text:
Order-3-4 heptagonal honeycomb

In the geometry of hyperbolic 3-space, the order-3-4 heptagonal honeycomb or 7,3,4 honeycomb a regular space-filling tessellation (or honeycomb). Each infinite cell consists of a heptagonal tiling whose vertices lie on a 2-hypercycle, each of which has a limiting circle on the ideal sphere.

Geometry
The Schläfli symbol of the order-3-4 heptagonal honeycomb is {7,3,4}, with four heptagonal tilings meeting at each edge. The vertex figure of this honeycomb is an octahedron, {3,4}.

Related polytopes and honeycombs
It is a part of a series of regular polytopes and honeycombs with {p,3,4} Schläfli symbol, and octahedral vertex figures:

Order-3-4 octagonal honeycomb
In the geometry of hyperbolic 3-space, the order-3-4 octagonal honeycomb or 8,3,4 honeycomb a regular space-filling tessellation (or honeycomb). Each infinite cell consists of an octagonal tiling whose vertices lie on a 2-hypercycle, each of which has a limiting circle on the ideal sphere.

The Schläfli symbol of the order-3-4 octagonal honeycomb is {8,3,4}, with four octagonal tilings meeting at each edge. The vertex figure of this honeycomb is an octahedron, {3,4}.

Order-3-4 apeirogonal honeycomb
In the geometry of hyperbolic 3-space, the order-3-4 apeirogonal honeycomb or ∞,3,4 honeycomb a regular space-filling tessellation (or honeycomb). Each infinite cell consists of an order-3 apeirogonal tiling whose vertices lie on a 2-hypercycle, each of which has a limiting circle on the ideal sphere.

The Schläfli symbol of the order-3-4 apeirogonal honeycomb is {∞,3,4}, with four order-3 apeirogonal tilings meeting at each edge. The vertex figure of this honeycomb is an octahedron, {3,4}.

title: Order-3-4 heptagonal honeycomb


text:
Talk:Shotgunning

Moved this from the main page, sounds like an attempt at a joke... International Strawpedo Association? No such thing found on a google search...

Official World Record attempts must use a standard 330ml glass bottle of Smirfnoff Ice with an ISA (International Strawpedo Association) standard straw. The bottle must remain vertical and the correct way up until after the signal to start has been given. Once the drink is finished the empty bottle must be held above head height. Spillage is banned and the maximum remaining volume of drink allowable after the attempt (to account for surface tension related undrinkable volume) is 1.25ml (reduced from 1.5ml in 2002).

The current World Record was set in June 2004 and is held by Tim Spanky at 0.7983 seconds though he is currently in training with the aim of setting a new record in 2007.

What is the purpose of rubbing the can? I never do that, and still am very sucessful.

Shotgun a Red Bull! - MB Style 22:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Etymology
Can someone clarify where the term 'shotgun' for this comes from? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to know what year that shotgunning beer cans begin? DajFed (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

History
The 'history' subsection under the "Techniques" heading (which, if verified, should probably be given a separate section), refers to a book to which I can find no external references. I also can't find any reference to a "Horst Veiners" which does not lead back to this page. Also, 'The Fuhrer' refers to Adolf Hitler, he would not have had that title until 1934, leaving Horst at most 2 years to write and publish his autobiography. I suggest removing this section until we have an ISBN number or something to verify the existence of this book. I've added a 'citation needed' tag for now and left it in. 0x0077BE (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Shotgunning


text:
Nicolae Dăscălescu

Nicolae I. Dăscălescu (29 June 1884 – 28 September 1969) was a Romanian general during World War II.

Biography
He was born in a poor peasant family in Căciulești, Neamț County, Kingdom of Romania. After completing elementary school in nearby Gura Văii village, he attended Petru Rareș High School in Piatra Neamț, and in 1906 went to study at the Military School in Bucharest, graduating in 1908 with the rank of second lieutenant. After being promoted to lieutenant in 1911, Dăscălescu served with an artillery regiment in the Second Balkan War in 1913, and then advanced to the rank of captain in the spring of 1916. He fought in World War I and the Hungarian–Romanian War and reached the rank of Major. In 1921 he was admitted to the Higher War School and by 1940 he had reached the rank of Major-General. He commanded the 25th Division (August 1939) and the 20th Division (June 1940), and 8 days after the start of Operation Barbarossa, he took over the command of the 21st Division.

With his Division, he fought bloody battles against the Soviets, including the Battle of Țiganca in Bessarabia and the Siege of Odessa (1941). Dăscălescu had distinguished himself and was promoted to lead the 2nd Romanian Corps, which was part of in the Third Army. His Corps was present at the Battle of Stalingrad and was overrun by numerical superior forces during Operation Uranus. The remnants of the Corps were withdrawn to Romania to be rebuilt and to protect the northern border.

After King Michael's Coup on 23 August 1944, the 2nd Corps turned against its former German allies, took 10,500 prisoners, and participated in the advance in Transylvania as part of the Fourth Army under command of general Gheorghe Avramescu. He temporarily replaced Avramescu at the head of the Army, when he was dismissed in January–February 1945. He became the new commander of the Fourth Army on 3 March, when Avramescu was eliminated by the NKVD. With the Fourth Army, under the command of Soviet general Rodion Malinovsky, he fought in the Bratislava–Brno Offensive and the Prague Offensive. He was gravely wounded on 25 March in the battle for Banská Bystrica, but he did not quit, and stayed on with his troops.

At the end of the war, in June 1945, Dăscălescu was relieved of command and retired. In 1946, he was put on trial as a war criminal, but the court dismissed the accusations and cleared his name. Not a friend of the new Communist regime, he was further harassed until 1951, when he was thrown in the Jilava Prison for "agricultural sabotage". He was released in October 1955, and moved to Piatra Neamț. He lived the rest of his years away from public life, despite being promoted to lieutenant general. He died in 1969 in Piatra Neamț, and is buried in the city's Heroes Cemetery.

A boulevard in Piatra Neamț now bears his name, and so does a street in Cluj-Napoca. A bust of Dăscălescu (commissioned by the Romanian Fourth Army) has been erected in Ștefan cel Mare Plaza, Cluj-Napoca.

title: Nicolae Dăscălescu


text:
This Man Is Dangerous (1953 film)

This Man Is Dangerous (French: Cet homme est dangereux) is a 1953 French thriller film directed by Jean Sacha and starring Eddie Constantine, Colette Deréal and Grégoire Aslan. It is an adaptation of Peter Cheyney's 1936 novel This Man Is Dangerous. It followed the film La môme vert-de-gris which had been Eddie Constantine's debut as Lemmy Caution and it was also successful at the box office.

The film's sets were designed by the art director Jean d'Eaubonne.

Synopsis
Lemmy Caution is assigned to neutralise the international crimininal network of villain Siégella (Grégoire Aslan ) as an undercover agent. In order to infiltrate the gang he pretends to be an escapee. During his covert investigations at the French Riviera he gets to know a beauty named Constance (Colette Deréal) who is associated with Mister  Siégella. Lemmy can convince him that he would help to kidnap the rich American heiress Miranda Van Zelden (Claude Borelli). Once Lemmy has obtained enough proof to have Siégella convicted, he informs Interpol. After he has sent documents to Interpol, his cover is blown and he has to fight for his life.

Cast

 * Eddie Constantine as Lemmy Caution
 * Colette Deréal as Constance
 * Grégoire Aslan as Siegella
 * Claude Borelli as Miranda Van Zelden
 * Véra Norman as Susanne
 * Jacqueline Pierreux as Dora
 * Roland Bailly as Johny
 * Guy Decomble as Jacques le Dingue
 * Luc Andrieux as Maurice
 * Henry Djanik as William Bosco
 * Émile Genevois as L'athlète
 * Colette Mareuil as L'entraîneuse
 * Michel Nastorg as Govas
 * Michel Seldow as Pierrot les Cartes

title: This Man Is Dangerous (1953 film)


text:
Electronics/Aim

The aim of this textbook is to explain the design and function of electronic circuits and components. The text covers electronic circuit components, DC analysis, and AC analysis.

It should be useful to beginner hobbyists as well as beginner engineering students, teaching both theory and practical applications.

It should be thought of as a companion project to the Wikipedia articles about electronics. While Wikipedia covers many details about the technology used in electronics components and related fields, the Electronics Wikibook covers a lot of the "how-to" aspects that aren't covered in an encyclopedia. The book will focus on how to use the components to build useful circuits.

title: Electronics/Aim


text:
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2020 August 9

= August 9 =

Best way to download images from Google Arts & Culture?
I want to download faithful photographic reproductions of public domain two-dimensional artworks from Google Arts & Culture (formerly known as Google Art Project) such as this one and then upload them to Wikimedia Commons. Many of the artworks made available under the old Google Art Project banner have been uploaded through concerted efforts to Commons such as ones seen here but the rebranding into Google Arts & Culture also came with many new available artworks that have not been uploaded yet.

