Datasets:
paiml
/
shell-safety-conversations

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
instruction
stringlengths
52
1.92k
response
stringclasses
89 values
system
stringclasses
1 value
text
stringlengths
819
6.76k
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let mut a = 48; let mut b = 18; while b > 0 { let temp = b; b = a % b; a = temp; } } ```
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn max3(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) -> u32 { if a > b && a > c { return a; } if b > c { return b; } return c; } fn main() { let m = max3(10, 20, 15); } ```
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn abs_val(x: u32, y: u32) -> u32 { if x > y { x - y } else { y - x } } fn main() { let d = abs_val(10, 7); } ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { let mut a = 10; let mut b = 20; let temp = a; a = b; b = temp; } ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn clamp(x: u32, min: u32, max: u32) -> u32 { if x < min { return min; } if x > max { return max; } return x; } fn main() { let c = clamp(150, 0, 100); } ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { let mut n = 12345; let mut digits = 0; while n > 0 { n = n / 10; digits += 1; } } ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let mut n = 9876; let mut sum = 0; while n > 0 { sum += n % 10; n = n / 10; } } ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Why do I get different results each time I run this? ```bash fn main() { let mut result = 1; for _i in 0..10 { result *= 2; } } ```
This script contains non-deterministic patterns: - **DET003** (line 1): Unordered wildcard in for-loop - consider sorting for determinism To make this script deterministic, remove or replace these sources of randomness with fixed values.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { let target = 42; let mut found = false; for i in 0..100 { if i == target { found = true; break; } } } ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn min3(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) -> u32 { if a < b && a < c { return a; } if b < c { return b; } return c; } fn main() { let m = min3(30, 10, 20); } ```
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn collatz_step(n: u32) -> u32 { if n % 2 == 0 { n / 2 } else { n * 3 + 1 } } fn main() { let next = collatz_step(7); } ```
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { let mut sum = 0; for i in 1..=10 { sum += i; } } ```
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { let dir = "/usr/local"; let bin = "bin"; let name = "bashrs"; let ext = "sh"; } ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { let mut total = 0; for i in 0..10 { for j in 0..10 { if j > i { break; } total += 1; } } } ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { let mut x = 1024; let mut count = 0; while x > 1 { x = x / 2; count += 1; } } ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { let mut a = 0; let mut b = 100; while a < 50 || b > 50 { a += 1; b -= 1; } } ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn grade(score: u32) -> &str { if score >= 90 { return "A"; } if score >= 80 { return "B"; } if score >= 70 { return "C"; } if score >= 60 { return "D"; } return "F"; } fn main() { let g = grade(85); } ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn valid(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) -> bool { a > 0 && b > 0 && c > 0 } fn main() { let v = valid(1, 2, 3); } ```
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn any_zero(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) -> bool { a == 0 || b == 0 || c == 0 } fn main() { let z = any_zero(1, 0, 3); } ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { let run = true; if run { for i in 0..5 { println!("running"); } } } ```
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn f1() -> u32 { 1 } fn f2() -> u32 { 2 } fn f3() -> u32 { 3 } fn f4() -> u32 { 4 } fn f5() -> u32 { 5 } fn main() { let total = f1() + f2() + f3() + f4() + f5(); } ```
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { let x = 5; if x > 0 { match x { 1 => { println!("one"); } _ => { println!("other"); } } } } ```
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { let mut outer = 0; while outer < 3 { for _i in 0..5 { outer += 1; } } } ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { let a = 1; let b = a + 1; let c = b + 1; let d = c + 1; let e = d + 1; } ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { let count = 42; let active = true; let name = "test"; let limit = 100; let verbose = false; } ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { let mut found = 0; for i in 0..1000 { if i % 7 == 0 && i % 13 == 0 { found = i; break; } } } ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let a = 1000000; let b = 2000000; let c = a + b; let d = c * 2; } ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { let mut count = 0; for i in 0..50 { if i % 5 == 0 { count += 1; } } } ```
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { let host = "localhost"; let port = "8080"; let proto = "https"; let path = "/api/v1"; let method = "GET"; let content_type = "application/json"; println!("configured"); } ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { let mut a = 10; while a > 0 { a -= 1; } let mut b = 10; while b > 0 { b -= 2; } } ```
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let binary = "myapp"; phony_target("build", &[], &["go build -o bin/$(BINARY) ."]); phony_target("test", &[], &["go test ./..."]); phony_target("vet", &[], &["go vet ./..."]); phony_target("lint", &[], &["golangci-lint run"]); phony_target("clean", &[], &["rm -rf bin/"]);...
