content-documents/ds10/EFTA01262965.md

---
title: "DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 10 (EFTA01262965)"
source: "DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 10"
sourceUrl: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete"
date: "2026-01-01"
category: "DOJ Data Set"
eftaNumber: "EFTA01262965"
ocrPages: 0
ocrChars: 90490
ocrElapsed: 0.0
parseTier: "external"
engine: "ishumilin OCR pipeline (engine undisclosed; CC0 mirror)"
externalSource: "ishumilin-ocr-complete"
externalLicense: "CC0-1.0"
externalCredit: "ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete (Hugging Face)"
externalUrl: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete"
---

AO 106 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Application for a Search Warrant

# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

```markdown

for the Southern District of New York 19MAG 8578

```

In the Matter of the Search of

(Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address)

Six binders with various CDs

Case No.

## APPLICATION FOR A SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

I, a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government, request a search warrant and state under penalty of perjury that I have reason to believe that on the following person or property (identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location):

located in the Southern District of New York , there is now concealed *(identify the person or describe the property to be seized)*:

See Attached Affidavit and its Attachment A

The basis for the search under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(c) is (check one or more):

X □ evidence of a crime;

```markdown

□ contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed;

```

```markdown

☐ property designed for use, intended for use, or used in committing a crime;

```

```markdown

□ a person to be arrested or a person who is unlawfully restrained.

```

The search is related to a violation of:

```markdown

Code Section(s)

```

Offense Description(s)

18 USC 1591

Sex Trafficking of Minors

18 USC 371

Sex Trafficking Conspiracy

The application is based on these facts:

See Attached Affidavit and its Attachment A

Continued on the attached sheet.

[ ] Delayed notice of 30 days (give exact ending date if more than 30 days: ___ ) is requested under 18 U.S.C. § 3103a, the basis of which is set forth on the attached sheet.



Sworn to before me and signed in my presence.

Date: 9/12/19

City and state: New York, NY

Task Force Officer

Printed name and title

Hon. James L. Cott, United States Magistrate Judge

Printed name and title

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000295

```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114379

| EFTA01262965 |
| :--- | :--- |

This is a simple Markdown document with no headings or paragraphs. It contains just one line of text.

# 19MAG 8578

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

In the Matter of the Application of the United States Of America for a Search and Seizure Warrant for six binders with various CDs

TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK) ss..

Agent Affidavit in Support of Application for Search and Seizure Warrant



being duly sworn, deposes and says:

## I. Introduction

## A. Affiant

1. I have been a Task Force Officer with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) since 2017. As such, I am a “federal law enforcement officer” within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(a)(2)(C), that is, a government agent engaged in enforcing the criminal laws and duly authorized by the Attorney General to request a search warrant. I am also a detective with the New York Police Department (“NYPD”) and have been employed by the NYPD for approximately thirteen years. I am currently assigned to investigate violations of criminal law relating to the sexual exploitation of children as part of an FBI Task Force. I have gained expertise in this area through classroom training and daily work related to these types of investigations. As part of my responsibilities, I have been involved in the investigation of sex trafficking cases, and have participated in the execution of search warrants for electronic devices and electronic storage media.

2. I make this Affidavit in support of an application pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for a warrant to search certain electronic devices, compact disks and related electronic media specified below (the “Subject Items”) for the items and information

1

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000296
```

EFTA_00114380

EFTA01262966

described in Attachment A. This affidavit is based upon my personal knowledge; my review of documents and other evidence; my conversations with other law enforcement personnel; and my training, experience and advice received concerning the use of computers in criminal activity and the forensic analysis of electronically stored information (“ESI”). Because this affidavit is being submitted for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause, it does not include all the facts that I have learned during the course of my investigation. Where the contents of documents and the actions, statements, and conversations of others are reported herein, they are reported in substance and in part, except where otherwise indicated.

## B. The Subject Items

3. The Subject Items are particularly described as follows$^{1}$:

a. Two blue binders with CDs, which were seized by Special Agent from a blue suitcase on or about July 11, 2019 ("Subject Item-1").



b. Three blue binders with various CDs and one clear binder with a green spine with various CDs, all four of which were seized by Special Agent from a black suitcase on or about July 11, 2019 ("Subject Item-2").

4. The Subject Items are all presently located in the Southern District of New York.

## C. The Target Subjects and the Subject Offenses

5. For the reasons detailed below, I believe that there is probable cause to believe that the Subject Device contains evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the

1 To the extent that the Subject Items contain any removable storage media, including CDs, the description of each such item encompasses those other media.

2017.08.02

2

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000297
```

EFTA_00114381

EFTA01262967

“Subject Offenses”). The Target Subjects of this investigation are known and unknown coconspirators of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, including but not limited to

## II. Probable Cause

## A. Probable Cause Regarding the Commission of the Subject Offenses

6. On or about July 2, 2019, a grand jury in this District returned an Indictment charging JEFFREY EPSTEIN with the Subject Offenses. A copy of the Indictment is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated by reference. EPSTEIN was arrested pursuant to the Indictment on or about July 6, 2019, and had been detained pending trial at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (“MCC”) in New York, New York.

7. On or about August 10, 2019, the Bureau of Prisons confirmed that JEFFREY EPSTEIN had been found unresponsive in his cell at the MCC that morning, and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter.

8. Notwithstanding EPSTEIN’s death, the sex trafficking investigation that led to his indictment remains ongoing. In particular, Count One of the Indictment alleged that EPSTEIN conspired with others to traffic minors, and further identified three individuals who worked for EPSTEIN (identified in Exhibit A as “Employee-1”, “Employee-2,” and “Employee-3”) and facilitated EPSTEIN’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, arranging victims’ encounters with EPSTEIN and paying victims after these encounters. The individual identified in Exhibit A as “Employee-2” is a Target Subject of this investigation.

9. On or about November 28, 2018, the Miami Herald began publishing a series of articles relating to the defendant, his sexual misconduct with minors, and a previous investigation into his conduct in Florida from in or about 2005 through 2008. The article included information about its role in EPSTEIN’s sexual abuse of minors. Based on my participation in this investigation, I have learned that bank records obtained by the Government appear to show

3

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000298
```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114382

EFTA01262968

that just days later, on or about December 3, 2018, the defendant wired $250,000 from a trust account to . This course of action, and in particular its timing, suggests that EPSTEIN was attempting to influence , who might have been able to provide information against him in light of the recently re-emerging allegations.

## B. Probable Cause Justifying Search of the Subject Items

The Indictment and Victim-1

10. As set forth in Exhibit A, from at least in or about 2002, up to and including at least in or about 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN sexually abused multiple minor girls in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere. During that time and continuing to the present, EPSTEIN possessed and controlled a multi-story, single-family residence located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, which is described in Exhibit A as “the New York Residence.”

11. As further set forth in paragraphs 8 through 10 of Exhibit A, from at least in or about 2002, up to and including at least in or about 2005, EPSTEIN sexually abused numerous minor victims at the New York Residence. In particular, and as alleged in the Indictment, when a victim arrived at the New York Residence, she would be escorted to a room inside the Subject Premises with a massage table, where she would perform a massage on EPSTEIN. The victims, who were as young as 14 years of age, were told by EPSTEIN or other individuals to partially or fully undress before beginning the “massage.” During the encounter, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of physical contact with his victim to include, among other things, sex acts such as groping and direct and indirect contact with the victims’ genitals. EPSTEIN typically would also masturbate during these sexualized encounters, ask victims to touch him while he masturbated, and touch victims’ genitals with his hands or with sex toys. Following each encounter, EPSTEIN or one of his employees or associates paid the victim in cash.