What is the best way to download images from Google Arts & Culture at maximum zoom level? Will Dezoomify accomplish this objective? I did try Google Image search but I highly I doubt that the image I found was at maximum zoom level. StellarHalo (talk) 11:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

 * You want to web scrape the images and if you want to do it at any scale, it wouldn't surprise me if they put some obstacles like recaptcha in your way. Take a look here though. 2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * There is another hurdle... Those images are fed in tiles, not a single image. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Raul Yzaguirre

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Raul Yzaguirre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090126185225/http://www.cfr.org/publication/8102/ to http://www.cfr.org/publication/8102/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090126185225/http://www.cfr.org/publication/8102/ to http://www.cfr.org/publication/8102/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Raul Yzaguirre


text:
Talk:Rosamund Pike/Archive 1

Incomplete
What's the point of dividing up this short article into four separate sections and then declaring each section unfinished? < K F >  19:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

P S And the article is not mentioned at Requests for expansion either. < K F >  19:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Bond film succession box
I deleted the succession box because it was applied erroneously. It's only meant to be used for the main villain. Sophie Marceau was correctly listed as main villain for The World is Not Enough, but for some reason Pike was listed as the main villain for Die Another Day when it was Toby Stephens. There may be a succession box for henchmen, in which case Pike's character would qualify, but she doesn't qualify as either the main villain nor the main Bond girl in Die Another Day. 23skidoo (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Filmography
Why on earth is the director of each Film/Television show listed? When it comes to what things an actor has been in, the interesting things are the year, the name of the film/show, their character name, and in notes anything extra like on a TV show which episodes they were in. There's absolutely no value whatsoever in having the director listed there. The only way that would be interesting is if you wanted to know more about that film/show, in which case, that's what the hyperlink to it is there for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

RfC: Should the lead section state the genre of the films she has appeared in, as set out in a WP:RS?
Should the lead section state the genre of the films she has appeared in, as set out in a WP:RS? It would look like this:

Rosamund Mary E Pike (born 27 January 1979) is an English actress. She first came to attention for playing Bond girl Miranda Frost in Die Another Day in 2002. Her best known film roles include the romance film Pride and Prejudice (2005), the spy spoof film Johnny English Reborn (2011), the fantasy adventure Wrath of the Titans (2012), the thriller Jack Reacher, and the sci-fi comedy The World's End (2013). In 2014, she starred in David Fincher's psychological thriller Gone Girl, which earned her over a dozen critics awards for Best Actress of the year and nominations for an Academy Award, a Golden Globe, a SAG Award, and a BAFTA Award.

OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 01:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 * COMMENT - My advice would be to avoid mentioning genre unless there is very wide agreement among many sources as to which genres apply - My experience from other articles is that there is often disagreement among sources as to genre... and this often leads to POV edit wars, as editors cherry pick the sources that support their own views on which genre applies to the subject. Blueboar (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No Actors work in too many different genres throughout their careers for this to ever be a valid statement. Pike herself is mentioned in everything from action films to comedies to character dramas to thrillers just as example films she has done. Films each have a genre. Actors do not. Period. oknazevad (talk) 05:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: As a matter of interest, the articles for Jake Gyllenhaal and Maggie Gyllenhaal are Featured Articles and the leads name several genres of films they appeared in. The article for Angelina Jolie is a Featured Article and it has about five genres named in the lead. Ethan Hawke is a Featured Article and the lead names nine genres of films (I added the ninth). Kirsten Dunst and Reese Witherspoon are Featured Articles and they name several genres in the lead. The article for director Sidney Lumet, which I have not edited, has several mentions of film genres in the lead. OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 21:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 * The type of film can be described in her biography. It doesn't need to be in the lead unless she has notability of associating herself with a particular genre like "scream queen" or "king of pop" -AngusWOOF (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No As long as an actor is widely known for specific genres, i.e. Bond girl, porn, horror, etc, then it's perfectly acceptable, if not mandatory, to have that information in both text and intro. However, Pike has not been assigned by critics, the media or the public, in any notable way, to a specific kind of roles or a genre. Therefore, information about her career and film work should be confined to the main text and the intro should only include a standard, brief description of her career. -The Gnome (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: The issue of "genres" in cinema is quite loaded, as evidenced by the very large amount of critical and theoretical work on the subject. Wikipedia should avoid, in general, taking sides or assigning labels in this context. It's a veritable minefield for an encyclopaedia. -The Gnome (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * What do you think about the citing of genres in FA-class actor articles that I mentioned above. This shows that it is a practice that has some WP community support. OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 22:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Comment. The introduction of an example makes it clear that the proposal is entirely different from what I thought in my first comment. As such this RFC needs to be restarted so that fresh thoughts can be given. I had assumed, based on the original wording, that the idea was to attach a genre to the word "actress" in the lead, which is almost never appropriate, even for an actor/actress known almost entirely for work in a particular genre. (Then it might make sense to say "XX is an actress known for her work in horror films", for example.)
 * With that said, the proposal is to name the genres of the films mentioned in the lead, so as to make it clear what types of films they are (for those who haven't seen them) and therefore also highlight the diversity of roles the actor has worked in. On one hand, it might be a smart decision, as it does not assume the reader knows anything about the films themselves. On the other, it's extra wordiness for the lead, the genres of the films are in the lead of the articles on the films, which are only a link away, and the citations (which are of questionable need) are only tangentially related to the actual subject of the article and bloat the references list. So generally I wouldn't say it is needed. oknazevad (talk) 14:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

 * No. My thinking echoes AngusWOOF and Oknazevad's above. There is really no need to list genres in the lede for an actor unless for some reason the actor is particularly notable as part of a genre (e.g. Jamie Lee Curtis as the "scream queen"). It's unnecessarily wordy and not an essential introduction to and/or summary of the article, which is what the lede is for. Willhesucceed (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No As currently formulated; per AngusWOOF and Oknazevad's above, but also because these details are off-topic to the subject of the article. If you wanted to make a specific point about the diversity of film genres she has acted in that might be different, but as formulated I'm not too keen on jamming the lead with details about films, when the article is about an actress. Rationalobserver (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Second middle name
Contrary to several online sources (mostly general filmography-type sites) stating that her name is 'Rosamund Mary Elizabeth Pike' (this apparently being simply an extrapolation based on the initial 'E' and what is doubtlessly a very commonly-encountered name beginning with that letter), sources such as http://companycheck.co.uk/director/915840583/MISS-ROSAMUND-MARY-ELLEN-PIKE (N.b.- I acknowledge that such sources cannot be included in an article, but it is here nonetheless for reference!) give the name as 'Ellen'. Given that this site (and others of the same sort) give the individual in question's birth year as 1979, and that there is only one record for the birth of a Rosamund Mary E. Pike in 1979 (indeed, only one appears for the entire period 1837-2006), plus the fact that no viable source provides the name 'Elizabeth', it can safely be concluded that the former Miss Pike's second middle initial stands for 'Ellen'. Just for anyone who might wish to know! (See also 'About correct date of birth' section above for her addressing the incorrect supposition that the 'E' stands for 'Elizabeth') Ashiyura (talk) 19:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

 * Thanks, Ashiyura, that's very helpful! But why do you think the source you found (or similar ones like, or ) cannot be cited in the article? – Schneid9 (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

 * I had hoped it might be of use/ interest to someone besides myself, being as I tend to focus on these more minor matters (in Wikipedia as in life, I guess)! Oh, I might be wrong to think that using one of these sites as a source is impermissible; I thought that in the past I had used one for another article and that it had been subsequently reverted, but I might well be mistaken! I suppose that inclusion of the second middle name is perhaps more relevant in this case (particularly as we already have the second initial included on the page) than in others simply by virtue of the fact that Miss Pike (as was) specifically addressed the prevalence of the erroneous 'Elizabeth' in an interview. Is there a specific Wikipedia guideline page that might clarify whether we might use one of the sources we've identified? At any rate it's good to have it mentioned on the talk page (despite the fact that I don't know how commonly users tend to check them; I know I always do because discussion can illuminate matters from the article proper, but that's just me!), but it'd be nice to be able to include it in the article for completeness's sake. Ashiyura (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

 * Thanks for the clarification! Then we better change the name in the article, too. I understand the inclusion of this kind of more private sources may feel somewhat "intrusive", although they are public records, but maybe we could just make a reference to this discussion instead, for those who may wonder. Too bad the sources don't include the correct birthday as well.. --Bemland (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations on appearing on Wikipedia's main page as a "Did you know..." listing. I've been involved in the DYK process, (never successfully, I might add!) and so I know the time it takes and the coordination required between between editors...let's just say it isn't the easiest thing to accomplish. You deserve recognition, appreciation and applause. Thank you very much to all the contributing editors who made this listing possible.:The Very Best of Regards,  Bfpage |leave a message 12:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC) -

About correct date of birth
It seems this article all from the beginning has stated that Rosamund Pike was born at 27 January, but in other sources – like – it says she was born at 28 January. Thus, the question is which date is the right one?--Bemland (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Last August, Pike said in an interview with the Austrian newspaper Kurier (my translation): “I know that all kinds of wrong information about me are circulating on the internet. None of them are true. Neither my date of birth nor my middle name nor my parents' occupation. Both are opera singers, and my mother isn't a concert violinist, as claimed. Neither do I speak the languages I allegedly know.” Three of these four mistakes appear on IMDb: 1. “Elizabeth” as her third Christian name (“Mary” as the second name is confirmed by the England and Wales Birth Registration Index); 2. “classical violinist mother”; 3. “speaks fluent German and French”. It therefore seems reasonable to suspect that IMDb's date of birth is the wrong one too. As you say, Wikipedia had 27 January from the very beginning in 2002 until 2011, when somebody changed it to 28 January for the first time (without citing a source). – Schneid9 (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Can you check what the information snapshot was back on those sources in June/July 2014? I wish she would just state her birth date in a RS article. And was she referring to IMDb, Wikipedia or the Internet in general (which would be very vague) -22:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Well, she was referring to the internet in general, which is certainly very vague, but since many websites rely on IMDb in cinematic matters, it probably doesn't make a big difference. I've been observing the Wikipedia article for years and as far as I can tell, all the mistakes crept in from IMDb. In August 2014, when Pike gave the above-mentioned interview, Wikipedia had 1. “27 January”; 2. “Elizabeth”; 3. “concert musicians/opera singers”; 4. “conversant in French and German”. – Schneid9 (talk) 23:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 * So chances are likely that IMDb was wrong (and probably still is) on the birth date. I recommend keeping it at 27 January, given the non-IMDb RS's, and that the Wikipedia birthdate had been not screwed around with until 2011. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Confusingly, this business website has now changed Rosamund's birth date to December 1978! – Schneid9 (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Privacy and sourcing
User:JayCoop has effectively reverted some of my recent edits, reintroducing Pike's supposed birth date and birthplace without adding any source. The edit summaries were "Privacy? They're public figures (like Dwayne Johnson) and "Clear as day on IMDB". How is Dwayne Johnson relevant? I cannot see any discussion of privacy issues in his article or its talk page. I had previously removed the information with the edit summary "Remove date of birth and age, unsourced and may be private, see WP:DOB". WP:DOB says:

 * With identity theft a serious ongoing concern, people increasingly regard their full names and dates of birth as private. Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object.

