text:
2016 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Gråbergs Gråa Sång and MjolnirPants - if you concur with Version 2, as you have seemed to indicate, please note with a !vote in the Survey section. We have found this is an extremely delicate article and all changes have to occur by the book. Right now there is not a consensus to adopt Version 2, in my opinion, if someone were simply tabulating !votes in the survey section of this RfC. While we would hope someone would not do that, it is best if every i is dotted and t is crossed so that no door is left ajar for future challenge. LavaBaron (talk) 08:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frank Gaffney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150929040240/http://chicago.suntimes.com/other-views/7/71/823005/gop-presidential-candidates-will-appear-alongside-disgraced-conspiracy-theorist-john-guandolo to http://chicago.suntimes.com/other-views/7/71/823005/gop-presidential-candidates-will-appear-alongside-disgraced-conspiracy-theorist-john-guandolo
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708200632/http://author.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev012406a.cfm to http://author.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev012406a.cfm

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Jeff Sessions attorney general hearing
Senator Blumenthal queried about Mr.Gaffney. Wikipietime (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Chicago Sun-Times
is correct: This Chicago Sun-Times source appears to be an opinion piece, and is should not be cited without in-text attribution. It is designated by the newspaper as "Other Views" which contains only opinion pieces. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 05:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:Frank Gaffney/Archive 1


text:
nonassignable

Adjective

 * 1) That cannot be assigned to another.
 * a nonassignable annuity
 * 1)  That cannot be assigned to.
 * Constants, unlike variables, are nonassignable.

title: nonassignable


text:
User:Sepseyedi

Links to userfied pages
 * User:Sepseyedi/Mobile agency
 * User:Sepseyedi/Plastic. The Mobile Agency

title: User:Sepseyedi


text:
Listed buildings in Stretton, Cheshire West and Chester

Stretton is a civil parish in Cheshire West and Chester, England. It contains seven listed buildings that are recorded in the National Heritage List for England. Of these, two are listed at Grade II*, the middle of the three grades, and the others are at Grade II, the lowest grade. The listed buildings consist of a country house and its garden wall, a smaller house, a farmhouse and associated barn, and a watermill that has been converted into a museum with its associated former stable.


text:
List of protected heritage sites in Walcourt

This table shows an overview of the protected heritage sites in the Walloon town Walcourt. This list is part of Belgium's national heritage.

 * }


text:
User:Mcasa-mongolia/sandbox

= Nandin-Erdene Budzagd =

Nandin-Erdene Budzagd (Mongolian: Будзагдын Нандин-Эрдэнэ) is a Mongolian contemporary artist known for her collage works.

Solo shows
2016     Me and Table, National Modern Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2015     Prohibited Hand, Zanabazar Museum of Fine Arts, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2010     Lost Government, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Mirror, café de France, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Collage & Collision, Amsterdam Cafe, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Group shows
2019    Jeju International Experimental Arts Festival, Tamnara Republic Art Space, Jeju Island, South Korea

2019     Infini, Space Zero Gallery, Tokyo, Japan

2019     The Studio, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2018     Exhibition, 175 Gallery, Seoul, South Korea

2018     New Wight, International Biennial-2018, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

2018     International Perforated Project, Buffalo Bridge Gallery, Bangkok, Thailand

2017     55th International Art Exhibition, Busan, South Korea

2017     International Art Fair-6th, Fine Art Association of Busan, South Korea

2017     Contemporary Asian Women Artists-3, Jeonju, South Korea

2017     Tropical Lab, Art Gallery of Lasalle art College, Singapore

2016     New Wave, Busan, South Korea

2016     Daejeon International Art Show, Daejeon, South Korea

2015     Do Not Do It, Red Ger Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2014     Fukuoka Asian Art Triennial, Fukuoka, Japan

2013     Contemporary Art of Mongolia, Art Space 976+, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2013     Delights of the World, Art Space 976+, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2012     Urban Narratives, Schoeni Art Gallery, Hong Kong

2012     Water, National Modern Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2012     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2012     Autumn, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2012     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2011     Time To Stop, Teo+Namfah, Gossip Gallery, Bangkok, Thailand

2012     Time To Stop, Teo+Namfah Gallery, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

2012     A Celebration of Contemporary Mongolian Art and Culture, San Francisco, USA

2012     Modern Mongolia: From Steppe to Urban Dynamics, Hanart TZ Gallery, Hong Kong

2012     Autumn, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2012     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2010     From Imagination to Creation, Modern Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2010     Time and Space, Museum of Contemporary Arts, Jeju Island, South Korea

2010     Contemporary Arts, Xanadu Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2010     Autumn, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2010     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     New Works, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Autumn, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Ulaanbaatar-370, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Children’s Day, Khan Bank Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2009     Golden Brush, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2008     New Works, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2008     Opening Art Studio, Art Gallery of 5+…Art group, Mongolia

2008     Santa Fe 2008, Art Fair, USA

2008     Nude, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2008     Spring, Art Gallery of UMA Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2008     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2008     Vaqcin, Khan Bank Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2007     Art Singapore 2007, Art Fair, Singapore

2007     The Best Artworks of the Year, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2007     Asian Young Artists, Teo+Namfah Gallery, Bangkok, Thailand

2007     Women Artists, Art Gallery of UMA, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2006     The Best Artworks of the Year National Modern Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2006     Modern Art, Xanady Art Gallery, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2006     Art Expo NewYork 2006, New York, USA

2006     Art Expo, Miami 2006, Miami, USA

2006     Silk Road Festivities, Chicago, USA

2006     Puro Arte, Vigo, Spain

title: User:Mcasa-mongolia/sandbox


text: User:Briilcrockett/A Sojourn in the City of Amalgamation, in the Year of Our Lord, 19--/Bibliography


text:
Talk:Neale Fraser

Triple Crown achievement
This significant achievement focuses on the fact that he is the last man to achieve the triple crown in GS tournaments. It does not state that he is only one of three men to achieve this (Tilden and Sedgman being the others). Not sure about this but is he the second to Tilden for most Championships in each discipline for male players (2+)? Antipodenz (talk) 07:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Neale Fraser


text:
caritas

Etymology
From.

Noun

 * 1) dearness
 * 2) costliness, high price
 * 3) charity, the attitude of kindness and understanding towards others
 * 4) regard, esteem, affection, love
 * 5) lack of something, deficiency

title: caritas


text:
Solid state physics/Notes

This page is intended to start as notes from various physical textbooks and sources listed below augmented by notes and links to resources around the net as well as Wikipedia, Wikibooks and other places within Wikiversity. It is an experimental attempt to master chaos and attract interesting participation from others interested but ignorant (as I am) of the subject matter.

As sections become complete enough and different enough from other sources the material may be migrated to proper wikibooks and/or lesson plans as/if appropriate and links substituted under goals as in lesson plan. Perhaps this will evolve a useful learning trail for self and others.

Notes added here much be at minimum paraphrased (put in own personal wording) or factual so as to avoid copyright infringement and establish our copyleft rights. Diagrams, tables, pictures, etc. must all be uniquely owned and submitted or rights established as per Wikimedia Foundation projects standard procedures. Very helpful to be logged in so an audit trail is automatically maintained and others can seek clarification or provide notification of correction of percieved errors.

Applcable local links:
 * http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Topic:Condensed_Matter_Physics

Notes Bullet History

 * Crystals: When crystals are grown from constant conditions (saturated fluid, constant temperature, et.) they grow by adding identical blocks. This was known and supported in the 18th century by the fact that crystalline faces all provide the same integral index numbers.  This could be accounted for only by periodic arrays of identical building blocks.  This was conclusively demonstrated via x-ray diffraction as described below.

 * X-Ray Diffraction: "Interference Effects with Rontgen Rays" in 1912 provided a basis to launch Solid State Physics (which is now a subset of the larger field of Condensed Matter Physics  In the first half of the paper Laue presented a theory that x-rays could be diffracted by periodic arrays of atoms.  In the second half of the paper Friedrick and Knipping presented the first experimental data and analysis results using x-rays shined through crystals to support the diffraction theory.

 * Condensed Matter: Armed with x-ray diffraction and proven theory of periodic arrays of atoms in at least some solid matter, (ionic crystals), intensive studies of condensed matter has now expanded to amorphous (non crystalline) solids, liquids, and glasses.  ^2 p.3.

 * Nanotech: Nanotech requirements for knowledge of behavior of molecular machinery, feedstocks, and surrounding matter will obviously be driving this field.   Add links to computational tools and interesting nanotech science liberally to help update the material to be useful to modern students of science and technology.

 * Query: Can an AWACs style molecular machine be developed that can communicate with other molecular machines/computers in assembly environment?   Perhaps miniturize the conceptual and implementation approach of U.S. DODs battlesphere to provide QC/QA or construction management for macroscopic projects nanotech has under construction?

Unit Cells

Reference ^1 has a good treatment of unit cells in Metals. Reference ^2 has a generic treatment of general crystalline unit cells in preparation of general mathematical treatment of generic methods.

^References 1. Engineering Materials and Their Applications, Flinn and Trojan, ISBN 0-395-29645-5, LOCCCN 80-82840. 2. Introduction to Solid State Physics, Kittel, ISBN 0-471-87474-4, LOCCCN 75-25963

title: Solid state physics/Notes


text:
Acacia barakulensis

Acacia barakulensis, commonly known as waajie wattle, is a shrub belonging to the genus Acacia and the subgenus Juliflorae that is native to north eastern Australia.

