text:
Talk:Litigation involving Apple Inc./GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Canadian Paul (talk · contribs) 14:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I'll take on this review. It may take me several days, however, given its size. Per the "external links" report on the side, there are 10-11 dead URLs in the article and resolving them would make my task here easier. Canadian  Paul  14:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Comments:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

 * 1) Per WP:LEAD, the lead should not introduce information that is not present in the main body of the article as it is supposed to summarize the key points. Currently it is written as a separate entity entirely; I would recommend using it (or at least the first two paragraphs) as a sort of "Background" section in the body itself and re-writing the lead to summarize the article as compliance with WP:LEAD.
 * 2) In the lead, first paragraph "Like all large, multinational technology corporations," seems to be unnecessary - for one thing, it could be challenged and isn't really verifiable, for another, it seems to be a little fluffy and unencyclopedic, possibly even running afoul of WP:PEACOCK. I would just remove it because the rest of the sentence works fine without it.
 * 3) Under "Apple iPod, iTunes antitrust litigation", "The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005". Filed by whom? The government or someone else?
 * 4) Under "Apple and AT&T Mobility antitrust class action", "In the class action filed in 2008 against Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility In re Apple & AT&T Mobility Antitrust Litigation, the plaintiffs claim that Apple and AT&T illegally restrained competition, locked consumers into agreements with AT&T, and punished them if they tried to leave." Again, who filed?
 * 5) Under "Libel dispute with Carl Sagan", "Apple's third and final code name for the project was "LaW", short for "Lawyers are Wimps"." requires a citation.
 * 6) Under "itunes.co.uk", first paragraph, "The Apple-Cohen dispute was a high-profile cybersquatting case", calling it "high-profile" seems to be a bit POVish to me and could be challenged. Per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV, your best options would be to cite evidence showing that it was high-profile or to remove the word, discuss the case, and let the reader decide for themselves whether or not it was "high profile".
 * 7) In fact, that paragraph could use more citations in general, as most of that information could be challenged (that Napster was iTunes biggest rival, where the domain was redirected to etc.)
 * 8) Same section, second paragraph, "The dispute was unresolved at the free mediation stage and so Apple paid for an independent expert to decide the case; the expert decided the dispute in Apple's favor." requires a citation.
 * 9) Under "Woolworths Limited logo", "The Woolworth's smartphone app is also available on Apple's AppStore where its once-disputed logo is featured prominently." Why is it referred to as "once-disputed" here? The paragraph doesn't mention anything about the dispute being resolved.
 * 10) Under "Apple v. Think Secret", the resolution of this case should be included in the paragraph.
 * 11) Under "Object code cases and conflicts of law", first paragraph, "Apple's litigation over object code was seminal in the development of contemporary copyright law because the company's object code cases brought different results in different courts." seems pretty POV to me. I did remove a handful of instances of this kind of POV, but I left this one in because removing the offending parts of the sentence would alter its meaning. If it's "seminal", that fact should be directly cited per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV as it has the potential to be challenged.
 * 12) Same section, second paragraph, the Canadian decision needs a citation. Same with the New Zealand ruling in the third paragraph.
 * 13) Same section, third paragraph, "These revisions to copyright law in favor of including object code are still controversial and form the technical underpinnings for the legal notion of computer trespass and the following development of anti-hacking law-making such as the Patriot Act and such as are defined by the Convention on Cybercrime." Aside from the latter part of this sentence requiring a citation, and it's long and confusing to read and would do well being broken up into at least two sentences.
 * 14) Under "Apple v. HTC", "In the year before Apple and Samsung were engaging in their own patent wars..." Since you haven't introduced this subject yet, and it won't be mentioned for several sections, and it's not particularly relevant to the rest of the paragraph, does it need to be here? It would also help because then the whole sentence could be tweaked to make it shorter and less confusing if this were removed. It's also repeated again in the "Motorola Mobility v. Apple" section, making it further unnecessary.
 * 15) Under "Apple v. Samsung: Android phones and tablets", "In the spring of 2011, while Apple and Motorola were fully engaged in a patent war on several fronts, Apple sued Samsung, expanding its ongoing war to fight another major technology company at the same time." This whole sentence seems a bit unencyclopedic and disrupts the flow. Maybe toning down the rhetoric/POV ("its ongoing war", "another major technology company") would help.
 * 16) Same section, "The ultimate cost of these patent wars to consumers, shareholders, and investors is yet unknown, but it is not trivial..." "It is not trivial" sounds like a POV judgement and introduces a distinct narrator with an opinion (ie. patent wars are bad for consumers) into what has otherwise been neutral text. Cutting out that section may solve the problem, but the whole sentence seems a bit POV.

One question as well, although it has nothing to do with GA Criteria, but why all the "leave extra lines" comments? Just curious. Anyways, I went through and did a copyedit, hopefully nothing too controversial, but otherwise the article is very nice considering its length and depth. I will need to check references as well, but I will do that once the above concerns have been addressed. Finally, as this nomination has been sitting here since April, I will be checking for completeness by going through the unresolved cases to see if any developments have occurred. I'm going to go ahead and place the article on hold for a period of up to seven days so that these concerns can be addressed. I'm always open to discussion so if you think I'm wrong on something leave your thoughts here and we'll discuss. I'll be checking this page at least daily, unless something comes up, so you can be sure I'll notice any comments left here. Canadian  Paul  05:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Editor response
Editor: Sctechlaw (talk · contribs)

Thank you Canadian Paul for your substantial effort and time commitment in reviewing this lengthy and rather technical article. I believe I have now addressed your concerns, hopefully in a way that satisfies. I have used edit summaries that reference the above-enumerated concerns in most cases. The lead is now two paragraphs, and could be longer, but I think it complies with WP:LEAD. The material I removed from the lead I pasted into a new section just after the lead, "Background", where it does indeed fit better. The comments I left on your talk page regarding the extra lines being needed for visual rest and accessibility in a long article may have been better made here, but they are at least preserved. Won't you please review the changes I've made? Thank you so much, Sctechlaw (talk) 06:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Looks very good so far, no more problems with external links either. I think per WP:LEAD, the lead could probably be a bit longer, but I would be worried that it would devolve into arbitrary examples of case decisions, so I think that it's fine for GA purposes. Anyways, here's what needs to be done next:

Sctechlaw (talk) 00:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Sctechlaw (talk) 22:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Finally, and this is NOT a GA requirement, but the referencing style is pretty haphazard at times (for example, sometimes accessdates are included, other times not) - if you're thinking of bringing this beyond GA, that will be something of concern to higher level reviews but, as far as I can tell, the references all make it clear where one would find the information should they need to look it up (except for the one noted above), which is sufficient for GA. Anyhow, once these concerns are address, the article should be ready for promotion to Good Article status. Canadian  Paul  17:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't see that anything has been done to resolve concerns #9 or the Canadian part of #12 above. For the latter, even though it's cited in the paragraph above, there still needs to be a citation at the end of the paragraph because the paragraph contains material that could be challenged and that falls under the list of things that need to be cited by the good article criteria.
 * 2) I addressed item 9 in this change by informing the reader that there was no report (I could find) that the case was either settled or dropped (which often happens in law), however, Woolies continues to use the once-disputed logo even on Apple's site (which requires Apple's acquiescence), therefore, while the legal outcome of the dispute is unknown, the practical outcome is that Woolies prevailed. The meaning is decidedly implicit in the outcome and therefore could be worded differently, and I am open to suggestions.
 * 3) As to item 12, because both the Canadian and New Zealand decisions are cited in the previous paragraph, are established law, there was and is no expert debate as to their meaning, and the article's recounting of the content is highly unlikely to be challenged except by some extreme fringe legal theorist, it is unnecessary to re-cite them, and since they would be extraneous it seems to me to do so has an opposite effect on credibility (thou dost protest too much sort of thing) — however, if you insist I will throw them in. Also, I think your choice of word "contr" in your last edit to that section is confusing for most readers. Those object code cases are some of the most significant copyright cases in the industry, ever, so it is reasonable to state that fact. Just why that is so is explained in the section, thus using the phrase "were important because" or "were significant in" is reasonable. I suggest replacing "contr" with "were significant in".
 * 4) Under "Apple v. Samsung: Android phones and tablets", "Apple's multinational litigation over technology patents became known as the mobile device patent wars: extensive litigation in fierce competition in the global market for consumer mobile communications. By August 2011 Apple and Samsung were carrying out their legal battles in 19 ongoing lawsuits in 12 courts in nine countries on four continents; by October, the fight expanded to 10 countries." Neither of the references after these sentences support the fact that the activity became known as "the mobile device patent wars" I did a cut and paste from that section to a new article on Apple v. Samsung, and in the process it appears the cite you seek went there, so I'll fix that.
 * 5) Under "Sector Labs: use of Pod", "The Board found that the "iPod" mark was "famous" and therefore entitled to broad protection under U.S. trademark law." This should be sourced directly to the board's actual decision, rather than the current citation, because a blog is generally not considered to be a reliable source and I don't see a reason why an exception should be made here (although feel free to convince me otherwise). Agreed and done.
 * 6) I'm not sure that citation #157 (Creative Files Suit Against Apple For Patent Infringement, iPod Hacks, 2006-05-16. Accessed 2012-4-11, via archive.org.) is needed; the information is sourced by two other references and that source just looks like a rehashing/reposting of the other material on a website that doesn't strike me as particularly notable/reliable. Agreed, however, where possible I tried to include sources that non-lawyers might read too. :-) We can leave it in or take it out, your choice.
 * 7) Citation #203 (Oates, John, Consumer group slams 'unfair' software licenses, EULAugh, I cry, 2008-2-19.) needs to list the publisher of the article, so that it can be more easily found (or referenced) if the link goes dead.

