text:
Cookbook:Broccoflower

Broccoflower refers to two cultivated varieties of Brassica oleracea.

Characteristics
The first variety of broccoflower resembles a traditional cauliflower, but with light green flesh. The second variety is known as romanesco broccoli, and it has a bright yellow-green appearance with spiky florets growing in fractal patterns. Both taste more like cauliflower than broccoli.

Selection and storage
When selecting broccoflower, go for heads that are bright, firm and not soft or wilted, and dense. Avoid those with discoloration or slimy spots. Do not wash before storing in the fridge —they should keep for at least a week, and perhaps longer.

Use
Broccoflower is prepared much the same as cauliflower and broccoli, served raw, roasted, steamed, and boiled. Like them, overcooking broccoflower can quickly make it turn dull and mushy.

title: Cookbook:Broccoflower


text:
Martha Stewart Living Radio

Martha Stewart Living Radio was a 24-hour satellite radio station on Sirius Satellite Radio channel 110 produced by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. The station aired a variety of programming hosted by the company's team of experts, covering topics related to the domestic arts, including day and date reruns of the company's flagship television program Martha. In addition, Martha Stewart Living Radio also aired a weekday-evening talk show co-hosted by Martha Stewart's daughter Alexis Stewart, Whatever with Alexis and Jennifer.

Following the Sirius / XM merger, Martha Stewart Living Radio was added to XM on 2008-09-30 as part of its "Best of Sirius" package and broadcasts on channel 157, but was moved to channel 110 on May 4, 2011.

Martha Stewart Living Radio ceased production and broadcasting on February 18, 2013. Martha Steward hosted a 2-hour show on Sirius XM Stars channel 107 Mon-Fri from noon-2pm, called "Martha Live", from 2013 to 2015. Archives of broadcasts from the former Martha Stewart Living Radio can be accessed online and via SiriusXM radio app for smartphones.

Personalities

 * Jennifer Hutt
 * Marc Morrone
 * Christine Nagy
 * Alexis Stewart
 * Martha Stewart
 * Andrew Weil

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Martha Stewart Living Radio


text:
binomial coefficient

Noun

 * 1)  a coefficient of any of the terms in the expansion of the binomial (x+y)n, defined by $${n \choose k} = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$, read as "n choose k"

Translations

 * Czech: kombinační číslo
 * Danish: binomialkoefficient
 * Finnish: binomikerroin
 * French: coefficient binomial
 * German:
 * Hungarian:
 * Icelandic: tvíliðustuðull
 * Serbo-Croatian: binomni koeficijent

title: binomial coefficient


text:
User:Verdant333

Big fan of Wikipedia! Let the information flow and inform!

I have a conflict of interest with R. D. INNES.

Only works of R. D. INNES that can be seen at venues have been included. No private works in private collections or households are included. As an attempt to keep the page as authentic and legitimate for others to appraise and enjoy.

title: User:Verdant333


text:
Programming languages

Contents
Programming languages are the method used to instruct a computer in how to accomplish a task.

A programming language is a collection of operators and instructions, with specific rules or syntax regarding how the instructions are placed together. Various operations can be combined in an almost infinite number of ways to achieve the tasks we want the computer to perform.

Low-Level Languages
Some programming languages are bound to a particular set of hardware, commonly called Low-Level languages. Low-level languages will consist of a very small amount of abstraction to no abstraction from the computers set architecture. This language is able to covert to machine code, without the need of an interpreter. It will run the program straight on the processor. Typically, low-level languages are simple and will run very quickly. An example of a low-level language is Assembly, where the target is for a particular CPU instruction set. See Low-level programming language for more information.

High-Level Languages
Other languages are more abstract from the hardware, and are known as High-Level languages. High-Level languages will consist of a large amount of abstraction from the computers set architecture. A lot of the time, High-Level languages will use natural language aspects, which makes it easier to use and can automate areas found in the computing systems. This language can make the development of programs simpler and significantly easier to understand, compared to a Low-Level language. An example of a high level language is Java. See High-level programming language for more information.

Other Information
Early generations of computer languages were mostly procedural in nature. Theory taught that code should be logically divided, but left that division up to the programmer. More recently, Object Oriented languages have become more prominent. These languages encourage a more logical division of code.

One thing that should be noted is that programming languages are tools, and every tool has its strengths and weaknesses. While a high level language isolates a programmer from hardware, the programmer loses the ability to directly control that hardware. Choosing the right tool for a problem is very important.

Questions for self-test

 * Next lesson
 * Back to course contents

Multimedia

 * YouTube: The First Programming Languages
 * YouTube: Low-Level vs High-Level Programming Languages
 * YouTube: Machine Code and High Level Languages using Interpreters and Compilers

See also: programming languages
Category:Programming languages - An overview of many different languages
 * Ada
 * Assembly
 * Bash
 * C
 * C++
 * Go
 * Haskell
 * Java
 * JavaScript
 * Lua
 * mKR
 * Pascal
 * PowerShell
 * Processing
 * Prolog
 * Python
 * Rust
 * Smalltalk

title: Programming languages


text:
A Girl Like That (novel)

A Girl Like That is a 2018 novel by Tanaz Bhathena. The book was nominated for the 2019 Ontario Library Association White Pine Award.

Plot summary
The book begins with a car crash and the death of the two main characters, Zarin and Porus, two fictional teenagers from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Their ghosts watch from the wreckage, and see the reactions of their families and friends. The rest of the novel reveals the events that occurred before the car crash.

Reception
A Girl Like That was reviewed by Quill & Quire, Kirkus Reviews, The Globe and Mail, and CBC Radio.

Anum Shafqat, a staff writer for The Harvard Crimson, rated the novel as 4.5 stars.

title: A Girl Like That (novel)