Description
The shrub typically grows to a height of 2 m and has sparsely haired, resinous and ribbed branchlets. Like most species of Acacia, it has phyllodes rather than true leaves. The crowded, erect, and evergreen phyllodes are sometimes subverticillate, terete and straight with a length of 10 to 28 mm and a thickness of 0.6 to 1 mm with an inconspicuous yellowish nerve on adaxial surfaces. It blooms between August and September producing yellow coloured flowers. The simple inflorescences simple that occur singly in the nodes with spherical flower-heads with a diameter of around 9 mm containing 20 to 35 flowers. After flowering chartaceous, brown seed pods form with a linear shape form. The pods are straight and slightly contacted between the seeds with a length of 40 mm and a width of 4 mm and have prominent marginal nerves. The brown-colored seeds are arranged longitudinally in the pods and have a length of 3.7 to 4.2 mm with a clavate aril.

Taxonomy
The shrub belongs to the Acacia johnsonii group and is most closely related to Acacia burbidgeae.

Distribution
It is endemic to a small area to the north of Chinchilla within the Barakula State Forest, where it grows in sandy or pale loamy-sandy soils over sandstone as a part of Eucalyptus woodland communities. It is found in a similar habitat as Acacia gittinsii consisting of tall shrubland or shrubby woodland with other species of Acacia as well as Eucalyptus tenuipes, Corymbia trachyphloia and Triodia mitchellii.

title: Acacia barakulensis


text:
User:JBogdan

If you have anything you want to say you may mention it on my talk page.

Other userboxes I should add later (if they exist!): this user is a member of Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia, and Wikibooks. This user recycles and frequently drives 55mph to conserve gasoline. This user does not have a TV and enjoys not having it.

Regarding footnotes and HTML embedded links: If I use embedded HTML links, it is only due to my wiki-laziness--Footnotes are better and I already know it, especially because they still show up when a page is printed.

If you want to reach me faster, try my talk page on Wikipedia: w:User:JBogdan

I am also JBogdan there.

title: User:JBogdan


text:
Gothic/Phonology

<< Gothic

Strong Nouns This is the strong noun A-Stem section, there are other kinds of strong nouns but we will deal with those later.

Masculine A-Stem Nouns Gothic has strong and weak nouns (along with strong and weak adjectives!). There are many stems or different declensions within each class of nouns. Here I will show you a-stem nouns. There are three genders in Gothic: masculine, feminine, neuter. These are not always sex-based as in English.

Now onto the masculine article (definite). Gothic has no indefinite article (a, an) but only a definite (the) which has masculine, feminine, and neuter forms.

For a while here I'm going to be basically throwing you a lot of tables. But here I'll explain the cases: Nominative: marks the subject of the sentence Accusative: marks the direct object of the sentence Genitive: marks possession Dative: marks the indirect object of a sentence.

title: Gothic/Phonology


text:
General Biology/Tissues and Systems/Muscle Tissue

=Muscle tissue =

Mesodermal in origin, muscle has several functions: supply force for movement, restrain movement, proper posture, act on viscera (internal organs) for peristalsis (moving food down digestive tract), give body shape, form sphincters, (such as in esophagus, between stomach and intestine, large and small intestine, in anus), in sheets of muscles, affect air flow in and out of lungs, line blood vessels and play vital role in circulation.

Secondary roles: heat production (shivering a specialized heat production to supplement metabolism).

Muscles co-opted to other non-original functions: sharks detect electrical field created by fish muscles. Some fish formed electric organs, create current strong enough to repel predators or stun prey. Other fish can use field as “radar” to see things and communicate with other animals. (Evolved independently in different groups).

Different classifications: by color, (red or white) location, nature of nervous system control (voluntary or involuntary), embryonic origin, or by general microscopic appearance (striated, smooth, and cardiac.)

Striated muscle (or skeletal muscle): under voluntary control. Individual cells called fibers, grouped into fascicle. Myofibrils founding one cell made of even smaller myofilaments. Each striated cell very long and multi-nucleated. Fibers joined end to end to form longer composite fibers. Sarcomeres: repeating units make up myofibrils. Two kinds of myofilaments, thick kind made up of myosin and thin of actin. Striations visible in light microscope, smaller part only with electron microscope.

Cardiac muscle: occurs only in heart. Light banding visible under light microscope. Each band short, principally mononucleate (occasionally dinucleate) often branched, joined together with intercollated discs. Involuntary. Waves of contraction spread through intercollated discs. Initiated by nerve stimulation or can originate in the heart itself (useful in heart transplants.)

Smooth muscle: no striations visible with light microscope. Almost entirely visceral function: digestion, sphincters, urogenital tracts, piloerectory muscles (make hairs stand up), lungs. Non-voluntary control. Slow and sustained action. Each cell mononucleate, short, fusiform (spindly) in shape, cells usually uniform in size.

Striated muscle contraction: Muscle broken into units called fascicles, in units of myofibrils. Repeating units called sarcomeres, consisting of two kinds of myofilaments: 1. thick, myosin filament 2. thin, actin filament.

Sarcomere: Thick and thin filaments interspersed in ordered grid.

Sliding filament theory: thick and thin filaments move past each other in opposite direction, shortening length. Longer muscles contract more rapidly than short ones (see cell bio for details).

Myosin molecule: two polypeptides twisted together with two globular heads at end.

Myosin filament: many slender myosin molecules together.

Actin filament: chain of actin single, tropomyosin strands with repeated globular troponin, and with actin. All play role in muscle contraction. Myocin heads have sites that bind to actin. Actin filaments have many regular sites that can bind to myosin.

Troponin has four sites: 1. one to bind myosin 2. one for actin 3. one for tropomyocin 4. one for calcium ions

Nerve signal reaches muscle, triggers release of chemical signal called neurotransmitter, that diffuses across cell membrane (sarcolimic reticulum) and binds to receptors in it. Receptor is acetylcholine, ACH. When there is enough nerve signal, the message travels through t-line to sarcoplasmic reticulum to release calcium ions.

Lacking calcium, tropomyosin site blocked. In calcium, myosin binding sites exposed and heads bind to actin molecules, delivering force to move fibers in relation to each other. Myocin head then interacts with ATP to get “recocked”, if myosin still exposed then it fires again and results in further muscle contration. If there is no further nerve signal, sarcoplasmic reticulum sequesters Ca+ ions again and no recocking occurs.

Quirari (or curare): known from movies, used in South America, blocks acetylcholine receptors in cell and causes skeletal paralysis. Victim dies of asphyxiation because he can’t breathe.

Duchenne's muscular dystrophy: degeneration of sarcolema, plasma membrane of muscle cell unable to release signal and quickly atrophies.

Fast and slow twitch fibers: vertebrate muscle fiber. Terms relative within one group of animals. Differences related to differences in enervation, type of myocin, and actin activation.

Two parts of force generated by muscle: 1. active component 2. elastic component (energy stored in muscle when stretched by gravity or another force. Stored in muscle elastic tissue around tendons. Especially important in limb oscillation, like running, or trunk twisting, like fish swimming. Up to 90% of stored elastic energy can be recovered.)

How does a muscle match its power to its job? Two ways: 1. rate modulation, derived from frequency of nervous stimulation of muscle, force increases as frequency of stimulation increases up to point of tetanus. 2. selective involvement of motor units, a given neuron enervates a fixed number of muscle cells, (a motor unit), and force is increased by recruiting more motor units. Motor units may be small, such as in eye, or larger, like in leg muscle.

How do muscles grow stronger? 1. add more myofilaments, increases cross sectional area by up to 50%, more little ratchets working 2. proliferation in blood vessels and connective tissue around muscle

Muscle strength is relative to cross sectional area, not length. Not always feasible to add more cross sectional area.

Pinnate fibers: oriented obliquely (Y-shaped) to minimize muscle mass, in certain circumstances, like calf muscle. Spreads muscle out.

Velocity of shortening greater in long muscle than short. Why? Contraction tied to relation between fibers, and to total length of muscle. Both long and short muscles reach same percentage of contraction in same unit time, but distance covered by the longer muscle is greater.

Synergist muscles: muscles work together to produce motion in same general direction. Bicep shares work with brachialis.

Antagonist muscles: muscles that oppose each other. Bicep pulls forearm in, triceps pulls it back out.

Origin vs. insertion: origin is the end of the muscle that more fixed in its attachment to the body. The more movable end called insertion.

Fixators: muscles that act to stabilize a joint or lever system. Like upper arm when you clench your fist hard.

Flexors and extensors: applied mainly to limbs. Flexor bends one part relative to another about limb, extensor straightens it.

Adductor and abductor: adductor draws a limb toward the ventral surface. Abductor moves limb away from ventral surface. (Adduct: drawn toward; abduct: carry away).


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYNA

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

MYNA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a very promotional article, which gives no indication that the subject meets GNG or MUSIC criteria. Nothing has charted, only a small Soundcloud following. It has been tagged for Notability since 3 September, so there has been plenty of opportunity to improve it if the material was there. Gronk Oz (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gronk Oz (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MUSICBIO. OhKayeSierra (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. No clear primary topic. Barca (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NMUSIC, and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYNA


text:
Talk:Security, surveillance and law enforcement

Glad to see this is moving forward! I have been working with the School of Fire and Emergency Management. Let me know if I can help with any of this or if there are some projects we can collaborate on. Looks Great!--Mfinney 15:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

I am interested in creating a School of Computer Science course entitled "Introduction to Computer Forensics." This field deals heavily in both Computer Science and Criminal Justice, and I was wondering whether I should cross-list the course under the School of Security, Surveillance and Law Enforcement in addition to the School of Computer Science, and if so, what the course number here would be? (Obviously, somebody has the courses fairly laid out so far, what with all the broken links to course numbers, and I would like to stay in keeping with that procedure.)Soulaegis 04:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

School of War
I believe a great idea would be to add some courses about War, Strategy, Basic training, War History, Psychological warfare, Military logistics, Spying, Special Forces..., and such. As currently, I am working on some other projects it will take me some time to get into swing and recruit some members to help. However, if you are reading this and interested to start it earlier that would be a great help. And as I understand it would preferably be if we get some one from WestPoint Military Academy or a similar institution to contribute a course list and maybe a reading list for starters.