Agreed and done.

 * 8) Under "Apple and AT&T Mobility antitrust class action", "In October 2008 the court denied the defendants' motions to dismiss the case on the federal claims and granted their motions to dismiss the state unfair trade practice claims except in California, New York, and Washington, but gave the plaintiffs leave to amend those claims. The case remained pending before the Ninth Circuit appellate court in late 2011." Is it still pending? Have their been any updates worthy of updating the section for?

This is an extraordinarily complex case that may take years to resolve. I'll check for further developments that are more than just motions hearings in discovery, and report back, but in the meanwhile I added that fact to the section so the reader knows not to hold dinner while waiting to find out.
 * 1) Please check for any updates on the following sections and add the information if necessary: "Federal eBook price-fixing claims", "Proview: iPad trademark", "Amazon "App Store"", "Apple v. HTC", "Kodak v. Apple (digital imaging)", "Motorola Mobility v. Apple", "Apple v. Samsung: Android phones and tablets"

I'll check and report back.

Updated Motorola Mobility v. Apple;

Updated Apple v. Samsung;

Updated Kodak v. Apple;

Udated Apple v. HTC;

Updated Amazon "App Store"

Updated Proview: iPad trademark.

Thanks so much! Sctechlaw (talk) 20:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The access dates do need to be updated so I'll address that today. Is there something else you noticed about the referencing besides the access dates? If so I'll be glad to fix them.

 * Regarding "contr", that was meant to be "contributed to"; I don't know how that got cut off, but I have fixed it. I feel that this is a more neutral way of saying what you're looking to say - it highlights that there is relevance without telling the reader how you (or how they should) feel about it. Regarding the former #9, I just removed "once-disputed", as it just throws off the reader - you already mention "disputed" in the previous sentence, so there's no need to repeat it. Regarding the citations for the Canadian decision, I still think that the article would be better off with a citation to the decision, but perhaps it is fine as is, so I'll let it be. Regarding the iPod hacks citation, that makes sense I suppose, and since it's not independently verifying anything, there's no real reason it can't stay.

 * Anyways, everything looks ready to go now so I will go ahead and pass this article for GA status. Congratulations and thank you for all your hard work! Canadian   Paul  14:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
Talk:David Gibbins

Fair use rationale for Image:Crusader Gold Gibbins cover.jpg
Image:Crusader Gold Gibbins cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Gibbins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423174412/http://www.bonomiassociates.co.uk/index.php?page=6&authorsId=73 to http://www.bonomiassociates.co.uk/index.php?page=6&authorsId=73
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130629154343/http://www.panmacmillan.com/totalwarbooks to http://www.panmacmillan.com/totalwarbooks

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

David Gibbins page modifications
I've just improved, tightened up and updated the main text of this page in response to the note above it. Some extraneous bio detail has been excised and relevant info added, including references. I would like to add source references for his university degrees but these are not online (the Cambridge University Reporter does not have archive online before 1998 and the Times online which would include his 1983 Bristol degree is subscription only). Other than this I hope the improvements I've made now satisfy the criticism. There is a lot of external verification for him in all the listed external links, not just his own website but publishers, agents etc, so I don't think every detail needs to be footnoted. Thanks! BDDRAJ4 (talk) 13:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Talk:David Gibbins


text:
Letitia McClintock

Letitia McClintock (12 February 1835 – 1917) was an Irish writer and folklorist.

Life
McClintock was born to Robert McClintock and Margaret Macan in County Donegal on 12 February 1835. She lived with her family for her whole life. She worked as a writer and was a collector of folk stories from the areas around Dunmore and Kilrea where she grew up. She contributed to The Dublin University Magazine in 1878. She also wrote novels which tended to have an Anti-Land League tone. W. B. Yeats had great appreciation for the work she had done on folk stories and included several in his book Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry published in 1888. She was staying with her sister Alice Smyth in Ardmore, Derry in 1901 and with her sister Isabel Barton in Croaghross, Clondavaddog in 1911. McClintock died in 1917.

title: Letitia McClintock


text:
User:Abhishek2810

Hello, i am Abhishek Shukla, working in IT industry. I am great Fan of Indian Sports. I have edited several articles as username User:abhi2810, but now i forgot the password and couldn't recover it. That's why i created new account to Create and edit, articles/subjects in which i am good at.

Pages
Aritcles i have created.

title: User:Abhishek2810


text:
User:Hawkeye7/War/Selected anniversaries/March 23

March 23

 * 1568 - Peace of Longjumeau ends the Second War of Religion in France. Again Catherine de Medici and Charles IX of France make substantial concessions to the Huguenots.
 * 1708 - James Francis Edward Stuart lands at the Firth of Forth.
 * 1942 - World War II: In the Indian Ocean, Japanese forces capture the Andaman Islands.
 * 1983 - Strategic Defense Initiative: President Ronald Reagan makes his initial proposal to develop technology to intercept enemy missiles.


text:
List of protected heritage sites in Gesves

This table shows an overview of the protected heritage sites in the Walloon town Gesves. This list is part of Belgium's national heritage.

 * }


text:
Pietro Antonio Martini

Pietro Antonio Martini (9 July 1738 – 2 April 1797) was an Italian painter and engraver, active in a late Baroque style.

Biography
He was born at Trecasali, within the duchy of Parma, a relative of the painter Biagio Martini. Pietro's father wished him to study law, but he arranged to have some training locally under Giuseppe Baldrighi in design, and then Benigno Bossi. In 1761, he won a prize at the Academy of Fine Arts of Parma. In 1769, with the patronage of the minister of the Duchy du Tillot and perhaps under the encouragement of the court architect Petitot, Pietro went to Paris to learn engraving working with Jacques-Philippe Le Bas. With the dismissal of du Tillot in 1771, his subsidy stopped, but he demurred in returning to Parma to settle, since he was no longer assured a post as professor of engraving in the Parmesan Academy of Fin Arts. He set forth on traveling through Italy, then up to Netherlands, and finally London. In 1787, he had a prominent exhibition of his prints. In 1792, he was awarded the position of Academic Professor of the Parmesan Academy, but continued to travel, until the French Revolution prompted him to return to Parma.

One of the subjects of his etchings was views of late 18th-century art exhibitions themselves. For example, one etching depicts the 1785 Salon exhibition at the Louvre; another engraving depicts a View of the Salon of 1785; and a third, the Exhibition of the Royal Academy in 1787. These engravings are historically instructive in demonstrating the crowded stacked displays of artworks utilized in this period. Other etchings indicated that the admiring crowds may have been a stock image for use in other similar engravings.

Among his etchings are the following:
 * Plates after Teniers and other Flemish artists
 * Heliodorus driven from the Temple, after Francesco Solimena
 * Christ driving the Money-changors from the Temple, after Solimena
 * Architectural Ruins, after Robert
 * Pleasures of Summer, after Horace Vernet
 * View of Spoletto, after Vernet
 * View of Porto Ercole, after Vernet
 * View of Avignon, after Vernet
 * The Augurs, after Salvatore Rosa; etched by Martini, finished by le Bas.
 * Il Contento, after Adam Elsheimer

title: Pietro Antonio Martini


text:
石棉

Etymology
Dating back to the early 20th century – see below for citations.

Previous names include:, , , , ,.

Noun

 * 1) asbestos

title: 石棉


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magnets (Japan)

The result was   delete. Missvain (talk) 07:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

The Magnets (Japan)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not finding anything to meet WP:BAND The record label they released under fails criteria #2 and their most successful single Try My Limit fails criteria #5. Everything else in the article doesn't seem to reach a criteria. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 * Speedy Delete. (Criterion A7) The article does not indicate in any way why this band might have been vaguely notable. --DAJF (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


text:
Wikipedia:Peer review/2011–12 Manchester United F.C. season/archive1

2011–12 Manchester United F.C. season
This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because looking to get it t a featured article. It would also be good for future season articles to have an example to follow.

 * 1) It is rated as a start-class article. Is this an appropriate rating of the article?
 * 2) How well-written (grammer, punctuation etc) is the article?
 * 3) How comprehensive is the article and is there anything missing?
 * 4) Is it well-researched, have reliable sources and consistent citations?
 * 5) Is the lead section good?
 * 6) Is there an appropriate structure to the article?
 * 7) Is there a general critique that you would like to add to the peer review?

