text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/jehovainfo.com

Links

 * jehovainfo.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Users
No users found.

Additions
No additions recorded.


text:
User:Yerpo/sandbox2

How to select entries for the "Deaths" section in recent years pages? A list of options that have been floated around for the past few months.

Keep the current method of requiring 9 interwikis at the time of death
Pros: Cons:
 * quick and dirty
 * technically violates a number of Wikipedia policies, such as WP:RS
 * usefulness has degraded over the years, not the least because many Wikipedias are using bots to mass-create stubs, so interwikis don't reflect true international notability anymore

Included just for comparison. See Wikipedia talk:Recent years.

Comment For one, Wikipedia, in any language, is not a Reliable Source. For two, non-English Wikipedia's have standards far more relaxed than ours, meaning articles can be created in these spaces without any supervision, quality control or moderation. It would be entirely feasible for me to create a single article and post it multiple times on other wikis, without scrutiny or assessment. For three, the number of wikis is completely arbitrary. For four, this method was written and endorsed by an editor/admin whose credibility has been demonstrated as lacking, who fraudulently promoted the method to guideline status for cynical reasons. For five, as we have seen over recent times, this method comes into direct conflict with common sense, often denying entry of the obvious. For six, it's only support comes from a small pocket of individuals who are only interested in retaining it because they can dig into its confusing, woolly jargon to deny with false authority, any individuals or events they personally find distaste with or have a vendetta against, usually because of some pompous crusade against modern, populist notability. This option has been dismissed by RFC and should rightly be ignored. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. The above comment is a clear violation of WP:NPA, and, although the mentioned RfC can be read (with difficulty) as asserting the 9-Wikipedia rule is not a long-term solution, it cannot rationally be read as asserting the rule should be removed until an alternative is in place.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment the above comment claims the RfC can be read "with difficulty", so perhaps we need to spell it out. It fundamentally and clearly sets out that the community as a whole believe that the 9-wiki solution is invalid.  That is as plain as day, it couldn't be any easier to read.  It can rationally be interpreted that we need a need rule and that any consensus to include items against the old "guideline" (now essay) is perfectly justifiably included.  Using unreliable sources to include information in Wikipedia is patently absurd and as such we should work actively to distance everyone from this "approach". The Rambling Man (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Make a cross-section of entries in lists of notable deaths in various RSs
Pros: Cons:
 * using several reliable sources (examples: NYT, BBC, Britannica) would make the list as little biased as possible
 * can't use the method for the current year until after it has passed, or individuals that gain prominence even later
 * effort would be needed to identify RSs which reliably produce such lists every year, and agree on the ones to include

Comment As those most resistant to change were championing the inclusion of cherry-picked deaths on the basis that it fell in line with common practice regarding annual reviews outside of Wikipedia, then the idea of stalling publication until the year is complete, like others do, should not be met with objection. Current year can simply not exist or it can be a collection of links ascribing all events and deaths, which are upon release of sourced annual reviews, compiled accordingly. I also don't see 'effort' being a con.

Comment. The "con" concerns are legitimate, but not serious. Seems (at least a framework toward) the best approach. However, including all events is not part of a feasible solution. Including some events under specific rules might be feasible, if there were editors interested in reaching consensus. We all agree there are editors who do not appear interested in reaching consensus, although we do not agree who they are. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

 * Comment the above contains a veiled personal attack, thus noted, from a soon-to-be-desysopped editor. Including deaths per global RS is a reasonable approach, the three-continent rule is by far and away a better rule than the patently absurd 9-wiki rule.  At least it uses reliable sources. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Nominate each entry separately and have it voted upon
Pros: Cons:
 * the most direct way to have the collection reflect consensus
 * content pages in Wikipedia aren't normally built this way, violates WP:BOLD
 * a hefty administrative burden
 * small community of active editors around RY pages would mean that the few regular editors would tend to dominate decisions
 * would cause over-representation of Western entertainers (the only ones that usually attract attention of the wider community)

Comment As the 'regulars' on these articles spam every vote with the same argument that has been addressed so many times before, as if part of some weird Wikipedia Groundhog day, this option should only be considered if we could also seriously look into restricting disruptive editors from contributing, unless they have something new and of value to say. Phrases like "this is a local event" or "does not appear in 8 wikis" are just a stuborn #IDHT waste of time and serve only to rile. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment per above, has been the only wiki-vehicle available to ensure some level of community satisfaction is guaranteed. We may need to drop to this until a better method than the patently absurd "9 wiki" selection method is improved upon.  As such I would vote for this as an interim fix, followed by the "noted across 3 continents in reliable sources" approach. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Use coverage of death on three different continents
Pros: Cons:
 * relatively straightforward
 * too many people would merit inclusion in the current age of agency news, which would make the list very long and hard to navigate
 * Western entertainers would be even more overrepresented

Comment This could perceivably be used in conjunction with the reliably sourced annual reviews/obituraries method, to formulate a working list prior to review at the end of the year. Personally though, saving the admin of working set that will likely change and just linking all deaths/events without the laborious and problematic task of cherry-picking, is obviously more productive and satisfactory. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment yes, a good alternative, certainly better than using unreliable sources such as Wikipedia to determine notability. "hard to navigate" is a red herring.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Discard the section entirely, and link to "Deaths in 20XX" instead
Pros: Cons:
 * the easiest solution
 * lists of notable deaths are a traditional feature of yearly reviews, it's what readers expect to see here
 * discontinuity with other year pages which do not fall under WP:RY and would keep the section
 * "Deaths in 20XX" lists are hard to navigate, with hundreds of entries

Comment Our understanding of what readers expect is pure speculation and cannot be considered a con. Discontinuity, i.e. the reluctance to return to older articles to bring them in line with progressive solutions and the speculation that this would be in anyway negative to our readers (continuity issues with documentation spanning many years exist happily elsewhere) should not be considered a con. And the fact that 'Deaths in 20XX' articles are hard to navigate is also speculation. They clearly include names, careers and dates. People are at liberty to use find/search and the list is clearly broken down by month. The notion it is 'hard to navigate' stems from bias which boils down to POV "those I think significant are buried in the people I don't". One man's "nobody" is another man's hero. The overwhelming pro to this option, and the trump to any perceived con, is that the list is unbiased, impartial and all-inclusive without any reliance on inherently problematic cherry-picking processes. It would certainly be a strong contender for a current year hybrid solution along with RS Annual Review articles. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments the purist approach, and a good one. What readers "expect" is certainly not what we're giving them, as it appears to be entirely down to a group of three or four individuals who routinely remove individuals who are notable to a sizeable proportion of the English language readership we have.  This would avoid the relentless arguments over who is and who is not "internationally notable" whatever that means, and would result in a fully comprehensive list.  Just link to it.  They are not "hard to navigate", that's a red herring, what's hard about a "scroll bar"?  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Top [x] most notable deaths per month
There's a number of different ways this could be implemented, but the basic idea would be to limit each month to a certain number (or range) of deaths to be listed and then figure out from there.

