text:
Filmmaking Basics/Thumbnail Storyboard/Examples/Example 1

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="background-color: BlanchedAlmond; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px; height: 200px;"|

This is an example Thumbnail Storyboard

 * Start with a wide shot
 * In this example, we start with a wide shot from behind the people.. In this view we see the two people looking at the movie poster on the wall.  Then we dolly in to get a better view of the movie poster.

 * style="width: 370px; background-color: #ffffdd; border: 1px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="3" |

The Thumbnail Storyboards for "Seduced by the Dark Side"
EXTERIOR - The local movie theater - NIGHT

Fade In Dolly In

(1) The Young Person and Old Person stand looking at the movie poster outside the theater.

 * I want to start with an establishing shot which shows two people looking at the poster on the side wall of a local cinema. After two seconds of street sounds, I want to start the "Star Wars" musical theme as the poster becomes larger in the frame as the camera dollies in. I want to stretch this out as much as possible so once the camera is close enough to the poster to start the music for the poster, I want the camera to slow down and move steadily inward at the music plays for a full five seconds.

 * Note: This is a wide angle shot to give the feeling of being far apart. The camera slowly dollies in. (Example: a 24mm lens in 35mm still camera equivalents)

Pedestal Down

(2) Young Person: "That was a great movie..."

 * I want the young person to begin talking before the audience even sees the young person's face.

Dolly Left

(3) Young Person (continued): "but I do not understand one thing."

 * After the camera dollies in and it dollies left (trucks left), I want to see the face of the boy as he turns toward the old person (and toward the camera.)

Cut To

(4) Old Person: "What's that?"

 * I want to use a wide angle shot to emphasize the emotional distance between the two characters.

Cut To

(5) Young Person: "How can anyone be seduced by the Dark Side?"

 * I still want to use a wide angle shot but not as wide as before. I still want the audience to feel that the two people are emotionally very far apart.

Cut To

(6) The old person thinks for a while.

 * Now I want to become more emotionally involved with the old person. Therefore, I will begin using a mild telephoto lens.  I want to pause for three seconds as "thinking music" plays.  This will build tension.

(7) Old Person: "What computer do you have at home?"

 * I want to use a mild telephoto (85 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent)

Cut To

(8) Young Person (eagerly): "A Macintosh!"

 * I want to use a mild telephoto (85 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent). Just enough to feel some warmth to the scene but not too much.

 * For music, I just want a single musical note in the background, possibly angelic voices.

Cut To

(9) Old Person: "But what computer does your father use at work?"

 * Now I want to use a telephoto lens to give a warm and close feeling (135 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent)

 * Before the man speaks, I want about 2 seconds of music to indicate that he knows what he is doing.

Cut To

(10) The young person thinks for a moment.

 * I want to use a portrait telephoto to give a warm and close feeling (135 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent)

 * I want to stretch this out as long as possible. Therefore, I want five seconds of "Serious Thinking Music" to fill this gap in the dialog.

(11) Young Person (amazed and excited): "Seduced by the Dark Side!"

 * I want to use a portrait telephoto to give a warm and close feeling (135 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent)

 * To emphasize this, once the young person says this, I want a (musical) cord from the "Star Wars" theme.

Cut To

(12) The Old Person smiles.

 * Now I want to use portrait telephoto lense to give a warm and close feeling (135 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent). Again, I want to stretch this out as long as possible so I want really powerful music here which is very warm and happy.

Cut To

(13) Old Person and the Young Person walk toward home together.

 * I want to use a portrait telephoto to give a warm and close feeling (135 mm lens in 35 mm film camera equivalent). This is shot full frame of just the old person and the young person. The rest is a matte painting.  The dolly out shot will be done simply by compositing this into the matte painting and zooming out. Since the actual movie set is just a blank wall and a movie poster, everything else is a matte painting.  Threrefore, I can use a 3D animated matte painting with characters from the Star Wars movie walking around the streets in front of the movie cinema.  And of course, I want great music to associate the scene with the space port in Star Wars.

(14) Fade to Black.

The End

Point Of Reference:
This scene will be filmed outside the line. (Away from the poster = In the pink area). Therefore, the camera will never cross the line. The Floor Plan for the Movie
 * }
 * }
 * }

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="5" style="width: 99%; background-color: inherit; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto"
 * style="width: 50%; background-color: Cornsilk; border: 1px solid #777777; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" ,!--rowspan="2"--> |

The Next Page [[Image:Crystal Clear action loopnone.png|32px]]

 * Look at the other examples by going to the index at the top of this page.

 * Or continue this lesson at What software for thumbnail storyboards? to learn how to get started storyboarding.

 * }


text:
Mariam Metwally (volleyball)

Mariam Metwally (born May 1, 1999) is an Egyptian female volleyball player, a member of the Egypt women's national volleyball team. She started playing volleyball in Al Ahly Women's Volleyball since she was 7 years old. Mariam joined the Egyptian national team at the age of 16 in 2015 FIVB Volleyball Girls' U18 World Championship in Peru

Club career
Metwally is playing for Al Ahly Volleyball Club since she was 7 years old. She participated for the first time with the senior team of the club in 2015 Women's African Clubs Championship (volleyball) held in Egypt. Al Ahly won in the 1st place and Mariam MVP Honors and Best Blocker.

Individual

 * Women's African Clubs Championship (volleyball), 2015 Most Valuable Player and Best Blocker
 * Women's Arab volleyball clubs championship 2019, Best Blocker

Clubs

 * CAVB Championship 2016 – Simple cup icon.svg Champion, with Al Ahly
 * CAVB Championship 2015 – Simple cup icon.svg Champion, with Al Ahly
 * Women's Arab volleyball clubs championship 2015 – Simple cup icon.svg Champion, with Al Ahly
 * Women's Arab volleyball clubs championship 2016 – Simple cup icon.svg Champion, with Al Ahly
 * CAVB Championship 2018 – Simple cup icon.svg Champion, with Al Ahly
 * CAVB Championship 2019 – Simple cup icon.svg Champion, with Al Ahly
 * Women's Arab volleyball clubs championship 2019 – [[File:Med 2.png]] Silver medal, with Al Ahly

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: Mariam Metwally (volleyball)


text:
Web Design/Lists and Tables

While HTML is primarily concerned with semantic formatting of the content of a document, and less concerned with its style, there are situations where the meaning of some text is denoted by its presentation. Tables are widely used to organize the text visually on the screen, showing a relationship of some kind and demonstrating the meaning of the text. This activity will:

 * Familiarize you with tables and lists in html.

It will be assumed you:

 * Can identify HTML elements, attributes and their values.

This activity is not designed to:

 * Give a comprehensive list of elements, attributes or their accepted values.
 * Discuss document type, the meta element, or comments.

Lists
HTML allows you to easily set apart lists from the rest of your content with one of three different list types: Unordered (bulleted), ordered (numbered) and definition lists. Different kinds of lists can be nested to form an outline.

Unordered List
The unordered, or bulleted, list is formed using two elements. The list itself is defined using an unordered list element, and each item is marked using a list item element:  Item Item Item
 * Item
 * Item
 * Item

Ordered List
The ordered, or numbered, list is formed similarly to the unordered list using an ordered list element and the list item element from before. The ordered list element also has a handy start attribute that allows you to set a starting number other than 1.  Item Item Item
 * 1) Item
 * 2) Item
 * 3) Item

Definition List
The definition list is a slight departure from the two. While it uses an opening and closing definition list element similarly, it has two different elements for the items in the list. The first is the term element for the definition list and the second is the definition element for the definition list.

Item

The item's definition.

Item

The item's definition.

 * Item : The item's definition.
 * Item : The item's definition.

Try it!
Let's try making this simple outline using nested lists. Try to duplicate these results without peeking at my source below.

Get mail.
Shop for office supplies.

Printer paper.
Toner.

Deliver mail and supplies.

Here is one way to reproduce this list:
Get mail.

Shop for office supplies.

Printer paper.

Toner.

Deliver mail and supplies.

Tables
In HTML tables are set up similarly to lists, but are rendered differently and can be confusing early on. Tables are built using a number of elements. The table is first defined by the table element, then each row is defined by a table row element, and finally each cell within each row is defined by a table cell. There are additional elements that can be used to define tables, but some are not fully supported.

Try it!
Open up your text editor and type the above table example. Save it as 'table.html' and open it in your web browser.

A table generally 'shrinks' to fit its contents, but the width attribute allows you to specify either a number of pixels or a percentage of the are the table is in as the width. Save and refresh your browser. You should notice several things. The table takes up 80% of the page in width, the border is noticeably thick and has a 3D beveled appearance, and the background of the table is yellow. The background color attribute will accept either hex values or the name of some colors. To finish this activity, make it a three by three table and give the center-most cell a green background.

And this is how I did it: Table Example

title: Web Design/Lists and Tables


text:
Statics

Part of the Division of Applied Mechanics and the School of Engineering

Content summary
The study of Statics is the fundamental examination of the effects of forces upon objects. Often referred to as the primary discipline within the field of Engineering Mechanics, statics explores the behavior of bodies that are at rest or move at a constant velocity. Dynamics is the subsequent study of bodies moving at a variable velocity (accelerating or decelerating).

Mathematics

 * Algebra
 * Trigonometry
 * Calculus

Physics

 * Introduction to physics
 * Classical Mechanics

Texts

 * Statics

Statics Lessons

 * Free Body Diagrams
 * Force Systems
 * Force Equilibrium
 * Structures
 * Beams
 * Friction

Preliminary Study guide

 * 1) Wikipedia article:Statics
 * 2) Wikipedia article:Force
 * 3) Wikipedia article:Particle
 * 4) Wikipedia article:Rigid Body
 * 5) Wikipedia article:Vector
 * 6) Wikipedia article:Newton's laws
 * 7) Wikipedia article:Units
 * 8) Wikipedia article:Free Body Diagram

Readings

 * Peruse the appropriate sections of Statics

Activities

 * Pass the "Concept Assesment Tool for Statics" Test; Carnegie Mellon
 * Assignment 1: /Introduction to Statical Principles and Methods for Solving/

Extra credit
Solve the following: A ladder stands on a rough horizontal floor and against a "perfectly" smooth vertical wall. The ladder makes 30° with the vertical. A man weighing 209.4 lb stands halfway up the ladder. Assuming the ladder does not slip on the floor, find:
 * 1) The reaction between ladder and wall.
 * 2) The reaction and magnitude of the reaction of the floor on the ladder.