--<IP_ADDRESS> 21:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Any number of the world's armed forces will happily give you a free education, textbooks included. Just sign here... --Dhodges 15:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Image
Just so you know, I've uploaded your image from wikibooks. --Draicone (talk) 06:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


text:
Template:Strategic studies/Topic

=Online Reading Material=

Wikimedia Articles

 * This
 * That

Primary Texts

 * This
 * That

Commentaries and Articles

 * This
 * That

Biographical Works

 * This
 * That

=Offline Reading Material=

Primary Texts

 * This
 * That

Commentaries and Articles

 * This
 * That

Biographical Works

 * This
 * That

title: Template:Strategic studies/Topic


text:
Anna Westberg

Anna Westberg (14 September 1946 – 26 October 2005) was a Swedish journalist, novelist and non-fiction writer. She grew up in Ovansjö socken in Gästrikland. She made her literary debut in 1978, with the novel Paradisets döttrar. She co-edited the two-volume Kvinnornas litteraturhistoria from 1981/1983. She was awarded the Dobloug Prize in 1992.

title: Anna Westberg


text:
United States Government/Ratification

Introduction
The Constitution required ratification by nine states in order to come into effect. The fight for ratification was long and difficult. An important factor in ratifying the constitution was that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention required that ratification be done by special ratifying conventions, not by state legislature. Being interested in retaining state powers, the states would understandably have been resistant to ratifying a new, stronger central government.

Federalists versus Anti- Federalists
Those who favored ratification were known as Federalists,while those who opposed it were considered Anti- Federalists.

The Federalists attacked the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. They acknowledged that the Constitution was not perfect, but they said that it was much better than any other proposal then made.

Three Federalists- Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay- wrote a series of essays called The Federalist Papers. The essays explained the constitution and defended its provisions. The documents were intended for the state of New York, though people from across the country read them.

The Federalists defended the weakest point of the Constitution- a lack of a Bill of Rights- by suggesting that current protections were sufficient and that the Congress could always propose Amendments.

Anti- Federalists such as Patrick Henry attacked the Constitution, suggesting that it would lead to a dangerously powerful national government. The Anti- Federalist arguments relating to the Bill of Rights were especially powerful. However, many were convinced by the assurances provided by the Federalists.

State Conventions
Each state was to hold a convention to debate the Constitution and ratify or reject it. The Constitution was proposed in September, 1787. By the end of the year, some states that were in favor of the document ratified. Delaware's convention approved it by a vote of 30- 0; Pennsylvania's by a vote of 46- 23; New Jersey's by a vote of 38- 0. The next year, Georgia ratified by a vote of 26- 0 and Connecticut followed with a vote of 128- 40.

The Federalists were already more than halfway to the nine-state margin. However, the states that did not ratify the Constitution in that year included the extremely important states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. Massachusetts ratified the document by a close margin (187- 168) in February, 1788. Maryland followed with a 63- 11 vote, and South Carolina did not legend for the same with a 149- 73 vote. Then, New Hampshire provided the all-important ninth ratification by a 57- 47 vote.

The United States was established under the new Constitution, but the important commercial state of New York and the populous state of Virginia, among others, still did not ratify. After tough battles, these states also ratified, Virginia by a 89- 79 margin and New York with 30- 27.

The Bill of Rights was then created under the new Constitution, leading to North Carolina's ratification by a vote of 194- 77. Seeing itself alone, Rhode Island finally agreed to ratify with a 34- 32 vote.

All thirteen colonies had ratified the Constitution by May, 1790.

title: United States Government/Ratification


text:
Al-Khansaa Brigade

The Al-Khansaa Brigade (لواء الخنساء) was an all-women police or religious enforcement unit of the jihadist group Islamic State (IS), operating in its de facto capital of Raqqa and Mosul.

History
Formed in 2014 and initially consisting of around sixty women, the brigade was used to enforce Sharia law, mainly in IS-occupied Raqqa and Mosul, but also in refugee camps as IS territory collapsed. The group was probably named after Al-Khansa, a female Arabic poet from the earliest days of Islam. It was unique in the Muslim world as, in other regimes with similar systems of religious police (such as Saudi Arabia), only men are permitted to enforce hisbah among women.

After initially being set up to enable men disguised as women to be identified through searches at checkpoints, the group's role was expanded to police and punish women according to IS regulations, with the size of the group expanding to include 1000 women. An IS official, Abu Ahmad, said in 2014, "We have established the brigade to raise awareness of our religion among women, and to punish women who do not abide by the law." The outfit has also been called IS's 'moral police'.

Women who went out without a male chaperone or were not fully covered in public were subject to arrests and beatings by Al-Khansaa. An example of crimes punished and sentences administered by al-Khansaa were those for two women in Raqqa in 2015, who received 20 lashes for wearing form-fitting abayas, five for wearing makeup underneath their abayas, and another five for "not being meek enough when detained".

The brigade had its own facilities to enforce sex segregation. Its members were aged between 18 and 25, receiving a monthly salary of LS 25,000. According to defectors interviewed by Sky News, al-Khansa Brigade included many foreign women, and recruits were "trained for a month". Their pay is estimated to be "between £70 and £100 [ STG ] per month". According to one source hostile to IS, women were not allowed to drive cars or carry weapons, but women in the Khansaa Brigade "can do both".

In April 2017 the group released a recruitment video for female hackers claiming to have hacked over 100 social media accounts over the previous month. According to Iraqi News, in 2017 Al-Khansaa members were used as snipers to defend IS-held Mosul against assaults by Iraq's security forces. Though IS has not held any territory since 2019, there have been reports of the group's members infiltrating refugee camps in Iraq, with some of these reports having come as late as 2021.

Activities
The Brigade has been known for their brutal violence against women. They oversee brothels of enslaved Yazidi women and search women at checkpoints.

The Al-Khansaa Brigade is instrumental in disseminating ISIS propaganda and recruiting foreign militants.

title: Al-Khansaa Brigade


text:
Talk:Jeypore Estate

Paid British Bots are running this page
Wikipedia is sold out to frauds. Two users named Rexxs and Regentspark are running this page and I suspect they are looking for bribes. They removed Prince Vishweshvar's 'Maharajah of Jeypore' saying its unconstitutional as the Indian government abolished all titles. However, when it comes to other wiki pages like Padmanabh Singh and Muhammed Abdul Ali mentioning them as kings, maharajahs and prince, they deleted my questions and blocked my username for harrasment. They will delete this as well, but I will continue posting this message with other usernames and IP addresses until this issue is clarified. This online bullying of money swindlers should not run for long. Wikipedia must immediately block these so called admins cum cheap swindlers. I am going to post this in the talk page of every wiki admin. Rules should be the same for everyone, just because some royals throw a few pennies at jobless admins, they ignore their pages and let them use titles. Hattershush (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I've never edited either Padmanabh Singh or Muhammed Abdul Ali], liar.
 * This encyclopedia is not the place for hagiographers to puff up the status of titular maharajahs whose titles were abolished by the Indian government years ago. If you're so keen to meet me, please feel free to drop in to the next Manchester meetup (when we're able to have one) and I'll be happy to explain to you in person why you're mistaken about my reasons for upholding the integrity of Wikipedia. You can do that politely or otherwise – either is fine with me: your choice. --RexxS (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Where do I sign up to be one of these paid British bots? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Where do I sign up to be one of these paid British bots? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Kalinga
Shouldn't this be a part of the Kalinga article? Much of the history predates Jeypore and is the history of the larger region. Perhaps move this to History of Kalinga otherwise much of the pre 1637 content will need to go. --regentspark (comment) 21:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Inaccurate
This article is inaccurate from beginning till end. The Jeypore Samasthanam kings are Kshatriya not Rajputs. The source cited is the only book that says so. Therefore, it can’t be trusted. The paragraph of Bissam-Cuttak is trivial and it would be better if you could remove the protection from this article. I’d like to add some facts to it.Hattershush (talk) 22:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You can suggest changes to the article here on the talk page and, assuming that they are reliably sourced and in line with our WP:Policies and guidelines, someone will make the change for you. Make sure your suggestions are clear (as in "remove xxxx text from the article because of yyyy reason" or "add the following text to xyz section") and include sources. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * All of the content of Wikipedia is based on sourcing. Where a relevant claim is made in a reliable source, our article will generally report it. If you assert that isn't a reliable source, you will need to find other reliable sources that make that point. Alternatively, if you believe that the information cited to Schnepel is inaccurate, then please quote the reliable sources that you consulted to form that opinion. If you think that your opinion about a book being untrustworthy because "it's only one book" carries any weight, please think again; we don't judge the content of books by an editor's opinion. When you've found reliable sources that back up what you're proposing, you'll be in a position to suggest changes. Before you start searching, please note that on Wikipedia the consensus (not just my opinion) is that sources belonging to the Raj era are generally unreliable, and you'll need some modern scholarship to make your case. --RexxS (talk) 23:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * All of the content of Wikipedia is based on sourcing. Where a relevant claim is made in a reliable source, our article will generally report it. If you assert that isn't a reliable source, you will need to find other reliable sources that make that point. Alternatively, if you believe that the information cited to Schnepel is inaccurate, then please quote the reliable sources that you consulted to form that opinion. If you think that your opinion about a book being untrustworthy because "it's only one book" carries any weight, please think again; we don't judge the content of books by an editor's opinion. When you've found reliable sources that back up what you're proposing, you'll be in a position to suggest changes. Before you start searching, please note that on Wikipedia the consensus (not just my opinion) is that sources belonging to the Raj era are generally unreliable, and you'll need some modern scholarship to make your case. --RexxS (talk) 23:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

I would still suggest removing the lock because there are some minor changes that must be made. Also, I am not doubting Schepnel’s work but there are a lot of things that are completely incorrect. For example, the book mentions the royal family as Rajputs but in reality they are Kshatriyas of Indo-Aryan lineage. In other words, it’s like tracing your Queen’s lineage with the Han Dynasty of China. The article edited by some Sitush is intentionally degrading the main component of the article viz the Suryavansh dynasty. For eg. Last paragraph under History is insignificant however there was a tiny rebellion and he felt it important to add it in the article.