text:
Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 15

Requested move 3 May 2020

The result of the move request was: WP:SNOW not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart → Mozart – WP:COMMONNAME a google result shows 132,000,000 results for "Mozart"; while "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart" pings 54,000,000. An example for a similar discussion is Beyonce Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 04:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Poe's Law is strong with this one. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Oppose per WP:CONCISE "neither a given name nor a family name is usually omitted or abbreviated for conciseness" and apart from people who's first name is unknown I can't think of anyone who is titled here with only their last name (WP:CONSISTENCY). Also MOS:DABPRIMARY gives Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart as an example for using his full name on Mozart (disambiguation) even though he is primary for his surname. I don't think most people who know something about him would only know his last name per WP:NCA unlike Madonna for example not being known by her last name much at all.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 08:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose: While I hate Amadeus, and Mozart never used that himself, and in article prose I always use just "Mozart", I don't think that's a fair article name. Sounds a bit like Madonna to me. Look at concert programs, listen on radio: announcers usually give him a first name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose per advice in WP:CONCISE and WP:SINGLENAME to retain the title as-is. -- Netoholic @ 09:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose per those above who have read the actual guidelines. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Seriously? Against guidelines.Smeat75 (talk) 10:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. By this logic we should move William Shakespeare to Shakespeare. WP:CONCISE says, "Neither a given name nor a family name is usually omitted or abbreviated for conciseness. Thus Oprah Winfrey (not Oprah)." — the Man in Question (in question)  19:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Virtually all first-rank classical composers are routinely referred to by their surname alone (with the weird exception of César Franck), but that is a far cry from naming their articles accordingly. This would be the thin edge of the wedge for Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Chopin, Liszt, Rachmaninoff and all the rest. --   Jack of Oz   [pleasantries]  21:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Today's revert
I just undid a wiki data edit by a sock which produced an infobox. I've never seen this type of code before and as it was not the normal splurge of coded diarrhea you usually get with infoboxes, I reverted it. As this was inadvertently done against my restrictions, I've self reverted. I wouldn't, of course, put up much of a protest if someone were to revert me. Just sayin'.  Cassianto Talk  10:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , I couldn't possibly comment on your revert of me, but thank you. ArbCom would now want me to challenge you for being "disruptive". I of course, won't. Many thanks.  Cassianto Talk  10:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Ignored. What a toxic, horrible place this is.  Cassianto Talk  04:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Mozart’s Name
The article says nothing about the transition from his birth name to the name we know him by, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Britannica tells me: “Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, in full Johann Chrysostom Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, baptized as Johannes Chrysostomus Wolfgangus Theophilus Mozart…” But it to says nothing about the circumstances of adding Amadeus to his name. If there is a music historian out there, perhaps you could do an edit. With regard to his nationality, I noted that Britannica refers to him as Austrian and notes that he was born in the archbishopric of Salzburg. I’m too new to know what would be correct for Wikipedia. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not an addition. People often translated their names freely between languages in that time: Theophilus = Amadeus = Amadeo = Amadé = Gottlieb. (You will also often for similar reasons find "Louis de Beethoven" in early Beethoven editions: same story.) See Mozart's name (and regarding the rest of it, Mozart's nationality), which is a subarticle discussing this issue. Double sharp (talk) 04:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * In short, he usually signed Wolfgang Amadé. When he got serious, such as Great Mass in C minor (look at the autograph), he wrote Wolfgango AmDeo. The present common name is awful, but common. The Salzburg Festival says "W. A.". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Error in the early life section
It says he was appointed as fourth violinist in 1743, but he was born in 1756. Time travelling composer? Clarysandy (talk) 06:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Read again; that sentence refers to Leopold. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Profound disappointment
Opening this page in English and finding out that right at the beginning there is no line where Mozart is declared, as he truly is, one of the greatest composers of all times and certainly the greatest of the classical period, is utterly dispiriting. What is worse still, perhaps, is that there seems to be no room for improving the article: the page is locked!!!--<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You can suggest specific improvements right here, with sources, and we'll check if to be included. The page is locked because you can perhaps imagine that many changes to this article are no improvements, but vandalism. What you say above, is a specific Point of View (WP:POV), which has no room in Wikipedia. Please suggest something less problematic. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Well we already do say that Mozart is considered one of the greatest classical composers of all time. So what is the problem?
 * (P.S. "Greatest of the classical period" as the OP would have it is suddenly not quite as obvious for those of us who think Beethoven is best conceived of as part of the classical period. Which is similarly why I feel the current wording reflects the sources better and that we should leave well enough alone.) Double sharp (talk) 02:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Nationality
Most biographical articles seem to state the person’s nationality in the first sentence. That is missing in the case of Mozart. He was born before the annexation of Salzburg to the modern Austria. Would it be correct to say that he was ethnically German? Is this a contentious issue? If not, could the article be amended please? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 04:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It is complicated. See Mozart's nationality for a full discussion. "Ethnically German" is incidentally one of the little pickles: in Mozart's time Austrians would generally have considered themselves ethnically German. This naturally changed after the war that we are not supposed to mention. ;) Double sharp (talk) 05:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, he was ethnic German. Too bad I did not participated in the discussion when it was done, the Austrian lobby group introduced many times fallacious and misleading argumentation to prevent anything described German, although ethnic German would be the best solution. "Austrians" = residents of Archduchy of Austria not just considered themselves ethnic Germans, but they were Germans in fact, as Austrian national identity did not exist prior 1945, but even that does not change their blood.(KIENGIR (talk) 06:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC))
 * "Austrian" is not a nationality - it refers to citizenship, for the most part, as the majority of Austrians today speak German, with the other two major peoples speaking either Swiss or Italian - i.e., it is not a nation-state. His nationality/ethnicity was German, he resided in the Austro-Hungarian Empire for a large portion of his life (which had a huge chunk of its territory of Hungarian/Magyar speaking people.<IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Or adherence/resident of anytime Austrian state. Swiss language does not exist.(KIENGIR (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC))
 * (Recent editors): Perhaps in this case we might use geographic location: "Central European composer of the Classical period"? —DocWatson42 (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think Central Europe is a bit too wide: for me this term naturally would include Poland and Hungary. But what do you think of "German-speaking composer of the Classical period"? After all, Mozart's sense of German nationality was a linguistic-cultural one, so it makes sense from that view; and it is not against the "Austrian" view either (because Austria was and is still German-speaking). Double sharp (talk) 02:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure—that sounds okay to me. I just want something more specific.  (Anyone else?) —DocWatson42 (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This discussion is about the short description, right? Such thing cannot summarize the complicated matter. "German-speaking" is the least poignant description and is no improvement. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * DocWatson42,
 * you may read my analysis/stance above. The best solution is ethnic German composer...., on the other hand this is a fact, noone may debate or challenge it.(KIENGIR (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC))
 * Sure, I support that (too). —DocWatson42 (talk) 06:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think any such "clarification" is unnecessary. Adding it will only invite petty edits where this article has been stable for a long time. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I also think so. But if there has to be one, I prefer "German-speaking" as it seems the least likely to attract complaints of all the options that are not "leave well enough alone". Double sharp (talk) 10:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Michael Bednarek, Double sharp, we don't have afraid of anything, we don't write/censor facts in articles just because some trolls or some ignorants may appear, if so, we'll handle it, that's for the talkpage and our community guidelines, etc. Ethnic German cannot be challenged, see my argumentation above, and this is just a shortdesc, such never was debated before, I endorse to go on with it, and let's see what happens, we have nothing to loose.(KIENGIR (talk) 14:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC))
 * "ethnic German" would be problematic relative to MOS:ETHNICITY. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Nikkimaria's caution. "Censorship" is a straw man. WP:UNDUE also applies to short descriptions. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 23:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Nikkimaria, the guideline you cited is meant primarily to the lead. Michael Bednarek, a metaphore is not a "straw man", we should not choose thing based on "least likely to attract complaints of all the options" or not to "invite petty edits" etc., necessarily. I told I take the responsibility, will gladly make the edit. In case it would be reverted, I'd let it like so, but worths a try.(KIENGIR (talk) 00:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC))
 * The short description is part of the lead. See MOS:LEADELEMENTS. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Why does Mozart not have a information box?
Beethoven and Bach have the information box. But then most of the other major composers do not. Like Brahms, Chopin, Tchaikovsky, Haydn, and Debussy. Since when are the great classical composers not worthy of an information box? Like why? Cj7557 (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * They did not reach consensus for it since years. In reality it is because of the "Austrian-German war" over identity/birthplace, which has a history, though very easy and adequate solutions would exist, i.e., describing him as ethnic German, which he was in fact, etc.(KIENGIR (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC))
 * Cj7557, see Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 14, and other talk archives, and your talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Let's not feed the trolls, Gerda.  Cassianto Talk  06:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I treat a new user a new user, assuming good faith. - A link to an archive is good food for anybody ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , you seem to be a good judge of what is to come. Can you tell me next Saturday's lottery numbers?   Cassianto Talk  07:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, that is strange. It's standard practice to have an infobox regarding all figures. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 07:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Additional comment. Having gone through at least one archive, I will say this.  From an outside perspective regarding this article, I came to this article expecting to find a means to see information quickly.  This is the purpose of the infobox. But instead, I had to scroll down to see where his birthplace was marked.  Needless to say, I come across this article rather disappointed in having to do that. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 07:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * These things are useful on biographical articles... I'm clearly not a troll, just a typical casual user and sometimes editor of Wikipedia who finds this article less useful because it doesn't have an infobox. Keeping it out by accusing people of being trolls reeks of article ownership. --Here2rewrite (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

@Cassianto Let me be clear. I am no troll. I’m am new. I was unaware that some here on Wikipedia were so sensitive about this. I now know that this is a difficult topic for some. Live and learn. Cj7557 (talk) 07:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt First thank you for the link to the archive, it was most enlightening. Second I thank you for assuming good faith in me. I did not mean to upset anyone. I was simply curious. And now I have been supplied with an answer. Thanks again. Cj7557 (talk) 08:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

 * This is an old discussion, but let me just reiterate that consensus can change. I have now seen multiple discussions here saying "this has been discussed before, look there" and then closing the discussion. Infoboxes are ubiquitous on Wikipedia, so it's understandable that new editors are surprised when they see prominent articles without infoboxes. On the other hand, I understand that it gets tiring to rehash old discussions every time someone comes in. But relating to discussions from years ago is of itself not an argument. If he's still around, Cassianto could definitely stand reading the newly introduced Code of Conduct too. Biting at newcomers for even daring to ask about this topic is wholely unnecessary. Prinsgezinde (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree, considering the previous discussions contained many errors which has been not noticed/voiced by others.(KIENGIR (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC))
 * The most recent consensus not to have an infobox was just one year ago. In it, a proposal to have a multi-year moratorium was made by an advocate an infobox. While the closer did not endorse that view, it seems sensible. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Infobox (February 2021)
I am aware that this subject has been discussed extensively, but I still cannot understand why an infobox is not included in this article. Infoboxes are universally used across bios of notable people, and other famous composers, such as Ludwig van Beethoven, Johann Sebastian Bach, and George Frideric Handel all include them, as well as bios of people from all across different fields. According to a section addressing this above, the reason for the inclusion is "because of the "Austrian-German war" over identity/birthplace", which makes no sense to me. I strongly support the addition of an infobox. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes,
 * I agree, some non-experts in the topic started to be afraid of any German-associations in connection with events did not even exist in his lifespan. Sad story.(KIENGIR (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC))

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 5000 Schilling Mozart obverse.jpg

Gottlieb
His middle name that he took in life should be at least mentioned. --2600:1700:E910:B830:854B:2DD:9FCD:EAB (talk) 14:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * There's a whole article about Mozart's name, and "Gottlieb" is only a translation from the name used in his birth certificate, "Theophilus". I don't think mentioning "Gottlieb" here would improve the article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Infobox (March 2021)
I request we open a news discussion if a infobox is needed, personally it is my belief that a infobox is needed since it would gives quick and helpful information to viewers and makes the page more organized. BigRed606 (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Ps judging on the previous discussions it looks like the Majority agrees that a infobox is needed.BigRed606 (talk) 19:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

