text:
MTV e2

MTV e2 was a Canadian entertainment news program that aired on MTV and A; hosted by Anna Cyzon; produced at the Masonic Temple in downtown Toronto.

The show was discontinued on July 16, 2008.

title: MTV e2


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ-Psychosis

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ■ 08:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Christ-Psychosis
The first paragraph says it all: "a relatively new term" found on "web pages including blogs, chat forums and other informational resources". I.e., a neologism that was even invented on a web forum (see this old version) and is also unsourced. It seems to me that a controversial notion such as pathologising religion would need a lot more mainstream and professional usage, and sources, before becoming encyclopaedic. Sandstein 23:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC) Keep: I think that this page explains the term in a clear manner, and is necesary as the only reference that I have been able to find on the term. Besides, I don't see biblical terms being atacked just because they are predominently used by the mentally ill. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, WP is not for something made up in school one day. And if the only sources are "atheist blogs", that's what we have.--Deville (Talk) 00:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Question Is there an existing page on religious belief as a mental illness? Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 01:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - results I get on google are non-scientific and not numerous. Wickethewok 09:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neoblogism. Never assume that Google's hit counts are accurate; there are only 26 hits. Gazpacho 19:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * If this is the only reference for the term, it's all the more reason to delete it (see WP:V). Sandstein 05:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Ken Tasaka

Ken Tasaka (1905 – 1997) was a Japanese painter. His work was part of the painting event in the art competition at the 1936 Summer Olympics.

title: Ken Tasaka


text:
Talk:Dovdoin Bayar

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dovdoin Bayar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120731133705/http://www.dainst.org/index_82e0aff7bb1f14a115260017f0000011_de.html to http://www.dainst.org/index_82e0aff7bb1f14a115260017f0000011_de.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dovdoin Bayar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6GivSVZwc?url=http://www.historyfoundation.or.kr/Data/DataGarden/Journal(03).pdf to http://www.historyfoundation.or.kr/Data/DataGarden/Journal%2803%29.pdf

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dovdoin Bayar


text:
Computer-aided design/Principles and terminology

Part of:
 * Engineering and Technology
 * Mechanical Engineering; Production and Design Engineering
 * Computer Aided Design Course

Introduction
Computer aided design is a complex process.

There are many specialized tools that can speed up your design, minimize errors and improve your results.

In this lesson, we will:
 * Familiarize you with terms used in CAD industry.
 * Give the general idea of design process stages.
 * Teach about available software tools and their general purpose.

Terminology
Read about frequently used CAD/CAE/CAM terms on Wikipedia:
 * CAD (MCAD - mechanical, ECAD -electronic and electrical, AEC - Architecture, engineering and construction ...) Computer-aided design (CAD) is the use of a wide range of computer-based tools that assist engineers, architects and other design professionals in their design activities. The term CADD is sometimes used and it stands for Computer-aided Drafting and Design.
 * CAE, CAx Computer-aided engineering is the use of information technology for supporting engineers in tasks such as analysis, simulation, design, manufacture, planning, diagnosis and repair.
 * CAM Computer-aided manufacturing is the use of software tools that assist engineers, in the manufacture of product components.
 * GD&T GD&T, also refered to as geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, is a symbolic language used on engineering drawings and computer generated three-dimensional solid models (CAD) for explicitly describing nominal geometry and its allowable variation.
 * PLM Product lifecycle management (PLM) is the process of managing the entire lifecycle of a product from its conception, through design and manufacture, to service and disposal. In the PLM process engineers use different CAD/CAE/CAM tools.

Follow the links to get acquainted with other terms and abbreviations used in the CAD/CAE/CAM industry.

Design process

On the charts (gif and svg versions) you can see the generalized design, validation and manufacturing process.

Each stage requires specific knowledge and skills, and often requires the use of specific software.

Need or Idea
Usually the design process starts with a defined need. The need can be defined by market research, by the requirements of a larger body of work (for example airplane part). Sometimes, but more rarely than you may think, the design process is begun with a new idea or invention.

At any rate, a needs analysis should precede any decision to undertake a project. This includes defining the need in a highly detailed way, in writing. This is similar to the requirements specification process in software engineering.

Research
Professionals tend to research available solutions before beginning their work. There is no need to "reinvent the wheel".

You should study existing solutions and concepts, evaluating their weaknesses and strengths. Your research should also cover available parts that you can use as a part of your design. It is obvious, that Internet and search engines like Google are very helpful for this task. There are also many libraries of standardized parts which you can import into your project.

Concept
Based on your research, start with a high level concept. You should specify the main principles and major parts. For example you can consider Diesel or Stirling engines for stationary electric generators.

Draft
You can choose to create a draft by pen and paper. Some prefer to use simple vector graphics programs, others even simple CAD (for example SmartSketch), yet others prefer to start directly in their main CAD system.

Model Design
2D and 3D modeling in CAD. The designer creates a model with details, and this is the key part of the design process, and often the most time consuming. This will be described in greater detail in further lessons.

Part Libraries
Standard parts, or parts created by other team members, can be used in your model (you don't have to reinvent the wheel). Files representing a part can be downloaded from the Internet, or local networks. They are also distributed on CD ROMs or together with CAD as and extension (library). By putting these predefined parts into your project, you ensure that they are correct and save a lot of time and effort. When working on a large project, this becomes a requirement to ensure the parts operate together, swap out equivalent parts, and coordinate distributed teams' work. This was, a standard part can be inserted into the project by one team member, and used by all.

Assembly modeling
Parts are assembled into a machine or mechanism. Parts are put together using mating conditions such as alignment of the axis of two holes. More about how to do this in further lessons.

Analysis
Specialized programs (CAE -- Computer Aided Engineering) aid you in analysis of 3D model robustness and performance. Many software tools are used for this task. Most notably FEM (Finite Element Method) and Kinematics. Some CAD programs include these tools built in.

Engineering Drawings
From your 3D models, you generate a set of engineering drawings for manufacturing. These drawings are then distributed to the departments and individuals responsible for producing that work. Also these drawings must be toleranced for proper manufacturing.

Tool Design
You can use CAM software to simulate, optimize and prepare manufacturing. Generated NC (Numeric Control) code is then executed by manufacturing machines like lathes or milling cutters.

Planning
Critical Path Method, Gannt chart and other methods and tools are used by project managers to plan and optimize manufacturing. Project management and ERP systems are used.

Presentation
You should create photo realistic images and/or animations to present your design. This allows you to get customer feedback even before the product is actually manufactured. You can also consider using rapid prototyping techniques to present a physical 3D model.

Major CAD/CAE/CAM software companies develop and sell tools that cover the whole cycle. These complex software tools support change management, teamwork, versioning and resource planning.

Tasks to do

 * 1) Play the role of an engineer who has to select an appropriate software package for manufacturing.
 * 2) Select a manufacturer of a specific consumer product.  Choose a company that you know, or find one on the Internet (preferably one with well-described products and manufacturing processes).
 * 3) Find at least two (2) appropriate CAD/CAE/CAM packages suitable for your selected manufacturer. These software tools should support all the major design process stages (modeling, analysis, tool design, and presentation). Tools for teamwork, project management and planning is a plus.
 * 4) Compare and contrast your selected tools in terms of functionality, their added value, and price. (Use a weighted evaluation methodology to determine which included CAD/CAM/CAE software functions are most valuable/appropriate to your chosen manufacturer.)

Outcomes
Your focused research of CAD/CAE/CAM industry gives you an overview about available tools and their producers. You have also become familiar with industry lingo and terminology.

After successfully accomplishing this task you will be able to initialize the CAD/CAE/CAM software selection process for a specific industry.

Learning Assignment
Write a Paper (approxiamately 2 pages) with:
 * 1) Description of one of your chosen manufacturers.
 * 2) Discuss the manufacturer's business critical needs and requirements.
 * 3) Compare and contrast at least two software tools that meet these needs and requirements.
 * 4) Provide a weighted evaluation of your selected software tools (their major functions and features).  Hint:  Use tables.

You will need:
 * Word processor like OpenOffice Writer
 * Internet access and browser

 * Computer Aided Design Course
 * Previous lesson
 * Next lesson


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/rzyg.pl

Links

 * rzyg.pl resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * rzyg.pl is hosted on youtube.com
 * youtube.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Additions

 * Displayed all 1 additions.


text:
South African Law/Cession

Welcome
Welcome to "Cession in South African Law" I hope you find the content useful. This course is aimed at University Students doing an postgraduate LLB. It is a 1/2 course.

Principle works cited

 * 1) The Main reference is: Susan Scott: Cession for Students. Juta & Co 1997. The course outline will loosely follow her work, and the intention is to cover the following aspects.
 * 2) Case law from the South African Law Reports.

Course content
The course content will be broken into various chapters or lessons and will cover the following:
 * 1) Cession in South African Law: An introduction to cession - 2. -
 * 2) *A brief overview of cession
 * 3) *Background history and the need for cession.
 * 4) *The problem with cession.
 * 5) Cession in South African Law: Classification of cession - 3. -
 * 6) *The Definition of cession.
 * 7) *Various agreements distinguished.
 * 8) Cession in South African Law: The claim or object of cession - 4.
 * 9) *Description of the claim.
 * 10) *Transferrability of claims.
 * 11) *Future and contingent claims.
 * 12) *Delictus Personae.
 * 13) *Agreements prohibiting the transfer of claims.
 * 14) Validity requirements -
 * 15) *Formalities in cession agreements.
 * 16) *The doctrine of all effort.
 * 17) *The causa.
 * 18) Notice to the Debtor -
 * 19) Locus standi -
 * 20) Remedies and defences -
 * 21) Cessions in securitatem debiti -
 * 22) The distinction between cessions and pledges -
 * 23) Drafting and drawing.
 * 24) Cession in South African Law: Case law
 * 25) Index.

