text:
then lies low (I may be unfair in saying this).  As a number of people revert his edits without warnings or have given up putting stuff on his talk page it tends to not have many current issues, or perhaps just one.   There is a real risk he is relying on wikipedians assuming good faith and doing monthly edits to avoid recent warnings.  As some may/should have noticed he has communicated with me on my talk page with regard to a previous issue following my reversion of a number of edits ... I don't really have an answer. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC).  Please be aware that after becoming aware of Newtownforbes and mentioning it above I decided to work a little on the article .. initially because of tweaking some of IkbenFrank's content and restoring/reworking content deleted by Ritchie333 and subsequently to work on the Castleforbes demesne section.  While somewhat serving as an example of how article improvement works I was not expecting to work on the Newtownforbes when I first mentioned it here and would not have given it as an example if I was expecting that, this being a slight distraction in this ANI section.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  I've also just done a fairly bold edit on the Paddington article for reasons far deeper than IkbenFrank's contribution.Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Extremely unfair you creep! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IkbenFrank (talk • contribs)
 * Not helpful IkbenFrank. Do you have anything constructive to add to this conversation instead of calling people names? Wikipedia is a community and if people raise questions about some of your edits you need to respond to them otherwise admins etc will only get one side of the story. Canterbury Tail talk  11:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Thankyou for responding . I assume you are referring to my possible explanation of your pattern of timelines of contributions.  I accept it is perfectly possible that you may simply allocate say one or two days a month to Wikipedia contributions.  I think what people are finding is that you are making large proportion of (non-trivial) edits that are needing to be reverted or reworked.  I think other contributors to this section would wish you to make more positive comments.  For example I suggest a good start is to ensure you sign your talk page contributions with 4 tildes and as  has suggested ensure you use edit summaries - You can set an auto-reminder for those by : Perferences, Editting tab, Then checking: Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.  Responding positively in this way this will likely stand you in better stead with others.   Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocked user using a dopelganger - Fake Amusement Parks
Blocked user appears to be using her account at  to create draft articles. Enterprisey (talk!) 00:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It's because I love creating articles about fictional amusement parks and attractions. That's why I created Draft:Yellowstone Sky Seeker. Not to mention I'm Mothra's biggest fan.  AmyWeatherspoon63's doppelganger  (Talk to my main account) 01:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, good. You might have thought she was violating policy but no, she loves creating articles about fictional amusement parks and attractions. That's why she created Draft:Yellowstone Sky Seeker. Not to mention she's Mothra's biggest fan. And she's also obviously not a grody old man roleplaying as a braindead teenage girl. Nothing to see here, move along. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 01:49, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Let's give her a fictional Wikipedia to play with. Count Iblis (talk) 02:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  02:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * We don't allow the creation of alt accounts to evade a block. Sock blocked.

Please also block, who has also popped up. --MuZemike 22:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Unhatted. I'm not done and will find out who this is. Will report back shortly.
 * I believe that I have found him and have filed the SPI case.
 * I've just CSD G3 a series of Draft pages, rolled back a bunch of edits to mainspace and reported additional socks as vandals . Check my edits before this post if interested. Legacypac (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

IBM PC DOS, etc.
Involved articles: IBM PC DOS, TRS-80 character set, VGA connector, VGA-compatible text mode

Relevant diffs:, (reversion of removal of redundant link and reversion of italicization of computer/video game title, respectively)

It seems as though I've fallen into a case of rules lawyering and "policy" enforcement from User:Deacon Vorbis. He has decided that he must (at all costs) revert my edits to articles that he personally dislikes (per WP:NOTBROKE)), even if it fixes punctuation or redundant linking. This really is quite passive-aggressive on his part; I've tried discussing the matter politely with him but he seems to think that whatever his thoughts on policy are are the final word and no other action by other editors are valid. As a long-time editor and administrator, this doesn't really sit well with me having my proper (not merely good faith) edits reverted by an editor with less than two years of editing experience. I'm not going to play games here and get sucked into WP:3RR and other childish editing games.

He also seems incapable of any non-"black-and-white" thinking on objective matters (such as Wikipedia guidelines (which are not rules or laws) governing this project. I suspect I stumbled into editing articles in his "pet" area (math and technology) and that he feels the need to invoke "Protecting the valor of Wikipedia at all costs", which is a wreckless sort of mindset; we're all supposed to be working together toward the common goal of making information avaiable to people on the internet worldwide, not working against each other.

Involved party (Deacon Vorbis) needs to re-evaluate his view of Wikipedia policy and not act rashly before reverting experienced non-vandal editors. Bumm13 (talk) 03:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If there's a dispute, and a guideline says to do things one way, why not just follow the guideline? I don't understand why you're making a big deal of this.  Instead of escalating this to ANI, you should have said, "Oh, so I don't have to waste my time changing links that aren't broken?  That's good news.  Thank you for pointing that out.  Cheers."  In fact, it's not too late for you to say that now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 * I don't think you understand: it's not okay to revert edits involving removing redundant links and italicization of video game titles (per the diffs posted above). Also, this has effectively prevented me from editing any articles until this issue is resolved. That isn't acceptable and is borderline harassment. Bumm13 (talk) 03:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Indeed, I was a bit overzealous on a couple of those reverts; I should only have reverted the parts I was objecting to. Let's gloss over whether my actions were "passive-aggressive" or whether or not I've actuUser:Deacon Vorbisally "decided that I must (at all costs) revert your edits".  I'll try to be brief here; I can go into more detail if anyone wants.  I said it might be actually be helpful to escalate, but that first you should explain why your edits were okay.  My view is that the gist of [[WP:NOTBROKEN is pretty much just, "If a link works, then don't screw with it without a good reason".  But you didn't explain; you just tried to throw around the fact that you've been here longer (I guess?) and then went ahead and escalated here.
 * Guidelines make it helpful so that us poor, misguided, inexperienced editors can actually have some frame of reference when we see someone making changes like this. If you find it necessary to go against the guidelines on such a regular basis, then you can always modify the guidelines so it's clear for those without the vast accrued wisdom to see why it's okay.
 * Seeing as how this was barely discussed, I think it would be best for this matter to just be closed and let it try to sort itself out. --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 03:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The matter can't be closed if you don't at least undo the part of your reversions to IBM PC DOS and TRS-80 character set involving my removal of redundant links and italicization of a video game title link, as those are legitimate edits regardless of our views on WP:NOTBROKEN and avoiding redirects. Bumm13 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh for fuck's goodness sake. If you really want to make me do it, then fine; it's done.  But if you're going to continue editing in violation of WP:NOTBROKEN, then you should really update the guideline.  The rest of us aren't psychic, especially when you won't explain why you're doing it.  --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 04:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The matter can't be closed if you don't at least undo the part of your reversions to IBM PC DOS and TRS-80 character set involving my removal of redundant links and italicization of a video game title link, as those are legitimate edits regardless of our views on WP:NOTBROKEN and avoiding redirects. Bumm13 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh for fuck's goodness sake. If you really want to make me do it, then fine; it's done.  But if you're going to continue editing in violation of WP:NOTBROKEN, then you should really update the guideline.  The rest of us aren't psychic, especially when you won't explain why you're doing it.  --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 04:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Leaving aside the merits of the edits for a moment, let's look at: "As a long-time editor and administrator, this doesn't really sit well with me having my proper (not merely good faith) edits reverted by an editor with less than two years of editing experience." Hmmm. That "doesn't really sit well" with me at all. Some folks could view that kind of statement as an attempt to "throw your weight around". I'm sure that's not the intention, but you might bear it in mind, nevertheless. I agree with NRP that there was no need to escalate this to this noticeboard. -- Begoon 04:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing in the OP's approach to this whole issue sits at all well. I know standards for granting adminship were pretty lax in 2005, but I didn't realise that they were that lax. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Talk:IBM PC DOS has not been edited since February 2017, and the last substantive comment made at that page was in July 2012. Johnuniq (talk) 04:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * In the light of the behaviour shown in this whole dispute, including the ongoing failure to explain why the WP:NOTBROKE guideline shouldn't be followed in these cases, should Bumm13 continue to be an administrator? That editor has obviously displayed an inappropriate temperament for that role per WP:ADMINACCT and WP:CIR. This behaviour is akin to that of a D-list celebrity who says "do you know who I am?" when refused a table at a fully booked restaurant. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think you should prejudge me any more than another other editor here (including myself not prejudging others). At least take a look at my previous edits over the years and my ability to (mostly) avoid on-site controversy. After a day of reflection, I know I didn't handle the situation as well as I could have, but I don't think that this episode should define my ability to be a competent admin. I also find it somewhat curious that you bring these character issues up given you don't have an actual username; it's okay to be to edit anonymously as an IP but it seems odd that you seem so interested in on-site policies without bothering to even register a username. Just a small thing, though. Bumm13 (talk) 00:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I had no idea that User:Bumm13 was an admin. This filing was preceded by a filing at the dispute resolution noticeboard that appeared to have been filed by a clueless newbie who did not precede the filing by discussion on an article talk page. It appears to have been filed by a clueless admin.  I suggest that this report be closed as the filing of a clueless admin who doesn't know how to be an experienced editor, and I thought admins were supposed to be experienced editors.   Is there a remedial course for admins who don't know how Wikipedia works?  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, he really is an admin. That's disturbing. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * (e/c) Pretty much a c/paste of that DR filing, now you point it out. I'm concerned though, Robert, that Bumm13 might "find it somewhat curious" that you and I bring issues up here, or that it might not "sit well" with them. I'm trying to understand the 'caste system' they appear from their comments in this thread to apply to such judgments. We are neither of us IP editors, having both "bothered to" register usernames, so that seems to be a pass; we have both edited for well over 2 years, so that looks ok; but neither of us are admins, so that could be a stumbling block, I'm not sure. -- Begoon 04:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * My reply was to User:<IP_ADDRESS>, not you or User:Robert McClenon. Bumm13 (talk) 04:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know. (Mine and SBHB's were to Robert - which was apparent until you "top-posted" above them with the wrong indent.) Not sure why that's relevant to what I said, though? -- Begoon 04:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Robert, I would be delighted for you to "show me how Wikipedia works"; clearly I'm completely unable to understand very simple concepts (like responding to you at this page). Not really sure what your "remedial" comment was trying to accomplish, but it sure doesn't seem like WP:AGF or anything of the sort. So I don't know all the ins and outs of how specific noticeboards work here on Wikipedia? Dealing with user or content disputes isn't where I choose to spend my time when editing. I posted here after finding out that, sure enough, WP:DRN was the wrong place for dispute resolution with another editor. Let's stick to the purpose of this noticeboard (dispute resolution) and consider toning down the snarky comments. Bumm13 (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Bumm13 - The first rule about posting to noticeboards is to read any instructions at the top of the noticeboard. That isn't really a difficult rule.
 * The instructions at the top of DRN say: "The dispute must have been recently discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) to be eligible for help at DRN."  You posted almost the same complaint about the editing of links as you posted here at DRN, with no discussion on article talk pages.  It is true that my comment about remedial education was snarky, but it was deserved, because experienced editors, whether admins or not, are expected at least to know to read the instructions.  Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but it does matter to the DRN volunteers, and you wasted our time by filing a complaint without the preceding discussion.  I assumed, in closing it, that you were a clueless newbie who didn't yet know to read the instructions, but who had (after a little reading) found a place to complain.  You are not a clueless newbie.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Bumm13, the problem isn't just your competence, but also your attitude, which you displayed again in that post, that arguments can be won by pulling rank rather than by explaining your actions. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * And I'm not the one doing any prejudging here, but have only based anything that I have said on your actions. You are the one who is prejudging people on the basis of their non-admin status, their shorter history of editing than yours and my unregistered status. Why the fuck (I have a shorter fuse than User:Deacon Vorbis so won't redact that word) didn't you follow User:NinjaRobotPirate's advice above that "it's not too late for you to say that now". It now is (or at least should be on the basis of your intransigence) too late. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Proxy IP's constantly undoing recent changes
Since a few hours ago, an IP user has been constantly undoing recent changes, either made by a user/IP or a bot. Meanwhile, this user issues bogus user warnings claiming the reverted user's edits were unconstructive. Admins have been working hard blocking them, but once an IP gets blocked, the user simply switches to a new one. Examples include these IP's contributions: There are a lot more I won't be listing, as they can mostly be found at WP:AIV's edit history at least since here. It's been over 3 hours and still ongoing, so posting this to request attention from admins, as well as anyone willing to revert similar edits made by new IP's. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 03:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * <IP_ADDRESS>
 * <IP_ADDRESS>
 * <IP_ADDRESS>
 * <IP_ADDRESS>
 * <IP_ADDRESS>
 * <IP_ADDRESS>
 * <IP_ADDRESS>

