Upload ood_data/3domains/rewrite.json with huggingface_hub

ood_data/3domains/rewrite.json

@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_11",
-    "original_text": "The EU’s Common Position 2004/31/CFSP sets an embargo on exporting weapons, ammunition and military equipment to Sudan, and also bars any technical or financial support tied to military activities there. This prohibition is enforced through Council Regulation (EC) No 131/2004 of 26 January 2004, which imposes restrictive measures on Sudan. Recent developments—including continued violations of the N’djamena Ceasefire Agreement (8 April 2004) and the Abuja Protocols",
+    "original_text": "The European Union’s Common Position 2004/31/CFSP establishes a prohibition on exporting weapons, ammunition and military hardware to Sudan, as well as a ban on providing any technical or financial support linked to military activities there. This prohibition was enacted through Council Regulation (EC) No 131/2004, dated 26 January 2004, which set out specific restrictive measures concerning Sudan. In light of recent events in Sudan—particularly the ongoing breaches of the N’djamena Ceasefire Agreement of 8 April 2004 and the Abuja Protocols of 9 November 2004 by all parties in Darfur, and the inability of the Sudanese government, rebel factions and other armed groups to fulfil their obligations and the United Nations Security Council’s demands—the Security Council adopted Resolution 1591 on 29 March 2005 (hereafter “UNSCR 1591”). This resolution, among other provisions, imposes an arms embargo and bars the provision of related assistance to every signatory of the N’djamena Ceasefire Agreement and to any other combatants in Darfur, while also specifying certain exemptions to the embargo. The later Common Position 2005/411/CFSP reiterates the embargo and ban set out in Common Position 2004/31/CFSP and introduces an additional exemption to both the arms embargo and the ban on related assistance, covering all individuals and entities in Sudan so that the exemption list aligns with that of UNSCR 1591. Because this new exemption concerns the prohibition on particular financial and technical aid, Council Regulation (EC)",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_29",
-    "original_text": "Sweden states that its territory is free of Aujeszky’s disease and has provided the required documentation to the Commission under Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC. An eradication programme for the disease was carried out in these areas. According to Commission Decision 93/244/EEC, as amended by Decision 96/590/EC, additional guarantees are required for pigs destined for certain parts",
+    "original_text": "Sweden asserts that its territory is free of Aujeszky’s disease and has forwarded the requisite supporting documents to the Commission in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC. An eradication programme for Aujeszky’s disease has been carried out in the specified regions. The Commission’s Decision 93/244/EEC, as amended by Decision 96/590/EC, establishes additional guarantees for pigs destined for certain Community areas where an eradication programme has been approved, and these areas are listed in Annex I. The programme is considered to have successfully eliminated the disease from Sweden, making it appropriate to delete these Swedish regions from the Annex I list of Decision 93/244/EEC. Swedish authorities request that national pig‑movement regulations be at least equivalent to those set out in the current decision. Moreover, such additional guarantees must not be imposed on Member States or their regions that are already recognised as free of Aujeszky’s disease. Decision 93/24/EEC, as last amended by Decision 96/590/EC, also provides extra guarantees for pigs headed to Member States or regions free of the disease, with those areas enumerated in Annex I. Consequently, the disease‑free parts of Sweden should be incorporated into Annex I of Decision 93/24/EEC. The measures contained in this decision conform with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_61",
-    "original_text": "There is a marked mismatch between the capacity of the Community’s fishing fleet and the resources that are available, and the Common Fisheries Policy is intended to correct this imbalance. To achieve the policy’s objectives, new initiatives are required. When the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 3944/90 on 20 December 1990, amending Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86, it stressed that any structural policy measure in the fisheries sector would be ineffective unless its socio‑economic consequences—",
+    "original_text": "The Community’s fishing fleet far exceeds the sustainable capacity of its resources, creating a serious imbalance that the Common Fisheries Policy aims to correct. To achieve this goal, new initiatives are required. When the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 3944/90 on 20 December 1990, amending Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86, it emphasized that any structural policy in fisheries would fail unless its socio‑economic impacts—especially on jobs and regions heavily reliant on fishing—were also addressed. Consequently, it is essential to pinpoint the zones whose economies and societies depend on fishing and related activities, and to design suitable socio‑economic support measures that enhance the Community’s economic and social cohesion. At present, the Commission lacks the data needed to specify the nature and extent of these measures. Implementing a small‑scale pilot project that tackles a representative socio‑economic issue of Community significance would provide valuable insights and guidance for planning and executing the intended measures. Such a pilot can be considered a coordinated action under the third paragraph of Article 32 of Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86, and therefore Community assistance should be extended.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_70",