Practical examples and questions will also be given.

This is not a substitution for a university course and university exemptions are not given. It is an adjunct to study and may provide a simplified outline of what is covered in any university course on the subject.

Best wishes.

title: South African Law/Cession


text:
Talk:Hannah Vermeersch

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hannah Vermeersch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320192243/http://www.rowingaustralia.com.au/hp_athletes_profiles_vermeersch-h.shtm to http://www.rowingaustralia.com.au/hp_athletes_profiles_vermeersch-h.shtm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110315151202/http://www.esperanceexpress.com.au/news/local/sport/general/teenager-to-test-her-training/1877657.aspx to http://www.esperanceexpress.com.au/news/local/sport/general/teenager-to-test-her-training/1877657.aspx

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:00, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Hannah Vermeersch


text:
Talk:Derek Holmes

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Derek Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090929003844/http://www.qosfc.com:80/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/835/reftab/36/Default.aspx to http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/835/reftab/36/Default.aspx

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Derek Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091110024337/http://qosfc.com:80/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/906/reftab/36/Default.aspx to http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/906/reftab/36/Default.aspx

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Derek Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110723071257/http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/860/reftab/36/Default.aspx to http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/860/reftab/36/Default.aspx
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110930141508/http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/1156/reftab/36/Default.aspx to http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/1156/reftab/36/Default.aspx
 * Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/1166/reftab/36/Default.aspx

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Derek Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202191412/http://www.scottishfootballarchive.co.uk/seasons/1999-00/division/2 to http://scottishfootballarchive.co.uk/seasons/1999-00/division/2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110114183118/http://qosfc.com/new_report.aspx?fixtureid=203 to http://www.qosfc.com/new_report.aspx?fixtureid=203

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Derek Holmes


text:
Talk:Better Man (Pearl Jam song)/Archive 1

Untitled
I think it is important to note that part of the reason for the Vinyl release is the first single Spin the Black Circle. I haven't included this, but I think someone should add this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Clint Black version?
There was also a Clint Black song once titled "A Better Man," which was completely different from this song. Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong space, but there should be an article on the song (or at the very least, the album). Briguy52748 01:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


text:
Danburam Abubakar Nuhu

Danburam Abubakar Nuhu (born 7 August 1967) is a Banker, Economist and Politician in the city of Kano, Nigeria. He was the sole candidate for the All Progressives Congress (APC) Party Municipal constituency in Kano State in the 2015 Nigerian House of Representatives election. He served under Kano State Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso as the Honourable Commissioner, Ministry of Commerce, Industry, Cooperatives and Tourism for three years. He was later transferred to the Ministry of Information, Culture and Sports charged with "transform[ing] work efficiency and effective development."

Education
Nuhu is a graduate of Harvard Business School's Executive Management Program. He has an M.Sc in Banking and Finance from Bayero University, Kano and a BA in Economics from the University of Maiduguri. Nuhu is a Fellow of the Civilian Institute of Democratic Administration FCIDA, (Nigeria) and a member of the Institute of Business Executives, the Institute of Industrialist and Corporate Administrators, the Charted Institute of Treasury Management Of Nigeria, the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria, Nigerian Economic Society, the Certified Pension Institute of Nigeria and the Institute Strategic Management. He is an associate member of the Nigeria Institute of Management and the Institute of Chartered Management Accountants. Nuhu is also on the governing body of the Certified Institute of Nigerian Economists.

Career
Nuhu worked in the banking industry for more than 19 years. He was executive director of FinBank (now First City Monument Bank), where he managed the Retail Banking, Institutional Banking and Public Sector groups. He worked for Inland Bank, FSB International bank (now Fidelity Bank Nigeria), Diamond Bank and Liberty Merchant Bank Limited, and served on the board of directors of SunTrust Savings & Loans (now SunTrust Bank Nigeria Limited) for four years. He was a member of the Interim Management Committee that managed the Nigeria Premier League for the 2012-2013 season with the responsibility of "improving the season." Nuhu was specifically asked to join the committee because of his enthusiasm for the sport, and his management and strategic skills.

Ideology
Nuhu wrote a paper titled Africa's Emerging Investment Destination that sought to provide an economic philosophy of investment opportunities in Kano state and it was presented at the Nigeria In The Square Mile (NISM) conference in London, UK.

He asserted that the organization's fundamental role is to strengthen the relationship between Nigerian professionals in London and their British counterparts. At the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) in Kano, Nuhu stated, "We politicians must realize that we don’t have any other country beside Nigeria. Hence, the need for us to conduct ourselves without casting aspiration or blackmailing our political opponents during electioneering campaign."

title: Danburam Abubakar Nuhu


text:
Talk:Cavan railway station, Adelaide

Comment (moved)
Thanks for creating this, could you please add a reliable source? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I have re-purposed the single reference used on the other station pages on the Northfield line (i.e. Pooraka, Northfield). Am looking for others, but Google-able sources seem to be scant. JabberJawJAPAN talk 05:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok - there's more detail here now, and a few more refs (and an altered tag). JabberJawJAPAN talk 02:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cavan railway station, Adelaide


text:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jersey Devil

Comment. User Northmeister, quoted on the RfC, has been banned for incivility and disruption and has a personal beef with Jersey Devil. --Mmx1 00:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Comment User User:Mmx1 has a beef with myself as well, so take the above in context. I was not banned but blocked and I protested this in the strongest manner and still do as I did my second block (both instigated by Jersey Devil unjustly) which was over the Gatekeeper AfD page and his inflammatory comments made -I deleted them/he reverted etc. until I broke the 3RR rule supposedly, even though reversing offensive comments is not a part of that. --Northmeister 07:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * This is based on....what? One disagreement and that I pointed out your WP:POINT behavior which got you blocked? Excuse my improper terminology.--Mmx1 03:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * This is not the page to discuss this. But you seem to be very hostile with me over what I do not know.  The dispute we had was brief, true, and was not allowed to be carried out in the manner I just did at the Internet2 site etc. because Jersey Devil then moved to have me blocked based on senseless grounds which I was not able to respond to because the block was so quick by a person who should of recused himself from it. Like I said, this is not for this page.  I was defending Striver, who as it can be seen by this RfC was being harassed and stalked by a certain user in a manner I was beginning to be, after the GateKeeper confrontation. Makes me think what originally sparked Striver's mistreatment? --Northmeister 03:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I am not qualified to comment on the Islam articles, but they appear to be of equal quality to his Alex Jones creations, which are of questionable notability and extremely poorly written and POV. In addition, his additions to Internet2, Internet], [[Google and Google and privacy issues of Alex Jones's uninformed speculation have been disruptive and borderline vandalism. I will concede that Jersey Devil has been zealous in his pursuit, but his zeal is justified.

--Mmx1 00:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Didn't we just do this?
From Requests for comment:
 * "For disputes over user conduct, before requesting community comment, at least two people should have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem. Any RfC not accompanied by evidence showing that two users tried and failed to resolve the same dispute may be deleted after 48 hours. The evidence, preferably in the form of diffs, should not simply show the dispute itself, but should show attempts to find a resolution or compromise. The users certifying the dispute must be the same users who were involved in the attempt to resolve it."

If the previous RfC didn't meet this requirement, how does this one? What's changed? Tom Harrison Talk 03:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing, as far as I can tell.--MONGO 03:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment The previous RFC is non-existent, since it got deleted, hence, this is not a "second", this is a "first". For it to be a second, there need to be a offical record of the first, and since the first was deleted, there are no other officila RFC on Jersey Devil. Also, i would like to ask people to not forget to sign the RFC this time, so it does'nt get deleted. --Striver 12:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I am new to the RfC process, but my understanding of its rules indicate that two users must "certify the basis for the dispute" within 48 hours to prevent it from being deleted. Apparently that didn't happen with the first RfC, and that is why it was deleted; that is not a technicality, but likely more a reflection of the fact that there weren't two users who agreed with the "basis for the dispute." --mtz206 13:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Not really, its just that i didnt ask anyone to do that, since it was my firts. Georgewilliamherbert wrote to the admin that deleted it:
 * I have to strongly object here; I realize that I didn't sign the Cerify section, but had I realized it hadn't been done I would have done so immediately, and I am reasonably certain there are 3-4 other people who would do so. Stifle, you may have acted in accord with the letter of WP policy, but you have done the spirit a huge disservice here. This was an active ongoing discussion, and the particular subject of it (Jersey Devil AfD'ing stuff) just happened again'' with another dozen or so nominations of striver's articles.

