| --- |
| title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018415)" |
| source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)" |
| sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" |
| date: "2026-01-01" |
| category: "House Oversight" |
| eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018415" |
| ocrPages: 1 |
| ocrChars: 3494 |
| ocrElapsed: 0.0 |
| parseTier: "external-legacy" |
| engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)" |
| externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12" |
| externalLicense: "not granted" |
| externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology" |
| externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology" |
| --- |
| |
| system; it fuses cooperation with brutal competition as it aims for a kind of |
| equilibrium. After all, if we were constantly tearing into one another, we'd be |
| extinct, not evolved. Why did cities form? Nations? The key is a moment when |
| shared, possibly devastating risk of collective failure becomes apparent - those |
| moments when the whole system threatens to collapse right on top of all the |
| participants. The greater the shared danger, Mezza-Garcia and her colleagues |
| explain, the better the chance for real cooperation. It's a forumula that fits what we |
| face now: "An increased risk of collective failure facilitates large-scale cooperation, |
| especially when the large scale system is composed of smaller, nested groups," They |
| explain. ""Complex systems theory reveals an alternative to constant conflict." |
| This is our world now: Linked clusters of markets, nations, machines - all exposed |
| to a risk of shared and instant collective failure. Such a structure upends an axiom of |
| politics that has run for centuries: Man is purely Darwinian and that survival is |
| determined by constant competition alone. In a network, survival is determined by |
| sociability, by cooperation. Linked systems drive people to agree on rules in order to |
| participate, which accelerates change and co-evolution. Smart cancer databases, |
| linked traffic systems, video platforms like YouTube - each are Gatelands that press |
| users together on a single platform, one that can be instantly updated and |
| constantly studied for adjustment. "Rich get richer" arrangements are an ideal place |
| for co-evolution, shaped as they are by easy linkage, exchange and connection to |
| outside events. As more people follow the logic inside the gates, the system co- |
| evolves. It becomes still more fit. It's this loop that makes Hard Gatekeeping so well |
| suited to an age of connection. We're not merely putting up walls; gatelands are like |
| markets or public squares. They are loci for cooperation. In diplomatic history it's |
| not hard to calls for cooperation. "We must get along or this war will devastate us |
| all!" But they don't work. Mostly you find hand-wringing about how terrible war |
| would be followed by, well, war. The logic of networks offers an escape from this sad |
| habit. |
| Co-evolving relations between the US and China can begin at the most obvious of |
| starting points: Both sides need to change. New pressures are already tearing at |
| each. Both nations need a new gatekept system. Our aim isn't to "balance" China into |
| some sort of frozen checkmate. It's not to tip her unwisely into chaotic and |
| impoverished domestic order - we are, like it or not, all connected. It is to co-evolve |
| together. And China? She won't survive if she does not connect to a system that is |
| congenial to her needs. Fortunately, the networks are infinitely flexible in their |
| design. A Chinese model and an American model pose no problem of |
| interoperability. This is the best co-evolutionary strategy for each side. The dangers |
| we confront now are everywhere. The habitual American temptation is to break all |
| these risks into pieces, to find out where the problem is, and to flatten each of them: |
| "Let's hit the terrorists, then the Chinese navy, then the Russians, then the drug |
| lords." This will kill us if we keep it up. In a complex system, piecemeal attack |
| simply shocks the system to still greater complexity. The world, rather wonderfully, |
| is too flexible for brute force applied at one place. A dynamic defense, is a precursor |
| 183 |
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018415 |
|
|
