epstein-index / vision-joined /court-05 /004d149be693a12c8d71e0943c3303a48e29a4b41eac2ddf23b5ab8b2712fbef.md
robbd's picture
MEMY-1805 harvest: vision-joined (part 25)
b2a90d4 verified
|
Raw History Blame
2.04 kB
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 100-1 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED
STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS
Plaintiff,
Case Number: 1:22-cv-10904-JSR
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Third-Party Plaintiff,
JAMES EDWARD STALEY
Third-Party Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING REVIEW OF VIDEOMATERIALS
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and the authority of this Court to
administer its proceedings, and finding good cause established in the stipulated motion filed by
Jane Doe 1 and the Government of the United States Virgin Islands, the Court orders that:
The Epstein Estate shall review the Epstein Media to determine its responsiveness
to the subpoenas that have been issued by Jane Doe 1 and other parties to the related litigations.
2.
If, during the course of that review, the Estate sees a particular recording that
appears to contain possible CSAM, it shall promptly stop further review of that recording and
notify the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") or such other agency or entity as the FBI may
EFTA02806782
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 100-1 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2
direct of the recording's existence. No CSAM shall be copied or transmitted to another party,
except as directed by the FBI or other government agency.
If no CSAM is observed during the review, the Responsive Media will be provided
counsel for Jane Doe 1 and the Government in response to the relevant subpoena. To the extent
Responsive Media is identified prior to the identification of possible CSAM, such materials also
will be produced to counsel. Counsel for Jane Doe 1 and any other recipient of Responsive Media
may then use this material for the prosecution or defense of the above-captioned case and make
such further disclosures as are required by civil discovery rules (e.g., appropriate disclosures to
opposing counsel).
SO ORDERED.
JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.
Dated: March
New York, New York
, 2023
EFTA02806783