text:
Talk:Engadget

DAPReview
Looks like we have a revert war starting. Can someone please lock the page or block that anon IP who keeps removing criticism from the article? Rm999 23:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

This whole DPA review thing is absurd. It was a small mistake and it was corrected. Not worth mentioning in the entry Resiny 8:24 PM (GMT), 20 March, 2006

 * Engadget apologized as well. http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/16/nainworks-ubiquitous-multimedia-informator-pmp/ I also don't think this is really something that will be notable in the long run. --Interiot 03:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * We'll see I guess, but according to the DPAreview people and others, this is a recurring problem on engadget. I don't have anything against engadget, but I also don't see why the criticism should be taken down. Rm999

 * *shrug* If an issue isn't particularly notable, then I don't have a problem with removing it.  It's not the goal of the encyclopedia article to list every single public mistake and retraction Engadget has ever made.  If there are sources that can demonstrate a recurring problem, then I might personally think it was notable enough.  --Interiot 08:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * If you read the history here http://www.dapreview.net/news.php?extend.3106 it seems to be an ongoing situation between Engadget & DAPreview for over a year, which I've noticed before with a DAPreview article being linked from Engadget to a site that mirrored DAPreview's article, (causing a 1-2 day delay in the Engadget report.) They've done it before except this time they were caught red-handed (thanks to Google's cache.) WiZZLa 16:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * "Notable" is a subjective and relative term. In the context of this article, I think it is notable as it is currently one of the major criticisms of engadget. If the controversy dies down I would have no problem with you taking it down, but right now I think it is relevant information Rm999

 * Though the URL posted above notes that Engadget fixed mistakes and apologized on at least three separate occasions. Unless there are other citable  sources, it seems like Engadget is trying to do the right thing, but makes mistakes.  I don't know about the wider range of criticisms about Engadget, and don't have time to research it beyond the URLs posted so far, but it seems like a more neutral statement might be along the lines that Engadget has made repeated mistakes, possibly more than a typical journalism organization, but it's not clear that Engadget is trying to be malicious, as Engadget corrects the mistakes and appologizes when called on it.  --Interiot 23:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

 * Again, it's sorta subjective. One side claims they are maliciously being blacklisted and plagarized, and the other side claims they have made a series of mistakes. You are choosing to listen to the latter side when the point of the criticism section is the present the viewpoint of the former. I think it would be great if you included a defense for engadget (most articles i have seen do this), but just saying "the critics are wrong because engadget said so, lets delete the criticism" is not neutral. Rm999 00:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

 * As mentioned in the comments section of the Engadget story, http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/16/nainworks-ubiquitous-multimedia-informator-pmp/, how can you mistakenly crop an image and then miscredit the image source you just cropped? this is willful behavior and should remain as a valid criticism.

 * Well, you can always read engadget's perspective on this issue here: http://www.ryanablock.com/archive/2006/03/controversy/ Dario 03:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't know, the section still seems pretty POV and based on personal opinion to me. Wikipedia's goal isn't to take sides, or even to try to advocate for responsible journalism, admirable goal though it may be. Has the issue been covered by press beyond these two blogs? (no, forum posts in digg or fark don't count). --Interiot 09:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you advocating that we remove it? Should we take a vote? Dario 06:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

 * Should Wikipedia be a venue for the airing of petty grievances? These criticisms aren't notable in the slightest and have been completely ignored by the mainstream media. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)

 * "been completely ignored by the mainstream media."
 * That's a terrible reason to not include something in wikipedia. Many things that get little coverage in the mainstream media are encyclopedia worthy. I've never seen engadget covered in the mainstream media, let's just delete the whole article. To be serious, the criticisms are, in the context of engadget, fairly serious. Many criticisms in other articles may seem trivial to the average person (see EBaum's World), but to the people making the criticisms it is anything but trivial. I have no personal stake in this all, I just like to fight for the little guy and I hate to see past scandals like this forgotten because some editors think they are "petty grievances." Rm999 07:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I like to fight for the little guy too, but wikipedia is not the place for that. Here, we document things from a neutral detached position.  Yes, the EBaum's article may have problems with WP:WEASEL, but here we're just discussing the issues with this article.
 * Okay, the facts: Engadget originally obscured the source of the image. DAPreview noted the image had been copied and cropped.  Engadget apologized and corrected the situation.  That's easy to say, we don't even need other references (fark, digg, etc); DAPreview documents it well, and Engadget admits to it.
 * In terms of ascribing malicious intent to Engadget's actions, that's... pretty difficult to do, especially in an encyclopedic way.  As I said, feel free to briefly mention (with references) multiple past mistakes.  In general, I think the current criticisms section is too long, unless it's going to cover more material.
 * For the section about "homophobic in their choices of content providers", are there any reliable sources for that? If not, it should be removed per WP:WEASEL.  --Interiot 19:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

 * IMO, you are misunderstanding the point of a "Criticisms" section. Criticism does not have to be factual, it is the opinion of someone who is criticising it. I know this can get NPOV, but in this case the "Misattribution" section is not NPOV, from what I can tell. Please indicate what exactly about it is NPOV. It does not say "engadget maliciously did anything," it says something along the lines of "so-and-so criticized engadget for blah, and they also note it has happened several times in the past." It is 100% factual, and I see no point in removing it. BTW, it is not a weasel statement from what i can tell because it cites a specific critic, it is not saying "some people have claimed" or anything like that. As far as the "Politics" section - I think it is poorly written tripe and would not mind seeing it deleted. I will fight to keep the "Misattribution" section though. Rm999 04:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Apple bias
Should Engadget's pro-Apple position be mentioned? The comments regularly point out how Engadget praises Apple products while bashing a virtually identical product from any other company. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)

 * How is that different than any other tech publication. I don't think they are Biased. They like to talk about Apple but Apple is a major gadget maker. --8bitJake 16:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

 * I'd say they're a less biased than TWiT or Diggnation. I don't know, it seems like, from their comments on the podcast, they have an accurate grasp of, say, the iPod market (eg. that the iPod clearly dominates, even though similar products that are somewhat more featureful and/or somewhat less expensive, don't sell nearly as well).  I think they've explicitely said part or all of that, haven't they?  --Interiot 17:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't see how that is different than any other tech publication. I mean PC world magazine does not really cover an iMac or Linux distro than a specilized publication. Engadget is a specialized publication on tech products that the editors are interested about. --8bitJake 17:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I think in the interest of completedness, the bias should be mentioned under criticisms, as it is a criticism that many readers of the blog have encountered. I even mentioned the bias in a post on Engadget, and was banned for doing so by Ryan Block. Seeing as Ryan would rather kick people out than accept any criticisms, I think it is necessary to put these viewpoints in the article. --Kev50027 23 June 2008

Ryan from Engadget here. Kev 50027 is a long time troll who was banned on Engadget for unreasonable behavior. We do NOT ban users for criticizing us, and a cursory look at nearly any post's comments on the site should be evidence of that, as we are constantly criticized and consider that feedback a tool to better our editorial. One user's negative experience -- which that user brought upon himself -- does not reflect that of our vast community. -Ryan July 19, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanblock (talk • contribs) 01:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

 * As of 2009 and the departure of the original editorial head, it could be said that Engadget has been cultivating an anti-Apple bias. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 19:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

 * Comparing the recent reviews of iPad (by the current editorial head Joshua Topolsky) and JooJoo (co-authored by Joshua Topolsky) is enough to see the bias. In the iPad review, there's not a single mention of JooJoo or Fusion Garage; in the JooJoo review, the very first sentence after the fold implies that all good things come from Apple: "even if the iPad wasn't out there for comparisons, its minimalistic design would remind us of an aesthetically pleasing Apple product". The iPad review makes no mention of the widely reported overheating problem, but the JooJoo review say that it "gets quite warm" without actually saying whether or not this makes JooJoo lock up like it is reported to happen with iPad. The iPad says "The battery ... (non-removable of course)" as if removable battery is not a desirable option available in competing products. The JooJoo review even says that it's because of Linux that "type isn't rendered as cleanly as on a Mac or Windows machine". Even if JooJoo's really uses a lousy default font (can't really tell that from the Engadget's photos), that would certainly be no fault of Linux. For example, the Gnome default Bitstream Vera font family, when rendered by FreeType library, looks a lot cleaner than anything I ever seen on Windows or MacOS. Angdraug (talk) 20:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

 * I've removed the section again. It requires external (non-Engadget) citations: is Engadget's supposed bias notable enough to have been covered in some other medium? The section as currently written smells entirely of original research and uses weasel words to assert claims that are probably not as widespread nor as clear as you seem to think. Until you can find external references for this criticism (and no, your personal blog does not count), and the section can be written in an encyclopedic style, it must stay off the page. nneonneo talk 15:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