If it’s okay with everyone else I would be more than happy to make and add a infobox to the page. Although I do understand that their is some debate to adding a infobox, as I looked through the archives of this talk page. BigRed606 (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that an infobox is necessary. Many of the past iterations of an infobox were quite good, could just restore one. Rauisuchian (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This has been discussed ad nauseam, per MOS:INFOBOXUSE The use of infoboxes is neither required nor prohibited for any article. have a look at the archives.  Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 05:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Necessary? How so? … were quite good" – They've all been rejected. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I fervently support the inclusion of an infobox. It seems in the past this page was caught up in a contentious debate on infoboxes, and those that were against infoboxes on articles decided Mozart's article was the hill they wanted to die on. Despite this, it remains that for biographical articles of prominent individuals, having an infobox remains the norm, and there is no particular or specific reason why Mozart's should be without it. AvRand (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I too was surprised by the lack of a useful infobox. All that is needed is a simple one that projects simple information that can be looked at in a glance.-- JOJ  Hutton  12:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support, there should be an infobox Sahaib3005 (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Support - it is true that infoboxes are not required, but that's not actually an argument for not having one - a short box using the "Infobox classical composer" template, like Beethoven would be grand. Furius (talk) 11:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I see that the archives are full of pointless discussions of this issue. Infoboxes are getting more and more widespread on wiki and eventually this article will be brought into line, but for now it's clearly not worth rehashing it. Furius (talk) 11:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Birth and death dates
Shouldn’t their be a birth date and death date underneath his portrait to make it more convenient? Jdietr601 (talk) 20:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * His birthdate and death date are in the lead sentence in brackets. If you are referring to an infobox but consensus on this page has been against having one.  Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 21:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like that you are the only advocating for not having an infobox at the moment.-- JOJ Hutton  12:26, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Regular editors of this article are tired of repeating themselves. See this talk page's archives. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Consensus can change. "Regular" editors do not own this article. Anyone can add or subtract information, which also means that anyone can ask questions on the talk page. If you still feel you have a consensus then there shouldn't be any reason not to have a "Request For Comment" on this topic.-- JOJ Hutton  22:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

I added an infobox
This issue has been discussed many times before in the archives. There seems to be a lot of support for an infobox. Per WP:BOLD, I added the infobox. If people really don’t want an infobox, then you can revert my edits. Sahaib3005 (talk) 12:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Um did you see the hidden note? It says this: "Please do not add an infobox, per the consensus established on the Talk page, in Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 8, Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 10, Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 12, and Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 13". So you should self revert. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Not having a basic biographical information infobox is asinine. I noticed immediately that it was missing because I wanted to know how old he was when he died. This sort of simple information shouldn't be buried in the article. Morvahna (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's in the first line of the article, in case you didn't bother to look.--Smerus (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * p.s. he was 35 years, 10 months and 8 days old, in case it's a bit hard to calculate. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The topic of an infobox has been repeatedly been brought up so I have added an FAQ simliar to Kubrick's page.  Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 14:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

I gotta say looking at the discussions pointed to here from archive 8, here from archive 10, and finally [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart/Archive_12#no_infobox? here] from archive 12. None of those are really discussions or consensus. The one Martinevans123 pointed out in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart/Archive_13#Give_this_an_infobox. archive 13] is closer but still not great and a long while ago. I will also note that the archive 13 discussion was not consensus against, it was evenly split by my count. Does this call for broader input like a RFC? PackMecEng (talk) 13:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You missed the RFC in archive 14 in January to March 2020, which is mentioned in the FAQ above. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh snap I certainly did! Thank you for that! Well that answers that. PackMecEng (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Portrait as a child
Is there a particular reason that a portrait of Mozart as a child is included right after the lead image? Frankly, its awkward and out of place. I don't know of a single other article that shows an image of its subject as a child right below the one as an adult. Yes, I know Mozart is a child prodigy, but it feels unencyclopedic to shove that archetype in front of readers with this image so prominent. Aza24 (talk) 08:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The 1763 portrait used to be a bit further down, until User:UpdateNerd moved it up ("elevated" in their words) twice in August 2018. I agree that it should again be further down, below Getreidegasse, and the Carmontelle could possible moved to the left. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I tried as you suggested, and then some other variants but all were too crammed or caused too much sandwiching. I've opted to remove it entirely—we don't need every painting of Mozart, and the anonymous portrait is from the same year as the Carmontelle anyways. Aza24 (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

infobox person?
infobox person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No. See talk page header.  Jip Orlando (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Is there a tl;dr explanation? I'm not trying to argue that there should be an infobox, I frankly don't care whether or not there is. But the page header just said there has been "extensive discussion". For those of us who aren't willing to go down the rabbit hole of reading a debate that seems to span almost a decade, what's the gist of it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Margretarson (talk • contribs) 15:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Like all infobox discussions, the reasons to include or exclude given below are almost entirely couched in terms of personal preference. Current Arbcom guidance on the issue is that "(w)hether to include an infobox...is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." The current status of policy & procedures is in line with this guidance. This means that editor preferences are really the only basis on which to judge infobox discussions and should not be discarded solely on WP:ILIKEIT or WP:IDONTLIKEIT grounds. The discussion below shows a clear preponderance of editors by nearly a 2:1 margin against an infobox on this article and should be respected. Whether there should be a moratorium on further infobox discussions was not addressed by enough participants to make an assessment of consensus but there is a clearly-expressed fatigue with infobox discussions on this article. Any further discussions or RfC's on this issue should proceed only with the greatest caution. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * here is the close from the latest discussion. Jip Orlando (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It was 3 years ago so I think it's safe to run project-wide RfC on that. It's surprising though that the arbcom didn't clarify for how long the "infobox probation" should last. AXO NOV  (talk) ⚑ 15:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Still alive?
Do the rumors that Mozart is still alive deserve a mention? While he (probably) isn't, and we obviously shouldn't claim that he is without proper citation, the rumors are frequent enough that it seems they deserve at least some mention. Perhaps a brief "Rumors" subsection, or including the prevalence of the belief under an "In Popular Culture" section. 2601:405:4400:9420:5175:B20E:F653:2E42 (talk) 23:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What reliable secondary sources are there to support this? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Probably isn’t? Ha ha. We’d need a  in neon. Tag BLP anyone? DeCausa (talk) 09:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * And here I'd thought I'd seen everything on WP. Never dreamed I'd see someone suggest that a person could possibly be 265 years old. Carlstak (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Consensus about the infobox
There's a reason for not adding an infobox for classical composers, But it has a discussion for infobox multiple times: Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 8, Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 10, Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 12, and Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 13. --Aesthetic Writer (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Your comment is unintelligible so I don't know how you expect anyone to respond. Aza24 (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I need a consensus for infobox proposal based on Talk:Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart/Archive_13. --Aesthetic Writer (talk) 00:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Not once before did you say you were proposing something. You said just made an observation and linked to some archives. If you're proposing something, you need to actually be clear in what that is, otherwise your comment is as good as meaningless. Aza24 (talk) 01:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The editor is trying to remove the infobox at Leopold Mozart on the basis that the consensus at this article is for no infobox. Thrakkx (talk) 02:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok? And what does that have to do with THIS article? ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 05:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I have tried to tell this editor (my talk, their talk) that there is no requirement to first have a discussion as long as all agree. But they seem not to understand me, which may be my fault. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Obviously it has nothing to do with Wolfgang—we all know this. I am just explaining why this editor is coming out of nowhere, linking to archived discussions, and arguing about the existence of infoboxes for composers, both here and on Leopold's talk page. Thrakkx (talk) 14:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Indeed Thrakkx, and thank you for your clarification. Aza24 (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Haydn quote
The quote from Haydn that "posterity will not see such a talent again in 100 years" feels very much unhelpful in the lead, especially since posterity did see the another talent of the same stature (Beethoven) in the next 100 years. If anything, it feels misleading and like a sly remark to say Mozart is superior to Beethoven. I don't think it adds anything to the article, if a quote is desired there are surely better ones. Aza24 (talk) 06:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Given the lack of response I've gone ahead and removed it. I replaced it with a quote on the nature/character of Mozart's music, which seemed lacking in the lead anyways. Aza24 (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

"Virtually every genre"
Could I change this to "virtually every Western genre"? There are Eastern genres he didn't write in. BA1SV-5455 (talk) 15:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it is implied—it is introduced before that he is a composer of the 'classical period', so 'his time' presumably refers to that period, and thus the region associated with that time. Aza24 (talk) 23:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Biography template
Does anyone know why some composers like Mozart/Haydn/Tchaikovsky don't use a biography template (Infobox classical composer)? Well, except Beethoven. Not sure of others. Danial Bass (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Article-by-article consensus. For this one, see here et al. DeCausa (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link. Was gonna change it, but not anymore Danial Bass (talk) 22:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Infobox 1
Needs an info box <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