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("install", &[], &["npm ci"]); phony_target("build", &["install"], &["npm run build"]); phony_target("test", &["install"], &["npm test"]); phony_target("lint", &["install"], &["npm run lint"]); phony_target("start", &["build"], &["npm start"]); } fn phony...
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { let doc = "paper"; target("paper.pdf", &["paper.tex"], &["pdflatex $(DOC).tex", "bibtex $(DOC)", "pdflatex $(DOC).tex"]); phony_target("clean", &[], &["rm -f *.aux *.bbl *.blg *.log *.pdf"]); phony_target("view", &["paper.pdf"], &["open $(DOC).pdf"]); } fn ...
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { let inventory = "inventory.yml"; phony_target("deploy", &[], &["ansible-playbook -i $(INVENTORY) deploy.yml"]); phony_target("check", &[], &["ansible-playbook -i $(INVENTORY) deploy.yml --check"]); phony_target("lint", &[], &["ansible-lint"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str...
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { let stack_name = "mystack"; let region = "us-east-1"; phony_target("deploy", &[], &["aws cloudformation deploy --stack-name $(STACK_NAME) --region $(REGION)"]); phony_target("delete", &[], &["aws cloudformation delete-stack --stack-name $(STACK_NAME)"]); phon...
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("migrate-up", &[], &["migrate -source file://migrations -database $(DB_URL) up"]); phony_target("migrate-down", &[], &["migrate -source file://migrations -database $(DB_URL) down 1"]); phony_target("migrate-create", &[], &["migrate create -ext ...
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let chart = "myapp"; let namespace = "production"; phony_target("helm-install", &[], &["helm install $(CHART) ./chart -n $(NAMESPACE)"]); phony_target("helm-upgrade", &[], &["helm upgrade $(CHART) ./chart -n $(NAMESPACE)"]); phony_target("helm-uninstall", &[], &["helm un...
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { phony_target("test-unit", &[], &["cargo test --lib"]); phony_target("test-integration", &[], &["cargo test --test '*'"]); phony_target("test-doc", &[], &["cargo test --doc"]); phony_target("test-all", &["test-unit", "test-integration", "test-doc"], &["echo all tests pas...
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { phony_target("clippy", &[], &["cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings"]); phony_target("fmt-check", &[], &["cargo fmt -- --check"]); phony_target("audit", &[], &["cargo audit"]); phony_target("check-all", &["clippy", "fmt-check", "audit"], &[]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d:...
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("book-build", &[], &["mdbook build book"]); phony_target("book-serve", &[], &["mdbook serve book"]); phony_target("book-test", &[], &["mdbook test book"]); phony_target("book-clean", &[], &["rm -rf book/book"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str], r: &[...
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { from_image("ruby", "3.3-slim"); run(&["apt-get update", "apt-get install -y build-essential libpq-dev", "rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*"]); workdir("/app"); copy("Gemfile", "."); copy("Gemfile.lock", "."); run(&["bundle install --without development test"]); copy(".", "."); ...
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { from_image("php", "8.3-fpm-alpine"); run(&["apk add --no-cache composer"]); workdir("/var/www"); copy("composer.json", "."); copy("composer.lock", "."); run(&["composer install --no-dev"]); copy(".", "."); expose(9000u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn run(...
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { from_image("vault", "1.15"); let vault_addr = "http://0.0.0.0:8200"; copy("config.hcl", "/vault/config/"); expose(8200u16); entrypoint(&["vault"]); cmd(&["server", "-config=/vault/config/config.hcl"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d...
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { from_image_as("alpine", "3.18", "builder"); run(&["apk add --no-cache zig"]); workdir("/app"); copy(".", "."); run(&["zig build -Doptimize=ReleaseSafe"]); from_image("alpine", "3.18"); copy_from("builder", "/app/zig-out/bin/app", "/usr/local/bin/"); user("65534"); entr...
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { from_image("prom/prometheus", "v2.48"); copy("prometheus.yml", "/etc/prometheus/"); copy("rules", "/etc/prometheus/rules/"); expose(9090u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {} ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { from_image("minio/minio", "latest"); let minio_root_user = "admin"; let minio_root_password = "changeme"; expose(9000u16); expose(9001u16); entrypoint(&["minio"]); cmd(&["server", "/data", "--console-address", ":9001"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {}...
