text:
Talk:C++ Programming/Conventions/Archive 1

Common Programming Errors
It would be nice to point out some common programming errors, pitfalls and the like by highlighting it. Many books on programming have an inset with an icon indicating the type of the inset (general notes, common errors made in general & errors made mostly by people coming from some background (e.g. in our case a C or Java background may cause some confusion in people adopting C++), general pitfalls, pitfalls in some C++ implementations, etc.) beside it. We could also probably do something similar. There is already a common programming error in Programming:C plus plus Hello world. -- Paddu 12:46, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
 * What about Programming:Improving programming skills that will assume knowledge of programming and just focuses on improving style/skill so on? Dysprosia 07:01, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

 * Dysprosia, did you mean to respond to section 2? Section 1 deals with errors in programming, not styles. -- Paddu 08:01, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

 * This could be done with something similar to infoboxes in Wikipedia -- Paddu 20:45, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Brace Style
An important problem is how to have NPOV in the indent styles of examples. -- Paddu

 * Present all the styles and "let the reader decide"... at least that is my idea. -- Emperorbma 19:59, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)

 * I didn't quite get that. Obviously each example cannot be presented in all styles. So we should present one particular example in all styles & the rest all in the same style as a `convention we'll adopt in this book' (which may itself be controversial). But then the example must be comprehensive enough (to include, e.g. cuddling of else, do-while, etc.). Then what about the examples which are presented before this comprehensive example? -- Paddu 07:37, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Separate Chapters
y not split the content into different chapters? --Yacht (talk)Q 02:48, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

 * Follow the link to "your first program". I have been making separate chapters. I am just reluctant to make N different pages now itself (them each would be with nothing more than a few lines). Once each chapter is sort of complete, content from here would be moved there and a link added here. -- Paddu 06:47, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Broad overview ?
Sorry to ask, but do you think you have here a broad overview of C++, like the first chapter in Kernighan & Ritchie ?

Now the same subjects would have to be expanded in specialized chapters, right ?

Hgfernan 12 May 2004

What must be covered
IMHO there should be a book covering C++ without reference to platform & non-ANSI libraries, so that people who want to use various C++ libraries can first get to learn C++ per se. And, IMHO this is that book. Of course, there could/should be books about the various C++ libraries, e.g. MFC, boost, GTK--, etc. But they should be covered in books different from the book meant for learning C++. Any comments on this? -- Paddu 07:12, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)

 * I do agree that things must have a structure and a logical one if possible, using as many references to any C++ oriented content information would be only contributing to the goal (readers <= contributors), if there is any part that would could be made into a separate work they should be moved, I've done that with OOP part (as a test, but it pretty empty, if someone dislikes it they can change it), more important would be saving any work already done under the same license like *How To Think Like A Computer Scientist Learning with C++ by Allen B. Downey and other free work under a compatible license before they are lost and mailing other free content authors so the information remains free for all...

 * OOP is central to C++ and would have to be dealt with in a book on C++, but a book on C++ should not deal with MFC, etc. as they are not required to learn C++. There could/should be (a) separate book(s) on OOP; they'd probably deal with not only C++ but other OO languages as well. IMHO C++ is one subject for a book, MFC is another, general OO is yet another. Each would ideally be dealt with a separate wikibook.

 * Agree... but other libraries should be referred to... I personably don’t have a problem with some examples on the differences of approaches etc... but yes I agree that C++ and STL should be the main subject... -- Panic

 * Trying to pour in material from 3 subjects into one book would IMHO not lure contributors but would turn them away, since they'd think it's an unorganised set of notes rather than a textbook. -- Paddu 20:45, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * Disagree... as we are working on virtual space and not restricted to paper or other media a dif. page or chapter for MFC (until enough data to form a dif. work) is more logical than a different empty book for it... people would participate more if given a vast range of options to build upon, this is one of the reasons that a single "huge" page would work better, given the restrictions of wiki. (more on that below) -- Panic

My replies removed
My replies to many of the above threads have been wrongfully removed. -- Paddu 13:57, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * These include threads that User:Panic2k4 calls dead, and includes threads about User:Panic2k4's behaviour in Talk:Programming:C plus plus. My replies can still be found in Talk:Programming:C plus plus and Talk:Programming:C plus plus/single page. Some stuff I wrote to him are also at User talk:Panic2k4. -- Paddu 14:09, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Rearranged discussion "area"
The above three sections enclosed within horizontal rules is User:Panic2k4's interpretation of the previous discussion. I'm opposed to his/her refactoring at least because:
 * 1) I was misquoted at least once — Panic's interpretation is that I asked someone to be nice, though I'd just said that doing something would be nice.

 * Geezz Paddu just correct them, people do make errors, English is not my natural language, and try to not spend my time taking things that seriously... (probably the mess this was, if anyone changes your lines you wouldn't notice it :)

 * 1) The interpretation makes at least one false claim — It's false that I didn't implement the highlighting I proposed. All the pages that I edited (except those in which I added navigation links) follow the convention I proposed.

 * Didn't see any and I didn't contribute to any modules only to "the book" (modules have seperate discussion "boxes" (hint) ) was this miss plassed here ?

 * 1) It calls proposals without any opposition as dead.

I didn't check for more errors as I don't have much time. Besides, even then I wouldn't be correcting them as IMHO they form a comment Panic has posted and I believe I shouldn't edit his/her comment. Presenting the original is an easy way to make clear what each person said.

 * Humm the originals are still there only commented out so to reduce the mess (I reverted it again), and missquoted are is not the same as edited, it's easier to prioritize stuff as I have arranged it, please try to give it a chance, as for the dead proposals as adopted, heck if a house is pink I say it's pink I dind't select the color...

 * Please state what proposals you wish still to debate (if you still consider that for example the highlights are open, you should consider helping on heerr highlighting stuff :) lol at this point in time I don't think it's a great idea if that would have been settled before no time would be have to be lost on this (humm btw for example "In My First C++ ..." I didn't seem to notice any nor in the other modules I've seen...)
 * It can be done when all sections are filled and a full revision starts, but now it's a bit late on the game

And BTW Panic, Dysprosia is a "she" not a "he". -- Paddu 13:11, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

 * Lol I'll correct that one :)--Panic 02:10, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

moved from my talk page as this is relevant to this topic... (there = here)

Stop "vandalising" Talk:Programming:C plus plus with your own ideas

What you said there: "If you are an active contributor / engaged on any of the proposals you are free to edit this section" is not the wiki way. Everyone is free to edit any section. Stop adding this kind of nonsense. Thanks! -- Paddu 05:16, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I don't think I'm vandalising anything My First Contribution-as it is now... (you can always ask for moderation if you have your mind set into it). I'm just asking for your opinion on some proposals (and some were already "adopted" by contributors or just ignored) and take your point or of any other "major" contributor into account, the ideia is to make contributors in general happy... geezz

As for the warped ideia you have on the humm wiki way... wiki pages may have passwords and other "protections", I didn't and can't prevent any non humm "major" contributor from editing the section, it's just a request and I do think it's a logical one so to keep some order on it... geeezz you are to litral for me, first you wrongly accused me of vandalizing and them make me spend this time debating a self evident point don't be so single minded (almost anal) on the subjects, take the time to think on what/how you did/react and how I could have gone about it, I think I've been contributing so don't call me a vandal ... txs

PS: I'm a "he" :) --Panic 01:39, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Having all material in a book in a single page
Can't the reference tables be moved to the main page into the related part of the doc and use anchors to refer to them ?

This does have something to have with previous discussions about removing part of the work to other pages but as this is not an independent topic (it relates to misc. parts of the main topic) -- Panic

 * It's infeasible to have an entire book in a single wiki page. It may be OK for some people to read that (there do exist a lot of e-books available in "one-big HTML" format), but editing such a page would be difficult. Yeah, we have section editing and all that, but still it is a pain. After submiting it, you've to wait for the whole book to load again. Which reminds me... What about people trying to learn about just one language feature. Do you want them to wait for the entire book to load? That's why pages in the context of wikibooks are called "modules", not "books". Depending on the size of the book, each "module" may be a separate chapter or section or sub-section or anything.

 * If you want all chapters in one big HTML, it should be possible to create a page like this:

 * but the navigational links I've added to some of the chapters won't point within the page but to the page for individual chapters. But that should be the least of our problems. The real problem is that the servers would slow down. -- Paddu 20:17, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * A single page from my point of view is the best trade off, for the user and the writer, as stated above any contributor would find more easily were he can be most useful and avoid repeating already contributed information, as a reader I do really hate wiki because of the limitations it gives to export to a non wiki env. like to get a copy of the work as a PDF. -- Panic

 * What was dicussed before was not trying to include all C++-related topics into this book but to deal with only one topic — C++. The other topics must be in different books. Of course there should be a link to those books here and a link to this one in those, but each chapter in those other books should not be mentioned in the table of contents of this book. -- Paddu

 * Agree, but the "topics" can be easily moved later if found to be extensible enough to be a stand alone book, moving empty topics will only fragment the user/contributor base... -- Panic

and there isn't a wiki "extractor" (does it?) that would facilitate getting a copy of all the work I do think that it should be avoided and only use external pages to start independent "books" (works with private topics), I have also tried to find an offline editor (that isn't a Emacs or Unix solution...), does anyone know about one ? -- Panic

 * Probably you are looking for Special:Export?

