text:
Tsai Tsan-te

Tsai Tsan-te (born 3 May 1975) is a Taiwanese actress, also known by the names Vega Tsai and Chamder Tsai.

Tsai has performed on film, stage, and television. She was a finalist for the Golden Horse Award for Best Supporting Actress in 1998, for her appearance in Bad Girl Trilogy. She received the Best Actress Award at the Taipei Film Festival that same year. Tsai hosted the 2012 Taipei Film Awards ceremony alongside Sam Tseng. She was part of the original cast of Forever Dialogue, which premiered at the 2013 Kaohsiung Spring Arts Festival.

Selected filmography

 * The Heaven Sword and Dragon Saber (1984)
 * Daughter of the Nile (1987)
 * The Cabbie (2000)
 * State of Divinity (2000)
 * Angel Lover (2006)
 * Dangerous Mind (2006)
 * All Because of Love (2017)

title: Tsai Tsan-te


text:
User:Sububb/sandbox

About

subu melattur change 'Started as a Tester, testing mobile technology for Britco & Bridco Communications. Then jumped into Development and developed Bluetooth Multiplayer Chess application which works on Most high end mobile phones supporting CLDC 1.1 and MIDP 2.0 Now I have changed my field of interest and currently working on Blackberry, Apple handset testing project. Worked in Telecom Qatar for more than 3 year and now completing 2 year in Vodafone Qatar.

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User:Sububb/sandbox


text:
Wenche

Etymology
From, , , the diminutive of several female given names beginning with the Germanic element.

The spelling Wenche began to appear in Norway at the end of the 19th century.

title: Wenche


text:
Talk:Leeds United F.C.–Millwall F.C. rivalry

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Leeds United Millwall programme 1988.jpg


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Alvarez (politician)

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Claudia Alvarez (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a city councillor. As always, city councillors are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they are accepted as "inherently" notable only if they serve in an internationally prominent global city, and otherwise clear the bar only if they can be referenced to a depth and range and volume of reliable source coverage that marks them out as much more significant than most other city councillors. But of the eight footnotes here, three are primary sources and the other five are purely local media coverage of the type that every city councillor in every city can always show, which does not constitute evidence that she's special. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have much, much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Delete, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete bigotted, antisemitic city council members do not get articles just because they exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:06, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


text:
parapodium

Noun

 * 1)  Any of the paired unjointed lateral outgrowths used for locomotion by worms such as annelids.
 * 2)  A lateral expansion on both sides of the foot in some gastropods, often used as a swimming organ.

authors: Гражданская оборона

title: parapodium


text:
Svetlana Komleva

Svetlana Komleva (Светлана Комлева, born 15 December 1973) is a former professional tennis player from Moldova.

On 13 March 1995, she achieved a career-high singles ranking of world No. 132, and her best doubles ranking by the WTA was 158 on 7 August 1995. Komleva won four tournaments in singles and six in doubles on the ITF Circuit.

She made her WTA Tour main-draw debut at the Austrian Open, in the doubles event partnering Tatjana Ječmenica.

Playing for Moldova Fed Cup team, she has a win–loss record of 8–2.

title: Svetlana Komleva


text:
Anna Basta

Anna Basta (born 23 January 2001) is a retired Italian group rhythmic gymnast who joined as a member of the national squad in 2016. She is the 2018 World Group All-around silver medalist and two-time European (2018) Group All-around silver medalist.

Career
She began rhythmic gymnastics in 2005 at age 4 after previously being enrolled in swimming lessons by her parents and disliking the classes. She took gymnastics classes at the Polisportiva Pontevecchio club in Bologna, Italy.

As a senior competitor, she earned international recognition as a member of the Italian group team, winning accolades as an All-Around silver medalist at the 2018 World Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships and as a two-time All-Around silver medalist at the 2018 European Championships. Her former senior club was CS Aeronautica Militare, where she is a member of the Italian Air Force.

She quit the national team in 2019, following the development of an eating disorder and accusations of psychological abuse from coaches at the national rhythmic gymnastics training academy in Desio. She had previously spent 11 months out of the year training with the national team since she was 13 years old. An investigation of the national training staff was launched by the Italian Gymnastics Federation in 2022, following claims of abuse from Basta and several other former Italian rhythmic gymnasts.

title: Anna Basta


text:
2017–18 CERS Cup

The 2017–18 CERS Cup is the 38th season of the CERS Cup, Europe's second club roller hockey competition organized by CERH.

Format
All the thirty two teams will play a double-legged knockout tournament with the only rule of avoiding that two teams from the same nation play together in the first round.

Teams
Thirty two teams from eight national associations qualified for the competition and were confirmed on 19 September 2017. League positions of the previous season shown in parentheses.

Bracket
The draw was held at CERH headquarters in Lisbon, Portugal, on 23 September 2017.

Round of 32
The first leg was played on 4 November and the second leg on 23 November 2017.

 * }

Round of 16
The first leg was played on 9 December 2017 and the second leg on 13 January 2018.

 * }

Quarterfinals
The first leg will be played on 17 February 2017 and the second leg on 10 March 2018.

 * }

Final Four
The Final Four will be played on 28 and 29 April in Lleida, Spain.

title: 2017–18 CERS Cup


text:
talk down

Verb

 * 1)  To negotiate a lower price.
 * 2)  To verbally assist someone to land an aircraft.
 * 3)  To convince a person to cease a drastic action or response, such as a suicide attempt or act of rage.
 * 4)  To overcome by spoken argument.
 * 5)  To comfort someone experiencing a bad trip, to help them come down.
 * 1)  To convince a person to cease a drastic action or response, such as a suicide attempt or act of rage.
 * 2)  To overcome by spoken argument.
 * 3)  To comfort someone experiencing a bad trip, to help them come down.
 * 1)  To overcome by spoken argument.
 * 2)  To comfort someone experiencing a bad trip, to help them come down.
 * 1)  To overcome by spoken argument.
 * 2)  To comfort someone experiencing a bad trip, to help them come down.

Translations

 * French:
 * Polish:

 * French:
 * Italian: degnarsi, trattare dall'alto in basso
 * Polish:

title: talk down


text:
User:Naveed Anwar-Saghar Falsafi

Naveed Anwar-Saghar Falsafi Phylosopher Poet Author Painter Photographer Journalist.

title: User:Naveed Anwar-Saghar Falsafi


text:
Severfield

With multiple sites in the UK, Europe and a joint venture in India, Severfield plc is the market-leading structural steelwork Group in the UK and among the biggest in Europe, with a capacity to produce 250,000 tonnes of steelwork per year.

Severfield has been involved in numerous high-profile projects including Coal Drops Yard, Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, The Shard, Emirates Stadium, and 22 Bishopsgate.

The firm has acquired businesses across structural steel market sectors within the UK and Europe, and participates with JSW Group in two Mumbai-based joint ventures: JSW Severfield Structures Ltd and, indirectly, JSW Structural Metal Decking Ltd.

In 2023, Severfield announced the acquisition of Voortman Steel Construction Holding BV, headquartered in Rijssen, Netherlands. This addition will allow Severfield to accelerate its European growth strategy and diversify its end markets.

History
The business was founded in 1978 as a partnership named Severfield-Reeve; moved to Dalton in 1980, and incorporated as Severfield Reeve Structural Engineers Ltd in 1983. As a public company it was known from 1988 to 1999 as Severfield-Reeve plc; from 1999 to 2014 as Severfield-Rowen plc, and then adopted its current title.

Listings
In July 1988, Severfield-Reeve plc was quoted on the Unlisted Securities Market, then moved up to the London Stock Exchange on 8 June 1995.

, Severfield plc is a component of the FTSE SmallCap Index.

(UK) Steel and UK Steel
In 1991, Severfield Reeve acquired 80% of steel trading business, Steel (UK) Ltd and bought out the remaining minority shareholdings in 2009. The company ceased trading in 2002; was renamed Stable Move Ltd in 2005, and dissolved in 2013 owing £1,161,732 to Severfield plc and eliminating shareholder value.

In 2006, Severfield established Steel UK Ltd as a 50% joint venture with Sheffield based steel stockholder Murray Metals Group Ltd to negotiate steel purchase prices for both partners. The company had been incorporated in 2005 as Stable Move Ltd. Severfield and Murray bought steel at prices agreed with suppliers by Steel UK and the company did not trade itself. The joint venture was dissolved in 2013.

Meat processing equipment
In 1995, Severfield's meat processing safety equipment subsidiary Manabo (UK) Ltd began trading. Initially the business was a 75% joint venture with the original technology developer but in 1996, Severfield Reeve bought out all remaining minority shareholdings. The established Scandinavian distributor for Manabo's products agreed to purchase from the new company. Manabo manufactured at sites around Thirsk and, from 1997, operated a chain mail glove factory in Bataszek, Hungary.

Such was the anticipated transformation of the structural steel business that by 1997, The Times described Severfield as a specialist engineer and supplier of equipment for the meat and poultry processing industry. However, in the same year company founder John Severs blamed Manabo's six monthly £902,000 losses on the meat industry being reluctant to change its ways in health and hygiene.The glove business and company were sold in 2000 after a further £2 million loss in 1998, and asset write-down of £2.8 million in 1999.

Severfield Reeve Projects Ltd
In 1991, subsidiary Severfield Reeve Projects Ltd was incorporated, initially to carry out construction at Severfield's plants. It began to undertake main contracting for others in 1997.

Severfield Reeve Projects diversified into house building in 2002, purchasing on its own account a site in Bagby for two traditional, five bedroom dwellings with 1 acre gardens.

In 2008, it launched a property investment division with the purchase of distribution warehouses for £7.1 million. The value of the initial investments was written down by £2.1 million in 2009. New projects and investments by Severfield Reeve Projects Ltd stopped in 2009, and it closed in 2011.

