I have added the MySpace link back in, as Derren links to it from his official site, derrenlitten.com. I have also emailed him via the address given on that site and await a reply. — G a ry Kirk | talk! 13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Derren just confirmed it is his via email; I know that that in itself isn't verifiable but as he links to it from his own site, we can definitely say it belongs to him. — G a ry Kirk | talk! 19:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Derren Litten


text:
WZRK

WZRK may refer to:

 * WZRK (AM), a radio station (810 AM) licensed to serve Dodgeville, Wisconsin, United States
 * WZRK (Lake Geneva, Wisconsin), a defunct radio station (1550 AM) formerly licensed to serve Lake Geneva, Wisconsin
 * WBDL-LD, a low-power television station (channel 18, virtual 8) licensed to serve Elk Mound, Wisconsin, which held the call sign WZRK-LP in 2017

title: WZRK


text:
Top-rated United States television programs of 1987–88

This table displays the top-rated primetime television series of the 1987–88 season as measured by Nielsen Media Research.


text:
Dolino

Dolino (Долино) is a rural locality (a settlement) in Maloshelkovnikovsky Selsoviet, Yegoryevsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 39 as of 2013.

Geography
Dolino is located 55 km south of Novoyegoryevskoye (the district's administrative centre) by road. Kruglo-Sementsy is the nearest rural locality.

title: Dolino


text:
Ting Mound

The Ting Mound or Thing Moot at Fellfoot Farm, Little Langdale, Cumbria, England is an Ancient Monument (a 'nationally important' archaeological site). It is a natural mound which has been deliberately terraced, possibly in the tenth century, although it has not been dated archaeologically.

It is believed that the mound was used as an open-air meeting place for local government, specifically for a Thing (from the Old Norse þing), a type of early assembly found throughout Northern Europe where there was Scandinavian influence. The mound is very similar to the Tynwald Mount on the Isle of Man. This supports the idea that it was established by Viking settlers, who have left a legacy of Norse toponyms in the Langdales, and possibly built some of the dry-stone walls which are a feature of the landscape. It is situated close to a Roman road and other transport routes through the Cumbrian mountains.

Towards the end of the nineteenth century the site attracted the interest of local antiquarians. It was described by (see note) and painted by W.G. Collingwood.

title: Ting Mound


text:
Talk:Diane Lane

Headlines
-- articles to beef up this article. More to come... J.D. (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Meet Unfaithful's Diane Lane
 * Memory Lane
 * Diane Lane
 * Diane Lane, with a New Husband and No Fear of Flying, Takes Wing Again in Lonesome Dove

Some more...

--J.D. (talk) 17:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The Happy Life of Diane Lane
 * It's finally Lane's moment in Sun

nomination for worst line on wikipedia
She took three years off from acting and appeared in several independent films during the 1990s

enough said. ill change it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

"However, she tries not to draw attention to her humanitarian efforts..."
Maybe they shouldn't be mentioned in Wikipedia then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 12:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

 * Isn't that the reason for a celebrity to promote a charity, to draw attention to the cause? — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this is a very odd section and it doesn't have a valid source. 2601:C2:4200:32C0:DC01:F5E7:B1D3:FA56 (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Diane Lane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131205154909/http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PEOPLE_LANE_BROLIN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT to http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PEOPLE_LANE_BROLIN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011085311/http://www.lhj.com/style/covers/diane-lane/ to http://www.lhj.com/style/covers/diane-lane/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524142431/http://www.askmen.com/specials/2005_top_99/45.html to http://www.askmen.com/specials/2005_top_99/45.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110202010200/http://www.askmen.com/specials/2006_top_99/diane-lane-85.html to http://www.askmen.com/specials/2006_top_99/diane-lane-85.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120707214502/http://www.askmen.com/specials/2007_top_99/98/diane-lane/picture-1.html to http://www.askmen.com/specials/2007_top_99/98/diane-lane/picture-1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101017200431/http://www.menshealth.com/men/sex-relationships/couples/diane-lane-on-life-and-marriage/article/ae5d4ce46d194210vgnvcm10000030281eac/2 to http://www.menshealth.com/men/sex-relationships/couples/diane-lane-on-life-and-marriage/article/ae5d4ce46d194210vgnvcm10000030281eac/2

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

You forgot a movie
“Touched by love”she was in !! She plays a disabled girl who refuses to speak to anyone, shut down inside. her caregiver gets her to open up and in process discovers her love for Elvis and this begins a friendship and etc. go watch it. I don’t wanna give it all away. 1980!! Also starting Deborah Raffin. I cried so bad watching this film! Back when the cable box was the sixe of a small Buick ! Triviamaster68 (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Diane Lane


text:
Ayathil

Ayathil is a neighbourhood in Vadakkevila zone of Kollam city, Kerala, India. It is the 36th ward in Kollam Municipal Corporation. It is one of the cashew processing hubs in Kollam city. Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Limited has a factory there. Kollam Bypass passes through Ayathil.

Importance
Ayathil is a healthcare hub of Kollam city. Ayathil junction connects National Highway 66 with Kollam-Kulathupuzha road and Ayathil-Pallimukku road. There are four multi-speciality hospitals situated in Ayathil-Mevaram stretch of National Highway 66 in Kollam city. Sree Narayana Institute of Technology a college in Kollam city that runs Master of Computer Applications courses. Younus College of Engineering & Technology is another professional college situated close to Ayathil.

Ayathil is one of the major power suppliers of Kollam city. LDF ruled Kerala Government have upgraded 66kV Electrical substation in Ayathil to 110kV for boosting the power supply in Kollam. Now it is one among the 116 Electrical substations in Kerala with 110kV power. The Government of Kerala has laid the foundation stone for Rs.30 crore Gas Insulated Substation (GIS) project to supply power to Kollam city. Kollam is the fourth city in Kerala (after Ernakulam, Thiruvananthapuram and Kozhikode) to receive a Gas Insulated Substation (GIS) project for uninterrupted power supply in the city. Underground cables from Kavanad and Ayathil substations feed the Kollam GIS.