In more than three places, he has mentioned it as a “little kingdom” although they covered an area of 26,000km2 also mentioned by him. So I don’t really get why admins are so keen on the editing and locking this article. Hattershush (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

 * The article is locked because there have been too many promotional edits, sockpuppets, people with a conflict of interest etc editing the thing in outright defiance (not mere ignorance) of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You are demonstrating a rather similar attitude, unfortunately. For what it is worth, I have said somewhere recently that we probably could do with an article about the historiographic meaning of little kingdom, little king etc. It has nothing to do with the square miles/kilometres/feet ruled and everything to do with the relationship between various kingdoms and "their people" in a region. That you do not know this suggests to me that you haven't actually read any of the the Schepnel sources because it is explained to some degree in those. - Sitush (talk) 01:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * To add further to the "little kingdom" point, Nicholas Dirks wrote an entire book about them - The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ISBN 978-0-521-05372-3 - and he and Schepnel are not the only historians to have used the term. - Sitush (talk) 01:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Washbrook (see ) notes of little kingdoms that Inside community institutions - temple sects, lineage-based 'little kingdoms', mirasi villages - relationships between privilege and responsibility and between the appropriation of surplus and its reinvestment in production can be seen to have been close. The power of the 'little king' was in many ways transmitted and legitimated through the 'gifts' he bestowed on his favoured subjects In many ways, judging by some of the screams of protest that emerged in June from people claiming to be tribals from the Jeypore area, the successors to the royal dynasty of Jeypore continue that tradition of careful distribution of largesse. - Sitush (talk) 02:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Linking citation title to full text
I've now restored the link from the citation title to a full text version of this citation in Further reading for the third time: In separate edits, first removed the link from the citation title completely; then removed the link to a full text version and substituted a link to an abstract; then repeated the action. Each time that I've attempted to make the link to the full text version at http://www.fupress.net/index.php/rss/article/view/9116/8896 it has been reverted and a link made to an abstract. --RexxS (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a link to an interstitial download page. Using the DOI link is more stable and provides the abstract at a glance, which is the standard way to link to papers.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No, that's a link to a page that embeds the pdf directly into the page for anyone having a plugin that handles pdfs. It also provides a download link for the full text for those whose browsers don't render the pdf. The standard way to link from a citation title is to give the reader the full text where it is available, not just the abstract. In my version, the abstract remains available immediately from the doi for those who wish to use the doi.
 * If you wish to add the redundant s2cid, then I have no objection as long as you don't remove the link from the citation title to the full text. Similarly, this is in a Further reading section, so it needs the none to avoid harvard error false positives for editors using Ucucha's script. I hope you can respect that. --RexxS (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content
has twice removed reliably-sourced content,. The second one was after having received a DS/PIA alert. They are also intent on emphasising the non-existent "Maharajah of Jeypore". as I've already reverted the original edits, I don't feel comfortable applying a sanction, so would you be kind enough when you get a chance to review their contributions and take whatever action you think appropriate, please? --RexxS (talk) 14:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Unexplained reverting

 * the reason I gave was sock puppetry. Sock edits can be reverted without review. (And, you should read WP:SOCK asap) --RegentsPark (comment) 13:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Struck through yet another sock's comment. Doug Weller  talk 12:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Recent additions reverted
(Moved from User talk:RegentsPark)

May I know why has my entire work has been reverted when I have provided a plenty of sources as per the guidelines of Wikipedia ?

Please respond before I file a complaint for unexplained reverting. Rodotype (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

 * The explanation is in the edit summary. In your edit, you removed the "mythical" attribute and the "claimed belonging" to the suryavansh kingdom. Since that kingdom is mythical, you cannot make definitive statements about it. Also, the cite you provide says nothing about the fabled Ujjain king. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The Kingdom of Jeypore is not the Suryavansh dynasty so The kingdom was ruled by a dynasty who claimed to belong to the mythical Suryavansh dynasty and hence have been referred to as the Jeypore Suryavanshis. is more accurate. The lilavati stuff is unsourced. Schnepel uses "so called" in relation to Jeypore ant the Suryavanshis. You've removed Schepel's statement that Cuttack was independent of Jeypore. I'm sorry, but I can't selectively revert your edits so if you could add them piecemeal, that would be helpful. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Coat of Arms
I've removed it. Please provide a reliable source that this was the actual coat of arms if you want to reinstate the image. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Why is Indian Rajput not reliable ?
(Note: moved from User talk:RegentsPark)

I need an explanation on why Indian Rajputs is not a reliable website ? Which policy of Wikipedia does it breach ? It is used by numerous pages and no administrator has removed it. Therefore, if you can’t provide a proper explanation then I will have to file a complaint against you for continuously removing sources from one particular page as per your own wishes. RudolphHitz (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Indian rajputs is a fan site and the information on it is not verifiable. If you think otherwise, please post a question at WP:RSN. Generally, you should use academic sources for historical content (see WP:HISTRS). Also, please use article talk pages for content related comments so that others can see the discussion. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the other reference, http://kingdomofjeypore.in, is not reliable either. Please read WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:HISTRS carefully. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Coat of Arms
I've removed the coat of arms that someone added to the article. Please note that everything (emphasis added) on the page must be supported by reliable sources. "Own work" coat of arms is definitely not sourced. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Princely State or Zamindari ?
Hi, While I have done edit to mention Jeypore as princely state There seems to be different sources claiming different status for Jeypore as princely state or zamindari at time of independence.

some claim to be princely state as under :-

1. 2. 3 4

while other indicate it was a zamindari

1. 2 3.

Going into depth I feel it seems status of State was reduced to status of Zamindari in between by British, most probably after 1880 but not sure of exact dates. These are some sources I found.

Accordingly, I welcome other editors to do needed changes citing RS.

Thanks Jethwarp (talk) 04:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jethwarp,

Actually, it was made a zamindari in 1777 when the British defeated them (as mentioned in Gazetteers) but later in 1930s it’s status was promoted and was made into a princely state (as mentioned in modern sources like Accessions List, India & Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences and other government websites).

I hope that helps. Odiahistory (talk) 09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 * I am not sure some legal cases after independence mention as zamindari, ( cited above ) other older sources mention as State, needs research Jethwarp (talk) 10:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I don’t think legal cases can be considered as primary sources. The task of a legal case is to focus on the legal issue rather than the status of the zamindari/princely state. Most of the sources that you mentioned are primary and reliable sources, like books and government websites, which have also correctly stated the status of Jeypore’s neighbouring zamindaris and states.

Even I have seen many sources mentioning it as a princely state. I’ll try to find them and get back to you. Odiahistory (talk) 10:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 * I know legal case cant be considered as primary source, I have cited both type of sources in my opening remarks, however, it is not clear exact status on date of Independence of India. Jethwarp (talk) 10:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I found one article, seems like it was published by the government.

[]

However, it does clarify (sort of) that it was a princely state when it merged to the state of Odisha in 1950.

Page 1 - “ ……This Suryavamsi rule remained for five turbulent centuries till the princely state was annexed to the state of Odisha in 1950.”

Page 2 mentions its status in 1803 when it recently got annexed by the British - … “ The Jeypore Zamindary Estate was the largest one of the Madras Presidency. In the “Permanent Settlement” of 1803, Jeypore tribute was set at 16,000 rupees.”

Apparently, I have read about some zamindaris that had their status promoted to that of ‘princely states’. This seems to be the case here. This zamindari must have got promoted in its later years. Odiahistory (talk) 11:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I doubt it is RS as published by Indrajeet Mohanty Reader in History VD Auto College Jeypre, further in he says opposite on very 1st page (page 69) .....till abolition of estate in 1953 linking rajas with mythological Vikramadiya, regards Jethwarp (talk) 12:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 * Yes, it is a matter of debate. However, I found some other government sources and websites that mentioned it as a "state" (here ). It does not seem to be a typo because it has mentioned the neighbouring principalities like 'Parlakhemundi' as an 'estate' or zamindari ( here ). So, the government sites have mentioned Jeypore as a state several times in different pages but it is very much a matter of research. [[User:Odiahistory|Odiahistory] (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 * I have found some other sources that I previously mentioned. I am sharing it here, please have a look (pages 9 & 189),  (page 193), regards.Odiahistory (talk) 18:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 * I just checked the second link and for some reason the full sentence is not coming up. Therefore, My advice for the second link viz., is that you just type the word "princely" to see the result, you should see a sentence stating " ... Vikram Deo, the Maharajah of Jeypore (an erstwhile princely state in Orissa), the college now proivdes instruction, among others, in chemical technology and pharmacy up to the degree and postgradutae degree levels ....", regards.Odiahistory (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

It is a simple affair to ascertain whether or not an entity was a princely state. Anyone proposing that Jeypore (or anywhere else in dispute) as being a state should be requested to provide an official GOI reference, with full date in 1947 or 1948, of the signing of the Instrument of Accession to the Dominion of India. The Governor-General's notification of acceptance of same would also suffice. Equally, anyone claiming merger into the Union of India should similarly provide a reference with full date to the merger agreement in 1950 or later. Pending the provision of these references, the entity should be termed an estate (with the word zamindari, talukdari, jagir, etc, in parentheses).