Kennedy Watts Partnership Ltd
In 1999, Severfield purchased 25.1% of Sheffield based design bureau Kennedy Watts Partnership Ltd for £464,000 in shares and cash. The shareholding was restructured in 2008 so that it was held through an intermediary, Last Exit Ltd. Kennedy Watts Partnership Ltd was placed into administration in 2013; into liquidation in 2014, and dissolved in 2016 with a deficit to creditors of £292,000 and elimination of all shareholder stakes.

Work platform
In 2006, Severfield patented a craned or self climbing work platform that attaches to steelwork at height, and mounts its own powered cherry picker. The apparatus was invented to assist erection of steel structures where conditions are not suitable for safe operation of conventional access equipment. In 2009, the work platform project was abandoned and £2.4 million development costs written off.

Tonnage
Severfield structural, fabricated steel output, relative to capacity and UK market:

, the JSW Severfield Structures Ltd joint venture in India has a capacity of 100,000 tons of fabricated steel per annum.

Locations
Severfield plc is headquartered on the former RAF Dalton near Thirsk and is a significant employer there. It also has sites in Sherburn, Lostock, Bolton, Bridlington, Ballinamallard, and European offices at Zevenbergen.

Joint ventures JSW Severfield Structures Ltd and JSW Structural Metal Decking Ltd are located in Mumbai.

The Construction Metal Forming Ltd cold formed construction steel joint venture manufactures steel decking, and light gauge framing, in Mamhilad and Magor.

Accident statistics
Severfield plc's RIDDOR ratios have improved, and are lower than its industry average. Senior executives are remunerated according to the accident frequency rate of the business units they oversee.

Site fall denied
In January 2021, a steel erector employed by Severfield fell down a staircase at Google's Kings Cross site and was unfit to work for six days. Severfield suspected fraud and summarily dismissed him, but an Employment Tribunal determined the incident occurred; that the employee was unfairly dismissed, and awarded £2,721 in compensation. There was no order for payment in lieu of notice because, post dismissal, the erector took immediate, better remunerated employment elsewhere.

Hazardous welding fumes
In March 2020, Severfield was served a Health and Safety Executive Improvement Notice, because of hazardous welding fumes at its Lostock works. The fault was corrected by April 2020.

Lifting chain failure
In 2019, a link weld in the chain set being used to lift a 2.5 ton beam failed, although rated to over twice that capacity. The lifting equipment had recently been independently inspected. Similar sets from the Turkey based manufacturer were withdrawn from use and allegedly exhibited faulty welds. The beam was partially bolted in place so did not fall.

Damage to Leadenhall Tower
During 2017 redevelopment of 22 Bishopsgate, a suspended girder struck Leadenhall Tower. Severfield was the steel frame subcontractor to Multiplex's Bishopsgate site. Nobody was hurt.

Hand tool vibration
In November 2017, Severfield was served a Health and Safety Executive Improvement Notice, because of tools causing excessive hand arm vibrations, at its Dalton site. New working practices were applied by March 2018.

Forklift driver fatality
In 2016, the Health and Safety Executive fined the firm £135,000, plus £46,020 costs following a 2013 incident when a 27 year old forklift driver was fatally crushed at its Dalton site.

Site unloading
In 2015, Severfield and its haulage contractors adopted customised trailers for delivering fabricated steel to construction sites. They are fitted with exclusion barriers to prevent unauthorised access whilst unloading by forklift, and fall arrest equipment to protect riggers on the trailer when unloading by crane.

Leadenhall Tower bolts
In November 2014, two embrittled bolts, purchased from a supplier, broke and fell from Leadenhall Tower. Another descended in January 2015. Severfield announced an anticipated £6 million charge for bolt remediation works in 2015, and final settlement in 2019.

Faulty crane plate clamp
In 2012, Severfield settled the claim from a welder who had been moving steelwork with a crane and faulty plate clamp. A ten foot long, and two foot wide, beam fell and crushed his foot.

White finger
In 2011, a plater at Severfield's Dalton facility suffered permanent damage to his hands caused by vibrating tools provided by the firm. He developed hand arm vibration syndrome commonly known as white finger.

Clyde Arc Bridge
Severfield subsidiary Watson Steel Structures Ltd fabricated the Clyde Arc Bridge in 2007. It had to be closed in 2008 because a clevis connector failed and a 35 metre long tension bar fell onto the carriageway. Another clevis was found to be cracked and it was decided to replace all 14 tension bars in the structure. Watson Steel Structures Ltd claimed £1.8 million from Macalloy, the clevis supplier, alleging its product was faulty. Macalloy denied the claim and countered Watson Steel Structures Ltd had only specified minimum yield stress for the components.

Epoxy resin paint
In 2005 Severfield dismissed a painter, at its newly acquired Sherburn site, who suffered allergic industrial contact dermatitis following exposure to epoxy resin paint. He claimed compensation. Severfield initially denied, but then accepted responsibility just before the 2007 High Court hearing. Mr Recorder Salter went on to award the painter £113,168.15 damages including £50,000 for loss of future earnings. The firm appealed but in 2008, Lord Justice Keene's judgement rejected its arguments and increased the award for future earnings loss to £90,000.

Waltham Abbey fall
In 2002, a 29 year old steel fixer working for Severfield's Steelcraft Erection Services Ltd fell from a new Sainsbury's distribution centre, and suffered spinal injuries; broken ribs, and a punctured lung.

Blyth battery plant
The Guardian reported in September 2022 that Severfield had been impacted by cancelled and delayed works at Britishvolt's challenged Blyth gigafactory. It declined comment to the newspaper.

Manchester Ship Canal
In 2022, Severfield issued a legal claim against Davymarkham Ltd relating to 2015 bridgeworks over the Manchester Ship Canal. Davymarkham Ltd had been dissolved in 2021, but was restored by court order to face proceedings alongside its insurers and Fairfield Engineering Solutions Ltd.

Late supplier payments
In July 2019, subsidiary Severfield Design and Build Ltd was suspended from the UK Government's Prompt Payment Code for failing to pay suppliers on time. The firm submitted an action plan to the Chartered Institute of Credit Management and was reinstated by November 2019.

Carrington Power Station
In 2013, Severfield contracted with the Duro Felguera group to provide steelwork for the new Carrington Power Station. Duro Felguera's UK subsidiary refused to pay a December 2014 stage payment. Severfield obtained adjudication under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 for £2,470,231.97, and then sought summary judgement from the High Court of Justice to enforce payment for a reduced amount of £1,445,495.78. Judge Stuart-Smith refused because part of the sum related to a power plant and was therefore excluded from the 1996 Act, and the adjudicator's jurisdiction. Duro Felguera argued it was in fact owed money by Severfield because of overpayments.

Severfield finally obtained a judgement from Mr Justice Coulson in 2017 for £2,774,077.91 (or £1,760,480.27 up to 2014) but by then Duro Felguera UK Ltd had entered liquidation and recovery was limited to what Duro Felguera in Spain could be obliged to pay under a parent company guarantee for the period up to 2014.

Losses on Leadenhall Tower
During 2013, the group acknowledged substantial contractual losses in relation to Leadenhall Tower in the City of London. This prompted a major restructuring of the business; departure of the Chief Executive, and a £45m rights issue.

Severfield's 2012 accounts included a £9.9 million charge for losses at Leadenhall Tower, plus a further £10.2 million on other delinquent contracts.

Wimbledon roof leak
In 2011, the Daily Mirror alleged the retractable roof over Wimbledon Centre Court leaked during a quarter final tennis match. Severfield completed the 3,000 ton moving roof in 2009. The All England Club stated the leaks were in the permanent roof, not the mobile section, and were "part of the normal drainage process".

Discrimination by association
In 2011, Severfield decided to reduce the number of welders at its Sherburn site by selectively not renewing the contract of an employee who was caring for his disabled wife. He claimed discrimination by association. Severfield could not satisfy the employment tribunal there was any other reason for the dismissal and the welder was awarded £10,500 compensation with a recommendation he should be re-employed.

Remuneration of founder
Shareholders rebelled against a 2007 payment of £1.6 million to retiring Managing Director, John Severs. They refused to pass a resolution at AGM to authorise the payment which had already been made.

Property transactions
In 2001, directors of the company, including John Severs, purchased the headquarters property for £14 million. In 2007 the company bought it back again for £23.5 million. Both transactions were endorsed by the independent directors.

Fischer and Bartlett roof leaks
In 1989, a subsidiary of Georg Fischer AG built a distribution warehouse near Coventry. The shallow pitch roof leaked, exacerbated by deflection of supporting steelwork. It sued the builders and designer. Severfield-Reeve plc was the steelwork subcontractor and met specifications supplied to it by the designer. In 1994, Severfield-Reeve plc agreed to pay £175,000 to the building owner in return for an indemnity against all parties in the matter.

In 2009, Severfield became third party in a claim relating to the leaking roof at a potato processing plant in Airdrie constructed by its then subsidiary Atlas Ward Structures. Severfield agreed joint liability with the building's main contractors. Lord Menzies in the Outer House of the Court of Session was asked to choose between remediation options for the Airdrie premises, the alternatives differing in cost and quantum of damages. He drew attention to the similar decision that had faced Judge Hicks in the Fischer warehouse case.

title: Severfield


text:
Comandanta Esther

Comandanta Esther is the nom de guerre of a revolutionary in the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) of Chiapas, Mexico, created for indigenous people's rights. She is considered a high ranking woman in the EZLN. Military "commanders" have no actual military or governmental power and are simply spokespeople for the movement. Comandanta Esther is best known for her March 2001 speech to the Congress of the Union at the San Lazaro Legislative Palace in Mexico City, in which she spoke for constitutional recognition of indigenous people and the difficulty that indigenous women face in Mexico, demanded that their rights be acknowledged. Her work has helped inspire women activists to speak up in and join leadership roles in their communities in Mexico.

Biography
Comandanta Esther endured a difficult childhood as her family suffered from poverty and hunger. She lived with her mother and several siblings, four of whom died from lack of food or from illness. They did not have enough money; they ate tortillas and occasionally beans. Additionally, Esther did not know how to speak Spanish. She had gone to school as a child, but she did not learn because she did not understand the language. In her words, she learned how to speak and write in Spanish upon joining EZLN.