-    "original_text": "Metalaxyl is listed in Annex I of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92, which sets out the detailed rules for the first stage of the programme referred to in Article 8 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the market placement of plant‑protection products. \n\nAfter the European Court of Justice ruled on 18 July 2007 (Case C‑326/05 P) that annulled Commission Decision 2003/308/EC – which had kept metalaxyl out of Annex I – the Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 1313/2007 (8 Nov 2007). This amendment extended the time‑limit in Article 8 for metalaxyl under Regulation (EC) No 2076/2002 and removed the derogation for metalaxyl under Regulation (EC) No 2024/2006. \n\nArticle 233 of the Treaty requires the institution whose act was declared void to take",
+    "original_text": "Metalaxyl is listed among the active substances in Annex I of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992, which sets out the detailed rules for implementing the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the market placement of plant‑protection products. Following the European Court of Justice judgment of 18 July 2007 in Case C‑326/05 P, which annulled Commission Decision 2003/308/EC that had excluded metalaxyl from Annex I of Council Directive 91/414/EEC, the Commission issued Regulation (EC) No 1313/2007 of 8 November 2007. This regulation amended Regulations (EC) No 2076/2002 concerning the extension of the time limit referred to in Article 8 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC for metalaxyl, and (EC) No 2024/2006 concerning the removal of the derogation for metalaxyl. Article 233 of the Treaty obliges the institution whose act has been declared void to take the necessary steps to comply with the Court’s judgment. Consequently, additional measures are required regarding Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92, particularly concerning the deadlines for submitting additional trial results and information.\n\nThese further measures must be considered in light of the specific factual context of the C‑326/05 P judgment. IQV never submitted a complete dossier and instead sought to rely on studies submitted by another notifier. IQV argued that it should only be required to provide any material missing from that other dossier, which itself contained gaps. However, IQV was denied access to the other notifier’s dossier, which had been withdrawn. Throughout the proceedings, the Commission maintained that IQV bore the burden of proof to demonstrate that metalaxyl met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC, a stance the Court did not contest. Because IQV could not access the other dossier, the Commission concluded that a peer review could not be successfully carried out, as the review would raise questions about the studies in the other dossier that IQV would be unable to answer.\n\nThe rapporteur Member State submitted the Draft Assessment Report for metalaxyl on 26 January 2001, based on all studies available at that time. During the evaluation, the identified data gaps were such that inclusion of the substance in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC could not be contemplated. In contacts with IQV on 17 September and 14 November 2007, the Commission informed IQV of its intention to complete the evaluation. The information on metalaxyl submitted to the Commission to date remains incomplete and does not permit inclusion of metalaxyl in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC. The Commission cannot guarantee that the studies and data IQV will provide under Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 will be sufficient to fill the identified gaps and thereby demonstrate that metalaxyl is likely to satisfy the general requirements of Article 5(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.\n\nThe Commission and the Member States will adopt a pragmatic approach, relying as far as legally possible on the existing data. It is common for peer‑review questions to arise, and IQV alone is responsible for addressing any such questions should they occur. To complete the assessment of metalaxyl by the deadline set out in Regulation (EC) No 2076/2002, strict timelines must be applied at each procedural step. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that gaps identified later in the dossier can be remedied by additional studies, as this would delay the assessment. To enable the examination of metalaxyl, certain time periods provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 must be adjusted, and the regulation should be amended accordingly. The measures outlined in this regulation are consistent with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_126",
