text:
Carl Gunnar Feilberg

Carl Gunnar Feilberg  (1894–1972) was a Danish geographer, ethnographer and explorer of Asia.

Life
Feilberg was born in Copenhagen, Denmark on October 22, 1894. His father was Henning Frederik Feilberg (1865 - 1940) and his mother Anny Caroline Louise Olsen (1867 - 1934). His paternal grandfather was the pastor and folklorist Henning Frederik Feilberg. He graduated from the Østersøgades Gymnasium, Copenhagen in 1912. He attended the University of Copenhagen and in 1919 he was awarded a Master of Theology (Candidatus theologiæ) with excellence for the university's historical prize essay. He married Martha Siegumfeldt and they had a son Anders F S Feilberg. He died in Hellerup in Denmark on January 6, 1972.

Work
Feilberg was appointed to the Chair of Human Geography at University of Copenhagen in 1949. By the help of the Danish company, Kampsax, Feilberg travelled in 1935 to Iran, where he carried out ethnographical fieldwork in Bala Geriveh among the Papi tribe in Southern Luristan in Iran from the end of March to the end of July. Feilberg, who carried out fieldwork among the Lur pastoralists, dealt with the history of nomadism through an intricate analysis of the structure and distribution of the black tent (La tente Noire, Copenhagen, 1944). During his stay in the district of Luristan in Iran he gathered the huge number of material cultures of the nomads of Luristan and gave them to the National Museum of Denmark. Feilberg, funded by the Carlsberg Foundation, stayed with KAMPSAX engineers (in Bala Gariveh, southern Luristan) who had been contracted during the mid-1930s to build the Trans-Iranian railway. He made collections of ethnographic materials and took many pictures of people, working and relaxing; of tents and winter dwellings; of tools, rugs, carpets, and other domestic equipment; of animals; and of weddings and musical instruments. The photographs and collections are curated at the Danish National Museum (Copenhagen) and at the Prehistoric Museum (Moesgaard).

Publications

 * "Bidrag til de afrikanske Agerbrugsredskabers Kulturhistorie. Nogle Hakketyper i Belgisk Congo." (Geografisk Tidsskrift, Bind 37; 1934)
 * La Tente Noire: Contribution Ethnographique à l'Histoire Culturelle des Nomades. Published 1944 by [Impr. par B. Lunos Bogtr.] in Kobenhavn.
 * Les Papis: Tribu Persane de Nomades Montagnards du Sudouest de l'Iran. Published 1952 by I kommission hos Gyldendal in København.
 * Afrika. En Verdensdel lukker sig op.Det Danske Forlag, København 1945.
 * Hovedlinier i vor tids kulturgeografi by Carl Gunnar Feilberg (1963)

General references

 * Concise Biographical Companion to Index Islamicus, Volume 1 Bio-Bibliographical Supplement to Index Islamicus, 1665-1980, Volume One. A-G:

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Carl Gunnar Feilberg


text:
User:Merkel

Welcome!

My name is Oliver Merkel. In the wikibooks project most of my contributions are related to the mountaineering section in German called Outdoor-Aktivitäten and Outdoor - Klettern.

The best way to contact me is via mail.

 *<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Merkel.Oliver@web.de]

title: User:Merkel


text:
Panstrongylus geniculatus

Panstrogylus geniculatus is a blood-sucking sylvatic insect noted as a putative vector of minor importance in the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi to humans; this is a parasite, which causes Chagas disease. The insect is described as sylvatic; subsisting primarily in humid forests, and is also known to inhabit vertebrate nesting places such as those of the armadillo (dasypus novemcinctus or dasypus), and is also involved in enzootic transmission of T. cruzi to those species. It has wide distribution throughout 16 Latin American countries.

There have been few scientific studies of this particular species because of the low number of collected specimens and difficulties in rearing and maintaining populations in the laboratory. However, currently P. geniculatus is receiving attention as a potential vector of Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) due to reports of this species invading the domestic and peridomestic habitats over a vast area: Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Argentina.

P. geniculatus is apparently in the process of domiciliation, using the same strategies as highly domesticated species like Triatoma infestans and Rhodnius prolixus. This is also the case for other sylvatic triatomine species (Triatominae) that are experiencing similar ecological pressures originating from human disruption of the natural habitat.

Prevalence in Venezuela
A 2005 study conducted by the Universidad Central de Venezuela, used Panstrongylus specimens collected from Caracas City and the neighboring areas of Miranda and Vargas States. Through the use of a dot-ELISA test and other techniques to determine the presence of trypanosome cruzi, it was found through the examination of feces that 67 of the 88 (76.1%) specimens collected were carrying the parasite and that 53 (60.2%) of those reacted positively to human antiserum. A  2014 publication of Citizen science-based domiciliary triatomine collection carried out between 2007 and 2013 in the MDC has advanced understanding of urban T. cruzi prevalence, this piblicaction show the Geographical distribution of triatomine bugs in Caracas, Natural infection of triatomine bugs with T. cruzi, The presence of blood in the stomachs of the triatomine bugs and a Study of the nymphal stages of P. geniculatus in Caracas, showing A total of 3551 triatomines were captured from 31 of the 32 parishes surveyed. The vast majority of these were identified as P. geniculatus (98.96%), followed by Triatoma nigromaculata (0.59%), Triatoma maculata (0.39%) and Rhodnius prolixus (0.06%). for  2023 a recent Publication  demonstrate risk of urban Chagas disease transmission in Caracas, Venezuela by Vector mapping and bloodmeal metabarcoding.

title: Panstrongylus geniculatus


text:
Fariborz Besarati

Fariborz Besarati (born 23 August 1966) is a Swedish former wrestler who competed in the 1992 Summer Olympics and in the 1996 Summer Olympics.

title: Fariborz Besarati


text:
Mahesail

Mahesail is a village and a gram panchayat in the Suti II CD block in the Jangipur subdivision of Murshidabad district in the state of West Bengal, India.

Location
Mahesail is located at 24.5893°N, 88.0092°W.

Area overview
Jangipur subdivision is crowded with 52 census towns and as such it had to be presented in two location maps. One of the maps can be seen alongside. The subdivision is located in the Rarh region that is spread over from adjoining Santhal Pargana division of Jharkhand. The land is slightly higher in altitude than the surrounding plains and is gently undulating. The river Ganges, along with its distributaries, is prominent in both the maps. At the head of the subdivision is the 2,245 m long Farakka Barrage, one of the largest projects of its kind in the country. Murshidabad district shares with Bangladesh a porous international border which is notoriously crime prone (partly shown in this map). The subdivision has two large power plants - the 2,100 MW Farakka Super Thermal Power Station and the 1,600 MW Sagardighi Thermal Power Station. According to a 2016 report, there are around 1,000,000 (1 million/ ten lakh) workers engaged in the beedi industry in Jangipur subdivision. 90% are home-based and 70% of the home-based workers are women. As of 2013, an estimated 2.4 million people reside along the banks of the Ganges alone in Murshidabad district. Severe erosion occurs along the banks.

Note: The two maps present some of the notable locations in the subdivision. All places marked in the maps are linked in the larger full screen maps.

Demographics
According to the 2011 Census of India, Mahesail had a total population of 16,178, of which 8,233 (51%) were males and 7,945 (49%) were females. Population in the age range 0–6 years was 3,006. The total number of literate persons in Mahesail was 6,648 (50.47% of the population over 6 years).

Transport
National Highway 12 (old numbering NH 34) passes through Mahesail. This section is locally popular as Badshahi Road.

Healthcare
Mahesail Rural Hospital, with 30 beds, is a major medical facility in Suti II CD block.

See also - Healthcare in West Bengal

title: Mahesail


text:
Learning Java/Fundamental exercises

1. Fix It!
Fix this code so it compiles and runs correctly (your file name is )

2. A Full WaterVehicle, Ship, etc.
This exercise comprises of a base class WaterVehicle. It will also have a class Ship, a class Boat, a class WaterAirplane, and a class Submarine. WaterVehicle Methods:

updateSpeed(int) will update the speed to a valid speed - higher than minSpeed and lower than maxSpeed

You can choose what to use.

Note: Ship, Boat, and WaterAirplane should extend WaterVehicle.

When you are done, you can create a main class to run your program. For example, the main class could create an instance of WaterAirplane and try using the methods.

Submit Exercises
If you have any ideas for exercises that are related to what beginners learned in the fundamentals section, feel free to put them here. Note: It will look nice if you put them before this and make their name with a title2 (2 equal sign).