 * Here are some links: Does the Media Love Apple Too Much? ("Any time the Apple store goes down, Engadget will let you know just in case Apple finally releases its long awaited iJobs personal cancer-curing robot."); Engadget editor: Why I turned off comments ("a common insult hurled in the comments is that Engadget is being paid by Apple to write lots of positive coverage." -- this also confirms that the amount of criticism Engadget was getting over its alleged Apple bias was enough to force them to turn off comments); Techies: I am done with Engadget; Gizmodo is a bad alternative. What tech blog do you use/read? ("They report tech news, but I don't see the seriousness in it, and they are also very Apple-biased."); Engadget Pimps Apple site maintenance as an actual news story. Are any of these high-profile enough to qualify for "other medium"? Angdraug (talk) 11:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Old discussion. Maybe Engaged got less biased after Topolsky left. Looking at the stats, the whole site is becoming less popular, so maybe everyone just stopped caring. I don't know what it's like atm, but the site was very obviously biased. Scoring anything not apple 1-2 points out of ten lower. Even if it recovered in the past years, it was like that for several years and therefor it's worth mentioning. Does anyone feel the links Angdraug provided are insufficient? PizzaMan (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

 * Goine once... going twice... everyone agrees that we now have enough sources? PizzaMan (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd say half a year is quite enough for anyone disagreeing to let us know. Added a sobre singe sentence, with four references. PizzaMan (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I've removed the "Apple bias" section. These allegations are tenuous at best, and a self-published WordPress.com blog is not a reliable source. —  Newslinger  talk   11:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Advertising
Per the advertising criticism section... Blogs are almost never a reliable source. Period, end of story.

Regarding the criticism specifically...  regular readers quickly realize that all of the content is in the upper-left-hand part of the single-post page, and once you focus on that rectangle, there's http://paperlined.org/tmp/engadget/engadget.png (only perhaps 10-20% of ads) that get in between the top of the page and the content that you want to read. If Engadget put 100km of advertisements below the comments, it wouldn't really matter, as everyone would ignore them. --Interiot 15:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

 * I think you have to argue that this is an *unreliable* source, meaning that it is *possibly* untrue. They give evidence for their claim - I don't know how much more reliable one can get. I think when the guidelines say a blog is an unreliable source they mean more like when a blog is reporting something (eg. I heard this guy say something) not when they do some research. If they took the word "blog" out of the url would the source automatically be more reliable? Of course not, that's ridiclous. There are plenty of articles on wikipedia that use webpages as sources.

 * I would argue a page with 100km of advertisements would be hard to navigate and take forever to load. I know you are exaggerating, but this criticism exists for those same reasons IMO. Rm999 06:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

 * It is becoming increasingly obvious that RM999 has some sort of unexplained bias against Engadget and/or Weblogs Inc. It's people like him that are ruining Wikipedia. Wikipedia is intended to be a comprehensive source on matters of note, not a laundry list of petty grievances. Have ANY of his contributions to this page been on matters of note or true importance? Not in the slightest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)

 * I'm not going to respond to that because it is a personal attack on me and does not further your own point. You have to argue the issue, not attack the people who support the other side. Based on the fact that you removed my additions without being able to argue your own side leads me to believe you are the one with the unexplained bias. Oh - and please don't vandalize my user page again. Rm999 03:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Right, the layout of the page is clear enough to anyone, but the conclusion (that the page features an abnormally high number of ads relative to competing blogs or media, that readers are likely to be annoyed at the difficulty of finding the desired content among the ads, or that page loads or renders abnormally slowly) is not especially well-supported. If conclusions such as this were published by the New York Times, for instance, the section would be unassailable. Since Engadget's layout isn't particularly academic or noteworthy, it's difficult to pin down what counts as a reputable source for commentary on it. However, since http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?&compare_sites=&y=p&q=&size=medium&range=&url=photoshopblog.net (photoshopblog.net has a relatively small number of readers), I don't think it has much more credibility than any editor on wikipedia would have, and therefore, I think the conclusions are best classified as original research. --Interiot 20:41, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

 * So I think your arguments are twofold: the criticisms aren't well supported, and that the source isn't reputable. As far as the claim not being supported - someone made the criticism, IMO that means it is supported by someone. Beyond that, it is a bunch of opinions, as the claims are subjective. Maybe 30% of the population agrees and 70% disagrees - I don't think it's wikipedia's job to do this second step unless it is exceedingly and obviously one-sided.

 * You use the number of visitors to the site to claim it isn't popular and therefore not reputable (this reasoning sort of escapes me, but whatever). Look at your link again... There were 15 MILLION visitors the day they made this claim. According to your reasoning does this mean it was reputable that one day? You also claim that the layout of Engadget isn't noteworthy, but I would disagree simply because this is an article ABOUT engadget! If only 10% (or whatever) of the layout of a website is devoted to its main function (in this case articles) I would call that interesting and worth noting. Rm999 03:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

 * I don't quite understand. Since the claim is supported by one person, that makes the conclusion not original research?  Two, it's not 15 million visitors, it's 15 / 1,000,000 visitors.  Three, http://digg.com/design/Engadget.com_-_A_Visual_Breakdown. (one dugg story) on one day does not a reliable source make.  Maybe the blog has a lot of standing among the web layout community or something, but from what I saw, the blog didn't seem to be much more reliable than a blog I'd start tommorow, for instance.  --Interiot 06:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Hmm, you are right, it is 15/1000000. I'm not sure if that's a lot or not, but I don't see how many people read the page should matter anyway. I think the validity of the criticism should be what is at stake here, not how many people read the blog by the guy who came up with the criticism. The blog was a medium for a person to make a criticism just as much as the editoral page of the new york times would have been.

 * To answer your question directly, I do not think what I added was original research. As I understand it, the only way you could make that point is by arguing that my source is not reputable (because I cite a source). I think that is impossible to argue because they are simply stating a fact. If a blog with 1 reader states that 37294923 + 2458293 = 39753216, I would not call it original research for me to add that to wikipedia even though it is not listed anywhere else. This is because it is a fact that cannot be countered.

 * It seems to me like you're other argument is that this is not that big of a deal, in which case I entirely agree. At the same time, I see no reason why a sentence in the article should matter so much as it can only add to the reader's general understanding of the subject matter. I'm getting kind of tired arguing about petty things like this, but at the same time when I see people fighting so hard to remove my edits (which, by their nature, regardless of the article, tend to be criticisms because I think wikipedia needs more of them), I question why. I have nothing against engadget, I am just trying to present more opinions about it. Why have both criticisms I have added met with so much resistance? I feel like there is a constant push on wikipedia to offend no one by removing anything that criticizes anything. Anything as big as engadget will have its critics. Rm999 10:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

 * Coming up with the fact that "30% of Engadget's single-post view pages are advertising" or "5% of Wall Street Journal webpages are advertising" is NOT AN ISSUE in the slightest. What's original research is the opinion that the percentage of advertising is too much, or that it's a widely held opinion.

 * It IS relatively unimportant, thank you for acknowledging that. One issue is neutrality...  for Wikipedia's articles on spyware programs, it's probably appropriate to dedicate 80% of those articles to criticisms, because that most accurately/objectively represents society's response to those topics.  For Engadget, it's not appropriate to dedicate a large percentage to criticism, because I think the most neutral/objective/accurate way to portray Engadget is that society's response has been largely positive.

 * Another issue is notability... The non-criticism sections of this article don't delve into every possible little fact about Engadget (where an editor lives, where they grew up, what they ate for breakfast this morning), so it's also not appropriate to detail every little criticism either.  In fact, as far as notability goes, the standard is currently fairly strict...  I removed the list of Engadget writers, not for censorship reasons, but because other articles on major newspapers don't list their full staff, and it's probably not good to portray Engadget as being significantly more important than the largest newspapers out there.  If the full staff list of Engadget isn't important enough to be included, then many of the criticisms aren't remotely important enough to be included.

 * Another issue is OR/Verifiability, or whatever you call it... it would not be appropriate to ask a random person on the street "what do you think about this front page of Engadget?"  "Oh, I really don't like that shade of blue", and then add that statement here.  People say crazy random things sometimes, and it's not the goal of wikipedia to document every crazy random thing someone says, even if you can find a few people from Digg who would agree to a given statement.  --Interiot 19:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

 * So, I think I am going to give up on this, you do make some good points, and frankly I think I'm wasting my time. About the criticism section, IMO this is what we should do: remove the Politics thing (it's a pointless criticism), keep Misattribution, remove the layout thing (which I see has already been done) but link to the cited article. I'll add the link, and I probably won't check to see if it gets removed, so use your best judgement if you do (ie. don't remove it because you are biased and think engadget is beyond *any* sort of criticism, ahem <IP_ADDRESS>). Rm999 20:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Rm999 is clearly biased, just because a criticism has been made does not make it noteworthy. Please note that his view of what should be in Wikipedia differs significantly from established standards for inclusion. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by <IP_ADDRESS> (talk • contribs)

Merge?
I have suggested that Ryan Block be merged into this article. Please discuss, but do not remove the merge tag unless the issue has been resolved. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 06:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

The Ryan Block page of Wikipedia is a biography and is a separate page from engadget. While the two articles are related, they are not the same and need to be kept separated. The same goes for Benjamnin Heckendorn, Peter Rojas, Daran Murph, etc, Keep their biographies separate from the main engadget article.