Major institutions near Ayathil

 * Travancore Medical College Hospital, Kollam
 * N.S Co-operative Multispeciality Hospital
 * N.S Ayurveda Hospital
 * Meditrina Hospital
 * Ashtamudi Hospital
 * Popular Maruti
 * Popular Hyundai
 * AMW
 * Daiwik Fiat
 * Mohandas TATA

Government Offices, Central and State
Post Office. Pin. 691021 (type Branch Office)

title: Ayathil


text:
Talk:experience

RFV discussion
I can't make head or tail of the supposedly intransitive sense of the verb "experience". The OED does not show any intransitive usages of this verb. -- WikiPedant 14:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

 * I have come across this. I kind of associate it with hippy or new age babblings ("Don't think, just experience, man!"). I could only find this one example, but it's quite a tough one to Google for:
 * It gives them a chance to think about things, or the opportunity to not think and just experience.

 * Matt 00:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC).

 * I found another very similar one through Google Books in "Boost Your Self-Esteem" by John Caunt, 2002, page 82:

 * Don't think, just experience.

 * Matt 20:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC).

RFV failed, sense removed. —Ruakh TALK 22:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

put down to experience
chalk something up to experience --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:experience


text:
Filmmaking Basics/Understanding Filmmaking/Analyzing film dailies

 * {| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" width="500px"

 * bgcolor="#ccccff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Page 2 - Watching how dramatic scenes are broken down and filmed in Hollywood.
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" width="350px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Page 3 - Analyzing the movie George Lucas in Love
 * }

 * {| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" width="350px"

 * bgcolor="#eeeeff" style="border: 1px #cccccc solid;" |Page 4 - The Basic Filmmaking Process
 * }
 * }

How to learn filmmaking

 * There is only want way to learn filmmaking. You must watch films being made by professional filmmakers.  There is no substitute.

 * If you are serious about learning filmmaking, I highly recommend that you purchase the DVD disk containing order "Disk #2 - 24 Unedited Scenes" from the Star Movie Shop (requires QuickTime).

Possible ways of getting started learning the craft of filmmaking
There are many excellent ways to learn about filmmaking. However, each has some drawbacks:

 * Make your own motion picture - one to five years for your first feature film.
 * When you make your own motion pictures, you learn a tremendous amount about everything in filmmaking. An example is Renegade Possum Productions. One of their movies has shots from original Star Wars recreated by amateurs.  It is interesting to compare the performances of the actors in the real movie vs. an amateur motion picture.  The problem with creating your own motion pictures is you do not see the correct way to make a movie.

 * Work on student films - a few days to a few weeks... without pay.
 * If you go to Hollywood, just read the "Free Help Wanted" advertisements in the Backstage West/DramaLogue Magazine. This weekly newspaper/magazine is one of the three most important publications in Hollywood.  Don't move to Los Angeles without reading it for one year before you go.  Working on student films for the major film schools in LA is a great way to learn what filmmaking is all about.  The only problem with working on student films is you do not see the correct way to make a movie.

 * Become a PA (production assistant) - One to two months with almost no pay.
 * As a production assistant, you get to work on real motion pictures.    The only limitation with being a production assistant is you don't actually see that much.  You are often too busy to see what you need to see.

 * Go to film school - less than $100,000... but not by much.
 * There is no substitute for film school. But you can prepare for film school at home.  That way you do not waste the $60,000 to $100,000 that film school will cost.

 * Tour movie sets - great fun!
 * Visiting a movie set through one of the tours at Warner Bros (Hollywood) or Eiga Mura (Kyoto Japan) will teach you a lot. The taping of TV Sitcoms is also extremely interesting and free.  Even watching the filming of a game show in Hollywood is educational.  But traveling to Hollywood or Kyoto can be expensive.  See below for more information on current tours of the studios.

The best shortcutto understanding filmmaking - Film Dailies - Only takes a few hours

 * There is a shortcut. It is so obvious, most people miss it.  And it costs a lot less than any of the methods above.

 * The inexpensive and educational alternative is to watch film dailies from real television dramas and motion pictures. Watching the film dailies from television dramas is best since filming of a TV dramatic series is always more efficient.  The crew of a television series in its 5 year of production will always be more efficient that a film crew for a motion picture which has never worked together.

Sources of Film Dailies

 * 1. In Hollywood, you can buy film dailies at second hand video stores and at estate sales for people who work in the motion picture industry.

 * 2. Outside of Hollywood, you can buy them on eBay. Currently there is a limited selection.

 * 3. Recommended: You can order "Disk #2 - 24 Unedited Scenes" from the Star Movie Shop. About half of the scenes on this DVD-Data disk are interesting therefore it is worth a cost of $8 US plus shipping ($2.40 US to ship anywhere in India or all 50 states in USA; $5.20 US to ship to many countries outside of India or USA.)

 * Note #1: Because these film dailies are digitize and have time code on every frame, they are easy for practicing film editing. The only problem with the film dailies on "Disk #2 - 24 Unedited Scenes" from the Star Movie Shop is they are half size (320 by 240 pixels) QuickTime movies at 24 fps which cannot be edited by DV editing programs.

 * Note #2: You must be a film student or film instructor to purchase this disk. (Fortunately, completion of one of the lessons in this course (such as "Formatting the script" or "Storyboarding the script" qualifies you as a film student.)

Learning from Film Dailies

 * Each set of film dailies is very different. Therefore, I will describe what you will learn from Disk #2 from the Star Movie Shop.  This is a huge number of scenes so the scenes are only at half screen resolution but this is good enough to watch and learn from.

 * Overview Movies

 * Overview movies are included for each scene on Disk #2 - "24 Unedited Scenes" from the Star Movie Shop.

 * Most film dailies that you buy do NOT have an accompaning overview movie. Disk #2 does.  An overview movie is all the film dailies cut apart into individual pieces of dialog and reassembled into chronological order.  This way, you see each of the lines of dialog in the actual order that you will edit them.  Not only is this very useful, but it turns otherwise boring film dailies into something, which at times, can be very amusing and always educational.  It also helps you follow the story since dailies rarely come with the movie script.

Some of the scenes are extremely short and a few are extremely long. Because these are all scenes from actual productions, most of the scenes are interesting, long or short. It is not the length which is important.
 * Long and short

 * Well prepared
 * The first thing you see is all of the scenes are very well prepared. While you are only given the Circle Takes (which are the takes that the director feels are the best), you will see that it only takes a few takes for the scene to be perfect.