4

## CONFIDENTIAL

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000299
```

EFTA_00114383

EFTA01262969

12. As set forth in paragraphs 12 through 13 of Exhibit A, to further facilitate his ability to abuse minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked and enticed certain of his victims to recruit additional minor girls to perform “massages” and similarly engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN. When a victim would recruit another minor girl for EPSTEIN, he paid both the victim-recruiter and the new victim hundreds of dollars in cash. EPSTEIN knew that his victims were underage, including because certain victims told him their age.

13. One of the victims identified in paragraph 22 of Exhibit A is Victim-1. As part of the FBI’s investigation of EPSTEIN, other law enforcement officers and I have interviewed Victim-1. $ ^{2} $ During those interviews, Victim-1 has said, in substance and in part, that EPSTEIN sexually abused Victim-1 on multiple occasions between approximately 2002 and 2005 in the New York Residence. This sexual abuse all occurred when Victim-1 was under the age of 18.

The July 6, 2019 and July 7, 2019 Search Warrants for the New York Residence

14. On or about July 6, 2019, the Honorable Barbara Moses, United States Magistrate Judge, signed a search warrant authorizing a search of the New York Residence. The search warrant is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference herein.

15. At approximately 6 p.m. on or about July 6, 2019, law enforcement officers (the "Search Team") commenced executing the search warrant at the New York Residence.

2 In meetings with the Government, Victim-1 has disclosed that, approximately a decade ago, she committed marriage fraud in order to obtain a green card and, subsequently, U.S. citizenship. She has also disclosed personal substance abuse, primarily involving the abuse of prescription drugs, during various periods between the early 2000s and 2019. Victim-1 has also disclosed having worked for approximately a year at a “happy-ending” massage parlor, performing paid sex acts. Victim-1 is currently pursuing a civil damages claim against EPSTEIN for his sexual abuse of her. Information provided by Victim-1 has proven reliable and has been corroborated by independent evidence, including documents and records obtained during the investigation and the accounts of other victims whom Victim-1 has never met.

2017.08.02

5

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000300
```

EFTA_00114384

EFTA01262970

16. Based on the Search Team’s observations during an initial search of the New York Residence, at approximately 7 p.m., the Search Team stopped the search and froze the scene in order to seek a new search warrant.

17. On or about July 7, 2019, the Honorable Barbara Moses, United States Magistrate Judge, signed a second search warrant authorizing a search of the New York Residence (the "Second Warrant"). The Second Warrant is attached as Exhibit C, and incorporated by reference herein. At approximately 2:30 a.m., the Search Team resumed the search, and commenced searching pursuant to the Second Warrant.

18. Based on my conversations with members of the Search Team, I have learned the following:

a. The Search Team observed a number of computing devices, including computers and tablet devices, throughout the New York Residence.

b. Inside a safe in a closet on the third floor (the “Safe”), the Search Team discovered and seized, among other items, several binders containing sleeves of compact discs, most of which are labeled with handwriting. In total, the binders contain dozens of compact discs. One disc is labeled “Young—” Another disc is labeled “Nudes 00-24.” Another is labeled “Misc. Nudes.” Yet another is labeled “Girl Pics Nude.” Some discs contain the word “Zorro” or “LSJ.” For example, one disc is marked “Zorro Pics.” Based on my conversations with law enforcement agents who have participated in this investigation, I believe the name “Zorro” refers to Zorro Ranch, EPSTEIN’s property in New Mexico, and the name LSJ refers to Little Saint James, EPSTEIN’s property in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The majority of the discs contain titles that include female names. Some of the discs in the binders seized by the Search Team have titles that appear to refer to trips or vacations.

6

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000301
```

EFTA_00114385

EFTA01262971

c. At the time of the search, the Search Team did not seize certain binders of discs located in the Safe, where the majority of the discs in the binder were labeled in a manner that did not appear to refer to girls or nudes. The Search Team also did not seize at that time several unlabeled hard drives, which were also located in the Safe. As detailed below, those additional binders of discs are among the subjects of this application.

d. In addition to the Safe, in the drawer of a dresser in a room on the Fifth floor of the New York Residence, the Search team discovered and seized, among other items, a shoebox (the “Shoebox”) which contained numerous compact discs. The majority of the discs are labeled, in handwriting, with female names. One disc is labeled “Thai Massage.” Another disc is labeled “Blonde Girl Photo Shoot.” Yet another disc is labeled “Misc. Girls Nude/Dinner--Scientists.” The discs in the Shoebox were seized by the Search Team. In another drawer of that same dresser, the Search Team discovered loose polaroid photographs depicting young, nude females who, based on the training and experience of law enforcement officers who observed them, appear to be teenagers. In that same drawer, the Search Team discovered a folder marked, in handwriting, “,” which contained photographs, including nude and sexually suggestive photographs of a young girl who, based on the training and experience of law enforcement officers who observed them, appears to be younger than 18. The folder also contained other nude photographs of young girls who appear to be teenagers, based on my training and experience. Inside the folder is a compact disc marked “at LJS 6/03” (the “Disc”), which was seized by the Search Team.

e. In a closet on the Fifth Floor of the New York Residence, the Search Team discovered, among other items, a box marked “women/old photos.” The box contained, among other items, approximately seven compact discs, which are labeled with hand-written titles. One disc is labeled “nudes 00-24.” Another is labeled “Photographer--‘03” The remaining

7

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000302
```

EFTA_00114386

EFTA01262972

discs contain titles that include female names. All of the foregoing discs were seized by the Search Team.

f. In that same closet, the Search Team discovered numerous black binders containing what appear to be print outs of digital photographs (with file names underneath) and compact discs. The Search Team seized approximately ten binders (the “Seized Binders”) $ ^{3} $ which appeared to contain, among other photographs, photographs of nude or partially nude young girls, some of which are in sexually suggestive poses. Based on the training and experience of law enforcement officers who observed them, at least some of the young girls depicted in the photographs appear to be teenagers, including some who appear to be under the age of 18. The Seized Binders also include photographs of what appear to be personal functions, events, and travel.

g. The compact discs seized by the Search Team and described in paragraphs 16(a)-(d) are currently stored within the Southern District of New York in containers marked for identification with FBI evidence numbers 15, 16, 17, 18, and 22 (the “Seized Discs”).

The July 7, 2019 Search Warrant for the Seized Discs

19. On or about July 7, 2019, the Honorable Barbara Moses, United States Magistrate Judge, signed a third search warrant to search and seize electronic media stored on the Seized Discs (the “Third Search Warrant”). The Third Warrant is attached as Exhibit D, and incorporated by reference herein.

20. Based on my conversations with law enforcement agents who have reviewed the Seized Discs pursuant to the Third Search Warrant (the “Reviewing Agents”), I have learned the following:

$ ^{3} $ The Search Team did not seize the remaining binders.