 * Nope, something like a OpenOffice plugin something on those lines... I dont want to install a server and wiki on my comp to be able to edit offline :)... -- Panic

... and still on forking the work into multiple books. First lets have a working "book" and then we'll trim it out, using s streamline structure without references to multiple subpages will help to desegregate other topics, hec... even STL, that is part of the standard should have a separated book only for it, but lets try to just keep it on topic and with a simple and logic structure, then we can see if it is worth to fork it for the moment all content (on topic) will help to bring contributions ... -- Panic

 * It's difficult to have a working "book" without structure, with just random stuff about every C++-related topic thrown about. Talking of forks, splitting a program into a lot many source files is not equivalent to creating forks. Forks in wikibooks would be having two different wikibooks on the same subject. Is there any other book on C++ here? -- Paddu 20:45, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * Ok, I should have used thread of subject and not fork (topic would also be wrong as a topic can be linked to a external subject), but I've seen your changes to the "Guide to Writers" but is there a way to list all "modules" on a single page so anyone can get a easy copy of the book (for printing or just to avoid repeating info or just to link to the relevant areas ? ) if not dividing the work into multiple modules is not a good idea it will only hide information and segment the readers reducing the writers as they will only see blocks of the work and probably if a users comes to the book as a reader the probability that he will contribute to a section he wants to read about is less that to a part he already knows, in modules only people that already have some degree of knowledge on the subject would contribute and I really doubt that this would result on more work being done, to do spell checking I don't need to know C++ (for example)... -- Panic

 * The intent is to make the readers aware that they can edit any page, not just what they are reading. With Wikipedia, the average newcomer is tempted to read more & more pages following various internal links, and hence can easily arrive at something known and start contributing to that article. In wikibooks, the no. of links is low and this may be a problem. But IMHO the reader can easily guess that there is more than one module to a book and search for other modules in a book.

 * As far as coverage of new subjects is concerned, the idea probably was to list the books expected to be written in a bookshelf, and a visitor to the bookshelf can easily find what subjects he could contribute to. This approach would not work if bookshelves are (e.g.) given lower Google ranking than to a particular book. In such a case most visitors would only visit that book and might not be able to guess that they are free to contribute to any of the other books listed in the bookshelf.

 * I can't think of a solution to the problem other than what I've mentioned, namely have a huge page that instantiates each page of the wikibook as a template (did you know you could insert the contents of any page into any other page using templates?). It is possible to also have an edit link to individual pages, so any reader could be lured into adding content for any of the modules. But the real problem is that having large pages both irritates the reader and stresses the servers. I think we could get a better solution if we ask this in the Staff lounge, which has a greater visibility.

 * BTW, please sign your comments with a  ~ . It's difficult to find which comments are by whom. I'm having a tough time taking our discussion to the Staff lounge. -- Paddu 14:42, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * Done -- Panic

 * As it turned out, all the anonymous comments were by the same person, and I didn't have time to take this discussion to the lounge. Will do so today. BTW our conversation is quite large and I've decided to give a brief description and link to this page instead of copying the entire conversation there. -- Paddu 07:23, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * How about an infobox in each module of a book, which includes some text like:

 * -- Paddu

 * That is a great idea, but not to empty books (that is really very frustrating), btw keep those wiki wiki codes coming it's helping my learning curve :) -- Panic

 * That way you may not learn much. Read the help pages here and in meta to learn more. I believe you can get a better idea about Mediawiki and the way we work in Wikimedia projects by perusing the pages in Wikipedia in the Wikipedia: namespace. Not all those pages have been ported to Wikibooks.

 * Since you seem to have arrived at Wikibooks without first having been to the 'pedia (please confirm this), you might be able to give a better insight into how wikibooks must be different from wikipedia. IMHO red links are not frustrating, but rather an invitation to contribute. A wikibooks reader oblivious of wikipedia might think differently. BTW you could change the way broken links show up by changing your Preferences. -- Paddu 07:23, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

 * Er... That's not an infobox, that's more of a navigational template. -- Paddu 07:23, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Here's my 2c. A book has a lot of largish chapters - let's emulate this. Having everything on one page disadvantages the reader in having things referenced, it's easy to bookmark a module page to a certain section, but it's not if everything's on one page, since one has to look through that to find something. Not to mention it's more difficult on dialup connections. It also allows one to structure the material and have different people working on different things without loss of apparent continuity in the text. Speaking of forks, I am strongly against this. If we have any chance of making something decent here we need to pool our resources and create something unified. Dysprosia 21:32, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Here is a possible solution: Either way, the text needs to be split up into different sections. How about splitting up this page into chapters and having more lecture style material more suited for a Wikiversity type course which can be a bit more freeform as Panic seems to be more comfortable with? (Though you will need to break it up into a set of lectures regardless, and most importantly keep it structured).

HTH Dysprosia 10:30, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Lol, sorry about the "he" Dysprosia you are part of a minority so I did take it for granted, I've been corrected and switched any wrong gender references :) (Hope it alright now...)

I'll elaborate it more here and them move relevant parts to the "proposals section", I understand that you are referring to modules (separated pages) as chapters and sections... as for the order or structure I do think it's taking shape but stuff needs from time to time to be moved around just to make sense (we can't talk about classes before going into what OOP brings to C++ etc...), as for the fixed idea Paddu has with modules, I'm not against it nor mind set into a huge page but to make it a logical work. If we have multiple pages and with it discussion pages etc... it makes it a very difficult job on making a good work just take a look on the wiki bib. (on the previous modules) they go all over the place, I think that the problem is that people tend to look at this wiki book as an extension of wikipedia and this is separated work that must stand by itself if we fragment it it stops being a book. I'm taking the road set by P3 "move chapters to modules as they were finished" (they aren't) and see if the solution Paddu indicated will work (transclusion, I think its a great option), still waiting for him to give me a working example but that would solve the problem of extracting all content to let's say a .TXT file and make it easier to coordinate edits (stop the duplication) and keep the ease of editing (if you go into the history you can easily see that people edit and contribute to different "chapters" that would be made impossible if using modules at this stage... ufff I think it's all, combined with I and others have said before, will this close the subject ?!? (until we have a complete "chapter") --Panic 02:05, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Where is the reference to the STL ?
The book doesn't have any reference tothe STL. Since it is a part of the C++ standards, is there a plan to create a section on it? --Mecanismo 13:31, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Altering how talk pages are structured
As there seems to be no discussion about the cover image any more and seems to have been finished, I think its discussion should be removed. If for some reason someone disagrees with this I suggest, merging it with an archieve of previous proposals. I also think the link to book editing should be removed as well replaced with a link to help for editors and/or help for wikibook users. I also think the parts on merging contents and orphaned pages can be elemented since any merging and orphans should of been taken care of by now and the end of the main page lists anything that people think should be merged or added and the discussion on book contents seems to be the place to discussion it. I think copying and/or moving conventions and future contents that have been discussed and agreed to should be placed on the main talk page for quick access with a notice to not remove whats listed here, but to debate them if people disagree in the aproperate discussion.

Something like this to replace the main talk page:

== See Also ==
 * Before contributing to this book, read Wikibook Policies and Guidelines.
 * For information on editting wikis see help for editors and help for wikibook users.
 * See Archives for older talk pages.

Please try to limit discussions to the related discussion page:
 * See Conventions for debates over conventions used in this book.
 * See Contents for discussion and planning of books contents.
 * See the talk/discussion page of the related module for discussions and debates limited to that module.

==Conventions used in this book== ==Book Focus and Direction==

with maybe the see also part placed on its own page so that it can be included on any talk page for this wikibook to elemenate duplication. --darklama 18:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Please move this to the proper section... And I disagree.--Panic 04:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Is there anything you disagree with specifically? The choice of what cover image to use seems like a proposal that was finished. The help for editors seems like it would answer any questions related to editting making the book edit part unnessary. it also looks like its dead and could potially be duplicate contents. --darklama 17:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Before contributing to this book, read Wikibook Policies and Guidelines.

This is already on the book itself and sending it in that "In your face" form, could just scare contributors.