 * Memorized before filming
 * The bigest shock to amateur actors is that in professional productions, the actors have completely memorized their lines before they even begin to rehearse. Amateur actors (and beginning filmmakers) often feel that the actors are only give the lines that they need for the current scene and memorize just those lines for the shot.

 * This is not the way it happens. An actor cannot get into a roll or even memorize the blocking until the actor has the script memorized perfectly.  Then the actor has the freedom not to have to worry about the dialog but rather to concentrate on the performance.

 * As an example, try acting out any of the scenes Disk #2 - "24 Unedited Scenes" from the Star Movie Shop. you will never be as good as the actors in these scenes until you actually get into character.  You cannot get into character if you are still worried about the dialog.

 * The dialog must be memorized before you start.

 * Master shots first
 * In many of the examples, you see that the master shot is filmed first. This gives the actors the opportunity to get into their roles.

 * Skilled actors first
 * Always film the most skilled actors first. When you have "John Boy" on the movie set, he will always have his shots first because he is the freshest.  Notice in the scene where the now much older "John Boy" is keeping his journal, he almost always gives his best performance on the first take.

 * Then look at the scene with John Boy's mother and sister. The mother is a very experience actress so she goes first.  This gives the daughter time to practice her lines.  She has them memorized by when she it talking to her mother, she begins to find the tone and rhythm of the dialog which she cannot find when she is just memorizing her lines at home the night before the shoot.

 * Scene "The Assignment"
 * The longest and most complicated is called "The Assignment" where "the Smoking Man" is given his first assignment which is to kill President Kennedy. In one of the shots, one of the actors makes a mistake and stops and corrects himself.  The wording of the dialog is designed to give a hypnotic rhythm.  You quickly realize how complicated the wording is when the actors switches to the correct dialog.  They both seem correct but only the correct one has the proper rhythm.  This is amazingly difficult.

 * Scene "Out for a Walk"
 * Since this is one of the more humorous scenes, it is probably the most popular scene on the disk. The captain of the Babylon 5 space station has gone out for a walk OUTSIDE and the chief of security is trying to keep that information from the head of operations.

 * One of the most interesting things to see in this scene is the different deliveries of her lines by the head of operations. While some actors try to continually refine their performance aiming for a single goal of perfection, she tries a totally different delivery for each take.

 * This scene also shows how effects shots are done. The scene ends with the head of operations looking out the window of the Babylon 5 space station.  You see the movie set with glass in the widows and without glass in the windows.  The actual performance is done without glass (and, of course, without the exterior of the space station) which will be composited into a matte painting from a 3D model of the space station.  The shot with the glass and the framework for the glass is only for reference for the computer modelers.

 * Scene "Doctor, Doctor!"

 * The one thing which quickly becomes obvious is the lack of all sound except the dialog. This scene takes place in a large hospital.  When the doctor enters the room, the audience expects to hear all the sounds of a hospital.  In less than three seconds, the audience must get a picture in their mind of the corridor and rooms of the hospital.  None of this is shown visually.  It all must come from sound... and none of that sound comes from the filming on the movie set.  Even the squeeky shoes that the audience will hear in the final edit of this scene is not done on the movie set.

 * As with all 24 scenes on this disk, almost none of the scenes have much emotion. All of that must come from the musical score.  This is one reason why film dailies can seem very boring.  There is no music to create the moods for the scene.

To be continued shortly...

Hollywood Studio Tours
While the Universal Studio Tour is more entertainment than actual examples of filming, you can pick up tickets to filming as you leave Universal Studio Tour area. Most are for Sitcoms which are filmed totally different from a motion picture. Yet they are very educational and entertaining to watch.

At one time, the best tour in Hollywood (and the most expensive) was at Warner Bros. Their website is does not work well but you can try it at Warner Bros. If you have been on this tour recently, please tell us.

NBC Studio has a ticket office which gives out free ticket. However, these are mostly for sitcoms. If anyone has been to the filmings in LA, please give us a list of where you go to get tickets and what is available currently.

Japan
Don't overlook the studio tours in other lands. Eiga Mura, the Toei Studio Movie theme park in the northwest part of Kyoto is great fun. Years ago, you could actually see post production if you waited and watched very carefully in one of the distant buildings. If anyone has gone visited this movie village recently, please describe what you saw. Here is an article on this movie village in 2005. Many of the movie are filmed in plain sight of the crowds of tourists. Great fun!

India
Movies made in India, specially in Madras (Chennai) are filmed in a totally different way. Therefore, it is interesting to see how they do it. Unfortunately, the MGR Film City in Chennai is now closed and there are no tours of the state run film school still at that location (side entrance). Ramoji Film City in Hyderabad (part of the Telgu film industry) has a tour but you do not get to watch actual filming. It is a very weird tour. I do not know about Bollywood (Mumbai/Bombay). If anyone knows of tours to the film studios in India, please tell us. Indian films are made with lot of emotional scenes, especially family sentiments. AVM Studio in Chennai is an age old studio, where most of the Tamil movies are being made.

England
I believe that Pinewood Studios has a studio tour. Anyone been there? Please tell us more.


text:
Talk:Dick McGuire

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dick McGuire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404142802/http://www.databasebasketball.com/coaches/coachpage.htm?coachid=MCGUIDI01 to http://www.databasebasketball.com/coaches/coachpage.htm?coachid=MCGUIDI01

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dick McGuire


text:
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Apororhynchus/archive1