2017.08.02

8

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000303
```

EFTA_00114387

EFTA01262973

a. The discs contain approximately thousands of nude or partially nude photographs of girls or young women, many of which are in sexually suggestive poses. Based on my conversations with the Reviewing Agents, who have particular training and experience relating to child erotica and visual depictions of children in child exploitation cases, I have learned that the Reviewing Agents believe that many of the nude or partially nude images they have reviewed appear to depict girls under the age of 18. Moreover, many of the photographs appear to be labeled with file names that suggest the photographs depict these girls at properties associated with JEFFREY EPSTEIN. For example, some file names are labeled “Zorro” or “LSJ.”

b. Among the photographs on the Seized Discs, the Reviewing Agents identified partially-nude photographs of a young girl, labeled with an associated name that matched a particular individual (“Individual-1”). After identifying those photographs, the Government was advised by Individual-1’s counsel that Individual-1 recalls the month and year during which she believes those partially-nude photographs were taken, and also the location where they were taken, and that she was 17 years old at the time. $ ^{4} $

21. In addition, I have learned that some of the file names are marked “ ” which are the initials of . As set forth below, I have interviewed an individual who has reported that photographed her. Accordingly, I believe that a portion of these photos may have been taken by .

4 A preliminary review of the metadata from these photographs has been inconclusive. In particular, some of the photographs of Individual-1 contain metadata suggesting the photographs were taken on a date when Individual-1 would have been 18 years old. Other photographs of Individual-1, which appear based on Individual-1’s appearance and surroundings to have been taken around the same time, contain metadata suggesting the photographs were taken on a date when Individual-1 would have been 15 years old.

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000304
```

9

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114388

EFTA01262974

22. Among the photographs seized from the New York Residence, the Reviewing Agents identified partially-nude photographs of a young girl, labeled with the name of a particular individual (“Individual-1”). In or about August 2019, I participated in an interview of Individual-1, with her counsel present. Based on my personal observations, I believe that the photographs described in Paragraph 20(b) depict Individual-1. I have also spoken with another law enforcement agent who interviewed Individual-1 on a separate occasion in or about July 2019, with her counsel present. During the course of these interviews, Individual-1 stated, in sum an substance that she met EPSTEIN in 2003 when she was approximately 17, and that she travelled to several of EPSTEIN’s properties before she turned 18. EPSTEIN paid for the trips, and would give Individual-1 money and gifts while she traveled with him. During these trips, EPSTEIN sexually abused and assaulted Individual-1 on approximately four different occasions, all of which occurred before she turned 18. Individual-1 reported that EPSTEIN raped her during two of these incidents. Individual-1 further reported that, when she was approximately 17, asked to photograph her, and did in fact photograph Individual-1.

The July 11, 2019 Search Warrant for All Electronic Devices and Storage Media in the New York Residence

23. Following the initiation of the FBI’s review of the Seized Discs, on or about July 11, 2019, the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, United States Magistrate Judge, signed another search warrant authorizing another search of the New York Residence and specifically authorizing the seizure and search of all electronic devices and storage media inside the New York Residence (the “Fourth Warrant”). The Fourth Warrant is attached as Exhibit E and incorporated by reference herein.

24. Later on July 11, 2019, the Search Team executed the Fourth Warrant at the New York Residence.

10

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000305
```

EFTA_00114389

EFTA01262975

25. Based on my conversations with members of the Search Team, I have learned the following, among other things, regarding the execution of the Fourth Warrant:

a. During the July 11, 2019 execution of the Fourth Warrant inside the New York Residence, the Search Team found that the Safe described above was empty and, in particular, that the collection of discs and hard drives described in paragraph 16(b), above, that the Search Team had not seized during its prior search of the New York Residence on July 7, 2019, had been removed.

b. After discovering that the Safe was empty, the Search Team spoke with an employee who worked at the New York Residence (the “Employee”). During that conversation, the Employee told the Search Team that after the completion of the prior search on July 7, 2019, the Employee had been instructed by a third party (“the Third Party”) to take the contents of the Safe out of the New York Residence and deliver those items to the Third Party. The Employee further told the Search Team that after receiving that instruction, the Employee packed the contents of the Safe into two suitcases and delivered those suitcases to the Third Party. The Employee provided the Search Team with the Third Party’s contact information.

c. The Search Team then contacted the Third Party. During the ensuing conversation, the Third Party confirmed receipt of two suitcases from the Employee but also told the Search Team that the Third Party had not opened the suitcases or touched or tampered with their contents. The Third Party also agreed to deliver the two suitcases to the Search Team.

d. Later on July 11, 2019, and consistent with the conversation described above, the Third Party met the Search Team outside of the New York Residence and provided Special Agent with the two suitcases described above, one of which was blue and one of which was black. Consistent with standard law enforcement protocol, the Search Team

11

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000306
```

EFTA_00114390

EFTA01262976

conducted an inventory of both suitcases before taking custody of them. While taking an inventory of the blue suitcase, the Search Team discovered, among other items, Subject Item-1. While taking an inventory of the black suitcase, the Search Team discovered, among other items, Subject Item-2. These items, i.e., Subject Items -1, and -2, appeared to be the same items observed in the Safe by the Search Team during the July 7, 2019 search of the New York Residence.

The July 15, 2019 Search Warrant for Certain Items Located Inside the Blue and Black Suitcases

26. On or about July 15, 2019, the Honorable Kevin Nathaniel Fox, United States Magistrate Judge, signed a search warrant authorizing the search of several items, including items recovered from the black and blue suitcases seized by Special Agent on or about July 11, 2019 (the “Fifth Warrant”). The Fifth Warrant is attached as Exhibit F and incorporated by reference herein.

27. In support of the Government’s request for the Fifth Warrant, a Special Agent of the FBI submitted an affidavit in which she described some of the contents of the black and blue suitcases seized by Special Agent on or about July 11, 2019. Before submitting that affidavit, that agent had not personally reviewed the contents of those suitcases; rather, those descriptions were based on her conversations with other FBI agents who had seized the suitcases. Based on those conversations with other agents, she requested that the Fifth Warrant authorize the search of, among other items, (a) two black binders with CDs, which were seized by Special Agent from a blue suitcase on or about July 11, 2019, and (b) two binders with various CDs, which were seized by Special Agent from a black suitcase on or about July 11, 2019. The Fifth Warrant authorized the search of those specific items.

28. After the Fifth Warrant was issued, other law enforcement agents retrieved some of the items listed in the Fifth Warrant from the blue and black suitcases, which were and remain

12

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000307
```

EFTA_00114391

EFTA01262977

in FBI custody in the Southern District of New York. Those other agents initiated searches of certain items inside the two suitcases, including of Subject Item-1.

29. Subsequently, I personally inspected the contents of these suitcases, and realized that there had been a miscommunication about the color and quantity of the binders of CDs in each suitcase. In particular, the blue suitcase in fact contained two blue binders with CDs (defined herein as Subject Item-1), not two black binders. Additionally, the black suitcase in fact contained a total of four binders with CDs, three of which are blue and one of which is clear with a green spine, (defined herein as Subject Item-2), not two binders.

30. In light of these discrepancies, the FBI ceased its search of Subject Item-1 and never initiated a search of Subject Item-2. Accordingly, I now respectfully request a warrant authorizing a search of the binders that are in fact located inside the two suitcases, which have been identified as Subject Item-1 and Subject Item-2 herein.

Request to Search the Subject Items

31. Based on my training and experience and participation in this investigation, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that the Subject Items will contain and/or constitute additional fruits, evidence and instrumentalities of the Subject Offenses. As an initial matter, all of the Subject Items were originally found in the same Safe in which EPSTEIN was storing discs and other media already reviewed and which contain hundreds of not thousands of nude and suggestive images of young females, some of whom appear to be under 18. Given as much, and because there is probable cause to believe that EPSTEIN and his co-conspirators, including engaged in sex trafficking of underage girls, there is probable cause to believe that the additional storage media in EPSTEIN’s possession and control—i.e., the Subject Items—will contain evidence of the Subject Offenses. Moreover, that efforts were made to remove

13

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000308
```

EFTA_00114392

EFTA01262978

Subject Items -1 and -2 from the New York Residence after the initial search only further reinforces the probable cause to believe that those Subject Items contain and constitute fruits, evidence and instrumentalities of the Subject Offenses.

32. I further know from my training and experience that computer files or remnants of such files can be recovered months or even years after they have been created or saved on an electronic device such as the Subject Items. Even when such files have been deleted, they can often be recovered, depending on how the device has subsequently been used, months or years later with forensics tools. Thus, the ability to retrieve from information from the Subject Items depends less on when the information was first created or saved than on a particular user’s device configuration, storage capacity, and computer habits.