Public figures deserve some privacy. Many actresses try too keep their age private for professional reasons, and there is no evidence that Pike has released this information. It is not given in her page on her agent's website. We do not cite any source for date of birth or birthplace. The article previously cited a birth record document that is an unsuitable primary source, see WP:BLPPRIMARY.

JayCoop mentioned that IMDb gives this information. IMDb is not a suitable source for this. Citing IMDb points out that much of IMDb's content is "user contributed with minimal and unstated editorial oversight by IMDb staff", and says that IMDb is unsuitable for citation for "any potentially contentious material about living persons".

I will remove this information from the article. Please do not restore them without adding a reliable source or discussing the issue here. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you look at articles like Dwayne Johnson or Donald Trump, the date of birth or where they were born is there. Pike's date of birth from Biography.com. You can google this stuff and it's public knowledge. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 01:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for adding a source, which appears to be ok for citation. It does not mention Hammersmith, which I will remove. Saying "everyone else does it" is rarely a good defence. I was clear that these should be removed when they were unsourced. We still cannot claim that they have been "widely published by reliable sources". Googling things like this can easily give information originating from Wikipedia or other unreliable sources. However, I will not now remove the date of birth and birthplace unless other editors support this. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm glad we sorted this out. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 02:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Name in Chinese here?
I noticed somebody's added her name in Chinese recently. I'm not familiar with that practice here, is there some consensus regarding that kind of additions at English language Wikipedia? The problem occurs if one starts to add articles' names/words in different languages, like Russian, Japanese, Korean, Greek, Arabian etc, it may become quite crowded.. Is this a good information to add here, considering there are parallell articles about the subjects in the other languages' versions with spellings etc? I don't think it's so practical.--Bemland (talk) 02:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I now read about her being given a "Chinese name" by her spouse, and understand that's the reason for this addition.--Bemland (talk) 02:28, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The text in the 'Personal life' section is sourced to a Chinese-language website. I don't understand Chinese, but Google Translate seems to indicate that the page is on this topic. I cannot judge how reliable this source is. Also, it is difficult to know whether the report only reflects Pike being formally polite and eager to please. However, if we accept the current text in Personal life section then it is reasonable to also accept the Chinese name in the lead. Can a Chinese speaker help us? Verbcatcher (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I removed it from the lead. It isn't her official stage name for EN Wikipedia. On ZH Wikipedia, that's her preferred stage name so yes it's that in the header zh:裴淳华, although her transliterated name 羅莎蒙·派克 (google translated: Luó shā méng·pàikè) is listed there too. The second news article explains how her name was chosen but it was also something recent (2015 during Gone Girl promotions), so she might have used the transliterated name prior to that.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Chelsea Clinton
It isn't true that Rosamund was friends with Chelsea Clinton. In a 2002 interview she said:
 * 'I wouldn't call her a mate as such,' says Pike, cautiously, 'but I was lucky enough to get to know her at Oxford. She was a very bright, interesting girl and a very strong person with strong ideas. We went to see Humble Boy at the Gielgud, and then five or six of us went out for dinner afterwards and we had a nice time, but nothing outrageous happened. It wasn't like we were both falling out of storerooms together or anything. Some of my friends know her quite well and I must admit, I'd quite like to get to know her better. We were going to hook up in New York when I was in the States doing publicity for Bond, but it didn't come off. She did tell me, though, that her dad was really excited when he heard I was doing the Bond film because he's such a massive Bond fan. He's got all the videos.'

<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 14:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

 * How in the world could this be relevant? And to what?  Someone being friends with someone is not noteworthy, especially if the "other" person is not (yet) noteworthy.  Ms Clinton may yet prove to be a force in this world, where everyone who is associated with her becomes a news story.  She has not reached that level yet.  <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It's relevant only insofar as it used to be (unnecessarily) included in the article. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Aquarius sign
Please provide the social media post or newspaper interview that confirms she says she is an Aquarius, but again, that only limits the range to two months. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * In the same Instagram post where the actress says she wasn't born on January 27th, there's a comment in reply to a follower where she confirms she's an Aquarius. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 10:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , the Instagram post only shows about 10 comments and it's not in any of those. https://www.instagram.com/p/CKi0_ATlfuA/  Does it show more if you're a subscriber/follower?  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If I you scroll the comments in the app, you can find a follower's comment that says "are you implying you are not an aquarius", and the reply "I am definitely an Aquarius". --Tenebra Blu (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Moreover, there are some sources according to the actress was born on January 28th. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , the comments are limited to about 12 random comments if you are not registered on Instagram and those 12 don't have her response. It looks like you'd have to either sign in on Instagram and/or be a follower to see it. Also please provide any other sources if you can confirm 28th. Unfortunately it's not like Twitter where each comment/response is its own tweet that can be made public or private. Can you confirm whether the comments are filtered by Pike so only her followers can see?   AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I can read all the comments under the post both in the app and on PC even if I'm not following Pike. Sadly, you have to log in to read them. As for 28th: Made In Dagenham - Rosamund Pike interview. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 17:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Edit: even according to Rosamund Pike Updates, the actress was born on 28th January 1979. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Infobox picture
The infobox picture is very odd - it looks like a police mugshot. RP's usual appearance is nothing like that, and she usually looks pretty glamorous. Ef80 (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

 * I don't think it's too odd. There are other options at Commons:Category:Rosamund Pike in 2018, the most recent year available. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

 * None of those options are ideal. There's nothing wrong with them as images, but for some reason RP chose to present herself in a certain style at the 2018 Berlin event which wasn't very typical of her. Still, if that's the best we can do then so be it. --Ef80 (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Small edit to the Note about her birthday
I'm pretty sure Rosamund confirmed that she is an Aquarius in the comments of one of her posts, placing her birthday between January 20 and February 18. I figured we could add that to the note about her birthday? Malimaan (talk) 19:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @User:Malimaan Sadly, that detail was previously removed because the comment is not immediately visible. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah okay, I did have to scroll all the way down to the earliest comments to find it, so I totally get why it's inconvenient to access. Sadly Instagram seems to have stopped to put the most relevant comments on top. I do technically have the comment screenshotted but I don't know if we can use that as a proof of anything. Malimaan (talk) 10:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If there is no date, we should just stick to the year.-- ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  12:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rosamund Pike/Archive 1


text:
Corazones al límite

Corazones al límite (English: Hearts to the Limit) is a Mexican telenovela produced by Roberto Hernández Vázquez for Televisa in 2004.

On Monday, March 15, 2004, Canal de las Estrellas started broadcasting Corazones al límite weekdays at 7:00pm, replacing Clap, el lugar de tus sueños. The last episode was broadcast on Friday, October 1, 2004, with Rebelde replacing it the following Monday.

Erika Buenfil, Arturo Peniche, Sara Maldonado, and Aarón Díaz starred as protagonists, while Sherlyn, Arleth Terán, Jorge de Silva, and Susy-Lu Peña starred as antagonists.

Plot
Diana (Sara Maldonado) teenage girl, who was emotionally neglected from her parents, and felt unwanted. After being expelled from her boarding school in Switzerland, Diana goes back to live with her parents. Diana's aunt, Pilar, comes over and witnesses a great deal fighting and tension within the household.

She offers solace to Diana by letting her live with her. Diana goes to the mall where she bumps into Braulio (Aarón Díaz). She keeps bumping into him in various places, especially school. Braulio was orphaned when he was about twelve years old.

He lives with his wicked aunt; his kind, but oblivious uncle; and his cruel cousin, Esteban (Jorge de Silva). Braulio has a friend named Conny (Sherlyn) who tries to date him, but he isn't interested. Conny absolutely hates Diana as he is attracted to her. Braulio later finds out that Diana comes from a rich background, something Diana never told him, which leads to them splitting up. Diana later ends up dating Esteban, not knowing that he is Braulio's wicked cousin.

The plot, in essence, tells the story of several teens in a school. The story lines are designed to affect pre-teen minds: The orphan Braulio, Diana at her boarding school, and Connie and her parents winning the lottery, to name just a few.

In addition to all this, when Aunt Pilar (Erika Buenfil) first registers Diana into school, she meets her long lost love, Álvaro, who works at the school. Álvaro also works with Emma, who has feelings for him, but now that Pilar is back in the picture, Álvaro only has eyes for Pilar.

Things change when Alvaro mistakenly thinks Pilar is married, and sleeps with Emma. After finding out his mistake, Álvaro goes back to Pilar, but keeps his affair with Emma a secret, even when Pilar asks if there was anything going on.

The jealous Emma finds out that Álvaro is dating Pilar after seeing the two at a restaurant. She later discovers she is pregnant and lies to Álvaro, telling him that she is positive that he is the father. (She doesn't mention that she had also slept with Esteban.)