 * This has been heavily discussed in the past. There is consensus against including an infobox. The helper5667 (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Is there any particular reason why this specific article doesn't have an infobox? AHI-3000 (talk) 07:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, in short, because in 2010 (!), project composers arrived at a consensus that classical composers should not have an infobox. I don't believe that today's Wikipedia should take that seriously, but have been called an infobox warrior for that belief. The latest discussion was for Jean Sibelius, if you want to get a feel for the viewpoints, - it's mercifully short. Read Pierre Boulez (2016) for more background. I stayed away for the last discussions for Mozart, as a complete waste of my limited time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * All this talk page drama on Wikipedia can be amazingly confusing to me. I don't understand why people are so militantly against putting an infobox into this article, while Ludwig van Beethoven gets to keep one? It all seems kinda dumb and arbitrary to me. I dunno, I don't really know much about how exactly things work on this site. AHI-3000 (talk) 21:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There has not been drama in years, see archives of this page. Perhaps make a little statistic of how many wanted an infobox and how many thought it's a sacrilege. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The Wikipedia of the archived messages are a different time compared to what the current consensus is and it doesn't help that the latest citation for "consensus" was over 7 years ago. As AHI-3000 pointed out, if other classical composers can gain infoboxes then I don't see why Mozart is an exception, especially given that it doesn't violate WP:DISINFOBOX considering the length of the article and there should perhaps be a new review for consensus. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 14:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This should absolutely be revisited. Not having an infobox for composers is inane. Brad (talk) 16:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely. Thing is, an infobox does no harm. On the contrary - it is helpful for people wanting a quick overview. On the other hand, people who don't like infoboxes are free to not look at them. The boxes take nothing away from the article. The whole shebang is quite ridiculous, in my humble opinion. I can imagine that for some people against infoboxes it's more about standing their ground, and not so much improving the article slightly. I don't believe that a majority has reached consensus leaving infoboxes out. The status quo is quite some years old, and I honestly don't see that many people defending it. Ah, well. Regards, Gott (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

 * @Brad @SuperSkaterDude45 Lest I forget; it is possible to opt-out being shown an infobox. Given this possibility I really don't see a convincing reason to wanting to take something away from an article. Gott (talk) 09:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I concur. At last, an infobox should be created. Antiok 1pie (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Now that we reached a level of highly considered and thoughtful arguments, I suggest that those in favour try to get MOS:INFOBOXUSE and Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes ("neither required nor prohibited") overturned. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That wouldn’t of course be necessary for an Infobox to appear in this article. All that needs to happen is for a WP:CONSENSUS for it on this talk page which would overturn any previous consensus and trump any WikiProject point of view. I’m neutral on whether this article should have one (in the sense that I don’t care) but from this thread it appears a new consensus is emerging. I don’t see anyone putting forward a reason not to have it. DeCausa (talk) 06:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

First article image
I think that we should replace the opening image in the article. I’m not opposed to shifting it somewhere else within the current article, but I think it would be more appropriate to have a full image. Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * What image do you feel should be used instead? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m open to any suggestions, but this is my personal choice since it’s one of the most well-known (though posthumous) images of Mozart-

File:Barbara Krafft - Porträt Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1819).jpg Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * This has been discussed many, many times, and there is generally not consensus for a posthumous image, see here for instance. Aza24 (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Regardless of the image, I think that the image shouldn’t just be a closeup of somebody’s face Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * This is an image from the same painting as is currently in the Infobox, but with a a broader perspective:File:Retrato de Mozart, por Johann Nepomuk della Croce (detalle).jpg DeCausa (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree. It baffles me how it is not the lead image already and the current one has persisted for so long. It should absolutely be changed to the one you have proposed. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

"He is among the greatest composers in Western history"
Paging @Michael Bednarek -- one source is all that's included in the article, therefore the claim is based on one source. Just because it alleges Mozart to be 'among the greatest composers' doesn't mean the article has to report that. It's a wholly subjective statement.

In fact, If you're entirely insistent on including this claim, it should be reworded to "Mozart is widely regarded as one of the greatest composers in Western history". Simply stating that he  is  one of the greatest is subjective and not appropriate for Wikipedia. DeaconShotFire (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

efn vs. refn
Nitpick: I don't see the recent change in presenting explanatory notes from efn to refn as an unadulterated improvement. The introduction of columns improves the readability, but I always thought that distinguishing the numbering of explanatory notes with alpha identifiers (a.) from citations with numeric identifiers (1.) is a good thing. The format was here since the creation of that section four years ago, so WP:CITEVAR might possibly apply. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2022
change "Badura-Skoda, Eva, and Paul Badura-Skoda. Interpreting Mozart: The Performance of His Piano Pieces and Other Compositions (Routledge, 2018)" from "Further reading" section to (Routledge, 2008). The publication year is wrong. Ws143bach (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ❌ – Not necessarily. There is a 2nd edition 2018. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Mozart and the Miserere myth
In Rome, he heard Gregorio Allegri's Miserere twice in performance, in the Sistine Chapel, and wrote it out from memory, thus producing the first unauthorized copy of this closely guarded property of the Vatican. is plain false; as shown even by the sources cited here to support it (for ex, Chrissochoidis 2010, p. 86-87, states, right after describing this, that the only documentary evidence of this is a letter by Leopold Mozart, who did in fact, as one would say, slightly embellish things elsewhere, and that "there have been concerns about aspects of the story, particularly the claim that this was the first unauthorised copy of the work"; and describes [p. 87-89] multiple performances in London c. 1740 (a full three decades before Mozart's supposed unauthorised transcription), and that Mozart, having met "every important musician in London" in 1764-65, is far more likely to have been acquainted with the piece at this point than in Rome. This is also, if with less details, given in Byram-Wigfield 2017.

This should either be removed entirely, or, preferably, rewritten to explain the status of this little story as, indeed, not much more than a little story. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 04:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

 * See also the rewritten Miserere (Allegri) for a way in which this could be done (although obviously would require a significant summary for this article). <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I rewrote the section to clarify that this is more of an urban legend than an accurate historical account. Please ping me if you have further corrections. Thanks for your request :) Actualcpscm (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Might just do with altering this footnote: to something like this,
 * <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Implemented, after no technical struggles whatsoever. To ensure that you will never again struggle with wikitext, I recommend WP:SIRH. Thanks for your suggestions! Actualcpscm (talk) 00:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Suggested Merge
I accidentally bumped into Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and the Catholic Church. The material in this second article was de-merged from this main article by to keep the main article to a reasonable size and allow the section of Mozart's Catholicism to grow. Usually when this happens, it's because the sub-article deals with something so large that it can't be dealt with adequately in the original article, which retains a short paragraph summarising the information, and a "main article" link to the article dealing with it in depth. In this case there is almost nothing in the main article about Mozart's faith, and merely a buried link to the second article deep in the section on character and appearance, and adjacent to some stuff about scatological humour. This means that a reader is extremely unlikely to find the second article. The sub-article simply isn't working as intended. I therefore propose that the material be merged back again. Less happily, I wonder why there is so little about Mozart's Catholicism in the main article? If it's important enough to need the second article, there should be more here, and if it isn't important enough, then the second article runs the risk of looking like a biased point of view. I am therefore also suggesting that if the merger doesn't go ahead, we should introduce some summary of Mozart's Catholicism here, to give a better link to the other article, while if it does, we should discuss how much material to merge back without creating a lop-sided article here. Elemimele (talk) 06:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Elemimele, this article is missing enormous amounts of information on Mozart's music and legacy, so it is not surprising (and perhaps not pressing) if religious information is missing as well. As for the merge, such requests tend to sit around for years upon years until anyone actually goes ahead and does a merge (if there is agreement in the first place, that is), so please keep that in mind. To your point, the sources of the current Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and the Catholic Church does not convince me that it is a topic in itself, given that they are all general overviews, not specific studies.  Aza24  (talk)   21:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Oppose – I think the reasons for splitting this aspect from the main article are still valid. Given the state of the WAM & Church article, such a merge would not improve the main article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree that the WAM & Church article isn't great. I'll come clean: to me it looked possibly like a point of view on Mozart's religious convictions being pushed in a separate place to the Mozart article to avoid scrutiny by those who watch this article. Can I clarify, is your objection to the merge that the other article is bad (so you don't want a load of stuff from there brought to this article), or is it that Mozart's religious convictions are a sufficiently large topic that they can't be dealt with in the main article (so you think the existence of the second article is necessary)? If the former, I'm wondering whether it's a case for AfD?
 * , yes, I was rather afraid things might just linger for ever. I don't think the current situation is right. Either that second article does have valuable information, in which case we need to link to it properly from here, or it doesn't, in which case we need to get rid of it. I don't know enough about Mozart to assess which is true. Or am I being over-simplistic? Elemimele (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The other article isn't great, so a merge would be a disimprovement of the main article, but it isn't unsalvageable. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Elemimele, you are correct that (unconsciously or not) the split was certainly done to remove scrutiny from this article, which is why the current article has so little comparable information. I do not think an AFD would result in deletion. I find it difficult and rather overwhelming to judge and contextualize this specific situation in light of the huge defects of the main Mozart article, so I don't know what I can say to help.  Aza24  (talk)   00:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart/Archive 15


text:
trad

Etymology
Shortening of.

Adjective

 * 1)  traditional

Noun

 * 1)  Irish traditional music
 * 2) * 2017, Lonely Planet Ireland's Best Trips'',
 * Miltown Malbay hosts the annual Willie Clancy Irish Music Festival, one of Ireland's great trad music events.
 * 1) * 2010, Fodor's Ireland 2010 https://books.google.com/books?id=dhfTd0wKanIC&pg=PA443&dq=%22trad+music%22+irish+music&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I0qUVaWXLIjjsAWYyILQDg&ved=0CFAQ6AEwCQ
 * Galway is the heart of Trad— the city and its environs have nurtured some of the most durable names in Irish music.
 * 1)  A traditionalist.
 * 2)  Anything traditional, such as a school or a model of car.
 * 1)  Anything traditional, such as a school or a model of car.

Noun

 * 1) way, trade

Etymology
From, from , from.