33. Based on the foregoing, I respectfully submit there is probable cause to believe that evidence of JEFFREY EPSTEIN’s commission of the Subject Offences is likely to be found on the Subject Items.

## III. Procedures for Searching ESI

## A. Review of ESI

34. Law enforcement personnel (who may include, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents, attorneys for the government, attorney support staff, agency personnel assisting the government in this investigation, and outside technical experts under government control) will review the ESI contained on the Subject Items for information responsive to the warrant.

35. In conducting this review, law enforcement may use various techniques to determine which files or other ESI contain evidence or fruits of the Subject Offenses. Such techniques may include, for example:

14

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000309
```

EFTA_00114393

EFTA01262979

- surveying directories or folders and the individual files they contain (analogous to looking at the outside of a file cabinet for the markings it contains and opening a drawer believed to contain pertinent files);

- conducting a file-by-file review by “opening” or reading the first few “pages” of such files in order to determine their precise contents (analogous to performing a cursory examination of each document in a file cabinet to determine its relevance);

- "scanning" storage areas to discover and possibly recover recently deleted data or deliberately hidden files; and

- performing electronic keyword searches through all electronic storage areas to determine the existence and location of data potentially related to the subject matter of the investigation$^5$; and

- reviewing metadata, system information, configuration files, registry data, and any other information reflecting how, when, and by whom the computer was used.

36. Law enforcement personnel will make reasonable efforts to restrict their search to data falling within the categories of evidence specified in the warrant. Depending on the circumstances, however, law enforcement may need to conduct a complete review of all the ESI from the Subject Items to evaluate its contents and to locate all data responsive to the warrant.

## B. Return of the Subject Items

37. If the Government determines that the Subject Items are no longer necessary to retrieve and preserve the data on the Subject Items, and that the Subject Items are not subject to seizure pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(c), the Government will return the Subject Items, upon request. Computer data that is encrypted or unreadable will not be returned unless law enforcement personnel have determined that the data is not (i) an instrumentality of the

5 Keyword searches alone are typically inadequate to detect all relevant data. For one thing, keyword searches work only for text data, yet many types of files, such as images and videos, do not store data as searchable text. Moreover, even as to text data, there may be information properly subject to seizure but that is not captured by a keyword search because the information does not contain the keywords being searched.

2017.08.02

15

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000310
```

EFTA_00114394

EFTA01262980

offense, (ii) a fruit of the criminal activity, (iii) contraband, (iv) otherwise unlawfully possessed, or (v) evidence of the Subject Offenses.

## IV. Conclusion and Ancillary Provisions

38. Based on the foregoing, I respectfully request the court to issue a warrant to seize the items and information specified in Attachment A to this affidavit and to the Search and Seizure Warrant.

39. In light of the confidential nature of the continuing investigation, I respectfully request that this affidavit and all papers submitted herewith be maintained under seal until the Court orders otherwise.



Task Force Officer
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Sworn to before me on September 12, 2019

Arush. Lott

HØN. JAMES L. COTT

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

```markdown

```

16

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000311
```

EFTA_00114395

EFTA01262981

## Attachment A

## I. Items Subject to Search and Seizure

The Subject Items are particularly described as follows$^1$:

a. Two blue binders with CDs, which were seized by Special Agent from a blue suitcase on or about July 11, 2019 (“Subject Item-1”).

b. Three blue binders with various CDs and one clear binder with a green spine with various CDs, all four of which were seized by Special Agent from a black suitcase on or about July 11, 2019 ("Subject Item-2").

## II. Review of ESI on the Subject Items

Law enforcement personnel (who may include, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents, attorneys for the government, attorney support staff, agency personnel assisting the government in this investigation, and outside technical experts under government control) are authorized to review the ESI contained on the Subject Items for evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the “Subject Offenses”) described as follows:

1. Any documents or communications with or regarding victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

2. Any photographs of victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

3. Any nude, partially nude, or sexually suggestive photographs of individuals who appear to be teenage girls, or younger;

4. Records, data, or other items that evidence ownership, control, or use of, or access to the Subject Items, including, but not limited to access history data, historical location data, configuration files, saved usernames and passwords, user profiles, e-mail contacts, and photographs;

5. Any child erotica, defined as suggestive visual depictions of nude minors that do not constitute child pornography as defined by 18 U.S.C. §2256(8).

$ ^{1} $ To the extent that the Subject Items contain any removable storage media, including CDs, the description of each such item encompasses those other media.

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000312
```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114396

EFTA01262982

In conducting this review, law enforcement personnel may use various techniques to determine which files or other ESI contain evidence or fruits of the Subject Offenses. Such techniques may include, for example:

- surveying directories or folders and the individual files they contain (analogous to looking at the outside of a file cabinet for the markings it contains and opening a drawer believed to contain pertinent files);

- conducting a file-by-file review by “opening” or reading the first few “pages” of such files in order to determine their precise contents (analogous to performing a cursory examination of each document in a file cabinet to determine its relevance);

- "scanning" storage areas to discover and possibly recover recently deleted data or deliberately hidden files; and

- performing electronic keyword searches through all electronic storage areas to determine the existence and location of data potentially related to the subject matter of the investigation; and

- reviewing metadata, system information, configuration files, registry data, and any other information reflecting how, when, and by whom the computer was used.

Law enforcement personnel will make reasonable efforts to search only for files, documents, or other electronically stored information within the categories identified in Section II of this Attachment. However, law enforcement personnel are authorized to conduct a complete review of all the ESI from seized devices or storage media if necessary to evaluate its contents and to locate all data responsive to the warrant.

2

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000313
```

EFTA_00114397

EFTA01262983

## EXHIBIT A

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000314
```

EFTA_00114398

EFTA01262984

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

- v. -

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

<table><thead><tr><th>SEALED</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>INDICTMENT</td></tr></tbody></table>

19 Cr.

19 CRIM

490

```markdown

COUNT ONE

(Sex Trafficking Conspiracy)

```

The Grand Jury charges:

## ```markdown

OVERVIEW
```

1. As set forth herein, over the course of many years, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations.

2. In particular, from at least in or about 2002, up to and including at least in or about 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and recruited, minor girls to visit his mansion in Manhattan, New York (the “New York Residence”) and his estate in Palm Beach, Florida (the “Palm Beach Residence”) to engage in sex acts with him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars in cash. Moreover, and in order to maintain and increase his supply of victims, EPSTEIN also paid certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly abused by EPSTEIN. In

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000315
```

EFTA_00114399

EFTA01262985

this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit in locations including New York and Palm Beach.

3. The victims described herein were as young as 14 years old at the time they were abused by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and were, for various reasons, often particularly vulnerable to exploitation. EPSTEIN intentionally sought out minors and knew that many of his victims were in fact under the age of 18, including because, in some instances, minor victims expressly told him their age.

4. In creating and maintaining this network of minor victims in multiple states to sexually abuse and exploit, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, worked and conspired with others, including employees and associates who facilitated his conduct by, among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with EPSTEIN at the New York Residence and at the Palm Beach Residence.

## FACTUAL BACKGROUND

5. During all time periods charged in this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, was a financier with multiple residences in the continental United States, including the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.

