Datasets:
|
Download content-documents/house-oversight-nov/00/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189.md from robbd/epstein-index: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.05 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/robbd/epstein-index/resolve/017fec08ea9a0d0d71c9e9bb60de6bbcd7aa2f95/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/00/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/robbd/epstein-index@017fec08ea9a0d0d71c9e9bb60de6bbcd7aa2f95/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/00/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189.md
-
curl -L -o HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/robbd/epstein-index/resolve/017fec08ea9a0d0d71c9e9bb60de6bbcd7aa2f95/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/00/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189.md
4.05 kB
| title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189)" | |
| source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)" | |
| sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" | |
| date: "2026-01-01" | |
| category: "House Oversight" | |
| eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189" | |
| ocrPages: 1 | |
| ocrChars: 3490 | |
| ocrElapsed: 0.0 | |
| parseTier: "external-legacy" | |
| engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)" | |
| externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12" | |
| externalLicense: "not granted" | |
| externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology" | |
| externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology" | |
| of sub-developers which would inflate the acq. cost of land and consequently | |
| depreciate the residual value of land due to lower margins (4) Mismanagement of | |
| cash flows: a mismanagement of the resources (overspending in CAPEX for land | |
| for example) could arise liquidity concerns because of over-exposure to land | |
| sales mkt. Upside risks: A lower-than-expected borrowing cost: We | |
| forecast an incremental cost of debt of 9%, A improvement in the credit | |
| environment sensitive to exogenous factors such as liquidity and the risk appetite | |
| of the international mkt. would lower DAAR s cost of funding, We see upside | |
| valuation risk in the value of the land bank should the company manages to | |
| develop housing units with the support of the Ministry of Housing. debt-financed | |
| acquisition to boost its recurring income. | |
| Extra (XYDUF) | |
| We derive a PO of SAR 24 using a DCF valuation model which we believe best captures | |
| differing capital costs and growth profiles across the MENA region. Key assumptions are | |
| an 11% WACC and a 2% perpetuity growth rate. Upside/downside risks to our PO are | |
| better/worse returns from better/worse like-for-like sales and shorter/longer break even | |
| times from new international markets. | |
| We derive a PO of SAR134 using a DCF valuation model which we believe best captures | |
| the company's plan to add c.60% new stores by 2017. Key assumptions are: - a 5-year | |
| CAGR in sales of 11% followed by an five-year CAGR of 6% and a perpetuity growth rate | |
| of 2%, - an average EBIT margin of 13%, - a WACC of 9.5% with a beta of 0.9x. Our | |
| WACC is calculated using a RFR of 5.0% and an ERP of 6.0%. We used a 2% terminal | |
| growth rate. | |
| The risks to our PO are company-specific issues such as a failure to deliver the expected | |
| 11% top-line growth or a faster-than-expected deterioration in electronics margins. In | |
| addition, there are risks associated with a slowdown in the economy or consumer | |
| spending. | |
| Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (XDUAF) | |
| We apply a justified P/E multiple to derive SAFCO's PO of SAR72. The P/E is based on a | |
| normalized RoE of 30.2%, Cost of Equity of 10.4% and payout of 93.5%. | |
| Upside risks to our price objective are: (1) delays in global nitrogen fertilizers capacity | |
| expansions, which would result in a tighter supply of urea and effectively higher prices, | |
| (2) Stronger demand for fertilizers and effectively prices, (3) An increase in the marginal | |
| producer cost that effectively leads to a higher urea price floor. | |
| Downside risks are: (1) lower prices of urea due to weaker than expected demand, (2) | |
| Delay in SAFCO 5 expansion project, (3) an increase in natural gas cost. | |
| Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (XAUBF) | |
| We apply a justified P/E multiple to derive SABIC's PO of SAR99.5. The P/E is based on a | |
| normalised RoE of 15.8%, Cost of Equity of 11.5% and payout of 65.0% | |
| Downside risks to our price objective are a decline in the supply of low-cost feedstock, a | |
| lower-than-expected recovery in petrochemicals prices, delays in the ramp-up of newly | |
| established subsidiaries, or weakness in steel demand in Saudi Arabia. | |
| Saudi Telecom Company (STC) (XUTUF) | |
| We derive our SAR81/share PO for STC on a sum of the parts basis, using a combination | |
| of DCF and market valuations for its core subsidiaries and associates, adjusting for | |
| ownership stakes. Specifically, we use DCF to value its core operations in Saudi Arabia | |
| (9.5% WACC), Viva Kuwait (10.5% WACC), and other subsidiaries (10.1% WACC). We | |
| 2a Merrill Lynch | |
| GEMs Paper #26 | 30 June 2016 | |
| 79 | |
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016189 | |