User:Jastorga vandalism
Special:Contributions/Jastorga - 4th warning. Thanks. (WP:AIV is protected) <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 04:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked 31 hours for WP:SOAPBOX violations. Probably not here to constructively contribute, but the worst that happens is that we end up back here tomorrow. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The event in question will be over by tomorrow. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 04:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Yonggary vandal from Sandy, Texas
Can we block a particular vandal who keeps disrupting articles related to Yonggary (character)? Multiple IPs are being used, all from Sandy, Texas. has been particularly plagued by this vandal. A rangeblocks should do it, on 2602:306:839B:77F0:x, plus a single block of <IP_ADDRESS>, who was previously blocked for three days in June.

An example series of edits may be seen here, where the vandal writes his own unreferenced analysis of the filmmakers' motives ("Made to cash in on Pacific Rim and The Upcoming Godzilla remake") along with a copy/paste of some plot text taken word-for-word from online sources published a month earlier. Another example of the vandal's original analysis was placed here, comparing multiple films, unreferenced, written poorly. Binksternet (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

 * Sep 28–30
 * Sep 23–27
 * Sep 10
 * Sep 2–4
 * Aug 27
 * Aug 27
 * Aug 26
 * Aug 19
 * Aug 17
 * Aug 15 – Sep 30
 * Aug 13–15
 * Aug 11–12
 * Aug 9–10
 * Aug 6–7
 * Aug 4–5
 * Aug 3
 * Aug 2
 * Jul 23
 * Jul 22
 * Jul 22
 * Jul 21–22
 * Jul 13–14
 * Jul 12
 * Jul 9–10
 * Jul 6–8
 * Jul 5–6
 * Jul 4–5
 * Jul 2–3
 * Jun 30 – Jul 1
 * Jun 27
 * Jun 24–26
 * Jun 22
 * Jun 20–21
 * Jun 19
 * Jun 19
 * Jun 18
 * Jun 16
 * Jun 15–16
 * Jun 15 – Jul 26
 * Jun 13–15
 * Jun 13 – Sep 30

 * Yonggary (character)
 * Yonggary (1999 film)
 * Yongary: Monster from the Deep
 * Horton Hatches the Egg
 * Horton Hears a Who!
 * Horton Hears a Who! (TV special)
 * Director's cut
 * The Cat in the Hat (film)
 * D-War
 * It (miniseries)
 * The Mighty Kong
 * Gargantua (film)
 * Bigfoot (1970 film)

 * 2602:306:839b:77f0::/64 is the range. I also collapsed the lists above to make this section more legible. – Nihlus (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Binksternet summarized it perfectly. There's nothing else I can say except that I (and others) have been playing whack the mole with this person for the past few months with no end in sight. This person's edits are unconstructive. Just today, I even left a warning on this person's talk page and an hour or so later, proceeded to restore his previous unconstructive edits that I reverted before warning him on his talk page. Enough is enough. Action must be taken against this person. His edits are not benefitting the affected articles. One 3-day block didn't teach him a lesson, perhaps a permanent block will do the trick. Armegon (talk) 02:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

 * I blocked 2602:306:839b:77f0::/64 and <IP_ADDRESS> for a week. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