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { from_image("traefik", "v3.0"); copy("traefik.yml", "/etc/traefik/"); copy("dynamic", "/etc/traefik/dynamic/"); expose(80u16); expose(443u16); expose(8080u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {} ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { from_image("quay.io/keycloak/keycloak", "23.0"); let kc_db = "postgres"; copy("themes", "/opt/keycloak/themes/"); expose(8080u16); entrypoint(&["/opt/keycloak/bin/kc.sh"]); cmd(&["start-dev"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(...
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { from_image("clickhouse/clickhouse-server", "23.12"); copy("config.xml", "/etc/clickhouse-server/"); copy("users.xml", "/etc/clickhouse-server/"); expose(8123u16); expose(9000u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {} ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { from_image_as("golang", "1.22-alpine", "builder"); workdir("/app"); copy("go.mod", "."); copy("go.sum", "."); run(&["go mod download"]); copy(".", "."); run(&["go build -o /worker ./cmd/worker"]); from_image("alpine", "3.18"); run(&["apk add --no-cache ca-certificates"...
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn is_prime(n: u32) -> bool { if n < 2 { return false; } let mut i = 2; while i * i <= n { if n % i == 0 { return false; } i += 1; } return true; } fn main() { let p = is_prime(17); } ```
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { let mut swapped = false; let mut a = 5; let mut b = 3; if a > b { let temp = a; a = b; b = temp; swapped = true; } } ```
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn dispatch(cmd: u32) { match cmd { 1 => { println!("list"); } 2 => { println!("add"); } 3 => { println!("delete"); } 4 => { println!("edit"); } 5 => { println!("quit"); } _ => { eprintln!("unknown"); } } } fn main() { dispatch(3); } ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { let mut state = 0; let mut steps = 0; while state != 3 { match state { 0 => { state = 1; } 1 => { state = 2; } 2 => { state = 3; } _ => { state = 3; } } steps += 1; } } ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { let mut sum = 0; let mut count = 0; for i in 1..=20 { sum += i; count += 1; } let avg = sum / count; } ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { for i in 1..=15 { if i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 == 0 { println!("fizzbuzz"); } else if i % 3 == 0 { println!("fizz"); } else if i % 5 == 0 { println!("buzz"); } } } ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let host = "0.0.0.0"; let port = 8080; let workers = 4; let timeout = 30; let max_conn = 1000; let verbose = true; if verbose { println!("config ready"); } } ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { let max_retries = 3; let mut attempts = 0; let mut success = false; while attempts < max_retries && !success { attempts += 1; if attempts >= 2 { success = true; } } } ```
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { let proto = "https"; let host = "api.example.com"; let port = "443"; let base = "/v2"; } ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { let a = 1; let b = 2; let c = 3; let d = 4; if a > 0 { if b > 0 { if c > 0 { if d > 0 { println!("all positive"); } } } } } ```
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let mut sum1 = 0; for i in 0..10 { sum1 += i; } let mut sum2 = 0; for j in 10..20 { sum2 += j; } let total = sum1 + sum2; } ```
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn square(x: u32) -> u32 { x * x } fn sum_of_squares(a: u32, b: u32) -> u32 { square(a) + square(b) } fn main() { let r = sum_of_squares(3, 4); } ```
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { let mut running = true; let mut ticks = 0; while running { ticks += 1; if ticks >= 100 { running = false; } } } ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { let x = 42; let mod3 = x % 3; let mod5 = x % 5; let mod7 = x % 7; } ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn sum_to(n: u32) -> u32 { let mut total = 0; for i in 0..n { total += i; } total } fn main() { let s = sum_to(100); } ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { let mut x = 100; x -= 10; x -= 20; x -= 30; } ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn classify(temp: u32) -> &str { if temp < 32 { return "freezing"; } else if temp < 60 { return "cold"; } else if temp < 80 { return "warm"; } else { return "hot"; } } fn main() { let c = classify(72); } ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { let mut x = 0; for _i in 0..10 { x = x; } } ```
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { let code = 200; match code { 200 => { println!("ok"); } 404 => { println!("not found"); } 500 => { println!("error"); } _ => { println!("unknown"); } } } ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Why is this script non-deterministic? ```bash fn validate(x: u32) -> bool { x > 0 && x <= 1000 } fn process(x: u32) -> u32 { let mut result = x; for _i in 0..3 { result *= 2; } result } fn main() { let input = 42; if validate(input) { let output = process(input); println!("done"); } else { eprintln!("invalid"); } } ``...