--Striver 13:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

"Users certifying the basis for this dispute"
Striver moved a signature to under "Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute". I can't find the effort in Zereshk's contributions – zero edits to Striver's talk page, zero edits to Jersey Devil's talk page during the dispute. Where is that effort? Weregerbil 14:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. perhaps he meant to move it to the "users who endorse this summary" section? --mtz206 14:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry, thanks for the alert. Ill correct it.--Striver 14:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't see two people certifying this RfC. -Will Beback 20:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Which means if that's not fixed in about 24 hours or so that page may be deleted. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 21:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Adrian certified it, but I'm not sure if he had "tried but failed to resolve the problem." He had posted on Jersey Devil's talk page after the second batch of AfDs, so his advice does not apply to the "same dispute" Striver identified in his statement.  Striver needs someone who posted on Jersey Devil's talk page or other talk pages involved in the dispute, and whose advice was not heeded.  Adrian's advice has seemingly been heeded so far. Esquizombi 06:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Striver's certification
I mistakenly removed Striver's certification. I didn't think it made sense that he could certify a RfC he created, but I couldn't really find any evidence saying he couldn't. I re-added his certification. If that is not correct, someone else remove it and please provide evidence (for my future reference). If Striver's certification is valid, the RfC is now valid. joturner 03:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it's pretty sketchy to certify one's own RfC. If one can, the certifier must still show evidence that he "contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem."  I'm not sure if there is evidence he did that.  Jersey Devil's talk page has two posts from Striver, one informing him of the first RfC and a second criticism him for what Striver erroneously viewed as vote stacking.  Nothing regarding this dispute.  None of the Discussion pages for the AfDs appear to have been utilized.  Striver's one post on the failed RfC talk page does not relate to trying to resolve the basis for this new dispute.  His certification must be dismissed, unless there is evidence I'm missing that he "contacted the user on [User talk:Jersey Devil], or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem" (emphasis added). Esquizombi 04:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Trying and failing to resolve
It looks like the only 'Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute' is an attempted RfC that was removed because it lacked 'Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute.' Tom Harrison Talk 14:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Again, it was deleted because people like Georgewilliamherbert where not informed by me that they need to sign it. I did not do that since it was my first RFC. Even if there where no other atempts previous to that, that RFC is it.--Striver 15:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * So where is the evidence of you trying to resolve the AfD dispute before resorting to RfC? The RfC guidelines suggests using diffs to show the attempt. Weregerbil 16:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Several of us were asking Jersey Devil to not AfD stuff without properly tagging for cleanup first; there was moderate discussion prior to the first RfC, much during, some after, then another round of AfDs and more energetic discussion.
 * All of that said, per my opinion in the RfC I believe that discussions on people's talk pages have significantly improved communications and I am hopeful that we're close to a workable agreement to de-escalate all this. Georgewilliamherbert 22:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Reason for RfC?
May I ask others why they think that AfDing articles by Striver is reason for an RfC? And that includes Striver as that appears to be a key point in his RfC. Many of the articles Jersey Devil nominated for deletion were eventually deleted for good reason. I think that we need to realize that adding AfDs for articles by Striver shouldn't be at the heart of the issue (as Jersey Devil didn't necessarily have to heed the advice of other editors), but rather at the heart of the issue should be adding AfDs for articles by Striver not because of their content but because of the author. joturner 22:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * As I see it, there are two issues:
 * Whether the particulars of so many of Striver's articles being AfD'ed by Jersey Devil is, or is like, Wikistalking, and
 * Whether the AfDs are being done properly in accordance with AfD policy (i.e., tag for cleanup unless it's so bad as to be irrepairable, or has been cleanup tagged for some time without improvement).
 * I believe that the latter is clearly a problem, and am assuming good faith on the first.
 * Also at issue is the quality of Striver's articles, which ranges from excellent to stub. I don't think it's controversial now to point out that the stubs aren't a good thing and should be cleaned up and expanded.  Nor do I think it's controversial that stubs Striver won't clean up in reasonable time should be deleted.   Georgewilliamherbert 22:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that the criteria for proposal of deletion of Striver-created articles (WP:OWN) are being made to be more difficult than for other articles. I'm not saying that tagging them might not sometimes be appropriate first, as you say.  But I see those tags remaining on a number of articles, and I would argue that the quality of Striver's articles ranges not from excellent to stub but from substub (less than three sentences and lacking enough content to provide any editor enough knowledge to expand them) to possibly good if other editors help out on them.   I also note that Striver has invited people to propose deletion of his articles in the past, e.g. "vfd them if you belive you have the majority support" Wikipedia:WikiProject_Islam:The_Muslim_Guild/User_comments/Striver "Now, lets just wait for someone to AFD this, claimin he is not notable..." Talk:Robert_M._Bowman.  He really can't complain if people take him up on his invitations and dares. Esquizombi 00:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Jersey Devil's Response
I'm surprised that Jersey Devil has not written a response to this. The RfC is about him and I even told him about writing a response on his his talk page. I'm not sure what to think of that. I hope he's not letting everyone else do the talking for him, because that would not be a good idea. joturner 23:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not like he's not aware of its existence. He's been actively tagging talk pages. Perhaps a better use of his time and effort would be in his own defense? Isopropyl 23:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Not to put words in his mouth or anything, but I'm pretty sure he's waiting for a second person to certify by the basis of the dispute. Similarly, as am I. If this is going to be deleted after forty-eight hours, he wouldn't want to, nor do I, waste time writing a response (or an outside view). Pepsidrinka 01:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 01:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I hope that's it. joturner 01:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I just wrote it. Might add a little more to it later.--Jersey Devil 05:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * "There is another user who is quoted in Striver's initial statement, User:Northmeister. If you see his blocking log you will see that the user has been blocked 3 times within the last four weeks (two for 24hrs and another for 48hrs). I also ask that you see his talk page and judge for yourself how credible the quotes from this user are."

--- I consider the above a personal insult and attack on me once again by you. I request to re-write it not to include the personal attack please. --Northmeister 07:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * HERE IS THE WHOLE STORY:

 * "Jersey Devil did not like the fact that I deleted what I considered harmful commentary on the Gatekeeper deletion vote page (AfD). SEE HERE. So he responded by going to my articles at Wealth of Nations, and Dirigisme among others and reverting (REVENGE REVERTS he calls them) them without commentary on the talk page.  I responded by looking into his edit history.  I saw that he was engaged in the same thing at other pages.  So I took a stand on something I knew about to stop this - Democracy Now! (I am a progressive Democrat afterall).  I did this to give User:Radical Mallard a chance to respond to his reverts without discussion.  We came to an agreement that it was not helpful to revert others material without discussing it (unless it is an anonymous user or obvious vandalism) and he apologized for his conduct.  Then a few days later he again reverted Dirigisme without discussion (while a discussion was in process with another user Will Beback).  I took offense first, because he broke our cordial agreement to not revert without first discussing why and second because after I reverted back he reverted again, until I could revert no more (each time he did not list a reason on the talk page).    He continues as above to insinuate I am a LaRouche supporter when I am not. This is the same thing Will Beback has done to me since I arrived over disputes at the American System page.  I have bent over backwards for them with citations and references and they continue to call me this name.  I even wrote a brief about myself to indicate a little about me and where I am from and sent Wikimedia my real name to be on record.  That is a little background to balance the above statement. PS. My Buchanan edit was actually accepted by Will Beback after he found out it was well founded himself by the way." --Northmeister 07:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Um, you might also mention (per your talk page) you can't make your mind up as to whether Jersey Devil and Will Beback are two different people, or if JD is a sock puppet of Beback, or if JD and Beback are both sock puppets of somebody else targetting you. Maybe it's because I haven't been here that long, but that seems... unusual.  I don't know enough about your history to comment further, beyond your conduct on Articles for deletion/Gatekeeper (politics) which wasn't admirable and Talk:Democracy Now! which mostly seemed OK.  Given the response the last block triggered User_talk:Northmeister you might consider a break for a little while. Esquizombi 08:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The response is mostly to the way this whole process works (blocking) works, as the one who blocked me in the second case was not exactly a non-partisan...but I digress. Thanks for the commentary. --Northmeister 22:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Can we avoid personal attacks and dragging an unrelated dispute into this RfC please? If you object to Jersey Devil's actions regarding yourself, Northmeister, feel free to open an other RfC.  But we have enough issues in this one without dragging other user conflicts in.  Thank you.  Georgewilliamherbert 08:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You are right to some degree. But, I was brought into this by Jersey Devil himself making comments (see above and on the page) which are a personal attack on my credibility.  So I had to respond with my side.  That is fair enough.  Plus, the community should know how this editor works..per other users not just Striver.  Thank You. --Northmeister 22:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Brief Comment
I am not familiar enough with the situation to write a full "outside view", nor do I really want to be. I agree that Jersey Devil seems to have nominated the articles in bad faith; on the other hand, there are problems with the articles in question. Those problems should be addressed with cleanup tags and discussion on talk pages, though, and not through AfD. See especially my comments at Articles for deletion/Family tree of Maymuna bint al-Harith Ardric47 00:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Jersey Devil is sending SPAM

 * JERSEY DEVIL STOP YOUR SPAM - It is totally wrong to spam other Users! I would sign my name but you would spam me like you did several people I know. STOP PLEASE!

PLEASE STOP THIS! "*Hi, I've seen your edits repeatedly pop up on my watchlist. Please avoid spamming other users' talk pages, thanks. NSL E (T+C) at 05:02 UTC (2006-03-20)
 * I am undergoing an Rfc and under Rfc rules I am suppose to inform users involved with the dispute about the Rfc to get their comments (See the first bullet). I think that is the "spam" you are referring to.--Jersey Devil 05:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)"

"Not obligated to tag"
Regarding Mongo's outside view:

While it is true that nobody is obligated to tag in one sense, the whole issue here is that there's obviously stress and friction and disagreement regarding the AfDs.

As noted in the first RfC, the Article for Deletion guidelines say:
 * Articles for deletion
 * Consider that adding a tag to an article may be a better option than deleting, for instance Cleanup tags or disputed tags.
 * Deletion policy excerpt
 * {| class="wikitable"

!Problem with page !Solution !Add this tag
 * + Problems that don't require deletion
 * Article needs improvement
 * List on Cleanup.
 * {{cleanup}}, or preferably a more-specific tag.
 * Article needs a lot of improvement
 * List on Pages needing attention.
 * {{attention}}
 * Article is biased or has lots of POV
 * List on Pages needing attention.
 * {{npov}} or {{POV check}}
 * Dispute over article content
 * List on Requests for comments.
 * {{disputed}}
 * }
 * Dispute over article content
 * List on Requests for comments.
 * {{disputed}}
 * }

Thus, tagging is strongly recommended by WP guidelines and policies.

It is particularly important if there is controversy involved, as failure to follow policies during arguments leads to strife and finger pointing about intent and whether actions are appropriate or not.