6. Beginning in at least 2002, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000316
```

EFTA_00114400

EFTA01262986

recruited, dozens of minor girls to engage in sex acts with him, after which EPSTEIN paid the victims hundreds of dollars in cash, at the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.

7. In both New York and Florida, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, perpetuated this abuse in similar ways. Victims were initially recruited to provide "massages" to EPSTEIN, which would be performed nude or partially nude, would become increasingly sexual in nature, and would typically include one or more sex acts. EPSTEIN paid his victims hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter. Moreover, EPSTEIN actively encouraged certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly sexually abused. EPSTEIN incentivized his victims to become recruiters by paying these victim-recruiters hundreds of dollars for each girl that they brought to EPSTEIN. In so doing, EPSTEIN maintained a steady supply of new victims to exploit.

## The New York Residence

8. At all times relevant to this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, possessed and controlled a multi-story private residence on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, New York, i.e., the New York Residence. Between at least in or about 2002 and in or about 2005, EPSTEIN abused numerous minor victims at the New York Residence by causing these victims to be recruited to engage in paid sex acts with him.

CONFIDENTIAL

$$\text{SDNY_GM_00000317}$$

EFTA_00114401

EFTA01262987

9. When a victim arrived at the New York Residence, she typically would be escorted to a room with a massage table, where she would perform a massage on JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant. The victims, who were as young as 14 years of age, were told by EPSTEIN or other individuals to partially or fully undress before beginning the "massage." During the encounter, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of physical contact with his victim to include, among other things, sex acts such as groping and direct and indirect contact with the victim's genitals. EPSTEIN typically would also masturbate during these sexualized encounters, ask victims to touch him while he masturbated, and touch victims' genitals with his hands or with sex toys.

10. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates, paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter.

11. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that many of his New York victims were underage, including because certain victims told him their age. Further, once these minor victims were recruited, many were abused by EPSTEIN on multiple subsequent occasions at the New York Residence. EPSTEIN sometimes personally contacted victims to schedule appointments at the New York Residence. In other instances, EPSTEIN directed

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000318
```

EFTA_00114402

EFTA01262988

employees and associates, including a New York-based employee ("Employee-1"), to communicate with victims via phone to arrange for these victims to return to the New York Residence for additional sexual encounters with EPSTEIN.

12. Additionally, and to further facilitate his ability to abuse minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, asked and enticed certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to perform “massages” and similarly engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN. When a victim would recruit another girl for EPSTEIN, he paid both the victim-recruiter and the new victim hundreds of dollars in cash. Through these victim-recruiters, EPSTEIN gained access to and was able to abuse dozens of additional minor girls.

13. In particular, certain recruiters brought dozens of additional minor girls to the New York Residence to give massages to and engage in sex acts with JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant. EPSTEIN encouraged victims to recruit additional girls by offering to pay these victim-recruiters for every additional girl they brought to EPSTEIN. When a victim-recruiter accompanied a new minor victim to the New York Residence, both the victim-recruiter and the new minor victim were paid hundreds of dollars by EPSTEIN for each encounter. In addition, certain victim-recruiters routinely scheduled these

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000319
```

EFTA_00114403

EFTA01262989

encounters through Employee-1, who sometimes asked the recruiters to bring a specific minor girl for EPSTEIN.

## The Palm Beach Residence

14. In addition to recruiting and abusing minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, created a similar network of minor girls to victimize in Palm Beach, Florida, where EPSTEIN owned, possessed and controlled another large residence, i.e., the Palm Beach Residence. EPSTEIN frequently traveled from New York to Palm Beach by private jet, before which an employee or associate would ensure that minor victims were available for encounters upon his arrival in Florida.

15. At the Palm Beach Residence, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, engaged in a similar course of abusive conduct. When a victim initially arrived at the Palm Beach Residence, she would be escorted to a room, sometimes by an employee of EPSTEIN’s, including, at times, two assistants (“Employee-2” and “Employee-3”) who, as described herein, were also responsible for scheduling sexual encounters with minor victims. Once inside, the victim would provide a nude or semi-nude massage for EPSTEIN, who would himself typically be naked. During these encounters, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of the physical contact to include sex acts such as groping and direct and indirect contact with the victim’s genitals. EPSTEIN would also typically masturbate during these encounters, ask victims

## CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000320
```

EFTA_00114404

EFTA01262990

to touch him while he masturbated, and touch victims' genitals with his hands or with sex toys.

16. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates, paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds of dollars for each encounter.

17. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that certain of his victims were underage, including because certain victims told him their age. In addition, as with New York-based victims, many Florida victims, once recruited, were abused by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, on multiple additional occasions.

18. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, who during the relevant time period was frequently in New York, would arrange for Employee-2 or other employees to contact victims by phone in advance of EPSTEIN’s travel to Florida to ensure appointments were scheduled for when he arrived. In particular, in certain instances, Employee-2 placed phone calls to minor victims in Florida to schedule encounters at the Palm Beach Residence. At the time of certain of those phone calls, EPSTEIN and Employee-2 were in New York, New York. Additionally, certain of the individuals victimized at the Palm Beach Residence were contacted by phone by Employee-3 to schedule these encounters.

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000321
```

EFTA_00114405

```markdown

EFTA01262991
```

19. Moreover, as in New York, to ensure a steady stream of minor victims, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, asked and enticed certain victims in Florida to recruit other girls to engage in sex acts. EPSTEIN paid hundreds of dollars to victim-recruiters for each additional girl they brought to the Palm Beach Residence.

## STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS

20. From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, sex trafficking of minors, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1591(a) and (b).

21. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, would and did, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain, by any means a person, and to benefit, financially and by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in any such act, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000322
```

EFTA_00114406

EFTA01262992

commercial sex act, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a) and (b)(2).

## Overt Acts

22. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere:

a. In or about 2004, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited multiple minor victims, including minor victims identified herein as Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, and Minor Victim-3, to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN at his residences in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida, after which he provided them with hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter.

b. In or about 2002, Minor Victim-1 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the New York Residence over a period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-1 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-1 how old she was, and Minor Victim-1 answered truthfully.

c. In or about 2004, Employee-1, located in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000323
```

EFTA_00114407

EFTA01262993

a telephone call to Minor Victim-1 in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-1 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.

d. In or about 2004, Minor Victim-2 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over a period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars after each encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-2 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she did.

e. In or about 2005, Employee-2, located in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed a telephone call to Minor Victim-2 in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-2 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.

f. In or about 2005, Minor Victim-3 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over a period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-3 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-3 how old she was, and Minor Victim-3 answered truthfully.

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000324
```

EFTA_00114408

EFTA01262994

g'. In or about 2005, Employee-2, located in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed a telephone call to Minor Victim-3 in Florida in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.

h. In or about 2004, Employee-3 placed a telephone call to Minor Victim-3 in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.

(Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.)

## ```markdown

COUNT TWO
(Sex Trafficking)
```

The Grand Jury further charges:

23. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 19 and 22 of this Indictment are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth within.

24. From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, did recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain by any means a person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, and did aid and abet the same, to wit, EPSTEIN recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, and obtained numerous

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000325
```

EFTA_00114409

EFTA01262995

individuals who were less than 18 years old, including but not limited to Minor Victim-1, as described above, and who were then caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act in Manhattan, New York.

(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a), (b)(2), and 2.)

## FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS

25. As a result of committing the offense alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(c)(1), any property, real and personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of the offense alleged in Count Two, and any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the offense alleged in Count Two, or any property traceable to such property, and the following specific property:

a. The lot or parcel of land, together with its buildings, appurtenances, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements, located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, with block number 1386 and lot number 10, owned by Maple, Inc.

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000326
```

EFTA_00114410

EFTA01262996

Substitute Asset Provision

26. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:

(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;

(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

(d) . has been substantially diminished in value; or

(e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty;

it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the above forfeitable property.

(Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594; Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p); and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.)