Later, as Esther grew up and started to become aware of the poverty around her, she began to attend indigenous meetings where they talked about the state of their community. She gradually started increasing her political participation, but was not met without obstacles due to being an indigenous woman living in a region where inequality is common.

Political participation
Comandanta Esther became known for her role as the spokesperson relaying the official message from the Clandestine Revolutionary Indigenous Committee (CCRI) of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation in the Congress of the Union, located in the Legislative Palace of San Lázaro on March 28, 2001. Her position as an EZLN representative brought much attention to the speech because up until that point, Subcomandante Marcos had been the only and main spokesperson that represented the organization.

Her speech was broadcast live on all Mexican television channels and was additionally published on March 29 under the Profile segment of La Jornada, a Mexican newspaper. The published piece reported that the Commission for Concord and Pacification (Cocopa) needed to recognize the need for indigenous rights, especially rights for indigenous women, since their demographic faced much more gendered targeted violence, have less reproductive and health rights along with employment opportunities and freedom of expression.

In her Congress of the Union speech she is recorded saying, "That is how we Zapatistas want Mexico to be. One where indigenous people will be indigenous and Mexican, one where respect for difference is balanced with respect for what makes us equals. One where difference is not a reason for death, jail, persecution, mockery, humiliation, racism. On where, always, formed by differences, ours is a sovereign and independent nation." which ultimately summed up the sentiment of the EZLN at the time.

Although Comandanta Esther's involvement in the March 28, 2001, speech to the Congress of the Union is the most well-known speech, she is also recognized for her work as a speaker during International Women’s Day in Chiapas on March 8 of the same year. She presented the need of women solidarity and unity:

“To women throughout the country, we tell them to fight together. We have to fight more because as indigenous we are triply despised. As an indigenous woman, as a woman and as a poor woman. But women who are not indigenous also suffer, that is why we are going to invite them all to fight so that we no longer suffer. It is not true that women do not know, that nothing else is useful to be at home, that not only happens in indigenous communities but also in cities."

Additionally, she also recounted the difficulties that she and other women have had in order to participants in politics:

"At first, it was really difficult for me, the men did not understand, although I always explained to them that it is necessary to fight so that we are not all the time starving. Men did not suit them, they say women were only good for having children and they should take care…”

Comandanta Esther also participated as a speaker in following events during the year 2001:

 * Juchitán, Oaxaca, February 25
 * Nurio, Michoacán, March 3
 * Toluca, State of Mexico, March 5
 * Zócalo of Mexico City, March 11
 * National Polytechnic Institute (IPN), March 16
 * National School of Anthropology and History (ENAH), March 18
 * San Andrés Totoltepec and Santo Tomás Ajusco, March 19
 * UAM Azcapotzalco, March 20

And in 2003, in Oventic, Chiapas, on August 9.

In most of her speeches, Comandanta Esther highlights the importance of the unity between indigenous and non-indigenous individuals, and between men and women, in the search for a better country:

"It is our word as a woman, let's walk together with men. Just They will not be able and we alone cannot. Let us put more effort, consolidate our social fighting organization. Let us all fight together, men and women, for the rights that the powerful deny us and build a Mexico where there is no racial mockery, color and tongue. Brothers and sisters, let us not loosen our conscience, we are very important because without women there would not be a country nor would humanity multiply. We as women feel the pain, we give birth and we are a foot of the men, only men fighting will not make the change. "

During the Fiesta de los Caracoles in Oventic, Chiapas, in 2003, Comandanta Esther harshly criticized political parties, pointing out that they did not represent Mexicans. "We cannot stop being Indians to be recognized as Mexicans. Never again. They will be able to finish us or betray us (referring to the PRI, PAN and PRD) ... they agreed to deny us our rights. "

The activist also wrote a letter on January 1, 2003, addressed to the President of the Republic at that time, Vicente Fox Quesada, and Luis H. Alvarez, Commissioner for the Development of Indigenous Peoples, to demand that they acknowledge indigenous peoples and their demands instead of not fulfilling the promises they had made, telling them, among other things: "It is you commissioner of peace. And you are only a commissioner of Fox to provoke division, and deceive the people of Mexico."

title: Comandanta Esther


text:
Novozyryanovo

Novozyryanovo (Новозыряново) is a rural locality (a selo) and the administrative center of Novozyryanovsky Selsoviet, Zarinsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 538 as of 2013. There are 9 streets.

Geography
Novozyryanovo is located 20 km north of Zarinsk (the district's administrative centre) by road. Zarinsk is the nearest rural locality.

title: Novozyryanovo


text:
Lists of naval flags

Naval flags, both Naval jacks and naval ensigns, are a subset of Maritime flags flown by naval forces.

There are several lists of naval flags, organised by present or former country:

Current countries

 * Australia - List of Australian flags § Royal Australian Navy
 * Bangladesh - List of Bangladeshi flags § Military
 * Belgium - List of Belgian flags § Military
 * Croatia - List of Croatian flags § Maritime flags
 * Hungary - List of Hungarian flags § Naval flags
 * India - List of Indian flags § Navy
 * Ireland - List of flags of Ireland § Naval service
 * Japan - List of Japanese flags § Self-Defense Force and Imperial Army/Navy
 * Latvia - List of Latvian flags § Military flags
 * Norway - List of flags of Norway § Flags of the Navy
 * Poland - List of Polish naval and maritime flags, List of Polish flags § Navy
 * Russia - List of Russian navy flags
 * Thailand - List of flags of the Royal Thai Armed Forces § Royal Thai Navy
 * United Kingdom - List of British flags § Naval service
 * United States - Flags of the United States Armed Force § Maritime flags

Former countries

 * USSR - List of USSR navy flags
 * Yugoslavia - List of Yugoslav flags § Military flags

List of flags

 * Category:Lists and galleries of flags
 * Lists of lists
 * List of Bangladeshi flags

title: Lists of naval flags


text:
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-10/Lemma entries

Lemma entries
Wiktionary:Entry layout explained does not yet distinguish between the full format typically used for lemma entries and the abbreviated format typically used for non-lemma entries. This vote seeks to describe which entries should be considered non-lemma entries and what details they should exclude. If approved, the following text will be added to in WT:ELE:
 * Voting on: Noting lemma and non-lemma entry differences in WT:ELE.
 * ===Lemma entries===
 * For English entries, the lemma form is usually the “bare” form: the singular form for nouns, the bare infinitive form for verbs, and the positive form for adjectives:
 * Lemma entries: word:, talk:, easy:
 * Non-lemma entries: words:, talks:, talking:, talked:, easier:, easiest:
 * Some kinds of words may have a different lemma form or may be handled differently, including pluralia tantum, pronouns, defective verbs, and in some cases, words in other inflected languages. Other kinds of words may have only one form, including prepositions and words from non-inflected languages.
 * Lemma entries: scissors:, they:, may:, μιλώ:, to:, 詞:
 * When the situation is unclear, editors are advised to use their best judgment on a case by case basis.

The first paragraph of the "Inflections" section will be changed to this:
 * The term of the entry is given in boldface type in the line following the "Part of speech" header. Key grammatical properties follow on the same line (e.g. gender, case, and number).  For lemma entries with other forms, the key forms are given in parentheses.  See .  For non-lemma entries, the only inflections shown in the inflection line are the headword and optionally the lemma.

The following will be appended to the paragraph in the "Definitions" section:
 * For non-lemma entries, it is sufficient to describe the relationship of the entry to the lemma form, optionally with a brief gloss of the main meaning of the lemma. See .  E.g. on words::
 * or, with a brief gloss:
 * Units of language.
 * Units of language.

The following sentence will be added to the first paragraph of the sections "Synonyms", "Further semantic relations", "Translations", "Descendants", "Derived terms", and "Related terms":
 * This section is only used for lemma entries.

 * Vote ends: 29 November 2007 23:59 UTC
 * Vote started: 30 October 2007 23:59 UTC

 * Vote created: Rod (A. Smith) 23:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2007-10/Translation into lemma only