Thanks, Kingjeff (talk) 00:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Will take the review and get to it this week itself. Of the top the article is a little long per WP:Article length AS ITS approached 100k. Some split off sections needed.
 * Its at lesat c-class, but needs much more sources (as indicated by the tags)Lihaas (talk) 13:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Since I'm not an editor of the article, I'm going to add a bit. The appropriate structure isn't there. However, it can be easy to restructutre. The writing portion for each of the competition sections should go into a "Review and events" section. You have a section for each competition. Each one of those sections should be a subsection of "Match results". The statistics table for appearances and goals looks good. Transfers section looks good. It would be good to see a section called the "Starting 11". 2011–12 FC Bayern Munich season has a good example. Could also add a "Minutes played" section. Sources is another issue. 56 sources to-date. When sourcing is complete. This will put the article in a very good position. Kingjeff (talk) 04:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Also the lead has a mish-mash of 1 sentence paragraphs. They could be merged with the update for each competition into 1 para.
 * Also need consistent usage of Manchester United/United (this is not a fan weblog).
 * Cant think of content thats been missing. Perhaps staff changes, etc. As Kingjeff states a squad info/lineup section would do good.
 * Big issue is that there is the tag and there are no sources from premier league to the transfrs section (including the stats).
 * A general cleanup to remove OR and answer the tag should put it in good stead.Lihaas (talk) 06:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Per WP:MOSLEAD Lead should be no more than 4 paras. Definitely too much prose for each competition. Using the community shield as an example. It is currently; As Premier League champions, United began the season against the holders of the FA Cup, local rivals Manchester City in the 2011 FA Community Shield. The match was played at Wembley on 7 August.[7] This was the first time the Shield had been contested by the two clubs in 55 years. United had most of the possession and more shots on goal in the first half, but it was City who took the lead in the 38th minute when Joleon Lescott nodded in a David Silva free-kick. Edin Džeko then doubled City's lead on the stroke of half-time with a low strike from long-distance. However, seven minutes into the second half, Chris Smalling volleyed home an Ashley Young free-kick to reduce the deficit, and then Nani finished off an intricate passing move involving Wayne Rooney and Tom Cleverley in the 58th minute to bring the score back to 2–2. With a penalty shoot-out looming as the game moved into injury time, Nani forced a mistake from City captain Vincent Kompany, outpaced the defence and rounded goalkeeper Joe Hart before sliding the ball into the empty net to seal United's comeback and their 19th FA Community Shield.[8] But should be more along the lines of As Premier League champions, United began the season against the holders of the FA Cup, local rivals Manchester City in the 2011 FA Community Shield. The match was played at Wembley on 7 August.[7] This was the first time the Shield had been contested by the two clubs in 55 years. City took the lead in the 38th minute through Joleon Lescott. Edin Dzeko then doubled that before half-time. After 52 minutes Chris Smalling scored for United, Nani then equallised six minutes later and scored the winner towards the end of the match. (You could add some of what is already there to 2011 FA Community Shield). But as you can see it is roughly half. Overall the prose is way too detailed and there are lots of tabloid phrases used (looming, seal united's comeback, nodded in, stroke of half-time). The Premier League section - there are 33 paragraphs - 33! That's ridiculous, it should be about 5, MAX. I'm assuming its written in largely the same manner as the Community Shield paragraph and every match is covered. So there should be lots of infotmation you can remove. The two sections on Europe also look to be suffering from the same thing. At the moment I can't see much point saying anything else as, IMO, the article needs a complete re-write if it is your intention to get it to GA. Adam4267 (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
Talk:Dave Leitao

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Dave Leitao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090418004935/http://msn.foxsports.com:80/cbk/story/9340936/Sources:-Virginia-fires-Leitao-as-coach to http://msn.foxsports.com/cbk/story/9340936/Sources:-Virginia-fires-Leitao-as-coach
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002034448/http://www.virginia.edu/insideuva/2005/08/leitao.html to http://www.virginia.edu/insideuva/2005/08/leitao.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232817/http://www.newstribune.com/news/2012/jun/16/leitao-joins-tigers/ to http://www.newstribune.com/news/2012/jun/16/leitao-joins-tigers/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Dave Leitao


text:
Swimming at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Women's 200 metre backstroke

The women's 200 metre backstroke event for the 1976 Summer Olympics was held in Montreal. The event took place on July 25, 1976.

Heats
Heat 1

Heat 2

Heat 3

Heat 4


text:
User:Hypermorphism

Hello there. I am a mathematics major that is interested in all the physical sciences. I was originally going to major in physics until I attempted to study general relativity and got sucked into majoring in mathematics. I found the physicist-types too vague and hand-wavy in their axioms and the more mathematically minded physicists' descriptions too elegant to ignore. :D

title: User:Hypermorphism


text:
Graphic Design/Photography

Like drawing, you can skip photography and still be a salary-earning graphic design professional. However, some familiarity with the craft will make you an even better designer.

Kids today have many more options open to them than we did back when I graduated three years ago. That is, you can take digital pictures and save the money and time needed to develop the film.

title: Graphic Design/Photography


text:
Portal:Theology and philosophy

Welcome to the Department of Theology and Philosophy Part of The School of Theology Theology, is the rational and systematic study of religion and its influences and of the nature of religious truth. The Department of Theology and Philosophy focuses on the nature, sources, and scope of systematic theology and philosophy of religion.

Active participants
The histories of Wikiversity pages indicate who the active participants are. If you are an active participant in this school, you can list your name here (this can help small schools grow and the participants communicate better; for large schools it is not needed).
 * biginnes
 * Dev920
 * josephpaul

School news

 * August 25, 2006 - School founded!

Learning materials and learning projects
Wikiversity has adopted the "learning by doing" model for education. Lessons should center on learning activities for Wikiversity participants. Learning materials and learning projects can be used by multiple departments. Cooperate with other departments that use the same learning resource.
 * Science as Religion - a learning project using a seminar format. Participants explore the published literature on this topic then write and discuss their own essays about the relationship between science and religion.

Learning materials and learning projects are located in the main Wikiversity namespace. Simply make a link to the name of the lesson (lessons are independent pages in the main namespace) and start writing! Remember, Wikiversity has adopted the "learning by doing" model for education. Lessons should center on learning activities for Wikiversity participants. We learn by doing.

Research projects
This feature of Wikiversity will be implemented later pending further discussion.

Journals

 * Free Journals on Theology and Philosophy

Know any good resources for scholars of this topic? Add them here!

title: Portal:Theology and philosophy


text:
Galeopsis tetrahit

Galeopsis tetrahit, the common hemp-nettle or brittlestem hempnettle, is a flowering plant in the family Lamiaceae, native to Europe and northwestern Asia.

It is a herbaceous annual plant growing to 1 m tall; it is a pioneer species and thrives on disturbed sites or roadsides. The plant looks like mint but is taller. The stems have reflexed hairs and swollen nodes. In cross section, the stem is square. The leaves are rhombic to elliptic, with coarsely to bluntly serrate edges. The flowers are multicoloured, with purple, pink, or white areas; diminutive, bilateral and snapdragon-like, and are mostly visited by bumblebees.

The species is considered by some authorities to have arisen as a natural hybrid between Galeopsis pubescens and Galeopsis speciosa.

Description
Common hemp-nettle is an erect annual plant and grows to a height of about 20 to 70 cm. The stem branches occasionally and is squarish and hairy, with glandular hairs on the upper part of the plant. The nodes are swollen and widely spaced and the pale green, stalked leaves are in opposite pairs. The leaf blades are hairy and are ovate with a long tapered tip and with regular large teeth on the margin. The inflorescence forms a terminal spike and is composed of whorls of pinkish flowers with dark markings on the lower lip. The calyx has five sharp-pointed lobes and the corolla forms a two-lipped flower about 15 to 20 mm long with a fused tube. The upper lip of each flower is convex with dense, glandular hairs and the lower lip is three-lobed, the central lobe being the largest, squarish with a flat or rounded edge. There are four stamens, two long and two short, the gynoecium has two fused carpels and the fruit is a four-chambered schizocarp. The plant has a slightly unpleasant smell.

Distribution and habitat
Common hemp-nettle is native to Europe and northwestern Asia. Its typical habitat is rough ground, arable land, logging clearances and waste places. It spreads readily as its sharp calyces adhere to clothing and animal pelts.

title: Galeopsis tetrahit


text:
User:Detroitbuckeye/sandbox

The Drinko Cup is an annual golf tournament established in 1996 by students of The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. The tournament is named after the building that houses the law school, John Deaver Drinko Hall.

title: User:Detroitbuckeye/sandbox


text:
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Desg

 __NOINDEX__

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Desg

This editor's last articlespace contributions were six years ago, which mostly revolved around attempting to add links to his own website to Lead came and copper foil glasswork. After no edits in three years, the user reappeared to create his user page, featuring... the same links. No other edits in the last three years. Purely self-promotional page from a long-gone editor. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

 * Delete apparently spam. OSborn arfcontribs. 21:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The page is more about external links to his own website than about himself or his Wikimedia-related activities . -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


text:
陝西

Etymology
From its position west of the Shan Pass in Shanzhou, Henan, through which the Yellow River flows into the North China Plain.