User fabricating AFD discussion closures
Please review the past hour's contributions from User:Thebigs2update. Many articles created by this user were nominated for deletion today, and the user has removed AFD tags from the articles and redirected the discussions to spurious "keep" results, exemplified by, e.g.. Thanks, y'all. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  22:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC) Update: Upon further investigation, I'm not sure the user is creating redirects, at least not effectively (that may have been the intent). Unfortunately I don't have any more time at the moment to figure this out in any greater technical detail, but nothing good is going on here, and I felt it best to bring it to teh authoritez' attention sooner rather than later.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  23:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging User:El cid, el campeador, who reported this user to AIV this morning with the rationale SPA to promote Kasey Ryne Mazak. All edits are regarding him or creating pages for movies he's been in or editing pages he was involved in.. He's also been uploading many non-free movie posters and claiming them as his own. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I think I've tidied everything up, and have sent the remaining two articles they created to AfD. If they continue to disrupt, a block is in order. Black Kite (talk) 23:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've sent two articles to AfD. There are still seven creations by this user not marked for deletion. — JJMC89  (T·C) 00:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * And, a day later, this just appeared on the Kasey Ryne Mazak talk page: . -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification, and sorry for being MIA. As noted, the user continues to take the same actions, interrupting AfDs by deleting notices. He has been notified of this discussion twice, and warned multiple times, but continues to take the same actions. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  01:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 * I've just given this user a warning that they'll be blocked the next time they disrupt Wikipedia by messing with AfDs, removing templates or promoting this non-notable actor they'll be blocked. I don't know why they haven't been blocked earlier, all they're doing is promoting this non-notable person in every way they can. They may even be them, but that's not actually important. The main thing is they're not here to build an encyclopaedia, just promote this person. If they don't find another topic lets cut them loose. Canterbury Tail talk  02:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Nevermind, Alex Shih has just shown them the door. Canterbury Tail talk  02:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 * Apologies, I have left a note for this editor about instructions to be unblocked. Contribution history shows nothing but single purpose account (sole purpose is to promote Kasey Ryne Mazak) participating in undisclosed paid activity. Alex ShihTalk 02:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * All creations not tagged for AFD have been prodded except for Health Nutz and WWE Byte This!, which make no mention of Kasey Ryne Mazak. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I removed Mazak from Health Nutz because he was listed on IMDb as "waiter" for 1 episode which doesn't confer someone as notable for the cast. However I think it's pretty obvious it was only added because he did appear in a background role once. Canterbury Tail talk  11:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * These two topics probably meets the notability guideline, although the subject is involved in both of these two topics also, as small, insignificant roles. Alex ShihTalk 03:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


text:
Guitar/Muting and Raking

Muting
Muting a string is simple: with the fretting hand, touch the string with a finger, but do not press it down, and strike the string. It is usually best to do this where a harmonic will not result, but strings can be muted at harmonics for special effect. In tablature, muted notes are often marked with an "x" instead of a fret number. It is also common practice to mute a string with the picking hand after striking a note to create a shortened "staccato" effect. Again touching a string to mute away from harmonic nodes is advised, but sometimes pulling off into harmonics creates interesting effects.

Palm muting
Palm muting may or may not make the pitch of the string discernable. Very lightly rest the palm of the hand on or near the bridge, then fret and strike strings normally. Palm-muted notes are sometimes notated the same way as muted notes when the pitch is not discernable; otherwise fret numbers are given normally and the muted notes are marked "P.M." in tablature.

The Palm Muting Technique
The idea is not to mute the strings, but to dampen them, so that the notes are still clear, but with less sustain. To start, hold your guitar like you normally would, but let your palm brush against the strings, near the bridge. Remember to "let" the strings brush against your palm, not putting any force on the strings. The closer to the bridge, the more forgiving it is. As you get better, try adjusting the amount of muting by keeping your palm at different distances from the bridge. Very heavy palm muting can raise the pitch of the note(s), especially on guitars with a floating tremolo bar system equipped. Using or not using this effect is at the reader's discretion.

Finger Muting
You can also mute strings just by pressing your fingers against the strings, but not so hard that they are fretted and play notes.

Raking
Raking is not a kind of muting, but a technique for applying it. It is vaguely related to sweep picking, but instead of an arpeggio, the result is usually a single percussive-sounding note. (However, sweep picking is sometimes incorrectly notated as a rake in tablature, and sloppy sweep picking may accidentally become a rake.) Between two and four strings are struck, only one containing the desired note and the rest muted. Rakes may be notated in various ways; the most common way is to add muted grace notes, possibly adding the word "rake" to the tablature for clarification.

de:Gitarre: Palm Mute Chitarra/Palm mute e Stoppato

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Guitar/Muting and Raking


text:
kelli

Etymology
From, from.

Proper noun

 * 1) Wood

Etymology 1
Probably related to (possibly as ), which can in dialects also mean "to copulate" (through a similar development as seen in ). There are many dialectal variants as well (e.g., , ), which could hint at a origin.

Noun

 * 1) penis, dick
 * 2)  testes, balls
 * 1)  testes, balls

title: kelli


text:
Geology of the Central African Republic

The geology of Central African Republic (CAR) is part of the broader geology of Africa. CAR occupies a swath of ancient rocks, dating back billions of years that record significant aspects of Earth history and yield minerals vital to the country's small economy.

Geologic history
Southern CAR is part of the Congo Craton, a stable landmass dating to the Archean that was once fused with the Sao Francisco Craton until the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean. Some of the oldest rocks in CAR belong to the 3.4 billion year old Bomu Complex which includes migmatite gneiss and metasedimentary schist spanning from the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Congo Craton once functioned as a small continent, until it was joined with Siberia during the formation of the supercontinent Columbia, between 2.1 and 1.8 billion years ago. A string of large igneous province (LIP) volcanic events took place in three pulses during the time that the craton was part of Columbia, until the supercontinent fragmented. The Congo Craton was subsequently joined to the supercontinent Rodinia between 1.3 billion and 750 million years ago after a period where it may have existed as a separate continent in the Southern Hemisphere. At the time, the continent was entirely barren with no land life and the region experienced large scale glaciation during the Cryogenian Period.

The northern part of the country is grouped with the Saharan Metacraton, which began to form between 3 billion and 2 billion years ago and accelerated with the Pan-African Orogeny and the creation of the Oubangides Belt in the Neoproterozoic. After the breakup of Rodinia, modern CAR was situated near the center of the subsequent supercontinent Pannotia, as part of the fully assembled basement rock of the current African continent. The region existed in the Southern Hemisphere as part of the supercontinents Gondwana and Pangaea.

Many aspects of Central African Republic's geologic history remain unknown. Along with the Brazilian state of Bahia, CAR is the only country known to host carbonados (black diamond aggregates), which some researchers have suggested may be connected to a Precambrian meteorite impact that could also have generated the Bangui magnetic anomaly.

Bedrock geology
Up to 60% of bedrock beneath the Central African Republic dates to the Precambrian. Much of the country is situated in the Archean Congo Craton. The North Equatorial Fold Belt, Pan-African granulites and greenstone belts are found in the north and center of the country. Cretaceous sandstones span the west and central areas of the republic. The Bakouma Formation includes extensive carbonates, glacial outwash and tillite deposits dated to the Neoproterozoic.

Stratigraphically, the lower units of Precambrian rock are granite, amphibolite, gneiss and gneissic-migmatite rock, likely dating to the Neoarchean. These sequences, divided into the Bandas Belt and Dekoa Belt, are often described as a greenstone belt. Granitoid batholiths and dolerite dikes dating to the Proterozoic frequently intrude into these layers. The upper sequence is Neoproterozoic age quartzite and schist and tends to be folded, but only weakly metamorphosed. In the west, the Mambere Formation and the Kombele Formation in the east each record glacial sediments, while erosion and river activity left behind the Cretaceous Mouaka-Ouadda and Carnot-Berberati sandstone formations, as well as the plateaus of the Eocene Bambio Sandstone. During the Quaternary extensive weathering of surface rocks took place, up to 40 meters deep.

Surficial geology and soils
Iron-rich plinthosols dominate most of the center of the country. Unconsolidated psamment deposits (also known as arenosols) occupy a section of the west and center of the country along with soils grouped under the FAO ferralsol classification of iron and aluminium-rich soils. Hydric, grayish-blue wetland gleysols are found in small locations in the north and along the border with the Congo.

title: Geology of the Central African Republic


text:
Talk:Information Architecture

content from Information architect:

information architecture noun. 1. The business of organizing information. 2. Involves the organization, design and presentation of an information product to provide intuitive access and ease of use that meets the needs of the customer and of the end user. Information architecture typically comprises needs analysis, content identification and organization, navigational mapping, and physical layout. The typical product of information architecture is a blueprint which may take a variety of forms, such as a site map, outline, wireframes and so on. 3. (Informal) The familiar practice of architecture provides a metaphor that helps to explain information architecture. When you look at a building, you might not be aware of its architecture, especially if it’s a building you need to "use" immediately - for example, an airport terminal in an unfamiliar city. You need to find the ticket counter, or the rest rooms, or your gate, and you hope they are not too far apart, and you don’t want to retrace your steps. When the terminal was being designed, an architect considered all those needs and tried to arrange the space to meet them. His "deliverable" was a design and a blueprint that builders could follow. An information delivery system needs to be designed as well, or the people who need the information won’t be able to find it or use it.

Brassratgirl 06:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Information Architecture


text:
User:Ajaysharma751

AJAY SHARMA

DOB - 7 March 1994 Home town - Bhind (M. P. ), india Work - M. P. Police live in - indore

title: User:Ajaysharma751


text:
Meinhard V, Count of Gorizia

Meinhard V, Count of Gorizia (b. after 1297 - d. after 1318) was a member of the Albertine line of the House of Gorizia. He was a son of Count Henry III and his first wife Beatrix dei Camerino.