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Rod (A. Smith) 04:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support EncycloPetey 04:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Forgive me, but the idea of a full definition/translation for each sense of each word form is a bad one. If the translation of pardonner seems a bit off to me, but I know that every single one of its many forms has a version of that translation, I'm certainly not going to improve all of them, and I might not even bother improving the lemma translation, as I'll know that such an improvement is suddenly a lot less worthwhile. If it seems like a verb might warrant a usage note, this will tip it over the line: I know that people looking up a form of the verb — the people who don't know which form is the lemma, and therefore seem most likely to need the usage note — aren't likely to see it, so why bother? I guess I'm being defeatist here, but I'm also being practical: I can't be the only editor whose desire to contribute has something to do with thinking his contributions will be helpful to future readers, and we stand to sacrifice a lot of potentially useful contributions from new editors who realize the barrier to helpfulness is insanely high. If we want to be maximally helpful, require the minimum number of clicks, etc., then we should seriously re-consider the possibility of using redirects where possible, which is most of the time. —Ruakh TALK 22:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I should clarify that I'd be O.K. with form-of entries having a bit more information, provided they make very clear that the lemma page is where the full scoop is; for example, it would be cool if, whenever foo has a usage note, there were a bot that added a usage note to foos that read simply, "The entry for foo: has usage notes; see foo." And it would be O.K., though not great, if pardonnes had a definition along the lines of " Second-person singular present indicative of pardonner ; so “[you] forgive”, roughly (but see pardonner)." But, absent any sort of specification of how this should work, I think we're better off without editors following their own half-cocked notions. —Ruakh TALK 23:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think anyone who's functioning on a logical level wants full translations or full treatment on non-lemmas. :-) What I would like to see is just a basic translation, and maybe an example sentence. Nothing fancy, just more than grammatical terms that not everyone is going to be familiar with. Wikipedia has little "Main article" templates from which we might be able to base something similar here for these articles. Something like . — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 00:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. The comments below suggest to me that Robert, Connel, and Cynewulf want to see full definitions, full translations, etc. in every non-lemma entry.  You, however, would support this proposal if I just modify the definitions section to make the brief gloss required instead of making it optional?  Rod (A. Smith) 02:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * NO! You are making an utterly absurd and unfounded leap from not prohibited to required. I did not say "required" and no one else did. We are seriously concerned about more complete entries being "dumbed down" by people removing content because ELE supposedly says it shouldn't be there! And people thinking that they "aren't supposed to" add definitions etc because ELE says non-lemma entries don't have them. The vote language above explicitly prohibits things that are reasonable and useful in some set of entries. The language should make it crystal clear that a non-lemma entry MAY be anything from the bare minimum soft-redirect stub to being a expanded "complete" entry. In particular that some actual English in the definition and usage examples are always desirable. Robert Ullmann 22:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Why are you yelling? The proposal above allows for an optional brief gloss definition.  You and Ric opposed it, for one because you don't want editors to remove brief glosses.  So, I suggested that the next proposal should require a brief gloss.  What the hell do you want?  Rod (A. Smith) 23:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not yelling about the the definitions / tranlations gloss, I'm yelling about the flat prohibition on Translations, -onyms, etc, and the idea that the only alternative is to require them! And about the presentation which implies that stubs are the "normal" form of non-lemma entries, instead of being incomplete stubs. Robert Ullmann 00:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Full definitions and translations would be friggin insane. See dar. All those definitions in every article? No thanks. Like I've said (somewhere) I don't want to see full treatment of non-lemmas, just enough so that those who aren't familiar with the grammatical terms we use. If someone doesn't know what "pluperfect" or "past historic" or "genitive" mean, what good is the article? I might support this proposal if the "brief gloss" were very strongly suggested, or an example sentence required in its absence, if the word itself is impossible to translate accurately alone. I also think the "form of" information should by default go on the inflection line if there is a definition or "brief gloss" given. It just makes sense to me that way. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 02:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ric, the idea of lots of people going and creating an open free dictionary of words in all languages is friggin insane ... but somehow we have 2.6 million unique headwords in 170 languages describing 401 languages. Yes. It is friggin insane. You may not want to do it; but those that think that something cannot be done should stay out of the way of those doing it. (-) Robert Ullmann 22:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you think you could format such translation tables in a way that isn't an un-navigatable (yay for making up words) pile of crap? :) I've tried, but that level of organization takes an assload of work that I seriously doubt most people are going to ever want to deal with. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 23:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Please note that I never suggested putting the conjugation tables in the translations tables; other people have gone way way past anything I said! (We don't do that at the lemma, and no one is suggesting it, eh?) See on my talk page. We just do something like at the lemma, where we translate to (e.g.) masculine singular, or maybe a couple of forms if not too much. Likewise, talked can have "Swahili: -linena, -lisema, -liongea", very useful and perfectly reasonable. Robert Ullmann 00:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No, that is not useful and only seems reasonable with sufficient myopia. How is a reader to know whether those are alternate translated lexemes or just alternate forms of a single translated lexeme?  It's impossible to know from that text, and the reader will need to click through to the target entry for more details.  No clicks were saved.  If we were to adopt such a system, readers would lose the consistent way to find translations that we have today.  (Should languages without tense have translations at talked:?  Should languages without number have translations at talks:?)  To find the translation of an English verb, readers should be consistently able to turn to the primary English entry (the infinitive), which nicely organizes the translations by sense, not by person, number, mood, etc.  Then, to know which specific target inflection to use, readers should be able to turn consistently to the conjugation/declension tables of lemma entries and not have to scour our site in various other nooks and crannies.  Rod (A. Smith) 01:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Robert Ullmann 11:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC) very strongly
 * The premise is wrong. There is no reason why a non-lemma entry cannot be a full entry. The "soft redirect" form specified (and commonly used) should not be described as "sufficient", but as (barely) "minimal".
 * Specific sections may not be needed, but they must not be prohibited.
 * The (e.g.) plural form may have differing senses, requiring the -nyms be used for some information.
 * The forms may have different translations depending on tense and/or sense used only by that form.
 * The inflection (... form of) should be on the inflection line, the definition line should contain something in English that translates or defines the word. For most users, minimal FL form entries that say "first-person singular present tense of saltare" might as well be written in Klingon. That should be on the inflection line, and the definition line should read "(I) jump"
 * It should then have an example, or a quotation, or both; translated into English if a FL entry. Keep in mind that our users are often learning English or the FL (they are looking up a word, after all!)
 * Other: there is, for example, no reason not to put the conjugation table in each form if it is a one-line template call.
 * Most importantly: Licence must not be given to editors to go around removing content because "ELE says it shouldn't be here".
 * We have a lot of entries created by hand or by bot that are in the minimal soft-redirect form; that is fine, and the majority will probably stay that way, but they should be seen as stubs to be expanded, not in any way whatsoever recommended as the preferred form. I ran across this sort of minimal stub being created by WF when I first started here, and wondered why, was he just lazy? (The answer was a bit more complex). I created mtoto and watoto; and have spent time since thinking about this. Now see children, which in its present form would violate the proposed ELE. Would you remove content? Is it to be wrong to have a complete entry? Robert Ullmann 11:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your feedback, but I disagree.
 * Prohibiting the extra sections in non-lemma entries focuses contributors’ efforts on the primary entries. That focus is good for this project.
 * (inlining a comment: This idea is diametrically opposed to the fundamental principle of a wiki: people will work on different things that interest them; if you tell them they aren't allowed to spend their time adding obscure details to Albus Dumbledore but should work on what you want them to "focus on", they will just leave. Robert Ullmann 23:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC))
 * Then why do we prohibit "sum of parts" entries? Rod (A. Smith) 23:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And why do we prohibit translations between foreign languages? Those are potentially genuinely useful, and experience shows that there exist editors who want to add them. —Ruakh TALK 03:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That's what the Wiktionaries in other languages are for... this idea seems crazy to me. Maybe you're seeing something in it that I'm not. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 05:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Precisely. There is an ideal repository for many types of information.  Normative documents like WT:ELE help define such ideal repositories.  This proposal and its successor, Votes/2007-11/Lemma entries 2, seek to have WT:ELE inform contributors and readers about where best to place certain information like nuance definitions, synonyms, translations, and inflections of any given word.  With any luck, the next proposal will be much more clear about how defining “primary entry” helps in that regard.  Rod (A. Smith) 07:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * We don't include (non-idiomatic) sums of parts because we are a dictionary, and we don't include translations of between foreign language because we are an English- language dictionary (of all languages). You are both drawing false dichotomies here. There are many useful things we don't do, because they don't fit our scope or purpose, not just bcause they are more work. In this case, however, I think that inclusion of full information appropriate for a dictionary in the English language on all articles ought to be our aim. Dmcdevit·t 04:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe we are in violent agreement, because I also think that inclusion of full information appropriate for a dictionary in the English language on all articles ought to be our aim. This and the successor proposal, Votes/2007-11/Lemma entries 2 seek to help define what's appropriate for a dictionary.  Rod (A. Smith) 07:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If a plural form has a sense that the singular lacks, that sense is a plurale tantum, which would be treated as a lemma.
 * Spreading translation efforts across the multiple forms of lexemes dilutes translation efforts and is confusing to readers who may happen to encounter a non-lemma entry first (e.g. words:, which currently has a small translation section that should be deleted).
 * This proposal allows the lemma inflection to be shown on the non-lemma entry’s headword/inflection line.
 * This proposal allows non-lemma definitions to include translation glosses. Requiring them would be difficult in many cases and would deviate from current practice.  This proposal does not seek to introduce any new requirements.
 * This proposal does not prohibit example sentences with translations.
 * Conjugation sections should be only in the lemma entries so that readers learn to go to the lemma entry for complete details.