The government website of Odisha itself recognises Jeypore as a princely state so there is no point of acquiring a Government certificate. If you have a problem contact the royal family via Twitter or Instagram, instead of posting nameless suggestions. MasterClass8x (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Adding Unreliable British Raj Sources
Sources dating to the era of the British Raj are unreliable and not suitable to support content in Wikipedia. MasterClass8x (talk) 11:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * As a flat statement that is not correct. I notice your recent edit has removed some more recent academic sources & left far older ones! Johnbod (talk) 13:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Even more reliable academic sources were removed on 27th September by Lancepark without any Edit Summary or reason of their removal. Even the title of the article was changed from “Kingdom of Jeypore” to “Jeypore Estate”. When there are several sources that claim Jeypore was an estate and later got promoted to a lower tier princely state. It should be changed back to “Kingdom of Jeypore” as it covers the early history when it was a kingdom. MasterClass8x (talk) 11:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Jeypore Estate
Moved from User talk:RegentsPark

May I know why have you removed my edit? I am providing a legitimate source of Raphael Rousseleau. MasterClass8x (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You've replaced "Jeypore Zamindari" with "popularly known as Jeypore Samasthanam" (unexplained change to sourced information)
 * You say "Gajapati empire finished in 1560, so how can Jeypore be tributary until 1777". However, the content you removed clearly says "that existed from the mid-15th century to 1777 CE as a tributary state of the Gajapati Empire and following its decline retained various degrees of semi-independence until it became a vassal state of the British". It does not even remotely imply that the estate was a tributary of the Gajapati empire till 1777.
 * Prince of Kashmir. I'm not going to bother with this one.
 * The "Under the present town organisation of Nandapur...." appears to be unsourced and it is unclear what the purpose of including it is.
 * You've removed a lot of sourced information with the edit summary "Wikipedia does not allow the use of colonial era (pre-independence) sources. Read WP policy". Unfortunately, most of the sources removed by you are not pre-independence and the one that is colonial is probably kosher.
 * In another edit, you removed sourced content about someone named Mayanka Devi being a claimant. In a subsequent edit, you say "Where does it say that Mayanka Devi is claimant?" (it doesn't, because you removed it).
 * These are a few examples. Much easier to revert to a clean version and I suggest you get consensus for your edits on this talk page before you try to make changes to the article going forward. --RegentsPark (comment) 20:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I will add source now, it’s Raphael Rousseleau’s book, year 2009 MasterClass8x (talk) 21:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, your additions are not good. First, you've again removed Gajapati with the same edit summary about 1777. Are you even reading my notes above? The text clearly says that the estate was first a tributary of the Gajapati kingdom and then following its decline (bolded to make it easier for you) retained various degrees of semi-independence. Also, your new additions are not kosher. Rousseleau clearly says that the Vinayak from Kashmir story is a legend, you're converting it into a fact. Your quote is mostly correct though the addition about Vikramaditya appears to be your own (I don't see it in Rousseleau's text). But, Rousseleau only describes the mound and does not associate it with Vinayak, that's your own addition. The entire quote is unnecessary. Sorry, but no. I again suggest you discuss your edits here on the talk page first. --RegentsPark (comment) 18:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Rewrite
@RexxS @RegentsPark I have rewritten the controversial sections of this article. Does the article still have issues? Witchilich (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Stop putting unsourced info or use Kalingapride.com as a source.
@DubuliRao stop putting unsourced info like Shankaravamsa. Kalingapride.com is not a source. Nabin Kumar Sahu is a reliable odia historian and the Koraput district Gazetteer by him clearly mentions that Vishwanath Dev Gajapati submitted to Govind Biddyadhar. Even more unsourced info like "This was however not an easy task for the Sultanate of Golconda as the next two kings Balaram Dev I and Yashasvan Dev continued resisting their advancement. There were a few skirmishes and battles between the two kingdoms and eventually Golconda was successful in subduing Jeypore and other hill chiefs of Kalinga." Wikipedia is not a place for writing your fantasy. Witchilich (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

title: Talk:Jeypore Estate


text:
Parabrotulidae

The Parabrotulidae, the false brotulas, are a small family of bathypelagic cusk eels that currently contains two genera. The species in this family are known from the northwest Pacific Ocean and the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Small fishes of less than 6 cm, they are not of any economic importance.

title: Parabrotulidae


text:
Aging (food)

Aging or ageing, in the context of food or beverages, is the leaving of a product over an extended period of time (often months or years) to aid in improving the flavor of the product. Aging can be done under a number of conditions, and for a number of reasons including stronger umami flavors and tenderness.

Drying
Drying of foods by leaving them in a low-humidity environment has been used as a food preservation technique for millennia. Air-dried meat such as jerky may have been some of the first preserved foods ever eaten by man. Drying also concentrates flavors in foods by removing water from them.

Fermentation
Foods may be aged to allow fermentation to occur, such as in the making of alcoholic beverages, in cheesemaking, in pickling, such as kimchi, and in meat or fish products such as fermented sausage or surströmming.

Culturing
Besides fermentation, microbial food cultures can act on food products to alter their chemical make-up and provide additional flavors. This is especially true in processes such as the making of blue cheese or aged beef.

Extraction
In the case of beverages, such as the aging of wine, beer, or whiskey, storing the beverage for extended periods of time in wooden casks allows the liquid to extract flavor compounds from the wood itself, adding to the complexity and depth of flavor. Traditional Balsamic Vinegar is aged for years in a succession of oak barrels to extract and concentrate flavors.

title: Aging (food)


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATAv

The result was delete. Petros471 17:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

ATAv
The whole article appears to be an advertisement for a virtual airline that isn't particularly notable - Canwolf 05:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Delete —  per nom Chris Griswold 07:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It- this site is completly free to anyone so it is not an advertisment. Atavpilot 03:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it- <IP_ADDRESS> 13:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - (Nick Comber) the article originally did not at all follow Wikipedia's entry rules. I've cleaned it up to make it a lot more neutral rather than opinionated and advertising, and also emphasised that this is not the real world ATA, including links to the real world ATA. This site operates with full permission from the real world ATA and should be allowed on Wikipedia, article just needs to be from a neutral point of view and not at all opinionated, this is what I have hopefully achieved in my edits. 13:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep- it now displays a neutral point of view — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)
 * Keep It-(Eklapper) not an advertisment, just a legitimate organization's place on Wikipedia. --Eklapper 16:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It-<IP_ADDRESS> 17:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It-(IsaacN) Very legit. This article is about a notable, well known group.
 * Keep It-(JimW23) No harm, no fowl. Good article, with no code violations. — Possible single purpose account: JimW23 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic..
 * Keep It- Though there are a few sentences in the article that give the impression the entire article is an advertisement, I see no reason to delete it, merely to edit the offending sentences out. — Possible single purpose account: <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep- Article about legitimate organization that is notable within its field. -- Ibagli ( Talk ) 23:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Keep It-(Benoregan) It displays a neutral POV now, so it should be kept --Benoregan 10:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 16:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Can we please have a few more comments from established editors? Petros471 16:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Delete This seems to be a ame mod, and as such, not-notable. Wildthing61476 16:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable and more importantly there is not a single reference so fails WP:V Yomangani talk 16:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable virtual airline. NawlinWiki 16:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:V WilyD 16:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete based on WP:RS and WP:V. --Wafulz 17:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATAv


text:
Talk:Montagu Private Equity

Wording
The wording of this article is commercial, not academic and scholarly. It's written more like an advertisement than Wikipedia article. How do we fix this? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 * Agreed, pretty blatant PR placement, cleaned it up Mattparlmer (talk) 02:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

title: Talk:Montagu Private Equity


text:
Baumea articulata

Baumea articulata, commonly known as jointed rush, is a sedge in the sedge family, Cyperaceae, that is native to Western Australia. The grass-like plant is rhizomatous and perennial, it typically grows to a height of 1 to 2.6 m. It blooms between September and December producing red-brown flowers on pendulous inflorescences.

