| --- |
| title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016622)" |
| source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)" |
| sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" |
| date: "2026-01-01" |
| category: "House Oversight" |
| eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016622" |
| ocrPages: 1 |
| ocrChars: 2740 |
| ocrElapsed: 0.0 |
| parseTier: "external-legacy" |
| engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)" |
| externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12" |
| externalLicense: "not granted" |
| externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology" |
| externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology" |
| --- |
| |
| Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes 07/17/08 |
| the truck he was out with had 2 other leaf blowers on the truck that he could |
| identify as being over 65dBA but he only tested the one they were using and wrote |
| a violation for that one. Ms. Van Buren asked about the testing method and Mr. |
| Weymer explained how it was done. |
| MOTION BY MR. OCHSTEIN TO FIND THE VIOLATOR IN NON- |
| COMPLIANCE, ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT |
| OF $150.00 AND ORDER HIM TO PAY THE $125.00 FINE |
| SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN |
| MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY |
| K. |
| Case # 08-2520, 165 Brazilian Ave., Richard Lynn |
| Violation of Chapter 10, Section 10-45 (i) of the Town of Palm Beach Code of |
| Ordinances, if any dog attacks and causes severe injury or death to any human or |
| domestic animal more than once, the owner shall be required to have said dog |
| removed from the Town or humanely euthanized at his/her sole expense and |
| violation of Chapter 10, Section 10-6 of the Code which prohibits animals from |
| creating nuisances which are detrimental to the public safety and welfare. |
| (Mr. Ochstein recused himself, stating that he has a relative who has a business |
| relationship with Dr. Lynn and Mr. Hoffman advised Mr. Vanneck would be a |
| voting member in this case) |
| Sgt. Curtis Krauel said this case was brought to Code Enforcement through a |
| culmination of events spanning back over a period of 4 years. Sgt. Krauel |
| explained Section 10-6 of the Code and said he was going to be showing some |
| graphic photographs. Sgt. Krauel presented the facts of each of the documented |
| cases involving attacks by Duke from March 17, 2004 until May 11, 2008. |
| Mr. Hoffman questioned how the Code Enforcement Board came into this |
| procedure since the Town Council had already said Duke is a dangerous dog. Mr. |
| Randolph explained that Town Council does not have the authority to fine. |
| Originally, the police department did not issue a code enforcement board citation |
| but ordered the dog be removed from the Town or humanely euthanized which |
| was appealed to Town Council. Town Council denied the appeal. Since that time, |
| Dr. Lynn has refused to comply with the order of the Town Council so a citation |
| was issued by Code Enforcement to bring the matter before the Board to |
| determine whether there should be a finding of violation and at a later time, |
| whether a fine should be imposed. Mr. Randolph said it was now the jurisdiction of |
| the Code Enforcement Board and not the Town Council. Mr. Hoffman questioned |
| whether or not the Board had to determine if the dog was going to be euthanized |
| or removed from the Town and Mr. Randolph explained that this was not the |
| Board's determination. The Board was only to determine whether or not there |
| had been a violation of the Town Code. |
| 7 |
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016622 |
|
|