Verb

 * 1) to tread

title: trad


text:
Talk:Galactic spheroid

Complete rewrite. The previous article was contained some innacuracies IMHO. My new version is still not great, I would like to sit down with some of my notes, and also look more closely at articles on Population II stars and Galactic structure, but its still better. David s graff 05:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

 * I'm going to revert this, as the rewritten article is incoherent. Many sentences seem to have no relation to the preceding sentences.  For instance the second sentence begins "These stars", with no antecedent for the adjective "these". <IP_ADDRESS> 20:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Jon Wilson

title: Talk:Galactic spheroid


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of the Hill (song)

The result was redirect to Back from Rio. RL0919 (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

King of the Hill (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable in its own right. Slatersteven (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Comment - It’s a pretty terrible shape, but hitting #2 on the Mainstream Rock Charts is a notable feat. Could this just be a case of sources being trapped in print magazines, because it’s a song from 1991? I wouldn’t oppose redirecting if no ones going to actually bother to write a decent article with any content, but I also wouldn’t oppose undoing that redirect if someone actually put effort into writing it, because I believe it’s likely the sourcing exists. Sergecross73   msg me  12:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Not sure, all I know is its been in this state for a while. Never sure about billboard, I know the main chart is enough, but am none to sure about the genre charts.Slatersteven (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ”A while”? You nominated it today, less than 2 hours after it was created. It’s only existed for a few hours. And you didn’t even try boldly redirecting. Sergecross73   msg me  14:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It came up on the new articles feed as created in 2009, by banned user XxTimberlakexx.Slatersteven (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * That is because it was originally created as a redirect in 2009. The actual article was only created on Sep. 20 2019. Rlendog (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hence my confusion, as it showed up (as I said) in the new pages feed as an old article created in 2009. So I clicked on the link and saw this article.Slatersteven (talk) 10:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Redirect to Back from Rio (the album it was on) if nothing new is found, but I'm pretty supportive of a #2 charting song keeping its own article overall.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 15:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Back from Rio. Charting, in and of itself, does not make a song notable if it hasn't otherwise received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Back from Rio. I agree with Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. Chart placement does not make a song notable; significant coverage in reliable sources is a better indicator of notability. Since there does not appear to be significant coverage on this subject, a redirect seems like the best option. Aoba47 (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2019 (UTC)


text:
Category:American military sports players

This category is for people who played organized sports or participated in athletic competitions while serving in the United States military. This category is reserved for those who traveled to other locations to participate in events (not intramural participation in sports by people on the same base). Participation includes military or non-military competitions, such as a member of a professional basketball team while serving in the military reserves.


text:
Fred Anderson (American football)

Fredell Lamont Anderson (born October 30, 1954) is an American former National Football League (NFL) defensive lineman who played for the Pittsburgh Steelers (1978–1979) and the Seattle Seahawks (1980–1982).

Early life
Anderson was born in Toppenish, Washington in 1954 and attended Toppenish High School.

Career
He played college football for Oregon State University and Prairie View A&M University. He was then drafted by the Pittsburgh Steelers. He stayed there for the 1980 season before being released, and won Super Bowl XIII against the Dallas Cowboys and Super Bowl XIV against the Los Angeles Rams. He was later picked up by the Seattle Seahawks in 1980, where he stayed for three seasons.

title: Fred Anderson (American football)


text:
User:Johnpaulorbillo

Born. johnpaul2020 Johnpaultiponesorbillo June 9, 2001(age19) Naga,Camarines Sur, Occupation. Tiktoker Years active. 3000-present Knownfor. Tiktok Artist

title: User:Johnpaulorbillo


text:
People's Palace, Mile End

The People's Palace is a Grade II listed building in Mile End in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. It is home to the Great Hall, a large theatre and entertainment venue, and is now part of Queen Mary University of London. It was the site of the first People's Palace which allowed local people to use a library.

History
The first People's Palace was built on the site of what is now the Queens' Building, and was opened in 1886/7 to be source of training and recreation. It was designed by Edward Robert Robson and it was heated by hot water and lit by gas. The octagonal library was based on the Prior's Kitchen of Durham Cathedral and it could hold 250,000 books. It boasted that it employed women librarians at the suggestion of Sir Edmund Hay Currie who was the chair of the trustees and Walter Besant. The first two women librarians were called Miss Black and Miss Low. There was an iron spiral staircase that allowed access to the galleries and books could be sent down on wires in brass fittings that could carry 112lb of books. In 1889 Minnie James became one of the first women to lead a major UK library. She understood her working class clientele and she introduced novels and opened the library on Sundays. She left in 1894 in protest at the poor funding. The library closed in 1901 for a few years.

It was destroyed by a fire in 1931, and a new People's Palace was built on the current site, immediately adjacent to the former. It was opened by King George VI on 13 February 1937, in what was his first public engagement as king.

The People's Palace was acquired by Queen Mary College in 1954.

title: People's Palace, Mile End


text:
Software Freedom/Context

The goal of this section is to encourage students to think of computation as a tool that has built their computer system and that, now that is demystified and -- to some extent -- brought under student's control, has demystified their system more generally.

Explorations and Activities
The following activies or explorations might help the students explore and discover the key concepts in this section. Each is framed in terms of the key questions it raises.

Exploration: What is Software?
A project or discussion that prompts students to discuss "software" and its role on their computer.

Questions might include:

 * What is software? What is hardware? How do the two differ?
 * What is an Operating System? What are applications?
 * Is the software that runs on their computer fundamentally different than the software they wrote in Squeak in Software Freedom/Computation? Why or why not?

Exploration: Extending Software
''An activity where students are shown how to script, build upon, or change an element or set of elements of their operating system and its applications. Students should be allowed some time to work on this then should present their modifications of their system to class.''

Ideally, the students should be able to transfer and share their changes with other students. One intriguing possibility is to create a space fo iterative development where students can improve on each others projects and ideas and work together to combine creations with important synthetic possibilities.

At some point (perhaps in a different activity), the instructor should explain and demonstrate the way that all software in a computer can be changed via this method -- although access to change somethings can be turned off. The details (e.g., source code, binary code, compilation, obfuscation, etc.) need not be dealt with explicitly.

Students should be encouraged to discuss the limits of what they can and cannot change about their system.

Key Concepts
Students could walk away from this section with:

 * Hands on experience changing something about their computer that, normally, they would assume as static.
 * The ability to imagine themselves taking a design role in their operating system and in taking over some important piece of development.
 * Reflection, on some level, of the fact that they have transcended their role as the "consumer" of software.

title: Software Freedom/Context


text:
Women's Health Issues (journal)

Women's Health Issues is a bimonthly peer-reviewed medical journal covering women's health care and policy. It is the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health and published on their behalf by Elsevier. The editor-in-chief is Chloe E. Bird (RAND Corporation).

Abstracting and indexing
The journal is abstracted and indexed in: • Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature

• Current Contents

• MEDLINE

• Embase

• Sociological Abstracts

• Studies on Women Abstracts

• Scopus According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 1.811, ranking it 4th out of 40 journals in the category "Women's Studies".

title: Women's Health Issues (journal)


text:
Francesco Antonio Xaverio Grue

Francesco Antonio Xaverio Grue (1686–1746) was an Italian potter and painter.

Biography
Grue was born in Castelli, Abruzzo, into a family of maiolica potters and painters. His grandfather was Francesco Grue and his father was Carlo Antonio, who was also a potter. In Naples, Grue produced many ceramic works, especially plates decorated with landscapes or putti in the center, and tendril or festoon borders. Wares were also often signed and dated. In 1736 he returned to his hometown and continued to work until his death in 1746.

Initially sent to the Seminary of Penne, Abruzzo to become a priest, but uninterested in liturgy, he became interested in literature. He left to study medicine in Teramo, civil law in Naples, and canon law in Rome. Despite all this training, he gravitated to the arts, and studied in Penne with Giovanni Lavalle. After a stint in Urbino, he developed a focus on decorating ceramics. His depicted genre or Bamboccianti themes. Grue headed a tax revolt that broke out in Castelli, Abruzzo in 1716 against the Marchese Francesco Paolo Mendoza when he imposed a tax on the clay used to make majolica. He was jailed for a number of years in Naples, but emerged, and is responsible for painting some of the ceramics at pharmacy of the Ospedale degli Incurabili, Naples. The ceramics depicted the illnesses treated by the contents of the ceramic jars.

title: Francesco Antonio Xaverio Grue


text:
Swimming at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Men's 4 × 100 metre medley relay

The men's 4 × 100 m Medley Relay event for the 1976 Summer Olympics was held in the Canadian city of Montreal on 22 July. The United States used two different foursomes in the heats and final - each combination won the race and broke the world record.

Heats
Heat 1

Heat 2


text:
Jarir

Jarir may refer to:

 * Jarir (poet), Arab poet
 * Jarir Bookstore, a Saudi company specializing in office retailing and book publishing.
 * an alternative name for the Somali Bantu

title: Jarir


text:
Talk:Owen Daniels

Untitled
I wouldn't say Harrison is a starter! Nope. just any ivy league QB. Sah-weeeeeet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Owen Daniels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.denverbroncos.com/team/roster/Owen-Daniels/83e808ea-892b-477a-9cfb-8365a13ea7fd
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baltimoreravens.com/team/roster/Owen-Daniels/d47c4de3-53b8-468e-95df-9faada0e4749
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.houstontexans.com/team/roster/owen-daniels/ac7e8af5-8e36-4c55-b502-bd361afc2775/

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Owen Daniels


text:
Márton Izsák

Márton Izsák (István) Martin Isaac was a prolific Transylvanian Jewish sculptor of Hungarian descent, noted personality and recipient of the honorary citizenship award from the city of Târgu Mureș.

