Datasets:

robbd
/

epstein-index

---
title: "DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 (EFTA00074352)"
source: "DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9"
sourceUrl: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete"
date: "2026-01-01"
category: "DOJ Data Set"
eftaNumber: "EFTA00074352"
ocrPages: 0
ocrChars: 9104
ocrElapsed: 0.0
parseTier: "external"
engine: "ishumilin OCR pipeline (engine undisclosed; CC0 mirror)"
externalSource: "ishumilin-ocr-complete"
externalLicense: "CC0-1.0"
externalCredit: "ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete (Hugging Face)"
externalUrl: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete"
---

From: "brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com>

**Subject:** RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 02:23:57 +0000

Thank you.

**Sent:** Tuesday, February 4, 2020 9:23 PM

**To:** Quigley, Brendan <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com>

Subject: Re: David Rodgers Subpoena

## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

That should be fine, thanks.

On Feb 4, 2020, at 9:03 PM, "brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com> wrote:

Any chance we could aim for 9:30?

## From:

**Sent:** Tuesday, February 4, 2020 7:51 PM

**To:** Quigley, Brendan `<brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com>`;



Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

We’d like to go through a good chunk of the records on Friday, so it would probably be best to block off 3 hours just in case. Would going until 1pm work for you, or would you rather start earlier?



Assistant United States Attorney

Southern District of New York

1 St. Andrew's Plaza

New York, NY 10007

EFTA00074352

From: <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com> <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com>

**Sent:** Tuesday, February 4, 2020 7:16 PM

Subject: Re: David Rodgers Subpoena

How long do you guys anticipate going on Friday? I had something unrelated come up in the early afternoon. If you think we’re going to go for more than a couple of hours, I’m happy to start earlier than 10.

| Brendan F. Quigley |

| :--- |

| M +1.917.885.8069 |

On Feb 4, 2020, at 2:34 PM,

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Brendan,

In advance of Friday’s meeting, wanted to give you a heads up that we expect to ask Mr. Rodgers about a discrete topic that is related to our Epstein investigation just through the logs – it turns out that there is a missing person named “___” a teenager from Florida, who was last seen sometime around about August 1, 1997. In the flight logs, there is an individual listed as “___” (so, slightly different spelling) on an August 1, 1997 flight that’s designated as being from SAR to ZOR. The entry is the following:

## <image001.jpg>

On the one hand, given the spelling we thought perhaps it’s a relative of your client; on the other, I don’t see that name listed on other dates around then, but that’s just at a glance. In any event, we wanted to let you know we expect to ask about it, and we’re happy to discuss further with you in advance if that’s useful.

## thanks,



Sure, that works. Just let me know what time, and I’ll meet you here.

Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza

EFTA00074353

New York, NY 10007

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

Thanks guys. Could I do that review on Wednesday afternoon?



Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Hi Brendan,

Mr. Rodgers's travel is booked, so we should be set for our meeting on 2/7. Can we please plan to start at 10am at 1 St. Andrews?

Also, we have received approval to make the materials you asked about available for your review in hard copy form at our office in advance of the 2/7 interview. Please let me know when you would like to come down to complete that review, and we’ll get that set up for you.

Thanks,

Assistant United States Attorney

Southern District of New York

1 St. Andrew’s Plaza

New York, NY 10007

<table border="1"><tr><td>From:</td><td>brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com</td><td>&lt;brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td colspan="2">Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:07 AM</td></tr></table>

EFTA00074354

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

It's fine with me if Wendy or one of her colleagues calls him directly. I’ll give him a heads up.



## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Thanks very much, Brendan. I’ll pass this all along to It is possible that or someone from her office will need to reach out to Mr. Rodgers directly to arrange the travel logistics—is that alright with you, or would you rather I ask them to contact you?

Assistant United States Attorney

Southern District of New York

1 St. Andrew’s Plaza

New York, NY 10007

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

Maurene-

Thanks for talking before.

Here is Mr. Rodgers info for travel purposes

EFTA00074355



Subject: Re: David Rodgers Subpoena

## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Sure, I’m available until 11:30 at my desk-

or the rest of the team should free up after 4pm today.