An example of this might be President Ronald Reagan and Vice President George Bush. Those are two separate articles that are closely related but both men get their own article and are connected via internal links. --<IP_ADDRESS> 18:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I also agree, should be merged**Mr.Bombo** 09:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Person != Job. Telepheedian 18:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Engadget-logo.svg
File:Engadget-logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Alleged Trademark infringement
by Engadget : http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/01/painting-the-town-magenta/ --Wikibert (talk) 19:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Masthead updates
Hey everybody, Ryan Block from Engadget here. I don't want to edit our page, but I would like people to take notice that our masthead has changed significantly, and our roster of editors as listed on Wikipedia is very out of date. Please see the latest masthead at engadget.com/about. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanblock (talk • contribs) 01:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, the link for Joshua Topolsky led to Joshua Topolsky which is not the same person. A new page needs to be created. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roubitch (talk • contribs) 18:05, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Engadget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511054156/http://corp.aol.com/products-services/local to http://corp.aol.com/products-services/local

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Engadget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606091539/http://technorati.com/blogs/top100/ to http://technorati.com/blogs/top100

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Uncited material in need of citations
I am moving the following uncited and poorly-cited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. The material includes information that is both uncited, and which is accompanied by forty-two citations of the article subject itself, a degree of reliance on primary sources that is inappropriate. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

History
Engadget's editor-in-chief, Ryan Block, announced on July 22, 2008, that he would be stepping down as editor-in-chief in late August, leaving the role to Joshua Topolsky. On March 12, 2011, Topolsky announced that he was leaving Engadget to start The Verge. Editorial director Joshua Fruhlinger appointed Tim Stevens as the editor-in-chief.

On February 13, 2013, AOL acquired gdgt, a device review website that was created by Rojas and Block.

...with Perton leaving AOL to pursue other opportunities.

In April 2017, Christopher Trout became editor-in-chief. alongside Dana Wollman as executive editor, Olivia Kristiansen as director of video and Jose del Corral as head of product.

In September 2018, Wollman was promoted to editor-in-chief of Engadget. The site's general manager is Adam Morath, who also oversees sister site Autoblog.

In May 2021, Verizon sold its media businesses, including Engadget, to Apollo Global Management for $5 billion.

Blogs
Engadget operates a number of blogs spanning seven different languages including English, Chinese (traditional and simplified), Japanese, Spanish, Polish (until April 1, 2010), Korean and German. The English edition of Engadget operates four blogs which, like the international editions, have been assimilated into a single site with a sub-domain prefix. These include Engadget Classic (the original Engadget blog), Engadget Mobile, Engadget HD and Engadget Alt. As of late 2013, these editions exist but have been wrapped into Engadget Classic. In March 2014, a UK edition of Engadget also launched to target the developing European tech market.

Industry analyst Ross Rubin contributed a weekly column called Switched On from October 2004 to March 2014.

Engadget uses proprietary AOL CMS to publish its content.

Since its founding, writers who have contributed to Engadget, Engadget Alt, Engadget Mobile and Engadget HD, include Jason Calacanis, Paul Boutin, Phillip Torrone, Joshua Fruhlinger and Susan Mernit. Darren Murph, has worked on the site as managing editor and editor-at-large. He has written over 17,212 posts as of October 5, 2010.

Podcast
The Engadget Podcast was launched in October 2004 and was originally hosted by Phillip Torrone and Len Pryor. Torrone was the host for the first 22 episodes of the podcast at which point Eric Rice took over. Eric Rice is known for his own podcast, called The Eric Rice Show and has also produced podcasts for Weblogs, Inc.. Eric hosted and produced four episodes of the podcast for Engadget until the show was taken over by Peter Rojas and Ryan Block. The podcast was hosted by Editor-in-chief Joshua Topolsky along with editors Paul Miller and Nilay Patel with occasional special guests until their 2011 departure. The podcast was produced by Trent Wolbe under Topolsky's editorship and continued to be under Tim Stevens until December 2012.

The topic of discussion for the podcast is technology-related and closely linked to events that have happened during the week in the world of technology. The show generally lasts an hour or more. The show is normally weekly, however, the frequency can change, especially during special events. When events such as the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) and the Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) occur, the podcast has been known to be broadcast daily.

The Engadget Podcast is available as a subscription through iTunes and as an RSS feed. Alternatively, it can be downloaded directly from the site in either MP3, Ogg, AAC or m4b format. The m4b version features images related to the current topic of discussion and can be displayed in iTunes or on a compatible player.

Engadget started doing live podcasts, usually broadcasting Thursday or Friday afternoons hosted by Ben Gilbert and Terrence O'Brien. The recorded podcast is usually available the day after. Engadget also hosts weekly Mobile and HD-focused podcasts, with the former typically featuring Brad Molen, and the latter is generally hosted by Ben Drawbaugh and Richard Lawler.

As of June 27, 2014, all Engadget podcasts are on hiatus according to a tweet sent out from Engadget's Twitter account.

App
Engadget then released its app for the Palm Pre and Palm Pixi phones on January 1, 2010 claiming it was the "1000th application in the "webOS" Catalog". A week later, on January 8, 2010, they launched the app on the BlackBerry platform. An app for Android devices was released on March 25, 2010 and the app for Windows Phone was released on July 1, 2011, making the app available on all major mobile smartphone platforms. On December 15, 2010, Engadget debuted its official iPad app, while Engadget updated its Android app to support Honeycomb (and in turn, Android tablets) on July 28, 2011. The app's features included sharing articles through Twitter, Facebook or email, the ability to tip Engadget on breaking news, and the ability to bookmark and view articles offline. Engadget also debuted "Engadget Mini," an app that seemed to replicate Tumblr ahead of CES 2014, during which the site shared other tweets and media content out of the event. Since CES, the app just duplicates all published articles on the site and its fate or future use is unclear.

On February 2017, Engadget launched a completely redesigned version of the app after three years without any update.

In 2019, Engadget stopped publishing new content to their app, which was removed from the Apple Store and the Google Play store.

Distro
Engadget Distro was a tablet magazine from the editors at Engadget that has been published on a weekly basis since its inception, although Special Issues have appeared at times and multiple issues per week are published during the annual Consumer Electronics Show (CES). The magazine was born from Tim Stevens' desire to provide a different, distilled look at a week's worth of Engadget news, and to enable readers to enjoy that coverage without the frantic nature of the online experience being necessarily attached. The magazine was announced on September 20, 2011 and teased on that night's episode of The Engadget Show in New York City. It became available to the public on October 12, 2011, with the initial issues being available for Apple's iPad. On December 21, 2011, Distro officially moved into the Newsstand app within Apple's iOS ecosystem while also becoming available for the first time on Android tablets. Each issue is also made available in PDF form.

While Distro began as a way to see a week's worth of Engadget news distilled down into a single magazine, it evolved into a platform where high-profile features and long-form content are launched. Brian Heater's profile of Apple's third founder, Ron Wayne, was the cover story for Issue 18, while Issue 69 featured an in-depth look at PayPal coupled with an interview with its president, David Marcus. In October 2013, Distro was folded into parent Engadget and is no longer producing a weekly edition.

Engadget Expand
On December 11, 2012, Engadget announced Expand, a "live event and expo for gadget fans." This marks Engadget's first major foray into the conference world, following several years of sporadic meetups at smaller venues in New York City and San Francisco. Engadget alum Barb Dybwad was brought on to help launch the event. The inaugural event will be held March 16–17, 2013 at the Fort Mason Center in San Francisco, and it will feature "live panel and one-on-one sessions" as well as an Insert Coin: New Challengers competition where hardware startups can compete for exposure and other prizes. Nearly 2,000 people attended the first Expand, and exhibitors / panelists included Google, Microsoft, Toyota, Kickstarter, Indiegogo, Lenovo, Microsoft, Oculus Rift, Razer, Boston Dynamics, NASA, Samsung, DJ Spooky, Esko Bionics, ZBoard and Ouya.

Tickets at the door are "$60 for a full pass, $40 for Saturday (includes the after-party) and $30 for just Sunday."

As the inaugural Expand closed, editor-in-chief Tim Stevens announced that a second Expand conference would occur in Q4 2013 in New York City. At Expand New York 2013, the site welcomed big names including LeVar Burton, Ben Heck, Reggie Watts, Spike Lee, Ben Huh and speakers from companies like Google, Sony, Facebook and Pebble.

While the attempt to make the event biannual did not pan out, the now annual Expand event is free of charge. and will return to New York City in November 2014.