Take g=9.8m/s^2 & 209.439 pounds = 95 kg

title: Statics


text:
ambasada

Etymology
.

Noun

 * 1) embassy
 * 2) embassy
 * 1) embassy

Etymology
, ultimately from, from , from.

Noun

 * 1) embassy organization representing a foreign state

Etymology
,  ultimately from, which see for more. .

Noun

 * 1) embassy
 * 2) embassy
 * 3) embassy
 * 4)  embassy

Noun

 * 1) embassy (official residence; organization)

title: ambasada


text:
Talk:Semyonov's Rebellion

Regarding drafts and reviews
I went ahead and translated this article as requested on the WikiProject Russia page, under requested articles. It was shortly made into a draft due to a lack of sources. Obviously, when translating an article it's helpful to translate the sources as well. However, is there something I should do to prevent translations of already-approved articles from being converted into drafts, which then adds to the review backlog? Or is that a good thing? Should I request a review from the beginning? Also, is there a way I should let the WikiProject community know that I went ahead and made an article? I kept the old article page as a redirect to this page, so anyone can see that something was made, but that page was also marked as a candidate for Speedy Removal, so I'm not sure that that was the right move. Help/feedback appreciated, as always. Ph03n1x77 (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

title: Talk:Semyonov's Rebellion


text:
User:Dr jkl~enwikiversity

Name: Julian Keith Loren

I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2002.

I am one of the founders of the The MuGeum Project.

Fields of interest include:

Traditions of Visual Representation (which I call "Ethnoartology") and their evolution, migration, and fusion over time.

Military History (Particularly large-scale invasions and religious wars).

The Decline of Polytheism and Early Development of Monotheistic Cults.

title: User:Dr jkl~enwikiversity


text:
Electronics/Magnetic Field

Magnetic Field: B
A magnetic field is generated due to:
 * 1) Magnetic moment.
 * 2) Moving charge.

 * Magnets have two poles, a north and a south.
 * Like poles repel, unlike poles attract.

 * Magnets will try to align their poles.

 * North and south pole: pole of earth is reversed; geographic north is magnetic south and vice versa.

 * Polarity: the alignment of the magnetic field.
 * Magnetic monopole: the idea that a single independent pole can exist

 * Pauli-exclusion principle: Two electrons cannot occupy the same state.

 * Spin: quantum property of electrons, which gives them intrinsic angular momentum. This means, they act as if they were perpetually spinning around their own axis.

 * Permanent dipoles: These occur when 2 atoms in a molecule have substantially different electronegativity – one atom attracts electrons more than another becoming more negative, while the other atom becomes more positive. See dipole-dipole attractions.

 * Instantaneous dipoles: These occur due to chance when electrons happen to be more concentrated in one place than another in a molecule, creating a temporary dipole. See Instantaneous dipole attraction.

 * Induced dipoles: These occur when one molecule with a permanent dipole repels another molecule's electrons, "inducing" a dipole moment in that molecule. See induced-dipole attraction.

 * magnetic dipole: Analogous to electric dipole. It refers to a magnetic field that looks as if it came from a pair of north and south monopoles, infinitesimally close together.

An object with a magnetic moment creates an magnetic dipole
 * magnetic moment (u): The tendency of an object to align itself with a magnetic field. This alignment creates a PE (U). A current carrying loop has a magnetic moment. Electrons and many nuclei have intrinsic magnetic moments due to their quantum spin. The electrons generally come in pairs, whose intrinsic magnetic moments cancel, but they may still produce a magnetic dipole because they rotate (have orbital angular momentum), or produce a magnetic quadropole because of incomplete cancellation. These intrinsic magnetic moments create some of the macroscopic effects of magnetism, such as Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.

 * intrinsic magnetic moment: The moment which a thing has. Due to intrinsic angular momentum.

$$F = qV x B$$

Permeability: μ

 * Permeability: (μ) How much a material becomes magnetized in response to a magnetic field.

 * Permeability of vacuum: (μ0): 4π × 10-7 N·A-2 (exactly).

 * Relative Permeability: (μr) Permeability of materials compared to that of the vacuum.

 * $$ \mu_r = {\mu \over \mu_o} $$

 * Absolute magnetic permeability (μ): = μ0(1 + χ). henry / meter.

If χ is positive the magnetic field increase and the material is paramagnetic and if χ is negative the magnetic field decreases and the material is diamagnetic.
 * Magnetic susceptibility (χ): the fractional part of the relative permeability.

\chi = \frac {M} {H}, $$

Paramagnetism
Paramagnetism: (with magnetism) tendency of a magnetic dipoles to align itself with an external magnetic field due to the effects of spin. By aligning themselves the dipoles strengthen the external magnetic field. (relative magnetic permeability > 1, magnetic susceptibility 10-3 to 10-5) When the magnetic field is removed thermal motion will quickly disrupt magnetic alignment. Paramagnetism acts on each dipole of an atom separately with no interactions between the dipoles. Behaves like a bar magnet when subject to an external magnetic field.

$$M = C {B \over T}$$

M magnetisation, B magnetic flux, T is absolute temperature (Kelvin), and C is a material-specific Curie constant. Increasing the magnetic field makes paramagnetic materials more magnetic, decreasing the temperature reverses this. Curie's is accurate when saturation is low and stops working as the material becomes saturated.

Diamagnetism

 * Diamagnetism: (against magnetism) The orbital motion of electrons forms a microscopic current loop that has a magnetic dipole moment. A purely diamagnetic material is a superconductor, which is a phase transition that has no magnetic field and no resistance.

 * Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect: the exclusion of a magnetic field from the inside of a superconductor. Also called perfect diamagnetism.

 * cooper pairs: When electrons of opposite spin become paired due to low energy. Like atoms bonding. Being in a cooper pair binds electrons together so they are not scattered from the ions in the material. This causes the resistance of the material to become zero.

 * High-temperature superconductivity: superconductivity at temperatures high enough to use liquid nitrogen rather than liquid helium as a coolant.(Important because liquid nitrogen is cheap and easy to obtain)

 * superfluidity: When atoms are cooper paired due to spin. Turns a solid into a gas. A state of matter characterized by the complete absence of viscosity. Thus superfluids, placed in a closed loop, can flow endlessly without friction.

 * phonon: thermal energy in a solid. Takes the form of vibrations. As a solid gets cold it stops vibrating and forms cooper pairs. Responsible for electron pairing and electrical conductivity, how well a material conducts charge.

 * copper, bismuth

Ferromagnetism

 * magnetization: zero above Curie temperature.

 * spontaneous magnetization: the tendency of spins to align without an applied magnetic field.

 * Ferromagnetism: (iron magnetism) Phenomenon by which materials exhibit spontaneous magnetization. Most common and one of the strongest forms of magnetism. Found in bar magnets and permanent magnets. Magnetic moments are partially aligned in magnetic domains. Increasing temperature causes thermal fluctuations and destroys alignment. Above Curie temperature ferromagnetic domains melt away (no net spontaneous magnetization) if there is no external magnetic field, and the material become purely paramagnetic. The Pauli Exclusion principle causes magnetic dipoles to align in the same direction with lower energy known as exchange energy. Over distance dipoles repel each other. This is the principle behind magnetic domains. A Block Wall is the transition between magnetic regions. A strong magnet will align the domains.

 * iron, steel, nickel, cobalt, and some alloys and ceramics.

 * Curie temperature: Temperature at which a ferromagnetic material undergoes a phase transition and becomes paramagnetic. At this temperature magnetic susceptibility is theoretically infinite. Phase transition.

 * Curie point: Above which material becomes paramagnetic. When combined with ferromagnetism follows hysteresis curve with applied field. Used as temperature control in soldering irons.

 * Curie points: dysprosium -188 °C gadolinium 16 °C nickel 358 °C iron 770 °C cobalt 1131 °C

 * Antiferromagnetism: The spins of electrons align an a regular pattern.

 * Neel temperature: The temperature at which antiferromagnetic materials undergo a phase transition and become paramagnetic due to thermal energy.

 * spin glass: exhibits high magnetic frustration.

 * magnetic frustration: Its magnetic structure is disordered even at low temperatures.

Permanent Magnets

Ferromagnetic materials make up permanent magnets.

To understand how a permanent magnet is made and destroyed it is necessary to look at the microscopic structure of a magnetic material such as iron. A piece of iron is made up of lots and lots of tiny little magnets called domains. In unmagnetised iron these domains have their north poles pointing all over the place in a random way, but when the iron is put in a strong magnetic field the domains line up with the field. The iron becomes magnetised.

Once it has become magnetised, the magnet's own field is strong enough to keep itself magnetised even after it is removed from the external field.

Picture Hysteris Curve

Hysteris curve. heat destroys magnetism if the material is heated above its Curie point.

 * Remanence: (Bd, Mr) The amount of magnetism remaining after a magnetic field is removed. Less than the applied magnetic field.

 * Residual induction:

 * Retentivity: retains some residual magnetism.

 * Saturation: The maximum amount of alignment that can occur in a magnet due to a magnetic field. When the majority of dipoles in a material are aligned with an external magnetic field.

 * Coercivity: The strength of the magnetic field needed to reduce to magnet from saturation to zero.

 * Magnetic flux density: in tesla (T)

 * Magnetic field strength: Ampere / meter.

 * Compass: A small bar magnet that aligns itself with an external magnetic field. Talk about earth's magnetic field, how its south pole is our north pole, how it keeps switching and is weak.