On Jan 30, 2020, at 10:31 AM, "brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com> wrote:

Sorry to circle back on this, but any chance one of you could talk this morning?



## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Hi Brendan— I’m free from 2pm onwards tomorrow, if that works for a call. We are available on 2/14, but let’s discuss.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 29, 2020, at 5:21 PM, "brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com> wrote:

Would 2/14 work? If so, could we chat briefly on the phone tomorrow?

## From:

<table><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Tuesday, January 28, 2020 10:15 AM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Quigley, Brendan &lt;brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>Cc:</td><td>Lankler, Andrew &lt;andrew.lankler@bakerbotts.com&gt;;</td></tr></table>

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

## [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Hi Brendan,

Thanks for the quick response. We’re trying to be flexible, and to that end we could move this to the week of 2/10. However, February $ 21^{\mathrm{st}} $ would be a significant delay, especially given that we initially made this interview request in July, and renewed those discussions in December. Let us know if you’d like to discuss further.

Thanks,

EFTA00074356



We’re still working through the issues I mentioned on the phone. We had hoped to have those resolved by now, but they haven’t been. Would it be possible to move the meeting to 2/21?

From:

**Sent:** Monday, January 27, 2020 12:39 PM

**To:** Quigley, Brendan <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com>

Cc: Lankler, Andrew <andrew.lankler@bakerbotts.com>;

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

Hi Brendan,

Our team has blocked off time to meet with your client on February 7th, along the lines we discussed. I wanted to check in with you to see if the issues you had raised regarding the estate had been resolved. If so, please let us know and we can move forward with travel arrangements.

Thanks,

From:

**Sent:** Tuesday, January 21, 2020 1:34 PM

To: brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com

Cc: `andrew.lankler@bakerbotts.com;`

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

Hi Brendan,

Following up on our conversation from two weeks ago, I wanted to check to see if you have any updates on when we might be able to schedule an interview with your client.

Thanks,

From:

**Sent:** Monday, January 6, 2020 3:10 PM

```markdown

To: brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com

```

Cc: `andrew.lankler@bakerbotts.com;`

Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena

EFTA00074357

Hi Brendan,

Thanks very much. In terms of next steps, we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with your client for an interview. I think we’ve discussed this before, but in general we continue to view your client as a witness, and we would expect the interview would largely focus on the flight records you’ve produced. We don’t anticipate that we would need to speak with your client for much longer than an hour or so, in case that helps give a sense of what we have in mind. I think you mentioned that your client is based in Florida, so we’re happy to discuss arranging logistics to work out something convenient for you and your client.

Please let us know if a call would be useful to discuss further, and thanks again for sending records earlier today.

Best,



We hope you had a good holiday season.

We attach additional flight logs for David Rodgers, reflecting flights between 1991 and January 2006. Again, we ask that these records be kept confidential.

Best regards,

Brendan

From: Quigley, Brendan

**Sent:** Friday, December 20, 2019 10:55 AM

To:

<table border="1"><tr><td>Cc: Lankler, Andrew</td><td>&lt;andrew.lankler@bakerbotts.com&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>Subject: David Rodgers Subpoena</td><td></td></tr></table>

We attach flight logs for David Rodgers, dated between January 23, 2006 and September 19, 2013. We understand that these records will be kept confidential, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e).

As discussed on the phone last week, we are in the process of obtaining and reviewing additional materials and anticipate making further productions to you on a rolling basis.

Best regards,

Brendan F. Quigley

EFTA00074358

# Brendan F. Quigley

**Partner**

Baker Botts L.L.P.

brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com

T +1.212.408.2520

F +1.212.259.2520

M +1.917.885.8069

30 Rockefeller Plaza

New York, NY 10112

## Confidentiality Notice:

The information contained in this email and any attachments is intended only for the recipient[s] listed above and may be privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, copying, or use of or reliance upon such information by or to anyone other than the recipient[s] listed above is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately at the email address above and destroy any and all copies of this message.

EFTA00074359