 * Rod (A. Smith) 16:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Connel MacKenzie 16:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC) I know I commented on this topic somewhere - but that discussion is not linked here.  In general, my opposition echoes Robert's: this is exactly opposite the intended goal.  Complete entries should replace minor enrties, minor entries should replace stub/form-of entries, sub entries should replace redirects.  Advocating the wrong direction in the past has had immediate bad effects (removal of content) and must never be encouraged.  --Connel MacKenzie 16:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Currently, some editors (myself included) are under the impression that non-lemma entries are supposed to be minimal. For example, I think this project is better off if we delete the translation table from words:.  If this vote shows that our project should have non-lemma entries with translations, etc., then at least that will be clarified.  Rod (A. Smith) 17:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that is a poor example. For translation tables, (in the past) people have extended the "lemma-only" mentality to irregular verbs, e.g. be, which remains ridiculous, IMHO.  I think your proposed vote is much further-reaching than you intend it to be.  But note that I am only discussion translations without even broaching any of the other topics.  In general, the emphasis should be on expanding entries.  So far, translations, indeed, have been an exception.  As Wiktionary stabilizes, I hope that too, will change (gradually.)  This proposal does seem to be the direct opposite of where we should eventually be aiming: complete entries everywhere, synchronized in an automated fashion (with the ability to override automatic synchronization where appropriate.)  --Connel MacKenzie 20:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why words: is a poor example of a non-lemma entry. I'm trying to understand how you and the other opposing contributors think non-lemma terms should be formatted.  Do you have a better suggestion for our example non-lemma entry?  Rod (A. Smith) 20:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose—msh210 ℠ 17:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC). I agree with the proposal as a minimum for non-lemma entries, but must vote against it as a model or maximum for them. Denying editors the ability to enter -onyms, translations, etc. into non-lemma English-language entries is a Bad Thing, per Robert Ullman's comments.
 * "Prohibiting the extra sections in non-lemma entries focuses contributors' efforts on the primary entries", while a reasonable argument, is not a strong one, especially as editors will do what they want anyway (by which I mean that someone who wants to work on lemmata will do so even if he's allowed to work on other entries, and someone who can't be bothered to work on lemmata will do nothing if he's not allowed to do anything else).
 * "Spreading translation efforts across the multiple forms of lexemes dilutes translation efforts and is confusing to readers who may happen to encounter a non-lemma entry first (e.g. words:, which currently has a small translation section that should be deleted)" is a reasonable argument: someone who wants to know how to say "words" (units of language) in, say, Hebrew (for which we have a translation at word but not at words) might, in the current state of affairs, go to words, see translations, see that Hebrew's is missing, and give up. I grant that this is a problem, and a solution should be found, but I don't think that prohibiting translations is it. Perhaps instead we can, for non-lemma entries, have the Translations section start with "For translations of the singular , see |its entry .".
 * As to "Conjugation sections should be only in the lemma entries so that readers learn to go to the lemma entry for complete details", this depends on the language and word. For example, as recently discussed elsewhere, many verbs in Hebrew, but not all, have one or more infinitives. But all verbs are referred to, usually, by their third-person, singular, masculine, past-tense form. So the latter is where The Powers That Be (Shai, Ruakh, perhaps others; and I concur) have decided to put conjugation tables. I see no reason not to put them also at one or more infinite form's entries. I imagine a similar situation exists in other languages.
 * Wow. From the voting responses so far, it is clear that not everyone agrees that we should distinguish at all between lemma entries and non-lemma entries.  The respondents believe we should include translation tables for every inflected form of a word.  I am surprized by the feedback, but happy to receive it.  Assuming this turns out to be the majority opinion, should the headline of non-lemma entries specify all the key inflections?  That is, should words: be formatted like Votes/2007-10/Lemma entries/words?  If not, please help format it into your ideal.  Rod (A. Smith) 18:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose Cynewulf 19:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC) I like children:. Let's do more like that. The proposal for "words" looks nifty too. A couple thoughts. In a pure volunteer project, as User:Msh210 says, people are going to do what they want; using restrictions to try to focus people's efforts isn't going to work. Also, we should give people what they ask for; they shouldn't be given something else, or told to look up something else to find what they want. If someone looks up won and wants to know how to say "he won" in Spanish, it would be great if they didn't have to click win → translation section → ganar → conjugation section → figure out what preterite means, but rather just have a translation section in won listing something like "gané ganaste ganó ganamos ganasteis ganaron (see ganar)". Probably a bad example. Coming the other way, the entry at ganó is just barely sufficient: I'm starting to think that English translations are necessary in all cases (e.g. here "(he) won"). I've shown wikt entries for lemmas to people who were just wondering what someone said in chat, and their reaction could be summed up as "that's real helpful". Give users what they want up front, let editors work on what they want. Cynewulf 19:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Re: "I'm starting to think that English translations are necessary in all cases" I cannot begin to express how much I agree with that statement! YESYESYESYESYESYESYES!  --Connel MacKenzie 19:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Yeah, the "starting" is for the "necessary" and "all" -- if there's no "easy English" there, it belongs on a cleanup list. Cynewulf 20:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That could very easily get incredibly messy with verbs. For instance, on won, would we have a separate translation table for past particple, simple past? Romance languages tend to have 6 simple past forms. Which do we include? All of them? How are we going to handle that? lol — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 20:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Well, it's a Wouldn't It Be Nice If. We could at least say (start with saying) "see preterite conjugation in infinitive ganar". Cynewulf 20:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Messier than chasing links three or four down now? Well, yes won could have the translation tables split.  The example given was for the opposite, though - from another language to English.  I expect this to be a (very) long-term goal of Wiktionary, adding language-specific automation only where applicable.  While we currently have things like TheDaveBot, they do not keep anything in sync yet.  Gradually, they would, could and should (if given room to grow.)  --Connel MacKenzie 20:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Messier than chasing links three or four down now? - What? lol...I didn't understand that at all. For those who would like translation tables in non-lemma entries, check this out and comment or something, please Wiktionary_talk:Votes/2007-10/Lemma_entries/words. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 20:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If you are trying to create a mess, you have failed utterly. :-)     Indeed, the layout you have there is much easier to comprehend, particularly if the target pages exist (for popup-previews via WT:PREFS.)  Are you saying you don't (ever) want that sort of information filled out by bot?  --Connel MacKenzie 20:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Rejecting a normative proposal because "using restrictions to try to focus people's efforts isn't going to work" is ridiculous. Shall we just delete WT:ELE and let this project become a free-for-all?  Of course not.  Yes, contributors may choose to add full definitions, translations, and synonyms wherever they want, but a normative document like WT:ELE helps others know how best to realign such contributions to deliver the highest quality dictionary we can.  This discussion is headed in the direction of abandoning the concept of a lemma/non-lemma distinction.  If that is the conclusion we reach, we will have to find creative ways to manage the additional maintenance.  Not that it cannot be done, but it will require a significant new infrastructure to maintain the required synchronization.  Rod (A. Smith) 20:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You've apparently misunderstood my statement, otherwise you would have called User:Msh210's reasons "ridiculous" too. Your argument wrt ELE also does not follow. This proposal is about telling people not to work on words: and instead to "focus" on word:. That is a "restriction". It's "[not] going to work" because rather than focus on word, they're going to do nothing. This proposal is ... proposing that we prevent people from "add[ing] full definitions, translations, and synonyms wherever they want". Rather than "realign" (i.e. delete) what others have added, we should add whatever is missing. Cynewulf 21:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There is obviously some confusion. If an editor chooses to add a Spanish word to our project but uses a structure not approved by WT:ELE, that's fine, but other contributors use WT:ELE to normalize that contribution.  Rod (A. Smith) 21:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Stated another way, this proposal tells editors that if a sense appears on dice: that applies equally to all inflected forms of the word, it should be moved to decir:. Ignoring the distinction between lemma entries and non-lemma entries means we will need to introduce a huge, massively complicated infrastructure to update all of the inflected forms of decir:.  When an editor discovers a new definition for decir:, a single edit should suffice to inform interested readers.  I hope we can create a high quality set of lemma entries and soft redirects from inflected forms.  It is more than an order of magnitude more difficult to produce a complete, high-quality dictionary that treats every inflected form with equal detail.  Rod (A. Smith) 21:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. I agree completely with Robert and others. I view the stripped down non-lemma articles as placeholders for fleshed-out articles. Lemmas and non-lemmas are different words, and we ought to aim to include translations and meanings and all the other information we have, for all words, not just for some grammatical canonical words while explaining their relationships to others. That's a lot of work, of course (but I would say the same thing about a multilingual dictionary!). Our efforts should be towards finding creative solutions to that problem, though. Dmcdevit·t 06:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow. English entry translation tables are a terrible place to show each of the dozens of persons, numbers, tenses, aspects, moods, and levels of formality for each translation target for each of the hundreds of languages that will eventually be in those translation tables.  Instead, only a single form of each translation target lexeme can fit into each English translation table.  Each of those target entries can then show all of the many inflected forms of the target lexeme without further cluttering the huge English translation tables.  Since the English translation tables only have room for one form of the target lexeme, it would be deceptive to show anything other than the target lemma.  Thus, the translation table for a past tense English verb must be the same as that of an English lemma.  So, why repeat?  Rod (A. Smith) 16:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Repetition = bad and messy. lol...if people really insist on translation tables in all English entries, with verbs at least one could put in *Language: Varies by person, number, etc. See lemma., or something. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 17:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't really thining of English words here, but it works all the same. We repeat ourselves all the time, and it's usually for the better. If I come across a word I don't know, (quisiese, maybe) I cannot be expected to know it's lemma and look that up, and then to extrapolate from some lemma entry's inflection line or conjugation table what the actual meaning of the word I'm really curious about it. Our ideal should be to have an English translation of every non-English word (i.e., every form of every word), and vice versa. Dmcdevit·t 04:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. Wtf is a lemma anyway
 * Rod: a good point: most people have no idea what a "lemma" is, and one of the most confusing things about dealing with (dead-tree) FL dictionaries is figuring out what the lemma form is, and what stuff they implicitly expect you to go to the lemma for, because they have such limited space. We don't have that problem. Robert Ullmann 13:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Correct, we don't have that problem, because if you visit a non-lemma form, we give you a link to the lemma form. —Ruakh TALK 17:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Right. For readers, we don't really have that problem because links from secondary entries to main entries should ensure that readers who land on a secondary entry get a common sense of the word and are just one click away from the most complete information repository we have.  The terminology may challenge casual contributors, though, so the updated vote page, Votes/2007-11/Lemma entries 2 uses main: instead of lemma:.  Rod (A. Smith) 18:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Right. For readers, we don't really have that problem because links from secondary entries to main entries should ensure that readers who land on a secondary entry get a common sense of the word and are just one click away from the most complete information repository we have.  The terminology may challenge casual contributors, though, so the updated vote page, Votes/2007-11/Lemma entries 2 uses main: instead of lemma:.  Rod (A. Smith) 18:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain — [ ric| opiaterein ] — 01:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC) I agree with some parts, but others not entirely. I think the "form of" information should be on the main inflection line, as with lemma entries, with a brief definition below.
 * Indeed, we should be making entries like estu, with the inflection on the inflection line, and a definition (in English) on the definition line. What we have now are just stubs, that should be expanded over time, not limited. Robert Ullmann 16:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I hope the current wording is an unobjectionable compromise between current practice and the vision expressed by Opiaterein and Robert. Is that so?  Rod (A. Smith) 19:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Decision