Probably including the link in every existing talk page to the policies and guidelines would be helpful l is there a template we can implement on contributors discussion areas in genera (small fonts) and not in a red background would be great. (or on the side of the page, as V2 of the book something on those lines...) --Panic 03:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Your right, it is be a bit "in your face". If you have better wording suggestion, go for it. The idea is to cut down on needing to point out specific guidelines or policies that are better understood by reading them. For example "avoid copyright paranoia" is better understood by reading the policies and guidelines. Then again it may not be necessary at all since the "help for wikibook users" includes a link already to policy and guidelines. I don't see a red background, its all white here, must be something on your end. I don't know if a template for it exists or not yet. The closes I know of off hand is which gives:

Come introduce yourself at the new users page. If you have any questions, you can ask there or contact me personally. --darklama 05:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Again you misunderstood me, what I said was, we could probably use a banner (or something like V2 toc) and place those links and other info in all talk pages but not with a red background or big fonts. --Panic 16:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't think I misunderstood you this time. I was answering your question. There doesn't seem to be any existing template, except maybe, we would need to create one to use on all talk pages. It doesn't have to be a red background or big fonts, I was pointing out that what I used above doesn't use a red background, but a white background, in case thats what you see on your end. --darklama 19:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Altering the TODO box logic
I Propose altering the way the TODO boxes are used at the moment, the idea would be adding a TODO template on the C++ Programming namespace with a redirect to the existing root: template, this would provide a easy what on checking where TODO boxes are on the book and add the what links here link to the Content discussion. --Panic 05:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The TODO template could probably be changed to categorize pages in something like Bookname/Todo, but why is it needed? --darklama 03:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

A new template (reworked that is) will not be needed a simple redirect from a local (in the book namespace) to the general one would provide a whatlinksHere list of were all the TODO boxes are, so to facilitate contributions and prevent that people that add them forget or get confused by moves or text changes...--Panic 05:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Sounds to me like the category would be the better option, because the TODO template may be used by more then one book and people may forget to create a redirect. The category would ensure its always available for any book that has things to do that makes use of the TODO template. --darklama 12:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Try it then lets seem how it feels, I do think that the TODO box in itself doesn't need a link to the category, that could be done in per book bases in the talk section.--Panic 15:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC) PS: This discussion should be moved to the template page, so if anyone objects sees what our intentions are.

Making the template not appear in the category isn't a problem, thats easly done. --darklama 16:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Humm ok but I don't see another way of doing what I said having a Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:TODO with only the C++ Programming Pages.--Panic 17:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Yup I remember now why we didn't use the category on the TODO box, the box is intended to help editors/contributors not to crowd the navigational aids, even if in part it would help the page listing isn't specific to a book.--Panic 20:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC) PS: I will be moving this discussion to the TODO box talk in a few days (3 max)

So are you saying now you don't want it?! I had went ahead an added a category for it already, since pages (including templates) should be categorized. Maybe it can be somewhat helpful anyways. See Category:TODO. --darklama 23:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

-

I'm saying that I don't like it, there is no need to have an extra link in each page (on set of pages) that use the TODO, a quick way to see what book pages used it would suffice, as it is it only makes like a bit more confused to users, but I can live with it.--Panic 17:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Tables, Figures and More
'''From prev. debates...''' I like the green boxes, and i would re-use them until someone can come up with a better solution.

Here is an example:

I would suggest:
 * TODO for TODO notes (since that's already there)
 * Programming:C_plus_plus/Pitfall for common errors
 * Programming:C_plus_plus/Portability for portability tips
 * Programming:C_plus_plus/Practice for good practice

with right now the only difference being what is written there.

--Max 01:26, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Have a box template that can be used for tables, figures, examples and other commonly tools used in technical books. For now use a fix style. In the future if we can get it approved, allow for customize style by way of class or id name thats available in all monobook themes.

Usage would be one of:

which would be rendered as:

I also agree that we need to use several different types of notes with different styles to distinguish level of importance of the information being given. --darklama 20:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


text:
Yuri Shaporin

Yuri Alexandrovich Shaporin (Юрий (Георгий) Александрович Шапорин) (8 November 1887 – 9 December 1966), PAU, was a Soviet composer.

Biography
Shaporin was born in Glukhov in the Russian Empire (now in Ukraine). His father was a painter and his mother a pianist. He received his secondary education in Saint Petersburg. He first studied philology at Kiev University and went on to study law at Saint Petersburg University.

He then turned to music, starting his studies at the Saint Petersburg Conservatory in 1913. His teachers there included Nikolay Sokolov (composition), Maximilian Steinberg (orchestration), and Nikolai Tcherepnin (conducting). He graduated as a composer and conductor in 1918.

After the Bolshoi Drama Theater was established in 1919, he served as its musical director until 1928. He then worked with the Russian State Pushkin Academy Drama Theater — also known as the Alexandrinsky Theater — until 1934. During this period he composed a significant amount of theater music. He was a founding member of the Association for Contemporary Music in 1923.

During the 1930s Shaporin turned his attention to large scale works. His opera Dekabristi (The Decembrists), to a libretto written by Aleksey Nikolayevich Tolstoy about the Decembrist revolt, had been on Shaporin's mind since 1920 — a 1925 interim version, Polina Gyobe, had two scenes staged in Leningrad (as it had been renamed in 1924). In 1938, Shaporin received an offer of a teaching position at the Moscow Conservatory and he moved to Moscow. That year, he completed a version of Dekabristi for a commission by the Bolshoi Theatre, but dissatisfied with it, he decided to revise it. In 1952, Shaporin was awarded the Stalin Prize. The opera was only completed in 1953, after collaboration with librettist Vsevolod Rozhdestvensky, and it was premiered at the Bolshoi Theatre on 23 June 1953.

Among Shaporin's students at the Moscow Conservatory were Edward Artemiev and Rodion Shchedrin.

Selected works

 * Piano sonatas (at least two. First sonata, opus 5 published around 1924. Sonata no. 2 is op. 7, published around 1929)
 * Symphony for chorus and orchestra, op. 11, completed 1932 and premiered in London by Albert Coates and the BBC Symphony Orchestra
 * Na pole Kulikovom (On the Field of Kulikovo): cantata, op. 14
 * The Story of the Struggle for the Russian Soil op. 17 (recorded on HMV in about 1970)
 * How long shall the kite fly? : oratorio for baritone, mezzo-soprano, chorus and orchestra, op. 20
 * 5 Pieces for cello and piano, op. 25
 * Ballade for piano, op. 28
 * Dekabristy (The Decembrists), opera, completed 1953

Film music

 * The Deserter (1933)
 * Tri pesni o Lenine (Three Songs about Lenin) (1934)
 * Zaklyuchennye (Prisoners) (1936)
 * Victory (1938)
 * Minin and Pozharsky (1939)
 * Suvorov (1941)
 * Kutuzov (1944)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Yuri Shaporin


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Wharf

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Dragon Wharf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, and does not have supported claim of notability of subject. smileguy91talk 03:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Keep. The article now has external links to English and Vietnamese information on the museum. The corresponding Vietnamese article shows it is a major attraction and a historically important site. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Does seem to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The corresponding article on Vietnamese wikipedia is sourced, and it has a claim to WP:GEOFEAT.--Antigng (talk) 02:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Speedy Merge and Redirect - if this is about the museum (as it says it is) we already have that article at Ho Chi Minh Museum. Am I missing something? --—  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 04:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There are several Ho Chi Minh Museums. Maybe Ho Chi Minh Museum should be moved to Ho Chi Minh Museum (Hanoi).--Antigng (talk) 06:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah! Yes. It would appear I am a fool. :) Thanks for pointing this out. !Vote struck above accordingly. --—  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
User:Kizer/Web Page

Web Page Class Wiki
These pages will contain class work, projects, and knowledge that students in Web Page Design I and Web Page Design II have gained (and in many cases, are still gaining). All of the content is written, edited, and created by high school students based on projects completed in class.

Topics Covered in this Wiki Project

 * Web Page/Dreamweaver
 * Web Page/Flash
 * Web Page/Fireworks
 * HTML
 * CSS
 * Design Topics

Background for the Project
This Web Page Wiki is being used as a class project by Stacey Kizer and her students at Springfield High School.

Participants

 * Kizer 18:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Subpages
-

title: User:Kizer/Web Page


text:
Talk:Doina Ignat

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doina Ignat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310222851/http://www.databaseolympics.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=IGNATDOI01 to http://www.databaseolympics.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=IGNATDOI01

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Doina Ignat


text:
Sanoja Bibile

Thiromi Sanoja Bibile (born December 27, 1967, සනෝජා බිබිලේ), is an actress in Sri Lankan cinema and television. She started her career with dramatic roles and moved to comedy roles. Sanoja is well known for the roles Mali Nandani in the TV series Nonavaruni Mahathvaruni and Miss Kitty in the 1996 movie Cheriyo Darling. She is a successful netball player.

She is the 1st runner up in Miss Working Girl 1996 pageant and became 4th runner up in Miss Asia 1993 pageant.

Personal life
His father Sumith Bibile was an actor appeared in films such as Umathu Wishwasaya and Asoka. Sumith was born on 30 November 1930 in Kandy and died on 5 September 2017. He was educated in Dharmaraja College. Her mother was Nandanie Dehigama. Sanoja completed her education from Girls' High School, Kandy. She is a successful netball player.

On 4 November 2019, she met with an accident at 8. 45 am on Deans Road, Maradana and was hospitalized with minor injuries.

Career
She started cinema career with the 1987 film Mangala Thegga directed by H.D. Premaratne. Her notable cinema came through Awaragira, Cheriyo Darling, Ra Daniel Dawal Migel 3 and Supiri Andare. In 2000, she entered film production with the film Alu Yata Gini.

She acted in the new music video Ashokamala sung by Sunil Malawana.