The son of Jakab Izsák (a government official, professional soldier and eventual store owner), by arranged marriage to Vilma Friedmann, Márton was born in Gălăuțaș, now in Harghita County. After his family home in Gheorgheni burned down in World War I, his family spent some years in Petelea, before eventually settling down in Târgu Mureș.

After moving to the city, he spent some time apprenticing in furniture making under an artist named Géza Rózsa, who noted Márton's artistic talent. At the artist's behest, Márton's father enrolled him in an arts program, and he spent the next 3 years learning how to carve at the Industrial High School in Târgu Mureș, but before finishing he was invited by Rózsa to complete highschool, and then continue to an arts degree, at the College of Applied Arts in Budapest, graduating (notably early for his age) in 1933. While at the college, he studied under notable sculptors Imre Simay and Lajos Mátrai.

In the late 1930s he returned home to Târgu Mureș, where he gained recognition and eventually presented his works in personal exhibitions in 1936 and in 1937. He remained there until his deportation at the beginning of World War II, despite his fathers' World War I medals, which should have afforded some protection.

In 1940, as a result of the Second Vienna Award, Northern Transylvania (including Târgu Mureș) was annexed by Hungary. During the war, Izsák lost 25 relatives, including his mother, in the Nazi death camps of the Holocaust. After Romanian and Soviet troops regained control of the region in Fall 1944, he returned to the city from labor camp. He worked as an instructor and eventually art director at the acclaimed Art High School of Târgu Mureș in Târgu Mureș, 1945 to 1974.

During his time at the art school, he produced many notable works, including several collaborations with István Csorvássy. His Monument to the Deportees, erected in Dej in front of the local Orthodox synagogue is one of the earliest Holocaust memorials to be erected in Europe, and memorializes c. 7,000 Jews relocated to the nearby Dej ghetto and eventually deported and killed at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Many of his other works still are on display in several cities, but primarily in Târgu Mureș – including the notable "Two Bolyai" in Bolyai Square in Târgu Mureș.

The mysterious overnight removal, in 1962 of his statue of Stalin, erected just five years earlier in 1957, is remembered as signifying the metaphorical end of a Soviet Union domination of Romania during De-Stalinization in Romania.

In 2003, a public Holocaust memorial was erected in Târgu Mureș, based on a cast and plans originally produced for Dej in 1947. Shortly before his death, he was ordained as Cetățean de onoare (Honorary Citizen, an order recognizing civic contribution) for the city.

Mysterious disappearance of the Stalin statue in 1962
According to local tales, the Târgu Mureș statue was not officially destroyed — it simply disappeared overnight, without indication of where it went or what was done with it. All this occurred against a background of significant political upheaval, including the start and end of the Magyar Autonomous Region, De-Stalinization in Romania, and Romania's gradual distancing from the Warsaw Pact.

The event has entered public folklore, and to this day continues to be a subject of conversation and the source of several urban myths — for example, the popular idea that the statue was originally meant to contain a library in its base (which is also a myth related to the Bucharest statue), or that the library was actually constructed — still currently exists. Some claim that the statue is still stored inside.

==Selected works ==
 * Monument to the Deportees (Bronze, 1947, Dej)
 * Wedding customs (relief, 1951, Sfântu Gheorghe, theater façade)
 * Nicolae Balcescu (bust, in Sfântu Gheorghe)
 * István Szentgyörgyi (1953, Târgu Mureș, in front of the College of Theater)
 * Stalin (1955, Târgu Mureș with István Csorvássy; demolished in 1962)
 * Farkas Bolyai and János Bolyai (also known as the Two Bolyais Statue), in front of the Farkas Bolyai Theoretical High School in Târgu Mureș, with István Csorvássy)
 * "Unknown Soldier Monument" (bronze, 1963 to 1964, Târgu Mureș, War Memorial, Main Square, with István Csorvássy)
 * The poet Ernő Salamon (20 February 1968, in front of the Salamon Ernő High School, Gheorgheni)
 * Mihai Eminescu (1969, 1989 Târgu Mureș)
 * Andor Bernath (1974, Saint John the Baptist Church, Târgu Mureș)
 * Béla Bartók (bust, 1980, Târgu Mureș)
 * George Enescu statue composition (1983, Târgu Mureș)
 * Holocaust Memorial (2003, Târgu Mureș)

title: Márton Izsák


text:
Sami Hasan Al Nash

Sami Hasan Saleh Al Hadi Al Nash (سامي حسن صالح آل هادي ناش; 2 May 1957 – 10 May 2021) was a Yemeni professional football manager.

Career
Since January until May 2009 he coached the Yemen national team. Later, since January until October 2012 he again worked as manager of the Yemen team. In March 2013 he became a head coach of the Al-Ahli Ta'izz. Also since April until December 2013 he led the Yemen team.

In 2019, he was once again appointed coach of Yemen in preparation for the 2019 WAFF Championship replacing Ján Kocian.

Death
On 16 May 2021, the Yemen Football Association announced Al Nash had died from COVID-19 on 10 May 2021, in the Yemeni port city of Aden after contracting the virus in April during a training camp in Shabwah.

title: Sami Hasan Al Nash


text:
Cookbook:Tofu Pancake

| Vegan Cuisine

Ingredients

 * Flour
 * Cornstarch
 * Soy milk
 * Salt

 * Tofu
 * Spices (e.g. shoarma, gyros, powder from the general store, you name it)
 * Onion, chopped
 * Garlic, minced
 * Fresh herbs (e.g. coriander, etc.)
 * Raw vegetables (e.g. lettuce, etc.)
 * Chili sauce

Procedure

 * 1) Combine flour, cornstarch, salt, and soymilk to make a batter.
 * 2) Fry the batter in a greased skillet over medium heat to make pancakes. Reserve pancakes.
 * 3) Mash the tofu with a fork, and mix in the spices.
 * 4) Fry the onion and garlic in a skillet with a dash of oil. Add the tofu, and fry until it has a granular texture.
 * 5) Put a pancake on a dish, and top with the cooked tofu and some of the vegetables/herbs. Drizzle some chili sauce over the top, and serve.

title: Cookbook:Tofu Pancake


text:
Mei Hong (computer scientist)

Mei Hong (, born May 1963) is a Chinese computer scientist, a professor at Peking University, the director of Key Laboratory of High Confidence Software Technologies of Ministry of Education (MOE) at Peking University. He serves as President of the China Computer Federation (2020-2024), formerly the Vice President of The Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing Institute of Technology, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He is an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, a foreign member of the Academia Europaea, a fellow of The World Academy of Sciences, an IEEE Fellow, and an ACM Fellow.

Biography
Mei Hong was born May 1963 in Yuqing County, Guizhou, China. He earned his bachelor's degree in 1984 and his master's in 1987, both from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. In 1992, he obtained his Ph.D. from Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Mei joined Peking University in 1992, and served as Dean of the School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science from 2006 to 2014. He then became Vice President of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2013-2016), Beijing Institute of Technology (2016-2019), and The Academy of Military Sciences (2019-2023). In 2020, he became the President of the China Computer Federation (2020-2024).

Mei was elected an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2011, a fellow of The World Academy of Sciences in 2013, and a foreign member of the Academia Europaea in 2018. He was elected a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in 2014 for his "contributions to software architecture and component-based software engineering". He was named to the 2022 class of ACM Fellows, "for contributions to software engineering research and translation, and establishing research standards in China".

title: Mei Hong (computer scientist)


text:
Wikiversity:Searching

Help - main page

This article provides an overview of Wikiversity's search feature, and instructions on using external search engines, such as Google, to find information.

Wikiversity search
 Put your keyword in the searchbox.
 * Go - (or Enter on keyboard) will take you automatically to the article.
 * Search - will return a list of articles.

Effective searching
Here are some really helpful tips and hints for using the Wikiversity search feature effectively:

Avoid short and common words
If your search terms include a common "stop word" (such as "the", "your", "more", "right", "while", "when", "who", "which", "such", "every", "about") it may give a large number of non-relevant results.

Wildcards
You can use limited wildcards if you really want to. See Boolean fulltext search for details on their use. However, wildcard searches are slower, so go easy on the poor server.

Words with special characters
In a search for a word with a diaeresis, such as Sint Odiliënberg, it depends whether this ë is stored as one character or as "ë". In the first case one can simply search for Odilienberg (or Odiliënberg); in the second case it can only be found by searching for Odili, euml and/or nberg. This is actually a bug that should be fixed -- the entities should be folded into their raw character equivalents so all searches on them are equivalent.

Words in single quotes
If a word appears in an article with single quotes, you can only find it if you search for the word with quotes. Since this is rarely desirable, it is better to use double quotes in articles for which this problem does not arise.

An apostrophe is identical to a single quote, therefore the name Mu'ammar can be found only by searching for exactly that (and not otherwise). A word with  ' s is an exception in that it can be found also by searching for the word without the apostrophe and the s.