If people assume good faith and are not overly impatient to deal with perceived problems, acting in accordance with the tagging policy will get to the same end goal, without any argument as to whether there was proper notification and procedure followed. AfDs will come if Striver fails to clean up articles which people tag as needing it. They will not be suprises to anyone, as the tags will have been there for some time. If Striver feels strongly about fixing the stubs he's created, he will fill in the stubs within a reasonable amount of time. If he doesn't, then he will have to accept that they're going to likely get AfDed and he shouldn't get upset about that then.

A little bit of structure, and a little patience, and everyone can do what they want to do to improve Wikipedia as much as possible, without these flame wars blowing up all the time. Georgewilliamherbert 08:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Improving Wikipedia does not mean that if concensus to not have certain articles or content in one article, gives an editor carte blanche to supercede concensus and POV fork new articles to support their biases. As you quote, "strongly recommended" is not what it states in policy...it states "Consider that adding a tag to an article may be a better option than deleting". In the vast majority of the articles Jersey Devil nominated, they fit the criteria for article deletion. That in many cases, the concensus (which was oftentimes solicited by Striver) voted to keep the articles or that there ended up being no concensus to delete, doesn't mean that the nominations were all done in bad faith.--MONGO 10:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't believe that any of Jersey Devil's nominations were done in bad faith. But they have been by and large highly contentious.
 * The reason that the policy politely suggests "Consider that adding a tag to an article may be a better option" is that it avoids contention over the process. It's a more gradual notification to the author and interested parties that someone, possibly several someones, feel that the article's substandard or against policy.
 * Striver isn't manufacturing "his side" of the consensus to keep those articles. Nor is he just supported by like minded people.  RfC third certifier Adrian Lamo and I and Striver all represent rather different personal and political and likely religious opinions.  I feel, and I think that Adrian feels, that Striver when given a chance and treated with an assumption of good faith, will often produce good articles from his stubs.  They are articles representing a point of view in many cases, but in many of those cases the point of view is representative of the subject of the article, and the subjects are appropriate.  Striver's been up for review several times at one level or another and it's been clear that we are far from the only people to think this.
 * This is not carte blanche support, and I honestly don't know enough about the dynamics of the Moslem articles to know where his stuff is forking off and causing problems with the existing articles. This is not carte blanche support for his sometimes personal attack tendencies, which he at least admits he has a problem with.  This is not carte blanche support for the WP:POINT incident with nominating other lists for deletion, etc.
 * Even when he does cross the line into WP:POINT or personal attacks or POV forking, using those as excuses to delete his other articles (which Jersey Devil's current Response section does) crosses over into an ad homoniem attack. The author's behavior on other issues or articles is not justification for removal of articles.
 * They aren't his articles, they're WP's, even though he created them and may be editing and expanding them. If the articles are a stub, tag it, and see if he fixes it.  If it has a non-neutral POV tag it.  If it needs cleanup, or sources, tag it.  Assume good faith on his part and see if he fixes it, or if someone else does.  If not, if it's so much of a mess that it shouldn't be there if it's not going to get fixed up, then AfD it after a reasonable waiting period after the tagging.  This is not so hard.  Georgewilliamherbert 16:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no time period granted before an article can be nominated for deletion. It is routine that articles that qualify as candiates for deletion are nominated for deletion. Vitually every one of Strivers articles is either unsalvageable, a POV fork, not notable or easily fits the criteria needed for deletion. Some of Strivers articles, had I seen them on recent changes patrol, would have been speedied by me, as they completely fit criteria for being a speedy delete. I recognize we are talking about the interrealtionship between Striver and Jersey Devil, but the latter does not have to give the former a time period to "fix" his articles...especially those that are blatant POV forks. If anyone is guilty of WP:POINT it would have to be Striver and I have to completely disagree that he isn't the problem editor. Creating hate projects in which other editors are listed ....unbelievable. I'm confident if he were to not tone down his misuse of Wiki resources in which he creates attack pages, POV forks and his other issues of incivility, that a detail analysis brought before arbcom would resilt in a year long ban. Bad faith editors such as Stiver are the ones seeking out arguments, causing disruption and he is the one that causes editors like Jersey Devil to become protective of what Wiki resources are used for...they are not used for POV pushing nonsensical claptrap or POV forks of information that wasn't allowed in other articles, just to get their extremist POV mentioned. I think you are fighting the wrong fight my friend.--MONGO 21:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Striver's risen to the level of visibility to Arbcom people before, and nothing happened. He's simply not that bad.
 * He's persistent, and not that good on some levels. He rubs a lot of people the wrong way.  But in my opinion, he's contributing a lot of good stuff, along with the stuff which isn't so good.
 * If you cannot help but see Striver as only acting in bad faith, I think perhaps you need a mini-Wikivacation away from dealing with him (this applies to both MONGO and Jersey Devil). Honest, guys, he's nowhere near that bad, on the whole.  He wanders over the white-hat line into grey a bunch, but generally not that far, and seems to apologize and acknowledge errors.
 * As I have stated before, in the prior RfC, neither any single incident nor the combined series of incidents that I am aware of rises to the level of what I see ArbCom nuke people for. People who aren't wrapped up in this (admins, and in some cases arbcom members) have looked in and concluded Striver isn't acting in bad faith.
 * If you RfA and try and nuke him, I predict it will go badly for you and result in nothing more serious than minor behavior limits and/or a mentor appointed. I think that you understand this at some level, which is why we're still here, and not there.
 * Between the first RfC and this one, you and JD clearly see that you do not have uncontested consensus that Striver is just a vandal or just operating in bad faith. I accept that you disagree, but you need to accept that you don't have enough agreement among other interested parties, and aren't likely to get it among disinterested parties such as arbcom, to do anything based on Striver's prior history or now (as I see it) significantly improved behavior.
 * I can't make you change your mind on the question of whether Striver's generally acting in good faith or not. But I think it's a good time for you to consider that position again.  Working with him on the constructive criticism front, he has been responsive and has not attempted to play down what I see are the legitimate concerns that you and others have about what he's doing.  Assuming good faith on his part seems to work just fine, from my perspective.  Georgewilliamherbert 03:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing happened? I didn't know there had been arbitration against him...there has been discussion about him, but I didn't know about any arbitration. As far as what the arbitrators would do, who knows. But they rely on the evidence and this is provided by edit history. Striver's edit history link us to what he edited and what he said. How would my filing arbitration against Striver go bad for me...how perplexing and bizarre a notion. I did not create a project and in the article space on that project, attack other editors. We'll just have to agree to disagree, george williamherbert...in fact, I haven't agreed with anything you have posted since I first encountered you, georgewilliamherbert. Interestingly, I haven't noticed any arbcom members looking in here....where?--MONGO 05:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Where is your criticism of Striver's reverts on the Google, Internet2, Internet, etc.. pages? Where is the criticism of the Wikiproject created to salavage his articles? Where is the criticism of his cursing at Zora and creating an entire subpage in order to attack her which was speedy deleted? His putting afds on the "list of XXXX" articles out of revenge for a poster afding his Muslim Athletes article? His "Family Tree" articles was I wrong in afding those? It seems to me that there is just no helping it, there is nothing that Striver can do what so ever that would warrant any criticism from his defenders.--Jersey Devil 01:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * If you would like to file a RfC on his behavior feel free. This fundamentally isn't about that behavior; it's about you  applying AfD to articles he creates and stubs he creates.
 * Striver's behavior could clearly be genocidal, and that would not justify blanket deletion of his articles. In transferring your displeasure with some of his behavior to his articles, you're using an ad homoniem attack on the articles, violating WP:POINT and disrupting article space to make a point about his behavior, and assuming bad faith in all his edits.  These are not good things.
 * Regarding his prior behavior... do you believe that I somehow have to follow him around piling on every time he does something offensive in order to qualify as an interested party in defending his articles? There's not a lot of point to joining the chorus who complained about those abuses he did in the past.  People who were editing in real time with them already had done so, called for administrative intervention in a few cases (see speedy delete above), admonished him for the curse at Zora, etc.  I have not and do not intend to defend him or apologize for him in those cases... those were abuses, he did them, he was caught and in some cases chastised for them.  If he jumped up and did something terrible here in the RfC, while I was on and editing, I would certainly do something and say something.  In the case of the list of XXX AfD's he did, I was on, and I commented at the beginning that he'd violated WP:POINT and that it was a bad thing for him to have done that.  For the rest, I wasn't there at the time.
 * This isn't about whether Striver's annoying or crosses the line sometimes. He clearly is (to a lot of people) and he clearly has.
 * This is about whether people who do that can also be positive contributors, and whether their contributions should be treated with assumed good faith and given a reasonable and fair chance.
 * If he were blockable or bannable for what he's done in the past, he'd be gone. Admins and Arbcom members are well aware of the prior incidents.  The fact that he's still here is proof that there's no general consensus that the incidents separately or together justified long block or ban.
 * You obviously disagree. Which is fine.  If you want to be an administrator, there's an open self-nomination process for it.  If you want to then join Arbcom, that's fine, there's a voting procedure for that too.  If you just want to try and get him banned or blocked, you can file a Request for arbitration tonight.
 * As I noted above to MONGO, I don't think you'll succeed if you do that, though.
 * If you think you will succeed, or think that it's so important that you have to do it anyways, you can do that if you want. Nobody can stop you.
 * But until and unless he's blocked or banned by Arbcom, or does some particular new incident which justifies administrator blocks on the short term... please live with the fact that he's here, treat his article contributions civily and assume good faith in his edits, tag them if you feel justified and Afd them if they remain substandard for extended lengths of time.
 * AfDing stuff which doesn't fit into the category "blatantly and completely useless or off topic" en mass is confrontational and controversial. Even stuff by people who sometimes make personal attacks, excessive POV, POINT, etc.  All we're asking you to do is back off enough to treat his actual article edits and creations with an assumption of good faith and a little patience.  Delaying deletion of a stub by a couple of weeks to see if he expands it, or adds references, or whatever isn't going to cause Wikipedia to collapse.  And it will get myself and (I believe) Adrian Lamo and others off your case.  Georgewilliamherbert 03:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * How many times must Striver cross the line? If no action is taken there's no reason for him not to push the envelope just to see how much he can get away with, and apparently he got away with more than he should have with the Zora attack page. I discovered it after it was deleted, but feel that the snippets alone would have justified administrator action. Not having the original page as a reference, and having only the second-hand quotes on the AFD page, I didn't feel that was sufficient to push for and RfAr. It's a self-referential to claim that his actions don't justify a block or ban because he's still here. The attack page I certainly feel was worth a short-term block --Mmx1 03:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * As I recall, the original Zora attack page was deleted promptly by an admin, and that admin could have blocked him. A wide variety of admins and a couple of arbcom people participated in subsequent discussion about it.  He wasn't blocked.
 * As I said to MONGO and JD... if you think Striver needs a RfA, then RfA him. Don't nuke his articles because you think he deserves a RfA for his personal behavior.  That's textbook Ad Homoniem.
 * I don't think a RfA to ban or block him will actually fly. Admonish?  sure, but that's already happened, and he's already admitted responsibility for the most arbcom-actionable things and apologized, that I can recall from the record.  Arbcom isn't likely to do anything much in the absence of new personal attacks or gross article space misbehavior... and merely creating stubs and getting into arguments a lot doesn't count.
 * But the RfA page is right over thataway, if you feel a uncontrollable urge to call one anyways. Georgewilliamherbert 03:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * FYI, it's RfAr, not RfA, unless you intend to nominate Striver for admin ;-) --Mmx1 03:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No comment. joturner 04:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Suggesting that this is an arbitration attempt is odd. It's just an Rfc, filed by Striver because he feels that Jersy Devil was nominating his article for deletion based on some grudge or something. I disagree. Stiver's edits bring a lot of attention to him, and his POV fork articles and the vast bulk of the rest of his articles (any article can be nominated for deletion, afterall) are definitely in the realm of deletion worthy. Arbitration? Oh, you mean his creation of a wikiproject which attacked other editors that he disagreed with. Arbitration? Oh you mean his incivility to a number of editors in this project? Arbitration? Oh you mean failing to work with the concensus and instead creating POV forks articles? If I sat down and searched his edits.....--MONGO 04:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Let me add that while I didn't particularly enjoy some of the things Striver has said and done, I recognize that I've argued with him, revert warred with him, put his articles up for AfD, and that I've often discussed "what will we do about Striver". He's actually been fairly civil about it all -- more than some other people have been when opposed. It's his articles that I mind more than the occasional incivilities. So make this RfC about articles, not about me. Zora 04:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I didn't suggest this is an arbitration attempt, MONGO. Please re-read.
 * As I stated, Striver's actions are not cause to delete (nominate for deletion, etc) his articles. His articles and their state is justification for improvements, and in some cases perhaps deletion.  Nominating articles for deletion because you dislike his conduct is POINT, and an ad homoniem attack.
 * If you feel that his conduct either current or historical justifies arbitration, file for it.
 * I advise you and JD that arbitrators have participated in prior Striver related debates, and I don't think it's likely he'll get sanctioned if you do that. But it's up to you whether you feel like filing arbitration requests or not.
 * Please separate your arbitration effort from article deletion. Articles stand or fall based on their content, not their editors.  To do otherwise is gross abuse of WP policy and community.
 * If you aren't planning on filing for arbitration, then why do you keep bringing up his prior actions?
 * Zora, right above here... gets it exactly right in my opinion.
 * Georgewilliamherbert 07:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What? Articles stand and fall based on being articles, not POV forks or nonnotable subjects. I think Jersey Devil deserves a medal for trying to rid Wikipedia of Striver's "contributions". Besides, the concensus on the flip side of this affair clearly indicates that the majority of those that have chimed in on this matter consider this Rfc to be hostile action on Striver's part....backfire.--MONGO 12:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