Little is known about his life. He was probably co-ruler with his father. Around 1314, his father negotiated Meinhard's marriage with a daughter of king James II of Aragon.

title: Meinhard V, Count of Gorizia


text:
Talk:Onalaska, Texas

Unalaska?
Any relation to Unalaska, Alaska? Stuart Ravn (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Onalaska, Wisconsin, Onalaska, Arkansas (now defunct), Onalaska, Texas, and Onalaska, Washington are all historically linked to one another. They were all lumber towns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C44:701B:300:5D65:8C2A:6F29:6655 (talk) 09:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Some say that the name Onalaska (in the Lower 48) or Oonalaska, comes from Scottish poet Thomas Campbell's "Pleasures of Hope." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C44:437F:EA8B:79CC:264D:1369:CEED (talk) 19:27, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Onalaska, Texas


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foam Field

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 02:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Foam Field

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Foam Field appears to be a real thing but some part of the page make no sense. Especially, the section "Work on unsolved problems in physics" seems unrelated and pasted from somewhere else. I would suggest delete and recreate but I would like more opinions. Magioladitis (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Delete. Non-notable unpublished WP:FRINGE theory, and so poorly expressed as to almost be WP:Patent nonsense. The author of the article is the same "David Woroner MA Industrial Tech" who proposed the idea, so there is a serious WP:COI here too. -- <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR, and WP:Patent nonsense.PianoDan (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is incoherent. Maybe redirect to quantum foam, after application of WP:TNT. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Wikiversity:Import/Archive 1

'''This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not modify it or make new requests here. Please do so at Import.'''

Thursday, October 19 - Requests

 * Could someone please import Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages from wikipedia? RichMac 02:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We already have a help page on signatures. Why do we need another one? sebmol ? 09:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it had to do with another interlink and/or template, and I can't recall what it was anymore. I should have made a more detailed request. RichMac 17:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The link in unsigned comments points in that direction. RichMac 18:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've simply redirected Sign your posts on talk pages to Signature-- digital  _  me   15:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That only works in a search, not in a direct link, I've updated the template, and will request a removal of the redirect. Sorry for the unnecessary commentary, more learning by doing! RichMac 05:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * done sebmol ? 10:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Friday, October 5 - Requests

 * Could a custodian please look at School:Fire and Emergency Management/Fire Investigator (see also b:Wikiversity:School of Fire and Emergency Management/Fire Investigator). The pages (except the top, which I'll do in a second) need to be imported and moved. I've just spent an hour and a bit importing pages for this school and have run out of time (I should have been asleep about an hour ago). --Draicone (talk) 02:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I completed Fire Investigator and also did Fire Officer. Need break now, but will try to do more later. Cormaggio 19:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Saturday, September 2 - Done

 * b:Wikiversity:Introduction to Philosophy → Introduction to Philosophy-- digital  _  me   04:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Wednesday, August 30 - Done

 * Sociology of the Family → Sociology of the Family-- digital  _  me   00:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Tuesday, August 29 - Done

 * Web Design → Topic:Web Design -- see notes on the talk page. SB_Johnny | talk 09:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * All subpages moved to main namespace, see Special:Prefixindex/Web Design
 * b:Wikiversity:Classical_Mechanics → Classical_Mechanics (please move to appropriate namespace)
 * I'd like a copy of m:Template:for and m:Template:for/aux. I'm assuming since I wanted a copy, but the original stays there, that we don't need an import, with an import history, so I did a transwiki paste.  But if we do, feel free to delete my copy, and import the other one.  But be aware that while those pages don't exist, it'll make Disclosures look funny.  If the transwiki paste is OK, just mark this "done".  TimNelson 15:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't see any problems with a c&p, so this should be fine.-- digital  _  me   17:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

 * b:Wikiversity:High_School_Physics → High_School_Physics (please move to appropriate namespace)
 * The whole section, or just mainpage? --SB_Johnny | talk 14:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The mainpage is useless without the others, so I went ahead and transwikied it all.-- digital  _  me   17:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Monday, August 28 - Done

 * School of Theology/Gospel 101/Verses for the week --SB_Johnny | talk 01:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Christianity/Gospel 101--SB_Johnny | talk 01:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * b:Wikiversity:Stellar_Evolution → Stellar Evolution
 * b:Wikiversity:Astronomy → Astronomy (Topic:Astronomy already exists, please merge or rename).
 * b:Portuguese:Contents - Trevor MacInnis 14:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC) (This is a textbook.SB_Johnny | talk 19:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC))
 * b:Wikiversity: Hitler's Germany → Hitler's Germany -- digital  _  me   21:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * b:Wikiversity:The Great War and Versailles → The Great War and Versailles -- digital  _  me   21:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Completed

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Productive_Forking_and_Tailoring_is_Encouraged I would like this linked to from the policy discussion and voting page.  If there is a place for discussion of draft policy or guidelines that is adequate as well.  Forking and tailoring the material to achieve different purposes is a fairly obvious way to rapidly expand our available materials for various purposes.  However, I fear much of the local wiki culture is oriented around deleting material perceived as redundant and eliminating duplication from the database.  Hence a discussion of this type of useful activity from the start may be extremely useful. Thanks!  Mirwin 23:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Linked to with voting and discussion at WV:RULES. -- sebmol ? 08:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Communication
 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Media_Studies --Rayc 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Library_and_Information_Science probably should come too.--Rayc 15:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * All done. -- sebmol ? 16:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * m:Template:Wikiversity and m:Template:WikiversityActivities (see What links here of local pages) 555 19:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. -- sebmol ? 20:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Aviation, b:Wikiversity:School of Aviation/Chapter 1 Airplane Components - Trevor MacInnis 02:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. --Robert Horning 05:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Psychology --Rayc 23:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, with all subpages as well. It has been moved to School:Department of Psychology. --Robert Horning 05:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Mathematics and this one with all it's subpages for Robert Horning. --Rayc 16:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. --Robert Horning 06:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Literature_and_English_Studies/Writing_Center which I'd like to now come under the new Literary Studies thing (we're stepping away from strictly English). Atrivedi
 * Done. Now located at School:Department of Literary Studies/Writing Center. Please forgive the 80,000 moves of the talk page. I was clearly not up to par. -- sebmol ? 22:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * I need this file: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Engineering/Free_or_open_source_design_tools transiki'd to: http://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Free_or_open_source_design_tools  Thanks! Mirwin 06:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, now at Topic:Engineering/Free_or_open_source_design_tools --SB_Johnny | talk 23:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

 * I would like the two files below (currently at Wikibooks) moved over into the lesson space under http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Topic:Project_Management
 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Project_Management/Goal_Setting_and_Management
 * Topic:Project Management/Goal_Setting_and_Management
 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Engineering:Critical_Thinking_%26_Self_Communication:goal_setting
 * Topic:Project Management/Experimental Self Communication/Critical Thinking & Self Communication/Goal Setting

Thanks! Mirwin 05:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Imported, moving now. --SB_Johnny | talk 23:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved, feel free to rename, but don't delete redirects.--SB_Johnny | talk 23:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Saturday, November 4 - Re-Requests

 * Suppose this got lost in the shuffle. Could someone please bring that Cite_book over? I don't want to list a whole bunch of sources and then re-format them later on. It would help out a lot. Thanks. RichMac 08:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's imported now... keep in mind that we do not have import enabled from wikipedia! I had to first import it to wikibooks, then from wikibooks to here, which I'm not sure I should really do. Now at Template:Cite book --SB_Johnny | talk 11:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Most appreciated. RichMac 04:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Tuesday, October 24 - Requests

 * Could someone please import w:Template:Cite_book and ideally all the related cite pages? (The preceding unsigned comment was added by RichMac (talk • contribs) .)
 * Currently the only way to do that is to import first to wikibooks, then to wikiversity... though in the case of this page that's fine, because it would be nice to have that on wikibooks too. What related pages are you talking about? --SB_Johnny | talk 17:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Everything on the Citation_templates would be ideal. RichMac 06:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Could someone at least bring that cite book over? RichMac 20:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Old Requests for Import
(Some of these are done, some aren't. If a page is needed, please list it above, under today's date.)

For security reasons, only admins can import pages. You can list here what pages on Meta or Wikibooks you would like to have moved to Wikiversity. An admin will take care of the import as soon as possible and notify you when it is done.

Note: there is a list of pages already imported from Wikibooks that have not yet been marked with.