You are ready to move on! Inheritance. Note that it is not complete... Back to Java Main Page

title: Learning Java/Fundamental exercises


text:
Cookbook talk:Barbecued Spare Ribs

Page history from Barbecued spare ribs

* (cur) (last). . 11:12, 14 Dec 2003. . The Grimm Ripper (Copied to Wikibooks Cookbook) * (cur) (last). . M 14:17, 2 Aug 2002. . <IP_ADDRESS>   * (cur) (last). . M 18:41, 22 May 2002. . WojPob

This recipe was the featured recipe on the main Cookbook page from April 28, 2004 - May 8, 2004

Cook book barbecue ribs
I love it and it's delicious and it's a great recipe Tawiy101 (discuss • contribs) 00:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

So ture Tawiy101 (discuss • contribs) 00:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

title: Cookbook talk:Barbecued Spare Ribs


text:
Talk:DeLisha Milton-Jones

Fair use rationale for File:DelishaMJ.jpg
File:DelishaMJ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot 04:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DeLisha Milton-Jones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129200229/http://www.wnba.com/playerfile/delisha_milton/ to http://www.wnba.com/playerfile/delisha_milton/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050827002536/http://www.usabasketball.com/bioswomen/delisha_milton_bio.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/bioswomen/delisha_milton_bio.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:DeLisha Milton-Jones


text:
Talk:Electronics/RCL

What would be nice is some pictures of the various forms of dampening.

Damping, not "dampening". Dampening is sprinkling water upon.

title: Talk:Electronics/RCL


text:
Talk:Deanie Ip

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Deanie Ip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106161751/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=115100&sid=33690191&con_type=3 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=115100&sid=33690191&con_type=3
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120805124141/http://www.news.gov.hk/en/categories/health/html/2011/09/20110911_143815.shtml?pickList=ticker to http://www.news.gov.hk/en/categories/health/html/2011/09/20110911_143815.shtml?pickList=ticker

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Deanie Ip


text:
Talk:Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) season 19/Archive 1

Removing maintenance templates and unreferenced information
Please do not remove maintenance templates from this article. Unreferenced information needs to be sourced using WP:RELIABLE sources and/or proper WP:CITE coding. AldezD (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Scores can be checked easily by anyone online from the moment the episode is released. Quoting from Wikipedia's policy about primary sources:
 * "A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge."
 * Scores are facts of the episode! Anyone can verify them! So please stop adding templates where they are not needed. Everything that needs reference on the article is already referenced. TeamGale 03:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

There are currently no references within these sections. Use Template:Cite episode to reference the scores if there are no other WP:RELIABLE sources for each score. Please stop removing maintenance templates. AldezD (talk) 03:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Additionally, listing intricate unreferenced information such as each individual judges' score for each dance falls under WP:IINFO (#3), WP:LISTCRUFT (#2, 3 and 4) and WP:FANCRUFT. AldezD (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It's referenced now. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * BlueMoonset I do not know why you've added them, because they're unnecessary. I will be removing them once this stupid and unnecessary deletion nomination has been resolved with an admin. Callmemirela (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Good faith for you to do it BlueMoonset. Based on my comment above though, I still don't believe scores need reference. The scores are facts of the episode and the episode can be used as primary source in such situations. Just like the episodes of a show or the movies are used as primary sources for plots and directors/writers/titles of episodes. I didn't see in any list of a show's episodes article or in movies articles to cite the movie or the episodes themselves at the end of the plot or next to the names of the directors/writers. Instead, when the episode airs the references are removed with the explanation "episode aired"! Anyway...personally I won't comment further on this. I prefer to wait for the administrators to make a decision and say what is needed and what is not needed. If I am thinking this the wrong way and it's not the same situation as movies/episodes, then I'll apologize. TeamGale 05:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Callmemirela, it is never the right thing to do to remove a valid reference unless you're replacing with a better one. Wikipedia articles are improved by citing valid sources; it has always been a weakness of the DWTS articles that no one has even bothered to include a primary reference to the specific episode, much less secondary sources. An IP just removed the citations, and I restored them. I'll do the same if you remove them. TeamGale, I think it's a bit of a stretch to equate a fictional plot with a reality show, but if you can show me a Wikipedia policy that says so (like WP:FILMPLOT), I'll be happy to go with it, since it's a bit of a pain to find secondary sources and put them together. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, a fictional film/TV show is different from a non-fictional one. Here, we're dealing with real people (WP:BLP) and statistics, not a plot. Just like the ratings always need to be sourced, these stats really should be as well. (And that's not my area. I've never added any of that info. I've also never added maintenance tags to them either -- unless it was unaired). --Musdan77 (talk) 04:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * OK...I see. Then I apologize because I had all the shows in the same category as "TV shows" and not fiction VS reality ones. As I've seen the articles won't be deleted and I am glad for that. I guess sources can be added from now on in this season. For the past seasons lots of hours are needed for sources to be found and I don't know if someone has that time to do it. Hopefully someone/few people will...even slowly. Just a little question...since sources are needed, why the ones for the dances are being removed every week when the episode airs? Shouldn't those be kept as well? TeamGale 10:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Coding
There seems to be a problem with the iPad and iPhone mobile site Jonathan and Allison are out of the table can someone try and sort this out. Thank you NaThang0P (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * NaThang0P It has to be fine now. If there is still a problem let us know :) TeamGale 11:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Removing references
Please do not remove references from this article without replacing those links with another valid/appropriate reference. If no valid reference exists, use Template:Cite episode. AldezD (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference links
Please use Template:Cite web rather than inserting raw links as references. AldezD (talk) 17:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

"TBA" placeholders
Please do not add unreferenced "TBA" placeholders for details about specifics within future episodes that have not yet aired.

If no WP:V link is available to add verified data for upcoming episodes but the information was part of an earlier television broadcast, use Template:Cite episode when adding actual data. AldezD (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Auto-reverting to former table templates
Please stop auto-reverting edits made to this article to improve readability and functionality of tables. Simply because the format does not match unsourced, unsortable formats used in earlier articles does not mean this is an unconstructive edit. Content is not being removed. It is being re-formatted into a clearer presentation of sortable data.

Even with recent additions of sources, overall these articles are filled with excessive tables and WP:UNDUE coverage of WP:FANCRUFT and WP:TRIVIA. AldezD (talk) 03:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

 * This has long been the way the tables have worked, they are far easier to read over 'CAI, LG, JH, BT' I mean really. Don't change something that doesn't need to be. As to referencing and sourcing - that is in the process of being added to the tables. The added colour, initials is not necessary - and I have received likes from people on this site who have agreed with me on this change of formatting. Leave it be.

 * Even with recent additions of sources, overall these articles are filled with excessive tables and WP:UNDUE coverage of WP:FANCRUFT and WP:TRIVIA - you say? Tell me how does your change help this AT ALL? Kiwi Jaden (talk) 04:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

 * Your argument is WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Reverting scores to a non-sortable, non-labeled format is not "far easier to read". Every other data element in these tables is sortable—except individual numeric scores, something that benefits from a sortable format. Also, the individual scores are not labeled to a specific judge, and instead a user must notice a header at the top of the Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 19) section to understand to what judge the scores are referring, instead of being labeled to a judge and again being sortable by that individual judge. Initials were used to save space in the table format; however, this can easily be replaced by the judges' last names. AldezD (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

 * Comment AldezD It's not a WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument...probably the editor put it wrong or you read it wrong, I don't know. The tables follow a specific format for 19 seasons now. Additional coloring to the tables or any of those big changes are not needed, especially with no discussion first. Seems like lots of editors disagree with those additions but you keep adding them back. If your argument is the "sortable" table, you can make the scores sortable but without adding anything more. You can discuss further changes on the talk page and if many editors agree with it, then you can change it. But as I can see, many editors (including me of we count votes) don't want the format to be changed but to kept the way it is for 19 seasons now so you should probably leave it the way it is. And as for the references, like Kiwi Jaden is a work in progress after the show is aired. TeamGale 12:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Simply because it's "always been done this way" doesn't mean that it can't be improved. You and other editors make the argument that "change is not needed"—yet the point of the table is to easily compare and sort information, and one of the main data elements of the table is not sortable, nor is it easy to follow. You make the comment "you can make the scores sortable but without adding anything more", and—with the exception of highlighting a total column to differentiate it from individual judges' scores—that's exactly what the reformat has done. AldezD (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, no. AldezD, I've had enough of your editing. Your decision to change the physical appearance of DWTS season 19 without discussion made me reach my breaking points. The reason why I reverted your edits for the change on DWTS is because NOBODY AGREED TO IT. Before you start insulting me, look after yourself first.