Apororhynchus

 * Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

This is my first ever featured article nomination, so if it not up to standard I'm happy to withdraw quickly. I conducted a little experiment to see if I could research and expand the article for the first animal listed alphabetically using the taxonomy system (Animalia, Acanthocephala, Archiacanthocephala, Apororhynchida, Apororhynchidae, Apororhynchus). I've now done my very best and appear to have gathered all the information I could from google scholar articles (there is not much out there on these tiny parasitic worms). Yes, I am claiming comprehensiveness (to the best of my knowledge) despite the relatively few lines for each species. Prove me wrong! I had an excellent good article review by Chiswick Chap which improved the article considerably. Fun fact: I'm also the creator of this article 10 (!) years ago. Thanks! Mattximus (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Support Comments from Tim riley
Looks pretty good to me, though I know nothing at all about the subject. The article will certainly have benefited from having the treatment, and all I can find to quibble about at a first read-through are the inconsistent –ise/–ize endings for "parasitise/parasitize". I'll re-read and look in again later.  Tim riley  talk   13:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC) (Incidentally, and not that it matters perhaps, is the date of 31 July 2019, above, the right one?   Tim riley  talk   13:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC))
 * Thanks! And yes 's review was fantastic. And almost nobody on earth knows much about this topic (including myself!), I think I've incorporated every article that exists and is available on google scholar. "ize" has been changed, and date fixed. Mattximus (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * After second perusal happy to support. The co-ordinator should note my total ignorance on the subject, but the article strikes me as comprehensive, well researched and referenced, suitably illustrated and a surprisingly good read. Meets the FA criteria so far as this layman is any judge.  Tim riley  talk   17:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Sources review

 * No spotchecks carried out
 * Verifiability
 * Ref 8: rather a wide page range (273–305 = 33 pages). Can the citation be more specific?
 * Yep, found the url as well. ✅
 * Note (b) appears to be only partly referenced
 * Oops. Fixed now. Very bizarre reference but I think I did it accurately.✅

 * Links to sources checked and working, per the external links checker tool
 * Formats
 * Ref 13: give language ✅
 * Ref 15: Publisher - the book lists about 16! Maybe choose one and add "and others"?
 * Used your suggestion, but also happy to type out all 16! ✅
 * Ref 22: Language? ✅

Brianboulton (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Quality and reliability: No issues - sources appear to meet the required FA criteria
 * Thanks Brianboulton! I've addressed all your comments above. Mattximus (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Image review

 * File:Apororhynchus_hemignathi.png needs a US PD tag and author date of death
 * I added the tag with the death year of 1927. I think I did this correctly, this is my first featured article nomination.

 * What's the source for the latitudes and longitudes in the distribution map? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Each sample specimen (only 1 or 2 from each species exist) have a location attached. The citation of each location is included in the respective paragraph. I searched that location on wikipedia and used the latitude and longitudes to create the map. Is there a better way of doing this?

 * I'm not sure what alternative to suggest, but there are problems with this approach. For example, one sample was found in Hungary - this is a good-sized country, but your dot for that sample specifies particular minutes which don't appear to be supported by any source. If we don't know where in Hungary the sample was found, this level of precision is inappropriate. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I've been thinking about this, and I wonder if it is actually ok to simply reduce the precision in the data, the map itself won't change at all since the dot covering Hungary is larger than the country itself! So graphically there is no issue with precision, just in the underlying data.
 * Thanks for your review! Mattximus (talk) 13:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Cas Liber
Taking a look now.....
 * It'd be good to add that they are tiny or microscopic in the lead. ✅

 * Link cloaca in lead. ✅

 * The section marked Genus is more properly about the description/anatomy and should be called such. It does need a section on this anyway. ✅

 * There seems to be a lack of information on biology - the hosts section is very small. Do birds suffer and get ill hosting these things? Do we know? Does anyone speculate yea or nay?
 * A great question, and as far as I can tell there is no description of the effect on the birds, apart from the possible age at infection (which I included in the final paragraph) for one species only. The sources of information on any of these species is extremely scant.
 * Yeah a tricky one. Even ay source that says "the effects of infection are unknown" would be valuable here. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes I would be happy to write that, but as of yet have no source which claims that. Hmmm.... Ok I found one reference! It only applies to one species, but it's likely it's generalizable. Added to host section. ✅

 * Has anyone done any cladistics or DNA analysis on the group and its closest relatives?
 * I very much agree with the addition of this information (it was also brought up by Chiswick Chap in the GA review). But according to this recent paper "insufficiency of morphological data seems also to explain why the taxon has not been included in phylogenetic analyses so far" so we are out of luck there apparently. This paper [] claims to have molecular sequences for some related species, but I can find nothing on this genus or it's place in the larger picture.
 * Do you think it worthwhile to include this information in the article? "No phylogenetic analysis have been completed on this genus."
 * If a source says it, then yes! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yep found the source that says that very thing. I added it to a new paragraph which I normally wouldn't do for a single sentence but it's not related to the other two. ✅
 * Great - the last sentence of the paper adds something about the anatomy and speculating on where the family lies in the Acanthocephala. It would be good to add something about this as it is about where these critters are likely to lie in the Acanthocephala family tree..fulltext at here..Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Well that full text article you've given me allowed me to significantly expand the first paragraph of "description". It was a great find, thank you! I think I've incorporated all relevant information, and I'm just a bit weary of readability and closeness to the source material. I tried to summarize and reword, however I'm not sure how to approach list of anatomical terms any other way besides copying the list. What do you think Cas Liber? Is it an improvement? Mattximus (talk) 15:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is very difficult as one cannot sacrifice accuracy. There are some similar sets of words but I can't think of alternatives. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Overall the article seems a bit on the slim side but can imagine this might reflect the meagreness of knowledge about the subject. Still would be good to confirm/rule out above. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

 * Agreed. And thanks for the review! All changes I could make have been completed. Mattximus (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks like I found the last two points, thanks again for the review. I'm happy to continue to improve the article in any way. Mattximus (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Ultimately I think I am in tentative support territory in comprehensiveness and prose. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:21, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your review, and digging up that paper. The article is much better now. Mattximus (talk) 12:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