Engadget also hosts a myriad of smaller meetup style events called Engadget Live, a merger of then gdgt and Engadget events prior to the site's merger.

The Engadget Show
File:Engadget-Show-Ident-Logo-01-June-2011.jpg File:Engadget Show Original Ident.jpg On September 8, 2009, Joshua Topolsky announced that Engadget would be taping a new video show once a month in New York City. Admission to the show was free, and video of it was posted on the website. It featured one-on-one interviews, roundtable discussions, short video segments, and live music. At first it was taped at the Tishman Auditorium at Parsons The New School for Design, but after the fifth show it began taping at The Times Center, part of The New York Times Building.

The show was originally hosted by Joshua Topolsky along with editors Paul Miller and Nilay Patel. After their departure from Engadget and AOL in early 2011 newly appointed editor in chief Tim Stevens became the show's host. It is directed by Michelle Stahl and is executive produced by Joshua Fruhlinger and Michael Rubens. As of 2014, the show is cancelled.

Trademarks
In early 2006, Engadget reported that they were victims of their likeness being stolen and used as a store name at a mall in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. However, they stated they would not be taking any action. The store has since changed its name (or possibly shut down and a new store opened with a new name). In July 2007, another store had opened, also in Malaysia, with a logo bearing the same resemblance to that of Engadget.

On March 31, 2008, Engadget reported that Deutsche Telekom (the parent company of T-Mobile and T-Mobile USA) had sent a letter requesting that Engadget cease using the color magenta in its Engadget Mobile site, claiming that T-Mobile had trademarked the color. Engadget issued a response on April 1, mainly by repainting the Engadget sites and changing the Mobile logo for the day to a logo that looks as though it is saying "Engadge t-mobile". The site has since returned to normal format, with the exception of the highlighting color.

The Verge
It appears the departure of the team from AOL which includes not only Topolsky but editors Nilay Patel, Paul Miller, Joanna Stern, Ross Miller, Chris Ziegler, Chad Mumm, Justin Glow, Dan Chilton, Thomas Ricker and Vladislav Savov was primarily the cause of an internal memo distributed by AOL detailing "The AOL Way", a 58-page long company plan to grow AOL into a media empire. Some employees suggested that AOL was sacrificing journalism for page views and that it would be difficult for the organization to apply a 'one size fits all' business model to reporting. The group set up a "placeholder site", This Is My Next, while they developed a new technology news site in partnership with Vox Media. The new site, called The Verge, was launched on November 1, 2011.

Awards
Engadget has been nominated for numerous awards, including 2004 Bloggie for Best Technology Weblog, and 2005 Bloggies for Best Computers or Technology Weblog and Best Group Weblog; Engadget won Best Tech Blog in the 2004 and 2005 Weblog Awards.

The Engadget Show won the 2011 People's Voice Webby Award in Consumer Electronics, while also winning the official Webby in Consumer Electronics (voted on by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences).

title: Talk:Engadget


text:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Campbell, Duchess of Argyll

The result was delete. Tone 20:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Eleanor Campbell, Duchess of Argyll

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article appears to be here solely for the sake of genealogy, which is contrary to WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. I am unable to find any significant coverage that would prove the subject's notability as defined by WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. There appears to be in-depth coverage at all. Surtsicna (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Delete just being married to a peer is not a defalt sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NOTGENEOLOGY and WP:NOTINHERITED. There doesn't seem to be significant coverage of the individual oustide of being in the peerage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EverybodyEdits (talk • contribs) 20:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment the Duchess of Argyll is an integral part of the British aristocracy which is still very important even in the 21st century, see Nobility.   -- Devoke water   (talk)  22:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

source: wikimedia

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Talk:Harbortown, Perth Amboy

Coordinate error
Harbortown is located north of current coords along the Athur Kill.Djflem (talk) 20:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. Deor (talk) 12:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

title: Talk:Harbortown, Perth Amboy


text:
Talk:howay

Spelling of "howay"
Howay is the attempted "standardised spelling" of haway. I'm from the northeast and nobody up here spells the word "howay" in fact, many Geordies and other northeasterners resent the word being spelled in this way and they see it as an[other] attempt What a loads of rubbish, 'Howey' is the way it is and should always be spelt! southerners to set the standard in our "language". "Howay" is occasionally used by the upper classes to try and show their "connections to the working class" but seriously, "howay" is an insult! It most likely came about because the people who originally put it into the dictionary couldn't make out the difference of Geordie "a" and "o". There have even been petitions to St. James' Park to change the saying above the door of the changing room from "Howay the lads" to "Haway the lads". When Jimmy Carter (US President at the time) visited Newcastle he even read it as "haway the lads" not howay.

Therefore I think that this whole article should be moved to "haway" with "howay" made the alternative spelling, NOT the standard spelling.

What a load of rubbish, 'Howay' is the way it is and should always be spelt!

 * It's spelt many ways and both howay and haway are acceptable in my opinion. I'm not sure which part of the toon your from but both forms seem to be spoken, I have friends from both ends of the City and difference in pronunciation spans the range from haway to howay. Remeber its a varied dialect and any attempt to have the proper spelling will only marginalise folk. This article will not be moved.--Williamsayers79 08:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Quebecois French

I find it interesting that in Quebec and Canadian French they use the exact same expression with the same meaning. I don't think they use it in France, but I could be wrong. I think it's spelled "aweille" or "aoueille" and basically means "let's go" "vas-y" or "on y a va" and it's more or less pronounced the same "haway". I'd be interested to know if linguists have looked into the origin of that expression... why would that word turn up specifically in Quebecois French and Geordie English?

It appears in Beowulf, too, as the first word (after the Prologue) in the first part. In the 1898 Oxford University Press Edition, it is spelt 'Haway!' and translated 'What Ho!'

Are you sure? It's not in the Bosworth-Toller dictionary, and "y" was an umlauted "u" in Old English, so "-ay" would be very unusual. Are you sure you're not looking at a scanno for "Hwæt"? Chuck Entz (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Mentalmicky

i'm afraid you're all confused. Howay is geordie, Haway is mackem (plastic geordies to you) speak

HA'WAY NOT HOWAY

The article is correct in stating the term as 'Haway'. There has been a swing to the other term 'Howay' by people who can't understand the structure of the word and so associate it the 'How' part with the word how. It has nothing to do with Geordie or Mackem influences but mor a grasp of the word structure itself. The word probably came from the term 'have way', which was used by early settlers to express an urgency to 'move on'. They used this a lot and also the term 'have a care' to signify taking care. So the term most probably derived from 'have way' and has been shortened over the generations to ha'way.

Please learn your linguistic history before commenting. Oh and the whole language of the north east is a mish mosh of all the invading tribes and cultures who came and settled in the area from Europe and elsewhere. So the Geordie dialect is in fact a bastardisation of many languages, as indeed is English itself. We in the north east can take little credit for our dialect ourselves but we can be proud of it. Ian, linguistic historian

Just look at the sign at sjp, it says howay, the Mackems sign says haway, make of that what u will

I write it ha'way but do not claim that to be definitive. However, I am interested in how that relates to haddaway - they could even have been the same word originally, although the meanings have diverged.

title: Talk:howay


text:
Lokotrans Aréna

Lokotrans Aréna is a multi-purpose stadium in Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic. It is currently used mostly for football matches and is the home ground of FK Mladá Boleslav. The stadium holds 5,000 people. The stadium was known as Městský stadion Mladá Boleslav until July 2019, when it was renamed for sponsorship reasons to Lokotrans Aréna.

International matches
Městský stadion has hosted two friendly matches of the Czech Republic national football team.

title: Lokotrans Aréna


text:
Filmmaking Basics/Thumbnail Storyboard/Step by Step/aaaaaaaaaa

Excellent Decision!
Now the first four shots are:

$$\Rightarrow$$ Fade In $$\Rightarrow$$ $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$   $$\Rightarrow$$ Dolly Out  $$\Rightarrow$$      $$\Rightarrow$$ Pedestal Down $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$   $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$  $$\Rightarrow$$ Cut To  $$\Rightarrow$$

EXTERIOR - The local movie theater - NIGHT

(1) The Young Person and Old Person stand looking at the movie poster outside the theater.

(2) Young Person: "That was a great movie..."

(3) Young Person (contined): "but I do not understand one thing."

(4) Old Person: "What's that?"

(5) Young Person: "How can anyone be seduced by the Dark Side?"

(6) The old person thinks for a while.

(7) Old Person: "What computer do you have at home?"

(8) Young Person (eagerly): "A Macintosh!"

(9) Old Person: "But what computer does your father use at work?"

Next Frame?
The Old Person says, "But what computer does your father use at work?"

 * Option A
 * The Old Person says, "But what computer does your father use at work?"

 * Option B
 * The Old Person says, "But what computer does your father use at work?"

Now Decide!