 * Molecular Magnets:

 * hysteresis: when an external magnetic field is applied, the ferromagnet takes up some of the field

and becomes more aligned. When the field is removed the magnet retains some of the field and is magnetized.

 * hysteresis loop: when an alternating magnetic field is applied to a ferromagnetic material. The material is less magnetized than the magnetic field.

 * electrical hysteresis: occurs in ferroelectric material, where domains of polarisation contribute to the total polarisation. Polarisation is the electrical dipole moment (either C·m-2 or C·m).

 * electrical dipole moment:

Moving Charge

When a negatively charged particle such as an electron moves through space or a wire it generates a magnetic field that circles counterclockwise in a plane perpendicular to it. This is part of Ampere's law. For a positively charged particle the magnetic field is clockwise. The faster the charged particle moves the larger the magnetic field.

Inductance

Self inductance This is what happens when you turn on DC in an inductor.

 * 1) The voltage increases very rapidly ( in a matter of ms) as you turn on the switch.
 * 2) This causes a very rapidly changing current to flow.
 * 3) This current has an associated magnetic field which also changes very rapidly.
 * 4) The rapidly changing field induces an e.m.f. (Faraday’s Law) that tends to oppose the increase of current (Lenz’s Law). However it cannot stop it increasing completely, just slow it down.
 * 5) Once the current reaches it's maximum (determined by the voltage and the ordinary resistance of the wire) it ceases to change, the magnetic field becomes constant and the back EMF goes to zero.

All remains calm until you try to turn the thing off

 * 1) The field collapses very suddenly
 * 2) The changing magnetic field induces a back EMF which tries to oppose the collapse of the field (Lenz’s Law again)

For large coils the EMF can be huge, sparks can fly!

Isn't really an issue for DC though except when turning on and off. But for AC the current is varying all the time, so things never settle into a steady state. The higher the frequency, the faster things are changing and so the greater the inductance. I hope all this is reasonably clear now. Theresa knott 13:49, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Electromagnet
A magnetic hose that acts like a bar magnet. As the current increases the magnet becomes more repulsive to other magnets. Used as a switch for magnetic materials and to pick up magnetic material such as cars at scrapyards.

To make a good electromagnet we use a 'soft iron' core. Soft iron has the property of being easy to magnetise. It also loses its magnetism very easily once the electric current is turned off. Steel can also be used as the core of an electromagnet, but steel does not lose its magnetism once the electric current is turned off. It stays magnetised.

When a current is switched on, or off, it creates a changing magnetic field, which in turn creates voltages that oppose the current. This is the basis for inductance.

By coiling the wire up we can make a solenoid. The magnetic field of a solenoid looks like the field of an ordinary bar magnet.

A solenoíd makes a pretty weak bar magnet on its own but if a piece of iron is put inside the solenoid the field becomes much much stronger. Try the following experiment:

 * Wrap a piece of plastic coated wire around a pencil.Remove the pencil then connect to a power supply set at 1V DC current. sprinkle iron filings around thwe coil of wire. Put a plotting compass near the wire. Try to pick up a paper clip.
 * Wrap a piece of plastic coated wire around a large nail. Repeat all of the above experiments

You will find that the solenoid with the iron core is very much stronger than the one with the air core.

Q1) Why is it important to use plastic coated wire?

Mutual Inductance

 * induced current: magnetic field creates current.

 * eddy current: a current induced by electromagnetic waves.

Mutual inductance is just like inductance except that the magnetic field from the current in one solenoid is creating voltage in a different solenoid, as well as in itself.

 * transformer: Transformers and transformer design: Transformer Design

Toroid
Picture of a toroid

A toroid is a solenoid that wraps around on itself.

toroid: A donut shaped inductor where the magnetic fields stay contained within it. Has an air gap.

A Toroid is a doughnut-shaped object enclosed by a torus. It has a ring-shaped surface generated by rotating a circle around an axis that does not intersect the circle. Usually, a toroid is composed of a coil of insulated wire in a donut shape (and is usually composed of iron or similar metals).

Toroids are inductors in circuits. They are primarily used in low frequencies transception for the inductance properties needed. Toroids possess greater inductance properties and carry greater current than similarly constructed solenoids. Toroidal coils reduce resistance, due to diameter and number. In a toroid, magnetic fluxes are confined in the toroid's core.

a toroid magnifies current.

Magnetic Fields and Electric Fields
Notice the similarity between magnetism and electricity. Electricity attracts neutral material (recall a rubbed balloon picking up small bits of paper). Electricity comes in two forms: positive and negative. Like charges repel unlike, charges attract. Physicists long ago realised that these similarities were important. It is now realised that electricity and magnetism are closely related forces. They are really two different aspects of the same force! We call that force electromagnetism. This next section of the electricity module is probably the hardest, but it is also the most interesting. Work out the problems in the text as you go along and you will be able to cope.

A changing electric field creates a magnetic field. Conversely, a changing magnetic field creates an electric field.

used to create photon / radio waves

This means that electric currents produce magnetic fields and changing or moving magnetic fields produce electric currents. This module looks at this property of electric and magnetic fields in detail. You will learn about the magnetic fields generated by a wire and a solenoid, then go on to look at motors, generators, and transformers.

Any charged particle in a magnetic field feels a force perpendicular to both the field and its own velocity.

So far we have looked at the effect of putting a current in a magnetic field and seeing that there is a force on the wire that carries the current. On this page we will look at a related effect known as induction.

Talk about straight magnetic fields and electrons moving in circular path.

Talk about how magnetic fields alter the paths of charged particles.

For a more math oriented explanation of Electric and Magnetic Fields consult Electrodynamics.

Conclusions

 * 1) If there is relative movement between a coil of wire and a magnet, there will be a current induced in the coil.
 * 2) The faster the movement the bigger the current.
 * 3) Reversing the magnet, or the direction of movement reverses the direction of the induced current.

Theoretical explanation of what's going on (Advanced)
So now we know what happens we have to come up with an explanation. Look at the diagram below.

In this diagram the green line represents a wire that is going into the screen or page. It is at right angles to the magnetic field between the two bar magnets. The wire is moved downwards so that it "cuts" the field lines. This induces an e.m.f. (voltage) along the wire. It is this e.m.f. that causes a current to flow if a complete circuit is made. So now we know why you get a current. It's caused by the induced voltage, but why do you get a voltage?

This is a close up of the wire seen end-on. The blue circles represent where the magnetic field lines stick out of the screen or page. They are coming straight out of the screen.

The wire is made of a metal and so has many free electrons. As the wire moves downwards each individual electron travels downwards too. They effectively form loads of little current flowing down. From the motor effect we know that if a current flows in a magnetic field there will be a force. In this case the force pushes the electrons to the right. It is the electrons all moving up to the right end of the wire that causes the voltage difference.

So, the motor effect can induce an e.m.f. This is one of two ways magnetic fields can induce an e.m.f

Q3) Imagine more than one loop of wire cutting through the magnetic field.Each loop of wire has its own e.m.f. induced on it. If the wires are joined up, it's as if they are little cells in series. Fill in the blanks " As the number of windings on the solenoid increases the value of the induced voltage ______________.

When a current flows down a wire it creates a magnetic field. To see this place a small plotting compass near the wire and turn the current on.The compass needle will deflect. The shape of the magnetic field around a wire is circular. look at the diagram on the right. The wire is coming straight out of the screen so you only see it's cross section (the red circle) The plotting compasses show how the field wraps around the wire.

Making the field stronger
To make the field stronger we can:
 * Use a soft iron core
 * Increase the amount of current flowing in the wire

 * Increase the number of turns on the solenoid.

Reversing the field
To make the north pole and south pole swap positions we can
 * reverse the direction of the current by swapping the positive and negative leads on the power pack.
 * Wind the wire the other way round. {So if you wound it clockwise, take it off and wind it anticlockwise.

Talking of north and south poles, there is a little trick to find out which end will be the north pole and which end will be the south.

Look down the solenoid and work out which way the current is flowing. Remember current flows from the positive to the negative terminals on the power pack. If the current is flowing clockwise the end will be a south pole. If it looks like it's going anticlockwise the end will be a north pole. The easy way to remember this is to put arrows on the end of a capital N and S like this.

title: Electronics/Magnetic Field


text:
Named colors

Modern browsers and X11 systems. The name is printed in both black and white to help you decide which font color to choose.

Problems, questions, ideas, comments? Let us know!

More information
The table above was generated by a simple Perl script called  . See Perl/Fun with Named Colors.

title: Named colors


text:
List of protected heritage sites in Namur (city)

This table shows an overview of the protected heritage sites in the Walloon town Namur, or Namur (city). This list is part of Belgium's national heritage.

 * }


text:
George Wigan

George Wigan (c1692 – 11 November 1776) was a tutor at Christ Church, Oxford then rector of St Mary’s, Oldswinford in Worcestershire.

George Wigan was born at Kensington, oldest son of William Wigan and Mary (nee Sonds) to survive to adulthood and brother of John Wigan. He was educated at Westminster School and Christ Church, Oxford, matriculating on 9 June 1711 at the age of 18. He was awarded his BA, 1715; MA, 1718; DD (by diploma) 19 June 1749. Wigan was ordained deacon by George Hooper, Bishop of Bath and Wells (20 December 1719).

Career
Wigan remained at Christ Church as a tutor. One of his students was John Wesley who wrote to his mother on 23 September 1723 reporting that “Mr Wigan had resigned his pupils and was retired into the country to one of his livings.” Wesley goes on to note that “The small-pox and fever are now very common in Oxford; of the latter a very ingenious young gentleman of our College died yesterday, being the fifth day from the beginning of his illness. There is not any other in the College sick at present, and it is hoped that the approach of winter will stop the spreading of the distemper.”.