FunkMonk

 * I'll have a look soon, but at first glance, I'm a bit puzzled that there's no taxonomy section? Especially since so many higher level taxa are covered here too. We would need a section that goes into the naming of each taxon mentioned here, as well as etymologies and authors. The current species section would be a subsection of the taxonomy section.
 * Likewise, there could also be an evolution/classification section, as well as one on behaviour/biology.
 * This I believe was addressed above. There has been no phylogenetic analysis, no behavioural, biological, or evolutionary information beyond what is already included related to the genus. All those would be great to add, but as far as I can tell, they do not exist. Information on this genus is extremely limited. And I do have a citation saying that no evolutionary studies have been done, and it is from a recent source. Mattximus (talk) 22:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, even then, surely there is info on the taxonomic history, as in who named it, when, and based on what. Especially the many higher order taxa the article covers warrant discussion. Why so many, what do the names mean, etc., and I can't believe this info doesn't exist in the original descriptions. FunkMonk (talk) 07:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Who named it and when is included for every species, including a link to the original paper. I even added a discrepancy with the link to both dates for one species. The etymology seems to be the only thing that is missing. I have searched as best as I can and found 3 of the 6 species name origins. Only 1 has an explicit etymology source that could be found, however the other two are almost tautological (being named after a parasitologist and a region where the parasite was found). The remaining three remain a mystery despite my best efforts. Is this sufficient to meet your request? If not I am happy to work on any other issues that you see fit. Mattximus (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I mean the higher order taxa, such as the genus name. For example it is rather unusual for orders to contain a single family which contains a single genus. Since all these taxa are covered in this article, I expect discussion of them. I see the order was named by someone else than the family and genus, for example, so it leaves questions that should be answered here. Same with the etymology, what does the genus name mean? FunkMonk (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I think I covered what you said, and placed it in a new section. What do you think? Mattximus (talk) 11:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks good, anything on the naming of the family and order? FunkMonk (talk) 10:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

 * Would be good to spell out and link the names of the people mentioned in the text.
 * Great idea. I found a wiki page for Shipley and spelled out and linked accordingly, but no other authors.

 * Why to the species have links if they all redirect to this article? They are selflinks.
 * All links removed.✅

 * I think you could specify the taxobox image is a drawing and from when.
 * Changed to "Drawing of Apororhynchus hemignathi by Arthur Shipley in 1896. This is the original sketch of the first species to be described in the genus Apororhynchus." What do you think?

 * "of samples of species of Apororhynchus" The tripple of is repetitive, could be spiced up.
 * Changed to: "Worldwide distribution of Apororhynchus samples collected in the field"

 * "Infection can cause enteritis and anemia in Hawaiian honeycreepers" Surely they can't be the only species badly affected by infection?
 * I'm certain they all are, however this is the only record of any effect I could find for any of the species. No other article mentions anything about how the birds are affected (as far as I can tell)

 * "Apororhynchus species parasitize exclusively avian hosts" Exclusively parasitize would seem like a better order.
 * Order changed. ✅

 * Have you searched places like Google Scholar and JSTOR for additional sources?
 * Oh yes, as far as I can determine, I've cited *every* article published on this genus. If there is any that I have not discovered, I'm more than happy to add them. Mattximus (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

 * Terms like retinacula, protonephrida, cement glands, as well as others, could be explained in parenthesis, as you do with other unfamiliar terms.
 * I added short descriptions in parentheses to these and a few others. I also wikilinked where appropriate. Great suggestion.

 * The infobox image still contains a selflink.
 * Fixed. ✅

 * "and renamed by, also by" Double by.
 * Fixed. ✅

 * "Although Apororhynchus has not been included in phylogenetic analyses thus far due to insufficiency of morphological data, the lack of features such as an absence of a muscle plate, a midventral longitudinal muscle, lateral receptacle flexors, and an apical sensory organ when compared to the other three orders of class Archiacanthocephala indicate it is an early offshoot (basal).[6]" This paragraph seems like it would fit more in a taxonomy section, or perhaps made into its own paragraph under description. Now it is lumped with rather unrelated text.
 * Yes, I noticed as this excellent review goes on, paragraphs are getting larger and less connected. I made your suggested change. What do you think now?

 * I wonder if thinks we could give a specific etymology for the genus name using dictionaries? Rhynchus means beak, at least...
 * I added a note with a link to the wikitionary for the Greek root rhúnkhos, which does indeed mean nose, snout or beak. Is this what you were thinking?

 * "The spines on proboscis" On the?
 * Nice catch, fixed. ✅

 * "It was described in 1971[23] or 1966." Seems a strange discrepancy, sure it can be figured out?
 * The most recent publications all say 1966, however when looking for the original article, I could only find the 1971 version. It's possible this 1971 version is just a collection of older papers. The linked reference indicates how there was confusion and to use the 1966 date and not the 1971 date. I've made a request to WP:RX to see if they can find that very article in question.

 * Not all the species have their diagnostic features listed? Sources not found online can be requested at WP:RX.
 * I've requested one for Apororhynchus paulonucleatus, which is one of only two that lack diagnostic features.

 * The intro could be longer, as it is supposed to be a summary of the entire article. Now there is no description, for example, which is a pretty significant omission.
 * I've rewritten the introduction, so it is now about twice the length. What do you think?
 * Thanks for this excellent review! I'm still working on some of your excellent comments. Mattximus (talk) 00:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks again FunkMonk for this amazingly good review of this article, it's significantly better once again. I've addressed all comments (but awaiting your opinion and a reference that I've requested). Mattximus (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Nice, I'll take a new look once the requested source is incorporated. FunkMonk (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

 * Support - the changes look good, and it seems it will maybe take a while before the last source can be found, so I won't hold this back. FunkMonk (talk) 12:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I've collected one of the sources and will incorporate the description soon. Already incorporated the etymology. No luck at all on the Russian one, and similar doubts about the German article from 1931. Thanks FunkMonk on your review. It was so good you've inspired me to write another one of these articles! Mattximus (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Lead

 * "suggests a basal branching from the other three orders of class Archiacanthocephala; however no phylogenetic analysis has been completed." As it happens, I know what you mean, but I suspect that very few general readers will. Would it not be possible to phrase this more accessibly in the lead? With all of the technical details being in the main article?
 * I added two explantions for technical terms but I see what you mean about reducing the technical aspect. I will think about this one and get back to it.
 * I think it's better now. What do you think?

 * Still too technical. Just as a suggestion to get you thinking, what do you think of 'A lack of features commonly found in Acanthocephala (primarily musculature) suggests an evolutionary branching from the other three orders of class Archiacanthocephala; however no analysis has been completed to determine the evolutionary relationship between species.'?
 * That sounds good, I used your structure to reword that sentence, then reworded the next sentence accordingly. I think this is what you were suggesting all along, does it work now?
 * It does.

 * Link proboscis.
 * Done. ✅

 * "that might have undergone complete reduction" Again, could this be phrased more accessibly?
 * Just removed it, it's too much info for the lead anyway I think... ?