It is found around swamps and on the margins of lakes along coastal areas in the Mid West, Wheatbelt, Peel, South West, Great Southern and Goldfields-Esperance where it grows in damp black sandy soils.

title: Baumea articulata


text:
Talebi, Nishapur

Talebi (, also Romanized as Ţālebī) is a village in Sarvelayat Rural District, Sarvelayat District, Nishapur County, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran. At the 2006 census, its population was 674, in 178 families.

title: Talebi, Nishapur


text:
Talk:Greg Autry

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Greg Autry Headshot - lg.jpg

title: Talk:Greg Autry


text:
Wikiversity:Colloquium/archives

2024

 * /December 2024/
 * /November 2024/
 * /October 2024/
 * /September 2024/
 * /August 2024/
 * /July 2024/
 * /June 2024/
 * /May 2024/
 * /April 2024/
 * /March 2024/
 * /February 2024/
 * /January 2024/

2023

 * /December 2023/
 * /November 2023/
 * /October 2023/
 * /September 2023/
 * /August 2023/
 * /July 2023/
 * /June 2023/
 * /May 2023/
 * /April 2023/
 * /March 2023/
 * /February 2023/
 * /January 2023/

2022

 * /December 2022/
 * /November 2022/
 * /October 2022/
 * /September 2022/
 * /August 2022/
 * /July 2022/
 * /June 2022/
 * /May 2022/
 * /April 2022/
 * /March 2022/
 * /February 2022/
 * /January 2022/

2021

 * /December 2021/
 * /November 2021/
 * /October 2021/
 * /September 2021/
 * /August 2021/
 * /July 2021/
 * /June 2021/
 * /May 2021/
 * /April 2021/
 * /March 2021/
 * /February 2021/
 * /January 2021/

2020

 * /December 2020/
 * /November 2020/
 * /October 2020/
 * /September 2020/
 * /August 2020/
 * /July 2020/
 * /June 2020/
 * /May 2020/
 * /April 2020/
 * /March 2020/
 * /February 2020/
 * /January 2020/

2019

 * /December 2019/
 * /November 2019/
 * /October 2019/
 * /September 2019/
 * /August 2019/
 * /July 2019/
 * /June 2019/
 * /May 2019/
 * /April 2019/
 * /March 2019/
 * /February 2019/
 * /January 2019/

2018

 * /December 2018/
 * /November 2018/
 * /October 2018/
 * /September 2018/
 * /August 2018/
 * /July 2018/
 * /June 2018/
 * /May 2018/
 * /April 2018/
 * /March 2018/
 * /February 2018/
 * /January 2018/

2017

 * /December 2017/
 * /November 2017/
 * /October 2017/
 * /September 2017/
 * /August 2017/
 * /July 2017/
 * /June 2017/
 * /May 2017/
 * /April 2017/
 * /March 2017/
 * /February 2017/
 * /January 2017/

2016

 * /December 2016/
 * /November 2016/
 * /October 2016/
 * /September 2016/
 * /August 2016/
 * /July 2016/
 * /June 2016/
 * /May 2016/
 * /April 2016/
 * /March 2016/
 * /February 2016/
 * /January 2016/

2015

 * December 2015
 * November 2015
 * October 2015
 * September 2015
 * August 2015
 * July 2015
 * June 2015
 * May 2015
 * April 2015
 * March 2015
 * February 2015
 * January 2015

2014

 * December 2014
 * November 2014
 * October 2014
 * September 2014
 * August 2014
 * July 2014
 * June 2014
 * May 2014
 * April 2014
 * March 2014
 * February 2014
 * January 2014

2013

 * December 2013
 * November 2013
 * October 2013
 * September 2013
 * August 2013
 * July 2013
 * June 2013
 * May 2013
 * April 2013
 * March 2013
 * February 2013
 * January 2013

2012

 * December 2012
 * November 2012
 * October 2012
 * September 2012
 * August 2012
 * July 2012
 * June 2012
 * May 2012
 * April 2012
 * March 2012
 * February 2012
 * January 2012

2011

 * December 2011
 * November 2011
 * October 2011
 * September 2011
 * August 2011
 * July 2011
 * June 2011
 * May 2011
 * April 2011
 * March 2011
 * February 2011
 * January 2011

2010

 * December 2010
 * November 2010
 * October 2010
 * September 2010
 * August 2010
 * July 2010
 * June 2010
 * May 2010
 * April 2010
 * March 2010
 * February 2010
 * January 2010

2009

 * December 2009
 * November 2009
 * October 2009
 * September 2009
 * August 2009
 * July 2009
 * June 2009
 * May 2009
 * April 2009
 * March 2009
 * February 2009
 * January 2009

2008

 * December 2008
 * November 2008
 * October 2008
 * September 2008
 * August 2008
 * July 2008
 * June 2008
 * May 2008
 * April 2008
 * March 2008
 * February 2008
 * January 2008

2007

 * December 2007
 * November 2007
 * October 2007
 * September 2007
 * August 2007
 * July 2007
 * June 2007
 * May 2007
 * April 2007
 * March 2007
 * February 2007
 * January 2007

2006

 * December 2006
 * November 2006
 * October 2006
 * September 2006
 * August 2006

title: Wikiversity:Colloquium/archives


text:
Talk:Peace studies/Templates

I like these changes
These are good changes to the basic templates. I think I may want to go back to Strategic Studies with some of your ideas!--Dnjkirk 07:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Peace studies/Templates


text:
Celia Harvey

Celia Jane Harvey (née Plummer; born c. 1962) is a British soldier and academic. She has served in the Territorial Army since joining the Women's Royal Army Corps in 1987. Harvey transferred to the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers in 1991. She was promoted to major general in March 2020 and became deputy commander Field Army. Harvey stood for election to parliament as a Conservative Party candidate in 2010 in the Leicester West seat and came second to Liz Kendall. She is a lecturer in business studies and has published several academic papers.

Early life and career
Celia Plummer was born in Leicester in 1962/63. She joined the Territorial Army (TA) section of the Women's Royal Army Corps (WRAC) as an officer cadet and was commissioned as a probationary second lieutenant on 5 July 1987; her full commission was confirmed the following year. Plummer was promoted to the rank of lieutenant on 5 July 1989. With the disbandment of WRAC and integration of women into the main army Plummer transferred to the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers on 1 April 1991, by which time she held the acting rank of captain. In November of that year she received promotion to the substantive rank of captain with her seniority backdated to 1 January 1991. On 31 July 1993 she married John Attlee, 3rd Earl Attlee, and was afterwards styled Countess Attlee.

Field officer and political career
Countess Attlee was promoted to the rank of major on 20 January 1997 with seniority backdated to 10 January 1994. She was awarded the Efficiency Decoration for twelve years' service in the TA on 24 August 1999 and promoted to lieutenant colonel on 1 January 2001. From February 2001 to May 2003 she commanded the East Midlands University Officer Training Corps. She was nominated for appointment as an Officer of the Order of the British Empire, which was approved and granted in the 2003 Birthday Honours. By this time Countess Attlee had divorced Earl Attlee and remarried to John Harvey, a TA colonel 13 years her senior. The couple had their first child in November 2001.

Harvey then worked as an instructor at the Joint Services Command and Staff College and was promoted to colonel on 1 March 2005. She was awarded the Queen's Volunteer Reserves Medal in the 2009 New Year Honours and the Volunteer Reserve Service Medal on 23 June 2009. Harvey's husband became a district councillor and in July 2009 Celia Harvey was selected as the Conservative Party's parliamentary candidate for the Leicester West constituency. In the 2010 United Kingdom general election Harvey came second to Labour's Liz Kendall having increased the Conservative vote by 2.8% and reduced Labour's majority to 4,017 (from 9,070).

Harvey's career outside the army was in academia, particularly in business studies. She has worked as a lecturer and published several papers on innovation and entrepreneurship including Entrepreneurship and Marketing: Issues for Independent Inventors in 2014. Harvey was working as a consultant for Marketwise in 2004. Harvey assists her local branch of the Royal British Legion.

General officer career
Harvey was promoted to brigadier by 2017, at which time she was serving as assistant commander of Force Troops Command. On 4 June 2019 the then Defence Secretary Penny Mordaunt announced that Harvey would be promoted to the rank of major general and appointed deputy commander Field Army in March 2020. Harvey would become the third female major general in the British Army and the first from the reserve forces. Harvey assumed the appointment on 11 March 2020, and was promoted to major-general at the same time. She retired from the Army on 4 December 2022.

title: Celia Harvey


text:
Talk:Deborah Joy Corey

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deborah Joy Corey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519040737/http://www.randomhouse.ca/author/results.pperl?authorid=37558 to http://www.randomhouse.ca/author/results.pperl?authorid=37558

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Deborah Joy Corey


text:
Talk:David Francolini

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Francolini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://repertoire.bmi.com/writer.asp?page=1&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&fromrow=1&torow=25&affiliation=PRS&cae=176852533&keyID=640921&keyname=FRANCOLINI+DAVID+THOMAS+GIUSEPPE&querytype=WriterID
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150717155730/http://www.electricity-club.co.uk/client-interview/ to http://www.electricity-club.co.uk/client-interview/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:David Francolini


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renaissance Washington DC Downtown Hotel

The result was delete. Tone 09:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Renaissance Washington DC Downtown Hotel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is just a regular hotel - nothing notable about it as compared to any other downtown hotel. Wikiwriter700 (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete. Per WP:MILL: just a regular hotel that fails WP:NBUILD. Coverage, such as it is, is WP:ROUTINE. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 15:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


text:
Talk:David Russell (guitarist)

David Russell Guitarist
I believe there are enough resources and citations to eliminate the multiple issues. SandChannel (talk) 22:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Russell El Ultimo tremolo.jpg

title: Talk:David Russell (guitarist)


text:
Talk:Lucid Dreaming/Reality Checks/Vision

Also, check if your wearing your glasses, if you wear any. I've noticed that I have perfect vision in some dreams, which I can make super human. Rather fun. :D (anon)


text:
Touch the Invisible Sky

Touch the Invisible Sky is a 60-page tactile astronomy book written by astronomy educator Noreen Grice, and astronomers Simon Steel and Doris Daou, and was published in 2007 by Ozone publishing. The book contains colour images alongside Braille and large print descriptions of celestial objects, and colour photographs from the Hubble Space Telescope, Chandra X-Ray Observatory, and Spitzer Space Telescope, amongst others, which are over-laid with TechnoBraille, allowing visually impaired readers to feel the images. The images featured include nebulae, stars, galaxies and some of the telescopes used to photograph the celestial objects. The images span a range of wavelengths on the electromagnetic spectrum, with a variety of textures and shapes used to convey the characteristics of the objects. The objects featured include our own Sun, the star Eta Carinae, The Crab Nebula, and Kepler's Supernova.