 * Select either option A or B

 * If you change your mind, you can go back to the previous page.

 * Reference Material
 * All the thumbnail storyboard frames.
 * The unformatted script.
 * The original story.
 * The [[Media:SBTDS Script Ciprian2.pdf|formatted script]].
 * To start over, go back to the beginning.


text:
Transcendology

 * See also
 * Wikipedia: Transcendentalism
 * Transcendental Experiences
 * Transcendentalism And Spirituality

 * Transcendental Christian Mysticism

Transcendology

 * 1) A study of Transcendentalism.
 * 2) The application of transcendentalism to spirituality.
 * 3) Asserts that truthfulness and rationality in religions are truths that can be substantiated by science or those that can not be proven to be incorrect.
 * 4) A doctrine and proclamation that spiritual transcendence and spiritual interaction, if one believes this to be an actuality, could only be possible between the spiritual existence and the spirit of man.
 * 5) A tenet proclamation that supernatural acts performed by physical or spiritual beings in the physical universe are not capable of existing or transpiring.
 * 6) The transcending, or going beyond, empiricism, and ascertaining a priori the fundamental principles of human knowledge.
 * 7) A philosophy which holds that reasoning is key to understanding reality (associated with Kant); philosophy which stresses intuition and spirituality (associated with Ralph Waldo Emerson); transcendental character or quality.
 * 8) transcendologist; a movement of writers and philosophers in New England in the 19th Century who were loosely bound together by adherence to an idealistic system of thought based on a belief in the essential supremacy of insight over logic and experience for the revelation of the deepest truths.
 * The spirit of man – consciousness; the vital principle or animating force within living things; a fundamental emotional and activating principle determining one's character; liveliness, life; animation and energy in action or expression; denotes the rational, immortal soul by which man is distinguished. Dr. Lommel (NDE)states “You can call consciousness outside the brain "spirit", if you like, but this can be confusing because not everybody has the same ideas about what exactly "spirit" should be. And there are several "levels" of consciousness, waking consciousness, dreaming consciousness, "subconsciousness", collective human consciousness, morphogenetic consciousness, higher consciousness, cosmic consciousness, and Divine consciousness. All these levels of consciousness are interconnected, and available, also during our life in our body”.
 * Spiritual transcendence, spiritual interaction - Spiritual transcendence into a Dimensional beyondness is a concept that was first used by Kierkegaard to convey the idea transcendence. Transcendence is thought of not as spatial distance, but as God's being in a different dimension altogether, or in a different realm of reality, from that in which we exist.
 * A tenet proclamation in Transcendology that supernatural acts performed by physical or spiritual beings in the physical universe are not capable of existing or transpiring…and the doctrine and proclamation that spiritual transcendence and spiritual interaction, if one believes this to be an actuality, could only be possible between the spiritual existence and the spirit of man…are based on rational certainty and the knowledge that the contrary would violate the laws of nature.
 * Kant sharply distinguishes opinion, belief, and knowledge, the three "modes of holding-to-be-true", three kinds of judgment "through which something is presented as true". Knowledge is the strongest mode of judgment of truth and is apodeictic: "what I know, I hold to be apodeictically certain, i.e. to be universally and objectively certain", although Kant suggests that we can make this judgment about "a mere empirical truth". [L:78] This kind of knowledge--"or certainty"--is a judgment of truth by on "a cognitive ground that is both objectively and subjectively sufficient". There are two kinds of knowledge (certainty), empirical and rational. Rational certainty is mathematical (in which case it is intuitive certainty) or discursive; all rational certainty is apodeictic. By contrast, "empirical certainty" is not apodeictic (And thus not, strictly speaking, knowledge?) but assertoric. Kant comments, "we cannot have rational certainty of everything, but where we can have it, we must prefer it to the empirical". [A320/B377]
 * In the Critique, Kant's first definition of knowledge--as "objective perception"--occurs early in the Dialectic. Kant gives this "definition" in the midst of an appeal not to use the term `idea' loosely, but to follow his terminology for the various kinds of representations; the passage rather confusingly invokes many earlier distinctions. Kant writes: "The genus is representation in general. Subordinate to it stands representation with consciousness. A perception which relates solely to the subject as the modification of its state is sensation, an objective perception is knowledge. This is either intuition or concept, the concept is either an empirical or a pure concept". [A822/B850] Much later in the Dialectic Kant speaks of knowledge in the terms of the Logic, writing "the holding of a thing to be true...has the following three degrees: opining, believing, and knowing....when the holding of a thing to be true is sufficient both subjectively and objectively, it is knowledge....Objective sufficiency is termed certainty". Presumably the "empirical knowledge"--experience--discussed in the Aesthetic and Analytic is different from this, which Kant characterizes (and then presumably goes on to critique) as "the transcendental employment of reason". In the Deduction in B, Kant speaks of the understanding as "the faculty of knowledge"--presumably empirical knowledge of appearances. "This knowledge consists in the determinate relation of given representations to an object; and an object is that in the concept of which the manifold of a given intuition is united", suggesting, as he does later, a coherence theory of (the nature of) truth. Of course, there is no kind of this knowledge beyond experience.

Metaphysics of Transcedentalism

 * Used by Kant in many senses:
 * to refer to a type of philosophy, to a type of deduction, to a type of exposition,
 * to types of idealism and realism,
 * to "content",
 * to a way of employing the faculties of the mind,
 * to the unity of apperception, to different types of proofs,
 * to a type of reflection,
 * to a special unknown "transcendental object = x",
 * to a type of truth,
 * to a type of knowledge,
 * to a type of reflection,
 * to a type of illusion,
 * to subjects(selves),
 * to certain ideas,
 * to a sort of negation,
 * to principles,
 * to a kind of theology,
 * to a type of hypothesis--not to mention the term's use in contrast to empirical, transcendent, etc.

Nevertheless, Kant did hazard some general comments about the meaning of the term. In the Introduction, he writes "I entitle transcendental all knowledge which is occupied not so much with objects as with the mode of our knowledge of objects in so far as this mode of knowledge is to be possible a priori". In the Dialectic he defines a different usage: "we shall entitle the principles whose application is confined entirely within the limits of possible experience, immanent; and those, on the other hand, which profess to pass beyond these limits, transcendent. In the case of these latter, I am not referring to the transcendental employment of misemployment of the categories, which is merely an error of the faculty of judgment when it is not duly curbed by criticism". Kant offers innumerable other such definitions in the Critique, e.g. "synthetic propositions in regard to things in general, the intuition of which does not admit to being given a priori, are transcendental. Transcendental propositions can never be given through construction of concepts, but only in accordance with concepts that are a priori"

Kant's four main perspectives, aiming to establish a kind of knowledge which is both synthetic and a priori. It is a special type of philosophical knowledge, concerned with the necessary conditions for the possibility of experience. However, Kant believes all knowing subjects assume certain transcendental truths, whether or not they are aware of it. Transcendental knowledge defines the boundary between empirical knowledge and speculation about the transcendent realm. 'Every event has a cause' is a typical transcendental statement. The science of real as distinguished from phenomenal being; ontology; also, the science of being, with reference to its abstract and universal conditions, as distinguished from the science of determined or concrete being; the science of the conceptions and relations which are necessarily implied as true of every kind of being; phylosophy in general; first principles, or the science of first principles.

Note:
 * Metaphysics is distinguished as general and special.
 * General metaphysics is the science of all being as being.
 * Special metaphysics is the science of one kind of being; as, the metaphysics of chemistry, of morals, or of politics. According to Kant, a systematic exposition of those notions and truths, the knowledge of which is altogether independent of experience, would constitute the science of metaphysics. Commonly, in the schools, called metaphysics, as being part of the philosophy of aristotle, which hath that for title; but it is in another sense: For there it signifieth as much as "books written or placed after his natural philosophy." But the schools take them for "books of supernatural philosophy;" for the word metaphysic will bear both these senses. Obbes. Now the science conversant about all such inferences of unknown being from its known manifestations, is called ontology, or metaphysics proper. w. Hamilton. Metaphysics are [is] the science which determines what can and what can not be known of being, and the laws of being, a priori. Hence: the scientific knowledge of mental phenomena; mental philosophy; psychology. metaphysics, in whatever latitude the term be taken, is a science or complement of sciences exclusively occupied with mind. w. Hamilton. Whether, after all, a larger metaphysics might not help our physics.

Epistemology of Transcedentalism
The theory of knowledge: the study of the nature, sources, and validity of knowledge. It differs from logic and psychology. Logic is concerned with the specific and formal problem of correct reasoning, while epistemology deals with the nature of reasoning, with truth, and with the process of knowing themselves. Psychology is concerned with a descriptive study of behavior, phenomena, etc., while epistemology deals with our claims to knowledge, i.e., what we mean by & knowing Epistemological realism.