 * Ever since you decided to randomly nominate Dancing with the Stars season pages for deletion, you have been causing mayhem. Just on Monday, you kept removing the table for week 3 in the weekly scores. People were constantly undoing your edit yet you still took them off until I told you stop. You changed the page's physical appearance WITHOUT DISCUSSION. Ever since the nomination, your edits have been falling under WP:OWN. You do not own the page! This is what is written and I quote:

 * An editor disputes minor edits concerning layout, image use, and wording in a particular article daily. The editor might claim, whether openly or implicitly, the right to review any changes before they can be added to the article.
 * An editor reverts justified article changes by different editors repeatedly over an extended period to protect a certain version, stable or not.
 * An editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it "unnecessary" without claiming that the change is detrimental. This has the effect of assigning priority, between two equivalent versions, to an owner's version.  "
 * An editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it "unnecessary" without claiming that the change is detrimental. This has the effect of assigning priority, between two equivalent versions, to an owner's version.  "

 * Which is what you are doing. I am sorry, but that is unacceptable. You are taking over the page by removing content you deemed unnecessary or empty even though content included (news flash, the DWTS seas pages have been doing this for a long time), changing the physical appearance without discussion, telling people what to do by not removing this and that and whatnot. We do not live under your rules. This is everybody's page. We make decisions as a team, not individually.  You either edit as a team or you make edits elsewhere.  You tell people to follow policies, so follow this one yourself.

 * I am well aware that the page has turned into WP:EW. BECAUSE of YOU. You make edits that people don't agree with. You are taking ownership. You, yourself, are also causing edit war.

 * You do not own the page. You make changes without discussion. Or when there is discussion, the discussion is after you made the change. That is unacceptable on so many terms as well.

 * So ask yourself this question and think clearly (emphasize the adjective clearly): do you own the page? The answer is boldly and clearly no. Are you an admin? It doesn't seem like it, but you act as if you are.

 * The page has been always been this way, whether you like it or not. Your changes have complicated things even more.

 * This is not WP:IDONTLIKEIT, although it seems likely this applies to you.

 * You need to understand you need to stop this. I know I am not perfect myself, so pointing out my mistakes won't support your argument. When people disagree, leave it. Just ask them why it was removed. There is no need to revert it, especially when you have discussed with other editors or it is disagreed with accurate and acceptable reasons.

 * Here is a list of contributions (talk pages included) you've made with unedits to those contributions that apply:

 * 1: link Unedits: link (three other edits by this user) linklinklinklink

 * 2: link (unedit of link) Unedits: linklinklinklinklinklink

 * 3: link (updated since this edit) Unedits: linklinklinklinklink

 * 4: (telling people what to do as if you owned the page) linklinklink

 * 5: (making changes before discussing): link

 * Edit warring has occurred because you make changes by your gut and decision without agreement from other editors. Can you not see how many people disagree with you and the characteristics of owning a page you're turning into? This all turns back to Wikipedia's Ownership policy. If you want to edit, you have to respect people's wishes when they disagree, whether you like it or not. You taught us something, I am teaching you something now. We edit as a team. If you want changes, discuss before doing them. We can work as a team. And please, by all means, look at yourself before posting on talk pages. You've done wrong as well. We disagree with your edits and we have reasons, but you post on talk pages just because you don't like the way they changed it. You gave me a warning on my talk page about edit warring. I undid your edit for many reasons.

 * I thank you for the least discussing about the dance charts, but in the future discuss before making the changes. People will just revert it because they do not agree. Or propose a trial on the potential change. I would mostly suggest a trial before editors make a decision. If people come to decide that is too much to handle or for other reasons, follow what they say. You do not own the page, and we make decisions and agreements as a team. (I will continue saying this if I have to)

 * I am hoping for the very least that these issues can be resolved and we can edit peacefully without confrontation or arguments. If that happens, well with me anyways, I will have to have an admin interfere. I do not want this page to be permanently protected so only admins can edit or completely wiped off. These pages have taken so much hard work that it does not deserve it.

 * Thank you for reading my complaints. I apologize for starting off angry then somewhat soft. I was truly angry when I was typing this message, but I wanted you to understand what you were doing is wrong as well. And I wanted you to comprehend that we don't have to argue like this. It won't do any good for anybody. We need and have to make decisions as a team. I hope this is understood. No apologies or forgiveness is needed from anybody's part. We all make mistakes that need to be forgotten. We all need to learn from our mistakes.

 * If you still disagree with what I've said, please do not make any changes onto the page and reply to me first. We do not need real edit warring between you, me, this editor and that editor. Please, the least, take into consideration what I've said. Think about how other editors feel. Not me specifically, but in general. Thank you. I look forward to your response, good or bad. At least we're now resolving this issue.

 * Callmemirela (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Callmemirela. None of us editors are averse to changing the look of the article if it's needed, but we take issue with the fact that the changes Aldez is making are being done without general consultation. It's becoming a case of "It's my way or the highway" here, as though the changes have to be agreed upon automatically and the input of other editors has little or no bearing. That's not proper editing etiquette. This article is not exclusive to one editor, like Callmemirela has said, and all editing decisions must be reached through collective consensus. If their have been reversions, it's due to the fact that the editors have not been happy to see sudden stylistic changes to the article without any debate on the matter beforehand. This is nothing personal against Aldez; the editors of the page are simply not going to allow major changes to be implemented without being consulted. It's as simple as that. We must respect the fact that the article is in the public domain and that no one has the exclusive rights to control its look. If it needs improvements, we're willing to listen and discuss suggestions. Wilted Youth (talk) 01:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

 * Callmemirela, your message addresses none of the issues brought up regarding layout/WP:MOS, WP:IINFO, WP:LISTCRUFT/WP:NOTSTATS, WP:UNDUE and WP:TRIVIA. Your message is WP:IDONTLIKEIT regarding the format. Regarding "Nobody agreed to it", please review WP:BB. These articles overall are filled with information that does not meet guidelines linked above, are filled with duplicative information, have multiple issues regarding WP:V and WP:OR, and are formatted in a way that makes them unnecessarily difficult to navigate. References are needed for scores, dances, and other information that takes place during an episode. If a WP:V source cannot be found, use Template:Cite episode. Regarding "Before you start insulting me, look after yourself first", there have been no insults directed toward you on this page or any other WP:TALK message. AldezD (talk) 02:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

 * But what about next week? The couples are dancing to songs from specific movies, which have been traditionally identified alongside the songs used during such weeks. The table for that week will be massive and ridiculously overcomplicated. And no, I'm not going to advocate to eliminate the column identifying the movies. That information is relevant. Wilted Youth (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

The movies can be easily added in as another column to the right of the music selection:

...or as a notation next to the song, since the film name does not need to be sorted:

Dance Chart
The dance chart section is a duplication of data in the Weekly scores section. I have removed this section and matched the formatting of highlighting the highest and lowest scoring dances with the same specific colors. AldezD (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The dance chart serves a specific purpose: to have a handy, convenient way of seeing which dances the couples danced during the course of their run on the show. There is no reason to delete it; referring to the week-by-week charts is too cumbersome and time-consuming. Wilted Youth (talk) 21:02, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The articles overall are already cumbersome and difficult to navigate. They feature far too many tables, and in duplicate information appears in several tables/sections (weekly dances, total weekly scores, placement, rank, highest/lowest scoring dances, etc.). AldezD (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Adding more colors and information in one table is too much and it adds much more confusion than before. It was better how it was before. Callmemirela (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Just stop - I actually am starting to like your format for the weekly scores - as long as extra colour is not used, where it is not needed nor is attractive. However - the dance chart is and always has been there and suits a purpose. Please stop changing anything and everything without ASKING first. Kiwi Jaden (talk) 23:57, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Aldez, if duplicate information appears, it doesn't automatically become unnecessary and in need of deletion. The various tables are meant to give a comprehensive look at how contestants progressed throughout the season. They are laid out in a convenient manner for easy reference, and the dance chart serves such a function. You may think you're simplifying the page by combining things, but really you're making analyzing the stats of the season a much more complicated and convoluted process. For instance, if someone wanted to know which dances Couple X did not dance this season, why should they have to go through every weekly score chart when they could look at the dance chart in a minute or two and get that information in a more timely fashion? You may think that merging it with the score charts is practical, but is it really practical for every visitor of the page? No. Wilted Youth (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The information being included in these articles as a whole are more appropriate for a fansite or other Wikia section. There are several guidelines these articles fail to meet, including WP:IINFO, WP:LISTCRUFT/WP:NOTSTATS, and WP:TRIVIA. Neither the dance each couple performs nor their score for each individual dance are appropriate to be listed separately in multiple sections within each article. There are currently five sections all repeating specific scores for individual dances, and one contains manual, unverified average calculations of weekly scores for each couple. These issues fall under WP:NOT and WP:IINFO. AldezD (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Why do the averages need to be sourced? It's fairly evident that the calculations were arrived at using basic addition and division, which anyone with basic mathematical skills can do. Also, why did you combine the best/worst dancer chart with the best/worst dances for each couple chart? It makes no sense to me, because (1) a couple's low-scoring dance may not necessarily be the worst-scored one of the style itself (i.e. Betsey & Tony may do a Samba worse than Michael & Emma, but it may not be the worst dance they do overall if it's scored above their Cha-cha) and (2) what in the world are you going to do when couples get varying scores on multiple dances? If, say, Alfonso & Witney get 36s for Paso, Tango and Contemporary, and Bethany & Derek get 38s for Contemporary, Quickstep and Jazz, then how can you distinguish that Alfonso & Witney's Contemporary is not season-best if it's entered as one of their best dances and thus highlighted in green (provided that the Paso or Tango are season-best)? Wilted Youth (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Seriously - now you've altered the average score chart, couples highest and lowest scores, weekly scores and taken away the highest and lowest dances and the dance chart - all of which helps the general public, and which we are working towards sourcing WHERE NEEDED? Everyone - we need to take this up with someone of a higher authority, because AldezD is just playing games now. You cannot say this is respecting the wishes of the majority of editors here - its literally him against all of us, and he refuses to stop changing things, deleting things, adding ridiculous colours (apparently to make it easier to read and more concise). Its becoming a joke now Kiwi Jaden (talk) 04:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