Selected television serials

 * Aswenna
 * Charitha Dekak
 * Class Sinhala Class
 * Dangamalla
 * Dedunu Sihina
 * Deweni Gamana
 * Ganga Addara Kele
 * Hapanaa
 * Indrachapa
 * Nonavaruni Mahathvaruni
 * Oba Mageya
 * Raja Bhavana
 * Shaun
 * Sihinayak Paata Paatin * Sivu Diyadahara

Controversy
In 2012, the husband of the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of the Kataragama hospital allegedly threatened Bibile with a sword after a heated argument had erupted between the two during Bibile went to the hospital to obtain treatment for an urgent illness. With the incident, chief medical officer has been transferred to the Middeniya Rural Hospital with immediate effect.

On 29 November 2015, while attending to pay her last respects to actress Damitha Saluwadana in Boralesgamuwa, Bibile's glass shutters of the car has been broken and stolen Rs. 32,000 in cash, a mobile phone worth Rs. 30,000 and jewelry worth Rs. 3.5 million. She immediately complaint about the burglary and Piliyandala police started the investigations.

title: Sanoja Bibile


text:
Talk:Doris Johnson

Likely deceased
According to a family tree on Ancestry.com posted by a close relative, Doris Johnson (née Doris June Bishop) apparently died on June 27, 2021 in Kennewick, Washington. It doesn't looks an obituary was published, if this was the case, but perhaps someone can find something further to confirm. Connormah (talk) 01:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Doris Johnson


text:
Cookbook:Edible dormouse

These were considered a great delicacy by the Romans and were raised in special earthenware jars. The animals have also apparently been an important food source in Slovenia and are still eaten today. Two recipes have survived from Roman times:

 * Glazed with honey and rolled in poppy seeds (Petronius)
 * Stuffed them with a mixture of pork mince, dormouse meat trimmings, pepper, nuts, asafoetida and garum and then roasting or boiling them (Apicius 8.9.1)

title: Cookbook:Edible dormouse


text:
Robert Andrew Gray

Robert Andrew Gray (1882–1975) was an American politician from Florida. From 1930 to 1961, he served as Florida Secretary of State. To date, he is the longest-serving Secretary of State. Earlier in his career he represented Gadsden County in the Florida Legislature.

Early life
Robert Andrew Gray was born in Georgia in 1882 to a Methodist preacher and his wife. The family moved to North Florida when Gray was six months old, settling near Tallahassee. In 1899 at age 16, Gray enrolled at the South Florida Military College, where he studied under former Confederate Army General Evander M. Law, whom Gray credited to having a "formative effect" on his life. After General Law was forced to resign his position at the school due to political controversy in 1903, Gray and his fellow students refused to graduate and dropped out of school. Later that same year, Gray married "Grace Mullins, the daughter of a local Baptist minister". The two moved to Havana in Gadsden County.

Political career
After a brief period in education and the newspaper industry, Gray ran for the Gadsden County seat in the Florida House of Representatives in 1910 and won. Gray would serve in the House until 1913.

After his time in the legislature, Gray continued work in government, working as a personal secretary for Governor Park Trammell and for the State Auditor's office.

In 1930, Florida Governor Doyle Carlton appointed Gray Secretary of State, a position he would hold for the next 31 years through several gubernatorial administrations. He left office in 1961, as the longest-serving secretary of state. In office, Gray was remembered as being fiscally conservative and deeply committed to public service.

Legacy
The R. A. Gray Building at 500 South Bronough Street in Tallahassee houses the Florida State Archives and State Museum of Florida.

title: Robert Andrew Gray


text:
Category:Cinema of the Dutch East Indies

Dutch East Indies - was also known as the Netherlands East Indies - acronym (NEI) - currently known as Indonesia.


text:
Flagpole Sitta

"Flagpole Sitta" is a song by American rock band Harvey Danger from their 1997 debut album, Where Have All the Merrymakers Gone? It was released as the band's debut single in April 1998 and was met with critical and commercial success, peaking at number 38 on the US Billboard Hot 100 Airplay chart, number three on the Billboard Modern Rock Tracks chart, and number nine on the Canadian RPM Alternative 30. A music video was produced to promote the single.

Composition
"Flagpole Sitta" was recorded in June 1996 at John and Stu's Place in Seattle, Washington, during the Where Have All the Merrymakers Gone? recording sessions. According to drummer Evan Sult, the song was written as a response to the Seattle music scene of the 1990s and its effect on mainstream culture.

The title of the song was inspired by the 1930 Marx Brothers film Animal Crackers, which features a line of dialogue about the pole sitting fad of the 1920s. The band was inspired to spell "sitter" as "sitta" by the Pavement song "Fame Throwa" and the N.W.A album ''Straight Outta Compton.

Release and reception
"Flagpole Sitta" gained popularity after Seattle radio station KNDD put the song into rotation. Afterwards, London Records sent a copy of Where Have All the Merrymakers Gone? to KROQ-FM in Los Angeles, who began to air "Flagpole Sitta" and received a positive response from listeners. On April 27, 1998, the song was officially serviced to US rock radio, and a release to contemporary hit radio followed on June 9 of the same year. The song gained further exposure when it was used as the music in theatrical trailers and TV spots for the 1998 film Disturbing Behavior. The track subsequently charted at number 38 on the Billboard Hot 100 Airplay chart.

"Flagpole Sitta" is regarded as a power pop single by MTV and a post-grunge anthem by author Ericka Chickowski. PopMatters describes the single as "a hyper-literate Alternative rock dissection of the stupidity of the modern age". Music journalist Rob Sheffield also considers the song as "nineties pop-punk rage at its loudest".

Legacy
"Flagpole Sitta" was used as the theme song for the British sitcom Peep Show for the second series through the ninth. In 2008, Harvey Danger singer Sean Nelson stated that Peep Show is "...the only pop culture item the song has been associated with that feels like a kindred spirit to the original attitude of the lyric." In 2016, he said: "It's a joy to be affiliated with something that's so smart and so funny and so kind of rude and weird." Rolling Stone ranked the track as the 25th-best song of the 1990s and the best song of 1998. The song was included on the soundtrack to Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed.

title: Flagpole Sitta


text:
Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Central Florida/WikiProject Medicine Fall 2017 UCF COM (Fall)

This course enables students to improve and enrich the quality of reliable information read by patients on Wikipedia by becoming a WikiProject Medicine Editor.

Week 1
Monday 10/23: UCF COM 210C 10am-12pm, UCF COM 212J 1pm-2:30pm

 * 10A-11A: Overview of the course
 * 11A-12A: Understanding Wikipedia as a community
 * 1p-2p: Presentation by Shalu Gillum information retrieval strategies and resources available to you at UCF
 * 2p-2:30p: Wikipedia Primer - Helaine Blumenthal

Tues 10/24:UCF COM 212J 9:30am-12pm

 * 9:30A-10A: Presentation by David Lebowitz on critical evaluation of sources
 * 10A-11A: Presentation by WikiProject Medicine Founder: Dr. Amin Azzam
 * 11A-11:30A: Practice editing session together
 * 11:30-12:00: Peer-review, expectations of productivity, WP-WIP's, etc.

https://youtu(.)be/gJxaQa_eZvA

To get started, please review the following handouts:

 * Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
 * Evaluating Wikipedia

 * Create an account and then complete the online training for students. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.

This is where we think specifically about how editing Wikipedia as a medical student might differ from editing as a "lay person."

By 10am on Fri 10/27 post your final Workplan. So that you can engage with the Wikipedian community members who are interested & actively following your article, post your Workplan on the talk page of your selected Wikipedia article. If you are working on a team, I want you to be explicit about what section(s) you will individually be responsible for. Consider explicitly declaring any/all of the following:

 * Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.
 * A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Which sections will I prioritize?
 * What resources do I intend to look up, and when?
 * How will I decide what things (signs, symptoms, side-effects, etc.) to explicitly include? To explicitly exclude?
 * Will I also embed additional links to other Wiki pages?
 * How will I ensure I avoid "doctor-speak" and not use jargon?

Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia,

These activities will occur in UCF COM Library with remote participation capacity

On Fri 10/27 from 9-10am you will informally present your work-in-progress to Dr. Lebowitz and/or Nadine. We will help troubleshoot or discuss your evolving thoughts on your work.

Call in: 1-888-670-3525

Passcode:<PHONE_NUMBER>#

Week 2
This is to remind you that adding images to WP articles can be just as important as adding text. Here's the general information about doing that scope of work as part of your efforts:

 * Identify an article that would benefit from illustration, create or find an appropriate photo, illustration, or audio/video, and add it to the article.
 * All media uploaded to Wikipedia must fall under a "free license," which means they can be used or shared by anyone. Examples of media you can use are photos that you take yourself, images and text in the public domain, and works created by someone else who has given permission for their work to be used by others. For more information about which types of media can be uploaded to Wikipedia, see Commons:Help desk.
 * To add a media file to an article, you must first upload it to Wikimedia Commons. For instructions on how to upload files to Commons, refer to Illustrating Wikipedia. This brochure will also provide you with detailed information about which files are acceptable to upload to Wikipedia and the value of contributing media to Wikipedia articles.