This and this is what happens when tags are added to Striver's articles.--Jersey Devil 12:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

"Example user"
Why does this RfC for Jersey Devil contain a link to "Example user" and this person's talk/contribution pages? Am I missing something? Isopropyl 23:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I believe that stuff is supposed to link to Jersey Devil's information. I fixed the links. joturner 06:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
Northmeister may well be right that WiKinny is a sockpuppet (a knowledgeable lurker or longtime IP poster is not out of the question, but perhaps not likely), which is not really important IMO as long as the sockpuppet master did not also post on the page (unless there was a "good reason". However, per the Discussion instructions Northmeister's comment and the replies to his comment should be on this page, not the project page, I think. Esquizombi 16:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that the best thing to do here if it can be done is to have Jersey Devil prohibited or to prohibit himself by his word from engaging Striver in the future and especially from nominating Strivers stubs or articles for AfD while at the same time prohibiting Striver from creating more stubs or articles for a period of time until his old ones are cleaned up or deleted as invalid by community consensus. In addition we here who have been engaged in this RfC should together with Striver, help him clean up his stubs, either to expand them into something keepable or to merge them with other articles or to delete them as not worthy enough for inclusion.  That seems to me to be the best solution if all party's could agree. --Northmeister 16:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I was wondering the same thing as Northmeister. I invite you to take a look at what I posted on WiKinny's talk page. After doing that, I took a look at this user's contributions. Clearly, the account was created solely for the purpose of arguing against Striver. Reading WiKinny's "outside" (?) view, one would think this is an RfC brought against Striver. I now believe the purpose of the insertion into the debate is in fact to draw attention away from the fact that this is an RfC about Jersey Devil's behaviour. The clear familiarity with Wikipedia exhibited in WiKinny's posts belies the innocent newbie cluelessness exuded by WiKinny's user page. Lambiam Talk 20:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Now matters beyond my control are being used against me.--Jersey Devil 21:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Jersey Devil...My comments above are meant in good faith and to resolve this conflict. If you would simply agree not to engage Striver and to lay off his stubs and articles; while he agrees to not create anymore stubs or articles until he cleans up the ones he has done so far with the help of others here interested; we all can move on and the community here would have a basis for judging both you and he in the future based on keeping to your promise. Problems can always be worked out when one steps back and takes a deep breath.  If you as dedicated to wikipedia as you indicate you are, then let the community know by accepting this proposition. If Striver is dedicated then he too can accept this proposition and we all can move on to better things. --Northmeister 01:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Striver already went through an RFC a long time ago (last July) and he made similar promises then. Considering that he has been keeping this up since he has been here I seriously doubt that he will change the way he edits articles and his frequent creation of forks and unencyclopedic articles. Furthermore, as I have always stated I see nothing wrong in my adding afds. For those who say it is about the articles and not the user, well then defend the "family tree" articles. Explain why I was wrong in placing afds in those pages. Well, for no other reason that the pages were created by Striver. Had it been any other user there would have been no problem however Striver has surrounded himself with people that systematically vote keep on his afds no matter what the content or what Wikipedia policy his articles break with for the sole reason that it is Striver creating the article. So there is really no point in debating this if the people I am debating this with are people who say I am on a "Christian Crusade" for placing afd tags on articles like this, this or this. If people can't see why I put them on, well that is not my problem that is their problem.--Jersey Devil 02:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, WiKinny looks like a meatpuppet, no, Jersey Devil can nominate any article that meets the criteria for deletion for a deletion, no matter who has written the article. You can't ban someone from nominating articles for deletion if those articles are POV forks, nonnotable, unreferenced jibberish or attack pages.--MONGO 21:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You and I can't ban someone from nominating articles; in a worst extreme case, the Arbitrators could do so, but we aren't at the point of needing their intervention (on either "side").
 * Most importantly, the RfC outcome here is just a collection of opinions. RfCs do not hold "legal weight"; they're a method for generating a consensus opinion about a controversy, if one can be found.  People above (not MONGO or JD) need to understand that this can't enforce policy on anyone or create an enforcable judgement against someone.  It's just a method for formalizing the discussion.  Georgewilliamherbert 08:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Then as can be seen plainly, the concesus of opinion is that this Rfc was a hostile action by Striver....--MONGO 12:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


text:
село

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) village
 * 2) the countryside
 * 3) rural area
 * 1) rural area
 * 1) rural area

Declension
Alternative dialectal stress patterns:

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) village
 * 2)  people

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) village, settlement
 * 2) farmstead, homestead, estate
 * 3) field, piece of land in the countryside
 * 4) * c. 1000, Codex Marianus, Matthew 13:44:
 * "cu"
 * "cu"

- пакꙑ подобъно естъ цср҃ствие нб҃ское · съкровищю съкръвенꙋ · {на} на селѣ · еже обрѣтъ чл҃вкъ съкрꙑ · ꙇ отъ радости его идетъ · ꙇ вьсе елико иматъ продаетъ · ꙇ҅ кꙋпꙋетъ село то ·

 * 1) country, region, land

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dwelling
 * 2) container
 * 3) residence
 * 4) village
 * 5) piece of land
 * 6) estate, property
 * 7) field, meadow

Etymology
First attested in 1130±10 as or in 1170±10 as. From.

Noun

 * 1) village, settlement

Etymology 1
, from, from.

Noun

 * 1) village

Usage notes

 * Traditionally, referred to a larger village with a church, while  referred to a smaller village without a church.

Etymology 1
.

Noun

 * 1) a village
 * 2) the country, countryside
 * 3) rural area
 * 1) rural area

Noun

 * 1) social call, visit
 * 2) rural evening social gathering, sometimes featuring traditional music and amusements

Etymology
From, from.