OK...I really don't know where to comment first so I'll just put my comment here as answer to everything... AldezD are you serious now?? You keep removing tables WITHOUT discussion and in one of your edits you used as excuse the discussion on the talk page!! If you haven't noticed NO ONE on the talk page agreed with those changes!! Editors go on and make the changes when there IS an agreement something that I can not see here!! It's what YOU want and you are refusing to listen a bunch of other editors and what they are saying. We are not talking about improvement here...you are destroying the article! You are saying that tables are not needed and you are merging them together because it's more practical and easier to read! For whom?? The tables you are creating might look more practical now that couples have only two dances each but when some couples have ten dances each those tables are NOT going to work!! STOP making big changes on the article without discussion!! The tables you are removing are there of a reason, they ARE NEEDED!!! I am wondering...do you even watch the show? Do you know how it goes in the future weeks? Because those edits doesn't look like you know what you are doing! A request...can someone please bring back the tables that have been removed? I would be happy to do it but I have so little free time this period and I can't go back and forth to build everything back together right now searching for the missing info etc. And I agree with Kiwi Jaden...this is becoming a joke. Please someone add the tables back and next time that they will be removed an admin needs to interfere! Callmemirela is right, this is clearly WP:OWN situation! TeamGale 06:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * TeamGale I just reverted the edits to how it was before they removed the average score and whatnot. I was unable to make it to how it was before because that is a lot of information to recuperate and I do not have the time right at this moment. If AldezD continues reverting after endless attempts to keep it the way it was, someone, for the love God, contact an admin! Just follow these steps first : Dispute_resolution. Make sure you can contact an admin right now. If you can't, go with the first item they tell you to do when resolving dispute issues. I would suggest the notice boards, editor assistance or formal mediation.Callmemirela (talk) 12:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

The issues of WP:IINFO, WP:LISTCRUFT/WP:NOTSTATS, and WP:TRIVIA have not been addressed. Arguments are made that "I don't like it" or "It's not how it has been done in the past", "This information is needed" and "I want it reverted", but these issues still fail to address Wikipedia guidelines presented. The excessive statistics listed in this article fall under WP:NOT. AldezD (talk) 12:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

 * This website is a mess why is AldezD so hell bent on ruining this site. The old way has been fine for 10 years. If it is not broke do not fix it. I like the full dance chart it helps me keep track on who has done what dance rather than trail through endless tables. Please someone contact an admin. Wiki articles on DWTS around the world are done in the same fashion I do not care if rules are not broken by altering the site beyond all recognition. There are tonnes of people who like it the way is was. I like the average chart as I like DWTS Statistics. I rely on this website as I live in the UK and I can see all the scores in one place and the (10,10,10,10) notation is self explanatory and does not need "dumming down". To sum up I am absolutley FED UP with this and very, very angry, I do not usually vent my anger in the internet as it does not solve anything, but if the overall motion on the website is that it should go back to how it was. Then i felt it was appropriate to say something. Can someone do something PLEASE! NaThang0P (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

 * 'This website is a mess why is AldezD so hell bent on ruining this site. The old way has been fine for 10 years. If it is not broke do not fix it' - NaThang these words ring entirely in my ears. I have added the average chart and dance chart - however I would implore my fellow editors to take heed of the necessity to look for referencing as well to add to these measures. Scores, dances, songs. However - I find it intolerable that 1) AldezD does not take action to discuss with everyone first before changing and 2) Makes the changes under the guise of WP:NOT to what he wants (sure he's deleted two parts of this article) but he is adding colours, changing formats of tables making them far less readable for the public. To me, it seems he says fan site, yet changes tables for his pleasure, adds colours etc. which make it look ridiculous and expect us to fall into line? I have changed it back, but recognise the need to look for further referencing. I ask my fellow editors to 1) look for these and 2) if there is a change back once more, to please take heed and bring in admin to work on sorting Aldez out. Does he recognise that his lack of discussion with fellow editors of the page can lead to disharmony, not allowed on this site? Oh dear.  Kiwi Jaden (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Again, your argument is "I don't like it" and "it was fine the way before", but these fail to address the Wikipedia guidelines brought forth, and the unnecessary duplication of information in tables upon tables of unsourced WP:IINFO. You comment that tables are less readable with color coding, but in your reversions, you changed them to a format with inconsistent widths, text sizes and text formats.
 * Regarding my lack of discussion, I have initiated all the discussions on this page regarding formatting changes and have participated in the discussions with clear comments and references to established guidelines, explaining the edits and changes to formats. The responses have largely ignored the multiple Wikipedia guidelines brought up that this article fails to meet. AldezD (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * AldezD, I changed the width sizes to suit YOUR new system for weekly scores. So if you prefer we return to our old system, we can? User:Kiwi Jaden (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference formatting
Please continue to add references to adhere to WP:V guidelines. Also, when adding references, please format code using Template:Cite web rather than posting raw links. AldezD (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Weekly scores: old vs. new (vote)
ETA: 5 editors (one IP address and excluding myself) voted for the older version. The result is the older version for the weekly scores. Consequences will be taken if an editor reverts for whatever reason. There was a discussion, and it's been officially decided. This should be the last time we hear about this. Discuss if you do not agree, and we will state our reasons as to why we made the vote and changes. Reverting may lead to your ban, as we are now applying this rule. Please read WP:3RR. I do not want, in any way, another edit war which is why I am listing these rules (not exactly, I just couldn't find another word). Follow WP:CONSENSUS to make changes before reverting then discuss or else it falls in WP:OWN. Thank you. Expect changes in the next few hours. Thank you to those whom voted! Your contributions are much appreciated! Ps: I apologize for sounding like an admin, if I do ever come across like that in this message. I am just trying to avoid unwanted past mistakes. Callmemirela (talk) 02:25, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

ETA #2: I have reverted the changes back to the weekly scores' old version. Some instructions have been applied to assure that editors follow the old table instead of the newest one. To those that disagree, do NOT revert. Create a new section and state your reasons as to why you would want the newest version. All warnings and rules (again, I could not find the right word) have been assigned above this message. Thank you! Please include all references the page needs in the weekly scores. Thank you once again!

Callmemirela (talk) 03:21, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

As stated in my previous message, we make decisions as a team, I know many editors do not agree with the new changes. I will be reverting edits that has changed the physical appearance. I presume the dance chart will be as previously before the change. As for the weekly scores, I want a vote to be done. To whom prefer the older version, say so. To whom prefer the newest version, say so. The version with the most votes will be the version that maintains. All other changes to the tables and templates or the page itself without discussion will be immediately reverted. We speak with others before making decisions. The references will remain the same, no changes will be added.

An example of the newest version is available on the page. An older example of the older version, visit Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 18).

If you would like a trial with the newest version (without dance chart additions), please comment below. This will be applied if editors agree to it. If it is not, then the trial won't be applied and changes will be made.

All other changes that you do not want or should add, please discuss first. We will all come to an agreement.

I also do not want people contradicting an editor's vote on which should belong. For example, an editor says to keep to the newest version, but some editor disagrees and says the oldest is the best with na-na-na reasons. No arguments, please. This is an issue we've been having a lot. Thus we will put this aside for now.

I will make these changes (or someone else if they want to) either in the next five hours or 24 hours if there aren't many votes. All editors and IP addresses are allowed to vote. No limits or restrictions on those whom are permitted to vote.

The dance chart will be restored sometime soon. If anyone has any issues with this, please discuss before restoring the dance chart in the weekly scores. We make decisions as a team, not indivually. We also have to follow |WP:REACHINGCONSENSUS

Thank you for voting!