Based on our discussions on the first two days of class, it is my expectation that by Week 2 you will be editing your selected article(s) "live" on Wiki and not merely in your sandboxes!

 * These activities will occur in UCF COM Library with remote participation capacity

On Fri 11/3 from 9-10am you will informally present your work-in-progress to Dr. Lebowitz and/or Nadine. We will help troubleshoot or discuss your evolving thoughts on your work.

Call in: 1-888-670-3525

Passcode:<PHONE_NUMBER>#

Week 3
On Fri 11/10 from 1-2pm you will informally present your work-in-progress to Dr. Lebowitz and/or Nadine. We will help troubleshoot or discuss your evolving thoughts on your work.

Call in: 1-888-670-3525

Passcode:<PHONE_NUMBER>#

Please perform peer reviews beginning on Fri 11/10

 * Post your Review to the talk page of the article you are reviewing.
 * Aim for finishing your peer review BEFORE Wed 11/15!

'''How to conduct peer review? Themes/questions that emerged:'''

 * Make sure it's understandable to the indended WP audience
 * Make sure we include appropriate sources, mostly NOT primary literature.  But OK to use primary literature when there is no secondary literature
 * Also OK to use closed-access resources
 * Look at the workplan and compare/contrast to actual work done
 * Don't be harsh on your classmate
 * Spot check a few links to ensure links are not broken
 * Ensure structure of article flows understandably
 * Follow readability guidelines (no sentences longer than 26 words)
 * Lots of periods, few commas or semicolons
 * Consider reviewing prior students’ declaration of intended work, as well as prior students’ peer reviews from our sister course @undefined UCSF.  All can be found on the talk pages of the articles they edited and peer-reviewed. Wide range in quality, but you can find all prior cycles of the elective here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/UCSF

How to respond to the peer-reviewer's comments?

 * Read the comments
 * Don't be salty-- follow WP etiquette
 * OK to ask for clarification
 * Prioritize things you think you have time to get to and that you think are most important to respond to
 * Do respond to some of the suggestions for improvement

Week 4
Use the final week of the course to respond to your peer-reviewer's suggestions. Additionally:

 * Leverage the Wikipedian community members who are interested in your article
 * Consider replying to the peer review directly on the talk page of your article
 * If you disagree with your peer reviewer, explain your rationale

On Wed 11/15 from 9-10am you will informally present your work-in-progress to Dr. Lebowitz and/or Nadine. We will help troubleshoot or discuss your evolving thoughts on your work.

Call in: 1-888-670-3525

Passcode:<PHONE_NUMBER>#

These activities will occur at UCF COM Library 210C *In Person*

On Fri 11/17 @undefined 10 - 11am we will convene for a 1 hour meeting to share accomplishments and discuss lessons learned. Final presentations will be structured as follows: round robin "reports" (maximum of 10 minutes each) from each of you as follows:

 * What did I accomplish this month (broad overview)?
 * What did I learn?
 * What will I take forward with me into the future?
 * Now in hindsight, is there anything I would have done differently?

We will conclude our meeting with a focus group about the elective overall. This will include:

 * Strategies for improvement for future cycles of the elective


text:
Serpukhovsky

Serpukhovsky (masculine), Serpukhovskaya (feminine), or Serpukhovskoye (neuter) may refer to:
 * Serpukhovsky District, a district of Moscow Oblast, Russia
 * Serpukhovskaya, a station of the Moscow Metro, Moscow, Russia

title: Serpukhovsky


text:
tvist

Noun

 * 1) legal dispute

Etymology
Borrowed from.

Noun

 * 1) twist type of dance

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a dispute

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a dispute

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) twist type of dance

Etymology
From, from. Compare 🇨🇬. See also.

Noun

 * 1) dispute, disagreement, quarrel

title: tvist


text:
User:Sbastow/sandbox/sbastow userspace

I am a former employee of Northern Trust. I am not paid for my Wikipedia edits.

Created
Thea Harrison (Author)

Improved
Northern Trust

Nalini Singh (author)

Purecircle

RR Donnelley

Chicago Marathon

title: User:Sbastow/sandbox/sbastow userspace


text:
Brishaketu Debbarma

Brishaketu Debbarma (born May 17, 1977) is a politician from Tripura, India. He was a member of 12th Tripura Legislative Assembly. He was elected to the Assembly in 2018, representing the Simna constituency) as a member of the Indigenous People's Front of Tripura.  He resigned from the Legislative Assembly on 29 June 2021 and joined The Indigenous Progressive Regional Alliance (TIPRA) on 9 July 2021.

Early life and career
Debbarma was born in Simna, West Tripura on 1 January 1977 to a Tripuri family. He attended the local government school till his matriculation and later shifted to a school in Agartala for his higher secondary studies. He studied at The Tripura Government Law College which was under Tripura University then and holds a B.A. LL.B or Law Degree.

After completing his B.A. LLB Degree, Brishaketu Debbarma briefly worked as an advocate in and around Agartala. He along with fellow advocates had actively in filing petitions in Tripura High Court on several issues like malaria deaths in Tripura and others related to public well-being.

Minister of State
Brishaketu Debbarma was sworned in as Minister of State on March 7, 2024.

Tripura State Legislature
In 2018, Brishaketu was picked by the Indigenous People's Front of Tripura as its candidate from the 1 Simna Assembly Constituency. He defeated the five times CPIM MLA Pranab Debbarma by 1,963 votes securing 48.37% of the total votes.

In 2018, Brishaketu was picked by the Indigenous People's Front of Tripura as its candidate from the 1 Simna Assembly Constituency. He defeated the five times CPIM MLA Pranab Debbarma by 1,963 votes securing 48.37% of the total votes.

After being a legislator for four years of the IPFT-BJP coalition government, Brishaketu resigned in 2021 citing personal reasons. He then joined TIPRA Motha in 2021 and is known to be close to the party Chairman Pradyot Manikya.

Political positions
According to political commentators, Brishaketu is perceived as a nationalist and social activists who approaches issues from a perspective of advocacy.

Tipraland Demand
He has been an "ardent" supporter of Tipraland and took some key decisions in politics in line with it. In 2021, Brishaketu Debbarma came out of IPFT as it was not voicing the statehood demand after it came to power.

Kokborok Language
According to Homchang, Brishaketu Debbarma has been an active advocate for use of Kokborok language in Tripura Legislative Assembly sessions and proceedings.

title: Brishaketu Debbarma


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elkhan Temirbaev

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Elkhan Temirbaev

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom.Simione001 (talk) 08:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kyrgyzstan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy (old)/Coordinator selection

Following the departure of Achowat, a new coordinator must be selected to succeed him, and join Dan653.

Process
There will be two phases to the selection process: nomination, and discussion.

During the nomination phase, editors may be nominated as candidates for the role, either by themselves or by other people. An editor may make as few or as many nominations as they wish. There are no requirements for nomination, other than the nominee is has a registered Wikipedia account, and is not currently banned. Once an editor has been nominated, other editors may endorse the nomination; however, this will have no effect on the outcome of the selection. Editors nominated by other users must signal their acceptance of the nomination (the acceptance or a link to it must be provided on this page). Editors do not have to accept their nominations immediately (they may have time to consider the nomination), but must have accepted by the end of the nomination phase if they are to be considered.

During the discussion phase, edits may discuss the various candidates, and indicate their support. Discussion should remain in the discussion section and not take place in the support section. Editors may signal their opposition to a candidate, but there will be no oppose section, and their opposition must be supported by rationale. Editors may also indicate additional preference choices (second, third, etc) in the support section. There will be an additional discussion section at the bottom for more general discussion, and for editors to express alternative preferences. All Wikipedia policies regarding civility and personal attacks apply. At the end of the discussion period, an uninvolved editor (either an administrator or another trusted, experienced editor) will determine the consensus, taking into account both the number of support votes and the discussions, and declare the new coordinator.

Schedules

 * The nomination phase will end on Friday 13 July 2012 at midnight UTC.
 * The discussion phase will begin on the morning of Saturday 14 July.
 * The discussion phase will end on Saturday 21 July at midnight UTC, and the results declared thereafter.

Nomination phase
To nominate someone, please add their username to the bottom of this table. To accept a nomination, change the 'Not yet' to 'Yes'. To decline a nomination, change the 'Not yet' to 'Rejected'. If a nominee has accepted or declined the nomination elsewhere, do the same and provide a link to the acceptance. Nominations have closed.

Discussion
My opinion (from what I've seen in my short time) is that Theo has had more experience with the enrolling side of the Academy (ie "looks good"). My only problem with the enrolling is Theo is very the willing to say I'll take you, given that we have instructors without students this could be a problem, however I'm inferring that after Dan's comment Theo realises this (or did beforehand) Since this is one of the main jobs of the coordinator would you mind just confirming it?

I'm not too concerned with the seeming inexperience regarding deteriming consensus, dealing with problems and answering questions, because at least for the first couple of times for each I would expect that he would ask Dan/Zippy/another experienced instructor to check the decision/answer he left?