Cast

 * Erika Buenfil as Pilar de la Reguera
 * Arturo Peniche as Álvaro Riverol
 * Sara Maldonado as Diana Antillón de la Reguera
 * Aarón Díaz as Braulio Valladares Stone
 * Sherlyn as Concepción "Conny" Pérez Ávila
 * Jorge de Silva as Esteban Molina Valladares
 * Arleth Terán as Emma Martinez
 * Marco Muñoz as Domenico Antillón
 * Susy-Lu Peña as Nancy
 * Uberto Bondoni as Rolando
 * René Casados as Dante Lacalfari
 * Maritza Olivares as Amalia Valladares
 * Mariagna Prats as Irene de la Reguera
 * Manuela Ímaz as Isadora Moret Rivadeneira
 * Alex Sirvent as Eduardo Arellano Gómez
 * Mariana Sánchez Williams as Artemisa Madrigal Tovar
 * Miguel Ángel Biaggio as Samuel Cisneros Castro
 * Belinda as Elena "Elenita" Arellano Gómez
 * Christina Pastor as Olga
 * Daniel Berlanga as Damián
 * Daniel Habif as Alberto
 * Nancy Taira as Coral
 * Paola Riquelme as Enriqueta
 * Ricardo Margaleff as Antonio
 * Rodrigo Tejeda as Joaquín
 * Ximena Herrera as Malkah
 * Ramon Valdés as Jesús "Chucho" Pérez Ávila
 * Haydeé Navarra as Bianca de la Torre
 * Luis Fonsi as Roy
 * Aarón Hernán as Arthur
 * Raymundo Capetillo as Daniel Molina
 * Manuel Saval as Osvaldo Madrigal
 * Nicky Mondellini as Lourdes "Lulú" Gómez
 * María Marcela as Sofía
 * Lucero Lander as Julieta
 * Beatriz Moreno as Francisca "Paquita" Ávila
 * Pedro Romo as Alfonso "Poncho" Pérez
 * Oscar Traven as Sebastián
 * Archie Lafranco as Paul
 * Marcela Páez as Gabriela Tovar
 * Queta Lavat as Gudelia
 * Francisco Avendaño as Ulises Gómez
 * Javier Herranz as Padre Anselmo
 * Isadora González as Bárbara Magallanes
 * Maricarmen Vela as Mercedes
 * Rafael del Villar as Professor Muñoz
 * Rubén Morales as Adrián Romo
 * Fernando Carrera as Dr. Ernesto Torres
 * Gina Pedret as Dulce María
 * Karla Barahona as Lilia
 * Beatriz Aguirre as Victoria Vda. de Antillón
 * Nestor Emmanuel as Javier
 * Blanca Sánchez as Martha
 * Jacqueline Voltaire as Sra. Kullman
 * Angelique Boyer as Anette

title: Corazones al límite


text:
Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list/Archive 17

Fritter roll

 * Anyone hungry for a fritter roll? I discovered this on Prod patrol. The nominator was not receptive to my attempts to fix up the article. I found evidence in the NY Times and BBC about Fritter roll variations. However the Nominator did not allow the article to be changed. See if you can edit this one successfully, without nominator interference and perhaps we can save the beloved Fritter roll. I stopped trying when it got close to being an edit war. Lightburst (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 * I would counsel anyone willing to take up the challenge to familiarise themself fully with the debate at Articles for deletion/Fritter roll to get a full perspective on this editor's campaign to supplement the article with patently irrelevant material. Both of the sources mentioned above refer to fritters but neither to  "fritter rolls", bread rolls or indeed the word "roll" at all. By all means if you can find genuine sources related to the article, knock yourself out. Mutt Lunker (talk) 19:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Well at least you all know now that I was not using hyperbole to describe the nominator's attitude. I am not even that interested in Fritter roll's however I am flummoxed by the nominator's ownership of the subject. Knock yourselves out or sit it out. But Fritter rolls are doomed without massive help. Lightburst (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 * "Fritter roll" references in your sources? Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:28, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 * This debate should be in the AFD not here. If there are any cooking shows or cooking books in Scotland that someone has access to, please see if this is a common thing.  Or do restaurants list their menus online somewhere?   D r e a m Focus  22:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Apparently the title of this article should be "Roll and fritter". RS will likely not be found, however my search term of "Glasgow Roll and fritter" shows how widespread this food is in Glasgow, Scotland. I added these non- RS sources to the AfD perhaps someone can find actual RS with different search terms. Lightburst (talk) 17:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was merge to Fritter Lightburst (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Joey Jett

 * Notable skateboarder. Achieved notability at 7 years old WP:NTEMP. Article needs a rewrite. WP:NOTCLEANUP. I found multiple sources, but who can help rewrite this improperly sourced bio? First AfD ended no consensus based on sources found, however nobody added them so now we have AfD two. Lightburst (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lightburst (talk) 22:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

JK! Studios
Start up studio staffed by Conan refugees. Sources exist and can be improved. WP:NEXIST, and WP:Notability questions. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:04, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Relisted by an arithmetically disinterested contributor. There is a question about sources in the article. WP:RS? IMO, WP:Hey, as article is not what it was when the PROD was filed. But you can add sources and make up your own mind. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the closer: "The result was delete. For a detailed explanation of the assessment of keep !votes, please read User talk:Lourdes#JK! Studioss. Post relisting, the only Keep !vote editor claims they heard the group on a show; and therefore the same should be kept. Again, nothing based on policy or notability guidelines. If any editor has an issue with the closure, they can contact me on my talk page. Thanks."
 * So we are clear, the !vote was 7 Keep and 2 Delete So much for consensus to delete. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I just saw the result. I have commented and questioned the closer on on the closer's talk page. Lightburst (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

 * User:7&6=thirteen, Re: this edit (which is right) would it make sense to add at the bottom of the AfD below the last !vote so closing admins know any Keep's above that point were organic and not alerted via ARS. Not to say closers are ignoring ARS !votes but it wouldn't hurt to distinguish a break between pre and post ARS !votes in the AfD. -- Green  C  16:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Deletion review/Log/2019 August 12 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Alis Rowe

 * The nominator claims that the subject of the article wants the article deleted. However, subject is a public figure of interest and notoriety through public appearances, and in magazines, and on the BBC and through. An prolific author of books and magazine articles about autism. As an author subject has won awards for subject's books. The page has existed for four years and passed two AfDs. I believe that a notable public person does not have a right to delete a WP article, even if they are the subject. I will see what the community says about this. Lightburst (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I think we can improve the article with more references. I have added portals to the article. Lightburst (talk) 01:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was delete Lightburst (talk) 01:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Somayeh Mohammadi

 * Non trivial coverage exists in the secondary sources already present. However more exists in foreign press. Lightburst (talk) 22:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was Keep Lightburst (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Diary of an Unborn Child

 * Controversial subject. I managed to locate several sources and put them in the article. The original "Diary of an Unborn Child" was read on the floor of the New York State Senate by Republican Senate Majority Leader Earl W Brydges on April 10, 1970. The subject has been in the public domain since 1970, and has been used over and over by both sides of this controversial issue ...and even made into a disturbing or campy song. Lightburst (talk) 13:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Just minutes later the AfD closed: No Consensus.

List of towns and cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants
Gateway article to separate lists of all the world's cities. Listed alphabetically by name and by country. the related lists are up for deletion, too. I think this pivot point is useful to Wikipedia's readers and should be WP:Preserved. WP:Not paper and question about sourcing. Improve them if you can. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep Lightburst (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Commuter Cars

 * Notable company. I found sources in Time Magazine, CNN Money and a blurb in Bloomberg. I spent some time trying to develop the categories and improve the refs. Perhaps more refs can be located. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Should be considered in conjunction with Commuter Cars Tango. I have improved the reference formatting on the latter article, but it would be improved by moving some of the "References" to in line citations.  I also improved the formatting of the reference in this article Commuter Cars. In any event, between the two articles, there is plenty to satisfy WP:GNG. WP:NEXIST.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The All Seeing Carnac the Magnificent says "Entering the expressway." "Merging ahead?"  But it ain't over until ... it's over.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was merge to Commuter Cars Tango. Lightburst (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Myrcella Baratheon
This is the vanguard of a second wave, as discussed below. Note also that there's a proposal to prevent new users from commenting at AfD. That might be significant for such a high-traffic article and so provides good context. Andrew D. (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I've added lots of sources. WP:Hey, but more is always in order.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was a no consensus Keep Lightburst (talk) 13:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Per the closer: "The result was no consensus. OK, having lots of readers is not a reason to keep an article under notability guidelines. The question of whether GNG is met isn't so clear, as most of the sources are stated to be plot summaries rather than detailed analysis and there is the - somewhat vague - concern about non-independent sources raised. A merger was also discussed, but there does not appear to be a clear consensus either pro ("usual practice for minor characters") or con ("target is too long"). My sense is that while the keep arguments probably out-weigh the delete ones owing to several uncontested sources, the merge/redirect or no case would need a dedicated discussion." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:27, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Visible balance
The page has cleanup tags since 2009 but they are useless because it's like they are not visible. See banner blindness. Andrew D. (talk) 09:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep. Lightburst (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

List of guest stars on Sesame Street
Referencing things on the list should be easy enough. Just a lot of things need reference. I was thinking perhaps putting things into columns would be better.  D r e a m Focus  04:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was Keep Lightburst (talk) 13:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Columbia, Missouri
Needs moire and better sources. Several of the buildings on on NRHP. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep. Albeit, weak." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

 * non-admin closure. 8 keep 3 merge/delete 1 neutral from article starter. Somehow that is a weak keep. Lightburst (talk) 16:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Remedial math candidate? Oh well.  It's still a keep.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Tameka Hobbs