Callmemirela (talk) 21:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Callmemirela - I agree completely, we need to vote on the change of the weekly scores and see who prefers the old - to this new version. I revised AldezD's to not include colours and changed the Total column to after the four judges scores, for ease of reading, however personally, the old system worked for me. Also - have placed a warning on AldezD's talk page as has he, and have the edit to consistently revert to, until we have ALL agreed on the changes necessary and what is not. I do however, believe we need to take heed of sourcing further as Aldez believes. That may quell his difficulty. User:Kiwi Jaden (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Kiwi Jaden You are most welcome. This was the best decision before turning into another WP:OWN situation. The sourcing is still under progress. It will take a while for editors to be used to the new change. It doesn't click to add a source in a blink of an eye. Ps: I will answer you about my help tomorrow. I want to review solutions for you first then I would ask you questions and give you a solution. I won't participate in an argument, but I will help you with resolving the issue (: Callmemirela (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll just go through each feature of the page from top to bottom:

Wilted Youth (talk) 01:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Scoring chart/average scores: They should be kept separate. Merging them may seem like a practical idea now, but once the chart grows week after week, it'll have to be formatted smaller and smaller and thus become overly difficult to read.
 * Highest and lowest scoring performances/dances: Should be separate, as merging them would cause logistical problems (which I have outlined above).
 * Weekly scores: I don't mind the new format, even though it makes the charts bigger than they probably ought to be. My only question is how scores will be sorted once couples begin doing multiple dances. We can't have two charts for one week, so something will have to be done to make sure the scores for every dance can be sorted properly, and not just the one danced first.
 * Dance chart: Should be kept as is. There are always going to be people visiting the page who are only interested in who danced what and when (to search dances up on something like YouTube, for instance), and this chart is the handiest one for such a purpose. Simply relying on the weekly charts is, as I have already said, not very user-friendly.
 * Wilted Youth I agree with what you said. All charts should be seperate or it gets angrily confusing. Adding this and that in one chart will get me frustrated. I mostly came into realization about your comment on the weekly scores tables. Yes, when having multiple dances in one night will add more confusion. Most importantly would the relays (whether it's Cha-Cha-Cha, Mambo, Jive, Mixed dances, etc.). The scores aren't based on judges's scores, but rather what they agreed upon. As well, there is the dance-off. I believe the previous season didn't have it, but it may return once again. With your arguments, I agree that the older version of the weekly scores would be useful to categorize the night better. I find the total scores given at the end is too much. There are too many numbers. Before the changes, it was easy to notice the total score. When the multiple dances arrive, it will be seriously too much to handle and will complicate people even more than now. Numbers here and there. It won't end. It won't simplify editors and viewers' lives. I am not quite fond on the new appearance, because I do find it big, and it will only be bigger when there are more dances as stated before. It would probably occupy the whole page, and it would be bigger than it should be. Callmemirela (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I like the old charts better. They are already good for the first 18 seasons of the show, plus the all the worldwide versions. Why change them now? <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 22:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 * I don't think voting is necessary since it's clear from all the previous discussions that only one person agrees with the new format and that one person is the same one who does the changes. But since it reached to this point, I prefer (might not be the right word) the old format NOT because I like it better but - as I stated in previous comment of mine - because the new format is not going to work as weeks pass by and more dances are added to the show and each couple will have 10 dances each.
 * The editors who work on these articles for some good years now kept the different tables for a reason. I am sure if they could merge them together they would have done it till now! I might be wrong but, I don't remember encountering AldezD's name in previous seasons or at least to the last three that I am personally editing. AldezD is a new editor on these DWTS articles who first appeared nominating ALL for deletion and then, when that didn't happen, comes and tries to change everything without discussion even though he/she was said many times that the changes are not practical for the article and not going to work.
 * Wilted Youth About the weekly tables, the new format won't be a problem when couples have two dances each. The problem will be when a dance marathon or a relay or some of these type of things is done. We always have one of them every season! In these type of dances, not every judge gives individual score but couples get ONE score from all of them. How is it going to be displayed? With dashes? Don't think that's right. I think weekly tables can be discussed but the rest are not going to work. TeamGale 23:57, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 * Count me as one who preferred the old format, especially the Judges' scores, which was far easier to take in at a glance. The table used to be more compact, with the key information to the left. The idea that it's useful to sort everything, including the songs (by first word), is oversold. Regardless of how I feel, Wikipedia is built on consensus: it's definitely inappropriate to edit war, and that's what we had here starting late on September 23 UTC. As best I can tell, more than one person violated the three-revert rule, and that simply isn't acceptable. If it happens again, I imagine that whoever does more than three reversions in a 24-hour period will be blocked by an admin. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Encore??
Should we add the encore for the Dance Chart? Bold the dance that received an encore? The one Janel & Val had in week 2.
 * I don't think so, only because the results show is not back for good. It was just for the first two weeks.

Wilted Youth (talk) 01:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 * We should just add them in the dance chart in bold. Even if they don't have one every week there is no harm in bolding the encore dances that they do have. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 22:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 * I disagree. I think it's not necessary, and attempting to explain the selection will get complicated, with a pick by the judges the first week, and a Twitter vote between two choices the second week. (Bolding without explanation wouldn't be helpful.) BlueMoonset (talk) 02:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Running order
Can I ask why there is already a table for week 3 about the "running order". We don't know yet the order the couples are dancing. This table is added when we have information of the order from at least one couple and that doesn't happen until Sunday/Monday or even till the live show. The dances with the references should be added to the Dance Chart. I think this table has to be removed for now or hidden and the references for the dances move to the dance chart. I was going to do it but because there were way too many reverts already on this article the past day, I thought to discuss it first in case I missed a conversation about it (very likely due to the chaos of the last couple of weeks). P.S. Why is Randy and Karina's reference dubious? I know that twitter/Instagram etc are not reliable sources but I think they can be used temporarily for the dances till the live show when a better source is found. And Karina says it clear that they have the Paso Doble. Just wondering and asking why. TeamGale 00:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

 * There shouldn't be a running order table unless we know the order, which we don't yet. Regarding the Paso reference, as long as you're sure that this is a particular dancer or contestant's Twitter or Instagram (verified account, or listed in a press release), then my understanding is that it's an allowable primary source for basic factual information. In this case, what dance they're doing, or where they come in the running order, would be acceptable, as long it's definitively stated. If there's some doubt as to whether this is really Karina's instagram, then tagging it with "dubious" is reasonable; if it's clearly her Instagram—for example, if she keeps linking to it from her genuine Twitter account—then I see no reason why it can't be used as a valid source, especially for short-term advance information. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

 * BlueMoonset Thanks for answering. Those were my thoughts exactly but I wanted to ask first regarding all the recent edits. I'll move on and delete/hide the running order table and it can be added back when we'll really have information about the order and not only the dances. Regarding Karina's IG, the IG is not verified but she keeps linking her posts to her verified twitter account so there is no doubt it's hers. I guess dubious is not needed. Thanks again. TeamGale 02:00, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

 * TeamGale, I just finished making that edit; so if you're working on it now, you may hit an edit conflict. Sorry about that. I also removed the "dubious", because it just mentions that there's a picture, but the information is based on the text accompanying the picture, which clearly says "paso doble". BlueMoonset (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Removing sources
Please stop removing sources from this article without replacing content with appropriate coding. When using sources as a placeholder for upcoming episodes, move the source to the appropriate section for the weekly result and/or replace with Template:Cite episode. AldezD (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Week 3 chart
How in the world was this deleted? I can't revert the edit, either. I am very angry right now. Wilted Youth (talk) 02:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Update: I got the data back, but this is not something that should happen to a semi-protected page. Vandalism or not, it irked me. Wilted Youth (talk) 02:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Scoring tables
Please try to keep the width of all scoring tables (both the width of the entire table and the width of each individual column) and the font size of text within the tables consistent throughout the article. Also, the aggregate weekly score tables should be nested together underneath Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 19) and left-aligned to increase readability of the article.