It was partly funded by NASA, who have also funded two other books by Grice, Touch the Universe and Touch the Sun, and by an education grant from the Chandra mission.

"We wanted to show that the beauty and complexity of the universe goes far beyond what we can see with our eyes!"

- Doris Daou

title: Touch the Invisible Sky


text:
Talk:David Wilshire

My removals
I have removed material from that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 11:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

The material may be replaced if and when the replacer can provide proper references. However, I'd also like to point out that a whole paragraph on his views on homosexuality when we've so little on his other views may constitute "undue weight". Is he a single issue campaigner on this issue? Further, "his opposition to rights for lesbian and gay people" is too vague to be NPOV. Does he oppose ALL rights for these people? The right to breathe the air? Is that how he'd describe his views? It is better to be specific - what exactly has he opposed. Whilst editors might not like his views, NPOV in a biography means that we should describe him in a way that both he and his strongest critics would deem fair and accurate.--Docg 11:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that explanation - I agree with all the above. I think his sponsorship of Section 28 is the one thing that probably does deserve reinsertion; I'm not sure what other legislation he has sponsored but Section 28 a particularly notable in terms of the controversies that sparked it, the strongly held views on it, and the subsequent debate around its repeal. Referencing of that should be easy. SP-KP 11:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Suggested text for reinstatement:

Wilshire has a record of opposition to equality for lesbian and gay people. In 1987 he introduced Section 28 as an amendment to the Local Government Bill. The amendment made it illegal for local authorities to "promote homosexuality or ... promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality". The ban was eventually reversed by Parliament in 2003.

Any comments/suggested changes?

SP-KP 11:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

 * "equality for lesbian and gay people" is not an NPOV description - it is value loaded. I suspect he'd say he does support equal rights for ALL people. Most supporters of clause 28 (which I agree is notable - and particularly since he proposed it) would not say "we oppose equality for gay people", they'd say "we oppose the promotion of this lifestyle" etc. Others may view that as opposing equality for the people themselves, but best for Wikipedia to record exactly what he has done and said, and not use interpretative commentary - let the reader decide that for themselves.--Docg 11:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I think you're saying your'e OK with the suggested reinsertion, but we just need to agree how the first sentence should be worded - is that right? How would you word it? SP-KP 11:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

 * Just stick to the facts: "In 1987 he introduced Section 28 as an amendment to the Local Government Bill. The amendment made it illegal for local authorities to "promote homosexuality or ... promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality". The ban was eventually reversed by Parliament in 2003. [give reference]". --Docg 11:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I can live with that. Thanks for discussing constructively & promptly. SP-KP 11:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

 * You need to provide the citation before reinserting the material. We can't have controversial claims about living people left with on them.--Docg 11:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

As I thought, finding a ref proved easy. I used the google search engine ... don't know if you've heard of it, it's rather good :-) I searched for "david wilshire section 28" and that gave plenty of options. How about we use:

http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2000/rp00-047.pdf House of Commons Library Research Paper 00/47 The Local Government Bill [HL]: the ‘Section 28’ debate

SP-KP 11:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

NPOV
This article is weighted very negatively; there is a huge focus upon thing which have received negative attention. There is zero mention of any of the other parliamentary work he has done. One-sided and appears to fall foul of WP:UNDUE. – Toon 13:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, you mean like claiming that Britain was full? Or saying that Princess Diana should stay away from Parliament?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You surely don't disagree that the article is being used to push someone's POV here? – Toon 14:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I just searched through Google News looking for something to balance it with. I didn't have any luck -- how about you?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Stubbed. If it is truly the case that this politician has never been written about positively in any reliable source, then we may have a real problem.  But for now, stubbed while we work on a balanced biography and not something that reads like a Labour hit piece. Thatcher 14:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * LexisNexis contains 278 articles containing the terms "David Wilshire", "tory" and "Spelthorne" prior to Jan 1, 2009, before the scandal broke (plus numerous articles from 2009 about the scandal, of course). Probably most of those are for the correct person.  (There are more than 1000 articles on "David Wilshire" but they may not all be about the Tory MP.)  I imagine somewhere in those 278 articles there must be an occasional positive statement. I don't have time to look them all up, and this is not my area of expertise anyway.  But they are out there. Thatcher 14:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem wasn't soley what information was presented, but how it was written, as Thatcher alludes to, it read like the Lib Dem flyer I got through my door at the last general election (bias disclaimer: I voted for a Lib Dem MEP). – Toon 14:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand what the problem is. I wrote most of what was on the Wikipedia page (and I don't have any party political leanings!) Everything I wrote was a fact and I backed everything up with sources. Just because something seems unbalanced to some people, this doesn't mean it is negative. For instance, it is a fact that David Wilshire was the architect of Section 28 legislation and that he is so opposed to the National Minimum Wage that he tried to launch a bill in May to have it abolished. To some people, these are causes to support mr Wilshire, to others these are causes to oppose. But what cant be ignored is that these are facts. I don't believe it is in the principles of Wikipedia to delete facts on this, or any, basis. The expenses story is a major story in his local constituency and it is a fact that Mr Wilshire caused quite a stir when he was exposed in the Daily Telegraph and then appeared to change his story to the local press - to the point that his former colleague has set up a group that is trying to force him out. These are all facts with sources and what it currently states about him denying the charges doesn't explain the full story nor does it do justice to the truth. I wouldn't dream of deleting any facts about Mr Wilshire that show him in a positive light (bar the fact that some people will view him in a positive light because of Section 28 and the minimum wage), but as someone else has said, I cant find anything that does show him in an objectively positive light. Please can I reinstate what was originally written? Albo2005 (talk) 09:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

You say: "Mr Wilshire caused quite a stir when he was exposed in the Daily Telegraph and then appeared to change his story to the local press - to the point that his former colleague has set up a group that is trying to force him out." - I have no problem with facts but I do have concerns around misleading arguments and suggestions.

The exposure you describe in the Telegraph is currently under litigation as factually untrue. The change of story to the press you elude to... His comments refer to his stance on the expenses row as a whole not his own part in it. The same story goes on to explain he refused a conference stating he preferred to answer each concern one-to-one, which I understand he has been or some time now with evidence rather than sensationalism. His former colleague has been gunning for him for a long time for reasons far less substantial than this and not backed up with evidence. They had an opportunity to oust him last week but presented no evidence to support such a motion.

Your tone I'm afraid does suggest bias and your 'facts' are very suggestible to someone that most certainly does have a political leaning. I won't pretend I don't, but I'm still very concerned by the leaning of this piece.

Fear not facts and references to follow. Might I suggest this article is reviewed further and until a balanced tone can be found or perhaps a factual account without such strong leanings, that it remains as per its previous version under 'Thatcher'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on David Wilshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090609090324/http://wageconcern.com/2009/05/15/youve-made-the-tories-pull-the-bill/ to http://wageconcern.com/2009/05/15/youve-made-the-tories-pull-the-bill/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907002856/http://www.stainesguardian.co.uk:80/li/member_of_parliament.in.Staines/ to http://www.stainesguardian.co.uk/li/member_of_parliament.in.Staines/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080620040007/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk:80/standard/article-23496659-details/Supporters+of+third+Heathrow+runway+blast+Cameron%27s+%27lie%27/article.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23496659-details/Supporters+of+third+Heathrow+runway+blast+Cameron%27s+%27lie%27/article.do
 * Added tag to http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Tory-MP-David-Wilshire-Said-To-Have-Claimed-100000-For-His-Own-Company-To-Stand-Down/Article/200910315406429?lpos=Politics_Top_Stories_Header_1&lid=ARTICLE_15406429_Tory_MP_David_Wilshire%2C_Said_To_Have_Claimed_%3F100%2C000_For_His_Own_Company%2C_To_Stand_Down

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on David Wilshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071128052721/http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2000/rp00-047.pdf to http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2000/rp00-047.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stainesguardian.co.uk/li/member_of_parliament.in.Staines/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23496659-details/Supporters+of+third+Heathrow+runway+blast+Cameron%27s+%27lie%27/article.do

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Wilshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216053648/http://www.mfa.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=30&info_id=11965 to http://www.mfa.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=30&info_id=11965

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:David Wilshire


text:
William Shakespeare's Works/Tragedies/Othello/Iago

The name Iago is a Spanish name, in English the name is James. When England was under attack by Spain the King was King Iago so to the British the name had a bad connotation.


text:
Talk:David P. Watts

Untitled
It s the greed for money that killed Dian. I think it is really disgusting how ORTPN, its director Laurent Habirameye, Protais Zigiranyirazo (the préfet and animal trader of Ruehengeri) and some of Dians fromer students let her former tracker Rwelekana kill her; just to exploit the gorillas for tourism.

Would a poacher brake unarmed into her cabin when everybody knew that Fossey made no calms about using her guns?