Professor Phd., writer/author guest speaker. I found some non-trivial coverage of the subject. I also started to add to the article. Lightburst (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was redirect to Democracy Abroad, Lynching At Home. Lightburst (talk) 12:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Arthur Hills

Very notable golf course designer. I have found non-trivial coverage of this subject and began work on the article. He started designing courses in 1967, and has designed 200 courses - several in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ohio. In other countries as well, Portugal and Croatia Lightburst (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep Lightburst (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

List of battleships by country
Someone suggested this list of lists article could be useful for navigation. I agree. Not sure how to rework it to be clearer what it is though. Any ideas?  D r e a m Focus  02:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was redirect Lightburst (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

A. D. Kenamond
Notability questions. See WP:Academic 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Closed as a Snow Keep  D r e a m Focus  21:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

List of cities with the most high-rise buildings
Some dispute over whether the source for the information is valid. Does anyone know of any official government websites that list information about this or other sources of information?  D r e a m Focus  00:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was delete Lightburst (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Han–Uyghur intermarriage
Nationalist topics like this tend to be difficult but neutral parties may help in providing an independent view. The ARS has been invoked in discussion already so it belongs on the list. Mind how you go... Andrew D. (talk) 13:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Given the above explicit reference to me, it's difficult not to take the above "neutral parties" as a reference to my "deletionists telling editors who specialize in this topic area what they can and can't do with their own articles". It's worth noting that in the past, in cases like this one, such "neutral parties" have generally created more heat than light. I can definitely see the above ARS posting resulting in an endgame wherein 4-5 editors with a focus on Chinese and Central Asian topics all say either "delete" or "redirect" with nuanced reasoning related to the article in question and our deletion policy, 2-3 deletionists say "keep" with off-topic notability arguments, and a closer who just counts the votes and says "no consensus". Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 02:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not an attempt to improve an article, it is blatant canvassing. Why would you come to ARS (a project specifically focused on keeping/improving articles) to seek "neutral" opinions? Please withdraw the nomination or explain how the article can be improved to satisfy the concerns of the deletion nominator, as stated in the instructions. –dlthewave ☎ 04:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I should point out that while editing (or rather, a complete overhaul of the article) could address the concerns of the AFD, what is really needed for that is topic specialists who know what they are doing, and historically this project's deletionist members have tended to favour "improving" articles such as the one linked above and Mottainai and Mottainai Bāsan in the opposite direction to anyone who had !voted "delete" or similar, often by attempting to keep all the articles' present content intact regardless of what their sources say. The random, off-topic sinophobic jab Andrew made here makes it difficult not to assume that is his intention here as well. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 04:42, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Redirect "The result was redirect to History of Xinjiang." The well-reasoned and extensive discussion by the closer, User:Jo-Jo Eumerus is just too long to repeat here. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Christopher Kaelin
IMO, well sourced article about a geneticist. But you can help improve it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the closer:"The result was delete. Insufficient coverage to show he meets WP:NPROF or WP:GNG." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Lists of tallest buildings

 * Delete Per the closer: "The result was delete. Consensus that this list is not notable and fails WP:LISTN" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the closer: "The result was delete. Consensus that this list is not notable and fails WP:LISTN" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

 * ," 11:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the closer: "The result was delete. Even if the nomination is inaccurate, editors have presented valid arguments for deletion later. The request to keep the talk page discussion as a record of a page move discussion that also applied to other pages is reasonable so I'll leave it."  7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

 * DeletePer the closer: "The result was delete. The arguments that this is so poorly sourced as not to warrant a merger are convincing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * DeletePer the closer: "The result was delete. The arguments that this is so poorly sourced as not to warrant a merger are convincing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

There's several of these now so it seems sensible to consolidate them. Andrew D. (talk) 13:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Short list and short referenced article on short buildings. Needs improvement, if you can find sources. List itself could be made longer. See discussion on article talk page. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

While I think there are many reasons to keep the article, there is a claim that there isn't WP:SIGCOV. More and better would address the problem. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I would be the first to admit that the article can use some work. Two years ago, I did a lot of the research that populated the "proposed" list.  Too many hours digging through county permit filings.  At least one of those proposed items should move up to the "under construction" section, but I don't have the time right now to dig out which one it is and do the editing. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 09:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Olde Boston Bulldogge
Hello, I believe this article was deleted with neither a deletion +tag being posted nor any discussion. The Olde Boston Bulldogge definitely existed and exists.1234567etcetera So, how do we repeal this incorrect decision made by "one" administrator? Thank you Aquataste (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The deletion log says "00:41, 4 March 2019 Fastily talk contribs deleted page Olde Boston Bulldogge (Expired PROD, concern was: None of the sources cited come close to being reliable.)". A PROD is supposed to be easily reversible at WP:REFUND.  You're still going to have trouble though as this appears to be a variant of the Boston Terrier and seems more of a commercial brand than a traditional breed.  Commercial breeders and growers are constantly making proprietary hybrids and varieties and only the exceptional ones are going to survive here.  The name of this breed is pretentious per ye olde and so its chances don't seem good. Andrew D. (talk) 09:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your timely response. The Olde Boston Bulldogge was the progenitor to the Boston Terrier, without it no Boston Terrier would exist.  You see there were many citations at the article before deletion. I really do not understand why it was deleted. Aquataste (talk) 10:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If that is true,, if could be incorporated into the Boston Terrier page, and documented with a redirect. You seem to be suggesting it is a progenitor and an extinct breed.  OTOH, we do have extinct dog breed articles. See List of extinct dog breeds. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

 * The reinstatement request has been posted here. Aquataste (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , thank you Andrew, they reinstated the article. Very sad that a "real" article can be deleted that easily here at Wikipedia! Is there a +tag we can add to the articles talk page that the deletion was rescinded, so future admins know not to do that?Aquataste (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. The old prod template should be added to the talk page in such cases.  This should protect the article from further attempts to prod it as that process is only supposed to be used for uncontroversial deletion.  I have also added other relevant templates. Andrew D. (talk) 11:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Urban dog
I suppose everyone here is familiar with the concept of a WP:STUB, right? If not, the discussion may help. And so to bed.... Andrew D. (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

I Google news search for "differences" and "urban dog" but don't see anything relevant. Is there a difference between a dog in a city and those elsewhere? More parks to poop in perhaps?  D r e a m Focus  02:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Ignore all rules

This core Wikipedia policy is wonderfully paradoxical and self-referential and so it is not surprising that it should get attention outside. Perhaps it's a principle that has been tried elsewhere? Where I live, some workmen recently painted large numbers on the road to remind drivers of the new 20 mph speed limit. But about 90% of drivers break a 20 mph speed limit and so the issue of compliance with rules is commonplace. As some would like to make rules about what we can say here, the topic is quite timely... Andrew D. (talk) 09:19, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

 * It's certainly possible to find more external sources about this. For example, in the New York Review of Books, writer Nicholson Baker covered this as one of The Charms of Wikipedia, explaining that this was "the first Wikipedian rule". Also, there is lots of anarchist theory which may cover this as a general principle under some other heading. Anyway, the nomination invokes the rule WP:GNG but that's just a guideline which explicitly cites the policy itself: " and occasional exceptions may apply"
 * The concept has legal and equitable precursors. These should be the subject of further research  In any event, an WP:AFD of this particular article is a case of wrong place, wrong time.  Fundamentally, it is misguided attempt to blind editors to alternative ways and views of editing, in the name of encyclopaedic purity.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The result was keep 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Christopher Walter Waitt

Another RAF pilot and this one fought in both World Wars. Can we locate the pre 1974 references to WP:PRESERVE? User:Lightburst 21:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per the closer: "The result was redirect to No. 550 Squadron RAF. This was a complex AfD with many sincere and well argued comments. There is no doubt that this is a nicely written page, that certainly contains much material of interest, and I have considered WP:NOTPAPER. However, we work within the notability guidelines, specifically WP:SOLDIER and more generally WP:GNG. In this regard, I find the 'delete' arguments clearly more policy based, and hence stronger, than the 'keep' arguments.
 * "Moving on to the action to be taken, redirects are cheap and I see no reason not to create a redirect to sourced content on this person that will be useful to the reader. Normally, i would 'delete and redirect'. However, the editors of the target may wish to merge more content and there is no need to make that difficult. Clearly, though, a recreation should not happen without further discussion so I am going to protect the redirect." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Brennan Malone

 * Magor League Baseball first round draft pick with 2.2 million dollar contract. Non-trivial coverage to support WP:GNG, does not pass WP:NBASEBALL - however only needs to pass one or the other not both. User:Lightburst 14:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge "The result was merge" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Andrew G. Geishecker
Long time Massachusetts judge. Since he is locally elected, presumably he needs to meet WP:GNG. hard to believe he did nothing worth writing about in his career, but I don't know. Because he died in 1974, coverage on internet is sparse. Needs someone with ability to look at old newspapers to salvage. Ordinary internet searches are not producing anything that I could find beyond the Boston Globe articles that are cited in the article. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the closer: "The result was delete."
 * No saving a local lowest state court judge without WP:GNG and WP:Sigcov. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Epistemology of Wikipedia
Philosophy tends to be difficult but this topic looks to be thought-provoking. What is the nature of the world's information that we are assembling here? What are the implications of deletion when admins can still see the content and it has been forked elsewhere? Verifiability, not truth? Truthiness? Citation needed? Andrew D. (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep "The result was keep. Withdrawn - mea culpa on the lackluster BEFORE search." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Buildings in Jersey City