```markdown

Drilling D. Bunn

```

GEOFFREY S. BERMAN

United States Attorney

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000327
```

EFTA_00114411

EFTA01262997

Form No. USA-33s-274 (Ed. 9-25-58)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

## v.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

# INDICTMENT

(18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1591(a), (b)(2), and 2)

GEOFFREY S. BERMAN

## CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000328
```

EFTA_00114412

EFTA01262998

## EXHIBIT B

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000329
```

EFTA_00114413

EFTA01262999

AO 93 (SDNY Rev, 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant

# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Southern District of New York

| In the Matter of the Search of | ) |

| :--- | :--- |

| (Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address) | ) | Case No. |

| See Attachment A | ) |

| | ) |

## SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

An application by a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government requests the search of the following person or property located in the Southern District of New York

(identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location):

See Attachment A

The person or property to be searched, described above, is believed to conceal (identify the person or describe the property to be seized): .

See Attachment A

The search and seizure are related to violation(s) of (*insert statutory citations*):

Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 1591

I find that the affidavit(s), or any recorded testimony, establish probable cause to search and seize the person or property.

J ARE COMMANDED to execute this warrant on or before 7.20.19

(not to exceed 14 days)

in the daytime 6:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. at any time in the day or night as I find reasonable cause has been established.

Unless delayed notice is authorized below, you must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken, or leave the copy and receipt at the place where the property was taken.

The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court.

Upon its return, this warrant and inventory should be filed under seal by the Clerk of the Court.

USMJ Initialis

USMJ Initials

I find that immediate notification may have an adverse result listed in 18 U.S.C. §2705 (except for delay of trial), and authorize the officer executing this warrant to delay notice to the person who, or whose property, will be searched or seized (check the appropriate box) for ___ days (not to exceed 30).

□until, the facts justifying, the later specific date of

Date and time issued:

7. 6.19 10:14 a.M.



Judge's signature

City and state: New York, NY

Hon. Barbara Moses, U.S. Magistrate Judge

```markdown

CONFIDENTIAL

Printed name and title SDNY_GM_00000330
```

EFTA_00114414

EFTA01263000

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant (Page 2)

<table border="1"><tr><td colspan="3">Return</td></tr><tr><td>Case No:</td><td>Date and time warrant executed:</td><td>Copy of warrant and inventory left with:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory made in the presence of：</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seized：</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Certification</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventory is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the Court。</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Date：___ Executing officer&#x27;s signature ___ Printed name and title ___</td></tr></table>

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000331
```

EFTA_00114415

EFTA01263001

## ATTACHMENT A

## I. Premises to be Searched—Subject Premises

1. The premises to be searched (the “Subject Premises”) are described as a nearly 19,000 square foot multi-story single-family residence located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, and include all locked and closed containers found therein. A photograph of the front entrance to the Subject Premises is included below:



## II. Items to Be Seized

1. This warrant authorizes executing agents to photograph, video record and otherwise document the full interior of the Subject Premises, including any items, furnishings, or possessions therein.

2. In addition, this warrant authorizes the seizure of certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors) and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the "Subject Offenses") described as follows:

a. Evidence concerning occupancy or ownership of the Subject Premises, including utility and telephone bills, mail envelopes, addressed correspondence, diaries, statements, identification documents, address books, telephone directories, and photographs of its occupant(s).

b. Evidence concerning the layout, furnishings, decorations, and floor pattern of the Subject Premises, including photographs and blueprints of the Subject Premises.

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000332
```

EFTA_00114416

EFTA01263002

## EXHIBIT C

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000333
```

EFTA_00114417

EFTA01263003

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Soilzure Warrant

# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Southern District of New York

| In the Matter of the Search of | |

| :--- | :--- |

| (Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address) | ) |

Case No.

See Attachment A

# SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

An application by a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government requests the search of the following person or property located in the Southern District of New York

(identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location):

See Attachment A

The person or property to be searched, described above, is believed to conceal (identify the person or describe the property to be seized):

See Attachment A

The search and seizure are related to violation(s) of (insert statutory citations):

Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 1591

I find that the affidavit(s), or any recorded testimony, establish probable cause to search and seize the person or property.

YOU ARE COMMANDED to execute this warrant on or before July 7, 2019

```markdown

□ in the daytime 6:00 a.m. to 10 p.m.

```

(not to exceed 14 days)

at any time in the day or night as I find reasonable cause has been established.

Unless delayed notice is authorized below, you must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken, or leave the copy and receipt at the place where the property was taken.

The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court.

□ Upon its return, this warrant and inventory should be filed under seal by the Clerk of the Court.

USMJ Initials

I find that immediate notification may have an adverse result listed in 18 U.S.C. §2705 (except for delay of trial), and authorize the officer executing this warrant to delay notice to the person who, or whose property, will be searched or seized (check the appropriate box) for ___ days (not to exceed 30).

□until, the facts justifying, the later specific date of ___ .

Date and time issued: 7.7.19 2:03a.m.

```markdown

Robert Hales

Judge's signature

```

City and state: New York, NY

Judge's signature

Hon. Barbara Moses, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Printed name and title

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000334

```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114418

EFTA01263004

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant (Page 2)

<table border="1"><tr><td colspan="3">Return</td></tr><tr><td>Case No:</td><td>Date and time warrant executed:</td><td>Copy of warrant and inventory left with:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory made in the presence of：</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seized：</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Certification</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventory is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the Court。</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Date：___ Executing officer&#x27;s signature ___ Printed name and title ___</td></tr></table>

# CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000335
```

EFTA_00114419

EFTA01263005

## ATTACHMENT A

## I. Premises to be Searched—Subject Premises

1. The premises to be searched (the “Subject Premises”) are described as a multi-story single-family residence located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, and include all locked and closed containers found therein. A photograph of the front entrance to the Subject Premises is included below:



## II. Items to Be Seized

## A. Evidence, Fruits, and Instrumentalities of the Subject Offenses

This warrant authorizes the seizure of certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors) and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the “Subject Offenses”) described as follows:

i. Any and all taxidermied dogs.

ii. Any and all massage tables and massage paraphernalia.

iii. Any and all busts or three-dimensional representations of female human torsos.

iv. Any and all photos or representations depicting nude or partially nude women located in the Massage Room, as defined herein.

v. Any and all sex toys and sex paraphernalia located in the Massage Room, as defined herein.

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000336
```

EFTA_00114420

EFTA01263006

vi. A binder labeled “PB Girls” and any other documents or communications with or regarding victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses.

2

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000337
```

EFTA_00114421

EFTA01263007

## EXHIBIT D

2017. 08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000338

```

EFTA_00114422

EFTA01263008

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant

# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Southern District of New York

In the Matter of the Search of

(Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address)

Case No.

See Attachment A

## SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

An application by a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government requests the search of the following person or property located in the Southern District of New York

(identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location):

See Attachment A

The person or property to be searched, described above, is believed to conceal (identify the person or describe the property to be seized):

See Attachment A

The search and seizure are related to violation(s) of (insert statutory citations):

Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 1591

I find that the affidavit(s), or any recorded testimony, establish probable cause to search and seize the person or property.

YOU ARE COMMANDED to execute this warrant on or before July 21, 2019

(not to exceed 14 days)

in the daytime 6:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. at any time in the day or night as I find reasonable cause has been established.

Unless delayed notice is authorized below, you must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken, or leave the copy and receipt at the place where the property was taken.

The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court.

□ Upon its return, this warrant and inventory should be filed under seal by the Clerk of the Court. ___

USMJ Initials

I find that immediate notification may have an adverse result listed in 18 U.S.C. §2705 (except for delay of trial), and authorize the officer executing this warrant to delay notice to the person who, or whose property, will be searched or seized (check the appropriate box) for ___ days (not to exceed 30).

□until, the facts justifying, the later specific date of ___ .

Date and time issued: 7-7-19 11:33 P.M.