-    "original_text": "The European Communities’ Statistical Office has carried out surveys to assess the cost‑of‑living differences at various German work locations. In its 23 January 1992 judgment (Case C‑301/90, Commission v. Council), the Court of Justice observed that by the end of 1987 the cost of living in Munich exceeded that in Bonn—the then capital—by 8.3 %. Without a dedicated weighting, this disparity",
+    "original_text": "The European Communities’ Statistical Office has carried out surveys to assess the cost‑of‑living levels at various German work locations. In its 23 January 1992 judgment in Case C‑301/90 (Commission v. Council), the Court of Justice observed that, by the close of 1987, living expenses in Munich were 8.3 % higher than in Bonn—the capital at that time—and that, without a designated weighting, this substantial disparity diminished the purchasing power of officials stationed in Munich relative to their counterparts in Bonn. The Court further noted that, given the pronounced gap identified, the duty to establish a specific weighting could not be contingent on the number of officials or other Community personnel involved. Consequently, the Court ruled that the regulation in question must be annulled to the extent that it failed to set a specific weighting for Munich effective from 1 January 1988. Accordingly, the judgment requires the implementation of a specific weighting for Munich, starting on 1 January 1988 and to be updated through 1 July 1991.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_135",
-    "original_text": "Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 establishes detailed procedures for getting rid of alcohol stocks that result from distillation and are held by intervention agencies, as outlined in Articles 27, 28 and 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999. It calls for tender processes to sell wine‑derived alcohol for export to non‑EU countries, but only for use as fuel, with the aim",
+    "original_text": "Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 sets out, among other things, the specific procedures for disposing of alcohol stocks that result from distillation under Articles 27, 28 and 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 and that are held by intervention agencies. It mandates that tender processes be launched for the export of wine alcohol to third‑country markets, but only for use in the fuel sector of those countries, with the aim of cutting down Community‑origin wine‑alcohol inventories and ensuring a more reliable supply for the importing nations. The wine alcohol of Community origin stored in the Member States comprises quantities produced by distillation in accordance with Articles 35, 36 and 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organisation of the wine market, as subsequently amended by Regulation (EC) No 1677/1999, as well as under Articles 27, 28 and 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999. Following the adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 2799/98 of 15 December 1998, which established agrimonetary arrangements for the euro, all tender prices and securities must be quoted in euros and all payments must be made in euros. The provisions set out in this Regulation are consistent with the view expressed by the Management Committee for Wine.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_137",
-    "original_text": "The tariff quotas for milk products set out in the GATT/WTO agreement, which are not tied to any specific country, are raised each year on 1 July, and Annex II of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1374/98 must be updated to reflect these changes. Council Regulation (EC) No 70/97, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2863/98, governs unilateral",
+    "original_text": "The tariff quotas for milk products listed in the GATT/WTO agreement, which are not assigned to a specific country of origin, are increased each year beginning 1 July, and therefore Annex II to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1374/98 must be updated accordingly. Council Regulation (EC) No 70/97, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2863/98, which governs unilateral preferential arrangements for certain former Yugoslav republics, excludes the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from any such preferential treatment, so any reference to that country in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1374/98 should be removed. Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1374/98 lists the names and locations of the agencies issuing IMA 1 certificates, but some of the information is incomplete or outdated, and this annex must be revised. Regulation (EC) No 1374/98 is a recasting of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1600/95, and during that recasting certain references in the annex were incorrect, requiring the necessary corrections. The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "legal_mercury_150",
-    "original_text": "Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89, dated 25 September 1989, which deals with the common organization of the sheep‑ and goat‑meat market, requires that the Community quotation for the standard quality of fresh or chilled sheep carcasses be introduced in every Member State by 1 January 1991 at the latest. The Commission has already submitted a proposal to the Council on how to define this Community standard quality, yet the Council has not yet taken a decision. The transitional rules laid",