 * "The proboscis receptacle and receptacle protrusor are also reorganized in this order." What is a "proboscis receptacle", a "receptacle protrusor" and what does "reorganized" mean? If that can't be succinctly summarised, then consider a more general statement. Just what the statement means will be explained in the main article.
 * I think that you missed this one.
 * Sorry, I missed this one. Sentence rearranged in a more summarized tone. What do you think?
 * Good.

 * "six species that are distributed globally" → 'six species that are each distributed globally'. (Assuming that this is the case.) I see that it isn't. Ignore. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * "being collected only sporadically in Hawaii, Europe, North America, South America, and Asia" It seems to me that "only" gives a meaning to this that you probably don't intend. Consider deleting it.
 * Done. ✅

 * "These worms parasitize exclusively birds" Perhaps 'These worms exclusively parasitize birds'?
 * Done. ✅

Article

 * "The first species to be described in this order" → 'The first species in this order to be described' might flow better?
 * Done, changed in two places. ✅

 * Link proboscis.
 * Done ✅

 * "The name Arhynchus was chosen based on the characteristic absence of a proboscis" I think that you need to explain what Arhynchus means, or a reader won't "get it".
 * Yep, there is a note right after that with an explanation and link to wikitionary. Is that not enough? I can take it out of the note and into the body if you think that's better?
 * To be honest I missed the note. I mistook the [a] for a cite. Personally I would include it in the main text, which seems to be standard practice; but your treatment is acceptable. (I dislike the single letter footnote signifiers as I almost always miss them. Personally I use [Note 1], so a reader is fully aware that there is supplementary material. But [a] is more common, and even preferred by many experienced editors.
 * I would put your footnotes above your references.
 * I see exactly what you are saying, it was hidden beside the reference. I've moved it directly to the word itself so it will be impossible to miss. Also moved the footnotes. Great suggestion! ✅

 * "However, it was later renamed to Apororhynchus" Delete "to".
 * Done ✅

 * "the name Arhynchus being used by Dujean" Optional: → 'the name Arhynchus having been used by Dujean'
 * Done ✅

 * "Although Apororhynchus has not been included in phylogenetic analyses thus far due to insufficiency of morphological data, the lack of features such as an absence of a muscle plate, a midventral longitudinal muscle, lateral receptacle flexors, and an apical sensory organ when compared to the other three orders of class Archiacanthocephala indicate it is an early offshoot (basal)." IMO, you need to Wikilink and/or explain - either in line or in a footnote - phylogenetic analyses; morphological data; muscle plate; midventral longitudinal muscle; lateral receptacle flexors; apical sensory organ; and, in more detail than "(basal)", what you mean by early offshoot. When this crops up elsewhere, I shall simply stste "explanation needed".
 * Linked morphological, phylogenetic, wikitionary for midventral, longitudinal. I cannot find a good explanation for muscle plate. A few more I will continue searching for.
 * Provided wiktionary links to more anatomical terms. I'm not sure I like this, as it seems like overlinking, but I believe it satisfies most of your concern.
 * That made me smile. Usually I am the one complaining of overlinking. I don't think that you have linked any words or terms that an average reader would be expected to know the full meaning of. This is a fairly technical article, so there will be a lot of links. If you differ, flag up the specific examples and we can discuss.

 * "microscopic" You have a consensus of sources for this? 2.5-5 mm is not what a layperson would consider microscopic.
 * Yes I agree. However it's certainly not macroscopic... any suggestions on an alternative word? "Very small" also doesn't seem precise.
 * Why say anything? If people don't have an idea what 2.5-5 mm is, then a single word or two won't help. How does "The genus Apororhynchus consists of ectoparasitic worms, 2.5 mm to 3.5 mm long, or 1 mm to 1.5 mm longer when distended." sound to you? At a push, insert "small" before ectoparasitic. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Good suggestion, I've adopted your wording for the body of the article, but used "small" for the lead.

 * "motility" I think that linking to Wiktionary - thus motility - may be appropriate here.
 * Done ✅

 * "the hooks (or spines)" Explanation needed.
 * Some references use hooks, others spines. Not sure how to clarify any further. Any ideas?
 * OK. Let's leave that one for later.

 * "neck retractor" and "receptacle retractors". Ditto.
 * Hmmm not sure how to describe without changing the source material. Retractor is simply a muscle that retracts, the receptacle is the part of the worm where the proboscis goes in, as stated earlier. Not sure how to clarify further here either.
 * Well you just explained them clearly and succinctly. Work exactly that wording into the text, or into a footnote, and I'm happy.
 * I added my explanation into parentheses, however I'm not sure if this is enough.
 * Looks good to me.

 * "the proboscis receptacle and receptacle protrusor both are reorganized" → 'the proboscis receptacle and receptacle protrusor are both reorganized'.
 * Done ✅

 * "are no longer involved in" The "no longer" doesn't really make sense. (Assuming that you don't wish to go into a great deal of detail about their [assumed] evolutionary history.) Perhaps simply 'not'?
 * Yeah there isn't enough info to go into the assumed evolutionary history. Changed as you suggest. ✅

 * "Two regions of musculature are considerably different in Apororhynchus compared to the other Acanthocephalan orders" and "Additional anatomical features that can be used to distinguish this genus among other acanthocephalans include" There seems to be a certain amount of overlap there.
 * Agree completely. With all these (excellent) reviewer comments, this section on description has two paragraphs but they are no longer containing distinct ideas. I think the content is still good but the wording now is a bit confused. Any suggestions here?

 * I have made a change to the article. See what you think. Feel entirely free to change or revert it if you aren't happy. I have tried to put a description in the first paragraph, and distinguishing features in the second. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Species

 * "There are six species in the genus Apororhynchus.[9][10] A seventh species, Apororhynchus bivoluerus Das, 1950[11][12] (also called A. bivolucrus) from an Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) from India was considered to be a strigeid trematoda by Yamaguti (1963)." I am confused. Are there six or seven species. Is Yamaguti the only authority who considers Neophron percnopterus to be a strigeid trematode? Or is this the consensus?
 * In this case there are 7 names assigned to this genus, however one of them is not considered to be accurate. Modern consensus appears to agree with Yamaguti. It still appears on indexes, but in all articles it is not considered valid. It is often listed with a note like mine saying it's not real. I'm not sure how to rephrase this and am open to any changes, but what is written is accurate, however unusual.
 * Again I missed the note. Maybe 'There are six species in the genus Apororhynchus. Apororhynchus bivoluerus Das, 1950 (also called A. bivolucrus) used to be [/was once] considered a possible seventh species, but the modern consensus is that it is not.' Then put the vulture, India, Yamaguti stuff in a footnote? Merely a suggestion.