Comment Working to a fixed number is problematic. I could get behind this solution if the number was flexible, i.e. in the event that 5 global megastar musicians die, we wouldn't be excluding one or more because of some arbitrarily decided cap. You could work this in a hybrid solution with the 'Deaths In 20XX' link solution - i.e. take a vote at the end of the year to condense the list into the finished Year article. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 13:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment no way. This still relies on a definition of "notable" which is the crux of the problem. And it also depends on when the snapshot of "notable" was taken.  Prominence evolves over time. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Using WikiProjects' importance level determinations
I know a number of WikiProjects (like WikiProject Chicago) already have a pretty thorough process for determining the importance of an article to that topic. We could somehow piggy-back off these processes. I don't know how, exactly, but I think this is what pt.wiki does (see pt:1994). I don't know how many different WikiProjects have such processes or what topics they cover or don't, but maybe we could come up with a list of certain WikiProjects that have a thorough process for that determination and automatically include any Top or High level importance people from those, and if they have a wide enough coverage, we could just take others on a case-by-case basis or use something else altogether in combination with this.
 * Comment Never. Wikiprojects are unreliable in maintaining their articles' importance, anyone can change the notability, avoid at all costs. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Develop our own requirements
We could hash out a thorough list of what makes a politician/athlete/entertainer/academic/activist/author/etc. sufficiently notable. This could be some combination of more vague criteria (“top-rated world-class players and managers”) and very specific criteria (any politician who was a (non-interim) head of state or any director who won the Palme d'Or twice).

Comment. Doesn't seem feasible. Involves building an entirely new set of "notability" guidelines. Possibly could be used to include interim events, but there are enough editors opposed to arbitrary criteria that consensus is unlikely. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment just stick with Wikipedia policy. People who are notable are covered by WP:N.  Some wise guy decided this set of articles needed to include "super notable" people.  That was always going to be an issue, particularly when measuring such "super notability" against something as patently absurd as the "9-wiki" rule.  Policy trumps essay, point at the list of deaths. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Process
Instead of starting with different proposals, it might be worthwhile to start with a fuller conversation about what we want the end product to look like (ideally, which deaths should be included and which ones shouldn't?) and then work backwards from that to come up with a way to achieve that.
 * Comment. Might be feasible if enough editors were interested in the process.  As I noted above, we all agree that there are editors who appear not to be interested in a solution. We just don't agree as to who they are.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 05:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment this is a good start, but yes, all the locals have gone into hiding once the real meat of discussion comes out, meanwhile this debate is being had in a sandbox, not at the project page, and the notification for it is easily overlooked. We should be involving the community as a whole, e.g. those who continually voted against the regulars time after time, to include items that they believed the readers would expect to see, not those items the regulars deemed appropriate for inclusion.  Once again we're in a walled garden.  It's raised a bigger issue, actually, that of the very raison d'etre of "recent years".  What's the actual point of this trivial subset?  I would be tempted to suggest the RY "mini project" gets binned entirely and WP:YEARS is modified to include a more inclusive and reader-friendly set of criteria, instead of these RY articles which are really not being run for the sake of the average passing reader who wanted to see the significant events of a given year, just because one or two people have deemed them "local events". As for individuals not interested in a solution, that would include de-sysopped Arthur Rubin who continually edits despite being subject to an Arbcom case in which he has not participated, despite it being of his own making, and the same individual who continues to make personal attacks in the same manner which got him de-sysopped.  If he is permanently excluded from the project, it won't be a big surprise.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:Yerpo/sandbox2


text:
User:Jamesapeters79

James Anthony Peters (born March 25, 1979) is an American rock drummer, multi-instrumentalist,and record producer. He is the drummer of the Indie-Mambo band Orkesta Mendoza and the Percussionist of Roger Clyne & The Peacemakers.

Peters is the drummer and co-founder of the rock The Jons. He additionally wrote all the music and performed all the instruments for his short-lived side projects Yardsale Heart. He has been involved with the rock band The Resonars many times throughout the past decade.

He has performed as a session drummer for a variety of musicians, including RCPM, The Resonars, The Little Rabbits, Yardsale Heart.

Early life
James Peters was born in Tucson, Arizona on the 25th of March, 1979. Ever since then he as always been a performer, recreating music videos, acting like Elvis, beating on pots and pans, dancing and singing like Michael Jackson. He began studying the drums at the age of 5. At the age of 10 he started his own band. He spent the next 15 years studying privately and touring professionally with his band “The Jons” who he has recorded three full length albums with and toured extensively with since 2002. In 2009 he joined Orkesta Mendoza which has been extremely successful in all of Europe and Latin America.

title: User:Jamesapeters79


text:
Talk:Runs

DISAMBIG suggested, beautiful music and the shits are two polar subjects. Will try to break out redirects.M jurrens 15:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Runs


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/singapore-visa-online.com

Links

 * singapore-visa-online.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Additions

 * Displayed all 21 additions.


text:
Talk:Denis Robert Pack-Beresford

Requested move 2 October 2021
I've requested a move for this and Denis Pack-Beresford (MP). You may wish to discuss it here. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Denis Pack-Beresford (MP) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:50, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Denis Robert Pack-Beresford


text:
The Promise (1965 play)

The Promise is a play written in 1965 by Russian playwright Aleksei Arbuzov. The story follows a young woman and two young men from their first meeting in a derelict room during the Siege of Leningrad in World War II; through the woman's marriage to one of the men, who turns out to be the "wrong" one; then finally to a new start with the "right" one.

Ariadne Nicolaeff's English translation of the play was produced in London in 1967, with a cast including Judi Dench, Ian McKellen and Ian McShane. A British reviewer called the play "Charmingly old-fashioned and chastely sentimental, [yet it] gave a lot of pleasure." This same production, with Eileen Atkins replacing Dench, opened on November 14, 1967, at Henry Miller's Theater in New York; it ran for 23 performances.

The play was profiled in the William Goldman book The Season: A Candid Look at Broadway.

A newspaper ad for the Broadway run can be seen in the final scene of the tenth episode of the second season of the show That Girl. The episode ("When in Rome") aired November 9, 1967, just under a week before the production opened.

title: The Promise (1965 play)


text:
三線

Noun

 * 1)  third line; third tier

Etymology 1
From.