+    "original_text": "Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 of 25 September 1989, which governs the common organization of the sheep‑meat and goat‑meat market, requires that every Member State introduce the Community quotation for the standard quality of fresh or chilled sheep carcasses no later than 1 January 1991. The Commission has already forwarded a proposal to the Council on how to define this Community standard quality, but the Council has not yet made a decision. The transitional rules laid out in Article 22 of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 will cease to apply at the close of the 1990 marketing year. In order to fulfil its treaty obligations and keep the market framework functioning smoothly, the Commission must act now to prevent any disruption. Specifically, the mechanisms for setting prices of fresh or chilled carcasses on the representative markets of each quotation area must continue to work, and the provisions of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1481/86 of 15 May 1986—amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3983/89—on price determination for fresh or chilled lamb carcasses and the price survey of certain other sheep‑carcass qualities must stay in force. This measure is intended solely as a temporary safeguard and does not affect any future Council decision.",
     "domain": "legal",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -6434,7 +6434,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "email_mercury_20",
-    "original_text": "I’ve located the file and summarized the current status:\n\n1. **Cross‑default threshold** – They initially wanted this to match the collateral threshold, but my notes show they were comfortable keeping it at $100,000.\n\n2. **Financial reporting** – Instead of full financial statements, we agreed to accept quarterly and annual Lease Operating Statements (LOS). \n - Is “Lease Operating Statements”",
+    "original_text": "I’ve located the file and wanted to give you an update on the current status:\n\n1. Regarding the cross‑default threshold, the original request was to match the collateral threshold, but my notes show they were comfortable keeping it at $100,000.\n\n2. Since we won’t be receiving full financial statements, we agreed to accept quarterly and annual Lease Operating Statements instead. I’m not sure if “Lease Operating Statements” is the precise term, but I assume they will be prepared internally and delivered within 90 days after the end of each quarter. Do we need to define this term, or is it already understood?\n\n3. We set a collateral threshold for them at $500,000.\n\n4. For the MAC trigger, is the Net Cash Flow/Revenue test the sole criterion, and what event would actually activate the MAC? Are there additional triggers? Previously we used Funded Debt/Partners Capital, EBITDA Coverage Ratio, and Minimum Partners Capital tests. I’m also proposing the following definitions: Cash Flow equals Net Income plus depreciation and other non‑cash items minus capital expenditures as shown on the income statement; Net Income is gross revenues and other appropriate income credits less all legitimate expenses, including taxes; Revenue is cash received from the sale of oil, gas, and plant products. Should we reference the Lease Operating Statements in these definitions?\n\n5. All Performance Assurance figures will be rounded up to the nearest $10,000.\n\nThat’s everything I have so far; please let me know your thoughts.",
     "domain": "email",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -6609,7 +6609,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "email_mercury_45",
-    "original_text": "To settle any disputes, I propose a protocol similar to what was discussed at Columbia Lakes:\n\n**a)** All P&P swaps and any activities involving network strategy or assets in the paper sector for Canada and Mexico should be handled by Industrial Origination. \n**b)** Pure energy‑commodity positions and standalone energy assets (no outsourcing) for every industrial segment in Canada and Mexico belong to ECC or Enron Mexico. \n**c)** Energy",
+    "original_text": "Team, to settle any remaining disputes I propose a protocol that mirrors the discussion at Columbia Lakes: (a) handle all P&P swaps and any network‑strategy or asset matters in the paper sector for Canada and Mexico under Industrial Origination; (b) manage pure energy‑commodity positions and independent energy assets (no outsourcing) for every industrial segment in Canada and Mexico through ECC or Enron Mexico; (c) coordinate energy‑outsourcing for all industrial segments in Canada and Mexico, with Enron Canada and Enron Mexico drafting a written target list that ECC, Enron Mexico, and Industrial Origination will jointly develop, market, and execute the most profitable, value‑adding outsourcing solution for industrial customers in those regions—ECC and Enron Mexico’s market expertise combined with Houston’s customer‑facing, product‑development, and execution capabilities should form a winning team.\n\nI request that the three groups clearly define their outsourcing targets, assign lead sales and structuring personnel, and set a timeline for initiating discussions with each prospective client as soon as possible.\n\nIdeally, the Canadian and Mexican teams would drive the sales effort while the Houston team would lead structuring, client interaction, and execution, though I leave the exact allocation to your judgment.\n\nIn any case, I expect the target list for Canada and Mexico to be finalized and approved within the next two weeks; regarding Tembec, I see no reason to change the current deal team now, but the US team will keep the Canadian team informed, and if the products shift away from outsourcing, the deal should be transferred to ECC.\n\nRegards.",