Namespaces searched by default
The search only applies to the namespaces selected in the user's preferences. To search the other namespaces check or uncheck the tickboxes in "Search in namespaces" box found at the bottom of a search results page. Depending on the browser, a box may still be checked from a previous search, but without being effective any longer! To make sure, uncheck and recheck it.

Searching the image namespace means searching the image descriptions, i.e. the first parts of the image description pages.

The source text is searched
The source text (what one sees in the edit box, also called wiki text) is searched. This distinction is relevant for piped links, for Interlanguage links (to find links to Chinese articles, search for zh, not for Zhongwen), special characters (if ê is coded as ê it is found searching for ecirc), etc.

Delay in updating the search index
For reasons of efficiency and priority, very recent changes are not always immediately taken into account in searches.

Multi-lingual Wikiversity search

 * You can do a multi-lingual Wikiversity search using Google Advanced Search or entering  in the Google search box.

 * Lumrix: AJAX driven Wikipedia search engine. Supports other languages such as German, Spanish, or French.

 * Qwika has indexes for larger Wikipedias, but not yet for Wikiversity.

External search engines
Various search engines can provide domain-specific searches, which lets you search Wikipedia specifically. Searches are based on the text as shown by the browser, so wiki markup is irrelevant. Depending on your browser, you may also be able to use tools that allow you to search Wikipedia using bookmarklets.

In general, external search engines are faster than a Wikiversity search. However, because the search engine's cache is based on when the site was indexed, the search may not return newly created pages. Similarly, the search engine's cached version of the page will not be as up-to-date as the link to Wikiversity itself. A search engine may also return results from a Wikiversity mirror (if such a thing ever exists).

Google
By following the links below, you can use the Google search engine to search Wikiversity - either all languages, or English-only. Google indexes all namespaces.

 * Search all languages
 * Search the English Wikiversity only

If you frequently search via Google, consider installing the Google Toolbar. Using the "search this site" button allows you to quickly search the English version of Wikiversity. The official Google Toolbar is for Internet Explorer (Windows and Mac) and for Firefox (works on all operating system platforms for which Firefox is available, such as Windows, Linux and Mac OS X).

How to provide a link to a specific Google Search
Wikiversity markup allows you to insert links to Google searches by including  as the prefix for the link. This can be useful on talk pages, and sometimes in External link sections. It is done like this:

Which looks like this:

 * Tipster

Note: It is important not to use spaces in the search. To add more parameters to the search, separate them by a plus sign, +. For a phrase search, use a hyphen (minus sign), -, between each word. E.g. to search for, use.

To provide a link to a Wikiversity-specific search, include in the google-link  (no spaces before or after), like this:

Which looks like this:

 * google:Tip-of-the-day+site:en.wikiversity.org

To clean up the link so that only the part you want to show is presented, use the pipe, like this:

Which makes it look like this:

 * "Tip of the day"

Yahoo!
By following the links below, you can use the Yahoo! search engine to search Wikipedia - either all languages or English-only.

 * Search all Wikiversitys with Yahoo!
 * Search English Wikiversitys with Yahoo!

Browser integration
Some Browsers allow you to customize your searches and add new search providers. Firefox, for example, has a feature called "quick searches" where a search can be carried out by prefixing a special code to the search term. To search English Wikipedia for "foo", you would write "wp foo" and Firefox should go to w:Special:Search?search=Foo. You can also define your own quick search for Wikiversity by creating a new bookmark in the Quick Searches section of your bookmarks list. Choose any shortcut of your liking (perhaps "wv") and use http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=%s as the location. Now you can search for a Wikiversity page by entering "wv foo" and the browser should take you to Special:Search?search=Foo.

If you cannot find an appropriate page on Wikiversity
If there is no appropriate page on Wikiversity, consider creating a page, since you can edit Wikiversity right now. Or consider adding what you were looking for on Page creation requests. Or if you have a question, then see the help desk, where our volunteers answer questions, any question you can possibly imagine.

title: Wikiversity:Searching


text:
Sergei Kudryavtsev (diplomat)

Sergei Mikhailovich Kudryavtsev (Сергей Михайлович Кудрявцев; 1915–1998) was a senior Soviet intelligence officer who served as the Soviet Ambassador to Cuba from August 22, 1960 to May 30, 1962. Kudryavtsev did not speak Spanish, nor did he have connections with the Cuban government. As a result, Alexander Alexeyev, who had been in Cuba since 1959, served as his cultural advisor for the duration of his appointment. Kudryavstev was expelled from Cuba in 1962 by Fidel Castro for open and excessive political activities, and was replaced by Alexeyev.

title: Sergei Kudryavtsev (diplomat)


text:
A Thing Called Divine Fits

A Thing Called Divine Fits is the only studio album by American–Canadian indie rock band Divine Fits. The album was recorded in Los Angeles in a backyard studio with producer Nick Launay between March and May 2012. It was released on August 27, 2012 in Europe and August 28, 2012 in North America on Merge Records. The first single, "My Love Is Real", was released on July 31, 2012.

Background
Britt Daniel, lead singer and guitarist of Spoon, met Dan Boeckner of Wolf Parade and Handsome Furs at a Handsome Furs concert in 2007. They kept in touch, and later, Spoon and Handsome Furs played shows together. Spoon later played Radio City Music Hall, and invited Boeckner onstage with them. Sam Brown, drummer of New Bomb Turks, was recommended by producer Mike McCarthy, who had previously worked with Daniel. Daniel had written the track "What Gets You Alone" and sent it to Boeckner in February 2011, who recorded vocals over top of it, and decided to go to California the following year, along with Sam Brown to form the band. Alex Fischel met Boeckner opening up for Handsome Furs with the band PAPA. Boeckner later got in touch with Fischel and asked him to join Divine Fits, adding keyboards to the mix. The vocals are roughly shared between Daniel and Boeckner.

Critical reception
A Thing Called Divine Fits was generally well received by critics, with aggregate rating site Metacritic assigning it a score of 77 out of 100 based on 30 reviews. Josh Modell of Spin described it as "something fresh from the "supergroup that they hadn't done with their respective groups before" and wrote that the band "is flirting with the coolest music 1982 had to offer," though that they have more potential than what that the album showed. Mary Chang of DIY called the album's cohesiveness "astonishing" considering that the band had only formed some months prior to its release. Other critics spoke positively of Daniel and Boeckner, noting that their songwriting fit together naturally. Rolling Stone's Jon Dolan described their partnership as a "genuine synthesis", while Harley Brown of Consequence of Sound wrote that "it might be the most fortuitous musical pairing in recent history."

A Thing Called Divine Fits was listed at number 23 on Rolling Stone's list of the top 50 albums of 2012, with the publication praising Divine Fits as "the super-group that is more than the sum of its promising parts."

title: A Thing Called Divine Fits


text:
William Lindsay (officer of arms)

William Alexander Lindsay (8 June 1846 – 13 September 1926) was a long-serving officer of arms at the College of Arms in London. Lindsay was the son of Hon. Colin Lindsay son of James 7th Earl of Balcarres, 24th Earl of Crawford and Lady Frances Howard, daughter of the Earl of Wicklow. He was educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, and was President of the Cambridge Union. On 7 May 1870, he married Lady Harriet Hamilton-Gordon, a daughter of the 5th Earl of Aberdeen and Mary Baillie. His heraldic career began in 1882 when he was appointed Portcullis Pursuivant in Ordinary at the College of Arms. He was promoted to the office of Windsor Herald of Arms in Ordinary in 1894. In 1919, he was promoted Norroy King of Arms after Charles Athill was promoted to Clarenceux King of Arms. Three years later, Lindsay followed Athill to the role of Clarenceux on Athill's death. Lindsay held the office from 1922 until his own death in 1926.

title: William Lindsay (officer of arms)


text:
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 22

September 22
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 22, 2017.