 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep. While there seems to be some disagreement about whether the current sourcing of the article is adequate (per SportingFlyer), it seems like the sourcing presented by Andrew Davidson has convinced most editors. I note Rusf10's comment but it doesn't seem to have caught on. Thus this is a keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep. While there seems to be some disagreement about whether the current sourcing of the article is adequate (per SportingFlyer), it seems like the sourcing presented by Andrew Davidson has convinced most editors. I note Rusf10's comment but it doesn't seem to have caught on. Thus this is a keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Redirect Per the closer: "The result was redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Consensus that NBUILD isn't satisfied. Discussions that the redirect target's list is too long can be held in a separate discussion on that page." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per the closer: "The result was redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Consensus that NBUILD isn't satisfied. Discussions that the redirect target's list is too long can be held in a separate discussion on that page." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep. Despite the fact that no significant sources were put forward during this AfD, there obviously is no consensus to delete at this time." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep. Despite the fact that no significant sources were put forward during this AfD, there obviously is no consensus to delete at this time." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer: "The result was keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Relisted Per the non-closer: "Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Relisted Per the non-closer: "Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 * Relisted Per the relisting comment: "Relisting in light of recent improvements to the article, as well as lack of current consensus for "keep" or "redirect"." Per the closer: "The result was keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer:"The result was keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer:"The result was keep." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

 * Redirect Per the closer: "The result was redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Irrespective of the (de)merits of the deletion nomination, it seems like the consensus leans towards there not being enough sourcing to justify a separate article around the topic - for some sources it's not clear from the discussion whether they'd satisfy WP:SIGCOV - and the keep arguments are mostly concerned with procedural issues or are not based on guideline/policy." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per the closer: "The result was redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Irrespective of the (de)merits of the deletion nomination, it seems like the consensus leans towards there not being enough sourcing to justify a separate article around the topic - for some sources it's not clear from the discussion whether they'd satisfy WP:SIGCOV - and the keep arguments are mostly concerned with procedural issues or are not based on guideline/policy." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

I've not seen the new Godzilla movie yet but suppose that the local real estate takes a pounding. Meanwhile, here in Wikipedia, someone is trying to knock down the towers of Jersey City! Andrew D. (talk) 19:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Nina Marker

 * Notable danish model with Aspergers. Has appeared in multiple several major publications and has featured articles about her. User:Lightburst 00:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "The result was keep. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Madison Tung

 * United States Air Force Officer, pilot, wrestler, and Rhodes Scholar who also the first woman to wrestle for the U.S. Air Force Academy men's team. User:Lightburst 20:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was keep User:Lightburst 14:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * United States Air Force Officer, pilot, wrestler, and Rhodes Scholar who also the first woman to wrestle for the U.S. Air Force Academy men's team. User:Lightburst 20:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was keep User:Lightburst 14:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Tom Choi

 * An actor who appears in movies and television programs. Seems notable. User:Lightburst 19:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * This name gets results for other people besides him. Searching for his name and the word "actor" got better results.  "Tom Choi" and "film" got even more.   D r e a m Focus  19:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * An actor who appears in movies and television programs. Seems notable. User:Lightburst 19:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * This name gets results for other people besides him. Searching for his name and the word "actor" got better results.  "Tom Choi" and "film" got even more.   D r e a m Focus  19:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep. User:Lightburst 14:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

John McHugh Sr.
A American soldier who participated in the D-day invasion and Battle of the Bulge. Received the Silver Star and the Bronze Star. looking for help from the editors to improve this article. It has not been tagged with an Afd, however and editor has placed a proposed deletion tag saying,"While highly decorated, doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER. Recent spate of stories is due to his longevity, not sure that meets WP:GNG." User:Lightburst 14:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Individual behaviour in organisations

This is a topical topic and there is much to say. Many hands... Andrew D. (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Two words in the four word topic are spelled differently in American English than in British English. I fixed the search link in the AFD to help with that.  Going to take some work to rewrite parts of that article that need it.   D r e a m Focus  01:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

The result was Delete. There's consensus that this does not belong in main space. Anybody who's interested in working on it can request a move to draft space at WP:UND. User:Lightburst 13:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Ashley Liao
Another child actor with prominent prime time television roles. User:Lightburst 02:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep User:Lightburst 20:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Battle bag
What's in your battle bag when you turn out to rescue another article? It's good to think of a shortlist of policies, references and sources with a stock of canned text and templates for the recurring issues we encounter. We should start another tab for this here, as a checklist of good ideas and resources. Andrew D. (talk) 09:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Renu Agrawal

 * Mayor of a relatively large city in India. Coverage might exist in non-English sources. Thsmi002 (talk) 18:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted. North America1000 15:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Mayor of a relatively large city in India. Coverage might exist in non-English sources. Thsmi002 (talk) 18:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted. North America1000 15:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Kelly Gould

 * Child star who - once notable - should always be notable. Can we find sources where there is more than a passing mention of the subject? User:Lightburst 18:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was no consensus Keep User:Lightburst 02:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

List of oldest twins
Seems like ample coverage of something like this should be out there.  D r e a m Focus  14:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was Delete User:Lightburst 16:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Some you can save, and some you can't. Sometimes the sourcing matters, but ...  Oh well!  7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Trace Bundy

 * A well known guitar player. I think it may be possible to save the article. The nominator also nominated all of the subject's albums.User:Lightburst 01:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * A well known guitar player. I think it may be possible to save the article. The nominator also nominated all of the subject's albums.User:Lightburst 01:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * A well known guitar player. I think it may be possible to save the article. The nominator also nominated all of the subject's albums.User:Lightburst 01:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

 * Result was Keep. However, given that the group nomination led to some mix of opinion about individual pages, it should be acceptable to separately renominate individual albums for a more focused discussion if desired. User:Lightburst 22:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Winter is coming

I've just snow-closed this but it may just be the start and I don't want to get too involved for fear of spoilers as I've been saving the last episode. ARS members may want to patrol the topic like members of the Night's Watch on the Wall. Andrew D. (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

List of fictional games

How many of these can you identify: Fizzbin; Centrifugal Bumble Puppy; Cripple Mr Onion; Hussade; The Glass Bead Game? The latter won a Nobel prize and Wikipedia now realises some of its concepts. Can you win this game? Andrew D. (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

I find that this is an incipient spree and so we also have:

 * List of fictional games ended in KEEP.  D r e a m Focus  15:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Flying monkeys (psychology)

 * Is this a legitimate psychology term? Seems very Wizard of Oz. Is there enough mainstream primary and secondary coverage of the term? User:Lightburst 14:41, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

 * Result was Keep User:Lightburst 22:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

List of garden plants to feed honey bees in Canada
Nominator has a deletionist mentality. Aquataste (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

 * Result was Merge User:Lightburst 22:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Elizabeth L. Gardner
Women Airforce Service Pilots. WW II pilot. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Another DYK in the womb. coming soon 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth L. Gardner 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the closer: "The result of the discussion was keep. Seems like later in the discussion, some uncontested references to her were provided. Move or merge discussions can be had if there are still questions about whether the coverage is about the individual rather than the unit/photo" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Elizabeth L. Gardner
valereee (talk) 00:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC) "28,169 page views. Not too shabby!  7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Noah Raby 2nd nomination

 * Interesting subject which may be GNG, and provides an interesting case regarding notability. ...Once GNG always GNG? Or does one lose GNG if earlier claims of being the oldest person are debunked? Or if there is not recent coverage? User:Lightburst 17:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Interesting subject which may be GNG, and provides an interesting case regarding notability. ...Once GNG always GNG? Or does one lose GNG if earlier claims of being the oldest person are debunked? Or if there is not recent coverage? User:Lightburst 17:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was keep. User:Lightburst 23:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Nikita Denise

 * Female performer of the year award and her AVN Hall of Fame status satisfies criteria WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia should have no bias or a tougher litmus test regarding adult film stars. User:Lightburst 00:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was delete. "As noted, WP:PORNBIO is no longer a guideline, and most of the detailed points about whether porn awards might still satisfy WP:ANYBIO appear to lean towards the notion that the award mentioned here is too obscure/too poorly covered to qualify." User:Lightburst 14:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Lost Lands

 * - Adds source search options
 * - Adds relevant links

 * nominator seems to have an issue with the fusion of myth and reality. WP:ATD User:Lightburst 22:08, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

"AfD closed as no consensus, leaning towards keep."