Also Theo has been actively trying to improve the running and management of the Academy, both the little fixes here and there as well as the work around archiving the enroll page and creating an instrucing resources page.

Please don't read this as a negative side to Electric - it's note and I didn't think about Electric as I wrote it (well...until now that is). So my support is for Theo, depending on the answers to the two questions above (and anything else I think of in the next couple of days ;)... Callanecc (talk) 04:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments! In re to #1, yes - I did realize the fact beforehand and was making my most recent remark purely as a joke- should have been more clear on this, oops! But yep- I think that keeping instructors engaged is KEY to the academy, and I would definitely make sure that, as various talk discussions have stated, that everyone gets a chance - by no means would I be a student hog! No worries about that- I'll be the last one... As I said before, instructor involvement is very important to the academy as a whole. Hope that clears that point up.
 * RE: #2 - yes. Agreed- A second opinion for anything coordinator like that I do (at leat for first few times) would be fantastic. Hope this answers questions, and sorry to be brief (on iPod)! If I totally skipped something or you have other questions, let me know! :)  Theopolisme TALK 04:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Support per above answers to my requests for clarification. (Plus he's amusing which is always good :) Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - I would look to the new coordinator to take a leading role along with Dan to cast vision and ideas. A lot of what Theo has been doing at the CVUA (as well as his great work as an instructor) has been working on larger projects like this (the new Enroll page, and the work he's put in to getting a resources page up, for example). This is the kind of thing I'd like to see from a coordinator. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:04, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Strong support as nominator - Theo demonstrates responsibility, patience and good faith. I also like people that say "I sure ain't purrrrrfect!" Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 17:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Support Great instructor and has had some of the best ideas the academy has seen so far. Dan653 (talk) 15:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Discussion
Any questions? Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I would say keep doing what your doing, but focus on the RfA and adoption and students and so on.
 * The main reason I went with Theo is that since I've been here (thanks to you, by the way) Theo is the one who has had all the ideas and then done something to implement them (and both of those are what I'm after).
 * You are doing a great job, but Theo has surpassed (I think it's fair to say all of us?) in both his ideas and dedication to the Adademy more generally. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've been less involved in the academy recently due to my RfA. I've gotten involved in areas such as new page patrolling, article creation, adoption, PERM and AIV clerking, AN/I commenting. I wish the best of luck to Theo and I will stick around here no matter what the result is here. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 12:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Where would this "RfA" of yours be?. Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 21:12, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * His plan it to go for adminship in January. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Close
If no one has any objections I would like to annouce Theo as the new coordinator. Speak now or forever hold your peas. Dan653 (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps make a note at the main CVUA talk page for those who might have missed this (yes it's unanimous at the moment, but we've only had 4 comment). If no one replies after a note there, I have no problems with an early closure, nor with you closing it yourself. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Could someone close this? I don't want to do it myself. Dan653 (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Dan I don't think any of us would mind you do it yourself (and considering Zippy is involved as well it doesn't really matter), there is only one decision which can be made. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No objections! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
1995–96 Paris Saint-Germain F.C. season

The 1995–96 season was Paris Saint-Germain's 26th season in existence. PSG played their home league games at the Parc des Princes in Paris, registering an average attendance of 37,353 spectators per match. The club was presided by Michel Denisot and the team was coached by Luis Fernandez. Bernard Lama was the team captain.

Players

 * As of the 1995–96 season.

Transfers

 * As of the 1995–96 season.

Kits
German automobile manufacturer Opel was the shirt sponsor. American sportswear brand Nike was the kit manufacturer.

Statistics

 * As of the 1995–96 season.

Appearances and goals
!colspan="16" style="background:#dcdcdc; text-align:center"|Goalkeepers

!colspan="16" style="background:#dcdcdc; text-align:center"|Defenders

!colspan="16" style="background:#dcdcdc; text-align:center"|Midfielders

!colspan="16" style="background:#dcdcdc; text-align:center"|Forwards

!colspan="16" style="background:#dcdcdc; text-align:center"|Players transferred / loaned out during the season

title: 1995–96 Paris Saint-Germain F.C. season


text:
User:Cassiopeia/NPPSchool/AbhiMukh97

Hello, welcome to your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.
 * How to use this page

Notability
When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

 * A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: Wikipedia articles are improved through the hard work of both regular editors and newcomers. Assuming that editors' edits and comments are made in good faith, is one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. Everyone makes mistakes, both behavioural (such as personal attacks) and content-based (such as adding original research). Behaviours arising from these perspectives, while possibly misguided, are usually not malicious and should not be treated as such. It is important to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's culture and rules but may nonetheless turn out to be valuable contributors. New members are prospective contributors and are therefore Wikipedia's most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience. It is very unlikely for a newcomer to be completely familiar with Wikipedia's markup language and its myriad of policies, guidelines, and community standards when they start editing. Most of the time, we can correct such mistakes with simple reminders. By helping newcomers, we can increase the range of knowledge, perspectives, and ideas on Wikipedia, thereby preserving its neutrality and integrity as a resource and ultimately increasing its value. That's why it is important to assume good faith and not bite new editors.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

2. In your own words, how does notability is defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: Notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article or not. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies some basic guidelines to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Not everything can have its own dedicated article, in Wikipedia.

For a topic to be notable for an article(or list) in Wikipedia,
 * It must be verifiable by third party sources which are independant and reliable.
 * It meets either the general notability guidelines for Wikipedia
 * It must not be excluded under What Wikipedia is not policy.

 * I think you meant "* It meets either the general notability guidelines or SSN for Wikipedia on point 2 above.
 * In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list (1) if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk about the subject directly in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2)  it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy.[

3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: Although this topic has significant coverage on many well known independent and reliable sources, it is not notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" may be notable enough for a guide book, but Wikipedia is not a guidebook.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia.
 * General notability guidelines refer to the basic set of guidelines, that a topic must follow to be notable enough for having an article in Wikipedia. A notable topic must be verifiable and must follow Wikipedia guidelines. Specific notability guidelines comes into play after the general notability guidelines. These are applied in specific cases where there may be sufficient sources, but the subject has not achieved a specific accomplishment
 * Both of the guidelines must be followed while patrolling an article. If an article doesn't follow general notability guidelines, there is no scope for it to follow specific notability guidelines.
 * , Both guidelines can be followed. Usually, if the subject meets SNG, it usually meets GNG. However, if a subject doesnt meet SNG (say female model) but gain so much news attention due the fact she just doing nothing much but present functions and events and people just like to see or talk about her (like Paris Houston in the beginning before she start in Simple life), She would have not have passed WP:MUSICBIO (she had one album/single) but would have passed GNG or ANYBIO notability guidelines due to she was worthy to be noted by by significant coverage in depth independent, reliable published sources. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: As there is no source provided, there is no chance that the article should be considered as notable. However I think, the article should exist as it has got significant discussions on reliable individual sources, that others can include. The article should exist, significantly improving and expanding over the course of time.
 * ✅. For such an event, it has been historically the event will be held in the near future (Not 2044 Summer Olympics - as it is way to far from today date). I would usually look for sources and add them in and get it pass the GNG which patrolling. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

 * B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below,  please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

6. A New York city based 2019 start up software company, specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. The fact that a startup company has found investors doesn't mean it is notable enough to have an article. Even if it has independent and reliable sourcing, it is not significant enough.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

7. Maycee Barber who is a female Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 7-0 and she is currently ranked #12 in the women's flyweight division.

Answer: Fails WP:NMMA, from the source we find out that she has been only in two UFC fights and needs another UFC to be notable.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2019 and to be released on August 2020 in the cinemas.

Answer: Fails WP:NF, the film production hasn't started to verify it's notability.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2019 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: Fails WP:NPOL, as he is getting his candidature for the first time and has no political background.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2019 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: Fails WP:SINGER, being on Spotify doesn't make someone notable.
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

 * C. Based on  which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: Meets WP:PROF. He is the chief editor of a major well-established academic journal, "Journal of Economic Psychology".
 * ✅. Do provide which criteria next time if applicable. Not only meets WP:NPROF #1  and #8 for chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: Meets both WP:NMMA and WP:NKICK. He is one of only two fighters to hold world titles in both MMA and K-1 kickboxing at the same time.
 * ✅. Good. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: Meets both WP:SINGER and WP:ENT. She was nominated for Grammy Awards and is also the highest-paid Latin actress featuring in many films like Anaconda(1997).
 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: Meets many criteria under WP:EVENT such as WP:EFFECT, WP:GEOSCOPE and WP:PERSISTENCE. This accident gave rise to a huge amount of anti-nuclear protest.
 * ✅. Good. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

15. Persepolis

Answer: Meets WP:NGEO. Being the ceremonial capital of the Achaemenid Empire, it is UNESCO declared heritage site.

 * ✅. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

-, See above and ping me when you are done with the questions and ready for review. (Note: Assignment 2 - Sources). CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have completed my assignment. Please review. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 08:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

 * , Hi Pls see section B and C where I have added further details info are needed. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have completed my assignment. Please check. Thank you, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 12:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * just to make sure, ive pinged correctly AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 12:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

 * , See above and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm ready to move into the next assignment. Thank you. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 05:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Sources and content policy

 * A. Sources
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.