Although this is a modification of how tables are coded from earlier seasons, it increases the readability of the article in that it maintains a consistent appearance of all tables. Also, it is more appropriate to have all aggregate weekly scores nested underneath one header rather than in three separate sections. AldezD (talk) 10:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Couples chart
Does anybody know why the couples chart is not centered? The code is there, something is just blocking its way to function properly. Callmemirela (talk) 21:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The couples chart should not be centered. All other tables in the article are left-aligned. AldezD (talk) 23:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe it should be centered. It's odd when it's aligned on the left side to be honest. I am not agreeing to this new change either. It was better before. Callmemirela (talk) 01:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Carlton
The discussion of week 4 is missing the rather notable information that Alfonso incorporated his iconic "Carlton" dance from Fresh Prince into his performance since that's what's making all the headlines about the episode. I think he is also the first contestant on DWTS to come into the competition already notable for a particular dance (seriously, maybe if Chubby Checker were brought in as a contestant he might top it, but that's about it). <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The Carlton is not a ballroom dance nor a dance that is associated with Dancing with the Stars thus it should not be included. The article only includes ballroom dances that are danced on the show, such as the Paso doble, Tango, Waltz, etc. as for the Carlton, it is not a ballroom dance, Alfonso is the only one that danced it (keep in mind it was incorporated with his jazz routine), and even Wikipedia does not notice the Carlton. Callmemirela (talk) 11:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Week 5 dances
Just a heads up that because the dances being performed during partner switch-up week are not considered part of the official repertoire of styles that appear every season, they should not be included in the best/worst dancer chart. However, if some styles are danced again sometime in the future, then there would be reason to add them to the chart. As it is now, though, they should be considered one-off performances relegated to this week and this week only. Thank you. Wilted Youth (talk) 00:50, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Scoring chart: adding together scores from week 5 and 6? Not 4 and 5?
I could be wrong, but shouldn't the scores from weeks 4 and 5 be added together instead of 5 and 6? Tonight's episode is week 6, and the couple eliminated tonight will be based on the scores from week 4 when Betsey was eliminated and last week (the switch-up week). As usual under the new format, the eliminated couple will have received a score for a dance tonight even though they were already eliminated by previous scores and votes. Since no one was eliminated last week, if any summing is done, it should be weeks 4 and 5. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 01:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Wks 4+5 instead of weeks 5+6
Clarification: On the table there's a sum column for weeks five and six. However, shouldn't the sum be for weeks four and five? I know it gets confusing logically, but don't the scores from the week of dancing only count for the following week? Thus, the elimination on 10/20/14 is based on scores from weeks four and five? AISept8 (talk) 01:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Yes, it should be, it originally was, and it is again. It was changed for a little while tonight, but 4+5 is back on the charts, since it was indeed the basis for tonight's elimination. If it gets changed again, it will be restored. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I was about to comment on that. I don't know whom made the changes, but I didn't like it. The show showed the top scores chart from week 4 and 5 together. I don't know why the person changed it to 5 and 6. Thank you BlueMoonset for restoring. Callmemirela (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

 * Someone else restored it before I got there (and I was even beaten to the one error made in the restoration). I did create the 4+5 column to begin with, for the reasons noted above, so I thought it was important that it remained in the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Week 6 theme
While week 6 contained a majority of salsa dances with other one-time dances, I believe the theme for the sixth theme should remain as Pitbull night. It was not a Latin night because Foxtrot, Tango and Jazz are not Latin dances. Furthermore, I did some research. Most recap articles and spoiler websites had no acknowledgement of the week's theme. If it were to be Latin night, it would had been announced countlessly. ABC did not release a press release stating it was Latin night. Season 18's Latin night contained Latin-only dances including the team dances. Previous to that, it contained Latin dances and two Jive dances, although it was announced it was Latin night. The old source given (before the reverts) was merely an opinion. They took the majority of dance styles while excluding the non-Latin dances. The night was based on Pitbull. Most of the music dances to included Pitbull's songs and some of his favorite personal tracks (Pitbull not featured). Overall, the theme should remain the same in my opinion. Callmemirela (talk) 02:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. Just my 2c on this subject. I was the one who changed the theme from "Pitbull night" to "Latin night" because in some articles I was reading about week 6, they were mentioning it as a "Latin night". If I remember it right, I saw it in about 3 articles and that's when I thought of changing it using one of them. It was removed and went back to "Pitbull night" with the excuse that not all dances that performed during week 6 were Latin. That's true and I agree that not all dances were latin. That being said though and since the subject was brought in discussion, I have to say that I didn't watch anywhere, not even on the ABC press release for the week, mentioning that it was a "Pitbull night" theme. Only that Pitbull was going to be a guest judge and some couples performed to his songs. For me personally, that doesn't make it a "Pitbull night" overall. Unless there is a reliable source saying so, or if all the couples had performed to his songs, like it happened on "Michael Jackson night" in All Stars season, it's not a "Pitbull night". My opinion is that week 6 should remain without any theme (it's not necessary every week to have a theme). Or if it has to have a theme, to be named as Latin night (even though not all dances were Latin) since secondary reliable sources (where WP is based on) named it as that and was presented as that. But I think no theme is the "right" choice since ABC always mentions in the press release if a night has a theme or not, something the they didn't do here. TeamGale 13:43, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Addition: Just heard the Afterbuzz show about Week 6...they also called week 6 "Latin night" 1 ... TeamGale 16:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Here are some more reliable sources naming week 6 "Latin night". It was sure not "one opinion". 1, 2, 3, 4. And there are more... I still think if there has to be a theme on week 6 section it should be "Latin night" despite not all dances being latin. TeamGale 08:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The only thing that confuses me is why didn't ABC or the show say anything about its theme? Do you know where I am coming from? I find it suspicious that the show hasn't said anything at all and people are calling it Latin night. I think it's best we leave it blank. Callmemirela (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That's the thing I was thinking too and that's why on my first comment I said that week 6 should have no theme at all or IF we put a theme on it we should go with what the secondary sources say since that's WP's policy. My thought is that probably the night didn't have a theme (that's why ABC didn't say anything about it) and many people assumed that it was a Latin night because of the many Latin dances. TeamGale 14:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it is best we leave it blank. I am not against secondary sources, but in this case I only rely on primary sources. ABC has not said anything, and those articles are opinions of what they thought. It can't be Latin night if nothing was ever said by officials or those responsible of the show. Blanking its theme should be the theme of that week. Callmemirela (talk) 01:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That's what I am basically saying since the beginning. That there was no theme for week 6. The rest was if we should add a theme to add latin night. If no one else has anything to say (this is being here for a while and doesn't seem like they do) then the "Pitbull night" has to be removed. TeamGale 19:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I was more into the whole "It's not Latin night if ABC didn't say so." And I agree. This discussion has been open for nearly a week, and we are the only ones deciding the theme. Because of that, I will blank the theme for week 6. Thank you for helping! Callmemirela  ( talk ) 19:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should apply the episode titles from ABC's site: Seemingly the other episode titles are relatively close.AISept8 (talk) 03:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Personally I think not. The site uses a title to generally describe the night. It's logical the nights that have a theme to match those descriptions. ABC announces the theme of the nights every week on their official press releases plus the hosts say the theme night many times during the live show. "Pitbull joins the party" is a general description for the night...not exactly a theme. Clearly "Sia and Nico & Vinz Perform" that is used for week 2 results is not a theme. Here are all the press releases:
 * Week 1 doesn't give a theme.
 * Week 2 says "It's #MyJamMonday"
 * Week 3 says "Movie night"
 * Week 4 says "Most Memorable Year"
 * Week 5 says "The Switch-Up"
 * Week 6 also doesn't give a theme. Only that Pitbull will perform and be a guest judge. I don't see anywhere saying "Pitbull night" (that was used here before) or "Pitbull joins the party" theme. It would be "Pitbull Night" if all the songs were his, like the "Stevie Wonder Night" in past season.
 * Week 7 and for next week, says "Halloween"

Like I mentioned in a previous comment, not all nights have to have a theme. They didn't in the past seasons and neither they have to now. I watched the live episode twice and I didn't hear anyone giving a theme for week 6 during the show. Of course they said that Pitbull was there and was a guest judge but they do that with all the guest judges but Tom never said "Pitbull night". TeamGale 06:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Sadie & Mark's Jive on Halloween Night
On Halloween Night on Oct. 27th, Sadie and Mark does the jive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 23:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Then cite your source to prove it. If it's not sourced, then it's not true. Callmemirela (talk) 23:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Immunity
Regarding the immunity and the 3 extra points; it was said clear at the end of the show that Janel was at the top of the leaderboard with 43 points and not 40, which means she also got 3 extra points. Please stop removing it from the chart. TeamGale 15:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


text:
Carla Pérez

Carla Pérez (born 28 December 1982) is an Ecuadorian mountaineer. In 2019 she became the first woman to successfully summit both Everest and K2 in the same year (in 1995 Alison Hargreaves reached both summits unsupported and without supplemental oxygen but died descending K2), and the first woman from the Americas to summit K2 without supplemental oxygen.

Early life
When Pérez was four years old her father took her to a 14,000-foot volcano near their home at Quito, Ecuador, which inspired her to become a mountain climber.

Manaslu
In 2012, Pérez reached the summit of Manaslu without supplemental oxygen.

Cho Oyu
In 2014, Pérez completed a solo ascent of Cho Oyu without supplemental oxygen.

Broad Peak
In 2015, Pérez reached the summit of Broad Peak without supplemental oxygen.

Mount Everest
Pérez has spent time on Mount Everest as both a mountain guide and a climber. In 2016, she became the first woman from Latin America to reach the summit without supplemental oxygen. In 2019, she successfully guided clients to the summit via the northeast ridge.