George Wigan was resident rector of Oldswinford, Worcestershire, from 1722 until death and non-resident rector of Ashbury, formerly in Berkshire also from 1722 to death, the previous incumbent having died of smallpox (conferred by Bishop Hooper) Wigan acted as steward at the annual Anniversary of the Sons of the Clergy service at St Paul's Cathedral on 12 December 1723,

The early eighteenth century antiquarian, Thomas Hearne, attributed a number of publications to George Wigan. In 1722, Hearne attributed the editing of a volume of John Ernest Grabe's Septuagint which included authoring its Prolegomena. Wigan is variously credited with editing volume 3 or volume 4 but there is no indication of his contribution in either volume. (It is more probable that he contributed to volume 3 which was published after Grabe's death.) Hearne also claimed that George Wigan was admitted as Principal of New Inn Hall, Oxford. In fact, it was John Wigan.

George Wigan did not marry, living out his life at Oldswinford and being buried there on 16 November 1776. For part of that time, his unmarried sister, Mary, lived at Oldswinford. She was buried there on 26 July 1763.

title: George Wigan


text:
Introduction to Philosophy

''What am I, really? Are my actions good? How can I know?'' Some of the most fundamental questions of life cannot be answered by a physical experiment. Instead, they live inside the realm of thought experiments, being examined through rigorous arguments and logic instead. The field of philosophy is broad, and the boundaries are fuzzy. In fact, some may even argue that the question of what philosophy is, is a deep philosophical question in and of itself. Even so, one common thread connects it all: philosophy is an attempt to explain our experiences and rationalize our choices in a rational, critical, and systematic fashion.

This is different from religion or doctrine, which asserts that one view and understanding of the world is the correct one, without asking for proof. But it is also different from science, in that philosophy attempts to answer those questions that fundamentally cannot be answered through physical experiments or numeric simulations. Even so, it also shares many similarities with science: both require logic and rigorous argument to understand the world. Indeed, science and philosophy go hand in hand, both depending on each other and complementing each other's strengths.

Philosophy is commonly divided into several subdisciplines or branches: the study of reasoning (logic), the study of knowledge (epistemology), the study of the features of reality (metaphysics), and the study of morality (ethics). Many other branches exist beyond these core branches, and each of these requires an introduction of its own.

It is easy to get lost in philosophy as a deep and tangled rabbit hole. It is not a discipline that gives answers plain-and-simple. In a sense, it is the art of asking the right questions, and learning things from that. As such, for the sake of introducing you to the concepts of philosophy, we will approach the subject with small, tangible steps, and instead show how to think like a philosopher before diving into deeper questions.

= Table of Contents =

Introduction

 * 1) The importance of philosophy in daily life
 * 2) But what is philosophy, really?
 * 3) The main branches of philosophy
 * 4) Thinking like a philosopher

Logic
Before we are ready to ask questions, we must first understand how to go about reasoning about them. In this chapter, we will lay out the basics of logic, the study of reasoning.

 * 1) Logic and Reason
 * 2) Truth and Validity
 * 3) Paradoxes

Epistemology
Once one starts to ask the first questions, it becomes quickly apparent that many conclusions are based on presumptions that we have simply always assumed to be correct. But how do we know for sure that those assumptions are indeed correct? What if what we believe is false? Can we verify our knowledge by critically analyzing each and every assumption we have? These, and many more such questions, form the basis of epistemology, the study of knowledge.

 * 1) What is Epistemology?
 * 2) Rationalism
 * 3) Empiricism
 * 4) Pragmatism

Metaphysics
With the unstable foundations of epistemology under our feet, and the sturdy tools of logic in our hands, we can take a look at reality itself. What is the nature of this existence we live in? How can we define the things inside? What is a person, exactly? Do we have free will? Although you may already be convinced of clear and seemingly intuitive answers for each of these questions, challenge your understanding by thinking rigorously. These deceptively simple questions quickly become very complex, and our attempts to answer them give great insight into the nature of reality. This is the realm of metaphysics, a complex field aimed at answering questions about existence itself, and many things related to it.

 * 1) What is Metaphysics?
 * 2) Ontology versus Cosmology

Ontology

 * 1) Objects and Properties
 * 2) Are People Objects?
 * 3) Emergent Properties
 * 4) Where does one object end and another object start?
 * 5) What is a Person?

Cosmology

 * 1) What is the fundamental nature of the universe?
 * 2) Determinism and randomness: does this affect free will?
 * 3) Why do we have memories of the past, but not of the future?
 * 4) Why is there something, rather than nothing?

Ethics
Building on top of the previous chapters, we now proceed to perhaps the most directly applicable discipline to our daily lives: ethics, the study of morality. What is good, and what is evil? Can something be objectively good, or is morality subjective? What choices should I make in my life? As with all such themes, these simple questions have complex, often incomplete answers. Different schools of thought build upon different core principles, and although they may appear to be similarly virtuous, the moral choices made by each of the schools of thought can conflict in fascinating ways.

 * 1) What is Ethics?
 * 2) What is a Person?
 * 3) Virtue and value-Ethics
 * 4) Consequentialism
 * 5) Deontology
 * 6) Utilitarianism
 * 7) Existentialism
 * 8) Zen Buddhism
 * 9) Transcendentalist Theology Transcendentalism
 * 10) What is Buddhist Philosophy?

Political Philosophy

 * 1) What is Political Philosophy?
 * 2) The Political Spectrum
 * 3) Introduction to Philosophy/Ancient Political Philosophy
 * 4) Middles Ages Political Philosophy
 * 5) Social Contract
 * 6) Marx and Marxists
 * 7) Liberalism
 * 8) Communitarianism
 * 9) Conservativism
 * 10) Libertarianism
 * 11) Anarchism
 * 12) Post-Politics
 * 13) Theocracies

Philosophy of Mind

 * 1) Philosophy of Mind

Aesthetics

 * 1) Aesthetics

Philosophy of Science

 * 1) Philosophy of Science

Theology

 * 1) Theology

Appendices

 * A brief history of philosophers before us
 * Authors

title: Introduction to Philosophy


text:
Talk:1906 (novel)

Merger proposal
I know I have been one of the film article's staunchest defenders, but as it was I who wrote the proposed target in preparation for this possibility... until such time as 1906 (film) is verified as filming, I would support a redirect and merge of that article's content to here. Most of the work being done already. The caveat of course is that the redirect can be undone once this project begins filming.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Pro
Support merge. We have a content fork here, and as per WP:NFF, "Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available." As we (now) have an article on the subject material, I see no reason to deviate from the guideline. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Support merge per the notability guidelines for future films. I believe that merging establishes a proper encyclopedic scope because this is an unstable topic. There is no guarantee of an actual film, so it is misleading to have a setup that purports one. I am also not in favor of a "film project" setup because it is continued shaky ground; the topic is not immutable. That is not something that we can say about articles in the rest of Wikipedia, which are based on established topics. The guidelines help establish the scope because despite movie news getting hyped and circulated, this does not mean the film industry will ultimately produce the films in development. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 * Hmm. I think we should wait for a few more editors' opinions here. I can see you guys are gung-ho for this merge, but some of us aren't. There is surely no problem with "Film project" as "notability is is not temporary" so we have nothing to fear from "continued shaky ground". Even if a film is eventually made it will remain a notably fraught film project. As (Rob Sinden) for a content fork, gee, if we copy an article into another article, well we have a fork, but that isn't necessarily a good reason for a merger. I remain interested in what uninvolved editors think of this. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If the film were cancelled outright tomorrow, there would be no justification for a standalone page. I think that's the stance we should be coming from, as (as WP:NFF states) "there is no "sure thing" production".  The content is not so weighty that it cannot be dealt with on the article "about its subject material", as also recommended at WP:NFF.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If the film were canceled outright tomorrow, it would still have been a topic which was the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Notability is not temporary. The film project is notable, whether or not the film is ever finished or even started. Pburka (talk) 06:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Notability may not be temporary, but as Erik points out to you below, WP:N says, "This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." Therefore, if the film were cancelled tomorrow, the sensible option would be to merge, which is what we should be doing right now.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

 * Support per Erik's comments above. At this point, there is no indication the film will be made.  And, as this article already has all the film project information, the standalone article is simply repetition.  If the film happens, the other article can easily be recreated.  And this fretting about something being irretrievably lost is unwarranted.  All the information will still be here, which is where it belongs, since the whole project is still only a possibility. --- The Old Jacobite The '45  15:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Con
Well, I have no special feelings about this either way, but given that the stalled film project a) existed; b) is of interest to many people; and crucially c) is reliably and multiply sourced, it's quite hard to see why a merge is needed. If the problem is that people are queasy about films-that-aren't, then the required action is to change the title to "(film project)" or something of that kind, and maybe to have a category like "film projects" too.

From the other end of the 'scope, both articles are of a reasonable size and structure, which would be muddied by plonking a great lump of film project stuff into the book article - one would reasonably expect just a sentence or two there about the film.