 * Withdrawn for refinement. Rod (A. Smith) 01:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * With 3-5-1 opposing, I have withdrawn this vote for refinement. Hopefully Votes/2007-11/Lemma entries 2 will be less controversial.  Rod (A. Smith) 01:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

title: Wiktionary:Votes/2007-10/Lemma entries


text:
User:Robhingle

Hi I'm not very familiar with wiki media, but I'm interested in contributing what I know robhingle @ gmail (dot) com

title: User:Robhingle


text:
Aloisia

Aloisia is a given name. Notable people with the name include:

 * Aloisia (wrestler) (born 1987), American actress and wrestler
 * Aloisia Bauer (born 1951), German swimmer
 * Aloisia Brial (died 1972), Uvean queen
 * Aloisia Kirschner (1854–1934), Austrian novelist

title: Aloisia


text:
unbolted

Adjective

 * 1) Not fastened with a bolt.
 * 2) Not sifted.
 * 3)  Coarse, uncultured, vulgar.
 * 1)  Coarse, uncultured, vulgar.
 * 1)  Coarse, uncultured, vulgar.
 * 1)  Coarse, uncultured, vulgar.

Translations

 * Greek:

title: unbolted


text:
Talk:Benjamin Butler (artist)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Benjamin Butler (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111204031100/http://www.tomiokoyamagallery.com:80/artists_en/butler_en/ to http://www.tomiokoyamagallery.com/artists_en/butler_en/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Benjamin Butler (artist)


text:
Symphonies by Anton Bruckner

The Austrian composer Anton Bruckner composed eleven symphonies, the first, the Symphony in F minor in 1863, the last, the unfinished Ninth symphony from 1893 to 1896.

Bruckner's F-minor symphony of 1863 was initially designated Symphony No. 1, and, in a letter to his friend Rudolf Weinwurm dated 29 January 1865, Bruckner described the C-minor symphony he was working on at the time as his Symphony No. 2. Later Bruckner decided to leave the F-minor symphony unnumbered, and he called the C-minor symphony of 1865/66 his “Symphony No. 1”. Similarly, the D-minor symphony of 1869 was initially designated Symphony No. 2, while the C-minor symphony of 1872 was his Symphony No. 3. At some time in 1872 or 1873, Bruckner decided to leave the D-minor symphony unnumbered, and he called the C-minor symphony of 1872 his “Symphony No. 2”.

Symphony in F minor
Otto Kitzler, Bruckner's last composition teacher, set him three final tasks as the climax of his studies: a choral work (Psalm 112), an overture (the Overture in G minor), and a symphony. The Symphony in F minor was completed in 1863. Bruckner later rejected this work, but he did not destroy it. While it certainly reminds one of earlier composers such as Robert Schumann, it also bears the hallmarks of the later Bruckner style. Kitzler simply commented that the work was "not very inspired". It was first performed in 1924 and not published in its entirety until 1973. It is occasionally listed as "Symphony No. 00".

Symphony No. 1 in C minor
Bruckner's Symphony No. 1 in C minor – sometimes called by Bruckner "das kecke Beserl" (roughly translated as "the saucy maid"), – was completed in 1866, but the original manuscript of this symphony was not reconstructed until 1998. Instead, it is commonly known in two versions, the so-called Linz Version – based mainly on rhythmical revisions made in Vienna in 1877 – and the completely revised Vienna Version of 1891.

Symphony in D minor
Bruckner's next symphony was the Symphony in D minor of 1869, the so-called "Symphony No. 0" ("Die Nullte"), a work, which was so harshly criticized, that Bruckner retracted it completely. It was not performed at all during his lifetime.

Symphony in B-flat major
Bruckner's next attempt was a sketch of the first movement to a Symphony in B-flat major, but he did no further work on it afterwards. There is a single, recent commercially available recording of this sketch: Ricardo Luna, Bruckner unknown, CD Preiser Records PR 91250, 2013.

Symphony No. 2 in C minor
The Symphony No. 2 in C minor of 1871/1872 was revised in 1873, 1876, 1877 and 1892. It is sometimes called the Symphony of Pauses for its dramatic use of whole-orchestra rests, which accentuate the form of the piece. In the Carragan edition of the 1872 version, the Scherzo is placed second and the Adagio third. It is in the same key as No. 1.

Symphony No. 3 in D minor
Bruckner composed his Symphony No. 3 in D minor in 1873. He presented it to Wagner along with the Second, asking which of them he might dedicate to him. Wagner chose the Third, and Bruckner sent him a fair copy soon after, which is why the original version of the Wagner Symphony is preserved so well despite revisions in 1874, 1876, 1877 and 1888–9. One factor that helped Wagner choose which symphony to accept the dedication of was that the Third contains quotations from Wagner's music dramas, such as Die Walküre and Lohengrin. Most of these quotations were taken out in the revised versions.

Symphony No. 4 in E-flat major, Romantic
Bruckner's Symphony No. 4 in E-flat major was his first great success. It is more commonly known as the Romantic Symphony, the only epithet applied to a symphony by the composer himself. The 1874 version has been seldom played; success came in 1878 but only after major revisions, including a completely new scherzo and finale, and again in 1880–1, once again with a completely rewritten finale. This version was premiered in 1881 (under the conductor Hans Richter). Bruckner made more minor revisions of this symphony in 1886–8.

Symphony No. 5 in B-flat major
Bruckner's Symphony No. 5 in B-flat major crowns his most productive era of symphony-writing, finished at the beginning of 1876. Until recently only the thoroughly revised version of 1878 was known. In 2008 original concepts of this symphony were edited and performed by Akira Naito with the Tokyo New City Orchestra. Many consider this symphony to be Bruckner's lifetime masterpiece in the area of counterpoint. For example, the Finale is a combined fugue and sonata form movement: the first theme (characterized by the downward leap of an octave) appears in the exposition as a four-part fugue in the strings and the concluding theme of the exposition is presented first as a chorale in the brass, then as a four-part fugue in the development, and culminating in a double fugue with the first theme at the recapitulation; additionally, the coda combines not only these two themes but also the main theme of the first movement. Bruckner never heard it played by an orchestra.

Symphony No. 6 in A major
The Symphony No. 6 in A major written in 1879 to 1881, is an oft-neglected work; whereas the Bruckner rhythm (two quarters plus a quarter triplet or vice versa) is an important part of his previous symphonies, it pervades this work, particularly in the first movement, making it particularly difficult to perform.

Symphony No. 7 in E major
The Symphony No. 7 in E major was the most beloved of Bruckner's symphonies with audiences of the time, and is still popular. It was written 1881–1883 and revised in 1885. During the time that Bruckner began work on this symphony, he was aware that Wagner's death was imminent, and so the Adagio is slow mournful music for Wagner (the climax of the movement comes at rehearsal letter W), and for the first time in Bruckner's oeuvre, Wagner tubas are included in the orchestra.

Symphony No. 8 in C minor
Bruckner began composition of his Symphony No. 8 in C minor in 1884. In 1887 Bruckner sent the work to Hermann Levi, the conductor who had led his Seventh to great success. Levi, who had said Bruckner's Seventh Symphony was the greatest symphony written after Beethoven, believed that the Eighth was a confusing jumble. Devastated by Levi's assessment, Bruckner revised the work, sometimes with the aid of Franz Schalk, and completed this new version in 1890. Deryck Cooke writes that "Bruckner not only recomposed [the Eighth]... but greatly improved it in a number of ways.... This is the one symphony that Bruckner did not fully achieve in his first definite version, to which there can be no question of going back."

Symphony No. 9 in D minor
The final accomplishment of Bruckner's life was to be his Symphony No. 9 in D minor, which he started in August 1887, and which he dedicated "To God the Beloved." The first three movements were completed by the end of 1894, the Adagio alone taking 18 months to complete, and the final eighteen months of Bruckner's life devoted to the fourth-movement Finale. Work was delayed by the composer's poor health and by his compulsion to revise his early symphonies, and by the time of his death in 1896 he had not finished the last movement. The first three movements remained unperformed until their premiere in Vienna (in Ferdinand Löwe's highly revised version) on 11 February 1903. Bruckner suggested using his Te Deum as a Finale, which would complete the homage to Beethoven's Ninth symphony (also in D minor). The problem was that the Te Deum is in C major, while the Ninth Symphony is in D minor, and, although Bruckner began sketching a transition from the Adagio key of E major to the triumphant key of C major, he did not pursue the idea. By the time of his death on 11 October 1896, Bruckner had completed most, if not all, of the fourth-movement Finale, with approximately 560 bars in numbered, sequential bifolios in Bruckner's own hand. There have been several attempts to assemble, augment where necessary and prepare the surviving manuscript material of the Finale for performance. The two most familiar completions are by William Carragan (1983–2010) and by a committee of musicologists, composers and conductors – Nicola Samale, John Philips, Benjamin-Gunnar Cohrs and Giuseppe Mazzuca (SPCM, 1984–2012).

Conductors
Jascha Horenstein made the first electronic recording of a Bruckner symphony (No. 7) with the Berlin Philharmonic in 1928.

Bruno Walter, who acted as an "ambassador" for Bruckner in the United States, made celebrated recordings of symphonies 4, 7 and 9 late in his career and wrote an essay on "Bruckner and Mahler". Otto Klemperer made one of the first two recordings of Bruckner (the Adagio of the Eighth Symphony from 1924). Later, he recorded Symphonies 4–9. Wilhelm Furtwängler made his conducting debut with the Ninth Symphony in 1906 and conducted Bruckner constantly throughout his career. Other Bruckner's pioneers were F. Charles Adler and Volkmar Andreae.

Hans Knappertsbusch was unusual in continuing to perform the first published editions of Bruckner's symphonies even after the critical editions became available. Eugen Jochum recorded Bruckner's numbered symphonies many times, as did Herbert von Karajan. Günter Wand, in addition to audio recordings, also made video recordings of his Bruckner concerts. Georg Tintner received acclaim late in life for his complete cycle of recordings on the Naxos label.

In Japan, Bruckner's symphonies were championed by Takashi Asahina, and multiple concert recordings of each symphony conducted by Asahina have been issued on compact disc.

The Romanian conductor Sergiu Celibidache did not conduct all of Bruckner's symphonies, but those that he did conduct resulted in readings of great breadth, possibly the longest accounts of the works on record. This is especially true in the case of the Eighth Symphony, which lasts over 100 minutes. Although he never made commercial recordings of Bruckner, several recordings of concert performances were released after his death. His pupil Cristian Mandeal recorded in the years 1980 the nine numbered symphonies with the Cluj-Napoca Philharmonic Orchestra.