 * Link New World oriole.
 * Done ✅

 * "which is likely a crested oropendola" I am not sure if that "is" should not be a 'was'?
 * Done ✅

 * "A. aculeatus is the second parasite to be discovered" "is" → 'was'.
 * Done ✅

 * "different host and geography" Should "geography" not be something like 'location'?
 * Agree with you, but that is the terminology used in the paper. Changed. ✅

 * The origins of the species names is given in some cases but not in others. Would it be possible to fill the gaps for A. aculeatus, A. hemignathi and A. paulonucleatus?
 * No luck on the aculeatus and paulonucleatus. I did include a good description of hemignathi. I will try requesting hard to access articles. I tried at the reference request and no luck for paulonucleatus but they suggested I try the Russian wikipedia request. I don't speak Russian but I will keep searching.
 * No luck on finding the source
 * OK. If it's not in the sources, it's not in the sources. Can't be helped.
 * I'm fairly sure it is in the source, the issue is that nobody can find a copy of this old Soviet paper that would,in any event, require translation. There are just references *to* the paper, which is what I included in the text.
 * Do not hold this FAC up for it, but have you tried asking at WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request?

 * "immature eggs around 0.035 mm to 0.015 mm" Possibly insert an 'are'? And it is conventional to give ranges starting with the smaller value.
 * Actually that whole sentence was worded weirdly. Fixed. ✅

 * "A. hemignathi is the first species" "is" → 'was'.
 * Done ✅

 * "due to the uniqueness" "the" → 'its'.
 * Done ✅

 * "A. silesiacus was found in the cloaca of the European robin (Erithacus rubecula), the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) in Wroclaw, Poland[25] and Hungary" Just checking that it has been found at both locations in all three birds.
 * All 3 at first location, 1 at second. Clarified. ✅
 * Tweaked a little. See what you think.

 * "it is the newest Apororhynchus species to be classified" I know what you are trying to say, but what you have written means something slightly different. Perhaps 'it is the most recently classified of the Apororhynchus species' or similar?
 * Changed to it is the most recently classified species of the Apororhynchus. ✅

 * "potentially also the intestinal wall" What do you mean by "potentially". Surely it either does or doesn't. If you mean something like 'sometimes' or 'in some cases', then say so.
 * Actually it is unknown if they infect the intestinal wall according to the most recent sources, however an older source does indicate that a sample was indeed found in the intestine. Have added your wording "in some cases". ✅

In passing I note that a lot of your references lack identifiers - ISSNs, OCLCs, or whatever. WorldCat is your friend here. Scroll down for the OCLC.
 * This one took a while but I collected as many OCLCs for all those missing identifiers.

A fine article. I am impressed. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for this very thorough review. These are all excellent recommendations. I will start working on them but it may take a few days to address all of them. Mattximus (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * As and when you feel that you have addressed all of my comments, could you give me a ping? Thanks. (I assume that you are still working on making the language of the lead more accessible.) Gog the Mild (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Will do! I will need some time, I want to address every signle one before giving you a ping. Progress is slow but consistent. Your review has been excellent and this weekend I will aim to finish everything. Mattximus (talk) 23:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

 * From my point of view there is no great rush. And I can see that, as you say, you are making steady progress. When you are ready. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

 * Hi Mattximus. You ready for me to look over your responses yet? Gog the Mild (talk) 15:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Gog the Mild. I have addressed every single comment you made, I think most are resolved satisfactorily, however each time I couldn't complete your request I made a comment for your input. Thanks again for this excellent, and thorough review. Mattximus (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries; other editors do the same for me. Looking good. Five points above with responses needed from you. Plus: In "Description" you refer to "hooks (or spines)", then two sentences later "spines". Choose one, stick to it and parenthesise the other on first mention. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Great! I've addressed your comments. Thanks again, this is my first featured article nomination, and I received such great reviews that I'm very thankful. Especially for such a random topic. Mattximus (talk) 19:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that you missed my point above. You use "hooks" (5 times) and "spines" (7 times) apparently interchangeably. Is there a reason why you can't choose one, stick to it and parenthesise the other on first mention? Gog the Mild (talk) 20:33, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Got it, went with hooks throughout. Mattximus (talk) 23:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

 * You have worked hard and have a very classy article here. More than happy to support. The first of many I hope. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gog the Mild for walking me through my first featured article nomination! Your review really made the article significantly better. Appreciate your time! Mattximus (talk) 01:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It was enjoyable working with you, and if I ever get stuck for a reviewer for one of my nominations, I shall feel free to ask if you fancy being on the other side. Happy editing. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Coord note
Hi, since this is your first FAC, we'll need a spotcheck of sources for accurate use and avoidance of plagiarism or close paraphrasing. If one of the existing reviewers would like to carry that out, that's great, otherwise you can put a request at the top of WT:FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, just finishing up the last comments from the final reviewer now. If nobody does a spotcheck I will request above. Mattximus (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

JJE
Imma try to get a dual source and image review, here. All images seem to be adequately applied and licensed. Only one has ALT text. Regarding sources:
 * Thanks! Alt texts seemed to have been all there but formatted incorrectly, fixed. ✅

 * 1#Not sure that I am finding the text of the infobox that is referenced to this in the source.
 * This was a recommendation from an above editor. I added that caption based on the context of the source. That source is the first description of this genus. This is the diagram found within. Is there a way to word it a different way?

 * 2#Don't have access.
 * 3#Doesn't seem to support most of the information referenced to it, except for the "anus of birds" part.
 * Oops, not sure how that slipped into the lead. Removed. The location in the body of the text contains multiple references for all the information in that sentence.