City and state: New York, NY Hon. Barbara Moses, U.S. Magistrate Judge 00000339

Confidential name and title

EFTA_00114423

EFTA01263009

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant (Page 2)

<table border="1"><tr><td colspan="3">Return</td></tr><tr><td>Case No.:</td><td>Date and time warrant executed:</td><td>Copy of warrant and inventory left with:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory made in the presence of:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seized:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Certification</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventory is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the Court.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Date: ___ Executing officer&#x27;s signature ___ Printed name and title ___</td></tr></table>

# CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000340
```

EFTA_00114424

EFTA01263010

# ATTACHMENT A

## I. The Subject Devices to Be Searched

The Subject Devices are particularly described as compact discs stored in containers marked with FBI evidence numbers 15, 16, 17, 18, and 22, seized from the residence located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, on or about July 7, 2019.

## II. Items to Be Seized

## A. Evidence, Fruits, and Instrumentalities of the Subject Offenses

This warrant authorizes the seizure of certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the “Subject Offenses”) described as follows:

1. Any documents or communications with or regarding victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

2. Any photographs of victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

3. Any nude, partially nude, or sexually suggestive photographs of individuals who appear to be teenage girls, or younger;

4. Motion pictures, films, videos, and other recordings of visual or written depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. §2256(2);

5. Records or other items that evidence ownership, control, or use of, or access to devices, storage media, and related electronic equipment used to access, transmit, or store information relating to the Subject Offenses, including, but not limited to, sales receipts, warranties, bills for Internet access, handwritten notes, registry entries, configuration files, saved usernames and passwords, user profiles, e-mail contacts, and photographs;

6. Any child erotica, defined as suggestive visual depictions of nude minors that do not constitute child pornography as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8).

## B. Review of ESI

Law enforcement personnel (including, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents, and depending on the nature of the ESI and the status of the investigation and related proceedings, attorneys for the government, attorney support staff, agency personnel assisting the government in this investigation, and outside technical experts under government control) will create a forensic image of the Subject Devices (if practicable) and review the ESI contained therein for information responsive to the warrant.

In conducting this review, law enforcement personnel may use various techniques to determine which files or other ESI contain evidence or fruits of the Subject Offenses. Such techniques may include, for example:

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000341
```

EFTA_00114425

EFTA01263011

- surveying directories or folders and the individual files they contain (analogous to looking at the outside of a file cabinet for the markings it contains and opening a drawer believed to contain pertinent files);

- conducting a file-by-file review by “opening” or reading the first few “pages” of such files in order to determine their precise contents (analogous to performing a cursory examination of each document in a file cabinet to determine its relevance);

- "scanning" storage areas to discover and possibly recover recently deleted data or deliberately hidden files; and

- performing electronic keyword searches through all electronic storage areas to determine the existence and location of data potentially related to the subject matter of the investigation $ ^{6} $; and

- reviewing metadata, system information, configuration files, registry data, and any other information reflecting how, when, and by whom the computer was used.

Law enforcement personnel will make reasonable efforts to search only for files, documents, or other electronically stored information within the categories identified in Section II.A of this Attachment. However, law enforcement personnel are authorized to conduct a complete review of all the ESI from seized devices or storage media if necessary to evaluate its contents and to locate all data responsive to the warrant.

6 Keyword searches alone are typically inadequate to detect all relevant data. For one thing, keyword searches work only for text data, yet many types of files, such as images and videos, do not store data as searchable text. Moreover, even as to text data, there may be information properly subject to seizure but that is not captured by a keyword search because the information does not contain the keywords being searched.

2017.08.02

2

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000342
```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114426

EFTA01263012

## EXHIBITE

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000343
```

EFTA_00114427

EFTA01263013

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant

# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Southern District of New York

```markdown

19MAG 6439

```

In the Matter of the Search of

(Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address)

See Attachment A

| Case No. | 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) |

| :--- | :--- |

--in the daytime 6:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. at any time in the day or night as I find reasonable cause has been established.

# SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

An application by a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government requests the search of the following person or property located in the Southern District of New York

(identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location):

See Attachment A

The person or property to be searched, described above, is believed to conceal (identify the person or describe the property to be seized):

See Attachment A

The search and seizure are related to violation(s) of (*insert statutory citations*):

Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 1591

I find that the affidavit(s), or any recorded testimony, establish probable cause to search and seize the person or property.

YOU ARE COMMANDED to execute this warrant on or before July 12, 201

Unless delayed notice is authorized below, you must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken, or leave the copy and receipt at the place where the property was taken.

The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court.

Upon its return, this warrant and inventory should be filed under seal by the Clerk of the Court. ___

USMJ Initials

I find that immediate notification may have an adverse result listed in 18 U.S.C. §2705 (except for delay of trial), and authorize the officer executing this warrant to delay notice to the person who, or whose property, will be searched or seized (check the appropriate box) for ___ days (not to exceed 30)

□until, the facts justifying, the later specific date of

Date and time issued:

71119

S/Henry Pitman

Judge's signature

Henry Pitman, U.S. Magistrate

Printed name and title

City and state: New York, NY Hon. Henry Pitman U.S. Magistrate GM 00000344

Confidential

EFTA_00114428

EFTA01263014

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant (Page 2)

<table border="1"><tr><td colspan="3">Return</td></tr><tr><td>Case No:</td><td>Date and time warrant executed:</td><td>Copy of warrant and inventory left with:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory made in the presence of:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seized:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Certification</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventory is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the Court.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Date: ___ Executing officer&#x27;s signature<br>___ Printed name and title</td></tr></table>

# CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000345
```

EFTA_00114429

EFTA01263015

# ATTACHMENT A

## I. Premises to be Searched—Subject Premises

1. The premises to be searched (the "Subject Premises") are described as a multi-story single-family residence located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, and include all locked and closed containers found therein. A photograph of the front entrance to the Subject Premises is included below:



## II. Items to Be Seized

## A. Evidence, Fruits, and Instrumentalities of the Subject Offenses

This warrant authorizes the seizure of certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the "Subject Offenses") described as follows:

The items to be seized from the Subject Premises are any computer devices and storage media that may contain any electronically stored information falling within the categories set forth in Section B of this Attachment, including, but not limited to, desktop and laptop computers, disk drives, modems, thumb drives, personal digital assistants, smart phones, digital cameras, scanners, routers, modems, and network equipment used to connect to the Internet. In lieu of seizing any such computer devices or storage media, this warrant also authorizes, in the alternative, the copying of such devices or media for later review.

The items to be seized from the Subject Premises also include:

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000346
```

EFTA_00114430

EFTA01263016

1. Any items or records needed to access the data stored on any seized or copied computer devices or storage media, including but not limited to any physical keys, encryption devices, or records of login credentials, passwords, private encryption keys, or similar information.

2. Any items or records that may facilitate a forensic examination of the computer devices or storage media, including any hardware or software manuals or other information concerning the configuration of the seized or copied computer devices or storage media.

3. Any evidence concerning the identities or locations of those persons with access to, control over, or ownership of the seized or copied computer devices or storage media.

## B. Search and Seizure of Electronically Stored Information

As set forth in Section A to this attachment, this warrant authorizes the search of the Subject Premises for any computer devices and storage media that may contain any electronically stored information falling within the categories set forth below:

4. Any documents or communications with or regarding victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

5. Any photographs of victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

6. Any nude, partially nude, or sexually suggestive photographs of individuals who appear to be teenage girls, or younger;

7. Records or other items that evidence ownership, control, or use of, or access to devices, storage media, and related electronic equipment used to access, transmit, or store information relating to the Subject Offenses, including, but not limited to, sales receipts, warranties, bills for Internet access, handwritten notes, registry entries, configuration files, saved usernames and passwords, user profiles, e-mail contacts, and photographs;

8. Any child erotica, defined as suggestive visual depictions of nude minors that do not constitute child pornography as defined by 18 U.S.C. §2256(8).