     "domain": "email",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -6840,7 +6840,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "email_mercury_78",
-    "original_text": "I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.",
+    "original_text": "Hello!\n\nI’ve just returned from Germany, and while the trip was enjoyable, Frankfurt proved to be extremely pricey. I was there for a distributor’s meeting and finally got to meet in people we’d only been corresponding with by fax and email up until now.\n\nOur account officer is a very attractive young woman, only 23 years old. Unfortunately, she’s already been married for a year—life can be tough sometimes. I think one of the other distributors may have noticed me flirting with her. After all, a quarter of the world away seems like a reasonable distance for a bit of fun.\n\nI was surprised by how compact Frankfurt actually is. You can walk between the main parts of the city in just a few minutes. The city is dominated by churches—there seems to be one every five blocks—along with slaughterhouses and castles. They’ve preserved a lot of allegedly historic buildings, but many of them look quite unattractive and lack any real architectural merit. Because of this, the new European Central Bank headquarters had to be squeezed into the back of one of those so‑called historic sites. The building is long, occupies a lot of prime space, and seems to serve no clear purpose. This kind of layout appears to be common throughout Frankfurt.\n\nA pleasant surprise during the trip was that the company covered my hotel bill. I was prepared to pay, but I wasn’t charged when I checked out. Our meeting ran from Monday through Thursday, leaving Friday and Saturday free before my Sunday flight. I decided to take a bus tour of Rothenburg. Initially, I had planned to go to Heidelberg, but I met an American‑Chinese woman traveling alone and chose to accompany her to Rothenburg instead. She works for a startup IT firm in Santa Clara. I told my girlfriend about the outing, but nothing more happened beyond us spending the entire Friday and Saturday together. Of course, I can’t say for sure what I would have told her if anything had escalated—just a thought.\n\nI’m seriously considering pursuing a Master’s in Finance at the University of the Philippines. The application forms only become available in May, and the entrance exam is in August. The program would start in September and last a year, which would line up my graduation with the time Claudine finishes her local board exams. I don’t see a particularly bright future for myself in the Philippines, so I may follow her if she specializes in the United States or Canada. Unless something dramatic happens—like rapid progress in our country or a change in my fortunes—this seems like the most likely plan.\n\nIf she were to petition for Canadian citizenship on my behalf, that would greatly improve my chances of finding a job in Canada or the U.S. I’m fairly confident the U.S. economy will bounce back within a couple of years. You never stay down for long.\n\nMy country feels like it’s sinking because of deep divisions among its people. There’s no unity, and I sometimes think it might be better to split the nation",
     "domain": "email",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -6861,7 +6861,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "email_mercury_81",
-    "original_text": "Tana – I talked with Joe Wright from APB earlier today. The key points are:\n\n- APB currently has a $500 K letter of credit (LC) pending to support its US trading activities. \n- Norwegin Energy Brokers AS (NEB) is a brokerage firm operating in the Nordic and EU markets, primarily in Scandinavia. \n- First Energy Brokers AS (FEB) was created by NEB",
+    "original_text": "Tana, I talked with Joe Wright at APB this morning. The issue is that APB has a $500 K letter of credit to support U.S. trading, while Norwegin Energy Brokers – AS (a brokerage operating mainly in the Nordic and EU markets, especially Scandinavia) and First Energy Brokers – AS (created by NEB to trade in the Netherlands at an uncertain date) are both involved. NEB holds a significant, though not total, stake in FEB, and APB currently owns 23 % of NEB, giving it an indirect interest in FEB. APB intends to acquire the remaining NEB shares—a confidential transaction slated for later this month—and Joe believes that after this purchase NEB and FEB may be merged. He also said that expanding the APB LC to cover these entities would not be an issue if credit requires it. I’m not aware of any prior dealings with NEB or FEB, but we’ll need to consult credit to determine what’s required for the trading to proceed. Could you handle this, or should I take the lead? Thank you.",
     "domain": "email",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11558,14 +11558,14 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_2",