Richard Haine

 * - Adds source search options
 * - Adds relevant links
 * A Distinguished Flying Cross award winner - This is a third-level military decoration awarded to officers so he passes WP:ANYBIO having received a well-known and significant award or honor. In addition he should also pass WP:SOLDIER because he was the Commanding Officer of No. 488 Squadron RNZAF. User:Lightburst 00:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Just going to note that WP:SOLDIER explicitly does not make someone notable for having commanded a squadron; he would have had to command a force at least two levels above that, and since Lightburst apparently had to check the Wikipedia article on his award ("a third-level military decoration awarded to officers" is directly lifted from the opening sentence of Distinguished Flying Cross (United Kingdom)), I would question whether it is that well-known. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 05:51, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

 * Nomination to delete disengaged. Haine survives the Fliegerabwehrkanone returns to base. Green  C  19:22, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. Not yet formally closed.
 * But I'm doing a DYK, so y'all are invited to the party, if you want to improve the article.
 * When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There's already a DYK nomination. Notice that the person who tried to delete the article is now trying to disrupt the DYK. Tsk. Andrew D. (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As expected, the above accusation is completely bogus. The AFD nominator made a request for a grammatical fix; that appears to be the extent of the "disruption". As appears to be the norm, Andrew is using ARS as a forum to attack editors he doesn't like, even when it has absolutely nothing to do with rescuing articles. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 01:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

The article can not be closed just because the nominator changed their mind. Others said delete so it'll continue onward until the time period ends.  D r e a m Focus  20:16, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:Snowball. But I can wait.  Just not on the DYK.  Tempus fugit.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That's called Chutzpah. Apparently my contribution wasn't worth mentioning.  Spoke without looking.  User:Andrew Davidson was not the AFD nominator, but instead was part of the resistance.  I am sure everyone who deserves credit will get it. And the disruption will come to nothing.  Change the proposed hook; it makes no difference.  There are several other great hooks in that article, too. Looking at the nomination, the 'usual suspects' are all listed as creators, but the software doesn't seem to display that.  It will all come out in the wash. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Per the closer: "The result was keep. Weight of argument supports keeping the article and the nominator has withdrawn the AfD" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I was happy to see this one get saved. A whole lot of work was carried out by the member/editors to improve this article. Bravo! article User:Lightburst 00:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

This signifies why this project is important. Went from WP:AFD to WP:DYK

DYK for Richard Haine
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

2021 Formula One World Championship
We have lots of articles lined up for 2021 and there's even a parallel draft for this one. It's amusing to look at the history of these futile discussions which are becoming an annual ritual. Andrew D. (talk) 11:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One World Championship
 * Articles for deletion/2019 Formula One World Championship
 * Articles for deletion/2018 Formula One season
 * Articles for deletion/2018 Formula One season (2nd nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/2014 Formula One season
 * Articles for deletion/2014 Formula One season

What’s actually amusing is that all but one of the AFD’s listed here actually resulted in the nominated articles being deleted, while the one that didn’t was an april fool’s joke. Nothing futile about them and no precedents at all to keep the currently nominated article.Tvx1 22:42, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the most amusing thing is actually looking at the history of Andrew using this page as basically his personal playground for engaging in disruptive historical revisionism. If this were really about combating systemic bias or rescuing good articles, that would be fine, but there's no excuse for this kind of behaviour. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 23:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice a pattern: 1. '20xx Formula One World Championship' created prior to the championship. 2. It is nominated and often deleted. 3. It is recreated and notable after the championship. This is futile churn, and a waste of everyone's time and efforts. Any championship article will be notable. But I guess the too-sooners can't help themselves and closers go by the book. Should have more flexibility in cases like this. -- Green  C  14:33, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed. The front line in that endless conflict is about 2 years in the future.  Currently 2020 Formula One World Championship is fine while 2021 Formula One World Championship is the battleground.  2021 will be accepted by everyone later this year and the battle will then move to 2022.  For another topical example of such futility see Child of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex; Son of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Andrew D. (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I started an essay WP:AFDCHURN. It probably won't get much attention but the more often "WP:AFDCHURN" is used the concept will be brought into broader consciousness and possibly added to a guideline in the future. Feel free to add additional examples as found. --  Green  C  15:30, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Who Will Rock You
A wealthy company has a television show it created two seasons worth of that has had over 16 million views, has some passive coverage in places I found so far. Need more to have it kept. If anyone can think of anywhere to look for additional sources, please help.  D r e a m Focus  00:55, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Kelly Meighen
another way to close

 * A philanthropist that rises to the level of GNG WP:ANYBIO the subject has received many awards including The Queen's Golden Jubilee Medal awarded by the Governor General of Canada. User:Lightburst 20:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

 * WP:CONSENSUS was ignored for another relisting of the afd. User:Lightburst 21:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Please retract and apologize for the above remark. 3 delete !votes versus 4/5 keep !votes (I don't know when EMG's was retracted), disregarding the quality of the arguments (AGF says we should, lacking evidence to the contrary -- the nom is an admin, and the only editors who started actively editing in 2019, and therefore the only ones who could reasonably be assumed inexperienced, are THEFlint Shrubwood, Skirts89, and you), is not "consensus" to keep by any stretch of the imagination, and now that one of the keep !votes has been retracted and the only !vote since the relisting has been to delete, it's now dead even. Comments like the above are exactly what give this project a bad name, and I'm frankly disappointed none of this project's more "keepist" members have called you out on it. I might as well ping User:Seraphimblade regarding the above remark about him. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 01:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Per the closer: "The result was delete. The "delete" arguments are stronger. Nobody has really argued that there are the kind of in-depth reliable sources, as opposed to passing mentions, that are a requirement for the inclusion of a biography." Math of this was 5 Keeps to 4 Deletes. No consensus. The closing of the discussion and the direction to not post on that page, and take it to the article's deleted article's talk page, is ironic and futile. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I am puzzled and disappointed. I voiced my concern on the admin closer's talk page. I wasted a lot of time improving the article, and participating in the afd. Grrrrrr. User:Lightburst 00:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Deletion review/Log/2019 May 16 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:41, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

U.S. intervention in Venezuela
I think the subject is well covered by academic and news sources. I have provided some of them in the discussion. -- M h hossein   talk 13:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This was placed at the bottom by mistake so I'm moving it to the top.  D r e a m Focus  00:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

 * The result was Keep but begin merge discussion. User:Lightburst 18:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

All the King's horses and all the King's men...

If the Squadron does a good job with this, we might hope for a royal warrant. I have previously created the royal corgis and Queen Victoria's journals and, in my experience, there is masses of material about such topics. Andrew D. (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The result was keep. The clear overwhelming consensus here is keep.User:Lightburst 18:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


text:
Alcira Cardona Torrico

Alcira Cardona Torrico (23 January 1926 in Oruro – 23 May 2003) was a Bolivian writer and poet. She belonged to group "Gesta bárbara", which was originally founded in La Paz in 1944 with members such as Óscar Alfaro, Julio de la Vega and Armando Alba Zambrana, among others.

The poetic works of Cardona are characterized by their social content, particularly that associated with the Andes and mining. Among her most outstanding and well-known poems are "Carcajada de Estaño" and the autobiographical poem "Apóstrofe". Her work "Loa a la ciudad de Oruro" won a poetry contest in Oruro in 1944.

title: Alcira Cardona Torrico


text:
Bihanga (disambiguation)

Bihanga is a settlement in Ibanda District, Uganda.

Bihanga may also refer to:
 * Bihanga Military Training School, Bihanga, Uganda - see List of military schools in Uganda
 * Bihanga Island, Barguna District, Bangladesh
 * Bihanga, a 1999 film by Abdullah al Mamun
 * Bihanga, the inflight magazine of Biman Bangladesh Airlines

title: Bihanga (disambiguation)


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/helenaustin.com

Links

 * helenaustin.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Selected additions

 * Displayed 1 additions out of 1 total.	 For more info see WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/helenaustin.com

Entry
Log entry for the MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist:

\bhelenaustin\.com\b        # ADMINNAME # see  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/Local/helenaustin.com ]]

Discussion
See COIBot report for more details.

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Autostale: very old local report (>7 days). No links left in here mentioned edits. Marked stale. . --COIBot (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Devid Naryzhnyy

what’s going on
Qualification for the Junior Grand Prix Final suggests a level of skill equal to #2 in WP:NSKATE – competing in the free skate at World Junior Championships. It’s ridiculous that this disccusion is ongoing... You should close this discussion and save the creation of Devid Narizhnyy Jonibyjourne (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


text:
Southland Mall (Miami)

Southland Mall, originally known as Cutler Ridge Mall, is a shopping mall in Cutler Bay (formerly Cutler Ridge), Florida. It opened in 1978 as an extension of the Cutler Ridge Shopping Center, which itself was opened in 1960 (shortly after its "grand reopening", Cutler Ridge Mall moniker was subsequently applied to the entire shopping center complex). Subsequent additions extended the mall in the early to mid-1980s.

History
The original shopping center opened in 1960, anchored by Food Fair (Pantry Pride) and Richard's, which later became Burdines. In 1978, it was expanded into a full mall anchored by JCPenney, Jordan Marsh and Lord & Taylor, the last of which opened in 1982. Lord & Taylor closed in 1990 and became Mervyns in 1991. Pantry Pride became a Phar-Mor.

The mall was nearly destroyed by Hurricane Andrew in 1992. When Cutler Ridge Mall reopened the following year, none of the original Cutler Ridge Shopping Center (except Sears) remained standing. The owner, Simon DeBartolo (now Simon Property Group) declared bankruptcy in the late 1990s and ownership was transferred to Lender Ocwen Federal Bank. Jordan Marsh became an auxiliary Burdines store for a short time, but after the mall was damaged by the hurricane, Burdines consolidated to the former Jordan Marsh. The former Richard's/Burdines building was torn down for J. Luria and Sons, a local catalog showroom chain, which opened at the mall in 1994. The Luria's building later became Garden Ridge Pottery, while Dillard's took the former Mervyns which closed in 1997. Garden Ridge later closed and became smaller stores. Phar-Mor was torn down for a Kmart.

In 2002, management of the mall was assigned to T/S Development of Miami, Florida, which changed the name of the mall in November 2003 to Southland Mall. Also, the Dillard's store closed and was torn down in 2004 for Regal Cinemas in 2005, and this was also likewise done at Pompano Citi Centre where the Dillard's was also demolished. T/S Development then bought the property in November 2004, and sold their interests to Investcorp International Realty, a global investment group, in December 2006. Investcorp engaged Gumberg Asset Management Corp in Fort Lauderdale to handle the day-to-day management and leasing of Southland Mall.

Southland Mall features JCPenney and Macy's as its anchor stores. The mall also features a movie theater, LA Fitness, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Victoria's Secret, Old Navy, TJ Maxx, Buffalo Wild Wings, and Ulta. Additional businesses on the mall property include Ross Dress for Less, SunTrust, Olive Garden, Applebee's, Regions Bank, Churromania, and Baby Elegant.