## C. Review of ESI

Law enforcement personnel (including, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents, and depending on the nature of the ESI and the status of the investigation and related proceedings, attorneys for the government, attorney support staff, agency personnel assisting the government in this investigation, and outside technical experts under government control) will create a forensic image of the Subject Devices (if practicable) and review the ESI contained therein for information responsive to the warrant, that is, for the materials specified in Section B of this Attachment.

In conducting this review, law enforcement personnel may use various techniques to determine which files or other ESI contain evidence or fruits of the Subject Offenses. Such techniques may include, for example:

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000347
```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114431

EFTA01263017

- surveying directories or folders and the individual files they contain (analogous to looking at the outside of a file cabinet for the markings it contains and opening a drawer believed to contain pertinent files);

- conducting a file-by-file review by “opening” or reading the first few “pages” of such files in order to determine their precise contents (analogous to performing a cursory examination of each document in a file cabinet to determine its relevance);

- "scanning" storage areas to discover and possibly recover recently deleted data or deliberately hidden files; and

- performing electronic keyword searches through all electronic storage areas to determine the existence and location of data potentially related to the subject matter of the investigation $ ^{6} $; and

- reviewing metadata, system information, configuration files, registry data, and any other information reflecting how, when, and by whom the computer was used.

Law enforcement personnel will make reasonable efforts to search only for files, documents, or other electronically stored information within the categories identified in Section II.A of this Attachment. However, law enforcement personnel are authorized to conduct a complete review of all the ESI from seized devices or storage media if necessary to evaluate its contents and to locate all data responsive to the warrant.

6 Keyword searches alone are typically inadequate to detect all relevant data. For one thing, keyword searches work only for text data, yet many types of files, such as images and videos, do not store data as searchable text. Moreover, even as to text data, there may be information properly subject to seizure but that is not captured by a keyword search because the information does not contain the keywords being searched.

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000348
```

2017.08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114432

EFTA01263018

## EXHIBIT F

2017. 08.02

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000349

```

EFTA_00114433

EFTA01263019

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant

# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Southern District of New York

In the Matter of the Search of

In the Matter of the Search of

(Briefly describe the property to be searched or identify the person by name and address)

A black iPhone with IMDI No.

Sex Attachment ADSMJT

Case No. 19MAG 6581

Following items seized on or about July 11, 2015 by Special Agent of the FBI: Two black binders with CDs seized from a blue suitcase; two black hard drives seized from a blue suitcase; a box of CDs seized from a blue suitcase; and two binders with CDs seized from a black suitcase.

SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

An application by a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government requests the search of the following person or property located in the Southern District of New York

(identify the person or describe the property to be searched and give its location):

See Attachment A

The person or property to be searched, described above, is believed to conceal (identify the person or describe the property to be seized):

See Attachment A

The search and seizure are related to violation(s) of (insert statutory citations):

I find that the affidavit(s), or any recorded testimony, establish probable cause to search and seize the person or property.

YOU ARE COMMANDED to execute this warrant on or before

July 29, 2019

(not to exceed 14 days)

in the daytime 6:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. at any time in the day or night as I find reasonable cause has been established.

Unless delayed notice is authorized below, you must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken, or leave the copy and receipt at the place where the property was taken.

The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court.

Upon its return, this warrant and inventory should be filed under seal by the Clerk of the Court. USMJ Initials

I find that immediate notification may have an adverse result listed in 18 U.S.C. §2705 (except for delay of trial), and authorize the officer executing this warrant to delay notice to the person who, or whose property, will be searched or seized (check the appropriate box) for ___30 days (not to exceed 30).

until, the facts justifying, the later, specific date of:

Date and time issued:

```markdown

6:35 p.m.

JUL 1 5 2019

```

```markdown

```

City and state: New York, NY

HON: KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114434

EFTA01263020

AO 93 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warrant (Page 2)

<table border="1"><tr><td colspan="3">Return</td></tr><tr><td>Case No:</td><td>Date and time warrant executed:</td><td>Copy of warrant and inventory left with:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory made in the presence of：</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seized：</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Certification</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventory is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the Court。</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3">Date：Executing officer&#x27;s signaturePrinted name and title</td></tr></table>

CONFIDENTIAL

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000351
```

EFTA_00114435

EFTA01263021

## Attachment A

## I. Items Subject to Search and Seizure

The Subject Items are particularly described as follows$^{1}$:

- A black iPhone with IMEI number 357201093322785, which was seized from JEFFREY EPSTEIN on or about July 6, 2019 ("Subject Item-1").

- A silver iPad with serial number DLXQGM3KGMW3, which was seized from JEFFREY EPSTEIN on or about July 6, 2019 (“Subject Item-2”).

- Two black binders with CDs, which were seized from a blue suitcase on or about July 11, 2019 ("Subject Item-3").

- Two black hard drives, which were seized from a blue suitcase on or about July 11 2019 ("Subject Item-4").

- A box of CDs, which was seized from a blue suitcase on or about July 11, 2019 ("Subject Item-5").

- Two binders with various CDs, which were seized from a black suitcase on July 11, 2019 ("Subject Item-6").

by Special Agent

## II. Review of ESI on the Subject Items

Law enforcement personnel (who may include, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents, attorneys for the government, attorney support staff, agency personnel assisting the government in this investigation, and outside technical experts under government control) are authorized to review the ESI contained on the Subject Items for evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the “Subject Offenses”) described as follows:

1. Any documents or communications with or regarding victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

2. Any photographs of victims or potential victims of the Subject Offenses;

3. Any nude, partially nude, or sexually suggestive photographs of individuals who appear to be teenage girls, or younger;

4. Records, data, or other items that evidence ownership, control, or use of, or access to the Subject Items, including, but not limited to access history data, historical location data,

1 To the extent that the Subject Items contain any SD cards or other removable storage media, the description of each such item encompasses those SD cards and other media.

2017.08.02

```markdown

SDNY_GM_00000352
```

CONFIDENTIAL

EFTA_00114436

EFTA01263022

configuration files, saved usernames and passwords, user profiles, e-mail contacts, and photographs;

5. Any child erotica, defined as suggestive visual depictions of nude minors that do not constitute child pornography as defined by 18 U.S.C. §2256(8).

As to Subject Item-1 and Subject Item-2, Law enforcement personnel (who may include, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents, attorneys for the government, attorney support staff, agency personnel assisting the government in this investigation, and outside technical experts under government control) are further authorized to review the ESI contained on Subject Item-1 and Subject Item-2 for evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the "Subject Offenses") described as follows:

1. Any documents or communications with or regarding co-conspirators in the Subject Offenses.

In conducting this review, law enforcement personnel may use various techniques to determine which files or other ESI contain evidence or fruits of the Subject Offenses. Such techniques may include, for example:

- surveying directories or folders and the individual files they contain (analogous to looking at the outside of a file cabinet for the markings it contains and opening a drawer believed to contain pertinent files);

- conducting a file-by-file review by “opening” or reading the first few “pages” of such files in order to determine their precise contents (analogous to performing a cursory examination of each document in a file cabinet to determine its relevance);

- "scanning" storage areas to discover and possibly recover recently deleted data or deliberately hidden files; and

- performing electronic keyword searches through all electronic storage areas to determine the existence and location of data potentially related to the subject matter of the investigation; and

- reviewing metadata, system information, configuration files, registry data, and any other information reflecting how, when, and by whom the computer was used.

Law enforcement personnel will make reasonable efforts to search only for files, documents, or other electronically stored information within the categories identified in Section II of this Attachment. However, law enforcement personnel are authorized to conduct a complete review of all the ESI from seized devices or storage media if necessary to evaluate its contents and to locate all data responsive to the warrant.

2017.08.02

```markdown

$DNY_GM_00000353$
```

EFTA_00114437

EFTA01263023