-    "original_text": "I reached out to Credit Acceptance on [date 1]",
+    "original_text": "On XX/XX/XXXX I contacted Credit Acceptance about my payments, and they told me they would not repossess my car. Then, on XX/XX/XXXX I requested that the vehicle be taken away because I could no longer make the payments. I was informed that I would be stuck with the car, since if they reclaimed it they wouldn’t obtain much from an auction",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_3",
-    "original_text": "I keep getting loud automated calls from XXXX that are meant for someone I don",
+    "original_text": "I keep getting loud, automated messages from XXXX about someone I don’t know (XXXX XXXX). My cell phone has been the same for over XXXX years, and my name is definitely not XXXX XXXX! I reached out to the rude male listed at the XXXX number to point out their error, and he simply hung up on me. I also tried dialing the number in the message (XXXX), but it returns an error stating the number or code is invalid. How can I make them stop harassing me? I have no outstanding debts, and they have the wrong number!",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11656,7 +11656,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_16",
-    "original_text": "They continue to call a person who",
+    "original_text": "They continue to call someone who has already asked them to stop, repeatedly dialing every phone and leaving two messages on each. I have attempted to cooperate with them, but they refuse to work with me. The final straw occurred when an acquaintance went to make a loan payment, and the manager, XXXX, kindly told him that I",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11684,7 +11684,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_20",
-    "original_text": "I entered into a one‑year lease agreement with the company XXXX XXXX XXXX",
+    "original_text": "I entered into a contract with the company XXXX XXXX XXXX for a one‑year term. At the time of signing, the manager named XXXX informed me that if I terminated the lease before the year was up, I would for the down payment, and that everything would be fine. However, after six months I contacted her to attempt to cancel the lease, and she responded that cancellation was not possible; she said that if I ended the lease now, I would have to pay the full remaining balance. Consequently, I returned the keys, and she placed my information in collection for the specified amount.",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11712,7 +11712,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_24",
-    "original_text": "I was released on XXXX without having to post a bond. My family",
+    "original_text": "I was released on XXXX without a bond. My family was unaware that I would be released on XXXX and they went to XXXX. The night I was released I felt scared and confused, especially after seeing that the paperwork I received listed “OR.” The judge instructed me to have XXXX call him to explain that I owed nothing to them. I then went to XXXX",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11733,7 +11733,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_27",
-    "original_text": "I’m dealing with a",
+    "original_text": "Hello, the private collection agency that now owns my student loans—purchased from my school—continues to call me at my workplace, putting my job at risk. I am unclear about who the primary holder of the loan is, and although I have asked for the signed loan documentation, they have not supplied it. I am unable to make payments because I have a XXXX child and lack the financial means to repay my student loans",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11824,7 +11824,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_40",
-    "original_text": "For the past year I’ve been having problems with my child‑support debit card. It never",
+    "original_text": "Over the past year I have been dealing with persistent problems with my child‑support debit card. It never arrives on schedule, and I can never speak with a live representative on the phone to learn where my money is or when it will be posted to my account. It takes",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11838,7 +11838,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_42",
-    "original_text": "The individual reaches",
+    "original_text": "XXXX XXXX XXXX contacts me roughly XXXX times each day, beginning before XXXX XXXX. They continue to call me while I am at work, even after my employer has told them that such calls are prohibited. At times they ring me",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -11957,7 +11957,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_59",
-    "original_text": "The plaintiff claims that while my wife’s portion of the debt was discharged, my portion was not. However, I have no involvement in",
+    "original_text": "The plaintiff alleges that my wife’s share of the debt was discharged, but my share was not, even though I had no involvement in the debt at all; he has arbitrarily assigned a portion to me without any contract or evidence, and I have never been responsible for it. I have read that he is required to show when and where I supposedly accepted or own this debt, and I must contest this because it is my right, even against this erroneous judgment.",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12083,7 +12083,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_77",
