Datasets:
File size: 2,821 Bytes
80fb2a3 41e059b 80fb2a3 41e059b | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 | ---
license: cc-by-4.0
pretty_name: Trismegistus Receipt-Bound AI Expert Partner Evaluation
tags:
- artificial-intelligence
- ai-agents
- evaluation
- benchmarks
- continuity
- model-agnostic
- research-paper
- zenodo-doi
---
# Trismegistus: Receipt-Bound AI Expert Partner Evaluation
Author: Dean Patterson, Renaissance Field Lite
Zenodo DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.21417649](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21417649)
Zenodo record: [https://zenodo.org/records/21417649](https://zenodo.org/records/21417649)
## Summary
Trismegistus is a receipt-bound AI Expert Partner architecture developed by
Renaissance Field Lite to preserve continuity across research, coding, browser
action, source review, outreach, and paid-work operations.
The central contribution is a model-agnostic continuity and evaluation method:
run a baseline route, run an architecture-on route, evaluate the same task under
the same source and evidence gate, and preserve SQL, JSON, Markdown, media,
benchmark, source, or browser receipts for review.
This Hub package mirrors the DOI-backed public-safe paper bundle for AI-native
discovery. The official archival publication is the Zenodo record above.
## Paper Files
- [`files/TRISMEGISTUS_RECEIPT_BOUND_AI_EXPERT_PARTNER_EVALUATION_ARXIV_CANDIDATE_2026-07-16.pdf`](files/TRISMEGISTUS_RECEIPT_BOUND_AI_EXPERT_PARTNER_EVALUATION_ARXIV_CANDIDATE_2026-07-16.pdf)
- [`files/TRISMEGISTUS_WHITE_PAPER_PUBLIC_SAFE_2026-07-15.md`](files/TRISMEGISTUS_WHITE_PAPER_PUBLIC_SAFE_2026-07-15.md)
## Figures
- [`figures/figure_01_three_surface_architecture.png`](figures/figure_01_three_surface_architecture.png)
- [`figures/figure_02_receipt_bound_operator_loop.png`](figures/figure_02_receipt_bound_operator_loop.png)
- [`figures/figure_03_baseline_vs_architecture_on.png`](figures/figure_03_baseline_vs_architecture_on.png)
- [`figures/figure_04_six_lane_field_curriculum.png`](figures/figure_04_six_lane_field_curriculum.png)
## Public-Safe Boundary
This package publishes public-safe paper materials only. It does not include
private raw logs, credentials, browser profiles, local databases, biometric
captures, unpublished security artifacts, or private operator-state material.
The paper does not claim a completed AGI system, official public benchmark
leaderboard result, clinical system, or peer-reviewed status. It claims a
receipt-bound engineering method and identifies the current evidence, boundary,
and next gate.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{patterson2026trismegistus,
author = {Patterson, Dean},
title = {Receipt-Bound AI Expert Partner Evaluation: A Model-Agnostic Continuity Architecture for Baseline Versus Architecture-On Workflows},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Zenodo},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21417649},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21417649}
}
```
|