Noun

 * 1) a fretless plucked lute with three strings and a skin-covered body originally from Okinawa, the precursor to the shamisen

Etymology 2
From 🇰🇲.

Noun

 * : a Japanese plucked string instrument played similarly to a banjo

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) a fretless plucked lute with three strings and skin-covered body, a precursor to the shamisen

title: 三線


text:
Adrian Wright

Adrian Wright (1 July 1947 – 28 November 2015) was an English-Australian actor remembered for his roles in the 1970s children's television series Freewheelers and the Australian serial Prisoner in which he played male nurse Neil Murray, after playing an off-duty policeman in episode 10.

Personal life and career
Born in Maidenhead, England, he was the son of Matvin Wright, a painter and first appeared as an actor in repertory theatres in England and Wales. He subsequently moved to Australia where he continued his career. His most prominent role is probably that of Neil Murray in Prisoner. He was married to Australian actress and singer Abigail, he died in 2015.

Film

 * End Play (1975) as Andrew Gifford
 * Summerfield (1977) as Peter Flynn
 * The Survivor (1981) as Goodwin
 * Sky Pirates (1986) as Valentine
 * The Lighthorsemen (1987) as Lawson
 * Gross Misconduct (1993) as Kenneth Carter
 * Body Melt (1993) as Thompson Noble
 * The Final Stage (1995)

Television

 * Freewheelers (1970-72, seasons 4-7) as Mike Hobbs
 * Village Hall (1974)
 * Prisoner as Off Duty Policeman / Neil Murray
 * Halifax f.p. (1995, season 1, episode 2) as Grammar School Teacher
 * Tales of the South Seas (1998) as Lt. Jean Morlais

title: Adrian Wright


text:
Talk:Aaron Heffernan

He also had a small role in an episode of the American produced ID show Obsession:Dark Desires

""Aaron Heffernan"" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect &. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Aaron Heffernan


text:
Andre Cason

Andre Cason (born January 20, 1969) is an American former track and field sprinter. He was a member of the American 4 × 100 meters relay team that won the gold medal at the 1991 World Championships in Tokyo with a world record time of 37.50 seconds. A few weeks after this event, Cason ran his first sub-10-second 100 meters race when winning in Koblenz in 9.99 seconds.

Cason attended Texas A&M University, where he was a two-time NCAA champion, and seven-time All-American for the Aggies.

The 1992 season started well for Cason as he set the world indoor record for the 60 meters on three occasions, leaving a standing world record of 6.41, and equalled the world indoor record for the 50 meters with a time of 5.62. Cason kept his excellent form until the early summer. However, at the 1992 US Olympic Trials he suffered a career threatening injury with a torn Achilles tendon, and was out for the rest of the season.

In 1993 Cason won the 100 m at the USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships in Eugene, Oregon and won a silver medal over 100 m at the 1993 World Championships in Athletics in Stuttgart, running in 9.92 s. In the 4×100 m relay he was a member of the US team that tied the world record at 37.40 s in the semi-finals, and won the gold in the final with 37.48 s.

Cason coached the Liaoning Province Team Sprinters, and assisted in building and cultivating the Chinese National Sprint Team from 2010 to 2013. In 2014, Cason oversaw the high performance training for professional MMA fighters in Hong Kong. Since late 2014, Cason has been the National Sprint Coach for the country of Thailand, and the Thailand Olympic team.

National titles

 * USA Indoor Track and Field Championships
 * 60 m: 1991
 * USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships
 * 100 m: 1993

title: Andre Cason


text:
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2012 July 10/Beeblebrox comments

Beeblebrox comments in order, focused on those related to the move close and the possibility of a 'no consensus' finding.

RM close

There is certainly a lot to be considered when evaluating this discussion. I haven't actually counted but at a glance if we went by straight numbers we would arrive at yet another "no consensus" result. That is, in my opinion, not acceptable. Of course we don't do things that way anyway, but I wanted to be clear from the outset that strength of numbers was not a contributing factor to this close.

 * On the topic of which is the more widely used name in reliable sources we have contradictory and sometimes unclear information. However, several users analyzed not only sheer number of hits but what type of sources those hits were coming from. Those analyses were quite helpful and appreciated

 * The argument that "arguments have not changed since last time" is irrelevant and any such remarks were ignored when determining the close. Since there has never been a consensus on this issue it is only logical that arguments for both positions will be more or less the same. If this move had been unambiguously accepted or rejected in the past it would be a different story.

 * The core issue here is "what is the purpose of an article title?" All other arguments about colonialism, respecting the locals, what atlases or even other encyclopedias say etc are not entirely without merit but are secondary to that concern.

 * So, what this is about is not fairness or respect, it is about how best to serve our readers.

 * The majority of people who are not editors of this page are more likely to be familiar with the term "Ivory Coast." When they type that in they will see exactly what they were looking for right away and will know they are in the right place. Anyone searching "Côte d'Ivoire" will almost certainly already be aware that "Ivory Coast" is another common name for this place and will not suffer that same confusion. As is indicated in the discussion, many of the sources that use Côte d'Ivoire are not journalistic sources but rather governments or NGOs. It would be impolitic of them to use Ivory Coast, but we do not need to worry about that.

Therefore I conclude that the arguments to rename the article to "Ivory Coast" have more merit than the arguments to retain it at the current title. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk page

1) I don't really have much more to say about the close except to be abundantly clear that Icame to this with no opinion or preffered outcome and I read every single word of the very long debate, twice, before doing the close. As to the specific points raised here, the statement about there never having been any consensus is clearly being taken out of context. Beeblebrox (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

2) After so many lengthy discussions over a period of eight years it is not acceptable to still not be able to come to some sort of conclusion. Other geographic naming disputes like this have wound up before ArbCom and if this continues to be contested and argued about they will probably become involved in this situation as well, although the nationalism that plagued discussions about Ireland and Eastern Europe are thankfully not evident in this case. However,I did not consider that option to be off the table, Rather I came to the conclusion that after analyzing the various arguments there was a better case made for moving it than for retaining it where it was. My comments about how we might have had another no consensus result anyway were intended to clarify the I could see that if we went by sheer numbers there was yet again no clear result, but if we do what we are supposed to do and consider the arguments as opposed to who or how many are making them it didn't have to end that way yet again. I knew the minute I started looking at this that no matter how it was closed a sizable portion of participants would be upset, you have to accept that when closing something like this. It would have been easier to just look at how things were split and declare that once again consensus had eluded us, but I think this is the better result for Wikipedia's readers, the people we are supposed to be doing all for. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