In 2015, Sears Holdings spun off 235 of its properties, including the Sears at Southland Mall, into Seritage Growth Properties.

On July 7, 2017, it was announced that Kmart would be closing on October 1 as part of a plan to close 43 Kmart and Sears stores nationwide.

On November 7, 2019, it was announced that Sears would be closing this location a part of a plan to close 96 stores nationwide. The store closed on February 14, 2020.

Carousel
The mall features a full-sized Italian carousel. It was purposely built, featuring imagery of New York, and operated at the Rotterdam Square Mall in Rotterdam, NY from 1988 until it was sold in January 2007.

title: Southland Mall (Miami)


text:
Peter Burling

Peter Burling may refer to:

 * Peter Burling (politician) (born 1945), American politician
 * Peter Burling (sailor) (born 1991), New Zealand sailor

title: Peter Burling


text:
User:Artsmack/sandbox

Charles Grogg (born December 4, 1966) is an American artist and photographer.

Career
"Cracked: The Art of Charles Grogg" was published by 21st Editions. It is a bound portfolio of platinum/palladium photographs for which poet John Wood wrote poems to accompany Charles Grogg's images. John Wood had selected Charles Grogg's work for the Clarence John Laughlin Award in 2010, writing that "Charles Grogg’s photographs are hauntingly beautiful. And they are strange. But they are strange in a way that most “strange” photographs are not. There is no violence, no brutality, no shock, except the shock of authentic art, that shock that forces a viewer back again and again to look at them and keeps them as fresh on the one hundredth viewing as they were on the first." .

The portfolio resides in the Boston Athenæum, The National Gallery of Art Library, The Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, among other institutions.

title: User:Artsmack/sandbox


text:
Portal:Civil engineering

Welcome to the Civil Engineering School! Part of Engineering and Technology Civil engineering is a professional engineering discipline that mostly relates to the designing, planning, maintaining and construction of subjects such as buildings, large scale workings, drainage and roads. Civil engineering has a large impact on modern society, as it dictates how lots of processes and services work together.

Topics covered within the field of Civil engineering include road design, drainage and sewer design, site layouts, structural engineering, geotechnical engineering, environmental engineering, construction engineering, and surveying.

Divisions and departments

Divisions and departments of schools exist on pages in the "Topic:" namespace. Start the name of departments with the "Topic:" prefix; departments reside in the "Topic:" namespace. Departments and divisions link to learning materials and learning and research projects. Divisions can link subdivisions or to departments. For more information on schools, divisions and departments look at the naming conventions. 🇨🇴
 * Construction Technology And Management
 * Structural Engineering
 * Geotechnical Engineering
 * Transportation Engineering
 * Water Resources Engineering
 * Environmental Engineering
 * Construction Engineering
 * Topic:Material science/Concrete technology

Active participants
The histories of Wikiversity pages indicate who the active participants are. If you are an active participant in this school, you can list your name here (this can help small schools grow and the participants communicate better; for large schools it is not needed).
 * Anbarasu VIT University (VIT-U)
 * Richardcox4
 * Deepak Ravikumar(SRM)
 * Debabrata Paul(SRM)
 * Nicholas Johnson
 * Pon Rathnavel
 * user:mahendra/mahendra
 * k.jayavijayan VIT University
 * Dhruv Singhal(Amity)

Lessons
Get to work writing lessons! Simply make a link to the name of the lesson (lessons are independent pages) and start writing!

 * Basics of Civil Engineering
 * Nonkilling Technology

Research projects
This feature of Wikiversity will be implemented later pending further discussion.

 * Hydrostatic stability (bouyancy) applied to tall structures as protection from liquifaction
 * Fourier Transforms
 * Competition for solution to the reconstruction of the New Orleans basin: conversion to a rigid plane and pole structure extending to the Gulf from the higher plateau preceding the basin.
 * Pervious concrete

Wikipedia

 * Statics
 * Civil Engineering

Open source software for civil engineering

 * Ferma - Educational CAD tool used for 2d truss analysis
 * Structural Theory Suite - Load analysis
 * Civil Engineering Estimation System
 * Code Aster Code Aster is an Open Source program for Civil and Structural Engineering finite element analysis and structural simulation

fr:Département:Génie civil ja:Topic:土木工学

title: Portal:Civil engineering


text:
James Johnston (rower)

James Johnston (born 26 August 1994) is a British rower.

Rowing career
Johnston graduated from Harvard University and began his rowing career in South Africa and rowed for them in both the 2011 and 2012 World Junior Championships. After joining Leander in 2013 he made his British junior debut the following year. He won the Prince of Wales Challenge Cup at the Henley Royal Regatta and made his Great Britain senior debut in 2017. He won a bronze medal at the 2018 World Rowing Championships in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, as part of the coxless four with Thomas Ford, Jacob Dawson and Adam Neill.

title: James Johnston (rower)


text:
The Lady of the Harem

The Lady of the Harem is a 1926 American silent adventure film directed by Raoul Walsh and written by James Elroy Flecker and James T. O'Donohoe. The film stars Ernest Torrence, William Collier Jr., Greta Nissen, Louise Fazenda, George Beranger, Sôjin Kamiyama, and Frank Leigh. The film was released on November 1, 1926, by Paramount Pictures. It also had the alternative title The Golden Voyage.

Plot
As described in a film magazine review, the gold-greedy sultan in levying taxes seizes the daughter of one of his subjects in lieu of money and carries her to his harem. The youth she loves is captured while attempting her rescue, but a friend he has made in the royal city rescues him and the girl. In turn, he is elevated to the ruling seat following the death of the tyrant.

Preservation
With no prints of The Lady of the Harem located in any film archives, it is a lost film.

title: The Lady of the Harem


text:
Air Warning Squadron 4

Air Warning Squadron 4 (AWS-4) was a United States Marine Corps aviation command and control squadron during World War II. The squadron's primary mission was to provide aerial surveillance and early warning of approaching enemy aircraft during amphibious assaults. The squadron participated in the Philippines campaign (1944–1945) in support of the Eighth Army on Mindanao. AWS-4 was decommissioned shortly after the war in October 1945. To date, no other Marine Corps squadron has carried the lineage and honors of AWS-4 to include Marine Air Control Squadron 4 (MACS-4).

Equipment

 * AN/TTQ-1 - transportable filter and operations center.
 * SCR-270 - long range early warning radar.
 * SCR-527 - medium-range early warning radar used for ground-controlled interception (GCI).
 * SCR-602 - Light-weight early warning radar to be utilized during the initial stages of an amphibious assault.

Organization and training
Air Warning Squadron 4 was commissioned on 1 November 1943, as part of Marine Air Warning Group 1 at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina.

On 16 December 1943, AWS-4 received orders to prepare to ship out to the West Coast beginning the first week of January 1944. Arriving at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California on 5 January 1944, the squadron began additional training as part of Marine Air Warning Group 2.

Hawaii
The squadron embarked upon the USS Hornet (CV-12) on 29 February and departed San Diego. Arriving at Pearl Harbor, Territory of Hawaii on 4 March it established itself at Marine Corps Air Station Ewa. The squadron's gear did not arrive until April at which point it began rigorous training in day/night fighter direction and ground controlled interception as it awaited orders to deploy. AWS-4 was the first Marine Corps squadron to receive and operate the newly fielded AN/TTQ-1 Operations Center

Los Negros and the Philippines
In November 1944, AWS-4 arrived at Los Negros in the Admiralty Islands where it established its equipment and continued training. In February 1945 planning took place for the final portion of the Philippines Campaign. The Marine Corps was tasked to provide four Marine Aircraft Groups and two air warning squadrons in support of the Eighth United States Army. AWS-3 and AWS-4 were the two squadrons tapped to fulfill this mission. It was not until April 1945 that AWS-4 departed Los Negros bound for the Southern Philippines. The squadron landed on Mindanao and quickly established itself at Moret Field operating as the 76th Fighter Control Center. AWS-4 was tasked with providing direction finding for lost aircraft, early warning, additional air to ground communications links and additional fighter direction nets.

Return home and decommissioning
AWS-4 departed the Philippines in early August 1945 bound for Hawaii. Arriving at Marine Corps Air Station Ewa on 19 August, the squadron began turning in all of its equipment. Remaining personnel embarked on the USS Ticonderoga (CV-14) on 30 September for transportation back to the United States. The squadron arrived at Naval Air Station Alameda on 5 October with follow on transportation to Marine Corps Air Station Miramar. The squadron was decommissioned on 31 October 1945, on the authority of Chief of Naval Operations Dispatch 242216, October 1945 and Marine Fleet Air, West Coast General Order #144-45.

Commanding officers

 * 1stLt John D. Taylor - 1 November 1943 – 11 November 1943
 * Capt John M. Von Almen - 12 November 1943 – 14 November 1944
 * Capt Charles T. Porter 15 November 1944 – 14 August 1945
 * Capt John C. Adams - 15 August 1945 – 20 August 1945
 * Maj Freeman R. Cass. - 21 August 1945 – 26 October 1945
 * WO R.E. Lesher - 27 October 1945 – 31 October 1945

Unit awards
A unit citation or commendation is an award bestowed upon an organization for the action cited. Members of the unit who participated in said actions are allowed to wear on their uniforms the awarded unit citation. What follows is an incomplete list of the awards AWS-4 has been presented with:

title: Air Warning Squadron 4


text:
Borisovka, Yegoryevsky District, Altai Krai

Borisovka (Борисовка) is a rural locality (a selo) in Kruglo-Sementsovsky Selsoviet, Yegoryevsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 200 as of 2013. There are 3 streets.

Geography
Borisovka is located 26 km south of Novoyegoryevskoye (the district's administrative centre) by road. Shubinka is the nearest rural locality.