 * If someone could import Calculus/Building up to the Riemann-Darboux Definition and The Riemann-Darboux Integral, Integrability criterion, and monotone/Lipschitz function that would be nice, this is part of a Calculus class that I might continue next year. Fephisto 14:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Are these on meta? wikibooks?--SB_Johnny | talk 01:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikibooks, sorry:  Calculus/Building up to the Riemann-Darboux Definition]  The Riemann-Darboux Integral, Integrability criterion, and monotone/Lipschitz function]
 * Aren't those textbooks? --SB_Johnny | talk 14:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I created them and linked them from the Calculus page in Wikiversity.Fephisto 15:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This has been here for quite a while, is it possible that anyone could move these? Fephisto 03:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Engineering should replace the copy of itself located here: http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/School:Engineering_and_Technology  Sorry about the extra work deleting the early copy.  Will not happen again.  Mirwin 12:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. It's at School:Engineering. If you want to rename it, go ahead and move, but leave the redirect because that's what the Wikibooks page links to now. -- sebmol ? 12:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm importing the subpages too. This might take a while. -- sebmol ? 12:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, how about you give me a list of the sub pages you want imported? Or do you want all of them? -- sebmol ? 12:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Eventually we want all of them. I have requested admin status so I can help out.  Pace yourself and service requests by name first.  Thanks!  Mirwin 19:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I understand the last part of that sentence. "service requests by name first"? -- sebmol ? 19:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for confusion. I meant by specifically requested titles that people list here as urgent or of immediate interest.  Such as the one below regarding "proposed productive forking and tailoring".  8) Mirwin 23:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

 * Probably should move over the department subpages for School of Engineering as well, particularly Electrical Engineering :) --Rayc 23:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

 * m:Wikiversity/Archive 1, m:Wiki 101, m:Wikiversity students, m:Wikiversity browsers, m:Wikiversity teachers, m:Wikiversity and Wikipedia services, m:Service community, m:Wikiversity and Wikibooks services, m:Research community, m:Secondary research, m:Citing Sources, m:Research collaboration, m:Wikiversity thinktank, m:Wikiversity support staff, m:Student union, m:Wikiversity:Communities, m:Wikiversity:Helpdesk, m:Wikiversity:Faculty club (and talk), m:Cell biology improvement drive, m:Human Genetic Uniqueness Project. 555 23:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * m:Wikiversity:Faculty club (and talk), m:Wikiversity:Subjects, m:Language training in Wikiversity, m:Wikiversity/Draft Charter (and talk), m:Andrew Worth, m:Dan Cruthirds, m:Dean Boudewijnse, m:Shingle (and talk), m:Moving Wikiversity forward. 555 23:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

 * We've got our first com-sci advisor, so I'm proposing that http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Computer_Science and all subpages get moved over for him. --Rayc 14:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

 * And we have someone writing theology classes, so import http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Theology and subpages --Rayc 00:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity:School_of_Computer_Science This might be useful to import Spacey 14:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

 * http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Web_Design and all subpages. We've been working on this Wikibook for a year or so now, but it really belongs in wikiversity as it's mostly activities/challenges etc. Not sure whether Web Design should go in Information Studies or Computer Science. Also, sub topics like Javascript, PHP might cross boundaries of schools. Michaelnelson 07:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

How about this
Here is a list of all the schools on wikibooks, just check them off after you've imported them (and put them in the "School:" namespace unless such a school already exists. In thoses cases, I am putting the page from Wikibooks into the "Portal:" namespace and linking it to the existing school page already in "School:" namespace):

Physical Sciences

 * Physical Science Schools that were started at Wikibooks:
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Chemistry
 * I've transwikied this, and fixed all the links.--digital_metalk 02:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Computer Forensics and Security - exception- low priority --JWSchmidt 23:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This has subpages that can be imported. --Draicone (talk) 05:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Computer Science
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Engineering
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Electronics
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Geology - exception- Not really worth importing --JWSchmidt 22:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Mathematics
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Physics and Astronomy
 * All but School of Computer Forensics and Security have been imported here. --Draicone (talk) 05:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Life Sciences

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Biology
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Medicine
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Biomechanics - exception- low priority --JWSchmidt 22:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Oceanography - exception- Not really worth importing --JWSchmidt 22:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Doesn't need importing. --Draicone (talk) 05:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Plant Sciences
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Zoology - exception- Not really worth importing --JWSchmidt 22:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Veterinary Medicine
 * Biomechanics is a set of wikibooks links, should we import this? Also, school of zoology not worth importing. Oceaonography doesn't need importing either. --Draicone (talk) 05:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Humanities (done)

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Art and Design
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Classics
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Law
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Linguistics
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Literature and English Studies
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Music
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Comparative Mythology
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Philosophy
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Theology

Professional Schools (done, wikibooks versions locked)

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Architecture
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Aviation
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Business
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Education
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Entrepreneurship
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Foreign Language Learning
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Audio Engineering -- page was deleted earlier, 1 edit with no real content. --SB_Johnny | talk 00:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Computer Science

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Computer Science
 * School of Computer Science has been imported. --Draicone (talk) 02:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) should be added to the School of Computer Science. -- Done -- Tadpole256(Discuss)

Engineering

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Engineering
 * b:Wikiversity:Institute of Construction
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Project Management
 * These have all been imported. --Draicone (talk) 05:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Social Sciences

 * b:Wikiversity:School of Anthropology
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Communication
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Development Science
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Economics
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Fire and Emergency Management
 * b:Wikiversity:School of History
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Journalism
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Library and Information Science
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Media Studies
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Political Science
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Psychology
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Social Work
 * b:Wikiversity:School of Sociology
 * b:Wikiversity:School Of Security, Surveillance and Law Enforcement
 * b:Wikiversity:Embedded System Engineering

--Rayc 17:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * b:Wikiversity:Embedded System Engineering Srinivasasha 08:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Embedded System Engineering now exists. --JWSchmidt 15:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that one of the purposes of this page is also to prioritize what schools are actively going to be developed right away on Wikiversity, so we can make sure that the content is here instead of somewhere else. Still, thanks for posting this message here. --Robert Horning 05:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I just thought that every one of these probably should be moved over at some point, so it would be good to have a list so that people see that XXX is oging to be imported eventually, as to not do extra work. --Rayc 20:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If this is an unwritten policy to "guide" or "prioritize" incoming volunteers acttivities it is in serious error. Volunteers will have their own priorities and leaving their previous files in limbo is not likely to shift them from one subject to another productively.  A page somewhere noted 37 files had been transwikied to date.  This does not make us look like a serious going concern. Mirwin 04:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I need the following pages imported and moved to these locations:
 * b:Primary mathematics:Numbers to Primary mathematics:Numbers
 * b:Primary mathematics:Adding numbers to Primary mathematics:Adding numbers
 * b:Primary mathematics:Subtracting numbers to Primary mathematics:Subtracting numbers
 * b:Primary mathematics:Multiplying numbers to Primary mathematics:Multiplying numbers
 * b:Primary mathematics:Dividing numbers to Primary mathematics:Dividing numbers
 * b:Primary mathematics:Negative numbers to Primary mathematics:Negative numbers
 * b:Primary mathematics:Fractions to Primary mathematics:Fractions
 * b:Primary mathematics:Working with fractions to Primary mathematics:Working with fractions
 * b:Primary mathematics:Powers, roots, and exponents to Primary mathematics:Powers, roots, and exponents
 * b:Primary mathematics:Average, median, and mode to Primary mathematics:Average, median, and mode
 * b:Primary mathematics:Percentages to Primary mathematics:Percentages
 * b:Primary mathematics:Probability to Primary mathematics:Probability
 * b:Primary mathematics:Factors and Primes to Primary mathematics:Factors and Primes
 * b:Primary mathematics:Method for Factoring to Primary mathematics:Method for Factoring

If I've set it all up right, the links at Topic:Primary School Mathematics should all turn from red links to blue links. There is no hurry to do this, just let me know. --Whiteknight (Versity) (Books) 17:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The pages listed above were imported. I only imported the talk page for the first one. Since it might be possible to turn the original pages at Wikibooks into a book that can be used with additional complementary course material at Wikiversity, I did not put the ugly "MovedToWikiversity" template on the pages at Wikibooks. --JWSchmidt 18:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

recent

 * b:template:mbox – Mike.lifeguard | talk 03:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

 * Looks like Template:Mbox was already copied here. --mikeu 06:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

 * Emergency Operation Centre GIS - Webaware talk 03:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

 * This article you requested to be imported have already been done by Darklama . Terra  19:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

 * Wikibooks has decided b:Special:PrefixIndex/Democracy Project is not suitable for our project, but we thought it may fit within Wikiveristy's scope. Darklama was not sure it did. – Mike.lifeguard | @meta 23:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Green tick.svg|20px]] imported, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Chat (try) 10:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