MVR

1) endorse own close The argument that "Ivory Coast" is the name most of our readers would be familiar with was in fact the central point of most if not all of the arguments to change the name. That I expressed it slightly differently in an attempt to clarify the logic behind the close does not mean I made up myself or used a "supervote" to force my own desired result. . If I cared one way or the other what this article was called I would have participated in the discussion instead of closing it. Was it a slam dunk? No, but I endeavored to make it clear that if we factored in concern for our readers (you know, the people we do all this for, the ones who want information, not a demostration that we know how to argue chapter verse of some policy they have never heard of and don't care about) then the argument to move the article had greater strength. As I mentioned in my close, if I had been so inclined I could have just looked at the number of bolded endorsements and said "no consensus" for the sixth time, but instead I actually read this monstrous debate, twice, and carefully considered every argument made before writing up the close. i remain convinced this was the right move for Wikipedia and its readers. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

2) P.T., I am wondering why you continue to make the claim that I prematurely ruled out a no consensus result when we already discussed this on my talk page and I explicitly told you I did not.[1] Of course in the cherry picked, out of context portions of those remarks you reposted here that is not evident. I can imagine only three possibilities:

 * You did not understand my answer
 * You think I am lying
 * You understood my answer and believe it but it is not in the interest of your position to acknowledge it so you persist in making the claim anyway.

I would appreciate it if you would indicate which of these situations best describe your position or if there is a fourth possibility I have not envisioned. Beeblebrox (talk) 13:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

3) That is not what I did. As I explicitly mentioned in the closing statement and in the discussion on my talk page, I accept that if you look soleley at the numbers, there is no consensus, but if you do what we are supposed to do and consider the arguments and not just the numbers, I believe there is one position with a stronger argument. Apparently my choice to add a remark that I would not consider a no consensus result acceptable has caused everyone to assume that I did not even consider the possibility. It was more of an aside, an editorial comment if you will, that I clearly should have just kept to myself because it has been misinterpreted and taken out of context ever since. That's four times now, once at the RM, once on my talk page, and twice here that I have tried to clarify this point. Hopefully it is now clear to everyone. Beeblebrox (talk) 13:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

4) I'd just like to point out once again that I have repeatedly refuted the notion that I closed this the way I did because I felt a decision had to be made one or the other. I said it would not be an acceptable result. That is not the same thing. Sometimes these things are in fact closed with unnaceptable results and if I saw no other way I would have closed it that way. I would once again request that those arguing this point clarify if they have simply not read those previous explanation or if they are calling me a liar. It pretty much has to be one or the other. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

5) ok, I will try one more time to clarify this point:

"There is certainly a lot to be considered when evaluating this discussion. I haven't actually counted but at a glance if we went by straight numbers we would arrive at yet another 'no consensus' result. That is, in my opinion, not acceptable. Of course we don't do things that way anyway, but I wanted to be clear from the outset that strength of numbers was not a contributing factor to this close."
 * I responded to request for closure and came into this discussion with no preconceived notions whatsoever. Until I began reading the RM I didn't even know there was a naming dispute on this topic
 * I read the entire debate all the way through, walked away from it for a few minutes, and then came back and read the entire thing again to make sure I had not missed anything important.
 * It was at this point I arrived at the conclusion that the argument to change the name was slightly stronger than the argument to retain it where it was. At no time before that did I feel certainty about the result.
 * While writing up the close I said this:

So what I wanted people to take away from that but apparently did not express properly was that if I had done nothing but count heads we would have had another no consensus result but since I instead evaluated the strength of arguments I felt we did have an actionable result. At no time did I say I never considered the possibility. If you take those two sentences in isolation I could see how you might interpret them the way they have been interpreted here, but they were part of a larger point. Beeblebrox (talk) 10:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
User:Miraclemitch/sandbox

Covenant House Toronto is a nonprofit organization that serves homeless and sex trafficked youth between 16 to 24. It is based in Toronto, Ontario and is one of the many Covenant House locations based in North America. The Toronto location is the largest agency of its kind in Canada, with 80 percent of their annual funding coming from donors. The house serves an average of 250 youth daily regardless of their gender, race, and sexual orientation. Covenant House also offers services such as education, aftercare counselling, health care, employment assistance, and job training.The organization  has also offered hope and care towards 90,000 homeless young people since its start in 1982.

History
Covenant House began its operations in Toronto after Cardinal Carter gathered the local community to support the kids sleeping outside of his office. The 30 bed shelter opened its doors in 1982 and became the second international site established in the childcare agency. In the late 80’s, the house had achieved big milestones by opening an on site health clinic and school. In the 1990’s, Covenant house has managed to open up programs such as employment service program, increasing the size capacity by 48% and provide long term residence. During the 2000’s, the house had started its own culinary arts program, and build a rooftop garden for therapeutic services. In 2006, the organization launches the “Arts and Minds” program which provides day programs for youth with mental health issues. In 2010, the shelter had achieved more milestones by launching a renovated job centre, on site adult education, and an urban response model, which is an anti-sex trafficking plan. Since then, Covenant House has established itself by employing 200 professionals at the facility to assist the youth of Toronto in any issue seems fit.

The Issues
According to a study by Covenant House, the issues of youth homelessness, leaving child welfare, sex trafficking and youth employment are be the biggest issues the youth in Canada face today.

Youth Homelessness
Youth Homelessness is one of the growing issues in Canada. Case studies argue that the issue of street kids is largely misunderstood. In Canada, there are many youths who struggle to call a place home. Actions such as couch surfing, sleeping in shelters, parks, alleyways, or even random doorways are very common. Research shows that many kids who live on street left their homes because they did not want to live under their parent’s rules. Some fled their home due to mental health, trauma or sexual abuse. Mental health issues are a major factor in youth homelessness. Covenant House ensures that mental health is one of their top priorities, because 40 percent of youth that enter the facility have some form of mental health issue. Covenant House has seen a reported demographic from the aboriginal community, black youth, and LGBT youth that make up between 25-40 percent of homeless youth in Toronto. A recent study showed that around 40 percent of homeless youth that were under 16 experienced their first form of homelessness. Without proper housing, full-fledged meals, clean clothes, and showers, it is hard for a youths to mobilize towards a good future because they suffer from a lack of basic necessities. At Covenant House, it is their mission to end youth homelessness by offering a wide number of services and support.