Proper noun

 * 1) Shaanxi

title: 陝西


text:
Pir Gaz

Pir Gaz (, also Romanized as Pīr Gaz) is a village in Eshqabad Rural District, Miyan Jolgeh District, Nishapur County, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran. At the 2006 census, its population was 269, in 69 families.

title: Pir Gaz


text:
Talk:Richard Warren Sears

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:Richard Warren Sears


text:
Talk:Derek Kraus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) 01:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article. Please keep in mind I've only ever written one motorsports article (but not as detailed as this one). If I make any errors in regards to terminology. please let me know. Also, feel free to leave any comments or questions you have on this review. I'll go through a bit here and there, and let you know when the review is completed. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Lead, infobox, images

 * The following section would need verification and inclusion that he currently competes full-time in West, part-time in East and part-time in Ganders.
 * "current NASCAR Next member" - yes he joined in 2018, but there's no mention that he's still a member as of 2019.
 * Seems the program was dropped for this year at least temporarily, changed to "former." --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine with former as there's no source added for him for 2019, so former would still apply.✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

 * The infobox says Las Vegas 2019 was Kraus's last race. Does that mean he will no longer compete at Ganders?
 * "Last" just means "most recent" in NASCAR and motorsport infobox terms. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay. I don't think it'd effect this review. When i use the infobox for my racing bio, last race was the last race LOL. ✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

 * There seems to be too many pictures, some of which doesn't reflect what's in the paragprahs. Of the photos:
 * There's no mention of the 2015 Midwest Truck win at Golden Sands Speedway.
 * --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * His debut during the 2016 ARCA Midwest at Madison isn't there
 * --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Dover 2018 was skipped in the related paragraph.
 * information to both the caption and body, the season finale was the Dover race. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * The Meridian Speedway caption would need a year and needed to be rewritten as the related paragraph says "led nearly 200 laps" - not the first 189 laps.
 * a year, tweaked the body in addition to the caption. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * Just noticed the Hometracks source does say 189 laps so this works. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

 * There is also no mention in the 2018 section that Meridian was his fifth pole for K&N West of the 2018 season.
 * --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * The Bristol 2019 and bandolero 2013 pictures are relevant.

Early years

 * "State Park and state bandeleros championship" -> championships (as they were two separate events)
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "He moved up to Midwest trucks and super late models before he turned fourteen." - As he competed in American Ethanol at age thirteen. I think his age during these two series should be reworded to prevent confusion.
 * ✅ Changed wording to avoid confusion.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Still a bit of issue as the sentence "winning his first SLM race before he turned fourteen" is earlier in the paragraph before "he became the youngest driver to win a feature at Rockford Speedway at age 13." To me, it'd confuse the reader going from fourteen to thirteen instead of the other way round. Yes i realize it's two different years (2014 and 2015). --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Tweaked it further. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * “traveling far across the United States” - This is not in the KWWL source. As the source just states he competed at New Symera, I suggest dropping this quoted part only and reword for grammar.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * "traveling to compete" sounds odd to me. I would say this is a grammar issue as well. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Changed to "competing" for simplicity. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "win a full-bodied vehicle feature" - I don't think this close paraphrase passes WP:LIMITED with "full-bodied vehicle feature"
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * ARCA Midwest Tour doesn't specifically state he competed full-time at the Midwest Truck Series. Yes he won the championship but doesn't state how many races he competed in.
 * ✅ sources swapped to back it up.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC))✅

 * Similar problem with Motosrport.com not specifically saying he competed full-time at the ARCA Midwest Tour. Just has his final point standings and record he surpassed.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

2017: K&N Pro Series

 * Wausau Daily Herald doesn't say Kraus would drive in K&S Pro Series West full-time, just that'd he be competing that season.
 * ✅ source swapped to back it up.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Midwest Tour 2017 source doesn't say the Kern County Raceway race happened in the winter. Yes, it happened before the January 2017 announcement, but this source doesn't state when exactly the race was held. Maybe reword to "that year" ✅
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "tried out for the ride" -> the race? I know this source states "ride" but the rest of Kraus's Wiki article says race.
 * ✅ believe it was for the season. I adjusted wording accordingly.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "tried out for the ride, testing for the team" - seems redundant. I think trying out for the team sounds better than trying out for the ride. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redundacy was removed. See recap section. truck suffered from transmission problems," ✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * "After setting career-best finishes of second at Kern County, Spokane County Raceway, and Colorado National Speedway he broke through by winning the pole at Iowa Speedway,[11] thanking his team for good equipment to keep him ahead of the learning curve"
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "second at Kern County, Spokane County Raceway, and Colorado National Speedway" - true, but these races were Pro Series West. I think clarification is needed as the previous sentence talks about his Pro Series East debut.
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "early in the season." - I don't think this part is needed as the last second place for West Series was halfway in the season. Racing Reference has the race numbers, but not early/middle/late etc. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Dealt with in the recap section. ✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * "broke through by winning the pole" - i don't think "broke through" is neutral.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "thanking his team for good equipment to keep him ahead of the learning curve" - seems like unnecessary detail.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "Kraus first led for an extended period at Meridian" - Frontstretch doesn't say it was his first time he led for an extended period. I think "first" can be dropped, otherwise source would need to be swapped.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "Kraus credited his spotter for telling him to save tires on the final run to clinch the victory" - also seems like unnecessary detail.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

2018: K&N contender; truck debut
Paragraph one:
 * "transporting his Super Late Model 2,000 miles (3,200 km) from Wisconsin with Ty Majeski to California" - unnecessary details.
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "considered by some as the favorite to win the championship" - this seems like WP:WEASEL with the "considered by some" part. The hometracks source says "Kraus is BMR’s focal point and championship favorite". From my understanding, the source is saying that Kraus was BMR's top pick to win the championship, not more than one person. Even if that is the case, this statement is not neutral and would be puffery as well.
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "dominant driver Kevin Harvick" - dominant isn't neutral.
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Too many citations with the Kern County race per Citation_overkill
 * I don't see any of these sources mentioning that Kraus slid to the back of the pack, only Harvick going from 1st to ninth.✅
 * Close paraphrasing with "ceding the lead" and "lapped traffic" of the Autoweek source. I don't thinking these would fall under WP:LIMITED.✅
 * "Kraus eventually caught Rouse" - sounds like WP:EDITORIALIZING with "eventually caught" ✅
 * ✅ all of them.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Even though "lapped traffic" is still there, I think it might be a terminology that can't really be rephrased. I also see that this entire part was reworded as well, so it's good. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

 * " led an overwhelming majority of the race but ran out of fuel in the closing stages of the race, handing the win to Derek Thorn" - similar neutrality issue with "overwhelming majority". ✅
 * I also thinking "handing the win" is a bit not neutral. But I'm more concerned with the "overwhelming" part.✅
 * Both ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "Kraus battled a tight car but eventually passed BMR teammate Cole Rouse on the final restart" - the tight car part doesn't seem right. Kraus said he would get too "tight" behind a car when attempting to pass them. I don't think this part is needed.✅
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "eventually passed BMR teammate" - similar editorialzing part with "eventually".✅
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "At the Las Vegas Motor Speedway Dirt Track, he led laps but spun twice, once from lead and wound up retiring in the later stages of the race." - Hub City Times said he spun once, not twice.✅
 * He didn't retire from the race. He finished in 17th.✅ per below.
 * Should the amount of laps be mentioned? "led laps" seems incomplete, but if you'd prefer not to mention it, then that's fine.✅
 * ✅ Reworded to avoid confusion, source added.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I see the additional Racing Reference source did say he crashed in this event. So i think this'll work for the retiring part.✅

 * but spun and wound up retiring" - not 100% if this is netural. Minor tweak maybe? --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Dealt with in recap section.✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * " The bad luck that seemed to plague Kraus in 2018 continued in the Idaho 208 when Taylor Canfield spun and blocked the track, forcing Kraus into the wall after leading over 175 laps. Kraus would later imply that Canfield's incident cost him the victory" - mutliple issues with this one.
 * "The bad luck that seemed to plague Kraus in 2018 continued in the Idaho 208" - not neutral.✅
 * Yes Canfield spun out and resulted in Kraus going into the wall, but it doesn't specifcally say Canfield was blocking the track.✅
 * Source doesn't say Kraus was leading for over 175 laps when Canfield spun out.✅
 * "Kraus would later imply that Canfield's incident cost him the victory" - not neutral.✅
 * Overall, this citation (Lastcar.info) doesn't seem like a reliable source as the page says it's an "unofficial NASCAR website". I could be wrong with it being not reliable.✅
 * Everything ✅. Blew up the section and started from scratch in prose and cites.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "the site of Kraus' notable bump-and-run in March and a track that Kraus called "fun". Like the spring, Kraus won the race, and unlike the spring, Kraus avoided controversies in doing so." - all of this quoted part is not netural. Main issues are "notable bump-and-run" and the controversies part.✅
 * Also, the Bakersfield Californian does not mnetion the March race at all, making this editorializing/OR.✅
 * ✅ swapped sources.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * While the speed51 doesn't mention it was the second time in the season for Kern County, I think it's fine as earlier in the paragraph it mentions Kern with citation. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Need a source for Kraus's fourth finish in points for Pro Series West.✅
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Racing Reference doesn't state the team name for Thorn, Partidge nor Rouse. Although Rouse was mentioned as being Kraus's teammate earlier in this section, there's no mention of Sunshine Ford. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This was dropped in recap. ✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Just realized that the Winter Showdown is not part of the Pro Series West season. Maybe clarification is needed since the first race for Pro Series West was also held at Kern County.
 * ✅ clarified that it was late models.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * *A lot of the 2018 West part is not included in this section. The main thing I noticed missing was the 2 poles at Tuscon and 1 at Colorado. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Tucson was added, Colorado wasn't based on too overly detailed per recap. ✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Second and third paragraph
 * " After finishing fourth in the hotly-contested season opener at New Smyrna Speedway" - hotly-contested not neutral✅
 *  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "issues took its toll at Bristol Motor Speedway, leading to a disappointing result" - doesn't seem neutral✅
 * also vague as it makes me ask "What happened at Bristol? What position did he finish in?" without consulting the source.✅
 * Same issue as above with Lastcar.info not being an official NASCAR website.✅
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * " New Hampshire Motor Speedway in the summer" - it won't effect this review, but I know from other articles that specific months are preferred per MOS:SEASON.
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * should be July, not June for New Hampshire. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Was corrected. ✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