Noun

 * 1) village
 * 2) country
 * 3) rural area

title: село


text:
Djoehana Wiradikarta

Raden Moehamad Djoehana Wiradikarta (born 18 September 1896 in Bandung, Indonesia – died in 1986 in Bandung) was a professor in microbiology and serology at the Bandung Institute of Technology and the faculty of medicine at Padjadjaran University, also in Bandung. He played a significant role in the development of the Indonesian higher education system.

He was also one of the founders of Padjadjaran University, in particular its faculty of medicine. He was the first native Indonesian to be appointed to the position of dean of the faculty of sciences at the University of Indonesia in Bandung in 1957. He is also one of the founders of private university Universitas Nasional. Djoehana was one of five members of the committee for the establishment of the Indonesian Red Cross.

Biography
Djoehana was born in what was the Dutch East Indies. His father, Raden Rangga Wiradikarta, was wedana ("subdistrict head") of Majalaya south of Bandung, and belonged to the Sundanese nobility, as did his mother. Djoehana attended STOVIA (School tot Opleiding van Inlandsche Artsen, "school for the training of native physicians") and graduated in 1918. He was then appointed as a district physician in Bawean Island. After that he held various positions in the colonial government health system, in various cities in Sumatra and Java.

In 1930, he was sent to Amsterdam University in the Netherlands, where he got his "European" Doctor of Medicine degree the following year. Back in the Netherlands Indies, he was the director of the public hospital of Ambarawa in Central Java when Japanese troops landed in 1942. During the Japanese occupation of the Dutch East Indies, Djoehana was deputy director of the laboratory of the Eijkman Institute in Jakarta.

On 17 September 1945, exactly one month after the proclamation of Indonesian Independence, Djoehana was appointed to a committee with five members formed by President Sukarno to establish the Indonesian Red Cross.

In 1947, Djoehana was appointed gewoon hoogleraar ("university professor") at what was to become the faculty of medicine of the University of Indonesia in 1950. From 1951 to 1954, he was head of the Landskoepokinrichting, which was renamed (1950–60) Pasteur Institute of Indonesia, and then (1960) became the state-owned pharmaceutical company PT Bio Farma. He was the first native Indonesian to head this organization, having been in existence since colonial times.

In 1953, he was appointed "professor extraordinary" in microbiology and serology at the Faculty of Sciences, the University of Indonesia in Bandung, established in 1950.

In 1956, Djoehana was appointed vice-president of the foundation in charge of setting up a faculty of medicine at Padjadjaran University, of which he became the first dean (1957–1962). In 1957, he became the first native Indonesian to hold the position of dean, Faculty of Sciences, University of Indonesia in Bandung, replacing Dutch Professor H. Th. M. Leeman. This faculty was the last in Indonesia to still be headed by somebody from the Nederlands, because of difficulties in finding a qualified person required during the initial years of independence.

As dean of the Faculty of Sciences, Djoehana participated in the establishment of the Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) in 1959 and was appointed a member of the Presidium of the ITB on 2 March 1959 until 1 November 1959 when Prof. Ir. R. O. Kosasih was appointed as Rector of ITB.

Djoehana was married to the sister of Sjahrir, the first prime minister of the Republic of Indonesia from 1945 to 1947, and founder of the Indonesian Socialist Party

title: Djoehana Wiradikarta


text:
crazy quilt

Noun

 * 1) A quilt made from random patches, without any unifying design.
 * 2)  An uncoordinated jumble of things, ideas, practices, policies, etc.

title: crazy quilt


text:
five-spice powder

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) A ground mixture of five varieties of spice used in Chinese, East Asian and Southeast Asian cuisine.

Translations

 * Burmese: တရုတ်မဆလာ
 * Chinese:
 * Mandarin:
 * Danish:
 * Finnish: viismauste
 * Greek: μείγμα πέντε μπαχαρικών
 * Japanese: 五香粉, 五香粉, 五香粉
 * Korean: 오향분
 * Portuguese:
 * Russian:
 * Vietnamese: bột ngũ vị hương, ngũ vị hương

title: five-spice powder


text:
Template:Did you know nominations/Comoros blue pigeon

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Comoros blue pigeon

 * ... that the Comoros blue pigeon is endemic to Comoros and coralline Seychelles? Source:
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/List of India women Twenty20 International cricketers

5x expanded by Adityavagarwal (talk). Self-nominated at 18:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC).

 * Symbol question.svg Solid expansion, on few but good sources, subscription source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. - Do we know more about the life of these birds? The required length of the article is more achieved by explaining the rules of rating, which is not specific to them. - The hook is acceptable, but not exciting. Perhaps link the places? - Please remove the stub categories. - I removed the clutter about ALT1, - please do that next time if you have only one. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Gerda Arendt Removed the stub category. Also, would remove the unused ALT1 from the next time! How about:
 * ALT1 "... that the Comoros blue pigeon is endemic to Comoros and coralline Seychelles, and is reportedly extinct in some areas?" Adityavagarwal (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg both, but I prefer the original. Rule of thumb: only one "and" in a hook ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Striking ALT1 in that case. Thanks a lot, learning a lot from you! :D Adityavagarwal (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The hook is uninteresting, but I have added an extra paragraph to the article which opens up the possibility of a more interesting hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ALT2 - ... that the Comoros blue pigeon has a habit of perching in full sun and raising one wing to expose it to the sun?
 * How about this? Adityavagarwal (talk) 08:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks OK to me, we'll see if Gerda approves. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, Cwmhiraeth! Adityavagarwal (talk) 09:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg sure --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


text:
serrature

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) A notching, like that between the teeth of a saw, in the edge of anything.
 * 2) One of the teeth in a serrated edge; a serration.
 * 1) One of the teeth in a serrated edge; a serration.

title: serrature


text:
Category:Pages needing cleanup after Import

This category contains pages that have been imported to Wikiversity from a sister project, but still need cleanup of some type.

Please read: Help with the migration of Wikiversity pages from Wikibooks.

fr:Catégorie:Page importée nécessitant un nettoyage

__HIDDENCAT__


text:
montaggio

Etymology
From. .

Noun

 * 1) assembly
 * 2) frame (for a picture, etc.)
 * 3) montage (in a film)

title: montaggio


text:
Allelopathy

Allelopathy is the chemical property of a given plant that allows it to suppress the growth of other plants, similar to herbicides.

This project is for the collection of learning materials related to allelopathy.

Subtopics
Subtopics of allelopathy deal with particular plants that have this trait.

Black walnut (Juglans nigra)
In the eastern United States, one of the most common allelopathic species is Black Walnut, which produces the chemical Juglone. Considerable amounts of research has been done on this chemical because of the problems it causes in horticulture and agriculture.

 * http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/nursery/430-021/430-021.html - Virginia Cooperative Extension Service (mostly cultural aspects)
 * http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/hortcult/fruits/blkwalnt.htm - West Virginia Cooperative Extension Service (mostly cultural aspects, with an emphasis on vegetables)
 * http://ohioline.osu.edu/hyg-fact/1000/1148.html Ohio State University Extension Service (includes information about toxicity to humans and animals, as well as crops)
 * http://wihort.uwex.edu/landscape/Juglone.htm University of Wisconsin (a list of plants tolerant to juglone)

Goldenrod (Solidago)
www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/ch/ch05/CHvolume05page269.pdf

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0031(200210)148%3A2%3C253%3AEOTAAI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I

http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/solcan/all.html

Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata)

 * http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 Discussion of allelopathic effects on mychorrizae

title: Allelopathy


text:
User:Ashad ps/sandbox

carstroke
carstroke is the nick name of the self talented designer Ashad p.s born in India>Kerala>Cochin on 18-05-1991 he is specially talented to design almost anything but his favorite to design is car's that's why he got his nick name carstroke he's an greatest fan of BMW vehicles cause of that his design's mostly tagged or named as BMW concept's his work's are shown in his blog http://carstoke-as-rd.blogspot.com his work's are also shown in his facebook page BMW carstroke http://www.facebook.com/pages/BMW-carstroke/264086773620239

title: User:Ashad ps/sandbox


text:
Talk:Pochaiv

Name
Per WP:NC the city name transliterates from Ukrainian as "Pochaiv". --MapLover 06:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. —Centrx→talk • 01:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Pochaiv


text:
Talk:Toby Hemenway

death
There are are no news articles yet regarding his death, but his wife has stated such both on his Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1128998883864888&id=289594264472025) and a fundraiser for his hospice care (https://www.youcaring.com/tobyhemenway-718641). Owen (talk) 22:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Toby Hemenway


text:
Hollister School

The Hollister School, at 2463 Contact Ave. in Hollister, Idaho, was built in 1912. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1991.

It was designed by Twin Falls architect Burton Morse. It is a brick building, with brick laid in running bond. It appears to be three stories high, though it has been termed as two-stories with a raised basement. Its entrances are into the "basement" level.

Its design includes a few elements of Craftsman style, in its roof rafters being exposed, and in its small entry porches having Craftsman style brackets.

It was funded by a $30,000 bond, approved 52–0 in January 1912 by citizens of Hollister. Classes began in part of the building in September 1912, while construction continued.

It has also been known as Hollister Elementary.

The school was deemed significant as "it represents the early settlement of Twin Falls County and more specifically, the organization of the Salmon River irrigation project" which reclaimed a large area by use of Milner Dam (1904) and Salmon Dam (1909), the latter being the largest dam in the U.S. northwest and the third largest in the world, at the time.

The irrigation project partly failed, in not providing enough water, in part because lava rock in the Salmon Dam leaked water. Hollister failed to thrive, and the local high school moved to the second floor of this building. The building included a gymnasium, which was damaged by 1925 by the large crowds during basketball games, so athletic events had to be moved elsewhere. The high school was consolidated with a school district based in Filer, Idaho in 1948; this building continued to be used as an elementary school thereafter.