Leaving Child Welfare
Some children and youth live under the child welfare system when a family is under crisis. This can include youth who have suffered from abuse, neglect and trauma. There are children who go into foster care and end up with new families. According to research, that is not always the case due the past experiences and trauma that plague a child’s mind to not be comfortable with their current living situation.This situation leads to many youth to run away from their homes and live on the streets. In Ontario, the age limit to be eligible under the child welfare system is 18. In some cases, a child can receive support up till the age of 21. The main issue lacking in the system is the opt out age of 16. One study has shown that youth lacking maturity tend to leave the system because they feel that the system never cared for them in the first place. The study conducted by the Provincial Advocate for Children and Youth found that many youth are leaving care and struggling to live independently. In the study, it states that 60 percent of the homeless youth reported have had some form of involvement with the child welfare system.

Sex Trafficking
Sex Trafficking in Canada is a widespread issue with 63% of human trafficking victims in Ontario are Canadian citizens. Covenant House looks at sex trafficking as a modern day version of slavery. Homeless youth have become the biggest target in exploitation. Most the sex trafficking victims are young Canadian girls. The average age of sex trafficking is reported to be 17 years old. Many of the victims suffer from Stockholm Syndrome. Since 2014, Toronto Police have brought the issue into the limelight by formalizing an anti-trafficking team. Since the beginning of the operation, Toronto has seen an increase of over 113% in occurrences and have made arrests 360% more than the last year.

Youth Employment
Another big issue that leads to youth homelessness is youth unemployment. The main cause of this issue focuses on how homeless lack basic education, life skills, job experience, and stability keep their employment. The drop-out rate for homeless youth is at an all-time high of 53%. Covenant House believes that kids who do not have a support system and basic necessities have a hard time seeking a job and keeping employment.

The Facility
At Toronto’s Covenant House, the troubled youth are provided with fresh meals, a clean bed and safe haven from outside danger. The house is a 96 bed shelter that is split into two different floors based on gender. Each floor is split into different rooms with a maximum of 3 beds. Majority of the rooms consist of double and limited single beds. These rooms are well maintained that provide the youth with basic amenities such as underwear, socks, shampoo, pyjamas, toothbrush, and bodywash.

Family Link
In the Family Link, Covenant House volunteers work with each youth to re-establish broken relationships with their family and friends. The organization also works on preventing youth in the community from leaving their home and living in the street. The Family Link program counsels youth from the age of 16 to 24 who are living at the shelter to start reconnecting with a family member, friend, or trusted guardian. The program also looks at how counsellors can counsel youth to improve their relationships with their families. The program also enables parents to get involved with their kids by joining family counselling sessions and receiving advice from counsellors.

BensKids Health Centre
The BensKids Health Centre is an onsite clinic that helps homeless youth to overcome physical, emotional and psychological tolls of living on the streets. The clinic serves anyone that comes through, even if they do not have any health coverage or any form of ID. The clinic is open to kids five days a week with no limitations. The clinic is staffed with five nurses, three family doctors, volunteer massage therapists and counsellors, one adolescent medicine specialist and two psychiatrists. The clinic also provides on-site testing for any medical emergency.

Onsite School
Covenant House claims that homeless youth have had their education privileges taken from them because of their unfortunate circumstances. Covenant House have started a day school for youth between 16 to 21 that offer high school credits and access to e-learning with dedicated onsite teacher to help the kids in any educational matter. The school offers compulsory and elective courses that can help a youth graduate high school. Covenant House also offers schooling for youth aged 22 to 26 by offering them an online adult education program that helps the young adults to achieve their high school diploma.

Job Training Programs
Covenant House Toronto provides different workplace programs that help youth gain experience in the outer world. The organization has their own culinary arts training program called Cooking for Life. The program is led by and executive chef who trains the youth for entry level jobs in the hospitality industry. Covenant House pays for all the fees for all students to achieve their job placement, which includes the Food Handlers certificate.

Job Centre
At the Job Centre, young people are given the tools and material to find a job and have a sustainable income. The job centre also helps the struggling youth with ideas in how to live independently by having one-on-one sessions. In these sessions, counsellors look at the person’s interest, challenges and strengths to determine the career path he or she should take. The centre help the youth by helping them create a resume and weekly coaching meetings. On Interview day, kids are provided with the appropriate attire and transportation money.

Support Services
Covenant House has established their own Community Support Services (CSS) that offer youth that do not live in the shelter the same support system as the residents who live in the house. CSS looks on to help the youth of community to be independent and have stability in their lives. Youth workers always welcome youth by having regular appointment and counselling sessions. Some of the ways the CSS help the kids is by providing them with housing support. This support is used to help a youth to get accustomed to his or her lifestyle living independently. CSS also helps youth who are going through a rough transition in their lives with counselling sessions. CSS also provides goods, clothing and food items to kids who are starting their new independent lives.

Presentations and Training
Covenant House is deeply committed to bringing more awareness and knowledge regarding the issue of youth homelessness. In the presentation, the issues surrounding sex trafficking, youth homelessness and exploitation are heavily discussed. Covenant House also offers presentations and workshops to students, health care professionals, transport and security staff, child welfare and social workers and other stakeholders.

Lise Watier: This is Me! Girls Program
The program is sponsored by the Lise Watier Foundation and collaboration with the girls at Covenant House. The program offers girls life skills workshops and speeches from influential female mentor speakers. The program also creates a safe space for women to embrace anything that is on their minds. A Toronto study showed that homeless girls are ten times more likely to be sexually assaulted than girls with normal housing. The report states that 23 percent of homeless women have traded sex for food. This leads to heavy mental health issues like addiction, self-harm and eating disorders. There is even a higher chance of unplanned pregnancy. The program’s motto includes the “Seven C’s”. They are Confidence, Character, Control, Coping, Competence, Connection, and Contribution. The core elements of the programs runs from providing basic necessities, female focused programming, mentorship, one-on-one counselling, monthly reflection meetings, safe girls’ space, special outings, and physical fitness.

Just Like A Girl You Know
In 2017, Covenant House launched a five year $10 million dollar campaign to bring more awareness to sex trafficking in Ontario. Most of the funding is depended on donations, and only 20 percent of the programming will be funded by the government. The Archdiocese of Toronto had pledged $600.000 every year to support this cause. The organization published a four minute video explaining on real life experiences of everyday teens being the victim of sex trafficking in the province. The campaign was chaired by Canadian philanthropist Suzanne Rogers. Covenant House opened up “The Rogers Home” which is a transitional housing program that will provides services for victims of sex trafficking.

How to Donate
There are many ways to donate and support Covenant House and their work to end youth homelessness. In these donations, the main purpose would to provide food, shelter, health care, and education to struggling youth. Here are some ways

Single Gift / Monthly Giving
Donors have an option of giving a one-time donation or make a pledge to give monthly donations to the house. Covenant House has created a street kids catalogue website called streetkidsgifts.com. In the catalogue, donors can pick gifts that ranges under $50 to gifts over $500. These ranges start from the lowest value in the price range to the highest. As of December 2017, these are the gifts and the price range of donation.