For these two reasons I Oppose the suggested merger. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The information about the film is already included in the novel article, so it wouldn't be a case of "plonking a great lump of film project stuff into the book article". As you state, the article is of a "reasonable size and structure", so there's no real necessity for a breakout article just yet, as it is already comfortably included. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * So a merge would be tantamount to outright deletion? Then I'm really opposed to it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Not at all. All of the information will remain in the novel article, and will be preserved in the edit history of the film article until such time as a breakout article is warranted.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

 * I'm becoming increasingly skeptical of the project-specific inclusion criteria, especially when they're used to argue against inclusion. The WP:GNG are clear that significant coverage in multiple reliable sources is the benchmark for inclusion. This topic clearly meets that standard. Therefore I oppose the merger. Pburka (talk) 09:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Pburka, WP:N says, "This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." Potential films in development are an unstable set of topics because there are two outlooks: 1) movie news is widely hyped and circulated at any given stage, and 2) the film industry only produces a small portion of films that they develop. Before the guidelines, there were constant assumptions that movie news (like the boarding of a director) absolutely meant that a film will be produced. It is understandable because it is indeed concrete news coverage, but that does not necessarily lend itself to a stand-alone article on an encyclopedia. I'm in favor of reporting the coverage (and have written my fair share of merged "Film adaptation" sections), but there is often a "driver" behind the excitement for such films. It's usually a famous book or a well-known director or both; these factors make plans for a film worth noting in the public eye. In addition, non-activity (in terms of developing a film) is generally not reported, so a stand-alone article cannot be historical in failed plans or honestly be about something tangible (the actual film). That gray area to me is a sign of a topic that is not immutable. If we do not know if the stand-alone topic will ever change from the collection of follow-along news coverage to treating "fiction in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works" (WP:PLOT), it is not defined as one of enduring notability. Pardon my long-windedness, but the guidelines have existed for these reasons as not to exaggerate news into actual films and to maintain an encyclopedic presentation. There is no deletion here; I'm always in favor of reporting the project status but in the proper scope. If filming does begin, it is a near-definite sign of something tangible, and as I like to say, we can then have an article for the ages. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1906 (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20121208150759/http://www.bigscreenanimation.com/2008/03/1906-to-be-pixarwarner-bros.html to http://www.bigscreenanimation.com/2008/03/1906-to-be-pixarwarner-bros.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pageonelit.com/interviews/Dalessandro.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1841996

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:1906 (novel)


text:
Statistics/Displaying Data/Bar Charts

Bar Charts
The Bar Chart (or Bar Graph) is one of the most common ways of displaying catagorical/qualitative data. Bar Graphs consist of 2 variables, one response (sometimes called "dependent") and one predictor (sometimes called "independent"), arranged on the horizontal and vertical axis of a graph. The relationship of the predictor and response variables is shown by a mark of some sort (usually a rectangular box) from one variable's value to the other's.

To demonstrate we will use the following data(tbl. 3.1.1) representing a hypothetical relationship between a qualitative predictor variable, "Graph Type", and a quantitative response variable, "Votes".

tbl. 3.1.1 - Favourite Graphs

From this data we can now construct an appropriate graphical representation which, in this case will be a Bar Chart. The graph may be orientated in several ways, of which the vertical chart (fig. 3.1.1) is most common, with the horizontal chart(fig. 3.1.2) also being used often

fig. 3.1.1 - vertical chart

fig. 3.1.2 - horizontal chart

Take note that the height and width of the bars, in the vertical and horizontal Charts, respectfully, are equal to the response variable's corresponding value - "Bar Chart" bar equals the number of votes that the Bar Chart type received in tbl. 3.1.1

Also take note that there is a pronounced amount of space between the individual bars in each of the graphs, this is important in that it help differentiate the Bar Chart graph type from the Histogram graph type discussed in a later section.

title: Statistics/Displaying Data/Bar Charts


text:
Herbert Winters

Herbert Winters (born 6 June 1937) is a German field hockey player. He competed in the men's tournament at the 1960 Summer Olympics.

title: Herbert Winters


text:
Talk:David Mackenzie (director)

Career Section
This section reads like a PR bio, a badly written one at that. I am going to cull some the more overtly enthusiastic expressions unless backed up by RS. 79616gr (talk) 17:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Mackenzie (director). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160806100120/http://www.sigmafilms.com/david-mackenzie/ to http://www.sigmafilms.com/david-mackenzie/

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:David Mackenzie (director)


text:
User:Carlos Galvam/sandbox

 Carlos Ricardo Galvan  (born February 5, 1978 ) is a hip hop artist who is the founder/member of the Korean hip-hop group Uptown He's known better by the alias "Cali-Mexci" & "SoLRaC". One of the influential rappers in Korea. He's known for his catchy rhymes and trend setting styles. But he's more of a battle emcee that love a good competition every now and then.

He was born in Savannah, Georgia at St. Josephs Hospital, to a Mexican-American Military Father (Richard Galvan) and a Korean Mother (Pok Nyo Galvan). He also has two brothers whos names are Jonathan and Michael.

==MUSIC CAREER IN KOREA==

Carlos Galvan has been at the forefront of the Korean Hip Hop movement since its early stages dating back to around 1996-97 when he was part of the group Uptown. It was introduced by many influential K-Pop (Korean Pop music) groups such as Seotaiji & Boys, DJ DOC, Solid, and others; but, one can say that Hip Hop music in Korea didn't have much resemblance to "real" Hip Hop until groups like Uptown came around. Uptown is considered to be one of the pioneers of Korean Hip Hop & R&B and were able to succeed and sell millions of albums in a very selective Korean music market where cutesy looks and boy-band/girl-band groups dominated the charts. Another part of Uptown that made them unique within the industry was that the group was composed of two half Koreans, Carlos (Korean/Mexican American) and Tasha Reid (Korean/African American). At the time of their debut, there were not many (if any) mixed Koreans of their age/generation in the music industry.

Even with the popularity and acclaim, a scandal nearly derailed Uptown. There was a major falling out between them and Drunken Tiger, another major Korean Hip Hop pioneer, in 1999/2000 due to a drug possession charge in Korea that involved members of both groups (including Carlos). Things were even more complicated due to the fact that Tiger JK (of Drunken Tiger) had been dating Tasha (of Uptown) at the time. The friendships and relationships between and within the two camps had dissolved and the end result was Uptown was banished and not allowed to perform in Korea.

After 4 solid albums, it looked as though Uptown was finished. But, in 2002, as things began to calm and settle, Carlos and Steve Kim (an original member of Uptown) embarked on something that had not been done before; a crossover attempt by a Korean-based artist/group to America. They were a duo now known as Uptown 3000 and seemed poised to make some noise. The album "Same Book... Different Chapter" was released initially to Asian markets to capitalize on the success of Uptown in Korea. Unfortunately, the transition to the American market was practically dropped after mismanagement occurred and the release stalled.

In 2006, Uptown reformed in Korea with 3 of the original members (Carlos, Steve & Chris Jung) along with a new female lead singer/rapper and released a 5th album, "Testimony". In what could be considered a surprise due to the length of time between albums (6-7 years; which could be considered an eternity in the music business and especially in the Korean industry), the album was received quite well and it looked as though Uptown was back and had shaken all the problems of the past off. Unfortunately, after the latest album the group has dissolved again and looks to be finished forever.

Now, in 2009, Carlos has moved forward with the release of his first solo album, "Still Standin'". He's starting to generate some buzz and was even able to cross-promote with American R&B artist Ne-Yo by hosting his concert after-party in Seoul. His first single, "U R My Girl", has already started charting in Korea and he's looking to reclaim his rightful spot near the top in the Korean Hip Hop community. He also featured in these albums 1999 대한민국(daehanminkook) - Girlfriends 1집 - 간종욱(kan jong wook) 1집 - Bae Seul Ki 1집 - KCM 4집 - Allstars 겨울바다

Galvan has been an ambassador of hip hop who has not looked back, His first taste of fame came in the late 1990s as part of the Korean hip hop pioneers Uptown. His ability to rap in three languages (English - Korean -Spanish) has galvanized his audiences and left his peers and rivals in awe.

His West Coast flava and Asian roots is what separates this artist from the rest. Holding eight albums under his belt, Galvan has only one thing to prove at this stage of his career - hip hop is not dead - it is alive and he is flippin it.

Coming in early 2010 his project mix-tape "South-Cide Vol.1"

He is also a member of the Notorious JIGGYFELLAZ crew in Korea.

1997: UPTOWN 업타운 (1st LP) - Represent

1998: UPTOWN 업타운 (2nd LP) - Represented... Now Believe

1998: UPTOWN 업타운 (Mixed LP ) - Mutual Best

1999: UPTOWN 업타운 (3rd LP)  - Chapter 3 in History

1998: UPTOWN 업타운 (collabo LP) - Absolute Power

2000: UPTOWN 업타운 (4th LP) - Verbal Medication

2000: UPTOWN 업타운 (Greatest Hits/MV) - History

2006: UPTOWN 업타운 (5th LP) Testimony

2009: Carlos  카를로스 (1st Solo LP) - Still Standin'

2010: Carlos  카를로스 (Mixtape LP) -South-Cide Vol.1 - Hustle

Carlos has featured and worked with a lot of young up and coming artist in Korea.

==Notes==

You can check out his music @ www.myspace.com/carlosizsolrac

==See also==

* List of hip hop artists

* List of Korean Americans

이현수 (가수)

title: User:Carlos Galvam/sandbox


text:
Talk:Came glasswork/Archive 1

External link proposal
Wish to include website titled...  *"Stained Glass Art Tips" in the external links section of this article. My family has been in the stained glass business for over 100 years and our experience is described within the pages. I have removed all sponsorship advertising that may be interpreted as spam. I am truly excited about Wikipedia and it's wealth of information. My newbie status here has led me to some conflict with editors but I think I finally figured out what it is all about. Thanks for your involvement and wish you will consider my request.

Thank you,

Desg 01:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose The main website (one click away) does appear to be a commercial site. Wikipedia is not a collection of external links. If you have 100 years of experience to contribute, add content, not links. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
 * The other site in the external links listing contains bold sponsor advertising and clearly links back to a commercial site. Why have you let that remain? Why have a different set of standards for me? Respectfully... I find your reason for opposing my link unacceptable. Desg 02:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I've only looked at your proposed link, and haven't scrutinized the existing links on the article. Other editors, however, appear to feel that link is appropriate (according to edit summaries in the history). Still, the existance of one link in violation of policy (hypothetically) does not justify the addition of a 2nd link out of policy. Finally, what's the big deal about having a link to your site? Just add content if you want to contribute to the encyclopedia. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

So we agree the other link in violation of policy should be removed. I have tried to do so and was blocked. Being the person responsible for actions taken against me for removing content that is clearly in violation of policy why have you then allowed it to remain? Or... Why did you take action against me? As I see it we know have 2 votes to remove the violating link. I will give others time to decide if the link is indeed within policy or deems removal for violation. If nobody disagrees with our conclusion, I feel it only fair the link be removed.Desg 03:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

 * No, I've made no such claim that the other link does or does not belong on the site. I noted a hypothetical condition above. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

The agreement doesn't concern the "other link" which appears, for reasons known only to you, to be a bee in your bonnet. The agreement is that the link you suggest should not be listed.