 * " but ultimately could not win a race in any of his four starts with BMR, though he did lead the New Hampshire race until nearly the final lap before being passed by Brandon McReynolds" - not netural, especially with the " ultimately could not win a race" and "though he did lead" parts.✅
 * "lead the New Hampshire race until nearly the final lap before being passed by Brandon McReynold" - The wording of the sentence to me sounds like he led the race until the final race, which isn't true as McReynold took the lead in lap 29.✅
 * also, Hometracks doesn't say how many Pro Series East races he competed in nor that he didn't win any of the four races.✅
 * ✅ wording changed.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * " In his first race with DGR, he again claimed the pole at New Hampshire[30] and was leading before being passed by Brandon McReynolds on the final restart, finishing in second." - two sentences please for grammar.
 * Also similar issue with Kraus and McReynolds trading the lead in the race multiple times. The sentence to me reads he led the race until the final restart, which isn't the case. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if Catchfence is reliable for the jump to DGR Crosley. I could be wrong.
 * It's a reliable site. They have boots on the ground almost every weekend in the NASCAR garages.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "In his first weekend with DGR, he completed his season sweep of East poles at New Hampshire," - Hometracks doesn't say it was a season sweep, just that it was his second pole in the season.✅
 * "first weekend" -> first race? ✅
 * Both ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Need a source for his second and third place finishes while competing with DGR Crosley at Pro Series East.✅
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "but once again finished second, and finished a similar third in the season finale at Dover." - minor retweak needed with "but" per WP:EDITORIALIZING.✅
 * "On November 4, 2018, it was announced that Kraus would make his NASCAR Camping World Truck Series debut at ISM Raceway, driving the No. 19 Toyota Tundra for Bill McAnally Racing." - close paraphrasing of the Motorsports Tribune source.
 * Kraus announced it himself, not it was announced by someone else.
 * Not sure if Motorsports Tribune is reliable for the 2018 Camping Truck debut. I tried searching the author of the article, Luis Torres, but I'm not seeing any certain reliable sources he has written for.
 * ✅  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 19:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Per the removal of the Motorsports Tribune source, the WSAW source doesn't say he specifically announced he'd be competing at ISM. Also, the source says it was a Friday, so it wasn't "that weekend". --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

2019: Full-time in K&N, part-time in Trucks
First paragraph
 * "Kraus returned to BMR for a third full West season in 2019. He also planned to run some East races, and potentially a few ARCA Menards Series events." - couple issues here.
 * Journal sentinel doesn't state that he'd be competing in a full season for Pro Series West.
 * It would take a major unforeseen circumstance for him not to run each of the last four races and complete the full season, but for now I have removed "full" from the sentence. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Source also said Kraus would be racing in some Pro Series East races, there wasn't doubt.
 * Fixed. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019✅

 * This source does not specifically state Menards Series. It said his father was "working on sponsorship" for Kraus to race in an ARCA Series. Automobile Racing Club of America has multiple series, so this isn't backed up.
 * With only two races left in the ARCA season, it's safe to say this probably isn't happening, so I've removed it. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "Kraus began the season by winning the K&N East season-opener at New Smyrna" - seems redundant with began the season and season-opener.
 * ✅ --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * " Kraus found himself only three points out of the championship points lead" - I'd suggest tweaking this a bit for neutrality, especially the "found himself only" part.
 * Seems to be ✅ by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "This led to speculation that the team might run the full East schedule," - sounds like doubt and not neutral. Autoweek said he'd keep racing for Pro Series East as long as he was leading the points.
 * Seems to be ✅ by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "Kraus and BMR teammate Deegan did end up competing" - editorializing with "did end up competing".
 * ✅ --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Mmentioning that Deegan did compete in races three and four is off topic. I suggest removing Deegan's mention here as the sentence before only talks about Kraus.
 * Seems to have been by Willsome429 --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * The Catchfence source says that he would be competing in the double header, not that he did. However, the adjacent Autoweek source does confirm it.
 * Also a similar question with whether Catchfence is reliable.
 * As was said earlier in the review, Catchfence is a credentialed media outlet at the track almost every weekend with a verified, reputable staff of writers. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * As Kraus has raced in races 5 - 10 for East (skipping 9), I think a summary should be added for broadness, but up to you if you want to include each event. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Second and third paragraph
 * "In the West Series, Kraus began the season at the Dirt Track at Las Vegas with a sixth-place finish after qualifying second and leading the field until getting shuffled back with 30 laps remaining" - maybe split into two sentences for grammar?
 * Seems to be ✅ by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Minor point - NAPA Know How says he lost the lead with "just over 30 laps" left, not exactly 30 laps.✅
 * Seems to be ✅ by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * To me, I think the Colorado race is too overly detailed (with three sentences) in comparasion to the other races. But there's also issues with individual sentences:
 * "Kraus ran up front until a broken sway bar hindered his car's performance, dropping him back to outside the top-five" - I don't think this right. Autoweek said "hanging on for dear life inside the top five." So i think he maintained a top-five position after the sway bar broke.✅
 * Seems to be ✅ by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "He then worked back up to third on the final restart, forcibly taking the lead back from Deegan with two laps remaining." - not neutral with "forcibly taking the lead back".✅
 * Seems to be ✅ by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Also doesn't state that Kraus went back to third place with two laps left.✅
 * "Deegan then spun out Kraus going into turn 3 on the final lap, resulting in Kraus finishing eighth and venting his frustrations with the result on social media after the race" - not what Autoweek said. It said his car went up in smoke a lap after colliding with Deegan. No mention that Deegan spun out, nor Kraus was going into turn 3 in the final lap.
 * Tweaked the wording in this section. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The addition of the Sporting News source doesn't have Kraus's going into lap 3, nor Kraus finishing eighth after the collision with Deegan. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Bit of WP:EDITORIALIZING issue with "eventually returned to the lead;[43] however," when describing the Colorado race. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * "however" is a editorialzing word as well per Words to watch. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Yes he did vent his frustrations after the race, but I don't think it's needed in my opinion.
 * Seems to have been by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * "Before the next race at Sonoma, Kraus also had the opportunity prepare" - not sure what you mean by "opportunity prepare". ✅
 * Seems to have been reworded by Willsome429. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Also, this race was at Sonoma, not the next race.
 * ❌ Sonoma actually was the next race in the K&N West schedule after Colorado; the results table and applicable source indicate that. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * I don't think you'd need a source/sentence to say he had the opportunity to race at Trans Am and a source to say that he did race at Trans Am. To me, it sounds redundant.✅
 * the first source. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Just noticed that HomeTracks doesn't specifcally said it was held on the 16th, just "this past weekend" when the source was published on the 18th. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Also per MOS:SEASON with spring/fall. Extra part that won't effect GA, but thought I should mention.✅
 * "Jones, who spun and wrecked late in the race as a result of contact while contending for the win with Kraus, was unhappy with Kraus's aggression, saying he "just cleaned us out." - this additional sentence doesn't seem netural or relevant to Kraus, and would seem more suitable to the individual race article. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * partly, but I still think it's important to note how the winning move was made so I made note of the fact that Jones was spun out. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Any particular reason why his results at Martinsville and Las Vegas aren't mentioned? I know that ISM is november, Las Vegas was just this month, but Martinsville was in March according to Speed Sport.
 * Willsome added his Martinsville result earlier, I added his finishing position from Vegas. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * " truck suffered from transmission problems," - i think "suffered" doesn't sound netural. Minor rewording needed. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Not sure if Speedway Digest is relialbe for his eighth position finish at Dover.
 * Source seems to have been changed (yes, Jayski is reliable, I have used it in several GAs and even FAs without issue and has been a part of ESPN and NASCAR's online media ventures (formerly and currently respectively). --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I've no doubts about Jayski's reliability as I'm famillar with him per the reliable sources listed at WikiProject NASCAR ;) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)✅