Related terms

 * philosophy
 * religion
 * transcendental
 * transcendentalist

title: Transcendology


text:
Llewellyn M. K. Boelter

Llewellyn Michael Kraus Boelter (August 7, 1898 – July 27, 1966) was an American engineer, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles, and founding Dean of its UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science.

In the late 1920s Boelter came into prominence for by his work in the field heat transfer, for which he had investigated heat transfer in the automobile radiator of the tubular type. F. W. Dittus and Boelter proposed "a convective heat transfer correlation for turbulent flows," which became known as the Dittus-Boelter equation. In 1957 he was awarded the ASME Medal.

Early life and education
Boelter was born Winona, Minnesota in 1898, son of John Julius Boelter and Clara Carolina (Kraus) Boelter. His ancestors had "endured the ravages of Indian attacks and had served in the battles of the Civil War," which triggered an early and lasting interest in American history.

After regular education in the states of Minnesota and Washington, Boelter obtained his BSc in 1917 at the College of Mechanics of the University of California, Berkeley, now UC Berkeley College of Engineering, and his MSc in Electrical Engineering in 1918. In 1917 he had been awarded a John W. Mackay, Jr., Fellowship in Electrical Engineering to make this happen.

Career and acknowledgement
In 1919 Boelter started his academic career at the University of California, Berkeley as instructor in electrical engineering in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. In 1923 he became assistant professor of experimental engineering, in 1927 to associate professor of mechanical engineering, and in 1934 he was appointed full professor. In 1943 Boelter served as associate dean of engineering at Berkeley, and in 1944 became founding dean of its college of engineering, the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science.

Boelter was awarded the Lamme Award by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the ASME Medal by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) in 1957, and the Max Jakob Memorial Award by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICC) and the ASME. Purdue University awarded him the honorary degree of Doctor of Engineering.

Selected publications

 * Boelter, Llewellyn Michael Kraus, G. Young, and H. W. Iversen. An investigation of aircraft heaters. University of California, Department of Engineering, 1946.
 * Boelter, L. M. K., G. Young, and H. W. Iversen. An Investigation of Aircraft Heaters XXVII: Distribution of Heat-transfer Rate in the Entrance Section of a Circular Tube. NACA Technical Note No. 1451, 1948.
 * Boelter, Llewellyn Michael Kraus. Heat transfer notes. Univ of California Press, 1948.
 * Seifert, Howard S., and Llewellyn Michael Kraus Boelter, eds. Space Technology. Vol. 1. Wiley, 1959.

Articles, a selection

 * F.W. Dittus, L.M.K. Boelter. "Heat transfer in automobile radiator Radiator of the tubular type," University of California at Berkeley Publ. Eng., 2 (1930), pp. 443–461
 * Martinelli, R. C., Boelter, L. M. K., Weinberg, E. B., & Yakahi, S. (1943). "Heat transfer to a fluid flowing periodically at low frequencies in a vertical tube." Trans. Asme, 65(7), 789-798.
 * Boelter, L. M. K., HSj Gordon, and J. R. Griffin. "Free evaporation into air of water from a free horizontal quiet surface." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 38.6 (1946): 596-600.

title: Llewellyn M. K. Boelter


text:
Lamichhane

Lamichhane (लामिछाने) is a surname found in Nepal. Used by Bahun, Chhetri, Magar and Gurung, the name originates from Lamachhini village in west central Nepal.They belong to different clans such as Aatreya,Garga etc. They are sacred thread bearers (Tagadhari), twice-born Hindus and trace their origins to Indo-Aryan people.They are connected with the Thapa dynasty of the Nepal.

Lamichhane Thapa

They Belong to Garg Gotra. It is believed that Lamichhane were firstly originated from Dailekh district from Nepal then later they came and settled in Gorkha, Sarangkot, Kaski. They served in various military campaigns during the unification and expansion of Nepal and settled in newly acquired regions of expanding kingdom. Sardar Ram Krishna Thapa, ancestor of Surya Bahadur Thapa, was appointed administrator of newly acquired eastern province and settled in Mugu, Dhankuta. His youngest brother, Dharma Raj Thapa, was sent to Tityang, Baglung and that's where his descendants can be found today. Only non Tibetan/Mongolian Victoria Cross winner of Nepal Sher Bahadur Thepa, Former 5 time Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa and Janakabi Dharmaraj Thapa are some notable people of this Khasa clan of Thapa Kaji. Poet Dharmaraj Thapa had published a Lamichhane Thapa genealogy in 1982. Some notable Lamichhane include:

 * Gopal Chandra Lamichhane (b. 1974), Nepalese film director
 * Jiba Lamichhane, Nepalese businessman
 * Khagendra Lamichhane, Nepalese actor, writer and director
 * Rabi Lamichhane, Nepalese politician and journalist
 * Rabin Lamichhane, Nepalese Folk Singer, Creator
 * Sandeep Lamichhane (b. 2000), Nepalese cricketer
 * Santosh Lamichhane, Nepalese writer
 * Sarita Lamichhane (b. 1975), Nepalese actress
 * Shankar Lamichhane, Nepalese writer
 * Manoj Khanal, Scientist and Academician(CCT,Dharan)

title: Lamichhane


text:
Talk:Christien Rioux

Notability
Subject appears to meet WP:BIO. --SmackTacular 15:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where are the sources writing about him? I personally think he belongs here one way or another, but the article is seriously lacking in sources. All that can be said about him from the current sources is that he was a member of some groups and wrote such and such a paper and a piece of software; that isn't much. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 15:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ...in your opinion. --Myles Long 18:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So you're telling me that because there isn't an article explicitly about him, he is somewhat less notable for the things he's accomplished? --SmackTacular 18:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that we can't write about things that other people haven't. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * His accomplishments are well documented, that's why they return thousands of google hits, a ton of articles, et cetera. I think, of the things to question, notability isn't one of them! --SmackTacular 20:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * All I'm saying is that the article needs sources added to it that talk about him with more than a bare mention. You'd get thousands of hits on the word "apple" but not all of them talk about it at length. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So, by your logic, we should delete this article. --Myles Long 04:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, we should add sources to it that support its information, and delete anything not supported by the sources. If the sources prove not to exist, then we delete the whole thing. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 06:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what should be done. And that's what has been done in this article as well.  It's not too impressive at just 3 sentences long (it is a stub, after all), but having 9 references should suffice. --Myles Long 13:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Member of cDc
According to the member list here, he's still an active member of cDc. Please stop changing the wording to past tense. --Myles Long 04:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

this article needs cleanup
grammatical errors and the second paragraph seems to repeat information found in the first paragraph. Zeroday (talk) 09:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Also this sentence needs more accuracy "He co-authored the best-selling Windows password auditing tool @stake LC (L0phtCrack)" There were five versions of l0phtcrack sold most with different authors. If the claim is that he authored the original l0phtcrack then it should be stated as such. Zeroday (talk) 09:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Christien Rioux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050502171648/http://attrition.org/errata/www/ao.016.html to http://attrition.org/errata/www/ao.016.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Christien Rioux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070429202619/http://www.csoonline.com/read/040107/fea_lopht.html to http://www.csoonline.com/read/040107/fea_lopht.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080204102848/http://www.veracode.com/about/christien-rioux.html to http://www.veracode.com/about/christien-rioux.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050305105425/http://www.bo2k.com/docs/bo2k_pressrelease.html to http://www.bo2k.com/docs/bo2k_pressrelease.html

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

title: Talk:Christien Rioux


text:
Category:Ministers in the third Churchill government, 1951–1955

This category holds articles about ministers who served in the third Churchill government of 1951–1955.


text:
Talk:Shallow (Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 02:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'll review this - comments should be added here soon Kingsif (talk) 02:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Style

 * Lead good length for article
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Lead generally written well, made minor edit for clarity
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Background and release section could use some tightening on what is in the fictional film, that Cooper is also the director, and then the real filming of the sequence at the Greek
 * The mention of the internet meme use could be incorporated better since the article doesn't otherwise have a Culture section for it to go in
 * Writing and recording section good (again, one tweak)
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * In Composition, the sentences "Cooper sings the line "Tell me something, girl" to open the first verse with restraint. Gaga joins from the second verse belting in a "sturdy voice"." feel like they could be phrased better. Maybe 'Cooper opens the first verse by singing "Tell me something, girl" in a restrained voice; Gaga joins from the second verse, belting with what is described by Pitchfork as a "sturdy voice".'
 * Saying "The song moves gradually toward the final chorus with a vocal run" makes it seem like the whole song up to the final chorus is a building vocal run. Some expansion before the
 * The Composition and lyrical interpretation section (especially last 2 paragraphs) are weaker than the rest of the writing. Sentences and getting information across can definitely be constructed better.
 * Also, structurally it could be better sectioned off - parts about composition and performance and lyrics are all currently mixed together in the second paragraph.
 * In Critical reception, the word "boffo" needs a wiktionary link - it's slang and unique to the US, and understanding the sentence relies on knowing the word when many won't.
 * When parts rewritten, a comma check may be useful for this article.
 * Critical reception section well structured
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Some of the information at the start (first paragraph) of the Charts section seems to be disorganized - there's a lot of numbers and I don't quite know which chart-topping and position stats refer to which of the two charts initially mentioned (the info about Streaming Songs chart is ok). Maybe separating by chart could help the confusion.
 * Question on why chart performance and the actual charts are not together?
 * Again, this (Chart performance) section is weaker, probably because it's just trying to handle a lot of numbers and needs some breaking up of the stats and some extra prose to make it clearer and less like a really long list of numbers.
 * Accolades is good and both high enough up the article and not excessive enough to warrant a table
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Some bits of clean-up elsewhere but otherwise good
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Could probably wikilink the first instance of Eurovision to Eurovision Song Contest for those who don't know what that is.
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Needs work Some parts weaker than others in terms of writing
 * I tried, take a second look. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Coverage