RogerJ 03:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

So the reasons my link should not be listed given by you, I believe was referred to as spamming. Then... How is it right another link remains that is far worse spam by your definition? This would clearly put you in the delete the link corner. Correct? What are your thoughts? Please respond.Desg 04:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC) PS. I wish to keep this discussion civil and free of unwarranted comments such as your bee remark. I accept your apology in advance. Again, Please respond. Desg 04:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

 * For the record: Oppose
 * Please examine the edit history of this page. Some knowledgeable Wikipedians have investigated the link and found it more than appropriate. Please refer to these edits:, , .  In particular, note that Captainktainer wrote "Re-adding a removed link; this particular link actually is helpful and relevant" and more importantly to you, "External link that satisfies WP:EL criteria #4 and #5 and does not fail removal criteria."  Let's now approach the links from an objective, stained glass perspective.  The site whose listing you advocate, which happens to be yours, contains very little material, all of which is common knowledge, and some of it of debatable technical accuracy.  To me, it appears to exist merely to establish a bit of credibility and good will for your commercial entreprise.  You may wish to compare it with this page [] which contains far more detailed and, possibly, far more accurate and credible information.  Perhaps this page should be considered for inclusion in the internal links instead, if it complies with the philosophy of the Wiki.  For the life of me I cannot comprehend why you were hell-bent on removing the link to this superlative, well-researched and learned web page about restoration Preservation of Stained Glass  and replace it with a link to a very unimportant forum that belongs to you at stainedglassville.com.  This is very much against the spirit of Wikipedia.  Since this failed, you are now hell-bent on removing the Art of Stained Glasspage, which does contain a lot of unique and well-presented information, and is abundantly illustrated with photographs and videos.  I think we have discussed the inclusion of your personal and commercial links, and the deletion of sites that perhaps belong to your competitors, quite enough.  Thus far, it appears most unlikely that you will garner support for listing your link, and unlisting the other.  I invite you to participate in the Wiki project in a more constructive, and less selfish manner in the future.  We are here to help others, and for the common good, not to pursue personal and commercial agendas.  RogerJ 12:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok so add the link to DeBrady's site if you feel it contains valuable information. The earlier editing by me was done with no experience here. I made some rookie mistakes. The link to the Nation Forest website listed here for stained glass seemed to be wrong so I deleted it. I assumed there was an error. Before I forget...Please check if Debrady's website contains excessive advertising before putting it up. We wouldn't want to support pages that violate policy. As far as being here for the common good, that comment seems a bit hypocritical from you since you have initially acted to remove everything I edited from the start. Could you have come to me and ask? Or explain your concerns? I believe in compliance. As for your opinions re: the web-o-rama link... It is clear you show a great deal of bias with your comments. You are wrong with your analogy of both my site and the other. My site contains ZERO advertising and far more instructive content. For the record: I am insulted with your shallow comment about my site. Please refrain from your attacks here as we try to have a civil discussion.Desg 13:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

 * (1) After some consideration, I did add a reference link to a specific section of the Debrady site, a very learned article by restorer Art Femenella, as it pertains to the different opinions concerning the stretching of lead came. If other, more experienced Wikipedians disagree with this, I will not argue with them.  (2) There is no "Nation Forest" website that I am aware of.  You probably refer to the Preservation of Stained Glass, a cr.nps.gov subdomain of the National Park Service, where the "cr" stands for "Cultural Resources." This page could not posibly be mistaken as being about anything other than the preservation of stained glass. (3) I agree with the assesment of other Wikipedians concerning the value of your sites vs. that of the sites you dispute, which hardly qualifies as bias on my part. (4) Most reasonable people would agree that my removal of your gauche spamming attempts were for the common good. Thank you for stopping it. (5) As to contacting you personally, no, I prefer that everything be open to the scrutiny and arbitrage of third parties.  (6) On a positive note, my faith in mankind has been somewhat restored when I saw that you actually made an effort to contribute. I hope we can now consider the issue of your external link, and those of your competitors, settled once and for all. RogerJ 13:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It has not escaped my notice that you have found another way to spam the Wikipedia, which is by repeated referrals and links to your commercial page in the talk pages [] []
 * RogerJ 13:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Another link that is being removed is Stained Glass Soldering Tutorial. DrippingGoofball has removed it twice, with an explanation that the site adds very little. The linked page has a step-by-step tutorial, with pictures on how to solder stained glass using copper foil - exactly the tecnique that is the topic of this page. True, it has Adsense ads on the page, but everyone needs to make a living, i don't understand why would that prevent from adding a link to an interesting (IMHO), relevant content ?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Other link proposals
This link was recently added: Stained Glass Tutorials. Given how little the page contains, should it be included?

Might this one be considered instead? Technical ArticlesRogerJ 12:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts, an important subsection of the article I suggested is probably better as a reference on the practice of stretching lead, than as an external link.   We should still discuss the inclusion of the recently added Stained Glass Tutorials page. RogerJ 12:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

So reasons for opposing listing my site Stained Glass Art Tips is why now? I am not clear to the actual reasons. It qualifies as a non-biased resource related to the topic "Stained Glass" absent of blatent advertising. I feel the additional information therein is an asset to this subject. Please explain. DESG —The preceding unsigned comment was added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs).

 * It has been repeatedly explained to you, please read again. I point out that you have already added two links to your website on this page, the second one being wholly unnecessary, this in addition to another link in the Admin Noticeboard []so in a way, you have achieved your goal of a link on Wikipedia at least three times.  I have started a discussion about links other than those to your website.  Please do not derail the discussion so that it focuses on links to your commercial website instead, and confine your opinion to those mentioned above. RogerJ 20:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the stretching lead link you point to and your opinion based information added to this article I feel this is no place for it. If you wish to add a subcategory for Myths I would agree inclusion is warranted. Respectfully... The information is a debated issue and most professionals agree with a contradictory point to the one you share.

I ask permission to remove this controversal information.

Desg 00:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

 * There indeed exists a controversy regarding the worth of stretching lead, which is based on science and facts. Regardless of one's personal stance on the matter, I do believe it's worth pointing out that there are practitioners that believe stretching lead may be of little use, and perhaps harmful.  There is no reason not to expose the Wiki visitors to both points of view.  RogerJ 01:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Last call for reasonable opinions
To RogerJ:

Perhaps you have failed to recognize my original post here for discussion. I was asking for consensus from a non partial group of members for consideration of my link. The topic keeps getting diverted to other issues. You display your disdain for my existence at every turn with your remarks and insistent comments pertaining to me as a spammer. I have truly apologized for my naive action when I first came here. I have been instructed by administrators and other knowledgeable members to the steps involved in using my material and content in articles and am following the rules. What is it you want from me? I have eliminated all sponsorship ads from my site, checked the content for substantive and relative information and just short of begging within this discussion for a rational conclusion. I have yet to see anyone give a straight answer to why my link shouldn't be included. If I were a third party here viewing this topic I would be ashamed to see this unfair censorship going on and insert the link myself. Alas... I cannot use my own link for fear of having it booted and getting blocked again. The comparison I was using with web-o-rama was simply done to point out the Hippocratic spam issue. Why is it OK for other external links to display very obvious sponsor text and images and ban mine especially when all traces of were removed? Please don't waste everyone's time with your biased-content-better issue. You know the reason is your disdain for me as I have mentioned earlier. Up to now I haven't described in detail your past dealings with me for respect of this community and care not to. You have a craft to come of concerned for my wellness as displayed in your posts. This tactic wears thin when you continue knocking me and my stained glass knowledge. I ask again please consider allowing me to use my stained glass art tips page as a cross reference to articles here. To add all of the text would bog down the reader within the key articles which I feel need to be pithy in nature and not stray from the definition value therein.

Desg 00:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Added:

If someone could let me know the steps for possible arbitration regarding my concerns, please post it here or send me mail.

Thank you,

Desg 00:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Stretching lead
The Wiki is an encyclopedia, not a collection of editorial pages. Efforts should be made to remain impartial regarding the value of stretching lead. Presently, the page mentions the existence of two different practices, and does not advocate one or the other. It is impartial, and this impartiality should be preserved. RogerJ 03:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Clarification to the opinion you have made regarding stretching lead is necessary for definition. Tensile strength is crucial for larger work and must be pointed out. You have failed to do so in this article. I am going to revert the edit. Please educate yourself in the importance of stretching lead for tensile values before you submit to removing this vital information. Thank you Desg 03:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I revised the section to give both points of view equal value but I had to remove the following sentence because I didn't undersand it.
 * This theory is applied to the actual lead composition rather than tensile strength which is crucial when assembling larger windows as earlier mentioned.

Can you explain exactly what you mean by this so we can work out how to put this back into the article in a clearer way? Thanks --Spartaz 06:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Stretching the lead as described in the article link Stretchinglead contains information relating to the composition of lead as when stretched weakens it. Though this may be valid in regard to the molecules within lead and does weaken the molecular bond as described. However when the "theory of weaking a stained glass window" is applied by stretching lead, the facts are highly disputed by many professionals including myself. In fact as my edit describes, stretching lead adds lateral strength to a stained glass window by stiffinig the came. If the lead is left unstretched it will have a better chance of moving causing the window to prematurly sag. The term "theory" is a polite way of giving an adverse opinion without discrediting the objecting view. Desg 11:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Also: In my opinion, which is shared by most professional stained glass craftsmen, the article poorly explaines to the reader any objection to the opinion therin and leads to a sided view of the lead debate and does so stating complete discredit to the stiffining issue described here. I will gather more facts on this subject and post when available.

With that said: I suggest removing the link in the article and mention of the "theory' altogether.