Personal life and Motorsports career results

 * Yes he wrestles for Stratford High School but I don't think it's during the winter. He does have a break from racing from December to January, but it's not specifically stated he wrestles while he's not racing in the winter.✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * "That connection led to Menard becoming a fan of Derek's racing career." - puffery as it's saying Menard is a fan of Derek. i'd remove this quoted part only as saying that racing is in the family seems relevant.✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Kraus had two top fives and two top tens while competing for DGR-Crosley at 2018 Pro Series East, not one each.✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Kraus has six top fives, not three for 2019 Pro Series East✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * He's also currently 7th, not 6th for this season. Same amount of points though.✅
 * ✅. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Kraus is currently 42nd with 58 points for 2019 Ganders✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Kraus led for 109 laps at 2017 Pro Series West, not 40.✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Also slight tweak with his points. He had 534 points, not 533.✅
 * ✅. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Slight point tweak with 2019 Pro Series West. It should be 414, not 424.✅
 * Seems Willsome429 took care of this. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Overall
I think that's pretty much it. I'll write a recap tomorrow. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Overall: the article has minor and major issues. For minor, there are a few sentences where I feel needs some grammar tweaking. There's a little bit of off topic information and some spots where it's too overly detailed. Finally, the lead needs to reflect what's in the subsequent paragraphs in terms of part-time/full-time and NASCAR Next. For major issues, there are many neutrality issues, some inaccurate information, images that are not relevant to the article and possibly a handful of unreliable sources which would require more discussion. As this article had been edited during the review, I believe placing this article on hold would be beneficial. I'll have this article on hold until the 30th and reassess from there. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment (full disclosure, William is a good friend of mine and I am also a NASCAR and motorsports project editor): I understand why you may find Lastcar questionable at first glance, but I think it has enough going for it. The founder and head writer, Brock Beard, has been granted full media credential status at NASCAR races at Sonoma Raceway, Darlington Raceway, and Canadian Tire Motorsport Park. I believe that says something about NASCAR's view of the source. If they deem it legitimate enough to be granted access to officially cover it on-site with access to drivers and teams for interviews, I think it passes the test. It may be small, but it's oftentimes the only resource smaller teams have. (FWIW Brock is also a published author through Waldorf Books with his recent release J.D.: The Life and Death of a Forgotten NASCAR Legend.)
 * Also, if you need any assistance finishing this up, just ping me and I'll do my best to help. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 01:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello. Thank you for your comments. I don't know if you've seen, but both of these Lastcar.info sources were part of sentences where there were neutrality issues (the bad luck and disappointing result parts), These parts were subsequently removed. Also, these sources were not written by Brock, but a guest contributor named William Soquet. While Brock might be a reliable suthor (i would have to dig outside of this review), Soquet himself doesn't seem to have written in other reliable sources. As Lastcar.info is technically a blog (published on Blogger), and Kraus is a living person, I think this would fail WP:SELFPUBLISH per not using "third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert," If it doesn't fail this particular criteria, then the question is whether Soquet has published in other reliable sources or not. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, for a driver of Kraus' level there should probably be alternatives out there anyway, but if the sections have been removed entirely, it's a non-issue. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 12:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I believe everything in the review has been addressed by at least one of us. As for the lead regarding his full-time and part-time status in each series, would the results tables be enough to verify and indicate that? Best, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * In response to full time/part time, Ganders part time and West full time would be obvious in terms of the table. East part-time I don't think so, based on his 2019 season (9 out of 12 races). --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Recap
Here's a recap of the sections and what's left to be done, if any.

 * Early years done
 * 2017 K&N Pro Series - "tried out for the ride, testing for the team" redundancy, second place wins "early in the season" not cited
 * redundancy and the "early in the season" phrase. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * All done for 2017 part.✅

 * 2018 K&N Contender paragraph one: - Not sure if "but spun and wound up retiring" is neutral for Las Vegas, especially the wound up part (yes i know it means ending up). Alternativelly, Racing Reference doesn't have the team name for Thorn nor Partidge for the season points. So either an additional source is needed, or Sunrise Ford Racing has to be dropped.✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Not sure why I didn't check this off but I think it's ✅. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Section done.✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 2018 K&N Contender paragraph two and three: WSAW doesn't have Kraus's specific announcement and says ISM was on a Friday and not a weekend, minor editorializing with "but once again" with New Hampshire/Dover results.✅
 * ✅ reworked the section and added a new source. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

 * New Hampshire's first race was in July, not June, Kraus did not lead the entire first New Hampshire race before the final restart, and second New Hampshire race has a grammar issue. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * All ✅ --Bcschneider53 (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Just noticed "battled with Brandon McReynolds" - battled isn't netural to me. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * Also "Kraus began the 2018 season", should be clairifed this was the West season. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , the winter showdown wasn't a part of the K&N West season, I tweaked the opening couple of sentences though. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Some of the races for 2018 West aren't included in this summary. If not all of them are needed to prevent unncessery detail, then that's okay with me. The one thing I'm a bit surprised was omitted was Kraus's two poles at Tuscon and one at Colorado, considering the ones at Evergeen and Meridian were added. Was there a reason why this East season is not fully written? --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I added Tucson since the double pole was worth mentioning, but we do try to avoid including every single race in season summaries to avoid excessive details. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Alright. As long as some of it was included, then that works. Section complete.✅ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC) ✅

 * 2019: first paragraph - I think a summary of his performance of East races 5 - 10 (skipping 9) should be there for broadness, considering it's in the results. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , he essentially conceded the East title by skipping 9. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 14:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * "However" would need to be dropped per editorialzing when describing the rest of his East Races. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * 2019: second and third paragraph - ediorializing issue with "eventually returned to the lead; however" for the Colorado race, HomeTracks doesn't state the Trans Am race was specifically on the 16th, neturality issue with "truck suffered from transmission problems," with the word choice of "suffered".✅
 * All ✅. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * The Sporting News source doesn't say Kraus was going into lap 3 when he collided with Deegan at Colorado, nor say Kraus finished in eighth. Also an editiorialzing issue with "however" for Colorado. On a different note, the additional sentence about Jones's comment of Kraus's behaviour at Meridian doesn't seem netural or relevant to his specific article. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * Almost there. The racing reference citation that supports the eighth place finish would need to be beside the Sporting News reference, as Racing reference doesn't have the collision. also "Kraus' truck " -> "Kraus's truck" for the Las Vegas race. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅
 * --Bcschneider53 (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

 * again a similar issue with "but Deegan collided with him on the final lap," per WP:SYNTH and editorializing. I know these parts are difficult. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * "where he led 100 laps after racing Jagger Jones for the victory throughout the event and spinning him late in the race" - I don't understand what you mean "spinning him". If you mean Kraus's collision sent Jones spinning, then yes. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Changed to "colliding with him late in the race, spinning Jones out." --Bcschneider53 (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)✅

 * Personal life done
 * Motorsport results done

--MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Will check the rest tomorrow. So far, most of the issues has been resolved in the first pass through with a few little bits here and there addressed in the second look through. In regards to the lead, I'll leave it for last. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

As of today, there's only two points left to address: the lead with full time/part time and the "but Deegan collided with him on the final lap," editorializing part. I'm willing to keep it open an extra day. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅? Did my best at addressing each, feel free to let me know if anything else needs to be fixed, or to be bold and do it yourself. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks good! The only thing I spot is ref #11 needed to be moved to the end of the sentence (" his first combination race between the K&N Pro Series East and West."). But I don't think that's major enough to hold up this review. I'll pass this review as the criteria has been fulfilled. Well done! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

title: Talk:Derek Kraus/GA1


text:
The Abduction of the Sabine Women (1954 film)

The Abduction of the Sabine Women (Der Raub der Sabinerinnen) is a 1954 West German musical comedy film directed by Kurt Hoffmann and starring Gustav Knuth, Fita Benkhoff and Paul Hörbiger.

The film's sets were designed by the art directors Hermann Warm, Erich Grave and Paul Markwitz. It was shot at the Spandau Studios in Berlin and on location in Bavaria.

Cast

 * Gustav Knuth as Emanuel Striese
 * Fita Benkhoff as Frau Striese
 * Paul Hörbiger as Professor Martin Gollwitz
 * Loni Heuser as Frau Friederike Gollwitz
 * Anneliese Kaplan as Renate Gollwitz
 * Bully Buhlan as Charly Gross
 * Ernst Waldow as Emil Gross
 * Willi Rose as mayor
 * Ruth Stephan as Maid Rosa
 * Wolfgang Müller as Friedrich
 * Edith Hancke as Fräulein Müller-Muthesius
 * Hans Stiebner as Perchtramer
 * Jakob Tiedtke as Chief baker
 * Herbert Weissbach as Professor of Biology
 * Margitta Sonke as Iphigenie Striese
 * Norbert Steinkrauß as Othello Striese
 * Wolfgang Condrus as Hamlet Striese
 * Ekkehard Lau as Torquato Striese
 * Friedrich Domin as Dichter
 * Wolfgang Jansen
 * Egon Vogel


text:
Obraztsovka

Obraztsovka (Образцовка) is a rural locality (a settlement) in Srostinsky Selsoviet, Biysky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 147 as of 2013. There are 3 streets.

Geography
Obraztsovka is located 45 km southeast of Biysk (the district's administrative centre) by road. Beryozovka is the nearest rural locality.

title: Obraztsovka


text:
Category:Wikipedians interested in Chinese martial arts

This user category contains the user page links of Wikipedians who are interested in Chinese martial arts.
 * For Wikipedians who practice Chinese martial arts, see Category:Wikipedian Chinese martial artists.

To add your user page to this user category, place the following Wikitext on your user page.


text:
Indonesian

This Wikibook begins with an introduction to the language and a series of lessons.