K2
In 2019, Pérez became the first woman from the Americas to reach the summit of K2 without supplemental oxygen. In so doing, she became the second woman to reach the summit of Mount Everest and K2 in the same year. Alison Hargreaves being the first, in 1995 who climbed unsupported and without supplemental oxygen but tragically died in a storm during descent.

Dhaulagiri
In 2021, Pérez climbed on Dhaulagiri but was not able to reach the summit.

Makalu
In 2022, Pérez reached the summit of Makalu without supplemental oxygen.

title: Carla Pérez


text:
Platovka

Platovka (Платовка) is a rural locality (a selo) in Klyuchevsky Selsoviet, Klyuchevsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 269 as of 2013. There are 3 streets.

Geography
Platovka is located 17 km north of Klyuchi (the district's administrative centre) by road. Tselinny and Klyuchi are the nearest rural localities.

title: Platovka


text:
User:Bobby Crowe III

Social Media is a large part of Columbus. Especially with it being a college town. Many businesses now even use facebook and twitter to communicate with the local population. Facebook and twitter seem to be the most popular forms of social media, but lately there has been a rise of an app called YikYak, in which people can post things anonymously.

title: User:Bobby Crowe III


text:
User:Msh210/welcome

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wiktionary. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or make a hyperlink. The Wiktionary tutorial is a more wordy, multi-page document that helps you through those same formatting issues, and also touches on a couple of other issues relevant to editing.
 * The document What Wiktionary is not may be of interest. In particular, if you've edited Wikipedia in the past, you should note that Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia and does not have Wikipedia-style page titles.
 * There is a technical guide to how to start a new page. But you'll also want to look at our guidelines for how to format an entry (what goes where) and our criteria for inclusion (what can be included), which are our two main policy documents. (You can get a feel for how to format an entry by looking at existing entries.)
 * The sandbox is a safe place for testing markup.
 * The FAQ has, of course, some frequently (and some infrequently) asked questions, and their answers.

I hope you enjoy editing here! By the way, you can sign your comments on talk (discussion) pages using four tildes, like this:, which automatically produces your name (or IP number if you're not signed in) and the current date and time. If you have any questions, then see the help pages, add a question to one of the discussion rooms or ask me on my talk page.

title: User:Msh210/welcome


text:
1941 Furman Purple Hurricane football team

The 1941 Furman Purple Hurricane football team was an American football team that represented Furman University as a member of the Southern Conference (SoCon) during the 1941 college football season. In its 10th season under head coach Dizzy McLeod, the team compiled a 3–4–2 record (2–3–2 against conference opponents), finished in ninth place in the conference, and was outscored by a total of 195 to 129.

Furman was ranked at No. 138 (out of 681 teams) in the final rankings under the Litkenhous Difference by Score System for 1941.

The team played its home games at Sirrine Stadium in Greenville, South Carolina.


text:
Talk:Rochester, Illinois

A Note From Older RHS CISCO Students to RHS and RJHS Students Who Should Know Better:
Rochester students who choose to edit this page are reminded that any information they add must be accurate and all should be able to verify their sources. It should also go without saying that correct spelling and grammar are absolutely required on all modifications to the wiki. ALSO! Those of you who have been vandalizing Wikipedia in the past few months will suffer consequences. You know who you are. Thank you. DukeOfSquirrels 08:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

A Note of History and Recognition - I would like to suggest that some credit for the park be given to the Rochester Schools and the Rochester Youth Athletic Association. In the early years, the park was nothing until the school and the RYAA spent a tremendous amount of time into so many aspects of the park and then an agreement was made with the Village to allow for a wonderfully productive coop with the Village. The Village saved thousands of dollars of labor and materials while the good people of the Village including the Rochester School District enjoyed the benefits of the efforts of the schools, the Village and the all volunteer RYAA.

High School Championships
1999 Boys Golf Team won the Class A State Championship 2600:1008:B061:E28:3040:AA74:D28B:F6F8 (talk) 05:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

title: Talk:Rochester, Illinois


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mort Lawrence

The result was   delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Mort Lawrence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some mentions, but not enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Successful artist, but I couldn't establish notability. Has been tagged for notability for over six years, so time for a discussion. Boleyn (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 13:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Biblio  worm  17:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Very little verified information is available about this person - just a brief entry at the Lambiek Comiclopedia. That's not enough for notability; according to Lambiek that pedia contains entries for more than 11,000 comic artists. --MelanieN (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Derrick McKey

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Derrick McKey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113075027/http://www.usabasketball.com/history/mwc_1986.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/history/mwc_1986.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

title: Talk:Derrick McKey


text:
Template:Did you know nominations/Rembrandt (horse)

Rembrandt (horse)

 * ... that Rembrandt was called a "living work of art"?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/3rd Ranger Infantry Company (United States)

Created/expanded by Dana boomer (talk). Self nom at 20:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Looks good to me. Hook fact is cited and present; article is new enough and solid enough. Would like to see that medal table expanded with all the medals mentioned rather than just the olympic ones though, as otherwise it seems needlessly incomplete. That's the only concern though and it's not a major deal at this stage. I'd say we're good to go. GRAPPLE   X  01:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Grapple! I plan to take this to GA in the relatively near future, so I'll expand the medal box when I'm doing prep work for that nomination. Dana boomer (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Save for use during the 2012 Olympics? --PFHLai (talk) 16:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want - I don't really care either way. The hook itself has nothing to do with the Olympics (other than that the horse was at the Olympics when this statement was made), but the horse did compete (and win) twice, resulting in four gold medals. Dana boomer (talk) 23:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

authors: ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ


text:
provenanced

Adjective

 * 1) Having a provenance.
 * Most of the provenanced pottery vessels were found in San Diego county middens.
 * The auction house had a history of selling provenanced fine art.

title: provenanced


text:
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 August 18

File:Uniacke Square Lane between 1966 and 1971.jpg

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Uniacke Square Lane between 1966 and 1971.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])  – uploaded by EastCoastHistory ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No evidence provided that this photo is in the public domain in the US. Wikiacc (¶) 00:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete - The stated PD reasoning is "Rules for Archival Description", but Rules for Archival Description is a descriptive standard for archival and does not specify that an archived work is public domain. -- Whpq (talk) 13:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Primo de Rivera Estella.jpg

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Primo de Rivera Estella.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])  – uploaded by Paliano ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Plausibly unfree, see. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Fite TV Logo.png

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Fite TV Logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])  – uploaded by DTH89 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obsoleted by File:FITE TV.svg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Northwest Territories Licence Plate 1981 bear design.jpg

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Northwest Territories Licence Plate 1981 bear design.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])  – uploaded by M4CD0N4LD-D4N ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

see. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Micronesia Chuuk license plate graphic.png

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Micronesia Chuuk license plate graphic.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])  – uploaded by Kintetsubuffalo ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

see. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ashok-Arora.jpeg

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * File:Ashok-Arora.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])  – uploaded by Globalwatch123 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I have some concerns about the "Own Work" status of this file. There are no EXIF details, something unusual on a contemporary picture. It leads to suspicions that the file is scanned or grabbed from elsewhere.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. Potential copyright violation Fiddle   Faddle  09:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Keep - Absent other evidence, simply lacking EXIF is not a reason to delete. -- Whpq (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.


text:
User:Kizer/Web Page/Fireworks/Fade

1.	Open macromedia fireworks. Go to file the new hit ok when a box pops up FW_fade_2.png

2.	Then go to file import… or hit ctrl + R on you keyboard 3.	Open the picture that you want to fade

4.	Then on the top tool bar go to commands and then creative.

5.	Then click on the one that says fade image.

6.	A box will pop up with option on how you want it faded.

7.	Pick one

8.	After that there will be a black line you can move around

9.	Move it in to make less faded and out for more.

<IP_ADDRESS> 18:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

title: User:Kizer/Web Page/Fireworks/Fade


text:
Electronics/Voltage and Current

Voltage
This is a rough draft.

This section talks about the nature of voltage and current. Voltage and current sources and series and parallel voltage and current belong in the DC section. I'm not sure where voltage drops should go.

Voltage is a potential in an electric field between two charges. A voltage drop is a change in potential. Voltages add or subtract in series. (Relate this to voltage symbol)

(Moved to talk page)

Two electrically charged particles separated by a distance will have a potential energy associated with them,

Potential energy between two charges, where k is a constant, q and Q are the value of the two charges and r is the distance. Note that potential falls off as 1/r.

$$PE = {k q_{1} q_{2} \over r} $$

The potential divided by the amount of charge is the voltage:

$$V = {PE \over Q}$$

$$Volt = {Joule \over Coulomb}$$

Ideal voltage sources
An ideal voltage source is a fundamental electronics component that creates a constant voltage between two points regardless of whatever else is connected to it. Since it is ideal, some circuit configurations are not allowed.