 * Good spread in lead
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Background and Writing & recording seem good
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Composition section seems to not cover much of the song except the end of it - is there nothing on the rest? (Lyrical interpretation part of this section is good)
 * If IB didn't add it it's because he couldn't find it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

✅ take a look one more time. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Does the sentence "Nate Jones of New York magazine noted the track was the basis for the romantic relationship that develops between Jackson and Ally in the film. "'Shallow' is the moment Ally and Jack both realize how great they can be when their talents intertwine, and the rest of the movie explores what happens when they start to fray," he added." in Critical reception actually need to be included - this isn't a review, it's just a clear statement about it that has already been made in the article.
 * This section otherwise good
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * May be too much in the Chart performance section, especially with a lot of this reflected in the Charts table below
 * Accolades good, especially with link to main article
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Live performances could maybe have a mention of 'after the initial recording, the song has been included in several live performances', e.g.
 * If not mentioned, it's good
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Attention Only a few things to look at

Illustration

 * Good use of images
 * Good use of song clip, though its caption may be a bit long (could be shortened to end at 'final chorus.')
 * Good choice and use of quote block
 * Good use of charts
 * Pass
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Neutrality

 * Seems good
 * Pass
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Stability

 * A whole section was removed on Sep 15. It was sourced and may be relevant, so I don't see why except to avoid covering the plagiarism claim - it has a brief section on the talk page where I feel its inclusion should be discussed before finalizing this review (I'll put it on hold until discussion's over, for a reasonable period, unless the discussion isn't started in the next week)
 * Where should I add that? It's not a matter of discussion it has several relable sources and coverage. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd put it after Critical reception, before Chart performance. Good to see someone taking this up, thanks :) Kingsif (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

✅ please take a look. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Otherwise, is protected. Kingsif (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Verifiability

 * Sources look good
 * Everything cited inline
 * Pass
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright

 * Check looks clean
 * Fair use cover in infobox
 * Good fair use for song clip
 * Otherwise free images
 * Pass
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Overall

 * On hold, will add more notes in coming week while plagiarism section discussed. Kingsif (talk) 18:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , IndianBio has not edited Wikipedia since May 1. I wonder if you might want to pick up this Good article nomination? So far there are not many concerns needing to be addressed. --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 18:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I will do by best.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thank you. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I've added you as a co-nominator since you're taking over in IB's absence. Thanks again. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Pinging you 3 as active editors and members of WikiProject Lady Gaga. Care to help see this GA nomination through in IndianBio's absence? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I doubt it given my current off-wiki obligations :/. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

 * Symbol support vote.svg Thanks for doing this, nice work! Kingsif (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)


text:
Malaysia Federal Route 9

Federal Route 9 or Karak–Tampin Highway (Malay: Jalan Karak–Tampin) is a federal road in Pahang and Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. It connects Karak, Pahang in the north with Tampin, Negeri Sembilan in the south, running along the eastern edge of the Titiwangsa Mountains.

Features
At most sections, the Federal Route 9 was built under the JKR R5 road standard, with a speed limit of 90 km/h.

title: Malaysia Federal Route 9


text:
Portal talk:Chemical engineering

Ideas for atraction
add to the department front page interesting links related to chemical engineering, like:

 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCola
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vores_%C3%98l

 * Another idea would be to link the Department with wikipedia´s Chemical Engineering Portal.

Accessible publications for Chemical Engineering
It would be a very users attracting method to publish list or access to freely accessible publications. (it could also be a good source for interesting news and topics on ChE)

we could create a == Accessible publications for Chemical Engineering == division

Here I post 2 I've found but they are for ME, feel free to add more!

 * MCADonline Magazine
 * Prototype Magazine

best regards,WiKimik 20:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

'A new chlorine-tolerant material may streamline desalination processes.'
http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/21146/?a=f Emesee 06:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

title: Portal talk:Chemical engineering


text:
User:Kiki sahil

Username: Kiki sahil Country: India Education: F.Y. Bsc Computer Science Skills: I am good programmer. Interests: Music, Hard core Gaming.

title: User:Kiki sahil


text:
Dov Tzvi Heller

Dov Tzvi Heller (1862 – 1935) commonly called by his Yiddish name, Ber Hirsch Heller, was a rabbi and mashgiach ruchani at the Slabodka Yeshiva in Europe, as well as the father-in-law of Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetzky and Rabbi Avraham Grodzinski.

Life
Dov Tzvi Heller was born in 1862 in Shilel (Šilalė), Lithuania, then part of the Russian Empire, to Eliezer Yitzchak and Hasseh Gisseh Heller. In 1890, he became the mashgiach ruchani in the Yeshiva Knesses Yisrael Slabodka under Nosson Tzvi Finkel, where he was known for his sweet personality, gentleness, and love of his students, which was so strong, that he would often fast for their success. During World War I, the yeshiva escaped to Minsk, and later many of them Kremenchug, and Heller came with the yeshiva on these travels. Shimon Reuven Dvoretz, who was teenager in Kremenchug, described Heller as "a saint, a Chafetz Chaim in his simplicity," comparing him to Yisrael Meir Kagan, who had been the greatest rabbi of the time until his death a few years prior.

Family
Heller was married Feiga Esther Heller née Blankfield (c. 1862-1942). They had five children, four of which lived to adulthood (one son and four daughters). Their son was Avraham Meir Heller (1887-1979). Their oldest daughter, Chasya (1891-1944), married Avraham Grodzinski, who later served as mashgiach ruchani of the Slabodka Yeshiva as well. Their second daughter, Ita Ettel (1895-1954), married Yaakov Kamenetzky, a student of her father and Finkel, and future rosh yeshiva of Yeshiva Torah Vodaath. Their third daughter to live adulthood, Sara (1899-1941), married Shabsi Vernokovsky, and they both were murdered in the Holocaust. They had another child, named Kayle, who was born in 1897 and died two years later.

Death
Heller died in 1935 in Jerusalem.

title: Dov Tzvi Heller


text:
Kleis

Kleis is a surname. Notable people with the surname include:

 * Birgit Kleis (born 1956), Danish politician
 * Dave Kleis (born 1964), American politician
 * Martin Kleis (1850–1908), Danish trader on Nui
 * Mikkel Kleis, winner of the 2010 Copenhagen Marathon

title: Kleis


text:
Ayeni

Ayeni may refer to:

 * Adekunle Ayeni, Nigerian public relations practitioner, journalist, trained scientist and businessman
 * Bosun Ayeni (born 1978), Nigerian footballer
 * John Olatunde Ayeni (born 1967), Nigerian lawyer, investor and business magnate
 * Kayode Ayeni (born 1987), American basketball player
 * Phillip Ayeni (1949–2017), Navy Captain and first Administrator of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
 * Tayo Ayeni (born 1962), Nigerian businessman

title: Ayeni


text:
Vostell

Vostell is a surname. Notable people with the surname include:

 * David Vostell (born 1960), German-Spanish composer and film director
 * Mercedes Vostell (1933–2023), Spanish writer
 * Wolf Vostell (1932–1998), German painter and sculptor

title: Vostell


text:
Talk:Warfaze

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Warfaze Live.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Warfaze in 2022.jpg

title: Talk:Warfaze


text:
Talk:2020 Bandy World Championship

Cancelation of the games?
Will the world championship this year be cancelled, now when many nations have withdrawn?

Correct name?
Is it really correct to name these games the ”2020–22” Bandy World Championship? It was postponed, but it was never played in 2021 or 2022. The B division was played in 2020, so that’s the yearI think should be in the headline of this article <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 18 September 2022

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 02:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

2020–22 Bandy World Championship → 2020 Bandy World Championship – the A division of the 2020 championship tournament was postponed because of the covid-19 pandemy, but it was ultimately never played in 2021 or 2022. The B division was played in 2020, so that’s the year I think should be in the headline of this article. <IP_ADDRESS> (talk) 21:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Support Ove Raul (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

title: Talk:2020 Bandy World Championship


text:
pelerine

Etymology
From, feminine of , from.

