| --- |
| title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016614)" |
| source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)" |
| sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" |
| date: "2026-01-01" |
| category: "House Oversight" |
| eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016614" |
| ocrPages: 1 |
| ocrChars: 2813 |
| ocrElapsed: 0.0 |
| parseTier: "external-legacy" |
| engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)" |
| externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12" |
| externalLicense: "not granted" |
| externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology" |
| externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology" |
| --- |
| |
| Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes 04/17/08 |
| MOTION BY MR. FRIED TO ASSESS A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF |
| $100.00 A DAY FOR FOUR (4) DAYS FOR VIOLATIONS (A) FOR A |
| TOTAL OF $400.00 AND A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.00 A DAY |
| FOR VIOLATIONS (B), COMMENCING ON APRIL 15, 2008 AND |
| CONTINUING UNTIL COMPLIANCE IS ACHIEVED. |
| SECONDED BY MR. OCHSTEIN |
| During discussion on the motion, Mr. Fried told Ms. Fisher that although they |
| appreciated her testimony, fines had a way of giving people incentive and it was in |
| the Board's discretion to reconsider the fine if compliance was done in an |
| appropriate time. Mr. Koeppel said he was going to make a similar comment |
| especially in a case such as this one where one form of repair was anticipated and |
| it became something significantly different. He thought the Board needed to take |
| that into consideration. |
| MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY |
| IX. Comments: |
| Mr. Fried said he wanted to revisit the subject Mr. Raffo had enjoyed so much over the |
| past couple of months, regarding outstanding fines. He requested an update on the |
| progress made in collecting some of them. Ms. Houston advised the outstanding water |
| restriction fines had been reduced to $6400.00 this month from over $9000.00 due the |
| previous month and liens were in the process of being filed for the remainder that had not |
| been paid. The non-running fines either had liens filed or were agenda items which are |
| pending. Cases that had substantial fines and were not homesteaded would be looked at |
| for foreclosure proceedings. The list of the daily running fines indicated which of those |
| properties were homesteaded and Ms. Houston indicated she anticipated bringing some of |
| those non-homesteaded properties to the Board for foreclosure consideration next month. |
| Mr. Fried asked about the motion made by Mr. Raffo at the last meeting, requesting the |
| Town Council to address the issue of giving final authority for foreclosure action to the |
| those were the minutes that had just been approved today by the Board so they would |
| now be sent to the Town Council. Mr. Randolph said since these minutes had now been |
| approved, he would go ahead and call them to the attention of Peter Elwell and ask him to |
| agenda it on the next meeting of the Council. Mr. Fried asked that the outstanding fines |
| be prioritized for foreclosure starting with the largest ones first. Ms. Houston said she |
| would address the oldest and the largest outstanding fines first. |
| She said she had also |
| waited, based on the motion from the last meeting because it would be a different |
| procedure if it was just brought to the Code Enforcement Board for approval or if it came |
| to them for final action. Mr. Randolph said it was his understanding that the Code |
| Enforcement Board wanted final approval as set forth in State Statute rather than just |
| 13 |
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016614 |
|
|