Gifts under $50 would include items such as counselling and support for one kid with half a day counselling at the Covenant House. It would also include confidence building activities for one kid, that would help to build their self-confidence. There is also food for a day program that provides three kids with nutritious food for all the three meals throughout the day. It also offers spiritual comfort for one kid and provides clean clothes with a warm bed for a day.

Gifts that range from $50 - $100 would include educational counselling and support for two kids as they pursue their education at Covenant House. There are also health care programs that provide one kid to visit the on-site health care clinic where they can see a nurse, psychiatrist and doctor. The gift also includes an all-inclusive plan that keep a youth a day off the street by providing them with clean clothes, shelter, food, counselling and job preparation.

Gifts that range from $100-$250 provide life skills workshops for five kids. It also offers them job preparation seminars with coaching and support from Covenant House leaders. The gift range would also provide a warm bed for the week that would give a kid clean clothes and a warm bed to sleep for a week. You can also provide food and shelter for one week. At the top of the limit, four kids will the get the opportunity to get prepared through the Covenant House job centre and life skills workshop combined.

Gifts that range that from $250 - $500 begin with providing one homeless youth a full week of support and coaching in our job centre. The option after that includes three visits to the health clinic. It also includes a package of feeding one homeless youth for a full month. That includes three nutritious home cooked meals for one whole month. The ultimate package in this range would include two warm beds for two homeless youth. It also includes clean clothes and other amenities for a whole week.

The ultimate gift ranges from over $500, which only includes one ultimate package. The package provides one week of food, shelter, clean clothes, counselling and job preparation. This would help a struggling youth to get off the streets and have a huge support system to help them progress in society.

In Honour or in Memory
Donors have the option to celebrate a special occasion by purchasing an e-card for a loved one that has achieved important milestones in his or her life. It is perfect for birthday, anniversaries, retirements and graduations.Covenant House also creates personalized e-cards to donate to celebrate the memory of a loved one with a gift to the homeless youth. Both of these gift cards can be personalized and hand delivered to a loved one. According to Covenant house, this tribute will bring more opportunities and hope to homeless.

Leadership Giving
Leadership giving is when the individual donors get the opportunity to interact and have a significant part on the programs and the youth. Once you get involved in making a leadership gift, a volunteer from Covenant house will partner with you and ensure that your donation is going to the right cause. The volunteers will keep you informed of every impact your gift has made towards the organization. You will also be given personal invitations to see the programs and activities the kids participate in.

The volunteer will work closely with you to develop recognition and naming opportunities. Covenant House states that once a donor has agreed to be recognized, it shows the kids that they belong in society and there are individuals who are looking after them. Covenant House also believes that his program that the donors who partake in this change, will also demonstrate leadership characteristics to others around them.

Corporate Giving
Covenant House relies on most of their operating income from donors and sponsorships. As of 2017, the Covenant House has an operating budget of $19 million dollars, which is 80% funded by donors and other corporate sponsorships. Covenant House believes that the youth of our generation are the future consumers and employees of our companies. The organization states that corporations that invest in Covenant House help to boost the community’s moral values and a brighter future for everyone. Covenant House Toronto works closely with corporations by helping their donation to an area that aligns with the corporate’s values and mandates.

Bequest
Donors can leave a legacy gift to Covenant house in their will. If the donor decides to name Covenant House Toronto as a beneficiary in their will, they be placed under the White Dove Society. The society is a way to honour the donor, as a white dove with the donor’s name will be placed on the White Dove Society Wall.

Gift of Stock, Gift of Life Insurance, and Gift of Annuities
Another method of donations would include the gift of stock and the gift of life insurance. According to Covenant House Toronto, the gift of stock ensures that the donation of securities and is a great way to make a difference, while also reaping some tax benefits. The donation can in be form of mutual funds, bonds, and shares.

According to Covenant House, the gift of life insurance is a great way to transform affordable premium payments into a future donation. The gift of annuities combines a charitable with an insurance contract that sends out payments to the donor in return of a lump sum payment. The minimum value of annuities is $25,000. This enables the donor for eligible charitable tax credit and tax effective payments.

title: User:Miraclemitch/sandbox


text:
User:RobKohr

Current work projects

 * A study to see how well individuals can measure differences in area accross a set of objects
 * A mouse wheel controller to see how well mice can measure distance
 * A lingusitic comparative tool that allows researchers to collaborate on language parsing trees
 * Image creation tool that can create recognizable patterns in a noise field.
 * A web based file and communication management tool so researchers can collaborate on grant proposals

Self initiated projects

 * EditThis.info wiki hosting
 * Create a web site that anyone can edit
 * Great for collaborating for classes and research projects
 * Also great for clubs and groups of friends with a similar intrest
 * cueFlash web based flashcard application
 * Learn sign language
 * Memorize terms for an exam
 * Share with friends
 * Webisodes.org
 * A Place to organize all of the video content on the web
 * ConstantSun Advanced Web System Development
 * A web system development business I am starting

All about me
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.
 * My Blog- Read my ramblings and find out what I am up to. I am not much of a blogger, so don't expect much on updates.
 * Contact Info - Email, IM, etc...
 * Photos - Pictures of parties, friends, and holidays
 * Shared Folder - My shared folder containing random stuff you can download.
 * My Wishlist - My birthday is November 15th. Send me an email when your birthday is and what is on your wishlist.

Sir Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965)

Other nonsense

 * My google webpage - Just giving google pages a try
 * Myspace, Friendster, Facebook
 * del.icio.us

Books I am working on

 * Ones I Started or completed (if it is possible to have a completed wikibook)
 * Steamed_Clams
 * Advance_Wars_2:_Black_Hole_Rising
 * MATLAB Programming/Psychtoolbox
 * Emulation
 * Cinematography - Eventually became part of the MMM
 * Contributer
 * Movie making manual

Links for self
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist

Chat with me
not sure if you created the cryptography scratch pad but it's a great idea and i have started importing articles from wikipedia to fill out the holes. --Erichmj 07:32, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

 * Nope, I think I just put a small addition on it, but it is a pretty good artical. --RobKohr 19:58, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

title: User:RobKohr


text:
User:J Rollei/be bold

'''Being bold is important on Wikipedia. Boldness is encouraged in order to make a positive difference in the online encyclopedia'''

title: User:J Rollei/be bold


text:
S36 (ZVV)

The S36 is a regional railway service of the Zürich S-Bahn operated by THURBO. The service runs hourly between and  over the western half of the Winterthur–Bülach–Koblenz railway, calling at stations in the Swiss cantons of Aargau and Zürich, and the German state of Baden-Württemberg.