 * Leaving a note that I imported Romanticism and Revolution as it seemed to be an AfD that would not go well. It was an essay/lecture type setup that seems more suited to Wikiversity - would also go well as part of a Romanticism course project that I am writing various lectures for and I am contacting the creator now. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

 * From an en-Wikpedia Article for Deletion discussion History Essay Format & Thesis Statement. Cheers! Bwilkins 15:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

 * I'm not quite sure if it's actually appropriate for Wikiversity, but Genes to Cognition Project has been tagged on the English Wikipedia for several months. Dancter 14:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Genes to Cognition Project -- dark lama  17:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

The following are not personal requests of mine. They are books and their subpages suggested to be transwikied to Wikiversity over at Wikibooks, either through a template or a VfD discussion. Not being familiar with Wikiversity's workings, I post them for assessment of their worth here at Wikiversity. -- Adrignola 18:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hexpixel Code
 * Morphological Flows and Sustainable Growth
 * Numerical Methods Qualification Exam Problems and Solutions (University of Maryland)
 * Practical Argumentation Framework
 * UMD Analysis Qualifying Exam

 * Hexpixel Code
 * Practical Argumentation Framework

 * Done -- dark lama  19:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

The Use of English with Other Members of the Thai Academic Community among Dhurakij Pundit University’s Postgraduate Business Students is reaching a consensus for transwikiing here as part of a request for deletion and it is likely more suited to Wikiversity. -- Adrignola 23:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

✅ See log. --mikeu talk 17:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Ten Stupid Things Beginners Do to Mess Up Their Contradance Experience has been suggested to be transwikied here instead of deleted by darklama. The Knowledge Which No One Can Have has been described as nonsense by mike.lifeguard who says it can be pursued with vigor here. -- Adrignola 12:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

 * Import right now seems premature, there is no consensus yet for either work on Wikibooks. -- dark lama  13:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Neither of them are particularly useful on Wikibooks, IMO. Kayau (talk | email | contribs | stats) 10:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Standardized English Test Vocabulary Building - does not exactly belong to Wikibooks (OR). However, it is nice to have on Wikiversity as it can be treated as a course. Kayau (talk | email | contribs | stats) 10:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Ten Stupid Things Beginners Do to Mess Up Their Contradance Experience again and Lohse, Martin, Guide to Success and Fulfillment, Happiness. No consensus at Wikibooks needs to be had to request an import here; the question is whether this content is within scope here and whether custodians want the content. -- Adrignola 03:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Happiness at least I'd be interested to import and merge with resources in development on Happiness which I hope to develop for some upcoming teaching. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * While true that consensus at Wikibooks isn't needed to import here, I think requesting import is premature when there is a possibility that the work might be kept at Wikibooks. Duplicating works without anyone on Wikiversity to develop it isn't good IMO. -- dark lama  11:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, Lohse, Martin, at least, has consensus and the the main contributor is on board with it, so you'll have someone working on it once it's moved here. -- Adrignola 03:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Lohse, Martin is imported. -- dark lama  13:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Ten Stupid Things Beginners Do to Mess Up Their Contradance Experience
Is it possible to import Ten Stupid Things Beginners Do to Mess Up Their Contradance Experience? Thenub314 10:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ along with all its subpages. I've hopefully not missed anything. Adambro 11:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Also its related pdf version Thenub314 10:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:10 stupid pamphlet.pdf is available for use on Wikiversity by virtue of its existence on Commons. Adambro 11:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

KinderCalculus
Could you please import wikijunior:KinderCalculus at http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikijunior:KinderCalculus ? Please include all pages, including history, discussions, etc. Thank you. Numiri 17:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

This seems to have been missed so let me add a few links make the lives of the admins here a bit easier. Thenub314 10:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * b:Wikijunior:KinderCalculus -> KinderCalculus
 * b:Wikijunior talk:KinderCalculus -> Talk:KinderCalculus
 * b:Wikijunior:KinderCalculus/Nouns & Verbs -> KinderCalculus/Nouns & Verbs
 * b:Wikijunior talk:KinderCalculus/Nouns & Verbs -> Talk:KinderCalculus/Nouns & Verbs
 * b:Wikijunior:KinderCalculus/Bald -> KinderCalculus/Bald
 * b:Wikijunior talk:KinderCalculus/Bald -> Talk:KinderCalculus/Bald
 * b:Wikijunior:KinderCalculus/Syntax -> KinderCalculus/Syntax
 * b:Wikijunior:KinderCalculus/Dress -> KinderCalculus/Dress
 * b:Wikijunior talk:KinderCalculus/Dress -> Talk:KinderCalculus/Dress

 * ✅ Thanks for the links, they did make things easier although I hadn't spotted your request until now. Adambro 11:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

How To Do Nothing
I would like to request the following transwiki. The following module did not fit in at wikibooks and may be useful here, but I am not really sure if it falls under wikiversity's scope, and I don't know if a good home for it, so I can't preform my usual level of clean up after a transwiki. Since the page no longer has any active contributors at wikibooks it would be a good idea to look it over and see if it fits into this project. A record of the discussion about whether or not to transwiki may be found here.

 * How To Do Nothing -> Transwiki:How To Do Nothing

Thanks, Thenub314 11:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ doesn't fall under Wikiversity's scope, and per talk here. Diego Grez 19:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

How To Build A Pykrete Bong
If you would like this, please import it, otherwise it will be deleted as per discussion. Adrignola 21:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

 * ✅ Diego Grez 23:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Science
See discussion. Adrignola 22:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Support import. --Abd 00:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Towards A Better India
See discussion. Adrignola 22:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Vista-clean.png|15px| ]] Done -- dark lama  19:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

A Supplement to the Texas US History Textbook
Could you please import A Supplement to the Texas US History Textbook to Wikiversity which seems to be a better fit for the project. Thank you!Tgokey 10:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Vista-clean.png|15px| ]] Done Leutha 15:15, 9 September 2011, sig added by --Abd 15:31, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Import from betawikiversity
create a project in betawikiversity, but as English Wikiversity exist, and as it do not apport change in the pages since one month, I tell the import from betawikiversity into English Wikiversity for the page list above. Image was under GFDL license, they will be exported from Betawikiversity to Wikimedia Commons. In the list, the main page of this project may be "Logical graph" Crochet.david 08:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Charles Sanders Peirce
 * 2) Logical graph
 * 3) Descriptive science
 * 4) Normative science
 * 5) Truth theory
 * 6) Pragmatic maxim
 * 7) Logic of information
 * 8) Semeiotic
 * 9) Dynamics of inquiry
 * 10) Inquiry
 * 11) Zeroth order logic
 * 12) Sole sufficient operator
 * 13) Universe of discourse
 * 14) Truth table
 * 15) Relation reduction
 * 16) Relation construction
 * 17) Relation composition
 * 18) Relation
 * 19) Logical matrix
 * 20) Logic of relatives
 * 21) Hypostatic abstraction
 * 22) Continuous predicate
 * 23) Relative term
 * 24) Differential logic
 * 25) Boolean-valued function
 * 26) Boolean function
 * 27) Boolean domain
 * 28) Ampheck
 * 29) Parametric operator
 * 30) Multigrade operator
 * 31) Minimal negation operator
 * 32) Sign relation
 * 33) Triadic relation
 * 34) Relation theory
 * 35) Peirce's law
 * 36) Logical implication
 * 37) Exclusive disjunction
 * 38) Theory of relations
 * 39) Peer Educational Resource
 * 40) Peer Educational Resources
 * 41) Logic Live/Participants
 * 42) Inquiry Live/Participants
 * 43) Propositional calculus
 * 44) Logical disjunction
 * 45) Logical conjunction
 * 46) Logical negation
 * 47) Peirce’s Law
 * 48) Peirce’s law
 * 49) Peirce's Law
 * 50) Logical Graph
 * 51) Logical graphs

 * Jon was approached about this before. He said he did not want his contributions on en.wikiversity. He is not blocked here so he could place them here himself. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Jon has also mentioned on his user talk page that his intent is for this to be international and that some pages have already been translated into other languages. Beta Wikiversity seems like a better home for international works, where the work can be kept consistent across languages. -- dark lama  20:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikibooks RFDs
I believe these discussions have resulted in consensus for transwiki to Wikiversity.