Noun

 * 1) A kind of short cape or covering for the shoulders, associated especially with medieval pilgrims (of any gender).
 * 2) A woman's tippet or cape with long ends coming down in front.
 * 1) A woman's tippet or cape with long ends coming down in front.
 * 1) A woman's tippet or cape with long ends coming down in front.

Translations

 * Bulgarian:
 * Czech:
 * Dutch:
 * French:
 * German:
 * Macedonian: пелерина
 * Polish:
 * Romanian:
 * Russian:

title: pelerine


text:
Talk:James FitzGerald, 8th Earl of Desmond

Untitled
This page is almost entirely two large quotations. Perhaps this is acceptable if its the only available and prudent way to depict the history and character of the individual. However I think this article really needs to be reworked to paraphrase some of what is said here in the quote.DaltonCastle (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

A fair critique: this page does need a lot of work. Having started it as almost entirely the quote, I'll try to get around to reworking it in the near future if no one else does. Rinne na dTrosc (talk) 02:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Countess of Desmond?
Was his wife the Countess of Desmond who was rumoured to have lived to the age of 140, and reported favourably about Richard III after the Tudors had died out? Valetude (talk) 00:14, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


text:
User:SecomDevelopers

Secom Developers is a Private Software house which is located in Pakistan. In this software house there are many type of developing are done like Full .NET Frame work, PHP & PHP5, Java, CCNA, BI etc..

title: User:SecomDevelopers


text:
User:Lior Nesher/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Beer in Israel

 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * 1- https://www.calcalist.co.il/consumer/articles/0,7340,L-3111762,00.html
 * 2- https://blend.co.il/%D7%9E%D7%92%D7%96%D7%99%D7%9F/%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%AA-%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%93%D7%91%D7%A8-%D7%9B%D7%96%D7%94/
 * 3- https://www.israelhayom.co.il/article/179099
 * 2- https://blend.co.il/%D7%9E%D7%92%D7%96%D7%99%D7%9F/%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%AA-%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%93%D7%91%D7%A8-%D7%9B%D7%96%D7%94/
 * 3- https://www.israelhayom.co.il/article/179099

Hummus salad

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * 1- https://www.chef-lavan.co.il/%D7%9E%D7%AA%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9F-%D7%9C%D7%A1%D7%9C%D7%98-2- %D7%97%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A1-%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%AA-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%9D/
 * 2- https://www.foodisgood.co.il/all-about-chickpeas/
 * 3- https://www.foodsdictionary.co.il/Recipes/3822
 * 2- https://www.foodisgood.co.il/all-about-chickpeas/
 * 3- https://www.foodsdictionary.co.il/Recipes/3822

Spezi

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * 1- https://www.merkur.de/leben/genuss/warum-heissen-manche-cola-mix-getraenke-spezi-andere-nicht-6972406.html
 * 2- https://www.spezi.com/
 * 3- https://www.food.com/recipe/spezi-german-orange-cola-351610
 * 2- https://www.spezi.com/
 * 3- https://www.food.com/recipe/spezi-german-orange-cola-351610

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

title: User:Lior Nesher/Choose an Article


text:
Rajasuya Yaaga

 * Not to be confused with the ritual named Rajasuya.

Rajasuya Yaaga (Kannada: ರಾಜಸೂಯ ಯಾಗ) is a 1937 Indian Kannada film, directed by T. Dwarakanath and produced by Timmiah. The film stars S. R. Vasudevarao, T. K. Ramamurhty, K. R. Seetharama Sastry and T. Jayamma in the lead roles. The film has musical score by H. R. Padmanabha Shashtri.

Cast

 * S. R. Vasudevarao
 * T. K. Ramamurhty
 * K. R. Seetharama Sastry
 * T. Jayamma
 * T. Chandrashekar
 * E. V. Saroja
 * K. V. Achuta Rao

title: Rajasuya Yaaga


text:
Ὀρόντης

Etymology 1
From and also in  attested at least from the period of :
 * The meaning of which is contested with connections to:, perhaps in connection to the region around the city of , the ruins today being known as.
 * Also connected to, possibly related to the modern name for the river so-called for its flowing south to the north unlike the rest of the rivers in the region.
 * Disputably from ; compare 🇨🇬.

More at Orontes.

Proper noun

 * 1) Orontes river

Etymology 2
From, from , ; see 🇨🇬 for more.

Proper noun

 * 1) Orontes name of any one of a number of ancient Armenian kings

title: Ὀρόντης


text:
1976 Memphis State Tigers football team

The 1976 Memphis State Tigers football team represented Memphis State University (now known as the University of Memphis) as an independent during the 1976 NCAA Division I football season. In its second season under head coach Richard Williamson, the team compiled an 7–4 record and outscored opponents by a total of 241 to 182. The team played its home games at Liberty Bowl Memorial Stadium in Memphis, Tennessee.

The team's statistical leaders included Lloyd Patterson with 1,563 passing yards and 42 points scored, Terdell Middleton with 919 rushing yards, Ricky Rivas with 529 receiving yards.

title: 1976 Memphis State Tigers football team


text:
User:JimSpring2020/sandbox

Blessed are the hearts that Bend is an English group. They released their album "The limitless sweet love of precious suffering" in July 2020.

title: User:JimSpring2020/sandbox


text:
User:Jrprudlick

Jrprudlick is the user name of Jamez Ronald Prudlick - malcontent gay guy who lives in Virginia Beach. I'm a fan of the band Magg Dylan and my best friend is their lead singer.

title: User:Jrprudlick


text:
Smokeasac

Dylan James Mullen (born February 10, 1994), better known as Smokeasac, is an American record producer, singer, and songwriter. He gained notoriety for being a frequent collaborator and producer for emo rap artist Lil Peep throughout his career.

Career
In 2018, Smokeasac began his solo career with single, "Leave You Behind," which was featured on BBC Radio 1's Rock Show with Daniel P. Carter. His debut EP, Wasteland999, was released on March 8, 2019. During his shows, Smokeasac sometimes plays music from Lil Peep's Come Over When You're Sober Pt. 2.

Smokeasac co-produced Lil Peep's Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 1 and Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2 albums with George Astasio / The Invisible Men (Iggy Azalea, Sugababes). Rob Cavallo (My Chemical Romance and Linkin Park) was also a contributor.

Throughout the project, Smokeasac worked as the intermediary between Astasio and Lil Peep, and became an integral part of Part 2’s overall feel and essence.

Lil Peep

 * "Nineteen"
 * "Cobain"
 * "The Song They Played [When I Crashed Into The Wall]"
 * "Driveway"
 * "Hellboy"
 * "Benz Truck"
 * "Save That Shit"
 * "Awful Things"
 * "U Said"
 * "Better Off (Dying)"
 * "The Brightside"
 * "Problems"
 * "Avoid"
 * "Spotlight"
 * "Hate Me"
 * "Leanin"
 * "Broken Smile"
 * "Runaway"
 * "Sex With My Ex"
 * "Cry Alone"
 * "16 Lines"
 * "Life Is Beautiful"
 * "IDGAF"
 * "White Girl"
 * "Fingers"
 * "Benz Truck Pt. 2"
 * "Backseat"
 * "Sex Last Nite"
 * "Kiss"

Teddy

 * "Castle WIth No Light"
 * "Guap"
 * "Impossible"
 * "Foreign Banz"
 * "Dead Presidents"
 * "Cupid! (Shot Me In The Dark)"

Smokeasac

 * "Leave You Behind"
 * "BLACKOUT!"
 * "Losing My Mind"
 * "After I’m Gone"
 * "Insomnia" ft. Travis Barker
 * "One Bad Day"
 * "Overdose"

title: Smokeasac


text:
Programming HP Calculators

Note: Everything mentioned in this manual should work with all Hewlett Packard graphical calculators unless otherwise stated, however this manual has only been tested for commands and variables compatible with the 38g series of calculators.

This book does not work with HP 28 or HP 48 series graphical and scientific calculators. This series used a FORTH like programming language and also provided a symbolic calculation mode. Maybe someone wants to provide material about this series?

Contents

 * 1) /Introduction/
 * 2) /Commands/
 * 3) *Aplet Commands
 * 4) *Branch Commands
 * 5) *Drawing Commands
 * 6) *Graphic Commands
 * 7) *Loop Commands
 * 8) *Matrix Commands
 * 9) *Print Commands
 * 10) *Prompt Commands
 * 11) *Stat Commands
 * 12) *Easter Egg Commands
 * 13) /Variables/

title: Programming HP Calculators


text:
User:Pierrette Squires/sandbox

LGBT Bolton

Bisexual Bolton

DesireLoveIdentity

Chadwick resource centre

Bolton Museum history

Chadwick museum

early collectors

title: User:Pierrette Squires/sandbox