The service began on 9 December 2018, replacing the S41, which had operated from Waldshut to. The S41's western terminus became Bülach.

Route

The service runs from Bülach, in the canton of Zürich, to Koblenz, in the canton of Aargau, on the Winterthur to Koblenz line. At Koblenz, the service reverses direction and continues to Waldshut in Baden-Württemberg (Germany), using a short stretch of the Turgi to Waldshut line and crossing the historic Waldshut–Koblenz Rhine Bridge.

Stations
The service operates hourly and stops at the following stations (no call at Glattfelden):

Swiss-German border

title: S36 (ZVV)


text:
Sceptic (band)

Sceptic is a death metal band from Kraków, Poland.

History
Sceptic was founded in 1994 in Kraków, Poland initially under the name TORMENTOR, on the initiative of guitarists Jacek Hiro and Dariusz Styczen and drummer Maciej Zięba. A year later, already functioning as SCEPTIC, Dariusz Styczeń left the group and was replaced by Jacek Mrożek. In 1996, supplemented by a vocalist, the group recorded the first demo entitled "Demo'96". After the recordings, Stawiarski left the group, whose role was taken over by Mrożek. In the same year, the bassist Paweł Kolasa joined the band (associated with Atrophia Red Sun) with whom the band recorded the second demo entitled "Beyond Reality".

After the recordings, Jacek Mrożek and Maciek Zięba left the group. In their place, vocalist Marcin Urbaś and drummer Jakub Kogut (also known from Atrophia Red Sun) joined the group. With the new line-up, the band recorded their third release entitled "Demo'98". A few months later, the second guitarist Czesław Semla joined the group, with whom the band recorded their debut album at the turn of January and February 1999: "Blind Existence" released the same year by Mystic Production. Also in 1999, the group performed at the Thrash'em All Festival, preceding among others: Vader, Christ Agony and Yattering. During the concert, Adrian "Covan" Kowanek (Atrophia Red Sun) performed as a vocalist.

In February 2000, Jakub Kogut left the team, and Maciej Zięba, co-founder of the group, returned. Marcin Urbaś decided to develop his sports career and was replaced by Michał "Psycho" Senajko (Thy Disease). At the end of 2000, at Selani Studio in Olsztyn, the band started work on their second album: "Pathetic Being". The recordings were released in 2001 by Empire Records. As part of the promotion for the song "Pathetic Being", a music video directed by Adam Kuc was made. In February of the same year, Michał Skotniczny (Crionics) became the new vocalist, replacing Senajko. In August, Czesław Semla left the group and was replaced by Rafał Kastory from Atrophia Red Sun. In November 2001, Maciej Zięba left the band, and shortly afterwards Paweł Kolasa, who was replaced by Grzegorz Feliks (Atrophia Red Sun).

In February 2002, the last concert with Kastory and Zięba in this line-up took place. Jakub Chmura was hired as the drummer, while Michał Skotniczny was the second guitarist. In 2003, Skotniczny left the band, and Marcin Urbaś took over the vocal duties again. In July of the same year at Hertz Studio in Bialystok, the band recorded the third album tentatively titled "III". "Unbeliever's Script" was released on 25 September 2003, again on Empire Records. The album was promoted during concerts with guest vocalist Weronika Zbieg (Totem), replacing Urbas. In 2004, the band gave a number of concerts in Poland as part of the Empire Invasion Tour 2004 along with Dies Irae, Trauma and Shadows Land.

In August 2005, Grzegorz Feliks (bassist) left the band and was replaced by Marcin Halerz, a bassist known for his performances in Infernal Maze and Sourreal. The position of the singer was officially taken over by Weronika Zbieg. At the turn of September and October at Studio X in Olsztyn, the group began work on the fourth studio album. The album entitled "Internal Complexity" was released on December 9 of the same year by the Mystic Production music label. The album contains 2 versions of vocals, original vocals by Weronika Zbieg and an alternative version performed by Marcin Urbas, who also wrote all the lyrics. As part of the promotion for the song "Suddenly Awaken", a music video directed by Marcin Halerz was made. At the turn of September and October 2006, the group took part in the Rat Race Tour 2006. Virgin Snatch, Thy Disease and Rasta also participated in the tour. In 2008, Halerz left the band and was replaced by returning Paweł Kolasa. The line-up was also supplemented by a second guitarist - Wacław "Vogg" Kiełtyka (Decapitated). The musician performed with the band during sporadic concerts until 2010. In the same year, Kiełtyka was replaced by Daniel Kesler, a member of Redemptor. In the meantime SCEPTIC left Jakub Chmura, who was replaced by an old drummer: Jakub Kogut, who returned to the band. Another change in the line-up of SCEPTIC concerned Jakub Kogut, who was replaced on drums by James Stewart for several years. Jakub Kogut sat behind the drums again in 2019.

Preparations for the recording of the band's fifth release were in full swing, but SCEPTIC's plans slowed down due to the maternity leave of singer Weronika Zbieg. Weronika finally resigned from the position of SCEPTIC vocalist and Marcin Urbaś returned to her place in April 2022. Thus, the formation returned to almost the full line-up from the first studio album (not counting Czesław Semla). Between April and June SCEPTIC finalized the recordings for the new album, which was mixed and mastered by Piotr Mańkowski at Coverius Studio. In the meantime, under the supervision of Marcin Halerz, a music video was created for the song promoting the fifth release of the Cracovians entitled "All I Can Devour". Fifth studio album: "Nailed to Ignorance" was released on 30 September 2022.

