content-documents/house-oversight-nov/2e/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021302.md

metadata

title: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021302)'
source: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)'
sourceUrl: https://www.justice.gov/epstein
date: '2026-01-01'
category: House Oversight
eftaNumber: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021302
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 2650
ocrElapsed: 0
parseTier: external-legacy
engine: engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)
externalSource: greg-ep-nov-12
externalLicense: not granted
externalCredit: ep-nov-12.greg.technology
externalUrl: https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology

general domain of sociality and social relationships, a domain heavily influenced by our genetic constitution as a social species. Indeed, the importance of sociality may be more related to beliefs and attitudes about the meaningfulness of relationships than their existence or number. And again, beliefs about social relationships also have real consequences. Conclusion Beliefs impact thoughts and actions. This may be reflected in phenomena as diverse as biasing a behavioral disposition (such as slapping a donkey), coloring our perception of the environment, or determining how we perceive the quality of our social (including spiritual) relations. Psychology can also impact physiology, and physiology, in turn, can influence our thoughts and emotions. Psychophysiology is the study of these relationships, and promises to illuminate the intricacies of psychosomatic relations and the heretofore "invisible" mechanisms that mediate these links. The relations between the mind and the body, the so-called mind-body problem, are complex and still rather obscure. Nevertheless, the mind-body problem is yielding to science, and the problem it poses is progressively diminishing. Among the components of the mind- body problem yielding to rigorous scientific inquiry are the effects of spiritual beliefs including feelings of closeness to God. References

1. Cannon, W.B. (1942). "Voodoo" death. American Anthropologist, 44 (new series), 169-181. Page 56
2. Wittstein, I.S. (2007). The broken heart syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med, 74, Suppl 1, S17-22.
3. Wittstein, I.S., Thiemann, D.R., Lima, J.A., Baughman, K.L., Schulman, S.P., Gerstenblith, G., Wu, K.C., Rade, J.J., Bivalacqua, T.J., & Champion, H.C. (2005). Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N Engl J Med, 352, 539-48.
4. Padgett, D. A., Sheridan, J. F., Dorne, J., Berntson, G. G., Candelora, J., & Glaser, R. (1998). Social stress and the reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus-type 1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 7231-
6. Berntson, G. G., Sarter, M. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Ascending visceral regulation of cortical affective information processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2103-2109.
7. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205.
8. Berntson, G. G., Norman, G., Hawkley, L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Spirituality and autonomic cardiovascular control. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 198-208.
9. Berntson, G. G., Norman, G. J., Hawkley, L. C. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Cardiac Autonomic Balance vs. Cardiac Regulatory Capacity. Psychophysiology, 45, 643-652. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021302