Before her death Dr David Watts lobbied hard to formulate means to take Karisoke away from Dian. ORTPN said if they wanted Dian to leave they would have simply asked her to do so. That 's a joke. ORTPN asked her to leave and Dian who was the founder and through her background as occupational therapist made close research of habituated groups possible threatened to burn down Karisoke if she 'd had to go. As Dian wrote it was a threat and "the only way to save a lifetime of work".

I also think it is disgusting how David Watts then could take over as Karisoke director after Dians death. Some researchers are really losing their minds due to their ambitions.

10000 tourist visiting the gorillas that s way too much. In Mowat s book it is discribed how Dr Amy Vedder defecated among the gorillas and let them eat her feces and how Dian was horrified when she found that out. Afterwards gorillas like Nunkie died of human intestinal parasites. And imagine 10000 people defecating in the park....When I was there there was litter and garbage all over the place- even tampons. In 2005 9 gorillas died thorugh measles transmitted through tourists.

Text moved from article
I've moved the following text off the "external links" section of the main article: Before Dian' s death Dr David Watts lobbied hard to formulate means to take Karisoke away from Dian. ORTPN said if they wanted Dian to leave they would have simply asked her to do so. When ORTPN asked her to leave Dian who was the founder and through her background as occupational therapist made close research of habituated groups possible threatened to burn down Karisoke if she 'd had to go. As Din wrote it was a threat and "the only way to save a lifetime of work". [1]

In Mowat s book it is discribed how Dr Amy Vedder one of David' s best friends and fierce enemy of Dian defecated among the gorillas and let them eat her feces and how Dian was horrified when she found that out. Afterwards gorillas like Nunkie died of human intestinal parasites. [1].A lot of the 10 000 tourists who visit per year are defecating in the park and there s litter and garbage all over the place- even tampons. In 2005 9 gorillas died thorugh measles transmitted through tourists.

[1] Woman in the Mists by Mowat Farley, 1987 It needs a quite a lot of cleaning up regarding grammar, POV and references. — Chris (blather • contribs •  e )  21:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:David P. Watts


text:
Cookbook:Quesadilla

| Appetizers | Mexico | Southwestern U.S. cuisine | Tex-Mex cuisine

Similar to a sandwich, the amount of ingredients for a quesadilla depends on how many you are serving and how big you want to make a particular quesadilla. Here are ingredients for one serving using the typical size of tortillas most commonly available in stores in the southwestern U.S. (and in many other areas and countries). Other locally available thin flat breads may work instead of work of tortillas, but please know, the tortillas are intended to be similar to a 'wrap' to allow the eating of the filling.

Base

 * 2 flour tortillas, 6 inches (15 cm) in diameter
 * ⅓ cup grated meltable cheese (preferably a Monterey Jack and cheddar blend or a Tex Mex blend)
 * ¼ cup filling (see options below)
 * Cooking spray

Fillings

 * Salsa
 * Sarza criolla
 * Chile peppers
 * Chopped tomatoes and cilantro
 * Cooked meat or seafood
 * Fresh spinach, washed and torn into small pieces
 * Canned black beans, rinsed and well drained

Procedure

 * 1) Warm both tortillas in the microwave to the point of flexibility, keeping one warm.
 * 2) Preheat a frying pan or griddle over medium-low heat. Grease with oil or cooking spray, and place one of the tortillas in the pan.
 * 3) Sprinkle the shredded cheese over the tortilla.
 * 4) Top the cheese with any combination of the fillings, ideally warmed and very well drained. Make sure they are evenly distributed across the tortilla.
 * 5) Allow the cheese to melt. The tortilla may brown in spots but it should not be cooked to the point of changing color substantially.
 * 6) Press the other tortilla over the top of the tortilla in the pan, making sure it sticks a bit.
 * 7) Flip the quesadilla and allow to warm until it joins as a unit.
 * 8) Remove from pan and cut in eight wedges.
 * 9) Eat immediately, or remove to a fairly low-temperature 'keep warm' area, below the melting temperature of the cheese.

Notes, tips, and variations

 * Quesadillas are not usually not very good re-heated.
 * In some regions of Mexico a quesadilla is a simple corn tortilla with cheese, non-fried.
 * One traditional quesadilla filling consists of grilled chicken, beef, or pork, finely minced, sprinkled with a teaspoon of finely minced onion and half of teaspoon of cilantro, with a small amount of some lime squeezed on top.
 * Corn tortillas can be used in a pinch at home, but they may not hold together or work as well as flour tortillas.
 * See Crab Quesadillas with Mango Salsa for a variation.

title: Cookbook:Quesadilla


text:
Talk:David Hillier

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on David Hillier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150522125936/http://www.bhelitesoccer.co.uk/coaches to http://www.bhelitesoccer.co.uk/coaches
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150522125936/http://www.bhelitesoccer.co.uk/coaches to http://www.bhelitesoccer.co.uk/coaches
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150522125936/http://www.bhelitesoccer.co.uk/coaches to http://www.bhelitesoccer.co.uk/coaches
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160113183330/http://www.footballforheroes.co.uk/news/2014/former-arsenal-midfielder-david-hillier-signs-for-the-legends-squad/ to http://www.footballforheroes.co.uk/news/2014/former-arsenal-midfielder-david-hillier-signs-for-the-legends-squad

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Hillier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004142429/http://www.arsenal.com/history/profiles/317/david-hillier to http://www.arsenal.com/history/profiles/317/david-hillier

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Hillier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170803013538/http://www.auwefc.co.uk/club/109704/News/view/818445?archive=1 to http://www.auwefc.co.uk/club/109704/News/view/818445?archive=1

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:David Hillier


text:
Mind Mapping

Learn how to Mind Map right here at Wikiversity!

Content summary
So what's up? Well, this Wikiversity page is all about what Mind Mapping is, what to use it for and how to do it yourself. And it even tells you how to teach it to others. To start out however, you will see why you would be needing Mind Mapping at all and what problems it might solve for you, and of course which it won't.

Don't worry about these problems yet, however. The only necessary skills that you will need to solve them are basic reading, writing and drawing. And since you are reading this text, I'm quite sure that you already master at least one of them!

For whom is all this intended? Since Mind Mapping is being used in business, education, arts, daily life, etc. it would probably benefit most of us out there. So to make it a bit more concrete, there will be several discussion groups in every lesson, one for each of the aforementioned categories and possibly more. So if you are especially interested in applications for business for example, you can read the discussion and experience sharing pages on business and just skim through the rest.

Goals
Now what will you get from all this? Well, the goals of this learning experience on Mind Mapping are for you
 * to be able to Mind Map,
 * to get introduced to and develop a firm understanding of the Mind Mapping technique and to be able to explain it to others,
 * to know what Mind Maps can be used for and to be able to apply it in other areas,
 * to get convinced of its usefulness and to be able to convince someone else of the technique,
 * to be able to pass the quizzes at the end of each lesson.

Learning materials
How will you learn all this? Well, this learning experience on Mind Mapping will let you share your personal experiences with other Wikiversity participants. You'll be able to read other people's difficulties and tell future readers about your own. You'll be asked to give your opinion and ideas about several subjects. And above all, this wouldn't be a wiki if you couldn't alter the course itself!

Furthermore, you can download
 * a presentation (with speaker notes included) for a course on Mind Mapping and the accompanying mind map with the presentation overview,
 * a sheet with 10 ways to explain to someone what a Mind Map is,
 * a Mind Map overview of this learning experience,
 * etc.

Lessons
So where do you start? Well, if you're not yet convinced of Mind Mapping, or you'd like to know how to convince someone else of it's usefulness, start out with lesson 1 on the why of Mind Mapping. If you'd rather go directly to the how of Mind Mapping, then skip forward to lesson 2. If you're interested in a deeper understanding of Mind Mapping and really want to know what it is exactly, then read lesson 3. And finally, if you're looking for specialized applications in business, studying, arts, science, etc. then definitely read lesson 4. You'll be surprised to see how and where some people use Mind Maps. And no learning is complete without a summary, so you can find it in lesson 5.
 * Lesson 1: "Do I have a problem then?"
 * Lesson 2: "OK, now you made me want to solve it!"
 * Lesson 3: "But what am I doing here, exactly?"
 * Lesson 4: "Even more problems?"
 * Lesson 5: "What did you just say?"

Assignments
What can you expect to be doing? Well, you'll be making your own mind maps, that's for sure! But besides that, you'll also have the following activities and readings available to you during this learning experience.

Activities

 * Discussion groups: read what others experienced, felt or had an opinion about and what kind of ideas they had.

Readings
Yes, you learn by reading too! Here are some of the articles and websites referred to during the lessons.
 * Wikipedia's article on Mind Mapping
 * etc.

Active participants
Active participants in this Learning Group

title: Mind Mapping


text:
User:TeaDrinker

I am a graduate student in mathematical ecology. I primarily frequent the pages of the English language Wikipedia; the quickest way to contact me is my talk page there: w:User_talk:TeaDrinker.

title: User:TeaDrinker


text:
Kamlesh Patel

Kamlesh Patel may refer to:
 * Kamlesh D. Patel
 * Kamlesh Patel, Baron Patel of Bradford
 * Kamlesh Patel (politician)

title: Kamlesh Patel


text:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Anonymous

Reinstate anonymous (street meat)
Please reinstate this page. Mig (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

anonymous (street meat)
Please reinstate the article on anonymous (street meat) above. Also can someone please add WHEN IT RAINS my first feature on the Migdia Chinea page. I have a great visual. Thanks. Mig (talk) 13:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)