 * 1.

 * 2.

 * 3.

-

Answer:
 * 4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer:
 * 5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer:
 * 6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer:
 * 7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

--

 * Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

David Howell Petraeus (born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.
 * 8.

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad

 * 9.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. She won five Grand Slam singles titles. Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.
 * 10.

-
 * } Good day. See Assignment 2 above. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the ping, but my company is sending me on a 6 months training course in Germany. I will not be able to submit my assignment during this. Is it possible, for me to continue my schooling here, after the aforesaid training or I'll have to start afresh. Thanking you, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 05:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Did you mean to continuening the NPPSchool in Germany? (No problem) or continues 6 month from now after you Germany's assignment? 06:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about my continuation after the training. Simply, I want to take a wikibreak for 6 months, and then continue my NPP school here if possible. Thanking you, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 15:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * P.S: If I'm able to manage some time I'll definitely keep the progress up for my assignments. But I'm asking about the worst case scenerio here. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 15:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok no problems and all the best in Germany, a beautiful country and productive country. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 06:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

title: User:Cassiopeia/NPPSchool/AbhiMukh97


text:
File:ArtRage2SBTDS12b160.jpg

Used with the WikiU Film School Lesson on how to draw thumbnail storyboards with ArtRage2 free version.

title: File:ArtRage2SBTDS12b160.jpg


text:
Talk:Dinanath Ramnarine

This seems more like an advertisement than a biography — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Agree with anon above about this "article" sounding more like a puff piece than a genuine encyclopaedia entry. Why hasn't this been flagged? This has clearly been written by someone close to or working for Ramnarine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 16:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dinanath Ramnarine


text:
Template:Did you know nominations/Clytus Gottwald

Clytus Gottwald

 * ... that Clytus Gottwald has "arranged" compositions for an a cappella group of up to 16 voices, re-creating them "in a magical choral world"?
 * Reviewed: Caribbean Clipper

Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 13:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough and suitably sourced hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
Boston Irish Wolfhounds

The Boston Irish Wolfhounds Rugby Football Club (also known as BIWRFC) is a rugby union team based in Canton, Massachusetts, US. The club competes in, and is governed by, the New England Rugby Football Union (their LAU), the Northeast Rugby Union (their TAU), and USA Rugby. In 2014 it joined the American Rugby Premiership.

The club was established in the late 1980s as a social touring side, but was not recognised as an official club until 1992, when they entered the NERFU Division II in 1992. They advanced to the NRU Premier Division in 1995, winning it for the first time in 1998 and entered the Super League in 2007. BIWRFC competed in the NERFU Division 1 until 2017. "The Hounds" currently compete in New England Rugby Football Union Division 2 & Division 3. BIWRFC is recognised as one of the leading rugby union clubs in the United States.

Founding
The Wolfhounds began as a social touring side of rugby players in the Boston area looking to travel the United States during their off-seasons with their respective clubs. Due to their successes while touring (particularly in New Orleans and Texas) and enormous support from the Boston Irish community, the Wolfhounds became an official team and entered into the New England Rugby Football Union (NERFU) Division II in 1992. An unintended consequence of the establishment was the eventual disestablishment of Beacon Hill RFC (lost most of its first XV pack), the end of Mystic River Rugby Club's appearances as a national level club (lost three key first XV), and the relegation of Charles River RFC (lost complete first XV backline) to Division II.

During their inaugural season, the first XV suffered only one regular season loss and reached the Northeast Championships.

In 1995, the Wolfhounds met enough success to warrant the leap to the Northeast Rugby Football Union (NRU) Premier Division.

2000–present
In 2000, they won the Northeast Championships for the first time. In 2001, they advanced to the USA Rugby Division I National Championship pool for the first time, reaching the Sweet 16 pool. In 2002, they matched their 2001 successes and reached the Sweet 16 for a second straight season.

In 2003, the Wolfhounds entered and won a number of local and national tournaments and they were able to win the NERFU Division I Championship as well as the National Championship. Wolfhounds scrumhalf Dave Williams was named tournament MVP.

In 2004, the Wolfhounds repeated as both NERFU Division I champions and USA Rugby Division I national champions. Adam Thomas of the Wolfhouds was named tournament MVP. In 2005, the Wolfhounds became NERFU Division I champions for the third straight year and finished in fifth place in the Division I National Championship tournament.

In 2006, the Wolfhounds became the first-ever US team to submit two sides to the national championship tournament. Both the first XV and the third XV came in second place (Division I and Division III, respectively).

In 2007, the Wolfhounds became USA Division III National Champions in San Diego.

Since 2017 the Hounds have competed in New England Rugby Football Union Division 2. In the aftermath of the COVID pandemic the Wolfhounds reintroduced their storied Division 3. In 2022 the Division 2 team won the New England Rugby Football Union championship. The Division 3 team lost in the championship semifinal to eventual winners, Providence Rugby Football Club.

The Wolfhounds also field a third XV of "old boys" and new players with little experience. They compete in the New England Rugby Football Union Division III. They have been met with success, winning the NERFU Division III championships in 1996, 1997, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2009.

Club Championships

 * USA Rugby
 * 2003 USA Rugby Men's Club D1 Champions – 2003
 * 2004 USA Rugby Men's Club D1 Champions – 2004
 * 2nd place – 2006
 * 5th place – 2005
 * Division 1 Northeast Rugby Union Champions – 2000, 2002
 * Division 1 New England Rugby Football Union Champions – 2003, 2004, 2005
 * Division 2 New England Rugby Football Union Champions – 2022

Tournament Championships

 * Ft. Lauderdale Ruggerfest Champions – 2003, 2005
 * Jersey Shore Tournament Champions – 2004
 * Mad River Invitational Champions – 2004, 2007, 2008
 * New England 10s Champions – 2003, 2005
 * Newport 7s Champions – 2005
 * Newport 15s Champions (Division I) – 2006, (Division 2) 2016, (Division 3) 2021
 * New York 7s Champions – 2004
 * Thompson Island Tournament Champions – 2003
 * Vermont Invitational Tournament
 * 2nd place – 2005
 * Worcester 7s Champions – 2003

Club Championships

 * USA Rugby National Division III Competition
 * 2nd place – 2006
 * Division III New England Rugby Football Union Champions – 1996, 1997, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009

Tournament Championships

 * Lansdowne RFC New York City St. Patrick's Day Tournament Champions – 1998, 1999
 * MIT Culliton Tournament Champions – 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999
 * Newport 15s Champions (Division III) – 2006
 * Saranac Lake Can-Am Tournament – 1996

Individual Honors

 * 2003 USA Rugby National Division I Championship Tournament MVP – Dave Williams
 * 2004 USA Rugby National Division I Championship Tournament MVP – Adam Thomas

Sponsorship
The Wolfhounds have several individual sponsorships. Notable primary sponsors include The Somers Group including Paddy O's. The club also has several secondary sponsorships from local and regional businesses.

Recruiting
The Wolfhounds have been able to provide hospitality, housing, and career opportunities for players coming to Boston to play for the Hounds. This is one of the reasons they have been able to maintain success on the field. The team is composed of Americans, but there is also a large contingent of foreigners. Many countries are represented Australia, France, England, New Zealand, Fiji, and Wales.

BIWRFC has established relationships with local high school and college sides, which become feeder teams for the Wolfhounds. This allows the Wolfhounds to maintain a large player pool of young athletes. Members of the Wolfhounds have coached Northeastern University RFC, a nationally ranked Division I college side, Boston College, Harvard University, MIT and University of Notre Dame. Wolfhounds players also coach the Boston collegiate select-side All-Star team, which won the NERFU collegiate all-star tournament last spring. The Wolfhounds also coach Boston College High School RFC, which is perennially one of the best high school teams in the country, as well as Belmont High School Rugby which is four time MIAA state champions. Wolfhound alumni also coach at The College of the Holy Cross.

In recent years, the Wolfhounds have sent some of these young collegiate athletes abroad to gain experience by playing professionally. As of April 2006, there are two Wolfhounds playing in the NPC league in New Zealand.

As of April 2006, members of the Wolfhounds include a current USA Rugby U19 National Team player, two former U19 National Team players, and the current captain of the USA Rugby Collegiate All-Star team.

The Wolfhounds were a key player in organizing the Boston Rugby Consortium which consists of all NERFU clubs in the city of Boston. The club lent their administrative expertise to secure practice pitches from the city's Parks and Recreation department on a regular basis for the clubs. They have also initiated several coaching clinics and courses to build rugby in the Boston area among all clubs.

Notable Wolfhounds

 * Dave Williams, former Wolfhounds scrumhalf, USA Rugby National Team
 * Brian Lemay, Wolfhounds prop, USA Rugby National Team
 * Mark Tutton - Wolfhounds scrumhalf, South Canterbury provincial team (2002–2012), New Zealand Heartland XV 2007
 * Thomas Lee, former Wolfhounds wing, 1992 USA Rugby National U19 Team (US High School Development XV)

title: Boston Irish Wolfhounds


text:
User:Ipadrobloxian34/sandbox

Hello, I am Ipadrobloxian34 and right now, obviously, you're looking at my "sandbox".