 * 4#Checks out.
 * 5#Checks out, but proboscis receptacle, a receptacle surroundingmuscle (receptacle protrusor), retinacula, neck retractor, probos-cis and receptacle retractors, circular and longitudinal muscula-ture under the metasomal tegument, and a single muscular layerbeneath the proboscis wall in the source might be too close to the article text and cement glands are not mentioned in the source.
 * Yes I agree. This was a concern above from another reviewer, and the conclusion was that although it's too close to the article text, being a list of technical terms, it was determined that there was no reasonable alternative. Cement gland reference (#8) added.

 * 6#It doesn't seem like this source or the other ones support the sentence cited to them.
 * Removed ref 6 altogether. However the following ref has the information you are looking for: "...these cloacal and potentially also intestinal bird parasites...". Mattximus (talk) 14:54, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

 * 7#large, globular, with numerous deeply set spirally arranged rootless spines usually not reaching the surface, or with none is exactly identical in the article as in the source. That and I don't think the parenthetical actually appears in the source.
 * Same reasoning as #5 for the identical list of technical terms. Parentheticals were suggested by another editor above to help clarify words, based strictly on definitions, which I don't believe need to be cited.

 * 8#Checks out; any similarity of the text to the source probably falls under WP:LIMITED
 * 9#I am not sure if the source says there are six or seven species. Otherwise, it checks out.
 * 10#This one mentions seven species, not six. As with the prior, I see that #13 might endorse treating one of the species as not an acanthocephalan, but perhaps the wording could be changed to make the source-text contradiction less jarring.
 * Yes I agree that this is a bit jarring, however in this paragraph several of the sources show 7 species, but also explain that the 7th one is not considered accepted by taxonomists (in various wording depending on the source), not just #13.

 * 11#Checks out.
 * 12#Can't access this.
 * 13#Checks out.
 * 14#Can't access this.
 * 15#I am not sure if I am seeing the Kauaian bird mentioned there.
 * 2nd paragraph, hemignathus procerus, the old name for the Kauaʻi ʻakialoa (which is confirmed by the following sentence, with a reference)

 * 16#There is something wrong either with the link or with the source, as I don't see "cacicus cristatus" mentioned.
 * Just clicked, it's there third paragraph from the bottom on the left column, on page 345. You should be able to access this link.

 * 17#Checks out.
 * 18#Checks out, but this and the preceding might work better with their references shifted around a bit.
 * Happy to do so, however I'm not sure how it can be better placed than it is now.

 * 19#Can't read this.
 * 20#Can't access this.
 * 21#"srishailam" does not appear there.
 * I recall reading this. I believe it does appear there however it uses a different spelling, or an older spelling. I do not recall the original spelling to search for it, but I believe it's on page 211.
 * That should be clarified in the article, then. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

 * 22#Does not support the etymology.
 * Agree, moved the original citation for the naming of this species next to the description of the person to cover etymology correctly.

 * 23#Can't access this.
 * 24#Can't access this.
 * 25#Can't access this.
 * 26#I am not seeing the etymology and the research history in the source.
 * Not sure what you mean by research history. Reference 25 contains the original description which states that silesiacus comes from Silesia since it was found in Silesia so I can solve this issue by moving reference 25 to beside the etymology.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * 27#Checks out.
 * Thank you Jo-Jo Eumerus for your review! I've addressed all comments, made as many changes as I could, and when the change could not be made I commented for your advice/approval. Thanks again! Mattximus (talk) 15:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

 * Hi JJE. As a bystander, and knowing that is new to FACs, I was wondering if there was anything else for them to do? Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The only thing that I see which might want to address is #6, I am not sure if it was resolved. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You are correct, I missed that one. I have the correct ref in place with the quote from the text, as well as removed #6 altogether. What do you think? Mattximus (talk) 14:54, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems OK, with the caveat that I didn't recheck everything. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks to all these incredible reviews. I believe I've addressed every comment. Mattximus (talk) 01:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

-- Laser brain  (talk)  13:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


text:
Sometutuza

The Keta-Sometutuza or Keta-Sometutu Festival is an annual festival celebrated by the chiefs and peoples of Agbozume in Ketu South District in the Volta Region of Ghana. It is usually celebrated two weeks after the Hogbetsotso festival. It is celebrated by the Somey people of Agbozume, Denu and surrounding communities to commemorate their migration from Keta in 1792-94 after the Keta -Anloga War. It is usually celebrated on the 3rd Saturday in November.

Celebrations
There are pageantry shows and pomp during the festival. There is also a grand durbar of chiefs with their subjects.The festival commences with performance of traditional rites in Keta and the main durbar at Agbozume. The chiefs pay homage to their paramount chief and they renew their allegiance to him. During the festival, there is also a display of different types of Ewe Kente, and other traditional and woven textiles.

Significance
It is celebrated to mark the exodus from Keta, their place of origin to their present settlement.

title: Sometutuza


text:
User:Tbrason/sandbox

City of Lethbridge Electric Utility

City of Lethbridge Electric Utility (LEU) delivers electrical utility services in the area of the City of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. Its sole shareholder is the City of Lethbridge.

External links City of Lethbridge https://www.lethbridge.ca/living-here/electric/Pages/default.aspx

title: User:Tbrason/sandbox


text:
Thomas Smith (1682–1728)

Thomas Smith II (1682-1728) of Broxtowe, Nottinghamshire and of Gaddesby in Leicestershire was a member of the Smith family of bankers, being the eldest son of Thomas Smith I (1631-1699) who in 1658 founded Smith's Bank in Nottingham.

He served as Sheriff of Leicestershire in 1717-18 and in 1717 he was granted a coat of arms (Or, a chevron cotised sable between three demi-griffins couped of the last the two in chief respecting each other) to be borne by him and by all male descendants of his father.

He married Mary Manley, a daughter of Thomas Manley of Thorney Hills, Staffordshire, but left no male issue, only 5 daughters. The family banking business was carried on and expanded by his two younger brothers Abel Smith I (1686-1756) of East Stoke, Nottinghamshire and Samuel Smith (1688-1751) of London.

title: Thomas Smith (1682–1728)


text:
User:Zubster23

I am a filmmaker and videographer and work for the United Nations Refugee Agency. I make videos for clients, mostly for non profits and government bodies. I love nature, wildlife, art, craft, gardening. I care about conservation and the environment, studying Environmental Science in Tasmania in the 70s. My father was an artist, my mother a librarian and avid gardener.

title: User:Zubster23