Hinduism in Palau
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 9%23Hinduism in Palau

Housing (mechanical)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

 * The result of the discussion was delete  . -- Tavix  ( talk ) 23:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Housing (mechanical) → wikt:housing (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Housing_(mechanical)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

See Wikipedia is not a dictionary. A page consisting only of a redirect to Wiktionary is not an appropriate use of either an article or a redirect. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete; I don't know if R3 would apply to this specific case, but the nominator's rationale of WP:NOTDICT definitely applies. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment oh ok. Is there another way to acknowledge/encode the fact that there is a term 'housings' in engineering? there's articles mentioning 'gearbox housings' etc. My thinking was that disambiguation was a better 'default'. I understand that wikipedia is not a dictionary but think how awesome this resource of text is (e.g. imagine foreign language speakers, using wikipedia with the hover cards feature which means you get a nice dropbox under links.. the more precise a link can be, the more value you can get from that). I had made modifications to other articles ('button' -> button (clothing), button->DAB; 'interfacing' -> 'interfacing (textiles)' ) for similar reasons . Hidden_headlamp mentions a housing. Whilst I don't have any specific content in mind for that article, maybe it would appear in time, from other contributors. 18:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)MfortyoneA (talk)
 * Admin note - is blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Fmadd. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment in its current form this is just a WP:Soft redirect that doesn't use the template so it is not at all inappropriate for those reasons. Thryduulf (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep in some form. Soft redirects to wiktionary are a pretty standard feature (the situations in which they're used are described at Template:Wiktionary redirect). This redirect is necessary for linking and the only question is its target. Ideally, this should be an article or a section yet to be written, and there might well be one somewhere, but until it is found keeping as a wiktionary redirect is perfectly acceptable. – Uanfala 20:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: It really should be possible to write an article on this as a topic in engineering. bd2412  T 23:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Comment I went ahead and created a quick-and-dirty stub on the topic. It can be found at Draft:Housing (mechanical).  I suggest moving it to mainspace and mooting this discussion.  Tazerdadog (talk) 07:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment housing (engineering) might be better to cover the electrical examples, but i've already linked housing (mechanical). I think it would be ok to redirect one to the other since 'engineering' would be a superset (mechanical, electrical). I suppose we can also consider housing (casing), housing (enclosure), which are more literal MfortyoneA (talk) 09:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I've gone ahead and moved the article into mainspace at Housing (engineering), and retargeted the redirect under consideration to that article.Tazerdadog (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete created by a SOCK of Fmadd. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - it seems the creator meant this as a disambiguator for mechanical structures which enclose something, such as a headlamp housing, rather than the sort of housing that humans live in. "Mechanical" unfortunately was a poor choice of disambiguator, as houses are also mechanical structures. Not sure what the proper disambiguator ought to be, but this one is WP:XY-level confusing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * On that note, housing (engineering) is also poorly disambiguated. Unless you think nobody ever engineered a human dwelling? Again, I don't know what the proper treatment is, but it's not that. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blaster (weapon)
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Blaster. (non-admin closure)  f  e  minist  10:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Blaster (weapon) → Raygun (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blaster_(weapon)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

 * Blaster Pistol → Raygun (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blaster_(weapon)&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Someone searching for this could conceivably be looking for raygun, Blaster (Star Wars) or Blaster (flamethrower), so this is a confusing redirect with no clear target. They are better off going through the disambiguation page at blaster. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Dabify Blaster (weapon), but delete Blaster Pistol; all three pages the nominator listed apply to the former, but not the latter. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to the dab at Blaster. Blaster Pistol could refer to the generic science fiction raygun, gun-like toys, or (according to Wookiepedia's article a "common weapon used by both military personnel and civilians. [That] came in a variety of shapes, sizes, and capabilities.". All these entries are on the existing disambig. Thryduulf (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirecting blaster pistol to blaster can be said to be confusing, per WP:R. Assuming someone is looking for the Star Wars pistol, it will take them less time to be directed to it via search, than be sent to a disambiguation page and find it themselves.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The point is that there are several things that someone is equally likely to be looking for so disambiguation is needed. Thryduulf (talk) 11:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Blaster. No separate page is needed. bd2412  T 23:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to Blaster. Blaster pistols are hardly limited to Star Wars, it's a pretty generic sci-fi term. Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to Blaster per everyone. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Retarget both to Blaster as the Other section explains it is used for all sorts of toys. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rey gun
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

 * The result of the discussion was delete  .   Anarchyte  ( work  |  talk )  10:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Rey gun → Raygun (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rey_gun&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible typo, has barely gotten any hits over a long period of time. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; doesn't apply. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - stats indicate it's not a useful misspelling. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above mentioned findings -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Delete searches point to Rey's gun in Star Wars: The Force Awakens, and some random horses with the name, a likely pun on Reagan. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BerliCon
 Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

 * The result of the discussion was deleted under WP:G7.  . Author voted delete, essentially making it fall under G7.   Anarchyte  ( work  |  talk )  01:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

 * BerliCon → List of furry conventions (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BerliCon&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

This convention is not mentioned anywhere in the target. Most likely the convention was removed from the list due to lack of notability or use of primary sources. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable for now. No news sources provided to make it qualify for the discontinued or active lists. Reconsider when proper sources and notability is provided. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete in part because it is no longer active; the organizers have moved on. If the event is not notable enough for anyone to have mentioned it now, it never will be. GreenReaper (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per agreement with the above. bd2412  T 23:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.


text:
inrushing

Adjective

 * 1) Moving towards or into.
 * Inrushing winds fanned a firestorm.

Noun

 * 1) A rushing inward.

title: inrushing


text:
Government Medical College, Konni

Government Medical College in Konni, Pathanamthitta is the seventh government medical college in Kerala.

Location
The Medical college is situated on Nedumpara hill  near Vattamon in Konni taluk, Pathanamthitta District. The construction is completed.

History
The foundation stone for Government Medical College, Konni in Pathanamthitta district was laid on 26 January 2013 by Oommen Chandy, the then Chief Minister of Kerala. The campus had 50 acre of land which was received by the Soil Conservation Department at Vattamon in Aruvappulam grama panchayat. The Budget was Rs 200 crore, which includes the State Government's budget allocation and the credit taken from NABARD, for the construction work in the first phase of the project. On 14 September 2020, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan inaugurated the Medical College hospital. The inpatient capacity will be 300.

The college has been admitting 100 students since 2022.

title: Government Medical College, Konni


text:
Emmett Swanson

Emmett Swanson (February 17, 1906 – December 10, 1968) was an American sports shooter. He competed at the 1948 Summer Olympics and 1952 Summer Olympics. He served as president of the National Rifle Association of America in 1948. Swanson was noted as a versatile shooter, earning NRA Distinguished Marksman status in the Rifle, Pistol and International classes.

Shooting career
Swanson first rose to prominence in 1925 when he qualified to represent the United States in that year's Dewar Match. At the time he was a member of the University of Minnesota's rifle team which won the ROTC trophy two years in a row. In 1930 he travelled to Belgium to the ISU World Championships, where he won the smallbore rifle kneeling match, and was a member of the US team that won the Team 300metre event.

After the second World War, he served as President of the NRA in 1948, and competed at the 1948 and 1952 Olympic Games in the 300metre Free Rifle event. He captained the US Olympic Shooting Team in 1956 and 1960.

He competed in the World Championship teams in 1949, 1952 and 1954.

title: Emmett Swanson


text:
Template:Did you know nominations/Teresina Brambilla

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Teresina Brambilla

 * ... that soprano Teresina Brambilla (pictured) was known for performing leading parts in operas by Amilcare Ponchielli, whom she married?
 * Reviewed: The Demands of Liberal Education

Created by Voceditenore (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 22:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC).

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good nomination. This article is of adequate length and is well reffed. The hook fact is interesting and is reffed to a reliable source in Italian. I don't speak Italian but Google translate supports the interpretation made here. Image is old and free. No obv. paraphrasing spotted. Thanks. Good for Women's History Day/Month. Victuallers (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Coup d'etat (comics)

"Coup d'Etat" was a 2004 comic book crossover storyline published by Wildstorm Comics.

Publication history
The story ran across 4 issues, each featuring one of the major titles in the Wildstorm Universe at that time: Sleeper, Stormwatch: Team Achilles, Wildcats 3.0 and The Authority. Each issue of the overarching storyline, which Jim Lee described as a "stand alone 4 part mini-series event", is a one-shot focusing on one of the four different groups and created by their respective writers and artists.

There was also an "Afterword" issue including a preview to the second volume of Sleeper and a preview to the second volume of Wetworks, which was launched in mid-2006 by creator Whilce Portacio and writer Mike Carey.

Plot
In Coup d'Etat, Tao places a device in the hands of the U.S. Government that allows them to enter the Bleed, where it exploded, damaging a vessel of an alien race and starting an interdimensional war. The crossover had important consequences for the Wildstorm Universe with the Authority taking control over the U.S. Government and Stormwatch: Team Achilles being forced underground.

For Stormwatch: Team Achilles and Wildcats 3.0, most of these consequences could not be explored as both series were cancelled shortly afterwards. The Authority taking control of the U.S. Government led into the events of The Authority: Revolution.

Reception
Both the "Sleeper" and "Afterword" issues sold out, despite what DC described as "generous overprints".

Collected editions
The story was collected into a trade paperback:

 * Coup d'Etat (collects "Sleeper", "Stormwatch: Team Achilles", "Wildcats 3.0" and "The Authority" in that order, 112 pages, November 2004, ISBN 1-4012-0570-4)

title: Coup d'etat (comics)


text:
Burns Road

Burns Road (also spelled Burnes Road, and formally known as Muhammad Bin Qasim Road) is a street located in Karachi, Pakistan. It is well-known in the city for its many restaurants and street food vendors.

History
Burns Road was named after the Scottish doctor and spy, James Burnes, who worked in British India in 19th century. After the foundation of Pakistan,. The street has restaurants that were founded in the 1940s.

The street is considered a melting pot and is home to people of different ethnicities, including Punjabi Saudagaran-e-Delhi, Memons, Gaddis, and Qureshi Baradri.

Notable retailers

 * Fresco Sweets
 * Delhi Rabri House
 * Waheed Kebab House
 * Food Centre
 * Super Shaheen Shanwaari
 * Karachi Dehli Gola Kabab House
 * Tawkkal Biryani
 * Dilshad kulfi

Legacy
The name of this street or neighborhood used in the 2024 Pakistani television series Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet, which stars Hamza Sohail and Iqra Aziz. Filming for the series also took place there.

title: Burns Road