--There's actually nothing much here right now--

Games I played:

ROBLOX - Username: Ipadrobloxian34

Minecraft (cracked xD)

Team Fortress 2 - Steam Account: redteamsnipertf2

CS2D (Counter-Strike 2D)

title: User:Ipadrobloxian34/sandbox


text:
Belovo, Rebrikhinsky District, Altai Krai

Belovo (Белово) is a rural locality (a selo) and the administrative center of Belovsky Selsoviet, Rebrikhinsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 1,525 as of 2013. There are 31 streets.

Geography
Belovo is located 19 km southwest of Rebrikha (the district's administrative centre) by road. Rebrikha is the nearest rural locality.


text:
Bahá'í Faith/Compilations

A goal of this learning project is to create compilations of passages from religious texts.

Introduction
There are writings in the Bahá'í Faith about qualities of a true seeker. A goal is to search writings of many religions to create a compilation of quotes that can assist in the search of Truth.

Compilation
Qualities of a True Seeker

title: Bahá'í Faith/Compilations


text:
Echos o' Faith

Echoes O' Faith is the title of The 77s' second live album, released in 1996 on the band's own Fools of the World label. This album was recorded live at Echoes Of Faith Church in Ontario, California on November 28, 1992.

This performance was a rare acoustic "unplugged" performance of the 77s, which prompted producer Brian Healy to start recording. Everyone involved was happy enough with the overall sound of the recording that it was decided to make it into a live album.

Track listing

 * 1) "MT" (Mike Roe, Bob Smith) – 4:20
 * 2) "Nowhere Else" (Mark Tootle) – 4:35
 * 3) "Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba" (Gene Mascoli, Roe, Saterlee) – 5:39
 * 4) "The Treasure In You" (Roe) – 4:03
 * 5) "Hard To Say" (Bill Harmon, Mark Harmon) – 4:34
 * 6) "The Rain Kept Falling In Love" (Roe) – 4:34
 * 7) "Bottom Line" (Roe) – 4:29
 * 8) "A Different Kind of Light" (Steve Scott) – 3:23
 * 9) "The Lust, The Flesh, The Eyes & The Pride of Life (Roe) – 3:52
 * 10) "Caught In An Unguarded Moment"  (Mark Proctor, Mike Roe, Jan Eric Volz) – 3:54
 * 11) "Do It For Love" (Steve Griffith, Tootle) – 4:40
 * 12) "Look" (Harmon) – 3:41
 * 13) "UUUU" (Roe) – 5:18
 * 14) "Happy Roy" (David Leonhardt, Roe) – 4:10
 * 15) "God Sends Quails" (Roe) – 5:50
 * 16) "Kites Without Strings"

Personnel

 * Mike Roe - guitars, lead vocals
 * Mark Harmon - bass, background vocals
 * David Leonhardt - guitars, vocals
 * Steve Hindalong - drums, percussion

Production notes
Produced - Brian Healy
 * Executive Producers – The 77s.
 * Recorded by Pete Tessitore.
 * Mixed by Don McKenney.

title: Echos o' Faith


text:
Zarechny, Pankrushikhinsky District, Altai Krai

Zarechny (Заречный) is a rural locality (a settlement) in Pankrushikhinsky Selsoviet, Pankrushikhinsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 107 as of 2013. There is 1 street.

Geography
Zarechny is located 8 km southeast of Pankrushikha (the district's administrative centre) by road. Pankrushikha is the nearest rural locality.


text:
frocia

Etymology
. Likely from (passed through a minor Italian cognate stratum). Cognate with 🇨🇬~, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬, 🇨🇬.

Noun

 * 1)  omelette, frittata
 * 2) mistake
 * 1) mistake
 * 1) mistake
 * 1) mistake
 * 1) mistake

title: frocia


text:
User:Saharmh

Rasht 29 Club, Tehran, Iran (1967 – 1970):
Kamran Diba, Parviz Tanavoli and Roxana Saba founded the Rasht 29 Club on the north side of Amir Kabir University, formerly the Tehran Polytechnic, on no. 29 Rasht Street in Tehran in 1967. The nonprofit art space occupied a three-story building with a U-shaped bar in the main hall, a lounge area and an open dining space with salvaged old colored glass windows. There were not many galleries and exhibition spaces in Tehran at that time. However, there was a need for a social gathering space for artists: a place in which they could freely discuss their practice and the ever-changing landscape of the arts of their time. Sometimes these conversations would continue until dawn and would lead to future artistic events. Eventually, In Diba's upstairs studio, the Ideas for the future Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art were planned, programed and finally executed ten years later in 1977.

In addition to visual artists, intellectuals, thinkers, writers, journalists, art collectors, poets, and most importantly young poets would frequent the Rasht 29 Club. Poets would climb the wooden ladder-located in the main hall-and recite their poetry. Sometimes vagabond violinists and street performers would play a solo musical recital or break into an unofficial theatrical performance. Frequently, parties of exhibitions and concerts were held at the Rasht 29 Club in order to create an opportunity for the artists to meet one another and exchange ideas. Furthermore, the club’s restaurant served both an Iranian and international menu for both lunch and dinner. As a nonprofit art space, the income derived from the restaurant was spent on the upcoming projects. According to Kamran Diba,

"The presence of artists at the club and the presentation of their works allowed the public to get familiar with them– especially since Tehran had only few galleries at the time and art sales were negligible. The poverty of local art market, and the scarcity of financial support eventually, prompted the club to stage the very first Iranian contemporary art auction, to benefit the artist, at the club with the attendance of Queen Farah Pahlavi, Prime Minister Amir Abbas Hoveyda, and prominent industrialists. Notably, the P.M. bought many works to dress the walls of his ministry."

–(Daneshvar, 81, 90: 2014)

Occasionally artists such as Zendehroudi and Hajizadeh were granted residencies on the top floor of the building, which was Diba’s former architectural office. An experimental theatre workshop used the large studio as their rehearsal space. Sometimes and to the astonishment of club's clientele, Diba would encourage the group's performances to flow into the club dinning area. On Thursdays, the club organized a sidewalk exhibition just outside the building, where some artists sold their artworks and books. Some artists would donate their paintings to the club or as payment for using the facilities. The walls of Rasht 29 were always adorned by these works of contemporary Iranian art. Many artists and architects frequented the club—Charles-Hossein Zendehroudi, Sadegh Tabrizi, Faramarz Pilaram, Sohrab Sepehri, Masood Arabshahi, Yadollah Royayi, Nader Naderpour, Bahman Mohasses, Reza Barahani, Ismail Shahroudi, Ahmadreza Ahmadi, Bijan Elahi, Ebrahim Golestan, Hajhir Dariush, Kamran Shirdel and Sadeq Chubak to name a few.

References:
- A Garden Between two Streets (in Farsi) 4001 days of the life of Kamran Diba. in conversation with Reza Daneshvar Published by Edition Alborz. (2014)

- Mohebbi, Sohrab. Rasht 29, A cultural oasis in central Tehran: http://bidoun.org/articles/rasht-29

title: User:Saharmh


text:
Teletraffic engineering/Routing/Module 15/Answer 2

Answer 2

 * 1) Static routing schemes: Routing is based on the expected, as opposed to the actual, user and network behaviour and does not change according to the current state of the newtork and user traffic. The routing pattern is always the same.
 * 2) Dynamic routing schemes: Routing pattern is automatically altered based on present changes in the user and network state. The routing pattern varies.


text:
Oskaloosa City Square Commercial Historic District

The Oskaloosa City Square Commercial Historic District is a 9.8 acre historic district in Oskaloosa, Iowa that includes Early Commercial, Italianate, and Romanesque Revival architecture. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986. At the time of its nomination it included 68 contributing buildings.

The district includes the Mahaska County Courthouse, Oskaloosa City Park and Band Stand, Oskaloosa Fire Station and the Oskaloosa City Hall which are separately listed on the National Register.


text:
E-Learning

E-learning is a learning environment which uses information and communication technologies (ICT's) as a platform for teaching and learning activities. It has been defined as "pedagogy empowered by technology", though 'digital technology' is more accurate. Note that, due to the difference in terms of institutional goals, higher education and the industry have very different ideas about what e-learning is and how e-learning can be/should be used.

E-learning has its root in distance learning and is part of the revolution brought by the new media: the Web. Educators and trainers soon found the potentials to advance learning at the advent of the new Web technologies. The advocates of e-learning voice for the breakdown of barriers to learning (especially for adult learners in higher education) such as the limitations in time and distance. Research on media comparison "proves" that there is no difference in the learning outcome of e-learning from traditional face-to-face instruction. Over time, more and more instructors/institutions are incorporating e-learning components in the practice of instruction in higher education as a way of facilitating learning.

Learning Tasks

 * (COVID-19) Explore the requirement workflow transformations during an epidemic output break and identify the requirements and constraints of e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

title: E-Learning