Desg 12:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

 * The Wiki page does not exist to settle this debate, or advocate one practice over another, therefore, the explanations you propose for a future date are not desirable. Remember that the WIki is an encyclopedia, not a manual.  In order to remain neutral, the existence of both practices is pointed out. That is the correct way to present it.  We take no side.  Please do not revert the edits to give more prominence or credit to your belief.  Remain neutral and see:NPOV_dispute
 * RogerJ 12:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Neutral third-party opinion: if the practice really is controversial then the controversy should be described, neutrally and with references to credible sources. It currently reads as neutral to someone not familiar with the controversy, but does not explain the basis of the controversy and should be expanded. Presently the only reference is a website that seems to be maintained by one of the editors. The linked site takes a position of advocacy and does not provide any references. This seems likely to be original research, citing oneself, citing a self-published source, and should probably be removed from the article and replaced with more reliable sources. Chondrite 20:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

 * Thank you for your input. I assure that the article/website cited is not mine.  My personal belief is that no one really knows whether stretching lead is good practice,  because it has never been tested in a controlled experiment.  However, the arguments in favor of stretching lead are based on "that's what I've been taught" whereas arguments against stretching lead are based on the physical properties of the material.  The source given is the best there is on the topic.  On one side, you have people that have a "belief" and on the other, people that question this "belief" based on inferences about what is known about lead.  It's very difficult to determine who might be right.  There exists no proof that either is correct.  I'll definitely keep my eyes open, in case I do come across suitable material. RogerJ 12:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The subject in relationship to stained glass is not debated by a majority of professionals. The science you speak may be valid but has no value toward stained glass. The "that's what I've been taught" comment you suggest as a relation here was used to mislead any editors not familiar with this subject. Your intentional biased opinions should be avoided in an open discussion especially when you lack experience on the subject. If you need help learning about lateral tensile strength and the properties of "H" channel lead for stained glass go to any online glass message board and pose your questions. There are many professionals that visit these boards on a regular basis. As far as proof of being correct... Go to any TGI Fridays restaurant and look to see if their 8 & 9 foot ceiling panes are sagging. These panels were constructed by stretching the lead as far back as the mid 70's in a studio I personally was involved with. If the lead wasn't stretched to it's "tensile limit" in a few years gravity would have taken care of it. There are over 1200 windows done this way, to do so otherwise would be reckless. desg<IP_ADDRESS> 14:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

 * A proof exists when a proper scientific experiment has been conducted. Had 200 windows with the same glass and design been built, 100 without stretching the lead, and 100 stretching it until it nearly snaps, keeping every other variable equal, and the builder waited 25 years to assess the presence or absence or sagging, there would be proof of something.  To my knowledge, no proper experiment has been conducted. The example you provide proves nothing and message boards aren't a proper scientific source. RogerJ 22:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

safety precautions for lead added
This article may and will be viewed by many newbie glass artists. The importance of lead safety shoud be included within. Desg 04:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Excellent idea. I have expanded and added references. RogerJ 12:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

TX Desg 00:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

 * This is actually a bad idea. Please see my new section below. --Philosophus T 22:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Instructional style and Safety Warnings
While safety warnings would be appropriate for an instructional manual, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The purpose of the articles is not to provide instructional material, but a description of the methods. It shouldn't contain instructions, tips, advice, or warnings to the user. If you want to write instructional material on glasswork, you should look into creating a textbook on Wikibooks, which would be the appropriate place within Wikimedia for such a style.

This style is a considerable problem with the current article. I've tried to remove some of the warnings and advice given, but do not have the time or knowledge to remove all of them and refactor parts of the article if necessary. Others with more knowledge of the subject need to do this. --Philosophus T 22:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

 * Thank you for your input and advice to would-be Wiki editors such as myself. I will give it a go sometimes in the following days. After seeing the types of changes you have made, I think I get the idea. RogerJ 13:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree Philosopous. I have made many attempts to correct this article removing instructional material but the user RogerJ reverts at every move. This user is displaying an intentional disruption of my edited articles. I have added a link to the "instructional" material to my web site for additional information about stained glass technique that doesn't belong in this article... stained glass art tips I feel at this time will be in vane as before for it will surely be removed by RojerJ herself or she will canvass another user to do so. I will look into the Wikibooks you describe for additional options. Thanks,Desg 23:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If you feel it is "in vane" [SIC], then why did you add it? You suggested adding this link above, and no consensus emerged. Please don't add it again. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 12:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Desg & RogerJ
Enough already please. Both of your edit summaries are way too agressive and you must stop taking chunks out of each other's contributions. This talk page reads like a war zone with allegations and attacks left right and centre.

I am concerned that the article is becoming too much like a how-to manual. Some of the work on Desg's website is absolutely beautiful and taking the how-to to another site is a sensible idea. The ads are problematic but actually they are as bad or worse on the other two sites linked to - so either they go as well or we allow Desg to link his site. Decide between yourselves on one option or the other.

What I would like you to both do is cooperate. You both clearly know your stuff but have different approaches and beliefs. Instead of reverting each other all the time, how about discussing the bits you don't agree on and - where you cannot reach an agreement - keep stuff out of the article unless you can reference or cite a source for the statement or fact?

Finally, play civil. The article is coming along nicely but is still in beta. We have plenty of time to get it right. Let it evolve and perhaps we can have a look at it in a couple of weeks and see what needs changing?

?OK --Spartaz 12:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreeing with Spartaz, you might also want to officially request a third opinion if you can't agree on something. Edit wars are never productive. Or, consider disengaging for a bit... --ZimZalaBim (talk) 12:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

 * I did ask for a third opinion (RfC, I think), still waiting. The problem was not so much with advertising on the sites, but with content. I would be in favor of removing all external links, personally, but there seemed to have been some kind of pre-existing concensus regarding the [Art of Stained Glass] website, and other, more experienced editors seemed to be of opinion that it was of value, and I simply concurred. I am happy to disengage.  On a humourous note, I'd like to point out that I am ignoring his referring to me as a "she" and "herself" on account of my contribution to articles on homosexuality. RogerJ 13:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Here's a thought: keep gender & sexuality out of this discussion. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 13:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Have you interacted with Desg before? I have removed all external links per my suggestion. --Spartaz 13:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I finally feel justice has been done. Thank you! For all this time referring to me as a spammer while page links of equal or worse advertising with less information remained. That was my problem from the start. I applaud your actions Spartaz and how you have dealt with this ongoing dispute. I am more than happy to add content that is truly relative on an "encyclopedic" basis. I understand the value of avoiding objectionable or controversial content. To RojerJ, I am sorry to mix-up the gender thing. It was accidental.

Desg 13:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. I am wise enough not to be offended by such things.  Do you now agree to stop introducing links to downeaststainedglass.com? RogerJ 13:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes,but not for the reasons you imply. I don't feel external links are appropriate at all unless used within content of an article in a unbiased way. I originally added my chapel window (descending dove) for an example of a memorial stained glass window. I am very proud of my work and the example given is not just a regular everyday panel. The chapel is the only house of worship on Bald head island. Named a "Chapel" to open doors to all denomination and faith. The editing I did for "chapel" added on the main stained glass page was short on describing why the picture was added. I felt it was appropriate due to the relationship with a chapel and as a memorial window. Stained glass memorial windows are not mentioned in the article prior to my edit and do not now due to suspected spam removals. Spam was not the intent. When I looked around deeper in the stained glass article and found the disputed link I felt that Wiki was OK with posting of somewhat commercial pages. So I added mine. This is when the walls came down and the dispute began. I am satisfied with the end result here and hope first impressions have not been influenced by any bias here.

Respectfully  Desg 15:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If there is an image on your website that you think is appropriate for the article, consider adding it as an image, not an external link. (Be sure to follow all guidelines, especially copyright, when uploading images). --ZimZalaBim (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I have looked over the copyright policies and was wondering if someone could help. I am not clear on the public domain issue. I would like to post some images within this article. Thanks, <IP_ADDRESS> 12:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Candy machine example
I would like to propose that this part of the article be removed. It is an uncommon use of the foil method, and I am not comfortable that it should be given so much weight. I'd like some input before making such a significant change. RogerJ 17:24, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove it. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

title: Talk:Came glasswork/Archive 1


text:
User:Truthseekerleaker

I'm just a dude correcting things where appropriate. It's important to participate, so consider creating an account and adding your knowledge to humanity's greatest repository of it.

title: User:Truthseekerleaker


text:
Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought

The Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought (ICIT) is an Islamic research and activist center. ICIT describes itself as "international intellectual center of the global Islamic movement. It consists of individual activists, journalists and academics in all parts of the world who share a common commitment to developing the social and political ideas of the Islamic movement, and promoting them as an alternative worldview to that of Western civilization. Driven by the guidance provided in the Farewell Khutbah, much of the work of ICIT is to produce publications and provide programs that cultivate the Islamic personality, uphold economic justice, and protect social justice."

It was established in 1998 by the associates of Kalim Siddiqui (1931–1996), Director of The Muslim Institute in London. Members include director Zafar Bangash of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Muhammad al-Asi and Imam Abdul Alim Musa of Washington, D.C., and Iqbal Siddiqui of London, now the editor of the Crescent International magazine.

Crescent International a monthly newsmagazine associated with the ICIT, published in Canada. It is the continuation of a local Toronto Pakistani community paper founded in the early 1970s, converted to an international news magazine by Kalim Siddiqui in 1980.

Siddiqui acted as editor from 1975 to 1998. An Arabic edition, called Al-Hilal Al-Dawli, was published from 1986 to 1989.

Between 1998 and 2008, Crescent International was edited by Iqbal Siddiqui. It is now managed by an editorial board consisting of Zafar Bangash, Afeef Khan and Imam Muhammad al-Asi. Other major contributors include Imam Muhammad al-Asi of Washington, D.C., whose tafsir is being serialised, M A Shaikh in London, and Perwez Shafi in Pakistan. Former editor Iqbal Siddiqui is now a columnist.

The publication has been subject of a controversy by B'nai Brith Canada as Crescent International has published many articles referring to homophobia, antisemitism and denying Israel's right to exist.

The newspaper is also published online, under the name "Muslimedia", and with a daily news analysis under crescent-online.net.


text:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/yt.be

Links

 * yt.be resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * yt.be is hosted on youtube.com
 * youtube.com resolves to [//<IP_ADDRESS> <IP_ADDRESS>]
 * Link is not on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the domainredlist.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.
 * Link is not on the Monitorlist.
 * None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
 * Link is not on the whitelist.
 * Link is not on the monitor list.