Eliahu Inbal recorded an early cycle—the first to comprise all 11 symphonies—which featured some previously unrecorded versions. For instance, Inbal was the first conductor to record the first version of Bruckner's Third, Eighth, and the completed finale to the Ninth. Daniel Barenboim recorded one 10-symphony cycle of Bruckner's symphonies with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, and a later 9-symphony cycle with the Berlin Philharmonic. Both of these are notable for including Bruckner's final completed symphonic composition, Helgoland (1893) for men's chorus and large orchestra. In 2017, Barenboim and the Staatskapelle Berlin presented the nine numbered symphonies in a concert series at Carnegie Hall in New York City. Sir Georg Solti also recorded a 10-symphony cycle with the Chicago Symphony. Bernard Haitink recorded a 10-symphony cycle of Bruckner's symphonies with the Concertgebouw Orchestra, and re-recorded several symphonies with the Vienna Philharmonic and Berlin Philharmonic. Stanisław Skrowaczewski recorded all 11 symphonies with the Rundfunk-Sinfonieorchester Saarbrücken.

In the 1980s, Gennady Rozhdestvensky recorded a complete cycle of the eleven symphonies, including the two versions of Symphony No. 1, the three versions of Symphony No. 3, as well as its 1876 Adagio, the two versions of Symphony No. 4, as well as its 1878 "Volksfest Finale" and Mahler's reorchestration, and Samale and Mazzuca's completion of the finale of Symphony No. 9. The cycle did not include the 1872 version of the Symphony No. 2 nor the 1888 version of the Symphony No. 4 since they were not yet published. The 1887 version of Symphony No. 8, which was apparently recorded in February 1988, has not been released. Rozhdestvensky's cycle is still the most complete cycle to date.

Carlo Maria Giulini made a specialty of Bruckner's late symphonies as well as No. 2. Giuseppe Sinopoli was in the process of recording all Bruckner's symphonies at the time of his death.

More recently, Riccardo Chailly, Christoph von Dohnányi, Christian Thielemann, Mariss Jansons, and Benjamin Zander have recorded several Bruckner symphonies. Leon Botstein is the most recent conductor to record inauthentic versions of Bruckner's symphonies (e.g., the 1894 Schalk version of the Fifth). In 2015, Simone Young completed her cycle of all 11 symphonies with the Hamburg Philharmonic. Markus Bosch, and Georg Tintner have likewise recorded complete cycles of all 11 symphonies. Rémy Ballot in 2019 had recorded 6 of a projected complete cycle in the Basilica Church of St. Florian. Gerd Schaller has recorded all 11 symphonies, along with Mass No. 3 and Psalm 146.

title: Symphonies by Anton Bruckner


text:
Udelny

Udelny (masculine), Udelnaya (feminine), or Udelnoye (neuter) may refer to:
 * Udelny (inhabited locality) (Udelnaya, Udelnoye), name of several inhabited localities in Russia
 * Udelnaya (Saint Petersburg Metro), a station of the Saint Petersburg Metro, Saint Petersburg, Russia

title: Udelny


text:
Template:MHL catalog/doc

Description
MHL catalog is a template used to generate an external link to an entry for an individual at the Margaret Herrick Library at the Margaret Herrick Library. In an article it should only be used in the "External links" section.

 * For a person, use MHL catalog.

Usage
The required parameter is the ID number. The template then uses the article title as the anchor text:

This is necessary when adding a Margaret Herrick Library link to an article about somebody or something other than the linked work (for example, if you include the Margaret Herrick Library link for Katharine Hepburn on a talk page, you must specify Katharine Hepburn as the second parameter).

Detailed instructions

 * 1) Copy and paste one of the options above into the article's External links section
 * 2) Go to Margaret Herrick Library and search for the work you want (say, Katharine Hepburn papers; you'll reach  )
 * 3) Click on the correct Katharine Hepburn papers in the list (usually the first); this will bring up the page
 * 4) Copy  the number (here, " ")
 * 5) Replace " " in the template code with the number
 * For the first option above, you'll then have
 * resulting in:
 * Note that the link text is the same as the title of the page the template is used on; outside the page Katharine Hepburn, use the second option:
 * Replace " " with the number and " " with " "
 * results in:
 * results in:

title: Template:MHL catalog/doc


text:
Chemicals/Reactions/Oxidation numbers

Oxidation numbers are the numbers of electrons that are released or gained from the outer shell electronic configuration of an atom. They refer to how an atom will bond with another. Due to this, they help in balancing oxidation-reduction reaction equations. There are several rules for how these are assigned.

Rules

 * 1. The oxidation number (o.n.) of an uncombined element is 0.
 * 2. The total o.n. of all of the atoms in a neutral compound is 0.
 * 3. The total o.n. of all of the atoms in a polyatomic ion is equal to its charge.
 * 4. In compounds, group one alkali metals have an o.n. of +1 and group two alkali earth metals have an o.n. of +2.
 * 5. In compounds, fluorine atom has an o.n. of -1, hydrogen atom has an o.n. of +1, and oxygen atom has an o.n. of -2.
 * 6. In two element compounds with metals, group 17 elements have an o.n. of -1, group 16 elements have an o.n. of -2, and group 15 elements have an o.n. of -3.
 * 7. The o.n. of hydrogen is +1 when bonded to nonmetals and -1 when bonded to metals
 * 8. The o.n. of fluorine is -1 in all compounds. The other halogens have an o.n. of -1 in most binary compounds When combined with oxygen, as in oxyanions, however, they have a positive oxidation state.

Practice
What are the oxidation numbers of the following atoms:

1. Oxygen in O2? 2. Carbon in CO2? 3. Oxygen in H2O? 4. Sulfur in PbSO4? 5. Oxygen in H2O2?
 * Oxygen is an uncombined element, so by rule #1, the oxidation number is 0.
 * Because CO2 is a neutral compound, the overall oxidation number must be 0. According to rule #5, oxygen has an oxidation number of -2.  Therefore, carbon must have an oxidation number of +4.
 * Oxygen in a combined element is -2, by rule #5.
 * Oxygen has an oxidation number of -2. Because we know that lead must have an oxidation number of +2, being an ion, the oxidation number of sulfur must then be +6.  (-2 * 4 oxygen = -8 + +2 lead = -6 * 1 sulfur)
 * In this rare case, where the overall o. n. must still equal 0, hydrogen is still given an oxidation number of +1, forcing oxygen to have a charge of -1, in order for it to balance to 0.

Reference
1. Petrucci, Harwood, and Herring. General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications. Eighth edition.

title: Chemicals/Reactions/Oxidation numbers


text:
User:MargiEngineer

Margi Engineer
I am learning Wiki-magic at a training session run by the University of Edinburgh.

My example citation
Role models are very important.

title: User:MargiEngineer


text:
Hegesippus

Hegesippos (Ἡγήσιππος) or Latinized Hegesippus, may refer to:

 * Hegesippus (orator), 4th century BC
 * Hegesippus of Halicarnassus, naval commander during 306 BC campaign
 * Hegesippus (chronicler), 2nd century, early Church chronicler and saint
 * Pseudo-Hegesippus, conventional title for a 4th-century adaptor of The Jewish War of Flavius Josephus

title: Hegesippus


text:
Using GNOME/Application windows

Applications in GNOME appear in Windows. Windows are usually box-shaped and can be manipulated.

Things that can appear as Windows include
 * Folders and Files in the File Manager.
 * Applications
 * Message boxes
 * Preference screens
 * Notes

Window layout.

By default, the following layout is used

 * 1) Menu
 * 2) Title
 * 3) Minimize
 * 4) Maximize
 * 5) Close.

title: Using GNOME/Application windows


text:
Karimabad-e Suis

Karimabad-e Suis (, also Romanized as Karīmābād-e Sūīs; also known as Karīmābād-e Moţlaq) is a village in Darbqazi Rural District, in the Central District of Nishapur County, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran. At the 2006 census, its population was 19, in 4 families.

title: Karimabad-e Suis


text:
Materials Science and Engineering/magnetic materials/giant magneto-resistive tunnelling effect Giant

The magneto-resistance effect (MR effect) describes the change in the electrical resistance of a material due to the application of a magnetic field. The giant magneto-resistance effect was discovered in 1988. Several other magneto-resistive effects have been discovered, and they are classified under XMR effects or XMR technology.

Research advances related to electron spin, tunneling effects, and production of ultra-thin layers have made possible the design of electrical devices based on quantum mechanical effects of the electron.


text:
Vossen

Vossen is a Dutch patronymic surname most common in Belgian and Dutch Limburg. Notable people with the surname include:

Vosse
 * Elli Vossen, pseudonym of Bep Voskuijl (1919–1983), Dutch secretary who helped conceal Anne Frank
 * Jelle Vossen (born 1989), Belgian footballer
 * Peter van Vossen (born 1968), Dutch footballer
 * Piek Vossen (born 1960), Dutch academic
 * Stephan Cohn-Vossen (1902–1936), German mathematician
 * Benjamin Shaw Van Vossen (born 2008), Taiwanese Academic
 * Michael Vosse (1941–2014), American music journalist and publicist
 * (born 1972), Belgian race car driver

title: Vossen


text:
User:Hellenitta

Hi,my name is Elena,I am from Bulgaria and I study at the University of Sofia.Me and some fellow-studenst of mine chose a very interesting Topic to work on and we will do our best to make a wonderful presentation of it!Good luck!:)))

Global world. Is it the reality we live in, the reality we need for living or just an imagination we create to make life “easier” but useful complicated at the same time…Talking about this global world we imagine ourselves so powerful  that we probably just for seconds miss the idea of our  living,  and we somehow forget that the most important thing is the unique life that everyone of us have for ourselves the most precious one than everything else. It is so tempting to gather human ideas and lifestyle in general. Having it all under control, we often lose us in a dream of a powerful, and successful development of a global home for everyone. Building this special home our hungry for development and modernity souls create nothing but illusions very thin ones, and easy to vanish into space. In a world of a global emotions, thinking, breathing is definitely hard for a man to save himself as one very, very small but so important and unique part of this planet and something more it is definitely hard to walk to the roads which have been just given without any opportunity for choosing roads by himself. Living in a world of changes, it is supposed to discover changes in ourselves as well and these changes makes it turning as a matter of course. If we just for a moment try to imagine, that the world changes in only one direction one instruction only one way of thinking and acting  we would probably be afraid of this predictable future we face. It would be a disaster to lose our personality, and to erase everything which make us the way we are now...different, looking for competitions, prooving what we have and what we work on to achieve this. Loosing the identity what we have, and what makes us special no mater where we were born live feel special or keep on going is actually a play of a losing game because we lose the only thing that makes us unique. The world is changing and people changing as well. It is completely useless to change the world in its development no matter in a technical, emotional, structure way. But we could try to save not only the identity we have and the constant values of our lives, but us as humans who can follow the world changes. Thinking about it and taking own decisions and definitely not betraying our own principles and ideas for living traditions, is a way for creating a vision of a nation or just a man. Some of us do not care about it. They just follow the process. But some of us do care and it is our lifestyle a style to keep our identity in the globalising world.