Band members

 * Timeline

title: Sceptic (band)


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/yogakiddoswithgaileee.com

Links

 * yogakiddoswithgaileee.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Additions

 * Displayed all 4 additions.


text:
Talk:Steam locomotives of British Railways

Stanier Black Fives
The number of Stanier Black Fives built in BR times is given as 100, but the locos identified by their numbers add up to only 80. Which is correct? Senex (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

 * Well spotted. There is a table in LMS Stanier Class 5 4-6-0. Check against that? Tony May (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

 * Well, that article suggests that the missing 20 were built under Lot 192 at Crewe in 1948, so I presume they are BR-built as well and will alter the article to reflect that. Unless someone knows different. Senex (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Any Dean Goods returned?
I just deleted this question from the 'Locomotives acquired from the War Department' section maybee someone here can answer it Oxyman24 (talk) 18:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

War Department locos
Serious errors in this section. The Ex-LNER O7 locos formerly numbered from 63000 to 63199 became 90000 to 90199. And what about the J94 0-6-0s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamgeorgefraser (talk • contribs) 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

End of steam
Someone wants a citation for the end of steam in 1968. Ho hum. Some things are well-known, and to ask for citations for them would be like asking for a citation that the sky is blue. Pick one of those, or one of several thousand others, if you will. --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * http://www.lostockhallmpd.org.uk/grandfinale.html
 * http://www.bbc.co.uk/liverpool/content/articles/2008/08/06/history_end_of_steam_1968_feature.shtml
 * http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/nostalgia/dying-days-at-the-end-of-steam-965464
 * - Commentary by Sir John Betjeman.
 * - Commentary by Sir John Betjeman.
 * - Commentary by Sir John Betjeman.
 * - Commentary by Sir John Betjeman.
 * - Commentary by Sir John Betjeman.
 * - Commentary by Sir John Betjeman.

Wikipedia is for the general public, not for specialists. It's perfectly reasonable to ask for a reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 07:32, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Did the Great Western try to sabotage BR by building hundreds of pannier tank locomotives.
That seems to be the implication of this...

''Great Western management was opposed to nationalisation and built many pannier tanks, resulting in a surplus of them. 452 locomotives were built to ex-GWR designs, of which 341 were pannier tanks.'' — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Appropriate first photo? - GWR Grange
Is the photo of an ex GWR Grange class loco (I understand the final one was built in 1939) relevant of be included in a page describing BR built locomotives? (ie post-1948) Andywebby (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The article is not just about BR built locomotives; indeed, the second sentence of the first paragraph makes that clear. There are also sections titled Locomotives inherited from constituent companies and Locomotives acquired from the War Department which are not about BR-built locos. -- Red rose64 🌹 (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * My bad - thanks for clarifying - on first glance at the page title I took the page to mean those locos built by BR to pre-nationalisation designs as well as the BR 'Standards' but now I look again (properly this time!) I see what you mean. Andywebby (talk) 12:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Dubious unsubstantiated livery claims.
Another lightly referenced article by a bunch of railway enthusiasts who "just know" what's right, and feel they have no need to make claims easy to verify. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 04:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


text:
Online OsiriX Documentation/OsiriX Routing Preferences

Online OsiriX Documentation Table of Contents > OsiriX Menu > OsiriX Routing Preferences

The goal of routing is to forward images received by OsiriX to other Dicom locations.

To set up routing:

Server1 Description:Transfer Syntax/Description:Transfer Syntax/etc
 * 1) create an iCal calendar with the name you entered in the preferences.
 * 2) Next, add a route to a Calendar:
 * 3) Create a new Event in the specified calendar.
 * 4) *The event location should be in the format:

For Example:

OSIRIX:JPEG 2000 Lossy 10:1

Permissible Transfer Syntaxes are:

 * Explicit Little Endian
 * JPEG 2000 Lossless
 * JPEG 2000 Lossy 10:1
 * JPEG 2000 Lossy 20:1
 * JPEG 2000 Lossy 50:1
 * JPEG Lossless
 * JPEG High Quality (9)
 * JPEG High Quality (8)
 * JPEG High Quality (7)


text:
Talk:Georgette Valle

Link with more info
I'm working on another project and don't have time to edit this article right now, but thought someone else might eventually find it helpful that there is additional detail on the Washington legislature's bio page of her. W.stanovsky (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Georgette Valle


text:
Talk:Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead

Too much information!
Giving the entire plot line and ending ruins a reader’s desire and necessity of reading this interesting and well-written book. Very disappointed in the article. 2601:190:4302:2AF0:F903:DE36:22D0:AD5E (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

 * I am sorry you were disappointed after reading the plot summary. However, you seem to misunderstand what Wikipedia is and is not. Please read WP:SPOILER and WP:NOVELPLOT. Οἶδα (talk) 20:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Plot summaries very often contain spoilers. That is quite normal, and is in line with the spoiler content guidelines and Wikipedia's content disclaimer. Spoilers are no different from any other content and should not be deleted solely because they are spoilers.
 * One should of course expect spoilers in the 'Plot summary' section, but certainly not in the section concerning the novel's style! <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 10:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Wrong. Spoilers are not reserved for plot summaries ("This guidance also applies to other relevant information beyond simple plot elements") . And a novel's style is intimately connected to its plot elements, many of which could be perceived as spoilers. Especially if the style is defined a distinct narrative device, one which is usually revealed in a plot twist. So one should expect spoilers, especially with mystery novels. Οἶδα (talk) 10:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Your article backs up the other person's point: "Sections that frequently contain spoiler warnings—such as plot summaries, episode lists, character descriptions, etc.—were already clearly named to indicate that they contain plot details."
 * The spoiler was in 'Style'. It should be moved to 'Plot'. Ovigyre (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The article backs up my point actually. The distinction does not declare that plot sections are the only sections to include spoilers. So why you are you refactoring it to suggest that style does not fit because it is not included as a "such as" in a hypothetical exhaustive list to name every single occasion. I will repeat myself: A novel's style is intimately connected to its plot elements, many of which could be perceived as spoilers. Especially if the style is defined a distinct narrative device, one which is usually revealed in a plot twist. So one should expect spoilers, especially with mystery novels. And a plot section is meant to be purely descriptive. Any other information such as interpretation or explanatory remarks requires a secondary source and should be separate from the plot summary. So no, it should not moved.
 * You and the other editors continuously misunderstand what Wikipedia is and what it is not. So for the last time: Spoilers are no different from any other content. That is the longstanding consensus and if you are unshakeably in opposition to that, then may you venture elsewhere for information. Οἶδα (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for spoiling it
I was curious about the book but avoided the Plot Summary as I didn’t want to know too much about it. I read the wiki entry about “Style” which proceeded to give away the ending in the first sentence! It would be better to say that the book has an unreliable narrator, rather than “an unreliable narrator who is actually the murderer which is revealed on the last page!”. Sheesh! <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 20:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Wikipedia does not hide, avoid, or take effort to mark spoilers in plot summaries or similar material. If you believe the text should be presented differently (not removing the spoiler), you are welcome to change it. Οἶδα (talk) 21:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Plough
Presumably the original UK edition spelled plough correctly?? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Interestingly, the Fitzcarraldo Editions publication made no alteration to the title. Οἶδα (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: East European Prose
— Assignment last updated by Ak2113 (talk) 23:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


text:
User:Hybirdd

A request has been made on tools admin referencing this account and this message confirms that Kevin Deamandel is me https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/tools/membership/status/877

title: User:Hybirdd