Real voltage sources, such as batteries, power supplies, piezoelectric disks, generators, etc. have an internal source impedance (in series with the source), which is very important to understand. hfdh

Current
It is sometimes taught that current in electric circuits is composed of electrons, which flow from the negative terminal of the power source to the positive at the speed of light. This is not (completely) true.

 * 1) Electricity is carried by charged particles.
 * This can mean any small particles that carry charge and are free to move. In metals, electrons are free to move and the metal nuclei are not.  In salt water, however, electrons, negative ions, and positive ions are free to move, and do, when a voltage is applied (batteries and electrolytic capacitors are examples of electrical components that carry charge as ions).  In your own nerve cells, electricity is carried by moving ions, such as potassium and sodium.  In semiconductors, electricity is carried by electrons, but is often much more easily understood as movement of "holes"; the absence of an electron.  In some static electricity experiments, electricity can be carried by charged dust or small pieces of paper.
 * 1) Electrons drift through conductors.
 * 2) * When you flip the light switch, the light comes on almost instantly. This does not mean that the electrons themselves move that quickly.  In fact, they usually move much much slower.  A typical speed for electron drift in a DC electronic circuit is slower than molasses.  The electrons themselves are moving very quickly, but not in one direction.  They are constantly moving randomly from atom to atom, and only have a very gradual drift, or shift in average position over time.  The speed electrons drift actually depends on voltage, resistance of the conductor, shape of the conductor, material the conductor is made of, temperature, and other factors.
 * 3) * What is actually traveling quickly is electromagnetic waves; the pushing of electrons by their neighbors. This is similar to the way a wave in water works.  When you drop a stone in a pond, a wave spreads out from where the stone hit the surface.  But does the water itself move?  Not really.  The water molecules at the surface are just moving back and forth, and their cumulative effect is the wave that you see, which travels in one direction.  This is similar to the travel of an AC wave down a transmission line.  (we could make a better analogy to waves of car traffic or waves of people in line for a ride at the fair)  An interesting analogy would be moving a hand through air.  The hand is the wave and the air is the random electron movement.
 * 4) Electromagnetic waves only travel at the speed of light in a vacuum.
 * 5) * What is usually meant when someone says "the speed of light" is actually "the speed of light in a vacuum", as light itself slows down while traveling through materials. A typical speed for a signal traveling down common coaxial cable is 2/3 the speed of light (in a vacuum).  (This is about 200,000,000 m/s.)  The wave traveling down the cable is actually the same thing as light, just at a different frequency.  The waves traveling through your nerves as you read this are traveling at about 120 m/s.

(Section relating voltage to current.) As you increase voltage you apply an electric field to electrons and they travel from the negative to the positive potential. This is why increasing voltage directly increases current. Reversing the voltage reverses the current. Without resistance this is effectively a short meaning the electrons flow unhindered.

(section where you have voltage but no current.) Sometimes you have voltage but no current. Describe its effects on circuits.

So, negative particles drift from negative to positive voltage, and positive particles drift in the opposite direction from positive to negative voltage. The particles drift at different speeds in different materials. speed of "holes" based on bandgap. Given the presence of holes we tend to ignore the particles and focus on the current flow. Current is measured by the amount of charge flow per unit time and represents the speed of the electromagnetics waves. In talking about current we will mainly talk about electrons flowing, as they are the predominant charge carriers in metal and many circuit components.

Voltage = potential between two charges. Defined as the derivative of the flux linkage:

$$V(t)={d(Ni(t)) \over dt}$$

Current = flow of electrons Defined as the rate of change of the charge:

$$I(t)={dQ(t) \over dt}$$

Ideal current sources
An ideal voltage source is a fundamental electronics component that creates a constant current through a section of circuit, regardless of whatever else is connected to it. Since it is ideal, some circuit configurations are not allowed.

Real current sources, such as batteries, power supplies, piezoelectric disks, generators, etc. have an internal source impedance (in parallel with the source), which is very important to understand.

title: Electronics/Voltage and Current


text:
Savannah Centre for Contemporary Art

Savannah Centre for Contemporary Art is a centre of arts initiated by Ibrahim Mahamah in Tamale, Ghana. The centre is a space where artist run projects, exhibitions and research hub, cultural repository and more.

Exhibitions

 * Akutia: Blindfolding the Sun and the Poetics of Peace by Agyeman Ossei, ‘Dota’ (Co-Curators Adwoa)
 * In pursuit of something beautiful, perhaps... (A retrospective) by Curator Bernard Akoi-Jackson (PhD) Location

title: Savannah Centre for Contemporary Art


text:
Organic Chemistry/Foundational concepts of organic chemistry/History of organic chemistry/Vital force theory

<< Foundational concepts | Synthesis of urea >>

Long ago, people observed the differences between compounds that were derived from living things and those that were not. There seemed to be an impassable gap between the properties of the two groups. Someone proposed the vital force theory to explain the difference. The theory said that there was a something called a vital force that dwelled within the organic material that did not exist in the nonorganic materials. However, to echo the words of President Ronald Reagan, it was "only" a theory.

Synthesis of urea >>


text:
Colorado Group Limited

Colorado Group Limited was an Australian public company that operates a number of retail clothing chains. Major brands include Colorado Adventurewear, Mathers, Williams the Shoemen, JAG, Diana Ferrari, and Pairs. The company is based in Brisbane, Queensland with an office in Cremorne, Victoria. The history of the company dates back over 140 years to the 1864 founding of Williams in Ballarat, Victoria.

Colorado Group Limited was delisted from the Australian Securities Exchange on 15 August 2007 following the issue by ARH Investments of compulsory acquisition notices on 3 July 2007.

Colorado had 434 stores in Australia and New Zealand, and employed 3,800 people. It owed around A$400 million to 18 financiers.

The Colorado clothing retail group went into receivership on 30 March 2011. Insolvency accounting specialists Ferrier Hodgson were placed in charge of the group. Colorado was owned by Affinity Equity Partners. In 2011, the company became known as Fusion Retail Brands.

In June 2011 it was announced that the clothing chain was to "shut its doors" at the cost of 1,042 jobs. In Australia, 100 underperforming Colorado stores shut, 21 Williams stores, 7 Mathers stores, 2 JAG stores and one Diana Ferrari store. In New South Wales 42 stores closed, and in Victoria 27 closed. 9 Colorado Stores in New Zealand also closed.

Colorado ceased selling its clothing lines, returning to its beginning as a shoe brand which were sold through the company's Mathers and Williams the Shoemen stores, and online. In September 2013, the JAG brand was sold to Apparel Group.

In 2014, Couper Finance purchased Fusion Retail Brands, then, in 2017, the Munro Footwear Group purchased Fusion Retail Brands from Couper Finance.

title: Colorado Group Limited


text:
Talk:List of wars involving Syria

Images
Do we really need images in the table or specific colors? Imo, it looks more like a gallery than a list in its current state. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 02:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I think the images should be removed, it looks like the only other page of this type they are on is the American war list page. I think they should be removed from there as well, all the images do is add fodder for edit wars over which one should be there, ect.XavierGreen (talk) 02:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:List of wars involving Syria


text:
Abdirisak Omar Mohamed

Dr. Abdirizak Omar Mohamed is a Somali politician. He was Minister of Natural Resources in Abdi Farah Shirdon cabinet from November 8, 2012, till the cabinet was ousted on December 2, 2013, and then moved on to become the Senior Policy Advisor to the President of Somalia Hassan Sheikh Mohamud. He was the Minister of Internal Security of Somalia. Currently he is the Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources for the Federal Government of Somalia, and hold this post since 12 August 2022. He is the former Minister of Internal Security of Somalia, having been appointed to the position on 6 February 2015 by the former Prime Minister Omar Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke.

Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources
On 12 August 2022, Mohamed was successful in being elected as the next Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources of Somalia. As minister, Mohamed on 21 October 2022 helped finalize the signing of a large but controversial deal that had been in the works since February with the U.S.-based oil and gas company Coastline Exploration Limited ("Coastline"). In exchange for a US$7 million signature bonus to the Central Bank of Somalia, Coastline was allowed to move forward with its exploration program for new oil fields off the Somali coast.

title: Abdirisak Omar Mohamed


text:
Talk:2018 WGC-Dell Technologies Match Play

Websites glitching
Both the PGA Tour website and the European Tour website have had a problem for nearly a half hour now, with their respective scoreboards loading. Hopefully at least one of the two sites will have their scoreboard issue resolved soon. This is only Day 1, and there is still more than four hours of competition remaining. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 19:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Stretching the logo
The native resolution for the logo is 194 × 93 px. We really should not be stretching it beyond that resolution. It looks horrible when you do so. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)