You may also wish to browse further down this contents page for other useful pages, including Kosa kata (vocabulary), Alat-alat pembelajaran (Tools for learning) and other resources.

Perkenalan (Introduction)

 * 1) Isi Contents
 * 2) Halaman Depan Frontpage
 * 3) Mengapa belajar bahasa Indonesia Why learn Indonesian
 * 4) Bagaimana cara memakai buku Wiki Indonesia ini How to use this Indonesian Wikibook

Dasar (Basic)
This section describes the basics of the Indonesian language. Mostly it discusses the most basic structure of the language. What you'll learn here will be clarified further in the later sections.

Huruf-Huruf Indonesian Alphabet Sapaan Greetings Ini, Itu This, That Kata Ganti Pronouns Kalimat Sederhana Simple Sentences Angka-Angka Numbers Kata Depan Prepositions

Pemula (Beginner)
This section will expand your vocabulary and grammar building on the sentence structures explained in the basic lessons. Memperkenalkan Diri Introducing Yourself

Keluargaku My Family

Rumahku My Home

Di Sekolah At School

Jam Berapa Sekarang? What Time is it?

Ke Pasar To the Market

Pelangi Rainbow

Selamat Ulang Tahun Happy Birthday!

Sakit Getting Sick

Pergi ke Bali Going to Bali

Mau ke mana? Where are you going?

Ahli (Expert)
Learn some cultural background of the Indonesian language and further improve your vocabulary using the grammar you've learned so far.

Aku dan kamu Me and you

Bahasa Oke Slang language

Alat-alat pembelajaran (Tools for learning)

 * /Essential words and easy words/
 * Menambah kosa kata dengan asosiasi kata Adding vocabulary with word association - this page may be useful from beginners to advanced stages.
 * Lagu anak-anak Children's songs can help with learning basic language.
 * Perkecualian dalam pengucapan Exceptions to pronunciation rules
 * /Tongue Twister/

Hal-hal menarik (interesting stuff)

 * English word rooted from Indonesian:
 * Durian = Duri (thorn)+ an (grammar) = Object with thorn
 * Orangutan = Orang Hutan = Forest person
 * Lahar = debris flow of pyroclastic material
 * Rattan = rotan
 * Amok = amuk

Latihan (Exercises)
Under construction

Tata Bahasa (Grammar)

 * 1) Kata Sifat Adjectives
 * 2) Kata Kerja Verbs
 * 3) Kata Keterangan Adverb
 * 4) Kata Benda Noun
 * 5) Kata Ganti Pronouns
 * 6) Kata Depan Prepositions
 * 7) Kata Pengubah Waktu Tenses
 * 8) Konjugasi / Pembentukan kata Conjugation / Word forming
 * 9) Kata Jender Gender
 * 10) Kata Negasi Negation
 * 11) Kalimat Sentences
 * 12) Pengubah waktu Tenses

Kosa Kata (Vocabulary)

 * Kata-kata Penting Important Phrases
 * Angka Numbers
 * Kata Pembilang Quantification Words (e.g. many, few)
 * Kata Tanya Question Words (e.g. what, where)
 * Kata Penghubung Conjunctions (e.g. and, but)

Lihat Juga (See Also)

 * Indonesian Reader – another Wikibook for learning Indonesian, focusing on the vocabulary, and exposure to usage. Incomplete.
 * Indonesian language at Wikipedia
 * Indonesian Slang Language article at Wikipedia: for advanced speakers
 * BukuWiki - WikiBooks in Indonesian language (monolingual)

Kamus (Dictionary)
Online dictionary links:

 * 1) www.kamus.net - A user-friendly bilingual translation database which is still maturing itself and continuously adding new entries
 * 2) www.sederet.com -  A Large English-Indonesian Online Dictionary
 * 3) Kamus Indonesia -English - UGM University

Situs-situs untuk belajar bahasa Indonesia (Sites for learning Indonesian)

 * Online Indonesian Courses from University of Hawaii (with downloadable materials)
 * Bintang Bahasa - An extensive collection of audio samples, lessons and exercises for beginners to advanced advanced learners.
 * Learning Indonesian Podcast - A free audio lesson podcast with native Indonesian and English speaking instructors updated twice a week.
 * SEAsite – Indonesia home – from the Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University.
 * Learn Indonesian at Free Language - Free resources for learning Bahasa Indonesia.

Tentang Buku Ini (About this Book)

 * 1) Pengarang Authors

Enseignement de l'indonésien Bahasa Indonesia Indonezyjski Мова людства/Індонезійська 印度尼西亚语 인도네시아어

title: Indonesian


text:
Citizenship (Armed Forces) Act 2014

The Citizenship (Armed Forces) Act 2014 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that received Royal Assent on 13 March 2014 after being introduced on 19 June 2013. The bill amended the British Nationality Act 1981 in such a way as to not disadvantage foreign and Commonwealth members of the British Armed Forces when applying for naturalisation as British citizens.

title: Citizenship (Armed Forces) Act 2014


text:
Ryan Seaton

Ryan Seaton may refer to:

 * Ryan Seaton (singer) (born 1979), gospel singer
 * Ryan Seaton (sailor), Northern Ireland-born sailor who competed at the 2012 Olympics
 * Ryan Seaton, member of the band Callers

title: Ryan Seaton


text:
Top-rated United States television programs of 1955–56

This table displays the top-rated primetime television series of the 1955–56 season as measured by Nielsen Media Research.


text:
Template:2018 NL West standings/doc

Usage
This is a template that was created to easily update every article with the 2018 MLB National League West standings. To use the update on any article, insert:

To highlight the San Francisco Giants, insert:

To use a different team, just replace the name of the team in the highlight parameter.

title: Template:2018 NL West standings/doc


text:
David Taylor (Washington politician)

David Vincent Taylor (born February 17, 1972) is an American politician of the Republican Party. He was a member of the Washington House of Representatives, representing the 15th district.

Awards

 * 2014 Guardians of Small Business award. Presented by NFIB.

title: David Taylor (Washington politician)


text:
Talk:Pawnee, Illinois

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Pawnee, Illinois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

title: Talk:Pawnee, Illinois


text:
Talk:Sussan

Source for future article expansion
Here's an article from 1985 which could be used to expand this article. Note that the chain's establishment is listed in this article as commencing in 1942. It may be that the Gandels' store changed its name to Sussan at that time. https://www.newspapers.com/clip/65379849/for-spring-article-about-sussan-1985/ --Danimations (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Another one here: https://www.afr.com/companies/mr-sussan-keeps-on-adding-this-to-that-19940418-kat0h ...albeit behind a paywall. --Danimations (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Sussan


text:
School:Plant sciences

Welcome to ! Part of Life Sciences

Note: Material from Wikibooks was imported to Portal:Plant Sciences. Please coordinate that page with this page.

Plant Sciences covers a wide range of scientific disciplines that study the structure, growth, reproduction, metabolism, development, diseases, ecology, and evolution of plants. The School of Plant Sciences works closely with the Wikiversity School of Agriculture.

Active participants
Are you knowledgable in this topic? Would you like to create instruction material and help out with people studying this topic? Sign up to become an advisor — all it takes is adding your username to this list!

 * SB_Johnny | talk: Happy to help, my background is in horticulture and agriculture.

 * Charley Quinton | talk: I am bioneer working on urban planning initiatives geared toward sustainability and ecoscience. I am particularly interested in urban agriculture, aquaculture, plant and soil science, biophysics, urban microtransport systems – thus a new eco-logistical model for developing and re-develping both urban and rural economies.

 * Since 25 October 2013 with contributions to Botany --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 21:43, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Inactive participants

 * alettaka | talk: I have studied plant breeding and molecular plant virology, and am willing to help.

 * sonicbiology | talk: I am interested in plantlore, especially the medicinal uses of plants. My knowledge base includes a few medicinal plants of Guatemala and the US, a few food plants of the US, and a little botany, as well as a summer of experience on a natural farm.
 * -User:Wikicollege creator DS07 this is really Pika64eBay! This is just a pseudenoym!
 * User:Pika64eBay Hey yo! I'm back! I am intrested very much canrivorous plants (examples: Venus's Fly Trap, Sundew)
 * Trinity507 - my field of interest/some knowledge is ethnobotany, but I'd like to learn more about plants in general. I also do a lot of "practical horticulture", a.k.a. gardening. :-) I founded the ethnobotany department in the School of Ethnology. It's an interdisciplinary subject so I'll link a lot of the resources here.

School news

 * 17 August 2006 - School founded!
 * 20 September 2006 - Ethnobotany resource started!
 * 6 October 2006 - Plantlore lecture started!
 * 21 December 2006 - Plant identification quiz-making resource started!
 * 28 February 2007 - Botany lecture started!
 * 11 April 2007 - Aquaculture resource started!
 * 12 May 2007 - Forestry resource started!
 * 3 April 2008 - Horticulture learning project started!
 * 31 October 2008 - Plant tissue culture resource started!
 * 13 January 2009 - Plant fossil structure and preservation resource started!
 * 13 July 2010 - Plant microtechnique resource started!
 * 17 October 2011 - Plant propagation lecture started!
 * 18 November 2011 - Plant growth promoting bacteria lecture started!
 * 3 October 2012 - Hydroculture lecture started!
 * 28 October 2012 - Palynology lecture started!
 * 21 April 2013 - Phosphate biochemistry lecture started!
 * 22 November 2013 - Agriculture lecture started!
 * 20 June 2015 - Rainwater harvesting resource started!
 * 17 December 2015 - Agronomy lecture started!
 * 19 September 2016 - Plant movements lecture started!
 * 12 December 2016 - Plant Nutrition learning project started!