It is located in a sagebrush desert area, about .5 mi west of U.S. Route 93.

title: Hollister School


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Haddad

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Douglas Haddad
Non-notable, possible vanity article SDC 04:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I heard about his book through the Internet and decided to buy it last year. I found all answers that I needed and it changed my lifestyle.  My friend listened to him on the radio and he was awesome.  I did a report on Douglas Haddad and everybody at my University in Kaunas in Lithuania was amazed about his personality!  Thanks wikipedia for the information about his life.
 * Delete —  NN; I'm sure he's a nice man. Chris Griswold 07:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. His book is published by iUniverse, a print-on-demand publisher. However, it is listed on Amazon.com, together with some favorable comments. ISBN<PHONE_NUMBER> -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Only 171 distinct Ghits for "douglas haddad", allowing that many of those are unrelated to the subject.  Yes, he has a book, but the book fails WP:BK for not having multiple non-trivial reviews, hasn't been adapted to a major motion picture, shows no information that it's been adopted as a textbook, etc.  Book itself has only 30 distinct Ghits, largely catalog listings, and shows an Amazon sales rank of somewhere below 1.8 millionth.  Article is unsourced and unverified, and appears to be original research (at least it's not copyvio from anywhere I can find).  Tychocat 09:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete book is on-demand. Has a minor Radio & acting career but not enough IMHO.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


text:
segmentation clock

Noun

 * 1)  A molecular oscillator, governed by periodic shifts in gene expression, which influences the timing of vertebrate somitogenesis.

title: segmentation clock


text:
Philippe DeRouville

Philippe DeRouville (born August 7, 1974) is a Canadian former professional ice hockey goaltender. He played 3 games in the National Hockey League with the Pittsburgh Penguins during the 1994–95 and 1996–97 seasons. The rest of his career, which lasted from 1994 to 2008, was spent in the minor leagues and then in Europe.

Playing career
DeRouville was a top prospect in junior hockey but his National Hockey League tenure lasted all of three games in the 1990s. He bounced around the minors for five years before playing in various European leagues.

Born in Victoriaville, Quebec, DeRouville played in the QAAA with Magog before joining Longueuil Collège Français of the QMJHL. He was chosen 115th overall by the Pittsburgh Penguins in 1992 then returned to junior for two more years. DeRouville represented Canada at the 1993 World Junior Ice Hockey Championships. The gifted youngster was named to the league's second all-star team in 1993 and 1994. In 1993–94 his 3.06 goals against average was the best in the QMJHL.

DeRouville played most of his first two pro seasons with the IHL's Cleveland Lumberjacks but was recalled to make the odd appearance between the pipes for the Pens. In 1996–97, the emergence of rookie Patrick Lalime kept him from moving up to Pittsburgh. Eventually young goalie Jean-Sébastien Aubin and Peter Skudra supplanted DeRouville on the club's depth chart. Over his last two years he played in the ECHL, IHL, AHL and CHL before moving to Europe. He played in Britain for the Ayr Scottish Eagles, Sweden for Timrå IK, France for Briançon and Italy for Brunico SG . He signed for the British Elite Ice Hockey League side Belfast Giants towards the end of the 2006–07 season replace injured goalie Mike Minard. He re-signed for the Giants for the 2007–08 season but after the signing of Stevie Lyle from the Basingstoke Bison, it was announced on October 17, 2007, that DeRouville was released by the Giants.

DeRouville has received offers from 2 different teams on October 18, 2007, and signed on October 23, 2007, with the Croatian team KHL Medveščak from Zagreb, that plays in the Croatian and in the Slovenian league.

Awards

 * QMJHL Defensive Rookie of the Year (1992)
 * QMJHL Second All-Star Team (1993, 1994)

title: Philippe DeRouville


text:
User:RobertBDurham/Books/Twilight

Twilight: An Unofficial Companion

 * Introduction
 * Twilight (series)
 * The Twilight Saga (film series)

 * Characters
 * Bella Swan
 * Edward Cullen
 * Jacob Black
 * List of Twilight characters

 * Twilight
 * Twilight (novel)
 * Twilight (2008 film)
 * Twilight (soundtrack)

 * New Moon
 * New Moon (novel)
 * The Twilight Saga: New Moon

 * Eclipse
 * Eclipse (Meyer novel)
 * The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
 * The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (soundtrack)

 * Breaking Dawn
 * Breaking Dawn
 * The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1
 * The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2
 * The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1 (soundtrack)
 * The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2 (soundtrack)

 * Twilight Cast Members
 * List of Twilight cast members
 * Alex Meraz
 * Alex Rice
 * Alexandra Patsavas
 * Alexandre Desplat
 * Amadou Ly
 * Andrea Gabriel
 * Angela Sarafyan
 * Anna Kendrick
 * Ashley Greene
 * Bill Condon
 * Billy Burke (actor)
 * Booboo Stewart
 * Bronson Pelletier
 * Bryce Dallas Howard
 * Byron Chief-Moon
 * Cam Gigandet
 * Cameron Bright
 * Carter Burwell
 * Casey LaBow
 * Catalina Sandino Moreno
 * Catherine Hardwicke
 * Charlie Bewley
 * Chaske Spencer
 * Chris Weitz
 * Christian Camargo
 * Christian Serratos
 * Christopher Heyerdahl
 * Dakota Fanning
 * Daniel Cudmore
 * David Slade
 * Edi Gathegi
 * Elizabeth Reaser
 * Gil Birmingham
 * Graham Greene (actor)
 * Guillermo Navarro
 * Howard Shore
 * J. D. Pardo
 * Jack Huston
 * Jackson Rathbone
 * Jamie Campbell Bower
 * Javier Aguirresarobe
 * Jodelle Ferland
 * Joe Anderson (actor)
 * José Zúñiga
 * Judi Shekoni
 * Julia Jones
 * Justin Chon
 * Kellan Lutz
 * Kiowa Gordon
 * Kirsten Prout
 * Kristen Stewart
 * Lateef Crowder dos Santos
 * Leah Gibson
 * Lee Pace
 * Lisa Howard (American actress)
 * Mackenzie Foy
 * Maggie Grace
 * Marisa Quinn
 * Matt Bushell
 * Melissa Rosenberg
 * Michael Sheen
 * Michael Welch (actor)
 * Monique Ganderton
 * MyAnna Buring
 * Mía Maestro
 * Ned Bellamy
 * Nikki Reed
 * Noel Fisher
 * Noot Seear
 * Omar Metwally
 * Peter Facinelli
 * Peter Murphy (musician)
 * Rachelle Lefevre
 * Rami Malek
 * Robert Pattinson
 * Sarah Clarke
 * Stephenie Meyer
 * Taylor Lautner
 * Tinsel Korey
 * Toni Trucks
 * Ty Olsson
 * Tyson Houseman
 * Valorie Curry
 * Wendell Pierce
 * Xavier Samuel

 * Locations, Spin-Offs, Extras
 * Forks, Washington
 * Forks High School
 * La Push, Washington
 * St. Helens, Oregon
 * Volterra
 * Midnight Sun (novel)
 * The Short Second Life of Bree Tanner
 * Twilight: The Graphic Novel
 * The Twilight Saga: The Official Illustrated Guide
 * New Moon: The Graphic Novel
 * Gabriel's Inferno
 * Fifty Shades of Grey
 * Beautiful Bastard
 * Breaking Wind
 * Vampires Suck
 * List of highest-grossing openings for films

title: User:RobertBDurham/Books/Twilight


text:
Seminar in Tradecraft and HumInt/Moscow Rules

Introduction
Whether fiction or fact, the Moscow Rules are often referenced and seldom printed. Said to have been developed by CIA for making sure their operatives were not sent like lambs to the slaughter to tough spots like Moscow, the Moscow Rules are an incredibly profound set of pragmatic guidelines for effective tradecraft. They are exceptionally difficult to find online in their entirety. Here, all 40 of the Moscow Rules are preserved. This page provides an opportunity to seminar students to elaborate upon and give examples of the rules in operation.

The Moscow Rules
Please use this Template for commentaries!

 * 1) Assume nothing. Commentary
 * 2) Technology will always let you down. Commentary
 * 3) Murphy is right. Commentary
 * 4) Never go against your gut. Commentary
 * 5) Always listen to your gut; it is your operational antennae. Commentary
 * 6) Everyone is potentially under opposition control. Commentary
 * 7) Don’t look back; you are never completely alone. Use your gut. Commentary
 * 8) Go with the flow; use the terrain. Commentary
 * 9) Take the natural break of traffic. Commentary
 * 10) Maintain a natural pace. Commentary
 * 11) Establish a distinctive and dynamic profile and pattern. Commentary
 * 12) Stay consistent over time. Commentary
 * 13) Vary your pattern and stay within your profile. Commentary
 * 14) Be non threatening: keep them relaxed; mesmerize! Commentary
 * 15) Lull them into a sense of complacency. Commentary
 * 16) Know the opposition and their terrain intimately. Commentary
 * 17) Build in opportunity but use it sparingly. Commentary
 * 18) Don’t harass the opposition. Commentary
 * 19) Make sure they can anticipate your destination. Commentary
 * 20) Pick the time and place for action. Commentary
 * 21) Any operation can be aborted; if it feels wrong, then it is wrong. Commentary
 * 22) Keep your options open. Commentary
 * 23) If your gut says to act, overwhelm their senses. Commentary
 * 24) Use misdirection, illusion, and deception. Commentary
 * 25) Hide small operative motions in larger non threatening motions. Commentary
 * 26) Float like a butterfly; sting like bee. Commentary
 * 27) When free, In Obscura, immediately change direction and leave the area. Commentary
 * 28) Break your trail and blend into the local scene. Commentary
 * 29) Execute a surveillance detection run designed to draw them out over time. Commentary
 * 30) Once is an accident; twice is a coincidence; three times is an enemy action. Commentary
 * 31) Avoid static lookouts; stay away from chokepoints where they can reacquire you. Commentary
 * 32) Select a meeting site so you can overlook the scene. Commentary
 * 33) Keep any asset separated from you by time and distance until it is time. Commentary
 * 34) If the asset has surveillance, then the operation has gone bad. Commentary
 * 35) Only approach the site when you are sure it is clean. Commentary
 * 36) After the meeting or act is done, “close the loop” at a logical cover destination. Commentary
 * 37) Be aware of surveillance’s time tolerance so they aren’t forced to raise an alert. Commentary
 * 38) If an alert is issued, they must pay a price and so must you. Commentary
 * 39) Let them believe they lost you; act innocent. Commentary
 * 40) There is no limit to a human being’s ability to rationalize the truth.Commentary


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/indiaherald.com

Links

 * indiaherald.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

 * mobile.indiaherald.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Additions

 * Displayed all 5 additions.


text:
User:Ferrous~enwikiversity

I am me. That's about all you need to know.