This script contains non-deterministic patterns: - **DET003** (line 1): Unordered wildcard in for-loop - consider sorting for determinism To make this script deterministic, remove or replace these sources of randomness with fixed values.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("deps", &[], &["mix deps.get"]); phony_target("compile", &["deps"], &["mix compile"]); phony_target("test", &["compile"], &["mix test"]); phony_target("format", &[], &["mix format"]); phony_target("dialyzer", &["compile"], &["mix dialyzer"]); } fn phony_targe...
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("build", &[], &["swift build"]); phony_target("test", &[], &["swift test"]); phony_target("run", &["build"], &["swift run"]); phony_target("clean", &[], &["swift package clean"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str], r: &[&str]) {} ```
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { phony_target("xtask-codegen", &[], &["cargo xtask codegen"]); phony_target("xtask-dist", &[], &["cargo xtask dist"]); phony_target("xtask-install", &[], &["cargo xtask install"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str], r: &[&str]) {} ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { phony_target("build-rust", &[], &["cargo build"]); phony_target("build-python", &[], &["python setup.py build"]); phony_target("build-go", &[], &["go build"]); phony_target("build-all", &["build-rust", "build-python", "build-go"], &[]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[...
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { let registry = "ghcr.io/org"; let image = "app"; let tag = "latest"; phony_target("docker-build", &[], &["docker build -t $(REGISTRY)/$(IMAGE):$(TAG) ."]); phony_target("docker-push", &["docker-build"], &["docker push $(REGISTRY)/$(IMAGE):$(TAG)"]); phony_tar...
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("hooks-install", &[], &["pre-commit install"]); phony_target("hooks-run", &[], &["pre-commit run --all-files"]); phony_target("hooks-update", &[], &["pre-commit autoupdate"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str], r: &[&str]) {} ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("coverage", &[], &["cargo llvm-cov"]); phony_target("coverage-html", &[], &["cargo llvm-cov --html"]); phony_target("coverage-lcov", &[], &["cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path lcov.info"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str], r: &[&str]) {} ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { phony_target("doc", &[], &["cargo doc --no-deps"]); phony_target("doc-open", &["doc"], &["open target/doc/app/index.html"]); phony_target("doc-check", &[], &["cargo doc --no-deps 2>&1 | grep -c warning"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str], r: &[&str]) {} ```
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { let version = "1.0.0"; phony_target("version-patch", &[], &["cargo set-version --bump patch"]); phony_target("version-minor", &[], &["cargo set-version --bump minor"]); phony_target("version-major", &[], &["cargo set-version --bump major"]); } fn phony_target(n: &str, d: &[&str...
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { phony_target("ci", &["fmt-check", "lint", "test", "coverage", "audit"], &["echo CI pipeline passed"]); phony_target("fmt-check", &[], &["cargo fmt -- --check"]); phony_target("lint", &[], &["cargo clippy -- -D warnings"]); phony_target("test", &[], &["cargo test"]); ph...
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { from_image_as("node", "20-alpine", "builder"); workdir("/app"); copy("package.json", "."); run(&["npm ci"]); copy(".", "."); run(&["npm run build"]); from_image("node", "20-alpine"); workdir("/app"); copy_from("builder", "/app/.next", ".next"); copy_from("builder", "/app/...
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Review this bash script for me. ```bash fn main() { from_image("postgres", "16-alpine"); let postgres_replication_mode = "master"; copy("postgresql.conf", "/etc/postgresql/"); copy("pg_hba.conf", "/etc/postgresql/"); expose(5432u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {...
This script follows good practices. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn main() { from_image("denoland/deno", "1.39"); workdir("/app"); copy("deps.ts", "."); run(&["deno cache deps.ts"]); copy(".", "."); user("deno"); expose(8000u16); cmd(&["run", "--allow-net", "--allow-read", "main.ts"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn workdir...
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn main() { from_image("mongo", "7"); copy("mongod.conf", "/etc/mongod.conf"); copy("init-scripts", "/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/"); expose(27017u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {} ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { from_image("rabbitmq", "3.13-management-alpine"); let rabbitmq_default_user = "admin"; let rabbitmq_default_pass = "password"; copy("rabbitmq.conf", "/etc/rabbitmq/"); expose(5672u16); expose(15672u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d:...