Divisions and Departments
Divisions and Departments of the School exist on pages in "portal" namespace. Start the name of departments with the "Portal:" prefix; departments reside in the Portal: namespace. Departments and divisions link to learning materials and learning projects. Divisions can link subdivisions or to departments. For more information on schools, divisions and departments look at the Naming Conventions. Be bold! Start writing resources! Make a link to the name of the resource (resources are independent pages) and start writing! Be sure to include a link too!
 * Medicinal plants & wild foods
 * Paleontology resources
 * Ethnobotany research projects

Research projects

 * Wikiversity's oldest (first) research project: the Bloom Clock
 * A new project looking for participants: the Ethnobotanical research project

Resources
Know any good resources for scholars of this topic? Add them here!

 * Agriculture/Lectures
 * Biochemistry/Lectures
 * Biology/Lectures
 * Botany/Lectures
 * DNA/Lectures
 * Earth sciences
 * Ecology/Lectures
 * Eukaryotes/Lectures
 * Genetics/Lectures
 * Medicine/Lectures
 * Paleontology/Lectures
 * Plant sciences/Lectures

Things you can do!

 * Clean up Draft:Agriculture and move it to become a subpage of a supporting main page learning project.
 * Clean up Draft:Biology and move it to become a subpage of a supporting main page learning project.
 * Clean up Draft:Eukaryotes and move it to become a subpage of a supporting main page learning project.
 * Clean up Draft:Genetics and move it to become a subpage of a supporting main page learning project.
 * Clean up Draft:Heredity and move it to become a subpage of a supporting main page learning project.

title: School:Plant sciences


text:
CACS/Glossary/MPLS

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) (Networking) is a system of protocols that uses abbreviated routing information based on the devices and connections of a single Internet Service Provider (ISP). These abbreviated codes are then attached to an IP message to improve the speed and efficiency of internally routed messages. The protocols and their overall use are documented by the IETF in RFC3031.

title: CACS/Glossary/MPLS


text:
Talk:Lip balm

Holly Philips
Who exactly is this person? And what is her connection to Lip balm? I think we should be told. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Miscellaneous discussion 2006-2007
The "addiction cure" section does not belong here. The writing is very opinionated, with terms like "back to normal" and "don't lick your lips or use lip balm." Basically, it's more of that ridiculous anti-lip balm bullshit. Still, the oils-from-forehead-to-lips-using-knuckles bit is both hilarious and disgusting... and rather interesting. Is this what people who are anti-lip balm often do? If so, it deserves a mention. But either way, it must be rewritten because it is currently too opionated.
 * You find it more disgusting to apply one's own skin oil to the lips than to cover them with a petroleum derivative? That's interesting. Perhaps the topic could be covered if there are sources which discuss it. Jonathunder 17:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not bullshit, believe it or not my girlfriend is addicted to the stuff. I find it a bit ridiculous how often she thinks she needs to use it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 08:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

Could someone make it so that 'lip salve' directs here? Thats what I know it as, and I'm sure many other people do.

I suffer from this addiction myself... I carry lip balm with me 24/7. But my lips really do dry fast. I think I just have dry lips/skin. --Furwolf 05:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I added a link to Bag Balm. Although it was originally formulated for cows, it seems like it belons under li balm since its page says it is sold in drugstores and is commonly used as a balm. malatesta 22:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've seen it used on skin, fairly commonly, but is it really widely used on the lips? Would you call it a lip product? Jonathunder 23:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm also addicted to lip balm.... I've heard that if you use it too much your lips don't produce their own moisture anymore, and judging by my own I think that's true. Going to try to go cold turkey--will let you all know how it goes. :P Sten for the win 00:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I think perhaps some distinction needs to be made between addiction and frequent use. I mean, people aren't traumatized when they stop using it, are they? Yes, they get drier lips - which may possibly be why they *started* using lip balm in the first place. These people may also be "addicted" to moisturizer in the same way. Or hair conditioner. But they don't wind up hospitalized or in need of counselling, right? Let's save terms like "addiction" for substances that really are addictive. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Lip Balm Anonymous link relevant?
Anyone object to the link to lipbalmanonymous.com being put back into the article as an External Link? The site is mentioned but unlinked in the article. (disclosure: I own the site).Kevin Crossman 22:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

NN-site - I'd consider it spam and I'm not sure the inline mention is suitable either - if I find the time I'll have a go cleaning this article up in the morning and the mention will more than likely vanish at that point. --Fredrick day 22:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Lip Balm's Addictive Ingredient
Many lip balm formulations contain ethyl alcohol-- a known addictive substance. For example, there is alcohol in certain Blistex products.

Interestingly, the Blistex website ("The Myth of Lip Balm") quotes this patently false statement: Excerpted from Columbia University's Go Ask Alice Web Site, December 20, 1996: There is no ingredient in any of the lip balms/moisturizers on the market that is physically addictive." Ridesbikes 05:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

lol. There's no addictive ingredient. But, people do become addicted to it because over time the body stops producing the normal oils on the lips, therefore, people feel a need to continuously use it to avoid the discomfort caused by this depletion.

 * I have found some info about Lip Balm's Addictive nature . Do check Does Chapstick addiction really exist? -- Goodpupil (talk) 08:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Not a reliable source. . . Mean as custard (talk) 08:11, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

petroleum jelly
What is petroleum jelly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Earwax
I have removed the mention of it as originally being made from earwax. Please see discussion at Talk:Earwax. -- Fyslee (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I've removed this information again. As mentioned on the earwax talk page, this doesn't appear to be a reliable source, and it's also contradicted by another about.com article: "Dr. C. D. Fleet, a physician from Lynchburg, Virginia, invented Chapstick or lip balm in the early 1880s." Even if some people used earwax on their lips, it'd be a stretch to call it "lip balm".

The claim that "the flavor left something to be desired" is subjective, and the claim that earwax use is becoming popular isn't even in the article. --Klubbit (talk) 07:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Lip balm conspiracy theory
I thought I'd best link this since I found it. http://www.de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=107 According to that link, lipbalm is designed to cause chapped lips, to encourage you to use more, and end up in some sort of addiction cycle. -OOPSIE- (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

History
I came to this page looking for a history of lip balm. Obviously, since I was looking for it, I can't create the section. Would anyone who knows about this topic care to enlighten the rest of us? —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing C1
— Assignment last updated by Yusra nasir9 (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:Lip balm


text:
Austria at the 2019 World Athletics Championships

Austria competed at the 2019 World Athletics Championships in Doha, Qatar, from 27 September to 6 October 2019. Austria was represented by four athletes.

Men

 * Track and road events

 * Field events

Women

 * Track and road events
 * Field events
 * Combined events – Heptathlon


text:
piloti

Etymology
From, from. Attested from the 17th century.

Noun

 * 1)  One of the columns, pillars, or stilts that lift a building above ground or water.

Translations

 * Finnish:
 * French:
 * Japanese: ピロティ
 * Polish: podparcie nad wodą
 * Portuguese:

title: piloti


text:
Talk:Pauline Oliveros

MizRiz3133 (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Citation
Added citation link to liner note essay, and for full disclosure I work for the non-profit educational resource linked to.Ribbonabaca (talk) 15:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

"Deep Listening"
The Deep Listening section uses this phrase six times without actually explaining what it means or what it entails. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It is the musicological equivalent of the feminist 'close reading' horsefeathers.

 * Oliveros was yet another of contemporary art music's prestidigitators whose works seem to be profound and ground-breaking but dissolve quickly into pretentiousness and fairy dust when the cold wind of common sense blows.

 * 'Deep listening' is a way of persuading audiences, mostly distractible young Americans, to pay attention and perhaps descry something in the sonic landscape Oliveros and her colleagues confect, from random clicks and squeaks and farts, that just isn't there.

 * I wrote a paper on her work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:5BA:F77E:2353:3DFA (talk) 02:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pauline Oliveros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080127141904/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1589/is_n760/ai_20620450 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1589/is_n760/ai_20620450

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Sourcecheck).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pauline Oliveros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090530145802/http://paulineoliveros.us/site/node/47 to http://paulineoliveros.us/site/node/47
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125220424/http://paulineoliveros.us/site/node/15 to http://paulineoliveros.us/site/node/15
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141026030437/http://player.listenlive.co/24971/en/artist/97_MN0000522041/biography to http://player.listenlive.co/24971/en/artist/97_MN0000522041/biography
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050220122500/http://artofthestates.org/cgi-bin/composer.pl?comp=92 to http://artofthestates.org/cgi-bin/composer.pl?comp=92

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Pauline Oliveros


text:
Talk:Pedro Borbón Jr.

The Number of Teams he Played on.
He played for five teams, not four. — Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

title: Talk:Pedro Borbón Jr.