I wrote the Properties of Matter page for the School of Chemistry. Please take a look and feel free to add on.

title: User:Ferrous~enwikiversity


text:
A Broke Moon Rises

A Broke Moon Rises is a studio album by American musician David Pajo, under his pseudonym Papa M. It was released August 17, 2018 under Drag City.

Critical reception
A Broke Moon Rises was met with "generally favorable" reviews from critics. At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream publications, this release received an average score of 74, based on 7 reviews.

title: A Broke Moon Rises


text:
Template:Division boilerplate

Start the name of divisions with the "Topic:" prefix; divisions reside in the Topic: namespace. Divisions help schools with many departments organize related departments. See: Naming conventions.

Division news

 * Date founded - Division founded!

Subdivisions and Departments
Like divisions, subdivisions and departments are pages in the Topic namespace, and their names start with the "Topic:" prefix. Individual departments can be used by multiple schools. Schools that use (link to) the same department should cooperate to develop the department. Subdivisions are used by large divisions to help organize related departments. Not all divisions have subdivisions. If you need a subdivision in your division, you can use the Template:Subdivision boilerplate template to start a subdivision.

Active participants
The histories of Wikiversity pages indicate who the active participants are. If you are an active participant in this division, you can list your name here (this can help small divisions grow and the participants communicate better; for large divisions a list of active participants is not needed).

title: Template:Division boilerplate


text:
1912–13 Dumbarton F.C. season

The 1912–13 season was the 36th Scottish football season in which Dumbarton competed at national level, entering the Scottish Football League, the Scottish Cup and the Scottish Qualifying Cup.

Scottish League
Dumbarton's seventh successive season in the Second Division saw their worst performance since their return to league football in 1906, but still managed a 6th place finish with 29 points, 5 behind champions Ayr United.

An expansion of the First Division from 18 to 20 clubs meant that there would be at least 2 places available to Second Division clubs in the end of season election. As it was both the bottom 'top flight' clubs - Partick Thistle and Queen's Park - were to retain their places, and in addition to Ayr United, the Second Division champions, it was Dumbarton that would step up to the First Division - beating Cowdenbeath with the chairman's casting vote.

Scottish Cup
The Scottish Cup campaign saw Dumbarton disposing of First Division opponents before losing to eventual champions Falkirk in the fourth round.

Scottish Qualifying Cup
Dumbarton qualified for the Scottish Cup by reaching the semi-final of the Scottish Qualifying Cup before losing to non-league Nithsdale Wanderers.

Friendlies
During the season, 3 'friendly' matches were played, winning 1, drawing 1 and losing 1, scoring 4 goals and conceding 4.

Player statistics

 * }

Source:

Players out
Source:

In addition John Brown, George Hunter, Thomas Howat, John MacAulay, William Main, Robert Muirhead, Ebennezer Rodger, John Stalker, John Stewart and John Wilson all played their final 'first XI' games in Dumbarton colours.

Reserve Team
Dumbarton lost in the second round of the Scottish Second XI Cup to Kilmarnock.

title: 1912–13 Dumbarton F.C. season


text:
Ust-Volchikha

Ust-Volchikha (Усть-Волчиха) is a rural locality (a selo) and the administrative center of Ust-Volchikhinsky Selsoviet, Volchikhinsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 941 as of 2013. It was founded in 1812. There are 9 streets.

Geography
Ust-Volchikha is located 17 km southwest of Volchikha (the district's administrative centre) by road. Bor-Forpost is the nearest rural locality.

title: Ust-Volchikha


text:
Ballplay, Monroe County, Tennessee

Ballplay is an unincorporated community in Monroe County, Tennessee, in the United States.

History
A post office was established as Ball Play in 1830, and remained in operation until it was discontinued in 1910.

title: Ballplay, Monroe County, Tennessee


text:
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2017-09-25/Gallery

The Gallery is an occasional Signpost feature highlighting quality images and articles from Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons based on a particular theme.

If you're feeling cooped up, a variety of chickens...
This issue's Humour article is about chickens so cluck'n in with these.


text:
User:ShinJunBak

Hello! I am Jaac, a Canadian map maker and esports enthusiast. I upload occasionally, usually just making minor edits to pages.

Please enjoy my work!

title: User:ShinJunBak


text:
Japanese Language/Basic Greetings

Greetings are very important to know in Japan. It is something even Japanese people don't truly master, and yet it is a huge and important subject. This short lesson will go over the easier and more useful forms of address and greetings. Literal meanings are given in parentheses.

Hello
Saying hello takes many different forms, depending on the time of day. The Japanese have no one word for hello, they instead have three major greetings based on morning, afternoon, and evening, and a form used when speaking on the telephone.

Use "Ohayou" from waking to about 12:00, "Konnichiwa" until dusk, "Konbanwa" throughout the evening, and "Oyasumi" only before bed or sleeping.

 * Good Morning!
 * 「おはようございます」 "Ohayou-gozaimasu!" or simply "Ohayou!" (it is early)

 * Good Afternoon!
 * 「こんにちは」 "Konnichiwa!" (this day)

 * Good Evening!
 * 「こんばんは」 "Konbanwa!" (this night)

Now that wasn't too painful, was it? There's one more thing you should know how to say along these lines, and that's good night, used before someone goes to bed.

 * Good Night
 * 「おやすみなさい」 "Oyasuminasai" or just "おやすみ" "Oyasumi!" (Take a rest!)

 * Hello? (Answering a telephone)
 * 「もしもし」 "Moshi moshi"

Avoid the common mistake of saying 「むしむし」 "Mushi mushi" which actually means "bugs bugs" or "ignore and ignore". Yes is Hai and No is Iie(iie)...

Saying Goodbye!
Goodbye is done in two ways. Say "Sayounara" for goodbyes that are more formal or more permanent. A simple informal "bai bai" ("bye bye") is fine for friends. Occasionally you will hear friends use "Ja ne," which is tough to translate. Literally, it is probably more akin to "Well, all right then," but it is employed in the same way as English speakers would say "bye bye", or "see you."

Please and Thank you
Please has multiple ways of manifesting itself, as does Thank you, but we will learn only the two simple forms of these terms until the Honourifics section. Further expansion on this subject of thanks and requests will be dealt with in the Honourifics section as the giving and receiving of gifts is an important part of Japanese culture, and the language thereof is both more slightly complex and very flowery.
 * Please is "Kudasai" or "Onegaishimasu."
 * Thank you is "Arigatou."

title: Japanese Language/Basic Greetings


text:
Talk:Wild

Disambiguation
This artical has conflicinting information,
 * It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page. (Discuss)
 * This is a disambiguation page: a list of articles associated with the same title. If an internal link referred you to this page, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.

Is it a disambiguation or isn't it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs).
 * I think the idea was that the term "wild" was so vague that it could be split into separate articles that themselves were disambiguation articles. In any case, I'm proposing somewhat the opposite: merging WILD into Wild.  --Closeapple 19:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup
This disambiguation page was marked for cleanup per MoS:DAB. I merged content from WILD here, and I also removed several entries and will give the reasons here: I might be off with my judgement in some cases, so carefully(!) re-insert those terms that you think have to be included. Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines for a dab page first though. – sgeureka t•c 14:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wild Food Adventures: Institute for the Study of Edible Wild Plants and Other Foragables. A research and teaching institution operated by John Kallas, Ph.D.. Dedicated to understanding and dissemination of knowledge regarding the past present and future uses of edible wild plants and other foragables in North America. -- probably commercial (WP:ADVERT). Also violates WP:DAB.
 * Wild bill, a dollar bill on Where's George? that has previously been entered and marked with the Where's George web address -- Deleted because of WP:DAB
 * List of wild foods
 * Wild card
 * Wild cat
 * Wildflower
 * Wild ginger
 * Wild Hunt
 * Wild rice
 * Wild Weasel -- all from the "See also" section. Deleted because of WP:DAB
 * The Wild in the web comic Kevin and Kell, a forested area where animals go to give up on the trappings of civilization and live as their wild ancestors once did -- no significant mentions on Kevin and Kell, so probably non-notable.
 * Wyld (Rapper) -- no incoming links to this term/person, so probably nonnotable.

title: Talk:Wild


text:
Sunny Side, Waller County, Texas

Sunny Side is an unincorporated community in Waller County, Texas, United States. According to the Handbook of Texas, the community had an estimated population of 120 in 2000.

title: Sunny Side, Waller County, Texas


text:
Theodwin

Theodwin, also known in the forms Dietwin and Theoduinus, is a name. It might refer to:

 * Theodwin of Lobbes, an 8th-century abbot
 * Theodwin of Liège, an 11th-century bishop
 * Theodwin of Santa Rufina, a 12th-century cardinal

title: Theodwin