-    "original_text": "I’ve been receiving calls that look like they’re from Citi‑Bank on my phone",
+    "original_text": "I have been receiving phone calls that appear to be from Citi‑Bank on my number at XXXX, with the calling line listed as XXXX, and they claim the calls concern a Sear credit card—a card I do not own. I",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12111,7 +12111,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_81",
-    "original_text": "Hello, I received a letter from Chase on [date] informing me that they are",
+    "original_text": "I received a letter from Chase dated XX/XX/XXXX informing me that they have decided to terminate their relationship with me and will close my account on XX/XX/XXXX. When I called, they refused to take any action. I originally opened this account to hold my son’s XXXX XXXX money, and it has been in place ever since. My son is now XXXX years old, and I cannot understand why Chase would close this savings account or why they are unwilling to discuss the matter with me in order to have it reopened.",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12188,7 +12188,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_92",
-    "original_text": "I was told that if I paid a specific amount, my student loan would be cancelled. However, when I reached out to",
+    "original_text": "I was promised that by making regular payments of a specified amount, my student loan would be discharged, but when I reached out to XXXX they told me that claim was false, that they had never heard of the company, and that I had been sending monthly payments since XX/XX/XXXX without any of the money ever being applied to the loan. I was also told that student loans are never forgiven, yet I continued to pay, believing the balance would be cleared, and every time I called I was forced to leave a message and wait for a callback. The firm in question is Equitable Acceptance Corporation, located in XXXX, MN XXXX.",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12342,14 +12342,14 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_114",
-    "original_text": "I was placed on long‑term disability and have been unable to work since then. I",
+    "original_text": "On XXXX XXXX I experienced a XXXX and was placed on long‑term XXXX, which has prevented me from working ever since. I have repeatedly informed Walmart and Synchrony Bank that I am on hardship and have asked them not to contact me. Nevertheless, they continue to call, often blocking their own numbers, and are extremely rude, citing bank names that I have no dealings with. They claim the issue is personal, and the male caller refuses to identify himself. I keep telling them to stop calling and explain why they ignore my requests, yet they seem indifferent. They will only receive a payment when I am able to make",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_115",
-    "original_text": "A recent visit from Altisource XXXX XXXX XXXX resulted in another inspection sticker being aff",
+    "original_text": "Recently Altisource XXXX XXXX XXXX affixed another inspection sticker to the front door of a residence I have been squatting in for more than a year and a half. This marks the first occasion they have removed everything inside the house, positioned it in the middle of each room, and even",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12426,7 +12426,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_126",
-    "original_text": "I received a gift card from",
+    "original_text": "I received a gift card from my employer but didn’t have the activation code. When I called to have it activated, the representative asked for a lot of personal information, which I was okay with. However, she then requested my XXXX, insisting it was required to activate the card. I",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12447,7 +12447,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_129",
-    "original_text": "Hello,\n\nI have a state tax lien listed on my credit report that is",
+    "original_text": "Hello, I have discovered a state tax lien on my credit report that does not belong to me; it is actually associated with my father, XXXX XXXX XXXX. I am XXXX XXXX. I hired a credit‑repair company that sent XXXX letters, but the lien has not been removed. They instructed me to contact you to resolve the issue. My Social Security number is XXXX and my date of birth is XX/XX/XXXX. I am trying to have this lien eliminated from my credit report because it is dragging down my score, particularly as I am in the process of purchasing a new home.",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"
@@ -12496,7 +12496,7 @@
   },
   {
     "id": "consumer_complaints_mercury_136",
-    "original_text": "In",
+    "original_text": "I refinanced my mortgage with another bank on XXXX/XXXX/2015, and under the applicable statutes I was entitled to have my escrow balance returned within 30 days. That refund never arrived, and because the bank failed to pay my flood insurance on schedule—being 30 days late—my homeowners insurance and taxes are now due. I simply need the escrow funds to cover those obligations. I am exhausted from constantly urging these people to act correctly and conduct their business ethically.",
     "domain": "consumer_complaints",
     "text_type": "ai",
     "model": "mercury"