 * The Practice of Learning Theories
 * Signs for Selecting a Spouse for a Successful Marriage

Adrignola 13:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

 * Done. Learning theories in practice and Spouse selection according to Baha'i writings. -- dark lama  15:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

History Essay Format & Thesis Statement
Outcome of this deletion discussion on English Wikipedia in 2010 was to transwiki but I don't think any request was made at the time. Is it in scope for this project? January 17:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The request was made but there was no clear follow-up. January, if you are willing to take responsibility for this page, here, I'll import it to allow you to do that. Okay? My import will *not*, then, be a decision that it is in scope. It may need to be moved, refactored, etc. However, Wikiversity is highly inclusive, generally. Glancing at the page, it looks useful to me. I'm going to go ahead and import, just to practice using the tool. --Abd 17:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. I did not transwiki the Talk page because it had no real content relevant to the page's usage here. But if the Talk page is desired, let me know. Because I'm banned on Wikipedia, I cannot notify the Wikipedia community of the transwiki (except by email or with block evasion, and with strong reason, which this situation doesn't create). --Abd 18:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've tied up the loose ends on Wikipedia. January 18:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Katie Harwood
The article Katie Harwood on English Wikipedia is up for deletion. The consensus in the deletion discussion is leaning towards regretful delete: the person has put work into developing it as a piece of original research. Before deleting it, it seems like it might be an idea to import it to Wikiversity as providing a space for original research is really more Wikiversity's bailiwick. If the page gets deleted on enwiki, please feel free to contact me (I'm an enWP admin) and I can help in transwiki-ing it over to Wikiversity. I've tagged it with the "Copy to Wikiversity" template. Tom Morris 17:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

 * ✅ -- dark lama  19:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Rodger's Method
w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rodger's Method > Rodger's Method. Not a good match for Wikipedia, import was suggested on the Colloquium. <IP_ADDRESS> 09:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC) ✅--Collingwood (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

History Plant propagation
w:Cutting (plant): Revision history > Plant propagation. Sidelight12 Talk 12:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision history of Vertical farming hasn't been moved to Vertical farming's history since the article started. 10:01, 8 July 2009. It needs a history merge or a delete. deleted - Sidelight12 Talk 04:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Linear function (mathematics)
Linear function (mathematics) Looks like learning material. It looks better here than at Wikipedia. Citrusbowler (discuss • contribs) 19:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Import history of Star
Please import the revision history of Star to Intro_astronomy_college_course/Star_(Wikipedia)
 * This is my first effort to import the history of a Wikipedia article into a Wikiversity resource. Let me know if there is a smoother way to do this.  For more information see https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Colloquium#Second_question.  Thanks --guyvan52 (discuss • contribs) 18:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Surprisingly, it wouldn't let me import the entire history. I tried several times and several ways, and all failed as saying it couldn't open the file.  But I was able to import the most recent version, all attributed to a single author.  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 19:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I tried to help you by importing the text and only got in the way...--guyvan52 (discuss • contribs) 20:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Induced stem cells from Wikipedia
Please let me create a page "Guide for studying Induced stem cells" This page has moved here from Wikipedia as all of the Wikipedia content must be supported by secondary sources, as per w:WP:RS. We need to wait until all cited articles will be discussed in secondary sources. But, the article Induced stem cells most fundamentally relies on primary sources, where WP calls for primary reliance on secondaries. At the same time instructional and study guides that make use of original research are allowed on Wikiversity  Furthermore, Wikiversity will offer a space not just for hosting research, but also for facilitating research through creating researcher communities. Wikiversity is the place for original research, including primary or secondary research. This includes interpreting primary sources, forming ideas, or taking observations. See What is Wikiversity?

This article is a new type of scientific review - quickly replenished dynamic review. Its goal to combine the latest research results with an overall picture of achievements in the topic under discussion. See: Editing Induced stem cellsDmitry Dzhagarov (discuss • contribs) 07:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

 * ✅ - It imported history up through last summer and then crashed. I imported the most recent version on top of that history.  It's at Induced stem cells.  If you want to rename it, I'd recommend Induced stem cells study or Induced stem cells study guide.  If you rename it with the words Study guide first, the article is much harder for other users to locate.  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 11:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much Dmitry Dzhagarov (discuss • contribs) 14:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Crisis Bonding
I've placed a transwiki request to move [Crisis bonding] here to Wikiversity. This article is original research on a type of emotional bonding, and the consensus of Wikipedia editors is it is a better fit for Wikiversity than Wikipedia. PaintedCarpet (discuss • contribs) 22:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ - at Crisis bonding. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 23:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

More Pages
Pages in the Transwiki pseudo-namespace that need to be re-named, and unused redirects deleted. How does this feature work? Why and how are pages put here, and how can it be indicated when they have been worked on?Leutha 14:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Template:Location mark+
I would appreciate the import of the template Template:Location mark+ that I would like to use in my and my students' Wikiversity projects "Editing Internet Text". Thank you. Iszmael (discuss • contribs) 21:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

 * ✅ --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 23:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Gramophone Company of India Limited Vs. Shanti Films Corporation and others
I request that the page Gramophone Company of India Limited Vs. Shanti Films Corporation and others be imported into this project from Wikipedia. This revision of the Wikipedia article appears to be original research that might be suitable for Wikiversity (it reads like a periodical article). The page is presently at "articles for deletion" (AfD) so it may change drastically at any time, but we may still want to have the essay. There is no point in waiting for the end of the AfD, as most of the participants are convinced that "transwiki" isn't a possible outcome of any AfD, and can't be persuaded otherwise. James500 (discuss • contribs) 17:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 17:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Remarkable to see the deletion discussion: w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gramophone Company of India Limited Vs. Shanti Films Corporation and others. User:James500, you did not understand the relationship of the WMF and Wikipedia governance, the argument about "not allowed to delete" was incorrect. The Wikipedia community can basically delete whatever it chooses, and when you tell people they are "not allowed" to do what they want to do, they may well do it to spite you.
 * On the other hand, I've seen closes of "transwiki." Blue Raspberry was correct, however. But it requires more work, not only a deletion (which may be routine with a transwiki close, it is merely delayed), but then a request and an undeletion. I'd have suggested a close with blanking of the page and possibly page protection, of a soft redirect, see w:Wikipedia:Transwiki log. We can see in the discussion Wikipedian ignorance about Wikiversity. That's common. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 16:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Civic Chandran v. Ammini Amma
Similar to above, also likely to be deleted on Wikipedia. Please full history import as a subpage of Copyright/Law. Thanks. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 01:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 01:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

w:Draft:Visual C++ name mangling
This page w:Draft:Visual C++ name mangling was originally deleted because it was classed as original research. I have restored this as a draft to allow copying. Several people wanted to move it, so perhaps Wikiversity is the place for it to go. Please can someone import it here! Graeme Bartlett (discuss • contribs) 07:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ (BTW, original research is permitted on Wikiversity per Original_research) I'm going to let you deal with the page: Draft:Visual C++ name mangling (I'm new to importing... so if I did a mistake then I apologize) Thanks. ---Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Renamed to Visual C++ name mangling. Thanks for bringing this resource here. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 13:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Import/beta
There is a good chance that will close soon. If it does we should be prepared to import betawikiversity:Category:EN. I've produced a listing of everything that is there as of today. There's a few titles that we should skip. I'll update this in case anything new gets created. --mikeu talk 20:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 * until the outcome of the closure proposal is settled.

Representation theory of the Lorentz group
Please import this version as "Representation theory of the Lorentz group (for undergraduate students of physics)". This is a great resource for students of physics. On Wikipedia, the no-content-forking policy disallows coexistence of "...theory (for physicists)" and "...theory (for mathematicians)" etc. Boris Tsirelson (discuss • contribs) 05:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 * I tried four different ways to import. There's too much history. It timed out and failed. I imported the current version to Representation theory of the Lorentz group (for undergraduate students of physics) and updated the content to the requested OldID. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 18:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 * I see. Thank you. I did not want to make you troubles... Well, we got some experience. Really, the result is quite enough for my goals for now. Boris Tsirelson (discuss • contribs) 18:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Space (mathematics)
Please import this version. I need it for this submission. (This time the history is much shorter. Also, the current version would be OK; I can easily downgrade it as needed.) Boris Tsirelson (discuss • contribs) 20:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 20:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 * Thank you. Boris Tsirelson (discuss • contribs) 06:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

w:Template:Radic

 * ✅ but it was a mess. The import pulled numerous other templates. We need to look into this, so the next two are on hold for now. --mikeu talk 12:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

w:Template:Sqrt

 * ❌ Please see meta:Help:Displaying_a_formula where it explains how to use markup like  \sqrt{\pi}  to generate \sqrt{\pi} and other formulas. --mikeu talk 12:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

List of Setswana medical terms
I have placed the content at List of Setswana medical terms on WikiVersity. Wondering if we can important the edit history. Best Doc James (discuss • contribs) 09:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * waiting for outcome of w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Setswana medical terms. --mikeu talk 10:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

w:Template:Coxeter–Dynkin diagram

 * --mikeu talk 10:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Please import these from Wikipedia so I can use them in articles authored here.