Jana Eichlerová-Slowekei-23 Jahre alt

Ich muss sagen, dass ich Leute aus Bulgarien erst im Sommerkurs begegnet habe. Und sie waren sehr unterschiedlich. Wenn ich meine Meinung ueber den Bulgaren verallgemeinerm musste, wurde ich sagen, dass sie sehr freundlich, nett, klug und abenteuerlich sind. Sie haben auch gern Spass, und unterhalten sich oft. Aber Generalisierung ist nicht die beste Art, einen Nation zu beschreiben. Ich habe nur ein paar junge Leute aus Bulgarien getroffen, jeder war eine ganz eigenartige Personalitaet wie auch bei anderen Nationen. Mir scheint es, dass Bulgaren nicht so unteschiedlich von Slowaken sind, vielleicht mehr offen und gesellschaftlich, aber wenn es um Mentalität geht, Bulgaren sind mir näher als z.B. Spanier. Wie Nachbarn :)

I must say that I first met Bulgarians during the summerkurs in Germany this year,and they all were so different personalities.Sharing my impressions in general,I could say that they are friendly,clever,kind and adventures as well.But describing the national features of a nation is not the best way to come to a genaral conclusion.I met only few people from Bulgaria,and evreyone has very different personality from the others,just like the other nations.I think that bulgarians are not so different from the slovak,may be a little bit more open-minded and sociable.But if we talk about a mentality,I could understand Bulgarians better than spaniard, for example.like neighbours!:)

Eleonora Di Salvo,Italy-25 years

in my opinion, bulgarians are friendly, they're too worried about their country's situation, in terms of poverty i mean...they like dancing,their own songs and open-minded!!!

ulduz jafarkhanpor-The Niderlands

Ich habe dass eindrück bekomme dass Bulgarischen Leute (studenten)einander sehr mogen. Sie sind öffen, und nicht kompliziert. deshalb war für mich sehr einfach gute kontakten zu legen.

I have the impression that Bulgarians(especially the students who study abroad)support eachother.They are open-minded and easy-going persons.That's why I have no Problems to communicate with them.

Erlend Dalen-Norway,27 years old.

what strikes me the most is how you look at your own country,I mean, you are proud of who you are but not very satisfied.But Bulgarians are...sweet and with a bit of temper.The women are very adventurous:P

This is a sample of the inquiry we will make to yuong people in Bulgaria. The results will be part of the final valuation of the project.

INQUIRY Name Sex М F Age Occupation  How do you understend the meaning of the word “Identity”?

 Would you like to work/study abroad?  Are you an adherent of the ideas of a “Global World”?

 Witch of the following features are more popular of the bulgarian identity? (You can choose more than one.) 1. hard working; 2. lazy; 3. thievish; 4. complaining; 5. seeking benefiths; 6. joy; 7. contemporary; 8. old fashoned; 9. depressed; 10. hospitable; 11. stingy; 12. envious; 13. amusing; 14. prejudiced; 15. helpful; 16. ambitious.  Do you think that after bulgarians becomes a member of the EU, bounderies as we know them will disappear?

 Will life improve after January 2007? In which field the most? 1. education; 2. politics; 3. public health services; 4. more work; 5. better payment; 6. more perspectives for development abroad; 7. others  What kind of things are you proud of in bulgarian history or things we have achieved through the years?

 What are the essential problems of the bulgarian young people? 1. financial; 2. lack of ambitions; 3. lack of perspectives; 4. gap between generations; 5. family problems; 6. drugs; 7. work competition; 8. others  Have you ever participated in projects giving ideas of better perspectives for young people in Bulgaria?

 What are your plans about the future?

title: User:Hellenitta


text:
Ľuboš Benkovský

Ľuboš Benkovský (born 22 February 1989) is a Slovak professional football manager and a former player, who last managed ViOn Zlaté Moravce in the Fortuna Liga.

title: Ľuboš Benkovský


text:
Talk:An Evening River Landscape with a Ferry

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I was trying to see if there was a source that tells us something about the location and the type of ship. No luck so far..

Vexations (talk) 12:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * According to Mandrella 2009, it is somewhere by the sea at the edge of a canal. It may be an imaginary landscape - realistic, but not real. --Edelseider (talk) 12:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I don't know. He's not Ruysdael. There is very little that could tell us where it is, but the boats may provide a clue. They're riverboats, and those were often of a regional type. The maritime museum in Rotterdam might be a good place to ask. Vexations (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I think this would be original research. :) --Edelseider (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm a terrible person :) Vexations (talk) 13:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought you might enjoy this: Vexations (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Great (not Greta) find! --Edelseider (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


text:
User:Muhammad Moain Rajpoot

MM Rajpoot full name Muhammad Moain Rajpoot son of Muhammad Ali Rajpoot, date of birth 5 Febroary, 1997, is belong to a Rajpoot respective and very powerful family, residence of a village namely Pind Nawab Khan, Kasur, at the border line of pakistan-India near Ganda Singh Border.

MM Rajpoot got his early and religous education from his village and he passed his o-level in 2018 from lahore-Islamia-College, Civil lines lahore, and stared his own Youtube Channel as name and desigination Pk_Studioz in the year of 2018. To Be Continued...

title: User:Muhammad Moain Rajpoot


text:
Kordon, Altai Krai

Kordon (Кордон) is a rural locality (a selo) in Kordonsky Selsoviet, Zalesovsky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 646 as of 2013. There are 18 streets.

Geography
Kordon is located 38 km northeast of Zalesovo (the district's administrative centre) by road. Peshcherka is the nearest rural locality.

title: Kordon, Altai Krai


text:
User:Yasmejia/sandbox

Medicalization:

 * The article seemed to jump from one topic to another. It started off with mental health, then to drug companies, to HIV/AIDS I feel that they were all over the place.
 * The viewpoint seemed neutral all the topics written about was at a neutral standing point. I feel that they jumped around too many topic to go into detail.
 * Many of the sources used are books
 * Most of the sources used are from the earlier to mid 2000's
 * On the talk page it is stated that the article needs to be updated. As well as that a Sociology expert should review the article.
 * The rating are low for this article.

 * We haven't gone into this topic in class yet.

Week 5: Robert Gober

 * I would like to add were he got his ideas/inspiration.
 * Also add some awards he has won-if any.

Reliable Sources:

 * Robert Gober: The Heart Is Not a Metaphor (Book) by Hilton Als (Contributor), Robert Gober (Illustrations), Ann Temkin(Introduction), Claudia Carson (Contributor)
 * http://www.theartstory.org/artist-gober-robert.htm Robert Gober-American Sculptor and Conceptual Artist Movements and Styles: Conceptual Art, Appropriation Art, Installation Art
 * https://www.widewalls.ch/artist/robert-gober/ WideWalls-Robert Gober

Bubonic Plague
The article states that there are three types of the plague, which are bubonic plague, septicemic plague, and pneumonic plague. I would like to add in the article the differences between each type of the plague. The differences in the cause, symptoms, and treatments. I would also like to see if the other plagues have anything in common with the bubonic plague.

I would like to research and see if there has been any recent diagnosis of the plague.

Reliable Sources:

 * Botelho, G. (2015, September 14). Bubonic plague reported in Michigan. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/14/health/michigan-plague/index.html

 * Plague. (2017, October 23). Retrieved November 10, 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/plague/maps/index.html

 * Plague (Black Death) Causes, Symptoms, Signs, Treatment, History and Diagnosis on MedicineNet.com. (2008, January 16). Retrieved November 10, 2017, from https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=141316
 * Team, T. H. (2015, November 19). The Plague. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from https://www.healthline.com/health/plague#overview1

Improvements:

 * The article can be improved and updated.
 * research the treatment and see if its the most recent type of treatment
 * recent outbreaks
 * maps of outbreaks in the past

title: User:Yasmejia/sandbox


text:
Talk:Cloture

Speculative claims about future events
If the Democrats obtain 58 or 59 seats in the senate following the United States Senate elections, 2008, moderate GOP Senators Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter, will be heavily lobbied to switch parties in order to provide a 60 vote filibuster proof majority.

This is speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by APh8ohph (talk • contribs) 07:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Etymology
The etymology gives the French word 'cloture' as meaning 'fence' - is this really the origin? The French word *can* mean 'fence' but it often just means 'closure'. Anyone know for certain? Stevage 23:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)\

hi

cloture / history US / intro needs help
History A similar procedure was adopted in the United States. This was invoked for the first time on November 15, 1919,[5] during the 66th Congress, to end filibuster on the Treaty of Versailles.[6]

The beginning sentences under Cloture / HIstory for US Senate (several paragraphs into the article on cloture) make unclear reference. The paragraph needs to begin more clearly than "A similar procedure was adopted in the United States". A proceedure similar to what? Canada? Hong Kong? I am not offering to revise this because it seems that the original author best knows what is meant. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 19:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Hong Kong
I am not sure why Hong Kong is given as an example. What occurred there is clearly not cloture, but a communist regime preventing debate - without a vote - the direct opposite of cloture.<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 06:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

title: Talk:Cloture