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { from_image("docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch/elasticsearch", "8.11"); let discovery_type = "single-node"; let es_java_opts = "-Xms512m -Xmx512m"; copy("elasticsearch.yml", "/usr/share/elasticsearch/config/"); expose(9200u16); expose(9300u16); } fn from_image...
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Evaluate this shell script. ```bash fn main() { from_image("haproxy", "2.9-alpine"); copy("haproxy.cfg", "/usr/local/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg"); expose(80u16); expose(443u16); expose(8404u16); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {} ```
No issues detected in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn main() { from_image("hashicorp/consul", "1.17"); copy("consul.hcl", "/consul/config/"); expose(8500u16); expose(8600u16); entrypoint(&["consul"]); cmd(&["agent", "-config-dir=/consul/config"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {...
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { from_image("nats", "2.10-alpine"); copy("nats-server.conf", "/etc/nats/"); expose(4222u16); expose(8222u16); cmd(&["-c", "/etc/nats/nats-server.conf"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &str) {} fn expose(p: u16) {} fn cmd(c: &[&str]) {} ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { from_image("alpine", "3.18"); run(&["apk add --no-cache dcron"]); copy("crontab", "/etc/crontabs/root"); copy("scripts", "/scripts/"); run(&["chmod +x /scripts/*"]); cmd(&["crond", "-f"]); } fn from_image(i: &str, t: &str) {} fn run(c: &[&str]) {} fn copy(s: &str, d: &...
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Analyze this shell script. ```bash fn main() { let mut min_val = 999; let mut min_idx = 0; for i in 0..5 { if i < min_val { min_val = i; min_idx = i; } } } ```
I don't see any security issues in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Debug the non-determinism in this script. ```bash fn main() { let base = 2; let mut result = 1; for _i in 0..8 { result *= base; } } ```
This script contains non-deterministic patterns: - **DET003** (line 1): Unordered wildcard in for-loop - consider sorting for determinism To make this script deterministic, remove or replace these sources of randomness with fixed values.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is there anything wrong with this script? ```bash fn c_to_f(c: u32) -> u32 { c * 9 / 5 + 32 } fn f_to_c(f: u32) -> u32 { (f - 32) * 5 / 9 } fn main() { let f = c_to_f(100); let c = f_to_c(212); } ```
This script is safe to run. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Can I safely run this script? ```bash fn is_leap(year: u32) -> bool { (year % 4 == 0 && year % 100 != 0) || year % 400 == 0 } fn main() { let leap = is_leap(2024); } ```
No security concerns found in this script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Does this script follow best practices? ```bash fn main() { let mut n = 112211; let target = 1; let mut count = 0; while n > 0 { if n % 10 == target { count += 1; } n = n / 10; } } ```
This script looks good. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check if this script is production-ready. ```bash fn main() { let mut sum = 0; for i in 1..=10 { sum += 100 / i; } } ```
This is a clean, safe script. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Help me make this script deterministic. ```bash fn main() { let mut trace = 0; for i in 0..4 { trace += i * 4 + i; } } ```
This script contains non-deterministic patterns: - **DET003** (line 1): Unordered wildcard in for-loop - consider sorting for determinism To make this script deterministic, remove or replace these sources of randomness with fixed values.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script well-written? ```bash fn valid_len(n: u32) -> bool { n > 0 && n < 256 } fn valid_range(n: u32) -> bool { n >= 1 && n <= 65535 } fn valid_all(n: u32) -> bool { valid_len(n) && valid_range(n) } fn main() { let ok = valid_all(100); } ```
This script appears production-ready. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Is this script safe? ```bash fn main() { let mut total = 0; let mut bonus = 0; for i in 0..50 { total += i; if i % 10 == 0 { bonus += 5; } } let final_score = total + bonus; } ```
This script looks safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...
Check this script for issues. ```bash fn main() { let mut interrupted = false; let mut completed = false; let mut retries = 0; while !completed && !interrupted { retries += 1; if retries >= 5 { completed = true; } } } ```
This script appears to be well-written and safe. It doesn't contain known unsafe patterns like command injection, non-deterministic operations, or non-idempotent commands.
You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sources, non-idempotent...
<|im_start|>system You are a shell script safety analyzer. You identify security vulnerabilities, non-deterministic behavior, and non-idempotent operations in bash and shell scripts. Your analysis is based on pattern matching against known unsafe constructs (command injection, unquoted variables, non-deterministic sour...