May I have this one please? The time has come when I need it. It's just Module:Coxeter–Dynkin diagram and doesn't seem to have other dependencies, should be easy.Dc.samizdat (discuss • contribs) 02:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

 * ✅ Please check and verify that everything required is imported and working. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 03:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Works like a charm.Dc.samizdat (discuss • contribs) 04:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

600-cell
I'd like to import this article with its history as a base for something I'm working on. I'm happy to help and do any manual edits required after import, e.g. if there are template dependencies that Wikiversity doesn't support, but I don't think there are many (and no gnarly ones with deep dependencies of their own).

 * ✅ - Please add new entries to the bottom of the page/section and sign your requests. Thanks! -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 13:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

 * Thanks! I've done the manual edits to make Wikipedia: links work, and eliminated unnecessary template dependencies. The following Wikipedia template dependencies remain (all shallow table templates), and I'd like to have them imported as well (rather than eliminate them) if you will.
 * W:Template:H4_family
 * W:Template:Tetrahedral cell tessellations
 * W:Template:Icosahedral vertex figure tessellations
 * I'll edit their links too after they are imported. Dc.samizdat (discuss • contribs) 16:55, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 21:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

120-cell et. al.
May I also have these imported please: Dc.samizdat (discuss • contribs) 12:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * W:120-cell
 * W:Template:Tetrahedral_vertex_figure_tessellations_small
 * W:Template:Dodecahedral_tessellations_small
 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 03:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Leptospirosis
Request to import this wikipage into WikiJournal Preprints/Leptospirosis. The wikipage just updated into Good article status. Would like the journal to reflect the highest quality available Wiki version of the article. Thank you. Cerevisae (discuss • contribs) 13:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

 * ❌ Unfortunately, the import is failing. There are too many changes for it to import with history, and there's a database lock preventing it from importing without history. Just copy and paste and include a link in the edit summary when you update the most recent content. Sorry. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 21:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem Dave Braunschweig. I am unable to update the pre-print because of this one "Error: This action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed. If you believe your action was constructive, please inform an administrator of what you were trying to do. A brief description of the abuse rule which your action matched is: New User Blocked Edit". I tried to request custodian action to unblock me but there is no response to my question. I actually have a complete template ready for the updated version of the pre-print. Do you mind if I ask you to copy and paste for me at one go from my sandbox? I am blocked from editing my own sandbox also. That's why I put it on Wikipedia. The coding is not compatile on wikipedia so you can see some codes here and there.Cerevisae (discuss • contribs) 06:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Problem resolved. After I made my tenth edit on Wikiversity, I am able to update the pre-print without being blocked. Thanks. Cerevisae (discuss • contribs) 06:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, our abuse filter isn't optimal, but it is blocking more vandalism than false positives. I appreciate your dedication to getting it posted. You should be good to go now. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 14:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Johann Lahodny
Hello everyone,

As this is the very first time I am making such a technical request, I hope I am currently writing in the right place and in an adequate way. If not, please feel utterly free to update this content by correcting any unintentional mistake I might have done.

The subject of the request is as follows:

The English version of the article devoted to the Czech-Austrian doctor and professor Johann Lahodny seems to be facing highly specific criteria on the English-speaking Wikipedia, see → correlated debate.

Given that this is also an investigative work that attempts to provide a scientific synthesis of current research still in progress, may I ask you to please perform a global import of the article to Wikiversity, including the entire Wikipedian history?

Once this operation would be done, the previous content on WP could then simply be subsequently converted into a redirection, as formerly suggested by one of the contributors via diff → 958403287. This would then avoid any duplicate entry.

Thank you so much in advance for your help and your kind assistance.

Yours sincerely,

— Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 04:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've imported this to User:Euphonie/Johann Lahodny for cleanup before moving to its final location --DannyS712 (discuss • contribs) 07:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @DannyS712: Thank you very much. Kind regards to you, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 09:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @DannyS712: A first trial aimed to update the hyperlinks has just been finalized. However, parenthetical referencing does not seem to adequately interact. What would be the internal syntax suitable to Wikiversity regarding this specific aspect ? Same for the terms ISSN, PMC, PMID and doi, which remain in red. Your help and advice would be particularly helpful. Yours sincerely, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 11:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Not sure, sorry --DannyS712 (discuss • contribs) 19:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @DannyS712: The update has been completed and the few former technical hypertextual compatibility issues that were previously mentioned above have now been resolved. Thus, from then on, feel free to upload the article to dedicated section. In addition, can I ask you to please import the page entitled → Template:Infobox medical person so that I can subsequently integrate some focused additional information into the article? Thank you in advance for your help. With kind regards, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 09:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Done - Template:Infobox medical person --DannyS712 (discuss • contribs) 09:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @DannyS712: The aforesaid infobox seems to be inextricably combined with this one: → Template:Infobox medical details. May I ask you to please import it as well? Thank you in advance. Sincerely, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 10:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello DannyS712. Did you get my last message above? May I please ask you to import → Template:Infobox medical details as well? Thank you in advance. Sincerely, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 14:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Done - Template:Infobox medical details --DannyS712 (discuss • contribs) 14:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @DannyS712: The aforesaid infobox seems to be inextricably combined with this one: → Template:Infobox medical details. May I ask you to please import it as well? Thank you in advance. Sincerely, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 10:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello DannyS712. Did you get my last message above? May I please ask you to import → Template:Infobox medical details as well? Thank you in advance. Sincerely, — Euphonie (discuss • contribs) 14:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Done - Template:Infobox medical details --DannyS712 (discuss • contribs) 14:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Done - Template:Infobox medical details --DannyS712 (discuss • contribs) 14:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Media_and_Society:_Summer_2019
English Wikibooks would consider it an original research. Should it be imported here, please?--Jusjih (discuss • contribs) 05:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 15:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Template:Regular convex 4-polytopes
Please import the above template from Wikipedia, replacing the previous Wikiversity:Template of that name. I created this template at Wikiversity, and after a period of development copied it to Wikipedia, where the current version now resides. Wikiversity:Regular convex 4-polytopes is the original outdated version of this template, retained only for its development history. If there is a way to ensure that Wikiversity articles will always use the Wikipedia version of this template, without having to reimport it to Wikiversity after each edit to the Wikipedia version, that would be appropriate. (Is there a way to refer directly to a Wikipedia template in a Wikiversity article? I notice that doesn't work.) Thank you!

 * I've tried two different ways to import this but I don't know if it was successful. Your attempts to move and edit the local template have made a clean import very difficult. Going forward, leave it alone locally and just request the import. The import overwrites and updates with more recent changes. If the changes here are more recent, you'll need to update it manually. Since the work is yours anyway, there's no particular licensing benefit to importing. You can just copy and paste.
 * Regarding the use of templates from other wikis, this has been a requested feature for many years. It would most likely be a reference to Commons (similar to File:), but isn't currently possible. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 23:20, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 * Thank you, sorry for screwing it up. I've copy-and-pasted the current version from Wikipedia and will keep it updated here that way in future. Dc.samizdat (discuss • contribs) 23:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

11-cell
Please import W:11-cell for me. Thank you. Dc.samizdat (discuss • contribs) 16:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

 * @Dc.samizdat ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 23:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Anywhere on Earth

 * Anywhere on Earth as Anywhere on Earth.

✍ Dušan Kreheľ (discuss • contribs) 20:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

 * @Dušan Kreheľ: Imported to User:Dušan Kreheľ/Anywhere on Earth. This would not be something that belongs in main space, at least at this point. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 01:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Free Energy does not Exist
Please migrate my single-page Wikibook, Free Energy does not Exist, to Wikiversity since it is considered to be OR. Thank you. -- Vinyasi (discuss • contribs) 08:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

 * @Vinyasi: ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 16:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

 * @Dave Braunschweig Thanks! Vinyasi (discuss • contribs) 17:34, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

title: Wikiversity:Import/Archive 1


text:
Talk:David Straitjacket

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on David Straitjacket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://brighton.veganfayre.co.uk/latest-news/david-straitjacket--rubber-ritch
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041021140701/http://www.aiartists.com/wmcglaughlin/reviews.html to http://liveweb.archive.org/http:/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bristolveganfayre.co.uk/awards.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041021140701/http://www.aiartists.com/wmcglaughlin/reviews.html to http://liveweb.archive.org/http:/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:David Straitjacket