renaissancefieldlite commited on
Commit
41e059b
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 80fb2a3

Upload README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +69 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,72 @@
1
  ---
2
  license: cc-by-4.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
  license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ pretty_name: Trismegistus Receipt-Bound AI Expert Partner Evaluation
4
+ tags:
5
+ - artificial-intelligence
6
+ - ai-agents
7
+ - evaluation
8
+ - benchmarks
9
+ - continuity
10
+ - model-agnostic
11
+ - research-paper
12
+ - zenodo-doi
13
  ---
14
+
15
+ # Trismegistus: Receipt-Bound AI Expert Partner Evaluation
16
+
17
+ Author: Dean Patterson, Renaissance Field Lite
18
+
19
+ Zenodo DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.21417649](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21417649)
20
+
21
+ Zenodo record: [https://zenodo.org/records/21417649](https://zenodo.org/records/21417649)
22
+
23
+ ## Summary
24
+
25
+ Trismegistus is a receipt-bound AI Expert Partner architecture developed by
26
+ Renaissance Field Lite to preserve continuity across research, coding, browser
27
+ action, source review, outreach, and paid-work operations.
28
+
29
+ The central contribution is a model-agnostic continuity and evaluation method:
30
+ run a baseline route, run an architecture-on route, evaluate the same task under
31
+ the same source and evidence gate, and preserve SQL, JSON, Markdown, media,
32
+ benchmark, source, or browser receipts for review.
33
+
34
+ This Hub package mirrors the DOI-backed public-safe paper bundle for AI-native
35
+ discovery. The official archival publication is the Zenodo record above.
36
+
37
+ ## Paper Files
38
+
39
+ - [`files/TRISMEGISTUS_RECEIPT_BOUND_AI_EXPERT_PARTNER_EVALUATION_ARXIV_CANDIDATE_2026-07-16.pdf`](files/TRISMEGISTUS_RECEIPT_BOUND_AI_EXPERT_PARTNER_EVALUATION_ARXIV_CANDIDATE_2026-07-16.pdf)
40
+ - [`files/TRISMEGISTUS_WHITE_PAPER_PUBLIC_SAFE_2026-07-15.md`](files/TRISMEGISTUS_WHITE_PAPER_PUBLIC_SAFE_2026-07-15.md)
41
+
42
+ ## Figures
43
+
44
+ - [`figures/figure_01_three_surface_architecture.png`](figures/figure_01_three_surface_architecture.png)
45
+ - [`figures/figure_02_receipt_bound_operator_loop.png`](figures/figure_02_receipt_bound_operator_loop.png)
46
+ - [`figures/figure_03_baseline_vs_architecture_on.png`](figures/figure_03_baseline_vs_architecture_on.png)
47
+ - [`figures/figure_04_six_lane_field_curriculum.png`](figures/figure_04_six_lane_field_curriculum.png)
48
+
49
+ ## Public-Safe Boundary
50
+
51
+ This package publishes public-safe paper materials only. It does not include
52
+ private raw logs, credentials, browser profiles, local databases, biometric
53
+ captures, unpublished security artifacts, or private operator-state material.
54
+
55
+ The paper does not claim a completed AGI system, official public benchmark
56
+ leaderboard result, clinical system, or peer-reviewed status. It claims a
57
+ receipt-bound engineering method and identifies the current evidence, boundary,
58
+ and next gate.
59
+
60
+ ## Citation
61
+
62
+ ```bibtex
63
+ @misc{patterson2026trismegistus,
64
+ author = {Patterson, Dean},
65
+ title = {Receipt-Bound AI Expert Partner Evaluation: A Model-Agnostic Continuity Architecture for Baseline Versus Architecture-On Workflows},
66
+ year = {2026},
67
+ publisher = {Zenodo},
68
+ doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21417649},
69
+ url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21417649}
70
+ }
71
+ ```
72
+