Additions

 * Displayed all 2 additions.


text:
User:Bachupop

 * Mubashir hussain Height, Weight, Age, Biography, Affairs & More

Bio

Real Name

Mubashir hussain

Nickname

Bachu

Profession

Bodybuilding and fighting

Physical Stats & More

Height

in centimeters- 164 cm

in meters- 1.64 m

in Feet Inches- 5' 4"

Weight

in Kilograms- 55 Kg

in Pounds- 120 lbs

Figure Measurements

35-27-35

Eye Colour

Black

Hair Colour

Black

Personal Life

Date of Birth

14 october 2000

Age (as in 2017)

2017 Years

Birth Place

Kasaragod, kerela, india

Zodiac sign/Sun sign

Libra

Nationality

Indian

Hometown

Kasaragod, kerela, India

School

Chemnad jama-ath higher secondry

College

Al-hikma collage kasaragod, India

Educational Qualifications

+2 Humanties

Debut

Body building Debut: 2017

Family

Father- A M Abdul hameed

Mother- Nafeesa T M

Sister- Sumaya

Brother- Munazha(Younger)

Marwan

Marwan

Sidique

Religion

Muslim

Hobbies

Body building

Controversies

No

Favourite Things

Favourite Food

Pizza

Favourite Actor

Vidyut jammwal, Shah Rukh Khan

Favourite Actress

Hilary Duff

Favourite Film

Anjaan

Favourite Musician

Shirley setia

Girls, Affairs and More

Marital Status

Unmarried

Affairs/Girlsfriends

N/A

Husband

N/A

Money Factor

Salary

Not Known

Net Worth

Not Known

Some lesser known facts about Mubashir hussain

Does Mubashir hussain smoke?: No

Does Mubashir hussain drink alcohol?: No

he is not a trained bodybuilder.

As a kid he wanted to be an businessman.

title: User:Bachupop


text:
Talk:V Bomber Command

Cleanup
I am putting an expand tag here

because some of the facts listed in the sections are unclear. Also, the top section needs to be written in sentences. J. Finkelstein 01:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree that V Bomber Command and 5th Bomber Command should be merged. They really seem to be the same thing. Someone just needs to figure out which name is the most common and merge the articles into one.Glennfcowan 03:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

 * V Bomber Command is the more common name for this type of USAF unit. - NDCompuGeek 03:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

title: Talk:V Bomber Command


text:
Talk:List of youth movements

Did anyone check Youth organization to check out how much of the content overlaps? Dahn 14:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

uhmmm....
this article is waaaaay too short. The youth movement refers to that of the 1960s occuring in the US. The age of rock 'n' roll, the beginning of the generation gap between first and second generation americans, and the demand for the right to be heard by the youth. please expand... Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and everything should have meaningful info. Not a whole body of "See Also..."

I gave you some ideas. The most recurring theme should be the generation gap, as it was a milestone of the time period. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M93samman (talk • contribs) 22:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

title: Talk:List of youth movements


text:
Plotava

Plotava (Плотава) is a rural locality (a selo) and the administrative center of Plotavsky Selsoviet, Aleysky District, Altai Krai, Russia. The population was 469 as of 2013. There are 14 streets.

Geography
Plotava is located on the Plotavka River, 29 km south of Aleysk (the district's administrative centre) by road. Sovkhozny is the nearest rural locality.

title: Plotava


text:
Selena: The Series

Selena: The Series (Spanish: Selena: la serie) is an American biographical drama television series created by Moisés Zamora. It tells the story of Tejano singer Selena's rise to fame and the sacrifices she and her family must make along the way.

The first season was released on Netflix on December 4, 2020. The second and final season premiered on May 4, 2021.

Synopsis
The story of the Tejana singer Selena Quintanilla, from her childhood to her rise to fame, along with the difficult and heartbreaking tough choices she and her family make to hold on to love and music.

Main

 * Christian Serratos as Selena
 * Madison Taylor Baez as Young Selena
 * Gabriel Chavarria as A.B. Quintanilla
 * Juan Martinez as Young A.B.
 * Ricardo Chavira as Abraham Quintanilla
 * Brandol Ruiz as Young Abraham
 * Noemi Gonzalez as Suzette Quintanilla
 * Daniela Estrada as Young Suzette
 * Seidy López as Marcella Quintanilla
 * Aneasa Yacoub as Young Marcella

Recurring

 * Hunter Reese Peña as Ricky Vela
 * Luis Bordonada as Johnny Canales
 * Paul Rodriguez as Roger Garcia
 * Carlos Alfredo Jr. as Joe Ojeda
 * Julio Macias as Pete Astudillo
 * Gladys Bautista as Vangie
 * Bryan Arion as Ray
 * Jesse Posey as Chris Pérez
 * Rico Aragon as José Behar
 * Christian Escobar as Bill Arriaga
 * Natasha Perez as Yolanda Saldivar

Guests

 * Christopher Parks as Lee Ritenour
 * David Barrera as Hector
 * Oscar Avila as Manny Guerra
 * Casey Tutton as Jilly
 * Catia Ojeda as Laura Canales
 * Mark Atkinson as Denny's manager
 * David Fernandez Jr. as David Kramer
 * Joe Lorenzo as Luis Silva
 * Shauntè Massard as Whitney Houston
 * Giovanna Bush as Young Beyoncé
 * Marcela Guirado as Verónica Castro

Development
On December 11, 2018, Selena: The Series was ordered to series by Netflix. The series is produced by Campanario Entertainment with Selena's father (Abraham) and sister (Suzette), from a screenplay by Moisés Zamora for Netflix. It is based on the life of Selena, and is the version authorized by Selena's family, unlike El secreto de Selena, an unauthorized version by María Celeste Arrarás, which the family publicly condemned. Part one of the series was released on December 4, 2020. The second part of the series premiered on May 4, 2021.

Casting
The series stars Christian Serratos as the titular character. Deadline later reported that "Other cast members include Noemi Gonzalez (The Young and the Restless) as Suzette Quintanilla, Selena's sister and best friend, who learns to embrace her role as the first female drummer in Tejano music history. Seidy López (Training Day) will play Marcella Quintanilla, Selena's mother; and newcomer Madison Taylor Baez will portray a young Selena." Ricardo Chavira and Gabriel Chavarria were to play Selena's father and brother respectively. It was later announced the series would include Julio Macias, Jesse Posey, Hunter Reese, Carlos Alfredo, Jr., Juan Martinez, Daniela Estrada and Paul Rodriguez, Jr. co-starring in the series as the Quintanila family and various other important members of Selena's life. Macias plays Pete Astudillo, with Posey as Chris Perez, Peña as Ricky Vela, and Alfredo as Joe Ojeda. Martinez portrays a young A.B. Quintanilla, Selena's brother, with Estrada as a young Suzette Quintanilla, Selena's sister, and Rodriguez as Roger Garcia, a shy guitarist who was part of the group before Chris Perez became its guitarist. Additionally co-starring Johnny Jay Lee (NCIS: Los Angeles) and Fernanda Moya as the young man and woman respectively.

Filming
Filming began in early October 2019 in Baja California, Mexico in places such as Rosarito, Tecate and Tijuana. Christian Serratos revealed in an interview with the Los Angeles Times that she recently finished filming the show's second season - under the health and safety protocols of COVID-19 in November 2020.

Commercial performance
Selena: The Series Soundtrack debuted at number 8 on the Latin Pop Albums chart, selling 1,000 album-equivalent units during the week ending December 10, 2020.

Critical response
For part 1 of the series, review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported an approval rating of 32% based on 34 critic reviews, with an average rating of 5.35/10. The website's critics consensus reads, "Selena: The Series affections are obvious, but by not probing deeper into Selena herself it fails to capture the woman behind the legacy, settling for just-another-retelling of the charismatic star's life instead of something more." Metacritic gave the series a weighted average score of 48 out of 100 based on 9 critic reviews, indicating "mixed or average reviews".

For part 2 of the series, review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported an approval rating of 14% based on 7 critic reviews, with an average rating of 4.42/10.

Audience viewership
On January 15, 2021, Netflix announced that the series was watched by 25 million households for the first 28 days after its debut.

title: Selena: The Series


text:
Obliveon

Obliveon is a Canadian progressive death/thrash metal band from Quebec.

History
The band was formed in 1987 as Oblivion, but changed the spelling after discovering a band of the same name in the United States. Obliveon's second album, the self-released Nemesis, has since been "lauded as a tech metal cornerstone." According to Canvas Solaris drummer Hunter Ginn, Nemesis "[sounds like] the very essence of tech." After releasing four studio albums, Obliveon disbanded in 2002 but has reunited occasionally over the years, and they have discussed the possibility of writing new material.

In 2023, the band started a kickstarter campaign to fund the recording and release of their fifth album, as well as re-issues of the band's previous albums on vinyl and CD (via Floga and Awakening records, respectively). It was also announced that founding bassist Stéphane Picard would be stepping down for personal reasons.

Band members

 * Martin Gagné - guitar (1987-2002, 2007–2008, 2014, 2021-present)
 * Alain Demers - drums (1989-2002, 2007–2008, 2014, 2021-present)
 * Pierre Rémillard - guitar (1989-2002, 2007–2008, 2014, 2021-present)
 * Bruno Bernier - lead vocals (1994-2002, 2007–2008, 2014, 2021-present)
 * Stéphane Picard - bass, lead vocals (1987-1994); bass, backing vocals (1994-2002, 2007–2008, 2014, 2021–2023)
 * Francis Giguère - drums (1987-1989)

Studio albums

 * From This Day Forward (1990)
 * Nemesis (1993)
 * Cybervoid (1995)
 * Carnivore Mothermouth (1999)

Other releases

 * Whimsical Uproar... (demo, 1987)
 * Fiction of Veracity (demo, 1989)
 * Planet Claire (EP, 1998)
 * Greatest Pits (compilation, 2002)

title: Obliveon